
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1740                                    HERTZL  SINAI,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              GABRIEL O. DUMONT, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Lynch, Circuit Judge,                                        _____________                        Bownes and Cyr, Senior Circuit Judges.                                        _____________________                                 ____________________            Hertzl Sinai on brief pro se.            ____________                                 ____________________                                  February 12, 1998                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.   Pro se  plaintiff  Herzl Sinai  appeals a                 ___________    ___ __            district  court order  that dismissed  his  complaint on  the            ground that it has no arguable basis in law under 28 U.S.C.              1915(e).  This  court has thoroughly reviewed  the record and            Sinai's brief  on appeal.   We agree  that the  complaint was            properly  dismissed, for the  reasons stated by  the district            court.   Accordingly, the  judgment of the  district court is            summarily affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.                      ________   ___                                         -2-
