
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-05-00184-CR




Gary Eugene Franklin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 933724, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING




O P I N I O N
 
Gary Franklin was placed on deferred adjudication supervision after he pleaded guilty
to sexually assaulting a child.  Franklin has now been adjudicated guilty and he seeks to appeal.  The
trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Franklin has no right of appeal.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
A defendant who plea bargains for deferred adjudication has a right to appeal,
following a subsequent adjudication, issues unrelated to the conviction but no right to appeal issues
related to the conviction.  Woods v. State, 68 S.W.3d 667, 669 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Kirtley v.
State, 56 S.W.3d 48, 51 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 711, 884-85 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2001).  The form promulgated by the court of criminal appeals to certify the defendant’s
right of appeal does not provide for this conditional right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. appendix
(found at Tex. R. App. P. 25.2, notes and comments (West 2003)); and see Kahookele v. State, No.
03-04-00493-CR (Tex. App.—Austin May 12, 2005, no pet. h.); Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838,
840 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
The trial court’s certification that Franklin has no right of appeal is incorrect and
therefore defective.  See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (inaccurate
certification is defective).  We abate the appeal for ten days and instruct the trial court to prepare and
send to this Court an amended certification that accurately reflects Franklin’s conditional right of
appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.1; see Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614.  The certification should state that there
was a plea bargain for deferred adjudication, but following an adjudication of guilt the defendant has
the right of appeal as to issues unrelated to the conviction.  See Kahookele, slip op. at 5-6. 
The appeal is abated.
 
 
                                                __________________________________________
                                                W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Filed:   May 16, 2005
Publish
