
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1096                                    UNITED STATES,                                      Appellee,                                          v.                             CARLOS RENE GONZALEZ-CORREA,                                Defendant, Appellant.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                   [Hon. Daniel R. Dominguez, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Selya, Boudin and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Lucien  B. Campbell,  Acting Federal  Public Defender,  and  Laura            ___________________                                          _____        Maldonado Rodriguez,  Assistant Federal Public Defender,  on brief for        ___________________        appellant.            Guillermo Gil, United  States Attorney, Nelson Perez-Sosa, Antonio            _____________                           _________________  _______        R. Bazan,  Assistant  United States  Attorneys,  and Jose  A.  Quiles-        ________                                             _________________        Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.        ________                                 ____________________                                    June 20, 1997                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.  Upon careful review  of the parties' briefs                 __________            and  the record, we find  no reason to  overturn the district            court's conclusion.  We cannot  say that the district court's            findings were clearly erroneous.                 The sentence is affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.                                 ________   ___                                         -2-
