Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D),
this Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before
any court except for the purpose of                               Aug 13 2013, 7:16 am
establishing the defense of res judicata,
collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.



ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                                    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

JEREMY K. NIX                                              GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Matheny, Hahn, Denman & Nix, L.L.P.                        Attorney General of Indiana
Huntington, Indiana
                                                           RYAN D. JOHANNINGSMEIER
                                                           Deputy Attorney General
                                                           Indianapolis, Indiana



                                IN THE
                      COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

CORY A. MYERS                                      )
                                                   )
       Appellant-Defendant,                        )
                                                   )
               vs.                                 )   No. 35A05-1302-CR-90
                                                   )
STATE OF INDIANA,                                  )
                                                   )
       Appellee-Plaintiff.                         )


                     APPEAL FROM THE HUNTINGTON SUPERIOR COURT
                          The Honorable Jeffrey R. Heffelfinger, Judge
                               Cause No. 35D01-1207-FD-146


                                         August 13, 2013

                 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BAILEY, Judge
                                         Case Summary

          Cory Myers (“Myers”) appeals his conviction for Domestic Battery, as a Class D

felony,1 presenting the sole issue of whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding

a defense witness. We affirm.


                                  Facts and Procedural History

          In June of 2012, Denise Myers (“Denise”) filed to dissolve her marriage to Myers.

However, they and their two children continued to live together in the same house.

          On July 2, 2012, Denise was lying in bed when Myers removed the blankets,

“slammed” the bottom of Denise’s feet, and ordered: “Get up bitch.” (Tr. 112.) When

Denise asked Myers to leave her alone, he responded by picking up a glass of water and

dumping it on her “from head to toe.” (Tr. 112.) Myers screamed at Denise, turned on the

radio “full blast,” turned lights off and on, and kept Denise awake until around 1:00 a.m. (Tr.

112.)

          Denise got up at 5:00 a.m. the next morning to prepare for work. When she entered

the kitchen and reached for her book bag on the counter, Myers approached her from behind.

    Myers placed both hands on Denise’s shoulders and threw her up against the counter and the

wall. Denise grabbed her book bag and ran out to go to work, as Myers continuing

screaming at her.

          Denise arrived home with her children at approximately 3:00 p.m. Myers began

yelling and screaming. At one point, he threw something at Denise and threatened: “If you

1
    Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1.3(a).

                                                2
cross this line, bitch, I’ll kill ya.” (Tr. 115.) Myers checked Denise’s cell phone and Denise

responded that she would check Myers’s phone. Myers grabbed Denise’s wrists, shook her,

and threw her down on a bed. Denise gathered her children and escaped to the house of a

friend, who convinced Denise to call police.

       Huntington Police Officer Whitney Stoffel was dispatched to take a report. Officer

Stoffel observed that Denise was crying and “shaken up” and had a bruise on her forearm.

(Tr. 131.)

       The State charged Myers with two counts of Domestic Battery and one count of

Battery and also alleged that he had a prior Domestic Battery conviction. At the conclusion

of a jury trial, Myers was found guilty of Domestic Battery as a Class A misdemeanor. The

offense was elevated to a Class D felony due to his prior conviction for Domestic Battery.

This appeal ensued.

                                 Discussion and Decision

       Myers alleges that the trial court excluded a witness “where the excluded testimony

was vital to [his] theory of the case … and the State would not have suffered substantial

prejudice by allowing the testimony.” Appellant’s Brief at 1.

       An offer of proof is the method by which the proponent of evidence preserves any

error in its exclusion. Noble v. State, 725 N.E.2d 842, 846 (Ind. 2000). When the proponent

does not make an offer of proof, he has not adequately preserved the exclusion of the

witness’ testimony as an issue for appellate review. Id. The Rules of Evidence require that

the substance of the evidence be made known to the trial court and that the offer to prove


                                               3
identify the grounds for admission and the relevance of the testimony. Id. (citing Ind.

Evidence Rule 103(a)). Myers failed to submit an offer of proof and therefore has not

preserved the exclusion of his witness’s testimony for appellate review.2

        Affirmed.

MAY, J., and BRADFORD, J., concur.




2
 Myers’s brief suggests that the witness was his sister, who had been the recipient of text messages from
Denise at some unspecified time. However, the proffered witness was not identified at the jury trial.

                                                   4
