        SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
           Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1316
CAF 12-01175
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.


IN THE MATTER OF AMODEA D. AND BARON D.
---------------------------------------------
GENESEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,     MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;

JASON D., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


FARES A. RUMI, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

CHARLES N. ZAMBITO, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (PAULA A. CAMPBELL OF
COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

LINDA M. JONES, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BATAVIA


     Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R.
Adams, J.), entered June 19, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family
Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged that
respondent had neglected the subject children.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed without costs.

     Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to article 10 of the
Family Court Act, respondent father appeals from an order of fact-
finding and disposition adjudging that he neglected the subject
children. Contrary to the father’s contention, Family Court’s finding
of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family
Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [B]; 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Jayden B. [Erica
R.], 91 AD3d 1344, 1345). The testimony presented at the fact-finding
hearing established that one child witnessed, and the other was in
proximity to, a physical altercation between the parties wherein the
father kicked the mother in the face and placed his hands around her
neck to prevent her from breathing. The child who witnessed the
altercation told a caseworker for petitioner later that day that she
was “very sad and scared” upon seeing the mother’s bloodied face after
the altercation, and both children indicated to the caseworker that
they were afraid of the father. We conclude that the children’s
proximity to the altercation, “together with the evidence of a pattern
of ongoing domestic violence in the home, placed [the children] in
imminent risk of emotional harm” (Jayden B., 91 AD3d at 1345). We
reject the father’s further contention that he was denied effective
assistance of counsel, which is “impermissibly based on speculation,
i.e., that favorable evidence could and should have been offered on
his behalf” (Matter of Devonte M.T. [Leroy T.], 79 AD3d 1818, 1819).
                                 -2-                         1316
                                                        CAF 12-01175

Indeed, “ ‘[i]t is not the role of this Court to second-guess the
attorney’s tactics or trial strategy’ ” (Matter of Derrick C., 52 AD3d
1325, 1326, lv denied 11 NY3d 705).




Entered:   December 27, 2013                   Frances E. Cafarell
                                               Clerk of the Court
