                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-11-00124-CR

                                           Samuel MAHA,
                                             Appellant

                                                   v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 09-07-081-CRW
                              Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                  Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 30, 2011

DISMISSED

           The trial court suspended sentence on November 8, 2010, and appellant timely filed a

motion for new trial. Therefore, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was February 7, 2011,

or the notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal were due

fifteen days later on February 22, 2011. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2), 26.3. A notice of appeal was

not filed until February 11, 2011, and appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file
                                                                                     04-11-00124-CR


the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. There was no envelope or other document in the

clerk’s record to establish the date the notice of appeal was mailed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2.

       Because the notice of appeal appeared untimely, we issued a show cause order on March

9, 2011, ordering appellant to file a response establishing the notice of appeal was timely filed,

perhaps by mail, thereby establishing this court’s jurisdiction. Id.; see also Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal is necessary to

invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction). We advised appellant that if he failed to satisfactorily

respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed.

       On March 21, 2011, appellant’s counsel filed a response to our show cause order in

which he stated, with regard to our show cause order, that “the analysis indicating that the Notice

of Appeal . . . [is] late filed is correct.” Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we

lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Ater v. Eighth

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals

from felony convictions).

       Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


                                                             PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish




                                                -2-
