     Case: 17-10878      Document: 00514396255         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/21/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 17-10878
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                  Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                          March 21, 2018
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                       Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUNA-MARTINEZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:17-CR-10-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luna-Martinez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna-Martinez has not filed a response. Although Luna-
Martinez remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the
term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10878    Document: 00514396255     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/21/2018


                                 No. 17-10878

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED
as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
