Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
this Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before any
court except for the purpose of
establishing the defense of res judicata,
collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.


APPELLANT PRO SE:                                       Dec 18 2014, 10:17 am


WILLIAM TEMPLE, JR.
New Castle, Indiana




                             IN THE
                   COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

WILLIAM TEMPLE, JR.,                           )
                                               )
      Appellant-Defendant,                     )
                                               )
             vs.                               )      No. 33A01-1409-MI-373
                                               )
STATE OF INDIANA,                              )
                                               )
      Appellee-Plaintiff.                      )


                     APPEAL FROM THE HENRY CIRCUIT COURT
                        The Honorable Kit C. Dean Crane, Judge
                            Cause No. 33C02-1404-MI-52


                                  December 18, 2014

              MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BARTEAU, Senior Judge
                               STATEMENT OF THE CASE

       William Temple, Jr. appeals from the dismissal of his complaint for his failure to

comply with Indiana Code section 33-37-3-3 (2004). The State of Indiana has filed a

certificate of non-involvement in this appeal. We affirm.

                         FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

       Temple is incarcerated in the Department of Correction at the New Castle

Correctional Facility. As an inmate there, Temple has an offender trust fund account. On

April 28, 2014, Temple filed a document purporting to be an affidavit of indigency and a

request for legal representation, in addition to a pleading that appeared to be a prisoner’s

civil complaint.

       After receiving the documents, the trial court issued an order on May 29, 2014,

stating that Temple’s case could not be processed further and that all pleadings were to

pend until further action of the trial court. The trial court granted Temple forty-five days

from the date of the trial court’s order in which to comply with the provisions of Indiana

code section 33-37-3-3, and notified Temple that his case could be dismissed for failure to

do so. That statutory provision reads as follows:

       (a) When an offender confined by the department of correction commences
       an action or a proceeding without paying fees or other court costs under
       section 2 of this chapter, the offender shall obtain from the appropriate
       official of the correctional facility or facilities at which the offender is or was
       confined a certified copy of the prisoner’s trust fund account statement for
       the six (6) months immediately preceding submission of the complaint or
       petition. The offender shall file the trust fund account statement in addition
       to the statement required under section 2 of this chapter.

       (b) The offender shall pay a partial filing fee that is twenty percent (20%) of
       the greater of:

                                               2
       (1) the average monthly deposits to the offender’s account; or
       (2) the average monthly balance in the offender’s account;
       for the six (6) months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or
       petition. However, the fee may not exceed the full statutory fee for the
       commencement of actions or proceedings.

       ....

       (d) If the court approves the application to waive all fees, the court shall give
       written notice to the offender that all fees and costs relating to the filing and
       service will be waived. If the court denies the application to waive all fees,
       the court shall give written notice to the offender that the offender’s case will
       be dismissed if the partial filing fee is not paid not later than forty-five (45)
       days after the date of the order, or within an additional period that the court
       may, upon request, allow. Process concerning the offender’s case may not
       be served until the fee is paid.

       Temple complied with the trial court’s prior order and on June 18, 2014, filed an

indigency affidavit and a certification of his offender trust account as required by statute.

After reviewing Temple’s submissions to the trial court, on June 24, 2014, the trial court

determined that Temple was required to pay a partial filing fee of $1.67 in order for his

case to proceed. The trial court granted Temple forty-five days from the date of the order

to pay the partial filing fee and notified him that his case might be dismissed if he did not

comply.

       In the interim, on July 9, 2014, Temple filed a document with the trial court

contending that the trial court had failed to timely rule on his pleading. Temple did not

pay the partial filing fee of $1.67 within the time provided by the trial court’s order, nor

did he request additional time within which to do so. On July 14, 2014, the trial court

issued an order acknowledging Temple’s most recent submission to the trial court, and

reiterated that Temple had until August 8, 2014 to pay the partial filing fee or his case


                                              3
would be dismissed. On August 18, 2014, the trial court entered its order dismissing

Temple’s cause of action. Temple now appeals.

                              DISCUSSION AND DECISION

       At the outset, we note that the State of Indiana has not filed a brief in this matter and

has filed a certificate of non-involvement in this appeal. When an appellee does not submit

a brief we need not undertake the burden of developing an argument on that party’s behalf.

Howard v. Daugherty, 915 N.E.2d 998, 999 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). Instead, we will reverse

the trial court’s decision if the appellant’s brief presents us with a case of prima facie error.

Id. “Prima facie error in this context is error ‘at first sight, on first appearance, or on the

face of it.’” Id. at 1000 (quoting Santana v. Santana, 708 N.E.2d 886, 887 (Ind. Ct. App.

1999)). “If an appellant does not meet this burden, we will affirm.” Id.

       Here, Temple attempted to file a civil complaint but did not attach the statutorily

required documentation to receive either a complete or partial waiver of the filing fee. The

trial court notified Temple of the defect and Temple subsequently complied. The trial court

then determined that Temple was entitled to a partial waiver of the filing fee based upon

the information Temple supplied. He was notified of the amount of the filing fee, $1.67,

and that failure to pay the fee within the time provided could result in the dismissal of his

case. Even though Temple filed another document in the interim, the trial court issued an

order again advising Temple of the deadline for paying the partial filing fee and notifying

Temple that failure to pay the fee could result in the dismissal of his case. Upon Temple’s

failure to pay the fee, the trial court dismissed Temple’s case. Because Temple has failed

to establish prima facie error, we must affirm the decision of the trial court.

                                               4
                               CONCLUSION

In light of the above, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

Affirmed.

MAY, J., and ROBB, J., concur.




                                       5
