         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 17-0646V
                                    Filed: January 19, 2018
                                        UNPUBLISHED


    SUSAN CHATRIAND
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                        Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                                       Table Injury; Influenza Vaccine;
                                                             Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.


Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
       On May 16, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillian-Barre syndrome as a result of an
influenza vaccination she received on November 8, 2011. Petition at 1. Petitioner
further alleges that she received the vaccination in the United States, suffered the
effects of her injury for more than six months, and has not brought a civil action or
received compensation for her injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at 1, 6. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.



1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
        On January 19, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, respondent states that petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in
the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to
Interpretation. Id. at 3. Respondent further states that petitioner has satisfied the
Vaccine Act’s statute of limitations by filing within two years following revisions to the
Table concerning an injury that occurred less than eight years prior to the effective date
of the revision. Id. at 1.
     In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.


IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                    Nora Beth Dorsey
                                    Chief Special Master
