






William A. McIntosh v. State















IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
 

No. 10-01-409-CR
No. 10-01-410-CR
No. 10-01-411-CR
No. 10-01-412-CR
No. 10-01-413-CR
No. 10-01-414-CR
No. 10-01-415-CR
No. 10-01-416-CR
No. 10-01-417-CR
No. 10-01-418-CR

     WILLIAM A. McINTOSH,
                                                                              Appellant
     v.

     THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                                              Appellee
 

From the 40th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 20084CR, 20085CR, 20086CR, 20087CR
20379CR, 20380CR, 20381CR, 20382CR, 20383CR and 20384CR
                                                                                                                

MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                                                                                                

      William A. McIntosh appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions for appointment of
trial counsel in a series of DNA proceedings under chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 
We notified McIntosh in a published order dated December 11, 2002 that these are not appealable
orders and that these appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if supplemental clerk’s
records containing orders adjudicating the merits of his motions for DNA testing were “not filed
with the Clerk of this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2002.”  McIntosh v. State,
No. 01-409-CR, slip op. at 3-4, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8879, at *4 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 11,
2002, order).
      We have not received a supplemental record containing an order on the merits in any of these
appeals.  Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
                                                                   PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Davis,
      Justice Vance, and
      Justice Gray
Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Opinion delivered and filed March 5, 2003
Do not publish
[CR25]
