Motion Denied; Abatement Order filed February 17, 2015.




                                       In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                    ____________

                               NO. 14-14-00455-CR
                                 ____________

                       GREGORIO MORENO, Appellant

                                          V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


                    On Appeal from the 185th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. 1406639

                              ABATEMENT ORDER

      Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Vivian R. King. Appellant’s
brief was originally due August 20, 2014. We granted a total of more than 90 days
extension of time to file appellant’s brief until December 5, 2014. When we
granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted
absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On December 18, 2014,
counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief stating
that a brief would be filed December 31, 2014. No brief was filed. Counsel did not
allege any exceptional circumstances in the request.

      On January 13, 2015, this court denied appellant’s further motion for
extension of time and ordered the brief filed on or before February 5, 2015. On
February 3, 2015, counsel filed a further motion for extension of time stating that a
brief would be filed February 9, 2015. No brief was filed. The January 13, 2015
order instructed counsel that if no brief was timely filed, the court would issue an
order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of
sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief. Accordingly,
we deny appellant’s motion, and issue the following order:

      Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge
of the 185th District Court shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at which
appellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, either in person
or by video teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to prosecute
his appeal; (b) whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether appellant
has abandoned the appeal or whether appellant has failed to make necessary
arrangements for filing a brief; (d) the reason for the failure to file a brief; (e) if
appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief will
be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing.
If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be necessary to
assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the appointment of
new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make
findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a
transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a
recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing
the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this
court on or before March 17, 2015.

      The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will
also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or
the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any
party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to
schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not
request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date
and notify the parties of such date.



                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
                      RULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS



Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief.

      (b) Criminal Cases.

             (1) Effect.    An appellant=s failure to timely file a brief does not
authorize either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration
of the appeal without briefs.

             (2) Notice. If the appellant=s brief is not timely filed, the appellate
clerk must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the
appellate court does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court
must order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether
the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or,
if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make
appropriate findings and recommendations.

             (3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any
necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and have a
record of the proceedings prepared, which recordCincluding any order and
findingsCmust be sent to the appellate court.

             (4) Appellate Court Action. Based on the trial court=s record, the
appellate court may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant=s rights are
protected, including initiating contempt proceedings against appellant=s counsel. If
the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the
appeal, or that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the necessary
arrangements for filing a brief, the appellate court may consider the appeal without
briefs, as justice may require.
