               United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 18-1097
                      ___________________________

                            Eddie LaReece Pittman

                     lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

                                    ABB Inc.

                     lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                    ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
             for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
                               ____________

                        Submitted: September 5, 2018
                         Filed: September 10, 2018
                               [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
        Eddie Pittman appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se Title VII
action against his former employer, ABB Inc. Upon careful de novo review, see
Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158-59 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard
of review), this court agrees with the district court’s conclusion that Pittman failed
to state claims of race discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under
Title VII, see Young v. Builders Steel Co., 754 F.3d 573, 577 (8th Cir. 2014)
(discussing requirements for race-discrimination claim); Jackman v. Fifth Judicial
Dist. Dep’t of Corr. Servs., 728 F.3d 800, 804 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing
requirements for retaliation claim); Singletary v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 423 F.3d 886,
892-93 (8th Cir. 2005) (discussing requirements for hostile-work-environment claim).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Willie J. Epps, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

                                         -2-
