                                                                           ACCEPTED
                                                                       03-14-00129-CV
                                                                               5427072
                                                            THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                       AUSTIN, TEXAS
                                                                  5/27/2015 9:40:05 AM
                                                                     JEFFREY D. KYLE
                                                                                CLERK
                   CAUSE NO. 03-14-00129-CV

                             ***
                                                       FILED IN
                                                3rd COURT OF APPEALS
                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS           AUSTIN, TEXAS
              THIRD COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT   5/27/2015 9:40:05 AM
                       AUSTIN, TEXAS              JEFFREY D. KYLE
                                                        Clerk


                             ***

CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS; GALE POSPISIL, ROBERT CAMARENO,
               TOM WIBERT and MARY QUINONES
                                          Appellants,



                              V.

           GARRISON MAURER, d/b/a COMAL TOWING;
            JERAMIE HERNANDEZ d/b/a JJ TOWING and
       ROBERT FLEMING, d/b/a PRO CARE WRECKER SERVICE
                                          Appellees,

 APPELLANTS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE CASE AS MOOT

                            LAW OFFICES OF RYAN HENRY, PLLC
                            Ryan S. Henry
                            State Bar No. 24007347
                            1380 Pantheon Way, Suite 215
                            San Antonio, Texas 78232
                            210-257-6357 (Telephone)
                            210-569-6494 (Facsimile)
                            Ryan.henry@rshlawfirm.com
                            ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS




                              1
                         CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

       I certify that I attempted to confer with counsel for Co-Defendants in this case and
have been unsuccessful in doing so. The Co-Defendants are not part of this appeal, but
since the motion is to dismiss the entire case as to the City Defendants and not just the
appeal, I attempted to confer with them as well. I also certify that I conferred with
Plaintiffs’/Appellees’ attorney of record in this appeal via telephone. He advised he could
not say whether he was opposed or unopposed at this time, even after providing him a
copy of the proposed motion. As a result, the City assumes he is opposed to this motion
to dismiss the entire case as moot.

                            CERTIFICIATE OF SERVICE

      I certify that a true copy of this document has been sent by regular U.S. Mail unless
otherwise indicated, to the person(s) listed below on the 26th day of May, 2015.

Mr. Daniel P. McCarthy                           Fax No. (210) 979-8734
MCCARTHY LAW FIRM P.C.                           and to dan@mccarthy-law.com
10001 Reunion Place, Suite 640
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Mr. Samuel V Houston, III                        Fax No. (210) 826-0075
Houston Dunn, PLLC                               and to sam@hdappeals.com
4040 Broadway, Suite 440
San Antonio, Texas 78209
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Mr. Ricardo H. “Richard” Silvas            Fax No. (210) 236-5420
4538 Centerview Suite 240                  and to richard@rsilvas.com
San Antonio, Texas 78228
Attorney for Defendant New Braunfels Wrecker Service, LLC
Joe Medillin d/b/a New Braunfels Towing Company

Mr. Troy D. Burch, Jr.                           Fax No. (830) 629-0953
BURCH LAW FIRM                                   and to tburch@burchfirm.com
328 S. Seguin Ave.
New Braunfels, Texas 78130
Attorney for Hill Country Custom Towing




                                             2
Mr. David G. Pfueffer                          Fax No. (830) 629-2161
BRAZLE AND PFUEFFER LLP                        and to dpfeuffer@nblawyers.net
170 E. San Antonio Street
New Braunfels, Texas 78130
Attorney for Kahlig Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Bluebonnet
Collision Service a/k/a Bluebonnet Motors


                                              /s/____________________________
                                              RYAN S. HENRY




                                          3
MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:

      NOW COMES Appellants/Defendants City of New Braunfels, Gale Pospisil,

Robert Camareno, Tom Wibert and Mary Quinones (“City Defendants”) and files

this opposed motion to dismiss this case as moot, and would respectfully show the

Court the following:

                                      Summary

      The crux of this case turns on four separate towing contracts awarded to four

separate towing companies who were placed on a non-consent tow list created from

RFP #13-001. C.R. 10. The contracts in question expired on December 31, 2014 by

their own terms. C.R. 32. A new ordinance, No. 2015-04, took effect on May 1, 2015

which dispenses with the system utilized by the City in awarding the four prior

contracts and adding anyone to the list. Please find attached as Exhibit A, a certified

copy of Ordinance No. 2015-04.

      With a new regulatory process beginning which does not use contracts and

the contracts which made the basis of this suit no longer being in place, this case has

become moot. Appellants hereby move to dismiss the entire case as moot.

                           Factual Recap & Arguments

      Relief Requested is Prospective Only

      It is important to note that Maurer and the other Plaintiffs are not seeking

damages for being left off the list and expressly stated they are not suing to force the


                                           4
City to place them on the list. C.R. 235, para. 8. They state “Plaintiffs seek

prospective injunctive and declaratory relief that would prohibit the City from

continuing to operate under the contracts it awarded under the RFP. ….Plaintiffs

have intentionally not plead for monetary damages, such as lost profits or loss of

business opportunity, because it would invoke sovereign immunity.” C.R. 244 para.

21. “Plaintiffs' seeks this Court to declare void the actions taken by The City of New

Braunfels through its city council at the city council meeting on December 10, 2012

in the awarding the contracts to the Defendants…” C.R. 244 para. 22.

         The towing contracts and the list expired by their own terms on December 31st

of 2014. C.R. 32. The Plaintiffs are seeking prospective relief only to prevent the

City from utilizing the non-consent tow call list (which no longer exists). C.R. 14-

16. They seek to hold the list void ab initio. C.R. 16. They bring suit against the City

individuals for ultra-vires claims, which can only be prospective in nature under City

of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284 S.W.3d 366, 376 (Tex. 2009). C.R. 9, 50-51. As a result,

all of the relief sought is to prevent and control future action, not for anything

allegedly lost in the past. The future action is now dictated by the ordinance which

moots their claims for allegedly not following competitive bidding requirements.

The ordinance was not enacted until after the contract and list expired by their own

terms.




                                           5
      Mootness Generally

      As the court is well aware, the mootness doctrine prevents courts from

rendering advisory opinions, which are outside the jurisdiction conferred by Article

II, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution. See Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33

S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000). A controversy must exist between the parties at every

stage of the legal proceeding, including the appeal. Bd. of Adjustment of City of San

Antonio v. Wende, 92 S.W.3d 424, 427 (Tex. 2002) (Emphasis added).


      An issue may become moot when a party seeks a ruling on some matter that,

when rendered, would not have any practical legal effect on a then-existing

controversy. See In re H & R Block Fin. Advisors, Inc., 262 S.W.3d 896, 900 (Tex.

App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); City of Farmers Branch v.

Ramos, 235 S.W.3d 462, 469 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2007, no pet.). When an appeal is

moot, a court must set aside the judgment and dismiss the cause in its entirety. City

of Fort Worth v. Pastusek Indus., Inc., 48 S.W.3d 366, 371 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth

2001, no pet.).


      An appellate court is prohibited from deciding a moot controversy. See Nat'l

Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex.1999). This prohibition is

rooted in the separation of powers doctrine in the Texas and United States

Constitutions that prohibits courts from rendering advisory opinions. See Nat'l


                                          6
Collegiate, 1 S.W.3d at 86; see also Trulock v. City of Duncanville, 277 S.W.3d 920,

923-24 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.).


      Contracts are Moot

      When a contract expires and is no longer in effect or when it has been

superseded by an amended contract, a dispute on the contract becomes moot. Hutto

Citizens Group v. County of Williamson & Waste Mgmt. of Tex., 2009 Tex. App.

LEXIS 5690,2009 WL 2195582 (Tex. App. -- Austin, July 23, 2009); Meeker v.

Tarrant County College Dist., 317 S.W.3d 754, 760, (Tex. App. -- Fort Worth 2010);

See, e.g., Day v. First City Nat'l Bank of Houston, 654 S.W.2d 794, 795 (Tex. App.-

-Houston [14th Dist.] 1983, no writ) (stating that a case is moot when the actions

sought to be enjoined have been fully performed). A suit to enjoin the performance

of a contract becomes moot after the contract has been fully performed. See Hulett

v. West Lamar Rural High Sch. Dist., 232 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. 1950). When a

request for injunctive relief becomes moot because the action sought to be enjoined

has been accomplished, a request for declaratory relief also becomes moot. Speer v.

Presbyterian Children's Home & Serv. Agency, 847 S.W.2d 227, 229 (Tex. 1993);

Labrado v. County of El Paso, 132 S.W.3d 581, 589 (Tex. App. -- El Paso 2004).

All of the contracts at issue have expired by their own terms and are no longer in

effect. As a result, the claims are moot.


                                            7
      List is Moot as New Ordinance was passed

      A chapter of the City’s original ordinance (Chapter 138, Article V, Section

138-122) was repealed prior to the creation of the complained of non-consent tow

list. C.R. 119. It utilized a specific rotation system for placement on the list. No

ordinance regulation was therefore in effect at the time of RFP 13-001, which sought

to utilize a contract agreement to control non-consent tows. The City sent out the

RFP, received responses, reconsidered whether it wanted to use a single-source tow

company, and awarded four contracts instead of one. C.R. 122. However, after the

expiration of the four contracts under the list, the City enacted a completely new

ordinance, No. 2015-04. Ex. A.


      A significant alteration in the law on a subject can render a controversy moot.

Trulock v. City of Duncanville, 277 S.W.3d 920, 927 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no

pet.)(Citing Ne. Fla. Chapter of Associated Contractors, 508 U.S. at 662 n. 3, 113

S. Ct. 2297) (ordinance must be significantly altered or case not moot on appeal).

When the actions made the basis of this lawsuit occurred, no regulation was in effect.

The City could create and assign whoever it wished to the non-consent list but chose

to use an RFP process. However, the contracts entered into at the end of this process

expired by their own terms. Then, effective May 1, 2015, a completely new

regulation applied, thereby changing the regulatory landscape again and the method

under which non-consent tows are awarded.
                                          8
      As a result, Plaintiffs’ claims for relief have become moot. They sought to

enjoin the enforcement and execution of the four contracts awarded to competitors,

which have now expired under their own terms. They sought to enjoin the use of the

awarded list, which has expired and is now superseded by the new ordinance. They

sought to require compliance with competitive bidding laws they felt applied,

however the ordinance no longer utilizes a competitive bidding element. The

legislative findings expressly state the City wishes to abandon a contract system for

incident management tows and reinstate a rotation list system. Ex. A, p. 2.


      Ordinance 2015-04 states that the rotation list shall be created on an annual

basis, starting on May 1st of each year. Ex. A, Sec. 138-132 p. 11. Applications from

tow truck operators shall only be accepted within a defined time period each year

and shall be submitted to the Chief of Police. Ex. A, Sec. 138-132(b)-(c). Any tow-

truck operator who qualifies under the regulation requirements “will be placed on

the rotation list system for one year, subject to their rotation assignment which will

be determined by the Police Department.” Ex. A, Sec. 138-132(e). All qualifying

operators “shall be placed on the rotation list.” Ex. A, Sec. 138-133(a). A lottery will

be held if an odd number of operators are on the list to determine who gets an extra

rotation. Ex. A, Sec. 138-133(b). It is up to Plaintiffs to qualify for the list by

ensuring compliance with all regulation requirements. However, if they qualify, they

are placed on the list with everyone else and are not subject to the same types of

                                           9
actions complained of in the lawsuit. As a result, the claims are moot. No relief can

be awarded which will dispel a current controversy.


      It is important to note that the mootness is not caused purely because a new

ordinance was passed. The ordinance was not passed and did not become effective

until after the contracts made the basis of this suit expired by their own terms. The

expiration of the contracts alone qualifies as mooting the case. However, in addition

to that, the enactment of the ordinance also mooted the case independently of the

mootness caused by the expiration of the contracts. Either basis, standing alone, is

proper to moot the claims. Both standing together creates a multitier mootness.


      Texas Open Meetings Act Claims are also Moot

      Plaintiffs bring suit under the Texas Open Meetings Act (“TOMA”)

attempting to hold the contracts and list void. C.R. at 129. Declaring a meeting-

agenda notice violated TOMA cannot have any practical legal effect on a currently-

existing controversy when it would only void contracts and a list that have

previously been superseded or expired. Meeker v. Tarrant County College Dist., 317

S.W.3d 754, 761 (Tex. App. -- Fort Worth 2010). An issue becomes moot when a

party seeks a ruling on some matter that, when rendered, would not have any

practical legal effect on a then-existing controversy. See In re H & R Block Fin.

Advisors, Inc., 262 S.W.3d 896, 900 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig.


                                         10
proceeding); City of Farmers Branch v. Ramos, 235 S.W.3d 462, 469 (Tex. App.--

Dallas 2007, no pet.). Stated another way, an issue is moot if it becomes impossible

for the court to grant effective relief. H&R Block Fin. Advisors, Inc., 262 S.W.3d

896, 900 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (Citing Williams v. Lara,

52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2001)).


      Plaintiffs’ claims under TOMA are to void action which is no longer relevant.

Under the TOMA provision of the petition, the Plaintiffs state “Plaintiffs' seeks this

Court to declare void the actions taken by The City of New Braunfels through its

city council at the city council meeting on December 10, 2012 in the awarding the

contracts to the Defendants.” C.R. 129. That is the extent of the basis of their TOMA

claims. As noted above, the contracts expired by their own terms and the City is no

longer using contract based regulation for non-consent tows. Plaintiffs sought to

prevent selection of RFP awards behind “closed doors”, however the selection

process used now is that qualified applicants are placed on the list by the Police

Chief. It is the Chief who makes decisions (subject to the ordinance), but those

decisions also are not based on a competitive bid. The TOMA applies to the

governing body, not individual staff members. Tex. Gov’t Code §551.001(3)-(4)

(definition of governmental body and meeting) and §551.002 (the governmental

body must hold its meetings in public). No open meetings issues come into play

since there is no competitive bidding and the ordinance dictates who is on the list,

                                         11
not an RFP award. As a result, the new ordinance moots the TOMA claims presented

by the Plaintiffs.


                                       Prayer

      Defendants City of New Braunfels, Gale Pospisil, Robert Camareno, Tom

Wibert and Mary Quinones prays that this court grant their motion to dismiss this

entire case as moot and Plaintiffs take nothing from this cause of action. Defendants

pray this court dismiss all of Plaintiffs’ claims against all the City Defendants with

prejudice. This is not a motion to dismiss merely the appeal, but a motion to dismiss

the entire case as moot. Should the court not consider the case moot, the Defendants

pray the court consider the arguments presented in their brief on the merits and retain

the appeal.


      City Defendants seek dismissal of the entire case against them, costs should

be allocated to the party incurring same, and there is no need for an expedited

mandate. Defendants prays for such further relief, in law or in equity, it may show

themselves justly entitled to.




                                          12
SIGNED this 26th day of May, 2015.

                             Respectfully submitted,


                             LAW OFFICES OF RYAN HENRY, PLLC
                             1380 Pantheon Way, Suite 215
                             San Antonio, Texas 78232
                             (210) 257-6357
                             (210) 569-6494 (Facsimile)
                             Ryan.Henry@RSHlawfirm.com

                       By:                        /s/
                             ______________________________
                             RYAN S. HENRY
                             State Bar No. 24007347
                             COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS




                               13
                              CERTIFICATION

       I, Patrick 0. Aten, City Secretary for the City of New Braunfels, Texas, do
hereby certify that I am the custodian of the official records for the City of New
Braunfels, Texas, and that a true and correct copy of Ordinance Number 2015-4,
of the City of New Braunfels, Texas, is hereby attached herewith.
                  51
      Dated this 1 day of May, 2015.



                                               Patrick D. Aten
                                               City Secretary
                                               City of New Braunfels, Texas




                                                                                     EXHIBIT
                                                                                       A
                                       ORDINANCE NO. 2015- .         <J'/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER
138 "VEHICLES FOR IDRE," ARTICLE V. "VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITIES AND
TOWING OF VEHICLES," BY ADOPTING A NEW ROTATION LIST SYSTEM FOR
INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TOWS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

        WHEREAS, the 80th Texas Legislature (2007) amended Chapter 2303 "Vehicle Storage
Facilities" and adopted Chapter 2308 "Vehicle Towing" of the Texas Occupations Code; and

       WHEREAS, the provisions in Chapter 2303 and 2308 provide for the permitting and regulation
of vehicle storage facilities and the towing of vehicles, including nonconsent tows which include
incident management tows; and

        WHEREAS, the City of New Braunfels ("City") is a home rule municipality given broad
discretionary powers under the Texas Constitution to regulate for the public peace, health, safety, and
general welfare of its citizens; and

        WHEREAS, the City of New Braunfels intends to obtain twenty four hour, seven days per week
towing/wrecker and storage service for the City of New Braunfels in order to provide for the safety of
citizens and to safeguard their property; and

        WHEREAS, the City desires to abandon a contract system for incident management tows and
reinstate a rotation list system that is more effective and efficient than the pre-existing 2009 ordinance
based rotation list system for incident management tows.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW
BRAUNFELS, TEXAS:

        SECTION 1: That Chapter 138 "Vehicles for Hire," Article V be renamed "Vehicle Storage
Facilities and Incident Management Tows" and be hereby amended and adopted as follows:

    ARTICLE V. VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITIES AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TOWS

Sec. 138-121. Compliance with State Law.

(a) Any person or entity engaged in operating a vehicle storage facility, as that term is defined in
Section 2303.002(8) of the Texas Occupations Code, within the city limits of New Braunfels shall
comply with the provisions of State law, including Chapter 2303 of the Texas Occupations Code and
any rules or regulations with regard to the same adopted by the Texas Department of Licensing or
Regulation.

(b) Any person or entity engaged in operating a tow truck, as that term is defined in Section
2308.002(11) of the Texas Occupations Code, within the city limits of New Braunfels shall comply



                                               Page 1 of 15
with the provisions of State law, including Chapter 2308 of the Texas Occupations Code and any rules
or regulations with regard to the same adopted by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

Sec. 138-122. Definitions.

   Abandoned vehicle means the condition of being abandoned as defined in the Texas Transportation
   Code, Chapter 683 as amended.

   City controlled vehicle means those vehicles owned, leased or otherwise physically and/or lawfully
   under the City's control, including vehicles seized by the NBPD as evidence or for some other
   lawful police purpose.

   Consent tows means the towing of a motor vehicle with the consent of the vehicle owner, operator,
   person in possession, custody or control of the vehicle, or the lien holder.

   Disabled vehicle means a vehicle which has been rendered unsafe to be driven as the result of some
   occurrence other that a wreck, including but not limited to mechanical fai lures or breakdowns, fire,
   vandalism or a vehicle which is in a safe driving condition, but the owner is not present or
   permitted to drive so as to reasonably necessitate that the vehicle be removed by a wrecker.

   Winch fee means fees incurred for additional winching of vehicles other than normal winching onto
   a flatbed rollback-style wrecker. (Example: winching vehicles from ditches, ponds, or mud.)

   Drop fee means the fee charged when a consent-tow vehicle is completely hooked up to a wrecker
   and ready to be immediately moved, however the vehicle owner/representative decides not to have
   the vehicle towed by the on-call wrecker. (Example: an on call wrecker is called and hooked up to
   an abandoned vehicle. The driver arrives with a can of gas after the wrecker has hooked up the
   vehicle. The wrecker may still charge a " Drop Fee".)

   Incident management tow means the towing or other transportation of a vehicle by a tow truck
   which is the result of a police officer exercising his/her authority to effect the removal of said
   vehicle pursuant to state law and/or this ordinance.

   Nonconsent tows means a tow of a motor vehicle that is performed without the consent of the owner
   or operator of the vehicle or by a person who has possession, custody, or control of the vehicle, and
   includes incident management tows.

   Operator means an individual, association, corporation or other legal entity that controls, operates
   or directs the operation of one or more tow trucks over a public street or highway. It includes the
   person operating the tow truck/wrecker regardless of whether or not the individual owns the truck.

   Public roadway means a public street, alley, road, right-of-way, or other public way, including
   paved and unpaved portions of the right-of-way.




                                              Page 2of 15
Sec. 138-123. Incident Management and Non-consent Tows- Authority.

A pol ice officer of the City of New Braunfels is hereby authorized to order removal of a vehicle,
require the driver or other person in charge of a vehicle to move the same or have the vehicle removed
by the towing Operator on the rotation list to the nearest place of safety or to the premises of the towing
Operator that meets the criteria in this ordinance, or as otherwise directed by the New Braunfels Police
Department, under the following circumstances:

(a) When any vehicle is left unattended upon any bridge, viaduct or causeway, or in any tunnel where
such vehicle constitutes an obstruction to traffic;
(b) When any vehicle is otherwise legally parked so as to block the entrance to any private driveway;
( c) When any vehicle is found upon a street and a report has been prev~ously made that the vehicle has
been stolen or a complaint has been filed and a warrant thereon issued charging that such vehicle has
been embezzled, or there are reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle is stolen;
(d) When any such officer has reasonable grounds to believe that any vehicle has been abandoned;
(e) When a vehicle upon a street is so wrecked or disabled and because of the wreck or disability its
normal operation is impossible or impractical; or
(f) The person or persons in charge of the vehicle are incapacitated by reason of physical injury or other
reason to such extent as to be unable to provide for its removal or custody or are not in the immediate
vicinity of the wrecked or disabled vehicle;
(g) When any such officer arrests any person driving or in control of a vehicle for an alleged offense
and such officer is by this Code or other law required to take the person arrested immediately before a
magistrate and it is unsafe to leave the vehicle unattended at the scene, or the vehicle is being seized as
evidence;
(h) Whenever any such officer finds a vehicle standing upon a street, or public or private property in
violation of any State law or local ordinance;
(i) When the owner or operator of the vehicle consents;
G) When, in the opinion of a police officer, said vehicle constitutes a hazard or interferes with a normal
function of a governmental agency;
(k) When, in the opinion of a police officer, the safety of said vehicle is imperiled by reason of any
catastrophe, emergency or unusual circumstance;
(1) When any vehicle is found to be a junked vehicle;
(m) When the vehicle is parked in violation of Chapter 126, Article VII-Parking, as amended, of the
Code of the City of New Braunfels; or
(n) When the operator of a motor vehicle is requested to show proof of financial responsibility on that
vehicle and, in the opinion of a police officer, is unable to establish financial responsibility under
Section 601.051 of Texas Transportation Code.
(o) Where otherwise authorized by law.

Sec. 138-124. Operator Responsibility.

Operator shall perform all necessary work and administration for the removal from the public streets,
ways or other public property in the City of New Braunfels, and from private property when directed by
the Police Department or duly authorized representative, of vehicles which have been abandoned,
disabled, involved in collisions, parking violations, vehicles to be seized for evidence, prisoners'
vehicles and disabled City owned or City leased vehicles and cleaning up an accident scene. Vehicles


                                                Page 3of15
will be stored in a local vehicle storage facility on non-consent tows. For consent tows, see paragraph
(g).

(a) Any person or entity having an incident management towing permit issued by the State pursuant to
Chapter 2308 of the Texas Occupations Code shall be eligible for inclusion in the City's rotation list
system established pursuant to (a) above; provided however, that the person or entity makes an
application with the Police Department and complies with the rules, regulations and procedures
established by the Chief of Police pursuant to the authority granted under state law and this ordinance.
Any person or entity failing to maintain a valid incident management towing permit shall be
automatically removed from the rotation list without the necessity of the hearing process provided for
in this ordinance.

(b) The tow truck Operator responding to an incident management tow must be operated by a driver
that has a valid incident management towing Operator's license issued by the State pursuant to Chapter
2308 of the Texas Occupations Code. Any person or entity failing to use tow truck Operators that have
a valid incident management towing Operator's license issued by the State shall be automatically
removed from the rotation list by the Chief of Police without the necessity of the hearing process
provided for in this ordinance.

(c) Operator shall be available 24 hours per day seven days per week, subject to assignment or dispatch
by the Police Department, to cover the areas of City of New Braunfels as needed. Operator must
maintain at its storage facility an onsite office. The Operator of a participating storage facility must
make impounded vehicles available for release 24 hours a day, within one hours notice. The Operator
must have an adequate number of employees to meet their responsibilities. The Operator must have a
publicly listed telephone number which is answered 24 hours a day by the operator or an employee.
Use of an answering machine is prohibited.

(d) Operator shall furnish the Police Department with personnel data, fingerprints and photographs of
all wrecker drivers in its employment. Further, Operator agrees to update this information as new or
additional personnel are employed. This data is required to be furnished within 72 hours of such
employment.

(e) Operator must employ a minimum of four (4) drivers that are qualified pursuant to the requirements
of this agreement and applicable state law. Drivers can either be full-time or part-time employees.

(f) At the time of application, the Operator agrees to submit a list which includes the following:
        (l)     The make, model, vehicle identification number and TDLR identification number of
each vehicle to be used in performing services under this ordinance and
        (2)     The name, driver's license and TDLR license number and copies of such, of any/all
drivers assigned to the wreckers, but no less than four (4) drivers.

(g) Any wrecker dispatched pursuant to a request from the New Braunfels Police Department must
arrive on the scene within twenty-five (25) minutes of being dispatched.

(h) Under no circumstances will the Operator make recommendations concerning where a vehicle
should be towed or repaired, except as expressly allowed herein. In the event of consent tows the


                                               Page 4of15
owner of the vehicle will make the decision and the destination of the vehicle will be written on all
required forms at the scene. Operator will tow all non-consent tow vehicles to the designated/
approved Operator's storage lot, unless otherwise directed by the New Braunfels Police Department.

(i) A towing company that makes an incident management tow shall tow the vehicle to a vehicle
storage facility that is operated by a person who holds a license to operate the facility under Chapter
2303 unless the towing company agrees to take the vehicle to a location designated by the vehicle's
owner.

G) Operator agrees that all fees for towing under this ordinance shall be collected from the owner or
person in charge of said vehicle upon completion of tow. Owner or person in charge includes the
vehicle owner, operator, person in possession, custody or control of the vehicle, or the lien holder, but
this does not include the City of New Braunfels, unless the vehicle is a city-controlled vehicle and the
City has exceeded its allotted number of free tows. Operator agrees to submit to City of New Braunfels
Police Department monthly a copy of all invoices for tows occurring under this ordinance to allow the
Police Department to verify that Operator is charging applicable fees to the owner or the person in
control of the vehicle. Towing tickets must be submitted for review within 30 days from their last on-
call day.

(k) Operator agrees that if it inappropriately charges in excess of the amounts as stated in this
ordinance, Operator will be in violation of this ordinance. The appropriate and prompt refund will be
made to the vehicle owner. Operator agrees that any complaints regarding billing which arise out of this
ordinance shall be reported to the Chief of Police or his/her designee within 5 days of the date the
Operator receives the complaint.

(I) Upon receipt of a complaint concerning damage to a vehicle or its contents towed by operator which
occurs during a tow, the Operator will indemnify the City and shall immediately accept responsibility
and liability. (See Section 138-131) Operator agrees that any complaints received shall be reported to
the Chief of Police or his/her designee within 5 days of the date the Operator receives the complaint.

(m) VEHICLE STORAGE NOTIFICATION NOTICE: Operator will attempt to notify vehicle owner
by telephone or cellular phone within 24 clock hours upon completion of a tow. Operator shall notify
owner in writing within 48 clock hours after completion of a tow. Where the Operator fails to give
written notice to the vehicle owner within 48 hours as required in this subparagraph, the Operator shall
not charge or collect from the vehicle owner, any storage fees for that time including the initial 48 hour
period, that the Operator was in violation of this subparagraph, but may charge storage fees for that
time after the vehicle owner receives written notice.

(n) Operator will be responsible for all title paperwork and subsequent auction of all unclaimed
vehicles. Operator will supply a list and applicable documentation of unclaimed vehicles to the New
Braunfels Police Department for review, two weeks prior to the auction. Auctions shall comply with
TDLR guidelines.

(o) By Operator submission of an application, Operator represents to the City that it is currently in
compliance and will remain in compliance during the term of its participation in the City's rotation list



                                                Page 5of15
system, with all federal, state and local laws, orders and regulations pertaining to the operation of a tow
truck.

(p) AlJ drivers shall be dressed in a high visibility W1iform with name and company badge/patch and
TDLR prescribed credentials.

(q) Operator shall either own or have an exclusive lease to and have registered with the Texas
Department of Licensing and Regulation in Operator's name at least 4 tow trucks, one of which is a
heavy duty wrecker as defined herein. Acceptable written documentation must be attached to
application as specified in section 138-132 below.

(r) Operator cannot advertise for a body shop not owned by the Operator on tow trucks, equipment or
employees.

(s) There will be no subcontracting with other wrecker companies allowed with the exception of
specialty equipment such as a bobcat, hazmat, loaders or other construction type equipment for a major
scene.

(t) The City may inspect Operator's records at any time to ensure that Operator meets the minimum
qualifications required under this ordinance.

(u) Operator shall make wreckers, other equipment, storage facilities and on-site storage faci lity office
available for inspection when ordered by the City of New Braunfels Police Department.

(v) If Operator fails to pay any city ad valorem or sales taxes, or any fines, fees, or other amounts due
the city in a timely manner, the Chief of Police will automatically suspend the Operator from the
rotation list system until the amounts due are paid and without the necessity of the hearing process
provided for in this ordinance.

Sec. 138-125. City Responsibilities.

(a)    The City will direct all .requests for wrecker service under this Ordinance to the Operator;
(b)    The City shall tape all calls requesting wrecker service;
(c)    The City shall maintain a log book (open for inspection at all reasonable times) listing the date
and time for each tow.

Sec. 138-126. Wrecker/Tow Truck Technical Requirements.

(a)    Each tow truck/wrecker shall have brakes that meet manufacturer's braking specifications when
perfo1ming under all load conditions.

(b)     All wreckers shall have damage free towing attachments, hydraulic or mechanical wheel lift
with a lifting capacity of not less than two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds; hydraulic or
mechanical boom with a rated lifting capacity of not less than eight thousand (8,000); or a flat bed
vehicle without boom with at least 3/8" cable of not less than 100' length and safety chains.



                                                Page 6of15
(c)      Safety mechanisms of the tow truck/wrecker, including but not limited to, all headlights, tail
lights, tum signals, brakes, brake lights, hazard lights, flashing warning lights, windshield wipers, wiper
blades, handles opening doors and windows, and tires shall operate and/or be in good state of repair.

(d)   All tow trucks/wrecker shall operate within the applicable recommended towed vehicles
manufacturer's safety policies and procedures and state laws.

(e)     When towing a vehicle more than 500 feet, wrecker shall use a two bar with pins of any kind, or
any other method of attachment. After 500 feet or sooner, the wrecker Operator must drop the vehicle
and re-hook it following all safety procedures established by this section and by the manufacturer of the
vehicle being towed.

(f)    Each tow truck/wrecker must meet the safety requirements of all other applicable statutes in
addition to meeting the safety requirements of this ordinance.

(g)    Operator agrees that all vehicles and/or other equipment used by its employees will meet the
above safety requirements.


Sec. 138-127. Required Wrecker Equipment.

Each wrecker shall carry the following as minimum standard equipment:
(a)     A tow sling and hydraulic lift which is sufficient to prevent the swinging of any equipment
and/or vehicle being transported and/or towed. This subsection does not apply to a vehicle carrier or
rollback unless the wheels of a vehicle being towed are in contact with the ground. In the event that a
self-contained non-propelled towing device, or some other form of auxiliary device is used, the vehicle
to which that device is attached and which is providing the motive and braking forces, does not need to
provide this equipment.

(b)     5/16-inch link steel safety chains for wreckers with a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or
less and 3/8-inch Hy-test steel chains or their equivalent for tow trucks with a gross vehicle weight over
10,000 pounds. These link sizes are minimums.

(c)      All wreckers shall carry one ten pound or two (2) five pound type ABC fire extinguishers. The
fire extinguishers shall be properly filled and located so they are readily accessible for use. All fire
extinguishers shall be rechargeable, 2A: 1OBC Dry Chemical, UUFM listed and in compliance with
NFP A standard # 10, 1998 edition and shall be so labeled by a national testing laboratory.

(d)       One crowbar or wrecking bar of not less than thirty-six (36) inches in length with a wedge head.

(e)     One broom of a type designed for pushing with an eighteen ( 18) inch head, and a handle of not
less than thirty-six (36) inches.

(f)       One flat-edge shovel of at least nine (9) inches with a handle of not less than thirty-six (36)
inches.

(g)       A box or bucket to carry glass and/or debris removed from accident scenes.

                                                   Page 7of 15
(h)     Rope or strap suitable for securing doors, hoods, trucks, etc.

(i)     A functioning spotlight or flashlight.

G)      Outside rearview mirrors on both sides of truck.

(k)     All wreckers must be equipped with emergency lights visible from all directions and shall be
rotating or strobe type lights. The lights shall be in accordance with state law.

(I)     Three (3) portable red emergency reflectors, orange cones or flares.

(m)     Five (5) gallons of absorbent material.

(n)     Safety chains must be used on all tows.

(o)     All tow trucks with a slip-in-bed must have the bed properly secured to the body of the truck by
a minimum of eight (8) one-half diameter bolts. At least four (4) of these bolts must be in front of the
slip-in-bed.

(p)     No wrecker shall lift more than the factory-rated lifting capacity permits.

Sec. 138-128. Driver Responsibilities.

(a)    Tow truck/wrecker drivers shall not have or permit any prohibited weapon or alcoholic
beverages in or around a tow truck when operating the tow truck. This provision does not prohibit a
peace officer certified by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education
from carrying a firearm while operating or riding in a tow truck/wrecker.

(b)     Tow truck/wrecker drivers must have a valid Texas driver's license for type of vehicle being
driven, current identification and proof of a valid incident management towing Operator license.
Drivers shall wear a company uniform, be neatly groomed and be prompt and courteous in order to
provide services.

(c)     Tow truck/wrecker drivers shall ensure that while he is lifting a vehicle in preparation for
towing that no one but the Operator and/or helper shall be within a safe distance of the truck and
vehicle to be towed. A safe distance is at least twice the distance between the end of the boom and the
point of hook-up on the vehicle being winched or twice the distance the car is being lifted, whichever is
greater. If a hydraulic lift is being used, a safe distance is twice the distance to which the lift arm is
extended.

(d)      Tow truck/wrecker drivers shall ensure that if at any time during the process of connecting or
winching, the tow truck or vehicle to be towed is in line of traffic, the flow of traffic must be diverted.
If the tow truck cable is across lane/Janes of traffic, the traffic must be stopped or diverted by a law
enforcement officer to permit safe winching or lifting of the vehicle to be towed.



                                                  Page 8of15
(e)    Tow truck/wrecker drivers shall make all efforts to sweep and clean, remove debris, and use
absorbent material at the accident scene as necessary for public safety.

(f)     Tow truck/wrecker drivers shall conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times.

(g)   Tow truck/ wrecker drivers shall obey all lawful or direct orders from any and all police officers
managing a scene or call where a wrecker is requested.

Sec. 138-129. Storage Facility.

(a) City Limits. The storage faci lity must be located within the corporate limits of the City of New
Braunfels and in compliance with the provisions of state law, including V.T.C.A., Occupations Code
Ch. 2303, any rules or regulations with regard to the same adopted by the Texas Department of
Licensing or Regulation and City ordinances. Operator cannot change the location of its storage
facilities more than once during the Rotation Period as defined in § 138-132 (a) Application Guidelines.
If Operator desires to change the location of its storage facility, the Operator must obtain prior written
approval from the Chief of Police of the new location and facility.

Cb) Own or Lease. Operator can either own its storage facility or lease it under a written lease
agreement for a term that at a minimum covers the entire Rotation Period as defined in §138-132(a). A
copy of the title or deed in the case of ownership, or a copy of a lease agreement must be included with
the application.

Cc) Facility Requirements. The storage faci lity must be secure, completely enclosed by at least a 6 foot
high fence, well lit, have an all weather surface parking lot. The storage lot shall be equipped with
security cameras that record and the data shall be accessible to the Police Department for review. The
storage site must be of sufficient capacity to handle at least 50 vehicles stored pursuant to this
ordinance and exclusive of other vehicles stored not pursuant to this ordinance at any given time.
There shall be enough room to store semi trucks and trailers if necessary. At no time will cars be
stored on a road or thoroughfare. All police initiated non-consent towed vehicles will be towed to the
storage facility or a secure location as determined by NBPD.

Sec. 138-130. Insurance and Liability.

(a) The Operator shall maintain at his expense, insurance with limits not less than those prescribed
below. Operator further agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City of New Braunfels harmless from
any and all causes of action arising from performance of its responsibilities under this ordinance.

(b)With respect to required insurance shall:

       (l) Name City of New Braunfels as additional insured/or an insured, as its interests may
       appear.
       (2) Provide City of New Braunfels a waiver of subrogation.
       (3) Provide City of New Braunfels with a thirty (30) day advance written notice of
       cancellation or material change to said insurance.



                                                Page 9of15
        (4) Provide the New Braunfels Police Department with a Certificate of Insurance
        evidencing required coverage as part of the application for rotation list system.
        (5) The Certificate of Insurance shall also specify that the policy covers the vehicle or
        vehicles subject to being used by Operator under this ordinance. The Certificate of
        Insurance shall identify the vehicle by make, model and vehicle identification number.

(c) Submit a certificate of insurance reflecting coverage according to TDLR Regulations.

Insurance underwriters must be acceptable to City of New Braunfels.

Sec. 138-131. Indemnification.

(a) The Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officials,
officers, employees, agents and representatives from any and all loss, liability, obligation, penalties,
judgments, claims, deficiency, expense or damages of any kind whatsoever by reason of any claim
arising from a third person occasioned by any act, error or omission of Operator in the performance
under this ordinance.

(b) The Operator will, at its sole cost and expense, defend and protect the City against any and all
claims and demands set out in Section 138-131(a) above.

Sec. 138-132. Application Guidelines.

(a) The rotation period shall occur annually, starting on May   1st   of each year and shall run for a period
of twelve months.

(b) The application period shall occur once annually. Applications from Operators will only be
accepted from March 1st to March 15th of each year.

(c) Applications shall be submitted to the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police for the City of New
Braunfels is authorized to establish an application fee for applying to be included on the City's rotation
list so long as such fee does not exceed the amount of$15.00.

(d) Only licensed tow companies with a physical business address in the city limits and storage lots
located in the city limits of New Braunfels may apply. Post office boxes or similar are not permitted.
Operator can either own its storage facility or lease it under a written agreement for a term that at a
minimum covers the entire Rotation Period as defined in §138-132(a) above. A copy of the property
title in Operator's name or Operator's lease agreement must be included with the application.

(e) Applications will be reviewed by the Police Department, and all qualifying Operators will be placed
on the rotation list system for one year, subject to their rotation assignment which will be determined
by the Police Department.

(f) All Operators must apply each year during the application period to be on the rotation list and
receive a rotation assignment. There are no automatic renewals.



                                               Page 10 of15
(g) After the application period is closed, no additional wrecker services will be considered or added to
the rotation list.

(h) A list of tow vehicles, including the make, model, vehicle identification number and TDLR
identification number of each vehicle to be used in performing services under this ordinance must be
provided on the application. The vehicles on this list must be owned or exclusively leased by the
Operator and in the Operator's name and may not be a part of any other application by another
Operator. Vehicle title or a vehicle lease agreement must be attached to the application as supporting
documentation. Applications which contain duplicate tow vehicles will automatically be disqualified.
All towing equipment listed on the application shall be made available for inspection by the Police
Department.

(i) Operators must furnish the name, driver's license and TDLR license number and copies of such, of
any/all drivers assigned to the wreckers as part of the application process. Applicant must list a
minimum of four wrecker drivers who meet the requirements of this ordinance and applicable state law.

G) Submittal of an application is an indication of ability on the part of the Operator to perform
requested services, including sufficient personnel, vehicles and equipment in accordance with this
ordinance.

(k) The selection and notification of Operators for the tow list shall be made by April 15th of each year.

(1) A City Officer or Employee may not have ownership interest in any participating wrecker service or
participating storage facility.

(m) Applicant must provide a copy of legal title to the property in Applicant's name where the storage
facility is located. If the site of the storage facility is leased, then Applicant must include a copy of a
valid, executed copy of the lease agreement that must be in a form approved by the City. See Section
13 8-129 for additional requirements.

Sec. 138-133. Towing Rotation List Procedures.

(a) All qualified Operators shall be placed on the rotation list. When it is known how many Operators
are on the list, the rotation schedule will be set by the Police Department. The period of time an
Operator is assigned on the schedule shall be referred to as the rotation assignment.

(b) Should an odd number of Operators be approved for the tow rotation, a lottery will be held to
determine which Operator will get the extra rotation assigrunent on the rotation list. Operators will be
given the opportunity to be present at this drawing.

(c) There will be two Operators scheduled for each rotation assignment and they will be called out by
the Police Department on alternating calls. There will be no subcontracting allowed. Each Operator is
responsible for having on duty equipment and personnel to handle their own calls, and to respond
within the prescribed time limit. In cases where there is a large scene, the alternate Operator may be
called by the Police Department to help.



                                               Page 11 of15
(d) If conditions are such that both Operators are fully engaged and are unable to provide necessary
services, the on duty police supervisor shall have the latitude to call another qualified Operator from the
tow list to handle the excess workload.

(e) Operators may not sell or transfer their rotation assignment place on the rotation list to another
Operator. Another Operator may not respond to calls for service at the request of an Operator on the
list.

(t) An Operator may withdraw from the towing list with a one week notice to the Chief of Police. That
Operator must wait until the next application period for consideration to be placed back on the list.

(g) In the case of voluntary or involuntary removal from the tow list, a lottery will be held of the
remaining qualified Operators to fill each vacant rotation spot on the list.

Sec. 138-134. Fees For Incident Management Tows.

Operator agrees to follow the below listed fees for services rendered under this ordinance. The below
listed fees are the only fees to be charged by Operators participating under this ordinance. No
additional fees or surcharges can be added.
(a)    TOWING:
       1. Light-Duty Wreckers: A wrecker equipped with a power operated winch, winch line, and a
          boom at least six (6) feet in length, with a rated or tested single line lifting capacity of not
          10,000 pounds or less. Flatbed (also known as a rollback) load-up wreckers are included in
          this wrecker category.

              A. Standard towing with conventional or rollback $ 160.00 maximum.

              B. Standard towing for a wrecked vehicle, with conventional or rollback $190.00
              maximum. (No additional winch fees allowed on standard tow.)

              C. Waiting fee after first thirty (30) minutes, $32.00 for each additional fifteen (15)
              minutes not to exceed $128.00 per hour.

               D. Rollover fee can be applied at a rate no greater than the waiting fee for time used.

              E. Drop Fee (In lieu of a standard towing fee.) maximum $75.00.

              F. Any tow that starts and ends within the city limits will have NO additional mileage
                 fees.

               G. For consent tows, if customer requests vehicle to be towed outside city limits, a
                  mileage rate will be a private contract between the Operator and the customer.

               H. Standard clean-up of debris will have no additional fees. Charges for cleanup of
                  major incident scenes will require approval from on duty Police supervisor.

                                               Page 12 of15
        2. Medium-Duty Wreckers: A wrecker equipped with a power operated winch, winch line, and
           a boom at least six (6) feet in length, with a rated or tested single or double line lifting
           capacity of more than 10,000 to less than 25,000 pounds. Medium duty wrecker fees are
           only applicable if a medium duty wrecker is actually required.

                A. Standard towing $330.00 maximum.

                B. Standard towing for wrecked vehicle $380.00 maximum.

                C. Waiting fee after first thirty (30) minutes $62.00 for each additional fifteen (15)
                minutes not to exceed $248.00 per hour.

                D. Drop Fee (In lieu of a standard towing fee.) maximum $115.00.

               E. Standard clean-up of debris will have no additional fees. Charges for cleanup of
               major incident scenes will require approval from on duty Police supervisor.

        3. Heavy-Duty Wreckers: A wrecker equipped with a power operated winch, winch line, and a
           boom at least six (6) feet in length, with a rated or tested single or double line lifting
           capacity of 25,000 pounds or more. Must be rated at 25 tons or more. Must be capable of
           towing a 12 yard tandem dump loaded trailer (50,000 lbs gvw). Additionally, it is preferred
           that this specialty equipment have airbags, and other equipment needed to right an
           overturned big truck or 18 wheeler.

               A. Standard towing fee $700.00 maximum.

               B. Standard towing fee for wrecked vehicle $800.00 maximum.

               C. Waiting fee after first thirty (30) minutes $110.00 for each additional fifteen (15)
               minutes not to exceed $440.00 per hour.

               D. Labor fee $585.00 per hour, per incident maximum. Additional recovery equipment
               and personnel labor left open for major scenes as needed. Additional personnel or labor
               needed must be approved by the on scene Police supervisor.

               E. Drop Fee (In lieu of a standard towing fee.) maximum $325.00.

(b)    TOWING AND STORAGE OF CITY VEHICLES.
If so requested by the City, the Operator shall tow up to fifteen ( 15) per month at no cost to the City of
City owned, leased or vehicles otherwise under the City's control, including vehicles seized as evidence
or for some other lawful police purpose. Vehicles qualifying for a free tow shall not exceed 1 ton
hauling capacity. Vehicles will be towed to Operator's storage facility or as directed by the Police
Department. Operator shall store City controlled vehicles at no cost. However, City agrees that any of
the vehicles stored at Operator's vehicle storage facility shall not remain stored in excess of fifteen ( 15)
days without arrangement of fees to be charged to the City. The City of New Braunfels shall pay

                                                Page 13of15
Operator the same rates as stated above for City controlled vehicles towed in excess of 15 per month.
City controlled vehicles towed from outside of the City boundaries will be charged at no more than the
public rates. If this tow is within the 15 fee tows no charge will occur once inside the City limits.
Operator shall provide to the Police Department a monthly summary statement, along with the
individual tow tickets for all City controlled vehicles to include the 15 free tows.

Sec. 138-135. Hearing; Suspension and Termination by Chief of Police.

(a) Hearing. Before the Chief of Police suspends or terminates an Operator from the rotation list
system, the Operator must be afforded an opportunity to present his/her reasons why the Chief should
not take any suspension or termination action, or to present factors that the Chief can consider in
assessing the length of the suspension or termination.

(b) Suspension by Chief of Police.
The Chief of Police shall suspend an Operator from the rotation list system for any violation of this
ordinance or any policy adopted by the Chief of Police under authority of this ordinance or state law.
The period of suspension is to be determined by the Chief of Police, whose decision is final and is not
appealable to the City Manager or City Council. The Chief shall notify a rotation Operator of
suspension from the rotation list system in writing either by confirmed fax, certified mail return receipt
requested, or hand delivered notice. The notice must state the basis for the action.

(c) Termination by the Chief of Police.
The Chief shall terminate the Operator from participating in the rotation list system based upon:
       1. Any repeated violations of the provisions of this article;
       2. Any criminal offense committed by the service or by the driver, employee or agent of the
           service, in the course of providing services under this ordinance, whether or not the services
           are being performed as part of the rotation list system call; or
       3. Any conduct which endangers the life or safety of any person.

A tow Operator that has been terminated will not be placed on the rotation list for up to 5 years. The
decision of the Chief of Police to terminate an Operator is final and is not appealable to the City
Manager or City Council. The Chief shall notify a rotation Operator of termination from the rotation
list system in writing either by confirmed fax, certified mail return receipt requested, or hand delivered
notice. The notice must state the basis for the action.

Sec. 138-136 Penalties.

An Operator who violates any provision of this ordinance commits a misdemeanor and upon conviction
shall be punished by a fine of not less than $200 nor more than $500, unless a different fine is
otherwise specifically provided for a violation under this ordinance.

     SECTION 3: THIS ORDINANCE DOES NOT CREATE ANY CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS
FOR OPERATORS OR ANY THIRD PARTIES.

       SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative to all other
ordinances of the City of New Braunfels relating to vehicle storage facilities and nonconsent towing of


                                               Page 14of15
vehicles within the city limits, and same shall not operate to repeal or affect any such ordinance or
ordinances except insofar as the provisions of such ordinance or ordinances are inconsistent or in
conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which instance or instances those provisions shall be
and they are hereby repealed.

       SECTION 5: That if any prov1s10ns of this Ordinance shall be held void, illegal, or
unconstitutional, it is hereby provided that all other parts of the same which are not held void, illegal or
unconstitutional shall remain in full force and effect.

       SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall take effect upon the second and final reading of the same.

        PASSED AND APPROVED: First reading this               It-~   day of   2~            ,2015.

       PASSED AND APPROVED: Second reading this ?..-&'*"day of                o~
                                                                              fl
                                                                                            ,2015.




                                              Barron Casteel, Mayor


ATTEST:    1 A~
          -~
Patrick Aten, City Secretary


APPROVED AS TO FORM:



Valeria M. Acevedo, City Attorney




                                                Page 15of15
