

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 3, 2011.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-10-00647-CR
____________
 
ARSENIO RAY AUGUST, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 262nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1239147
 

 
MEMORANDUM
OPINION
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
attempted burglary of a habitation.  Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement a
finding of guilt was deferred and he was placed on three years’ deferred
adjudication probation.  On May 27, 2010, the State filed a motion to
adjudicate appellant’s guilt alleging he violated several conditions of
probation.  On July 13, 2010, the trial court sentenced appellant to
confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $300.  Appellant filed a timely
notice of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he
concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets
the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396
(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant
was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim.
App.1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and
agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no
reversible error in the record.  We are not to address the merits of each claim
raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined
there are no arguable grounds for review.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178
S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Panel consists of Chief Justice
Hedges and Justices Christopher and Jamison.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

