
USCA1 Opinion

	




        July 31, 1996           [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-1713                                            MICHAEL L. LONG,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                 PROGRESSIVE CONSUMERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                       [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Michael L. Long on brief pro se.            _______________            Michael  P. Duffy, Harvey Weiner and Peabody & Arnold on brief for            _________________  _____________     ________________        appellee IAG Federal Credit Union.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per  Curiam.      Appellee  has  informed  us  that                      ___________            appellant's bankruptcy action was dismissed with prejudice on            July 8, 1996;  thus this action is no longer  affected by the            automatic bankruptcy  stay.   Having  carefully reviewed  the            parties' briefs  and the relevant  record on this  appeal, we            conclude   that  no   substantial   question  is   presented.            Accordingly,  the judgment  in  favor of  IAG Federal  Credit            Union is summarily affirmed.   See Loc. R. 27.1.                               ________    ___                                         -2-
