                                       COURT OF APPEALS
                                    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                         EL PASO, TEXAS


                                                      §

                                                      §                 No. 08-12-00342-CR
                                                      §         AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN
    IN RE: MIGUEL ROJAS, JR.
                                                      §                     MANDAMUS
                                                      §

                                                      §

        MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

        Relator, Miguel Rojas, Jr., has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that

this Court compel the El Paso County District Clerk to provide him with “true and correct copies

of the Reporter’s Records” for a number of different cases.1

        To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus in a criminal case, a relator must

establish that (1) the trial court failed to perform a duty that is purely ministerial under the facts and

the law, and that (2) the relator has no other adequate legal remedy. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of

Appeals for Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). See also Barnes v. State,

832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding)(“Even a pro se

applicant for a writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”).

        Relator does not clearly state what ministerial act was not performed, nor does he indicate

which court failed to perform its duty. Relator asks that the Clerk of this Court provide him with

copies of reporter’s records, clerk’s records, exhibits, and fifteen other types of documents listed in



1
 We have previously denied a similar request made by this Relator. See In re Rojas, No. 08-12-00006-CR, 2012 WL
248046 (Tex.App.--El Paso Jan. 25, 2012, no pet.).
his writ, seeking these to prepare a writ of habeas corpus.

       An indigent criminal defendant is not entitled--either as a matter of equal protection or of

due process--to a free record of prior proceedings for use in pursuing post-conviction habeas

corpus relief. United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 322-23, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 2090, 48

L.Ed.2d 666 (1976); In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.]

1999, orig. proceeding). A free record is available for that purpose only if the defendant shows

that the habeas corpus application is not frivolous and there is a specific need for the trial records

that are sought. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, orig.

proceeding). To the extent that Relator seeks a copy of the reporter’s record for use in an

anticipated habeas proceeding, he has not made the required showing.

       Relator has not shown that the trial court violated a ministerial duty by denying his request

for a record, or in any other fashion. Therefore, he has not established that he is entitled to

mandamus relief. Accordingly, his petition for writ of mandamus is Denied.



November 28, 2012
                                               CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)




                                                  2
