      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                       NO. 03-10-00119-CR




                                James Dewey Minton, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee



  FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
        NO. B-05-1414-S, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING



                             MEMORANDUM OPINION


               In April 2007, appellant James Dewey Minton was placed on deferred adjudication

community supervision after he pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child. Two years

later, the State moved to adjudicate, alleging numerous violations of the conditions of supervision,

including failing to pay fees, failure to complete sex offender therapy, and having unsupervised

contact with children. At a hearing, the court found the allegations to be true, adjudicated appellant

guilty, and imposed a sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment.

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the

record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s

brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See

Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se brief has been filed.

               We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State,

300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw

is granted.

               The judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                             ___________________________________________

                                             Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: November 16, 2010

Do Not Publish




                                                2
