              ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
                                                                                             I
Appeal of--                               )
                                          )
Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation )          ASBCA No. 61724
                                          )
UnderContractNo. W91QVN-17-P-0099 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:                        Mr. Byung Chan Park
                                                      Vice President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:                      Scott N. Flesch, Esq.
                                                      Army Chief Trial Attorney
                                                     MAJ Wayne T. Branom III, JA
                                                      Trial Attorney

                OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STINSON

        Appellant, Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation (KECC), appeals a
contracting officer's final decision dated June 22, 2018, denying-in-part appellant's
May 11, 2018, certified claim for breach of contract in the amount ofKRW 301,598,400
(R4, tabs 39-40). We have jurisdiction pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978,
41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. The parties agreed to submit this appeal for a decision on the
record without a hearing pursuant to Board Rule 11. The government submitted an
initial brief and appellant declined the opportunity to submit any brief. For the reasons
stated below, we deny KECC's appeal.

                                 FINDINGS OFF ACT

        1. On August 24, 2017, the 411 th Contracting Support Brigade, Korea, entered into
Contract No. W91QVN-17-P-0099 with KECC in the amount ofKRW 95,880,000.00 for
gravel delivery and equipment lease (R4, tab 1 at 1-2). The contract required: delivery of
170 cubic meters of38mm-50mm diameter gravel (CLIN 0001); delivery of85 cubic
meters of 100mm-152mm diameter gravel (CLIN 0002); lease of a Caterpillar CS-563D
roller, or equal, loaded on a transport vehicle (CLIN 0003); and lease of 2 Doosan
DX500E hand drum rollers, or equal, loaded in dump trucks (CLIN 0004) (R4, tab 1
at 3-5, 11).

Contractual Provisions

      2. The contract specified a 30-day lease period for the Caterpillar roller and the
two hand drum rollers (R4, tab 1 at 4-5).
                                                                                             I
            3. Section 1 of the contract's Statement of Work provided:

                   Scope of Work: This SOW describes the requirements for
                   the delivery of gravel and construction equipment in
                   support of 35th Air Defense Artillery and 8th Army
                   Engineers construction efforts in the vicinity of
                                                                                            I
                   USAG-Daegu. The Contractor shall deliver gravel
                   conforming to the characteristics of the CLIN 0001 and
                   0002 narratives as directed by the Contracting Officers
                   [sic] Representative (COR). The Contractor shall deliver
                   construction equipment conforming to the characteristics
                   of the CLIN 0003 and 0004 narratives as directed by the
                   COR in accordance with this SOW and delivery schedule.

    (R4, tab 1 at 11)

            4. Section 2 of the contract's Statement of Work provided, in pertinent part:

                  2.1 Delivery: The contractor shall deliver items in CLINs
                  0001-0004 (170 cubic meters of38mm-50mm diameter
                  gravel, 85 cubic meters of 100mm-152mm diameter
                  gravel, one (1) Caterpillar CS-563D or Equal roller loaded
                  on a transport vehicle, and two (2) Doosan DX 500E or
                  equal in dump trucks) to Camp Carroll on 25 August 2017
                  between 1300 and 1600, Korea Standard Time (KST).

                  2.1.1 The Contractor is responsible for possessing Korean
                  Identification, Vehicle Registration, Vehicle Insurance
                  Certificate, and Driver Licenses for all vehicles and
                  drivers.

                  2.1.2 The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or
                  USAG-Daegu representative will escort the vehicle [sic] to
                  a designated staging area. The vehicles will be parked in
                  the staging area until directed for movement by the COR.

                  2.2 Drivers shall remain overnight at Camp Carroll and
                  will be transported by the U.S. Government to a facility for
                  overnight shelter and accommodations.

    (Id.)




l
1
                                               2


l
        5. Section 2.3 of the Statement of Work provided:

              2.3 Delivery to Construction Site: On 26 August 2017, all
              drivers shall be prepared to be transported to the vehicle
              staging point and prepared for movement no later than
              0600. The Contractor shall be prepared to drive as part of
              a military convoy to the construction site, offload material,
              and re-stage for departure. No vehicle will be released
              from the construction site prior to the direction of the
              COR. The Contractor shall be prepared to maintain
              operations and readiness until operations have been
              completed (approximately 1700hrs). Once escorted from
              the site, contracted drivers may proceed at their discretion
              directly to contractor facilities.

              2.3 .1 Vehicles transporting rollers required under CLIN
              0003 and 0004 shall be capable of offloading equipment by
              a driver-on/drive-off method.

(Id.)

     6. The contract included FAR 52.208-4 VEHICLE LEASE PAYMENTS
(APR 1984), which provided:

              (a) Upon the submission of proper invoices or vouchers,
              the Government shall pay rent for each vehicle at the
              rate(s) specified in this contract.

              (b) Rent shall accrue from the beginning of this contract, or
              from the date each vehicle is delivered to the Government,
              whichever is later, and shall continue until the expiration
              of the contract term or the termination of this contract.
              However, rent shall accrue only for the period that each
              vehicle is in the possession of the Government.

              (c) Rent shall not accrue for any vehicle that the
              Contracting Officer determines does not comply with the
              Condition of Leased Vehicles clause of this contract or
              otherwise does not comply with the requirements of this
              contract, until the vehicle is replaced or the defects are
              corrected.




                                           3
              (d) Rent shall not accrue for any vehicle during any period
              when the vehicle is unavailable or unusable as a result of
              the Contractor's failure to render services for the operation
              and maintenance of the vehicle as prescribed by this
              contract.

              (e) Rent stated in monthly terms shall be prorated on the
              basis of 1130th of the monthly rate for each day the vehicle
              is in the Government's possession. If this contract
              contains a mileage provision, the Government shall pay
              rent as provided in the Schedule.

(R4, tab 1 at 15)

       7. Upon completion of its use by the government, the contractor was obligated
to pick up the leased equipment:

             VEHICLES TRANSPORTING/DELIVERING ROLLERS
             REQUIRED UNDER CLIN 0003 AND CLIN 0004
             SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OFFLOADING EQUIPMENT
             BY A DRIVE-ON/DRIVE-OFF METHOD. A JOINT
             INSPECTION WILL BE CONDUCTED ANNOTATING
             ANY DEFICIENCIES AND OVERALL
             SERVICEABILITY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE
             GOVERNMENT. UPON COMPLETION OF USE, THE
             CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONTACTED AND
             COORDINATION WILL BE MADE WITH THE COR
             FOR EQUIPMENT PICKUP. PRIOR TO PICKUP, A
             JOINT-INSPECTION WILL BE CONDUCTED
             ANNOTATING ANY DEFICIENCIES AND
             OVERALL SERVICEABILITY PRIOR TO TRANSFER
             TO THE CONTRACTOR.

(R4, tab 1 at 4-5) (Emphasis added)

      8. The contract included FAR 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND
CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017). Section (c), entitled,
"Changes," dictates that "[c]hanges in the terms and conditions of this contract may be
made only by written agreement of the parties." (R4, tab 1 at 16)

    9. The contract incorporated by reference DFARS 252.201-7000
CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (DEC 1991) (R4, tab 1 at 14).
DFARS 252.201-7000(b) states, in pertinent part, "[t]he COR is not authorized to


                                           4
                                                                                          I
                                                                                          I
make any commitments or changes that will affect price, quality, quantity, delivery, or
any other term or condition of the contract." 48 C.F.R. § 252.201-7000(b).

       10. The post award conference notes dated August 24, 2017, state:

              1. GENERAL: The function and authority of the
              Government personnel:

              a. The Contracting Officer (CO) is the ONLY person
              authorized to modify the contract terms or take any action
              to enter into a change or contractual commitment on behalf
              of the Government.

             b. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), whose
             authority may not be redelegated, is usually limited to
             monitoring and surveillance of the contractor's
             performance.

(R4, tab 2 at 2) The COR was identified as MAJ Mitch Taylor (id).

Contract Performance

      11. Delivery of the gravel and leased equipment initially was scheduled for
August 25, 2017 (R4, tab 2 at 2).

       12. On August 31, 2017, the government issued Modification No. POOOOl,
changing the delivery date of the contract items to some unspecified future date, and
decreasing the amount of gravel specified in CLIN 0001 from 170 cubic meters to 112
and CLIN 0002 from 85 cubic meters to 64 (R4, tab 3 at 2, 8). The modification also
made changes to the delivery and staging of the equipment, as follows:

             2.1 Delivery: The contractor shall make multiple
             deliveries as part of military convoys, based on the
             contract delivery schedule.

             2.1.1 Delivery 1 (August 28-29 2017) 112 cubic meters of
             38mm-50mm diameter gravel (7 dump trucks), 64 cubic
             meters of 100mm-152mm diameter gravel (4 dump
             trucks), one (1) Caterpillar CS-563D (or Equal)(l truck),
             two (2) Doosan DX 500E (or equal) hand rollers (one
             truck) shall be delivered to the staging area at Camp
             Carroll. Notification will be given by the Government no
             later than 9:00am the day prior to the required staging.


                                          5                                               I
               No more that thirteen ( 13) trucks are authorized for
               Delivery 1.

               2.1.1.1 The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or
               USAG-Daegu representative will coordinate to meet the
               contractor at Gate # 1, Camp Carroll and escort the vehicles
               to the designated staging area. The vehicles will be parked
               in the staging area until directed for further movement by
               the COR.

              2.1.1.2 Drivers shall remain overnight at Camp Carroll and
              will be transported by the U.S. Government to a facility for
              overnight shelter and accommodations ....

              2.1.1.6 Delivery to Construction Site: The Government
              will provide transportation to contracted drivers from their
              overnight shelter to the vehicle staging point at a time
              coordinated as directed by the COR. Drivers will be
              prepared for movement within 1 hour of arrival at vehicle
              staging point.

              2.1.1.7 The Contractor shall be prepared to drive as part of
              a military convoy to the construction site, offload material,
              and re-stage for departure.

              2.1.1.8 No vehicle will be released from the construction
              site without direction and approval from the COR.

              2.1.1. 9 The Contractor shall be prepared to maintain
              operations and readiness until operations have been
              completed.

              2.1.1.10 Contracted drivers may proceed at their discretion
              to contractor facilities once released from the construction
              site.

              2.1.1.11 Vehicles transporting rollers required under
              CLIN 0003 and 0004 shall be capable of offloading
              equipment by a driver-on/drive-off method. No ramps or
              material handling equipment will be provided by the
              government to facilitate loading/unloading.
                                                                              I
                                                                              f
(R4, tab 3 at 9-10)
                                                                              r
                                                                              f
                                            6                                 f
                                                                              !
      13. The contractor delivered the contractually-required gravel and equipment
on September 7, 2017 (R4, tab 45 at 1; app. supp. R4, tabs 1-3).

Equipment Retrieval

        14. By email dated October 2, 2017, MAJ Taylor informed KECC:

               We are complete with the use of all rental rollers for the
               subject contract at Seongju. I have verified that all keys
               are in the rented equipment and it is ready to be picked up.
               You can pick it up at your convenience. I will be on the
               site tomorrow from 0900-1100 if you need to meet with
               me.

(R4, tab 7 at 2)

       15. Appellant stated that on October 3, 2017, it received MAJ Taylor's email
dated October 2, 2017, but did not respond until October 10, 2017, when KECC
informed MAJ Taylor it would pick up the equipment on October 11, 2017 (R4, tab 8
at 3).

        16. On October 11, 2017, KECC attempted to recover the equipment but was
prevented from gaining access to the installation by local national Korean protesters
(R4, tab 8 at 3-4). By email dated October 12, 2017, KECC informed the contracting
officer that it had incurred additional costs in attempting to retrieve equipment on
October 11, 2017 (id.). KECC stated, in pertinent part:

              The police came after requesting for support to COR but
              they did not have any information. Called COR again to
              ask what exactly is happening and found out that there was                I
              some mis-understanding between the government and
              police. Also COR has informed today's pick up work is
              impossible as there is not enough manpower to cover and
                                                                                        I
              escort us.

              In addition, COR acknowledged about the conflict and
              promised the government is responsible for any additional
              cost such as equipment expense and rental fee of pick up
              vehicle.

(Id. at 3) (Syntax in original)

                                                                                        f
                                            7
                                                                                        I
     17. By email dated October 13, 2018, the contracting officer informed
MAJ Taylor:

                Please see email below. The Contractor will be submitting
                another claim, which we will take a look at when it comes
                in. Can you please provide an update of when the pick-up                   I
                                                                                           I
                will be scheduled? I want to ensure the equipment is
                picked up before we modify the award to pay for our
                claims.

                Additionally, although I do not know if what the
                Contractor is saying true [sic], but please be careful when
                making any statements along the lines of, "COR
                acknowledged about the conflict and promised the
                government is responsible for any additional cost such as


(Id. at 2)
                equipment expense and rental fee of pick up vehicle."
                                                                                           I
                                                                                           '

      18. By email dated October 17, 2017, the contracting officer asked the COR
whether there was a plan in place for the contractor to pick up the equipment (id at 1).
By email dated October 20, 2017, the COR responded stating:

                We have submitted the following to the ROKA
                [Republic of Korea Army]/KNP [Korea National Police]:

                The preferred date is 2 Nov 2017. The alternate days are
                31 Oct 2017 and 3 Nov 2017.

                I anticipate an answer Monday.

(Id.)

          19. By email to the contracting officer dated November 15, 2017, KECC
stated:

                We requert [sic] for additional cost due to sudden
                cancelation [sic] at 25 Aug. 2017 and delibery [sic]
                pick-up failure 11 Oct. 2017 as follows.

                1. Sudden cancelation [sic] at 25 Aug. 2017




                                             8
              We should pay sudden cancelation [sic] fee 5,100,000KW
              (Dump Truck 15ea x 300,000 KW/ea) which was
              negotiated and final price.

              2. Delivery pick up failure at 11 Oct. 2017

              We should pay additional cargo crane and dump truck
              expense 600,000KW (cargo crane 300,000KW + dump
              truck 300,000KW) which was negotiated and final price.

               * As the leased vehicles (Catterpiller [sic] CS-562D and
              Hand durm [sic] roller) are now [sic] could not carry out of
              the base, So it is needed to be modified additional cost at
              the end time of leasing.

(R4, tab 11 at 3-4)

        20. By email to KECC dated November 16, 2017, the contract specialist stated:

              Understood, we are working with the requiring activity on
              finding a solution to removing the equipment from the site.
              Once that has been resolved, we will work with you on the
              final modification for the actual days of lease.

(Id. at 3)

        21. By emails dated November 16, 2017, and November 21, 2017, the
contracting officer asked the COR for updates on removal of the leased equipment (id
at 1-3). By email dated November 21, 2017, the COR responded to the contracting
officer:

              I am waiting on a report from the actions on today's
              mission to the site. Last week, they tried to get the
              equipment started, but weren't having any luck.

(Id. at 1)

       22. By email dated November 21, 2017, the contracting officer informed the
COR:

              Please keep our office updated and in the loop as each
              mission affects the contract. To clarify - are you talking



                                            9
               about not being able to start the leased equipment?

(Id at 1)

        23. By email to the government dated December 6, 2017, KECC stated:

               This contract is being delayed for almost 2 months and is
               getting really frustrating for us as we cannot do anything
                                                                              I
                                                                              l



               about it. It would be great, If [sic] you could give us a
               schedule of return date within this week. Otherwise there
               will be an extra charge for another month of rental. Please
               consider our situation and advise us.

(App. supp. R4, tab 4 at 1)

        24. By email dated December 6, 2019, the government responded:

               First, thank you very much for your cooperation, patience,



                                                                              I
               and understanding. MAJ_ Taylor's office is working with
               his higher headquarters and with the ROK Government to
               set up a schedule so that we can return your equipment to
               you. Returning your equipment to you is very important to
               our Team as well as MAJ Taylor's team. Additionally, we
               will be meeting next Tuesday to figure out how we to [sic]
               expeditiously resolve the current situation we are in now.
               We will provide you more information next week after our
               meeting.
                                                                              I
(Id.)

        25. By email dated December 12, 2017, KECC stated:

               As per contract, it has been almost two months since
               expiry [sic] date of the contract. We want to know the
               exact date of return of equipment (2 x 1ton roller, 1 x 5ton
               roller). For the return of two 1 ton rollers, we require a
               cargo crane to pick up the rollers. If you would like to
               continue rental of 5 ton roller, it needs to go through
               KOREA ENG directly. Also it would be great if there is
               co-operation by police when returning the equipment as we
               failed to pass the protesters last time.

(R4, tab 16)


                                           10
        26. By email dated December 12, 2017, the COR suggested KECC work
directly with MAJ Benny Lee, 35th ADA Brigade Executive Officer, to gain access to
the installation and arrange for removal of the equipment (R4, tabs 17, 41 at 8).

        27. By email dated December 13, 2017, the COR informed KECC:

              We do NOT wish to rent any equipment. We would like to
              get you out on the site to pick up the equipment as soon as
              possible. You will not need a crane to lift the hand rollers
              into the bongo truck - we can provide a lift capability.
              Please review my email from this morning and let me
              know when you can get to the site to pick up the hand
              rollers and drive the large roller off the site.

(R4, tab 22 at 7-8)

       28. During the period from December 14, 2017, to December 21, 2017, the
COR and KECC discussed various options to reduce the number of contractor vehicles
and employees needed to remove equipment from the site, and discussed KECC
possibly removing the equipment on December 21, 2017 (R4, tab 22 at 3-7). That
removal date was cancelled because the South Korea Ministry of Defense was "having
more problems with the protesters" (R4, tab 22 at 2).

       29. By email dated December 28, 2017, the contracting officer asked KECC
whether it had retrieved its equipment from the installation (R4, tab 20 at 1). By email
that same date, KECC responded:

             We are still waiting for your response to retrieve the
             equipments [sic] back. I understand there is a conflict with
             the protesters currently but it has been almost 3 months
             since CCD. A few months ago, we tried to retrieve the
             equipments [sic] which advised by COR. But protesters
             stopped us as there was no support from Korean police.
             Please inform us if there is a new plan or schedule.

(Id.)

        30. By email dated January 11, 2018, KECC requested "an extra amount of
rental fees for 3 months" (R4, tab 23 at 1).




                                           11
        31. By email dated January 16, 2018, MAJ Camille Morgan, contracting
officer, informed KECC:

              You must retrieve the following equipment from the site
              immediately. The method of recovery, should be the same
              as delivery the (Drive - on/Drive - Off Method). The U.S
              government is not hindering your company from retrieving
              the equipment at this time. I need confirmation from you
              by Friday, 19 January 2018 on how you plan to accomplish
              this task. You have 1 week from Friday, 19 January 2018,
              to recover the following equipment.

              1) 1 x Each Vehicle Lease Caterpillar CS-563

              2) 2 x Each Vehicle Lease HAND DRUM ROLLER

(R4, tab 24 at 2)

        32. By email dated January 16, 2018, the COR informed KECC:

              I would recommend you call the KNP and file a police
              report because you cannot get your equipment out. The
              issue is not with the US Army or the Government but with
              Korean nationals that are blocking the road.

(R4, tab 24 at 1)

        33. By email dated January 16, 2018, KECC responded:

              In order to retrieve the equipment, we would need 2
              vehicles (Trailer & 5ton cargo crane) with 3 people
              including 2 drivers and myself. This plan is exactly the
              same as before (Delivery plan). However, we need a clear
              answer for whether you can provide support with Korean
              police to protect us from protesters. I have actually called
              Korean national police (Seongju Police Dept. 054-930-
              0258) to ask for support but they advised U.S government
              need to contact them and arrange a plan. Please arrange
              and make a plan with Korean national police and inform us
              when to pick up the equipment with exact time (Day and
              time frame).

(Id.)


                                           12
       34. By email dated January 19, 2018, the contracting officer asked KECC
"have you established a new date to retire [sic] your rental equipment form [sic] the
site? Yes or no?" (R4, tab 25 at 2)

        35. By email dated January 22, 2018, KECC informed the government:

              No, we have not established a new date as we cannot set up
              a plan with Korean national police.

              Please contact Korean national police and inform us when
              to pick up the equipment with the exact time.

(Id. at 1)

       36. By email dated March 3, 2018, the government informed appellant:

              We agree that the option to procure the equipment is not
              the preferred method of ending this procurement; however,
              the daily cost of this procurement is unsustainable. The
              COR has stated that the site conditions are not
              compromised to such an extent that prevent KECC site
              access to recover the equipment. KECC has made no
              attempt to since October 11, 201 7 to recover this
              equipment which has been on site at a claimed rate of
              KRW 1,000,000 per day.

             Although movement "on government facilities shall be
             coordinated through the COR and conducted under escort"
             per para 2. 1.1.12 of the SOW. Paragraph 2.1.3
             (Equipment Recovery) does not require the government of
             the United States nor the Republic of Korea to provide an
             escort onto or off of the installation. Pursuant to
             52.212-4(a) "the Government may seek an equitable price
             reduction or adequate consideration for acceptance of
             nonconforming supplies or services." As the equipment in
             CLIN 0003 has been non-functional since November, the
             government, subject to mechanical inspection, may
             determine that the equipment is non-functional due to a
             latent defect of the electrical system and request and [sic]
             equitable adjustment. This is further supported by the
             CLIN text "THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY
             AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NORMAL


                                          13
                MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF EQUIPMENT
                FOR THE DURATION OF THE LEASE."

                You must coordinate with the COR (lLT Neky ... ), to
                arrange for access to the site at the earliest possible
                convenience. The government (US/ROK) will not provide
                additional security services as none were stipulated in the
                purchase order and assets are not available to provide such
                service.

                As the Contracting Officer for this requirement; I strongly
                urge you to retrieve this equipment immediately.

(R4, tab 28 at 1) (Syntax in original)*

         37. By email dated March 6, 2018, the government informed appellant:

                You missed yesterday's suspense of 5 Mar 2018, to
                provide me the Contracting Officer a date and time to pick
                your rental equipment from the site. This is my second
                attempt to confirm a retrieval date from your company. I
                have included our legal offices in this e-mail traffic to
                prove that the government has requested that YOU the
                contractor, establish a new pick up date of the Rental
                Equipment for subject contract.

                You must provide a date NLT Weds, 7 Mar 2018 to
                retrieve your rental equipment from the site.

(R4, tab 29 at 4)

       38. On April 25, 2018, appellant's recovery vehicles joined an Army convoy
entering the site as part of a convoy named "Operation Penny Packer" and KECC
retrieved its equipment from the site (R4, tabs 36, 39 at 3).




*   In February 2018, the government considered purchasing the equipment to minimize
         "any further issues with this purchase order" (R4, tab 28 at 4). However,
         appellant informed the government that the equipment owners were not
         interested in selling the equipment (R4, tab 28 at 2).

                                            14
Contractor Claim and Final Decision

        39. On May 11, 2018, KECC submitted a breach of contract claim seeking costs
incurred (1) on August 25, 2017, when the government cancelled the scheduled
delivery, (2) on October 11, 2017, when KECC was unable to retrieve the equipment
from the installation, and (3) for alleged extension of the equipment lease from the end
of the lease period until the date it was retrieved from the installation on April 25, 2018
(R4, tab 39 at 2-5).

       40. On June 22, 2018, the contracting officer issued a final decision sustaining
appellant's request for costs incurred on August 25, 2017, and denying appellant's
request for costs incurred on October 11, 2017, and costs sought for lease of the
equipment from October 7, 2017, until April 25, 2018 (R4, tab 40).

                                       DECISION

        Appellant seeks compensation for extended equipment lease and costs incurred
in attempting to retrieve the equipment on October 11, 2017 (compl. 115-6, 35). As
the party asserting a claim for breach of contract, appellant has the burden of proof.
Tecom, Inc., ASBCA No. 51880, 00-2 BCA 130,944 at 152,738 (citing Sphinx Int'/,
Inc., ASBCA No. 38784, 90-3 BCA 122,952 at 115,222). As noted above, appellant
did not file a brief with the Board in support of its Rule 11 submission on the record.
"This, of course, does not relieve the appellant from the necessity of establishing the
facts to support its assertions." C. Leonard Willis, ASBCA No. 25271, 81-1 BCA
114,948 at 73,987 n.l.

        Appellant's complaint offers insufficient legal support for its proposition that
the government was at fault for the contractor's failure to timely remove the leased
equipment after expiration of the lease. The contract put the onus on KECC to pick up
its equipment at the end of the lease period (finding 7). Appellant admits that the lease
period ended on October 6, 2017 (compl. 125.b). Appellant likewise admits that the
government informed appellant it was finished with the equipment and instructed
appellant to pick up the equipment from the installation (compl. 1111-12, 15; R4,
tab 8 at 3).

       The record establishes that appellant was unable to retrieve its equipment, not
because of government action or inaction, but because local national Korean protesters
blocked access to the installation (findings 16, 25, 28-29, 32-33). It is well established
that "absent fault or negligence or an unqualified warranty on the part of its
representatives, the Government is not liable for damages resulting from the action of
third parties." Oman-Fischbach International (JV) v. Pirie, 276 F .3d 1380, 1385 (Fed.
Cir. 2002) (quoting Dale Constr. Co. v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 692,698 (1964)).



                                            15                                                f
        Appellant cites no contractual provision wherein the government assumed the
risk of increased costs resulting from the actions of third parties such as local national
Korean protesters. The fact that, at various points in time, protesters inhibited access
to the installation did not somehow create a contractual obligation on the government
to remove appellant's equipment and deliver it to KECC. Moreover, the record
establishes that the government made efforts to assist KECC in removing the
equipment from the installation and, ultimately, arranged for KECC to remove the
equipment as part of a government convoy (findings 18, 20, 24, 26-28, 38).

        Appellant quotes FAR 52.208-4(b ), set forth in the contract, which provides
"rent shall accrue only for the period that each vehicle is in the possession of the
Government" (compl. ,r 8; R4, tab 1 at 15). This portion of the provision, alone, does
not entitle KECC to additional lease payments for the equipment while it remained in
the government's possession at the installation. Indeed, FAR 52.208-4(b) also
provides that rent "shall continue until the expiration of the contract term or the
termination of this contract." (R4, tab 1 at 15) As noted above, appellant admits that
the lease period ended on October 6, 2017 (comp 1. ,r 25 .b). Appellant's failure to
remove equipment from the installation as required by the contract does not create a
breach of the contract by the government or an obligation for the government to pay
appellant additional amounts for extended lease of the equipment. See generally,
Dynamic Research Corp., ASBCA No. 57830, 13-1 BCA ,r 35,273 at 173,149 ("A
contractor cannot create an obligation on the part of the Government to reimburse it
for a cost overrun by voluntarily continuing performance and incurring costs after the
cost limit has been reached") (quoting North American Rockwell Corp., ASBCA
No. 14329, 72-1 BCA ,r 9207 at 42,722 (construing limitation of funds clause)).              I
                                                                                             I
       Appellant correctly notes that the contract provided for use of a convoy to bring
equipment onto the post (compl. ,r 13.a). The contract, however, does not provide for
use of a convoy to remove the equipment (findings 5, 12). As explained in the
declaration of MAJ Morgan, "South Korean contractors and civilians could freely
come and go through the gate without any escort or assistance, which is in contrast to
U.S. Personnel, who had to use rotary wing transport to enter and exit the installation"
(R4, tab 45 at 2). The fact that the government ultimately arranged for appellant to
remove the equipment from the site as part of a convoy did not somehow obligate the
government to have done so, or make the government liable for increased costs
because it did not provide a convoy at any time prior to April 2018.

        In essence, appellant alleges a constructive change, although it does not invoke
that terminology. As we explained recently, "[a] constructive change occurs when a
contractor performs work beyond the contract requirements, without a formal order
under the Changes clause, due either to an express or implied informal order from an
authorized government official or to government fault." Optimization Consulting,
Inc., ASBCA No. 58752, 19-1 BCA ,r 37,426 at 181,905 (quoting Parwan Group Co.,              I
                                                                                             l
                                           16
                                                                                             I
ASBCA No. 60657, 18-1BCA137,082 at 180,498). Appellant's inability to remove
its equipment from the site was not the fault of the United States Government, but was
caused by the local national Korean protesters (findings 16, 25, 28-29, 32-33).

       In addition, the contract's Commercial Items Changes clause, FAR 52.212-4(c)
required that changes in the terms and conditions of the contract be made by written
agreement of the parties (finding 8). Appellant cites no formal order, or express or
implied formal order, from an authorized government official agreeing either to extend
lease payments or reimbursement of costs incurred on October 11, 2017. Moreover, as
we noted recently, the constructive change doctrine does not apply to a Commercial
Items contract because FAR 52.212-4(c) includes "no provision for unilateral action
by the contracting officer." Tkacz Engineering, LCC, ASBCA No. 60358, 18-1 BCA
136,940 at 179,962.

        As to appellant's claim for alleged costs incurred on October 11, 201 7, the
record reflects that appellant was prevented from accessing the installation by local
national Korean protesters, not the United States Government (finding 16). Appellant


                                                                                           I
suggests, however, that the COR agreed the government would reimburse appellant for
the costs it incurred that day (compl. 1 17.a). Although the record contains copies of
emails indicating the government discussed appellant's demand for payment of its
costs (see findings 16-17, 19-20), the record does not support a finding that the COR,
or anyone with actual authority to bind the government, made such an agreement.
Indeed, the contracting officer's representative - who allegedly offered to reimburse
appellant for its costs - lacked authority to make such an agreement or commit the
government to the payment of funds (finding 9). As such, even assuming the
constructive change doctrine applied to this appeal, appellant has not established it is
entitled to reimbursement by the government for costs incurred on October 11, 2017.




                                                                                           I
                                                                                           I
                                          17


                                                                                           I
                                    CONCLUSION

       For the reasons stated above, the appeal is denied.

       Dated: February 24, 2020



                                                  DAVID B. STINSON
                                                  Administrative Judge
                                                  Armed Services Board


 I concur
                                                  of Contract Appeals

                                                  I concur                              I
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        i
 RICHARD SHACKLEFORD                              OWEN C. WILSON                        t
 Administrative Judge                             Administrative Judge                  i
                                                                                        r.
 Acting Chairman                                  Vice Chairman
 Armed Services Board                             Armed Services Board
 of Contract Appeals                              of Contract Appeals


       I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61724, Appeal of Korea
Engineering Consultants Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's
Charter.                                                                                I
       Dated:

                                                  PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS
                                                                                        I
                                                  Recorder, Armed Services
                                                  Board of Contract Appeals




                                          18
