
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ____________________          No. 92-1441                                    GERARD BENOIT,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                               WILLIAM F. WELD, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ___________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                              Torruella, Circuit Judge,                                         _____________                      Brown* and Bownes, Senior Circuit Judges.                                         _____________________                                 ____________________                Matthew Cobb for appellant.                ____________                Jon  Laramore,   Assistant  Attorney   General,  Government                _____________          Bureau, with  whom Scott  Harshbarger, Attorney  General, was  on                             __________________          brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                   October 21, 1992                                 ____________________                                        ____________________          *  Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.                    Per Curiam.   Upon  full review of  the record  in this                    __________          case, and having  considered the briefs and oral  argument of the          parties,  the  decision of  the  district court  is  affirmed for          substantially the  same reasons  as are stated  in said  opinion.          See Benoit  v. Weld,  et al.,  No.  91-12314 (D.  Mass. March  5,          ___ ______     _____________          1992).                    Affirmed.  Costs to appellees.                    ________                                         -2-
