     Case: 18-50900      Document: 00515022716         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/05/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                    No. 18-50900                               July 5, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANTIAGO LUCERO, also known as Sonny,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:10-CR-2213-34


Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santiago Lucero has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Lucero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-50900    Document: 00515022716    Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/05/2019


                                No. 18-50900

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
