
USCA1 Opinion

	




          September 16, 1996    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1463                                   JOHN N. VAN RYE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                  HAROLD B. MURPHY,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ____________________            George R. Desmond on brief for appellant.            _________________            Andrew  G. Lizotte,  Harold E. Murphy  and Hanify &  King, P.C. on            __________________   ________________      ____________________        brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.   Upon  careful  review of  the  briefs and                 ___________            record,  we   find  no   error  in  the   bankruptcy  court's            determination, In re Van Rye, 179 B.R. 375, 378-79 (Bankr. D.                           _____________            Mass. 1995), that the  trustee had standing to object  to the            debtor's homestead exemption claim.   See First National Bank                                                  ___ ___________________            v. Norris, 701 F.2d 902, 904 (11th Cir. 1983); see also In re            _________                                      ________ _____            Duda,  182 B.R. 662,  665 n.1 (Bankr.  D. Conn. 1995);  In re            ____                                                    _____            Michael, 185 B.R. 830, 836-37 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1995).            _______                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.                 ________   ___                                         -2-
