                                   NO. 12-13-00283-CV

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                  TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                      TYLER, TEXAS

CHARLES CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER,                      §      APPEAL FROM THE 3RD
APPELLANT

V.                                                  §      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

NATRENIA L. HICKS, ET AL,
APPELLEES                                           §      HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Charles Christopher Lancaster, an inmate, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his
 lawsuit. Lancaster filed an affidavit of indigence along with his notice of appeal. We dismiss
 the appeal as frivolous.


                                INMATE LITIGATION–CHAPTER 14
        Effective January 1, 2012, Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
 was amended to apply to an action, including an appeal or an original proceeding, brought by an
 inmate in a district, county, justice of the peace, or small claims court or an appellate court in
 which an affidavit of indigence is also filed. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002
 (West Supp. 2012). This means that the requirements of Chapter 14 apply when inmates file an
 appeal or an original proceeding in an appellate court just as when they file an action in a trial
 court. See id.
        Chapter 14 requires an inmate to file an affidavit or declaration “relating to previous
 filings” in which the inmate must detail all previous actions filed pro se, other than a suit under
 the Texas Family Code. Id. § 14.004(a) (West Supp. 2012). The affidavit or declaration must be
 accompanied by a certified copy of his “inmate trust account statement” that “reflect[s] the
 balance of the account at the time the claim is filed and activity in the account during the six
months preceding the date on which the claim is filed.” Id. § 14.004(c) (West Supp. 2012). The
filings required under Chapter 14 are “an essential part of the process by which courts review
inmate litigation.” Hickson v. Moya, 926 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex. App.–Waco 1996, no writ).
         If the inmate fails to file the affidavit or declaration with the required information about
previous filings and the inmate trust account statement, the trial court can dismiss the action
without notice or hearing. See, e.g., Amir-Sharif v. Mason, 243 S.W.3d 854, 857 (Tex. App.–
Dallas 2008, no pet.); Thompson v. Rodriguez, 99 S.W.3d 328, 330 (Tex. App.–2003, no pet.).
Further, when an inmate fails to comply with requirements for the affidavit or declaration of
previous filings, the trial court may assume that the current action is substantially similar to one
previously filed by the inmate and thus is frivolous. Bell v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice–
Institutional Div., 962 S.W.2d 156, 158 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied).
We see no reason why this caselaw interpreting the Chapter 14 requirements as they apply to
actions filed in trial courts should not also now apply to actions filed in appellate courts. See
Douglas v. Turner, No. 10-13-00031-CV, 2013 WL 2245653, at *1 (Tex. App.–Waco May 9,
2013, no pet.) (op., not yet released for publication).
         In this appeal, Lancaster did not file an affidavit of previous filings accompanied by a
certified copy of his inmate trust account. Because the requirements of Chapter 14 now apply to
inmate proceedings in the courts of appeals, caselaw permits us to dismiss Lancaster’s appeal
without notice.


                                                   CONCLUSION
         Lancaster did not comply with the Chapter 14 requirements for an affidavit of previous
filings and an inmate trust account statement. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous.
See Bell, 62 S.W.2d at 158.


                                                                 SAM GRIFFITH
                                                                      Justice

Opinion delivered November 13, 2013.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.



                                                    (PUBLISH)




                                                           2
                                   COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                            JUDGMENT

                                         NOVEMBER 13, 2013


                                          NO. 12-13-00283-CV


                          CHARLES CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER,
                                      Appellant
                                         V.
                              NATRENIA L. HICKS, ET AL,
                                      Appellees


                                  Appeal from the 3rd District Court
                           of Houston County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13-0163)

                        THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.
                        It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
below for observance.
                        Sam Griffith, Justice.
                        Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
