MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this
Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before any                                      Nov 09 2015, 6:17 am
court except for the purpose of establishing
the defense of res judicata, collateral
estoppel, or the law of the case.


ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                  ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Kristin A. Mulholland                                   Gregory F. Zoeller
Appellate Public Defender                               Attorney General of Indiana
Crown Point, Indiana
                                                        Christina D. Pace
                                                        Deputy Attorney General
                                                        Indianapolis, Indiana



                                          IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Nicholas William Laskarin,                              November 9, 2015
Appellant-Defendant,                                    Court of Appeals Case No.
                                                        45A03-1504-CR-143
        v.                                              Appeal from the Lake Superior
                                                        Court
State of Indiana,                                       The Honorable Salvador
Appellee-Plaintiff.                                     Vasquez, Judge
                                                        Trial Court Cause Nos.
                                                        45G01-1407-F3-1
                                                        45G01-1410-F3-14



Brown, Judge.




Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015    Page 1 of 9
[1]   Nicholas William Laskarin appeals his sentence for armed robbery and robbery

      as level 3 felonies. Laskarin raises one issue which we revise and restate as

      whether his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and

      the character of the offender. We affirm.


                                      Facts and Procedural History

[2]   On July 7, 2014, Juan Barrientos went to a bank in Hammond, Lake County,

      Indiana, to withdraw money from an ATM. Soon after withdrawing $200,

      Barrientos was confronted by Laskarin, who pulled a gun and pointed it toward

      Barrientos’s face and demanded that Barrientos give him money. Barrientos

      complied with Laskarin’s demand because he was in fear for his life.


[3]   On July 8, 2014, Laskarin entered a White Castle in Hammond, Lake County,

      Indiana, and while armed with a silver handgun demanded that Megan Rogers

      give him all the cash from the registers. Rogers gave Laskarin the money

      because she was in fear for her life.


[4]   On July 12, 2014, the State charged Laskarin with two counts of armed robbery

      as level 3 felonies, one of which pertained to the robbery of Rogers while armed

      with a firearm, under cause number 45G01-1407-F3-1 (“Cause No. 1”).1 On

      October 24, 2014, the State charged Laskarin with the robbery of Barrientos as

      a level 3 felony under cause number 45G01-1410-F3-14 (“Cause No. 14”). The




      1
       The other count alleged that Laskarin committed an armed robbery of Terri Sims on or about July 8,
      2014.

      Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015     Page 2 of 9
      State also charged Laskarin with attempted armed robbery as a level 3 felony

      under cause number 45G01-1410-F3-15 (“Cause No. 15”).2


[5]   Laskarin and the State entered into a Stipulated Plea and Agreement, a copy of

      which was filed with the court on February 19, 2015, pursuant to which

      Laskarin agreed to plead guilty to the charges of the armed robbery of Rogers as

      a level 3 felony under Cause No. 1 and the robbery of Barrientos as a level 3

      felony under Cause No. 14, the State agreed to dismiss the remaining charge

      under Cause No. 1 and the charge under Cause No. 15, and the parties agreed

      that there would be a cap of seven years as to the sentence imposed for each

      count with the sentences to be served consecutively. A stipulated factual basis

      was attached to the plea agreement. The same day the court held a plea

      hearing, and Laskarin pled guilty pursuant to the agreement.


[6]   On March 19, 2015, the court held a sentencing hearing during which

      Laskarin’s counsel noted that the presentence investigation report (“PSI”)

      stated that Laskarin has never had a problem with drugs, but that in fact he

      does have a significant problem with prescription drugs. Laskarin’s girlfriend

      testified that she had been with him for about a year, that most of his problems

      stem from his alcohol addiction, and that he was about to be enrolled in a Fresh

      Start program when he was arrested. She testified that Laskarin has two

      children, ages three and six, and that he had custody of his six-year-old child.




      2
          The record does not include the charging information under Cause No. 15.

      Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 3 of 9
      When asked if anything significant happened in his life which may have

      contributed to his relationship with alcohol, she stated that he lost his first

      child’s mother, that his mother committed suicide, and that he recently went

      through a somewhat bitter divorce from his second child’s mother. When

      asked to explain his substance abuse issues, she testified that Laskarin had an

      injury while working construction, that he had been prescribed Vicodin and

      Xanax, and that he began abusing his medication.


[7]   Rogers testified that she has had many anxiety attacks due to the armed

      robbery, she had just turned eighteen years old at the time of the offense, she

      does not like to be out anymore, Laskarin’s actions changed her life, she dreams

      about the incident, and that it was something she will never forget. The

      prosecutor read a statement submitted by Barrientos in which he said that

      Laskarin pointed a gun at his head, he started feeling anxious a few days after

      the attack, he had to make an appointment with his doctor, he believes that if

      Laskarin is free he will keep doing the same thing to other people, and that he

      believes Laskarin does not care about the lives of others.


[8]   Laskarin’s counsel requested the court to consider a five-year sentence on each

      count to be split between the Department of Correction (“DOC”) and

      community corrections. The prosecutor requested the court sentence Laskarin

      to six years on each count to be served in the DOC.


[9]   The court asked Laskarin if he wished to make a statement on his own behalf,

      and Laskarin stated that he would like to apologize to the victim personally, to


      Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 4 of 9
       his family for placing the burden on his father for having to raise his child

       during his incarceration, and to the courts for wasting time on him.


[10]   The court noted the impact of the crimes on the victims, that Laskarin had prior

       felony convictions and pending felony charges, and that he received a favorable

       plea agreement in light of the maximum possible sentences. The court stated

       “you may have a drug habit but you failed to take advantage of program or

       opportunity where people try to help you out, yet you come in here saying well,

       the presentence report’s incorrect.” Sentencing Transcript at 23. The court also

       said that it thought Laskarin had a significant alcohol problem but not so much

       that he should be placed in community corrections for two armed robberies,

       and noted that alternative placement was not appropriate as he had prior felony

       convictions and pending felony charges and was on probation.


[11]   With respect to mitigating circumstances, the court found that Laskarin pled

       guilty and admitted responsibility and that minimal weight was given to this

       factor since other robbery charges were dismissed as a result of the plea

       agreement. With respect to aggravating circumstances, the court found that

       Laskarin was on probation at the time the offenses occurred, that Laskarin has

       a history of criminal convictions which included felony convictions, and that

       Laskarin has many open cases. The court sentenced Laskarin to five years in

       the DOC for each of his convictions and ordered that the sentences be served

       consecutively for an aggregate sentence of ten years in the DOC, with a

       recommendation that he be placed in a therapeutic community.



       Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 5 of 9
                                                   Discussion

[12]   The issue is whether Laskarin’s sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature

       of the offenses and the character of the offender. Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B)

       provides that this court “may revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after

       due consideration of the trial court’s decision, [we find] that the sentence is

       inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the

       offender.” Under this rule, the burden is on the defendant to persuade the

       appellate court that his or her sentence is inappropriate. Childress v. State, 848

       N.E.2d 1073, 1080 (Ind. 2006).


[13]   Laskarin’s arguments with respect to his character are that he is a single father

       of a six-year-old child, his child’s mother passed away as a result of an

       overdose, he lost his mother to suicide, he expressed remorse and apologized,

       and he has been employed in construction and upon release will be able to

       obtain employment as a laborer for a construction company. He states that he

       has some substance abuse issues which led to previous contacts with the

       criminal justice system, for the most part his prior convictions and pending

       cases are for alcohol-related traffic offenses, he has admitted to a problem with

       prescription drugs that arose from treatment for work injuries, and that he had

       scheduled an appointment with Fresh Start for treatment but was unable to

       attend because he was arrested. With respect to the nature of the offenses,

       Laskarin argues that he did not fire the weapon and did not physically harm the

       individuals. He requests this court to reduce his sentence or order that his

       sentence be split and a portion be served in a community transition program.

       Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 6 of 9
[14]   The State notes that the sentencing parameters for a level 3 felony are three to

       sixteen years with an advisory sentence of nine years, that the plea agreement

       capped Laskarin’s sentence at seven years on each count, and that the ten-year

       sentence is four years below the maximum under the agreement. The State also

       points to his lengthy criminal history and pending charges.


[15]   Our review of the nature of the offenses reveal that in July 2014 Laskarin

       confronted Barrientos after he withdrew money from an ATM, pointed a gun at

       his face, and demanded money, and that Barrientos complied because he was in

       fear for his life. The next day and while armed with a handgun, Laskarin

       demanded that Rogers give him all the cash from the registers at a White

       Castle, and Rogers complied because she was in fear for her life. Rogers

       testified that the robbery changed her life, that she dreams about the incident

       and it is something she will never forget, and that she has had many anxiety

       attacks due to Laskarin’s actions. Barrientos has also been seriously impacted.


[16]   Our review of the character of the offender reveals that, according to the PSI,

       Laskarin’s juvenile history included charges for operating while intoxicated

       endangering a person, illegal consumption of alcohol, and knowingly or

       intentionally operating a motor vehicle without ever receiving a license.

       Laskarin’s convictions as an adult include reckless driving in 2008; operating

       while intoxicated in 2011; domestic battery in 2011; no license in possession in

       2012; and operating vehicle while intoxicated with passenger under eighteen

       years of age as a class D felony in 2013. Laskarin had pending charges under

       several cause numbers, including charges for operating a vehicle while

       Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 7 of 9
       intoxicated, domestic battery as a class D felony, interference with reporting a

       crime as a class A misdemeanor, failure to return to the scene of an accident

       resulting in damage, and disorderly conduct, and was on probation at the time

       of the offenses.


[17]   The PSI notes Laskarin’s report that his mother committed suicide in 2012, that

       his wife was twice the victim of his domestic batteries, he reported that he is

       able to obtain employment as a laborer for a construction company, he had

       scheduled an appointment with Fresh Start for an assessment but did not have

       the necessary funds, and that he first consumed alcohol at age sixteen and by

       age twenty-five would consume alcohol to the point of intoxication about three

       times per week. The court heard testimony from Laskarin’s girlfriend regarding

       his alcohol and drug use and his children and family, and heard his apology.

       The sentencing transcript reveals that the trial court took into consideration

       Laskarin’s alcohol and drug use, his criminal history and pending charges, the

       favorable terms of his plea agreement, and the nature of the robbery offenses.


[18]   After due consideration, we conclude that Laskarin has not sustained his

       burden of establishing that his aggregate sentence of ten years to be served in

       the DOC is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and his character.


                                                  Conclusion

[19]   For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Laskarin’s aggregate sentence of ten years

       for armed robbery and robbery as level 3 felonies.


[20]   Affirmed.

       Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 8 of 9
Riley, J., and Altice, J., concur.




Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1504-CR-143| November 9, 2015   Page 9 of 9
