Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D),
this Memorandum Decision shall not                                         Nov 12 2013, 5:36 am
be regarded as precedent or cited
before any court except for the purpose
of establishing the defense of res
judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law
of the case.



ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                          ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

PATRICK A. DUFF                                  GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Duff Law, LLC                                    Attorney General of Indiana
Evansville, Indiana

                                                 RICHARD C. WEBSTER
                                                 Deputy Attorney General
                                                 Indianapolis, Indiana


                               IN THE
                     COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

JAMES EDWARD BANKS, JR.,                         )
                                                 )
        Appellant-Defendant,                     )
                                                 )
               vs.                               )    No. 82A01-1301-CR-38
                                                 )
STATE OF INDIANA,                                )
                                                 )
        Appellee-Plaintiff.                      )


                 APPEAL FROM THE VANDERBURGH SUPERIOR COURT
                          The Honorable Robert Pigman, Judge
                            Cause No. 82D02-0908-FC-749


                                      November 12, 2013

                 MEMORANDUM DECISION – NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BARNES, Judge
                                            Case Summary

          James Banks appeals the denial of his motion to correct erroneous sentence. We

affirm.

                                                  Issue

          Banks raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court properly denied

his motion to correct erroneous sentence.

                                                 Facts1

          On August 10, 2009, Banks was charged with Class C felony escape, Class D

felony battery resulting in bodily injury, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement,

and Class A misdemeanor illegall storage or transportation of anhydrous ammonia. On

January 20, 2010, Banks pled guilty as charged. At the March 3, 2010 sentencing

hearing, the parties agreed that the judgment of conviction on the escape charge would be

entered as a Class D felony. Banks was sentenced to three years on the escape charge,

with eighteen months executed and the remainder suspended to a drug abuse probation

services program. Banks was sentenced to eighteen months executed on the battery

charge and to one year executed on each of the misdemeanor charges. The trial court

ordered all of the sentences to run concurrently. Banks was awarded 102 days of credit

for time served and 102 days of good time credit.

          In August 2010, Banks was discharged from the Department of Correction and

placed on probation. On September 21, 2010, a petition for revocation of probation was

filed in Vanderburgh County. Although represented by counsel at a December 10, 2010

1
    The underlying facts are based on the chronological case summary.
                                                    2
hearing, Banks failed to appear. On December 10, 2010, a second petition for revocation

of probation was filed, and a bench warrant for Banks was issued. On December 23,

2010, another petition for revocation of probation was filed.

          On January 12, 2011, a hearing was held at which Banks was represented by

counsel. The trial court was informed that Banks was being held in the Posey County Jail

and ordered that the bench warrant remain in effect. On February 9, 2011, another

hearing was held, at which Banks was represented by counsel while he remained in the

Posey County Jail, and the trial court again ordered that the bench warrant remain in

effect.

          On May 26, 2011, the warrant was served on Banks. On May 27, 2011, Banks,

while in custody, appeared by video at an initial hearing on the alleged probation

violations. The trial court ordered that Banks be held without bond. On June 9, 2011,

Banks apparently admitted to the alleged probation violations and was ordered to serve

one year of his previously suspended sentence in the Department of Correction. The trial

court ordered that this sentence be served consecutive to matters arising out of Posey

County. The trial court also awarded fifteen days credit and good time credit.

          On December 10, 2012, Banks filed a motion to correct erroneous sentence.

Banks argued that he was entitled to 172 days of credit for December 20, 2010, when he

was arrested and held in Posey County, until June 6, 2011, when he was sentenced on the

probation violations in Vanderburgh County. On December 17, 2012, the trial court

denied the motion. Banks now appeals.



                                             3
                                         Analysis

       Banks argues that the trial court improperly denied his motion to correct erroneous

sentence. We review a trial court’s decision on a motion to correct erroneous sentence

only for an abuse of discretion, which occurs when the trial court’s decision is against the

logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before it. Davis v. State, 978 N.E.2d 470,

472 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).

       An inmate who believes he or she has been erroneously sentenced may file a

motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-15. Neff v.

State, 888 N.E.2d 1249, 1250-51 (Ind. 2008). Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-15 provides:

              If the convicted person is erroneously sentenced, the mistake
              does not render the sentence void. The sentence shall be
              corrected after written notice is given to the convicted person.
              The convicted person and his counsel must be present when
              the corrected sentence is ordered. A motion to correct
              sentence must be in writing and supported by a memorandum
              of law specifically pointing out the defect in the original
              sentence.

“[A] motion to correct sentence may only be used to correct sentencing errors that are

clear from the face of the judgment imposing the sentence in light of the statutory

authority.” Robinson v. State, 805 N.E.2d 783, 787 (Ind. 2004). “Claims that require

consideration of the proceedings before, during, or after trial may not be presented by

way of a motion to correct sentence.” Id. “When claims of sentencing errors require

consideration of matters outside the face of the sentencing judgment, they are best

addressed promptly on direct appeal and thereafter via post-conviction relief proceedings

where applicable.”


                                             4
      Banks argues that he is entitled to at least 147, if not 174, days of credit for the

time he was incarcerated in Posey County. Banks’s argument is based on his review of

the chronological case summary and the assumption that he was held in the Posey County

Jail because of the Vanderburgh County warrant. As Banks acknowledges in his brief,

however, the details surrounding his incarceration in Posey County are not clear. Thus,

the resolution of this issue would have required the consideration of matters outside the

face of the sentencing judgment. Therefore, it was not properly presented in a motion to

correct erroneous sentence. Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in

denying the motion to correct erroneous sentence.

                                      Conclusion

      The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Banks’s motion to correct

erroneous sentence. We affirm.

      Affirmed.

CRONE, J., and PYLE, J., concur.




                                           5
