               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42925

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 586
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: August 7, 2015
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
ROBERT DAVID HOLMES,                            )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Jason D. Scott, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified seven-year sentence with one-year
       determinate term for felony possession of a controlled substance, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                    Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                  and GRATTON, Judge
                   ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Robert David Holmes pled guilty to felony possession of a controlled substance, Idaho
Code § 37-2732(c). The district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with one year
determinate, to be served consecutively with his sentence in a separate case. Holmes appeals,
contending that his sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.

                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Holmes’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
