                  T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-166



                       UNITED STATES TAX COURT



          DAVID M. AND PHYLLIS E. BROWN, Petitioners v.
           COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent



     Docket No. 6412-04S.              Filed September 24, 2007.



     David M. and Phyllis E. Brown, pro sese.

     Randall L. Preheim, for respondent.


     VASQUEZ, Judge:    This case was heard pursuant to the

provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect

when the petition was filed.1   Pursuant to section 7463(b), the

decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and




     1
        Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section
references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the
year in issue.
                                 - 2 -

this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other

case.

      This case is before the Court on respondent’s motion for

summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121.     After a concession,2 the

sole issue for decision is whether petitioners can exclude from

income wages earned during 2000 from working in Antarctica.

                              Background

      At the time they filed the petition, petitioners resided in

Green Valley, Arizona.    During 2000, petitioners performed

services at McMurdo Station in Ross Island, Antarctica.     On their

2000 Federal income tax return, petitioners excluded wage income

earned and received during 2000 for services performed in

Antarctica.

                              Discussion

I.   Summary Judgment

      Rule 121(a) provides that either party may move for summary

judgment upon all or any part of the legal issues in controversy.

Full or partial summary judgment may be granted only if it is

demonstrated that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact

and that the legal issues presented by the motion may be decided

as a matter of law.     See Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v.

Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th



      2
        Respondent concedes that no penalty pursuant to sec. 6662
is due from petitioners for 2000.
                                - 3 -

Cir. 1994).    We conclude that there is no genuine issue as to any

material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of

law.

II.    In General

       Section 61(a) provides that gross income means all income

from whatever source derived.    Accordingly, citizens of the

United States generally are taxed on income earned outside the

geographical boundaries of the United States unless the income is

specifically excluded from gross income.    Specking v.

Commissioner, 117 T.C. 95, 101-102 (2001), affd. sub nom. Haessly

v. Commissioner, 68 Fed. Appx. 44 (9th Cir. 2003), affd. sub nom.

Umbach v. Commissioner, 357 F.3d 1108 (10th Cir. 2003).

Exclusions from income are construed narrowly, and taxpayers must

bring themselves within the clear scope of the exclusion.       Id.

III.    Section 911

       In Arnett v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 89, 91-96 (2006) (Arnett

I), affd. 473 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2007) (Arnett II), we addressed

the arguments made by the parties herein regarding section 911.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit agreed with our

analysis of section 911 and affirmed our conclusion that

Antarctica is not a “foreign country” pursuant to section 911 and
                                   - 4 -

the regulations thereunder.       Arnett v. Commissioner, 473 F.3d at

799.       We shall not repeat our analysis from Arnett I herein.   We

follow our analysis and holding in Arnett I and the analysis and

holding of the Court of Appeals in Arnett II.3




       3
        In Arnett v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 89 (2006), affd. 473
F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2007), we concluded our Opinion with a
citation of sec. 863(d) suggesting that sec. 863(d) provided an
additional reason to rule against the taxpayer. Id. at 96 (“See
also sec. 863(d) (providing that income earned in Antarctica by a
U.S. person is sourced in the United States).”). In Arnett v.
Commissioner, 473 F.3d at 797, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit addressed sec. 863(d) in greater detail, stating:

            At the outset, we think that it is important to
       note that considering Antarctica not to be a “foreign
       country” is compatible with the general statutory
       scheme. Notably, section 911 is found under subtitle
       A, chapter 1, subchapter N of the IRC, which is
       designated “Tax Based on Income from Sources Within or
       Without the United States.” Part I of this subchapter,
       entitled “Source Rules and Other General Rules Relating
       to Foreign Income,” deems any activity in Antarctica to
       be “space or ocean activity.” In turn, the United
       States is designated the source country of income from
       such activity when earned by a citizen of the United
       States. 26 U.S.C. § 863(d). Although this provision
       does not provide a definitive answer as to whether
       Antarctica is a “foreign country,” it supports the
       conclusion that section 911 is not intended to apply to
       income earned for services provided in Antarctica.

We take this opportunity to state our agreement with the Court of
Appeals’ conclusion set forth above. See also HCSC-Laundry v.
United States, 450 U.S. 1, 6 (1981).
                                  - 5 -

IV.   Conclusion

      Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Arnett I, Arnett II,

and herein, we conclude that petitioners cannot exclude from

gross income wages earned during 2000 from working in Antarctica.

      To reflect the foregoing,


                                               An appropriate order and

                                          decision will be entered.
