                                                                            FILED
                                 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
                                                                            MAY 18 2017
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS


                                 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT


In re: WEST COVINA MOTORS, INC.,                 No. 15-56621

               Debtor,                           D.C. No. 2:15-cv-04240-CAS

------------------------------
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
FRENCH AUTOMOBILE LLC,

               Appellant,

 v.

DAVID A. GILL, Chapter 7 Trustee of
West Covina Motors, Inc.; COREPOINTE
CAPITAL FINANCE LLC; HOWARD M.
EHRENBERG, Chapter 7 Trustee for
Hassen Imports Partnership; CITY OF
WEST COVINA, on its own behalf and as
successor to the West Covina Community
Development Commission,

               Appellees.


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Central District of California
                 Christina A. Snyder, Senior District Judge, Presiding



      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
                              Submitted May 12, 2017**
                                Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and DONATO,*** District
Judge.

      French Automobile LLC appeals from the district court’s order dismissing

its appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting the motion by David A. Gill,

as Chapter 7 trustee for the estate of West Covina Motors, Inc., for approval of a

settlement agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1), and we

dismiss the appeal for lack of prudential standing.

      1.     French Automobile’s appeal rests entirely on its claims that the

bankruptcy court’s order was entered in violation of its due process rights under 11

U.S.C. § 363 and Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 4001(b) and 7001(2).

Because French Automobile had proper notice of the hearing on the trustee’s

motion and failed to properly raise its due process claims to the bankruptcy court

in the first instance in either its written response to the motion or at the subsequent




      **
             The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for
decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      ***
            The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
                                           2
hearing on the motion,1 French Automobile lacks prudential standing to raise these

claims on appeal. See In re Commercial W. Fin. Corp., 761 F.2d 1329, 1335 (9th

Cir. 1985) (holding that, provided the appellant has proper notice of the bankruptcy

court proceeding, “attendance and objection” at the proceeding are “prerequisites

to fulfilling the ‘person aggrieved’ standard”).

      2.     Even if we declined to dismiss French Automobile’s appeal for lack of

prudential standing, we would affirm the district court’s dismissal of the appeal on

grounds of waiver, for the reasons stated above. See In re Southland Supply, Inc.,

657 F.2d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir. 1981) (holding that, absent exceptional

circumstances, arguments not raised before the bankruptcy court in the first

instance are waived).

      DISMISSED.




      1
        Because French Automobile’s sur-reply filed in response to the trustee’s
motion was twice stricken from the record by the bankruptcy court under both
Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure
8009(e)(1), and French Automobile has not challenged those rulings on appeal, we
do not consider any argument raised in the sur-reply in resolving the present
appeal.
                                           3
