
 

 
 







IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS





NO. PD-0684-07


ROBERT ANTHONY PORTEOUS, Appellant

v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY



Hervey, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

O P I N I O N


	A jury convicted appellant of attempted capital murder of a police officer.  We granted
discretionary review to address the decision of the court of appeals that appellant was not entitled
to a self-defense instruction on this offense. (1)  The ground upon which we granted discretionary
review states:
	The Court of Appeals erred in holding that Penal Code Sec. 9.31(b)(2), limiting the
right to use force "to resist an arrest ... the actor knows is being made by a peace
officer" disentitled appellant to the justification of self defense, because the evidence
raised the possibility that appellant did not know an arrest was being made, that even
if the jury believed he knew the person suddenly advancing on him with a gun was
a peace officer, what appellant perceived in the circumstances was not an arrest
(lawful or unlawful) but an attack.

(Emphasis in original).

	Having examined the record and briefs and considered the arguments in the case, we have
determined that our decision to grant review was improvident.  We, therefore, dismiss appellant's
petition for discretionary review as improvident.

								Hervey, J.

Delivered: May, 7, 2008
Publish
1. 	See Porteous v. State, No. 01-06-00419-CR, 2007 WL 926535 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.],
March 29, 2007).
