               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 45059

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 349
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: February 6, 2018
                                                )
v.                                              )   Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
                                                )
AARON ZACHARY GUILFORD,                         )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Kootenai County. Hon. Cynthia K.C. Meyer, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
       of confinement of three years, for lewd conduct with a minor child, affirmed.

       Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                    Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                 and LORELLO, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Aaron Zachary Guilford was found guilty of lewd conduct with a minor child. I.C. § 18-
1508. The district court sentenced Guilford to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum
period of confinement of three years. Guilford appeals.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.


                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Guilford’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
