                                  NO. 07-10-00508-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL C

                                    MARCH 9, 2011


                       LESHAWN MCREYNOLDS, APPELLANT

                                            v.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


             FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

            NO. 60,114-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, JUDGE


Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.


                    ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND


      Appellant, Leshawn McReynolds, filed a notice of appeal from his placement on

ten years deferred adjudication community supervision for possession of a controlled

substance, marijuana. On January 19, 2011, this Court received a request from the trial

court clerk for extension of time to file the clerk’s record. This motion indicated that

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record nor has an

attorney “appeared” on the case for appeal. On that same date, this Court granted the

clerk’s request for extension, and sent separate notice to appellant regarding his failure

to pay for or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Further, this Court
notified appellant that, if this Court did not receive the clerk=s record or a certification

from the clerk or appellant that the record had been paid for or that satisfactory

arrangements had been made for the preparation of the record by February 21, 2011,

this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We have not received the clerk’s record and, in fact, received another request for

extension of time to file the clerk’s record, which again indicates that appellant has not

paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record nor has an attorney “appeared”

on the case for appeal.


       Additionally, appellant’s notice of appeal was submitted by Darrell R. Carey.

Carey expresses appellant’s desire to appeal, and indicates that he was trial counsel for

appellant. However, Carey also states that he “has not been appointed or retained on

the appeal.” In this Court’s January 19, 2011 correspondence, we expressly informed

Carey that as the attorney whose signature first appears on appellant’s notice of appeal,

Carey is properly designated as lead counsel for appellant in this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 6.1. We also expressly informed Carey that, to the extent that the notice of

appeal was intended to constitute a nonrepresentation notice, it is deficient. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 6.4. Finally, we noted that Carey’s statement in the notice of appeal could

not be construed to constitute a motion to withdraw, see TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), and

that nothing in the record available to the Court indicates that the trial court had

permitted Carey to withdraw from continued representation of appellant.


       Because the clerk’s record has not yet been filed and due to the confusion

regarding representation of appellant on appeal, we now abate this appeal and remand

                                             2
the cause to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, the judge of

the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a

hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent; (3) if appellant

is indigent and desires to prosecute the appeal, whether he is entitled to have the

appellate record furnished without charge; (4) whether present counsel for appellant has

abandoned the appeal; (5) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and is indigent,

whether appellant=s present counsel should be replaced; and (6) what orders, if any,

should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to

dismiss appellant=s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal or, if

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently

pursued. If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be

replaced, the trial court should cause the Clerk of this Court to be furnished the name,

address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-

retained attorney.


       The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and

file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations and cause

them to be included in a supplemental clerk=s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings

to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter=s record; (4) have a record of

the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the

supplemental clerk=s record or the supplemental reporter=s record; and (5) cause the

records of the proceedings to be sent to this Court. In the absence of a request for

extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk=s record, supplemental
                                            3
reporter=s record, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings,

conclusions, and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the Clerk of

this Court not later than April 4, 2011.




                                               Per Curiam


Do not publish.




                                           4
