      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                        NO. 03-18-00531-CR



                                   The State of Texas, Appellant

                                                   v.

                                    Jeffrey Don Grays, Appellee



                  FROM THE COUNTY AT LAW NO. 1 OF COMAL COUNTY
            NO. 2017CR1315, HONORABLE RANDAL C. GRAY, JUDGE PRESIDING



                  ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

                The State of Texas has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting

Jeffrey Don Grays’s motion to suppress evidence. Before filing its notice of appeal, the State filed

a request for the trial court’s entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State subsequently

filed a notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions of law. No findings or conclusions were

filed before the filing of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record with this Court.1



        1
           Although the trial court signed findings and conclusions on August 27, 2018, which have
been forwarded here in a supplemental record, we may not consider these because the date of
signature was after the filing of the record in this appeal, which vested jurisdiction in this Court. See
Green v. State, 906 S.W.2d 937, 940 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (noting that trial court’s findings
entered after filing of trial record were “null and void” because once trial record was filed “the trial
court no longer ha[d] jurisdiction to adjudicate the case”); see also Berry v. State, 995 S.W.2d 699,
701 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (concluding that trial court’s supplemental findings made after receipt
of trial record were “null and void, and should not have been considered by the court of appeals”).
                A trial court must state its essential findings upon the request of the losing party

on a motion to suppress. State of Tex. v. Saenz, 411 S.W.3d 488, 495 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

“Essential findings” are the “findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate

court with a basis upon which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts.” Id.

When, as here, a trial court is required to make findings of fact but has lost jurisdiction to do so, the

trial court’s authority to take action may be revived by abatement. Green v. State, 906 S.W.2d 937,

940 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(g) (stating that, unless otherwise provided

by law or appellate rules, further proceedings in trial court are suspended once record has been filed

in appellate court).

                Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for its entry

of findings of fact and conclusions of law. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings

of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed with this Court no later than October 1, 2018. The

appeal will be reinstated once the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

                It is ordered September 11, 2018.



Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: September 11, 2018

Do Not Publish




                                                   2
