  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

      IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT
                  LITIGATION
           -------------------------

                   SYNOPSYS, INC.,
                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

                            v.

               RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
                  Defendant-Appellant.
               ---------------------

               RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
                      Plaintiff,

                            v.

        AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC
  SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC.,
MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH,
INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.,
                   Defendants.
             ______________________

                       2012-1522
                 ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge
James Ware.
                   ______________________

                        JUDGMENT
                   ______________________


      RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of
Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee.
With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN.

      KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With
him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M.
CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H.
RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California.

                    ______________________


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

       PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judg-
es).

             AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


                         ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



March 12, 2012                  /s/ Jan Horbaly
   Date                             Jan Horbaly
                                       Clerk
