
USCA1 Opinion

	




          May 13, 1996          [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-1545                                SCOTT PHILIP BROOKER,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.            COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                       __________________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Scott Philip Brooker on brief pro se.            ____________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per  Curiam.    We  have reviewed  the  record  and                      ___________            plaintiff's arguments.   We affirm for the reasons  stated in            the district court's May 4, 1995 order of dismissal.                      Affirmed.                      ________                                         -2-
