UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

MAY -3 2010

Carl Musgrove, )
) Clerk, U.S. District and
plain¢iff, ) Bankruptcy Courts
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 10-144 (UNA)
)
Harrison C0unty et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to
proceed without prepayment of fees. The application will be granted and the complaint will be
dismissed.

Plaintiff, convicted by a Mississippi state court in 1998, is serving a fifteen-year tenn of
imprisonment in a Mississippi prison in Leakesville, Mississippi. See slip. op. at 1-2 & n.l,
Musgrove v. Harrison Counly et al., Civil. Action No. 08-1504 (LG-RHW) (S.D. Miss. Sept. 8,
2009). In December 2008, Musgrove filed a civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United
States District Court for the Southem District of Mississippi against Harrison County, its circuit
court clerk, and the court reporter involved in his 1998 criminal proceeding. See id. at l. That
case was dismissed, after a hearing, for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be
granted. Id. at 2-3. In December 2009, Musgrove submitted a complaint for filing in this Court,
asserting § 1983 claims against Harrison County, its circuit court clerk, the court reporter, as well
as his defense counsel in the 1998 criminal proceeding and the federal judge and the federal
magistrate judge who presided over his Mississippi civil rights case. See Compl. at 4.
Notwithstanding its form, the complaint appears in substance to be an attempt to raise a

constitutional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, see id. at 4, an inference consistent with

what he told the court in his Mississippi civil rights case, see slip. op. at 1-2, Musgrove v.
Harrison County et al., Civil Action No. 08-1504. In this Court, Musgrove does not pray for
money damages, but rather to be "made whole, by truth of justice and place[d] in good medical
condition." He also seeks to restore his good name. Compl. at 4.

The plaintiff does not allege any wrong doing by the defendant judges. Id. at 4 (referring
to attachments that are not part of the record). Therefore, the claims against the judges will be
dismissed. The plaintiff also does not specifically allege any wrongful conduct by Harrison
County, its circuit clerk or the court reporter involved in Musgrove’s criminal case, and the
claims against them are therefore subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted. Moreover, because Musgrove’s civil rights complaint against those same
defendants was considered and dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, it is barred here by res judicata. Additionally, the claims must be dismissed on improper
venue grounds. See 28 U.S.C. §§ l39l(b), l406(a).

Finally, any intended claim for ineffective assistance of counsel is an attack on the
prisoner’s conviction. As such, it must be brought in a habeas petition. LoBue v. Christopher,
82 F.3d 1081, 1082-84 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

For these reasons, the complaint will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this

memorandum opinion.

 

Date:  9~)?/ 710/0

