People v Moore (2014 NY Slip Op 05807)
People v Moore
2014 NY Slip Op 05807
Decided on August 13, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on August 13, 2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentRANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.


2012-04319
 (Ind. No. 2651/11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vTirone Moore, appellant.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Riviezzo, J.), imposed April 11, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). The record does not demonstrate that the defendant "grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing" (People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267; see People v Johnson, 113 AD3d 635, 635). Therefore, notwithstanding the defendant's execution of the written appeal waiver form, it cannot be said that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Pressley, 116 AD3d 794). Accordingly, review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim is not precluded.
Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, AUSTIN, SGROI and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court


