
USCA1 Opinion

	




          February 3, 1995                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1742                                    SUBIR CHAKLADER,                                Petitioner, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                Respondent, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                          Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Subir Chaklader on brief pro se.            _______________            Donald  K. Stern,  United  States Attorney,  and Tobin  N. Harvey,            ________________                                 ________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.  Pro se prisoner Subir Chaklader appeals the                 __________            denial of his  motion to  vacate, set aside,  or correct  his            sentence under 28 U.S.C.  2255.   We have thoroughly reviewed            the  record  and  the parties'  briefs  on  appeal.   We  are            persuaded that Chaklader's motion was properly denied for the            reasons stated in the  district court's memorandum and order.            Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.                                                               ________
