       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

              IN RE: PRICEPLAY, INC.
                ______________________

                      2013-1102
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/009,444.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   SCOTT M. DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels &
Adrian, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Appellant.
With him on the brief was DARRIN A. AUITO.

   WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN
K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and STACY B. MARGOLIES,
Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


October 10, 2013         /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
   Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                             Clerk
