     Case: 14-31107        Document: 00512840822       Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/18/2014


           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                  ___________________                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                     No. 14-31107                         November 18, 2014
                                  ___________________                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
IN RE: DEEPWATER HORIZON
_______________________________________________________________________
LAKE EUGENIE LAND & DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; ET AL

              Plaintiffs

v.

BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INCORPORATED; BP AMERICA
PRODUCTION COMPANY; BP, P.L.C.,

              Defendants - Appellees

v.

SEALED APPELLANT 1; SEALED APPELLANT 2; SEALED APPELLANT
3; SEALED APPELLANT 4; SEALED APPELLANT 5; SEALED
APPELLANT 6; SEALED APPELLANT 7; SEALED APPELLANT 8;
SEALED APPELLANT 9,

              Claimants - Appellants

                               _______________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 2:12-CV-970
                             _______________________

Before JONES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-31107    Document: 00512840822     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/18/2014


                                 No. 14-31107

      IT IS ORDERED that the appellees’ motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED.
      The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
      Judge Dennis would have allowed the matter to proceed through the
ordinary course, including full briefing.




                                       2
