




Becker v. State



COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

)
MONARCH ASSETS, INC.,)
		   No. 08-03-00030-CV

)
			Appellant,)
		           Appeal from

)
v.)
		    162nd District Court

)
CONCOURSE PROFESSIONAL SUITES, )
		 of Dallas County, Texas

INC.,)
 )
		   (TC# DV02-02564-I)

			Appellee.)

MEMORANDUM OPINION


	This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Finding that the Appellant has failed to file a brief or respond
to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
	On June 26, 2003, this Court informed Appellant by letter that its brief was past due and no
motion for extension of time had been filed.  The Court advised Appellant that the appeal would be
dismissed unless it responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be
continued.  See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8.  No reply has been filed.
	This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when
appellant has failed to file its brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for
such failure.  Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63
(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ).  We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a
response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none.  We see no
purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. 
Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c) and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


October 16, 2003					 
 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Panel No. 2
Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.
