          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                FILED
                                                                 April 30, 2009
                                No. 08-30664
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEFFERY D ELLIS

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Louisiana
                            USDC No. 3:05-CR-6-1


Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Jeffery D. Ellis pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to
distribute and to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine and aiding and abetting the conspiracy.
21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841; 18 U.S.C. § 2. He now seeks to appeal his 108-month
guidelines sentence on the basis that changes to the guidelines calculations and




      *
      Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 08-30664

applicable guidelines sentencing range were untimely. The Government argues
that Ellis waived this argument as part of the appeal waiver in his plea
agreement.
      The record reflects that Ellis knowingly and voluntarily waived his right
to appeal his sentence except in limited circumstances not present in the instant
appeal. See United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 2005).
Because the waiver is valid, the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.
      Counsel John Harvey Craft is warned that pursuing an appeal despite a
valid appeal waiver provision in the plea agreement and failing to address the
waiver in a reply brief after it was raised by the Government in its brief is a
needless waste of judicial resources and will invite sanctions. See United States
v. Gaitan, 171 F.3d 222, 224 (5th Cir. 1999).
      APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
