          .,
s.   -   . ..-




                 Honorable Tom Blackwell        Opinion No. C-53
                 District Attorney
                 Travis County                  Re:   Various questions re-
                 Austin, Texas                        latlng to unimproved
                                                      property on the Hlgh-
                                                      land Lakes within
                                                      Travis County, to be
                 Dear Mr. Blackwell:                  made into a county park.
                         Your request for an opinion reads in part as fol-
                 lows:
                              "The County Auditor has requested that
                         your legal opinion be obtained concerning
                         the expenditure of County funds on land leas-
                         ed by the County from the LCRA for Public
                         Park purposes.
                         "FACTS: The LCRA and others own fee simple
                                 title to unimproved property locat-
                                 ed on certain of the Highland lakes
                                 within Travis County and not within
                                 the boundary of any incorporated city,
                                 town or village. This land has been
                                 offered to Travis County on long term
                                 leases (50-99 years) without cost pro-
                                 viding Travis County will make and
                                 maintain a public park out of the land.
                         'QUESTION No. 1. Out of what funds canTravis
                                  County legally pay for the construc-
                                  tion of permanent improvements on such
                                  land?
                         "QUESTION No. 2. Do the construction of roads,
                                  boat ramps, and other conservation mea-
                                  sures come under the same rule as perma-
                                  nent improvements.
                         "QUESTION No. 3. Out of what Funds can Travis
                                  County legally pay for the necessary
                                  cost of maintenance and supervision
                                  of such park?"

                                              -261-
Hon. Tom Blackwell, Page 2 (c-53)


       Section 1 of Article 6078, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
provides:
           "Each Commissioner Court is author-
      ized to levy and collect a tax not to exceed
      five (5~)cents on each one hundred dollars
      assessed valuation of the county for the pur-
      chase and Improvement of lands for use as
      county parks. No such tax shall be levied and
      collected until the proposition is submitted
      to and ratified by the property taxpaying
      voters of such county at a general or special
      election called for that purpose, provided, a
      two-thirds majority of the property taxpaying
      voters of such county, at an election held for
      such purpose shall determine in favor of such
      tax. If said court desires to establish two
      or more of such county parks, they shall locate
      them In widely separated portions of the county.
      Said court shall have full power and control
      over any and all such parks and may levy and
      collect an annual tax sufficient in their judg-
      ment to properly maintain such parks and build
      and construct pavilions and such other build-
      ings as they may deem necessary, lay out and
      open driveways and walks, pave the same or any
      part thereof, set out trees and shrubbery, con-
      struct ditches or lakes, and make such other
      improvements as they may deem proper. Such
      parks shall remain open for the free use of
      the public under such reasonable rules and
      regulations as such court may prescribe."
       In construing the above quoted provisions, it was held
in Attorney General's Opinion 0-1082 (1939):
           "Article 6078, Revised Statutes, author-
      izes the commissioners' court of any county
      to levy and collect a tax not to exceed five
      cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed
      valuation of the county 'for the purchase and
      improvement of lands for use as county parks,'
      after the proposition has been submitted to
      and ratified by the property tax-paying voters
      of the county. The full power and control over
      such a park Is vested in said court and it 'may
      levy and collect an annual tax sufficient in
      their judgment to properly maintain such parks


                              -262-
Hon. Tom Blackwell, Page 3 (c-53)

        Andybuild and construct pavilions and such.
        other buildings as they may deem necessary,
        lay out and open driveways and walks, pave
        the same or any part thereof, set out trees
        and shrubbery, construct ditches or lakes,
        and make such other Improvements as they
        may deem proper. Such parks shall remain
        open for the free use of the'publlc under
        such reasonable rules and regulations as
        said court may prescribe.'
             "It is obvious that the money with which
        to purchase a park site and to Improve the
        same must be paid from the general purpose
        or the permanent Improvement fund of the
        county derived from the ad valorem tax levied
        and collected under the authority conferred
        and limitations Imposed by Section 9, Article
        8, supra. The statute is silent as to which
        of these funds is the proper one~to bear,the
        expense. It is provided In Article 6079,
        Revised Civil Statutes, 'All revenue from the
        sale of such privileges or concessions shall
        go into a fund for the maintenance of said parks.'
             "The Legislature has authorized any county
        of this State to establish and maintain public
        parks. Such parks are established for the bene-
        volent purpose of promoting health, happiness
        and general welfare of not only the citizens
        of the county, but of the people generally.
        The character of the improvements specifically
        mentioned in the statute are designed to ac-
        complish that purpose. Lewis v. City of Fort
        Worth (Sup.Ct.) 89 S.W.(2d) 975.
             II. . .
             11      Article 6078 specifically author-
        izes the lo&t to purchase land and improve the
        same by constructing buildings thereon, etc. It
        follows that the land for park purposes may be
        acquired and paid for out of the same fund a-
        vailable for the erection of public buildings
        and other permanent improvements. It is our
        further opinion that current operating expenses
        of such parks must be paid out of the general
        purpose fund of the county."
         Likewise, it was held in Attorney General's Opinion
v-744   (1948) :
                            -263-
Hon. Tom Blackwell, page 4 (c-53)


            "Tax levied for park improvement is
       a charge against the County Permanent Im-
       provement Fund and that levied for malnte-
       nance is a charge against the County General
       Fund."
       In Carroll v. Williams, 109 Tex. 155, 202 S.W. 504,
509 (1918), the Court stated:
            "Taxes levied ostensibly for any spe-
       cific purpose or class of purposes designat-
       ed in section 9 of artlcle~VII1, supra, must
       be applied thereunto, in good faith; and In
       no event and under no circumstances may there
       be expended, legally, for one such purpose or
       class of purposes,.tax money in excess of the
       amount raised by taxation declaredly for that
       particular purpose or class of purposes."
         Under the facts submitted with your request, Travis
         will obtain the use and~benefit of the property on
long  term leases (50-99 years), in consideration for the
County establishing and maintaining a public park out of the
land. It is our opinion that such purpose constituted a
public purpose and is within the expressed power ranted the
commissioners   court by the provisions of Article 2078, ver-
non's Civil Statutes.
       In view of the foregoing authorities, you are advised
that the construction of improvements on such land must be
paid out of the Permanent Improvement Fund. You are further
advised that the construction of boat ramps and other perma-
nent structures (Including necessary repairs and improve-
ment of such structures) must be paid out of the Permanent Im-
provement Fund. The construction of roads (including mainte-
nance and repair of such roads), however, must be paid out of
the Road and-Bridge Fund of themCounty. Carroll v. Williams,
        In Attorney General's Opinion v-831 (1949), it was
he1
T    that the Permanent Improvement Fund may not be utilized
for the purpose of purchasing materials and supplies for the
construction of fences for adjacent landowners on rights of
way on new county roads and highways, stating that if such ex-
pense was a necessary expense to the construction of the road,
it would have to be paid out of the Road and Bridge Fund of
the County. We believe the same principle is applicable to
the construction of roads for the proposed county park. You
are therefore advised in answer to your second question that
the construction of roads must be paid out of the Road and
Bridge Fund of the County (including necessary maintenance
and repair of such roads).

                           -264-
Hon. Tom Blackwell, Page 5 (c-53)

       In ansner to your third question, you are.advised
that the necessary cost of maintenance and supervision of
such park 1s paid out of the General Fund of the County.
Attorney General's Opinions V-744 (1948) and O-1082 (1939).
However, as pointed out above, the necessary repairs and
improvements to structures built in the park must be paid
out of the Permanent Improvement Fund, and necessary malnte-
nance and repair of roads in the park must be paid out of
the Road and Bridge Fund.

                        SUMMARY
        The Commissioners Court of Travis County
        may legally pay for the construction of
        permanent improvements (including neces-
        sary repair and improvement of Buch struc-
        tures) on a proposed county park out of the
        Permanent Improvement Fund. The construc-
        tion of roads in such park (including mainte-
        nance and repair of such roads) is paid out
        of the Road and Bridge Fund. The cost of
        maintenance and supervision of such park is
        paid out of the General Fund of the County.
        However, any repairs and improvements to
        structures built in the park must be paid
        out of the Permanent Improvement Fund, and
        maintenance and repairs of roads in the park
        must be paid out of the Road and Bridge Fund.
                         Yours very truly,
                         WAGGONER CARR
                         Attorney General




                             Assistant
JR:ms




                             -265-
Hon. Tom Blackwell, page 6 (C-53)



APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
W. V. Geppert, Chairman
J; C. Davis
V. F. Taylor
Ernest Fortenberry
James N. Stofer
APPROVED FOR THE'ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: Stanton Stone




                              -266-
