                            Fourth Court of Appeals
                                  San Antonio, Texas
                                         March 4, 2015

                                      No. 04-15-00041-CV

                      TEMPLETON MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
                                  Appellant

                                                v.

                                    Michael MIDDLETON,
                                           Appellee

                 From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 10-422-A
                        Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER
        The trial court signed a default judgment in favor of Gary Poenisch and against Appellant
Templeton Mortgage Corporation on October 15, 2014. In that same order, the trial court severed
Poenisch’s claims against Templeton Mortgage Corp. and stated that the default judgment was
“intended to be a final entry of default resolving all issues raised in this cause by [Poenisch]
against Templeton from which appeal may be filed.” The original trial court cause number is 10-
422, and the severed cause was thus assigned 10-422A. The clerk’s record filed in this appeal
includes only pleadings assigned 10-422A and does not include pleadings from the original
cause number. In the companion appeal, Appeal No. 04-15-00040-CV, a full and complete
clerk’s record of trial court cause 10-422 was filed. We therefore ORDER the Clerk of this Court
to place a copy of the clerk’s record from Appeal No. 04-15-00040-CV into this Appeal No. 04-
15-00041-CV.

        Because the trial court signed a final judgment in trial court cause number 10-422A on
October 15, 2014, any motion for new trial was due to be filed by November 14, 2015. The
clerk’s record reflects that Templeton Mortgage Corporation did not file a motion for new trial
until November 18, 2014. Thus, it appears that Templeton Mortgage Corporation’s motion for
new trial was untimely filed.

       If the motion for new trial had been timely filed, the notice of appeal was due to be filed
on January 13, 2015. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on
January 28, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. The clerk’s record reflects that Templeton Mortgage
Corporation filed its notice of appeal on January 16, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). No
motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is contained within the clerk’s record.
         A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for
extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing
to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

        We, therefore, ORDER Appellant Templeton Mortgage Corporation to file, within fifteen
days from the date of this order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file
the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the
appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).



                                                     _________________________________
                                                     Karen Angelini, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 4th day of March, 2015.



                                                     ___________________________________
                                                     Keith E. Hottle
                                                     Clerk of Court
