       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

    IN RE VISTAPRINT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
              ______________________

                   2013-1261, -1550
                ______________________

    Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in consoli-
dated Reexamination Nos. 90/009,295, 90/009,296,
90/009,313, and 90/009,315.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Min-
neapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant. With him on
the brief was RICHARD J. ANDERSON.

    MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, Office of the
Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and
BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY, and
HUGHES, Circuit Judges).


          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 February 10, 2014          /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                  Daniel E. O’Toole
                            Clerk of Court
