
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

AT AUSTIN


 



NO. 3-91-248-CR



MARGIE NELL WILLIAMS,

	APPELLANT

vs.



THE STATE OF TEXAS,

	APPELLEE

 


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 0912104, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

 



PER CURIAM
	A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery.  Tex. Penal Code Ann. 
§ 29.03 (Supp. 1992).  The district court assessed punishment, enhanced by two previous felony
convictions, at imprisonment for seventy years.
	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the
appeal.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436  S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485  S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State,
516  S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v. State, 573  S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of her
right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal
is frivolous and without merit.  A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief would
serve no beneficial purpose.
	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

[Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd]
Affirmed
Filed:   April 8, 1992
[Do Not Publish]
