Order entered September 24, 2015




                                            In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                          Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                     No. 05-15-00621-CR

                           BYRON KEITH BOOKER, Appellant

                                               V.

                             THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                      On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
                                   Dallas County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. F09-58130-U

                                           ORDER
       On August 10, 2015, the Court sent the trial court a letter stating the amended

certification reflecting appellant waived his right to appeal did not appear to be accurate.

Specifically, nothing in the written plea agreement form nor the reporter’s record from the

hearing on the State’s motion to proceed to adjudicate guilt showed appellant waived his right to

appeal. We asked the trial court to review the record and file an amended certification that

accurately reflects the proceedings or written documentation supporting the certification already

filed. To date, we have had no response from the trial court. Additionally, appellant’s brief is

overdue.

       Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to do the following.
    •   The trial court shall determine whether the certification that states appellant waived the
        right to appeal is supported by the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If the trial court
        determines that the certification is accurate, the trial court’s findings shall include
        specific references to the portions of the record that support the certification. If the trial
        court determines that appellant did not waive his right to appeal, the trial court is
        ORDERED to prepare an amended certification that accurately reflects the trial court
        proceedings regarding the hearing on the motion to adjudicate guilt.

    •   The trial court shall next determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this
        regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and
        determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is
        indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX.
        R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
        trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742
        S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is
        indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to
        assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

        We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. If the trial court prepares an amended certification of

appellant’s right to appeal, the supplemental record shall contain that amended certification.

        We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell,

Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to

counsel for all parties.

        We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received.

                                                       /s/    ADA BROWN
                                                              JUSTICE
