     Case: 10-40553 Document: 00511450149 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            April 19, 2011
                                     No. 10-40553
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ESPINO-LOPEZ,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:10-CR-141-1


Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Espino-Lopez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Espino-Lopez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Espino-
Lopez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents
no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-40553 Document: 00511450149 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011

                                No. 10-40553

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
