









IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS





NO. 65,026-01


RAMIRO RAUL ESQUIVEL , Relator

v.


 DISTRICT CLERK, HIDALGO COUNTY, Respondent






ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 
FROM HIDALGO COUNTY



 Per curiam.


O R D E R


 
	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus.  In it, he contends that
he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 370TH Judicial District Court of
Hidalgo County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet
been forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District
Clerk of Hidalgo County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting
the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which
designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1992); by stating that the nature of the claims asserted in the application filed by relator
is such that the claims are not cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc., art 11.07, § 3; or
stating that relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in Hidalgo County.  This
application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the
respondent has submitted the appropriate response.  Such response shall be submitted within
30 days of the date of this order.

 IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JULY, 2006.

DO NOT PUBLISH















 
