






Becker v. State







COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS






BERTHA SALAZAR,

                            Appellant,

v.

JOSE MONSIVAIS, M.D.,

                            Appellee.

§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 § 


No. 08-06-00143-CV

Appeal from the

41st District Court
of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2006-1159)



 

 

 




MEMORANDUM OPINION

            This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Finding that the Appellant has failed to file a brief or respond
to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal.
            On August 4, 2006, this Court informed Appellant by letter that her brief was past due and
no motion for extension of time had been filed.  The Court advised Appellant that her appeal would
be dismissed unless she responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be
continued.  See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8.  No reply has been filed.
            This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the
appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for
such failure.  Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63
(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ).  We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a
response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none.  We see no
purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. 
Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b), 42.3(c), and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution.

September 21, 2006                                                     
                                                                                    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.
Barajas, C.J., not participating
