    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                            No. 12-356V
                                     Filed: November 14, 2013
                                         Not for Publication


*************************************
DOUGLAS FINLAY and CAMMIE                    *
FINLAY, on Behalf of Their Minor             *
Daughter, GINA L. FINLAY,                    *
                                             *
             Petitioners,                    *       Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on
                                             *       stipulation of fact
 v.                                          *
                                             *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                          *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                          *
                                             *
             Respondent.                     *
                                             *
*************************************
Carl D. Campbell, III, Alexandria, LA, for petitioners.
Gordon E. Shemin, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master


                DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

       On November 14, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an
appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.

        In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioners filed a statement
asserting that they did not incur any costs in pursuit of their petition.

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
redact such material from public access.
       Petitioners submitted their request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During
informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain aspects of petitioners’ application.
Based on these objections, petitioners amend their application for attorneys’ fees and costs to
$15,117.27. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to
be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $15,117.27, representing reimbursement for
attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner
and Neblett, Beard & Arsenault in the amount of $15,117.27.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: November 14, 2013                                                           s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                      Laura D. Millman
                                                                                       Special Master




2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2
