
In The


Court of Appeals


Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont


____________________


NO. 09-06-046 CV

____________________


MARTIN R. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant


V.


JOE JACKSON, CONSTANCE HENSON AND PAUL EAGLIN, Appellees




On Appeal from the 58th District Court
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. A-163381




MEMORANDUM OPINION 
	On May 18, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained
why he needed time for filing the record.  Appellant did not respond.  The appellant is not
entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.  There being no
satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Costs are assessed against appellant.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								____________________________
								        STEVE McKEITHEN
									      Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
