                               NO. 07-11-0248-CR
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                  AT AMARILLO

                                    PANEL A

                                OCTOBER 5, 2011
                        ______________________________


                            DIMAS MORENO, APPELLANT

                                      V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


                       _________________________________
  
              FROM THE 137[TH] DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

           NO. 2010-426,193; HONORABLE JOHN J. McCLENDON III, JUDGE

                        _______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
                             ABATEMENT AND REMAND
	Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, Dimas Moreno, was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams, in a drug free zone, and sentenced to fifteen years confinement.  On July 26, 2011, this Court dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction based on an untimely notice of appeal.  The dismissal was based on information contained in the judgment which reflected Appellant's sentencing date as April 21, 2011.  The notice of appeal filed on June 22, 2011, appeared untimely.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1) and 26.3.  Appellant filed a motion for rehearing supported by a copy of excerpts from the reporter's record demonstrating he was not sentenced until May 31, 2011, thereby making his notice of appeal timely.  The motion for rehearing was granted and the appeal was reinstated by order dated August 23, 2011.
	On September 26, 2011, the official court reporter's record was filed.  The record clearly reflects that although Appellant entered his plea on April 21, 2011, the trial court deferred sentencing to allow him to take care of some family issues.  The record also shows that Appellant was sentenced on May 31, 2011.  Because the sentencing date contained in a judgment is the critical date for determining our jurisdiction, and because the reporter's record clearly reflects that the actual sentencing date was May 31, 2011, the judgment contained in the appellate record contains inaccurate information.  
	We now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc reflecting a sentencing date of May 31, 2011.  We direct the trial court clerk to forward the judgment nunc pro tunc to the Clerk of this Court in a supplemental record on or before October 21, 2011.
	It is so ordered.
							Per Curiam
Do not publish.

