               THE      A          NEY     GENEIRAL,
                               F   TEXAS

GERALD C. MANN
-X
 A-ORNm:YG.KNERXL



  Honorable Melvin Combs
  Criminal District Attorney
  Beaumont, Texas
   Dear Sir:                         Opinion No. 0-4622
                                     Re: Should the County Clerk
                                     refuse to accept for record any
                                     affidavit that does not carry
                                     both a jurat and an acknowledg-
                                     ment.
  Your letter of May 27, 1942 submitting the above question has
  been given our careful consideration.
  As you state, Article 6626, Revised Civil Statutes reads:
       "The following instruments of writing, which shall have
       been acknowledged or proved acoording to law, are
       authorized to be recorded."
   It then names the various instruments.
  Article   6591of   the Revised Civil Statutes reads:
       "County Clerks shall be recorders for their respective
       counties; * * + * shall record all instruments of writing
       authorized or required to be recorded."
  Article 1941 of the Revised Civil Statutes relates to the duties
  of County Clerks and states:
       "They shall be ex-officio recorders for their several
       counties, and as such shall record in suitable books to
       be procured for that purpose all deeds, mortgages and
       other instruments required or permitted by law to be
       recorded."
   In the case of Farmers Mutual Royalty Syndicate vs. Isaacks,
   138 S.W. (2) 228, the Court after discussing the effect of a
  recorded affidavit duly sworn to but not acknowledged which
  related to the sale of certain lands states:
Honorable Melvin Combs, Page 2, O-4622


     "(l-3) The affidavit was not such an instrument
     as is authorized by Article 6626, Revised Civil Statutes
     to be placed of record in the clerk's office and, therefore,
     its record did not constitute constructive notice to
     defendant in error of the facts revealed by it."
The court then held in said case that since the purchaser of the
land had notice of said affidavit being on record he was charged
with actual notice of its contents, and that although the record-
ing of the affidavit was not constructive notice it did effective-
ly give the purchaser of the land actual notice of its contents.
36 Tex.Jur. 439 reads:  "An instrument which is not acknowledged
or proved for record as required by law is not entitled to be
recorded."
Under the above statement of the law a long list of authorities
are cited.
Article 6612, 6613, 6614 and 6615 of the Revised Civil Statutes
provide the methods of how instruments may be proved in order to
entitle same to be recorded when said instruments have not been
acknowledged.
There is no provision in the statute which authorizes an
unacknowledged affidavit to be recorded and as above stated the
recording of such an affidavit is not constructive notice of its
contents, although it would have the effect of giving actual
notice if the parties at interest saw the recorded affidavit.
Under Article 6626 of Revised Civil Statutes the only instruments
which are entitled to be recorded are those that have been
either acknowledged as provided by Article 6603 of the Revised
Civil Statutes or those proved under the provisions of Article
6612, 6613 and 6614 of the Revised Civil Statutes.
You ask whether an affidavit, in order to be recorded should have
a jurat and also an acknowledgment. It takes thenjurat to make
the instrument an affidavit. Before the County Clerk can be
required to record an affidavit it must be acknowledged.
                                  Yours   very   truly
GWG:WBP/cge
                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
APPROVED JUNE 16, 1942
s/ Grover Sellers            s/ George W. Barcus
FIRST ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL             BY           George W. Barcus
                                                 Assistant
APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE
BY BWB, Chairman
