     Case: 18-10661       Document: 00515060720         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/02/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
                                    No. 18-10661                              August 2, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                   Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODERICK GUIDRY,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:17-CR-257-1


Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Roderick Guidry has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Guidry has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
us to make a fair evaluation of Guidry’s claims of ineffective assistance of




       * Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-10661    Document: 00515060720     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/02/2019


                                 No. 18-10661

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Guidry’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2.




                                       2
