     Case: 11-10123     Document: 00511688500         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/07/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         December 7, 2011
                                     No. 11-10123
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO JAIMES-HERRERA, also known as Mandarino,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:09-CR-289-3


Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Jaimes-Herrera has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes-Herrera has filed a response in which he requests the
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 11-10123   Document: 00511688500      Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/07/2011

                                  No. 11-10123

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, Jaimes’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel
is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                        2
