
USCA1 Opinion

	




          May 29, 1996                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1027                       JOSEPH SANDERS HAAS, JR., ETC., ET AL.,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                               BENT & JOHNSON, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Selya, Boudin and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Joseph S. Haas, Jr. on brief pro se.            ___________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  The  action was properly dismissed for                      __________            lack  of federal  jurisdiction.   Complete diversity  did not            exist and plaintiff stated no federal claim.                      Affirmed.                      ________                                         -3-
