Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 April 16, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1638. DEBORAH L. BEACHAM v. CHARLES W. BEACHAM.

      The parties were divorced in 2008. In April 2016, Deborah L. Beacham
(“Wife”) filed a complaint seeking modification of custody of their two minor
children and modification of child support, and asserting claims against Charles W.
Beacham (“Husband”) for contempt of the settlement agreement that was
incorporated into the final judgment and decree of divorce. Wife later amended her
complaint to seek only modification of child support and contempt against Husband.
Husband filed a counterclaim for contempt for Wife’s violation of a 2011 consent
order. The trial court ruled on these claims and others filed by the parties in a
consolidated order. The court denied Wife’s request for modification of child support
and her claims for contempt, and granted Husband’s motion for contempt, awarding
him $5,000 in attorney fees.
      Wife moved for a new trial, and following the trial court’s denial of that
motion, she filed this timely direct appeal. Husband has moved to dismiss the appeal
for Wife’s failure to file an application for discretionary appeal. Husband is correct
that we lack jurisdiction to review this direct appeal.
      Where, as here, the underlying action involves rights and obligations arising
out of a divorce decree and does not involve child custody, the case is a domestic
relations matter within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). See Walker v. Estate
of Mays, 279 Ga. 652, 653 (1) (619 SE2d 679) (2005). Appeals in such matters,
including orders holding or declining to hold persons in contempt, must be pursued
by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); accord Voyles v. Voyles,
301 Ga. 44, 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017) (an appeal in a domestic relations case in
which custody is not at issue must be brought by discretionary application).
“[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v.
Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Wife’s failure to follow the
proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.1 Therefore, Husband’s
motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.



                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        04/16/2019
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.


                                                                                       , Clerk.




      1
        Wife’s motion for new trial also sought to set aside the judgment pursuant to
OCGA § 9-11-60. However, “the denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment
under OCGA § 9-11-60 is not directly appealable and instead requires the filing of
an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta
v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006); see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)
(8).
