DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 18, 2014.




                                        S   In The
                               Court of Appeals
                        Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                     No. 05-14-00797-CV

                            CORNELL RIVERS, SR., Appellant
                                        V.
                            BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee

                       On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
                                   Dallas County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01611-A

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION
                           Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis
                                  Opinion by Justice Fillmore
       This is an action to enforce a post-foreclosure eviction. Appellee purchased the property

at a foreclosure sale on December 4, 2012 and made demand that appellant vacate the property

on December 17, 2012. The trial court signed its order enforcing the eviction and granting

possession of the property to appellee on April 4, 2013. No party filed a post-judgment motion

extending the appellate timetable. Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on or before May

4, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.

       Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 8, 2013, but moved to dismiss that appeal on

August 2, 2013. Appellant’s motion to dismiss was granted by this Court and the appeal was

dismissed on August 13, 2013. Subsequently, appellant filed a bankruptcy petition on November

18, 2013. Appellant filed a second notice of appeal in this Court on June 20, 2014, after the

dismissal of his bankruptcy case.
       By letter dated July 16, 2014, this Court notified appellant that it appeared his notice of

appeal was untimely and inquired about the status of the bankruptcy petition. Appellant filed a

letter brief on July 28, 2014, in which he stated that he filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on

November 18, 2013, which activated an automatic stay.             He further explained that the

bankruptcy court dismissed his petition on May 1, 2014. He argued in his letter brief that the

June 20, 2014 notice of appeal was timely because, while his bankruptcy was pending, the

automatic stay prevented either party from proceeding with litigation in any court with regard to

the property. He further argued that he filed his notice of appeal within thirty days of the

bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the case.

       In the absence of a post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, notice of

appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.

Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b).

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal but, at appellant’s request, we dismissed the appeal.

Appellant’s bankruptcy petition was filed on November 18, 2013, which was more than six

months after his notice of appeal was due on May 4, 2013. Accordingly, the bankruptcy did not

present an impediment to timely perfecting appellant’s appeal. Because this appeal was not filed

timely, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).




                                                      /Robert M. Fillmore/
                                                      ROBERT M. FILLMORE
                                                      JUSTICE



140797F.P05



                                                –2–
                                        S
                               Court of Appeals
                        Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      JUDGMENT

CORNELL RIVERS, SR., Appellant                     On Appeal from the County Court at Law
                                                   No. 1, Dallas County, Texas,
No. 05-14-00797-CV         V.                      Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01611-A.
                                                   Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore,
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee                    Justices Evans and Lewis participating.

        In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want
of jurisdiction.

       It is ORDERED that appellee Bank of America, N.A. recover its costs of this appeal
from appellant Cornell Rivers, Sr.


Judgment entered this 18th day of August, 2014.




                                             –3–
