
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ____________________        No. 93-2156                                              EDWIN SANCHEZ,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________        No. 93-2157                                   RAFAEL SANCHEZ,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                   ________________                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                  _________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Edwin Sanchez on brief pro se.            _____________            Cheryl J. Sturm on brief for appellant Rafael Sanchez.            _______________            Donald  K. Stern,  United States  Attorney, and  Heidi E. Brieger,            ________________                                 ________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                  November 29, 1994                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   The  district court's  denial of  the                      __________            motions to  vacate sentence under  28 U.S.C.   2255  filed by            appellants  Edwin  and  Rafael Sanchez  is  affirmed  for the                                                        ________            reasons stated  in the  district court's  September 14,  1993            memorandum and order.                                         -2-
