       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

              IN RE DAVID M. PROKOP
                ______________________

                      2014-1423
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in serial No.
90/012,124.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    KEVIN A. ZECK, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Wash-
ington, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was
RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM.

    MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa-
tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan
K. Kelley, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor,
and FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 January 12, 2015              /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court
