                             STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               May 25, 2016
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
MYLINDA KIMBALL-SHEPHERD,                                                     OF WEST VIRGINIA

Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 15-0722 (BOR Appeal No. 2050186)
                   (Claim No. 2011010941)

FORTUNE BRANDS,
Employer Below, Respondent


                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
       Petitioner Mylinda Kimball-Shepherd, by George Zivkovich, her attorney, appeals the
decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Fortune Brands, by
Aimee Stern and Denise Pentino, its attorneys, filed a timely response.

         This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated July 1, 2015, in which
the Board affirmed a January 8, 2015, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges. In
its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s November 21, 2013, decision
which denied a request for referral to PARS Brain and Spine Institute for pain management. The
Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the
briefs, and the case is mature for consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

         Ms. Kimball-Shepherd, a lead QA tech, was injured in the course of her employment on
September 13, 2010, when she was struck in the side by a fork truck. The claim was held
compensable for sacroilitis, sciatica, contusion of the buttocks, thoracic sprain, lumbar sprain,
right hip strain, and right leg contusion. A treatment note from Marietta Memorial Hospital
indicates Ms. Kimball-Shepherd reported right hip and lower right side back pain that had waxed
and waned since September of 2010. She was diagnosed with ruptured disc, sprained back, and
sacroilitis. In May and June of 2012, she underwent lumbar transforaminal epidural and sacral
                                                1
transforaminal epidural injections. Ms. Kimball-Shepherd’s treating physician, Teresita DeJosef,
M.D., submitted a notice of maximum medical improvement in July of 2013. She opined that
Ms. Kimball-Shepherd required no further treatment and could return to work on October 1,
2013.

        On October 10, 2013, Sushil Sethi, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation
in which he noted that Ms. Kimball-Shepherd reported her symptoms were much improved. She
still had pain in the right hip; however, a recent MRI was normal. Lumbar MRIs were also
normal and showed no herniations. Dr. Sethi found she was at maximum medical improvement.
He found normal range of motion in the right hip and assessed 0% impairment. He assessed 5%
lumbar spine impairment and 0% thoracic spine impairment. He stated that Ms. Kimball-
Shepherd did not need additional treatment and that her injuries resolved long ago. In an October
26, 2013, addendum, Dr. Sethi confirmed his previous report. On November 21, 2013, the claims
administrator denied a request for referral to PARS Brain and Spine Institute for pain
management.

        Bruce Guberman, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation of Ms. Kimball-
Shepherd on September 25, 2014. He diagnosed chronic post-traumatic lumbar sprain, L5-S1
disc protrusion, resolved thoracic strain, and status post right hip contusion. He found that Ms.
Kimball-Shepherd had reached maximum medical improvement. He recommended that she be
referred to a pain clinic or a physician close to her home for medication maintenance, but he
opined that she should be weaned from narcotics. For the thoracic spine, Dr. Guberman found
0% impairment. For the lumbar spine, he assessed 10% impairment. He then placed Ms.
Kimball-Shepherd in Lumbar Category II of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-C
(2006) and adjusted the rating to 8% whole person impairment. For the right hip, he assessed 2%
impairment. The combined total rating was 10% impairment.

        The Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s denial for referral to PARS
Brain and Spine Institute for pain management in its January 8, 2015, Order. It noted the
compensable conditions in the claim are sacroilitis, sciatica, contusion of the buttocks, thoracic
sprain/strain, lumbar sprain/strain, right hip strain, and right leg contusion. The Office of Judges
found that a lumbar MRI dated April 22, 2011, showed a small disc bulge at L5-S1 and
degenerative disc disease at L5-S1. The assessments were lower back pain, degeneration of L5­
S1 lumbar intervertebral disc, and lumbosacral neuritis/radiculitis. The Office of Judges noted
that degeneration of L5-S1 lumbar intervertebral disc is not a compensable condition in the
claim. It also noted that electrodiagnostic studies dated April 23, 2012, of the right lower
extremity were normal. The Office of Judges determined that a history and physical by Sheena
Geer, FNP, BC, dated January 12, 2012, stated that Dr. Gold and Ms. Greer felt that the
degenerative disc at L5-S1 was the cause of Ms. Kimball-Shepherd’s pain and recommended a
PARS pain clinic consultation for evaluation and treatment.

       The Office of Judges further stated that Ms. Kimball-Shepherd has been found to be at
maximum medical improvement by multiple physicians, including her treating physician who
opined in a July of 2013 notice of maximum medical improvement that she needed no further
treatment and could return to work. Dr. Sethi also opined that she had reached maximum medical
                                                 2
improvement. Similarly, Dr. Guberman stated that Ms. Kimball-Shepherd had reached maximum
medical improvement and required no further treatment. The Office of Judges therefore
concluded that the requested consultation was not necessary to treat the compensable injury. The
Board of Review adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Office of Judges and
affirmed its Order on July 1, 2015.

       After review, we agree with the reasoning of the Office of Judges and the conclusions of
the Board of Review. The evidence shows that while Ms. Kimball-Shepherd may need referral to
PARS Brain and Spine Institute for pain management, the referral is not necessary to treat the
compensable injury. Ms. Kimball-Shepherd underwent treatment, was found to be at maximum
medical improvement, and was determined to require no further treatment by multiple physicians
of record, including her treating physician. The evidence shows that the requested referral was
made for the treatment of her non-compensable degenerative disc disease and not the
compensable injury.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: May 25, 2016

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Allen H. Loughry II




                                                3
