        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 16-279V
                                      Filed: July 29, 2016
                                          Unpublished

****************************
PATRICIA VILLANO,                       *
                                        *
v.                                      *
                   Petitioner,          *    Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
                                        *    Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination;
                                        *    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *    Administration (“SIRVA”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *    Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
                                        *
                   Respondent.          *
                                        *
****************************
Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Ryan Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On February 29, 2016, Patricia Villano (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that she
suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving the
influenza vaccine on November 11, 2014. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. Petitioner further alleges
that she received her vaccination in the United States, that she has suffered the residual
effects of her injury for more than six months, and that no lawsuit has been filed or
settlement accepted by herself or anyone else for her injuries. Id. at ¶¶ 19-21. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.



1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended
at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
        On July 29, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes
that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is
consistent with SIRVA; that a preponderance of evidence establishes that her SIRVA
was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccination she received on November 11, 2014; and that
no other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA were identified.” Id. at 2 (citation omitted).
Respondent further indicates that “based on the current record, petitioner has satisfied
all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 3.

       In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that
petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                  s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                  Nora Beth Dorsey
                                  Chief Special Master




                                            2
