pages that are of poor quali`t;‘
Utth time _of imaging.

 

 
  
 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33 35/3030€3 3143301
- v 400/530 33 3 33333330333» 1 5
` 3001/35 km0 3333/3033 3/03333110 3105/303
3033 50 303va 3533/005 335 1353
530 (_\33> _ - __ f‘\/ 253
~315: 3333304* \. -' _ :
355010 301 :1..;-;331433, 110/555 33 3013/063
033355:"3 333 130me 3033 0333<'> 4
334 531 33 335 333 3310/\~3“0350 30/3>>
' ' ~'" 035'3353 \31035
533 §\/0@1@;1>3\5<,5[ 0331-\353050 3553/0
‘ ` "-'15554§,:-(551“5535 (L) (1)1 1~£1§‘|1`

333/1361 /~`v\ /5‘§ 33 333’3'0€
3333103\3;5, 3311:5055<3@333 404 3 5 § 1 .
,4__\
011/1005 33341 503/41333<35» *’  `
m W<[;§V\/U:SS/ S€C/§T\/HT\/ ?QW¢U@W
333 3333/3 0335033> 34333030\50‘
333ch 04~31 3330105 305103 30333 z

 

   
 

 

v 1300/10 1\‘111§ 141\110 1000 100T <01141§1\/ '
L&£CS];§_€§§M]§ §KQ?, 411ch 141<2§11%
.' §@\/ 4
1540741414@0 .<0§§ 1100 @/*?‘::" j W.»WQ“M `
~~ ‘ 1' 000 CQ!\§B§Z§;NI]MWC
§00®1\4,§:3§0§/ 4§, 0 §S»§ 611 4 21 ( 1§ 1 01111';~’4»" '
1/101§1 111§1§041 300 311/111 1114 1111/11 114/047
141 §§ 4 1441 141'114@14010

_101144 '1~1<141 001410'§1114 01§11/111111141§ 141~1§1§0411
‘ 1 v ,.”1411 414/0 1100 §14141411»111414 1014 14 <11144-

MMW ( LX/Ml K(?\\Ld/:)©l q CR\ 1205 (F)))MLL_
';§:S 141 411/111'\§®01\§ 10§§ U/“r\/\’§ 3001 ` y “
330 0111:1\10 §14101/ 14401414 141£1§01_
5001040&3 - " 011/110j 1001§0/ ‘
11141411011\1§11 <§~4 1401/1100 0140 1404 160 141/1054
01\§ 1111§10|11.01# ~ r00<§;111<14 :1~3;1/1€11§§ ..4/ .1"
1010 11\1 §§1§3§(10(1§’§?11’§ §%”§)1411€/1'§§10'§ 1303

1140 1414/111 01 01011141;114W4001131\1 1401§101;10
041;114 1100 511410 114 141:.§ mm 014 1414-1141
1410 <:111110111§41111\ 11141441 @<14 4141101§1

" 1141:5 1,1:1110/ 101500\41: 1114 0011411\1€1§ 1;14:~ '
1§€1\10011@<§14144010 14111141/14§ 411,~101 14614~£1

000/4411 100101415 1100 1401131111\1 141§1§041 001/14
/§110 1144§ 001/§§4’4‘“" 1014§31`1115 111/11

 

 

 

 

  

    

 
 

 
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

195111:1\)6 016 1\101'1/-116101@§§611\16 mi mimms
1016 1661/161\11163 010 mm mmmimi mma
1111 11’1(°1161211”1 63 63161(1¢1!1'91763`<3~4 611:11`%~
1916 6636"1 1/‘11<7111@`15 -"
. ®€€1 ' ' ' 1211 6631 711
664 1: 131 iri\<,mmmmw§:m\) @0@'3‘) §im:@€€
mima 51/1166i 11111111511141 1:¢111:111,312`
1212\16 mm mmmmmmmi, mm' 65,()161.
wian Twi §T\/H*€ 15 KHAMQED wW
mm 4:111161 imi@ _'153111111
i mi\)i;:iom ©iwm§.,`-.- 1
1151.61/151;011 613\1€3 613/1310 2305 16\/ 614/in
mmi\)mmmm 56 ..-66131@ 611 ziim:om 166
1111/1616 1611“.2)1 1161 163 163?§11)€5) 16@@ (:i \ 310/55
s€i,mnmm11611/11i1691 351/3111 1511 1631/mm
1101/mm 1316 16161@) 1;11:;1 161 12iW6ic/mwi1@~5

§|Km\ 646 `(\161 (;31(75@1)('1)) ~ , WO’E§ 1\‘)1117
. §§U_:€W/ J\AWI§UIUCOU T@ l/+ VW /1/111`(11]41/11 1014

 

 

 

 

 

   
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51166-,@16 wi 166/mi immii 16199 mmowmi
5 16 0:1\111 i\m\/iym\\. 131 `1”1:3111_ _ _ v

312011~153 i.@w<m mmi<)imimn 1115
63531 <1_31114 10111»11@116 1165 <:11€111/1111366 @1¢>

.S€E~/

1213 ®11111@®6§ 06110116191111/116169/11° ' 1
~» 'l ` 361 31115.:1 13 151 1111 §161111111113/16 161‘161)

  
 

 

  

31033___ 1101 301 30131 1131 01 ~40“1451 03311
046140114111114111411:110 1110100143 - "/ 11114

13001;(331414‘/ 13 04‘041/1/1011€ 03114`11~1041
111100051401/1141) 0141061413) 0331€ 151430

33\43 3000 43141011/1 113011110 14141:4111100/
WILW”’C 3\/04<1/§101,11111:1)13 1334 ‘

3441991411140 40 14»141414141§1403 101103101;0
QML443 31333 405 404 110141414 10101111
1000/1145 1413 14444111414 401114/1` 434 440 1 4

1201/1130 110/ 0"67<145/11 3 0011101>51114 ~
331101 14311403411111140 1301 1041-513 0111:144

141/1300 1011/1140 311314141431'1413 3\'1333 1011/0 __
511 311013 00 1<1<113 10140'1 111/114141;30131110 1
0,1134 3111'§0]4<?1010€13 451'5(”0(001411010{0 00049.

51:4113111400 403/§1144”110 041014133100 410
.'5111)1 1010 401/1144 014 1024 10101/41 40 10101

, .. ' 0011101014101<4'10 311141;301114011,

' 1014141111411 0011141`?.. 001/ ._551114
1:31:11011:031\ 3111`1 00141311) 43004 141310

4000/10 _

344 144"10"71`01104 1045 13011111414@40 1014 1

0301:1;11/14/4131 43 03000’) 10114|311 0 503011

031011/0031 501/1443 1514 1‘\111,4111411
1:1014103 114 1340 3401/4000 / 14~14101 311-71010714;

' E§%MMW 1130/10 10003'3041/11044`\/0 301/1100101311715

MK _‘ 301/1 53014114 4131414141/1131

` 10000 1300 if 0
" ’ 111/11;1111` 38010 l§)€¥m§§@ 5 :G\Lma / W,MST"\]SW

 
 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

33 1 1444-3 0111477, 47 171<1>731110 1§<3§7
441:1611/,%7177711471\710 C-)OVWCWWTFQK 31414’/§51`
133314331/714147131 313~*311@
7§§§, 377/17- 7 /1:741\11/131>§§§43 313:7@1 171>17,
c27111~13141/71414’ §1/13/71\11®310 1333)1;1:1\1 11:'711/77°
43 11414/71;17\131 14730$§1714771717 ;1:§ <_33§7;1@§
39 173 147411414§§§ 3417:74 174/§ 3401/1333  
1@§§1\7 1371741341/1117’ 1/77473§1§7§79 1/17\11€ j> 76§!\7
77§1:§14,§ 3 37361;§17437§ 1714 1333 74/§ 11§
7:1\1101:17§10 1714 433146§10 1<4141074711717 1§€/§1))
___ 1 '~ 147/5 Ol%(<§\/¢F§ 0767) "
§311'311\/31 0141@1:7\101: 4411_17\16 171/7§§§ 1 4 .
§§§/131§1 3 1155 ,14131§1/31§77 7§/117 573 313
131414 1§<417; 134/477 3 <771/1414131:371113011 1173@
043743§§ 31§1473‘/ 141~33~;7171117 331 f -.

 

 

 

  

 

   
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

3011./ 4_;1:1:17\16 33_71@174,1717<4 313414137 4473§7~

WTGNM 316147§ 1133 727§ §1)14P§371§76' O 3

`7/7/73'7/1'§\/75 C@WW{/L§ DlA/§T@ U/‘¥€L< 1376 WCTON/ "
147 17147767< 1714 3141/!{§[7` 1/1/11/7767€74 W£§|U£ C/WXJ/\/

f/H\)I§W 3§§3:1 1144:§ 3 § "5§73171 § 731 37414
1713/175 1433 17@131414 7111)11§17173_ 1§7 131:§731)73

"` x~ § 3707§/ §7777_7@ 1TMW“ /IOJ:S " " 7

4131341;1717 <71719§'71 11344/1371 043/11§ 341677014 1
MU§\VV . ,_ 7

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

1443%6@ 11014 11441< 414 1641:§154:44450 1611;____,

14111\1611 6411\115:1:§164 414 -
K_W6S 141414140141411\16 1/3 1141/1111/1\14141414 .__14_
1143 3141/14 141411166 41141;11'1'19 10 110460111
§\414461\/1/€2 Q0141 1<'_`4114144 4114 144341111

1411043 1411/11@1' 4116 1/114'15@/11111/11\12 1/11\1W 114` “` 41 1111\1
1044/4414`10'€1\9“`130 193231/1/14'233€02 1411\110 3€`11` 1

1431219€ 1113(114’ 1317 \1©110312116§1/1/141111`/;1301461/40

 

 

 

 

   

. 934 434 41’1:11 1/11414141111 1 3011) 414/1212\141

A‘i/ nl?§ \/ dig-1043 `“ 4 . ~`1@'
3 ~ ~ j5 , 1/1141114411144141414 111 511/14_:14_;10

 

 

 

’ 11~4/6<_11514144 __

144 1441/1563 345 " -- ._/_ '
411/11144411441\166 WMXQ 14141`1:1%145,

. 101§`43\441131411‘11‘»."41 C1 14 (WWCO€WS\ITS 1110

.. . 4411/1104 14451§ 1111<1114145 1914 1414141@;

111 1114 14411461451111114141 111144~1144 ~

IA.LLOCK 1311“11 401 1 10@4301044£351443)/11061419111

; ,;f<<'% '>11114141411'1-€1~3'4111141<14 3111~1§ '1 344
@1€141<114 311111/ ?1€1;11141611411/ <1111 [ ' `

1 ’ §§ 35@1115 144411141/114 146617114 414141\1”@4
1114 J1411/’ 1116101‘21 461110151419411/1141111 41:33141:113
1\1111 1444445564 566141§056 164@414)

  

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

d ` . =#1' 1 y .( `}EW<€(_§{£L ii 3 j]\_}’)
leo L.GCWL&\T_'j_<€Y 51 fin emia,)"I-$§:z"zI/,’ lio<w\a,)'i~<§':>~“t g '
y . 1 _- _ 4 FiLEo

GREGG (_70(.\¢1`[\/l T _.

 
  

' ' NO. 40,789-B-H-2

 

 

EX PARTE § IN THE 124TH DISTRI '
§ z
§ rN AND F -e »
§ ' -

BRYAN WILLIAMS § GREGG CoUNTY, TEXAS

STATE’S. RESPONSE To PETITIoNER’S
APPLICATION FoR
WRIT oF HABEAS CORPUS

 

TO THE- HONORABLE IUDGE OF SAID COURT:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, opposes Petitioner’s Writ' ofHabeas Corpu`s.

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE
The applicant,"'Bryan Williams, is confined in TDC_J-lD because of his .

conviction and sentence in Gregg County cause number 40,789`-'B. Williarns Was
charged With the felony offense of possession of a controlled'substance (Count I)
and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon (Count ll). (Appendix A:

` Indictment). Aiter being admonished that he could face consecutive sentences if he.
-/" yvent to trial on both counts separately, he elected'severance of the two counts and
jury trials on bothj 3 RR 5-7. The jury found him guilty _of possession of a controlled
substance and sentenced him to 75 years. (Application, ‘Appendix G: Judgment~¥-
Cou_nt I)'. Aiter a jury was seated and testimony had begun on Count H, he pleaded
guilty and Was sentenced by the judge to 5 years, to run consecutively to the 75-year `/l

40

 

 

 

sentence (Application Appendix H: Judgment-Count Il). was sentenced by the
judge to five years in prison to run consecutively to the 75-year' sentence. ]d. He is

confined at the Allred Unit as TDCJ inmate number 1784621.

H. APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS

Williams claims that the municipal court judge and trial court judge lacked ' 1
jurisdiction, both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction over him due to a void

search warrant affidavit

{` * ‘
lII. NECESSITY FOR AN EVI])ENTIARY HEARING AND EXFANSION OF
THE RECORD.

The record needs no expansion Williams need not be returned 'to Gregg

County for a hearing.`

_ IV. ARGUMENT ANDAUTHORITIES.
_ ( ‘

l) This is a subsequent writ application, not subject to any exception.
This is a`subsequent request for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. While there are

exceptions for subsequent writs applications, applicant has failed to alleged that his

request falls within one_of those exceptions He alleges that his claims of subject_

v jig

- 1

T\vee<eoi _ jig

l

matter jurisdiction can never be waived, and that he only recently obtained a copy of
the “defective void Exh. A l from my family member.” The record and facts Were
- complete when Applicant filed his first application for writ of _ habeas corpus.
v Application Exhibit A l is the affidavit for search warrant signed by I<lilgore Police 4
Department officer Brady L. -.Middlebrool<s and used to obtain aj search warrant for
the blue 1994 Cadillac in Which Williams.had been seen sitting The search warrant
affidavit Was not offered into evidence at Williarns’ trial. No issue was made of the
See

search warrant affidavit’s validity at the hearing on motion to suppress

l Appendix A, Reporter’ s Record from hearing

lf there had been a problem With the search warrant affidavit, the issue could

 

should be dismissed

2_) _ Williams states he has a- petition or appeal pending in the Eastern
District ofBeaumont, under Cause Number 06:15CV0005.

C'ause`number *016215CV0005 in the Beaurnont Federa_l Court is related to _
Cause'number 40,789-§, the conviction under scrutiny here. As a matter of fact, the
magistrate’s report states that Williams used the same memorandum of law for his
" federal habeas that he used in his first state habeas application See Appendix B,

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate’s _

‘ " ‘ . 42 `

‘ v -l:‘i€t.€;‘@i@l

report was signed on luly 9, 20l5, and explains that Williams has 14 days to respond
to it, so as of the date of this response, it is technically still pending although a ruling
has been made to deny relief requested as well as to deny a certificate of
appealability j

3) The claim of lack of jurisdiction lacks merit.

lf his claim is considered on the merits, it should be denied for the following
reasons. Williams claims that Exhibit Al is the affidavit used to secure a search
warrant for a car in which Williams consistently denied any interest The affidavit
was not,»therefore, made a part of the record of this case because the search was

never an issue.

Mr. Williams complains that the affidavit is void for non-compliance with

" " ' reiss@ra§eta<a‘) (»Q (4><)@71> See

 

tFe"‘/X'§ST@§€%I@»QT ` " `
Application Memorandum at 2.

The two statutes Williams alleges were not followed do not refer to search
warrant affidavits They refer to charging instruments for misdemeanor offenses
called complaints Williams’ Exhibits A (l) and A (2) are, collectively, the affidavit '

sworn to by Officer Middlebrool<s in order to get the warrant to search the abandoned

   
 

r~. ear;

car which Williams claimed was not his.l' lem;aémlawg@l/§;@gr£gg@d@

reamredbr“§tneieas»eia

it _ 1 yet

 

`l`t le€<@s©( l l jn§

Williams’s sole ground for relief is frivolous and meritless and should be

denied.

- V. CONCLUSION

- The State prays this Court recommend that the application be denied.

Respectfully submitted,

CARL L.- DORROUGH
Criminal District Attorney
Gregg County, Texas

Byr @r/I £»£dj-'n/ &M/
Wolson Brown
istant District Attorney

State Bar No. 03205900

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

l certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing “State’s Response to
Applicant’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus” was given to the District Clerl<
of Gregg County, 'l`exas, on _ July 20, 2015, to be mailed to Applicant, Bryan
Williams, 1784621, Allred Unit, 2101 FM 369 N, Iowa Park, TX 763 67.

 

Assistant District Attorney '
State Bar No. 03205900

5 j%3

 

trees _ sit

No. 40,789-B-H-2. ` -

EX‘PARTE § IN'THE 124TH DISTRICT CoURT '
§ .
§ in AND FoR
_ . § ‘
BRYAN WILLIAMS § GREGG CoUNTY, TW{»E<D
_ _ GREGG COUHTY. TEXAS
JUL 2 8 2015 f
FINAL oRDER AND &MU~CA~`°° mta/fogg
FrNDINGs oF FACT AND CoNcLUsroNs oF LAw "7~;,#».2
oN APPLICATroN FoR wRIT or HABEAS CoRPUs j 3

Having considered the Appli`cant’s Application for Post-'Conviction Writ of
Habeas (iorpuS, the State’s Answer, along with reviewing the record in the case, and
the materials submitted; the Court recommends that the application be DISMISSED
as a subsequent writ, or, if considered on its merits, DENIED.,

The Court specifically finds as follows:

l) The police saw Williams exiting a car and later found the car to be
locked. 4 -

2) Williarns denied that the car was his.
3) The police, after determining that no one else at the location claimed to
own the 'car, had the car towed, obtained a Search warrant and searched

,the car, finding controlled substance, and several -of Williams’ personal
items connecting Williams to the car and its contents

'4) Williams was than indicted and his arrest was pursuant to a warrant ‘

following a grand jury indictment

T(K’r€<nn

5) Wi'lliams’ attorney filed a motion to suppress, claiming that his
warrantless arrest was without probable cause, but not making any

claim about the search of the car.

6) Williams’ motion to suppress any statements made after a warrantless
arrest was denied because it was not a warrantless arrest.

@ -Williams could have raised any issue regarding the search warrant
affidavit ‘could have been raised at the~rnouon~-to suppress?"'on**duect

appeal=:p'rz‘:'1r'_1:h1:.'_iir_st.__appl1ca`tion `_fo_ =rof habeas corpus -.

   

` The Court makes the following conclusions of laws

1) This is a subsequent writ, not subject to any exception.
2)- Williams has a federal habeas pending on this conviction.

3) Williams waived his right to complain about the search warrant affidavit by
denying any interest in the car. ~ '

4) The complaint that the search warrant affidavit lacked language required of
misdemeanor complaints lacks merit and 1s frivolous

The clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a transcript to include the
applicant’s Application for Post-Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus, the State’s

Answer, with appendices a copy ofth e indictment, the judgment for CountI, and a

jtq

 

copy of these findings and send it to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin,' Texas.

The clerk is further directed to forward a copy of these findings to the applicant

SIGNED On JUL 27 2015

 

WW
/” ,

sr

 

1 . ,,qr_ .._.

 

 

11~1~11@11 cea v 1111/111 11

 

1111 Ql1111;1 ®1 j \/011/(1111111111@ .

'Q§iiet€) C WU naw®t/ on negate mountain

f :4:°' 4447 ©WW ~ WPUO) tavern e/r//ebM/A/t~za
' ®r\) \~A;@oil \1\1/115 h w :u\t 514 entier stem

 

111/ic re saveer twin 4;,11111@@\11 sites
pt sle U Seci-te¢\)§ pete c tim ingram

' G‘Gei€CA/i/WW<SF wLMr`t memo ore sweet/ac
.\/itf£i€ld\i$l'i$l 1:5 151'0§ 15@5/45@1<0`4;@,9

 

 

 

\\a ce/ err ievtr`g

