
Opinion issued November 1, 2007










In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-06-00023-CR
____________

 JAMES WILSON DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 337th District Court 
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1023994



 
MEMORANDUM  OPINION
          Appellant, James Wilson Davis, was convicted by a jury of murder, and  the
jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 30 years.  We affirm.
          Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and
a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit.  Counsel’s brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967),
by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of
arguable grounds of error.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992,
pet. ref’d).
          Counsel represents that she has served a copy of the brief on appellant. 
Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file
a pro se brief.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 
More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief.  Having
reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit and that there is no reversible error.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d
824, 826-27(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  
          We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to 
withdraw.
 
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Bland.
Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
