             In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                               OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                  (Filed: September 30, 2015)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                      UNPUBLISHED
DOROTHY BUNDRICK,                          *
                                           *       No. 15-836V
              Petitioner,                  *
                                           *
v.                                         *       Chief Special Master Dorsey
                                           *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *       Ruling on Entitlement; Conceded;
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *       Influenza; Shoulder Injury Related to
                                           *       Vaccine Administration; SIRVA.
              Respondent.                  *
                                           *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

       On August 6, 2015, Dorothy Bundrick (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”) 2 alleging that she
received an influenza vaccination in her left shoulder on September 16, 2013, and thereafter
developed a shoulder injury known as adhesive capsulitis. See Petition at 1.

       On September 29, 2015, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) in which
she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 1, 3.
Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner’s shoulder injury is consistent with shoulder injury

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002 § 205, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2006). In
accordance with the Vaccine Rules, each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of
any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a
proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material
fits within the requirements of that provision, such material will be deleted from public access.
2
 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42
U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual
section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.


                                                  1
related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Id. at 3. Based on a review of the medical records,
respondent states that petitioner has met the applicable statutory requirements by suffering her
condition for more than six months and that, therefore, petitioner has satisfied all legal
prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id.

        A special master may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based
upon the record. A hearing is not required. §300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). In light of
respondent’s concession and a review of the record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is
entitled to compensation. This matter shall now proceed to the damages phase.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                            s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Chief Special Master




                                               2
