












 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   NUMBER
13-01-458-CV
 
                             COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                   THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                                CORPUS
CHRISTI
___________________________________________________________________
 
JESSE ELEAZAR HERNANDEZ,                                               Appellant,
 
                                                   v.
 
FROST NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.,                                          Appellees.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                        On
appeal from the 206th District Court
                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________
 
                                   O
P I N I O N
 
                   Before
Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
                                       Opinion
Per Curiam
 
 




Appellant, Jesse Eleazar Hernandez, perfected an appeal from a
judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause
number C-396-01-D.  On December 3, 2001,
this Court marked appellant=s brief Areceived.@  However, because the brief did not comply
with rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we advised appellant
it would be necessary for him to file an amended brief within ten days.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 38.1.  Appellant timely
tendered his amended brief on December 14, 2001; however, this brief also
failed to comply with the rules of appellate procedure.  See id.  Appellant was again advised that his brief
failed to comply with Tex. R. App. P.
38.1, and was advised that it would be necessary for him to file an amended
brief.  Appellant tendered an amended
brief on March 14, 2002; however, this brief also failed to comply with the
rules of appellate procedure.  On May 7,
2002, appellant was further advised in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.3 that, if a proper appellate brief was not filed by May 22, 2002,
the appeal would be dismissed for failure to comply with the rules of appellate
procedure and this court=s order.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3.  Appellant failed
to tender a proper brief by May 22, 2002.
Accordingly, the Court, having considered the documents on file and
appellant=s failure to file a
proper appellate brief, is of the opinion that the appeal should be
dismissed.  The appeal is hereby
dismissed.
 
PER
CURIAM
Do not
publish.
Tex.
R. App. P.
47.3.
 
Opinion delivered and
filed
this 27th day of June,
2002.
 

