46 F.3d 1126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.David R. REDMOND, Plaintiff Appellant,andTerry K. PRESSLEY;  Gary Stegall;  Paul Mincey;  KamatheneAdonia Cooper;  Stacy L. Ford;  Charles Underwood;  TimothyWellington;  Jerry N. Kelleher;  Carlos Elliott;  Gregory T.Bennett;  William Hall;  Roy Owens;  John Brown, Plaintiffs,v.SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMPLIANCE OFFICEat Headquarters, Defendant Appellee,andAMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant.
No. 94-6774.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.Decided Jan. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-94-1089-3-17AK)
David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se.  Barbara Murcier Bowens, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:


1
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing one Defendant in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.  This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988);  Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b);  Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).  The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


2
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
