                         T.C. Memo. 2004-221



                       UNITED STATES TAX COURT



   DARLENE R. ESPOSITO, a.k.a. AMNESTY NATIONAL, Petitioner v.
           COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent



     Docket No. 4178-03.            Filed September 29, 2004.



     Darlene R. Esposito, a.k.a. Amnesty National, pro se.

     Nancy C. Carver, for respondent.



              MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION


     CHIECHI, Judge:    Respondent determined a deficiency of $534

in petitioner’s Federal income tax (tax) for 1999.      Prior to

trial, respondent conceded that deficiency.

     The only issue remaining for decision is whether petitioner

made an overpayment of tax (overpayment) for her taxable year

1999.   We hold that she did not.
                                - 2 -

                           FINDINGS OF FACT

     Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.

     At the time petitioner filed the petition, she resided in

Rahway, New Jersey.

     Petitioner timely filed Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income

Tax Return, for her taxable year 1999 (1999 return).   In peti-

tioner’s 1999 return, petitioner reported taxable income of

$744.67, total tax of $288.66, tax withheld of $2,734, and other

tax payments (other tax payments) of $6,000 and claimed an

overpayment and refund of $8,445.34.

     In support of the other tax payments of $6,000 reported in

her 1999 return, petitioner attached two Forms 2439, Notice to

Shareholder of Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains (Form 2439),

that she prepared.    Form 2439 is a form that the Internal Revenue

Service (Service) requires a regulated investment company (RIC)

or a real estate investment trust (REIT) to file with the Service

and to send to its shareholders with respect to its undistributed

long-term capital gains.

     The respective Forms 2439 that petitioner prepared and that

she attached to her 1999 return showed, inter alia, the following

information:
                                       - 3 -
                                                              Tax Paid by the
                                                                RIC or REIT
  Name of Regulated                                              on Total
 Investment Company                     Total Undistributed    Undistributed
   or Real Estate         Name of            Long-Term          Long-Term
  Investment Trust      Shareholder         Capital Gains      Capital Gains
     New Jersey           Darlene              $12,000            $3,000
 Department of Labor     Esposito
     Division of
    Environmental
     Protection


                                                              Tax Paid by the
                                                                RIC or REIT
  Name of Regulated                                              on Total
 Investment Company                     Total Undistributed    Undistributed
   or Real Estate         Name of            Long-Term          Long-Term
  Investment Trust      Shareholder         Capital Gains      Capital Gains
     New Jersey           Amnesty              $13,000            $3,000
 Department of Labor   International

     Petitioner did not pay to the Service from any of her

personal accounts, including her checking account, the other tax

payments of $6,000 that she reported in her 1999 return with

respect to which she is claiming an overpayment.

     On or about August 7, 2000, respondent notified petitioner

that it had changed petitioner’s 1999 return and had determined

that petitioner was entitled to a refund of $2,445.34, and not

$8,445.34 as claimed in that return, for her taxable year 1999.

On a date not disclosed by the record after August 7, 2000,

respondent sent petitioner a $2,445.34 refund check.

     Around September 2000, petitioner filed (1) Form 1040X,

Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040X), (2) Form

1045, Application for Tentative Refund (Form 1045), and (3) Form

843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement (Form 843), with
                               - 4 -

respect to petitioner’s taxable year 1999.1

     In Form 1040X, petitioner claimed an overpayment and refund

of $6,243.   In Form 1045, petitioner claimed an overpayment and

refund of $6,735.   In Form 843, petitioner claimed a refund of

$7,099.

     Respondent issued to petitioner a notice of deficiency

(notice) for her taxable year 1999.     As noted above, respondent

conceded the deficiency determined in the notice.

                              OPINION

     Petitioner bears the burden of proving that she made an

overpayment for her taxable year 1999.    See Rule 142(a);2 Welch

v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).

     In support of her position that she made an overpayment for

her taxable year 1999, petitioner relies on her own self-serving

testimony and certain documentary evidence.    With respect to

petitioner’s testimony, we found her testimony to be vague,

uncorroborated, and incomprehensible in many respects.    We shall

not rely on petitioner’s testimony to establish her position in

this case that she made an overpayment for 1999.

     With respect to the documentary evidence on which petitioner

relies, petitioner introduced into the record, inter alia, her


     1
      Form 1040X, Form 1045, and Form 843 also indicated that
such forms related to a fiscal year ended Apr. 15, 2000.
     2
      All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice
and Procedure.
                               - 5 -

1999 return to which she attached Forms 2439 and various letters

(various letters) from certain banks and certain Federal and New

Jersey State agencies.   Petitioner conceded at trial, and we have

found, that she prepared Forms 2439 that showed other tax pay-

ments of $6,000 that were allegedly made for her taxable year

1999.   We find Forms 2439 attached to petitioner’s 1999 return on

which she relies to be unreliable.     We further find that the

various letters on which petitioner relies do not establish any

facts that support petitioner’s claimed overpayment for 1999.     We

shall not rely on Forms 2439 or the various letters to establish

petitioner’s position in this case.

     On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed

to carry her burden of establishing that she has made an overpay-

ment for her taxable year 1999.

     We have considered all the contentions and arguments of

petitioner that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be

incomprehensible, irrelevant, and/or without merit.

     To reflect the foregoing and the concession of respondent,


                                       Decision will be entered

                               reflecting no deficiency in, and

                               no overpayment of, tax.
