

People v Spitzer (2015 NY Slip Op 05705)





People v Spitzer


2015 NY Slip Op 05705


Decided on July 1, 2015


Appellate Division, Second Department


Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.


This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.



Decided on July 1, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
PETER B. SKELOS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.


2012-05370
 (Ind. No. 11-00289)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vShaul Spitzer, appellant.


Gribetz & Loewenberg, PLLC, New City, N.Y. (Deborah Wolikow Loewenberg of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), imposed April 17, 2012, upon his conviction of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty.
ORDERED that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Criminal Procedure Law 720.20(1) requires "that there be a youthful offender determination in every case where the defendant is eligible, even where the defendant fails to request it, or agrees to forego it as part of a plea bargain" (People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 501). Here, as the People correctly concede, the record does not demonstrate that the County Court considered whether the defendant, who was 18 years old at the time he committed the crime of assault in the first degree, a class B violent felony, should be treated as a youthful offender (see id., at 502-503; People v Stevens, 127 AD3d 791; People v Ojomo, 126 AD3d 1011; People v Ramirez, 115 AD3d 992, 993; People v Tyler, 110 AD3d 745, 746). Accordingly, the defendant's sentence must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for resentencing after determining whether the defendant should be adjudicated a youthful offender. We express no opinion as to whether the County Court should afford youthful offender status to the defendant.
ENG, P.J., SKELOS, AUSTIN, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court


