     Case: 13-41070      Document: 00513152612         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/13/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT     United States Court of Appeals
                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                                                                    FILED
                                                                                August 13, 2015
                                    No. 13-41070
                                  Summary Calendar                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL PENA, also known as Super,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:12-CR-1002-1


Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Pena has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena
has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-41070      Document: 00513152612   Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/13/2015


                                 No. 13-41070

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
