<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<META NAME="DATE" CONTENT="11/28/1995">
<TITLE>CV5-270                                                             </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-95-00270-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><STRONG>Rufus Gaut, C. W. Crouch, Omni Capital Corporation,</STRONG></P>

<P ALIGN="CENTER"><STRONG>and Credwell Corporation, Appellants</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><STRONG>Amarillo Economic Development Corporation and American Airlines, Inc., Appellees</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 95-04034, HONORABLE PAUL R. DAVIS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG>PER CURIAM</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Appellants<STRONG><A HREF="#N_1_"><SUP> (1)</SUP></A></STRONG> sought a temporary injunction to restrain any expenditure of funds
under a contract, the "Air Service Agreement," between Amarillo Economic Development
Corporation (AEDC) and American Airlines.  This appeal arises from the trial-court order
denying appellants' request for temporary injunctive relief.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. Civ. Prac. &amp; Rem. Code
Ann. § 51.14(4) (West Supp. 1995); Tex. R. App. P. 42(a)(1).  Because the trial court has now
rendered a final judgment in the underlying proceeding, we will dismiss the appeal as moot.</P>

<P>	On November 1, 1995, the trial court rendered a final judgment in appellees' favor,
declaring the "Air Service Agreement" valid and enforceable.  If a trial court renders a final
judgment during the appeal of an order denying temporary injunctive relief, the cause on appeal
becomes moot.  <EM>Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A.,</EM> 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex.
1991); <EM>PCA Health Plans of Tex., Inc. v. Rapoport,</EM> 882 S.W.2d 522, 525 (Tex. App.--Austin
1994, no writ).  When a cause becomes moot on appeal, the appellate court must set aside all
orders relating to the temporary injunction and dismiss the cause.  <EM>Isuani,</EM> 802 S.W.2d at 236;
<EM>Texas Foundries, Inc. v. International Moulders &amp; Foundry Workers' Union,</EM> 248 S.W.2d 460,
461 (Tex. 1952); <EM>Christie v. Argonaut Ins. Co.,</EM> 530 S.W.2d 334, 336 (Tex. Civ. App.--Austin
1975, no writ).  To decide the appeal under these circumstances would constitute an advisory
opinion on an abstract question of law.  <EM>Texas Parks &amp; Wildlife Dep't v. Texas Ass'n of Bass
Clubs,</EM> 622 S.W.2d 594, 596 (Tex. App.--Austin 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.).  On the other hand, to
dismiss only the appeal would effectively affirm the trial-court judgment without consideration
of any assignments of error.  <EM>Texas Foundries, Inc.,</EM> 248 S.W.2d at 461.</P>

<P>	Accordingly, we set aside the order denying the request for temporary injunctive
relief and dismiss the portion of the cause pertaining to the request for temporary injunctive relief. 
<EM>Id.</EM>  We express no opinion as to the final judgment that declared the contract valid as it is not
before this Court for review in this appeal.  <EM>See Davis v. Huey,</EM> 571 S.W.2d 859, 861-62 (Tex.
1978); <EM>Public Util. Comm'n v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Util. Rates,</EM> 776 S.W.2d 224,
226 (Tex. App.--Austin 1989, no writ) (in interlocutory appeal, review is confined to validity of
order that denies injunctive relief).</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and B. A. Smith</P>

<P>Order Set Aside and Cause Dismissed</P>

<P>Filed:   December 6, 1995</P>

<P>Do Not Publish
<P><A NAME="N_1_">1. </A>     <SUP>1</SUP>  Appellant Rufus Gaut was the plaintiff in the trial court.  Appellants C. W. Crouch,
Omni Capital Corporation, and Credwell Corporation were intervenors.</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
