     Case: 15-20068      Document: 00513545441         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/13/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 15-20068
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                         June 13, 2016
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                      Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VIRGILIO DE LA TORRE-SANTANA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:12-CR-614-1


Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Virgilio De La Torre-Santana has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). De La Torre-Santana has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-20068    Document: 00513545441    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/13/2016


                                No. 15-20068

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
