
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________          No. 95-1912                             PICKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.,                                Plaintiff - Appellee,                                          v.                          BRUCE LEAVITT AND THOMAS J. QUINN,                               Defendants - Appellants.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Chief Judge,                                          ___________                            Cyr and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                _____________________               William  H.  West, with  whom  Stokes  & Bartholomew,  P.A.,               _________________              ____________________________          Richard C.  Heidlage and Heidlage & Reece, P.C. were on brief for          ____________________     ______________________          appellants.               James  L.  Messenger, with  whom James  S. Dittmar,  Mark D.               ____________________             _________________   _______          Robins  and  Hutchins,  Wheeler  &  Dittmar  were  on  brief  for          ______       ______________________________          appellee.                                 ____________________                                   August 26, 1996                                 ____________________                    Per Curiam.  After a complete and careful evaluation of                    Per Curiam.                    __________          the  record  in light  of the  positions  raised in  the parties'          briefs  and at  oral  argument, we  affirm  the district  court's          decision on substantially  the same basis  as that elucidated  in          the district court's opinion.  Picker Internat'l Corp. v. Imaging                                         _______________________    _______          Equipment  Services, Inc., ___ F.  Supp. ___, 1995  WL 464918 (D.          _________________________          Mass. 1995).                    Affirmed.                    Affirmed                    ________                                         -2-
