             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,058



                     EX PARTE CARLOS MENDOZA, JR., Applicant



              ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
              CAUSE NO. 1077076-A IN THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM HARRIS COUNTY



        Per curiam.

                                           OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child and sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals dismissed

his appeal because his notice of appeal was untimely filed. See Mendoza v. State, No. 01-07-00067-

CR, (Tex App– Houston [First Dist.], 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. On April 11, 2008, the trial court ordered counsel to file an affidavit
                                                                                                       2

in response to Applicant’s habeas allegations. On July 1, 2008, trial counsel filed an affidavit in

response to the trial court’s order. Upon review of counsel’s affidavit, the trial court determined that

there were still fact issues to be resolved. On October 31, 2008, a habeas hearing was held

concerning the merits of Applicant’s claim.

        On the basis of trial counsel’s testimony at the habeas hearing, the trial court found that trial

counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 1077076-A

from the 228th Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time

at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain

a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the

date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute

an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30

days after the mandate of this Court issues.



Delivered: December 17, 2008
Do Not Publish
