
USCA1 Opinion

	




          May 30, 1995                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1944                                  ANTHONY SOLIMINE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                ORTHO MCNEIL, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                       [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                          Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Anthony Solimine on brief pro se.            ________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.  We have reviewed  appellant's brief and the                 __________            record  on appeal.   We  affirm  essentially for  the reasons            stated in  the district  court's memorandum, dated  April 26,            1994.                 Appellant's "motion  for leave  to file  up to  ten (10)            page memorandum on supplemental  authorities and an appendix"            and   "motion  for   leave  to   file  brief   memorandum  of            supplemental  authorities"  are denied.   They  are extremely                                            _______            tardy and, in any event, present nothing of merit.                 Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.                                                         _______                 The district court's order of dismissal is affirmed.                                                            _________                                         -2-
