             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                     NOS. WR-90,726-01, WR-90,726-02 & WR-90,726-03


                         EX PARTE MICHAEL W. CLAY, Applicant


                ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
              CAUSE NOS. CR-17-26390-A, CR-17-26391-A & CR-17-26392-A
               IN THE 336TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FANNIN COUNTY


       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant pleaded guilty to two charges of manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance

in a drug free zone and one charge of possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. He

was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment in each case. Applicant filed these applications for writs

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that his pleas were involuntary because, among other things, trial counsel

wrongly advised him about his eligibility for “shock” probation. Applicant has alleged facts that,

if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393

S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court
                                                                                                       2

is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial

court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial

court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,

it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE

CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify

this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was eligible for “shock”

probation in these cases. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 42A.202(b) (West 2018) (effective Jan. 1,

2017). The trial court shall also make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial

counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant refused plea bargain offers based on counsel’s

alleged deficient performance. Should the court find that Applicant would have accepted plea offers,

it shall make further findings as to whether the State would have withdrawn the offers and whether

the court would have accepted plea agreements based on those offers. Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d

781, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that

it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: February 5, 2020
Do not publish
