             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-89,765-01


                          EX PARTE PIERRE MCDANIEL, Applicant


             ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
      CAUSE NO. W14-70734-X(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 6
                          FROM DALLAS COUNTY


        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of compelling

prostitution and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. McDaniel v. State, No. 05-16-00391-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 9, 2017)(not

designated for publication).

        Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to

investigate the case, witnesses, and evidence, failing to object or move for suppression of evidence,

failing to challenge an accomplice witness jury charge, and failing to object to improper expert
                                                                                                      2

testimony. He also alleges that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise certain issues

on appeal.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order both trial counsel and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
                                                                         3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: May 1, 2019
Do not publish
