                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         For the Fifth Circuit

                      ___________________________

                              No. 00-30797
                      ___________________________


                         HARRY MENDOZA; ET AL,

                                                              Plaintiffs,

                     HARRY MENDOZA; NORVEL ORAZIO,

                                                    Plaintiffs-Appellees.


                                   VERSUS


                    THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL,


                       THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

          ___________________________________________________

             Appeal from the United States District Court
                 For the Eastern District of Louisiana
                              98-CV-2868-J
          ___________________________________________________
                            January 5, 2001

Before JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

     Appellants challenge the district court’s interpretation of

the consent decree at issue in this case.       For the reasons stated

by the district court in its order of May 31, 2000, we agree with

     *
      Judge, U.S.     Court   of    International    Trade,   sitting   by
designation.
     **
      Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree and

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.   Appellee’s motions0 to

supplement the record, to strike a portion of the brief, and to

strike the record are hereby DENIED.

     AFFIRMED.




                                2
