
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [Not for Publication]                            United States Court of Appeals                                For the First Circuit                                 ____________________        No. 96-2095                 HORIZONS HOTEL d/b/a CARIB INN TENNIS CLUB & CASINO                        AND/OR HOTEL ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED,                                     Petitioner,                                          v.                         THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,                                     Respondent.                                 ____________________                                ON PETITION FOR REVIEW                        AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT            OF A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD                                 ____________________                                        Before                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges,                                            ______________                            and O'Toole,* District Judge.                                          ______________                                 ____________________            Wallace Vazquez Sanabria on brief for Petitioner.            ________________________            Corinna L. Metcalf,  Deputy Assistant  General Counsel,  Frederick            __________________                                       _________        L. Feinstein, General Counsel,  Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel,        ____________                    __________        and  Aileen A. Armstrong,  Deputy Associate General  Counsel, on brief             ___________________        for Respondent.                                 ____________________                                     MAY 19, 1997                                 ____________________        _____________________        *Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation                      Per curiam.  Having carefully reviewed the parties'                      Per curiam.                      __________            briefs and  submissions, we find that  the administrative law            judge's  findings, adopted  by  the National  Labor Relations            Board, are  supported by  substantial evidence in  the record            and  reflect a correct application of the law.  Therefore, we            deny Petitioner's request for  review, and grant Respondent's            request  for enforcement of its  supplemental order.  See 1st                                                                  ___            Cir. R. 27.1.  Costs to Respondent.                           _____ __ __________                                         -2-                                          2
