       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                IN RE: VI-JON, INC.,
                       Appellant
                ______________________

                      2015-1387
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,150.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   ANDREW C. RYAN, Cantor Colburn LLP, Hartford, CT,
argued for appellant.

    SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented
by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD,
AMY J. NELSON.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
    PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


January 11, 2016            /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                  Daniel E. O’Toole
                            Clerk of Court
