                                   NO. 07-05-0404-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL A

                                   JANUARY 17, 2006

                          ______________________________

                         BRETT THOMAS BAIRD, APPELLANT

                                            V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
                        _________________________________

         FROM THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT #3 OF DENTON COUNTY;

             NO. 2004-09096-C; HONORABLE DAVID D. GARCIA, JUDGE
                       _______________________________


Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.


                            ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND


       Appellant Brett Thomas Baird has given notice of appeal from a Judgment of

Community Supervision for the offense of Duty on Striking Fixture or Highway Landscaping.

The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk’s record on September 23,

2005. The trial court reporter’s record was filed on November 15, 2005.


       By letter dated December 28, 2005, the appellate clerk reminded counsel for

appellant that appellant’s brief was due on December 15, 2005, and that neither the brief
nor a motion for a further extension of time had been received. Counsel for appellant was

further advised by such letter that if no response to the letter was received by January 6,

2006, the appeal would be abated to the trial court for hearing pursuant to Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b). No response has been received.


       Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court. TEX .

R. APP . P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately

cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine:


       (1)    whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal;
       (2)    if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, then whether appellant
              is indigent, and if not indigent, whether counsel for appellant has
              abandoned the appeal;
       (3)    if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant’s
              present counsel should be replaced; and
       (4)    what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of
              appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal
              if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant
              desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be
              diligently pursued.


If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the

court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar

of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney.


       In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental




                                              2
reporter’s record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court

no later than February 17, 2006.




                                                 Per Curiam




Do not publish.




                                            3
