        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
               __________________________

       TIMOTHY MCCOLLUM AND LEE ANN
                   MCCOLLUM,
       AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF
              GRANT F. MCCOLLUM,
               Petitioners-Appellants,

                            v.
      SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
                 SERVICES,
             Respondent-Appellee.
               __________________________

                       2010-5092
               __________________________

    Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in Case No. 94-VV-136, Judge George W. Miller.
              ___________________________

                Decided: March 15, 2011
              ___________________________

   PATRICIA A. FINN, Patricia Finn Attorney, P.C., of Pier-
mont, New York, for petitioners-appellant.

    ALTHEA WALKER DAVIS , Senior Trial Attorney, Commer-
cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States De-
MCCOLLUM   v. HHS                                          2


partment of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent-
appellee. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant
Attorney General, TIMOTHY P. GARREN, Director, MARK W.
ROGERS, Deputy Director, and GABRIELLE M. FIELDING,
Assistant Director.
               __________________________

    Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit
                      Judges.
PER CURIAM.

   Timothy McCollum and Lee Ann McCollum, parents and
guardians of Grant F. McCollum, appeal the decision of the
United States Court of Federal Claims, sustaining the
Special Master’s denial of appellants’ motion to reopen and
modify an award made in March 2000 under the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-I to -34.

    We have carefully considered the arguments made by
the appellants but find no error in the reasoning and deci-
sion of the Court of Federal Claims, reported at McCollum
v. Sec’y of HHS, 91 Fed. Cl. 86 (Fed. Cl. 2010). That court’s
decision is affirmed.

    No costs.

                       AFFIRMED
