
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1383                                  STEPHEN C. TWOMEY,                                Petitioner, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                Respondent, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                          Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Paul  Twomey  and  Twomey  &  Sisti   Law  Offices  on  brief  for            ____________       _______________________________        appellant.            Donald K. Stern, United  States Attorney, and  Timothy Q.  Feeley,            _______________                                __________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                   October 28, 1996                                 ____________________                                         -2-                      Per  Curiam.   Stephen T.  Twomey appeals  from the                      ___________            district  court's dismissal  of his  petition pursuant  to 28            U.S.C.    2255.    We summarily  affirm  for essentially  the                                  _________  ______            reasons stated by the  district court.  See United  States v.                                                    ___ ______________            Blais, No. 95-1093, slip op. (1st Cir. August 28, 1996).            _____                      Appellant's   2255 petition is denied.  See Loc. R.                                                     ______   ___            27.1.                                         -3-
