
USCA1 Opinion

	




        September 14, 1995      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                    ____________________        No. 94-1856                                  ARTHUR J. TOEGEMANN,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              CITY OF CRANSTON, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                 [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                         __________________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Arthur J. Toegemann on brief pro se.            ___________________            William  F. Holt, Assistant City Solicitor, on  brief for appellee            ________________        City of Cranston.            Seth E. Bowerman and Hanson, Curran, Parks  & Whitman on brief for            ________________     ________________________________        appellees Saratoga Hospital and Butler Hospital.            Joseph A.  Keough, Jr.,  Francis X. Flaherty  and Wynn  & Wynn  on            ______________________   ___________________      ____________        brief for appellee Peter Palombo, Jr.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                              Per  Curiam.  Upon review of the record and the parties'                 ___________            briefs  on appeal, we are persuaded that the district court's            order  was  fully justified  by  the  plaintiff's history  of            filing  meritless   actions  against   many   of  the   named            defendants.  Accordingly, the  judgment of the district court            is affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.  Costs to appellees.               ________   ___                                         -2-
