38 F.3d 609
309 U.S.App.D.C. 34
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Rhonda CHAPPELLE, Appellant,v.CAPITAL CITY MORTGAGE CORPORATION.
No. 93-7194.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 9, 1994.

Before:  BUCKLEY, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.


1
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties.  The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion.  See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b).  It is


2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed October 7, 1993, be affirmed.  Appellant's motion for reconsideration is properly construed as a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).  The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.   See Browder v. Director, Illinois Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7 (1978).


3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.  See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

