Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  September 26, 2011                                                                                   Robert P. Young, Jr.,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  142553 & (16)                                                                                        Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                             Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                       Stephen J. Markman
                                                                                                       Diane M. Hathaway
                                                                                                           Mary Beth Kelly
  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                         Brian K. Zahra,
            Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices

  v                                                                 SC: 142553
                                                                    COA: 301169
                                                                    Oakland CC: 2009-228490-FC
  AIMEE LOUISE SWORD,
             Defendant-Appellant.
  _________________________________________/

         By order of May 24, 2011, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the
  application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals. On
  order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is
  again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal,
  we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of
  the question of whether lifetime monitoring was authorized in this case, as part of the
  defendant’s sentence, where the complainant was 14 years old. In all other respects,
  leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions
  presented should be reviewed by this Court.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           September 26, 2011                  _________________________________________
         h0919                                                                 Clerk
