    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         Filed: April 6, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * *  *
ROBERT RAICHE,             *                                     UNPUBLISHED
                           *
         Petitioner,       *                                     No. 16-325V
                           *                                     Special Master Gowen
v.                         *
                           *                                     Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
         Respondent.       *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
Christine M. Becer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                         DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

        On December 20, 2019, Robert Raiche (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and
costs. Petitioner’s Motion for Attorney Fees (“Fees App.”) (ECF No. 103). For the reasons
discussed below, I GRANT Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and awards a total of
$83,707.11.

    I.        Procedural History

        On March 14, 2016, Petitioner filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program.2 Petitioner alleged that he suffered neuromyelitis optica and transverse myelitis as a
result of receiving the Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on October 15, 2013.
Petition at 1 (ECF No. 1). On August 22, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation, which I adopted as

1
  I intend to post this Ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be
available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services).
2
 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine
Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
my Decision awarding compensation on August 23, 2019. ECF No. 98.

        On December 20, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner
requests compensation for his attorneys at Conway, Homer, P.C. in the total amount of $83,707.11,
representing $61,549.55 in attorneys’ fees and $21,484.74 in costs. Fees App. at 1-2. Pursuant to
General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants he has personally incurred costs of $672.82 in pursuit of
his claim. Id. at 2. Respondent reacted to the fees motion on January 3, 2020, stating that
“Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are
met in this case.” Response at 2 (ECF No. 105). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

         The matter is now ripe for adjudication.

   II.      Analysis

       Under the Vaccine Act, the special master may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
for a petition that does not result in an award of compensation but was filed in good faith and
supported by a reasonable basis. § 300aa–15(e)(1). Here, because Petitioner was awarded
compensation, he is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

         Petitioners “bea[r] the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and
the expenses incurred” are reasonable. Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482,
484 (1993). Adequate proof of the claimed fees and costs should be presented when the motion is
filed. Id. at 484 n. 1. The special master has the discretion to reduce awards sua sponte, independent
of enumerated objections from the respondent. Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed.
Cl. 201, 208–09 (Fed. Cl. 2009); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed.
Cl. 2008), aff'd No. 99–537V, 2008 WL 2066611 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008).

                a. Attorneys’ Fees

        I have reviewed the rates requested by Petitioner for the work of his counsel at Conway,
Homer, P.C. (the billing records reflect that the majority of attorney work was performed by Mr.
Joseph Pepper, with supporting work done by Mr. Ronald Homer, Ms. Christina Ciampolillo, Ms.
Lauren Faga, Ms. Meredith Daniels, and Mr. Patrick Kelly) and I find the rates requested herein
to be consistent with what these attorneys have previously been awarded for their Vaccine Program
work and reasonable in light for the work performed in this case.

        Turning next to review of the submitted billing statement, I find that the overall hours spent
on this matter appear to be reasonable. The entries are reasonable and accurately describe the work
being performed and the length of time it took to perform each task. Respondent also has not
identified any particular entries as being objectionable. Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to final
attorneys’ fees of $61,549.55.

                b. Attorneys’ Costs

       Like attorneys’ fees, a request for reimbursement of costs must be reasonable. Perreira v.
Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (Fed. Cl. 1992). Petitioner requests total


                                                    2
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $21,484.74. This amount is comprised of acquiring medical
records, the Court’s filing fee, the work of Petitioner’s expert Dr. Salvatore Napoli, the work of
Petitioner’s life care planner Maureen Clancy, and work performed by Petitioner’s former counsel,
Ms. Marie Fabian. Petitioner has provided adequate documentation supporting all of his requested
costs, and all appear reasonable in my experience. The amount expended on expert and life care
planner work appears reasonable in light of the work performed in the instant case. Petitioner is
therefore entitled to the full amount of costs sought.

                   c. Petitioner’s Costs

       Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants that he has personally incurred costs
of $672.82 related to the prosecution of his petition. These costs are for acquiring medical records.
Fees App. at 83. Petitioner has provided adequate documentation to support the requested costs,
and they shall be reimbursed in full.

      III.      Conclusion

       In accordance with the foregoing, Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is
GRANTED. I find that Petitioner is entitled to a reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs as
follows:

    Attorneys’ Fees Requested                                                     $61,549.55
    (Reduction of Fees)                                                                -
    Total Attorneys’ Fees Awarded                                                 $61,549.55

    Attorneys’ Costs Requested                                                    $21,484.74
    (Reduction of Costs)                                                               -
    Total Attorneys’ Costs Awarded                                                $21,484.74

    Total Attorneys’ Fees and Costs                                               $83,034.29

    Petitioner’s Costs                                                              $672.82

    Total Amount Awarded                                                          $83,707.11

             Accordingly, I award the following:

      1) a lump sum in the amount of $83,034.29, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
         attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and his attorney,
         Mr. Ronald Homer3; and


3
  This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by
the attorney against a client, “advanced costs,” and fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, Section 15(e)(3)
prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded
herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991).


                                                          3
    2) a lump sum in the amount of $672.82, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
       costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

        IT IS SO ORDERED.



                                                     /s/Thomas L. Gowen
                                                     Thomas L. Gowen
                                                     Special Master




4
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine
Rule 11(a).

                                                        4
