<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</STRONG></P>
<CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">9</A>-00<A NAME="2">756</A>-CR</CENTER>


<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-99-00757-CR</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-99-00758-CR</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</STRONG></P>



<CENTER><A NAME="3">Harold Dean Pursley</A>, Appellant</CENTER>


<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="4">BELL</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="5">27TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NOS. <A NAME="6">49710, 49711 &amp; 49712</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="7">WILLIAM E. BACHUS</A>, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>



Appellant Harold Dean Pursley pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a
child, indecency with a child, sexual performance of a child, and possession of child pornography. 
The district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for fifty years for each count of
aggravated sexual assault, ten years for each count of indecency with a child, twenty years for the
sexual performance of a child, and ten years for the possession of child pornography.

<P>Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in each cause concluding that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit.  The briefs meet the requirements of <EM>Anders v. California</EM>,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  <EM>See also</EM> <EM>Penson v. Ohio</EM>, 488 U.S. 75 (1988);
<EM>High v. State</EM>, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); <EM>Currie v. State</EM>, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1974); <EM>Jackson v. State</EM>, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); <EM>Gainous v. State</EM>,
436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of each brief was delivered to appellant, and
appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No
pro se brief has been filed.</P>

<P>We have reviewed the records and counsel's briefs and agree that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the
appeals.</P>

<P>The judgments of conviction are affirmed.</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	<SPAN STYLE="text-decoration: underline">                                                                       
</SPAN></P>

<P>	Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice</P>

<P>Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Smith</P>

<P>Affirmed</P>

<P>Filed:   April 6, 2000</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
