
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS



ERNEST STANLEY,


                            Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                            Appellee.
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 § 


No. 08-07-00223-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20060D00825)


MEMORANDUM OPINION
	Ernest Stanley appeals his conviction for attempted capital murder of multiple persons. 
Appellant pleaded guilty and the court assessed punishment at imprisonment for a term of five years. 
Because Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the attempted appeal for want
of jurisdiction.
	The record before us reflects that sentence was imposed in open court on March 22, 2007. 
No motion for new trial was filed.  Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed April 23,
2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Tex. R. App. P. 4.1.  Appellant did not file his notice of appeal
until August 2, 2007.  By letter dated August 3, 2007, we notified Appellant in writing of our intent
to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918
S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which notice
of appeal must be filed by the defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case.  A defendant's
notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended
in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new
trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.  Pursuant to Rule 26.3, a court of appeals
may grant an extension of time to file notice of appeal if the notice is filed within fifteen days after
the last day allowed and, within the same period, a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably
explaining the need for the extension of time.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. 
Under Rule 26.3, a late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals'
jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for
extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing
the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time.  Olivo, 918
S.W.2d at 522.
	When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to file notice of
appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, not from the date sentence
is signed and entered by the trial court.  Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. Crim. App.
1993).  The last date allowed for timely filing of the notice of appeal was April 23, 2007, thirty days
after the day the sentence was imposed in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P.
4.1.  Because Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until August 2, 2007, and he failed to file 
a motion for extension of time, he failed to perfect this appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction.

						KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

September 20, 2007

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
