i          i         i                                                                                 i        i        i




                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                No. 04-08-00160-CV

                     IN THE INTEREST OF A.V., R.G., AND G.S., CHILDREN

                         From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                     Trial Court No. 2006-PA-01822
                                Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

Opinion by:        Catherine Stone, Justice

Sitting:           Catherine Stone, Justice
                   Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
                   Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 19, 20008

AFFIRMED

           This is an appeal concerning the trial court’s termination of Lucy V.’s parental rights to her

children, A.V., R.G., and G.S.1 Lucy’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing

a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL

21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in

appeal from termination of parental rights).




         … To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the children by their initials and the children’s
           1

mother by her first name only. See T EX . F AM . C O D E A N N . § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2002).
                                                                                      04-08-00160-CV

       A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Lucy, who was advised of her right to examine

the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we

agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore

affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.



                                                       Catherine Stone, Justice




                                                 -2-
