       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

             JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,
                 Plaintiff-Appellant,

                           v.

           NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC.,
           doing business as Now Foods,
              Defendant-Cross Appellant.

             -----------------------

         SOFT GEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
   Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant,

                           v.

             JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,
         Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.
                ______________________

                2014-1020, -1033, -1039
                ______________________

   Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in Nos. 2:10-cv-08301-PSG-
JC and 2:11-cv-00164-PSG-JC, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________
   MARK D. GIARRATANA and THOMAS J. RECHEN,
McCarter & English, LLP, of Hartford, Connecticut,
argued for Jarrow Formulas, Inc. With them on the brief
were ERIC E. GRONDAHL and CHARLES D. RAY.

    SRI K. SANKARAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellants, Soft
Gel Technologies, Inc. With him on the brief for Soft Gel
was DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN. On the brief for Now
Health Group, Inc., were R. DAVID DONOGHUE and STEVEN
E. JEDLINSKI, Holland & Knight LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



   PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. 1 See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


  October 8, 2014                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
       Date                       Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court




   1  Accordingly, the Motion to Strike filed by Jarrow
Formulas, Inc. (ECF No. 57) is DENIED as moot.
