
NO. 07-05-0118-CR



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL D



APRIL 7, 2005	

_____________________________



Ex parte ROGER D. PFEIL, 

 

 Appellant

_________________________________



FROM THE 154
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY;



NO. 16,508; HON. FELIX KLEIN, PRESIDING

_______________________________



Order of Dismissal

_______________________________



Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Roger D. Pfiel appeals from an order dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus.  The writ was sought to obtain release from the purported restraint of Bruce Peel, mayor of Littlefield, Texas.  Peel had moved for dismissal, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the proceedings.  The trial court granted the motion.  We now dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

One may not appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus unless the order arose after a hearing on the merits and the trial court denied the application on the merits.  
Ex parte Hargett
, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Next, granting a motion to dismiss due to the absence of jurisdiction is not a ruling on the merits.  
See Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue
, 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 2000);
 see also
 
City of Lubbock v. Rule, 
68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.–
Amarillo 2002, no pet.).  So because the trial court dismissed the appeal due to the lack of jurisdiction, we ourselves have no jurisdiction over the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.





Brian Quinn

   Justice



Do not publish.



 

