
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            United States Court of Appeals                                For the First Circuit                                 ____________________          No. 96-2070                          MANCHESTER SECURITY SERVICE, INC.,                                Plaintiff - Appellant,                                          v.                    CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, ETC., ET AL.,                               Defendants - Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Chief Judge,                                          ___________                          Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                _____________________               Andrew D. Dunn,  with whom Devine,  Millimet & Branch,  P.A.               ______________             _________________________________          was on brief for appellant.               Louis M.  Rohrberg, with whom  Rohrberg & Associates  was on               __________________             _____________________          brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                    April 24, 1997                                 ____________________                    Per  Curiam.  Upon review  of the briefs  and record in                    Per  Curiam.                    ___________          this  case,  we affirm  the decision  of  the district  court for          substantially  the  same  reasons  stated in  its  opinion  dated          August 28, 1996.                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellees.                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellees.                    ________________________________________                                         -2-
