                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 25, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-20586
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT FRANKLIN SCHOONOVER, JR.,
also known as Robert Aaron Cord, also known
as Robert Cord, also known as Robert Nabors,
also known as Robert Aaron Nabors,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:98-CR-101-ALL
                       --------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert

Franklin Schoonover, Jr., on appeal from the revocation of his

supervised release has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967).   Schoonover has not responded to counsel’s motion.

     Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.      Counsel’s

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 05-20586
                               -2-

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.   See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
