     Case: 16-50464      Document: 00513894436         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/02/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-50464
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                       March 2, 2017
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                    Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LORENZO ESPINO, JR., also known as Lencho, also known as Oso, also
known as Lorenzo Espino,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:10-CR-2213-33


Before KING, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Espino, Jr.,
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espino has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-50464    Document: 00513894436    Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/02/2017


                                No. 16-50464

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
