
USCA1 Opinion

	




          February 22, 1996                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-1470                                  THOMAS R. MCNELL,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                  MAX HUGEL, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Chief Judge,                                          ___________                           Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Thomas R. McNell on brief pro se.            ________________            Gary  M. Burt  and  Wiggin &  Nourie on  brief  for  appellees Max            _____________       ________________        Hugel, Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, Joseph Millimet, Esquire, and        Matthias J. Reynolds, Esquire.            William L.  Chapman, Cordell A. Johnston,  Orr and  Reno, Katie A.            ___________________  ___________________   _____________  ________        Gummer and McCarter & English on brief for appellee Asbury Park Press.        ______     __________________            Wilbur A. Glahn,  III, McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, Andrew            _____________________  ___________________________________  ______        L.  Sandler, Katharine R. Stollman and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &        ___________  _____________________     _______________________________        Flom on brief for appellee Paul L. Perito, Esquire.        ____                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and                 ___________            the  record  on  appeal.   We  affirm  the  district  court's            judgment of dismissal, essentially  for the reasons stated in            its orders  of May  16, 1994,  July 19, 1994,  and March  31,            1995.                 Affirmed.                 _________                 Appellant's  motion  for  leave to  file  a supplemental            appendix is granted.                        ________                 Appellant's "Rule  60(B)(4)(5) & (6) motion  for summary            judgment in vacating default judgment obtained in  a fraud on            the court in Hugel v. McNell litigation" is denied.                         _____    ______                _______                 The  motions  filed by  appellee  Asbury  Park Press  to            strike appellant's  (1) objection  to its motion  for summary            dismissal and (2) reply brief are denied as moot.                                              _______________                                         -3-
