                                                                                      MOTION DISMISSED
                                            RANDY J. KAIZER # 1730604                           ,»_ jJ, q (J * IcT
                                                  C.T.TERRELL UNIT                               '"t'c       "
                                                      1300 F.M.     655                     "            '
                                                 ROSHARON,     TX    777583
                                                                                     RECEIVED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS                                                       COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
CLERK, ABEL ACOSTA                                                                        APR 2 3 2015
P.O.Box      12308

AUSTIN,      TX   78711:
                                                                                                  6ia,uienc

       RE:   RANDY J.             KAIZER   V.   THE   STATE   OF   TEXAS    CAUSE   NO:   10-CR-2388A




DEAR    CLERK/

                   PLEASE           FIND   ENCLOSED FOR       FILING      PURPOSE   THE   FOLLOWING:

SUGGESTION FOR REMAND TO THE TRIAL                        COURT FOR AN!~ EVIDENTIARY HEARING

PLEASE FILE SAID SUGGESTION AND BRING IT TO'^THE..ATTENTION OF THE

COURT.


                       THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR                  KIND ATTENTION        IN THIS MATTER

PLEASE       CONTACT ME AT/THE               ABOVE ADDRESS         WITH ANY RESPONDS.




RESPECTFULLY




RANM'J-        KAIZER         #    1730604

C.T.TERRELL            UNIT

1300    F.M.      655

ROSHARON,         TX    77583
                     IN   THE   COURT   OF        CRIMINAL       APPEALS
                                                                 WR     NO:




EX PARTE                                     V        IN THE 28th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
RANDY J. KAIZER                              §
APPLICANT                                    V             COURT        OF
                                             V          NUECES        COUNTY/   TEXAS


   SUGGESTION FOR A REMAND TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING

TO THE HONONABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

   COMES NOW; RANDY J. KAIZER/ APPLICANT/ PRO-SE IN THE ABOVE STYLE CAUSE

NUMBER AND RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST THIS COURT/ TO REMAND THE APPLICANT'S
APPLICATION TO THE 28th DISTRICT COURT WITH AN ORDER FOR THE TRIAL COURT

TO HOLD AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS/ TO-WIT:




   APPLICANT WAS CONVICTED IN THE ABOVE CITED TRIAL COURT FOR/ CONTINOUS

SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD; INDENCY WITH A CHILD; AND AGGRAVATED SEXUAL

ASSAULT OF A CHILD AND WAS SENTENCED TO 60 YEARS OON COUNTS 1/3/4 and 20
YEARS JON COUNT 2 ran CURRENTLY. FOLLOWING AN UNSUCCESSFUL DIRECT APPEAL

AND REFUSED PDR(SEE APPLICATION FOR CAUSE NOS) APPLICANT FILED A PRO-SE
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO THE 28th DISTRICT COURT WITH

14 GROUNDSJOF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DUE

PROCESS TO A FAIR TRIAL AND INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON 2/17/15
WHICH THE CLERK STAMPED FILED ON3/10/15

                                         II.


   THE STATE IN ITS ANSWER MADE A GENERAL DENIAL(SEE STATE'S ANSWER @ P.

2) AND FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT AN AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT REQUESTED FROM TRIAL
COUNSEL BECAUSE THE APPLICANT'S CLAIM LACK (MERIT BASED UPON AN APPLICATION

OF THE LAW TO THE FACTS PRESENTLY CONTAINED IN THE RECORD.

   THE STATE'S ANSWER @ B. GROUND 2&14 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL:

@ P.   3-6   SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED THE APPLICANT'S CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVENESS.


                                                 1.
the STATE MISCONSTRUED AND MANIPULATED APPLICANT'S CLAIMS AND FAILED TO
PROPERLY ADDRESS TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/ APPLICANT'S
VERSION OF EVENTS OOF A THIRD PARTY PERPETRATOR AND CROSS EXAMINE THE
VICTIM CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S ALIBI STATEMENT( MADE TO COUNSEL, COUNSEL
INVESTIGATOR, V.A. PSYCHIATRIST/ APPELLATE COUNSEL/ TRAVIS BERRY AND TO
MARIA MEDRANO/^AND TRIAL COUNSEL'S DECISION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE TRIAL
WITHOUT CALLING APPLICANT TO TESTIFY NOR ANY OF HIS CHARACTER WITNESSES.

                                    III.


   THE COURT PURSUANT TO11.0T7 V 3(d) FAILED TO DESIGNATE THE CONTROVERTED
PREVIOUSLY UNROLVED FACTS MATERIAL TO APPLICANT'S INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
OF COUNSEL CLAIMS/ WHICH THE STATE DENIED. THUS THE CONTROVERTED ISSUE AT
HAND. THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE DESIGNATED THE ISSUE TO BE RESOLVED/
BUT INSTEAD ON 4/3/15 SIGNED THE STATES PROPOSAL ;OF FINDINGS OOF FACTS
CONCLUSION OF LAW AND RECOMMENDATION WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.

                                     IV.


   ABSENT, AN OPPORTUNITY TO CARRY HIS BURDEN OF SHOWING STRICKLAND'S
DUAL PRONGS( DEFICIENCY AND PERJUDICE) WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT ON A CLAIM
OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. THAT MUST BE SUPPORT BY A RECORD
CONTAINING DIRECT EVIDENCE OF WHY COUNSEL ACTED (OR DIDN'T) AS HE DID.
   IN EX PARTE TORRES/ 943 S.W.3d 469/475(T.C.A.1997) THIS COURT HELD/
 "THE IN HERENT NATURE OF MOST INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIMS
MEANS THAT THE TRIAL COURT RECORD WILL OFTEN FAIL TO CONTAIN THE INFO
RMATION NECESSARY TO SUBSTANTIATE THE CLAIM." ALSD/THE COURT STATED/
 " IT IS ESSENTIAL TO GATHERING THE FACTS NECESSARY TO...EVALUTE... THE
 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM." TORRES SUPRA @ 475.

                                      V.


    APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED IN HIS APPLICANT MEMO AN ALLEGATION OF
 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE, WHICH IF
                                      2.
TRUE/ MAY ENTITLE HIM TO RELIEF. HOWEVER/ WITH THE UNDEVELOPED RECORD,

WHICH IS THE SAME RECORD AS ON DIRECT APPEAL/ APPLICANT IS UNABLE TO

SUBSTANTIATE HIS CLAIM BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT DESIGNATED ISSUES

WHICH ARE CONTROVERTED BY THE STATE AND PREVIOUSLY UNRESOLVED/ BECAUSE

TRIAL COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN DEPOSITION CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S ALLEG

ATION THAT HE FAILED TO INVESTIGATE.

                                         PRAYER


   WHEREFORE,        PROMISES, CONSIDERED,   APPLICANT PRAYS THAT THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS WOULD HOLD HIS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN ABEYANCE AND REMAND WITH AN ORDER TO THE TRIAL COURT TO HOLD AN

EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO ALLOW APPLICANT TO FULLY DEVELOP HIS ALLEGATIONS

AND RETURN A TRANSCRIPTION OF THE COURT REPORTER'S NOTES AND A FINDINGS

BY THE COURT WITHIN A SPECIFIC TIME,          WITH ANT EXTENSION TO BE OBTAINED

BY THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS. SEE EXPARTE REYNA,          701 S.W.2d 921(T.C.A.

1986)



RESPECTFULLY/




RANDY J.AKAIZER            #   1730604

C.T.TERRELL         UNIT

1300    F.M.   655

ROSHARON,      TX    77583
                           UNSWORN     DECLARATION




   1/ RANDY J. KAIZER/ DO HEREBY DECLARE UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY
THAT THE FOREGOING SUGGESTION FOR A REMAND TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.



EXCUTED ON:, (fQ'/fa- /j                     ^^ANDW^Il^Tl730604


                         CERTIFICATE    OF       SERVICE



   1/ RANDY J. KAIZER DO CERTIFY THAT A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
FOREGOING SUGGESTION FOR REMAND TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR AN EVIDENTIARY
HEARING WAS PLACED IN THE PRISON MAIL BX WITH PRE-PAID POSTAGE ON THIS
   'dV'^ DAY OF /rp^'l               2015.
          r- tfoAf^H
EXCUTED °N: {f""r '                          '      RA%f J^KA^ER #1730604
                                                     C.T.TERRELL UNIT

                                                     1300 F.M.   655
                                                     ROSHARON/   TX 77583




                                        4.
