                                                                                                  FILED
                                                                                              Februa ry 23 , 2015
                                                                                               T :'\ COt:RTOF
                                                                                          WORKERS ' CO:\I PE;o.;SATI O:'\"
                                                                                                    C lA I.\1 5

                   COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                     DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

EMPLOYEE: Christopher Shelton                         DOCKET#: 2014-06-0022
                                                      STATE FILE#: 5850112014
EMPLOYER: Performance Food Group                      DATE OF INJURY: July 28,2014

INSURANCE CARRIER: Gallagher Bassett, TPA


                              EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

       THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon the
Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Christopher Shelton, Employee ("Mr. Shelton"), to
determine whether Employer, Performance Food Group ("PFG"), is obligated to provide
temporary disability benefits. Mr. Shelton requested a ruling based on a review of the record
without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Shelton is self-represented. Attorney David Deming
represents PFG and its workers' compensation Carrier.

        The undersigned reviewed the file and concludes that no additional information is needed
to determine whether Mr. Shelton is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits of the claim. See
Mediation and Hearing Procedures Rule 0800-02-21-.14(1)(c) (2014). Upon a review of the file
submitted and the applicable law, the Court hereby denies Mr. Shelton's request for temporary
disability benefits for the reasons set forth below.

                                          ANALYSIS

                                              Issue

               Whether Mr. Shelton is entitled to temporary disability benefits.

                                      Evidence Submitted

       Mr. Shelton requested a ruling based on a review of the record. PFG did not object.
Therefore, the Court identifies the following documents as the "record" reviewed:

   •   Petition for Benefit Determination, December 11, 2014
   •   Dispute Certification Notice, February 9, 2015
   •   Request for Expedited Hearing, February 9, 2015
   •   Medical records, Middle Tennessee Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Inc.
       ("MTOEM"), July 29-0ctober 9, 2014 (15 pages)

                                                1
    •   Employer's position statement (E-mail from Attorney David Deming), December 23,
        2014
    •   PFG note, August 7, 2014
    •   PFG Employee's Statement oflnjury/lllness, July 29, 2014 (2 pages)
    •   PFG Standards of Associate Conduct Policy (2 pages)
    •   Receipt for Associate Handbook, signed by Mr. Shelton, July 2, 2014
    •   Personal Conduct Standards
    •   Separation Notice, August 7, 2014
    •   Employer's First Report of Work Injury or Illness, July 29, 2014
    •   Wage Statement, October 8, 2014
    •   Medical Certificate, October 8, 2014
    •   Notice ofMediated Agreement, October 29,2014 (2 pages).

                                       History of Claim

        Mr. Shelton is a twenty-one (21) year-old resident of Wilson County, Tennessee. On
July 28, 2014, while at work for PFG, he injured his right elbow loading a box of potatoes onto a
pallet. PFG accepted the injury as compensable. PFG provided a panel from which Mr. Shelton
chose Middle Tennessee Occupational & Environmental Medicine. Mr. Shelton received
treatment from MTOEM from July 29, 2014, until the authorized treating physician (ATP)
released him with "NO RESTRICTIONS-REGULAR DUTY" on August 20, 2014
(capitalization in original). PFG accommodated the assigned restrictions between July 29, 2014,
and August 7, 2014, when PFG discharged Mr. Shelton for failing to comply with company
policy regarding the timeliness of his injury report.

      The parties agreed to temporary total disability payments from August 15, 2014, to
August 19, 2014, during a previous mediation. Mr. Shelton filed the present Petition for Benefit
Determination requesting additional temporary payments. Both parties acknowledge that the
ATP requested an EMG/NCV test on Mr. Shelton's right arm.

                                   Employee's Contentions

      Mr. Shelton contends he remains injured and cannot work. He insists the only reason the
ATP released him on full-duty was to allow him to obtain work because PFG terminated him.

                                   Employer's Contentions

       PFG contends the medical records clearly indicate the ATP released Mr. Shelton to full-
duty work without restrictions. Therefore, Mr. Shelton is not entitled to temporary benefits
under the Worker's Compensation Law.




                                               2
                           Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

                                           Standard Applied

        When determining whether to award benefits, the Judge must decide whether the moving
party is likely to succeed on the merits at trial given the information available. See generally,
McCall v. Nat'/ Health Care Corp., 100 S.W.3d 209, 214 (Tenn. 2003). In a workers'
compensation action, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(c)(6) (2014), the
employee shall bear the burden of proving each and every element of the claim by a
preponderance of the evidence. The employee must show the injury arose primarily out of and
in the course and scope of employment. Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-102(13) (2014).

                                            Factual Findings

        Mr. Shelton injured his right elbow at work on July 28, 2014. PFG accepted the injury as
compensable and provided a panel. Mr. Shelton selected MTOEM from the panel. The ATP
assigned temporary restrictions. PFG accommodated the temporary restrictions. The ATP
released Mr. Shelton to return to work full duty without restrictions on August 20, 2014. Despite
a subsequent office visit where the ATP ordered an EMG/NCV study, the records do not indicate
any present restrictions or "no work" orders.

                                      Application ofLaw to Facts

        Temporary total disability benefits, authorized by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-
6-207(1) (2014), ensure that employees receive compensation during the time they are totally
prevented from working while recuperating as far as the nature of their injury permits. Gluck
Bros., Inc. v. Coffey, 431 S.W.2d 756,759 (Tenn. 1968). In other words, "the temporary total
disability period is the healing period during which the employee is totally prevented from
working." Id In order to establish a prima facie case for temporary total disability benefits, the
worker must show that (1) he or she was totally disabled and unable to work due to a
compensable injury, (2) the work injury and inability to work are causally connected, and (3) the
duration of the disability. Gray v. Cullom Machine, Tool & Die, Inc., 152 S.W.3d 439, 443
(Tenn. 2004).

        After a thorough and careful review of the entire record submitted, the Court finds no
medical evidence to support Mr. Shelton's claim that he is unable to work and thereby entitled to
temporary benefits at this time. Although Mr. Shelton may require an EMG/NCV study, this
need does not demonstrate that he is unable to work. The last medical record concerning his
ability to work, dated August 20, 2014, indicates that he has the ability to return to work, full
duty. Should Mr. Shelton subsequently obtain the requisite proof under Gray, this Court
encourages the parties to revisit the issue directly. If they cannot reach an agreement, Mr.
Shelton may file another Request for Expedited Hearing.

        In sum, insufficient evidence exists in the record at this time to prove Mr. Shelton is
entitled to temporary disability benefits.



                                                3
  IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

    1. Mr. Shelton's request for temporary benefits is denied.

    2. PFG and/or its workers' compensation Carrier shall continue to provide Mr. Shelton with
       medical treatment for his injuries as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-
       204 (2014).

    3. This matter is set for Initial Hearing on April 8, 2015, at 9:30a.m.

        ENTERED this the 23rd day of February, 2015.



                                       enneth M. Switzer, Chi     ge
                                      Court of Workers' Compensation Claims



Initial Hearing:

       An Initial Hearing has been set with Chief Judge Kenneth M. Switzer, Court of
Workers Compensation. You must dial in at 615-532-9552 or 866-943-0025 toll free to
participate in your scheduled conference.
        Please Note: You must call in on the scheduled date/time to participate. Failure to
call in may result in a determination of the issues without your further participation. All
conferences are set using Central Time (CT).




Right to Appeal:

       Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order to
appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of Appeal,
you must:

    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal."

   2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven (7) business days of the date
      the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order.

   3. Serve a copy ofthe Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party.




                                                4
       4. If applicable, the parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on
          appeal, may request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for the
          purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it with the
          Court Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of
          Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a statement of the evidence within ten (1 0)
          calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal. The Judge must
          approve the statement of the evidence before the Clerk of the Court of Workers'
          Compensation Claims shall submit the record to the Clerk of the Appeals Board.

       5. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory appeal,
          the appealing party shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within three (3)
          business days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal, specifying the
          issues presented for review and including any argument in support thereof. If the
          appellee elects to file a response in opposition to the interlocutory appeal, appellee shall
          do so within three (3) business days ofthe filing of the appellant's position statement.


                                     CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

         I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to
 the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 23rd day of February,
 2015.


Name                     Certified   First    Via   Fax        Via     Email Address
                         Mail        Class    Fax   Number     Email
                                     Mail
Christopher Shelton,                                           X       christol!herjshelton(a),vahoo.com
Employee
David Deming,                                                  X       ddemin~:;(a),manierherod.com
Employer/Carrier's
Attorney




                                                               kers' Compensation Claims




                                                    5
