‘l<echycii£_coo, oiecri_oc clock
._l¢lith Ju_diciel District Gourt
" Polk Coimty warehouse

1101 W. Mi].1 St. St`e. 216
'jl.ivingecoo, iexee 77351

:?Rez Request fog £11e mask Mevant’s Pro-Se fiction for Judicial. Netica

loi;;Style: Del 33§ Ssnders vs. me State of Texas
(Movant) _ (Respondent)

1 Ceuse No. 30 ,_597

   
    
     
  

 

 

neeehe cuscoh, c1erh
_' -"' moose find ecolooed for filing chvehc' e Pro~se nocioo for mem
§Notice Whereas Movant Sandsrs' is respectfully requesting for said moti
-.'fco he filed vich che aiich Judleioi oiecriec com of reno coimcy--yr.lvi“"

" Ineddition,Ms. 'Cli£ton M;svant respectfully request for ym.lr o££i.
’§co' provide cho rome comicy cream oiocrioc eccorhey cir. miller lee non
"a file-mark copy of said motion. '

 

   
 

.me§FE&-i¥'§il'§e?srie' ' 1 w m
mm 25 2015 c ""““e unit
wl -|l mm 810 m 2§21 7
imatsville, Te_xas
y l 1 77349
_ pisnk§Yo'u, in adverse for your time and assistance with this matter.

I.

~_;2`(I.Er; 1b gm mm ma ms mRK-) 3

 

song hereee eei_e1 c adhere heed h deere headed die heidi readily there §.j'r
j w mci actual sheriffs report given ss arriving officers ash darim:§"§
z smith interrogation st tha shcsi£’d' s office after leaving hospital,th , g
schroeder sealed assessed dod three archer add srrr. ~

  
  
  
 
 
   
  
  
  
  
  

wearivinghma£messhandmahinghishi£atslathwintathh
'hwsd,dmetchilenstbemabla target in, sssinghiswi£ermn deems
“sscaleratad speed“ and slipping en loose tila add failing head first sets
f£lsos, vacating nearly haas th has fast and than mochanismly ending sp
her hide oh see rleoe. cree theme erred hirsch harry her heir rehire "
harsher ley hhc held ch she clear hrc seemed decreed hhc/cheese ch hh..,
ahead hhsei hhheehha, tested hlohd).deie heir -.; ~ , ' f
'_jeide or rhee, mem eha use elee' sphere co three heed hhhed, hide she
_`;sehdeee reese he deere eppeee ch he shepard 1 1 .

 

 

hsc - , in his laird aftes years et danith with sits‘ s smsa cf
tacha that was going hac whose tila by dean sss mowersphsd)c dec sanders
*hee,eh ce ehh. he remedies ee.lled hire h decree see shhhe, hlhhe lee
has at has residence visiting the day bates-s and aswd'jchs. disdas, -"%hsrh
" did ehe rec (hire) she decree elec ehe'e heeded dee he chc riooe eeeio. ah
Mas statsd, "Just put has in bad lisa yca always doc int has sleep it s££,,
shamlihssihtgntshanshesshscupc

l-allthishandharless/childselsedi:.technicianadviserstoisinsariehtasascc‘rshdh,.- 1
, harm his trialc attract s year hatch ts the initial sheri£f’ ‘ '
interchemical and sumsqmntly ma wishes decrease

 

she heir torres le dirreeehc ihehcihhh or ace hhhee hhs le the heehor::
tim thwart truck was sent ss the Tesas whath cf dublin details s erisa
lab in drh.zatsa th ha tasthd. (sda), is midst ah ssa discussing there had the
availability cf the seat defaults et did tim st amici ct the hair sample sealm
isaacs fmha the sense and hair traders ns ss driving the matthew

hr. darden ma arrested sliding the mach st detaiary 2069. trial vegas
ih oh areeda remedy tais, ore rees ieceh. he eeeelee reed heir ehe»iee here
11th tea trial than acted isaac heir samples mass by hhs manhattan the
we and hac Ssndaca attorney Jmas deman. "dhrsiil hines”, the medical assistant
mrs did the category and validate matthes the icshnaic scientist sss the rates

colo n |Obé

 

Department of Public Safoty‘ o crim lab Houston end Mr. Mctdiortes, merger

of the DNA section of the ‘l‘e)cas Department of Public Safety' s crime lab Houston
stated, “wc do not have those results divide us today." And dsn' t even knsw.-
if test were coslpl_eted one year later.

 
    
   
   
 
    
   

 

j 'Ihereaults fromthohoirbeing testede have provedwhoslmirwas
ir\the back of my truck and also if scruples were of went hair or hair Lc
non succeeds harrell wines also states er trial were pulled fred thevis

head durisg a struggle But as to date one year after being sent to crime
l lab no resilts from test et time of trial.

 

 
 
 
  
 

"My question is, edicts are the soaplos today? What were the test resul
_`_s_ul`d the;l" results have proved Mr. Sanders stamm "his sites hair was

_ d lalong with her lips, fingers and the beds distress," or would it have prov
";otherwise? ` ~ v

s h FAc'r 4
'lhe"State" ,Texas Deparmiont of I’ublic Saf'et-.y' o crime _lab_, and/or the
prosecutor withheld exculpatory mdenoe. E.\videece favorable to the accused
.by not readying or providing the defendant' s lawyer the result' o (DNA) from

' ' heir ee_rrrpiee helen free his hire' d body end sch scene he enable dererder_c'£
its prove his side of story and present evidence to the juty.

_"'\’ FACI’
.Hai_r was bomb inst pulled rout.

 

Hair saraplos should still be available for testing if crime lab didn'
destroy them Results of testing should at least be dosmnented in the archives.

  
  
 
 
 

Did court 411 actually receive test results performed on collected hair j _
during or after triel? who's hair were they actually testing, was it the deceased?

4 dill this bc a newly discovered evidence claile? Evidonce not available
at the time of- ficial and not known to the defendaet, hot the court or the
defendant s Attomoy clause Koegen..

 

‘ Also,: chain of custody is in question concerning the hair sampliegc4who

took hale seamen free 2 law cook wait angeles fm bede law mead

mix eawlaa, if tescad? we delivered the beat rawl-ea and nn anne the tent
needle delivered? llhaa see ma date af lane caselaw delivery slate, if rents
sane clean ‘*la~aere l£ any ana seat reavlae?“ ‘

 

 

'V°1 5» Paga 37, linen 8~*15. g . jj
blatant examination o£ near-w enlanrl‘.er, Med ky cba mla seamen of cna
ama nape¢aeaa ear eewe anew a mae lee emeee.

   
 

16 .l

» new , klan amaae. “’Vlatla'e hale nn mailed eun, l canadian her 1
was wmaenclnbenlannadie,il. started §elllngeatlnwaeh.“ “

  

,:line 8. (llan cessationing warned we question anna ap yaeaaaeey, l thin
’derl¢zgn~\ee£ymenneete beatme tenn weakeneeiaa¢naaanaz
been seated to clean are you swan of well

y{zl

line 11 (na%lnartea eepllea) laeh, l bean clay nasa net been testea.

vol a page '1&2, lines 8~2£?

 

(®ea¥ieeleg of Velaeia nnbnee), ?bzenein saleneiea, laws flamntaene af
wella Se£ety a edna lab bantam

linen 13~1'5._ {Raebnen} l ala nat test helen fm am sealy el nleal.n.

line i'.’v‘. (Qmsai<m by final lee an ana yes able lazy soule ina hale eawlee
nat have been tenead?

l.tnale. lennenaunneea} ibew messantanna, amenme cream
bna le hade’l: bm newlatea by able them (trlal tm).

 

Vol 3 page 36, line 10.

30 no’cieea_lnanne en hen lies end flegano.

line 7. lln noticed baseless all war ~vlaeia.
ibew sara ram name in treasnelala adam by wallen lineup and ma tankers
aafesdena nominee uaw arriving none feca anne ann swann vienna ne ana linen _
alan dried bland swann hen nasa nw shipped irene teeth all sara maclean

manlpiakedkana£¥meileeetneelnzealemwdnaafzwseaeandfoend
bae. '

nea/o

 

vol 3, mo 25§>, now lo»ry."`

(Qmazion w massive Alloti by ifaegan). Ha arm did you mo wise employs
'-_ti`\at waco £omni w truck? ‘

ime by mtootiva'&lsn)‘ It~ worst to tim BPS coram who
'§(iz£.ioyzooo ny owooo) no you wyo ow,ooooioo wyo rowe

4` (Anyyor by Al;oo) if do ~rou;.

 

 

 

 

v " . . '. aq~mzpb

 

  
  
 
  

   

series oz so women widow or twa casey
sweet e. montoya norwood noonan

less sea someone soon `

width ‘i’s_)_zaa 7705&*2098

- trial hogan on or about mary 11,13 or 101¥1., 2010.
dempsey 16,17,2009 delay sosna investigators arrive st the assist
mr mccall illness did assaime '

1 believe autopsy des sneewa gm op A_t,
jiles 925 sting lab than ss that daisy

 

`__2009 midway mandated india aowles iam assne.

9s`l 5, page 25, lite 16. amend statss, ‘ds generally dollar pair mind _
901 5,_ peggy 2§»25, lies 24»3 one page 20. aaitted ststaa, _"thsy postage die

(0'01) ssd tools tinane to their office is dominion one inventory 12%.,2009

the Fehmary 27th.,2009 moral am noon renewed fires the aiedlsol

_ miners od£los.
` 901 ~.0, page 37, lines 8~».13. ingredients sheet said samples hot being insist
to ddtd. (Didl‘didrtdta)t ”Y. drew they hav'm‘t hosp testsd", stated m line 11,

9ol 5, page 37.

 

 

9o1 5, page 122_, 1lnss_12~13. l aaa inst hair goss and meant up "

901 3, page 200, liens 12-13. "I`dat s stan I enelow n big board hole in restated ”
dates 901 a, page 33, lines o~d. (tierrlll dime), steiner its did mt deems
solely citations areas initials less on shoesst

Vsl é, pags 60, lines 5¢9. "!; saw it somebody tall mile being hold by

their halt that guild explain holt lsoa, also add said daniels snist ingestion "

ms in sttso_ndoass st demanding taking wit peoples san sppestsisna dated
daniels leloik~ ~tendirsn imitation send deletion damp also 9onya deed

~a~:~ . ~ so g <,,

Vol 4, page 168, lines 4-8. No traces of blood found on hair samples taken

from truck. Once again hair was not pulled out, hair was burnt from her catching
bed on fire and burning lips and fingers.

Vol 4, page 169, lines 18-25. Hair samples from hole in wall were not tested,
but were forwarded along with other hair samples to the Trace Department of

TDPS crime lab Houston.

Vol 3, page 259, lines 10-14. "Ma'am do you have the results from crime lab

on hair samples here today?"

"They went to crime lab DPS."

"Do you have the results here today?"

"l do not."

Although this information about hair samples not being available as DNA
evidence at trial was brought up during trial..

The results (New Discovered.Evidence) were not available during trial.
Making this newly discovered DNA evidence.

And last of all to prove Sanders truthfullness, was hair pulled or burnt?
Also who's hair is actually being tested? Where's results from lab? Why weren't
results offered up in court?

Withholding, Suppressing Exculpatory Evidence.

b /oF-/c,

"DelRaySanw § , 11011411111.111111111

(1111-`1`11`)"8* 1 _ v 1 - ,~: § m _ of )319|3 91800\1 |eqv

&1;31111 §§ 11111 1 ` § P°lk‘ °°‘“"‘Y' 'Te"” §luz 93 SVH

. . l§ siv.=.lddvnvmwm:) 10 ianoo-'
mm m mm mm ‘ ' Nl GEA|E|GHH

 

_ \ m w sam 01`)111`11=~v

v com 1101, 1111 my 3111111, 1' r.o.c.:.- m 111. 1621331 1111111 P1-1-s1

'_ 2'11111-11-11111, 11 1111 11111 1111111 11y11 111 111111, 111 11111 1111 nmabie
10111:1 11 1111 3111111`11 111111 11 1111111 11151111111111 11111; 1111 11
v1111111111111111111111111111111>110111»11111111111 ~=

 

I.
Tex. ._R~. M. Rnle 201 provides that a trial com:t may take j`-

notice of_. adjudicative facts. ‘Ihe rule frmther provides that judicial notice
ismndawrywhenrequestedbyapartyanddmthetrialcmmtissupplied

1111 1111 1w11111y 11111111111 nm, 11111111111111 11111 111 1111 11111 .

of this wrenc- case. o'camell v. stace, 17 s.w.zd 746(T1x.App.-Ans1m 20001,11 pet).

4 in this case,-:Plovant Sanders' request t'r'ra:tthe 'Honorable 601HK take judicial
11'11.11 1011-101.11 1111 111116 day 11 tamm 2015 App111111'111111111‘111m '
resr,`wg 01 11111111 11111111 0111111113 mn- 1111 v1111`111 1111 1111 1111_111111111
111 111111111, 111111111111, 01111111c111111<111y 0111111. 11 11111111111111111-
ises of saidmtion-~ that themth find diepiecessary infoth for the
111111g 11311111111 111111. "’

 

III.
manthere='-in, middtshehas applied the infomiati¢_mnecessary to the

takingcf gidicialnoticeasrequiredbymilezol(d) thereinhi_sb'|ctionofl?eb-
mary 16 as aforementioned above- and hereby sake adoption by reference Tex.R.
'Aq). P. 9.7 / 'I'ex.R.Civ.P. 10(¢_) for any and all purposes.

 

 

~ ssa mims miami (saa
. 9 ma (_§'*f‘~r~c 4 , ;
HMM,MM(£)MMMMWMMMM'
w w ii z :-...;.- ~z` ~'w; ‘ y ~_.i.
mt simms ssa minimum fists-w is 4
mm wammiaijwidictisa sf wis »~f

<sstwqaasaimad, mlytmmlmiysfwaaifiaisicmirawrim" ,~.

far cases mai Wmt“s filesssiaqsyof?ahwatyié, 2915 _ .'

 

  
  
 
  

   

\ mims sawsts“ far tim -x "
` `(1) maids faa

 

.(i) s miami wsm af im ms ims mathis swiss w ama assists miami
amiiwiaaatiiassiatiatimofmdafiasma'stsiai `

CS)wiasasiaaits massiaaatcsssiasiamdssswassssssmdsrasiss
,r)mamtaiisiima£wms£ms,“Raiavsativim“iuiaw!?as.i.wis:

(s)safammt‘sjwyssasswtxiars££mismaapsivsda£mmmiavsst

x ssi minimis ssssi._A _ .,

 

{3) w £my, M? §§ ¢,.".:i»,-/

 

_, :; wim-~ it is thimuidailm tim
Wicant s s wit n£ wm sam U (2} am say wm fm
timmw£sssawaamntwitwws, mims as§ii.€_i*.$aa. a.

(i) ma far was simms » “, wm sss assess is .. `
as twa mm la am mss; hasain aim s *’aiva is

 

   

,_ M is
_ ' hamm wm umwa a wsm mimms m smitracy

~"“” ~ f" j Miws § ms U~Ilm, (W 5¥§§»_ disks 1932) §§ 5sW.M

ms w m! iii ~:»i w s iii ‘¥¢' 3'..i‘ »_ 9 Sogi»£ MTB»M»AW 1%)* ' `

 

 

 

 

¢siii

 

' mm m .mrcm max com

I!I.. (Gaat

 

,Mmz$m&m* mays we wis swaim be
gmwimdthnmblawtwijmmo£¥maéjm§icatiw€mw
r.

mg smm' m wwa m mma mm w mma

W£My sulth

FSIGHB &; " , y
mm as ms rizzle m mm 2015. M_K 4
_ - mma m ms&m #mxs§z` w
m 'mc
,._ _ m 2821
mmam_. ms
rim

 

%\éfv'_

   

 

_ , , _ §_. 20,591 _
Del Ray Sanders b ‘ § In 'Ihe 411th` Judicia].
(bbvant) ‘

vs. § _ rD'isttict». watt of

The State¢ of Texas l y § ' Polk Oolmty, Texas
;(Respovdent)- - ’

 

onthisths ____dsyo£‘ l_201___hsthstshshssts.ztl:s=ii=sz.-sg¢>mg

 

" §Motmn for Judlcial Noti.ce

,_ Wheteas it 13 aftetteviswofthewvantspleadings thete:m--
~ arguments from the State, If Any ?

happenst com that said wasn shouch be.;

 

.JuocE sessions ~'

000

 

(¢rd¢r)

 

"i» -".~e‘_'»?€='

WM@}MM(E`M

` (28 assocs §17&6) / WVTOCC»A¢ ago kaca & RUL we §m»wl °° m¢m) j

i,, tel say mata »#1621331 certify mae I mountain '

at tim hhs its term that ~ ‘I'.D.C.J. -'ID 810‘£!! 2821 '= 12 77349
locatedinthr'”eatcemty, deemsuodatmltys£petjmy teactim£ore-
going is mm md moses to tim beat sf rey as '

 

 

Mmmsta_[__mtowmh,ms. }OiQV ju,,Pw-`ss

m ass , miami

m `{UB£%:
819 EM m
713£¥9

 

usery -

4»\.'~`;!_‘.`?;‘»;-;
' " "‘."?.‘E$:`t

 

‘ FICATE or stance _ s v 5
I, De1 Rey demises, T.D.C. J. Na. 1621331 certify that 1 have seitz a 5
twa and correct copy of-- threet.’ s Pro-Se Motion for Judi.eial Notiee via '
u. _s. veil Psstsge Prs~psia ts ms mustang psrt`iess _ , ' '
Davi.d Maland, Ql.eek ‘ ' Abe1 _Ac.esva, Cl.etk

 

U S. Di.-steiet Court-- Eas-veto Divieion Caurt of Griminal. Appesls
1034 N. 'I~'ni.rd St 4 v x , s `. P.O. Box 12308 , . _ -
mfkin,1exas 75901 ;, ~_ _ ' Capital Station " s
' At»xstim IX 78711

Cletk, Catal Ann Flotes` ,'_ ;`; l ~:*Clerk, Cli£von -
ch Dists Gautv of AMls _ . " z 411th District` Gaurt
1001 Peat_l` Ste. 330 , f § -. “ 5 Pal_k C;<xmty Courthause
Beam\oot, 'IX 77701 , 5 1015 W. tull St. Ste. 216

. , _ l »"Livi.ngsvon, 'LX 77351_
tiavant, - '*~ ; .1' -‘ : ' * Crixrd.nel Distri.et Attorney
Del Ray Sethers’ ‘~ .. 4 ‘ ' s ; 1 tile mark service-'- requested

   

wymsusit - .5 aff ; mssprsvissdbychssmss
\ 4 s sfessmsmsr. ~
insert uaw arms Disc.Avty.]

    

: 2 Ts£:j

 

 

Ds.l`R-sy 5 5 ,"#1,621331 §
wyws that '

810 at 2821

amesvs.ns, tx 77349

~:G-, U Ss Di.sv. Gvs Cl.ks thland’

°~' that sess s

ca %0‘ .

cs ante niss. cuts clifton e@'.-'im- Dis\=- nga nm'
‘f,";havanv Sanders' ' service liqu

[Ehelosures as Stated_]

 

    

 

del day sanders . § ' ' rn medium Jnamei
' ".,'V.» _~ v ~ 1 y " d § Distriet‘€ours;e€ate’ v w _
_ 'Ihe Stata._ef leaan ~ § z `Polk C¢cmgy,."rw *»: '_ " l

aPPi.cha'.r°s' dodson m one'i'asi~‘md en
" ' unused moines oaNrAINme DNA

  
 

C°de crim Pl`-`°a Ar`f’-~ 54‘91 (a)(-l)(B) In Support, App_licans will shaw
kic";::t cause as sp why his Mosi'on should be granted._ _

mandatesan " a

 

AFPlicant was charged wish the felony offense of harder in she first
l v"}d°gree’ M°h m duaged ee have taken place specifically on Febmary i€y`

'-`:pleased in detentien. 5
' Appiiaanc was finally indianad` far ann felony offense af gender in ins

 

first degree. ' _ __
n 7 James Keegan of Belaire, Texa_s was appointed as counsel for the Appllcant,
rand trial began on or about January 2010. _
Applz.sant elected to be sried by a jury on his plea af nos guilsy. A jury
was selected and the cause was tried in which Applican, was foimd to be gullty.

 

    
 

which he was subdequensly sentenced re life in State prison_.
.Althoixgh shape were post'-_-'convidtien appeals A'pplisant has not far-eva

 

   

Azp£iaem utu assess sees tm has ms filed say stations £er we means

' f_e§ hew heir md wis samples senseless seem mims same seemed see moment

'mee,mmmveesmmwmeemeemyesesmee,ee'ssmsm,,_'
\"e~sepsusescessse.
_ searates his samuel seems as wives e£§ieeds ssd m messagee&ees
leylrsmmemsg,smeesmwseseewrmewfeems?elkcmmy
l`§e££ies, eminent assess seen eaer misses hess fees sess se seesuedy 1§
‘-;2m.wsssmeewsfemmemssw semeswxssewsssssj
'5'essseeeyumeeseessemmsseee:msmeeemmmw _
'ie¢esesmsmessseeses,aeswe£e@ewpm:msmsensesess
':ssmeeemeeesswmemsemm,wsesssseeszmmme _,
emmssnmcemswwdmsssmresmesueeswemww '
seeswswmssm,eeessemweeemesmmws.m`",_,.

,eeeeyieeemssaseeeeyeeeemgeeeswsmaedsamswm.$mmese*eis
mseswssmmseessmsm.smeeemsmesemmw
`eedrieesloeea:seedzmesseipseesw,eeskeemuesdseeeeemmron
_~esseass£ssmeavsemsammsmmmemmeuesmsppsme
';wwswmeme. memsmmmssemeeosm.msm‘wa `

 
 
   
 
 
  
   
 
  

'&f‘£e

 

" "eesehsweeesdzseeceemm

_"_j_ emmeeeemeseesmgsemeeessammsesemems
vsomehoweisee§e*sassessmentsseeerassexeloeeedmmeendss misuse
stresseme wet%s}.eeesjsstmeo£thesesashiesesmee.
mims msssmeelyee&wemwx£semmmsseodeesem£mhm
sheeheedm@asmess£elmeedeesseswtoem£loseassteeeewem
_weezsmdsmgeseenmedeuseeweeeeemdspmttheesyes£meieeeer,
Msaelymeweedt¥mmelmneszeswcmsm§eeeemendlee

esa sleep m e£§, we dee would es emma assn sea sam us..
“2“ _

   
  
  
 

 

"4“1-_Iair das":`fo'und“`inidiffetent locations of the house and in the back ¢
theAFPl-"»¢ar\t 3 truckbycrimescene mestigators andtaken to theTexas v
` -Department of Pub]_.ic Sefety' s ctime lab in dorris Cnlmty, Texas to be test "

 

. 'Ihese hair emples, their testing and their results are what is in question
and the bas1s of chin Motion.

`l'£bese hair samples were taken from the accident scene and bait samp1

 
 

4 a1sn taken dur1ng the europey that was performed on the deceased. c
`:'_.At_ the time 6f Applicant' s Jury '1‘tia1, almost one year latsr, January

 

we see mich smoke s1sing than we could know 1c by one or two witnesses é;,

to 1t. 'Ihe witnesses may cnmit perjury bent the smoke canont.
d Appl.icant s notion for post~convictio_n DNA testing pursuant to 'F____`____aaas dade
’_`cf. arranch Prcc. Arc. ea.oi(a)(i)(a), miner eric precision cf chic ccccu`j ‘

   
 
  
 
 

applian should bc cccicl.ccl cc pccc-ccmaccicc ccccing. h
Under the provisions set out in chapter 64,01' article 6£., this Moticnl
:'-constitutee a sworn affidavit / declaration that challenges the prior responcas l
cr chc sccrc officer near ccccclich_cc chc c£ficicr clair cf cucccdy cr

;alaterial evidence collected but not available at the time of Appiicant' s Jury v
"r_rici. ', _ . `
1 When questioned as to the hair samples by the Polk dol.lnty Asst. Prosecutnr
icc ch, cia Appnccnc' c Acccrncy amc xccgcn, ncrrin since chc rcra clarity ‘
Medical dxaminar which per£omd the autopsy of the deceased Ms._ Sanders,
and took head hair ssslples....Valerie firemen the forensic scientist for jj
cadc ecpcrmcnc cf Public scfccy' c crew lab in search mich cia mm tracing

 

of other evidence taken from the accident scene and Mr. McWhorter, Manager 9£
the DNA Sec_tion of the Texas Department of_ Poblic Safety' s_ crime lab 19 Harris
County stated "we do not have timse results with us taday" and cmxld not testify

as to thr testing had been °mli’l`ete some one year later. ,'I-he testing _0444bl

 
 
 

the hair samples and their results would have given conclusive eva.dence as
ito who'- s ha117 was found in the back of the Applicenl!' s truck and also woold

‘*'e Pfo.\__f€.!l"éor or against the _State's amf fry as to whether thed€<=€a$€$ _ hair

 
  

   
 
  
 
 
 

 

heen pu]. ed out during a struggle or the defenses theory that. thehair
_4,appeared to have been burned out upon Applicant' a observation of his wife

 

when he returned home from wor- , 3
lt 1a thc Applicant' s belief that at the time the hair maples were
§they ware tested and failed to prove the easwmptions of the prosecutor hee
_Hon, and Merrill Hines of the Polk County medical examiners office and th;
_ '» prove the statanents given by the Applicant that upon arriving 4 y
4` when we observed ms wife mmiwws and lymg‘ on nw flon newman nov

 

her hair appeared to be burnt along with her fingera, lips, and a bed nptress _ '“

which was also wmt. -- - ._ 4 4
Appl1cant believes that the Polk County Prosecutors office end/or the

"'lle):ae Department of Public Safety’ a crime lab Harris County conspired to with- 4

hold this exculpatory avidence_, evidence that once existed and may still exist--

   
  
  
  

ithat is favorable to the Applicant and may hold the potential to exoner`4
him, Appl~icant feels that he was denied due process and equal protectio
-‘t-he law in violation ofB Brady v. Mland_, 373 U S. 83; i{yles v. Whitely, _|
514 u. s. 919, 115 s. cr. 1555; Armwa v. Ymmwbiood 498 u. s. 1514, 109 cr ‘
'_333; california v. much 467 v. s. 479; u. s.c.A. cowan mem 5,6-41'¢,,__:
and warsaw was denied a run and mr amy mem moss nw jury which

 

 

 

  
 
 
 

convicted the Applicant was denied die opportunity to consider this omni
"rrsaterial evidence, favorable evidence that was not disclosed to the defendant

 

 
 
   
    
 
  
    
   
   
  
  
  

equested_'or requested only in geneva way, 1£ suppression of evidence

be sufficient significance to result in denial cf dcfmdafnh' s right to __f
§srs.si. .s._ ,._'A{. cases misses 5, 6, is. ' '
. Applicant believes because of hhs probative value of the hair amp
§has_c1ng should have been done and chair results should have been available
lea me use sr ins jai-y asias., ha eiss beisaves esa she maveiisbs.iicy e`£`
iia-s material avisessa is sea ssa is say seen ss massie si- ai sss trial
Z.Atcorney .James Kce_gan, and the results of its testing coold be newly disco
- ";svssesse is his basin '
:'_ main of custody 1a also in question cornernmg chase hair sampling,
.-;_¢.queshione as co who removed the hair samples firm the anewe'nt scene, who
:_ieais hair ivan ass bssy of ass saeeaeed, visa ceases se miss sss ss visas
;wete they de$ivared? la their direct assassination by Asst_. Districc Attorne
lllion the following hranspired. (RR Vol 5, pg. 37, lines 8-15) I.ine .8, hoer
j‘Aadsav manner sr eha ma seems ss me cases assessment er marie sara
1§:citime lab, Hstris County 1aan ("cme question came op yesterday, l think
during one of your cohorts testimony as co why the hair spmmens had not
',bsen_ cashed to dates Ate; you aware of chat?") Lina lls(Mi:. Mmrt`er rep];._i

 

 

 

  
    
 
 
   
   
    
 
   
 
    
  
  

 

('?Yaahy '1_: 1444 amy 1444 44454441-144444.") (44 vol 4, pg. 142, 11444 §-zo
551 (Mr. Hon 49 55Valevie Huebaer, forensic scientist, Taxes Departmemt of Publi
5,5vSafety'5 s crim lab Havria Cot».mty) hines 15-116, ("I did not test haiv 55E7
5{_;144 444145 451 am 414114.") (1444 17. Mr-. 1144).<"144 maj 444 344 rhia 44
uld the hair salaries not have been tested?") (Line 19. Mrs. Emebner r
'Ihat' s trace evidencs, it was forwarded to traoe,-, but it hadn' t 5been 1559

  
   
  
   
  

 

 

this time ’5') By the time of Applioant' s .Iury 'I‘vial.

 

44 v41 3, pg. 34, 1144 10) 144114444 444144<1 ama 44 4144444 1144 444
Linej5~7). He also noticed bruises all over the victims body~. 5

 
 

45451v41~5 3 pa 259, 11444 10-14)(1)4£4444 ima-hay Jamaa Kaagaa 4444414
Betectivo;Allen) ('Pv'am did you save hair swiss that were found in
39_41144 rapiiaa) ("11 4444 44 rha ups erma 144. ") (Keeean) 5(5'~’04 1144 '
the results here today?”) (Alien replies). ("I do hoc.") 1
On February 516th 2009, Andvew Ma%?morter, ';i‘onya Dean, Vai_erie mebnev and
:Pauola bdwlcik arrived at the crim seene. Meerter collected hair sampl’

 

from sean'4
-,:_(5§5 Vol 5`,_ pg.Z§, line 14 Miorter atatea)a ("We generally colleot hair 1
(RR Vol 5,5 pg. 25*26, lines 24-3, mrtav states) ("'lhay package the 5 5
444144 and 444'4 4444 44 weir 4££444 14 marron 44 Fahruary 17 ,20`09.") gi _
j'("On February 27th, 2009 several specimens were received from the medical 55
4444144r4 44£144. '-') _
444 1141 4, 444 33, 11444 4-»8_) hamm 111444 4441144. ("1 did 444 44414441
.,_on my diagrams areas of hair loss on the scalp.") ('Ihis would have been sig 5
riflth testimcny) even if testing had or had not been omieted. 5 4
.§(-44 'v_4`1 4, 44. 14§, 11444 4-8) 44 444444 41 41444 farm 44 hair 44414_4
from truok. 4 ., 5 . . ~_
(RR Vol ls, pg.- 169, 5lines 18~25) Haiv amiss were taken from hole in wall
and forwarded 14 144 14444 oaparmehr 4c 444 "rm>s crima 144 41444 4414 arhar
_ _~.Balllp}_.es.h.55 " 5

   
 

_ 6 1116 6666161666 66'1:66, cons crim.'Psos.~ 666. 64.01 (6)(1)(6)(v6666116)2n1
'._`states_x (B_) Through no fault of the convicted person, for reasqns that '

 

§ of a nature mach that the interests of justice requires §§A tea ng. ' l l _ _ § k
Applicant cannot foresee the fact that this mitigating mmt'evu ' . l -_ ._ _
__:`_':c.ollscted at the scene of an alleged tanner has went tmtes_ted. At sums . . .

  
   
   
 
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
   

in time the expert§ representing the State of Tex.ss knew or should have
__5?»6666 616116616168 66166666 6666 66616 66 6666666_16 66 666 Appnoshc v1616
v vs rights ender Article One, Seet_ions 10, 15 and 19 of the _State Cons_(
won 66 666 566.-,6611., 666 1666., 666166. of 666 1161666 s66666 0666615

    
  

 

 

Th__e State of Texas alleges that the vintla`\, the deceased in this __
missed 1616 1666 16 66166 161166. 6666666 66 66166 6 666616, 66 116666
':‘:1666 any 6166666 66 this 66616666 mary 6666 666 66666666 6616 666661~ ' "
to have been burned as well as her lips, fingers, and a bed antennas ,"t
_j§:cannot be looked at as tho\@z a vannum, mere are werwhalming facts tha
Y:my 66 prova» moon 666 661-666116 of 66666 6611- 6616166 666 nn 6666116,'
or 666 661_6666`63 66 666 6666166 of 666 666616666 wmoh may novo sandy 666
tested when considering the facts that these Stste experts and their testimonies - `
as to hair lost of the deceased where contributing factors of the Applican s

n `:jur"y verdiet_. Appli.cant believes that ha is entitled to the production of y

 

 

 

 

`166.01 cons of erm. 6666., 6666666 66 5666'66 6111 3 666666166 66611 5, 2001 _`

 

§_`Appuoonc' 666 666666666 666 soxlowing 66666 16 666661~6 of his 666166 for _ 6616
DNA testing: (l) that forensic DNA hair sawles were taken, but these samp ~
are alleged to have never been tested st any tioe; (2-) Thsse authorized indivl&aals
_tho obtained the newlas_ ware accessible for tha Applie_ant' s jury trial," _
j-the DNA hair smnples were mt; (3) Ferens;c DNA testing will exclude the S t`e' s §

theory as to how the vietlm’s hair was lost-g (A) Appl_.ic~ant has never been

allowed the equal protection of the law to have DNA forensic testing proformed.

Finally Applicant seeks a "Live Evidentiary Hearing"`to present the facts
concerning these issues and collected DNA sample results. Be presented to

the Applicant for his defense.

R@wm

 

 

  

?o§sMs §§ seating of hair miss takes was sba am of ada am ana '
mo mass an ae¥s:nas? 1€1, 2161_,$.11 Mx ms §§ksssm' s 1111 sss ms wmata _
ass mliaaa§ was sarvissaa sf the salaa;v offense 01 midas ana mass this
;ssssssss assn sasas ass mass ss sss assassas se mass '

 
 
  

l iss a mass af sight. A§§lasaaa also Pcaya this swansshls< assist gxsa§ a
_E>zidsmiszy assess ss aaa iam. "

 
  
  
 
  

m
819 Fa 2811
m§avills, '£‘aa?§e

 

Bmm€ai _

 

__ s, ass say ssaaas, aaa am as. rsm-.a, mass ama sss ss ss 1""
fca§sz. masses ssa massa cases assw 131 1m1111 111-1111 111 1111§`§`:§
'_:pxssassl.y mwal:sa as am ayma mm of m'-GID, daslaas swiss pena .
.°§Wjasyama\awsssmsiamssssssaazassyssawss "

 

 

1191-1

01 10_\¢1.}0,` ' "

 

 

   

UMRH DMLARATIO"%_

   

I, Bel Ray Sandere, mC-J- 610 Ne. 1621331, aaa ksaass incarcerated at
_ yglass Wyx:_ms thus lessened in Halkar Ge"um;y, .‘_I‘sxaa daela-a and way that the
§§1»~’»`¢311!:1:»\:.6l herein esa ama and seaman nurses the penalty e£ perjury. - .

§ m °“ 1111 1111 ...1111 11 M!LMQA , 2115
§§L_is`eet

vel Ray Sandsrs, ````

Wys`na this Ne.1621331
819 211 2221 _ §
mnssville '£sxas

   

 

   

 

      
 

!".,_

Kafthy Clitm, Glerk
auth Judieial Distrset
101 13a will St. S§e.
Livingstm, Taxae

' , 117351

 

 

 

1110

mmwa EMMWJA .uu:ou »oHuumHm cuw»mmm
mmxmw cHum:<-.<.o.o.@

.. _ mmme ucoE:mmm¢.<.O.U
§ AWL uop ucmm mmH@oU

7515 HR 13 N"HU= "28

 

w h @¢m§§
h B mmme .mHHM>mpc:m
HN@N zm on
HHED mcc>z .

HmmHN@H# wUQH
mum©cmm >mm me

wm-@~m \<<qwgajw`@

.>Hmum Mm

 

