
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1313                        EMANUEL R. GRANGE, A/K/A TEDDY MURPHY,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Emanuel R. Grange, a/k/a Teddy Murphy on brief pro se.            _____________________________________            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney   General,  and   Ellyn  H.   Lazar,            __________________                              _________________        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                  September 22, 1997                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   Appellant  Emanuel R.  Grange appeals                      __________            from  the district court's  dismissal of his  complaint filed            under  42 U.S.C.     1983.    After carefully  reviewing  the            parties' briefs and the record, we believe that the dismissal            was  correct  for  essentially  the  reasons  stated  in  the            district court's Order, dated January 23, 1997.                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.                          ________   ___                                         -2-
