J-S89036-16


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                      IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                        PENNSYLVANIA
                      v.

JHILEEL BURTON

                             Appellant                No. 1055 EDA 2016


                  Appeal from the PCRA Order March 11, 2016
     in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division
                       at No(s): CP-46-CR-0000116-2013

BEFORE: SHOGAN, MOULTON, and FITZGERALD,* JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.:                      FILED APRIL 07, 2017

        Appellant, Jhileel Burton, appeals from the order of the Montgomery

County Court of Common Pleas denying his Post Conviction Relief Act1

(“PCRA”) petition. Appellant’s counsel, John W. Aitchison, Esq., has filed an

Anders brief,2 which we shall regard as a Turner/Finley brief.3 We remand



*
    Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
1
    42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546.
2
    Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
3
  Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988); Commonwealth
v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (en banc). We reiterate that
“[c]ounsel petitioning to withdraw from PCRA representation must
proceed not under Anders but under [Turner and Finley].”
Commonwealth v. Wrecks, 931 A.2d 717, 721 (Pa. Super. 2007)
(emphasis added). However, “[b]ecause an Anders brief provides greater
protection to a defendant, this Court may accept an Anders brief in lieu of a
Turner/Finley letter.” Commonwealth v. Widgins, 29 A.3d 816, 817 n.2
(Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted).
J-S89036-16


the record in this matter and direct counsel to file a separate petition to

withdraw from representation in this Court.

      Instantly, Appellant’s counsel has not filed a separate petition to

withdraw as counsel in this Court. Counsel’s brief includes, as appendices, a

petition to withdraw from representation and a copy of a letter informing

Appellant of his right to proceed pro se or with new counsel. App. D & Ex. A.

to “Anders” Brief. The petition to withdraw refers to an attached certificate

of service. Although counsel has certified that he served a copy of the brief,

which would presumably include the appendix and exhibit, we cannot find a

copy of a separate certificate of service for counsel’s petition to withdraw or

his letter to Appellant.

      It is well settled that

         PCRA counsel seeking to withdraw contemporaneously
         forward to the petitioner a copy of the application to
         withdraw that includes (i) a copy of both the “no-merit”
         letter, and (ii) a statement advising the PCRA petitioner
         that . . . the petitioner has the right to proceed pro se, or
         with the assistance of privately retained counsel.

Widgins, 29 A.3d at 818 (citations omitted).

      Thus, when confronted with the filing of a no-merit brief and a request

to withdraw in this Court, this Court’s threshold duty is to ensure that the

appellant has been provided with adequate notice of his counsel’s intent to

withdraw from representation.     See id.     Accordingly, in an abundance of

caution to ensure proper notice to Appellant, we direct counsel to file a

separate petition to withdraw in this Court and inform Appellant of his rights


                                     -2-
J-S89036-16


on appeal.     See Widgins, 29 A.2d at 818.       Counsel shall also submit a

certification that Appellant has been served with the petition, counsel’s no-

merit brief, and a letter informing Appellant of his right to proceed

immediately either pro se or with private counsel. Counsel shall comply with

within fourteen days of this decision. Appellant shall have thirty days from

the date of counsel’s service of his petition and accompanying documents to

respond or seek an extension of time to respond in this Court. The record

shall be remanded to the trial court for a period not to exceed forty-five

days.

        Record remanded with instructions. Panel jurisdiction retained.

Judgment Entered.




Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary

Date: 4/7/2017




                                      -3-
