
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1385                                 FRED L. MURRAY, JR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                               TRANS UNION CORPORATION,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Cyr and Stahl,                                     Circuit Judges.                                    ______________                                 ____________________            Fred L. Murray on brief pro se.            ______________            Mark E.  Kogan,  Bruce S.  Luckman,  Marion,  Satzberg, Trichon  &            ______________   _________________   _____________________________        Kogan, P.C. and Robinson & Cole on brief for appellee.        ___________     _______________                                 ____________________                                   December 3, 1996                                 ___________________                 Per Curiam.  Pro  se plaintiff Fred L. Murray  appeals a                 __________   ___  __            district  court  order  that  granted  defendant Trans  Union            Corporation  summary  judgment   on  Murray's  complaint  for            violations  of the  Fair Credit Reporting  Act, 15  U.S.C.               1681e(b) and  1681i(a) and (c), the  Equal Credit Opportunity            Act, 15 U.S.C.    1691-1691f, and various common  law claims.            This  court  has  thoroughly  reviewed  the  record  and  the            parties'  claims on appeal.   We agree  that summary judgment            was properly entered for  the reasons stated in the  district            court's memorandum and order.1   Accordingly, the judgment of                                         1            the  district court  is  summarily affirmed.  See Local  Rule                                     _________ ________   ___            27.1.   Murray's motion for  sanctions, motion to  compel and            continue  discovery,  and  motion  to  amend  district  court            complaint and add supplemental pleading are denied.                                                        ______                                            ____________________               1 We add that the record fails to establish a violation of               1            15 U.S.C.  1681i.                                         -2-
