                                     COURT OF APPEALS
                                  EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       EL PASO, TEXAS


                                                  §
                                                                   No. 08-08-00150-CV
                                                  §
                                                                     Appeal from the
     IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.M., A                 §
             MINOR CHILD                                       112th Judicial District Court
                                                  §
                                                                 of Pecos County, Texas
                                                  §
                                                                 (TC# P-10,635-112-CV)
                                                  §


                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

       This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination whether this appeal

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not filed a brief or a

motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.

       Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on May 21, 2008, but Appellant has not filed the

brief or a motion for extension of time. On June 20, 2008, the clerk of this Court notified the

parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss for want of prosecution if, within ten days of the notice,

no party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. We have not received a response.

       This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when

Appellant has failed to his brief in the time proscribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for

such failure. TEX .R.APP .P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63

(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ). We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a

response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief or statement of facts exists, and have

recieved none. We see no purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at
this stage in the proceedings. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant

to TEX .R.APP .P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(c).



September 18, 2008
                                            DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.




                                               -2-
