     Case: 15-40267      Document: 00513258986         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/04/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
                                    No. 15-40267                            November 4, 2015
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                   Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CELERINO CALDERON-CORONA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:14-CR-229-1


Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Celerino Calderon-
Corona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).         Calderon-Corona has not filed a response, has
completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from
the United States.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-40267     Document: 00513258986     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/04/2015


                                  No. 15-40267

      We do not enforce Calderon-Corona’s appeal waiver in light of the
magistrate judge’s failure to admonish him adequately of its consequences.
Nevertheless, our independent review of the relevant portions of the record
and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED
in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States
v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).




                                        2
