              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

                       NO. 2017-IA-01637-SCT

VINOD KHOSLA, KFT TRUST, VINOD KHOSLA,
TRUSTEE, SAMIR KAUL, DENNIS CUNEO, VK
SERVICES, LLC, KHOSLA VENTURES, LLC,
KHOSLA VENTURES ASSOCIATES II, LLC,
KHOSLA VENTURES II, L.P., KHOSLA
VENTURES III, L.P., KHOSLA VENTURES
ASSOCIATES III, LLC, FRED CANNON,
CHRISTOPHER A. ARTZER, ANDRE DITSCH,
JOHN HACSKAYLO, RALPH ALEXANDER, DR.
WILLIAM ROACH AND GARY L. WHITLOCK

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EX REL. JIM HOOD

DATE OF JUDGMENT:              11/06/2017
TRIAL JUDGE:                   HON. WILLIAM A. GOWAN, JR.
TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS:         WILLIAM M. QUINN, II
                               W. THOMAS McCRANEY, III
                               LINDSEY B. SILVER
                               WILLIAM C. BRABEC
                               MICHAEL G. BONGIORNO
                               HIRAM RICHARD DAVIS, JR.
                               PETER J. KOLOVOS
                               LEAH N. LEDFORD
                               KIP MENDRYGAL
                               JAMES POTTER STREETMAN, III
                               PAUL E. COGGINS
                               J. DOUGLAS MINOR, JR.
                               ALICIA N. NETTERVILLE
                               DEAN KIEHL
                               ROY D. CAMPBELL, III
                               JAN NIELSEN LITTLE
                               JUSTINA K. SESSIONS
                               STEVEN P. RAGLAND
                               MATTHEW WADE ALLEN
                               LEONARD D. VAN SLYKE, JR.
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:                  CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL
                                            DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS:                   J. DOUGLAS MINOR, JR.
                                            ROY D. CAMPBELL, III
                                            ALICIA N. NETTERVILLE
                                            JAN NIELSEN LITTLE
                                            STEVEN P. RAGLAND
                                            JUSTINA K. SESSIONS
                                            DEAN A. ZIEHL
                                            WILLIAM C. BRABEC
                                            H. RICHARD DAVIS
                                            MICHAEL G. BONGIORNO
                                            PETER J. KOLOVOS
                                            LINDSEY B. SILVER
                                            LEAH N. LEDFORD
                                            JAMES P. STREETMAN, III
                                            PAUL E. COGGINS
                                            KIP MENDRYGAL
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:                     WILLIAM M. QUINN II
                                            W. THOMAS McCRANEY III
NATURE OF THE CASE:                         CIVIL - INSURANCE
DISPOSITION:                                AFFIRMED AND REMANDED - 08/22/2019
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:

       EN BANC.

       KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶1.    This Court consolidated three cases from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District

of Hinds County for purposes of interlocutory appeal.1 Circuit Court District Seven,

comprised of Hinds County only, is a multi-judge district. The three cases were assigned

       1
        (1) Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. State, No. 2017-IA-01554-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22, 2019)
(Safeco); (2) Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State, No. 2017-IA-01558-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22, 2019)
(Liberty Mutual); (3) Vinod Khosla et al. v. State, No. 2017-IA-01637-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22,
2019) (Cannon). The parties refer to the third case as Cannon rather than Khosla because
the original complaint in the underlying action was styled Hood ex rel. Mississippi v. Fred
Cannon et al., No.: 15-CV-00017 (Hinds Cty. Circuit Court, 1st Jud. Dist., filed January 13,
2015) (Cannon).

                                              2
randomly to circuit court judges under Uniform Civil Rule of Circuit and County Court

Practice 1.05A. The original assignments were as follows:

          (1)   Safeco - Circuit Court Judge William Gowan

          (2)   Liberty Mutual - Senior Circuit Court Judge Tomie Green

          (3)   Cannon - Circuit Court Judge William Gowan

With the approval of Judge Green and Judge Gowan, Safeco and Cannon were reassigned

or transferred to Judge Green’s docket. Safeco and Cannon objected to the reassignments,

arguing that neither Judge Green nor Judge Gowan had the authority to make the

reassignments. To the extent that a court is authorized to transfer or reassign cases for those

reasons the majority has established in Safeco, we hold in this case that the trial court acted

within its discretion in transferring the case to another judge in the same court district. This

Court now has rescinded the order of consolidation and has deconsolidated the cases.

Regarding this case, because the trial court was within its discretion to reassign the case, we

affirm.

                         FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2.       Defendants in this case are, inter alia, former officers, directors, employees, and

investors of KiOR Inc., a startup biofuels company. The State lent KiOR $75 million to

construct its first commercial-scale production facility in Columbus, Mississippi. The facility

was completed in 2012. Operations were suspended in early 2014, however, and KiOR filed

for bankruptcy later that year.




                                               3
¶3.     In January 2015, the State sued Defendants, alleging fraudulent and negligent

misrepresentation, fraudulent and negligent omission, civil conspiracy, aiding and abetting,

and respondeat superior. The case was assigned randomly to Judge Gowan. He ordered the

complaint to be sealed, so the record is sealed for this interlocutory appeal as well. Several

amended complaints and motions to dismiss were filed afterward.

¶4.     On November 3, 2017—three weeks after briefing had ended on the last motion to

dismiss—Judge Gowan sua sponte reassigned the case to Judge Green. The order reads, in

toto,

                  ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE

        The undersigned Circuit Court Judge was assigned the above-styled cause.
        Upon agreement of the undersigned judge and Senior Judge, Tomie Green, the
        above-styled cause is hereby reassigned to Judge Green for judicial economy.

¶5.     Judge Green agreed to the reassignment.

¶6.     In response to the order, Defendants petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus,

which the Court treated as a petition for interlocutory appeal. We granted review and a stay

of the trial court proceedings and consolidated Cannon with Safeco and Liberty Mutual for

appeal. Today we have deconsolidated the three cases, and a separate decision is being

handed down for each.

¶7.     The Cannon defendants argue that Judge Gowan did not have the authority to transfer

or reassign Cannon to Judge Green. On December 7, 2017, Judge Gowan filed a response

to Cannon’s petition under the Safeco docket number before this Court. In his response,

Judge Gowan submitted that Cannon



                                              4
       involves extensive and complex litigation, which requires the utmost attention
       from the judge presiding over the matter. . . . Before the transfer of this case,
       this [c]ourt was concerned with the fact that Judge Gowan, the presiding judge
       at the time, would not be the presiding judge for the duration of the litigation.
       The above-listed reasons led to the transfer of this case to Senior Judge Tomie
       Green for reassignment or for her adoption of the case.

¶8.    On February 22, 2018, the State filed a motion to consolidate another cause with

Cannon, namely: KiOR, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. Fred Cannon et al., No.: 16-CV-00656

(Hinds Cty. Circuit Court, 1st Jud. Dist., filed Nov. 8, 2016) (KLT). KLT was pending on the

docket of then-Hinds County Circuit Judge Jeff Weill.2 The State alleged that both actions

“involve common defendants, an overwhelming number of overlapping facts and

circumstances, common witnesses . . . and common documentary evidence” and would

conform to Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 42 by avoiding inconsistent rulings. The

Cannon defendants argued the motion was a “bald attempt . . . for the State to create an

after-the-fact justification for Judge Gowan’s transfer.” We granted requests lifting the stay

in Cannon to allow the parties to supplement the record of actions pending before the trial

court regarding consolidation. Judge Weill stayed KLT pending the outcome of this

interlocutory appeal.

¶9.    On appeal the State and Defendants assert several different issues; but the question

before the Court, as it pertains to Cannon, is

       May trial court judges in a multi-judge district reassign cases amongst
       themselves?



       2
        KiOR, Inc., Liquidating Trust is a trust created by and through the KiOR, Inc.,
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding to pursue former KiOR claims and causes of actions for
the benefit of creditors.

                                              5
¶10.   To the extent that a court is authorized to transfer or reassign cases for those reasons

the majority has established in Safeco, we answer in the affirmative, and find no abuse of

discretion here. We therefore affirm the decision of the circuit court to reassign or transfer

the present case from Judge Gowan to Judge Green, we lift the stay of the lower court

proceedings, and we remand the case to the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of

Hinds County for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.3

¶11.   AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

     KING, P.J., CONCURS. MAXWELL, BEAM AND CHAMBERLIN, JJ.,
CONCUR IN PART AND IN RESULT WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN
OPINION. RANDOLPH, C.J., DISSENTS WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION
JOINED BY ISHEE AND GRIFFIS, JJ. GRIFFIS, J., DISSENTS WITH SEPARATE
WRITTEN OPINION JOINED BY COLEMAN AND ISHEE, JJ.; RANDOLPH, C.J.,
JOINS IN PART.

       RANDOLPH, CHIEF JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶12.   Consistent with today’s Safeco4 holding, I respectfully dissent. Judge Gowan’s

reassignment to Judge Green does not evidence a reasonable, legitimate, or justifiable basis.

Pending retirement does not absolve judges of their duty to hear cases assigned to them.



       3
         Specifically regarding Cannon, we do not decide whether consolidation with KLT
was an appropriate basis for reassignment to Judge Green. No law prohibited Judge
Gowan’s transfer of Cannon to another judge’s docket, as long as that judge consented. As
determined in this Court’s decision in Safeco, Judge Gowan’s order of reassignment was not
inconsistent with any law of this State. The action was consistent with the authority of the
trial courts of Mississippi to control their dockets, and Judge Gowan and Judge Green were
in agreement. See Harris v. Fort Worth Steel & Mach. Co., 440 So. 2d 294 (Miss. 1983);
United States v. Stone, 411 F.2d 597 (5th Cir. 1969). Whether Cannon and KLT should be
consolidated is an issue for the parties and trial judges to decide on remand, particularly
since the State’s motion to consolidate Cannon and KLT is pending in the trial court.
       4
           Safeco Ins. Co. of Amer. v. State, No. 2017-IA-01554-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22, 2019).

                                              6
Furthermore, Judge Green’s declaration in cases pending before her, that “overcrowded civil

and criminal dockets, and other administrative duties” forced her to appoint a special master

in numerous cases, does not align with reassignment to her docket. This case should be

remanded to the judicial seat to which it was originally, randomly assigned, the Seventh

Circuit Court District, Subdivision Four.

         ISHEE AND GRIFFIS, JJ., JOIN THIS OPINION.

         GRIFFIS, JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶13.     I respectfully dissent.

¶14.     This case is not related to Safeco5 or Liberty Mutual.6 The only commonality is that

all three cases were filed in Hinds County.

¶15.     This case was filed in Hinds County Circuit Court in January 2015. It initially was

assigned to Judge Gowan and, by order dated November 3, 2017, was transferred to Judge

Green. That order is the subject of this appeal.

¶16.     Here, the related case is styled KiOR, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. Fred Cannon et al.,

No. 16-cv-00656 (Hinds Cty. Circuit Court, 1st Jud. Dist., filed Nov. 8, 2016). It is currently

pending before Circuit Judge Adrienne Wooten, Subdistrict 1. KiOR, Inc. is not before this

Court.




         5
             Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. State, No. 2017-IA-01554-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22, 2019).
         6
             Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State, No. 2017-IA-015578-SCT (Miss. Aug. 22, 2019).

                                               7
¶17.   For the reasons stated in Safeco, I am of the opinion that no reason justifies the

reassignment of this case to Judge Green. Judge Green had no similar or related case

pending on her docket.

¶18.   Even were I to agree with Presiding Justice Kitchens’s reasoning on reassignment, the

case should be reassigned to Judge Wooten.

     COLEMAN AND ISHEE, JJ., JOIN THIS OPINION. RANDOLPH, C.J.,
JOINS THIS OPINION IN PART.




                                             8
