         TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                       NO. 03-01-00665-CR




                                 Zantar Anton Bright, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee



         FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
             NO. 52,630, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING




               Appellant Zantar Anton Bright pleaded guilty to robbery. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.

§ 29.02 (West 1994). The district court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to prison for fifteen

years.

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 5 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.

1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
               We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

               The judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                              David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: March 14, 2002

Do Not Publish




                                                 2
