       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

     IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY
                LICENSING, L.P.,
                     Appellant
              ______________________

                      2015-1170
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/012,036.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued
for appellant. Also represented by LORI R. MASON; FRANK
V. PIETRANTONIO, Reston, VA.

    ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by
NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, STACY BETH
MARGOLIES.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and
HUGHES, Circuit Judges).


          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


September 15, 2015             /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court
