                                                                                              ACCEPTED
                                                                                         06-14-00062-CV
                                                                               SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                    TEXARKANA, TEXAS
                                                                                    2/23/2015 2:10:25 PM
                                                                                         DEBBIE AUTREY
                                                                                                  CLERK

                                                     ORAL ARGUMENTS REQUESTED

                                                                       FILED IN
                                  No. 06-14-00062-CV            6th COURT OF APPEALS
                          IN THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS           TEXARKANA, TEXAS
                                TEXARKANA, TEXAS                2/23/2015 2:10:25 PM
                                                                    DEBBIE AUTREY
                                                                        Clerk

_____________________________________________________________________________


                             KRISTA LYNNE GARDNER

        INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LARRY RAY TINER,
                               Appellant

                                           v.

                              PENNY HEDDIN TINER,
                                    Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________________________


                                   On Appeal From the
                              402nd Judicial District Court
                            Trial Court Case Number 2006-404

_____________________________________________________________________________________

                      REPLY BRIEF FOR THE APPELLANT
________________________________________________________________________________




LAWRENCE L. BEASON
SBA# 01991000
416 N. Pacific Street
Mineola, Texas 75773
Telephone: 903-569-2627
Telefax: 903-569-9674

Attorney for Appellant


                                           1
                                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

ARGUMENT and AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

PRAYER FOR RELIEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6




                                                                    2
                                          INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Cases:                                                                                                          Page

Bushell vs. Dean, 803 SW@D 711,712 (Tex 1991) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Keen vs. Weaver, 121 S.W. 3d 721 (2005) cert. denied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4




                                                            3
TO THE HONORABLE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS:
                                          INTRODUCTION
       Penny Tiner (Penny) has filed a brief in response to the one filed by Krista Lynne Gardner

(Gardner), Independent Executrix of the estate of Larry Ray Tiner in this appeal. Gardner now

files this reply and requests, based on the argument herein, as well as those found in her opening

Brief, that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and rendered or, in the alternative,

Iremanded for proceedings consistent with the rulings of this Court.


                                 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES


       This appeal reminds one of two ships passing in the night. Penny, the Appellee, cites only

one case in her brief. In that case, Bushell v. Dean, 803 S.W.2d 711, 712 (Tex. 1991), the

Appellee complains of the timeliness of Appellant raising the issue of unjust enrichment. The

entire controversy here is about unjust enrichment of the former wife who voluntarily waived any

claim to the retirement benefits of Larry Ray Tiner, deceased, and now receives such benefits.

Appellee does not question, distinguish or counter the authorities cited in Gardner’s brief. Instead,

Appellee’s brief is devoted to the proposition that, under the Texas Family Code, §9.302(e)

provides that this section “does not apply to the disposition of a beneficial interest in the retirement

benefit or other financial plan of a public retirement system as defined by §802.001, Government

Code. Nowhere in Appellee’s brief does she address the federal law cases concerning waiver by

a former spouse after a divorce. The Texas Supreme Court in Keen v. Weaver, 121 SW3d 721

(2005), cert denied held that (i) ERISA expressly preempted application of the Texas

redesignation statute, but (ii) that applying the federal common law of waiver to former wife’s

waiver of ERISA plan benefits did not implicate or interfere with ERISA’S anti-alienation process;

and (iii) that former wife’s waiver of any interest in employee’s ERISA plans was enforceable

under federal common law. Keen, supra, required that a waiver by a former spouse must be

specific, knowing and voluntary in order to be enforceable. Penny’s waiver here was all of these.

                                                   4
She filed the divorce proceeding and knowingly, voluntarily and specifically waived any and all

rights and interest in Larry Tiner’s retirement benefits in the Property Settlement Agreement. This

action on her part makes her waiver under federal common law enforceable. And so it should be.

The couple’s Property Settlement Agreement was also a written contract between the parties that

should not be breeched. The law and the equity demand this result for Debbie, the surviving

spouse, as one entitled to Larry’s retirement benefits both as a surviving spouse and as a specific

beneficiary in his Will.


                              CONCLUSION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF


        Based upon the foregoing facts and authorities, the Executrix Appellant asks (i) that

the judgment of the trial court be reversed and judgment be rendered in her favor; (ii) in the

alternative, she asks that the judgment be reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent

with this Court’s opinion and (iii) and further, in the alternative, if this Court decides that Penny

is entitled to any part of Larry’s retirement benefits with ERS, then she should be awarded

$1,00.00 only under the provisions of Paragraph IV of Larry’s Last Will andTestament. The

Executrix seeks reversal on the grounds stated herein as well as in equity, interest of justice

and fairness; she also asks for any and all additional relief to which she may be entitled either

in law or equity.

                                                              _____/s/ Lawrence L. Beason

                                                              Lawrence L. Beason
                                                              SBA #01991000
                                                              416 N. Pacific Street
                                                              Mineola, TX 75773
                                                              Telephone: 903-569-2627
                                                              Telefax: 903-569-9674

                                                              ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT




                                                 5
                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was
forwarded to the following counsel of record, via regular U.S. mail with proper postage affixed on
this 23rd day of February, 2015.

William Brandon Baade
522 Broadway Ave.
Tyler, TX 75702


                                                             /s/ Lawrence L. Beason
                                                             Lawrence L. Beason




                                                 6
