     Case: 16-40042      Document: 00514010779         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/30/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-40042
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                           May 30, 2017
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ALONSO PINEDA-URQUIA, also known as Luis Alonso Pineda-
Urquilla,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:15-CR-802-1


Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Alonso Pineda-
Urquia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed original and
supplemental briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pineda-
Urquia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40042      Document: 00514010779   Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/30/2017


                                 No. 16-40042

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
