                          NUMBER 13-16-00065-CV

                          COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

YURIE JAH YOUNG,                                                       Appellant,

                                        v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF
CRYSTAL JENKINS F/K/A CRYSTAL YOUNG,                Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 117th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
              Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Yurie Jah Young, appealed a judgment entered by the 117th District

Court of Nueces County, Texas. On January 27, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.5.   See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5.    The Clerk directed appellant to file an
amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of

that notice. On March 7, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been

corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not

cured within ten days. To date, the defect has not been corrected, and the deputy clerk

has further informed this Court that appellant has failed to request and make payment

arrangements for the clerk’s record in this cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

       On February 12, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant of the failure to

remit a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was

subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt

of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

correct the defect and pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of

prosecution.

                                                                      PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
14th day of April, 2016.




                                             2
