
USCA1 Opinion

	




          February 28, 1994     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 93-1985                                            WILLIAM F. ENGLEHART,                                     Petitioner,                                          v.                         PAUL RAIKEY, WARDEN M.C.I. WALPOLE,                                     Respondent.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                             Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ___________________               William F. Englehar on brief pro se.               ___________________               Scott   Harshbarger,  Attorney   General,  and   William  J.               ___________________                              ___________          Duensing, Assitant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.          ________                                  __________________                                  __________________                 Per  Curiam.  For  the reasons stated  in the memorandum                 ___________            and  order  of  the  United States  District  Court  for  the            District of Massachusetts,  dated May 24, 1993,  the judgment            of  the  court denying  the  petition  for habeas  corpus  is            affirmed.            ________                                         -2-
