                                       In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                                _________________
                               NO. 09-12-00262-CR
                               _________________

                         WILLIAM SIDNER, Appellant

                                          V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________________________________________ _

                On Appeal from the 359th District Court
                      Montgomery County, Texas
                    Trial Cause No. 10-04-04064 CR
_________________________________________________________________ _

                                      ORDER

       Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief which

urges this Court to review this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403,

408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).         Counsel certified service of the motion to

withdraw and the brief on the appellant. Counsel states he provided appellant with

a copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record, notified appellant of his right


                                          1
to review the record and file a pro se brief, and advised appellant of his right to

seek discretionary review.

      It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, William Sidner, be given 60 days

from the date hereof to file a pro se brief. It is, further, ORDERED that the State

may file a reply brief, due 30 days from the date appellant files his brief, or if no

brief is filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof.

      ORDER ENTERED March 21, 2013.

                                                             PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.




                                          2
