

Motion Granted, Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September
22, 2011.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-10-01045-CR
____________
 
DERRICK JEMAINE ALLISON, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 176th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1211015
 

 
MEMORANDUM
OPINION
A jury convicted appellant of burglary of a habitation.  On October
20, 2010, the trial court sentenced appellant, Justice in accordance with the
jury’s assessment, to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal.  Appellant filed a timely notice
of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she
concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant
was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
 As of this date, more than forty-five days has passed and no pro se response
has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and
agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no
reversible error in the record.  We are not to address the merits of each claim
raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined
there are no arguable grounds for review.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178
S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Panel consists of Chief Justice
Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

