     Case: 12-60257       Document: 00512148865         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/20/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 20, 2013
                                     No. 12-60257
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

GERSON MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, also known as Gerson Martinez, also known
as Herson Hernandez-Martinez,

                                                  Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                  Respondent


                        Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                BIA No. A089 936 441


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
       Gerson Martinez-Martinez, a native and citizen of the Republic of
Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)
dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his
application for withholding of removal. Martinez contends that the BIA erred
because he established past persecution by gang members on account of his
membership in a particular social group and that there is a clear probability of


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-60257     Document: 00512148865      Page: 2    Date Filed: 02/20/2013

                                  No. 12-60257

future persecution against him if he returns to Honduras. He argues for the first
time that his family is a social group because it was the target of the gang
attacks.    In reviewing the order of the BIA, the court will also consider the
underlying decision of the IJ because it had an influence on the BIA’s decision.
See Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Questions of law are
reviewed de novo, while a substantial evidence test applies to factual findings.
Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001). Whether an alien
has demonstrated eligibility for withholding of removal is a factual
determination reviewed for substantial evidence. Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d
1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006). This court will affirm the BIA’s determination
“unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion.” Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,
78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). To qualify for withholding of removal, Martinez
must show that it is more likely than not that his life or freedom would be
threatened by persecution on account of his race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. See Mwembie v.
Gonzales, 443 F.3d 405, 410 n.9 (5th Cir. 2006).
      To the extent that Martinez raises an argument that he is a member of a
social group composed of his family that is subject to persecution, this court lacks
jurisdiction to consider this argument because the newly-raised claim was not
exhausted. See Said v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 668, 670-71 (5th Cir. 2007). Insofar
as Martinez presented evidence that the gang harmed and threatened him
because he was a member of a group with financial means, this court has
determined that economic extortion is not a form of persecution under
immigration law and that the wealthy group of individuals that are the targets
of the extortion are not a particular social group entitled to protection. See
Castillo-Enriquez v. Holder, 690 F.3d 667, 668 (5th Cir. 2012).            Nor did
Martinez’s generalized fear of violence and disorder caused by the gang subject
him to persecution. See Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 190 (5th Cir. 2004).



                                         2
    Case: 12-60257    Document: 00512148865       Page: 3   Date Filed: 02/20/2013

                                 No. 12-60257

      In light of the evidence presented, the BIA’s determination that Martinez
failed to demonstrate that he was persecuted or threatened with persecution
based on his membership in a particular social group was substantially
reasonable. Nor has Martinez presented any compelling evidence showing a
likelihood that he will be subject to future persecution in Honduras. Martinez
has failed to carry his burden of showing that the IJ or the BIA erred in denying
his application for the withholding of removal.
      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.




                                       3
