           In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 15-0107V
                                       Filed: June 1, 2015
                                           Unpublished

****************************
AARON PRIOR,               *
                           *
              Petitioner,  *                                Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
                           *                                Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (“Tdap”)
v.                         *                                vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
                           *                                Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”);
                           *                                Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
              Respondent.  *
****************************

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Sarah C. Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

      On February 2, 2015, Aaron Prior filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a tetanus-
diphtheria-pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on March 31, 2014, petitioner suffered a
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Am. Pet. at preamble. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special
Masters.

       On June 1, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”],
in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.
1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be
posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
Respondent’s Report at 4. Specifically, respondent “believes that petitioner’s alleged
injury is consistent [with a] SIRVA.” Id. Respondent stated that “based on the record as
it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the
[Vaccine] Act.” Id.

       In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that
petitioner is entitled to compensation.

                                  s/Denise K. Vowell
                                  Denise K. Vowell
                                  Chief Special Master




                                            2
