                                    In The

                              Court of Appeals
                   Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                          ____________________
                             NO.   09-14-00079-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00080-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00081-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00082-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00083-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00084-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00085-CR
                             NO.   09-14-00086-CR
                          ____________________

                        PAUL T. BROWN, Appellant

                                      V.

                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________        ______________

                  On Appeal from the 260th District Court
                          Orange County, Texas
      Trial Cause Nos. D120300-R, D120303-R, D120306-R, D120309-R,
             D120312-R, D120315-R, D120318-R, and D120321-R
________________________________________________________        _____________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On December 4, 2013, Paul T. Brown filed a notice of appeal from

sentences imposed on June 4, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed with the trial

court more than thirty days from the date of sentencing and outside the time for

                                       1
requesting an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal. We notified the

parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The

appellant filed a response but failed to show that he filed a timely notice of appeal.

      The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 26.2. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R.

App. P. 26.3. It does not appear that the appellant obtained out-of-time appeals

from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court finds it is without

jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

      APPEALS DISMISSED.


                                              ___________________________
                                                    STEVE McKEITHEN
                                                       Chief Justice


Opinion Delivered March 26, 2014
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.




                                          2
