                                  COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                             FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                      ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name:       Raziel Jesus Munoz v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number:     01-12-00204-CR

Trial court case number: 1175702

Trial court:               185th District Court of Harris County

        Although the record reflects that the appellant has the right to appeal, the clerk’s record
filed in this appeal does not contain a certification signed by the trial court judge indicating that
appellant has the right to appeal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require that a certification
from the trial court of the appellant’s right to appeal be filed in every criminal case in which the
trial court enters a judgment or other appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
        Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remove it from this Court’s active docket so that a
certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal may be executed.
       We direct the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris
County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel, Frances Bourliot, shall be present.
Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person, or he may appear by closed video
teleconference.1
       At the hearing, the trial court shall complete a certification of the appellant’s right to
appeal. The certification must be signed by the trial court, appellant, and appellant’s counsel. If
appellant appears by video teleconference, appellant’s signature on the certification may be
obtained by mailing the certification to appellant following the hearing.
       A supplemental clerk’s record containing the completed certification of appellant’s right
to appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.


1      Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that
       provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication
       of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the
       State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate
       privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing
       the State.
        The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental
clerk’s record is filed in this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a
hearing date and notify the parties of such date.
       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle
                    Acting individually    Acting for the Court


Date: July 15, 2013
