                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-10-00750-CV

                              IN THE INTEREST OF B.R.H., a Child

                     From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2009-PA-01726
                             Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Rebecca Simmons, Justice
                  Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           Appellant seeks to appeal an order terminating his parental rights. An appeal from such

an order is accelerated. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(a) (West 2008). The trial court

signed the order on May 20, 2010. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal

was due on June 9, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to file the

notice of appeal was due on June 24, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of

appeal on July 13, 2010, and a motion for extension of time in the trial court on July 13, 2010. It

thus appeared that neither document was filed within the time allowed for filing a motion for

extension of time to file the notice of appeal.
                                                                                       04-10-00750-CV


        A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once

the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can

no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id.

        On October 28, 2010, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by November 12,

2010, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded that

he did not receive timely notice of the trial court’s judgment. On December 13, 2010, we abated

this appeal to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the date on which the appellant

first received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the signing of the judgment. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 4.2; TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(5). On January 24, 2011, a supplemental clerk’s record was

filed containing the trial court’s order determining that the appellant first received notice of the

judgment or acquired actual knowledge of the signing of the judgment on May 20, 2010. Based

on the trial court’s finding, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal ran from the date the trial

court’s order was signed on May 20, 2010. Accordingly, by the time appellant filed his notice of

appeal, “the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] ha[d] passed,”

and appellant could “no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” See Verburgt, 959

S.W.2d at 617. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, this appeal is dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                              PER CURIAM




                                                 -2-
