                    United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 01-3699
                                   ___________

Lance Addison; Steven R. Schuyler;    *
Patricia Fitzharris,                  *
                                      *
                   Appellees,         * Appeal from the United States
                                      * District Court for the District
       v.                             * of Minnesota.
                                      *
Everest Connections Corporation;      *      [UNPUBLISHED]
Everest Global Technologies, LLC;     *
Utilicorp United, Inc.,               *
                                      *
                   Appellants.        *
                                 ___________

                             Submitted: June 13, 2002

                                 Filed: June 20, 2002
                                  ___________

Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
                              ___________

PER CURIAM.

       UtiliCorp United, Inc. entered into a limited liability company (LLC)
agreement with GLA New Ventures to form Everest Global Technologies, LLC, a
holding company for corporations engaged in cable, telephone, and internet services.
Later, UtiliCorp and GLA created Everest Connections Corporation, a subsidiary of
Everest Global, to build, operate, and license the proposed telecommunications
business. Three former employees of Everest Global and Everest Connections sued
them seeking money damages for breach of contract and tortious interference with
contract arising out of their employment. The former employees also sought
declaratory relief on a noncompetition agreement. The business entities moved to
dismiss or to compel arbitration based on a clause in the LLC agreement requiring
disputes arising out of or related to the agreement to be settled by arbitration.
Because the former employees were not parties to the LLC agreement, the district
court* denied the motion.

       Everest Connections, Everest Global, and UtiliCorp appeal asserting the former
employees should be required to arbitrate their claims and any claims not submitted
to arbitration should be stayed pending arbitration. Having carefully reviewed the
record, we disagree. The former employees are not parties to the LLC agreement and
the claims they assert in this case do not arise under that agreement. The former
employees did sign letter agreements, employment agreements, noncompetition
agreements, and stock vesting agreements with Everest Connections and Everest
Global, but these agreements contain no arbitration clause, and state the parties will
submit disputes to federal or state courts. The vesting agreements do provide that
certain terms of the LLC agreement applicable to “members” govern the parties’
rights, but the arbitration clause of the LLC agreement does not govern “members”
as the agreement defines those terms. Further, the vesting agreements make no
reference to the LLC agreement’s arbitration clause, and the former employees were
not given a copy of the LLC agreement before signing the vesting agreements.

      We thus affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.




      *
      The Honorable Paul Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

                                         -2-
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                              -3-
