

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 26, 2010.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-09-01051-CR
____________
 
KEITH A. WASHINGTON, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 183rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1222763
 

 
MEMORANDUM
 OPINION
After a trial to the court, appellant was convicted of the
third-degree felony of assault of a public servant.  On December 9, 2009, the
trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant
filed a timely notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirement
of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting
a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant
was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim.
App.1991).  As of this date, more than sixty days has passed and no pro se
response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders
brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable
grounds for review.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Panel consists of Chief Justice
Hedges and Justices Yates and Sullivan.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

