
USCA1 Opinion

	




          May 9, 1994           [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 93-2269                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                      Appellee,                                          v.                                  JUVENAL GRAJALES,                                Defendant, Appellant.                              _________________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                 [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]                                         __________________________                              _________________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,                                    ____________________                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.                                          _____________                              _________________________               Edward  J. Romano, with whom John F. Cicilline was on brief,               _________________            _________________          for appellant.               Margaret E.  Curran, Assistant United  States Attorney, with               ___________________          whom Edwin  J.  Gale, United  States  Attorney, and  Lawrence  D.               _______________                                 ____________          Gaynor,  Assistant United  States  Attorney, were  on brief,  for          ______          appellee.                              _________________________                              _________________________                               Per Curiam.  Having  carefully reviewed the record, the                    Per Curiam.                    __________          briefs, and the matters raised at oral argument, we conclude that          no hint of error  appears.  Accordingly, we summarily  affirm the          defendant's conviction  and the sentence imposed  by the district          court.   See 1st Cir.  Loc. R.  27.1; see also  United States  v.                   ___                          ___ ____  _____________          Ruiz-Garcia, 886 F.2d 474, 477 (1st Cir. 1989).          ___________          Affirmed.          Affirmed.          ________                                          3
