  
 

pages that are of poor quality
tl.eth time _of` lmaging.

‘ _ " ' 11 .~-\u'“ C.U(ll
1111/1111/11 13 ~ 111 105151911?1$1§@:11'1\

Mm:[®¥\) ©W W/C®L/WBTFQW %€CQN§M/\q
¢. ‘Y mix bd 1715§€10 011

1111@€15151301 _ _

151/1151 15511 551 @<11111111155 11111: 13-

5 1:3<1111551 511 511 1311 31115150 . z_ '

551/1111 1111 0111111111,1110111111 51511111<1:/151 111511/€111€
51111111111 11151111111;1/ 59115”11115 1113 1511113</

15111/110;111\15>,111/111113111<1111111114514 11 §

330 11115) _: _. ,_.-\.' f 5311>1:§ __
10511111"1 <S"§~'¢h 05;11’1&1"11?5?*»1 ' ~ '
1311/1110 ?> 1551111/11 1111131 1/5€ 111/11111\/11€10
<111111\11115' 1/11\110 1111/1111111@€10 1111/111 01115511 =>

134 '13’1 1\1;1 1111 1115 3111/11\1“111111155112>>

- - ~ 051111131 11111171§

1/11\110 1515151:1/111;1;33111/<'§) 1111/1151qu
1115 5\15 511\1<15 115 11510151111»1-15<1 1511

1 1 ' 9`~'5\\_1 4§,(\[<11'\\ §111'1)1 _ .lvAlI-»-n` k - j_;
1511111€3‘1` 14 511;15151111111 1:1\1§"111/11/1151\11 4

MM!€JE(WS §@\/IM @5 §

  
 
 

   
    
 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

   
   

f 00051\‘1111 141\1@ 1932 1004 <_@1/141¢11\/
' L§£CS§TWW:1S \l§§maF/S,m 1 1111 121 11%
1141 001\1§11@101:\111144
y%€®‘\/U:§IDYT§/ 4§)(11§1('\\(2/4 (_1> / ”' \"~`" ;._.¢.’..'QI ";;
11111§1’ 111€141‘/ 1 500 311/111 111/a 1111/11 MY
101 14 4 1/\4) 1/1~1'114014€1§

162/1141 1111/41 000va CMv/\vvvvm 1101/1148
-”1/1111 1140 1100 20142`1~7\1€1/ 414 1/1 201/14a-

_W(mw( L:/M1§(E\\/ 41§)©| q CR\ @/) (r))) W_L_
’,1:3 14 1111/11\"1®111\1 cova 11411\1 312 7111/41441114
:J;b£vv 0141;1\10 311/1101 mwvava 141£@01
820 1414/13 116’°>\ 311/1113 v€€WU/ ‘
11161@®0110 1315 ;14 1/101)11\1`610 21401440 120 121/1154
_, 01\1 191121|1 001 ~ r@vvm:vcvz vaz;v/v/€ 1111...1/ .1"
1314 11\1 §U»<STHO(WM\U @%3)1/14@1'1101 EMA

 

 

 

 

     

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-`

1114111 01 011/1101:)1/10011 1:1/1;10 110144110

0111‘11/1 1100 511/110 1111 1413 _1
' '1\1€111\®11\1\ 1151 /1\1\9 @(14 A}`l 01)01§)

' 1141:§101:1111\/ 01300\11: 014 4)12111:1:11€0 1541:.~~
0€1\10<1 10101/1100 12 1011 1124/145 411,1?1 1204

010/1014 100120115/1101§;0110113111111 %W©/vv 001/121
1111 11 1111 1041

1314 §11/~111<4001€1&\1 6323 0151 11140)0 1000 ~ -~
. 1'1§'% 4‘ 10101/<'1&1'1 1031 C@r\j j:ggufv® mMM

.. .2

  
 

 

 

 

 

00\11:1\10 010 1\01'13110101<103317010 1100 1/11001715
010 1331/1;€1\11173 01\1 1621700©1`1/‘176160/"10 1000
MIA17 $<'3 3/ 1001/01 10173'1`<_3~4 3101`1/<'w
1017 <§337 1/11011110`13 "
. S€C/ ' ' ‘ .`|"171(1 3111
007 0137 01'0<1006113177:317:10 0003'1 501\1717/0¢1;(0
10013;170€10 071/1100)§ 1700107017111`111£[111,§1?
131701& 107 117010017\117/1001\11`, 1/1»101' 41001‘1
17/1:71:)7171/0177/0377/17‘€ ;1:§1£?:1110@0\1 0\1:1717
1010/7 4<,01‘1 010:0 51 1
40 100\17:001:00 000/1100
001~1,01/01:011 3000 000 0015 1011 700
1/11/1/110\1001107\11 013 ..-031$,0 311 530113011 1613
1711\1&131011:11 117 10 130111100 030~5-<», 100/51
000 101:10001,311/1103107 :00107 130 000/1106
1701/1300 100“713131011;0:;. 1/1 00310101)€,015
0111€13\ 343 (\131(31(75041(711 ~ 1 10(1%_3x 101117

¢ ;_00§00 51/1101:50§0000 70 10- ' -
1113~130€016 700 100/100 <.,017101;11319191 1000101//1-1/€
5 16 071011 1 01/1111€3“00 17 317::01_ b l

50007;3 <.0011014 1610<00100\11/ ` ' 05
000¢1 007 007,0111; 010 0001 _111616 001

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

  

 

1003 01 111¢00<@0€100 000001711/116113/10 ;;331,115100
f ~"~'."'.~'50<1 30071013117&10011116116101<11<1)

  

3333@1__ 1151 § 31 33131(1\3 33 -301351 3331
335331/1131 311/1131 1155 5555;171/13 167 - WH

1\1€©:&31113"/ 73 5671€1/1/15\1€ 331/15 74
171/1553 (U553 33155313) ;5315/§H 535/37
1353 \1355: 511/1353 333515 13131:€155€/

' 711/177: M5M5LUC3111 1515 .

313 9113535 '<;3 1313515/11`§533 111/1553 1533
3\1`€513<3<37 33333 333 333 551/1155 151111115

' 17<133/,515 53513353/1775 331/1131 317 1151/,;
535115 151 3771/1515 3 331/1513 5015 “

13113115151711171111'111/3 13015€3\1 3\153~,

135355(11111153 ,FQ131311<77731S 17\11311 103 _
71 71 117»71,3 111<73 33 11770 11151/15131;311111 1 7531;v
~_.:?1 133 311-113133013€13,3€1:17111‘1131/3311£11 530 31

§5€15313;3 3331 571/1175 5131/1111:57311 30
5317/1 §35 31/<’ 5`151331 351 <10 7511/151

__ * ` * 331/1151 353/1355 31/113®51?115313
' 1575753@{1/177: CQ1/11/61`C31111,/ 85le

I;BUL`|TUMT\ 31:1`( 61€151731‘17§<555 1315
, 51:§1113 53

731<: 5325*33011153 513 1331“ 511153;55 51 1
.1:1\151:1;11151\11` 1113 11131153 13531317 3 533311

3551/1551 577/1175 1513 1751/131333
531333 35 353 31551;1:5 / 1355 555 115/1

' MM/H` 1511/1131 150‘6"3?303’ 1555/3 3
@:MU UQ» raw ,1;3 331/1 >QW$MHMD1
» .~ 1131 1311 133 3 …/”7;1£\1 . 1135

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

w 121142111121, 42111<11199110 15<11?10

1141:1/,111111141114 <4111/11411111111:1114 1144/1211
11111114141/11114114141121 25112011

451`1…213;1;- ~ , ~ 1 5451 2115@1 2914
211111111/1144 511111/1111®1151 1<>1<'115)11:111 111115

1441411/111;11111 141411$11,1,1 11~11111 125 <.1111151;0174~
154 111 144051@125 1411114 1111 415/2110

121111 1114411/121/ 11144€511”10 111\110 1141421

211311141€ 11 1441/16;1:5141/111 1114 11111`1\1 1112 125
12111141:17110 1114 <;141/-114612`10 1111401211 1511 121414)

- 1 145011§<1\/45 011>,1~
14111411\1111 0141411\101 11911\14 2455 51 ,
511/1449 1151-14 1112/11 211 111/111 2111 52<1
1111414 15111; 1114/1111 11 011111141111:11141200 1554

11414146'\€5 11 1:1151114‘/ ( 4~22~2111111 312 -» -~

§§ FI:U§D K)\SUH/X . §

§(:k/ A.J|A.ll ll
21114./ 4.11;1:1:1\14 512_,1@114,514<4 211141441 211151~
__ ;1:1112011141 14441415 111/1111 151 10141111110 01\1
111/11411/15 <11144/15 1111/111 11112< 1114 WCTON
14 2424 11142111/1”12`11/111111'14 1114 01§5111\1
ffd\)I\DT211~ ~ " :¢ ' ' " 411414
h 1222 1452 112 114411111115111\1121 101_212111,>1
. v 2 21111:>1211».l . f

212111_1111\11 011141211 111111,1111131 1145/11154111:611104 1
1414/1010211 ,,

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

§

1413%6@ F1114 1141414

141111151 L©M§IE§?'§O 114 " ` Y ` "- "
14116§ W:V;W;W%Y€ 1111/11"11/1&14141‘€4 ,__1_
1111»`5 1 F14131/'179 111 1:’0111&111

3\/11419€1/\/1/€/ 1111/1 /<'_`11`\/1191 1114 11141411`1411@

MM_;@M 111411141411411/ 111114 1111 gmw;'
141/11101~10’1.1\11135 191:§1/1/111:5§110/ 141\114 §§111 »

11§11:19€ LUL141417 \111121031/11$1/1/11111`/1?@1)1561/1§

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

313 1~1146’1 <101,141 1114 1114141/11$ 31:131 com ~
191 HMLUWG/Mmbm 113111111;(3411 311134
. 331 334 1531 14141411111 1 430111 1131;1)\141

A'</ nl§§RX/~ 4:/(1[§ § 11 . "’1`
' ' 1 ,1/11/1'11117;1’11/111'-1414111 311/11":1&1 O

 

 

 

’ 1114<_10\114)1 ll

weed 311 340 1111 .. v
111/11 1414441\11)1: 11 1;1/11;1411114 1141 1:;-3/45,

. 111411141:1111<1,'1@014 1414<<§411115 1111

l _ . 14111®_1114 14411111114/15 114 111 1144

' " ,-111 1114 1111141111111111/111 111/11111111 116

14111;1413,11 101 11111@31<14 1_:1:35\1133/11)01412111

; ,;.33 3/ 14114141'1-$§`3'41,11111<14311~
@1414,3<1€1‘ 311113;/1 3€13 111111411/ §§ <11§)€€{ * `
` § 4344£1§ 141111111141411 141111114 111414114@4

414 L1111/3 413 11134111141'1111111 1131/1113
1111114144111%364 361<141§13< 144414) __

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l@€¢ LOCW 13 \'ljf 355 ( !l§z`<i<\ am ~<`§_3'4,“ L”o gwen '1

'ii:ae:@s* "

FiLEDl

 
 
  

‘ ,‘ NO. 40,789-B-H-2

EX PARTE § IN THE 124TH DISTRI '
§ z
§ INAND F-e_
§ _

BRYAN WILLIAMS § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

STATE’S- RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S
APPLICATION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
'l`O THE~ HONORABLE IUDGE OF SAID COURT:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, opposes Petitioner’s Writl ofHabeas Corpu's.

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE

The applicant, "`Bryan Williams, is confined in TDCJ-ID because of` his .
conviction and sentence in Gregg County cause number 40,789¥B. Williams Was
charged with the felony offense of possession of a controlled'substance (Count I)
and unlawful possession of a firearm by_ a felon (Count ll). (App_endix A:

` Indictment). After being admonished that he could face consecutive sentences if he.
yvent to trial on both counts separately, he electedvseverance of the two counts and
jury trials on both.' 3 RR 5-7. The jury found him guilty of possession of a controlled
substance and sentenced him to 75 years. (Application, ~Appendix G: Ju_dgment-'
Cou_nt I)'. Alter a jury was seated and testimony had begun on Count H, he pleaded
guilty and Was sentenced by the judge to 5 years, to_, run consecutively to the 75~year j

404

 

 

sentence (Application Appendix H: Judgrnen_t-Count Il). Was sentenced by the

judge to five years in prison to run consecutively to the 75-year' sentencel Id. He is

confined at the Allred Unit as TDCJ inmate number 1784621.

II. APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS

Williams claims that the municipal court judge and trial court judge lacked ‘ f
jurisdiction, both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction over him due to a void

search Warrant affidavit

(‘ n '
III. NECESSITY FOR AN EVH)ENTIARY HEA`RING AND EXFANS!ON OF
THE RECORD.

The record needs no expansion Williams need not be returned 'to Gregg

County for a hearing

j Iv. ARGUM_ENT ANDAUTHORITIES_
( .

l) This is a subsequent writ application, not subject to any exception.
This is a_subsequent request for a Writ of Habeas Cor.pus. While there are

exceptions for subsequent Writs applications, applicant has failed to alleged that his

request falls Within one of those exceptions He alleges that his claims of subject-

ala

- 1

recent _ jt

»
matter jurisdiction can never be waive'd, and that he only recently obtained a copy of
the “defective void Exh. A l from my family member.” The record and facts were
complete when Applicant filed his first application for writ of _ habeas coipus. -
. Application Exhibit A l is the affidavit for search warrant signed by Kilgore Police ~
Department officer Brady L. i\/liddlebrool<s and used to obtain al search warrant for
the blue 1994 Cadillac in which Williams.had been seen sitting The search warrant
affidavit was not offered into evidence at Williams’ trial. No issue was made of the

search warrant affidavit’s validity at the hearing .on motion to suppress See

n Appendix A, Reporter’s Record f`rom'hearing.
` If` there had been a problem with the search warrant affidavit, the issue could

, MB§~H:S

§ 4
g.,;;gr. '-;§.»~-"g-"'*‘.'\" ;"‘ ~r~~.z:~¢&¢’.'.';»,.~l

    
 
 

c_- ~'

have been raised 111 amu@n.ta\suaa:ess» vera

    
 

ion'“.__P.ursuant to TEX. CODB CRiM. PROC. Art. ll'.O_'/', §4,. applicant’s writ

 

should be dismissed

2_) _ Williams states he has a-‘ petition or appeal pending in the Eastern
District of Beaumont_, under Cause Number 06:15CV0005.

Cause number -06115CV0005 in the Beaumont Federal Court is related to .
Cause'number 40,789-13, the conviction under scrutiny here. As a matter of fact, the
magistrate’s report states that Williams used the same memorandum of law for his
-' federal habeas that he used in his first state habeas application See Appendix B,

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate’s _

' _ "l:'l’€t€;@'@l

- report was signed on July 9, 20'15, and explains that Williams has 14 days to respond
to it, so as of the date of this response, it is technically still pending although a ruling

has been made to deny relief requested as well as to deny a certificate of
appealability

3) The claim ofl_ack ofjurisdiction lacks merit.

If his claim is considered on the merits, it should be denied for the following
reasons. Williams claims that Exhibit Al is the affidavit used to secure a search
warrant for a car in Which Williams consistently denied any interest. 'I`he affidavit

was not,-therefore, made a part of the record of this case because the search was

never an issue.

Mr. Williams complains that the affidavit is void for non-compliance with

  
 

;" eeaswiss@ra§aia<a‘) <»Q (4) < ) eli See

Application Memoranduin at 2'.

The two statutes Williams alleges were not followed do not refer to search
warrant affidavits They refer to charging instruments for misdemeanor offenses
called complaints Williams’ Exhibits A (1) and A (2) are, collectively, the affidavit `

sworn to by Officer Middlebrool<s in order to get the warrant to search the abandoned

' ‘ Mmaasatfidawwat@ereaa@da@

  
 

 

- ' §a"<imrad‘y£*aieieas¢eis

4 l § ja

 

Williams’s sole ground for relief is frivolous and meritless and should be

denied.

v V. CONCLUSION

» The State prays this Court recommend that the application be denied.

Respectfully submitted,

CARL L.¢ DORROUGH
Criminal District Attorney
Gregg County, Texas

B_y`: %67/2// Mm w

golson\ Brown
istant District Attorney

State Bar No. 03205 900

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

l certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing “State’s Response to
Applicant’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus” _was given to the District Clerk
of Gregg County, Texas, on , July 20, 2015, to be mailed to Applicant, Bryan
Williams, 1784621, Allred Unit, 2101 FM 369 N, Iowa Park, TX 763 67.

 
   

  

n Colson Brown
Assistant District Attorney '
State Bar No. 03205900

S~jié

No. 40,789-B-H_2. j 1

EX~ PARTE § INTHE 124TH DIsTRICT CoURT '
§ .
§ m AND FoR
BRYAN wILLIAMs § GREGG CoUNTY, T;F,X»EQD
. ‘ ~ ' GREGG cou_m TE_XAS
_ 1 JUL 2 8 2015 f
FINAL oRDER AND . Bm~mt%r;
1 Fn~u)n\rcs oF FACT AND CoNcLUsroNs 0F LAw - VW
oN APPLICATIoN ron wRIT oF HABEAS CoRPUs ` 5

Having considered the Applicant’s Application for Post-'Conviction Writ of
Habeas corpus, the State’s Answer, along with reviewing the record in the case, and
the materials submitted; the Court recommends that the application be DISMISSED
as a subsequent writ, or, if considered on its merits, DENIED.- »

The Court specifically finds as follows:

l) The police saw Williams exiting a car and later found the car to be
locked ~ ~

Zj Williams denied that the car was his.
3) The police, after determining that no one else at the location claimed 'to
own the Car, had the car towed, obtained a search warrant and searched

_ the car, finding controlled substance, and several of Williams’ personal
items connecting Williams to the car and its contents

'4) Williams was than indicted and his arrest was pursuant to a warrant '

following a grand jury indictment

T\l€<ii<&n

5) Williams’ attorney filed a motion to suppress, claiming that his
warrantless arrest Was without probable cause, but not making any
claim about the search of the car,

6) Williams’ motion to suppress any statements made after a warrantless
arrest was denied because it was not a warrantless arrest.

@ -Willi'ams could have raised any issue regarding the search warrant

affidavit c‘ould have been raised at the“~rnotion~to suppress on"'d1rect
efhabeas corpus:. '

 

appeala:gr?iri_‘_ln::iirs"t:apphcation '_fo‘

a

 

' The Court makes the following conclusions of law:

l) This is a subsequent Writ, not subject to any exception.
2)~ Williams has a federal habeas pending on this conviction.

3) Williams waived his right to complain about the search warrant affidavit by
denying any interest in the car, ~

4) The complaint that the search warrant affidavit lacked language required of
misdemeanor complaints lacks merit and is frivolous

The clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a transcript to include the
applicant’s Application for Post~Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus, the State’s

Answer, with appendices, a copy ofth e indictrnent, the judgment for CountI, and a

jj

copy of these findings and send it to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin,' Texas,

The clerk is further directed to forward a copy of these findings to the applicant

SIGN‘ED On JUL 2 7 2015

 

CY/%
/ 4

- . .,.qr. ..., _

 

111 ~1~111@1,1 1211 i:cd 3111 @`1
my QlWV‘/LS ®’\l 1145 \/oiio/ fiabv<%ici/ij`eb

 

 

`QSii/ii”€) C Wl$’ namsr/ o»z maine mountain

_' ]:1: 1/l/l-7 §eiai<U/r - WPDU) MJci-Y O/u/ 0577/71//\/¢7§
‘ en 1-4@019 \Ni/ia ft no :1:1\1 510 enuiern~ sir-11

 

111/110 in wsi/nwf \)WWL 01§_951_10@\1151%5
pt 9le M 36€/1?1?01\15 ustc c 10; m oiz>jim/a

' JWCM,/imei€e;r cementh epaa-ia ou soc <ii/</i\'i
, iai@t"iii@vi\®‘ b1 -1:5 is...Qe_;151055/45,'<11<.<#<1:;01.9

 

 

 

 

