
NO. 07-01-0021-CR
NO. 07-01-0026-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JULY 13, 2001

______________________________


BANESSA HOPE HUERTA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


_________________________________

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NOS. B13048-9806 & A13133-9808; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
ABATEMENT AND REMAND
	On October 11, 2000, appellant Banessa Hope Huerta was sentenced to five years
confinement for burglary of a habitation in trial court cause number B13048-9806, and six
years confinement for burglary of a habitation in trial court cause number A13133-9808. 
Appellant timely perfected her appeal and the clerk's record was filed on February 8, 2001. 
After an extension of time was granted, the reporter's record was due to be filed on March
12, 2001.  By letter dated April 10, 2001, Mr. Bratcher provided this Court with a status
report of pending appeals and his intent to have the record in this appeal filed prior to a
surgical procedure scheduled for June 18, 2001.  To date, however, the reporter's record
has not been filed and no reasonable explanation for the delay nor any estimate as to
when this Court may expect to receive the reporter's record has been presented.
	The trial court and an appellate court are jointly responsible for ensuring that an
appellate record is filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).  Among other duties, the trial court must 
"help ensure that the reporter's work is timely accomplished by setting work priorities," and
may appoint a deputy reporter when the official court reporter is unable to perform the
duties.  Tex. R. App. P. 13.3 and 13.5.  Thus, because Mr. Bratcher is now retired, we
abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 242nd District Court of Hale County for
further proceedings.
	Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given
and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine:
	(1) whether due to poor health or other reasons, Jerry K. Bratcher is unable 
to prepare and file the reporter's record within 30 days from the date of
hearing; or
	(2) whether circumstances require the trial court to direct the present court
reporter to prepare the record from the notes and materials of Jerry K.
Bratcher, or 
	(3) whether the trial court should appoint a deputy reporter to prepare and
file the reporter's record within 30 days from the date of hearing; and
	(4) finally, the trial court shall make such orders as in its discretion are 
appropriate to facilitate the prompt filing of a reporter's record no later than
30 days from the date of the abatement hearing. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed and shall execute findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the aforementioned
issues and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's
record.  A supplemental reporter's record of the hearing shall also be included in the
appellate record.  Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the
supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days from the date of
this order.
							Per Curiam
Do not publish.

 Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 







NO. 07-10-0413-CR
NO. 07-10-0414-CR
NO. 07-10-0415-CR
 
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
 
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
AT AMARILLO
 
PANEL C
 
MAY 13, 2011
 
______________________________
 
 
BOBBY JOE LEE, APPELLANT
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
 
_________________________________
 
FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT
COUNTY;
 
NOS. 1181069D, 1181071D, & 1181073D; HONORABLE
RUBEN GONZALEZ, JUDGE
 
_______________________________
 
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ABATEMENT AND REMAND
            Following a plea of not guilty,
Appellant, Bobby Joe Lee, was convicted by a jury of theft of property valued
at $20,000 or more but less than $100,000, enhanced,[1] in
cause numbers 1181069D and 118071D, and criminal mischief with a pecuniary loss
of $100,000 or more but less than $200,000, enhanced,[2] in
cause number 1181073D.  The fifty year
sentences imposed in each cause were ordered to run concurrently.  Appellant's notices of appeal were timely
filed on September 2, 2010, and following the filing of the appellate record,
his briefs were originally due to be filed on January 26, 2011. 
            On January 28, 2011,
Appellant's appointed counsel, Richard C. Kline, requested a sixty-day
extension of time in which to file Appellant's brief citing as grounds his busy
schedule.[3]  An extension was granted to February 25,
2011, and counsel was advised that subsequent extensions would not be granted
absent good cause.  On February 28, 2011,
counsel filed a second motion for extension of time reasonably explaining that
in addition to his busy schedule, he had a legitimate personal reason for the
request.  A second extension was granted
to March 31, 2011.  After the new
deadline passed, counsel filed a third motion for extension of time based not
only on his trial schedule, but also on the fact that he was moving his
personal residence.  This Court granted
yet another extension setting the new deadline at May 5, 2011.  At that time counsel, was admonished that
failure to comply with the deadline might result in the appeal being abated and
the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule
38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.[4]
            After the May 5, 2011
deadline passed, counsel filed his Fourth
Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief explaining that he
had filed a brief in the Second Court of Appeals on April 25, 2011, and was set
for a murder trial beginning May 9, 2011. 
To date, Appellant's counsel has failed to file Appellant's brief. 
            By Order of this Court,
Appellant's Fourth Motion for Extension
of Time to File Appellant's Brief is denied.
We now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial
court for further proceedings.  Upon
remand, the trial court shall immediately determine why counsel has failed to
timely file Appellant=s brief and take such action as is
necessary to ensure that the brief is filed with the Clerk of this Court on or
before June 20, 2011.
Should counsel file Appellant's brief on or before, June 6,
2011, he is directed to notify the trial court, in writing, of the filing,
whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take further action.  If, however, the brief is not filed by that
date, pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure, the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing
to determine the following: 
1.           
whether Appellant
desires to prosecute the appeals;
2.           
whether
Appellant=s counsel has effectively abandoned
the appeals given his failure to timely file the brief; and
3.           
whether
Appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel and is entitled to
new appointed counsel.
 
Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue these appeals
and the trial court determines he is entitled to new appointed counsel, the
name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of the newly-appointed
counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court.  The trial court shall execute findings of
fact and conclusions of law, and shall cause its findings, conclusions and any
necessary orders to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with
the Clerk of this Court by June 27, 2011. 
Finally, newly appointed counsel shall file Appellant's brief within
thirty days after the date of appointment. 
It is so ordered.
 
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
 
 
 
 
                                                                                    
 
 




[1]Tex.
Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(5) (West Supp. 2010).
 


[2]Tex.
Penal Code Ann. § 28.03 (b)(6) (West Supp. 2010).
 


[3]The
normal press of business is generally not considered good cause.  Curry v. Clayton, 715 S.W.2d 77, 79 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1986, no
writ).  This Court's guideline is
to grant subsequent extensions for good cause.
 


[4]Notwithstanding
that this appeal was transferred from the Second Court of Appeals, counsel is
not unfamiliar with this Court's guidelines on motions for extensions of
time.  See Salzido v. State, No. 07-10-0031-CR,
2010 Tex.App. LEXIS 5658 (Tex.App.--Amarillo July 19, 2010, no
pet.) (not designated for publication) (abating
the appeal to the trial court after counsel filed a fourth request for an
extension of time in which to file an appellant's brief).


