                                   NO. 07-05-0109-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL D

                                DECEMBER 20, 2005
                          ______________________________

                                     DONALD HICKS,

                                                                Appellant

                                             v.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                      Appellee
                        _________________________________

            FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

               NO. 2005-408202; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING
                        _______________________________

                            ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                       __________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

       Donald Hicks (appellant) appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation with

intent to commit theft. The clerk’s record was filed on July 8, 2005, a supplemental clerk’s

record was filed on November 3, 2005, and the reporter’s record was filed on October 21,

2005. Thus, appellant’s brief was due to be filed no later than December 5, 2005. That

date passed without appellant filing a brief, however. So, on December 6, 2005, this court

notified appellant that neither the brief nor an extension of time to file the brief had been
received by the court and unless a brief or a response was filed by December 16, 2005,

the appeal would be abated to the trial court. No response or brief has been received by

the court.

       Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court

of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

       1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,

       2.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
              counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file appellate brief.
              See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L.
              Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled
              to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right
              and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
              submitting an appellate brief).

       We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we

further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The

name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,

if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings

of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be

developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions

of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s

record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 20, 2006. Should

                                              2
additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or

before January 20, 2006.

      It is so ordered.



                                               Per Curiam

Do not publish.




                                           3
