









IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-25,912-11


DANIEL GONZALES SANCHEZ, Relator

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent




ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 03-08-06085-CV IN THE 435th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY


 Per curiam.

O R D E R



	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 435th Judicial District Court of Montgomery County, that more than 35 days have elapsed,
and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District Clerk of 
Montgomery County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on
such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues
to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); or stating that
Relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in Montgomery County.  Should the response
include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was served with
the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response.  This application for leave to file
a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate
response.  Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.


Filed: September 28, 2011
Do not publish	
