    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 09-841V
                                      Filed: January 24, 2014
                                        Not for Publication


*************************************
KATHERINE MCKELLAR,                         *
                                            *
               Petitioner,                  *     Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on
                                            *     stipulation of fact
 v.                                         *
                                            *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                         *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                         *
                                            *
               Respondent.                  *
                                            *
*************************************
Lisa A. Roquemore, Irvine, CA, for petitioner.
Debra A. Filteau Begley, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master


                DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

       On January 21, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an
appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.

        In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she personally
incurred $1,000.00 in out-of-pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her
request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent
raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
redact such material from public access.
amends her application for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner amends her request for
reimbursement for her current counsel, Lisa A. Roquemore, to $60,000.00. Petitioner amends her
request for reimbursement for her prior counsel, Ronald C. Homer, to $40,500.00. Respondent
does not object to these amounts. The undersigned finds these amounts to be reasonable.
Accordingly, the court awards:

        a. $1,000.00, representing reimbursement for petitioner’s out-of-pocket expenses. The
           award shall be in the form of a check made payable to petitioner in the amount of
           $1,000.00.

        b. $60,000.00, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs for petitioner’s
           current counsel, Lisa A. Roquemore. The award shall be in the form of a check made
           payable jointly to petitioner and the Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore in the amount of
           $60,000.00.

        c. $40,500.00, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs for petitioner’s
           prior counsel, Ronald C. Homer. The award shall be in the form of a check made
           payable jointly to petitioner and Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C. in the amount of
           $40,500.00.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: January 24, 2014                                                            s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                      Laura D. Millman
                                                                                       Special Master




2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2
