       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

       TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORP.,
                Appellant,

                           v.

       ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
                    Appellee.
             ______________________

                      2013-1661
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 95/001,362.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    AARON T. OLEJNICZAK, Andrus, Sceales, Starke &
Sawall, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for appel-
lant. With him on the brief was GEORGE H. SOLVESON.

    D. CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellee. With him
on the brief were DEAN W. RUSSELL and RENAE BAILEY
WAINWRIGHT.
                 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


  May 12, 2014                    /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court
