                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 06-3383
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
             Appellee,                   *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the
                                         * Western District of Missouri.
Levonne E. Dallas,                       *
                                         *    [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellant.                  *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: June 6, 2007
                                 Filed: July 12, 2007
                                  ___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Levonne Dallas pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). At sentencing, over Dallas’s
objection, the district court1 applied a 4-level enhancement under U.S.S.G.
§ 2K2.1(b)(5) (2005), and sentenced him to 71 months in prison and 3 years of
supervised release. He appeals, contesting the enhancement. Reviewing the district
court’s application of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error,
see United States v. Anderson, 339 F.3d 720, 724 (8th Cir. 2003), we affirm.

      1
       The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the Western District of Missouri.
      The Guidelines provide for a 4-level enhancement if a felon-in-possession
defendant such as Dallas “used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection
with another felony offense,” meaning any federal, state, or local offense that is
punishable by at least one year in prison, whether or not a criminal charge was
brought or a conviction obtained. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) & comment. (n.4)
(2005).

       The district court did not err in assessing the challenged enhancement: in the
midst of a heated argument during which Dallas physically assaulted his girlfriend,
he put a shotgun to her head. This constitutes a Missouri felony regardless whether
the gun was loaded2 and regardless of the state prosecutor’s decision to allow Dallas
to plead guilty to a reduced charge. See Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 558.011.1(4), 571.030.1(4),
571.030.7 (2007) (person is guilty of Class D felony for unlawful use of firearm,
punishable by up to 4 years in prison, if that person “exhibits, in the presence of one
or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening
manner”); United States v. Bryant, 349 F.3d 1093, 1098 (8th Cir. 2003) (even when
charges for qualifying felonies were later dismissed, court may still apply
§ 2K2.1(b)(5)); State v. Lutjen, 661 S.W.2d 845, 847 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983) (“A gun
is easily transformed into a lethal weapon by the insertion of bullets.
[Section 571.030.1(4)] does not contemplate that the gun be already lethal [loaded],
but only that the weapon can readily become lethal [by loading].”).

      Accordingly, we affirm.
                     ______________________________




      2
       Dallas’s girlfriend told police that he had put the gun in her face, loaded it, then
again pointed the gun in her face, causing her to plead with him not to shoot. Dallas
told police that the gun was unloaded.
                                            -2-
