     Case: 12-40907       Document: 00512466992         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/10/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        December 10, 2013
                                     No. 12-40907
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODERRETTE DEWRAYNE MCCLURE,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 9:11-CR-38-1


Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roderrette Dewrayne
McClure has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). McClure has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as McClure’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-40907   Document: 00512466992    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/10/2013

                               No. 12-40907

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2
