                                                                               FILED
                                                                          December 5, 2016

                                                                              IN COURT OF.
                                                                      1\ ORKE.R S' C01JPENSATIO
                                                                                 C1_'\11lS

                                                                              Tmu!·l :41 PM
           TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
          IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                           AT NASHVILLE

Ted Davenport,                               )   Docket No.: 2016-06-1403
           Employee,                         )
v.                                           )   State File No.: 56614-2016
Advanced Remodeling and Floor                )
Covering, LLC,                               )   Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
            Employer.                        )
                                             )

                           EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER


        This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on
November 21, 2016, upon the Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Ted Davenport
under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239 (2016) seeking medical and
temporary disability benefits. The central legal issue is whether Mr. Davenport suffered
an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment with
Advanced Remodeling and Floor Covering, LLC. The Court holds he is likely to prevail
at a hearing on the merits that he suffered a compensable injury and is entitled to medical
benefits and a portion of the temporary disability benefits he requested.

                                    History of Claim

       The testimony and exhibits established the following facts at the Expedited
Hearing. Mr. Davenport, a resident of Dickson County, worked for Advanced
Remodeling as a laborer installing hardwood flooring at an agreed rate of fifteen dollars
per hour for forty hours per week. He testified that, on June 16, 2016, while "cutting a
notch out in a vent" with a table saw with no guard, a board kicked back, causing him to
accidentally catch three fingers of his left hand in the saw. Additionally, the board hit
him on his right ribs. (Ex. 3 at 1.) An ambulance transported Mr. Davenport to
Vanderbilt University Hospital. (Ex. 3 at 1.) Mr. Davenport introduced into evidence
only the discharge instructions from this treatment, which indicate providers surgically
repaired the three amputated fingers. (See generally Ex. 2 at 1-5.) They also excused
him from work from June 16-23. !d. at 3.


                                             1
        After his release from the hospital, Mr. Davenport's condition worsened,
prompting him to seek treatment at Horizon Medical Center on July 1. (Ex. 3 at 2.) He
submitted no records of this encounter but testified providers there ultimately
recommended he return to Vanderbilt. Mr. Davenport was hospitalized for eleven days.
Discharge records from Vanderbilt dated July 12 indicate Mr. Davenport was treated for
chest trauma and underwent a thoracotomy. !d. at 9, 8. The discharge notes include an
excuse restricting him from all work from July 12 until July 26 and allowing a return to
light duty "when no longer taking narcotic pain medications, otherwise return to work
will be determined at your follow up appointment." !d. at 11. Mr. Davenport testified he
is presently under the care of Dr. Jonathan Nesbitt at Vanderbilt, who placed him on
light-duty restrictions approximately "two weeks ago," on November 7. He did not
introduce medical records into evidence that document the date he was placed on light
duty. Mr. Davenport is not currently working. He explained that, "In my kind of work,
there is no light duty," noting that he works in construction and tree-trimming.

       Mr. Davenport testified he incurred substantial medical bills for treatment, to
include: 1) a statement from Dickson County EMS in the amount of $1,287.20 for
transporting him to Vanderbilt on June 16; 2) $4,151.27 to Vanderbilt for the June 16,
2016 treatment; and 3) $181,789.39 to Vanderbilt for the July 1-12 surgery and
hospitalization. (Exs. 4, 12, 13.)

       With regard to the circumstances of his employment, according to Mr. Davenport,
Advanced Remodeling is owned by Aaron Waldrum, who refused to pay for his medical
care or any lost wages. (Ex. 3 at 4.) Mr. Davenport testified he came under Advanced
Remodeling's employ after a face-to-face conversation with Mr. Waldrum and
completion of a written employment application. Mr. Davenport asked at that time if Mr.
Waldrum would withhold taxes and if Advanced Remodeling had workers' compensation
insurance, to which Mr. Waldrum responded in the affirmative. Per Mr. Davenport's
testimony, Mr. Waldrum picked him up to go to the jobsite, thereby controlling the hours
of work; he provided all the tools and directed the work; he intended Mr. Davenport to
work for him exclusively; and Mr. Davenport had no power to hire or fire other
employees.

       The Bureau of Workers' Compensation initially contacted Advanced Remodeling
about this matter on July 26 to request that it file a First Report of Injury. (Ex. 6.) The
Bureau received no response. Mr. Davenport filed a Petition for Benefit Determination
on July 28. (T.R. 1.)

       Afterward, the Bureau's Uninsured Employers Fund (UEF) conducted an
investigation regarding whether Advanced Remodeling carried workers' compensation
insurance, resulting in an Expedited Request for Investigation. (Ex. 5.) In that report
dated August 18, 2016, the UEF investigator concluded there was no workers'
compensation policy. !d. at 2. Further, Mr. Waldrum characterized Mr. Davenport as a

                                             2
"subcontractor and that he was to have his own insurance." !d. at 3. The UEF
investigator further concluded, "Mr. Waldrum is a Construction Service Provider and he
is not on the workers comp exempt registry[.]" !d. at 4. The UEF investigator
additionally made .a "seven factors determination" as follows:
                                      SEVEN FACTOR$ DDERMINATION
                  1)    MR. WALDRUM SCHEDULED ALL WORKING HOURS. HE ALSO PICKED UP
                       THE WORKER BECAUSE HE HAD NO TRANSPORTION.
                  2)   RIGHT OF TERMINATION-MR. WALDRUM HAD THE RIGHT OF
                       TERMINATION
                  3)   METHOD OF PAYMENT -MR. WALDRUM NEVER PAID MR. DAVENPORT
                       FOR HIS WORK SO WE ARE UNSURE HOW HE PAID. THE AGREEMENT WAS
                       HOURLY WAGES.
                  4)   FREEDOM TO SELECT AND HIRE HELPERS-MR. WALDRUM CONTROLLED.
                  5)   FURNISHING OF TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT-MR. WALDRUM WOULD
                       FURNISH THE TOOLS.
                                                                    -....
                  6)   SELF-SCHEDULING OF WORKING HOURS-MR. WALDRUM WOULD
                       SCHEDULING THE WORKING HOURS.
                  7)   THE FREEDOM TO OFFER SERVICES TO OTHER ENTITIES-NO




!d. at 4-5. (Emphasis in original.)

       The Bureau unsuccessfully attempted to engage Mr. Waldrum's participation in
this process. The Mediator notified the parties via letter that she filed a Dispute
Certification Notice (Ex. 7); Mr. Waldrum did not respond. The Clerk of Court sent a
Notice of Expedited Hearing (T.R. 4); Mr. Waldrum filed nothing in response. The Clerk
emailed Mr. Waldrum to request dates of his availability for an expedited hearing, to
which he responded via email, "I am no longer in business for myself. I have a work
schedule with a company I work for and just started so if I take off I may loose [sic] my
job. I'm broke. So I can't pay his bills for him." (Ex. 8.) The Clerk subsequently ·sent
an email requesting that the parties confirm they received the Notice of Expedited
Hearing (Ex. 9); Mr. Waldrum did not reply. As a final attempt, the Clerk resent the
hearing notice via FedEx overnight, which was delivered in advance of the hearing.
(Exs. 10, 11.) Mr. Waldrum did not appear at the Expedited Hearing, where Mr.
Davenport requested an Order requiring Advanced Remodeling to provide medical and
temporary disability benefits.

                          Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

        In order to grant the relief Mr. Davenport seeks, the Court must apply the
following legal principles. Mr. Davenport bears the burden of proof on all prima facie
elements of his workers' compensation claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2016);
see also Buchanan v. Car/ex Glass Co., No. 2016-01-0012, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App.
Bd. LEXIS 39, at *5 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2016). He need not
prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain
relief at an expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-
0063, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App.
                                                3
Bd. Mar. 27, 2016). At an expedited hearing, Mr. Davenport has the burden to come
forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court can determine he is likely to
prevail at a hearing on the merits. !d.

        As an initial matter, the Court holds Advanced Remodeling received adequate
notice of Mr. Davenport's claim and these proceedings. The Bureau made numerous
attempts to contact Mr. Waldrum, who apparently serves as Advanced Remodeling's sole
principal. The Court finds the only instance Mr. Waldrum responded regarding this case
was the October 23 email to the Court Clerk. In that communication, he neither denied
ownership of Advanced Remodeling nor that Mr. Davenport suffered injury while under
Advanced Remodeling's employ. Rather, he conveyed he could not attend a hearing due
to his employment and he was "broke" and unable to pay Mr. Davenport's bills.

      As for the relationship between Mr. Davenport and Advanced Remodeling, the
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act provides:

      In a work relationship, in order to determine whether an individual is an
      "employee," or whether an individual is a "subcontractor" or an
      "independent contractor," the following factors shall be considered:
      (a)   The right to control the conduct of the work;
      (b)   The right of termination;
      (c)   The method of payment;
      (d)   The freedom to select and hire helpers;
      (e)   The furnishing of tools and equipment;
      (f)   Self-scheduling of working hours; and
      (g)   The freedom to offer services to other entities.

Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-102(12)(D)(i) (2016).

       Based upon Mr. Davenport's uncontroverted testimony at the Expedited Hearing,
as well as the UEF investigator's findings, the Court holds he was an employee of
Advanced Remodeling rather than a subcontractor or independent contractor. Advanced
Remodeling, through Mr. Waldrum, hired him after he completed a written application,
the typical means by which employment is sought. Mr. Davenport performed work at an
hourly wage, for a forty-hour work week, which precluded other employment. Advanced
Remodeling provided the tools, set the work hours and did all hiring and firing. It
appears Advanced Remodeling and Mr. Waldrum controlled all aspects of the worksite.
The Court further finds, based upon the UEF investigator's findings, that Advanced
Remodeling is a construction services provider as generally defined in Tennessee Code
Annotated section 50-6-901(5) and that it failed to secure workers' compensation
insurance as required by section 50-6-902(a).

      With regard to the compensability of Mr. Davenport's claim, the Workers'

                                          4
Compensation Law defines an "injury" as "an injury by accident ... arising primarily out
of and in the course and scope of employment that causes . . . the need for medical
treatment." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-1 02(14) (20 16). Further, an injury is "accidental"
only if the injury is caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily out
of and in the course and scope of employment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A)
(2016). Arising out of employment refers to causation. Reeser v. Yellow Freight Sys.,
Inc., 938 S.W.2d 690, 692 (Tenn. 1997). An injury arises out of employment when there
is a causal connection between the conditions under which the work is required to be
performed and the resulting injury. Fritts v. Safety Nat'l Cas. Corp., 163 S.W.3d 673,
678 (Tenn. 2005).

       Here, Mr. Davenport's undisputed testimony proves that, while under Advanced
Remodeling's employ on June 16, he injured his hand and ribs, resulting in the need to
surgically repair three amputated fingers and to later undergo a thoracotomy for chest
trauma. While the medical records introduced at the hearing are scant, they nonetheless
bolster his account of how he became injured, and he presented as an honest and credible
witness. Accordingly, the Court holds Mr. Davenport is likely to pevail at a hearing on
the merits that he sustained an accidental injury caused by a specific incident arising
primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

                                      Requested Relief

       Turning first to the medical benefits Mr. Davenport seeks, the Court holds that,
under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(l)(A) (2016), Advanced
Remodeling must provide him with past and continuing reasonable and necessary
medical treatment related to the injury. The Court appoints Dr. Nesbitt as the authorized
treating physician. The Court further finds treatment with Vanderbilt, Horizon Medical
Center and Dr. Nesbitt appropriate because Advanced Remodeling failed to provide Mr.
Davenport medical care, which required him to seek treatment on his own. See Young v.
Young Electric, No. 2016-06-0860, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16
(Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. May 25, 2016). The Court likewise holds Advanced
Remodeling is responsible for payment of the Dickson County EMS bill for
transportation to Vanderbilt on June 16 as well as sums owed to Horizon Medical Center,
Dr. Nesbitt and Vanderbilt.

       Next, Mr. Davenport seeks temporary disability benefits. In Jones v. Crencor, No.
2016-06-0332, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Tenn. Workers' Comp.
App. Bd. Dec. 11, 2016), the Appeals Board, citing Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d
953, 955 (Tenn. 1978), held: "An injured worker is eligible for temporary disability
benefits if: (1) the worker became disabled from working due to a compensable injury;
(2) there is a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the
worker established the duration of the period of disability." Temporary total disability


                                              5
benefits are calculated at a rate of sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the employee's
average weekly wages. Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-207(l)(A) (2016).

       Here, the Court finds Mr. Davenport became totally disabled at work due to a
compensable injury and a causal connection exists between the injury and his inability to
work. With regard to the remaining factor for consideration, the duration of disability,
Mr. Davenport introduced medical records into evidence excusing him from work from
June 16-23 (eight days). He credibly testified he returned to Vanderbilt on July 1 for
inpatient treatment until July 12, which records additionally excuse him from work from
July 12-26 (twenty-six days). Accordingly, the Court concludes that at this time, Mr.
Davenport satisfied all the criteria from Jones and is likely to prevail at a hearing on the
merits regarding his entitlement to temporary total disability benefits for these two
timeframes. At the fifteen-dollar hourly wage for a forty-hour work week, Mr.
Davenport's average weekly wage is $600, so that his compensation rate is $400 per
week, or $57.14 per day. Advanced Remodeling is obligated to pay him thirty-four days
of disability benefits totaling $1,942.84.

    . As for his status beyond those dates, Mr. Davenport contended he was totally
disabled until November 7, 2016, when Dr. Nesbitt implemented light-duty restrictions.
However, he failed to submit any medical evidence to support this claim. Although the
Court finds him credible, Mr. Davenport's testimony alone is an insufficient basis to
establish the duration of disability for that time period. Mr. Davenport may obtain
additional medical records documenting the restrictions. Should he do so, he may file
copies of the records along with another Request for Expedited Hearing, indicating that
the Court may revisit the issue as a review of the file rather than conducting an in-person
evidentiary hearing. 1

       Finally, although this Court holds Advanced Remodeling must provide Mr.
Davenport with past and ongoing medical benefits as well as past temporary total
disability benefits, it is unclear whether payment will be forthcoming, as Advanced
Remodeling did not have workers' compensation insurance at the time of the accident,
nor has Mr. Waldrum made any effort to participate in this case. Under Tennessee Code
Annotated section 50-6-802(e)(1) (20 16), the Bureau has discretion to pay limited
temporary disability and medical benefits to employees who have established medical
causation of their injuries and meet the following criteria:

        (1) The employee worked for an employer who failed to carry workers'
            compensation insurance;
        (2) The employee suffered an injury primarily arising in the course and

1
  Mr. Davenport filed a letter on November 30, 2016, from Karen Pinkard, RN, BSN, indicating that he underwent
surgery on September 19, 2016, and had a post-operative appointment on November 8, 2016. Because the letter was
not admitted into evidence at the Expedited Hearing, the Court cannot consider it at this time. The Court notes that
the letter is insufficient to establish the duration of disability after July 26, 2016.

                                                         6
           scope of employment after July 1, 20 16;
       (3) The employee was a Tennessee resident on the date of the injury; and
       (4) The employee provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and the
           employer's failure to provide workers' compensation insurance no more
           than sixty days after the injury occurred.

Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-801(d)(l)-(4) (2016).

       Based upon the evidence, the Court holds Mr. Davenport was a Tennessee resident
on June 16 and was an employee of Advanced Remodeling on that date for purposes of
the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law. As of June 16, Advanced Remodeling
failed to secure insurance for payment of workers' compensation benefits. Mr.
Davenport came forward with sufficient evidence for the Court to find he is likely to
prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving that he suffered an injury after July 1, 2016,
primarily within the course and scope of employment. At that time, Advanced
Remodeling failed to provide workers' compensation insurance and likewise has paid no
medical or temporary disability benefits. Further, Mr. Davenport provided notice to the
Bureau of the injury and of the failure of the employer to secure the payment of
compensation on July 28, within sixty days after the date of injury. Accordingly, the
Court concludes he is eligible to receive medical and past temporary total disability
benefits from the Uninsured Employers Fund.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

   1. Advanced Remodeling shall pay for past and ongoing medical care for Mr.
      Davenport's injuries, including the sums owed to Dickson County EMS, Horizon
      Medical Center and Vanderbilt. Dr. Jonathan Nesbitt shall continue to serve as the
      authorized treating physician. Mr. Davenport or the medical providers shall
      furnish any other reasonable, necessary and related bills to Advanced Remodeling
      for prompt payment.

   2. Mr. Davenport is entitled to past temporary total disability payments in the amount
      of$1,942.84, payable immediately as a lump sum.

   3. Mr. Davenport is eligible to receive medical and temporary disability benefits
      from the Uninsured Employers Fund under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-
      6-801, et seq.

   4. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on January 24, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.
      Central Time.

   5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
      with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

                                             7
      of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239( d)(3)
      (2016). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of
      compliance      with    this     Order    to   the    Bureau     by     email    to
      WC ompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after
      entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period
      of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For
      questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation
      Penalty Unit by email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov or by telephone at
      (615) 253-1471 or (615) 532-1309.

                                  ENTERED this the 5th day of December, 2016.




Scheduling Hearing:

        A Scheduling Hearing has been set with Judge Kenneth M. Switzer, Court of
Workers' Compensation Claims. The parties must call 615-532-9552 or 866-943-0025
toll-free to participate in the hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a
determination of the issues without your further participation.

Right to Appeal:

       Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order
to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of
Appeal, you must:

   1. ·complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal."

   2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven business days of the
      date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order.

   3. Serve a copy of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party.

   4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a filing fee in the amount of
      $75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment
      must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be
      made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or
      other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit
      of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing

                                            8
   fee. The Affidavit of Indigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice
   of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board
   will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying
   the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is
   practicable. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency
   in accordance with this section shall result in dismissal of the appeal.

5. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal,
   may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording of the hearing for the
   purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it
   with the Court Clerk within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited
   Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint statement of
   the evidence within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing
   Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and
   accurate account of what transpired in the Court of Workers' Compensation
   Claims and must be approved by the workers' compensation judge before the
   record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board.

6. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory
   appeal, the appellant shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within
   five business days of the expiration of the time to file a transcript or statement of
   the evidence, specifying the issues presented for review and including any
   argument in support thereof. A party opposing the appeal shall file a response, if
   any, with the Court Clerk within five business days of the filing of the appellant's
   position statement. All position statements pertaining to an appeal of an
   interlocutory order should include: (1) a statement summarizing the facts of the
   case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement
   summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a
   statement of the issue( s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing
   appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.




                                         9
                                             APPENDIX

Exhibits:
       1.   Affidavit ofTed Davenport
       2.   Partial medical records, Vanderbilt University Hospital
       3.   Written statement of Erica Davenport and witness list
       4.   Statement, Dickson County EMS
       5.   Expedited Request for Investigation Report
       6.   Letter from Mediator requesting First Report of Injury
       7.   Letter from Mediator notifying parties of filing of Dispute Certification Notice
       8.   Email exchange between the Court Clerk and Mr. Waldrum, October 21-23,
            2016
        9. Email from the Court Clerk to the parties to confirm receipt of hearing notice,
            November 17,2016
        10. FedEx proof of overnight mailing
        11. FedEx proof of delivery
        12. VUMC letter, total charges for June 16, 2016 outpatient treatment
        13. VUMC letter, total charges for July 1-12 hospitalization

Technical Record: 2
      1. Petition for Benefit Determination, July 28, 2016
      2. Dispute Certification Notice, September 20, 2016
      3. Request for Expedited Hearing, October 19, 2016
      4. Notice ofExpedited Hearing, November 2, 2016




2
  The Court did not consider attachments to Technical Record filings unless admitted into evidence during
the Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual statements in these filings or any attachments to
them as allegations unless established by the evidence.


                                                   10
                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 5th day of
December, 2016.

Name                          Certified   Via     Via    Service sent to:
                               Mail       Fax    Email
Ted Davenport,                                     X     Teddavenport3 3@gmail.com
Self-Represented Employee
Advanced                          X                X     Advancedremodel20 16@gmail.com;
Remodeling/Aaron                                         1619 Hill Street, White Bluff TN
Waldrum,                                                 37187
Self-Represented Employer




                                                       NY SHRUM, Court Clerk
                                                        C.CourtClerk@tn.gov




                                            11
