
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-2212                                 RENALDO ALAN BROWNE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. TREASURY, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Robert B. Collings, U.S. Magistrate Judge]                                             _____________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,                                        _____________                              Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,                                   ____________________                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.                                          _____________                                 ____________________            Renaldo Alan Browne on brief pro se.            ___________________                                 ____________________                                    March 27, 1997                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his                      __________            complaint  as "frivolous"  under former  28 U.S.C.    1915(d)            (now codified at  28 U.S.C.   1915(e)(2)(B)).   Reviewing the            dismissal  de  novo, and  upon  consideration of  plaintiff's                       __  ____            brief, we see no basis  for disagreeing with the magistrate's            reasoning and  conclusion.  The  judgment is  affirmed.   See                                                          ________    ___            Loc. R. 27.1.                                         -2-
