
USCA1 Opinion

	




          March 29, 1993        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 91-2341                                             THOMAS G. HODGETTS,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                          COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                          __________________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                          Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.                                             ______________                                 ___________________               Thomas G. Hodgetts on brief pro se.               __________________               James E. O'Neil, Attorney General, and James R. Lee, Special               _______________                        ____________          Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.                                  __________________                                  __________________                      Per Curiam.  We have reviewed  the record on appeal                      __________            and  conclude  that the  district  court  did  not abuse  its            discretion  in  entering  the  contempt  finding.  See  Mass.                                                               ___  _____            Association  of  Older Americans  v.  Commissioner of  Public            ________________________________      _______________________            Welfare, 803 F.2d 35, 38 (1st Cir. 1986); AMF Inc. v. Jewett,            _______                                   ________    ______            711  F.2d 1096, 1101 (1st Cir. 1983).  Accordingly, the order            holding appellant  in contempt  and enjoining  appellant from            further picketing is affirmed.                                 ________                                                            -2-                                          2
