                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

                                 NO. 2007-CA-01774-SCT

JON ADAMS

v.

A & C ENTERTAINMENT


DATE OF JUDGMENT:                           07/05/2007
TRIAL JUDGE:                                HON. W. SWAN YERGER
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:                  HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                     PAUL E. ROGERS
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:                      CHRIS N. K. GANNER
NATURE OF THE CASE:                         CIVIL - REAL PROPERTY
DISPOSITION:                                REVERSED AND REMANDED - 04/16/2009
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:


       BEFORE WALLER, C.J., DICKINSON AND KITCHENS, JJ.

       WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶1.    Jon Adams seeks review of the circuit court’s dismissal of his appeal from county

court. We reverse and remand to the Hinds County Circuit Court.

                               PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2.    Jon Adams leased a building to A & C Entertainment Corporation. Believing A & C

to be in default, Adams sought to evict A & C and recover possession of the building through

a complaint for unlawful entry and detainer. Following trial, the county court ordered Adams

to continue leasing the building to A & C subject to a variety of conditions not at issue here.
¶3.    Adams filed a timely notice of appeal with the Circuit Court of the First Judicial

District of Hinds County, and the parties filed briefs with the court. A & C filed a “Motion

to Strike Brief of Defendant/Appellant, Jon Adams and Dismiss Appeal,” to which Adams

filed a response. On January 17, 2007, the circuit court granted A & C’s motion and

dismissed Adams’s appeal for failure to cite authority, in violation of Mississippi Rule of

Appellate Procedure 28(a)(6). The order stated:

       Appellant’s Brief does not cite any authority to support his argument. Rule
       28(a)(6) M.R.A.P. requires that “[t]he argument shall contain the contentions
       of appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons for those
       contentions, with citations to authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied
       on.” Accordingly, Appellant’s Brief is procedurally barred. See Sandlin v.
       Sandlin, 906 So. 2d 39 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004).

¶4.    Adams filed a motion for reconsideration on or about January 29, 2007. The caption

of Adams’s motion for reconsideration correctly identified the parties, was appropriately

designated as a motion for reconsideration, and was filed in the Hinds County Circuit Clerk’s

office. However, Adams used the county court name and file number, rather than the circuit

court name and file number.1

¶5.    A & C filed a response to Adams’s motion for reconsideration on April 13, 2007. A

& C’s response did not object to the motion for reconsideration on the basis that the caption

incorrectly identified the court as “county court” and used the file number from county court.



       1
          Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(b) provides that “[a] motion or other
paper . . . shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the style (title) of the
case, the tracking or docket number, and a brief descriptive title indicating the purpose of the
paper.” Miss. R. App. P. 32(b).

                                                2
On July 5, 2007, the circuit court denied Adams’s motion for reconsideration. The order

stated, in part, that “the Court finds that said motion was not filed in this Court, but was

erroneously filed in the County Court; therefore, the motion was not timely filed in

accordance with Miss. R. App. P. 27(h), as amended, and should be DENIED.”

¶6.    Thereafter, on July 16, 2007, Adams filed a notice of appeal. On appeal, Adams

requests that this Court remand this case to the circuit court for a decision on the merits of

his appeal from county court. Alternatively, Adams requests that this Court reverse and

render the decision of the county court.

                                       DISCUSSION

¶7.    The sole issue for consideration is whether the circuit court improperly dismissed

Adams’s appeal.

Timely filing the motion for reconsideration

¶8.    Before reviewing the merits of the circuit court’s dismissal of Adams’s appeal from

county court, we first review the circuit court’s denial of Adams’s motion for reconsideration

as being untimely.

¶9.    The motion for reconsideration was timely filed on January 29, 2007, within fourteen

days of the circuit court’s dismissal of Adams’s appeal on January 17, 2007. See Miss. R.

App. P. 27(h) (“motions for reconsideration of rulings on motions . . . may be filed within

14 days after a decision is handed down on the motion to be reconsidered . . . .”).2


       2
         The Rules of Appellate Procedure apply to appeals from county court to circuit
court. See Van Meter v. Alford, 774 So. 2d 430, 432 (Miss. 2000).

                                               3
¶10.   We are unable to find any authority, at least by rule or precedent, for the circuit

court’s ruling that filing a motion for reconsideration using the county court caption renders

the motion “not filed.” 3 Here, the motion for reconsideration was filed with the Hinds

County Circuit Clerk and satisfied the rules applicable to the filing of motions.4

¶11.   While there is no case directly on point in Mississippi, we find some analogous cases

from other jurisdictions which support Adams’s position. See, e.g., Kaster v. Heinrich, 489

N.E.2d 152, 155 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986) (motion that was incorrectly numbered was considered

filed when presented to and received by the clerk of the court); Phillips v. Phillips, 265

S.E.2d 441, 443 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980) (defendant demonstrated no prejudice arising from

motion filed containing incorrect cause number when, at the time the motion was served,

there was only one case pending between plaintiff and defendant, and the contents of the

motion clearly indicated that the motion was directed to the subject case); Eagle Props. v.


       3
         The procedure for appeals from county court to circuit court is controlled by the
Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, the Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court
Practice, and the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure. American Investors, Inc. v.
King, 733 So. 2d 830, 832 (Miss. 1999).
       4
         In reviewing the applicable rules with respect to the requirements for filing motions,
we find a rule requiring that all papers shall be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court
(here, the clerk of the circuit court) and that copies of all papers be served on the other party.
Miss. R. App. P. 25. In addition, “motion[s] shall contain or be accompanied by any matter
required by a specific provision of these rules governing such a motion, shall state with
particularity the grounds on which it is based, and shall set forth the order or relief sought.”
Miss. R. App. P. 27(a). The attorney presenting the motion must include his/her name, office
address, and phone number. Unif. Cir. & Cty. R. 1.05. Motions must include a certificate
of service and be served pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 5. Unif. Cir. & Cty.
R. 2.06. Finally, original motions “shall be filed with the clerk of the county where the
action is docketed.” Unif. Cir. & Cty. R. 4.03. Adams complied with all of these rules.

                                                4
Tex. Commerce Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 7158 at *4 (Tex. App. 2005)

(despite the fact that the cause number at the top of appellee’s answer was incorrect, the title

clearly identified the document as “Defendant’s Original Answer to Plaintiff’s Second

Original Petition for Bill of Review,” and appellant should have known that the incorrect

cause number was simply a clerical error).

¶12.   We find that Adams’s motion for reconsideration was filed timely and was thus before

the circuit court.

Dismissal of appeal from county court for failure to cite authorities

¶13.   Having found Adams’s motion for reconsideration timely, we find that the circuit

court erred in dismissing Adams’s appeal on the basis that Adams had failed to cite any

authority in support of his argument. Pursuant to our rules of appellate procedure, Adams

was entitled to notice of the deficiencies in his brief and fourteen days from that notice to

correct the deficiencies. Miss. R. App. P. 2(a)(2). This precise issue has been addressed by

this Court. See Van Meter, 774 So. 2d at 432 (“Rule 2(a)(2) mandates that, after a motion

to dismiss has been filed, the court clerk (the circuit clerk in this instance) officially notify

an appellant of deficiencies in his appeal and that the appellant be given fourteen (14) days

therefrom to correct any deficiencies.”); see also American Investors, 733 So. 2d at 832 (the

circuit court erred in dismissing appeal from county court without prior notice of, and an

opportunity to cure, deficiency).

                                       CONCLUSION




                                               5
¶14.   The judgment of the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County is

reversed, and this case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion after it first issues a Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 2(a)(2) notice to

Adams, giving him specific notice of the deficiencies of his appeal and allowing him fourteen

days from the date of the notice to cure said deficiencies.5

¶15.   REVERSED AND REMANDED.

    CARLSON, P.J., DICKINSON, RANDOLPH, LAMAR, KITCHENS,
CHANDLER AND PIERCE, JJ., CONCUR. GRAVES, P.J., CONCURS IN RESULT
ONLY WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION.




       5
         In light of the disposition of this case, we deny A & C’s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal
by Appellant, Jon Adams, as Being Out-of-Time,” as well as A & C’s “Motion to Strike
Brief of Defendant/Appellant, Jon Adams and Dismiss Appeal.”

                                              6
