J-S30039-16


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                      PENNSYLVANIA
                         Appellee

                    v.

REGINALD TERREL FOSTER

                         Appellant                     No. 1506 EDA 2015


                 Appeal from the PCRA Order April 22, 2015
            In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
            Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0009100-2012


BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., and JENKINS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY JENKINS, J.:                           FILED MAY 20, 2016

      Reginald Foster appeals from an order denying his petition under the

Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq.         Because

Foster is no longer serving any sentence, we affirm.

      On February 26, 2013, the trial court found Foster guilty of two counts

of driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802, and sentenced him to 72

hours – 6 months’ imprisonment. The sentence began on March 22, 2013.

Foster filed a timely direct appeal, and this Court affirmed on April 15, 2014.

      On May 13, 2014, Foster filed a PCRA petition alleging ineffective

assistance of counsel. The court appointed counsel to represent Foster. On

February 15, 2015, counsel moved to withdraw and filed a “no merit” letter

advising that Foster was not entitled to PCRA relief because he was no

longer serving any sentence. Counsel served Foster with a copy of the “no
J-S30039-16



merit” letter and motion to withdraw.            On April 2, 2015, the court filed a

notice of intent to dismiss Foster’s PCRA petition and served Foster with this

notice via certified mail.      On April 22, 2015, the court granted counsel’s

motion to withdraw and dismissed Foster’s PCRA petition.1             Foster filed a

timely appeal to this Court.        On July 31, 2015, the court filed a Pa.R.A.P.

1925 opinion recommending that this Court affirm on the ground that Foster

was no longer serving any sentence.

       We agree that Foster is not entitled to relief. The PCRA provides that

“to be eligible for relief … the petitioner must plead and prove … [that] at the

time relief is granted, [he is] currently serving a sentence of imprisonment,

probation or parole for the crime.”            42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(1)(i).   Foster

began serving his sentence on March 22, 2013, and his sentence ended on

September 22, 2013. At the time the court reviewed his PCRA petition in

2015, he was no longer serving any sentence and could not obtain relief

under the PCRA.         See Commonwealth v. Stultz, 114 A.3d 865, 872

(Pa.Super.2014) (defendant was no longer eligible for PCRA relief for his DUI

conviction where he had completed serving his sentence for this offense).

       Order affirmed.



____________________________________________


1
  Foster does not object to counsel’s motion to withdraw or “no merit” letter
in this appeal. Based on our Supreme Court’s instruction to avoid raising
these matters sua sponte, we will refrain from examining these issues. See
Commonwealth v. Pitts, 981 A.2d 875, 876 n.1 (Pa.2009).



                                           -2-
J-S30039-16




Judgment Entered.




Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary



Date: 5/20/2016




                          -3-
