     NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


 United States Court of Appeals
     for the Federal Circuit
              ______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
             Plaintiffs-Appellants

                         v.

   E-MDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
 MERIDIANEMR, INC., HEALTHTRONICS, INC.,
   ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ALTARIS
      CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, MEDHOST,
  INC., COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS,
             INC., E-MDS, INC., A TEXAS
        CORPORATION, HEALTHTRONICS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
     AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION,
        AMERISOURCEBERGEN HOLDING
      CORPORATION, INTUITIVE MEDICAL
       SOFTWARE, LLC, ALTARIS HEALTH
PARTNERS II, L.P., ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS
         III, L.P., AHP-HT II ACQUISITION
    COMPANY, LLC, AHP-HT III ACQUISITION
        COMPANY, LLC, INTERNATIONAL
    ONCOLOGY NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.,
      SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA,
    INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY
            GROUP, INC., VISTA EQUITY
PARTNERS FUND IV, LIGHTNING ACQUISITION,
          LLC, EPIC HOSTING, LLC, EPIC
  SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CERNER HEALTH
             SERVICES, INC., GENERAL
2                              UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC.




    ELECTRIC COMPANY, DBA GE HEALTHCARE,
      ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS,
     INC., CERNER CORPORATION, LIGHTNING
            HOLDINGS, LLC, GREENWAY
      HEALTH, INC., GREENWAY HEALTH, LLC,
    GREENWAY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
                     Defendants
               ______________________

                        2018-1893
                  ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:14-cv-00625-RWS, Judge
Robert Schroeder, III.
                  ______________________

                Decided: February 8, 2019
                 ______________________

   BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake,
TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by
RYAN LOVELESS, JIM ETHERIDGE.
                 ______________________

    Before MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    Plaintiffs-Appellants sued Defendants for infringe-
ment of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,628,526 and 5,715,451. Defend-
ants moved to dismiss on ineligibility grounds, and the
district court partially granted this motion. Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants and Defendants subsequently settled their dispute
and jointly stipulated to dismissal of the case. Plaintiffs-
Appellants did not reserve the right to appeal. Accord-
ingly, we dismiss this appeal for mootness pursuant to
Aqua Marine Supply v. AIM Machining, Inc., 247 F.3d
1216, 1218–20 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC.      3



                        DISMISSED
