HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"count": 8293820,
"next": "https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0wLjk5NjQxMjQmcz0xMDg1MDI2MSZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTA2LTEzJnA9Mg%3D%3D&format=api",
"previous": null,
"results": [
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10873665/abouammo-v-united-states/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Abouammo v. United States",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10873665,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-30",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-11",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-5146",
"docket_id": 73112741,
"judge": "Elana Kagan",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:01:25.050631Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:24.845406Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99981815
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1691,
"cites": [
96405,
104319,
118216,
137737,
9402134,
9419555,
9421602,
9422100,
9433778
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-5146_e29f.pdf",
"id": 11341136,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/11/abouammo_v._united_states.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:08:00.936294Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:24.877720Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "13a83fab19027810ce616489986e685dc82b6517",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11341136
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10873664/fs-credit-opportunities-corp-v-saba-capital-master-fund-ltd/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10873664,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-12-10",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-11",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-345",
"docket_id": 72017726,
"judge": "Amy Coney Barrett",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:01:23.858069Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:23.644836Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99981815
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 8543,
"cites": [
93280,
93389,
96405,
106845,
109286,
109777,
110442,
110460,
112214,
676449,
4246855,
4276947,
4293666,
4422820,
6347905,
6496703,
8443092,
9404568,
9406262,
9416266,
9420596,
9420919,
9421883,
9422686,
9424145,
9427078,
9427540,
9427571,
9427718,
9427943,
9428307,
9428452,
9428751,
9428798,
9429329,
9429432,
9429794,
9430779,
9431152,
9432407,
9432551,
9432770,
9432983,
9433146,
9433240,
9433268,
9433921,
9434282,
9441950,
9795078,
9842028,
9883140,
9905787
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-345_i42k.pdf",
"id": 11341135,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/11/fs_credit_opportunities_corp._v._saba_capital_master_fund_ltd..pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:10:09.270974Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:23.695711Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "8c7433927487824a6cb4618267e06e29a7231070",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11341135
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10873663/keathley-v-buddy-ayers-construction-inc/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10873663,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-24",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-11",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-6",
"docket_id": 72598770,
"judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:01:22.891223Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:22.628436Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99981815
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1609,
"cites": [
17682,
94133,
96405,
103229,
104414,
118435,
145878,
169443,
176414,
239473,
380742,
498115,
603507,
661737,
703252,
723939,
793580,
794324,
794851,
807743,
2708512,
2801432,
2827258,
3010244,
4288402,
4424820,
4519390,
6681692,
8373934,
8410678,
9418969,
9419776,
9422469,
9435118,
9469793,
9478359,
9485664,
9519929,
9798247,
9869031,
9878456,
9885999,
11085138
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-6_d1o2.pdf",
"id": 11341134,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/11/keathley_v._buddy_ayers_construction_inc..pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:08:26.749108Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-11T15:01:22.716179Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "cf98a3890ba6949fd60617746a3274d758a3912d",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11341134
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10870061/fcc-v-att/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "FCC v. AT&T",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10870061,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-04-21",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-04",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-406",
"docket_id": 73221533,
"judge": "John G. Roberts",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:01:28.775113Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:28.665056Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9992628
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 2738,
"cites": [
85682,
96405,
98378,
99615,
109777,
185928,
781210,
806797,
931615,
2447523,
2517119,
2797291,
4099162,
4287285,
6341898,
7223433,
9387917,
9416316,
9417801,
9425299,
9432622,
9433701,
9527031,
10413904,
11080909
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-406_nmip.pdf",
"id": 11337518,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/04/fcc_v._att.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:01:57.013601Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:28.697170Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "7a2fe05624b5d6e835610a2465d081391a1d84e4",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11337518
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10870060/hikma-pharmaceuticals-usa-inc-v-amarin-pharma-inc/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10870060,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-04-29",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-04",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-889",
"docket_id": 72487163,
"judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:01:27.797799Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:27.685536Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9992628
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1609,
"cites": [
96405,
2676592,
6672100,
7263691,
9395548,
9432084,
9435068,
9435339,
9441653,
9489704,
9500045,
9807203,
9842042,
9975532,
10290955
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-889_5i36.pdf",
"id": 11337517,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/04/hikma_pharmaceuticals_usa_inc._v._amarin_pharma_inc..pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:01:50.222960Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:27.717080Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "50a0de6b6061133f2b3213d07e5e2ad269c5a6de",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11337517
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10870059/sripetch-v-sec/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Sripetch v. SEC",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10870059,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-04-20",
"dateFiled": "2026-06-04",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-466",
"docket_id": 73215957,
"judge": "Neil Gorsuch",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:01:26.882030Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:26.706147Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9992628
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1250,
"cites": [
88595,
96405,
97238,
101838,
298467,
302963,
1468753,
3298372,
3443694,
3614916,
3997437,
4174310,
6821582,
9405432,
9416316,
9425776,
9430943,
9434175,
9795078,
9889184,
9894034,
10413904,
10471378
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-466_5i26.pdf",
"id": 11337516,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/04/sripetch_v._sec.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-04T15:02:29.453988Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-04T15:01:26.762307Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "d7329d7c2bb396c885c5db2d114c66d65220d84b",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11337516
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10869022/allen-v-milligan/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Allen v. Milligan",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10869022,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": null,
"dateFiled": "2026-06-02",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25A1314",
"docket_id": 73431862,
"judge": "Per Curiam",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-03T02:00:59.392869Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-03T02:00:59.075361Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99910426
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": null,
"cites": [
104131,
118435,
4287784,
4410722,
4523017,
6671984,
6671987,
6671989,
6672087,
6672089,
9400446,
9413203,
9426633,
9427876,
9430645,
9433214,
9875632,
9973154
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a1314_7m58.pdf",
"id": 11336479,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/02/allen_v._milligan.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-03T02:01:30.602821Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-03T02:00:59.151559Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "b3dace900759123f991008af53c7b2fa979ffdf8",
"snippet": " Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1\n\n Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n _________________\n\n No. 25A1314\n _________________\n\n\n WES ALLEN, ALABAMA SECRETARY OF STATE,\n ET AL. v. EVAN MILLIGAN, ET AL.\n\n ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n _________________\n\n No. 25A1315\n ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11336479
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10867983/whitton-v-dixon/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Whitton v. Dixon",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10867983,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": null,
"dateFiled": "2026-06-01",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-580",
"docket_id": 73279025,
"judge": "Per Curiam",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-01T14:01:04.916010Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-01T14:01:04.748681Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9990249
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": null,
"cites": [
104321,
104670,
108471,
943667,
1722856,
6333584,
6343024,
9409946,
9424977,
9430271,
9432778,
9434777,
9434809,
9456711,
9804185,
9808646,
11077425
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-580_08m1.pdf",
"id": 11335438,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/06/01/whitton_v._dixon.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-06-01T14:01:42.260591Z",
"date_created": "2026-06-01T14:01:04.756605Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "36121e38530642d94390e9403d77fb5208f1c6be",
"snippet": " Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1\n\n Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n GARY RICHARD WHITTON v. RICKY D. DIXON,\n SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF\n CORRECTIONS\n ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED\n STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n No. 25–580. Decided June 1, 2026\n\n PER CURIAM.\n A Florida jury convicted petitioner Gary Richard Whitton\nof murder and sentenced",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11335438
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10865527/fernandez-v-united-states/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Fernandez v. United States",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10865527,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-11-12",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-28",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-556",
"docket_id": 71902746,
"judge": "Amy Coney Barrett",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:01:42.911453Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:42.756774Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9987079
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 8543,
"cites": [
96405,
117860,
872995,
899483,
3199495,
4248498,
4280800,
4409488,
4528126,
6216779,
6495363,
7804493,
8213091,
9363991,
9373866,
9375852,
9400913,
9404158,
9404159,
9404568,
9407323,
9422583,
9423948,
9425260,
9429592,
9431514,
9432727,
9433019,
9433081,
9433629,
9434718,
9434809,
9435324,
9485610,
9500020,
9888645,
9995178,
11080912
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-556_8m58.pdf",
"id": 11332975,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/28/fernandez_v._united_states.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:03:41.464559Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:42.794059Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "fee24bd0b51ec16efce678e828ea1db28fbe30e1",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11332975
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10865526/flowers-foods-inc-v-brock/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10865526,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-25",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-28",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-935",
"docket_id": 72487215,
"judge": "Neil Gorsuch",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:01:42.054030Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:41.855535Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9987079
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1250,
"cites": [
88291,
92814,
96405,
96550,
4556847,
6347223,
9297206,
9417777,
9434057,
9887864,
9958992,
10739048
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-935_k53m.pdf",
"id": 11332974,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/28/flowers_foods_inc._v._brock.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:03:11.067764Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:41.886059Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "3508e68a1668b879b86fc77747379f9084d6bdad",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11332974
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10865525/pitchford-v-cain/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Pitchford v. Cain",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10865525,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-31",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-28",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-7351",
"docket_id": 72486825,
"judge": "Brett Kavanaugh",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:01:38.603399Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:38.375166Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9987079
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1713,
"cites": [
96405,
112530,
4672350,
4700851,
4922832,
6333584,
6672009,
6672010,
6672011,
6672013,
6672026,
9427406,
9430491,
9433083,
9434817,
9434983,
9438938,
9499997,
9883145,
9888775,
10783544
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-7351_jiel.pdf",
"id": 11332973,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/28/pitchford_v._cain.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:02:39.551568Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:38.420505Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "04ec686baa6d2ac306f7bb7f13ffb85b3e09b448",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11332973
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10865524/rutherford-v-united-states/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Rutherford v. United States",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10865524,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-11-12",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-28",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-820",
"docket_id": 71903502,
"judge": "Amy Coney Barrett",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:01:33.927077Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:33.422219Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9987079
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 8543,
"cites": [
85453,
96405,
102139,
102719,
109240,
118082,
203706,
1792297,
4280799,
4638884,
4672369,
4685046,
4692682,
4703872,
4880093,
6216779,
6495363,
6607979,
8129780,
8213091,
8856840,
9410487,
9426899,
9431514,
9432802,
9433331,
9434718,
9435281,
9435287,
9435756,
9485610,
9500747,
9502823,
9817044,
9873454,
10452863,
10649893,
10820524,
11084232
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-820_97be.pdf",
"id": 11332972,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/28/rutherford_v._united_states.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T15:06:50.331102Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-28T15:01:33.724346Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "1f0d79a90eb279286506372a7490a691372104e3",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11332972
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10864190/margolin-v-naij/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Margolin v. NAIJ",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10864190,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": null,
"dateFiled": "2026-05-26",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-767",
"docket_id": 73279923,
"judge": "Per Curiam",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-26T14:01:59.500730Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-26T14:01:59.373473Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99854934
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": null,
"cites": [
4532445,
9418565,
9419289,
9425428,
9431171,
9432547,
9433265,
9475707,
9500663,
11065039
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-767_7758.pdf",
"id": 11331634,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/26/margolin_v._naij.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-26T14:02:17.478845Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-26T14:01:59.380869Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "7c38c526c7b36dd06480c4290b07405df5f63906",
"snippet": " Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1\n\n Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n DAREN K. MARGOLIN, DIRECTOR OF THE\n EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION\n REVIEW v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF\n IMMIGRATION JUDGES\n ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED\n STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT\n No. 25–767. Decided May 26, 2026\n\n PER CURIAM.\n After the Executive Office for Immigra",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11331634
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10862764/hamm-v-smith/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Hamm v. Smith",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10862764,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-12-10",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-21",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-872",
"docket_id": 72017725,
"judge": "Per Curiam",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T15:04:00.345504Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:04:00.209310Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99815327
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": null,
"cites": [
92834,
104196,
145870,
147406,
1140944,
1664585,
2490126,
2679204,
2809767,
2812588,
3043524,
4115365,
4155979,
4371670,
4526980,
4548063,
4679975,
4765711,
4799652,
4835964,
4835968,
4846032,
6353492,
7744291,
9225984,
9264835,
9396058,
9421564,
9426555,
9427916,
9429949,
9430789,
9433083,
9434285,
9434739,
9435238,
9668964,
9812461,
9821399,
9842108,
9877825,
9888262,
9888741,
9931737,
10699015
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-872_ec8f.pdf",
"id": 11330194,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/21/hamm_v._smith.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T16:36:21.432006Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:04:00.217629Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "d80524196c14661d790d9536cb9322040b5a4e0e",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1\n\n Per Curiam\n\n NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the\n United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of\n Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543,\n pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.\n\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11330194
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10862763/havana-docks-corp-v-royal-caribbean-cruises-ltd/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10862763,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-02-23",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-21",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-983",
"docket_id": 72315900,
"judge": "Clarence Thomas",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T15:03:49.329094Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:03:49.170597Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99815327
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 3200,
"cites": [
96405,
99472,
4641442,
6672020,
6672058,
9422753,
9434223,
10617893
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-983_c07d.pdf",
"id": 11330193,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/21/havana_docks_corp._v._royal_caribbean_cruises_ltd..pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T16:49:47.298061Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:03:49.209975Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "26774b55c14d80acb5f3341e3313de1e795b4407",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11330193
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10862762/m-k-employee-solutions-inc-v-trustees-of-iam-nat-pension/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10862762,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-01-20",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-21",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "23-1209",
"docket_id": 72163397,
"judge": "Ketanji Brown Jackson",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T15:03:38.218245Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:03:37.711183Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99815327
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 1609,
"cites": [],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/23-1209_i3kn.pdf",
"id": 11330192,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/21/m__k_employee_solutions_inc._v._trustees_of_iam_nat._pension.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-21T15:12:00.255109Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-21T15:03:38.099988Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "8aba0fdcf89eef80972ec2e230f99fa060f6ef61",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11330192
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10858761/jules-v-andre-balazs-properties/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10858761,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-30",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-14",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "25-83",
"docket_id": 73112739,
"judge": "Sonia Sotomayor",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T15:02:08.221184Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-14T15:02:05.330337Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99759895
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 3045,
"cites": [
96405,
103972,
117845,
118348,
145900,
725530,
757595,
854418,
4027030,
6328531,
6343025,
8412180,
9392980,
9435248,
9668724,
9940646,
9969337,
10505996
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf",
"id": 11326163,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/14/jules_v._andre_balazs_properties.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T15:54:00.944919Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-14T15:02:05.359253Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "c339c7276f934d05b332cb1d966715c9f536f94f",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11326163
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10858760/montgomery-v-caribe-transport-ii-llc/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10858760,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2026-03-04",
"dateFiled": "2026-05-14",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-1238",
"docket_id": 72362630,
"judge": "Amy Coney Barrett",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T15:01:54.541399Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-14T15:01:54.138971Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.99759895
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 8543,
"cites": [
96405,
867657,
4280798,
4570312,
9386623,
9400445,
9410677,
9433413,
9434292,
9485423,
10773718,
10831112,
11091747
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1238_1b7d.pdf",
"id": 11326162,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/05/14/montgomery_v._caribe_transport_ii_llc.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T15:51:53.801929Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-14T15:01:54.189680Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "836fbbfa536bdc611f1ea78ac6f8fac19df95b3e",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11326162
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10852760/louisiana-v-callais-revisions-50426/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Louisiana v. Callais Revisions: 5/04/26",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10852760,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-03-24",
"dateFiled": "2026-04-29",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-109",
"docket_id": 69779623,
"judge": "Samuel Alito",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-04T18:02:13.993041Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-04T18:02:13.783131Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9964124
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 77,
"cites": [
96405,
112824,
2810526,
4285391,
4287784,
4410722,
4699489,
4700327,
6326040,
9152888,
9400446,
9405814,
9422070,
9423246,
9423914,
9424381,
9425360,
9426633,
9427876,
9427884,
9429869,
9430506,
9430645,
9432353,
9432895,
9433051,
9433214,
9433318,
9433509,
9433913,
9434125,
9434735,
9434889,
9435315,
9515886,
9526974,
9806551,
9841965,
9842098,
9842139,
9875632,
9896414,
9973154
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_new_jifl.pdf",
"id": 11320154,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/04/29/louisiana_v._callais_revisions_50426.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-04T18:04:41.480899Z",
"date_created": "2026-05-04T18:02:13.876235Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "f34569ee4c69cac175614f9a9b4bebb6b1e25d5d",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11320154
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
},
{
"absolute_url": "/opinion/10850261/louisiana-v-callais/",
"attorney": "",
"caseName": "Louisiana v. Callais",
"caseNameFull": "",
"citation": [],
"citeCount": 0,
"cluster_id": 10850261,
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"court_citation_string": "SCOTUS",
"court_id": "scotus",
"court_jurisdiction": "F",
"dateArgued": "2025-03-24",
"dateFiled": "2026-04-29",
"dateReargued": null,
"dateReargumentDenied": null,
"docketNumber": "24-109",
"docket_id": 69779623,
"judge": "Samuel Alito",
"lexisCite": "",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-04-29T15:04:14.537340Z",
"date_created": "2026-04-29T15:04:14.028039Z",
"score": {
"bm25": 0.9964124
}
},
"neutralCite": "",
"non_participating_judge_ids": [],
"opinions": [
{
"author_id": 77,
"cites": [
96405,
112824,
2810526,
4285391,
4287784,
4410722,
4699489,
4700327,
6326040,
9152888,
9400446,
9405814,
9422070,
9423246,
9423914,
9424381,
9425360,
9426633,
9427876,
9427884,
9429869,
9430506,
9430645,
9432353,
9432895,
9433051,
9433214,
9433318,
9433509,
9433913,
9434125,
9434735,
9434889,
9435315,
9515886,
9526974,
9806551,
9841965,
9842098,
9842139,
9875632,
9896414,
9973154
],
"download_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf",
"id": 11317641,
"joined_by_ids": [],
"local_path": "pdf/2026/04/29/louisiana_v._callais.pdf",
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2026-04-29T17:21:44.661582Z",
"date_created": "2026-04-29T15:04:14.365202Z"
},
"ordering_key": null,
"per_curiam": false,
"sha1": "06a6015ae7d36711fb75fe3fc34d32ba1cd4b53f",
"snippet": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit ",
"type": "combined-opinion"
}
],
"panel_ids": [],
"panel_names": [],
"posture": "",
"procedural_history": "",
"scdb_id": "",
"sibling_ids": [
11317641
],
"source": "C",
"status": "Published",
"suitNature": "",
"syllabus": ""
}
]
}