       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

               GRANDEYE LIMITED,
                   Appellant

                           v.

                   GOOGLE INC.,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

           2015-1622, 2015-1624, 2015-1625
               ______________________

   Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00546, IPR2013-00547, IPR2013-00548.
                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   STEPHEN YEE CHOW, Burns & Levinson, LLP, Boston,
MA, argued for appellant.

    PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre-
sented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON, DAVID VONDLE, ZE-WEN
JULIUS CHEN, CONO A. CARRANO, ASHRAF FAWZY.

   JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS
W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, STACY BETH
MARGOLIES.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



    PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,
Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


March 28, 2016                    /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                         Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court
