      [Cite as In re K. D., 2014-Ohio-2368.]
              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
          FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
               HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO



IN RE: K.D.                                    :   APPEAL NO. C-130689
                                                   TRIAL NO. 13-7554X

                                               :      O P I N I O N.




Appeal From: Hamilton County Juvenile Court

Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Cause
                           Remanded

Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: June 4, 2014


Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rachel Lipman
Curran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee State of Ohio,

The Office of the Ohio Public Defender and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant State Public
Defender, for Appellant K.D.




Please note: we have removed this case from the accelerated calendar.
                     OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS




F ISCHER , Judge.

       {¶1}    Appellant K.D. admitted to an act of delinquency that, if committed

by an adult, would have constituted the second-degree felony of felonious assault,

along with two firearm specifications. The juvenile court committed K.D. to the

Department of Youth Services (“DYS”) for a minimum term of 24 months and a

maximum term not to exceed his 21st birthday.            The court also imposed an

additional three-year term for a firearm specification. K.D. has appealed.

       {¶2}    K.D.’s first assignment of error alleges that the juvenile court erred in

imposing a minimum term of commitment of 24 months. R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(d)

provides that if a child is adjudicated delinquent for committing an act that “would

be a felony of the first or second degree if committed by an adult,” the juvenile court

may commit the child to DYS “for an indefinite term consisting of a minimum period

of one year and a maximum period not to exceed the child’s attainment of twenty-

one years of age.”

       {¶3}    In In re Williams, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 04AP-624, 2005-Ohio-584,

Williams was adjudicated delinquent for committing an act that, had it been

committed by an adult, would have constituted the second-degree felony of

attempted aggravated robbery. The juvenile court committed Williams to DYS for a

minimum term of two years. The Tenth Appellate District held, and the prosecutor

conceded, that the juvenile court had erred under R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(d) in

committing Williams to DYS for a minimum of two years, because the statute

provided for a one-year minimum commitment for a delinquent act that would have

constituted a second-degree felony. The appellate court remanded the cause to the

juvenile court “with instructions to enter judgment committing [Williams] to the




                                          2
                     OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS



legal custody of the DYS for an indefinite term consisting of a minimum period of

one year[.]”

       {¶4}    The Second Appellate District followed In re Williams in In re T.J., 2d

Dist. Clark No. 2005-CA-123, 2006-Ohio-4406.         T.J. had admitted to an act of

delinquency that would have constituted the second-degree felony of felonious

assault if committed by an adult. The juvenile court committed T.J. to DYS for a

minimum term of 48 months. The Second District held that the juvenile court had

exceeded its authority in committing T.J. for a minimum term of 48 months, because

under R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(d), the court only had the authority to commit T.J. for a

one-year minimum term. The appellate court remanded the cause to the juvenile

court for resentencing.

       {¶5}    The Eighth Appellate District came to a similar conclusion when

interpreting R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(e), which provides that if the child is adjudicated

delinquent for committing an act that “would be a felony of the third, fourth, or fifth

degree if committed by an adult,” the juvenile court may commit the child to DYS

“for an indefinite term consisting of a minimum period of six months and a

maximum period not to exceed the child’s attainment of twenty-one years of age.” In

In re D.H., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 99880, 2013-Ohio-5134, D.H. had been

adjudicated delinquent for committing an act that, if committed by an adult, would

have constituted a fifth-degree-felony assault. The juvenile court committed D.H. to

DYS for a minimum term of two years to a maximum not to exceed “his attaining 21

years of age.” The Eighth District held that the juvenile court’s disposition was

contrary to law, because R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(e) did not permit a minimum

commitment of two years for the equivalent of a fifth-degree felony. The appellate




                                          3
                     OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS



court remanded the cause with instructions to the juvenile court “to order a

minimum period of commitment for six months.”

       {¶6}    We point out that if the General Assembly had intended for the

juvenile court to have discretion in imposing a minimum term of commitment on a

juvenile adjudicated delinquent for committing the equivalent of a second-degree

felony, it could have provided for such discretion, as it did in R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(c),

which states that for violations of certain provisions of the Revised Code, the juvenile

court may commit the delinquent child to DYS “for an indefinite term consisting of a

minimum period of one to three years * * * and a maximum term not to exceed the

child’s attainment of twenty-one years of age.” See Zumwalde v. Madeira and

Indian Hill Joint Fire Dist., 128 Ohio St.3d 492, 2011-Ohio-1603, 946 N.E.2d 748, ¶

24, quoting State v. Taniguchi, 74 Ohio St.3d 154, 156, 656 N.E.2d 1286 (1995) (“A

court should give effect to the words actually employed in a statute, and should not

delete words used, or insert words not used, in the guise of interpreting the

statute.”).

       {¶7}    In this case, the juvenile court committed K.D. to DYS for a minimum

term of 24 months for an act that, if committed by an adult, would have been a

second-degree felony.     Under R.C. 2152.16(A)(1)(d), the juvenile court had no

authority to commit K.D. to DYS for a minimum term in excess of one year. The first

assignment of error is sustained.

       {¶8}    The second assignment of error, alleging that K.D.’s counsel was

ineffective in failing to object to the illegal commitment, is made moot by our

disposition of the first assignment of error, and we do not address it.

       {¶9}    The portion of the juvenile court’s judgment committing K.D. to DYS

for a minimum term of 24 months for the equivalent of the second-degree felony of



                                           4
                     OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS



felonious assault is reversed. This cause is remanded to the juvenile court with

instructions to enter judgment committing K.D. to DYS for an indefinite term

consisting of a minimum period of one year and a maximum period not to exceed his

21st birthday. The judgment of the juvenile court is affirmed in all other respects.

                     Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded.


C UNNINGHAM , P.J., and H ILDEBRANDT , J., concur.


Please note:
       The court has recorded its own entry this date.




                                           5
