

People v Mazariego (2016 NY Slip Op 06727)





People v Mazariego


2016 NY Slip Op 06727


Decided on October 12, 2016


Appellate Division, Second Department


Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.


This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.



Decided on October 12, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.


2014-10286
 (Ind. No. 880/11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v Joni N. Mazariego, appellant.


Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, NY, for appellant.
Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Tammy J. Smiley and Cristin N. Connell of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), imposed June 26, 2014, upon his conviction of attempted gang assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, as reduced by a decision and order of this Court dated May 28, 2014 (see People v Mazariego, 117 AD3d 1082).
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, gang assault in the first degree, and attempted assault in the second degree. On a prior appeal, this Court modified the judgment of conviction by reducing the conviction of gang assault in the first degree to attempted gang assault in the first degree, and vacating the sentence imposed upon the conviction of gang assault in the first degree. As so modified, the judgment was affirmed, and the matter was remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, "for sentencing on the conviction of attempted gang assault in the first degree" (People v Mazariego, 117 AD3d 1082, 1082).
Upon remittitur, the County Court sentenced the defendant solely on the reduced conviction of attempted gang assault in the first degree, and did not disturb the sentences imposed upon the defendant's other two convictions.
The defendant's sole contention on this appeal is that, upon remittitur, the County Court should also have resentenced him on his other two convictions. Contrary to his contention, the County Court properly carried out the directive contained in this Court's decision and order by sentencing him solely with respect to the reduced conviction of attempted gang assault in the first degree (see CPL 470.15[2][a]; 470.20[4]; cf. People v Villanueva, 136 AD3d 1068; People v Calas, 134 AD3d 1043). The County Court had no obligation, or authority, to resentence the defendant on the convictions that were affirmed by this Court's decision and order (see CPL 470.15[2][a]; 470.20[4]; cf. People v Illescas, 139 AD3d 873).
ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court


