
USCA1 Opinion

	




          January 18, 1996      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 95-1717                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                      Appellee,                                          v.                                  DARREL C. BULLINS,                                Defendant, Appellant.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                                 ____________________               Michael A. Goldsmith,  with whom Stephen Hrones and Hrones &               ____________________             ______________     ________          Garrity were on brief, for appellant.          _______               Jean B.  Weld, Assistant  United States Attorney,  with whom               _____________          Paul M. Gagnon,  United States  Attorney, was on  brief, for  the          ______________          United States.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                    Per Curiam.   The arguments proffered  by the defendant                    Per Curiam                    __________          on appeal were not made in the district court and are, therefore,          waived.   See United States v.  Slade, 980 F.2d 27,  30 (1st Cir.                    ___ _____________     _____          1992); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3), 12(f).  And while this                 ___ ____          omission  leaves the  record  insufficiently developed  to permit          definitive review  for plain  error (a deficiency  which, itself,          precludes relief, see United States v. Barletta, 644 F.2d 50, 54-                            ___ _____________    ________          55 (1st  Cir. 1981)),  we see  nothing at  this point  that would          impel us to grant extraordinary relief on that basis.  See United                                                                 ___ ______          States v. Olano, 113 S.Ct. 1770 (1993) (elucidating standard  for          ______    _____          plain error).          Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.          ________   ___                                          2
