
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

AT AUSTIN


 



NO. 3-94-069-CR



QUINT PENA,

	APPELLANT

vs.



THE STATE OF TEXAS,

	APPELLEE


 


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR92-0397-A, HONORABLE JOHN E. SUTTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

 



PER CURIAM
	Appellant pleaded guilty and judicially confessed to the offense of aggravated
sexual assault.  Act of May 26, 1987, 70th Leg., R.S., ch. 573, § 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 2275,
amended by Act of July 18, 1987, 70th Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 16, § 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 80
(Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021, since amended).  The district court found that the evidence
substantiated appellant's guilt, deferred further proceedings, and placed appellant on probation. 
The court later revoked appellant's probation on the State's motion, adjudicated appellant guilty,
and assessed punishment at imprisonment for nineteen years and a $5000 fine.
	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the
appeal.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436  S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485  S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State,
516  S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v. State, 573  S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his
right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief would
serve no beneficial purpose.
	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed:   October 12, 1994
Do Not Publish
