i          i      i                                                                  i       i      i




                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                              Nos. 04-09-00664-CR & 04-09-00665-CR

                                           Charles PENA,
                                             Appellant

                                                   v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                      From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas
                                 Trial Court Nos. 292745 & 292744
                            Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                  Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 16, 2009

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           The trial court imposed sentence on August 5, 2009, and appellant did not file a timely

motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore due September 5, 2009.

See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a)(1). The notice of appeal was not filed until September 21, 2009, and the

clerk’s record shows the notice of appeal was not deposited in the mail before the last day for filing.
                                                                      04-09-00664-CR & 04-09-00665-CR



In fact, the notice of appeal shows it was not completed until September 5, 2009, the day after it was

due. No motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3.

        On November 3, 2009, we ordered appellant to show why this appeal should not be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction. On December 3, 2009, appellant filed a response in which he admits the

notice of appeal was untimely, and for the first time seeks an extension of time to file the notice of

appeal. A motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal must be filed in this court within fifteen

days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3. Here, the motion to

extend time to file the notice of appeal had to be filed on or before September 21, 2009, but was not

filed until December 3, 2009. See id.

        Because neither the notice of appeal nor the motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal

was timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519,

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions); see also TEX . R. APP . P.

26.3. Accordingly, we dismiss the motion for extension of time and the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.



                                                        PER CURIAM



Do not publish




                                                  -2-
