                                                                              F I L E D
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Tenth Circuit
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                               NOV 25 1997
                                      TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           PATRICK FISHER
                                                                                    Clerk

 USMAN SHEHU SULE,
               Plaintiff-Appellant,                          No. 97-1209
 v.                                                     (D.C. No. 95-S-2042)
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                    (D. Colo.)
               Defendant-Appellee.


                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*


Before BALDOCK, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.



      After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

      Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary-Administrative

Maximum (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, filed a complaint pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671-2680, for the negligence of the



      *
        This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
United States in maintaining an overcrowded prison at the Federal Correctional

Institution in Sheridan, Oregon.

       We affirm the determination of the magistrate judge as accepted by the district

court in its Order of Dismissal filed May 20, 1997, that the claim here is properly barred

by res judicata. Because the district court correctly determined that Plaintiff’s claim is

barred by res judicata, we need not address the discretionary function issue.



       AFFIRMED.

                                                  Entered for the Court



                                                  Monroe G. McKay
                                                  Circuit Judge




                                              2
