82 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Robert L. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.George DEEDS, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-7919.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 21, 1996.Decided April 10, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.  (CA-95-1088-R)
Robert L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:


1
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint* and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e).   We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Smith v. Deeds, No. CA-95-1088-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 13, 1995;  Oct. 24, 1995).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


*
 Because we find that no amendment to Appellant's complaint could cure the defects in his case, the district court's order is a final, appealable order.  See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993)


