[Cite as Wimberly v. Quaker Square Inn, 2009-Ohio-7168.]

                                     Court of Claims of Ohio
                                                                          The Ohio Judicial Center
                                                                  65 South Front Street, Third Floor
                                                                             Columbus, OH 43215
                                                                   614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
                                                                              www.cco.state.oh.us




MONICA D. WIMBERLY

       Plaintiff

       v.

QUAKER SQUARE INN

       Defendant

        Case No. 2009-06249-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION



        {¶ 1} On May 16, 2009, at approximately 6:00 p.m., plaintiff, Monica D.
Wimberly, was injured when she slipped and fell in a bathtub in Room #406 at the
Quaker Square Inn, a facility owned and operated by defendant, University of Akron.
Plaintiff recalled the injury incident occurred while she was preparing for a shower as
she stepped into the bathtub in Room #406 after turning the water on in the bathtub
shower. Plaintiff pointed out the bathtub surface become slippery from water contact
only and her feet began to “slip (and) slide” as she stepped upon the tub surface.
Plaintiff related she tried to steady herself in the bathtub, but was unable to stop herself
from falling “out of the tub onto the bathroom floor.”          After her fall plaintiff was
transported to the Akron General Medical Center where she received treatment.
Plaintiff has implied the injury she suffered from her slip and fall was proximately caused
by negligence on the part of defendant in maintaining a hazardous condition at the
Quaker Square Inn.          Consequently, plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover
$1,125.00, the medical care expenses she stated she incurred as a result of her slip
and fall incident. Plaintiff acknowledged she has insurance coverage for medical care,
but did not indicate she received any reimbursement from her insurer for treatment
expenses.1 The filing fee was paid.
        {¶ 2} Defendant explained Quaker Square Inn staff first learned of plaintiff’s
incident when she called an on duty employee at the front desk requesting a bath mat
and stating she had fallen in the tub in Room #406. According to the Quaker Square
Inn Shift Activity Report (copy submitted), a bath mat was located and delivered to
Room #406 at sometime after 6:30 p.m. on May 16, 2009. Subsequently, it was noted
in the Shift Activity Report that the front desk received a call requesting medical
attention for plaintiff. Paramedics were summoned, arrived at the inn at 7:50 p.m., and
were escorted to plaintiff’s room (according to information recorded in the Shift Activity
Report).      Defendant’s records also indicate University of Akron Police Department
personnel were also requested at the site. Apparently plaintiff was transported to Akron
General Medical Center by paramedics at sometime after 7:50 p.m. on May 16, 2009.
        {¶ 3} A “Property Incident Report” (copy submitted) was compiled by Quaker
Square Inn staff which contained written statements from both plaintiff and her
daughter, April Dillard, who provided assistance after the slip and fall event. Plaintiff
offered the following description of her slip and fall incident in the bathroom of Room
#406: “turning the shower on I took a step into the tub, immediately the slippery tub
caused me to fall out of the tub onto the bathroom floor landing on my back.” Plaintiff
recorded her injuries consisted of a head and back ache as well as bruises on her
shoulder, elbows, and back. April Dillard reported she found plaintiff on the bathroom
floor of Room #406 and assisted her into bed. Dillard further reported she then called
the front desk at the Quaker Square Inn and requested medical attention for plaintiff.
Dillard noted ambulance service personnel subsequently arrived at Room #406 and
transported plaintiff to a nearby medical facility for treatment.

        1
            R.C. 2743.02(D) states:
          “(D) Recoveries against the state shall be reduced by the aggregate of insurance proceeds,
disability award, or other collateral recovery received by the claimant. This division does not apply to civil
actions in the court of claims against a state university or college under the circumstances described in
section 3345.40 of the Revised Code. The collateral benefits provisions of division (B)(2) of that section
apply under those circumstances.”
          R.C. 3345.40(B)(2) states in pertinent part:
          “If a plaintiff receives or is entitled to receive benefits for injuries or loss allegedly incurred from a
policy or policies of insurance or any other source, the benefits shall be disclosed to the court, and the
amount of benefits shall be deducted from any award against the state university or college recovered by
the plaintiff.”
       {¶ 4} Defendant submitted an affidavit from Jeffrey M. Lynch, the General
Manager of the Quaker Square Inn, who reported “[t]here is no record of either [p]laintiff
or her daughter (April Dillard) being guests of the Quaker Square Inn on or about May
16, 2009.” Lynch explained “Room Numbers 405 and 406 at the Quaker Square Inn
were reserved in the name of and paid for by Sparkle Henry.” Lynch observed he has
been employed at the Quaker Square Inn “for the past two years” and he is personally
unaware of any incidents (other than plaintiff’s incident) of guests falling in slippery
bathtubs or complaints referencing slippery tub conditions. Lynch asserted every room
at the Quaker Square Inn is inspected daily by staff “for cleanliness and safety.” Also,
Lynch reported “the Quaker Square Inn is subject to inspection by state and local
authorities and has never been found to be in violation of any cleanliness, health or
safety rules.”
       {¶ 5} Defendant denied liability in this matter based on the contention that under
the facts presented no duty of care was owed to plaintiff to protect her from damages
presented by an open and obvious condition.             Defendant provided the following
argument:
       {¶ 6} “Assuming that Plaintiff was lawfully staying as a guest of the University’s
Quaker Square Inn on or about May 16, 2009 when she alleged attempted to take a
shower, common sense should have dictated to Plaintiff that stepping into a shower with
running water is necessarily slippery and as such, potentially dangerous.            For this
reason, any danger posed to Plaintiff in this situation would have been open and
obvious. Therefore, University owed Plaintiff no duty of care. (Armstrong v. Best Buy
Co., Inc. (2003), 99 Ohio St. 3d 79; Sidle v. Humphrey (1968), 13 Ohio St. 2d 45) Since
University owed Plaintiff no duty of care, it cannot be liable for any injuries and damages
she allegedly sustained.”
       {¶ 7} Alternatively, defendant argued that if it was determined the University of
Akron did owe plaintiff a duty of care in regard to the issue of premises liability, plaintiff
has failed to produce any evidence to establish any duty of care owed to her was
breached. Essentially, defendant contended plaintiff has failed to prove the University
of Akron failed to maintain the premises at the Quaker Square Inn in a reasonably safe
condition or warn her of any hidden defects. Armstrong.
       {¶ 8} The possessor of a premises, including hotel operations, owes a duty to
its invitees, or hotel guests, to exercise ordinary care for their safety. This duty includes
maintaining the premises in a reasonably safe condition and warning the invitees of
latent defects of which the hotel has or should have knowledge. See Keister v. Park
Centre Lanes (1981), 3 Ohio App. 3d 19, 3 OBR 20, 443 N.E. 2d 532. However, the
hotel does not have to protect invitees from open and obvious dangers that invitees may
be reasonably expected to discover. Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy (1985), 18 Ohio St.
3d 45, 18 OBR 267, 480 N.E. 2d 474, 475; Gillentine v. Econo Lodge/Beavercreek,
(July 2, 1998), Greene App. No. 97 CA 136, unreported (slip and fall in hotel shower);
Churchwell v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., (Mar. 24, 1998), Franklin App. No. 97APE08-1125,
unreported (slip and fall in hotel shower).
       {¶ 9} An owner of a premises has no duty to warn invitees entering the property
of an open and obvious danger existing on the property. Simmers v. Bentley Constr.
Co. (1992), 64 Ohio St. 3d 642, 1992-Ohio-42, 597 N.E. 2d 504.                    Applying the
circumstances of the instant action and assuming the absence of applying certain safety
devices in the bathtub in Room #406 created a condition that was dangerous, there is
no duty on the part of defendant to warn a plaintiff of a condition which is open and
obvious to anyone using ordinary diligence. “It is common knowledge that a bathtub
surface becomes slippery when water and soap are applied.” Churchwell. Considering
the facts of the instant claim, it is common knowledge a bathtub surface would be
slippery with the application of water only. The fact that wet bathtubs present a slippery
surface is known to all bathers. Coyle v. Beryl’s Motor Hotel (1961), 85 Ohio L. Abs.
492, 171 N.E. 2d 355. Plaintiff, in the present claim, was injured from an open and
obvious condition and consequently, defendant had no duty to protect her from the
condition presented. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim is denied.


                                Court of Claims of Ohio
                                                                          The Ohio Judicial Center
                                                                  65 South Front Street, Third Floor
                                                                             Columbus, OH 43215
                                                                   614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
                                                                              www.cco.state.oh.us




MONICA D. WIMBERLY
        Plaintiff

        v.

QUATER SQUARE INN

        Defendant

         Case No. 2009-06249-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert


ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION



         Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth
in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff.



                                                  ________________________________
                                                  DANIEL R. BORCHERT
                                                  Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Monica D. Wimberly                                M. Celeste Cook
1080 Meadowbrook Street                           Associate Vice President and
Inkster, Michigan 48141                           Assistant General Counsel
                                                  302 Buchtel Mall
                                                  Akron, Ohio 44325-4706
RDK/laa
10/27
Filed 11/20/09
Sent to S.C. reporter 3/12/10
