
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1662                                 ARLENE SIMS FOSTER,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                WAL-MART STORES, INC.,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,                                        _____________                              Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,                                   ____________________                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                                 ____________________            Arlene Sims Foster on brief pro se.            __________________            E.  Tupper Kinder and  Nelson, Kinder,  Mosseau &  Gordon, P.C. on            _________________      ________________________________________        brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                    March 3, 1997                                                                                       ____________________                 Per Curiam.   We have reviewed  the parties' briefs  and                 __________            the  record  on  appeal.    Appellant,  Arlene  Sims  Foster,            challenges only the district  court's dismissal of her common            law claim of wrongful discharge and her claim of  intentional            and negligent  infliction of  emotional distress.   We affirm            that  dismissal essentially  for  the reasons  stated in  the            district court's order of March 15, 1996.                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                 _________                                         -2-
