                PD-1364-15


iM TttECCOfcT 6^^-^H^AL AP^AV-S OF Tb^A6

                 AJo. \b-\Z-0oHi(?-C$\


     JoKn OaMiJ Waai£iP<l^k                  A ppe IWaARECEIVED IN
                  zr^r                         rr      COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                                                            DEC 18 2015
                V
                                                       Abel Acosfa, Clerk

     ~XY)C S+oAe of Te*a6                   AppeU ee


          CouM^, TC'^ Via! Mo. ^fi^-%'^1
          cia^ t-V.e T«?mVv dourer o? Apf>£CUi)

ApptUciM'5 Trial A+Aor^c^
                                         \\0b Wooded A^frS, 601H &bO
                                         W^o,Tx. 767 ID
AffelUM'i ApptaA Attorney


S^A Tr»a\ A^orofuS                       /A$, Afna^cJ^ O\\\on
                                         /v\5, 6rabnel Ma3$«»j
^a-Ve't) Kppeal A-Woca€lj5                Abel'.Ao ^acl
                                         Sterling Har/vsoO

                                          Wa«>, Tjc 767£l
TABLE   OF C0MTE-MT5"'

  ORAL ARGrUMENl              ^

  thbt summary            i

  PROdfc'DUkAL HISTORY^

  Index or- authorities ^

  GrfcOOMOS FDR REVIEW              M
          - Does HoMCb^ re^u'-re afpfUarv* to pe0ue Wsn •

                f.c\r«Qartoc<i)   harm ,

  AR(rOn£N)TS r3
  PRAMEA FOR REtief 1
ORAL AtUrU/AfcMT'

    The -<LppeU«A4 doe6 Oo-V wi6h ^or aOZl ar^u/^eoV urA«£


CA6£ Sl>W\A«Of:
     Appellant pled no+^uil*^ bwf wai iufeSequert+U^
-^oond <^utl^-, o* 6ey.ucLl As6<2<jW. The v/'klUa^ W^ a
 •V-w^nVu-f^g ^car o\d ^lr\ w»Vh whom A.pp£lla<v4 had
 ptcv/ioui)^ W <LorL5c05t>^ ^ex ^'^ before, Appe^onV
W<^ be^^ceo ku^e sain* oyr^ T-W-f £ooac* hiAo
Quil+k +0 Li^re in pclSOA, TV cba^e wcis C.aW^()
ba 0, prior ArsoA £ase in ^6£)&-

PROdtOURAl          HiSTD^Y:
  Apellate SeMeA^di ^ /*,0u«& +0 app*^"             \t-tVd0l3
  *U$<r>t^ ov Tr.a\ dvor* Af?ir^i                   &/> ~\%- ^? l^
  forage Wo-V.w -fix- tribal &^on5<cWV.or.          0°»-0%-^6\S
  ?co i>€ A\o+'>oa for £v*eni>"on o£ Tine foe ?0R    \& '^ "^£>Vb
    Cou>p4 o4- Appfai/i




                                                                     ^
WPFY    OP   Authorities'

 Abclftor v 6Me &71 5,W.^di 7^^> lT*>dn/n App Wl^               5


AImar. to. v.-Slate Mb stite.Wl het.CM.fiiftAW'fi              7


 Cab'iO V. itttte BbB» ^A-0,Bd ~?U [lev .£0*. Aff- ^lU         7
 Hernandez v,£t<ite 176 6,U.3ci e^i (lex.^M. App. ^00$)         b
 OacK^on v. £>4aic 3^6 6.W3<i S75(T^.App,-Te^ka^Qs ^I0p^^<i")5
 U ctnaaS V- State U 5»W.3tA 471                                /

 Wo rale* v. 5 Kate "2>^ S.W3d (^                              "7

  (W.Uc v, £>We *3 6.U3i 17H (.Tc* ^. App. &&0(^                b
 Wheeler ^' We &7 i.U.3J H^                               ~    5
  TdCP T?,07 3^                                           *, t, 5




                                                                    3
(tMUNJDS F£>& REVitW'.


 \) D'.ci *V»t ^.oort o^ App-enAs e<T iA ^(7oJu(iiA^ tto €uideAc<f
    o£ an €\+raftCous ofte*^ <A;<J Aot cq»6£ enough V\aw v-o
    LuaccaaV action wjh<?n appelant 're£>ueA ^ V<£e 6eAt^/\d€ tor
    rL 66dc(v«i (kafee Selon^ <u^ 5<i»<* e\)i^<?^ ^ efctraf><rot# o^ense
    violates Te*aa U&e <£ UrK>rA Pro^<W 37-67 3& a^
      e>a5 Ry»c& 9? EuicW Ho3 and HoH^?
     \r




^) feii rcqu»r'in« cm cfpei^M +o 6V\o*J Kow he or $he, ii
    Surprised \>y Ho^b} A.oto requirement, l& t-h<e ^-ourt o$
    cUPpeoSb counferpw^'irf^ nu/*-.(?rou6 £oi*t of £nrAinal Appeal
    hav/e tW buc<k^ to pcaue har^o tcoM d?rfor,

3) boes the ^-oor\ oS' appeals or -^Ke ^oort o\ £rth*r\o\
   Appra^ toe Hid responsibility when £gnd<xKAj a.
   hcic^ul tcror <ma|y,ii> wK'«^ /*ust £onA5t of reviewin^
   euerothir^ in tW 'colore^ to atV on \/vf>tsn'<\5 c£ eafeyxioui
     haa* £ou^ with.A the Cc^orA,feuV not $Vatei ^ any
     UieC in tV/e \nVeCe5V of ^051*6??




                                                                           n
