
In The


Court of Appeals


Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont


____________________


NO. 09-03-539 CV

____________________


IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF TIMOTHY ROSALES, JR.




On Appeal from the 221st District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 02-11-07554-CV




MEMORANDUM OPINION
	Pursuant to Title 11, Chapter 841 of the Health and Safety Code (the SVP statute), the
State of Texas filed a petition to civilly commit Timothy Rosales, Jr. as a sexually violent
predator.  See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 841.001-.150 (Vernon 2003 & Supp.
2004).  The trial court found that Rosales suffers from a behavioral abnormality that makes
him likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence and entered a final judgment and
order of civil commitment.  Rosales appeals presenting two issues.
	In his first issue, Rosales argues the SVP statute is unconstitutional because it is
punitive in nature.  This court has repeatedly held the SVP statute is not punitive, In re
Commitment of Larkin, 127 S.W.3d 930 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2004, no pet.); In re
Commitment of Morales, 98 S.W.3d 288 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2003, pet. denied); In re
Commitment of Mullens, 92 S.W.3d 881 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2002, pet. denied); and
Beasley v. Molett, 95 S.W.3d 590 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2002, pet. denied), and the Texas
Supreme Court has not written on this issue. (1)  Issue one is overruled.
	Rosales' second issue contends the SVP statute and the concomitant "Final Judgment
and Order of Commitment" are unconstitutionally vague.  Rosales' complaints regarding the
order of commitment are based upon its conformance with the statute.  This court has held
the statute is not unconstitutionally vague, see Larkin, 127 S.W.3d at 932; Morales, 98
S.W.3d at 291; Mullens, 92 S.W.3d at 887-88, and the Texas Supreme Court has not written
on this issue.  Accordingly, we decline to find the statute and the attendant judgment are
unconstitutionally vague.  Issue two is overruled.
	The judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
 
							_________________________________
                                                                                                  DON BURGESS
                                                                                                         Justice
Submitted on August 24, 2004
Opinion Delivered August 31, 2004

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.
1. But see Fisher v. State, 123 S.W.3d 828 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2003, pet. filed). 
