                                   IN THE
                           TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                  No. 10-19-00319-CV

KENNETH RAY BROWN
AKA RAYMOND LEWIS BROWN,
                                                              Appellant
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                              Appellee



                            From the 54th District Court
                             McLennan County, Texas
                              Trial Court No. 94-324-C


                                      OPINION

       Kenneth Ray Brown a/k/a Raymond Lewis Brown, an inmate, is attempting to

appeal from the trial court’s “order” to withdraw funds from his inmate account “to pay

attorney’s fee and other bill of costs.” We will dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       Section 501.014(e) of the Government Code governs the withdrawal of funds from

an inmate’s account for the recovery of court fees and costs assessed against the inmate.

See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 501.014(e). Proceedings under section 501.014(e) to recover
court fees and costs assessed against inmates “are civil in nature and not part of the

underlying criminal case.” Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 (Tex. 2009). In civil cases,

unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final orders or

judgments. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.012; CMH Homes v. Perez, 340

S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

       Although called an “order,” an “order” to withdraw funds is not a final,

appealable order; it is a notice to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to withdraw

funds from an inmate’s account under section 501.014(e). Ramirez v. State, 318 S.W.3d

906, 907-08 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, no pet.); see Jones v. State, No. 10-10-00006-CV, 2011

WL 5221243, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Oct. 26, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Harrell,

286 S.W.3d at 316 n.1. On the other hand, an inmate may appeal from a trial court’s final

order denying the inmate’s motion to modify or rescind the withdrawal. See Ramirez, 318

S.W.3d at 908 (“Only when [the withdrawal notification is] properly challenged and

denied relief is there a trial court order that is final from which the inmate . . . can

appeal.”). In this case, however, there is no final order denying any motion to modify or

rescind the withdrawal of funds from Brown’s inmate account. In Brown’s “petition of

appeal,” which we have determined is his notice of appeal, Brown states that he has

attempted to file with the trial court clerk a “motion to quash attorney’s fee and other bill

of costs.” But, Brown asserts that the trial court has not responded to his motion.

       The Clerk of this Court notified Brown that, unless he showed grounds for

continuing this appeal, it was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. Brown

subsequently filed a “Motion for Continuation of Appeal to Pay Attorney’s Fee and Other

Brown v. State                                                                         Page 2
Bill of Costs.” Brown, however, has not shown grounds for continuing this appeal.

Accordingly, we deny Brown’s “Motion for Continuation of Appeal to Pay Attorney’s

Fee and Other Bill of Costs,” and we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.




                                                REX D. DAVIS
                                                Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Davis, and
       Justice Neill
Motion denied; appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed October 9, 2019
[CV06]




Brown v. State                                                                       Page 3
