
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                 FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-2063                               FRANK P. GIFFORD, ET AL.,                                     Appellants,                                          v.                                  KEY BANK OF MAINE,                                      Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                     [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Frank Gifford and Elaine Gifford on brief pro se.            _____________     ______________            Jana S. Stabile and Michael S. Haenn on brief for appellee.            _______________     ________________                                 ____________________                                     July 7, 1994                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  Appellants,  former chapter 7 debtors,                      __________            appeal  a district court  order affirming a  bankruptcy court            order  dismissing appellants' second  motion to  reopen their            chapter  7  proceedings,   this  time  for  the   purpose  of            challenging appellee's  right  to  enforce  its  real  estate            mortgage against debtors' residence.  Upon careful review, we            summarily  affirm  the  dismissal order  as  appellants  have            demonstrated no abuse of discretion.                      Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.                      ________   ___                                         -2-
