                                COURT OF CHANCERY
                                      OF THE
    SAM GLASSCOCK III           STATE OF DELAWARE                       COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE
     VICE CHANCELLOR                                                              34 THE CIRCLE
                                                                           GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947


                            Date Submitted: February 24, 2017
                              Date Decided: March 3, 2017

    Andrew S. Dupre, Esquire                          Robert A. Penza, Esquire
    Michael P. Kelly, Esquire                         Christopher M. Coggins, Esquire
    Benjamin A. Smyth, Esquire                        Polsinelli PC
    McCarter & English, LLP                           222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1101
    405 North King Street, 8th Floor                  Wilmington, DE 19801
    Wilmington, DE 19801

                 Re: Brace Industrial Contracting, Inc. v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.,
                 Civil Action No. 11189-VCG

Dear Counsel:

         The following Letter Order addresses issues raised at the office conference

held on February 24, 2017.

         On October 31, 2016, I issued a Memorandum Opinion (“Brace I”)1 and found

that the Plaintiffs are entitled to an indemnification award of $725,059 from funds

in escrow.2 Two issues remain with respect to that award: when it should be released

and when, or whether, it begins to carry interest. I address the latter issue first.



1
  Brace Indus. Contracting, Inc. v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc., 2016 WL 6426398 (Del. Ch. Oct.
31, 2016) (“Brace I”).
2
  Id. at *15. To consummate the acquisition underlying this litigation, the parties entered into an
escrow agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) in which $1.87 million of the purchase price was
placed into escrow and scheduled to be released to the Defendants in equal halves at two different
points in time absent outstanding indemnification claims (the “Escrowed Amount”). See Pretrial
Stip. at 10; JX 69 (the “Escrow Agreement”) §§ 1.3(c), 1.4(a), 1.5(a).
       The parties dispute the proper interest amount, if any, that should accompany

the Plaintiffs’ indemnification award of $725,059. In Brace I, and in my recent

Interim Order, I awarded the Plaintiffs an indemnification award of “$725,059,

together with interest.”3 The Defendants point out that, pursuant to Section 6.6 of

the stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”),4 the parties agreed that if Defendants’

indemnification obligation is satisfied out of the amount in escrow, then interest does

not accrue on that obligation (unless otherwise provided in the Escrow Agreement,

which contains no such interest provision).

       By stating, in Brace I and in the Interim Order, “together with interest” I meant

to convey “with that amount of interest appropriate.” After a careful examination

of the SPA, it is clear to me that the parties have provided by contract that the

appropriate amount of interest for the $725,059 indemnification award is $0, so long

as it is satisfied from escrow. To the extent this contradicts any statement in Brace

I, such statement is withdrawn. My reasoning follows.

       Section 6.6 of the SPA states, in full:

       Once a Loss is agreed to by the Indemnifying Party or finally
       adjudicated to be payable pursuant to this ARTICLE VI, the
       Indemnifying Party shall satisfy its obligations within ten (10) Business
       Days of such final, non-appealable adjudication by wire transfer of
       immediately available funds; provided, however, that the Buyer
       Indemnitees shall be required to take payment first out of the Escrow

3
  Brace I, 2016 WL 6426398, at *15 (emphasis added); Interim Order (February 24, 2017) (Dkt.
No. 193).
4
  JX 70 (the “SPA”).
                                             2
         Amount, to the extent is has sufficient funds. The Parties agree that
         should an Indemnifying Party not make full payment of any such
         obligations within such ten (10) Business Day period, or to the extent
         the Escrow Amount is insufficient, any amount payable shall accrue
         interest from and including the date of agreement of the Indemnifying
         Party or final, non-appealable adjudication to and including the date
         such payment has been made at a rate per annum equal to the prime rate
         set forth in The Wall Street Journal’s Table of Interest Rates and Bonds
         on the day immediately prior to the date that payment is to be made;
         provided, however, if such obligations will be satisfied from the Escrow
         Amount, then such amounts will be released in accordance with the
         terms and conditions of the Escrow Agreement and such amounts shall
         not accrue interest unless otherwise provided in the Escrow Agreement.
         Such interest shall be calculated daily on the basis of a three hundred
         sixty-five (365) day year and the actual number of days elapsed.5

         Accordingly, I agree with the Defendants that, under Section 6.6 of the SPA,

any indemnification owed should first come out of the Escrow Amount and only

accrue interest to the extent required by the Escrow Agreement. The escrow amount

of $1.87 million is more than sufficient to satisfy the $725,059 owed to the Plaintiffs

and, accordingly, the Escrow Agreement does not provide for the accrual of interest.

In light of the foregoing, I find that no interest has accrued on the $725,059 award.

         As to the timing of the award’s release, in light of the fact that interest is not

accruing, it would be inequitable to delay the release of the amount the Plaintiffs are

due from escrow, pending resolution of additional issues unrelated to

indemnification that are still under consideration in this matter. Accordingly, the




5
    SPA § 6.6 (emphasis added).
                                             3
Plaintiffs should provide a form of order directing the release of $725,059 from

escrow, to be effective when issued.

      To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO

ORDERED.



                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Sam Glasscock III

                                           Sam Glasscock III




                                       4
