             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                            NOS. WR-89,752-01 AND WR-89,752-02


                           EX PARTE JAIME CUELLAR, Applicant


                ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NOS. 070471-01-D-WR AND 070472-01-D-WR
              IN THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY


       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two felony

offenses and sentenced to imprisonment.

       Applicant attempted to appeal, but his appeals were dismissed because the notices of appeal

had not been timely filed. See Cuellar v. State, Nos. 07-18-00392-CR; 07-18-00393-CR (Tex.

App.—Amarillo del. Nov. 26, 2018). Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal

through no fault of his own. This Court has held that trial counsel’s representation does not terminate

at the end of trial, and counsel cannot “bow out” of representation without notice to the trial court.
                                                                                                      2

Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2003), this Court outlined the steps trial counsel must take to preserve a defendant’s

appellate rights. This Court wrote:

       Trial counsel’s responsibilities consist of a two-step process. First, the attorney must
       ascertain whether the defendant wishes to appeal. The decision to appeal lies solely
       with the defendant.... If the defendant does not wish to appeal, trial counsel’s
       representation ends. If the defendant decides to appeal, the attorney must ensure that
       written notice of appeal is filed with the trial court. At this point, trial counsel has
       two options. He may sign the notice himself, in which case, he effectively
       “volunteers” to serve as appellate counsel. Alternatively, the defendant may file the
       notice pro se, which serves as “an indication that trial counsel ‘does not wish to
       pursue his client’s appeal.’” A “contemporaneous” presentation of the pro se notice
       with a motion to withdraw by trial counsel serves as actual notice to the trial court
       of the defendant’s desire to appeal.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). There is

no response from trial counsel in the habeas record or findings from the trial court. As we held in

Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim

that he was denied his right to appeal because the notices of appeal were not timely filed. To obtain

the response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to an appeal through no fault of his own. The trial court shall also make any

other findings it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s habeas claims.
                                                                                                     3

       These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: June 5, 2019
Do not publish
