946 F.2d 1567
292 U.S.App.D.C. 87
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Richard Allen TYREE and Joseph A. Bonacci, Appellants,v.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
No. 90-5257.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 30, 1991.

Before SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.


1
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is


2
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 1990.   The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action.   See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam);   Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.)  (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).


3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.   See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

