                                   NO. 07-07-0386-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL A

                                  JANUARY 9, 2008
                          ______________________________

                       JOEY NICKOLAS VALLEJO, APPELLANT

                                             V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

                  NO. 18022-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE
                        _______________________________


Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.


                              ABATEMENT AND REMAND


       Following a plea of not guilty, a jury convicted appellant Joey Nickolas Vallejo of

possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, of four grams or more but less

than 200 grams.      The jury assessed punishment at 16 years confinement in the

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant timely filed

a notice of appeal. The reporter's record, clerk's record, and supplemental volumes of the

clerk’s record were filed. Appellant's brief was due for filing on November 28, 2007, but

neither his brief nor a motion for extension for time were filed.
       By letter dated December 7, 2007, this Court notified appellant's appointed counsel

of this failure and also explained that if no response was received by December 17, 2007,

the appeal would be abated pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. We received no response and therefore abate the appeal and remand the

case to the trial court for further proceedings.


       On remand, the trial court shall conduct the hearing required by Rule 38.8(b)(2) and

(3) to determine:


       1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

       2. If so, whether appellant's present counsel, given his failure to file a brief,
       will pursue the appeal or, if appellant is indigent, the appointment of new
       counsel is necessary.


       Should the trial court determine appellant desires to continue the appeal, is indigent,

and that new counsel should be appointed, it shall appoint new counsel to represent

appellant for this appeal.     Should the trial court appoint new counsel, its order of

appointment shall include newly appointed counsel’s name, address, telephone number,

and state bar number.


       The trial court shall execute all orders necessary regarding the aforementioned

issues. If necessary, it shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court

shall include its findings, conclusions, and orders, in a supplemental clerk's record. A

supplemental reporter's record of the hearing of matters made the subject of this opinion

shall also be included in the appellate record.        Finally, the trial court shall file the



                                              2
supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this

Court by February 11, 2008.


      It is so ordered.




                                               Per Curiam




Do not publish.




                                           3
