[Cite as Nelson v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles, 2011-Ohio-4579.]



                                      Court of Claims of Ohio
                                                                           The Ohio Judicial Center
                                                                   65 South Front Street, Third Floor
                                                                              Columbus, OH 43215
                                                                    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
                                                                               www.cco.state.oh.us




PENNY ANN NELSON

        Plaintiff

        v.

BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES

        Defendant

        Case No. 2011-01089-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION


        {¶1} Plaintiff, Penny Ann Nelson, stated she received a citation issued by a local
law enforcement officer on May 23, 2010, for failing to stop at a stop sign in Gahanna,
Ohio. Plaintiff further stated she was unable to show proof of insurance because “I
kept my cards at home.” Subsequently, plaintiff called her insurance company and
learned that her policy had been cancelled “by my ex.” Plaintiff related, “I got insurance
on May 27th. I mailed in my fine and that copy of insurance on July 2nd.”                 Plaintiff
submitted a copy of the Gahanna court’s case details listing the stop sign offense and
the notation “guilty/waiver.” Plaintiff paid a fine and court costs. Plaintiff maintained that
her case data with her Gahanna address was sent to defendant, Bureau of Motor
Vehicles (BMV), by court personnel. Plaintiff also pointed out that the ticket she
received on May 23, 2010, listed her address as 6431 Crescent Way Norfolk, VA
23513, and that she presented to the officer a Virginia driver’s license which expired in
2015.
        {¶2} Plaintiff related that on November 13, 2010, “I was pulled over for my
license plates being 2 days expired. I was then informed my driver’s license had been
suspended and the BMV had an order put out to confiscate my plates.”                                   Plaintiff
contended she never received notice that her license was suspended. According to
plaintiff, she contacted BMV and learned that the notice had been sent to an address in
Colorado and that it had been returned to BMV as undeliverable. Plaintiff insisted she
had not resided in Colorado since 2007, that she was a military spouse until September
2010, and that inasmuch as she was a dependent of a person in the military she was
not required to change her license. Plaintiff related she moved to Ohio from Virginia in
2008 and her car has been registered in Ohio for the past two years. In addition,
plaintiff claimed that “[e]very time I move I put in a change of address.”
        {¶3} In describing her damages, plaintiff stated, “I had to wait until December 1,
2010 to get my car back, my license back and my registration renewed. That’s when I
had money coming in.             On the 1st, I went and got my license reinstated, went to
Johnstown BMV, renewed my registration and went to Johnstown PD to get the
impound release. I then went to get my car. I discovered my plates were gone. I had to
go back to the BMV and get new plates.” Plaintiff contended, “[h]ad the BMV used the
current information (like my Ohio registration or what the Gahanna mayor’s court had
sent in), I would have received the notice and taken care of the matter immediately.”
Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover $495.84 for towing and storage
expenses, new plates, and a late fee imposed during the registration process. The filing
fee was paid.
        {¶4} Defendant denied any liability in this matter asserting BMV issued plaintiff a
“notice of suspension pursuant to her failure to provide insurance to a police officer or to
the court after she received a traffic ticket on May 23, 2010.” Defendant maintained
R.C. 4509.101 prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle without proof of financial
responsibility. See R.C. 4509.101.1

        1
            R.C. 4509.101which prohibits operation of a motor vehicle without proof of financial
responsibility states in relevant part:
         “(A) (1) No person shall operate, or permit the operation of, a motor vehicle in this state, unless
proof of financial responsibility is maintained continuously throughout the registration period with respect
to that vehicle, or, in the case of a driver who is not the owner, with respect to that driver's operation of
that vehicle.”
         “(2) Whoever violates division (A)(1) of this section shall be subject to the following civil penalties:
          “(a) Subject to divisions (A)(2)(b) and (c) of this section, a class E suspension of the person's
driver's license, commercial driver's license, temporary instruction permit, probationary license, or
nonresident operating privilege for the period of time specified in division (B)(5) of section 4510.02 of the
Revised Code and impoundment of the person's license. The court may grant limited driving privileges to
        {¶5} On July 7, 2010, defendant sent plaintiff a Notice of Suspension letter
pursuant to R.C. 4509.101(D)(5). R.C. 4509.101(D)(5)(a) states as follows:
        {¶6} “(5)(a) Upon receiving notice from a clerk of courts or traffic violations
bureau pursuant to division (D)(4) of this section, the registrar shall order the
suspension of the license of the person required under division (A)(2)(a), (b), or (c) of
this section and the impoundment of the person’s certificate of registration and license
plates required under division (A)(2)(d) of this section, effective thirty days after the date
of the mailing of notification. The registrar also shall notify the person that the person
must present the registrar with proof of financial responsibility in accordance with this
section, surrender to the registrar the person’s certificate of registration, license plates,
and license, or submit a statement subject to section 2921.13 of the Revised Code that
the person did not operate or permit the operation of the motor vehicle at the time of the
offense. Notification shall be in writing and shall be sent to the person at the person’s
last known address as shown on the records of the bureau of motor vehicles. The
person, within fifteen days after the date of the mailing of notification, shall present proof
of financial responsibility, surrender the certificate of registration, license plates, and
license to the registrar in a manner set forth in division (A)(4) of this section, or submit
the statement required under this section together with other information the person
considers appropriate.
        {¶7} “If the registrar does not receive proof or the person does not surrender the
certificate of registration, license plates, and license, in accordance with this division,
the registrar shall permit the order for the suspension of the license of the person and
the impoundment of the person’s certificate of registration and license plates to take
effect.”
        {¶8} Defendant mailed the Notice of Suspension letter to plaintiff at 608 W.2nd
Florence, CO 81226. According to defendant, this address was on file due to a previous


the person only if the person presents proof of financial responsibility and has complied with division
(A)(5) of this section.

             “* * *
             “(d) In addition to the suspension of an owner's license under division (A)(2)(a), (b), or (c) of
this section, the suspension of the rights of the owner to register the motor vehicle and the impoundment
of the owner's certificate of registration and license plates until the owner complies with division (A)(5) of
this section.”
traffic citation issued to plaintiff while she was driving in Ohio in 1999. Defendant
contended this address was the address on record in the BMV’s driver’s license
database for plaintiff as of May 23, 2010. The notice was returned to BMV with the
stamp “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward.”
        {¶9} Defendant contends BMV acted properly in that BMV is required to provide
notice to persons “at the person’s last known address as shown on the records of the
bureau.”     See R.C. 4501.022.2           Defendant explained that the notice provisions are
governed by Ohio Adm. Code section 4501:1-10-01.
        {¶10} Ohio Adm. Code section 4501:1-10-01 states, in relevant part:
        {¶11} “(D) The bureau of motor vehicles (BMV) shall maintain a drivers' record
data file which shall include the last known address of each driver, commercial driver,
motorcycle operator, or temporary permit holder licensed by the state of Ohio. For the
purpose of this rule, the last known address of the driver, commercial driver, motorcycle
operator, or temporary permit holder shall be the address entered on the most recent
application submitted by that person unless the bureau of motor vehicles receives
notice of, and enters, a new address in accordance with this paragraph. Upon receipt of
a written or electronic notice of a new address submitted by a driver, commercial driver,
motorcycle operator, or temporary permit holder pursuant to division (D) of section
4506.14 or division (C) of section 4507.09 of the Revised Code, the BMV shall, within
twenty-eight days, enter the new address in the drivers' record data file.
        {¶12} “(E) The bureau of motor vehicles shall maintain a vehicle registration data
file which shall include the last known address of the registered owner of each motor
vehicle registered in the state of Ohio. For the purpose of this rule, the last known
address of the owner shall be the address entered on the most recent motor vehicle

        2
          R.C. 4501.022 states as follows:
          “(A) The registrar of motor vehicles shall determine the necessary or appropriate method by
which written notice of an order suspending a motor vehicle driver's or commercial driver's license or
requiring the surrender of a certificate of registration and registration plates may be provided to the
person holding the license or the certificate of registration and registration plates. Division (A) of this
section does not apply if the registrar is required to provide notification by use of a method specified by
law.
         “(B) Pursuant to rules adopted by the registrar, the bureau of motor vehicles shall implement
proof of mailing procedures to provide verification that written notice of an order suspending a motor
vehicle driver's or commercial driver's license or requiring the surrender of a certificate of registration and
registration plates was sent to the person holding the license or the certificate of registration and
registration plates.”
registration submitted by the owner, unless the bureau of motor vehicles receives notice
of, and enters, a new address in accordance with this paragraph. Upon receipt of a
written or electronic notice of a new address submitted by an owner or lessee of a motor
vehicle holding a certificate of registration pursuant to division (E) of section 4503.101 of
the Revised Code, the bureau of motor vehicles shall, within twenty-eight days, enter
the new address in the vehicle registration data file.
       {¶13} “(F) Written notice of any order which relates only to requiring the
surrender of a certificate of registration or registration plates, or both, but does not relate
in any way to the revocation, cancellation, or suspension of a driver's license,
commercial driver's license, motorcycle operator's license or endorsement, or temporary
permit, shall be sent by regular mail to the owner's last known address contained in the
vehicle registration data file in accordance with paragraph (E) of this rule.
       {¶14} “(G) Written notice of all other orders, including orders revoking, canceling,
or suspending a driver's license, commercial driver's license, motorcycle operator's
license or endorsement, or temporary permit, and any orders requiring the surrender of
a certificate of registration or registration plates, or both, if there is any underlying
relationship between that surrender and any action revoking, canceling, or suspending a
driver's license, commercial driver's license, motorcycle operator's license or
endorsement, or temporary permit, shall be sent by regular mail to the driver's,
commercial driver's, motorcycle operator's, or temporary permit holder's last known
address contained in the drivers' record data file in accordance with paragraph (D) of
this rule.” (Emphasis added.)       Thus, defendant is required to give written notice of
driver’s license suspensions by regular mail sent to the last known address of the
person whose license is suspended.           State v. May (July 19, 1995), Ross App.
94CA2075.     Defendant argued that BMV does not accept the address listed by a
mayor’s court or the address contained on the vehicle registration form to be acceptable
options for changing the address in the data base. Indeed, defendant contended if a
driver wished to change the listed address, “he or she must provide BMV written or
electronic notice of the change of address * * * . The BMV does not have any record of
Plaintiff giving notice of a change of address in the driver’s record data file.” In the
instant claim, evidence has shown BMV complied with the requisite notice provisions in
mailing the July 7, 2010 Notice of Suspension letter to plaintiff’s listed address in
Colorado. Pursuant to statutory authority, defendant suspended plaintiff’s license
effective August 6, 2010.
       {¶15} Resulting monetary damages are recoverable when plaintiff proves, by a
preponderance of the evidence, defendant erroneously records driver’s license
information. Ankney v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1998), 97-11045-AD; Serbanescu v.
Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1994), 93-15038-AD; Black v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles
(1996), 95-01441-AD.
       {¶16} Plaintiff filed a response explaining that she has never had an Ohio
driver’s license and that she has not lived in Colorado since 2007.             Plaintiff then
explained “I was a military spouse from Feb 2000 ‘til Sept. 2010. We moved around,
but not to Ohio. I have always put in a change of address.” Plaintiff again insisted that
the address listed on the May 23, 2010 ticket or the address listed in accordance with
her vehicle registration should have been used by BMV to provide notice of the
suspension.
       {¶17} The credibility of witnesses and the weight attributable to their testimony
are primarily matters for the trier of fact. State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 230,
39 O.O. 2d 366, 227 N.E. 2d 212, paragraph one of the syllabus. The court is free to
believe or disbelieve, all or any part of each witness’s testimony. State v. Antill (1964),
176 Ohio St. 61, 26 O.O. 2d 366, 197 N.E. 2d 548. Despite the plaintiff’s allegations in
her complaint and in her response, the file is devoid of any evidence to verify plaintiff
informed BMV of her address every time she moved.             Indeed, the court does not find
plaintiff’s assertions to be credible.
       {¶18} Upon review of all the evidence submitted, the court finds defendant’s
records were accurate under the circumstances when plaintiff’s cause of action
accrued. Elliott v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (2002), 2001-02104-AD, jud. Considering
the information available to defendant, insufficient evidence has been offered to show
that BMV acted improperly in sending the notice to the Colorado address. No evidence
has been presented to establish BMV failed to comply with statutory requirements for
sending the notice. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim is denied.
                                  Court of Claims of Ohio
                                                                           The Ohio Judicial Center
                                                                   65 South Front Street, Third Floor
                                                                              Columbus, OH 43215
                                                                    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
                                                                               www.cco.state.oh.us




PENNY ANN NELSON

          Plaintiff

          v.

BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES

          Defendant

          Case No. 2011-01089-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert


ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION


          Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth
in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff.



                                                   ________________________________
                                                   DANIEL R. BORCHERT
                                                   Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Penny Ann Nelson                                   Anne Vitale, Associate Legal Counsel
6207 Polo Drive West                               Department of Public Safety
Columbus, Ohio 43229                               Legal Services
                                                   1970 West Broad Street
                                                   P.O. Box 182081
                                                   Columbus, Ohio 43218-2081
SJM/laa
5/12
Filed 6/1/11/
Sent to S.C. reporter 9/12/11
