                    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                            FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            _____________________

                                 No. 95-40376
                            _____________________



TEXANS AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC., ET AL.,

                                                                 Plaintiffs,

WYNNE L. CREEKMORE, JR.,

                                                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                     versus

STATE BAR OF TEXAS; JAMES M. MCCORMACK;
DISTRICT 1A GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE
STATE BAR OF TEXAS,

                                            Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                    Eastern District of Texas
                           (3:94-CV-61)
_________________________________________________________________

                              (October 9, 1996)

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     In this case, the appellant, Wynne L. Creekmore, Jr., argues

on vague grounds that the State Bar of Texas violated his rights

guaranteed     by    the   First   Amendment   by   issuing   guidelines   for

regulating written solicitations by lawyers.            We find none of his

     *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
arguments convincing.    We find that the extensive district court

opinion ably and correctly addressed each of the issues raised by

the appellant.   See Texans Against Censorship, Inc. v. State Bar of

Texas, 888 F.Supp 1328 (E.D.Tex. 1995).    Therefore, we AFFIRM on

the basis of the district court’s opinion.

                                                   A F F I R M E D.
