




Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2006







Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2006.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-06-00337-CR
____________
 
JAMES EDWARD HAGGERTY, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 178th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
1034602
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
After a
jury trial, appellant was convicted of delivery of less than one gram of
cocaine.  On  April 5, 2006, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement
for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal.




Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief
meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, more
than sixty days have elapsed, and no pro se response has been filed.
We have
carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed
December 21, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices
Fowler and Edelman. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).

