        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 15-1143V
                                      Filed: May 12, 2016
                                          Unpublished

****************************
ASHOK PATEL,                              *
                                          *
                     Petitioner,          *
                                          *      Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                                        *      Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
                                          *      Injury; Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *
                                          *
                     Respondent.          *
                                          *
****************************
Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Julia McInerny, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                              DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On October 7, 2015, Ashok Patel (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left shoulder injuries as a
result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on October 2, 2014. Petition at 1;
Stipulation, filed May 12, 2016, at ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that he received the
vaccination in the United States, that he has suffered the effects of his injury for more
than six months, and that he has not received compensation for his vaccine related
injury. Pet. at ¶¶ 3, 13, 15; see also Stip. at ¶¶ 3-5. Respondent denies that petitioner’s
alleged injuries and residual effects were caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine. Stip. at ¶ 6.
Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine caused any other injury or petitioner’s
current condition. Id.


1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
        Nevertheless, on May 12, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.

        The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

        A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
        Ashok Patel. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages
        that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stip. at ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Chief Special Master




3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      2
