LAW LTBRAF%Y

 

N0. 30429
:N THE sUPREME coURT or THE sTATE 0F HAwA;T
F“*~?
M:cHAEL c. TIERNEY, Petiti@n@r, §§
sr
vS. §§ %
{ ,
THE HoNoRABLE R1cHARD K. PERK1Ns, JUDGE or THE " r~
coURT or THE F:RsT cIRcU1T, sTATE or HAwAr:, R@_ §§ fn
__
oR:G1NAL PRocEED:NG §§
<s.P.P. N@. 10-1-0018)
oRDER
and Recktenwald, JJ.)

Acoba, Duffy,
Tierney's

it

(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama,
Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C.

petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support,

See Hawafi Rules of Penal

_appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and
91 Hawafi 200,

indisputable right to relief.
Procedure, Rule 40(a) and (c)(2); Kema v. Gaddis,

982 P.2d 334, 338 (l999) (A writ of mandamus is an

204,

extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
Therefore

obtain the requested action.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.
Honolulu, Hawafi, May 4, 20lO.

DATED:

PYow4nLY*7%MMUuj@J¥w

/e-~§

%v~a>f. *()W@@[ %\ l
mm ~’-‘- Ac¢z»¢¢/¢.M//M

