     Case: 17-50715      Document: 00514521770         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/20/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-50715                               FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                       June 20, 2018
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

MICHEL VILLALPANDO-GONZALEZ, also known as Michel Gonzalez-
Villalpando, also known as Michel Vallalpando, also known as Michael
Gonzalez, also known as Michel Gonzalez, also known as Michael Gonzalez-
Villalpando,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:16-CR-360-2


Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Michel Villalpando-Gonzalez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Villalpando-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50715    Document: 00514521770    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/20/2018


                                No. 17-50715

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
