     Case: 18-11113      Document: 00515021204         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/03/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                             July 3, 2019
                                    No. 18-11113
                                 Conference Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERASMO RUIZ GAYTON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:16-CR-130-3


Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Erasmo Ruiz Gayton has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ruiz Gayton has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ruiz Gayton’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11113    Document: 00515021204     Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/03/2019


                                 No. 18-11113

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
