
172 Mich. App. 489 (1988)
432 N.W.2d 350
PEOPLE
v.
JEROVSEK
Docket No. 103999.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided October 18, 1988.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. *490 Caruso, Solicitor General, James J. Gregart, Prosecuting Attorney, and David W. DeBack and Kenneth A. Roth, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for the people.
James R. Rinck, for defendant on appeal.
Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and WEAVER and McDONALD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to a plea agreement defendant pled nolo contendere to first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b(1)(f); MSA 28.788(2)(1)(f), and was sentenced to fifteen to thirty years imprisonment. Defendant appeals from his sentence as of right. We affirm.
On appeal defendant contests the trial court's Sentencing Information Report (SIR) scoring of two points for prior record variable six  prior misdemeanor convictions. Defendant claims the trial court erred in including defendant's prior convictions for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor (OUIL) in its calculation under variable six as alcohol-related offenses are not contained in the guideline advisory committee's list of misdemeanors properly considered under this variable.
However, we decline to rule that only those misdemeanors contained in the advisory committee's list may be considered in calculating points for purposes of the SIR. This list was compiled after our Supreme Court's adoption of the guidelines and is not included in the newly adopted guidelines. Thus, to determine whether the trial court properly considered defendant's prior OUIL convictions, we look to the body of the guidelines themselves.
*491 Under prior record variable six the guidelines state: "A misdemeanor refers to any offense punishable by one year or less of incarceration and directly related to one of the following crime groups: robbery, assault, CSC, drug, burglary...." In the instant case the trial court included defendant's OUIL convictions finding them to be misdemeanors, punishable by one year or less of incarceration, and related to the drug-crime group:
I disagree with the guidelines advisory committee that alcohol is not a drug related offense. Alcohol is the most abused drug in this country, according to a lot of statistics. To say that marijuana and L-S-D and other controlled substances are related to a drug group and to say that alcohol is not related to a drug group is in this Court's opinion, to ignore reality.
We agree with the trial court and find that OUIL is a drug-related crime. Under article seven, the controlled substances section, of the Public Health Code our Legislature has defined "drug" to include any "substance recognized as a drug in the official United States pharmacopeia, official homeopathic pharmacopeia of the United States, or official national formulary, or any supplement to any of them; ...." MCL 333.7105; MSA 14.15(7105). As the official United States pharmacopeia recognizes alcohol as a drug, USP XX, July 20, 1980, p 35, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in finding driving while under the influence of alcohol to be a drug-related offense.
Affirmed.
