                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                 :~;T    'T<t   ED
                                FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
                                                                                               NOV - 1 2011
                                                                                         Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy
                                                                                        Courts for the Dlstrwt of Columbia
                                                   )
    MILTON J. TAYLOR,                              )
                                                   )
                           Plaintiff,              )
                                                   )
           v.                                      )       Civil Action No.         11 1!Jl1
                                                   )
    ISAAC FULWOOD, et aI.,                         )
                                                   )
                           Defendants.             )
    --------------------------)

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION

            This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis

    and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

            Plaintiff finds himself in custody upon the execution of a parole violator warrant on July

    2,2011. According to plaintiff, neither the United States Parole Commission, its

    Commissioners, nor any individual in any way associated with the warrant, the revocation

    hearing, or his detention at the D.C. Jail, had the authority to effect his imprisonment. For the

    defendants' alleged violations of rights protected under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Six, Seventh,

    Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, plaintiff demands

    damages of $33 million.

           Because plaintiff s claims go to the fact of his incarceration, he cannot recover damages

    in this civil rights action without showing that his confinement has been invalidated by

    "revers [al] on direct appeal, expunge [ment] by executive order, declar[ ation of invalidity] by a

    state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance of a writ of

    habeas corpus." Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); accord White v. Bowie, 194


N                                                                                                                       3
F.3d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (table). Plaintiff has not satisfied this prerequisite.

       This action will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1)

because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can granted. An Order is issued

separately.



                                                                                    -
