     Case: 10-41118     Document: 00511891092         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/19/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 19, 2012
                                     No. 10-41118
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ELIAS SALINAS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:08-CR-164-3


Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Jose Elias Salinas has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Salinas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Salinas’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 10-41118   Document: 00511891092   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/19/2012

                              No. 10-41118

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2
