131 F.3d 150
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ezekiel Su-Chen-WANG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-50061.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 1997**Decided Nov. 21, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of, D.C. No. CR-96-00670-JMI-01;  James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding.
Before HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


1
MEMORANDUM*


2
Ezekiel Su-Chen Wang appeals his conviction and sentence for bank robbery.  His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Wang submitted a pro se supplemental brief.


3
Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.


4
AFFIRMED.



**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4


*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3


