                                RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
                                     Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206
                                              File Name: 06a0276p.06

                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                         FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
                                           _________________


                                                   X
                                       Petitioner, -
 ENRIQUE H. CIFUENTES RUIZ,
                                                    -
                                                    -
                                                    -
                                                        No. 05-4240
          v.
                                                    ,
                                                     >
 ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General,                -
                                      Respondent. -
                                                   N
                       On Petition for Review from a Final Order
                         of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
                                   No. A72 438 772.
                                           Submitted: July 17, 2006
                                    Decided and Filed: August 3, 2006
             Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; COLE, Circuit Judge; ROSEN, District Judge.*
                                              _________________
                                                   COUNSEL
ON BRIEF: Subhash Chandra, CHANDRA LAW OFFICES, Omaha, Nebraska, for Petitioner.
Keith I. Bernstein, Michelle Gorden Latour, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF
IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
                                              _________________
                                                  OPINION
                                              _________________
         PER CURIAM. Enrique H. Cifuentes Ruiz, through counsel, petitions the court for review
of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from a decision
of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his application for special rule suspension of deportation
under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-100,
111 Stat. 2160 (1997), as amended by Pub. L. No. 108-139, 111 Stat. 2644 (1997). The parties have
waived oral argument on appeal and, upon review, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument
is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
       The Immigration and Naturalization Service issued a notice to appear to Cifuentes Ruiz, a
native and citizen of Guatemala, charging him with removability under the Immigration and
Nationality Act § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) as an alien present in the United States without being admitted or

         *
          The Honorable Gerald E. Rosen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by
designation.


                                                          1
No. 05-4240           Ruiz v. Gonzales                                                         Page 2


paroled. Cifuentes Ruiz applied for suspension of deportation and for asylum and withholding of
removal.
       The government moved to pretermit Cifuentes Ruiz’s application for suspension of
deportation and Cifuentes Ruiz opposed the motion. After conducting a hearing, the IJ granted the
government’s motion to pretermit and denied Cifuentes Ruiz asylum and withholding of removal.
Cifuentes Ruiz appealed the IJ’s decision to the BIA, arguing that the IJ erred in pretermitting his
application for suspension of deportation. The BIA dismissed Cifuentes Ruiz’s appeal.
        Cifuentes Ruiz timely petitioned this court for review of the BIA’s decision, and argues on
appeal that substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s conclusion that he failed to timely
register for benefits under American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh (ABC), 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D.
Cal. 1991). Pursuant to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
(“IIRIRA”) § 309, a Guatemalan national who entered the United States on or before October 1,
1990, and registered for ABC benefits on or before December 31, 1991, is eligible for special rule
suspension of deportation. IIRIRA, Pub. L. No. 104-208, § 309(c)(5)(C)(i)(I)(bb), 110 Stat. 3009-
627 (1996), amended by Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act, Pub. L. 105-100,
§ 203(a)(1), 111 Stat. 2197 (1997). Determinations by the Attorney General as to whether an alien
satisfies the requirements of § 309(c)(5)(C)(i)(I)(bb) are “final and shall not be subject to review by
any court.” IIRIRA § 309(c)(5)(C)(ii). We have previously upheld similar unreviewability
provisions in CDI Info. Servs. v. Reno, 278 F.3d 616 (6th Cir. 2002) and Daniel v. INS, 138 F.3d
1102 (6th Cir. 1998). See also Ortega v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 416 F.3d 1348, 1350 (11th Cir. 2005);
Gramajo v. Gonzales, 128 F. App’x 16, 17 (9th Cir. 2005). We therefore lack jurisdiction over
Cifuentes Ruiz’s challenge to the BIA’s determination that he was ineligible for special rule
suspension of deportation under IIRIRA § 309(c)(5)(C)(ii).
        For the foregoing reasons, Cifuentes Ruiz’s petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
