<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</STRONG></P>
<CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">7</A>-00<A NAME="2">663</A>-CR</CENTER>


<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-97-00664-CR</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</STRONG></P>



<CENTER><A NAME="3">Marc Giles</A>, Appellant</CENTER>


<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="4">TRAVIS</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="5">167TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NOS. <A NAME="6">0950012 &amp; 0971016</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="7">CHARLES CAMPBELL</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>


PER CURIAM

<P>A jury found appellant Marc Giles guilty of aggravated robbery, after which the
district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for forty years.  Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03
(West 1994).  Based on the evidence adduced at the aggravated robbery trial, the court also
revoked Giles's community supervision from an earlier conviction for robbery and imposed a
sentence of imprisonment for ten years.</P>

<P>Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed briefs concluding that these appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  The briefs meet the requirements of <EM>Anders v. California</EM>, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by advancing a contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeals. 
<EM>See also</EM> <EM>Penson v. Ohio</EM>, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); <EM>High v. State</EM>, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978); <EM>Currie v. State</EM>, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); <EM>Jackson v. State</EM>, 485 S.W.2d
553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); <EM>Gainous v. State</EM>, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  Copies
of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine
the appellate records and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.</P>

<P>We have reviewed the records and counsel's briefs and agree that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's briefs would
serve no beneficial purpose.</P>

<P>The judgment of conviction in Travis County cause number 0971016 is affirmed. 
The order revoking community supervision in Travis County cause number 0950012 is also
affirmed.</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Justices Jones, B. A. Smith and Yeakel</P>

<P>Affirmed on Both Causes</P>

<P>Filed:   March 25, 1999</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
