     Case: 16-41601      Document: 00514236274         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/14/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                          United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-41601
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                       November 14, 2017
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAIME ELARIO RAMOS-CALLEROS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:16-CR-1063-1


Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jamie Elario
Ramos-Calleros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).             Ramos-Calleros has not filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-41601    Document: 00514236274     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/14/2017


                                 No. 16-41601

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review, especially in light of the
district court’s statement that Ramos-Calleros’s sentence was appropriate
irrespective of the Guidelines range. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
