












 
 
 
 
 
 
                                      COURT
OF APPEALS
                                       SECOND
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                                   FORT
WORTH 
 
                                        NO.
2-06-312-CV
 
FANTASY
RANCH, INC.                                                        APPELLANT
                                                                                                        
 
                                                   V.
 
CITY
OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS                                                APPELLEES
AND LICENSE AND AMORTIZATION 
APPEAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF 
ARLINGTON,
TEXAS                                                                            
 
                                               ----------
            FROM THE 342ND
DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
                                               ----------
                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
                                               ----------




On December 4, 2006, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the court that
arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
35.3(a)(2).  TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated we
would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within
fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.  
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be
dismissed for want of prosecution.  
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 
See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
In addition, appellee=s Motion to Dissolve Post-Judgment Injunction is GRANTED.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a)(4).  The trial court=s orders suspending enforcement of the judgment are hereby vacated.
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution
issue.
 
PER
CURIAM                       
 
 
PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.                                       
DELIVERED: January 11, 2007
 




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


