       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

               IN RE ARACHNID, INC.,
                 ____________________

                      2011-1430
            (Reexamination No. 90/010,094)
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   STEPHEN M. HANKINS, Schiff Hardin LLP, of San
Francisco, California, argued for appellant. On the brief
were JAMES P. MURPHY and DAVID Z. PETTY, McAndrews
Held & Malloy, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois.

    FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND
T. CHEN, Solicitor, and LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate
Solicitor.
                 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (BRYSON, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



 May 9, 2012               /s/ Jan Horbaly
  Date                        Jan Horbaly
                                  Clerk
