                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 03-2465
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
             Appellee,                  *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * Western District of Missouri.
Terrence S. Diamond,                    *
                                        * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellant.                 *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: February 4, 2004

                                  Filed: February 18, 2004
                                   ___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Terrence S. Diamond pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm.
At sentencing, the district court1 departed upward to a Category V criminal history
and sentenced Diamond to 105 months in prison and 3 years supervised release. On
appeal Diamond argues the district court erred in departing upward without
comparing his criminal history to that of most defendants with a Category V criminal



      1
      The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
history, and by failing to enumerate what specific aspects of his background
warranted an upward departure.

      After carefully reviewing the record de novo, see United States v. Flores, 336
F.3d 760, 763 (8th Cir. 2003), we conclude that Diamond’s arguments are either
without legal merit or are unsupported by the record, see United States v. Levi, 229
F.3d 677, 679 (8th Cir. 2000) (district court is not required to compare defendant
explicitly to other offenders in particular criminal history category before departing
upward); United States v. Hendricks, 171 F.3d 1184, 1188 (8th Cir. 1999) (when
departing, court must explain why Guidelines sentence is inadequate, identify specific
factual basis for departure, and explain why resulting sentence is reasonable);
U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, p.s. (court may depart upward if reliable information indicates that
defendant’s criminal history category does not reflect seriousness of his past criminal
conduct or likelihood he will commit other crimes).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




                                          -2-
