                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                                AT JACKSON

                COREY ALAN BENNETT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

                    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County
                       No. 2014CR229      Joe H. Walker, III, Judge

                              ________________________________

                  No. W2015-00442-COA-R3-CV – Filed September 2, 2015
                          _________________________________

      The notice of appeal was not timely filed and therefore, this appeal must be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                  Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

KENNY ARMSTRONG, J., J. STEVEN STAFFORD, P.J.W.S., AND ARNOLD B. GOLDIN, J.

Corey Alan Bennett, Nashville, Tennessee, pro se.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; and Jennifer L. Brenner, Senior
Counsel, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION1

        The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal set forth in Rule 4 of the
Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil matters.
Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004); Binkley v. Medling, 117 S.W.3d 252,
255 (Tenn. 2003). The Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure expressly prohibit this
Court from either waiving or extending that time period. See T.R.A.P. 2 and 21(b). Thus,
the failure to timely file a notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the
matter and therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.


1
    Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee provides:

         This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm,
         reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal
         opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum
         opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION”, shall not be published, and
         shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
        In this case, it appears that a final order was entered on December 9, 2014, and
there is no indication that any of the motions listed in Rule 4(b) were timely filed. Thus,
the Appellant’s notice of appeal should have been filed within thirty days after December
9, 2014. See Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). The Appellant, however, did not file a notice of
appeal until February 18, 2015, and February 18, 2015, is more than thirty days after
December 9, 2014.

        By Order entered on July 24, 2015, the Court directed Appellant to, within twenty
(20) days from the entry of that Order, show cause why this appeal should not be
dismissed for failure to timely file the Notice of Appeal. Our Order of July 24, 2015, also
provided that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order within the time provided herein could
result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice.” On that same date, the Clerk of
this Court transmitted a copy of our Order to Appellant by certified mail, return receipt
requested. The Clerk later received the return receipt indicating that Appellant received
the mail parcel on August 11, 2015. As of this date, Appellant has not responded to our
Order of July 24, 2015.

        Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this Court lacks subject matter
jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.

                                       Conclusion

       For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss this appeal for failure to timely file the
notice of appeal. Costs of this appeal are taxed to the appellant, Corey Alan Bennett, for
which execution may issue if necessary.

                                          PER CURIAM
