









IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS





NO. WR-66,190-02


EX PARTE ANDREW JOSEPH LEWIS, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 63181 IN THE 252ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY



 
 Per curiam.

O R D E R


	Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unauthorized use
of a motor vehicle and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
	Applicant contends that after he was released on mandatory supervision, Texas Department
of Criminal Justice-Parole Division held a revocation hearing and voted to send him to an
Intermediate Sanction Facility (ISF). But shortly thereafter, he contends, the Parole Division revoked
his mandatory supervision without holding a hearing.
	On January 10, 2007, we remanded this application and instructed the trial court to obtain an
affidavit from the Parole Division. The Parole Division, however, did not submit an affidavit. We
believe that the record is not sufficient to resolve Applicant's claim. In these circumstances, additional
facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997),
the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. Accordingly, the trial court shall order the
Parole Division to submit an affidavit in response to Applicant's claim. 
	If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney
to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. 
	The trial court shall then make findings of fact as to whether the Parole Division held a
revocation hearing after Applicant was sent to an ISF. Ex parte Catham, 59 S.W.3d 677 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2001). The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it
deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.
	This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the
order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be
returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be
obtained from this Court. 
Filed:  September 12, 2007
Do not publish
