
USCA1 Opinion

	




          June 28, 1994                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-2093                                    JUAN DIAZ LOPEZ,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                   COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                   [Hon. Gilberto Gierbolini, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,                                    ____________________                                Stahl, Circuit Judge.                                       _____________                                 ____________________            Juan Diaz Lopez on brief pro se.            _______________            Ricardo  F. Casellas,  Fiddler, Gonzalez  & Rodriguez  and  Arturo            ____________________   ______________________________       ______        Bauermeister on brief for appellees.        ____________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   The judgment of the district court is                      __________            affirmed  for  the reasons  stated  in  the district  court's            ________            August 24, 1993 opinion and order.                      Appellant's motion  that this court  reconsider its            order allowing the filing of appellees' supplemental appendix            is denied.                 ______                      Appellees'  request  that   sanctions  be   awarded            against appellant pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38 is denied.                                                                ______
