
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 93-1528                                     DAWN DAIGLE,                                 Plaintiff, Appellee,                                          v.                             MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,                                Defendant, Appellant.                              _________________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                       __________________________                              _________________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,                                    ____________________                               and Cyr, Circuit Judge.                                        _____________                              _________________________               Christine  M. Rockefeller, with whom Paul  R. Cox and Burns,               _________________________            ____________     ______          Bryant,   Hinchey,  Cox  &  Schulte,  P.A.  were  on  brief,  for          __________________________________________          plaintiff.               Gerald  F. Petruccelli, with whom Mary Mitchell Friedman and               ______________________            ______________________          Petruccelli & Martin were on brief, for defendant.          ____________________                              _________________________                              _________________________                    Per  Curiam.    Having  today  decided  the  merits  of                    Per  Curiam.                    ___________          plaintiff's appeal, see Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc., No.                              ___ ______    __________________________          93-1470 (1st  Cir. Jan. ___,  1994), it is unnecessary  to decide          this cross-appeal.  We, therefore, dismiss it.                    Appeal dismissed.  No costs.                    Appeal dismissed.  No costs.                    ______ _________   __ _____                                          2
