                        NUMBERS 13-09-00402-CV
                                13-09-00678-CV
                                13-09-00679-CV
                                13-10-00091-CV
                                13-10-00092-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

DEAN CORY ROBLIN,                                                    Appellant,

                                      v.

DEBORAH SUSAN BRIGGS,                               Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
                 of Montgomery County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                  Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
     Appellant, Dean Cory Roblin, in appellate cause numbers, 13-09-00402-CV, 13-

09-00678-CV, 13-09-00679-CV, 13-10-00091-CV, and 13-10-00092-CV, appealed a
judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Montgomery, County. In all five

causes, Roblin filed an affidavit of indigence with this Court. However, on October 28,

2010, in Roblin v. Briggs, No. 13-09-00475-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8655, at *12

(Tex.–Corpus Christi Oct. 28, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.), this Court concluded that

Roblin had not met his burden of showing that he was indigent; and therefore Roblin

was not entitled to a free record.

       On May 16, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Roblin, in accordance with

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss his appeals unless

the $175.00 filing fees were paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Roblin responded to the

notice from the Clerk; however, he has not cured the defect by paying the $175.00 filing

fee in each cause. See id 5, 12.1(b).

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and Roblin’s failure to pay

the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),

(c). Accordingly, the appeals in cause numbers 13-09-00402-CV, 13-09-00678-CV, 13-

09-00679-CV, 13-10-00091-CV, and 13-10-00092-CV are dismissed for want of

prosecution.

                                               PER CURIAM



Delivered and filed the
9th day of June, 2011.




                                           2
