<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<root><count>8284495</count><next>https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0wLjk5MzI1NTg1JnM9MTA3NzQ2MDgmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wNC0wOSZwPTI%3D&amp;format=xml</next><previous></previous><results><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10830655/chiles-v-salazar-revisions-33126/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Chiles v. Salazar Revisions: 3/31/26</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10830655</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-07</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-31</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-539</docketNumber><docket_id>71573389</docket_id><judge>Neil Gorsuch</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-31T20:01:03.249009Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-31T20:01:01.747612Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9992628</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1250</author_id><cites></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539new_hfci.pdf</download_url><id>11297434</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/31/chiles_v._salazar_revisions_33126.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-31T20:03:00.226922Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-31T20:01:02.487154Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>a467048792a2b98eb29e90d851a144849ae9e1a5</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11297434</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10830408/chiles-v-salazar/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Chiles v. Salazar</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10830408</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-07</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-31</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-539</docketNumber><docket_id>71573389</docket_id><judge>Neil Gorsuch</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-31T15:01:17.373440Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-31T15:01:17.234281Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9992628</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1250</author_id><cites></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf</download_url><id>11297186</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/31/chiles_v._salazar.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-31T15:01:28.265292Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-31T15:01:17.281136Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>0bf12cf3ba00f7c5e0052e5fc0f519fa21b10fbe</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11297186</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10814782/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10814782</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-12-01</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-25</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-171</docketNumber><docket_id>71978744</docket_id><judge>Clarence Thomas</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-25T16:01:35.410422Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-25T16:01:13.436504Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9987871</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>3200</author_id><cites><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>97466</list-item><list-item>297181</list-item><list-item>613803</list-item><list-item>2655590</list-item><list-item>2810526</list-item><list-item>4241570</list-item><list-item>6672133</list-item><list-item>9395548</list-item><list-item>9418327</list-item><list-item>9420303</list-item><list-item>9429426</list-item><list-item>9432983</list-item><list-item>9434163</list-item><list-item>9500045</list-item><list-item>9841899</list-item><list-item>9942799</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf</download_url><id>11281536</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/25/cox_communications_inc._v._sony_music_entertainment.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-25T16:02:35.780493Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-25T16:01:13.485572Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>65aadeddbca1b313e1680af0a6881e3cf6b576ab</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11281536</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10814644/rico-v-united-states/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Rico v. United States</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10814644</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-03</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-25</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-1056</docketNumber><docket_id>71867004</docket_id><judge>Neil Gorsuch</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-25T14:01:14.573588Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-25T14:01:14.397966Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9987871</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1250</author_id><cites><list-item>353</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>100286</list-item><list-item>118343</list-item><list-item>214623</list-item><list-item>594761</list-item><list-item>4238065</list-item><list-item>4402818</list-item><list-item>9433818</list-item><list-item>9435027</list-item><list-item>9838754</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1056_qn12.pdf</download_url><id>11281398</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/25/rico_v._united_states.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-25T14:01:22.459208Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-25T14:01:14.468189Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>1f1951dc828eee90815dbb4bfa248c575b9ba845</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11281398</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10813527/zorn-v-linton/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Zorn v. Linton</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10813527</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued></dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-23</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>25-297</docketNumber><docket_id>72528904</docket_id><judge>Per Curiam</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-23T14:02:04.989920Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-23T14:02:04.836016Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9986286</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id></author_id><cites><list-item>2672535</list-item><list-item>2801435</list-item><list-item>4238064</list-item><list-item>4260145</list-item><list-item>4356493</list-item><list-item>5118993</list-item><list-item>8408673</list-item><list-item>9431119</list-item><list-item>9431666</list-item><list-item>9434318</list-item><list-item>9795093</list-item><list-item>9808641</list-item><list-item>9873109</list-item><list-item>10850767</list-item><list-item>11051434</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-297_bqm2.pdf</download_url><id>11280281</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/23/zorn_v._linton.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-23T14:03:00.404788Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-23T14:02:04.842993Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>dcacd8081759cd03b756238ae04064b7793ad61c</sha1><snippet>                    Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)                 1

                              Per Curiam

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
          JACOB P. ZORN v. SHELA M. LINTON
   ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
   STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
                No. 25–297.   Decided March 23, 2026

   PER CURIAM.
   On the Governor’s inauguration day in Vermont, protest-
ers staged a sit-in at the state capitol. When the capitol
closed for the day, p</snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11280281</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10811625/olivier-v-city-of-brandon/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Olivier v. City of Brandon</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10811625</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-12-03</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-993</docketNumber><docket_id>71988984</docket_id><judge>Elana Kagan</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-20T15:02:42.316067Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-20T15:02:41.808821Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9983909</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1691</author_id><cites><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>106507</list-item><list-item>4382927</list-item><list-item>6352830</list-item><list-item>7260400</list-item><list-item>9387917</list-item><list-item>9424435</list-item><list-item>9425260</list-item><list-item>9425630</list-item><list-item>9426752</list-item><list-item>9429504</list-item><list-item>9433019</list-item><list-item>9433460</list-item><list-item>9434532</list-item><list-item>9434756</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-993_10n2.pdf</download_url><id>11278377</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/20/olivier_v._city_of_brandon.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-20T15:02:56.186039Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-20T15:02:42.116902Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>fb23beddfa8d5fb38a664a86113f3f15e5d1094f</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11278377</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10803604/galette-v-new-jersey-transit-corp/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10803604</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2026-01-14</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-04</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-1021</docketNumber><docket_id>72143460</docket_id><judge>Sonia Sotomayor</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-04T16:01:50.921212Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-04T16:01:50.795860Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99712414</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>3045</author_id><cites><list-item>85281</list-item><list-item>85451</list-item><list-item>85452</list-item><list-item>85633</list-item><list-item>92561</list-item><list-item>92688</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>97453</list-item><list-item>99982</list-item><list-item>101352</list-item><list-item>102452</list-item><list-item>103165</list-item><list-item>104057</list-item><list-item>109574</list-item><list-item>118087</list-item><list-item>118089</list-item><list-item>200439</list-item><list-item>652994</list-item><list-item>2224512</list-item><list-item>2620987</list-item><list-item>4162936</list-item><list-item>4391661</list-item><list-item>4396209</list-item><list-item>6352831</list-item><list-item>9377925</list-item><list-item>9406262</list-item><list-item>9416301</list-item><list-item>9416537</list-item><list-item>9417465</list-item><list-item>9417832</list-item><list-item>9420995</list-item><list-item>9425281</list-item><list-item>9425645</list-item><list-item>9427483</list-item><list-item>9429254</list-item><list-item>9429830</list-item><list-item>9433066</list-item><list-item>9433083</list-item><list-item>9433866</list-item><list-item>9433869</list-item><list-item>9439699</list-item><list-item>9474421</list-item><list-item>9841615</list-item><list-item>9879800</list-item><list-item>9907545</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1021_p860.pdf</download_url><id>11270334</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/04/galette_v._new_jersey_transit_corp..pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-04T16:02:23.819049Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-04T16:01:50.829468Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>38b82f1b2ba8cf31b30655af3b93826cc6180d66</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11270334</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10803603/urias-orellana-v-bondi/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Urias-Orellana v. Bondi</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10803603</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-12-01</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-04</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-777</docketNumber><docket_id>71978741</docket_id><judge>Ketanji Brown Jackson</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-04T16:01:49.727204Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-04T16:01:49.521921Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99712414</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1609</author_id><cites><list-item>25366</list-item><list-item>77820</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>170955</list-item><list-item>203452</list-item><list-item>553255</list-item><list-item>587295</list-item><list-item>595200</list-item><list-item>612183</list-item><list-item>664672</list-item><list-item>682457</list-item><list-item>771093</list-item><list-item>785791</list-item><list-item>2652336</list-item><list-item>2999859</list-item><list-item>4511499</list-item><list-item>4518657</list-item><list-item>4529351</list-item><list-item>4538002</list-item><list-item>4565746</list-item><list-item>4655927</list-item><list-item>4675302</list-item><list-item>4685429</list-item><list-item>4691738</list-item><list-item>9405074</list-item><list-item>9418994</list-item><list-item>9432459</list-item><list-item>9487777</list-item><list-item>9888266</list-item><list-item>9951898</list-item><list-item>10740905</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-777_9ol1.pdf</download_url><id>11270333</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/04/urias-orellana_v._bondi.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-04T16:02:29.874893Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-04T16:01:49.631424Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>d1d686a8b4f2c57b62d730d1f15b039fe5efc0e5</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11270333</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10802600/mirabelli-v-bonta/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Mirabelli v. Bonta</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10802600</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued></dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-03-02</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>25A810</docketNumber><docket_id>72353718</docket_id><judge>Per Curiam</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-03-03T09:02:08.370721Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-03T09:02:08.131444Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99696594</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id></author_id><cites><list-item>100233</list-item><list-item>100694</list-item><list-item>145884</list-item><list-item>2812209</list-item><list-item>4264598</list-item><list-item>4637719</list-item><list-item>4879298</list-item><list-item>6353492</list-item><list-item>9424861</list-item><list-item>9425157</list-item><list-item>9427628</list-item><list-item>9432680</list-item><list-item>9433522</list-item><list-item>9435860</list-item><list-item>9441858</list-item><list-item>9526957</list-item><list-item>10801367</list-item><list-item>11076608</list-item><list-item>11080913</list-item><list-item>11085139</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf</download_url><id>11269328</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/03/02/mirabelli_v._bonta.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-03-03T09:02:23.186416Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-03-03T09:02:08.181103Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>f86156af9ff13b70636a51ac622b3110a5d07e5e</sha1><snippet>                  Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)            1

                           Per Curiam

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                          _________________

                           No. 25A810
                          _________________


    ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA,
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
 ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER
                         [March 2, 2026]

   PER CURIAM.
   Before us is an application to vac</snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11269328</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10800194/geo-group-inc-v-menocal/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10800194</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-10</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-25</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-758</docketNumber><docket_id>71895450</docket_id><judge>Elana Kagan</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-25T16:01:19.336102Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-25T16:01:19.041212Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9965705</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1691</author_id><cites><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>97453</list-item><list-item>99982</list-item><list-item>103165</list-item><list-item>103284</list-item><list-item>103311</list-item><list-item>103761</list-item><list-item>104809</list-item><list-item>104925</list-item><list-item>105542</list-item><list-item>109677</list-item><list-item>109908</list-item><list-item>112092</list-item><list-item>112226</list-item><list-item>112931</list-item><list-item>117906</list-item><list-item>145689</list-item><list-item>145918</list-item><list-item>1087952</list-item><list-item>2734145</list-item><list-item>4181066</list-item><list-item>4238064</list-item><list-item>4391661</list-item><list-item>4472577</list-item><list-item>7863110</list-item><list-item>9080287</list-item><list-item>9413211</list-item><list-item>9420349</list-item><list-item>9427621</list-item><list-item>9428860</list-item><list-item>9428897</list-item><list-item>9430106</list-item><list-item>9430379</list-item><list-item>9432709</list-item><list-item>9433265</list-item><list-item>9433502</list-item><list-item>9435077</list-item><list-item>9499837</list-item><list-item>9821187</list-item><list-item>9888074</list-item><list-item>10453795</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-758_2dp3.pdf</download_url><id>11266870</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/25/geo_group_inc._v._menocal.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-25T16:02:12.080518Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-25T16:01:19.232654Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>ce581e51d2244f7edeeea89144f844f97c5d497b</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11266870</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10800125/villarreal-v-texas/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Villarreal v. Texas</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10800125</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-06</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-25</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-557</docketNumber><docket_id>71563321</docket_id><judge>Ketanji Brown Jackson</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-25T15:01:38.013847Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-25T15:01:23.095602Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9965705</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1609</author_id><cites><list-item>94162</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>108551</list-item><list-item>137735</list-item><list-item>767404</list-item><list-item>790687</list-item><list-item>797822</list-item><list-item>2273941</list-item><list-item>4274909</list-item><list-item>4371672</list-item><list-item>6985050</list-item><list-item>8981242</list-item><list-item>9422152</list-item><list-item>9426191</list-item><list-item>9426342</list-item><list-item>9427684</list-item><list-item>9429156</list-item><list-item>9429592</list-item><list-item>9430360</list-item><list-item>9430614</list-item><list-item>9431063</list-item><list-item>9431503</list-item><list-item>9439123</list-item><list-item>9499806</list-item><list-item>9575538</list-item><list-item>9611490</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-557_l5gm.pdf</download_url><id>11266801</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/25/villarreal_v._texas.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-25T15:02:18.057413Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-25T15:01:23.203199Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>df862576a79960a181ca3e9be96de221fc19c109</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11266801</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10799652/hain-celestial-group-inc-v-palmquist/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10799652</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-04</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-24</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-724</docketNumber><docket_id>71872250</docket_id><judge>Sonia Sotomayor</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-24T16:02:00.958771Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-24T16:01:56.785318Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99649143</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>3045</author_id><cites><list-item>77123</list-item><list-item>77409</list-item><list-item>84812</list-item><list-item>84900</list-item><list-item>88034</list-item><list-item>96392</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>101809</list-item><list-item>102333</list-item><list-item>110334</list-item><list-item>117845</list-item><list-item>118069</list-item><list-item>145753</list-item><list-item>180747</list-item><list-item>201949</list-item><list-item>369006</list-item><list-item>764083</list-item><list-item>1992638</list-item><list-item>2169836</list-item><list-item>2644673</list-item><list-item>3190688</list-item><list-item>9418159</list-item><list-item>9420556</list-item><list-item>9428409</list-item><list-item>9431703</list-item><list-item>9431920</list-item><list-item>9433307</list-item><list-item>9434608</list-item><list-item>9497422</list-item><list-item>9795100</list-item><list-item>9908664</list-item><list-item>9974411</list-item><list-item>10848823</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-724_igdj.pdf</download_url><id>11266326</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/24/hain_celestial_group_inc._v._palmquist.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-24T16:02:53.197661Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-24T16:01:56.819630Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>ae9a122476400537064023c8cb97bed7bec598fe</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11266326</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10799651/postal-service-v-konan/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Postal Service v. Konan</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10799651</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-08</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-24</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-351</docketNumber><docket_id>71585798</docket_id><judge>Clarence Thomas</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-24T16:01:59.584944Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-24T16:01:55.143772Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99649143</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>3200</author_id><cites><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>102021</list-item><list-item>104863</list-item><list-item>112676</list-item><list-item>131145</list-item><list-item>145656</list-item><list-item>203505</list-item><list-item>276230</list-item><list-item>854177</list-item><list-item>856345</list-item><list-item>1480069</list-item><list-item>3580980</list-item><list-item>3803703</list-item><list-item>3817711</list-item><list-item>3833966</list-item><list-item>3834398</list-item><list-item>4013157</list-item><list-item>4286670</list-item><list-item>4695231</list-item><list-item>5464205</list-item><list-item>6228686</list-item><list-item>6546129</list-item><list-item>6621986</list-item><list-item>6648955</list-item><list-item>6833704</list-item><list-item>7892556</list-item><list-item>8262736</list-item><list-item>8825357</list-item><list-item>9373887</list-item><list-item>9429527</list-item><list-item>9432491</list-item><list-item>9434972</list-item><list-item>9435068</list-item><list-item>9435156</list-item><list-item>9435339</list-item><list-item>9500502</list-item><list-item>9888645</list-item><list-item>9952760</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf</download_url><id>11266325</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/24/postal_service_v._konan.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-24T16:02:59.524428Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-24T16:01:55.399814Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>fd2afab2169a7e3e4e9b1ae9f7d13791510e094a</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11266325</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10799354/learning-resources-inc-v-trump-revisions-22326/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Revisions: 2/23/26</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10799354</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-05</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-1287</docketNumber><docket_id>71877961</docket_id><judge>John G. Roberts</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-23T23:02:37.202563Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-23T23:02:36.809120Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9961753</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>2738</author_id><cites><list-item>84759</list-item><list-item>85016</list-item><list-item>85272</list-item><list-item>85412</list-item><list-item>85453</list-item><list-item>86867</list-item><list-item>88987</list-item><list-item>93358</list-item><list-item>94726</list-item><list-item>95030</list-item><list-item>96260</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>97006</list-item><list-item>97825</list-item><list-item>101250</list-item><list-item>102065</list-item><list-item>102726</list-item><list-item>102794</list-item><list-item>103319</list-item><list-item>103369</list-item><list-item>109489</list-item><list-item>111221</list-item><list-item>117855</list-item><list-item>145625</list-item><list-item>205720</list-item><list-item>1933842</list-item><list-item>2652946</list-item><list-item>2674863</list-item><list-item>2676593</list-item><list-item>2795703</list-item><list-item>2811845</list-item><list-item>2812209</list-item><list-item>4408695</list-item><list-item>4687475</list-item><list-item>4879298</list-item><list-item>5514964</list-item><list-item>6092369</list-item><list-item>6092370</list-item><list-item>6333585</list-item><list-item>6349225</list-item><list-item>6349963</list-item><list-item>6496703</list-item><list-item>6506017</list-item><list-item>6824316</list-item><list-item>6895317</list-item><list-item>7182465</list-item><list-item>7261906</list-item><list-item>7990223</list-item><list-item>8003014</list-item><list-item>9004890</list-item><list-item>9393811</list-item><list-item>9402136</list-item><list-item>9406262</list-item><list-item>9417329</list-item><list-item>9418565</list-item><list-item>9418740</list-item><list-item>9418827</list-item><list-item>9419015</list-item><list-item>9419148</list-item><list-item>9419346</list-item><list-item>9420099</list-item><list-item>9420759</list-item><list-item>9420879</list-item><list-item>9423023</list-item><list-item>9428084</list-item><list-item>9428506</list-item><list-item>9431176</list-item><list-item>9432987</list-item><list-item>9433009</list-item><list-item>9433310</list-item><list-item>9433818</list-item><list-item>9433921</list-item><list-item>9434047</list-item><list-item>9434497</list-item><list-item>9434723</list-item><list-item>9434985</list-item><list-item>9435221</list-item><list-item>9500048</list-item><list-item>9806335</list-item><list-item>9808243</list-item><list-item>9841789</list-item><list-item>9842193</list-item><list-item>9874869</list-item><list-item>9887864</list-item><list-item>9931116</list-item><list-item>9969339</list-item><list-item>10452863</list-item><list-item>11084233</list-item><list-item>11085138</list-item><list-item>11243407</list-item><list-item>11243412</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_new_3135.pdf</download_url><id>11266028</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/20/learning_resources_inc._v._trump_revisions_22326.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-23T23:24:59.633886Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-23T23:02:37.026887Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>f2241619e45d25d774678ff71e92b62defdd7958</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11266028</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10796821/learning-resources-inc-v-trump/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10796821</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-05</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-02-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-1287</docketNumber><docket_id>71877961</docket_id><judge>John G. Roberts</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-02-20T16:01:25.540470Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-20T16:01:23.790300Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.9961753</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>2738</author_id><cites><list-item>84759</list-item><list-item>85016</list-item><list-item>85272</list-item><list-item>85412</list-item><list-item>85453</list-item><list-item>86867</list-item><list-item>88987</list-item><list-item>93358</list-item><list-item>94726</list-item><list-item>95030</list-item><list-item>96260</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>97006</list-item><list-item>97825</list-item><list-item>101250</list-item><list-item>102065</list-item><list-item>102726</list-item><list-item>102794</list-item><list-item>103319</list-item><list-item>103369</list-item><list-item>109489</list-item><list-item>111221</list-item><list-item>117855</list-item><list-item>145625</list-item><list-item>205720</list-item><list-item>1933842</list-item><list-item>2652946</list-item><list-item>2674863</list-item><list-item>2676593</list-item><list-item>2795703</list-item><list-item>2811845</list-item><list-item>2812209</list-item><list-item>4408695</list-item><list-item>4687475</list-item><list-item>4879298</list-item><list-item>5514964</list-item><list-item>6092369</list-item><list-item>6092370</list-item><list-item>6333585</list-item><list-item>6349225</list-item><list-item>6349963</list-item><list-item>6496703</list-item><list-item>6506017</list-item><list-item>6824316</list-item><list-item>6895317</list-item><list-item>7182465</list-item><list-item>7261906</list-item><list-item>7990223</list-item><list-item>8003014</list-item><list-item>9004890</list-item><list-item>9393811</list-item><list-item>9402136</list-item><list-item>9406262</list-item><list-item>9417329</list-item><list-item>9418565</list-item><list-item>9418740</list-item><list-item>9418827</list-item><list-item>9419015</list-item><list-item>9419148</list-item><list-item>9419346</list-item><list-item>9420099</list-item><list-item>9420759</list-item><list-item>9420879</list-item><list-item>9423023</list-item><list-item>9428084</list-item><list-item>9428506</list-item><list-item>9431176</list-item><list-item>9432987</list-item><list-item>9433009</list-item><list-item>9433310</list-item><list-item>9433818</list-item><list-item>9433921</list-item><list-item>9434047</list-item><list-item>9434497</list-item><list-item>9434723</list-item><list-item>9434985</list-item><list-item>9435221</list-item><list-item>9500048</list-item><list-item>9806335</list-item><list-item>9808243</list-item><list-item>9841789</list-item><list-item>9842193</list-item><list-item>9874869</list-item><list-item>9887864</list-item><list-item>9931116</list-item><list-item>9969339</list-item><list-item>10452863</list-item><list-item>11084233</list-item><list-item>11085138</list-item><list-item>11243407</list-item><list-item>11243412</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf</download_url><id>11263492</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/02/20/learning_resources_inc._v._trump.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-02-20T16:03:43.910199Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-02-20T16:01:23.957424Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>e48fc10146e896af5125cc33f7c94e8bcbe940be</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11263492</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10779476/klein-v-martin/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Klein v. Martin</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10779476</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued></dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-01-26</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>25-51</docketNumber><docket_id>72187113</docket_id><judge>Per Curiam</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-01-26T16:01:33.145631Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-26T16:01:31.456459Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99420166</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id></author_id><cites><list-item>122243</list-item><list-item>2686476</list-item><list-item>3162142</list-item><list-item>4181063</list-item><list-item>4642625</list-item><list-item>4672350</list-item><list-item>9422583</list-item><list-item>9433120</list-item><list-item>9433497</list-item><list-item>9433839</list-item><list-item>9434356</list-item><list-item>9438938</list-item><list-item>9502782</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-51_4g15.pdf</download_url><id>11246089</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/01/26/klein_v._martin.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-01-26T16:02:16.826155Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-26T16:01:31.466383Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>2202411ab14e46c423d62c22dd31f2322f9d538f</sha1><snippet>                  Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026)            1

                           Per Curiam

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
     CHRISTOPHER KLEIN, SUPERINTENDENT,
     DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION FACILITIES
      FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, ET AL. v.
          CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
   ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
   STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
              No. 25–51.   Decided January 26, 2026

   PER CURIAM.
   Under the Antiterrorism and Effectiv</snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11246089</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10776753/berk-v-choy/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Berk v. Choy</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10776753</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-06</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-01-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-440</docketNumber><docket_id>71563327</docket_id><judge>Amy Coney Barrett</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:02:07.213797Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:02:07.096394Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99372864</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>8543</author_id><cites><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>103395</list-item><list-item>104209</list-item><list-item>110274</list-item><list-item>111819</list-item><list-item>112825</list-item><list-item>118482</list-item><list-item>145763</list-item><list-item>2098670</list-item><list-item>4452964</list-item><list-item>4453864</list-item><list-item>4705347</list-item><list-item>4965068</list-item><list-item>6114508</list-item><list-item>6677269</list-item><list-item>9418969</list-item><list-item>9419134</list-item><list-item>9420347</list-item><list-item>9420349</list-item><list-item>9422999</list-item><list-item>9430607</list-item><list-item>9432198</list-item><list-item>9435031</list-item><list-item>9435068</list-item><list-item>9782762</list-item><list-item>9842112</list-item><list-item>11080908</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-440_1b82.pdf</download_url><id>11243340</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/01/20/berk_v._choy.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:03:04.812343Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:02:07.124789Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>ff730eb3da0b183129f42d4ed2fde96752edb8e5</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11243340</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10776752/coney-island-auto-parts-unlimited-inc-v-burton/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10776752</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-11-04</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-01-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-808</docketNumber><docket_id>71872251</docket_id><judge>Samuel Alito</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:02:03.840484Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:02:02.693185Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99372864</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>77</author_id><cites><list-item>1727</list-item><list-item>28423</list-item><list-item>86789</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>198220</list-item><list-item>464721</list-item><list-item>3307626</list-item><list-item>4174311</list-item><list-item>4687475</list-item><list-item>4692447</list-item><list-item>6349225</list-item><list-item>6929769</list-item><list-item>7964998</list-item><list-item>8909533</list-item><list-item>9428777</list-item><list-item>9449018</list-item><list-item>9816225</list-item><list-item>10482006</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-808_lkgn.pdf</download_url><id>11243339</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/01/20/coney_island_auto_parts_unlimited_inc._v._burton.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:02:24.655866Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:02:02.744391Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>3b5de0338b2ed288829e2e4198d1c61b3c0c21b5</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11243339</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10776751/ellingburg-v-united-states/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Ellingburg v. United States</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10776751</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-14</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-01-20</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-482</docketNumber><docket_id>71644700</docket_id><judge>Brett Kavanaugh</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:01:36.758462Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:01:36.597730Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99372864</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1713</author_id><cites><list-item>84695</list-item><list-item>84788</list-item><list-item>85639</list-item><list-item>89805</list-item><list-item>92252</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>111103</list-item><list-item>899483</list-item><list-item>4161363</list-item><list-item>4264598</list-item><list-item>6680913</list-item><list-item>8328886</list-item><list-item>8639351</list-item><list-item>9387021</list-item><list-item>9422536</list-item><list-item>9428052</list-item><list-item>9428197</list-item><list-item>9430233</list-item><list-item>9432091</list-item><list-item>9433499</list-item><list-item>9433542</list-item><list-item>9433683</list-item><list-item>9433696</list-item><list-item>9434392</list-item><list-item>9434513</list-item><list-item>9434781</list-item><list-item>9799405</list-item><list-item>9823702</list-item><list-item>9888741</list-item><list-item>10145945</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-482_d1oe.pdf</download_url><id>11243338</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/01/20/ellingburg_v._united_states.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-01-20T16:02:06.147272Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-20T16:01:36.631867Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>a814e51c5cdac2f4b8b1e8d11e94df471a7ea34c</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11243338</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item><list-item><absolute_url>/opinion/10774608/barrett-v-united-states-revisions-11426/</absolute_url><attorney></attorney><caseName>Barrett v. United States Revisions: 1/14/26</caseName><caseNameFull></caseNameFull><citation></citation><citeCount>0</citeCount><cluster_id>10774608</cluster_id><court>Supreme Court of the United States</court><court_citation_string>SCOTUS</court_citation_string><court_id>scotus</court_id><court_jurisdiction>F</court_jurisdiction><dateArgued>2025-10-07</dateArgued><dateFiled>2026-01-14</dateFiled><dateReargued></dateReargued><dateReargumentDenied></dateReargumentDenied><docketNumber>24-5774</docketNumber><docket_id>71574136</docket_id><judge>Ketanji Brown Jackson</judge><lexisCite></lexisCite><meta><timestamp>2026-01-14T23:01:14.305599Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-14T23:01:10.471959Z</date_created><score><bm25>0.99325585</bm25></score></meta><neutralCite></neutralCite><non_participating_judge_ids></non_participating_judge_ids><opinions><list-item><author_id>1609</author_id><cites><list-item>93781</list-item><list-item>96405</list-item><list-item>101824</list-item><list-item>110091</list-item><list-item>111289</list-item><list-item>112906</list-item><list-item>117985</list-item><list-item>118013</list-item><list-item>179213</list-item><list-item>205265</list-item><list-item>613489</list-item><list-item>4157383</list-item><list-item>4409488</list-item><list-item>4434932</list-item><list-item>4643184</list-item><list-item>9402664</list-item><list-item>9421165</list-item><list-item>9422096</list-item><list-item>9424091</list-item><list-item>9426871</list-item><list-item>9426874</list-item><list-item>9426986</list-item><list-item>9427860</list-item><list-item>9427986</list-item><list-item>9428220</list-item><list-item>9428993</list-item><list-item>9429972</list-item><list-item>9430036</list-item><list-item>9432013</list-item><list-item>9432921</list-item><list-item>9433597</list-item><list-item>9435533</list-item><list-item>9837731</list-item><list-item>9842131</list-item><list-item>9888741</list-item><list-item>9917282</list-item><list-item>9968829</list-item></cites><download_url>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5774new_f20h.pdf</download_url><id>11241193</id><joined_by_ids></joined_by_ids><local_path>pdf/2026/01/14/barrett_v._united_states_revisions_11426.pdf</local_path><meta><timestamp>2026-01-14T23:02:15.010114Z</timestamp><date_created>2026-01-14T23:01:10.513543Z</date_created></meta><ordering_key></ordering_key><per_curiam>False</per_curiam><sha1>50b6c72bb307fdcfcb4a51a47e12381993b79615</sha1><snippet>(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1

                                       Syllabus

         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.
       See United States v. Detroit </snippet><type>combined-opinion</type></list-item></opinions><panel_ids></panel_ids><panel_names></panel_names><posture></posture><procedural_history></procedural_history><scdb_id></scdb_id><sibling_ids><list-item>11241193</list-item></sibling_ids><source>C</source><status>Published</status><suitNature></suitNature><syllabus></syllabus></list-item></results></root>