         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 16-1526V
                                    Filed: January 23, 2018
                                        UNPUBLISHED


    JANICE CREIGHTON,

                        Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                                                             Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.


Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On November 16, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) following her November 18, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination.
Petition at 1. On October 31, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding
compensation to petitioner based on the respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 33.)

       On December 18, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
(ECF No. 37.) Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $14,182.00 and
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $723.67. (Id. at ¶ 4.) In accordance with General

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
Order #9, petitioner's counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket
expenses. (Id.) Thus, the total amount requested is $14,905.67.

        On January 2, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF
No. 38.) Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” (Id. at 1.) Respondent adds, however, that he “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.” (Id. at 2.) Respondent “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special
Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees
and costs.” (Id. at 3.)

        Petitioner has filed no reply.

        The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the total requested hours. However, upon review
of the distribution hours billed by petitioner’s counsel the undersigned has found that the
amount of hours listed as expended by petitioner’s counsel in the application do not
match the time as provided in the time records and will need to be adjusted accordingly.
Time records submitted show petitioner’s counsel, Paul R. Brazil, expended 3.9 hours
at a rate of $255.00; 12.9 hours at a rate of $275.00; 16.7 hours at a rate of $300.00 an
hour. Attorney C. Clark Hodgson, III expended 6.3 hours at a rate of $225.00 an hour.
The total fees for Mr. Brazil and Mr. Hodgson is $10,969.50. Paralegals billed a
combined 25.6 hours at an hourly rate of $125.00 for a total fee of $3,200.00. Total
attorney’s fees equal $14,169.50, a reduction of $12.50.

       The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates. However, due to
attorney C. Clark Hodgson, III‘s inexperience in the Vaccine Program, the undersigned
does find cause to reduce his hourly rate from the requested $225.00 an hour to
$200.00 an hour. Therefore, attorneys’ fees are reduced by $157.50 for a total of
$14,012.00. The full amount of costs sought, $723.67, is awarded.

      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

      Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $14,735.67 3 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
Paul R. Brazil.

3This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
                                                   2
        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                           s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Chief Special Master




Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                      3
