       Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
       this Memorandum Decision shall not be
       regarded as precedent or cited before any
       court except for the purpose of
       establishing the defense of res judicata,
       collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.



ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                                  ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

KIMBERLY A. JACKSON                                      GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Indianapolis, Indiana                                    Attorney General of Indiana

                                                         KELLY A. MIKLOS
                                                         Deputy Attorney General
                                                         Indianapolis, Indiana
                                                                                       FILED
                                                                                   Feb 25 2013, 9:32 am
                                    IN THE
                          COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA                                       CLERK
                                                                                          of the supreme court,
                                                                                          court of appeals and
                                                                                                 tax court




ROBERT STOKES,                                           )
                                                         )
             Appellant-Defendant,                        )
                                                         )
                 vs.                                     )        No. 49A02-1206-CR-500
                                                         )
STATE OF INDIANA,                                        )
                                                         )
             Appellee-Plaintiff.                         )

                           APPEAL FROM THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT
                                The Honorable Grant Hawkins, Judge
                                  Cause No. 49G05-1112-MR-85729



                                              February 25, 2013

                       MEMORANDUM DECISION – NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MATHIAS, Judge



	  
	     Robert Stokes (“Stokes”) was convicted in Marion Superior Court of murder and Class B

felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.      Stokes appeals his

convictions and argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his

convictions.

We affirm.

                                Facts and Procedural History

       On March 31, 2010, Michael Conner (“Conner”) and Jerry Howard (“Howard”) drove to

the corner of Roberta Avenue and Kessler Boulevard in Indianapolis. Conner was driving his

car, and Howard was sitting in the passenger seat. While Howard was rolling a marijuana

cigarette, he heard a gun shot. Conner immediately began to drive away. As Conner did so,

Howard saw an African American man holding a black gun walk away from the car. During

their escape down Kessler Boulevard, Conner lost consciousness. Only then did Howard realize

that Conner had been shot. Howard managed to steer the car into a driveway at Kessler

Boulevard and Eugene Street.

       After stopping the car, Howard ran to the house and knocked on the door, and the

occupant called 911. Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Officers and paramedics arrived on the

scene soon thereafter. The paramedics treated Connor’s gunshot wound at the scene, but the

wound caused Connor to die shortly thereafter at Wishard Hospital.

       Later that day, Detective Gregory Sheid (“Detective Sheid”) of the Indianapolis

Metropolitan Police Department (“IMPD”) investigated the crime scene at Eugene and Kessler.

During his investigation, Detective Sheid recovered a bullet casing from the floor of the

passenger seat of Conner’s vehicle. Another bullet casing was recovered in the street at the

scene of the shooting at Roberta and Kessler, near some broken glass.




	                                             2	  
       IMPD Officer Matthew Addington (“Officer Addington”) was one of the first officers to

respond to the scene. Howard told Officer Addington that the suspects were driving a black, box

style, 80’s model Caprice with no hubcaps and all black tires. Tr. p. 59. Officer Addington

further testified that Howard was sweating and upset almost to the point of tears on the day of the

shooting. Howard wanted to leave and kept looking around as if expecting the suspects to return.

Tr. p. 60. Howard identified William Vest (“Vest”) in a photo array on April 13, 2010. Tr. p.

182; Ex. Vol., State’s Ex. 44 p. 58. At that time, Howard told Detective Sheid that Vest went by

the nickname Mook. Tr. p. 182.

       More than five months after the murder, on September 21, 2010, a Marion County

Sheriff’s Deputy interviewed Stokes after arresting him on an outstanding, but apparently

unrelated, warrant. During the interview, Stokes asked to speak with the FBI regarding a

homicide, and later that day, Stokes spoke with FBI Special Agent Steven Secor (“Agent

Secor”). During the interview, Stokes claimed that he was riding in a car with Maurice Phillips

(“Phillips”) when Conner was shot. According to Stokes, Phillips got into a fight with someone,

a gun discharged, and Phillips disposed of the gun in a lake. Stokes and Agent Secor drove to

the Lakes of Georgetown apartment complex. Stokes escorted Agent Secor to the edge of a large

lake behind the apartment complex and told the officers that Phillips allegedly threw the two

pieces of the gun into the lake from that location. Agent Secor testified at trial that during a later

meeting with Stokes, Stokes admitted that his story on September 21 was a lie. Stokes also

mentioned to Agent Secor that he preferred .40 caliber guns because a 9mm gun would not

effectively kill someone. Tr. p. 161.

       After Agent Secor confirmed that there was an unsolved homicide in the time frame

Stokes described, he began investigating Stokes’s story. During a training dive with the Pike

Township Fire Department, a firefighter found the receiver of a black, .40-caliber Glock handgun

	                                                3	  
a short distance from where Stokes originally told Agent Secor the gun was discarded. The

recovered .40-caliber Glock was already known to the police through its original owner and had

been test fired previously by the police. The crime lab’s records showed that the recovered

Glock left markings on bullet casings that mirrored those on the spent bullet casing found at the

scene.

                                                      At the time of the shooting, there were three women in Stokes’s life: Star Brown

(“Brown”), the mother of two of Stokes’s sons; Terran Larkin (“Larkin”), the woman Stokes was

living with at the time of the murder, and finally, Audriana Austin (“Austin”), Stokes’s girlfriend

after Larkin. IMPD and FBI investigations of the shooting revealed that Stokes had discussed

the events of March 31, 2010 with each of these women.

                                                      While testifying at trial, Brown could remember very little of her discussion with police.

However, Brown and Stokes had communicated while Stokes was in jail awaiting trial, and

Agent Secor listened to over forty of their conversations. During one conversation Stokes told

Brown that, “if she wronged him in some way that she, she and another person would be floating

in the White River.”1 Tr. p. 296.

                                                      Stokes and Larkin were living together at the Lakes of Georgetown Apartment complex

at the time of Conner’s murder. Larkin testified that Stokes told her that he took a gun apart and

threw it behind the apartment complex. Tr. p. 100. Larkin further testified that Stokes drove a

rented grey Impala, but Stokes’s younger brother, Vest, drove a black Chevy. Tr. p. 101. This

was consistent with Howard’s report to Officer Addington on the day of the shooting.

                                                      Austin saw Stokes on the evening of March 31, 2010. She testified that he appeared

nervous. Stokes told her that his younger brother, Vest, called Stokes and said that he had “got

into some things with some other dudes.” Tr. p. 80. Stokes had met Vest, and they got into an
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
1
 While this conversation pertained to another matter, not this particular prosecution, it could certainly
explain Brown’s poor memory at trial to a reasonable fact-finder.	  
	                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 4	  
altercation with the other men. As Stokes slapped one of the men in the face with the pistol, the

gun went off. At that point Stokes ran. Austin testified that Stokes appeared to be upset and

seemed to regret what happened.

       During Stokes’s trial, Howard was extremely reluctant to testify. He did not comply with

several subpoenas, even hand-delivered subpoenas. He appeared only after the court issued a

body attachment, and the judge told Howard that he would go to jail if he did not appear. During

his testimony, Howard did not want his statement to Detective Sheid to be read in court, and it

was not.

       On May 22, 2012, following a bench trial, Stokes was found guilty of murder and of

Class B felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. On May 30, 2012,

the trial court sentenced Stokes to sixty years of imprisonment for murder, and to a concurrent,

fifteen-year sentence for Class B felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent

felon. Stokes now appeals.

                                   Discussion and Decision

       Stokes argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that

he shot Conner or possessed a gun as charged. He does not challenge his classification as a

serious violent felon, however. Upon a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence to support a

conviction, we neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses; instead,

we respect the exclusive province of the trier of fact to weigh any conflicting evidence.

McHenry v. State, 820 N.E.2d 124, 126 (Ind. 2005). We consider only the probative evidence

and reasonable inferences supporting judgment, and we will affirm if the probative evidence and

reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence could have allowed a reasonable trier of fact to

find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Id.




	                                             5	  
        The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that Stokes told Larkin that he

dismantled a gun and threw it behind the Lakes of Georgetown Apartments. Behind the Lakes of

Georgetown Apartments is the lake where the receiver of a black .40-caliber Glock was

recovered. The gun was recovered a short distance from the spot where Stokes told Agent Secor

it had been thrown in the lake. Agent Secor testified that Stokes told him that his weapon of

choice is a .40-caliber gun. Previous test fires of the recovered Glock produced bullet casings

that mirrored the bullet casing recovered from the intersection where Conner was shot, Kessler

Boulevard and Roberta Street.

        Howard told Officer Addington on the day of the shooting that the suspects were driving

a black, box style, 80’s model Caprice with no hubcaps and all black tires. Larkin testified that

Stokes’s brother, Vest, drove a black Chevy. Austin testified that Stokes told her he had gotten

into a fight on the day of the shooting and his gun had gone off. She said he appeared nervous

and regretful. By suggesting that Brown would be floating in the White River if she wronged

him in any way, Stokes tried to intimidate Brown while he awaited trial.

        It is well-settled that circumstantial evidence can be sufficient to convict. Bockler v.

State, 908 N.E.2d 342, 346 (Ind. 2009). The facts set forth above, and the reasonable inferences

from those facts, are sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact, in this case a trial court judge, to find

that Stokes murdered Conner with the gun recovered from the lake and that Stokes was in

possession of that gun while a serious violent felon.

        Affirmed.

KIRSCH, J., and CRONE, J., concur.




	                                                  6	  
