
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 96-1202                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Plaintiff, Appellee,                                          v.                        THE ONE-SIXTH SHARE OF JAMES J. BULGER                        IN ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE PROCEEDS OF                      MASS MILLIONS LOTTERY TICKET NO. M246233,                      REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF MICHAEL LINSKEY,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                                    JEAN HOLLAND,                                 Claimant, Appellant.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                                 ____________________               Martin S.  Cosgrove, with whom Cosgrove,  Eisenberg & Kiley,               ___________________            _____________________________          P.C. was on brief, for appellant.          ____               Richard L. Hoffman, Assistant  United States Attorney,  with               __________________          whom Donald K. Stern,  United States Attorney, was on  brief, for               _______________          the United States.                                 ____________________                                  November 13, 1996                                 ____________________                    Per  Curiam.   On this  record, the  putative claimant,                    Per  Curiam.                    ___________          appellant  here, lacks standing to file a  claim or object to the          forfeiture.   Consequently,  the  district court  did not  err in          granting  the  government's motion  to  dismiss her  claim.   The          appellant's request for a stay  pending the determination of  her          appeal  from the  denial of  her application  to be  appointed as          receiver for James  J. Bulger, now  pending in the  Massachusetts          Appeals  Court, is denied, as  she never timely  requested such a          stay  in the  district court.   Should  the appellant  eventually          succeed in securing an  appointment as receiver, she may  move in          the  district court under Fed.  R. Civ. P.  60(b) for appropriate          relief from the federal judgment.                    We need go no further.  The judgment is          Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.          ________                                          2
