Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                       ATLANTA,____________________
                                                March 05, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0351. AMMON RA SUMRALL v. TODDRICK HUNTER et al.

      On July 26, 2018, the trial court denied prison inmate Ammon Ra Sumrall’s
request to file a civil complaint against defendants Toddrick Hunter and Johnny R.
Hunter, finding that his pleading, on its face, showed a complete absence of any
justiciable issue of law or fact. See OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). Sumrall then filed
“Plaintiff’s Response to the Court’s Order that Denied Plaintiff’s Request to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis.” The trial court denied the response on January 14, 2019 and, on
February 14, 2019, Sumrall filed this application for discretionary review. We,
however, lack jurisdiction.
      To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry
of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 582
(420 SE2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot
accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-34 (d).
Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Sumrall filed his
application 31 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. Sumrall attempted to
file his application earlier, but it was returned because he did not have a proper
certificate of service in compliance with Court of Appeals Rule 6. Sumrall has filed
a motion to change the filing date back to the date of the original filing. However,
this Court can only accept an application once it is in compliance with our rules and
that is the filing date. Accordingly, Sumrall’s motion to change the filing date is
hereby DENIED.
      Moreover, although Sumrall called his filing a response, his filing was in
substance one for reconsideration. See Masters v. Clark, 269 Ga. App. 537, 538 (604
SE2d 556) (2004) (“[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules,
pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.”) (citation and
punctuation omitted).     An order denying a motion for reconsideration is not
appealable in its own right. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d
187) (2000). Moreover, a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for
filing an appeal from the underlying order. See Cheeley- Towns v. Rapid Group, Inc.,
212 Ga. App. 183, 183 (1) (441 SE2d 452) (1994); Harris v. State, 278 Ga. 280, 282
n.3 (600 SE2d 592) (2004) (“[A] motion to reconsider does not toll the time for filing
an application to appeal.”). Thus, this application is untimely as to both the denial
of his request to file a civil complaint and the order denying reconsideration and also
invalid as to the order denying reconsideration.
      For these reasons, the application is hereby DISMISSED.



                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         03/05/2019
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                               Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.


                                                                                        , Clerk.
