                                                                         REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION
                                       ORIGINAL                                         JUL 24 2017
                                                                                          OSM
                                                                              U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

         1Jn tbe 'mlniteb ~tateg C!tourt of jfeberal C!tlaimg
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                               No. 14-946V
                                           Filed: June 27, 2017
                                           Not for Publication
                                                                                F'LED
                                                                                 JUN 2 7 20\7
*************************************
                                                                                        OSM
J.O.,                                             *                                U.S. COURT OF
                                                                                   FEDERAL CLAIMS
                                                  *
                 Petitioner,                      *
                                                  *        Attorneys' fees and costs decision;
    v.                                            *        reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
                                                  *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               *
                                                  *
                Respondent.                       *
                                                  *
*************************************
J.O., Buffalo, NY, prose.
Arny P. Kokot, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

                     DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 1

         On October 6, 2014, petitioner filed a petition prose under the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10-34 (2012) alleging that his receipt of hepatitis B
vaccine on September 30, 2013 caused him to develop numerous symptoms, including
lightheadedness, hypertension, burning heart pain, metabolic syndrome, and loss of appetite.
Pet. at iii! 5, 6. On December 2, 2015, attorney Robert J. Krakow became the attorney of record
in the case. The undersigned issued a decision dismissing the case on April 5, 2017.

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)
(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that
all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets
or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar
information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a
decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the
document's disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within
the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. On
June 5, 2017, the undersigned issued an Order on petitioner's Motion to Redact dated April 19, 2017. In
her Order, the undersigned granted petitioner's motion to redact his name, but denied petitioner's motion
to redact the civil case number.
       On June 6, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Petitioner
requests attorneys' fees in the amount of$22,346.30, attorneys' costs in the amount of
$1,019.80, and personal costs of $525.00, for a total request of $23,891.10.

        On June 13, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion explaining he is
satisfied that this case meets the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(l)(A)-(B). Resp. at 2. Respondent "respectfully recommends
that the [undersigned] exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys'
fees and costs." Id. at 3.

       Petitioner filed a reply to respondent's response on June 13, 2017. In his reply, petitioner
requests that the undersigned "grant petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs in the
amount requested." Reply at 1.

        The Vaccine Act permits an award of"reasonable attorneys' fees" and "other costs."
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(l). It is not necessary for a petitioner to prevail in the case-in-chief in
order to receive a fee award as long as petitioner brought the claim in "good faith and there was a
reasonable basis for the claim." Id. The special master has "wide discretion in determining the
reasonableness" of attorneys' fees and costs. Perreira v. Sec'y of HHS, 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34
(1992), affd, 33 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Saxton ex rel. Saxtonv. Sec'y of HHS, 3
F.3d 1517, 1519 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (''Vaccine program special masters are also entitled to use their
prior experience in reviewing fee applications.").

        Based on her experience and review of the billing records submitted by petitioner, the
undersigned finds petitioner's attorneys' fees and costs request reasonable. Therefore, the
undersigned GRANTS petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Accordingly, the
court awards:

        a. $23,366.10, representing attorneys' fees and costs. 2 The award shall be in the form of
           a check made payable jointly to petitioner and the Law Office of Robert J. Krakow,
           P.C. in the amount of$23,366.10; and

        b. $525.00, representing petitioner's costs. The award shall be in the form of a check
           made payable to petitioner's for $525.00.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3




2
  The undersigned hereby directs the clerk to send a copy of this decision to petitioner's former counsel,
Robert J. Krakow.
3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule l l(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                        2
IT IS SO ORDERED.



Dated: June 27, 2017   ~£.~
                           Laura D. Millman
                            Special Master




                       3
