Filed 5/23/14 P. v. Donnell CA4/1
                      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


                    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                  DIVISION ONE

                                           STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THE PEOPLE,                                                         D064377

         Plaintiff and Respondent,

         v.                                                         (Super. Ct. Nos. SCD235326,
                                                                    SCD245608)
ERICA LYNN DONNELL,

         Defendant and Appellant.


         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert J.

Trentacosta, Judge. Affirmed.

         Neil Auwarter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

         No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

                                                 INTRODUCTION

         In separate cases, Erica Lynn Donnell (aka Erica Lynn Bruce) pled guilty to one

felony count of forcibly resisting a police officer (Pen. Code, § 69)1 and one



1        All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
misdemeanor count of resisting a police officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)). After admitting she

violated probation in both cases by failing to appear in court as required, the court

imposed the two-year middle term to be served in local prison for the felony case (case

No. SCD235326). Against the sentence, the court awarded Donnell 433 days of

presentence custody credit consisting of 319 days actual custody credit and 114 days of

conduct credit. The court subsequently modified the judgment to award a total of 550

days of presentence custody credit after adding 117 days of conduct credit. The court

terminated probation in the misdemeanor case (case No. SCD245608) and released her

from custody in that case alone based on time served.

       Donnell appeals. Her appointed appellate counsel filed a brief requesting we

independently review the record for error. (See People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,

441-442.) Having done so and having identified no reasonably arguable appellate issues,

we affirm the judgment.

                                     BACKGROUND

                                             A

                                   Case No. SCD235326

       According to the probation report, a San Diego Police officer encountered an

apparently intoxicated Donnell in an alley on July 12, 2011. When he attempted to arrest

her for an outstanding warrant, Donnell resisted by refusing to cooperate, hitting the

officer and burning his arm with a cigarette lighter.

       Donnell pleaded guilty to one felony count of knowingly resisting, by use of force

and violence, an executive officer in the performance of his duty. (§ 69.) She was placed

                                              2
on three years formal probation with 365 days in custody. However, after 180 days she

was to be released to an approved treatment facility.

                                             B

                                  Case No. SCD245608

       Donnell later pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of resisting a police officer

while he was attempting to arrest her on January 10, 2013. (§148, subd. (a)(1).) In

exchange, she was granted probation in case No. SCD245608, with terms including 365

days in custody and continued probation in case No. SCD235326. Probation was

conditioned on her compliance with all terms and conditions of the Behavioral Health

Court (BHC). As part of the application for acceptance into the BHC, Donnell agreed to

follow all the rules and requirements of the program and to comply with the rules of the

court, the probation officer, case manager and treatment team.

                                             C

                           Probation Violation and Revocation

       According to a supplemental probation report, after being accepted into BHC in

April 2013, Donnell absconded and failed to appear at a scheduled BHC review hearing.

Donnell waived her right to an evidentiary hearing and admitted she violated the terms

and conditions of probation by failing to appear in court as ordered.

       The court revoked probation in case No. SCD235326 and denied further probation

noting there was no reasonable probability to believe she can or will comply because she

had been tried and failed to complete two prior grants of probation. The court sentenced

her to two years in local prison with custody credits of 319 days plus 114 days of conduct

                                             3
credits for a total of 433 days. Subsequently, pursuant to a stipulation, the court found

Donnell was entitled to receive an additional 117 days of conduct credits for total custody

credit of 550 days.

        The court terminated probation in case No. SCD245608. She was committed to

local custody for 205 days, but was released from custody only on this case based on

credit for time served of 103 actual days plus 102 days of conduct credit for a total of 205

days.

                                             D

                                          Appeal

        Donnell appeals challenging the sentence or other matters occurring after the plea.

Her appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief raising a single issue seeking

additional presentence conduct credits in case No. SCD235326. This issue was rendered

moot when the trial court granted the additional conduct credits. On the motion of

appointed appellate counsel, we struck the original opening brief and permitted counsel

to file a brief under People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.

                                      DISCUSSION

        Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presented no argument for reversal and instead requested

we review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at

pages 441-442. Consistent with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744, counsel

identified one possible but not reasonably arguable issue (Anders issue):



                                             4
      (1) "Was appellant correctly denied presentence conduct credits for her 88 days in

a residential treatment program? (People v. Palazuelos (1996) 180 Cal.App.3d 962.)"

      We granted Donnell permission to file a supplemental brief on her own behalf.

She did not do so.

      As requested by counsel, we reviewed the record for error and did not find any

reasonably arguable appellate issues. Donnell has been competently represented by

counsel on this appeal.

                                    DISPOSITION

      The judgment is affirmed.


                                                                    MCCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:


BENKE, J.


MCINTYRE, J.




                                           5
