       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                          STEVEN R. POWELL,
                              Appellant,

                                     v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                              No. 4D15-1221

                             [August 19, 2015]

   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David Crow, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 502012CF005639AXXX.

   Steven R. Powell, Okeechobee, pro se.

   No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Steven Richard Powell appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850
motion which the trial court found to be untimely. Following an order to
show cause, the state concedes error. We remand for the court to consider
the merits of his claims.

   While on probation, Powell committed new, substantive offenses. He
was charged with attempted burglary of a dwelling (count 1) and criminal
mischief ($1,000 or more) (count 2). From the sparse record on appeal, it
appears that the codefendant, Larry Dean Hafner, also was charged with
possession of cocaine (count 3) and possession of marijuana less than 20
grams (count 4). According to Powell’s motion, he entered a guilty plea
and was convicted on all four counts, even though he was not charged
with counts 3 and 4. It is unclear from the record whether Powell was
convicted of both counts 3 and 4 or only count 3.

   A conviction for an uncharged crime can be raised at any time as it is
a denial of due process. See, e.g., Jaimes v. State, 51 So. 3d 445, 448 (Fla.
2010) (“It is a fundamental principle of due process that a defendant may
not be convicted of a crime that has not been charged by the state.”). The
fact that a plea was negotiated would not cure the error. Moore v. State,
924 So. 2d 840, 841 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The trial court could have
considered the untimely 3.850 motion as a petition for writ of habeas
corpus.

   We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the merits of
Powell’s motion and determine whether he was convicted of uncharged
crimes in counts 3 and 4.

   Reversed and remanded with instructions.

STEVENSON, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

                          *         *         *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.




                                   2
