     Case: 11-30015     Document: 00511615720         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/28/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                       September 28, 2011
                                     No. 11-30015
                                   Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HAROLD J. JACKSON,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 5:10-CR-169-1


Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harold J. Jackson has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Jackson has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jackson’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-30015   Document: 00511615720   Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/28/2011

                              No. 11-30015

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2
