
                UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

                                   Before
                         CONN, HOFFMAN, and GIFFORD
                          Appellate Military Judges

                          UNITED STATES, Appellant
                                     v.
                        Specialist MICHAEL A. PRINCE
                        United States Army, Appellee

                             ARMY MISC 20100939

                            1st Cavalry Division
                       James L. Varley, Military Judge
                 Colonel Mark Sydenham, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellee:  Colonel Mark Tellitocci, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Imogene M.
Jamison, JA; Major Laura R. Kesler, JA; Captain Matthew T. Grady, JA (on
brief).

For Appellant:  Colonel Michael E. Mulligan, JA; Major Adam S. Kazin, JA;
Captain Joshua W. Johnson, JA (on brief); Colonel Michael E. Mulligan, JA;
Major Amber J. Williams, JA; Major Adam S. Kazin, JA; Captain Joshua W.
Johnson, JA (on motion for reconsideration).

                               26 January 2011

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND ACTION ON APPEAL
                   BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO
                ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per Curiam:


      On reconsideration, applying the standard of review articulated in
United States v. Thompson, 63 M.J. 228, 230 (C.A.A.F. 2006), we do not find
that the military judge was wrong as a matter of law.  Accordingly, the
appeal by the United States under Article 62, UCMJ, of the military judge’s
ruling is denied.

                                  FOR THE COURT:




                                  MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.
                                  Clerk of Court
