
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1823                             ALFA SEAFOOD COMPANY, INC.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                           CARIBBEAN SEAFOOD, INC., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                 [Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                          __________________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Philip E. Roberts on brief for appellant.            _________________            Miguel E. Miranda on brief for appellee Leonel Diaz.            _________________            William  M.  Vidal  Carvajal  on  brief  for  appellees  Caribbean            ____________________________        Seafood, Inc., Ernesto Cabeza and Jorge Cabrera.                                 ____________________                                  November 12, 1997                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.  Upon careful consideration of the parties'                 ___________            briefs and  the record provided  for our review,  we conclude            that  the district court  properly denied  appellant's motion            under  Puerto Rico R. Civ. P. 51.7.  We reach this conclusion            substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.                 ________   ___                                         -2-
