




Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 21, 2008







Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed August 21, 2008.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-07-00615-CR
____________
 
CHRISTIAN NEVILLE KNIGHT,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 179th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
1101223
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
A jury
convicted appellant of the offense of possession of a controlled substance. 
Appellant entered a plea of true to two enhancement paragraphs and the jury
sentenced appellant to confinement for forty-five years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a notice
of appeal.




Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  At appellant=s request, the record was provided to
him.  On July 3, 2008, appellant filed a pro se response to counsel=s brief.
We have
carefully reviewed the record, counsel=s brief, and appellant=s response, and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.  We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders
brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable
grounds for review.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005).  
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August
21, 2008.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Fowler, and
Frost. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).

