    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 17-127V
                                       Filed: July 23, 2018
                                       Not for Publication

*************************************
BONITA ROSNER,                             *
                                           *
               Petitioner,                 *
                                                    Attorneys’ fees and costs decision;
                                           *
                                                    reasonable attorneys’ fees and
 v.                                        *
                                                    costs
                                           *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *
                                           *
               Respondent.                 *
                                           *
*************************************
Joseph A. Vuckovich, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Jennifer L. Reynaud, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

                DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

       On January 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2012) alleging that she suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome
(“GBS”) as a result of her November 17, 2015 receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine. Pet. at ¶¶
1 and 8.

       On March 23, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case
and described the settlement terms. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s
GBS or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally. On
the same day, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation in the amount and on

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)
(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that
all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets
or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar
information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a
decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the
document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within
the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access.
the terms set forth in the stipulation. Judgment entered on April 3, 2018.

       On July 5, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses (“fees
motion”), requesting attorneys’ fees of $34,038.00 and attorneys’ costs of $1,219.85, for a total
request of $35,257.85. Because counsel paid the filing fee, petitioner had no costs.

        Respondent had until July 19, 2018 to file a response to petitioner’s fees motion. On
July 19, 2018, respondent filed neither a response nor a motion for an extension of time. The
undersigned’s law clerk emailed respondent’s counsel on July 20, 2018. Respondent’s counsel
did not respond. The undersigned finds respondent’s failure to respond constitutes a waiver.

        The Vaccine Act permits an award of “reasonable attorneys’ fees” and “other costs.”
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1). It is not necessary for a petitioner to prevail in the case-in-chief in
order to receive a fee award as long as petitioner brought the claim in “good faith and there was a
reasonable basis for the claim.” Id. The special master has “wide discretion in determining the
reasonableness” of attorneys’ fees and costs. Perreira v. Sec’y of HHS, 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34
(1992), aff’d, 33 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Sec’y of HHS, 3
F.3d 1517, 1519 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (“Vaccine program special masters are also entitled to use their
prior experience in reviewing fee applications.”).
        Based on her experience and review of the billing records submitted by petitioner, the
undersigned finds petitioner’s attorneys’ fees and costs request reasonable except for Mr.
Vuckovich’s hourly rates. Petitioner requests the hourly rates of $313.00 and $323.00 for Mr.
Vuckovich’s work performed in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Since Mr. Vuckovich has been
practicing law for eight years, he may be awarded $230-307 for work performed in 2017 and
$291-370 for work performed in 2018. The undersigned awards Mr. Vuckovich’s hourly rate
for his work performed in 2017 at $290 and his work in 2018 at $300. Because Mr. Vuckovich
billed 74.4 hours in 2017 and 6.3 hours in 2018, this results in a deduction of $1,856.10.

       Accordingly, the court awards $33,401.75, representing attorneys’ fees and costs. The
award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio Christopher
& Toale, PA in the amount of $33,401.75.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2018                                                     s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                            Laura D. Millman
                                                                              Special Master

2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2
