                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-10331
                          Summary Calendar


                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                VERSUS


            KEITH FIELDS, also known as James Johnson,
         also know as Keith Green, also known as Greasie,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant.




            Appeal from the United States District Court
        For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
                  District Court No. 3:99-CR-74-2-G
                            January 2, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

      Keith Fields appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute

cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.      We modify his sentence,

and, as modified, affirm.

      Fields was charged in a one-count indictment with conspiracy


  *
   Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

                                   1
to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine.                  Fields pleaded

guilty    and     the      district   court    sentenced    him    to    108   months’

imprisonment, followed by a five year term of supervised release.

On appeal, Fields challenges only the five-year supervised release

term. Because Fields made no objection in district court to his

term of supervised release, we review his present challenge for

plain error.      United States v. Meshack, 225 F.3d 556, 575 (5th Cir.

2000).

     A five-year term of supervised release is required in cases

involving in excess of five kilograms of cocaine.                        21 U.S.C. §

841(b)(1)(B).           However, the statutory maximum term for cocaine

possession which does not require some showing of drug amounts is

three     years       of     supervised       release.       See    18      U.S.C.     §

3583(b)(2)(providing for a term of supervised release of “not more

than three years”); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)(providing for a “term

of supervised release of at least 3 years”); United States v.

Kelly, 974 F.2d 22, 24-25 (5th Cir. 1992)(reducing a term of

supervised release to three years by harmonizing the three-year

minimum    in     §   841(b)(1)(C)      with    the   three-year        maximum   in   §

3583(b)).       In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), the

Supreme Court held that any fact, other than a prior conviction,

which increases the penalty for a crime, must be submitted to a

jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.                 Because the government

did not prove quantity beyond a reasonable doubt at the plea or


                                          2
sentencing hearing, we find plain error in Fields’s sentence.   See

Meshack, 225 F.3d at 578.   The government concedes that the term of

supervised release is incorrect and should be adjusted.

     Because the only authorized term of supervised release for the

offense of conviction is three years, there is no need for a

remand.   See United States v. Vasquez, 504 F.2d 555, 556 (5th Cir.

1974).    We therefore vacate Fields’s five-year term of supervised

release and impose a three-year term of supervised release.      As

modified, Fields’s sentence is affirmed.

     SENTENCE MODIFIED and, as modified, AFFIRMED.




                                  3
