                            ·CAUSE 11 Ci65(t.)~

                                         l
                                         s·
                                         (
  In Re .Jeffrev L.·ward-                <;           In THE. CD\J'RT .
                   Rela+of"
             v.                          (              . OF
  Ho~\J. DWIC H·t L· PHlrER              s        Cf\'IIV1ltJ AL APPEAL~
                  ResPcindavrl-          (


                    RElAfORS PETITIO\\) fOR WRIT
                              OF-MANDAMVs               ~-

   . Ll5-\ o-f Parties
   Tria I Co l)(+5 Dl strt"c:t lb DGE:        Je-t·fr~ L. ·vvarl
   tt lJt\J .. DW!blir L. PHI;F"ER
                             -    \



                    Resp·ot'do.vrt-
                                                       i'
                                              Vf'l r1n(: Vo~it .i8~o-FA1lSl1 \
                                              · H votsvi e1 TX· '77 -:54q
                                                    Relator rro          ~e



       Into ·the LDURT DfCRit1\tN-AL~PE:J\LS COW\E's how_
- Je~re'f L- Wa.·rd I reQ.ues-\-i 1)9 +h.is Wr~+ ot ;1) Af\JbAMVS
  fro·M Writ 1\lo·f::tq~(<:l.Jn the .11\l:O .t>~ ,c~~~O,l:
  CHERoKEE CoonJr'1.1 ·Qt RUS~tfEXFtS.


                                                      RECENEfi ~~
                                                COURT OF CRIIlllll\lAL APPEALS

                                                        JUN 24 2a15

                                                     Abet Acosta, Clerk
                       TABLE    CE CD}Jif.NIS
A1 Puge i- Lists; ident',e5 of Par~t~
:A\ Pa.<at:H- Tab\e ot Coot~rrts,List of Au\hori~·,es
AT Patae(i)- SIA1'EME.N1 or:ft-l£f.A~£ 'InJ~\~,~~4-h~ d~ tR
              t\t\e Ccurl1 Rul£ !J·l~a;~)G)·t:R~A~~
\\ \\ \\      Sta\em)·en-\ ot JlH"tiscl\<:;-\t'oo
 ,,, '\' \\ Issue~ PKesente·d
AT Page(2)- l.ssuE's f>· RESel\Ffto.J MC.J~JP.~~m.u.s,j·w•~H.i_s~e\ ·
 \\. \:\ '\ STPt1£MENr oF·F'Auts~ Ho\J,ha eX Pe\-thof\.
  \\ \\ '' ARG\JEMf:N:T._ Re\cr\-or(ha~-\-\1e !?l:lme ra'a~rt~
              £16 other Pek-\-t-oner(g; cta:>!            .
 ',, ,, '\\ P'({ft~£R_~ to ComPel-· lO a.ccorda\';\{'e wt\\.t )nw·
AT Pooe l3)- (.£ RUtiC Ali ln\1; APPa\nrt ~ Cert i1'i ca.ie of
                  5e.r\hoce·~



                  . INDEX OF AUTHDR1fiE5
                                                     .I

 B('ax.to() V· DvnV\ I Bo~ s,.,\JD lpl-~:19,/310 {T~~ ~r,. A·l?f,•l-qCJ:L. fbf2.)
 T£~. CODE. CR1:rvt ffioc..cAN\Vi ur+.·u~o1§~ .1;5{\Ve.s\- fjL)pp Jo\4)
                                  '   •      '                '           ~     .1'   •                •




              '    .                                 :.                                                    Pg~(1)

  PaJ i eu Va Court of APPeals ofTex.,i fi{~ Da:st.·3q;t S~W.~J \\!l.~tl?-
                                                                  1




  IS ( T~.er.·m. 1\ PP· ~or3),                                     pg (4
  RVlt El~3k\)(3) IT. R.A.R , ~ • • ~            j        J       ;~(l)'
                                                                  •   '   :   • ·I ,, •i   I'   ....




  S~~TE €'X ~e\ Y~~NG V. Si~ Di'"~t, r~o.u.rt:~~ Appea~s . ) • ·: .P13(1)
  l"3~ 5,\AJ~ 3d 101;~\D[T~··Cru'"' App,_~D7) ( or~g.Pr«eedia,~).
                          I 55 U£.5 PB£5£\\l'tf.D __
    Se.e Brax-ion v. buo;i'\,B03 S,vJQ:Jcl :3\·B;"3:lo(Tex.o(}, ltf'~,j.q~j\.
Mandnmvs vv6 U ·assue where there is b~ one ProPec ord~i-o
he. enieredv
                _ .A PRE.\\) D'IX.' ----
  Rel~ has need for ibn-e-. Page ot Joc.vmen+eJ evideYGe
to hel.P      ~P\QtV\   the ..foptoote. See ff>th\h;t(A),

                        _C E BtrFfCA:tE Of SERVl('E    ,
   B"   M'/   hand 1 do swenrtha\ a iTo~ u~ ea-red            Cc:JPil   ~
th!tS ..Porego·)),g d&t,:rf()ent Was MO\i Ieel io -the \-lon,qJvdQe
 DWJ:"G l-\J _L. j\Ht--~t;R !J\:f\1 the ProP(!r Posfc:\9~ ~ tta.<:l\~~) .
+o the -J.tJD J VD'IC!RL .DISTRict CDOe.T Df QtaloK.E<: (OUtrfl/ 1/
 a+ 1'35 s. IV'loh~ :S+·) p,o,Bo>C J..87i R'U!SK/TX·~ 75_7S5·lAiW
 to M£. RACHf:L L, Plt1To~, Pf5+riG+ ffitotne"', f,o>Box45t>
  R aJsK ,T;x., ·75795 an th"•~ -4-l\e ~ J..Cl.\J ~Xuoe~ ,lbl~~
       •




                                              COURT OF APPEALS

                TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                      JUDGMENT.

                                                         JUNE 3, 2015


                                                    NO. 12-15-00142-CR


                                                    JEFFREY L. WARD,
                                                         Relator
                                                                          v.                      '
                                               HON. DWIGHT L. PHIFER,
                                                     Respondent


                                             Appeal from the 2nd District Court
                                    of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 11965(c))                                      \



                          ON THIS DAY came to be heard the                            petitio~          for writ of mandamus· filed by
           JEFFREY L. WARD; who is the relator ip Cause No. 11965(c), pending on the docket of the
                                      '                               ~                          '.,.

           2nd Judicial Dis.trict Court of Cherokee County, Texas. Said petition fo~ Wl"it of mandamus
           having"'been filed herein on June 1, 2015, and the same having been duly cons~dered, because it
                                                         .   ~   '.
           is the opinion of this Court that this court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus
           in this proceeding and that it should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is therefore
           CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be,
           and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
                          By per curiam opinion.
                          Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J.,      Hoyl~~i·       and Neeley, J.
                                                                          '!.




' -.
