
USCA1 Opinion

	




          November 7, 1995                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                         ____________________        No. 95-1601                      FRANCOIS O. SEVIGNY AND ALBERTA M. SEVIGNY,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                                   STATE OF MAINE,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________        No. 95-1640                      FRANCOIS O. SEVIGNY AND ALBERTA M. SEVIGNY,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                               STATE OF MAINE, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]                                          ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Francois O. Sevigny and Alberta M. Sevigny on briefs pro se.            ___________________     __________________            Andrew Ketterer,  Attorney General,  and Leanne  Robbin, Assistant            _______________                          ______________        Attorney General, on brief for state appellees.            William H.  Dale and Jensen  Baird Gardner &  Henry, on  brief for            ________________     ______________________________        Town of Sanford appellees.            Sally  J. Daggett and  Jensen Baird Gardner &  Henry, on brief for            _________________      _____________________________        appellees, Jensen Baird  Gardner &  Henry, William H.  Dale, James  N.        Katsiaficas and Sally J. Daggett.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the record on  appeal and                 __________            the briefs filed by the parties in these related appeals.  We            find  neither error  of law  nor abuse  of discretion  in the            district   court's  disposition   of  these  matters.     We,            therefore,  affirm   the   dismissals  of   each   complaint,            essentially  for the  reasons  stated in  the district  court            order of May 15, 1995 and the judgment of May 25, 1995.                 The appellants' request that we  reconsider our decision            submitting these  appeals on briefs without  oral argument is            denied.            _______                 The order of May 15, 1995, in district court docket #95-            MC-46 and the  judgment of  May 25, 1995,  in district  court            docket #95-cv-2 are affirmed.                                _________                                         -3-
