888 F.2d 1387Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Curtis L. WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and HumanServices, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Stateof Maryland, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,University of Maryland at Baltimore Medical System/Hospitaland Professional Schools, G. Bruce McFadden, Individuallyand as Director, Morton I. Rapport, M.D., Individually andas President, University of Maryland Medical Systems,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-2084.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 21, 1989.Decided Oct. 19, 1989.

Curtis L. Wrenn, Appellant Pro Se.
Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:


1
Curtis L. Wrenn appeals the district court's denial of his motion for appointment of counsel.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


2
Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders.  A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties.  It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment."    Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).


3
As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.  The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.  Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).    See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3267 (U.S. Oct. 13, 1987) (No. 86-7132).


4
Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.  We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue has been decided authoritatively.


5
DISMISSED.

