












 
 
 
 
 
 
                                       NUMBER
13-10-00497-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
EDGAR NANDIN,                                                                            Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
TEXAS A&M
UNIVERSITY, KINGSVILLE,                                     Appellee. 
 ____________________________________________________________
 
                             On
Appeal from the 105th District Court 
                                        of
Kleberg County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
            




The
appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 31, 2011.  On April 29,
2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of
prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within
ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably
explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the
appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been
received from appellant.  
Appellant
has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
 
PER
CURIAM
 
Delivered and filed the
23rd day of June, 2011.

 
 
 
 
 

