               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42800

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 720
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: November 17, 2015
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
JAMES LEMAR PARTON,                             )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Bonner County. Hon. Barbara A. Buchanan, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum
       term of confinement of ten years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen,
       affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                      Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
                                 and HUSKEY, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       James Lemar Parton was found guilty of lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen,
Idaho Code § 18-1508. The district court imposed a unified sentence of twenty years, with a
minimum term of confinement of ten years. Parton appeals, contending that his sentence is
excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-


                                                1
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Parton’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
