             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,786



                   EX PARTE HUGO ISRAEL MARTINEZ, Applicant



           ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
       CAUSE NO. B-35,031-A IN THE 161ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
                          FROM ECTOR COUNTY



        Per curiam.

                                           OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with

intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends he was denied his right to appeal, because although trial counsel timely

filed a motion for new trial and was subsequently permitted to withdraw, appellate counsel was not

appointed until after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the

trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
                                                                                                     2

       The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied the opportunity to appeal his

conviction through no fault of his own. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment

of conviction in Cause No. B-35,031-A from the 161st Judicial District Court of Ector County.

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of

this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.



Delivered: May 2, 2012
Do Not Publish
