                                      IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                      FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

SILVIA C. GONZALEZ,                   NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                      FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                      DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                    CASE NO. 1D15-4512

VISA and TRAVELERS,

      Appellees.


_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 12, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.
Robert D. McAliley, Judge.

Date of Accident: March 16, 2012.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Albert Marroquin
of Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Steven H. Preston of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.



PER CURIAM.

      In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant challenges an order of the Judge

of Compensation Claims (JCC) that denied her claim for additional temporary total

disability (TTD) and temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits beyond the 104-

week cap imposed by subsections 440.15(2) and (4), Florida Statutes (2011), and
also denied associated penalties, interest, costs, and attorney’s fees (PICA). We

affirm the denial of TTD and accompanying PICA because no party challenged the

JCC’s finding of fact that no medical evidence supports that claim. We reverse the

denial of TPD benefits and accompanying PICA for the reasons that follow.

      The Florida Supreme Court has held, in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg,

194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016), that the 104-week limitation set forth in subsection

440.15(2), as applied to a TTD recipient, is an unconstitutional deprivation of access

to the courts. Westphal’s reasoning was recently extended to subsection 440.15(4),

which applies to TPD recipients, by this Court in Jones v. Food Lion, Inc., 41 Fla.

L. Weekly D2490 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 9, 2016). Claimant here seeks TPD benefits

from September 24, 2014, through August 24, 2015. The JCC in the instant case

denied Claimant’s claim because Claimant had already received 104 weeks of

temporary indemnity; under the current state of the law, this was error.

      The JCC made the additional finding of fact, unchallenged by any party, that

Claimant “was partially disabled through July 9, 2015,” and “reached actual MMI

[maximum medical improvement] shortly after . . . July 9.” Accordingly, on remand,

the JCC is instructed to determine whether Claimant reached MMI before August

24, 2015, and if so, when, and to award TPD benefits and associated PICA for any

weeks between September 24, 2014, and August 24, 2015, that are prior to

Claimant’s attainment of MMI, on authority of Westphal and Jones.

                                          2
      AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with

instructions.

RAY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.




                                3
