                                            CAUSE NO.             04-14-0024-CR

 PD-1334-15

MR. DESTYN DAVID FREDELB.IJSK. )f.                                    §              IN   THE   COURT    OF
[PRO-SE APPELLANT]     NLtU IN
                            COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
vs.                                                                   §             CRIMINAL      APPEALS
                                      NOV 03 2015
THE    STATE      OF   TEXAS
[APPELLEE]                                          „.       .        §              AUSTIN/     TEXAS
                                    Abel Acosta, Clerk
                                                                                                              RECEIVED IN
                                                                                                          COURT CF CRi^lMAL APPEALS
                            APPELLANT'S MOTION PLEADING SINGLE-COPY TO FILE HIS                                ..-.. nQ onir
                            PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW PURSUANT TO RULES                                NUV U<i lUU
                            OF APPELLATE PROCEDURES/                  RULE 9.3.



TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE(S)                      OF    SAID COURT:


       NOW     CONES          Mr.      Destyn D.             Frederick/            TDCJ-ID #1920865/          pro-se Appe
llant        styled hereinafter/ and respectfully presents this Motion Plead
ing     Single-Copy             to      file        His          accompanying             PDR pursuant to Rule 9.3
of     the Rules of Appllate Procedures.                                        In support hereto,        the Appellant
shows the following:
                                                                      I.

       In     accords          with rules governing the filing of a Petition for Dis
cretionary             Reiew/        the      Appellant                    is    instructed that He must present
the     Court          with     eleven (11) copies of His PDR.                                  The Appellant's appe
llate        attorney          (Richard         E.           Langl-ois), inter-alai/ failed to mention
this        fact       to     the      Appellant              before he withdrew from the Appellant's
case.

                                                                  II.

       The        Facility          where      the Apellant resides does not provide avenues
for     its        litigants           to     use        a       copier. Thus being the case, and being
that        the     Appellant is a "pro-se" litigant, He ask that this Honorable
Court        suspend          Rule      9.3     and           allow             Him to file one (1) copy only of
His Petition For Discretionary Review.

                                                                 PRAYER

      ALL PREMISES CONSIDERED, the                               Appellant           PRAYS       that    this Motion is
GRANTED and allow Him to file one (1) copy only of His enclosed PDR.




                                                          1      of       2
             Respectfully submitted,



             Mr. Destyn D. Frederick #1920865
             The Connally Facilities
             899 FM 632
             Kenedy, Texas 78119-4516




2   of   2
