                                        Slip Op. 17- 

                UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE


 UNITED STEEL AND FASTENERS,
 INC.,

        Plaintiff,

 v.

 UNITED STATES,
                                                 Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge
        Defendant,
                                                 Court No. 13-00270
 and

 SHAKEPROOF ASSEMBLY
 COMPONENTS DIVISION OF ILLINOIS
 TOOL WORKS INC.,

        Defendant-Intervenor.


                                          OPINION

[Sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s revised instructions suspending liquidation of
merchandise subject to the final scope ruling on American Railway Engineering and
Maintenance-of-Way Association washers.]

                                                                  Dated: April 17, 2017

Ned Herman Marshak and Andrew T. Schutz, Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman &
Klestadt, LLP, of New York, N.Y. and Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff United Steel and
Fasteners, Inc.

Michael Damien Snyder, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S.
Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for Defendant United States. With him on the brief
were Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M.
McCarthy, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Joanna Victoria Theiss, Attorney,
Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, of Washington, D.C.
Court No. 13-00270                                                                          Page 2


Raymond Paul Paretzky and David John Levine, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLC, of
Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of
Illinois Tool Works Inc.

       Choe-Groves, Judge: This matter returns to the court following the remand order in

United Steel and Fasteners, Inc. v. United States, 41 CIT __, 203 F. Supp. 3d 1235 (2017)

(“United Steel”). This court sustained the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”)

conclusion that American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association

(“AREMA”) washers were included within the scope of the antidumping duty order covering

certain helical spring lock washers from the People’s Republic of China (“China”), but remanded

Commerce’s instructions to suspend liquidation of AREMA washers. See id. at __, 203 F. Supp.

3d at 1241. In the final scope ruling, Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection

to collect cash deposits and suspend liquidation of all unliquidated entries of AREMA washers

retroactive to October 1993, which is the date that Commerce first suspended liquidation of

merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order. See Helical Spring Lock Washers from the

People’s Republic of China: Final Scope Ruling on Request from United Steel and Fasteners,

Inc. at 9, PD 12, bar code 3144783-01 (July 10, 2013). This court determined in United Steel

that the suspension instructions were unlawful because Commerce exceeded its authority by

ordering retroactive suspension of liquidation when issuing a final scope ruling that clarified the

scope of an order. See United Steel, 41 CIT at __, 203 F. Supp. 3d at 1255. The court ordered

Commerce to draft new suspension instructions accordingly. See id.

       Commerce filed revised suspension instructions with the court on February 6, 2017. See

Results of Redetermination, Feb. 6, 2017, ECF No. 54–54-1. The revised instructions “correct

the effective date of the suspension of liquidation” and suspend liquidation of AREMA washers
Court No. 13-00270                                                                      Page 3


imported by United Steel and Fasteners, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) from China entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after July 8, 2013, which is the date that Commerce issued the

final scope ruling. See id. at Annex ¶¶ 2, 5.

       Plaintiff and Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc.

(“Shakeproof”) filed comments on Commerce’s revised suspension instructions. See Pl.’s

Comments on Department of Commerce’s Results of Redetermination, Mar. 6, 2017, ECF No.

56 (“US&F Comments”); Comments of Def.-Intervenor on Commerce’s New Suspension

Instructions, Mar. 6, 2017, ECF No. 57 (“Shakeproof Comments”). Plaintiff commented that the

revised instructions comply with the court’s remand order. See US&F Comments 2. Shakeproof

maintained that Commerce’s original suspension instructions were lawful, but agreed that the

revised instructions comply with the court’s remand order. See Shakeproof Comments 1.

       The court finds that Commerce has complied with the court’s remand order and opinion

in United Steel by correcting the effective date to suspend liquidation of AREMA washers.

Because the revised suspension instructions comply with the court’s remand order and no party

challenges the instructions, Commerce’s remand redetermination is sustained.

       Judgment will be issued accordingly.

                                                               /s/ Jennifer Choe-Groves
                                                               Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge

 Dated: $SULO
      New York, New York
