     NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


 United States Court of Appeals
     for the Federal Circuit
              ______________________

 FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY RESEARCH
 CORPORATION, DOMAINE ASSOCIATES, LLC,
            Plaintiffs-Appellants

                         v.

 ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ASUSTEK
            COMPUTER INC.,
           Defendants-Appellees

  TPV TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, TOP VICTORY
   INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, TOP VICTORY
ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TOP VICTORY
    ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV
     ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV
    INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION
           PERIPHERALS, INC.,
            Defendants-Appellees

 ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
              Defendants-Appellees

            AOC INTERNATIONAL,
                   Defendant
             ______________________

              2015-1125, -1126, -1127
              ______________________
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida in No. 9:12-cv-80694-PAS,
9:12-cv-80697-PAS, 9:12-cv-80701-PAS, Judge Patricia A.
Seitz.
                ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

    GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, Nor-
folk, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represent-
ed by OZZIE FARRES, MICHAEL ALFRED O’SHEA,
Washington, DC.

    JONATHAN HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defend-
ants-appellees TPV Technology Limited, Top Victory
International Limited, et al., also represented by MARK A.
SAMUELS, BRIAN BERLINER, VISION WINTER, Los Angeles,
CA.

    JOSHUA M. MASUR, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City,
CA, for defendants-appellees Asus Computer Internation-
al, Asustek Computer Inc. Also represented by ZHUANJIA
GU.

   CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP,
Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Acer, Inc.,
Acer America Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL
CHAOCHA TING.
               ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
                                                   3



   PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 July 17, 2015             /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
    Date                   Daniel E. O’Toole
                           Clerk of Court
