[Cite as O'Stricker v. Robinson Mem. Hosp. Found., 2013-Ohio-4313.]


                                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                              ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                   PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO


COREY O’STRICKER,                                       :             MEMORANDUM OPINION

                 Plaintiff-Appellant,                   :
                                                                      CASE NO. 2013-P-0043
        - vs -                                          :

ROBINSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL                              :
FOUNDATION,
                                                        :
                 Defendant,
                                                        :
MICHAEL L. PRYCE, M.D., et al.,
                                                        :
                 Defendants-Appellees.


Civil Appeal from the Portage County Court of Common Pleas.
Case No. 2011 CV 01405.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.


Robert J. Sawyer, 815 Superior Avenue East, Suite 300, Cleveland, OH 44114-2746
(For Plaintiff-Appellant).

Juliana S. Gall and Rocco D. Potenza, Hanna, Campbell & Powell, L.L.P., 3737
Embassy Parkway, Suite 100, P.O. Box 5521, Akron, OH 44334 (For Defendants-
Appellees).



TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.

        {¶1}     Appellant, Corey O’Stricker, appeals from the April 8, 2013 judgment entry

of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, denying his motion for relief from

judgment.
       {¶2}   A review of the record in this case reveals that on August 27, 2012,

appellant filed a motion for relief from judgment from a July 30, 2012 order. In that

entry, the trial court granted appellees’, Michael L. Pryce, M.D. and Stow-Kent

Orthopedics, Inc., motion to dismiss appellant’s complaint for failure to provide an

affidavit in compliance with Civ.R. 10(D)(2). Appellant appealed that entry with this

court on August 28, 2012.        This court dismissed that appeal for lack of a final,

appealable order on November 5, 2012. O’Stricker v. Robinson Mem. Hosp. Found.,

11th Dist. Portage No. 2012-P-0104, 2012-Ohio-5123, ¶7. On April 8, 2013, the trial

court denied appellant’s August 27, 2012 motion for relief from judgment pursuant to

Civ.R. 60(B). Appellant filed the instant appeal on May 7, 2013, as a result of the denial

of his motion for relief from judgment.

       {¶3}   On June 27, 2013, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack

of a final, appealable order because the trial court has not disposed of all claims against

the other parties in the underlying action, and there has been no Civ.R. 54(B)

determination that “there is no just reason for delay.”

       {¶4}   It is well settled that “an order must be final before it can be reviewed by

an appellate court. If an order is not final, then an appellate court has no jurisdiction.”

Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 19 (1989). Normally, the

grant or denial of a motion for relief from judgment is a final, appealable order pursuant

to R.C. 2505.02(B)(3). See, e.g., Bencin v. Bencin, 9th Dist. Medina Nos. 10CA0097-M

& 11CA0113-M, 2012-Ohio-4197, ¶11.

       {¶5}   Here, the trial court’s July 30, 2012 entry was interlocutory because there

were claims still pending in the trial court. A motion for relief from judgment is permitted

only for relief from a final judgment. Thus, although appellant labeled its August 27,


                                             2
2012 motion as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B), it was

essentially a motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory order that could be modified

at any time before entering final judgment because claims remained pending. See

Harris v. Lucic Gen. Contrs., Inc., 11th Dist. Lake No. 2011-L-112, 2012-Ohio-2004,

¶15.

         {¶6}   The record clearly indicates that there are claims still pending in the trial

court involving Robinson Memorial Hospital Foundation and Ohio Conference of

Plasters & Cement Masons Health & Welfare Fund.                As the proceedings in the

underlying action were not completed before appellant filed his August 27, 2012 motion

for relief from judgment, it was simply a motion for reconsideration of a non-final order.

Therefore, the April 8, 2013 appealed entry is not final under R.C. 2505.02 and Civ.R.

54(B).

         {¶7}   Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellees’ motion to dismiss the

appeal is granted. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider this matter.

         {¶8}   Appeal dismissed.



CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,

concur.




                                              3
