
USCA1 Opinion

	




          October 18, 1995                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-1529                                    BETSY FOREST,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                TRANS CARRIERS, INC.,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Stahl and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Mark S. Kierstead on brief for appellant.            _________________            Peter T. Marchesi on brief for appellee.            _________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.   We have carefully  reviewed the record  in                 __________            this case  and  affirm the  dismissal  for lack  of  personal            jurisdiction.   The record  indicates that, although  much of            the  information would  have been available  to her  from the            proper sources, plaintiff  failed to place in  the record the            "specific  facts"  necessary  to support  her  jurisdictional            allegation.  Boit  v. Gar-Tec Products,  Inc., 967 F.2d  671,                         ____     ______________________            680  (1st  Cir.  1992).    The  record  likewise  shows  that            plaintiff never  asked that the court permit discovery on the            limited   issue   of   personal   jurisdiction.      See  id.                                                                 ___  __            Consequently, plaintiff has  not met her burden, id.  at 675,                                                             __            of  showing  that  defendant's   contacts  with  Maine   were            sufficiently  "substantial"  or sufficiently  "continuous and            systematic"  so that  the exercise  of personal  jurisdiction            over it in this case would comport with due process.                 Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.                 ________   ___
