                                      Cite as 2015 Ark. 315
                    ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
                                         No.   CR-15-490

                                                   Opinion Delivered   September 10, 2015

ZECKEYA K. PERRY                                   PRO SE MOTION FOR BELATED
                               PETITIONER          APPEAL OF ORDER
                                                   [PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
V.                                                 NO. 60CR-12-1791]

                                                   HONORABLE HERBERT T. WRIGHT,
STATE OF ARKANSAS                                  JR., JUDGE
                            RESPONDENT

                                                   MOTION DISMISSED.


                                         PER CURIAM


       In 2013, judgment was entered reflecting that Zeckeya K. Perry had been found guilty

by a jury of capital murder and aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of

life imprisonment without parole. We affirmed. Perry v. State, 2014 Ark. 406. The mandate of

this court issued on October 21, 2014.

       On January 5, 2015, seventy-six days after the mandate issued, Perry filed in the trial

court a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal

Procedure 37.1 (2013). The trial court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not filed

within the time limits set by the Rule for filing petitions. Perry did not timely file a notice of

appeal from the court’s order within thirty days of the date that the order was entered in

accordance with Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(a)(4) (2014), and he now

seeks leave to proceed with a belated appeal.
                                       Cite as 2015 Ark. 215

       We need not consider the merits of the motion as it is clear from the record that Perry

could not prevail if an appeal were permitted to go forward. An appeal from an order that

denied a petition for postconviction relief will not be allowed to proceed where it is clear that

the appellant could not prevail. Justus v. State, 2012 Ark. 91. In this case, the trial court did not

have jurisdiction to consider Perry’s Rule 37.1 petition because the petition was not timely filed.

See Wilmoth v. State, 369 Ark. 346, 255 S.W.3d 419 (2007).

       Pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.2(c)(ii), when there was an appeal

from a judgment of conviction, a petition for relief must be filed in the trial court within sixty

days of the date that the mandate was issued by the appellate court. Justus, 2012 Ark. 91. The

time limitations imposed in Rule 37.2(c) are jurisdictional in nature, and, if the petition is not

filed within that period, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant postconviction relief. State v.

Tejeda-Acosta, 2013 Ark. 217, 427 S.W.3d 673. Perry’s petition before the trial court was not

timely filed. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction, the appellate court also lacks jurisdiction.

Id.

       Motion dismissed.

       Zeckeya K. Perry, pro se petitioner.

       No response.




                                                  2
