              In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                      (Filed: July 11, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *                *      UNPUBLISHED
MICHELLE WILTON, on Behalf of              *
T.W., a minor,                             *
                                           *      No. 13-976V
              Petitioner,                  *
                                           *
v.                                         *      Special Master Dorsey
                                           *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *      Decision on Proffer; Damages;
                                           *      Hepatitis A Vaccine; Necrosis in
              Respondent.                  *      Left Arm.
                                           *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Cary S. Macy, Huntington Beach, CA, for petitioner.
Ann Martin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

                               DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

         On December 11, 2013, Michelle Wilton (“petitioner”), on behalf of T.W., a minor, filed
a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2
Petitioner alleges that T.W. suffered from necrosis in his left arm as a result of his receipt of a
Hepatitis A vaccination on January 21, 2011. On April 30, 2014, a Ruling on Entitlement was
issued based on respondent’s concession.

        On July 10, 2014, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation. Respondent
proffers that, based upon her review of the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002 § 205, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2006). In accordance with the
Vaccine Rules, each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by
that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or
confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Further, consistent with the rule
requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such material
will be deleted from public access.
2
  The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§
300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be
to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.
$5,021.75 in addition to an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in
Proffer Section I.C. Petitioner agrees with the amounts set forth in the Proffer. See Notice, filed
July 10, 2014.

       Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an
award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the
undersigned awards the following:

                A lump sum payment of $1,021.75.00, in the form of a check payable to
                petitioner;

                A lump sum payment of $4,000.00, in the form of a check payable to
                petitioner as guardian/ conservator of T.W.’s estate; 3 and

                An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in the
                Proffer’s Section I.C.

Proffer ¶ II.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith. 4


        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                  s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                    Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                    Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Proffer Section I.A., the lump sum of $4,000.00 “shall not be paid until petitioner provides
respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as guardian/ conservator of
T.W.’s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/
conservator of the Estate of T.W., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a
court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/ conservator of the Estate of T.W. upon submission of
written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.”
4
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                     2
          Case 1:13-vv-00976-UNJ Document 24 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 4



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                        OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
____________________________________
                                     )
MICHELLE WILTON, on behalf of T.W., )
a minor,                             )
                                     )
            Petitioner,             )
                                    )   No. 13-976V
       v.                           )   Special Master Dorsey
                                    )   ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
                                    )
            Respondent.             )
____________________________________)

             RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

       On December 11, 2013, Michelle Wilton (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation

under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended (“the Vaccine Act” or

“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34. The petition was filed on behalf of petitioner’s son,

T.W., alleging that he suffered necrosis in his upper left arm following receipt of a Hepatitis A

vaccination on January 21, 2011. Petitioner filed medical records and other documentation in

support of her claim on or about February 11, 2014. The Secretary of Health and Human

Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report on April 22, 2014, conceding that T.W.

suffered fat necrosis in his left upper arm that was caused in fact by his Hepatitis A vaccination,

and recommending that compensation be awarded. The Special Master issued a Ruling on

Entitlement on April 30, 2014, consistent with the concession made in Respondent’s Rule 4(c)

Report. Respondent hereby submits the following proffer regarding the award of compensation.

For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s Rule

4(c) Report and the Special Master’s April 30, 2014, decision.
            Case 1:13-vv-00976-UNJ Document 24 Filed 07/10/14 Page 2 of 4



I.     Items of Compensation and Form of the Award 1

       A.       Future Medical Care Expenses

       Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, T.W. should be awarded a

lump sum of $4,000.00 for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the

date of judgment, as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). The lump

sum should be paid to Michelle Wilton, petitioner, as guardian/conservator of the Estate of T.W.

The lump sum shall not be paid until petitioner provides respondent with documentation

establishing that she has been appointed as guardian/conservator of T.W.’s estate. If petitioner is

not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the Estate

of T.W., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of

competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the Estate of T.W. upon submission of

written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary. Petitioner agrees.

       B.       Lost Earnings

       Respondent proffers that based upon the evidence of record, T.W. is not likely to suffer a

loss of earnings as a result of his vaccine injury. Accordingly, T.W. should not be awarded lost

earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Petitioner agrees.

       C.       Pain and Suffering

       Respondent proffers that compensation for actual and projected pain and suffering, as

provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4), should be provided to T.W.

through respondent’s purchase of an annuity contract in an amount sufficient to provide future

payments to T.W. as follows:



1
 Should T.W. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for
appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses and future pain and suffering.
                                                 2
          Case 1:13-vv-00976-UNJ Document 24 Filed 07/10/14 Page 3 of 4



       (1) On January 17, 2027, a guaranteed lump sum payment of $24,250.00;

       (2) On January 17, 2028, a guaranteed lump sum payment of $24,250.00;

       (3) On January 17, 2029, a guaranteed lump sum payment of $24,250.00; and

       (4) On January 17, 2030, a guaranteed lump sum payment of $24,250.00.

The amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract to provide lump sum payments to T.W. as

described above will be paid to the life insurance company2 from which the annuity contract will

be purchased. 3 Should T.W. predecease the remittance of the guaranteed lump sum payments set

forth above, the remaining guaranteed payments shall be made to his estate. 4 Petitioner agrees.

       D.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses

       Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to T.W.’s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,021.75, made payable in a lump sum

payment to Michelle Wilton, petitioner. Petitioner agrees.

2
 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus,
exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have
one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

               a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;

               b. Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;

               c. Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
               AA, AA+, or AAA;

               d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability
               Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
3
 Petitioner authorizes the disclosure of certain documents filed by the petitioner in this case
consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
4
 Written notice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and to the Life Insurance
Company shall be provided within twenty (20) days of T.W.’s death.
                                                 3
            Case 1:13-vv-00976-UNJ Document 24 Filed 07/10/14 Page 4 of 4



       E.       Medicaid Lien

       Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to T.W.’s

vaccine-related injury.

II.    Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

       A.       Lump sum paid to petitioner, Michelle Wilton, as compensation for
                past unreimbursable medical expenses: $1,021.75;

       B.       Lump sum paid to petitioner, Michelle Wilton, as
                guardian/conservator of T.W.’s estate: $4,000.00; and

       C.       An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract
                described above in section I.C.

                                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                    STUART F. DELERY
                                                    Assistant Attorney General

                                                    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
                                                    Director
                                                    Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                    VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
                                                    Deputy Director
                                                    Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                    MICHAEL P. MILMOE
                                                    Senior Trial Counsel
                                                    Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                    s/ ANN D. MARTIN
                                                    ANN D. MARTIN
                                                    Senior Trial Attorney
                                                    Torts Branch, Civil Division
                                                    U.S. Department of Justice
                                                    P.O. Box 146
                                                    Benjamin Franklin Station
                                                    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
                                                    Tel.: (202) 307-1815

DATED: July 10, 2014



                                                4
