                   United States Court of Appeals
                         FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 01-2155
                                   ___________

In re: MBA Poultry, L.L.C.,             *
                                        *
          Debtor.                       *
_________________________               *
                                        *
Bird Watchers, L.L.C.,                  *
                                        *
            Appellant,                  *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * District of Nebraska.
Johnson County, Nebraska,               *
                                        *
            Appellee.                   *
                                   ___________

                              Submitted: March 15, 2002

                                  Filed: May 29, 2002
                                   ___________

Before McMILLIAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

      Bird Watchers, L.L.C. (Bird Watchers) purchased personal property from the
bankruptcy estate of MBA Poultry, L.L.C. (MBA Poultry). At the time of the
purchase, MBA Poultry owed personal property taxes to Johnson County, Nebraska.
The bankruptcy court1 held that, if Johnson County has a valid tax lien on MBA
Poultry's personal property, that lien is a first lien which survived Bird Watchers's
purchase of the property. The district court2 affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision,
and Bird Watchers appeals. Having considered the well reasoned opinions of the
district court and the bankruptcy court, we affirm.

I.     BACKGROUND
       The debtor in bankruptcy, MBA Poultry, owned and operated a chicken
processing plant in Johnson County, Nebraska. On January 25, 2000, the day it filed
its bankruptcy petition, MBA Poultry owed Johnson County both real estate and
personal property taxes. On May 26, 2000, Johnson County filed a bankruptcy claim
for the property taxes in the amount of $106,724.32 plus interest and penalties.

       One of MBA Poultry's creditors, Heller Financial, Inc. (Heller), had a security
interest in MBA Poultry's personal property. Heller perfected its security interest
before Johnson County's tax lien attached. On February 17, 2000, before Johnson
County filed its claim for unpaid taxes, the bankruptcy court entered a final order
giving Heller's security interest in MBA Poultry's personal property a super-priority
and authorizing the sale of the personal property. Heller later sold its security interest
to Bird Watchers, which then purchased all of MBA Poultry's property, both real and
personal, for $4,800,000.

       After purchasing MBA Poultry's property, Bird Watchers paid the outstanding
real estate taxes but refused to pay the personal property taxes. It claimed that, under



      1
       The Honorable John C. Minahan, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the
District of Nebraska, retired.
      2
       The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.

                                           -2-
the bankruptcy court's February 17, 2000 final order, the security interest it obtained
from Heller had priority over Johnson County's tax lien.

      Johnson County then sought relief in the bankruptcy court. Johnson County
argued that it was never given notice of the motion which culminated in the February
17, 2000 final order and that its tax liens had priority over the security interest Bird
Watchers obtained from Heller. The bankruptcy court agreed with both arguments,
and ordered that, notwithstanding the final order, "the interest, if any, of Johnson
County in personal property shall be deemed to have continued and to be enforceable
in accordance with Nebraska laws."

       Bird Watchers appealed the bankruptcy court's decision to the district court.
At approximately the same time, Bird Watchers also conveyed the personal property
to a subsidiary, Tecumseh Poultry, L.L.C. (Tecumseh Poultry). According to Bird
Watchers, it did not sell the property to Tecumseh Poultry, but rather "contributed"
it. Bird Watchers did not inform the district court or Johnson County of this
conveyance, and the district court affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy court.

       On appeal to this Court, Bird Watchers raises the same issues it raised in the
district court. While the appeal was being briefed, Johnson County attempted to
collect the unpaid personal property taxes from Bird Watchers through the use of a
distress warrant. When Bird Watchers responded that it no longer held the personal
property, Johnson County moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Johnson County also seeks attorney fees for having to respond to Bird
Watchers's appeal.

II.   DISCUSSION
      Before reaching the merits of Bird Watchers's appeal, we must determine
whether Bird Watchers has standing to contest Johnson County's tax lien. See Steel
Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 101 (1998) (holding a federal court

                                          -3-
cannot hypothesize jurisdiction to reach the merits of the case before it). To have
standing, a party must have "a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy."
Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498-99 (1975) (citation omitted). During oral
argument, counsel for Bird Watchers stated that Bird Watchers will ultimately be
responsible for any tax Johnson County is able to collect in relation to the personal
property at issue, whether it is paid in the first instance by Bird Watchers or
Tecumseh Poultry. This direct stake in the issue presented gives Bird Watchers
standing to pursue its appeal.

       We review the bankruptcy court's decision using the same standards as the
district court. In re Cedar Shore Resort, Inc., 235 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2000). This
case presents only an issue of law, which we review de novo. Id.

       Under Nebraska law, as it existed prior to 1903, a lien for personal property
taxes had priority only over other liens and security interests that arose after it.
Chamberlain Banking House v. Woolsey, 83 N.W. 729, 731 (Neb. 1900). In 1903,
however, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a comprehensive revenue law which made
unpaid personal property taxes "a first lien upon the personal property of the persons
to whom assessed . . . until paid." 1903 Neb. Laws ch. 73, § 15. In a separate section
of the same law, the Nebraska Legislature also accorded first lien status to unpaid real
property taxes. 1903 Neb. Laws ch. 73, § 14.

       These two sections of the 1903 revenue law are now codified, with minor
revisions, in a single section of the Nebraska Revised Statutes. Section 77-203 of the
Nebraska Revised Statutes provides:

      Commencing on [the date they are due] taxes on real property shall be
      a first lien on the property taxed until paid or extinguished as provided
      by law. Taxes on personal property shall be a first lien upon the
      personal property of the person to whom assessed until paid.


                                          -4-
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-203 (emphasis added). As the district court observed, a "first
lien" is "one which takes precedence over all other charges or encumbrances upon the
same piece of property." In re MBA Poultry, L.L.C., 261 B.R. 9, 11 (D. Neb. 2001)
(citing Black's Law Dictionary 934 (7th ed. 1999)).

       According to Bird Watchers, the Nebraska Legislature did not have this type
of priority in mind when it made delinquent personal property taxes a first lien. As
evidence for its argument, Bird Watchers points to section 77-208, which provides
that "[t]he first lien upon real estate under section 77-203 shall take priority over all
other encumbrances and liens thereon." Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-208. Unlike section 77-
203, section 77-208 says nothing about personal property taxes. Based upon this
omission, Bird Watchers argues that the Nebraska Legislature must not have wanted
the "first lien" on personal property to have the same kind of priority as the "first lien"
on real property.

       Based on our review of the original 1903 revenue law, we believe the Nebraska
Legislature did not intend for real estate tax liens to be a different kind of "first lien"
than liens for personal property taxes. In enacting the provision that became section
77-208, the legislature was not distinguishing between real and personal property
taxes; rather, it was distinguishing between liens for general taxes, which have first
priority, and liens for special assessments, which are subject to the lien of general
taxes. See 1903 Neb. Laws ch. 73, §§ 17, 18.3 Thus, contrary to Bird Watchers's
argument, the mere fact that the first lien for real property taxes is mentioned twice


      3
        In its original form, section 77-208 simply mentioned a lien for "general taxes"
and did not cross reference the provision on real estate tax liens in what is now
section 77-203. 1903 Neb. Laws ch. 73, § 17. The current reference to "[t]he first
lien upon real estate under section 77-203" was apparently added in 1943, when
Nebraska's Codified Laws were edited by the 1943 Statute Commission. See Polenz
v. City of Ravenna, 18 N.W.2d 510, 511 (Neb. 1945); Walter D. James & Charles F.
Bongardt, Preface to Revised Statutes of Nebraska 1943, at iv (1944).

                                           -5-
in the Nebraska Revised Statutes does not diminish the priority of the lien for
personal property taxes.

       Nebraska's Uniform Commercial Code does not cast doubt on the first priority
of personal property tax liens. As the district court held, the version of the U.C.C. in
effect in Nebraska at the time this dispute arose expressly did not apply to tax liens
arising under state statute. MBA Poultry, 261 B.R. at 11-12 (citing Neb. U.C.C. § 9-
102(2));4 see also Malakoff v. Washington, 434 A.2d 432, 434-35 (D.C. App. 1981).

       Bird Watchers asserts that we have previously held the U.C.C. applicable to tax
liens. It is true that in United States v. Trigg, 465 F.2d 1264, 1268 (8th Cir. 1972),
we held that the United States was a lien creditor under the U.C.C. by virtue of a
federal tax lien. In Trigg, however, we were applying the Federal Tax Lien Act,
which Congress enacted "to bring federal tax lien law into conformity with the
concepts of the Uniform Commercial Code." Dragstrem v. Obermeyer, 549 F.2d 20,
26 (7th Cir. 1977). Bird Watchers has not pointed to any Nebraska law comparable
to the Federal Tax Lien Act, and so we decline to apply Trigg to the facts of this case.

       We also decline Bird Watchers's invitation to decide whether Johnson County
has a valid lien under Nebraska law, because that issue was not raised in either the
bankruptcy court or the district court. We hold only that if Johnson County has such
a lien, it is superior to Bird Watchers's interest in the property.

III. CONCLUSION
     The bankruptcy court and the district court correctly ruled that if Johnson
County has a valid lien for the personal property taxes MBA Poultry failed to pay,

       4
       The version of Article 9 of the Nebraska U.C.C. cited by the district court
expired on June 30, 2001. On July 1, 2001, a revised version of Article 9 or the
U.C.C., including a revised provision as to its scope, went into effect. See Neb.
U.C.C. § 9-109 [Operative July 1, 2001].

                                          -6-
then its lien is superior to the security interest Bird Watchers purchased from Heller.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Johnson County's motion
to dismiss and motion for attorney fees are both denied.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                         -7-
