                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                        _______________________

                              No. 99-60520
                        _______________________


GRAND OAKS, INC.,

                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

ARTHUR W. ANDERSON; JERRY
HOLLINGSWORTH,

                                                  Defendants-Appellants.


_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Northern District of Mississippi
                         (3:94-CV-159-S-D)
_________________________________________________________________
                           July 14, 2000

Before JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and WALTER*, District
Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

           The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the briefs, oral arguments and pertinent portions of the record.

Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact.               In

particular,     considering   Hollingsworth’s     crucial    role   in   the



     *
            District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by
designation.
     **
            Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
development    of   Grand   Oaks,   we   cannot   say   that   there   was

insufficient evidence under the Boeing standard to send this case

to the jury.    See Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5th

Cir. 1969).    As to Anderson, there was clearly sufficient evidence

to support the verdict.       The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

            AFFIRMED.




                                    2
