                                                                                             ACCEPTED
                                                                                         04-15-00321-CR
                                                                             FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
                                                                                    7/16/2015 2:24:38 PM
                                                                                          KEITH HOTTLE
                                                                                                  CLERK

                                No. 04-15-00321-CR

                               IN THE                   FILED IN
                                                 4th COURT OF APPEALS
                  FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXASSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
                       AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS     07/16/2015 2:24:38 PM
                                                                   KEITH E. HOTTLE
                      BRYAN KRYSTOPHER ANDERS,                          Clerk
                               Appellant

                                         v.

                            THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                  Appellee

 RESPONSE TO THE ORDER PROPOSING TO DISMISS THIS APPEAL
  PURSUANT RULE 25.2(d) OF THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE
                        PROCEDURE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

        Comes now BRYAN KRYSTOPHER ANDERS, Appellant, by and through

undersigned counsel, in reply to the ORDER of this Honorable Court dated June

23, 2015, and shows the Court the following:

   I.     Procedural history:

        Anders was charged by indictment in cause number 2015CR1954 with one

count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in penalty group 2,

(MDMA) having an aggregate weight of 4 grams or more but less than 400 grams,

and one count of possession of a controlled substance in penalty group 2, (MDMA)

having an aggregate weight of 4 grams or more but less than 400 grams. (CR at 4).

Both felony offenses were alleged to have been committed in Bexar County,
Texas, on or about July 2, 2014. Anders was represented by attorney Jamie

Balagia.

      On April 20, 2015, pursuant to a written plea agreement with the State,

Anders pleaded nolo contendere to both counts alleged in the indictment. The

parties agreed in writing that the punishment would be assessed at 15 years of

imprisonment and the State would make no recommendation to the trial court on

Ander’s application for probation. (CR at 31). As part of the plea agreement,

Anders agreed in writing to voluntarily waive the right of appeal. (CR at 31) . By

her signature, the trial court approved Anders’ waiver and voluntary

relinquishment of his known rights, including his waiver of the right of appeal.

(CR at 35).

      On April 28, 2015, the trial court, the Honorable Mary Roman presiding,

followed the terms of the plea agreement and sentenced Anders to 12 years of

imprisonment in the Institutional Division for each count, with no fine. (CR at 82-

5). The sentences were ordered to be served concurrently with the sentences

imposed in cause number 2015CR1955. (CR at 82, 84). The trial court accurately

certified that this is a plea-bargain case and that Anders has “NO right of appeal.”

(CR at 81). By his signature on the certifications, Anders acknowledged that he

was informed that he has no right of appeal.




                                          2
         On May 20, 2015, through his trial counsel, Anders filed a motion for new

trial. Anders argued that he was sentenced without the trial court having the benefit

of reviewing letters from family members and friends. (CR at 86). Letters from

quite a number of family members and friends are attached to the motion for new

trial and were available for the trial court to review. (CR 90-106). Nevertheless, the

motion for new trial was overruled by the operation of law on July 12, 2015. TEX.

R. APP. P. 21.8.

         Despite having waived the right of appeal as part of his plea agreement,

Anders timely filed a notice of appeal with the District Clerk on May 20, 2015.

(CR at 107). On July 10, 2015, the trial court appointed the Bexar County Public

Defender’s Office to represent Anders in his attempted appeal. (Supplemental CR

at 6). The clerk’s record was filed on June 5, 2015. On June 23, 2015, this Court

gave written notice that the appeals will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing

that Anders has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by July 20,

2015. This is court-appointed counsel’s response to the Court’s ORDER.

   II.      No right of appeal:

         In a plea-bargain case where the sentence does not exceed the agreed-upon

punishment, the defendant may appeal only matters that were raised by written

motion and ruled upon before trial, or by getting the trial court’s written


                                           3
certification that he has permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not

been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

      This was a plea-bargain case. As noted above, the clerk’s record shows that

Anders entered a no-contest plea to the charged offenses pursuant to the terms of a

written plea agreement with the State. The trial court followed that plea

agreement––and actually departed below the agreed-upon term of imprisonment––

by sentencing Anders to 12 years of imprisonment with the sentences to run

concurrently with cause number 2015CR1955. The trial court accurately certified

that this is a plea-bargain case and that Anders has “NO right of appeal” because

the plea agreement was followed. Anders, by his signature, acknowledged that he

was informed that he has no right of appeal. Further, he voluntarily waived the

right of appeal in writing when he signed the written plea agreement. For these

reasons, the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal accurately

reflects that this is a plea-bargain case, that the terms of the plea bargain were

followed, and that Anders has no right of appeal.

   III.   Waiver:

      A defendant may waive the right of appeal, as long as the waiver is made

“voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently.” See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 1.14


                                           4
(“The defendant in a criminal prosecution for any offense may waive any rights

secured him by law.”); Ex parte Broadway, 301 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App.

2009). The record shows that Anders voluntarily waived the right of appeal in

writing as part of the plea agreement and the trial court approved that waiver.

Undersigned counsel can identify nothing in the clerk’s record to show that the

trial court failed to follow the terms of the plea bargain, or that Anders’ written

waiver of the right of appeal was involuntary.

      Since Anders has validly and voluntarily waived the right of appeal and

accepted the benefit of his plea bargain, this Court has not acquired jurisdiction

over the attempted appeals in these cases. Marsh v. State, 444 S.W.3d 654, 660

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(“…because Appellant had validly waived his right to

appeal, the court of appeals never acquired jurisdiction.”). If Anders now wishes to

argue that he received ineffective assistance from his plea counsel or that his no-

contest plea was involuntary, he will have to raise those arguments in a post-

conviction writ. He cannot make those arguments in this attempted appeal. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2).

      Nor may Anders appeal from the denial of the motion for new trial or argue

on appeal that the trial court should have reduced his sentence after being

presented with the letters from his friends and family. Estrada v. State, 149 S.W.3d

280, 285 (Tex. App. ––Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d)(“[T]he denial of a


                                           5
motion for new trial, regardless of the ground or grounds raised in the motion, is

not appealable in a plea-bargained case without the trial court’s permission.”).

   IV.    No amended trial court certification will be sought by counsel:

      For all of the reasons stated above, the undersigned attorney can find no

right of appeal for Anders. Nothing in the record suggests that the trial court gave

Anders permission to appeal or that any appealable pretrial motions were filed and

ruled on. In fact, as noted above, Anders explicitly waived the right of appeal in

writing as part of the plea agreement. The waiver is enforceable against him. For

that reason alone, the trial court’s certification that he has no right of appeal is

accurate. Marsh, 444 S.W.3d at 660.

      In short, undersigned counsel can find no reason to seek an amended

certification from the trial court that would give Anders the right of appeal. The

certification is accurate in that it comports with the proceedings in the trial court.

Therefore, the undersigned cannot prevent this Court from dismissing this

attempted appeal. Undersigned counsel also cannot raise legal claims—such as an

argument that plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance —in this attempted

direct appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006)(where the defendant has no right to appeal after his plea bargain, dismissal

of the appeal is required, with no inquiry by the appellate court into even possibly

meritorious claims).


                                            6
   V.      Relief available:

        Although the Court of Appeals will dismiss this this appeal, Anders may still

challenge his convictions after the mandate issues by filing an application for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. He may also seek relief by filing an original petition for a writ of

certiorari with the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 4.04 (West 2005), and TEX. CONST. art. V, § 5. However, undersigned counsel

is appointed to represent Anders on these attempted direct appeals only. He will

not represent or assist Anders with any post-conviction or original-proceeding

challenges to his conviction and sentence in these cases. Anders will have to

pursue those remedies on his own, or with retained counsel, if he so chooses.

        WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel, is compelled to concede that Anders

has no right of appeal from the underlying criminal case and must also concede

that the Honorable Court of Appeals may dismiss this appeal for that reason. No

amended certification of the defendant’s right of appeal will be sought.

                                        Respectfully submitted,

                                        /s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.
                                        _________________________________
                                        RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.
                                        Texas Bar No. 06196400
                                        Assistant Public Defender
                                        Bexar County Public Defender’s Office
                                        101 W. Nueva St., Suite 310
                                        San Antonio, Texas 78205
                                          7
                                      (210) 335-0701
                                      FAX (210) 335-0707
                                      richard.dulany@bexar.org

                                      ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT


             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND COMPLIANCE

      I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing response has been delivered electronically to the Bexar County District

Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W. Nueva St.,

Suite 710, San Antonio, Texas 78205, on July 16, 2015. The total word count is

1,690, not including the appendix.

                                      /s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.
                                      _________________________________
                                      RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.




                                        8
Appendix: Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal in cause
                          numbers 2015CR1954




                                     9

