
USCA1 Opinion

	




          August 4, 1992        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ___________________          No. 92-1357                                    ELIGIO CASTRO,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                      NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                  _________________          No. 92-1482                                    ELIGIO CASTRO,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                 NEW YORK CITY BOARD                                OF EDUCATION, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                  __________________                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                    [Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                               and Cyr, Circuit Judge.                                        _____________                                 ___________________               Eligio Castro on brief pro se.               _____________               Robert Abrams, Attorney  General of the  State of New  York,               _____________          and  Jeffrey I. Slonim, Assistant Attorney  General, on brief for               _________________          appellees New York City Board of Education, et al.               O. Peter Sherwood,  Corporation Counsel of  the City of  New               _________________          York,  Stephen J. McGrath, Peter J. Cahill and Kristin M. Helmers                 __________________  _______________     __________________          on brief for appellee New York City Board of Education.               Daniel  Lopez-Romo,  United  States  Attorney,  and  Rebecca               __________________                                   _______          Vargas-Vera,  Assistant  United  States Attorney,  on  brief  for          ___________          appellee Secretary of the United States Department of Education.                                  __________________                                  __________________                 Per Curiam.  We agree with the district court's February                 __________            11,  1992  opinion  and  affirm  the  judgment  of  dismissal            substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.                 Since  the action  was properly dismissed,  the district            court   did   not   err   in   denying   injunctive   relief.            Consequently,  the March  19, 1992  order denying  injunctive            relief is summarily affirmed.                 Appellant's motion to perfect diversity jurisdiction and            other requests are denied.                 Because these  appeals are frivolous,  double costs  are            awarded to appellees.                 Affirmed.                 ________                                         -3-
