                              Fourth Court of Appeals
                                     San Antonio, Texas
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-14-00384-CR

                                       Clay Arron ROBERTS,
                                             Appellant

                                                v.
                                           The STATE of
                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2014CR2824W
                           Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                  Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 2, 2014

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on April 8, 2014. Even if we

construed appellant’s motion to reduce state jail felony to a misdemeanor as a motion for new trial,

the motion would not extend the deadline to file appellant’s notice of appeal because it was not

timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a). Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new

trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed May 8, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion

for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 23, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
                                                                                                           04-14-00384-CR


Appellant filed a notice of appeal on May 28, 2014, and appellant did not file a motion for

extension of time.

         A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered

timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last

day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within

fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals

grants the motion for extension of time. See id. After reviewing the record, it appeared that

appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed.

         On June 4, 2014, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by June 18, 2014, why this

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 1 See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of

Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction

may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure). Appellant did not file a response to our order. Because appellant’s notice

of appeal was untimely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918

S.W.2d at 522.

                                                              PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH




1
  In our order, we also noted the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the
punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant;
therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed
if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

                                                            -2-
