                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 01-41008
                          Conference Calendar



RANDY JOE WHITE,

                                           Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ERNEST V. CHANDLER,

                                           Respondent-Appellee.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 1:01-CV-325
                       --------------------
                         February 20, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Randy Joe White, federal prisoner # 61041-180, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.    He argues that his

sentence was improperly enhanced by his prior burglary conviction

under the Sentencing Guidelines because that conviction was not a

“crime of violence” within the meaning of the Armed Career

Criminals Act.    White does not renew his challenge to his

sentence and indictment based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), and that claim is waived.     See Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-41008
                                -2-

     White’s challenge to the calculation of his sentence under

the guidelines is a nonconstitutional one which could have been

raised on direct appeal and thus could not have been considered

in a § 2255 motion.   See United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281,

289 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Towe, 26 F.3d 614, 616 (5th

Cir. 1994).   Because he could not raise it a § 2255 motion, a

fortiori, White is precluded from raising the claim in this

§ 2241 petition.   The district court’s dismissal of the petition

is therefore AFFIRMED.
