                   E:TT~BBNEY            GENERAL
                          OFTEXAS
                         AU~TXN II.TEXAS
PRICE   DANIEL
ATTOIlNEYGENERAL         March 9, 1948


                                     Reoonsideration of Opinion
                                            No. V-4194.
    Hon. Paul H. Brown
    Secretary of Stats
   'Austin, Texas

   ATTN: Wm. E. Stapp
         chief ) Charter Division

    Dear Sir:

   This Department has carefully considered your request of
   December 4, 1947, for a reconsideration of Opinion No. V-419,
   together with the briefs submitted by the attorneys for the
   United States Trust Company of New York and other similar
   corporations.

   The entire opinion file, together with the briefs above referred
   to, have been carefully conaSdered individually and in conference
   by various members of this Department; and in such consideration
   the intention of the Legislature and the equities governing the
   fndividual factual situations have been carefully weighed.

   It is. the view of this Department that prior to the enactment of
   the Texas Banking Code of 1943 (Title 16, Chapters 1-9, Arts.
   342-101 to 342-911, inclusive, Vernon's Annotated Civil
   Statutes), the sole statutory authority concerning the use of
   the word "trust " by a corporation in its name, stationery, or
   advertisSng existed by virtue of Art. 491, Revised Civil
   Statutes of Texas, 1925, which is in part as follows:

        "It shall be unlawful for any incorporated bank other
   than State bsnking corporations and national banks to advertise
   or put forth any sign as a bank, bank and trust company or
   savings bank, or in any way solicit or receive business as
   such or as any auah, or to use as their name or part of their
   name, or in or upon any sign, advertising, letterhead or
   envelope the work 'bank', rbanker,f 'banking,' 'truat,r'truat
   company,? rsavings bank,' *savings,' or any other       which
   may be confused with the~name ofcorporations organized
   under this title.~,,Corporations heretofore organized under the
   general laws of this State, and foreign corporatrona heretofore
   or hereafter authorseed to do business in this State,
                                                              -.
                                                         -.    .


Hon. Paul H. Brown, Page 2, Reconsideration   of V-419



forfeit its charter, or if a foreign corporation, its permit
to do business within this State. . . .'I(Emphasis ours).

It is manifest from a reading of the foregoing statute that
from the time of the passage of this Act In 1905 no domeatio
corporation other than State banking corporations and national
banks oould be granted a charter in Texas if the oorporate
name contained any of the forbidden words named in the statute.
However, it was possible for any foreign corporation, whloh
was authorized by its charter provisions to use such prohibited
name or part thereof, which had theretofore obtained a permit
to do business in Texas or which might thereafter obtain such
a permit to use the prohibited words ss a part of its
corporate name, provided that such name was followed by words
"without banking privileges,"

Although this article was a part of the general provisions of
Title 16 9 Revised Civil Statutes of 1925, which dealt generally
with the subject of banks and banking, nevertheless, it was a
general statute affecting all corporations. Under the pro-
v isiona of this law, permits were granted to foreign corpora-
tions which contained the forbidden words in their corporate
names ; and it is presumed that the terms of Art. 491 relating
to the use of the words %ithout banking privileges" were
complied with by such corporations.

However, 1943, when the Forty-eight Legislature enacted the
Texas Banking Code of 1943, it specifically repealed Art. 491,
Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, by the terms of Article
342-911, V.A.C.S., and enacted in lieu thereof Art. 342-902,
V.A.C.S., quoted in Opinion No. V-419. Here there was a
specific repeal of the only legislative authority for the use
of the forbidden words in the corporate names of foreign car-
porations obtaining a permit in this State, and no such
authority then existed for the granting of such permit.  In
fact it was specifically forbidden by the provisions of Article
342-902 above referred to.

That this was the intention of the Legislature was further
evidenced by that part of Art. 342-902 which states as follows:

     "This article shall not bar an individual from acting
     in sny fiduciary capacity, if he does not hold out to
     the public that he is conducting any branch of the trust
     business." (Emphasis ours)

While it is true that there are many decisions to the effect
that the word "individual" shall be construed to include the
word "corporation" where the context clearly so indicates,
nevertheless, such inclusion is not apparent when Art. 342-902
is read as a whole.
    Hon. Paul II. Brown, Page 3, Reconsideration   of V-419



    In view of the foregoing, we are constrained to adhere to our
    original Opinion No. V-419.

*                                       Yours very truly

                                   ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

                                   s/ C. K. Richards


                                   BY
                                        C. K. Richards
                                           Assistant


    CKR/JCP/cg
