









Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12, 2004








Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12,
2004.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-03-00002-CR
____________
 
CLYDE EUGENE BRADFORD JR.,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 228th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
908,593
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M  
O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
possession of a controlled substance.  On
December 4, 2002, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 30  years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.




Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a
professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se
response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed February 12, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler,
Edelman, and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App.
P. 47.2(b).

