[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward, 2016-Ohio-734.]




                          DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WARD.
 [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-734.]
  (No. 2013-1979—Submitted February 25, 2016—Decided February 29, 2016.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
         {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Richard Grove Ward, Attorney
Registration No. 0037613, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
         {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of January 29, 2015,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent
from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R.
V(24).
         {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the State of Ohio.
         {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
         O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur.
                             ________________________
