[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 124 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2010-Ohio-1049.]




                        DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARGOLIS.
                      [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis,
                        124 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2010-Ohio-1049.]
  (No. 2006-2331 — Submitted February 25, 2010 — Decided March 4, 2010.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Loren Jonathan Margolis, Attorney
Registration No.0007957, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 18, 2007,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the
practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 114 Ohio
St.3d 165, 2007-Ohio-3607, 870 N.E.2d 1158.
        MOYER,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG       STRATTON,       O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                               ______________________
