J-S44034-14


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                     PENNSYLVANIA
                            Appellee

                       v.

ANDRE JAMAL JACKSON

                            Appellant               No. 290 WDA 2014


                   Appeal from the PCRA Order April 23, 2013
              In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
              Criminal Division at No(s): CP-02-CR-0003387-2000


BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and OTT, J.

MEMORANDUM BY OTT, J.:                         FILED NOVEMBER 21, 2014

       Andre Jamal Jackson appeals from the denial, without a hearing, of his

petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §

9541 et seq. Jackson’s counsel has filed a Turner/Finley1 no-merit letter

and concurrent petition to withdraw as counsel.2     The PCRA court denied

Jackson’s petition because he is ineligible for relief, having served his


____________________________________________


1
 Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988); Commonwealth
v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988).
2
  This matter is before us from remand. See Order, 3/31/2014. As the
underlying petition is Jackson’s first PCRA petition, he was entitled to
appointment of counsel.      Counsel was appointed and he entered his
appearance in this Court. See Order April 15, 2014. The matter is now
properly before this panel. See also, Commonwealth v. Hart, 911 A.2d
939, 942 (Pa. Super. 2005) (harmless error from original failure to appoint
counsel when petitioner’s sentence had expired).
J-S44034-14



sentence in its entirety. Following a thorough review of the certified record,

submissions by the parties, and relevant law, we grant counsel’s petition to

withdraw and affirm the Order below.

         Initially, we note:

         Our standard of review of a trial court order granting or denying
         relief under the PCRA calls upon us to determine whether the
         determination of the PCRA court is supported by the evidence of
         record and is free of legal error. The PCRA court's findings will
         not be disturbed unless there is no support for the findings in the
         certified record.

Commonwealth v. Heredia, 97 A.3d 392, 294 (Pa. Super. 2014 )(citation

omitted).

         Further, in conjunction with filing the Turner/Finley brief, counsel

has also provided Jackson with a copy of the brief, notified Jackson of his

request to withdraw, and of his rights to retain new counsel or file his own

brief.

         We need not conduct a lengthy recital of the facts and procedural

history of this matter.        To be eligible for relief pursuant to the PCRA, the

petitioner must be currently serving a sentence for the crime.            See 42

Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(1)(i).3


____________________________________________


3
    Specifically, the statute reads in relevant part:

         (a) General rule.--To be eligible for relief under this
         subchapter, the petitioner must plead and prove by a
         preponderance of the evidence all of the following:

(Footnote Continued Next Page)


                                           -2-
J-S44034-14



        The certified record reveals that Jackson plead guilty to drug charges

in 2000 and was sentenced to an aggregate term of 9-18 months’

incarceration to be followed by one year of probation, effective January 4,

2001.     Accordingly, Jackson’s sentence expired on July 4, 2003.        The

certified record also reveals that no appeals were taken from that judgment

of sentence and Jackson did not violate parole or probation.     However, in

2010, Jackson was indicted on drug charges by federal authorities. He pled

guilty in 2011 and was subsequently sentenced to 188 months’ incarceration

to be followed by four years of supervised release. The federal sentence was

enhanced due to Jackson’s state conviction.       In 2013, Jackson filed this

PCRA petition, challenging his judgment of sentence for his 2000 conviction.

        The PCRA court found that Jackson’s state judgment of sentence has

expired. See Opinion, 2/14/2014, at 1. Our review confirms this fact. As

such, Jackson has no standing to bring a PCRA petition, and we may not

address the merits of the present PCRA petition filed. See Commonwealth

v. Ahlborn, 699 A.2d 718 (Pa. 1997) (PCRA eligibility limited to those


                       _______________________
(Footnote Continued)

          (1) That the petitioner has been convicted of a crime under
          the laws of this Commonwealth and is at the time relief is
          granted:

             (i) currently serving a sentence of imprisonment,
             probation or parole for the crime;

42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(1)(i).



                                            -3-
J-S44034-14



serving sentence by plain language of statute). See also Commonwealth

v. O’Berg, 880 A.2d 597 (Pa. 2005) (same).4

       Accordingly, we are required to affirm the PCRA court’s order

dismissing Jackson’s petition without a hearing.     Motion to withdraw as

counsel is granted.

       Order affirmed.



Judgment Entered.




Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary



Date: 11/21/2014




____________________________________________


4
  Additionally, we note that proper notice, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 907, was
provided by the PCRA court to Jackson regarding notice of intent to dismiss
the petition without a hearing.



                                           -4-
