                NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
                           File Name: 12a0084n.06

                                         Case No. 10-2108
                                                                                             FILED
                           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                               Jan 24, 2012
                                FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
                                                                                 LEONARD GREEN, Clerk

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                             )
                                                       )
         Plaintiff-Appellee,                           )
                                                       )       ON APPEAL FROM THE
                 v.                                    )       UNITED STATES DISTRICT
                                                       )       COURT FOR THE WESTERN
 JERRY EDSON WEATHERS,                                 )       DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
                                                       )
         Defendant-Appellant.                          )
                                                       )
 _______________________________________               )

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; MCKEAGUE and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

       ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. Defendant Jerry Edson Weathers appeals the

district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release. Finding no abuse of discretion, we

AFFIRM the judgment.

                                                  I.

       In 2002, the district court sentenced Weathers to 76 months in prison followed by three years

of supervised release for being a felon in possession of stolen firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g) and (j). On October 19, 2009, the United States Probation Office petitioned for Weathers’s

arrest on the grounds that he was not complying with the terms of his supervised release. The

petition alleged that Weathers had assaulted a man named Jarrid Minzey on March 23, 2009.

       The district court held a supervised-release-violation hearing on August 17, 2010. At the

hearing, Minzey testified that on the evening of March 22, he had been partying with Weathers and

                                                  1
No. 10-2108, United States v. Weathers




others, including Minzey’s girlfriend and her friend Heather Cook, who was Weathers’s girlfriend.

The party continued through the night, and Minzey drank excessively during that time. The next

morning, Minzey’s girlfriend accused him of having “slept with” Cook. Minzey testified that he

walked outside to “confront” Weathers. Weathers was sitting in a car, and Cook was standing

nearby. Before Minzey could say anything, Weathers jumped out of the car and hit Minzey, first

with his fist and then with a bottle. Minzey went to see a doctor and was diagnosed with a

concussion. He reported the assault to the police later that evening. Although Minzey admitted that

he had been drinking heavily during the hours leading up to the assault, and he had some difficulty

remembering the exact time that he reported the incident to the police, he testified that his alcohol

consumption had not impaired his recollection of the assault.

        The government also presented testimony from Officer James Sliter, the police officer who

responded when Minzey reported the assault. Sliter testified that he met with Minzey on the evening

of March 23, and that Minzey had described the assault to Sliter and told him that Cook had

witnessed it. Sliter also testified that he observed a lump on Minzey’s head and a scrape on

Minzey’s elbow. After his meeting with Minzey, Sliter attempted to speak with Weathers and Cook

at Weathers’s home. He testified that Weathers denied knowing Minzey and initially refused to let

him speak with Cook. When Cook did join the conversation, Weathers instructed her “not to say

anything” to Sliter.

        The district court determined that Minzey was a credible witness and found by a

preponderance of the evidence that Weathers had assaulted Minzey, thereby violating the conditions



                                                 2
No. 10-2108, United States v. Weathers




of his supervised release. The court sentenced Weathers to four months in prison followed by 28

months of supervised release. Weathers filed this timely appeal.

                                                 II.

        We review a district court’s revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. United

States v. Kontrol, 554 F.3d 1089, 1091 (6th Cir. 2009). We review legal conclusions de novo, and

findings of fact for clear error. Id. at 1091–92. We will uphold a district court’s determination that

a witness is credible unless it is “without foundation.” United States v. Pruitt, 156 F.3d 638, 647

(6th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted).

        A district court may revoke a defendant’s supervised release if it finds by a preponderance

of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervision. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3);

United States v. Cofield, 233 F.3d 405, 406 (6th Cir. 2000). There is no dispute that Weathers’s

release included a condition that he not commit any crimes; nor is there any dispute that the alleged

assault constitutes a crime under Michigan law. The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence

supports the district court’s conclusion that Weathers assaulted Minzey. Weathers claims that the

district court should not have credited Minzey’s testimony because Minzey is “a binge drinking

alcoholic who may have drank for at least twelve [] hours before the events in question and who may

have blacked out that day.” Appellant’s Br. at 6.

        We find that the evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that Weathers assaulted

Minzey, and the court did not err when it determined that Minzey was a credible witness. Although

Minzey was intoxicated at the time of the assault, other evidence presented at the hearing



                                                  3
No. 10-2108, United States v. Weathers




corroborates his testimony. Several hours after the alleged assault, Officer Sliter observed a lump

on Minzey’s head and a scrape on his elbow. Further, Weathers attempted to prevent Cook from

speaking with Sliter about the assault, and told her “not to say anything”—actions from which the

district court could draw an “inculpatory inference.” Accordingly, the district court did not abuse

its discretion in revoking Weathers’s supervised release.

                                               III.

        For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.




                                                4
