       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

 MICHAEL R. LANGE, AND SKY ROBOTICS, INC.,
             Plaintiffs-Appellants,

                           v.

    MARK A. LITMAN, AND MARK A. LITMAN &
              ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
              Defendants-Appellees,

                         AND

                  IPC EAGLE, INC.,
                      Defendant.
                ______________________

                      2012-1565
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota in No. 11-CV-2387, Judge Donovan
W. Frank.
                 ______________________

                    ON MOTION
                ______________________

   Before DYK, MAYER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
                      ORDER
2                       MICHAEL R. LANGE   v. MARK A. LITMAN
    On March 11, 2013, appellees Mark A. Litman and
Mark A. Litman & Associates filed a motion seeking
reversal without oral argument and a remand with in-
structions to dismiss the plaintiff’s malpractice claims for
lack of jurisdiction. Appellants Michael R. Lange and Sky
Robotics, Inc., opposed.
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gunn v.
Minton, 568 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 1059 (2013), we conclude
that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the mal-
practice claims at issue. We vacate the district court’s
decision and remand to the district court. On remand the
district court shall dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint for
lack of jurisdiction.
                                   FOR THE COURT

March 27, 2013                     /s/ Jan Horbaly
   Date                            Jan Horbaly
                                   Clerk

cc: Paul A. Sortland, Esq.
    Charles E. Lundberg, Esq.
