21 F.3d 426NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Michael James SMITH, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-7230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.Decided March 11, 1994.

Michael James Smith, appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, NC, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:


1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Smith, No. CR-92-110, CA-93-247-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.


2
AFFIRMED.

