
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1549                                   JUAN M COFIELD,                                      Appellant,                                          v.                              JOHN O. DESMOND, TRUSTEE,                                      Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. George A. O'Toole, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ____________________            Juan M. Cofield on brief pro se.            _______________            John O. Desmond on brief pro se.            _______________                                 ____________________                                   October 9, 1996                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   After carefully reviewing the  briefs                      __________            and  the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court            for the  reasons stated  in its  Memorandum and  Order, dated            April 10, 1996.   Simply,  appellant Juan M.  Cofield has  no            standing to  pursue this appeal, having  completely failed to            show that he is not insolvent.  See  In re El San Juan Hotel,                                            ___  _______________________            809  F.2d 151, 154 (1st Cir. 1987).                      Affirmed.    Appellant's  motion  for  sanctions is                      ________            denied.                                         -2-
