               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 43679

STATE OF IDAHO,                               )   2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 775
                                              )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                  )   Filed: November 14, 2016
                                              )
v.                                            )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                              )
ASHLEY RAE DAILY,                             )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                              )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                   )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                              )

       Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Kootenai County. Hon. Fred M. Gibler, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum
       period of confinement of one year, for aggravated driving under the influence,
       affirmed.

       Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W.
       Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                    Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                  and HUSKEY, Judge
                   ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Ashley Rae Daily pled guilty to aggravated driving under the influence (DUI), Idaho
Code § 18-8006; possession of marijuana, I.C. § 37-2732(C)(3); and possession of drug
paraphernalia, I.C. § 37-2734A(1). The district court imposed a unified seven-year sentence,
with a minimum period of confinement of one year, for aggravated DUI and concurrent 180-day
jail sentences for the misdemeanors.     Daily appeals, contending that her aggravated DUI
sentence is excessive.



                                              1
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Daily’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
