     Case: 18-60680      Document: 00514941933         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/03/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 18-60680                             May 3, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

HORACE M. RUTLEDGE, JR.,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Mississippi
                             USDC No. 1:17-CR-116-1


Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Horace M. Rutledge, Jr. has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rutledge has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rutledge’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-60680    Document: 00514941933     Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/03/2019


                                 No. 18-60680

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
