     Case: 17-51036      Document: 00514637433         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/11/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-51036                                 FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                     September 11, 2018
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GILBERTO PEREZ-MARTINEZ, also known as Gilberto Perez Martinez,
also known as Gilberto Martinez Perez, also known as Gilberto Martinez-
Perez, also known as Gilberto Perez, also known as Jose O. Garcia, also
known as Gilberto Martinez, also known as Gilbert Perez, also known as Jose
Orlando Garcia,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:16-CR-362-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Gilberto Perez-Martinez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-51036    Document: 00514637433    Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/11/2018


                                No. 17-51036

Cir. 2011).   Perez-Martinez has not filed a response.     We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
