<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">7</A>-000<A NAME="2">86</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>


<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Lonnie E. Daniels, Jr. and Lonitta Daniels</A>, Appellants</CENTER>


<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="4">Scott Penn</A>, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">FAYETTE</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">155TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">94V-288</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">DAN R. BECK</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING </STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>


PER CURIAM

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Appellants Lonnie and Lonitta Daniels appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor
of Scott Penn.  Because appellants have failed to file a brief, we will dismiss this appeal for want of
prosecution. </P>

<P>	The Clerk of this Court filed the transcript in this cause on February 18, 1997. Accordingly,
appellants' brief was due on March 20, 1997.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. R. App. P. 74(k). <STRONG></STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG>	</STRONG>By letter dated June 23, 1997, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that appellants'
brief was overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellants tendered a motion by July
3, 1997, reasonably explaining their failure to file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 74(<EM>l</EM>)(1); <EM>see</EM> Tex R. App. P.
60(a)(2).  Thus far, appellants have submitted neither a brief nor a motion for an extension of time to file
a brief.  </P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion.  Tex. R.
App. P. 60(a)(1), 74(<EM>l</EM>)(1); <EM>Sentinel Pipe Servs., Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing</EM>, 825 S.W.2d 212
(Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1992, no writ); <EM>Dickson v. Dickson</EM>, 541 S.W.2d 895, 896 (Tex. Civ.
App.--Austin 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).<STRONG>  </STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd</P>

<P>Appeal Dismissed for Want of Prosecution</P>

<P>Filed:   August 28, 1997</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
</BODY>
</HTML>
