     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 18-1677V
                                         UNPUBLISHED


    DEBRA H. CHILDRESS,                                       Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                          Filed: July 6, 2020
    v.
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Stipulation on Damages; Tetanus
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap)
                                                              Vaccine; Influenza (Flu Vaccine);
                        Respondent.                           Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                                                              Administration (SIRVA)


Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Sands Anderson PC, Richmond, VA, for petitioner.

Lynn Christina Schlie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.


                               DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

        On October 31, 2018, Debra H. Childress filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a permanent indentation in her left
shoulder as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) and tetanus diphtheria acellular
pertussis (Tdap) vaccines in her left shoulder on October 14, 2016. Petition at 1-2;
Stipulation, filed at July 6, 2020, ¶¶ 4, 6. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced
the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petition at 3; Stipulation at ¶¶
4, 6. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a permanent indentation in her left
shoulder following the flu and Tdap vaccinations, and further denies that the vaccines
caused petitioner to suffer any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.



1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       Nevertheless, on July 6, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation
reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth
therein.

     Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following
compensation:

        A lump sum of $12,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
        Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
        damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

       I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of
a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed
to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      2
