8293820https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0wLjk5NjMzMzM2JnM9MTA4NTAyNjEmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wNi0xNCZwPTI%3D&format=xml/opinion/10873665/abouammo-v-united-states/Abouammo v. United States010873665Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-302026-06-1125-514673112741Elana Kagan2026-06-11T15:01:25.050631Z2026-06-11T15:01:24.845406Z0.9997387516919640510431911821613773794021349419555942160294221009433778https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-5146_e29f.pdf11341136pdf/2026/06/11/abouammo_v._united_states.pdf2026-06-11T15:08:00.936294Z2026-06-11T15:01:24.877720ZFalse13a83fab19027810ce616489986e685dc82b6517(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11341136CPublished/opinion/10873664/fs-credit-opportunities-corp-v-saba-capital-master-fund-ltd/FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.010873664Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-12-102026-06-1124-34572017726Amy Coney Barrett2026-06-11T15:01:23.858069Z2026-06-11T15:01:23.644836Z0.9997387585439328093389964051068451092861097771104421104601122146764494246855427694742936664422820634790564967038443092940456894062629416266942059694209199421883942268694241459427078942754094275719427718942794394283079428452942875194287989429329942943294297949430779943115294324079432551943277094329839433146943324094332689433921943428294419509795078984202898831409905787https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-345_i42k.pdf11341135pdf/2026/06/11/fs_credit_opportunities_corp._v._saba_capital_master_fund_ltd..pdf2026-06-11T15:10:09.270974Z2026-06-11T15:01:23.695711ZFalse8c7433927487824a6cb4618267e06e29a7231070(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11341135CPublished/opinion/10873663/keathley-v-buddy-ayers-construction-inc/Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.010873663Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-242026-06-1125-672598770Ketanji Brown Jackson2026-06-11T15:01:22.891223Z2026-06-11T15:01:22.628436Z0.999738751609176829413396405103229104414118435145878169443176414239473380742498115603507661737703252723939793580794324794851807743270851228014322827258301024442884024424820451939066816928373934841067894189699419776942246994351189469793947835994856649519929979824798690319878456988599911085138https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-6_d1o2.pdf11341134pdf/2026/06/11/keathley_v._buddy_ayers_construction_inc..pdf2026-06-11T15:08:26.749108Z2026-06-11T15:01:22.716179ZFalsecf98a3890ba6949fd60617746a3274d758a3912d(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11341134CPublished/opinion/10870061/fcc-v-att/FCC v. AT&T010870061Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-04-212026-06-0425-40673221533John G. Roberts2026-06-04T15:01:28.775113Z2026-06-04T15:01:28.665056Z0.99918354273885682964059837899615109777185928781210806797931615244752325171192797291409916242872856341898722343393879179416316941780194252999432622943370195270311041390411080909https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-406_nmip.pdf11337518pdf/2026/06/04/fcc_v._att.pdf2026-06-04T15:01:57.013601Z2026-06-04T15:01:28.697170ZFalse7a2fe05624b5d6e835610a2465d081391a1d84e4(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11337518CPublished/opinion/10870060/hikma-pharmaceuticals-usa-inc-v-amarin-pharma-inc/Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.010870060Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-04-292026-06-0424-88972487163Ketanji Brown Jackson2026-06-04T15:01:27.797799Z2026-06-04T15:01:27.685536Z0.99918354160996405267659266721007263691939554894320849435068943533994416539489704950004598072039842042997553210290955https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-889_5i36.pdf11337517pdf/2026/06/04/hikma_pharmaceuticals_usa_inc._v._amarin_pharma_inc..pdf2026-06-04T15:01:50.222960Z2026-06-04T15:01:27.717080ZFalse50a0de6b6061133f2b3213d07e5e2ad269c5a6de(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11337517CPublished/opinion/10870059/sripetch-v-sec/Sripetch v. SEC010870059Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-04-202026-06-0425-46673215957Neil Gorsuch2026-06-04T15:01:26.882030Z2026-06-04T15:01:26.706147Z0.9991835412508859596405972381018382984673029631468753329837234436943614916399743741743106821582940543294163169425776943094394341759795078988918498940341041390410471378https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-466_5i26.pdf11337516pdf/2026/06/04/sripetch_v._sec.pdf2026-06-04T15:02:29.453988Z2026-06-04T15:01:26.762307ZFalsed7329d7c2bb396c885c5db2d114c66d65220d84b(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11337516CPublished/opinion/10869022/allen-v-milligan/Allen v. Milligan010869022Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-06-0225A131473431862Per Curiam2026-06-03T02:00:59.392869Z2026-06-03T02:00:59.075361Z0.99902491041311184354287784441072245230176671984667198766719896672087667208994004469413203942663394278769430645943321498756329973154https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a1314_7m58.pdf11336479pdf/2026/06/02/allen_v._milligan.pdf2026-06-03T02:01:30.602821Z2026-06-03T02:00:59.151559ZFalseb3dace900759123f991008af53c7b2fa979ffdf8 Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A1314 _________________ WES ALLEN, ALABAMA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL. v. EVAN MILLIGAN, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY _________________ No. 25A1315 combined-opinion11336479CPublished/opinion/10867983/whitton-v-dixon/Whitton v. Dixon010867983Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-06-0125-58073279025Per Curiam2026-06-01T14:01:04.916010Z2026-06-01T14:01:04.748681Z0.9989456510432110467010847194366717228566333584634302494099469424977943027194327789434777943480994567119804185980864611077425https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-580_08m1.pdf11335438pdf/2026/06/01/whitton_v._dixon.pdf2026-06-01T14:01:42.260591Z2026-06-01T14:01:04.756605ZFalse36121e38530642d94390e9403d77fb5208f1c6be Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GARY RICHARD WHITTON v. RICKY D. DIXON, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 25–580. Decided June 1, 2026 PER CURIAM. A Florida jury convicted petitioner Gary Richard Whitton of murder and sentencedcombined-opinion11335438CPublished/opinion/10865527/fernandez-v-united-states/Fernandez v. United States010865527Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-11-122026-05-2824-55671902746Amy Coney Barrett2026-05-28T15:01:42.911453Z2026-05-28T15:01:42.756774Z0.998628685439640511786087299589948331994954248498428080044094884528126621677964953637804493821309193639919373866937585294009139404158940415994045689407323942258394239489425260942959294315149432727943301994330819433629943471894348099435324948561095000209888645999517811080912https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-556_8m58.pdf11332975pdf/2026/05/28/fernandez_v._united_states.pdf2026-05-28T15:03:41.464559Z2026-05-28T15:01:42.794059ZFalsefee24bd0b51ec16efce678e828ea1db28fbe30e1(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11332975CPublished/opinion/10865526/flowers-foods-inc-v-brock/Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock010865526Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-252026-05-2824-93572487215Neil Gorsuch2026-05-28T15:01:42.054030Z2026-05-28T15:01:41.855535Z0.9986286125088291928149640596550455684763472239297206941777794340579887864995899210739048https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-935_k53m.pdf11332974pdf/2026/05/28/flowers_foods_inc._v._brock.pdf2026-05-28T15:03:11.067764Z2026-05-28T15:01:41.886059ZFalse3508e68a1668b879b86fc77747379f9084d6bdad(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11332974CPublished/opinion/10865525/pitchford-v-cain/Pitchford v. Cain010865525Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-312026-05-2824-735172486825Brett Kavanaugh2026-05-28T15:01:38.603399Z2026-05-28T15:01:38.375166Z0.998628617139640511253046723504700851492283263335846672009667201066720116672013667202694274069430491943308394348179434983943893894999979883145988877510783544https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-7351_jiel.pdf11332973pdf/2026/05/28/pitchford_v._cain.pdf2026-05-28T15:02:39.551568Z2026-05-28T15:01:38.420505ZFalse04ec686baa6d2ac306f7bb7f13ffb85b3e09b448(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11332973CPublished/opinion/10865524/rutherford-v-united-states/Rutherford v. United States010865524Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-11-122026-05-2824-82071903502Amy Coney Barrett2026-05-28T15:01:33.927077Z2026-05-28T15:01:33.422219Z0.998628685438545396405102139102719109240118082203706179229742807994638884467236946850464692682470387248800936216779649536366079798129780821309188568409410487942689994315149432802943333194347189435281943528794357569485610950074795028239817044987345410452863106498931082052411084232https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-820_97be.pdf11332972pdf/2026/05/28/rutherford_v._united_states.pdf2026-05-28T15:06:50.331102Z2026-05-28T15:01:33.724346ZFalse1f0d79a90eb279286506372a7490a691372104e3(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11332972CPublished/opinion/10864190/margolin-v-naij/Margolin v. NAIJ010864190Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-05-2625-76773279923Per Curiam2026-05-26T14:01:59.500730Z2026-05-26T14:01:59.373473Z0.998470145324459418565941928994254289431171943254794332659475707950066311065039https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-767_7758.pdf11331634pdf/2026/05/26/margolin_v._naij.pdf2026-05-26T14:02:17.478845Z2026-05-26T14:01:59.380869ZFalse7c38c526c7b36dd06480c4290b07405df5f63906 Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAREN K. MARGOLIN, DIRECTOR OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–767. Decided May 26, 2026 PER CURIAM. After the Executive Office for Immigracombined-opinion11331634CPublished/opinion/10862764/hamm-v-smith/Hamm v. Smith010862764Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-12-102026-05-2124-87272017725Per Curiam2026-05-21T15:04:00.345504Z2026-05-21T15:04:00.209310Z0.9980740592834104196145870147406114094416645852490126267920428097672812588304352441153654155979437167045269804548063467997547657114799652483596448359684846032635349277442919225984926483593960589421564942655594279169429949943078994330839434285943473994352389668964981246198213999842108987782598882629888741993173710699015https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-872_ec8f.pdf11330194pdf/2026/05/21/hamm_v._smith.pdf2026-05-21T16:36:21.432006Z2026-05-21T15:04:00.217629ZFalsed80524196c14661d790d9536cb9322040b5a4e0e(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES combined-opinion11330194CPublished/opinion/10862763/havana-docks-corp-v-royal-caribbean-cruises-ltd/Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.010862763Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-02-232026-05-2124-98372315900Clarence Thomas2026-05-21T15:03:49.329094Z2026-05-21T15:03:49.170597Z0.99807405320096405994724641442667202066720589422753943422310617893https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-983_c07d.pdf11330193pdf/2026/05/21/havana_docks_corp._v._royal_caribbean_cruises_ltd..pdf2026-05-21T16:49:47.298061Z2026-05-21T15:03:49.209975ZFalse26774b55c14d80acb5f3341e3313de1e795b4407(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11330193CPublished/opinion/10862762/m-k-employee-solutions-inc-v-trustees-of-iam-nat-pension/M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension010862762Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-01-202026-05-2123-120972163397Ketanji Brown Jackson2026-05-21T15:03:38.218245Z2026-05-21T15:03:37.711183Z0.998074051609https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/23-1209_i3kn.pdf11330192pdf/2026/05/21/m__k_employee_solutions_inc._v._trustees_of_iam_nat._pension.pdf2026-05-21T15:12:00.255109Z2026-05-21T15:03:38.099988ZFalse8aba0fdcf89eef80972ec2e230f99fa060f6ef61(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11330192CPublished/opinion/10858761/jules-v-andre-balazs-properties/Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties010858761Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-302026-05-1425-8373112739Sonia Sotomayor2026-05-14T15:02:08.221184Z2026-05-14T15:02:05.330337Z0.997519830459640510397211784511834814590072553075759585441840270306328531634302584121809392980943524896687249940646996933710505996https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf11326163pdf/2026/05/14/jules_v._andre_balazs_properties.pdf2026-05-14T15:54:00.944919Z2026-05-14T15:02:05.359253ZFalsec339c7276f934d05b332cb1d966715c9f536f94f(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11326163CPublished/opinion/10858760/montgomery-v-caribe-transport-ii-llc/Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC010858760Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2026-03-042026-05-1424-123872362630Amy Coney Barrett2026-05-14T15:01:54.541399Z2026-05-14T15:01:54.138971Z0.997519885439640586765742807984570312938662394004459410677943341394342929485423107737181083111211091747https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1238_1b7d.pdf11326162pdf/2026/05/14/montgomery_v._caribe_transport_ii_llc.pdf2026-05-14T15:51:53.801929Z2026-05-14T15:01:54.189680ZFalse836fbbfa536bdc611f1ea78ac6f8fac19df95b3e(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11326162CPublished/opinion/10852760/louisiana-v-callais-revisions-50426/Louisiana v. Callais Revisions: 5/04/26010852760Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-03-242026-04-2924-10969779623Samuel Alito2026-05-04T18:02:13.993041Z2026-05-04T18:02:13.783131Z0.99633336779640511282428105264285391428778444107224699489470032763260409152888940044694058149422070942324694239149424381942536094266339427876942788494298699430506943064594323539432895943305194332149433318943350994339139434125943473594348899435315951588695269749806551984196598420989842139987563298964149973154https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_new_jifl.pdf11320154pdf/2026/04/29/louisiana_v._callais_revisions_50426.pdf2026-05-04T18:04:41.480899Z2026-05-04T18:02:13.876235ZFalsef34569ee4c69cac175614f9a9b4bebb6b1e25d5d(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11320154CPublished/opinion/10850261/louisiana-v-callais/Louisiana v. Callais010850261Supreme Court of the United StatesSCOTUSscotusF2025-03-242026-04-2924-10969779623Samuel Alito2026-04-29T15:04:14.537340Z2026-04-29T15:04:14.028039Z0.99633336779640511282428105264285391428778444107224699489470032763260409152888940044694058149422070942324694239149424381942536094266339427876942788494298699430506943064594323539432895943305194332149433318943350994339139434125943473594348899435315951588695269749806551984196598420989842139987563298964149973154https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf11317641pdf/2026/04/29/louisiana_v._callais.pdf2026-04-29T17:21:44.661582Z2026-04-29T15:04:14.365202ZFalse06a6015ae7d36711fb75fe3fc34d32ba1cd4b53f(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit combined-opinion11317641CPublished