     Case: 13-20556      Document: 00512735336         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/15/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT      United States Court of Appeals
                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                                     FILED
                                                                                 August 15, 2014
                                    No. 13-20556
                                  Summary Calendar                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTEMIO CASTENE HERNANDEZ, also known as Artemio Casteneda
Hernandez, also known as Aldredo C. Hernandez, also known as Artemio C.
Hernandez, also known as Aldredo Hernandez Casteneda, also known as
Artemio Hernandez Costa,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:12-CR-537-1


Before JOLLY, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Artemio Castene
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castene Hernandez has not filed a response. We


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20556    Document: 00512735336     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/15/2014


                                 No. 13-20556

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
