                                      Cite as 2016 Ark. 2

                SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                       No.   CV-15-979

EVETTE MOORE                                      Opinion Delivered   January 7, 2016
                               APPELLANT
                                                  MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
V.


ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF                            MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
HUMAN SERVICES                                    GRANTED; MOTION ALSO
                    APPELLEE                      TREATED AS MOTION FOR
                                                  BELATED APPEAL AND GRANTED.




                                        PER CURIAM

       Appellant Evette Moore, by and through her attorney, Kimberly Eden, has filed a

motion for rule on clerk. In the present motion, Ms. Eden candidly admits fault for not

timely filing the record in this case wherein the circuit court entered an order granting

permanent relative custody of A.M. to Eddie Aldridge. Additionally, Ms. Eden admits fault

for noncompliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(b)(2)(D). As to the latter issue,

we treat the present motion as one for a belated appeal. See S.F. v. Ark. Dep’t of Health &

Human Servs., 370 Ark. 475, 261 S.W.3d 462 (2007) (per curiam).

       We have clarified our treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated

appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we stated that

there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party

or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is “good reason.” Id. at 115, 146 S.W.3d at
                                      Cite as 2016 Ark. 2

891.

       Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal
       is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party
       or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party
       or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with
       the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault
       where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good
       reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the
       motion, and this court will decide if good reason is present.

Id., 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit

admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault

where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See id. The instant

case is not a criminal case; however, we have afforded indigent parents appealing from a

termination of parental rights similar protections as those afforded indigent criminal

defendants. S.F., 370 Ark. at 476, 261 S.W.3d at 464 (citing Flannery v. Ark. Dep’t of Health

& Human Servs., 368 Ark. 31, 242 S.W.3d 619 (2006) (per curiam)). A review of the notice

of appeal reveals that Moore did not sign it. Rule 6-9(b)(2)(D) states,

       The notice of appeal and designation of the record shall be signed by the appellant, if
       an adult, and the appellant’s counsel. The notice shall set forth the party or parties
       initiating the appeal, the address of the party or parties, and specify the order from
       which the appeal is taken.

       In accordance with McDonald v. State, Ms. Eden has candidly admitted fault for failing

to timely file the record in this case due to a mistake on her part and for noncompliance with

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(b)(2)(D). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the

Committee on Professional Conduct.

       Motion for rule on clerk granted; motion also treated as motion for belated appeal and

granted.


                                                2
