               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42954

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 664
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: October 20, 2015
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
KEVIN EUGENE HANKINS,                           )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Steven J. Hippler, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum
       term of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen,
       affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                   Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                 and GRATTON, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Kevin Eugene Hankins pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, Idaho
Code § 18-1508. The district court imposed a unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum
term of confinement of five years. Hankins appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.


                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Hankins’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
