82 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Alfreda RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-16757.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 26, 1996.*Decided April 1, 1996.

Before:  GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


1
MEMORANDUM**


2
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on October 3, 1994.  See Mason v. Genisco Tech.  Corp., 960 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir.1992);  Townsel v. County of Contra Costa, 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir.1987).


3
AFFIRMED.



*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4


**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3


