     Case: 16-11322      Document: 00513942856         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/06/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                             United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-11322
                                                                                      Fif h Circuit

                                                                                    FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                               April 6, 2017
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                           Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHESTER BROWN, also known as Baldy,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:15-CR-226-5


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Chester Brown has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Brown has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Brown’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-11322    Document: 00513942856    Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/06/2017


                                No. 16-11322

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
