              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                     __________________________

                           No. 97-41385

                     __________________________


IN THE MATTER OF: DANIS TUCKER,
                                                             Debtor
-------------------------------

TYLER TUCKER; HELEN TUCKER,

                                                       Appellants
versus

MICHAEL BOUDLOCHE,
                                                         Appellee
*****************************************************************
IN THE MATTER OF: DANIS R. TUCKER, doing
business as Ralph’s Foods Company,
                                                           Debtor
-------------------------------
DANIS R. TUCKER,

                                                           Appellant
versus

MICHAEL BOUDLOCHE, Trustee, Chapter 7; MARY ALICE GARAY,

                                                        Appellees
*****************************************************************
IN THE MATTER OF: DANIS R. TUCKER, doing
business as Ralph’s Foods Company,
                                                           Debtor
-------------------------------
DANIS R. TUCKER,

                                                           Appellant
versus

MICHAEL BOUDLOCHE, Trustee, Chapter 7;
MARY ALICE GARAY,

                                                           Appellees
          ___________________________________________________

             Appeals from the United States District Court
                   For the Southern District of Texas
                              (C-97-CV-345)
          ___________________________________________________
                               May 5, 2000

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

       This     bankruptcy        appeal      involves       questions       of    denial        of

discharge, denial of homestead claim, inclusion of property in the

bankruptcy estate, rejection of proffered disclaimer as invalid,

and partial determination of mootness.                           We have reviewed the

material facts, as reflected by the record on appeal, in light of

the pertinent law as discussed in the appellate briefs of the

parties; and we have now considered the facts and the law in the

context of oral argument by able counsel for the parties.                                At the

end of the day we are firmly convinced that no reversible error was

committed by the bankruptcy court or the district court and that

all rulings and judgments of those courts should be and hereby are,

in all respects,

AFFIRMED.




   Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
