                    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                             FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                             _____________________

                                  No. 96-50103
                                Summary Calendar
                             _____________________



ELMO HAROLD LIESMANN,

                                                            Plaintiff-Appellant,


                                        versus

BOB OWENS, Director; TAMMY McINOCH,
Parole Officer, Dallas County,

                                                            Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                    Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. A-95-CV-396
_________________________________________________________________
                           July 9, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*


     Elmo Harold Liesmann, Texas prisoner #390085, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

Liesmann contends that the requirements of Heck v. Humphrey, 114

S.Ct.       2364   (1994),   do   not   apply    to   his    claims   against   the

defendants.        We do not agree.      See Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175,

        *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 148 (1995).      We have

reviewed the record and Liesmann’s brief and AFFIRM the district

court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons adopted by the

district court.   Liesmann v. Owens, No. A-95-CV-396 (W.D. Tex.

Jan. 2, 1996).

                                                 A F F I R M E D.




                               -2-
