      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                      NO. 03-09-00211-CR




                              Joseph Delmarco Carter, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee



      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
            NO. 63925, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               Appellant Joseph Delmarco Carter pleaded guilty to stealing property worth $1500

or more. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West Supp. 2009). The district court

adjudged appellant guilty and sentenced him to twenty months in state jail. The only issue on appeal

is whether the court’s judgment awards the correct amount of jail time credit. Finding that no error

is presented, we affirm.

               At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing, the court announced its sentence as

follows:


              All right, Mr. Carter, I’ve read your reports, I’ve listened to your testimony
       and I’m going to find you guilty and assess your punishment at 20 months
       confinement in state jail.

               I’m not sure how much credit you’re entitled to because you’ve been in and
       out of jail so much, but this offense occurred July the 7th of ‘08. So, if you’ll go
       back and figure up how much credit you’re entitled to since July the 7th of ‘08, I’ll
       give you credit for all of those days.


Appellant’s counsel told the court that he would do this. The court’s written judgment gives

appellant credit for time spent in jail from January 12 to March 9, 2009.

               Appellant contends that the written judgment does not conform to the court’s oral

pronouncement regarding jail time credit. See Taylor v. State, 131 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2004). Appellant argues that the court’s comments indicate that appellant had multiple

incarcerations, yet the written judgment gives him credit for only one period of incarceration.

Appellant asks the Court to remand the cause to the trial court so that the proper amount of jail time

credit can be calculated.

               At the time appellant entered his plea, there was a question regarding bail pending

sentencing. In this connection, the prosecutor remarked without contradiction by defense counsel

that “[t]he warrant on this case was issued, I believe, back in August, and it took a really long time

for him to get arrested.” The record reflects that January 12, 2009, was the day before appellant was

taken before a magistrate. March 9 was the sentencing date.

               The trial court stated that appellant had been “in and out of jail,” but the court did not

state that all of these periods of incarceration were in this case. The court plainly did not know how

much jail time credit appellant was due, as he asked defense counsel to make that determination.

The court stated that appellant would be given all the jail time credit to which he was entitled, and

there is nothing in the record to indicate that this was not done. The time credit awarded in the




                                                   2
judgment has not been shown to be incorrect, nor has appellant shown any reason to remand this

cause to the district court.

                The issue is overruled, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                              __________________________________________

                                              J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: December 3, 2009

Do Not Publish




                                                 3
