
USCA1 Opinion

	




          June 24, 1996                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-2110                               WALTER R. SIMPSON, JR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                             GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                    [Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Walter R. Simpson, Jr. on brief pro se.            ______________________            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department            _________________        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.   We  affirm the judgment  substantially for                 __________            the reasons recited  in the  magistrate-judge's report  dated            August  11, 1995.   See also  Figueroa v. Vose,  81 F.3d 147,                                ________  ________    ____            1996  WL  136891  (1st   Cir.  1996)  (per  curiam)  (table).            Inasmuch  as plaintiff  did not incur  any loss  of good-time            credits,  we voice no opinion  as to whether  such a sanction            might give rise to a liberty interest under Sandin v. Conner,                                                        ______    ______            115 S. Ct. 2293 (1995).                   Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.                 ____________________________                                         -2-
