                             UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 07-6783



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus


SAMUEL MORRIS OVERSTREET,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:04-cr-00009-jct; 7:06-cv-00609-jct)


Submitted:   July 24, 2007                 Decided:   August 1, 2007


Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Samuel Morris Overstreet, Appellant Pro Se.         Ronald Andrew
Bassford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Samuel Morris Overstreet seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability.         28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000).   A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”         28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).   A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating   that   reasonable    jurists   would   find   that   any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable.      Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).      We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Overstreet has

not made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny Overstreet’s

motions for bail, to present additional evidence, for new counsel,

for transcripts at the government’s expense, to disqualify district

court judge, and for removal of prosecutor.        We further deny as

moot Overstreet’s motion to expedite his bail motion.

          We deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal




                               - 2 -
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                           DISMISSED




                              - 3 -
