<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<META NAME="DATE" CONTENT="3/15/1996">
<TITLE>Gliddon                                                             </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>ON MOTION FOR REHEARING</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-94-00712-CR</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>Reverdy Hilmar Gliddon, Appellant</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 7440, HONORABLE CHARLES J. HEARNE, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	The State contends in two related arguments that this Court erred in holding that
the Double Jeopardy Clause bars appellant's prosecution.  First, the State argues, the record does
not establish that appellant owned the forfeited property; therefore, he could not have been
punished by its forfeiture.  <EM>See</EM> <EM>Ramirez v. State</EM>, Nos. 01-95-00636-CR and 01-95-00637-CR
(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] December 14, 1995, no pet. h.) (absent indication in record of
defendant's ownership interest in forfeited property, defendant is not punished by forfeiture of that
property).  The State claims in its second argument that Gliddon could not have been punished
by the forfeiture because no record evidence shows that Gliddon lawfully acquired the forfeited
property.  <EM>See Ex Parte Ariza</EM>, 913 S.W.2d 215, 221-22 n.3 (citing <EM>Tilley v. United States</EM>, 18
F.3d 295, 300 (5th Cir.), <EM>cert. denied</EM>, 115 S.Ct. 574 (1994), for proposition that owner of
unlawfully acquired forfeited property is not punished by its forfeiture).</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	These issues were not presented in either the State's or appellant's brief, and they
played no part in this Court's determination of this cause.  Accordingly, these issues are not
properly raised as points in support of the motion for rehearing, and we will not consider them. 
<EM>See</EM> Tex. R. App. P. 100(a).  We point out, however, that the record before us does indicate that
appellant owned the property forfeited.  The named defendants in the forfeiture proceedings,
appellant and Debra Faye Gliddon, admit in their Original Answer that they are the owners of the
forfeited property.  Additionally, appellant verified under oath the "Motion to Dismiss on Grounds
of Former Jeopardy," which stated that appellant was the owner of the forfeited property.</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	The motion for rehearing is overruled.</SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">					<SPAN STYLE="text-decoration: underline">                                                               </SPAN></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">					Bea Ann Smith, Justice</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Dally<STRONG><SUP>*</SUP></STRONG></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><SUP></SUP></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">State's Motion for Rehearing Overruled</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Filed:   March 27, 1996</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Do Not Publish     </SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><SUP></SUP></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG><SUP>*</SUP></STRONG></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><SUP></SUP>	Before Carl E. F. Dally, Judge (retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by assignment. 
<EM>See</EM> Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (West 1988).</SPAN></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
