









Affirmed and Opinion filed April 24, 2003








Affirmed and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO.
14-02-01231-CR
____________
 
MARCUS CARVEN MOORE, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On
Appeal from the 230th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial
Court Cause No. 926,849
 

 
M
E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of
aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. 
On November 7, 2002, appellant entered into a post-conviction agreement
to accept a sentence of ten years in prison in exchange for the abandonment of
one of the enhancement paragraphs in the indictment.  As part of his agreement, appellant signed a
written waiver of the right to appeal. 
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.




Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a
professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991).  As of this date, no pro se
response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Opinion
filed April 24, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice
Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R.
App. P. 47.2(b).

