§§ 313 /0/,</)\
1 - ' ' §§§ §11§§\1

@@§§§ §§§§1§1 1§§1§1§§§§§13

CHARLES HALL_JR¢ .=.; @@§ ()5 29§5
1421116 . ’ .

.2101 F.M.369 N

10wA PARK_,TX 76367 §§®€§ @§§©@S§@, ©§ @W§<
ALLRED UNIT - .. 7 - » DATE: 9- 29- 15

COURT OF cRIMINAL APPEALs-OF TEXAS
P.o-Box 12308,cAPIT0L~STA110N'
AUSTI:, TEXAS 7871
RE: oBJEcT10N 10 wHiTE ¢ARD DENIAL
[cAUSE No.54218-D]AND[€AUSE'N0.54219-D]

8.

POINTS OF ERRORS TO BE RAISED'UNDER FIRST IMPRESSION

(1)_JURISDICTION - PAGE ONE OF ONE [4th,14th cGNST.AMEND. V10LAT1ON]

(2) 1LLEGAL'€0NF1NEMENT'~ ~“AGE ONE oF Two [CONST. vIOLATION UNDER T11LEzSU.S.c.§§2241(3)
(3)DOUBLE_JE0PARDY -cONIINUAT 10N PAGE Two OF THREE{Sch, 6ch,8ch,1lch,&l4th const amend. ]
(4)UNLAWFUL & 1LLEGALE NACTMENT OF THE [AEDPA][U. S. C. A.  CONS1.§IGLATION UNDER ARTICLE

DATE:.NOVEMBER 5 2014 28§§2241(3)1. e. TEXAS CONST. ART 1§§19.]

I AM RAISING AN OBJECTION TO THESE WHITE CARDS WITHOUT A WRlTTEN ORDER.I HAVE A
(RIGHT) TO A [FAIR AND PROPER INQUIRY ]

 

CONCLUSION§"IF I WOULD HAVE HAD A PROPER INQUIRY,WHAT WOULD THE PROPER`OUTCOME

HAVE BEEN?WOULD 1 HAVE GONE BACK TO COURT ORWHAT?WHAT IS THE REASON
FOR (DENIAL)?

RESPECTFULLY'SUBMITTED
CHARLES HALL JR.
#1421116

CC FILE

