     Case: 19-10263      Document: 00515231546         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/11/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 19-10263
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   December 11, 2019
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                      Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KENNETH WAYNE DAVIS, JR.,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:18-CR-59-1


Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenneth Wayne
Davis, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Davis has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. While
counsel’s compliance with our Anders directive is barely sufficient, we concur


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10263    Document: 00515231546    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/11/2019


                                No. 19-10263

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
