                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                    No. 15-1297
                              Filed October 14, 2015


IN THE INTEREST OF M.H.,
Minor Child,

J.H., Mother,
Appellant.
________________________________________________________________


       Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Louise M. Jacobs,

District Associate Judge.



       A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, born in

2012. AFFIRMED.



       Nancy L. Pietz, Des Moines, for appellant mother.

       Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kathrine S. Miller-Todd, Assistant

Attorney General, John Sarcone, County Attorney, and Kevin Patrick, Assistant

County Attorney, for appellee State.

       Michael R. Sorci of the Youth Law Center, Des Moines, attorney and

guardian ad litem for minor child.



       Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Potterfield and McDonald, JJ.
                                         2


VAITHESWARAN, Presiding Judge.

      A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, born in

2012. She (1) challenges the grounds for termination cited by the juvenile court

and (2) contends termination was not in the child’s best interests.

      I. The juvenile court cited several statutory grounds for termination. We

may affirm if we find clear and convincing evidence to support any of the

grounds. See In re S.R., 600 N.W.2d 63, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 1999).

      The mother has a twenty-year substance abuse history, with her drugs of

choice being crack cocaine and marijuana. The child was adjudicated in need of

assistance based on the mother’s use of drugs while the child was in her care.

      The mother entered a residential recovery center, but five months before

the termination hearing, left the program and provided no forwarding contact

information. At the termination hearing, she admitted using marijuana less than a

month earlier. She also admitted her last drug test was probably seven months

before the termination hearing.     Finally, the mother was not slated to begin

outpatient drug treatment services until the evening of the termination hearing.

      In sum, the mother had yet to take significant steps to address her long-

standing addictions. On our de novo review, we conclude the juvenile court

appropriately terminated the mother’s parental rights pursuant to Iowa Code

section 232.116(1)(h) (2015), which requires proof of several elements including

proof the child could not be returned to the parent’s custody.

      II. The mother argues termination was not in the child’s best interests. In

re P.L., 778 N.W.2d 33, 37-38 (Iowa 2010). We disagree. Although the mother

regularly attended supervised visits with the child and interacted appropriately
                                      3


with him, there was no indication she could safely care for him on an

independent basis. Had she remained at the residential recovery center, her

unsupervised parenting skills would have been reviewed and tested.         Her

decision to leave and resume her illegal drug use compromised the safety of the

child and the prospects for reunification. We conclude termination was in the

child’s best interests.

       AFFIRMED.
