     Case: 17-40284      Document: 00514238293         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/15/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fif th Circuit

                                    No. 17-40284                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                       November 15, 2017
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN SAUCEDO-DURAN, also known as Juan Manuel Duran-Saucedo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:16-CR-709-1


Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges,
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Saucedo-
Duran has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011).       Saucedo-Duran has not filed a response.                  We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40284    Document: 00514238293     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/15/2017


                                 No. 17-40284

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
