
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 96-1503                           JESUS SALAS-RIJOS AND ANA SALAS,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                          COSTA CRUISE LINES, N.V., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                              _________________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                  [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]                                                ___________________                              _________________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                            Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,                                    ____________________                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                              _________________________               Harry A. Ezratty on brief for appellants.               ________________               William A. Graffam, Jos  Luis Su rez-Villafa e, and Jimenez,               __________________  __________________________      ________          Graffam & Lausell on brief for appellees.          _________________                              _________________________                                   January 14, 1997                              _________________________                    Per Curiam.  Having  reviewed the record and considered                    Per Curiam.                    __________          the  parties' briefs, we are fully persuaded that the court below          did  not err  in  granting  summary  judgment  in  favor  of  the          defendant.  Since  the reasons underlying this ruling are clearly          set  forth in the  district court's  opinion, see  Salas-Rijos v.                                                        ___  ___________          Costa Cruise Lines, N.V.,  No. 94-2342CCC (D.P.R. Feb. 9,  1995),          ________________________          we  need go  no further.   Instead,  we  affirm the  judgment for          substantially the reasons elucidated by Chief Judge Cerezo in her          well-reasoned rescript.                    Affirmed.                    Affirmed.                    ________                                          2
