    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 12-544V
                                       Filed: June 27, 2013
                                       Not for Publication


*************************************
BRETT BYLER, a single man,                 *
                                           *
               Petitioner,                 *     Damages decision based on stipulation;
 v.                                        *     influenza vaccine; Bell’s palsy; urticaria;
                                           *     angioedema
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *
                                           *
               Respondent.                 *
                                           *
*************************************
Jay A. Bansal, Tempe, AZ, for petitioner.
Darryl R. Wishard, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

                              DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

        On June 27, 2013, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle
this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Bell’s palsy
and urticaria/angioedema that were caused by his November 6, 2010 receipt of influenza vaccine.
Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of these injuries for more than six
months. Respondent denies that petitioner’s Bell’s palsy and urticaria/angioedema, or any other
injury, were caused by influenza vaccine. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter
informally.



1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
delete such material from public access.
       The court hereby adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards
compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the
Court awards petitioner a lump sum of $25,000.00, representing compensation for all damages that
would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award shall be in the form of a check for
$25,000.00 made payable to petitioner.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: June 27, 2013                                                         /s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                Laura D. Millman
                                                                                  Special Master




2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2
