
Opinion issued July 27, 2006











In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-05-00917-CR
____________

DARRYL JAMES LEBLANC, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 185th District Court 
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1007120



 
MEMORANDUM  OPINION
               Appellant, Darryl JamesLeblanc, was convicted by a jury of the felony
offense of indecency with a child, and after a hearing at which appellant pleaded true
to two enhancement paragraphs, the jury assessed punishment at confinement for
thirty years.  We affirm.
               Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel
and a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit.  Counsel’s brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967),
by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of
arguable grounds of error.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992,
pet. ref’d).
               Counsel represents that she served a copy of the brief on appellant.  Counsel
also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
brief.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  More than
30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief.  We have carefully
reviewed the record and counsel’s brief.  We find no reversible error in the record,
and agree that the appeal is without merit.  We therefore affirm the judgment of the
trial court.
               We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
 See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d
770, 771 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). 
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Alcala, and Bland.
Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
