               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 43529

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 511
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: April 29, 2016
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
JASON ROBERT SHUTER,                            )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Samuel A. Hoagland, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                   Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                 and HUSKEY, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Jason Robert Shuter was found guilty by a jury of grand theft, Idaho Code §§ 18-2403(1),
2407(1)(b), 2409. The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence, with two years
determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Shuter on probation for five years. Shuter
appeals, contending that his underlying sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing


                                                1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Shuter’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
