              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-82,242-01


             EX PARTE JEVANTE TREVION MITCHELL-SMITH, Applicant


                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 1374104 IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY


        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to

aggravated robbery in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. He was later

adjudicated guilty and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Although Applicant explicitly

waived his right to appeal from the adjudication, he did file a motion for reconsideration, which the

trial court treated as a motion for new trial. The trial court set the motion for a hearing, but through

no fault of his own, Applicant was not bench-warranted, and the hearing was not conducted until
                                                                                                     2

after the motion for new trial had been overruled by operation of law.

       Applicant contends, among other things,1 that he was denied due process when he was unable

to present evidence in support of the motion for new trial before it was overruled by operation of

law. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

       Before remand, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending

that relief be granted on the basis that Applicant was denied due process. We find that Applicant

is entitled to the opportunity a hearing on his timely-filed motion for new trial after adjudication in

Cause No. 1374104 from the 230th District Court of Harris County. Applicant is ordered returned

to that time at which the trial court has jurisdiction to consider the motion for new trial, and to

conduct a hearing on that motion if necessary. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the

trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

for the motion for new trial. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed

on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to have

the trial court consider his motion for new trial, he must take affirmative steps to request a hearing

on the motion for new trial within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.



Delivered: October 14, 2015
Do not publish



       1
           This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
