     Case: 09-20438     Document: 00511085901          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2010
                                     No.09-20438
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL MARTINEZ-REYES, also known as Manuel Reyes, also known as
Luis Martinez-Reyes, also known as Jose Louis Rodriguez, also known as
Martinez Manuel Reyes, also known as Jesus Torres,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:09-CR-111-1


Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Martinez-
Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).             Martinez-Reyes has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.          Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 09-20438   Document: 00511085901 Page: 2      Date Filed: 04/20/2010
                               No. 09-20438

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                     2
