    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 19-0582V
                                         UNPUBLISHED


    THE ESTATE OF APOLINAR HASEM                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    PERDOMO FELIZ, by and through
    Administrator, BIENCHIS Y. ESTEVA-                        Filed: May 19, 2020
    FELIZ,
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                         Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                                        Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                              Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                        Respondent.


John Richard Taylor, Zaytoun Law Firm, Raleigh, NC, for petitioner.

Dhairya Divyakant Jani, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                     RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

      On April 17, 2019, the Estate of Apolina Hasem Perdomo Feliz, by and through
Administrator Biechis Y.L Esteva-Feliz, filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that, due to a March 12, 2017 influenza (“flu”)
vaccine, Apolinar Hasem Perdomo Feliz suffered from Guillain-Barre syndrome
(“GBS”), which led to his subsequent death on April 21, 2017 Petition at 1, 9-12. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
       On May 15, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in
the Vaccine Injury Table and Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for GBS. Id. at 5.
Respondent states that the scope of damages to be awarded “is limited to the
decedent’s GBS and its related sequelae only.” Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                   s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Chief Special Master




                                              2
