     Case: 10-20236 Document: 00511382394 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          February 15, 2011
                                     No. 10-20236
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE ALEJANDRO CARRILLO SIFUENTES, also known as Jorge Alejandro
Carrillo, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carillo-Sifuentes, also known as George
Alex Tarin, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carrillo-Sifuentes,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:09-CR-592-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Alejandro
Carrillo Sifuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Carrillo Sifuentes
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s
brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-20236 Document: 00511382394 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2011

                                No. 10-20236

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
