
USCA1 Opinion

	




        November 21, 1995       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                            ____________________        No. 95-1087                                     UNITED STATES,                                      Appellee,                                          v.                                 CESAR RAMON ROBLES,                                Defendant, Appellant.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                          __________________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ____________________            Joel D. Landry on brief for appellant.            ______________            Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney,  and Zechariah Chafee,            __________________                               ________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per  Curiam.   In this  appeal, Cesar  Roman Robles                      ___________            challenges  the  district court's  denial  of  his motion  to            dismiss his  indictment for having  illegally reentered  this            country after having been deported.  See 8 U.S.C.   1326.  We                                                 ___            affirm  essentially for  the  reasons given  in the  district            court's  order, finding  Robles'  appellate  arguments to  be            without merit.  See Loc. R. 27.1.                            ___                      Affirmed.                      _________                                         -2-
