ALD-257                                                         NOT PRECEDENTIAL

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
                                 ___________

                                       No. 20-1295
                                       ___________

                             In re: JOHN A. CHAMPION,
                                                Petitioner
                       ____________________________________

                      On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
           United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
                     (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-18-cv-02421)
                      ____________________________________

                    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
                                   July 16, 2020
               Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges

                             (Opinion filed: August 18, 2020)
                                        _________

                                        OPINION*
                                        _________

PER CURIAM

       In 1999, John Champion pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia to second degree murder. A sentence of 20 years to life was imposed.

Champion’s subsequent efforts to invalidate his conviction have thus far been




*
 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
unsuccessful. See, e.g., Champion v. United States, 947 F. Supp. 2d 84, 88 (D.D.C.

2013).

         At issue here is Champion’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a writ of habeas

corpus. Because he is currently incarcerated at USP Allenwood in Pennsylvania,

Champion filed his § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Pennsylvania.

         Briefing on the petition was completed by March 2019. Eleven months later,

Champion filed in this Court a petition for a writ of mandamus, asking that we compel

the District Court to act on the § 2241 petition.1 That petition has since been dismissed

by the District Court.2 Champion’s mandamus petition is thus moot and will be

dismissed. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 699-700 (3d Cr.

1996).3




1
  The mandamus petition was dismissed for failure to prosecute, insofar as Champion
failed to timely supply a certificate of service. That defect having been cured,
Champion’s motion to reopen this proceeding is granted. His motion to proceed in forma
pauperis is granted. His motion for appointment of counsel is denied. See Tabron v.
Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155 (3d Cir. 1993).
2
 Champion’s § 2241 petition was originally assigned to the Honorable A. Richard
Caputo. Judge Caputo passed away earlier this year, after more than 20 years of service
on the federal bench. Champion’s case was reassigned to then-Chief Judge Christopher
C. Conner, who ruled on the § 2241 petition in due course. See ECF 25-26.
3
  Champion has sent a letter to the District Court indicating that he plans to appeal from
the dismissal of his § 2241 petition. See ECF 27.
