
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-2376                                  STEVEN A. GRAHAM,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                      MAINE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Steven A. Graham on brief pro se.            ________________            Robert  F. Hanson,  Christopher C.  Taintor and  Norman, Hanson  &            _________________   _______________________      _________________        DeTroy on brief for appellees Bert Beverly, M.D. and Rock Welch.        ______            Andrew  Ketterer,   Attorney  General,  Linda  Conti  and  Francis            ________________                        ____________       _______        Ackerman,  Assistant Attorney Generals, on brief for appellees Lehman,        ________        Merrill, Lorenz and Farrington.                                 ____________________                                  September 5, 1997                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and                 ___________            the record on appeal.   We affirm the amended judgment of the            district court, dated  October 29, 1996, essentially  for the            reasons   stated   in  the   magistrate-judge's   recommended            decision, dated September 30, 1996.                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                 _________                                         -2-
