                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

                                                )
                                                )
                                                )
 INTELSAT CORPORATION,                          )
                                                )
                Plaintiff,                      )
                                                )
        v.                                      )         Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-01644
                                                )         (ABJ) (AK)
 PALLYN INTERNATIONAL, INC.,                    )
                                                )
                Defendant                       )
                Counterclaim-Plaintiff,         )
                                                )
                                                )
                                                )


                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                     I. BACKGROUND

       Pending before the Court is a Motion for Default Judgment [7] by Plaintiff, Intelsat

Corporation, for breach of contract and quantum meruit/unjust enrichment. On May 25, 2011,

Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default [5] under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. The Clerk of Court

made an Entry of Default as to Defendant [6] on May 26, 2011. Plaintiff then filed a Motion for

Entry of Default Judgment [7] on June 7, 2011. The Motion was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge for determination pursuant to LCvR 72.2(a). An evidentiary hearing was held

on September 21, 2011, at which Defendant did not appear.
                                      II. DISCUSSION

       A. Standard for Default Judgment

       The clerk of court must enter a default “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for

affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by

affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Where the plaintiff’s claim is not for a sum

certain, the party must apply to the court for a default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). “The

determination of whether default judgment is appropriate is committed to the discretion of the

trial court.” Int’l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F.

Supp. 2d 56, 57 (D.D.C. 2008) (citing Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980)).

The standard for default judgment is satisfied where the defendant makes no request to set aside

the default and no suggestion that it has a meritorious defense. J.D. Holdings, LLC v. BD

Ventures, LLC, 766 F. Supp. 2d 109, 113 (D.D.C. 2011).

       Upon entry of default by the clerk of the court, the “defaulting defendant is deemed to

admit every well-pleaded allegation in the complaint.” U.S. v. Bentley, 756 F. Supp. 2d 1, 3

(D.D.C. 2010). The court must then make a determination of the sum to be awarded. Id. “The

court may rely on detailed affidavits or documentary evidence to determine the appropriate sum

for the default judgment.” Id.

       B. Analysis

       Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Master Service Agreement on October 17, 2007,

that called for subsequent Service Orders. (Pl.’s Exs. 1-2.) Service Order No. 20595 established

a monthly recurring service fee of $11,445.00. (Pl.’s Ex. 2.) Defendant became delinquent on




                                                 2
the Service Order charges, eventually compiling over nine months’ balance outstanding before

Plaintiff terminated service. (Pl.’s Ex. 4.)

       At the evidentiary hearing, Plaintiff offered John C. Nibecker as a witness. Mr. Nibecker

serves as Senior Manager of Credit and Collections for Intelsat Corp. Mr. Nibecker testified that

when he inquired about Defendant’s delinquent bill, Defendant gave reasons why service should

continue and asserted that it would pay its bill, prompting Plaintiff to continue service for a

longer period of time than it otherwise would for a delinquent account.

       Plaintiff requests $103,305.00 in outstanding invoices. (Pl.’s Ex. 4.) Plaintiff also

requests $36,613.34 in interest based on an 18% per annum rate as set out in the Master Service

Agreement. (Pl.’s Exs. 1, 5.) Therefore, the total amount requested is $139,918.34.

       The Clerk of Court’s Entry of Default as to Defendant [6] established Defendant’s

liability. Defendant offered no evidence prior to or at the evidentiary hearing disputing the sum

to be awarded.



                                       III. CONCLUSION

       For the foregoing reasons, this Court will grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment by

Default [7] and will award damages totaling $139,918.34.

       A separate Order of judgment will accompany this Opinion.




Date: September 23, 2011                              ________________/s/__________________
                                                      ALAN KAY
                                                      UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

                                                  3
