              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-29,146-22


                    EX PARTE ROLAND JEROME MADDEN, Applicant


             ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
      CAUSE NO. W93-04717-H (G) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1
                           FROM DALLAS COUNTY


        Per curiam.


                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

building and sentenced to sixty-five years’ imprisonment.

        In his present application, Applicant raises one ground for review. This application,

however, presents a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed six

prior applications pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant

continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should
                                                                                                    2

have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily

abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).

Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under

Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is

dismissed.

       Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,

not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application

pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims

presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous

application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

       Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: December 10, 2014
Do not publish
