                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42549

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 493
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: May 15, 2015
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
JAIME SALATIEL TREVINO,                         )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified fifteen-year sentence with a minimum period
       of confinement of three and one-half years for aggravated battery, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                       Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; LANSING, Judge;
                                 and GRATTON, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Jaime Salatiel Trevino pled guilty to one count of aggravated battery, Idaho Code §§ 18-
903(a), 18-907(b). The district court imposed a unified fifteen-year sentence with a minimum
period of confinement of three and one-half years. Trevino appeals, contending that his sentence
is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.

                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Trevino’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.




                                                   2
