                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 43189

STATE OF IDAHO,                                )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 670
                                               )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                   )   Filed: October 21, 2015
                                               )
v.                                             )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                               )
MELISSA L. STRAIN,                             )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                               )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                    )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                               )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge.

       Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                     Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                   and GRATTON, Judge
                    ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Melissa L. Strain pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. I.C. § 37-2732(c).
The district court sentenced Strain to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of
confinement of three years. Strain filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied.
Strain appeals.
       A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,
addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

                                               1
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the
motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the
record, including any new information submitted with Strain’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no
abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Strain’s
Rule 35 motion is affirmed.




                                             2
