                                    Cite as 2015 Ark. 468

                SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                       No.   CR-15-948

RANDY WILLIAM GAY                                 Opinion Delivered   December 10, 2015
                               APPELLANT
                                                  MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
V.


STATE OF ARKANSAS                                 MOTION GRANTED.
                                 APPELLEE


                                        PER CURIAM


       Appellant Randy William Gay, through his attorney Mark S. Fraiser, brings the instant

motion for rule on clerk. Gay seeks to appeal the March 20, 2015 sentencing order

convicting him of capital murder and sentencing him to death. He timely filed a notice of

appeal on March 23, 2015, causing the record to be due in the office of this court’s clerk no

later than October 20, 2015. Gay did not submit the record by that date because his counsel

requested and received an extension beyond the seven-month period allotted by Rule 4(c)(2)

of the Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal.

       This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated

appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). In that case, we

identified only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party

or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason. McDonald, 356 Ark. at 116,

146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained as follows:
                                   Cite as 2015 Ark. 468

       Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the
       appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely
       perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two
       options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault
       should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself.
       There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second,
       where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was
       not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this
       court will decide whether good reason is present.

356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires

an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly

admit fault where he or she has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal.

Id. When it is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under either

rule based on error or good reason, the relief will be granted. Id. If there is attorney error,

a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

       It is plain from the motion and record before us that there was error on Mr. Fraiser’s

part in failing to timely lodge the record. Pursuant to McDonald, we grant Gay’s motion for

rule on clerk and forward a copy of this opinion to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

       Motion granted.




                                              2
