                           State of New York
                    Supreme Court, Appellate Division
                        Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: February 9, 2017                    106763
________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
   NEW YORK,
                    Respondent,
      v                                      MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDRE DOLBERRY,
                    Appellant.
________________________________


Calendar Date:    January 20, 2017

Before:   Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

                              __________


      Justin C. Brusgul, Voorheesville, for appellant, and
appellant pro se.

      P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark
of counsel), for respondent.

                              __________


Garry, J.P.

      Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Breslin, J.),
rendered March 6, 2014 in Albany County, convicting defendant
upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal
possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

      Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, and in full
satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded
guilty to attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance
in the third degree and executed a written waiver of appeal in
open court. Consistent with the terms of the plea agreement,
Supreme Court imposed upon defendant, as a second felony
offender, a prison sentence of 5½ years to be followed by three
years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, and we
                              -2-                106763

affirm.

      Initially, contrary to defendant's contention, we find that
his oral and written waiver of appeal was knowing, voluntary and
intelligent (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-341 [2015];
People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Supreme Court
distinguished the right to appeal as "separate" and "independent"
from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea, and
defendant acknowledged that he signed and understood the written
appeal waiver after reviewing it and conferring with counsel
regarding its contents (see People v Taylor, 144 AD3d 1317, 1318
[2016]; People v Toledo, 144 AD3d 1332, 1332-1333 [2016]).
Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea survives
his appeal waiver, but his claim is unpreserved for our review in
the absence of an appropriate postallocution motion (see CPL
220.60 [2]; People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212, 214, 219-222 [2016];
People v Blair, 136 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2016], lvs denied 27 NY3d
1066, 1072 [2016]), and defendant did not make any statement
during the plea allocution that triggered the narrow exception to
the preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662,
666-667 [1988]).

      To the extent that defendant's ineffective assistance of
counsel claims raised in his supplemental pro se brief implicate
the voluntariness of his plea, such claims survive his valid
appeal waiver; however, these claims are not properly before us
absent an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v Islam,
134 AD3d 1348, 1349 [2015]; People v Kormos, 126 AD3d 1039, 1040
[2015]). The balance of defendant's ineffective assistance of
counsel claims concern matters that are outside of the record on
appeal and are more appropriately addressed in a motion to vacate
pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Clark, 135 AD3d 1239,
1240 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 995 [2016]; People v Pickett, 128
AD3d 1275, 1276 [2015], lvs denied 26 NY3d 930, 933 [2015]).
Defendant's contention raised in his supplemental pro se brief
challenging his status as a second felony offender is unpreserved
for our review. Defendant's remaining pro se arguments
concerning various pretrial matters, to the extent they are not
precluded by his waiver of the right to appeal, are also
unpreserved for our review or are barred by his guilty plea.
                        -3-                  106763

Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.



ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.




                       ENTER:




                       Robert D. Mayberger
                       Clerk of the Court
