     Case: 10-40844     Document: 00511515361          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/21/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 21, 2011
                                     No. 10-40844
                                   c/w No. 10-40850                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                  Conference Calendar                            Clerk



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERARDO SANCHEZ,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:05-CR-272-1
                             USDC No. 2:10-CR-268-1


Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Erardo Sanchez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.                 We concur with



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 10-40844   Document: 00511515361      Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/21/2011

                                 No. 10-40844
                               c/w No. 10-40850

counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
