UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.                                                                      No. 98-4078

ELIZABETH JEAN WOOD MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-97-611)

Submitted: June 23, 1998

Decided: July 23, 1998

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

C. Rauch Wise, WISE & TUNSTALL, Greenwood, South Carolina,
for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, William C.
Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Wood Martinez pled guilty to conspiring to use fraudu-
lent identification documents to make and utter counterfeit payroll
checks, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 513 (1994), 18 U.S.C.A. § 1028 (West
Supp. 1998). She appeals the 14-month sentence imposed on her,
arguing that the district court clearly erred in finding that she was a
manager or supervisor in the offense. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
Manual § 3B1.1(b) (1997). Because there was no evidence that Marti-
nez managed or supervised another participant in the offense, we
vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

John Wood, Martinez's brother, began making counterfeit payroll
checks on his computer in October 1996. Co-defendants Cindy Grif-
fin and Robert Horne cashed twelve counterfeit payroll checks total-
ing $3702 with false driver's licenses and Social Security cards
supplied by Wood, but ceased involvement after Horne was arrested
in November 1996. Thereafter, John Wood created false Wal-Mart
payroll checks which were cashed by Martinez and Ruby Wood (Mar-
tinez's mother) using false identification documents. Over the life of
the conspiracy, 141 counterfeit checks worth $43,089 were cashed. In
July 1997, John Wood and Martinez bought a computer store using,
in part, proceeds of the check cashing scheme. Using the name Lor-
raine Swanson, Martinez acted as the store owner. She and John
Wood also opened a bank account under false names.

To receive a three-level adjustment as a manager or supervisor, a
defendant must have managed or supervised at least one other partici-
pant in a criminal activity that involved at least five participants or
was otherwise extensive. See USSG § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2). A par-
ticipant is someone who is "criminally responsible" for the offense.
See USSG § 3B1.1, comment. (n.1). A defendant's role in the offense
is a factual question and we review the district court's determination

                    2
for clear error. See United States v. Reavis, 48 F.3d 763, 768 (4th Cir.
1995). The district court found that Martinez was a manager or super-
visor for the reasons set forth in the presentence report, i.e., that Mar-
tinez had worked with her brother to obtain the computer equipment
necessary to make the checks, rented the mini-warehouse, and pur-
chased the computer store with her brother. Martinez asserted at sen-
tencing that she had not rented the mini-warehouse.

While Martinez was undoubtedly active in carrying out the scheme,
the record is devoid of evidence that she managed or supervised any
other participant in the offense.* Consequently, the district court's
finding that Martinez was a manager or supervisor was clearly errone-
ous.

We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing
without the adjustment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
_________________________________________________________________
*In her appeal brief, Martinez also argues that she did not manage any
property for the conspiracy. However, only management or supervision
of a person will trigger the adjustment. See United States v. Capers, 61
F.3d 1100, 1108-09 (4th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that 1993 amendment
adding Application Note 2 made substantive change in this circuit's law).

                     3
