                United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 17-2041
                        ___________________________

  Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman, Wilma Marie Pennington, Inc, Standing In,

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

 Barry S. Schermer; United States of America, Jeff Sessions, Attorney General of
   the United States; Bank of America, N.A., CEO Brian T. Moynihan; David A.
     Sosne, Bankruptcy Trustee; Summers Compton Wells; Brian J. LaFlamme,
 Attorney for Trustee; Ira Bergman & Bergman, Schraier & Co. and Brown Smith
    Wallace; Federal Housing Finance Agency, CEO David M. Moffett; Federal
 Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, CEO Donald H. Layton; Martin Leigh, P.C.;
 Adam A. Field; Matthew M. Peters; Caitlin Stayduhar; Amy T. Ryan; Thompson
 Coburn, LLP, Chairman Tom Minogue; Allen D. Allred; Christopher M. Hohn;
Seth A. Albin; Bryan Cave, LLP, Managing Partner Robert L. Newmark; Bryan C.
   Walsh; Rhiana Luaders; Amy E. Breihan; State of Missouri, Attorney General
  Josh Hawley; David L. Dowd; Timothy J. Boyer; Robert H. Dierker; Angela T.
  Quigless; Philip M. Hess; Gary M. Gaertner; Millsap & Singer, P.C.; Anne M.
                       Zimmermann; Charles S. Pulliam, III,

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
                                      ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                 ____________

                          Submitted: February 14, 2018
                             Filed: March 1, 2018
                                 [Unpublished]
                                ____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, see
Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the
district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could
be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
                         ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

                                         -2-
