       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

     IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY
                LICENSING, L.P.
              ______________________

                       2013-1139
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 90/010,130.
                 ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

    FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Vir-
ginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were
JONATHAN G. GRAVES, OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, AND LORI R.
MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.

    STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria,
Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and Thomas W.
Krause, Associate Solicitor.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 November 7, 2013              /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court
