     Case: 12-20076       Document: 00512146642         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/19/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 19, 2013
                                     No. 12-20076
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO SANTIBANEZ RIVERA, also known as Francisco Hernandez
Santivanez, also known as Francisco Santibanez-Rivera, also known as
Francisco Rivera Santibanez, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santibanez,

                                        Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-600-1


Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Santibanez Rivera
(Santibanez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santibanez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-20076    Document: 00512146642    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/19/2013

                                No. 12-20076

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
