                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 04-3434
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
            Appellee,                   *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the Western
                                        * District of Missouri.
Joshua M. Tilson,                       *
                                        *    [PUBLISHED]
            Appellant.                  *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: October 21, 2004
                                Filed: July 15, 2005
                                 ___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

      Joshua M. Tilson entered a guilty plea to unlawful transport of firearms and
was sentenced to 180 months in prison. The judgment was entered on July 8, 2004,
and his deadline to file a notice of appeal was due July 22, 2004. See Fed. R. App.
P. 4(b)(1)(A); 26(a)(2). Defendant filed his motion to extend time to file notice of
appeal on August 13, 2004. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) (allowing the district
court1 to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the petitioner shows “excusable
neglect or good cause”). The district court denied the motion.

       We review a denial of a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal
for an abuse of discretion. Gibbons v. United States, 317 F.3d 852, 853-54 (8th Cir.
2003). We find there was no abuse of discretion below because Tilson failed to show
excusable neglect or good cause for his filing delay. Further, even if we were to
reach the merits of his appeal, Tilson would not be entitled to relief. Tilson seeks to
appeal his sentence based on supposed judicial fact-finding in violation of Blakely
v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Tilson’s argument is that the district court
should not have considered Tilson’s three prior violent felonies in calculating his
sentence. However, Blakely does not apply to the fact of a prior conviction. 124 S.
Ct. at 2536. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
                          ______________________________




      The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Court Judge for
      1

the Western District of Missouri.

                                         -2-
