




Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 26, 2006







Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed October 26, 2006.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-06-00120-CR
____________
 
CARLOS PALACIOS,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 351st District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
1044497
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant
entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly
weapon.  On January 11, 2006, the trial court sentenced appellant to
confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal.




Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and was given the opportunity to file a pro se
response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim.
App.1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have
carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October
26, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).

