      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-09-00498-CR



                                   Charles White, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee


    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
     NO. D-1-DC-09-201777, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               Appellant Charles White’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). White received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se response.

               We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and White’s pro se response and we

agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might
arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

              The judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                            _____________________________________________

                                            Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: February 3, 2010

Do Not Publish




                                                2
