       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________


                IN RE HARRY FISCH

                ______________________


                      2011-1068
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in
Reexamination No. 90/008,024.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    WILLIAM F. SMITH, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant. With
him on the brief was JOHN F. MURPHY.

    NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor Associate, Office of the
Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L.
R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

                    AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                       ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


December 12, 2011            /s/ Jan Horbaly
     Date                       Jan Horbaly
                                   Clerk
