                        COURT OF APPEALS
                         SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                              FORT WORTH

                             NO. 02-11-00105-CR


MICHAEL BOHANNAN                                                   APPELLANT

                                       V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                       STATE


                                   ------------

     FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                   ------------

                                  OPINION
                                   ------------

      Appellant Michael Bohannan seeks to appeal the trial court’s dismissal of

charges filed against him. On March 30, 2011, we notified Appellant and his

counsel that it appears we lack jurisdiction over this matter because an order

dismissing charges is not an appealable order, and we advised that this appeal

could be dismissed unless he, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, filed

a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before April 11,

2011. On April 5, 2011, we granted Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw and
informed Appellant of his right to proceed pro se. Appellant timely filed a pro se

response to our March 30, 2011 letter.          We have considered Appellant’s

response. It does not cite any authority granting us jurisdiction over this appeal.

      The rules of appellate procedure provide that a criminal defendant has the

right to appeal a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). Although the State is expressly permitted by statute to appeal an

order dismissing an indictment, this right of appeal has not been extended to the

defendant by statute or rule.     Consequently, an order dismissing a charging

instrument is not an appealable order for purposes of rule 25.2(a)(2) if a

defendant brings the appeal. See Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583–84 (Tex.

App.––Tyler 1990, no pet.) (applying federal law holding that a dismissal of an

indictment is not an appealable order and review of a dismissal order must await

the outcome of a trial).     Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Skinner v. State, 305 S.W.3d 593, 594

(Tex. Crim. App. 2010).




                                                    LEE GABRIEL
                                                    JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GABRIEL, JJ.

PUBLISH

DELIVERED: May 26, 2011



                                         2
