J-S66029-17

                            2017 PA Super 333

IN RE: R.L., MINOR CHILD               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                       :        PENNSYLVANIA
                                       :
APPEAL OF: WASHINGTON COUNTY           :
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SOCIAL              :
SERVICES AGENCY                        :
                                       :
                                       :
                                       :   No. 860 WDA 2017

               Appeal from the Order Entered May 18, 2017
  In the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County Orphans' Court at
                           No(s): 63-17-0316


BEFORE:   BENDER, P.J.E., DUBOW, J., and PLATT*, J.

OPINION BY DUBOW, J.:                           FILED OCTOBER 20, 2017

     Appellant, Washington County Children and Youth Social Services

Agency (“Agency”), appeals from the May 18, 2017 Order entered in the

Court of Common Pleas of Washington County Orphans’ Court, which

dismissed the Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment of Parental Rights and

Consent to Adoption (“Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment”) signed by R.L.

(“Father”) based on Father’s verbal revocation of his consent made 72 days

after he executed the consent to adoption. After careful review, we conclude

that, pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. §2711(c), Father’s revocation was untimely.

We, thus, vacate the Order and remand with instructions.

     Minor child R.L. (“Child”) was born in December 2015 and placed with

the Agency two days after birth.     On March 7, 2017, Father and V.C.

(“Mother”) both signed Petitions for Voluntary Relinquishment.




____________________________________
* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S66029-17



       On May 18, 2017, the trial court held a hearing to confirm consent and

terminate parental rights.         At the hearing, Mother remained willing to

terminate her parental rights to Child.          However, through counsel, Father

verbally informed the trial court that he no longer wanted to terminate his

parental rights and wanted to revoke his consent. The Agency informed the

trial court that Father had signed the Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment

more than thirty days prior to the hearing and had not provided any written

notice that he intended to revoke his consent as required by 42 Pa.C.S. §

2711(c).    The trial court, over the Agency’s objection, dismissed Father’s

Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment based on the fact that Father no longer

consented to Child’s adoption.1

       The Agency timely appealed.             Both the Agency and the trial court

complied with Pa.R.A.P. 1925.

       The Agency raises the following issues on appeal:

       1. Did the trial court err in dismissing the above referenced
          action on May 18, 2017, based upon advice from counsel for
          biological father that his client no longer consented to
          adoption of the minor child when biological father executed a
          [Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment] on March 7, 2017,
          and failed to revoke or challenge the consent pursuant to 23
          [Pa.C.S.] § 2711(c)?


____________________________________________


1 The trial court entered the following order: “AND NOW, this 18th day of
May, 2017, upon advice from counsel for the biological father that he no
longer consents to the adoption of the child, this matter is hereby
dismissed.” Order, 5/7/17.



                                           -2-
J-S66029-17


      2. Did the trial court err by accepting biological father’s verbal
         request to revoke his [Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment]
         more than 30 days after the execution of the consent, in
         violation of 23 [Pa.C.S.] § 2711 (c)(1)(i)?

Agency’s Brief at 2.

      We review a revocation of consent to adoption in relation to a

voluntary relinquishment of parental rights for an abuse of discretion or legal

error. In re C.M.C., 140 A.3d 699, 704–05 (Pa. Super. 2016). We must

determine whether the record is free from legal error and the court’s factual

findings are supported by the evidence. Id.

      Instantly, the Agency avers that the trial court erred when it entered

an Order dismissing Father’s Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment based on

Father’s verbal request to revoke his consent to adoption, which was made

in violation of the revocation timeline and procedure provided for in 23

Pa.C.S. § 2711(c). Agency’s Brief at 5. We agree.

      Section 2711 of the Adoption Act sets forth the requirements for a

consent to adoption and clearly outlines the procedure and timeframes for

revoking a voluntary consent to adoption.     See 23 Pa.C.S. 2711.     Section

2711(c) unequivocally states that “[a] consent to an adoption may only be

revoked as set forth in this subsection,” and “[t]he revocation of a consent

shall be in writing and shall be served upon the agency or adult to whom the

child was relinquished.” 23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c). Further, “[f]or a consent to

an adoption executed by a birth father or a putative father, the consent is

irrevocable more than 30 days after the birth of the child or the execution



                                     -3-
J-S66029-17



of the consent, whichever occurs later.”                 23 Pa.C.S. §2711(c)(1)(i)

(emphasis added). “An individual may not waive the revocation period[.]”

23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c)(1)(ii).2

       This Court has held that “the statute renders a consent to adoption

irrevocable    more     than    thirty   (30)    days   after   execution,”   and   the

unambiguous language of the statute requires a trial court to consider the

timeliness of a petition to revoke before it considers the merits of such a

petition.   In re Adoption of J.A.S., 939 A.2d 403, 408-09 (Pa. Super.

2007).

       Instantly, Father did not revoke his consent in writing within 30 days

of his execution of consent to adoption and did not serve any written

revocation upon any party. Rather, he orally revoked his consent through

counsel at the May 18, 2017 hearing, which occurred 72 days after Father

executed his Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment on March 7, 2017. In its

1925(a) Opinion, the trial court acknowledged, “[Father] failed to withdraw

his consent to voluntary relinquishment of his parental rights within 30 days

of March 7, 2017[,] in writing to the appropriate authorities as required by

[23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c)].”            Trial Court Opinion, dated 6/16/17, at 4.

Nonetheless, the trial court accepted Father’s untimely oral revocation and

____________________________________________


2 We note that Section 2711(c) also allows an individual to challenge the
validity of the consent by filing a petition within sixty days of the execution
of the consent and alleging fraud or duress, which Father did not allege.
See 23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c)(3).



                                           -4-
J-S66029-17



entered an Order dismissing Father’s Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment.

The trial court opined:

      [I]n open court [Father] withdrew his consent to voluntary
      relinquishment of his parental rights. We were prepared to hold
      a hearing on [Father]’s withdrawal of consent, however, the
      petition for voluntary termination of his parental rights had been
      filed only as a voluntary relinquishment without an alternative
      pleading for involuntary relinquishment. Therefore, we dismissed
      the [voluntary] termination in order for the Agency to file an
      involuntary termination petition.

Id. at 4. This constitutes legal error.

      Section 2711(c) sets forth the only procedure for revoking a consent

to adoption; it requires that the revocation be timely, in writing, and served

upon appropriate parties. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c). If a revocation is untimely,

the trial court is not able to consider the merits of the revocation.      In re

Adoption of J.A.S., supra at 408-09.         Father’s oral revocation of his

consent to adoption that occurred more than 30 days after his execution of

the Petition for Voluntary Relinquishment does not meet the requirements of

Section 2711(c) and the trial court, thus, erred in considering its merits.

Accordingly, the trial court improperly dismissed Father’s Petition for

Voluntary Relinquishment.     We, thus, vacate the trial court’s Order and

remand for the trial court to         grant Father’s Petition for Voluntary

Relinquishment.

      Order vacated.      Case remanded with instructions.        Jurisdiction

relinquished.

.
Judgment Entered.

                                      -5-
J-S66029-17




Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary



Date: 10/20/2017




                          -6-
