       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

          GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
                   Appellant,

                           v.

     INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
                 Appellee,

                         AND

             OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC
           (doing business as Otterbox),
                     Intervenor.
               ______________________

                      2013-1230
                ______________________

   Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-780.
                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    TERRY L. CLARK, Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellant.

   PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,
of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the
brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and
SIDNEY A. ROSENWEIG, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
Of counsel was WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Attorney.

    LOUIS S. MASTRIANI, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaum-
berg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
With him on the brief were DANIEL F. SMITH and EVAN H.
LANGDON.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:


PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit
                     Judges).


           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


December 12, 2013                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                         Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court
