     Case: 10-10805     Document: 00511925787         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/18/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                            July 18, 2012
                                      No. 10-10805
                                    c/w No. 11-11119                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                   Summary Calendar                             Clerk



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICK BLANKENSHIP,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 2:04-CR-32-1


Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rick Blankenship has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Blankenship has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 10-10805   Document: 00511925787    Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/18/2012

                               No. 10-10805
                             c/w No. 11-11119

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                     2
