
USCA1 Opinion

	




          December 17, 1992     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________          No. 92-1680                              REMCO DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                  ORECK CORPORATION,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                              Torruella, Circuit Judge,                                         _____________                      Brown* and Bownes, Senior Circuit Judges.                                         _____________________                                _____________________          John  Foskett, with  whom  Eric I.  Zucker  and Deutsch  Williams          _____________              _______________      _________________          Brooks  DeRensis  Holland &  Drachman,  P.C., were  on  brief for          ____________________________________________          appellant.          Gary W.  Smith, with whom Thomas  D. Burns, Patricia B.  Gary and          ______________            ________________  _________________          Burns and Levinson, were on brief for appellee.          __________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                                        ____________________          *  Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.                    Per Curiam.  We affirm the district court opinion  with                    __________          respect to counts II-IV  for the reasons stated in  that opinion.          Appellant  did not appeal the district  court's judgment on count          I.   See Remco Distributors,  Inc. v. Oreck  Corporation, No. 91-               ___ _________________________    __________________          40106 (D. Mass. April 28, 1992).                    Affirmed.                    ________
