              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,965


                           EX PARTE XAVIER POWELL, Applicant


                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 48857 IN THE 268th DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM FORT BEND COUNTY


         Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

         Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Powell v. State, No. 14-09-00398-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.], delivered April 21, 2011, no

pet.).

         Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of

his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.
                                                                                                      2

       Based on the record in this case, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions

of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed

and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court

recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

       We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-09-

00398-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 48857 from the 268th District Court of Fort

Bend County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.



Delivered: February 6, 2013
Do not publish
