     NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
              ______________________

   HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and
HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC.,
            Plaintiff-Appellants,

                         v.

  NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC., FUJITSU
  LIMITED, FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU
COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC., ALL
  AROUND CO. LTD., BOE-HYDIS TECHNOLOGY
   CO. LTD., PICVUE ELECTRONICS LIMITED,
CURITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KONINKLIJK
    PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., HIGH TECH
     COMPUTER CORPORATION, WISTRON
    CORPORATION, MATSUSHITA ELETRICAL
INDUSTRIAL CO., MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICAL
   CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SEIKO EPSON
 CORPORATION, ARGUS (also known as Hartford
Computer Group.), TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., and
           TOSHIBA CORPORATION,
                  Defendants,

                       and

FUJIFILM CORPORATION and FUJIFILM U.S.A.,
            Defendants-Appellees,

                       and

SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA INC. and SAMSUNG SDI
                      CO. LTD.,
                 Defendants-Appellees.

                 ____________________

                      2010-1121
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in consolidated Case Nos.
04-CV-1337, 04-CV-1338, 04-CV-1536, and 05-CV-0874,
Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    MARTIN R. LUECK, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs-
appellants.   With him on the brief were MATTHEW L.
WOODS and STACIE E. OBERTS.

    LAWRENCE ROSENTHAL, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-
appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the
brief were IAN G. DIBERNARDO, ANGIE M. HANKINS, and
MATTHEW W. SIEGAL.

    STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for
defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.

                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and PROST, Circuit
Judges).


          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


November 1, 2010     /s/ Jan Horbaly   _____________
  Date              Jan Horbaly
                    Clerk
