
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1815                                  HENRY K. BOATENG,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                             KATHLEEN E. O'TOOLE, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,                                        _____________                              Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,                                   ____________________                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.                                          _____________                                 ____________________            Henry K. Boateng on brief pro se.            ________________            Bruce R. Henry, Susan M.  O'Hara and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on            ______________  ________________     __________________________        brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                   January 28, 1998                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and                 ___________            the  record  on appeal.    We  affirm  the grant  of  summary            judgment  in favor  of the  defendants,  essentially for  the            reasons  stated in the district court's memorandum and order,            dated May 30, 1997.                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                 _________                                         -2-
