GET /api/rest/v4/search/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "count": 8282593,
    "next": "https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0wLjk5MzU3MSZzPTEwNzc0NjA4JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDQtMDUmcD0y&format=api",
    "previous": null,
    "results": [
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10830655/chiles-v-salazar-revisions-33126/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Chiles v. Salazar Revisions: 3/31/26",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10830655,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-07",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-31",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-539",
            "docket_id": 71573389,
            "judge": "Neil Gorsuch",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-31T20:01:03.249009Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-31T20:01:01.747612Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9995801
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1250,
                    "cites": [],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539new_hfci.pdf",
                    "id": 11297434,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/31/chiles_v._salazar_revisions_33126.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-31T20:03:00.226922Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-31T20:01:02.487154Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "a467048792a2b98eb29e90d851a144849ae9e1a5",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11297434
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10830408/chiles-v-salazar/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Chiles v. Salazar",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10830408,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-07",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-31",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-539",
            "docket_id": 71573389,
            "judge": "Neil Gorsuch",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-31T15:01:17.373440Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-31T15:01:17.234281Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9995801
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1250,
                    "cites": [],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf",
                    "id": 11297186,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/31/chiles_v._salazar.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-31T15:01:28.265292Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-31T15:01:17.281136Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "0bf12cf3ba00f7c5e0052e5fc0f519fa21b10fbe",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11297186
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10814782/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10814782,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-12-01",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-25",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-171",
            "docket_id": 71978744,
            "judge": "Clarence Thomas",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-25T16:01:35.410422Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-25T16:01:13.436504Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99910426
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 3200,
                    "cites": [
                        96405,
                        97466,
                        297181,
                        613803,
                        2655590,
                        2810526,
                        4241570,
                        6672133,
                        9395548,
                        9418327,
                        9420303,
                        9429426,
                        9432983,
                        9434163,
                        9500045,
                        9841899,
                        9942799
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf",
                    "id": 11281536,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/25/cox_communications_inc._v._sony_music_entertainment.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-25T16:02:35.780493Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-25T16:01:13.485572Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "65aadeddbca1b313e1680af0a6881e3cf6b576ab",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11281536
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10814644/rico-v-united-states/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Rico v. United States",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10814644,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-03",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-25",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-1056",
            "docket_id": 71867004,
            "judge": "Neil Gorsuch",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-25T14:01:14.573588Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-25T14:01:14.397966Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99910426
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1250,
                    "cites": [
                        353,
                        96405,
                        100286,
                        118343,
                        214623,
                        594761,
                        4238065,
                        4402818,
                        9433818,
                        9435027,
                        9838754
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1056_qn12.pdf",
                    "id": 11281398,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/25/rico_v._united_states.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-25T14:01:22.459208Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-25T14:01:14.468189Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "1f1951dc828eee90815dbb4bfa248c575b9ba845",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11281398
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10813527/zorn-v-linton/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Zorn v. Linton",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10813527,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": null,
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-23",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "25-297",
            "docket_id": 72528904,
            "judge": "Per Curiam",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-23T14:02:04.989920Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-23T14:02:04.836016Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99894565
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": null,
                    "cites": [
                        2672535,
                        2801435,
                        4238064,
                        4260145,
                        4356493,
                        5118993,
                        8408673,
                        9431119,
                        9431666,
                        9434318,
                        9795093,
                        9808641,
                        9873109,
                        10850767,
                        11051434
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-297_bqm2.pdf",
                    "id": 11280281,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/23/zorn_v._linton.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-23T14:03:00.404788Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-23T14:02:04.842993Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "dcacd8081759cd03b756238ae04064b7793ad61c",
                    "snippet": "                    Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)                 1\n\n                              Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n          JACOB P. ZORN v. SHELA M. LINTON\n   ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED\n   STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT\n                No. 25–297.   Decided March 23, 2026\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   On the Governor’s inauguration day in Vermont, protest-\ners staged a sit-in at the state capitol. When the capitol\nclosed for the day, p",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11280281
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10811625/olivier-v-city-of-brandon/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Olivier v. City of Brandon",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10811625,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-12-03",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-993",
            "docket_id": 71988984,
            "judge": "Elana Kagan",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-20T15:02:42.316067Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-20T15:02:41.808821Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9987079
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1691,
                    "cites": [
                        96405,
                        106507,
                        4382927,
                        6352830,
                        7260400,
                        9387917,
                        9424435,
                        9425260,
                        9425630,
                        9426752,
                        9429504,
                        9433019,
                        9433460,
                        9434532,
                        9434756
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-993_10n2.pdf",
                    "id": 11278377,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/20/olivier_v._city_of_brandon.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-20T15:02:56.186039Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-20T15:02:42.116902Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "fb23beddfa8d5fb38a664a86113f3f15e5d1094f",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11278377
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10803604/galette-v-new-jersey-transit-corp/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10803604,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2026-01-14",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-04",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-1021",
            "docket_id": 72143460,
            "judge": "Sonia Sotomayor",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-04T16:01:50.921212Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-04T16:01:50.795860Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9974407
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 3045,
                    "cites": [
                        85281,
                        85451,
                        85452,
                        85633,
                        92561,
                        92688,
                        96405,
                        97453,
                        99982,
                        101352,
                        102452,
                        103165,
                        104057,
                        109574,
                        118087,
                        118089,
                        200439,
                        652994,
                        2224512,
                        2620987,
                        4162936,
                        4391661,
                        4396209,
                        6352831,
                        9377925,
                        9406262,
                        9416301,
                        9416537,
                        9417465,
                        9417832,
                        9420995,
                        9425281,
                        9425645,
                        9427483,
                        9429254,
                        9429830,
                        9433066,
                        9433083,
                        9433866,
                        9433869,
                        9439699,
                        9474421,
                        9841615,
                        9879800,
                        9907545
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1021_p860.pdf",
                    "id": 11270334,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/04/galette_v._new_jersey_transit_corp..pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-04T16:02:23.819049Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-04T16:01:50.829468Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "38b82f1b2ba8cf31b30655af3b93826cc6180d66",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11270334
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10803603/urias-orellana-v-bondi/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Urias-Orellana v. Bondi",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10803603,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-12-01",
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-04",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-777",
            "docket_id": 71978741,
            "judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-04T16:01:49.727204Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-04T16:01:49.521921Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9974407
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1609,
                    "cites": [
                        25366,
                        77820,
                        96405,
                        170955,
                        203452,
                        553255,
                        587295,
                        595200,
                        612183,
                        664672,
                        682457,
                        771093,
                        785791,
                        2652336,
                        2999859,
                        4511499,
                        4518657,
                        4529351,
                        4538002,
                        4565746,
                        4655927,
                        4675302,
                        4685429,
                        4691738,
                        9405074,
                        9418994,
                        9432459,
                        9487777,
                        9888266,
                        9951898,
                        10740905
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-777_9ol1.pdf",
                    "id": 11270333,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/04/urias-orellana_v._bondi.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-04T16:02:29.874893Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-04T16:01:49.631424Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "d1d686a8b4f2c57b62d730d1f15b039fe5efc0e5",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11270333
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10802600/mirabelli-v-bonta/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Mirabelli v. Bonta",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10802600,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": null,
            "dateFiled": "2026-03-02",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "25A810",
            "docket_id": 72353718,
            "judge": "Per Curiam",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-03-03T09:02:08.370721Z",
                "date_created": "2026-03-03T09:02:08.131444Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.9972824
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": null,
                    "cites": [
                        100233,
                        100694,
                        145884,
                        2812209,
                        4264598,
                        4637719,
                        4879298,
                        6353492,
                        9424861,
                        9425157,
                        9427628,
                        9432680,
                        9433522,
                        9435860,
                        9441858,
                        9526957,
                        10801367,
                        11076608,
                        11080913,
                        11085139
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf",
                    "id": 11269328,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/03/02/mirabelli_v._bonta.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-03-03T09:02:23.186416Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-03-03T09:02:08.181103Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "f86156af9ff13b70636a51ac622b3110a5d07e5e",
                    "snippet": "                  Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)            1\n\n                           Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                          _________________\n\n                           No. 25A810\n                          _________________\n\n\n    ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA,\n    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.\n ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER\n                         [March 2, 2026]\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   Before us is an application to vac",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11269328
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10800194/geo-group-inc-v-menocal/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10800194,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-10",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-25",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-758",
            "docket_id": 71895450,
            "judge": "Elana Kagan",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-25T16:01:19.336102Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-25T16:01:19.041212Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99688685
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1691,
                    "cites": [
                        96405,
                        97453,
                        99982,
                        103165,
                        103284,
                        103311,
                        103761,
                        104809,
                        104925,
                        105542,
                        109677,
                        109908,
                        112092,
                        112226,
                        112931,
                        117906,
                        145689,
                        145918,
                        1087952,
                        2734145,
                        4181066,
                        4238064,
                        4391661,
                        4472577,
                        7863110,
                        9080287,
                        9413211,
                        9420349,
                        9427621,
                        9428860,
                        9428897,
                        9430106,
                        9430379,
                        9432709,
                        9433265,
                        9433502,
                        9435077,
                        9499837,
                        9821187,
                        9888074,
                        10453795
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-758_2dp3.pdf",
                    "id": 11266870,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/25/geo_group_inc._v._menocal.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-25T16:02:12.080518Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-25T16:01:19.232654Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "ce581e51d2244f7edeeea89144f844f97c5d497b",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11266870
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10800125/villarreal-v-texas/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Villarreal v. Texas",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10800125,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-06",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-25",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-557",
            "docket_id": 71563321,
            "judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-25T15:01:38.013847Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-25T15:01:23.095602Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99688685
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1609,
                    "cites": [
                        94162,
                        96405,
                        108551,
                        137735,
                        767404,
                        790687,
                        797822,
                        2273941,
                        4274909,
                        4371672,
                        6985050,
                        8981242,
                        9422152,
                        9426191,
                        9426342,
                        9427684,
                        9429156,
                        9429592,
                        9430360,
                        9430614,
                        9431063,
                        9431503,
                        9439123,
                        9499806,
                        9575538,
                        9611490
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-557_l5gm.pdf",
                    "id": 11266801,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/25/villarreal_v._texas.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-25T15:02:18.057413Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-25T15:01:23.203199Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "df862576a79960a181ca3e9be96de221fc19c109",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11266801
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10799652/hain-celestial-group-inc-v-palmquist/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10799652,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-04",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-24",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-724",
            "docket_id": 71872250,
            "judge": "Sonia Sotomayor",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-24T16:02:00.958771Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-24T16:01:56.785318Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99680775
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 3045,
                    "cites": [
                        77123,
                        77409,
                        84812,
                        84900,
                        88034,
                        96392,
                        96405,
                        101809,
                        102333,
                        110334,
                        117845,
                        118069,
                        145753,
                        180747,
                        201949,
                        369006,
                        764083,
                        1992638,
                        2169836,
                        2644673,
                        3190688,
                        9418159,
                        9420556,
                        9428409,
                        9431703,
                        9431920,
                        9433307,
                        9434608,
                        9497422,
                        9795100,
                        9908664,
                        9974411,
                        10848823
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-724_igdj.pdf",
                    "id": 11266326,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/24/hain_celestial_group_inc._v._palmquist.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-24T16:02:53.197661Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-24T16:01:56.819630Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "ae9a122476400537064023c8cb97bed7bec598fe",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11266326
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10799651/postal-service-v-konan/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Postal Service v. Konan",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10799651,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-08",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-24",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-351",
            "docket_id": 71585798,
            "judge": "Clarence Thomas",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-24T16:01:59.584944Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-24T16:01:55.143772Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99680775
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 3200,
                    "cites": [
                        96405,
                        102021,
                        104863,
                        112676,
                        131145,
                        145656,
                        203505,
                        276230,
                        854177,
                        856345,
                        1480069,
                        3580980,
                        3803703,
                        3817711,
                        3833966,
                        3834398,
                        4013157,
                        4286670,
                        4695231,
                        5464205,
                        6228686,
                        6546129,
                        6621986,
                        6648955,
                        6833704,
                        7892556,
                        8262736,
                        8825357,
                        9373887,
                        9429527,
                        9432491,
                        9434972,
                        9435068,
                        9435156,
                        9435339,
                        9500502,
                        9888645,
                        9952760
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf",
                    "id": 11266325,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/24/postal_service_v._konan.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-24T16:02:59.524428Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-24T16:01:55.399814Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "fd2afab2169a7e3e4e9b1ae9f7d13791510e094a",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11266325
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10799354/learning-resources-inc-v-trump-revisions-22326/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Revisions: 2/23/26",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10799354,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-05",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-1287",
            "docket_id": 71877961,
            "judge": "John G. Roberts",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-23T23:02:37.202563Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-23T23:02:36.809120Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99649143
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 2738,
                    "cites": [
                        84759,
                        85016,
                        85272,
                        85412,
                        85453,
                        86867,
                        88987,
                        93358,
                        94726,
                        95030,
                        96260,
                        96405,
                        97006,
                        97825,
                        101250,
                        102065,
                        102726,
                        102794,
                        103319,
                        103369,
                        109489,
                        111221,
                        117855,
                        145625,
                        205720,
                        1933842,
                        2652946,
                        2674863,
                        2676593,
                        2795703,
                        2811845,
                        2812209,
                        4408695,
                        4687475,
                        4879298,
                        5514964,
                        6092369,
                        6092370,
                        6333585,
                        6349225,
                        6349963,
                        6496703,
                        6506017,
                        6824316,
                        6895317,
                        7182465,
                        7261906,
                        7990223,
                        8003014,
                        9004890,
                        9393811,
                        9402136,
                        9406262,
                        9417329,
                        9418565,
                        9418740,
                        9418827,
                        9419015,
                        9419148,
                        9419346,
                        9420099,
                        9420759,
                        9420879,
                        9423023,
                        9428084,
                        9428506,
                        9431176,
                        9432987,
                        9433009,
                        9433310,
                        9433818,
                        9433921,
                        9434047,
                        9434497,
                        9434723,
                        9434985,
                        9435221,
                        9500048,
                        9806335,
                        9808243,
                        9841789,
                        9842193,
                        9874869,
                        9887864,
                        9931116,
                        9969339,
                        10452863,
                        11084233,
                        11085138,
                        11243407,
                        11243412
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_new_3135.pdf",
                    "id": 11266028,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/20/learning_resources_inc._v._trump_revisions_22326.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-23T23:24:59.633886Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-23T23:02:37.026887Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "f2241619e45d25d774678ff71e92b62defdd7958",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11266028
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10796821/learning-resources-inc-v-trump/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10796821,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-05",
            "dateFiled": "2026-02-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-1287",
            "docket_id": 71877961,
            "judge": "John G. Roberts",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-02-20T16:01:25.540470Z",
                "date_created": "2026-02-20T16:01:23.790300Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99649143
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 2738,
                    "cites": [
                        84759,
                        85016,
                        85272,
                        85412,
                        85453,
                        86867,
                        88987,
                        93358,
                        94726,
                        95030,
                        96260,
                        96405,
                        97006,
                        97825,
                        101250,
                        102065,
                        102726,
                        102794,
                        103319,
                        103369,
                        109489,
                        111221,
                        117855,
                        145625,
                        205720,
                        1933842,
                        2652946,
                        2674863,
                        2676593,
                        2795703,
                        2811845,
                        2812209,
                        4408695,
                        4687475,
                        4879298,
                        5514964,
                        6092369,
                        6092370,
                        6333585,
                        6349225,
                        6349963,
                        6496703,
                        6506017,
                        6824316,
                        6895317,
                        7182465,
                        7261906,
                        7990223,
                        8003014,
                        9004890,
                        9393811,
                        9402136,
                        9406262,
                        9417329,
                        9418565,
                        9418740,
                        9418827,
                        9419015,
                        9419148,
                        9419346,
                        9420099,
                        9420759,
                        9420879,
                        9423023,
                        9428084,
                        9428506,
                        9431176,
                        9432987,
                        9433009,
                        9433310,
                        9433818,
                        9433921,
                        9434047,
                        9434497,
                        9434723,
                        9434985,
                        9435221,
                        9500048,
                        9806335,
                        9808243,
                        9841789,
                        9842193,
                        9874869,
                        9887864,
                        9931116,
                        9969339,
                        10452863,
                        11084233,
                        11085138,
                        11243407,
                        11243412
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf",
                    "id": 11263492,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/02/20/learning_resources_inc._v._trump.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-02-20T16:03:43.910199Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-02-20T16:01:23.957424Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "e48fc10146e896af5125cc33f7c94e8bcbe940be",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11263492
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10779476/klein-v-martin/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Klein v. Martin",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10779476,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": null,
            "dateFiled": "2026-01-26",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "25-51",
            "docket_id": 72187113,
            "judge": "Per Curiam",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-01-26T16:01:33.145631Z",
                "date_created": "2026-01-26T16:01:31.456459Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99451715
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": null,
                    "cites": [
                        122243,
                        2686476,
                        3162142,
                        4181063,
                        4642625,
                        4672350,
                        9422583,
                        9433120,
                        9433497,
                        9433839,
                        9434356,
                        9438938,
                        9502782
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-51_4g15.pdf",
                    "id": 11246089,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/01/26/klein_v._martin.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-01-26T16:02:16.826155Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-01-26T16:01:31.466383Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "2202411ab14e46c423d62c22dd31f2322f9d538f",
                    "snippet": "                  Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)            1\n\n                           Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n     CHRISTOPHER KLEIN, SUPERINTENDENT,\n     DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION FACILITIES\n      FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, ET AL. v.\n          CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN\n   ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED\n   STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT\n              No. 25–51.   Decided January 26, 2026\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   Under the Antiterrorism and Effectiv",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11246089
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10776753/berk-v-choy/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Berk v. Choy",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10776753,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-06",
            "dateFiled": "2026-01-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-440",
            "docket_id": 71563327,
            "judge": "Amy Coney Barrett",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:02:07.213797Z",
                "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:02:07.096394Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99404395
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 8543,
                    "cites": [
                        96405,
                        103395,
                        104209,
                        110274,
                        111819,
                        112825,
                        118482,
                        145763,
                        2098670,
                        4452964,
                        4453864,
                        4705347,
                        4965068,
                        6114508,
                        6677269,
                        9418969,
                        9419134,
                        9420347,
                        9420349,
                        9422999,
                        9430607,
                        9432198,
                        9435031,
                        9435068,
                        9782762,
                        9842112,
                        11080908
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-440_1b82.pdf",
                    "id": 11243340,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/01/20/berk_v._choy.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:03:04.812343Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:02:07.124789Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "ff730eb3da0b183129f42d4ed2fde96752edb8e5",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11243340
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10776752/coney-island-auto-parts-unlimited-inc-v-burton/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10776752,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-11-04",
            "dateFiled": "2026-01-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-808",
            "docket_id": 71872251,
            "judge": "Samuel Alito",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:02:03.840484Z",
                "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:02:02.693185Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99404395
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 77,
                    "cites": [
                        1727,
                        28423,
                        86789,
                        96405,
                        198220,
                        464721,
                        3307626,
                        4174311,
                        4687475,
                        4692447,
                        6349225,
                        6929769,
                        7964998,
                        8909533,
                        9428777,
                        9449018,
                        9816225,
                        10482006
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-808_lkgn.pdf",
                    "id": 11243339,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/01/20/coney_island_auto_parts_unlimited_inc._v._burton.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:02:24.655866Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:02:02.744391Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "3b5de0338b2ed288829e2e4198d1c61b3c0c21b5",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11243339
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10776751/ellingburg-v-united-states/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Ellingburg v. United States",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10776751,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-14",
            "dateFiled": "2026-01-20",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-482",
            "docket_id": 71644700,
            "judge": "Brett Kavanaugh",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:01:36.758462Z",
                "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:01:36.597730Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.99404395
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1713,
                    "cites": [
                        84695,
                        84788,
                        85639,
                        89805,
                        92252,
                        96405,
                        111103,
                        899483,
                        4161363,
                        4264598,
                        6680913,
                        8328886,
                        8639351,
                        9387021,
                        9422536,
                        9428052,
                        9428197,
                        9430233,
                        9432091,
                        9433499,
                        9433542,
                        9433683,
                        9433696,
                        9434392,
                        9434513,
                        9434781,
                        9799405,
                        9823702,
                        9888741,
                        10145945
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-482_d1oe.pdf",
                    "id": 11243338,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/01/20/ellingburg_v._united_states.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-01-20T16:02:06.147272Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-01-20T16:01:36.631867Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "a814e51c5cdac2f4b8b1e8d11e94df471a7ea34c",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11243338
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        },
        {
            "absolute_url": "/opinion/10774608/barrett-v-united-states-revisions-11426/",
            "attorney": "",
            "caseName": "Barrett v. United States Revisions: 1/14/26",
            "caseNameFull": "",
            "citation": [],
            "citeCount": 0,
            "cluster_id": 10774608,
            "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
            "court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
            "court_id": "scotus",
            "court_jurisdiction": "F",
            "dateArgued": "2025-10-07",
            "dateFiled": "2026-01-14",
            "dateReargued": null,
            "dateReargumentDenied": null,
            "docketNumber": "24-5774",
            "docket_id": 71574136,
            "judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
            "lexisCite": "",
            "meta": {
                "timestamp": "2026-01-14T23:01:14.305599Z",
                "date_created": "2026-01-14T23:01:10.471959Z",
                "score": {
                    "bm25": 0.993571
                }
            },
            "neutralCite": "",
            "non_participating_judge_ids": [],
            "opinions": [
                {
                    "author_id": 1609,
                    "cites": [
                        93781,
                        96405,
                        101824,
                        110091,
                        111289,
                        112906,
                        117985,
                        118013,
                        179213,
                        205265,
                        613489,
                        4157383,
                        4409488,
                        4434932,
                        4643184,
                        9402664,
                        9421165,
                        9422096,
                        9424091,
                        9426871,
                        9426874,
                        9426986,
                        9427860,
                        9427986,
                        9428220,
                        9428993,
                        9429972,
                        9430036,
                        9432013,
                        9432921,
                        9433597,
                        9435533,
                        9837731,
                        9842131,
                        9888741,
                        9917282,
                        9968829
                    ],
                    "download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5774new_f20h.pdf",
                    "id": 11241193,
                    "joined_by_ids": [],
                    "local_path": "pdf/2026/01/14/barrett_v._united_states_revisions_11426.pdf",
                    "meta": {
                        "timestamp": "2026-01-14T23:02:15.010114Z",
                        "date_created": "2026-01-14T23:01:10.513543Z"
                    },
                    "ordering_key": null,
                    "per_curiam": false,
                    "sha1": "50b6c72bb307fdcfcb4a51a47e12381993b79615",
                    "snippet": "(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ",
                    "type": "combined-opinion"
                }
            ],
            "panel_ids": [],
            "panel_names": [],
            "posture": "",
            "procedural_history": "",
            "scdb_id": "",
            "sibling_ids": [
                11241193
            ],
            "source": "C",
            "status": "Published",
            "suitNature": "",
            "syllabus": ""
        }
    ]
}