                               NUMBER 13-07-133-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

CITY OF ABRAM, ET AL.,                                                        Appellants,

                                             v.

CITY OF MISSION, TEXAS,                             Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

  On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                 Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on May 16, 2008. On June 3,

2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly

injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, appellants have neither filed

their brief in this matter nor otherwise responded to the Court’s notices.

       Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                                          PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 29th day of August, 2008.




                                               2
