<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-95-00565-CR</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>Anthony Tallbear, Appellant</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times" STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 0951632, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG><CENTER></CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times"><STRONG>PER CURIAM</STRONG></SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	After accepting appellant's plea of guilty and judicial confession, the district court found him
guilty of aggravated sexual assault.  Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West 1994 &amp; Supp. 1996).  The
court assessed punishment at imprisonment for thirty years.</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	On December 29, 1995, appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in which he
concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of <EM>Anders v.
California</EM>, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  <EM>See also</EM> <EM>Penson v. Ohio</EM>, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); <EM>Gainous
v. State</EM>, 436  S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); <EM>Jackson v. State</EM>, 485  S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1972); <EM>Currie v. State</EM>, 516  S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); <EM>High v. State</EM>, 573  S.W.2d
807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was
advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	On January 18, February 23, March 20, and May 22, 1996, this Court granted appellant's
pro se motions for extension of time to file his pro se brief.  In granting the fourth extension to July 22, we
informed appellant that no further extensions would be granted.  On August 1, appellant filed a fifth pro se
motion for extension of time, requesting that the time for filing his pro se brief be extended to October 22. 
This motion was granted in part.  The time for filing appellant's pro se brief was extended to September
11, and the cause was ordered submitted for decision on that date.  On September 3, we overruled
appellant's sixth pro se motion for extension of time, by which he asked that the time for filing his pro se
brief be extended to November 22, and reminded him that his brief was due by September 11.  No pro
se brief has been received.</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.<STRONG><A HREF="#N_1_"><SUP> (1)</SUP></A></STRONG></SPAN></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Affirmed</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Filed:   September 25, 1996</SPAN></P>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-family: CG Times">Do Not Publish
<P><A NAME="N_1_">1. </A>     <STRONG>&nbsp;&nbsp;Appellant's motion to reconsider his sixth pro se motion for extension of time is overruled.</SPAN></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
