                                                                            FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              MAR 15 2013

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS




                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 12-30057

              Plaintiff - Appellee,               D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00155-RFC-1

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
NICHOLAS JOHN MONTANO,

              Defendant - Appellant.



                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Montana
                 Richard F. Cebull, Chief District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted March 5, 2013 **
                                 Portland, Oregon

Before: TASHIMA, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

       Michael Montano appeals his conviction of being a felon in possession of a

firearm. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We affirm.


        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
        **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence supporting a

conviction, we must determine whether, “after viewing the evidence in the light

most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the

essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v.

Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Viewing the evidence in

that light, we conclude that it was sufficient to sustain the conviction. David

Delgado, a passenger in the vehicle, testified that he saw Montano place the

firearm in the glove compartment shortly before police officers found it there.

Though the defense impeached Delgado because he had recounted a different

version of events before trial, it is not our role as a court of review “to question the

jury’s assessment of witness credibility.” United States v. Bingham, 653 F.3d 983,

995 (9th Cir. 2011). The government also presented evidence probative of

Montano’s consciousness of guilt: that Montano lied about his identity to the

police officers, urged the driver of the vehicle to refuse to consent to the search of

the vehicle, and fled from the officers at the scene to avoid arrest. A rational juror,

viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the government, could have

concluded that Montano possessed the firearm.

      AFFIRMED.




                                            2
