       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

         UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., AND
              UNILOC USA, INC.,
              Plaintiffs-Appellants,

                           v.

           ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC, AND
             PULSE SYSTEMS, INC.,
               Defendants-Appellees.
              ______________________

                      2014-1005
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in Nos. 2:13-cv-03244-MWF-
PLA and 2:13-cv-03246-MWF-PLA, Judge Michael W.
Fitzgerald.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    LAWRENCE M. HADLEY, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.,
of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-
appellants. With him on the brief was ALAN P. BLOCK;
and DANIEL L. GEYSER, of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel on
the brief was JAMES L. ETHERIDGE, Etheridge Law Group,
of Southlake, Texas.
    KEITH M. AURZADA, Bryan Cave LLP, of Dallas, Tex-
as, argued for defendant-appellee, eClinical Works, LLC.
With him on the brief was JOHN C. BUSH, of Atlanta,
Georgia. Of counsel on the brief was RYAN T. PUMPIAN,
Bloom Sugarman Everett, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia.

     DON V. KELLY, Evans & Dixon, LLC, of Saint Louis,
Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee, Pulse Systems,
Inc.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



   PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 October 14, 2014                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court
