











IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,322




EX PARTE KEVIN PATRICK JACK, Applicant




ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 92-CR-0056 IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM BEXAR COUNTY




           Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.  Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).  Applicant was convicted of forgery and
sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment.  He did not appeal his conviction. 
            Applicant contends that his sentence is illegal because his criminal conduct constituted a
felony of the third degree, with a maximum punishment of ten years’ confinement, rather than a
felony of the second degree, for which he was sentenced.  The trial court entered findings of fact and
conclusions of law recommending that relief be granted.  Specifically, the Court found and
concluded that the version of the Texas Penal Code which applies to the offense Applicant pleaded
guilty to, namely: forgery by possessing a sight order for the payment of money, constitutes a third
degree felony.  See Tex. Penal Code § 32.12(d) (Vernon’s 1990).  The Court found further that
Applicant has served at least twelve years of his sentence.  We agree with the trial court’s findings
of fact and conclusions of law. 
            Relief is granted.  The judgment in Cause No. 92-CR-0056 in the 175th Judicial District
Court of Bexar County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Bexar
County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment.
            Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
 
Delivered: March 24, 2010
Do Not Publish
