




Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2008







Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2008.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-08-00286-CR
____________
 
FELICIA NICOLE ENER, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 262nd District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
1152289
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N




Appellant
entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession of between four and two
hundred grams of phencyclidine, a controlled substance.  The trial court
deferred a finding of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for
four years and assessed a $100 fine.  The State filed a motion to adjudicate
guilt, asserting violations of the terms of appellant=s community supervision.  Appellant
entered a plea of true, and on March 6, 2008, the trial court adjudicated
appellant=s guilt and sentenced her to confinement for three years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant
filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, more
than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have
carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d
824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.  
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed
December 11, 2008.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Anderson
and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).

