                             NUMBER 13-08-00126-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

DAVID SOTO,                                                                APPELLANT,

                                             v.

TEXAS STATE BANK,                                  APPELLEE.
_____________________________________________________________

          On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
                    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

                   Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, David Soto, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. CL-06-2160-B. Upon

review of the documents before the Court, the notice of appeal is not in compliance with

Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that
steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1,

42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the

date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct

the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.   See id.    Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.




                                             2
