986 F.2d 1413
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.George W. GANTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION;  Richard A. Lanham;Seawall Smith, Warden;  Purnell, Chief of Security;  Briggs,A, Hearing Officer;  Parker, Hearing Officer;  LieutenantDiay;  Cornish, Correctional Officer II;  Major Councel;Captain McLean;  Jake Sutton, Correctional Officer II;Bryant Goode, Correctional Officer II;  Bagley, ARPCoordinator, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-7077.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  February 23, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge.  (CA-92-2124-B)
George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:


1
George W. Gantt appeals from the district court's failure to act on certain motions.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the action appealed from is not appealable.  This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988);  Fed.  R. Civ. P. 54(b);   Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.  Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).  The matter here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


2
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
