Case: 20-125   Document: 5    Page: 1    Filed: 05/20/2020




          NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

 In re: ANDREW G. BODNAR, CHRISTINE M. ZAJ-
    BODNAR, FRANK H. BUNKER, RICHARD R.
CARTER, M. LYNN CARTER, J. THOMAS CONKLIN
      TRUST, GERARD V. COSGROVE, RUTH
 COSGROVE, as trustees of the Gerard V. Cosgrove
   and Ruth Cosgrove Living Trust, MARILYN J.
     CUNAT, MARC DEL MARIANI, MARY DEL
MARIANI, EHRET MICHIGAN TRUST, GEORGE J.
GREGULE, JR., VICTORIA JACKSON, aka Victoria
Illsen, HYUN S. JYUNG TRUST, ROBERT J. KANE,
 PATRICIA KANE, FRANK F. LAHR, CHARLOTTE
     D. LAHR, RICHARD NEUSER, ROBERT S.
PANCOAST, PAMELA S. PANCOAST, LEONARD J.
SMITH, KAY F. VARGA, aka Kay F. Smith, ROBERT
    D. MELCHER, MARIA MELCHER, CRAIG D.
OKONSKI, CHERIE R. OKONSKI, KENT WERGER,
MARGARET WERGER, ROGER B. WILSCHKE, ANN
   C. WILSCHKE, COUNTRY, L.L.C., L. RICHARD
   MARZKE, NANCY A. MARZKE, NOTRE DAME
   PATH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, HERZL
RAGINE, M.D., ELIZABETH S. ERRANT, aka Eliza-
  beth Saphir, BANK ONE, FKA NBD BANK, N.A.,
                     Petitioners
               ______________________

                       2020-125
                ______________________

   On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
Court of Federal Claims in Nos. 1:00-cv-00379-EMR, 1:00-
Case: 20-125      Document: 5     Page: 2     Filed: 05/20/2020




2                                                IN RE: BODNAR




cv-00381-EMR, 1:00-cv-00382-EMR, 1:00-cv-00384-EMR,
1:00-cv-00385-EMR, 1:00-cv-00386-EMR, 1:00-cv-00387-
EMR, 1:00-cv-00391-PEC, 1:00-cv-00392-EMR, 1:00-cv-
00393-EMR, 1:00-cv-00394-EMR, 1:00-cv-00395-EMR,
1:00-cv-00396-EMR, 1:00-cv-00398-EMR, 1:00-cv-00399-
EMR, 1:00-cv-00400-EMR, 1:00-cv-00401-EMR, 1:05-cv-
01381-EMR, 1:06-cv-00072-EMR, 1:99-cv-04452-EMR,
1:99-cv-04453-EMR, 1:99-cv-04455-EMR, 1:99-cv-04457-
EMR, 1:99-cv-04458-EMR, 1:99-cv-44510-EMR, and 1:99-
cv-4456-EMR, Judge Eleni M. Roumel.
                ______________________

                         ON PETITION
                     ______________________

    Before REYNA, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
                          ORDER
    Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus asking this court
to direct the United States to indicate whether it agrees or
disagrees with their calculations regarding real estate lost
by erosion “and to provide its own calculations if it disa-
grees without further delay.” We find that the petitioners
have not demonstrated that they satisfy the standard for
mandamus relief at this time.
      Accordingly,
      IT IS ORDERED THAT:
      The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
                                  FOR THE COURT

          May 20, 2020            /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
             Date                 Peter R. Marksteiner
                                  Clerk of Court
s25
