     Case: 17-50748      Document: 00514742805         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/30/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 17-50748                             FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                 November 30, 2018
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RUDOLFO ROMERO PAREDES,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:14-CR-227-5


Before CLEMENT, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Rudolfo Romero Paredes has moved
for leave to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Paredes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50748      Document: 00514742805   Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/30/2018


                                 No. 17-50748

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
