i          i     i                                                                   i       i      i




                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                        No. 04-09-00588-CR

                                         Gary Ace AVANT,
                                             Appellant

                                                  v.

                                       The STATE of Texas,
                                             Appellee

                     From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2008-CR-1308
                       Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:         Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                 Karen A. Angelini, Justice
                 Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009

DISMISSED

           On August 9, 2009, appellant Gary Ace Avant filed a notice of appeal stating he was

appealing “within thirty (30) days of sentence having been imposed against Defendant on 11 day of

July 2009 in said cause.” However, the clerk’s record does not contain a judgment or other

appealable order of the trial court in this cause. Rather, the clerk’s record contains a State’s motion

to dismiss this cause, which was signed by the trial court on June 11, 2009. The motion shows the
                                                                                                          04-09-00588-CR



State requested a dismissal because appellant “was convicted in another case or count,” specifically

cause number 2008-CR-8981. Thus, it appeared to this court that we had no jurisdiction in this

matter.

          In light of the foregoing, we ordered appellant to file a response showing why the appeal

should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(c). In response,

appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a response stating “there is no final conviction in this

case, and therefore no jurisdiction for this Court to consider the Appellant’s purported appeal.”1

          Accordingly, because there is no appealable judgment or order in this cause, we dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id. R. 42.3(a).



                                                                       PER CURIAM



DO NOT PUBLISH




          1
              … Appellant notes there is an inconsistency in the clerk’s record in that the “Certificate of Notice of Appeal
to the Fourth Court of Appeals,” which was filed by the district clerk, indicates appellant was convicted in this matter.
W e agree with appellant that this certificate is incorrect – appellant was not convicted in this cause of any offense.

                                                             --12 --
