Honorable Doug Crouch      Opinion No. Ww-1469
District Attorney
Tarrant Countv            Re:   Whether a fee aaid to a deoutv
Fort Worth, Tkxas               county clerk for signing an ik-
                                ventory and appraisement in a
                                probate matter, as an appraiser,
                                is a fee of office that must be
                                paid into the county treasury as
Dear Mr.Crouch:                 a fee of office.
          You have requested an opinion from this office in re-
gard to the question of whether:
         II
          . . . the fee paid to the deputy clerk for
    signing an inventory and appraisement as an ap-
    praiser in probate matters a fee of office such as
    must be paid into the county treasury and accounted
    for as a fee of office?"
          You have mentioned in connection with the above-quoted
question that:
         "Here in Tarrant County as in many other
    counties in the state, the practice has developed
    over quite a period of time whereby in probate
    matters, attorneys will take into the office of
    the county clerk an inventory and appraisement to
    be filed in connection with the probate proceedings.
    The attorney will then ask one or more deputy clerks
    to sign the inventory and appraisement for them be-
    fore it is filed. This is done, I am sure, as a
    matter of convenience to the attorneys. For signing
    these instruments the deputy clerk is usually paid
    some fee, and I am informed this fee is usually
    about j610.00each.'l
          Article XVI, Section 61, of the Texas Constitution, pro-
vides in part that:
          "All district officers in the State of Texas
     and all county officers in counties having a popula-
     tion of twenty thousand (20,000) or more, according
     to the then last preceding Federal Census, shall be
Hon. Doug Crouch, page 2   (WW-1469)


     compensated on a salary basis . . . All fees
     earned by . . . county . . . officers shall be
     paid into the county treasury. . . .I'
          In State v Glasg,,167 S.W.2d 296 (Civ. Ap    1943,
error ref., State v.'Glass 141 Tex. 83, 170 S.W.2d Is*
                                                     70), it
was held in Section 61 of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution
that:
          11
           . . . all fees earned by district
     county and precinct officers shall be pa!d into
     the county treasury . . . indicates an intention
     that all fees of every character collected by a
     county officer officiallv in counties having a
     population of twenty thousand or more shall be-
     come fees of office, and that the officer is lim-
     ited to his salary as compensation, and any fees
     collected by him official& must be paid into the
     county depository as directed by the constitu-
     tional provisi0n.l' (Emphasis added)
          In addition? the Supreme Court of Texas in the case of
Wichita Countv v. Robinson, 155'Tex. 1, 276 S.W.2d 509, in com-
menting upon State v. Glass, su-ora,states that:
          ,I
           . . . Section 61 of Article XVI, Constitu-
     tion of Texas, required that the collection be
     limited to his salary as compensation and any fees
     collected by him +&d&a;;d',:'o
                      offi                 the County
     Depository. . . .
          The language of the courts in the cases cited above
makes it readily apparent that the fees or compensation received
by county officers to which Section 61 of Article XVI of the
Texas Constitution applies are those fees which are received by
the county officer in his capacity as a county officer and which
are considered a fee of the county office which he holds. Such
being the case, it is necessary to determine in the instant case
whether the fee received by the deputy county clerk for signing
an inventory and appraisement as an appraiser in a probate mat-
ter is a fee of the county office he holds or is merely remunera-
tion which he has received in a capacity other than in his offi-
cial capacity as a county officer.
          Section 248 of the Probate Code, Vernon's Civil Stat-
utes, provides that:
          "When letters testamentary, or of administra-
     tion or guardianship, are granted, the court, in the
Hon. Doug Crouch, page 3   (W-1469)


     order granting such letters, shall appoint three
     or more disinterested persons. citizens of t&
     gountv, a majority of whom may act, to appraise
     the property of the estate to be administered.
     . . .‘I (Emphasis added)
          Section 250 of the Pro’bateCode, Vernon’s Civil Stat-
utes, provides that:
          “It shall ‘bethe duty of every personal rep-
     resentative of an estate. as soon as he has col-
     lected the estate, and within sixty days after he
     has qualified and received letters, with the as-
     sistance of a majority of the appraisers appointed
     by the court, to make or cause to Abemade a full
     and correct inventory and appraisement of the prop-
     erty . . . and such appraisement shall be duly
     sworn to and subscribed by the appraisers.”
          Section 253 of the Probate Code, Vernon’s Civil Stat-
utes, provides that:
          “Each appraiser appointed by the court, as
     herein authorized, shall be entitled to receive a
     minimum compensation of Five Dollars ($5) per day,
     payable out of the estate, for each day that he
     actually serves in performance of his duties as
     such.”
          A study of the above-quoted provisi,onsof the Probate
Code reveals that the court may appoint as an appraiser in a
probate matter any disinterested person who is a citizen of the
county. There is no requirement that any of the appraisers ap-
pointed by the court be a deputy county clerk. In turn, there is
no requirement set forth by statute that the County Clerk or any
of his deputies serve as appraisers in probate matters.

          The fees earned or collected by deputy county clerks
which must be paid into the county treasury pursuant to Section
61 of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution are those fees earned
or collected by the deputy county clerks in their official capa-
city as deputy county clerks and in performing their functions as
deputy county clerks. As there are no statutory requirements
placed upon a deputy county clerk, in carrying out his official
functions, to act as an appraiser in probate matters; and as the
duties of an appraiser in probate matters can be fulfilled by
any disinterested person who is a citizen of the county, we are
of the opinion that any remuneration paid to a deputy county clerk
by virtue of his having been appointed an appraiser in a probate
Hon. Doug Crouch, page 4   (WW-1469)


matter is not a fee of office as contemplated by Section 61 of
Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, and it would not be
necessary for such compensation received by a deputy county clerk
to be paid into the county treasury.
                           SUMMARY
           Remuneration received by a deputy county clerk
      in acting as an appraiser in a probate matter is not
      a fee of office as contemplated by Section 61 of
      Article XVI of the Texas Constitution and would not
      have to be paid into the county treasury.

                            Yours very truly,
                           WILL WILSON
                           Attorney General of Texas



                               Pat Bailey
PB:wb                          Assistant
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
W. V. Geppert, Chairman
Frank Booth
San.Stone
Paul Phy
L. P. Lollar
REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY:   Leonard Passmore
