       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

             AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A.,
                   Appellant

                           v.

          AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD
            ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
                     Appellees
              ______________________

                      2017-1999
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-
01804.
                 ______________________

               Decided: January 9, 2019
                ______________________

   MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin,
TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G.
HARDY.

   DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto,
CA, argued for appellees.        Also represented by
CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q.
SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH.
                ______________________
2                                 AC TECHS. v. AMAZON.COM




    Before MOORE, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
    Before us is AC Technologies S.A.’s appeal of the Pa-
tent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that all claims of
U.S. Patent 8,656,125 are unpatentable. On appeal, AC
raises arguments substantially identical to those we
rejected today in AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com,
Inc., No. 18-1433. For the reasons explained in that
decision, we affirm the Board.
                        AFFIRMED
                          COSTS
    Costs to Appellees.
