United States Court of Appeals
         For the Eighth Circuit
     ___________________________

             No. 16-4285
     ___________________________

             Eugene H. Mathison

    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                        v.

          United States of America

    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
      ___________________________

             No. 16-4286
     ___________________________

             Eugene H. Mathison

    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                        v.

          United States of America

    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                   ____________

 Appeals from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
                ____________

          Submitted: July 18, 2017
            Filed: July 26, 2017
               [Unpublished]
               ____________
Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In these consolidated cases, Eugene Mathison appeals following the district
court’s1 denial of his petitions for coram nobis relief. Upon careful review, we
conclude that the district court properly denied relief. See United States v.
Camacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review; coram
nobis writ should be granted only under circumstances compelling such action to
achieve justice and to correct errors of most fundamental character); Azzone v.
United States, 341 F.2d 417, 419-20 (8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (coram nobis
petitioner not entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved either on
direct appeal or in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.

                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.

                                         -2-
