📣 The Wait is Over! Semantic search is now available on CourtListener. Already live in our API, you can now search case law using natural language directly on the website. Click the & / ? toggle to switch between keyword and natural language search.

Learn more here!

Volume 815

— of the —

Federal Reporter (F.2d)

Landy v. Amsterdam

Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, New Vector Communications, Inc., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, St. Louis Cellular System, Inc., New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Centel Corporation, Yankee Celltell, Co., Newvector Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. La Star Cellular Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Contel Cellular, Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Harry J. Pappas D/B/A California Portaphone v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Intervenors

Bach v. Gilbert

Landy v. Amsterdam

Sustaita v. Ylst

Tipton v. Bowen

Manning v. Lewis

Robles v. Madrid

Stage v. Bartolone

Katocs v. Parkhurst

Seymour v. Cyr

Adekunle v. Stingley

Badgley v. Santacroce

Badgley v. Santacroce

Burton v. Bowen

Kimball v. Sullivan

Chiofar v. Bowen

Newsletter

Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements.