[Cite as Raig v. Ohio Real Estate Comm., 2019-Ohio-5415.]


                                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                     PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO


 JEFFERY RAIG,                                          :   OPINION

                   Appellant,                           :
                                                            CASE NO. 2019-P-0081
         - vs -                                         :

 OHIO REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,                           :

                   Appellee.                            :


 Civil Appeal from the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2019 CV
 00238.

 Judgment: Affirmed.


 Lester S. Potash, 25700 Science Park Drive, Suite 160, Beachwood, Ohio 44122 (For
 Appellant).

 Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, and Brian R. Honen, Assistant Attorney General,
 State Office Tower, 30 East Broad Street, 16th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (For
 Appellee).



THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.


        {¶1}      Appellant, Jeffery Raig, appeals the trial court’s decision affirming

revocation of his real estate license. We affirm.

        {¶2}      Appellant and his brother had a business that purchased, rehabilitated, and

then sold real estate. His brother primarily performed the work on the properties and

prepared progress payment applications that appellant signed and presented to a local
private investor, who then approved payments to the business.

      {¶3}   Some of the progress payment applications claimed that work had been

performed when in fact it had not. As a result, in October 2016, appellant and his brother

were indicted on 45 felony charges. Appellant ultimately plead to and was convicted of

five counts of telecommunications fraud, fifth-degree felonies, and was sentenced to

community control.

      {¶4}   Appellant notified the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Real

Estate and Professional Licensing (“the Division”) of his convictions. The Division issued

a complaint asserting violations of R.C. 4735.18(A) and ethical canons governing real

estate brokers.

      {¶5}   An administrative hearing was held in October 2018. Appellant admitted to

the convictions but argued for a suspension and fine. The hearing officer did not make a

sanction recommendation but found that appellant’s convictions relate to his real estate

license and violate R.C. 4735.18(A).

      {¶6}   Appellant filed objections with the Ohio Real Estate Commission (“the

Commission”). The Commission unanimously adopted the hearing officer’s decision,

revoked appellant’s license, and imposed a $2,500 fine.

      {¶7}   Appellant appealed to the Portage County Court of Common Pleas. In

affirming revocation, the trial court found the Commission’s decision to be supported by

reliable, probative and substantial evidence, and consistent with applicable law.

      {¶8}   Appellant assigns the following as error:

      {¶9}   “The lower court abused its discretion in affirming the Ohio Real Estate

Commission’s adjudicatory order revoking Jeffery Raig’s real estate sales license.”




                                            2
       {¶10} Appellant does not challenge any factual findings, that a felony conviction

constitutes a violation of R.C 4537.18(A), or that the Commission has the authority under

R.C. 4735.051(I) to revoke his real estate license. Instead, he maintains that revocation

is not warranted in light of the mitigating circumstances.

       {¶11} Neither a common pleas court nor an appellate court has the authority to

modify a penalty imposed by a state agency unless it is unauthorized. Abdel Latif, Inc. v.

Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 06AP-1078, 2007-Ohio-2943, ¶ 14,

citing Henry’s Café, Inc. v. Bd. of Liquor Control, 170 Ohio St. 233, 163 N.E.2d 678.

O’Wesney v. State Bd. of Registration for Engineers and Surveyors, 5th Dist. Stark No.

2009-CA-00074, 2009-Ohio-6444, ¶ 72.

       {¶12} Revocation is authorized and therefore, appellant’s sole assignment is

without merit. The judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.



TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.




                                             3
