









Affirmed and Opinion filed November 21, 2002








Affirmed and Opinion filed November 21, 2002.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO.
14-02-00430-CR
____________
 
FELIX E. GUERRERO, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On
Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial
Court Cause No. 864,095
 

 
O
P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
possession with intent to deliver at least 400 grams of cocaine.  After a pre-sentence investigation report and
a punishment hearing, on April 17, 2002, the trial court found appellant guilty
and sentenced him to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a $1,000
fine.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of
appeal.




Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he
concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396
(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. 
See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se
response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Opinion
filed November 21, 2002.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Hudson and Fowler.
Do not publish C Tex. R.
App. P. 47.3(b).           

