     Case: 17-50752      Document: 00514525208         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/22/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 17-50752                              FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        June 22, 2018
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                              Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONEL GONZALEZ-CASTILLO, also known as Cristobal Gonzalez, also
known as Froilen Garcia,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:17-CR-61-1


Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Gonzalez-
Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Castillo has filed a response. The record is
not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of his claims of



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50752     Document: 00514525208    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/22/2018


                                 No. 17-50752

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829,
841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Castillo’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
