Case: 13-1169    Document: 43     Page: 1   Filed: 07/31/2013




           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                __________________________

        GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND
                GE WIND ENERGY, LLC,
      Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,
                             v.
                  THOMAS WILKINS,
           Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,
                           AND

    MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. AND
  MITSUBISHI POWER SYSTEMS AMERICAS, INC.,
            Counterclaimants-Appellees.
                __________________________

                        2013-1171
                __________________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of California in No. 10-CV-0674, Judge
 Lawrence J. O’Neill.
          -------------------------------------------------
        GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND
                 GE WIND ENERGY, LLC,
      Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,
                             v.
                 THOMAS WILKINS,
          Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,
Case: 13-1169    Document: 43     Page: 2   Filed: 07/31/2013




 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY V. THOMAS WILKINS                2


                            AND

    MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. AND
  MITSUBISHI POWER SYSTEMS AMERICAS, INC.,
           Counterclaimants-Appellants.
                __________________________

                     2013-1169, -1170
                __________________________

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of California in No. 10-CV-0674, Judge
 Lawrence J. O’Neill.
               __________________________

                      ON MOTION
                __________________________

                        ORDER
    General Electric Company and GE Wind Energy, LLC
 move without opposition to withdraw its cross-appeal no.
 2013-1171, and to reform the caption of the remaining
 appeals to reflect the dismissal of GE’s cross-appeal.
    Upon consideration thereof,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion to withdraw 2013-1171 is granted.
 2013-1171 is dismissed.
     (2) The motion to reform the official caption is grant-
 ed. The revised official caption in 2013-1169, -1170, is
 reflected above.
    (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2013-1171.
Case: 13-1169     Document: 43   Page: 3    Filed: 07/31/2013




 3              GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY V. THOMAS WILKINS



                                    FOR THE COURT


                                    /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                    Daniel E. O’Toole
                                    Clerk


 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: (As To 2013-1171 Only):
 July 31, 2013


 s21
