        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                         AT NASHVILLE
                                 January 14, 2015 Session

            STATE OF TENNESSEE v. THOMAS LEE CAREY, JR.

                 Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County
                     No. 2010A254     Mark J. Fishburn, Judge




                 No. M2013-02483-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 10, 2015


T HOMAS T. W OODALL, J., concurring.

       I concur in the results reached in the majority opinion. I do not join in that portion of
the opinion which holds that admission into evidence of the autopsy report itself was not a
violation of the Confrontation Clause. The first page of the autopsy report states that the
“probable cause of death” was “multiple [gunshot wounds]” and that the “manner of death”
was a homicide.

       I am simply unable to conclude, based upon the conclusion of a plurality (but not
majority) of Justices of the Supreme Court in Williams v. Illinois, ____ U.S. _____, 132 S.Ct.
222 (2012), that the autopsy report in the case sub judice is not testimonial. Under the
circumstances of this case it defies logic to conclude that the autopsy report was not prepared
for use at a trial of the perpetrator(s) of the homicide of the victim.

       While I believe the autopsy report prepared by Dr. Jones should have not been
admissible, I do agree with the majority opinion that Dr. McMaster’s testimony as an expert
witness was not a violation of the Confrontation Clause simply because she reviewed Dr.
Jones’ autopsy report, as long as she did not “recite the conclusion of Dr. Jones’ report.”
Error in the admission into evidence of the autopsy report as an exhibit was rendered
harmless beyond a reasonable doubt by Dr. McMaster’s testimony.

                                            _______________________________________
                                            THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE
