   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,
                                                 No. 74949-8-1
                     Respondent,
                                                 DIVISION ONE
                                                                                  i
              v.

                                                 UNPUBLISHED OPINION
DOUGNYLAKEANG,

                     Appellant.                  FILED: January 9, 2017


       Per Curiam.     Dougnyl Akeang appeals from the judgment and sentence

entered after he pleaded guilty to one count of felony harassment. Akeang's court-

appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis

for a good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184,

470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California. 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S.

Ct. 1396 (1967), the motion to withdraw must:

      [1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that
      might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel's brief should
      be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points
      that he chooses; [4] the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full
      examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly
      frivolous.

State v.Theobald. 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744).

       This procedure has been followed. Akeang's counsel on appeal filed a brief

with the motion to withdraw.      Akeang was served with a copy of the brief and

informed of the right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. He did not

file a statement of additional grounds.

       The facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the motion to

withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independently
No. 74949-8-1/2




reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential

issues raised by counsel:

      1: Did the superior court abuse its discretion in revoking Akeang's suspended

sentence?

      2. Did the proceedings below violate Akeang's right to due process?

      The potential issues are wholly frivolous.    Counsel's motion to withdraw is

granted and the appeal is dismissed.

                                  For the court:
