     Case: 15-11227      Document: 00513882242         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 15-11227
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSALINO SALGADO, also known as Chalino, also known as Miyagi, also
known as Cocho,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:13-CR-412-6


Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Rosalino Salgado has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salgado has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-11227   Document: 00513882242    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2017


                               No. 15-11227

as Salgado’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2
