       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

                   SOFTVIEW LLC,
                      Appellant

                           v.

      KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA
                MOBILITY LLC,
                    Appellees
             ______________________

                       2014-1600
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Nos. IPR2013-
00007, IPR2013-00256.
                 ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

   MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA,
argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU,
ALAN J. HEINRICH.

    ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP,
Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation.
Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM
DORFMAN.
   JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola
Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD
CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L.
WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA;
CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

    JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER,
NATHAN K. KELLEY.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



    PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir-
cuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


February 9, 2015                  /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court
