     Case: 17-30005      Document: 00514353813         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/20/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 17-30005
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 20, 2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KENVALLENO DIXON, also known as Kenvallen Dixon, also known as
King,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                              USDC: 5:15-CR-160-1


Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenvalleno Dixon
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Dixon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-30005    Document: 00514353813    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/20/2018


                                No. 17-30005

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
