       In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                            No. 14-63V
                                      Filed: October 8, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                             UNPUBLISHED
SEAN NEWMAN,                                  *
                                              *             Special Master Dorsey
               Petitioner,                    *
                                              *
v.                                            *
                                              *             Joint Stipulation on Damages;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *             Influenza (Flu) vaccine; Guillain-
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *             Barré Syndrome (GBS); Attorneys’
                                              *             Fees and Costs; Reasonable Amount
               Respondent.                    *             which Respondent Does not Object.
                                              *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller, Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Justine E. Daigneault, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                            DECISION1

        On January 24, 2014, Sean Newman (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).
Petitioner alleged that he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) that was caused in fact by
an influenza (“flu”) vaccination that he received on February 10, 2011. See Petition at 1-2.
Petitioner further alleged that he experienced the residual effects of these injuries for more than
six months. Id. at 3.

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                  1
       On October 7, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be
entered awarding compensation.

        Respondent denies that the influenza immunization caused petitioner’s GBS or any other
injury or his current condition. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached
hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the
decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       (a) A lump sum of $125,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This
           amount represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
           U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       (b) A lump sum of $18,117.45, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner
           and petitioner’s counsel, Maximillian J. Muller, Esq., at Muller Brazil, LLP, for
           attorneys’ fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15€; and, in compliance
           with General Order #9, no out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by petitioner in
           proceeding on the petition.

       Stipulation ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                              s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                 2
