       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

              IN RE TECHSHELL, INC.
                ______________________

                      2014-1179
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 95/001,767.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos,
of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief
was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas|Horstemeyer LLP,
of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN
and DAN R. GRESHAM.

    MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria,
Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief
were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B.
LATEEF, Associate Solicitor.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and
HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 September 17, 2014             /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court
