                         Environmental Court of Vermont
                                State of Vermont

===============================================================================
                    E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N
===============================================================================

JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLC     Docket No.s 92-5-07 Vtec & 116-6-08 Vtec
Project:     Wal-Mart discount/retail store (mun. permit and Act 250 permit)
Applicant:   JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLC

Title:    Motion to Amend Judgment (filing No. __)
Filed:    March 26, 2010
Filed by: Jon Anderson, Attorney for Appellants Commons Associates, Inc. and
           R.L. Vallee, Inc.

Response: none; Attorney Anderson represents that Applicant JLD consents.

_X_ Granted               ___ Denied                 ___ Other

      Appellants Commons Associates, Inc. and R.L. Vallee, Inc. (“Commons” and
“RL Vallee”) have requested that this Court amend its Merits Decision of January
20, 2010, (“Merits Decision”) concerning the consolidated appeals relating to
the Wal-Mart retail store and related improvements proposed for a site off of
U.S. Route 7 in the Town of St. Albans (“Town”). Commons and RL Vallee request
that the Court amend its Merits Decision to include memorials in both the Act
250 permit appeal and municipal appeal proceedings to reflect that Applicant JLD
Properties of St. Albans (“Applicant”) has pledged to not include in its
proposed development (1) gasoline sales or (2) retail floor space in excess of
10,000 square feet for the sale of food items similar to those sold in grocery
stores. The attorney for Commons and RL Vallee has represented that Applicant
does not object to these suggested revisions. No party has filed a response to
Commons’s and RL Vallee’s pending motion.
      We addressed both of these issues in our Merits Decision, at pages 37–38.
Our Decision references similar or identical prohibitions as conditions in our
approval of the municipal and Act 250 applications, respectively. However, both
conditions are not specifically referenced in both approvals.     It is for this
reason, we understand, that Commons and RL Vallee have filed for amendment.
      As addressed in the Merits Decision, the prohibitions concerning grocery
and gasoline sales was not a consequence of the Court determining that Applicant
had failed to fulfill its burdens of production or persuasion on the propriety
of their project including such sales, but rather because Applicant had not
proposed including gasoline or significant grocery sales in the first instance.
Merits Decision, at 37 (noting that Applicant had “never requested approval to
have its proposed Wal-Mart directly compete with nearby grocery stores,
supermarkets, and gasoline stations.”)     These legal issues were a topic of
discussion at trial and in our Merits Decision, because of concerns by Commons
and RL Vallee, if such sales were to occur at the proposed Wal-Mart. Thus, we
included conditions prohibiting gasoline and significant grocery store sales in
our approval of the Act 250 and municipal applications, respectively. Commons
and RL Vallee now seek to have both conditions included in both the Act 250 and
municipal approvals.
      For the same reasons, and on the same premise as we included one of these
restrictions in each of the approvals in our Merits Decision, we hereby include
both conditions in both approvals, thereby GRANTING the pending motion.
In re JLD Properties/St. Albans Wal-Mart, No. 92-5-07 & 116-6-08 Vtec (05-03-10)
                                                                        Page 2 of 2

      Our remand of the site plan, conditional use, and planned unit development
proceedings in Docket No. 92-5-07 Vtec, and our remand of the Act 250
proceedings (LUP #6F0583) in Docket No. 116-6-08 Vtec, is hereby AMENDED to
require both of the following conditions in both permit proceedings:
      There shall be no sale of gasoline for automobiles on Lot 3 without
      the permittee, its successors, or assigns first submitting an
      application for amendment of the underlying permit, and actual
      receipt and final disposition of all necessary permit amendments,
      for authority to sell gasoline on Lot 3.
      And
      The proposed Wal-Mart discount store shall not devote more than
      10,000 square feet of retail floor space (including aisle space) to
      the sale of food items (i.e., not including paper goods, cleaning
      items, and other non-edible items commonly available for purchase in
      both grocery and discount stores) without first submitting an
      application for amendment of the underlying permit, and actual
      receipt and final disposition of any necessary permit amendments,
      for authority to use more than 10,000 square feet of retail floor
      space in its Wal-Mart discount store to sell such food items.

      The Court Manager is hereby directed to note on our original Merits
Decision, as well as the electronic copy of it posted on the Vermont Judiciary
web site, that we have hereby AMENDED our January 20, 2010 Merits Decision. In
all other respects, except as further amended by the Entry Order on Appellant
VNRC’s motion to amend (also issued today), our January 20, 2010 Merits Decision
remains in full force and effect, subject to appeals pending before the Vermont
Supreme Court.




___________________________________________       ______May 3, 2010______
      Thomas S. Durkin, Judge                             Date
===============================================================================
Date copies sent to: ____________               Clerk's Initials _______
Copies sent to:
    Attorney Jon T. Anderson for Interested Person R.L. Vallee, Inc.
       (with Co-Counsel David W. Rugh)
    Attorney Jon Groveman for Appellant Vermont Natural Resources Council, the
       Northwest Citizens for Responsible Growth, Marie Frey and Richard Hudak
    Attorney Gerald R. Tarrant Esq. (co-counsel for VRNC)
    Attorney Stewart H. McConaughy for Appellee JLD Properties
       (with Co-Counsel Robert F. O'Neill and Ross A. Feldmann)
    Attorney Mark L. Lucas for Interested Person Natural Resources Board
    Attorney John H. Hasen for the Natural Resources Board/LU Panel (FYI only)
    Attorney Judith L. Dillon for the Agency of Natural Resources
    Attorney David A. Barra for Interested Person Town of St. Albans
    Attorney Brian S. Dunkiel for City of St. Albans (FYI only)
    Attorney William H. Rice for Vt. Agency of Transportation (FYI only)
    Clerk, Vermont Supreme Court (FYI only)
