                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                       No. 98-21008
                                     Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                             versus
ISIDRO ARAUJO, also known as Wilfredo Hernandez,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                   -------------------------------------------------------------
                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the Southern District of Texas
                                   USDC No. H-98-78-01
                   -------------------------------------------------------------
                                      February 28, 2000

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Isidro Araujo, also known as Wilfredo Hernandez, appeals his conviction by a

jury for conspiracy to possess more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to

distribute and possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to
distribute.2 He contends that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to give

a jury instruction on the lesser included offenses of conspiracy to possess cocaine or


       *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
       2
        21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846.
simple possession of cocaine. Our review of the record persuades that Araujo’s intent
to distribute can be inferred from his possession of 9.5 kilograms of cocaine. We

conclude that no reasonable jury could have found him guilty of conspiracy to possess

cocaine or possession of cocaine and then have acquitted him of the more serious
offenses of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute or possession of

cocaine with intent to distribute.3 Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion in the

trial court’s refusal to give the requested jury instruction for a lesser included offense

of conspiracy to possess cocaine or simple possession of cocaine.
      AFFIRMED.




      3
       See United States v. Lucien, 61 F.3d 366 (5th Cir. 1995).

                                              2
