
USCA1 Opinion

	




        October 13, 1994        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1153                            EVENT PRODUCERS, INC., ET AL.,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                       TYSER & CO. NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                   [Hon. Gilberto Gierbolini, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,                                       _____________                          Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and                                  ____________________                                Stahl, Circuit Judge.                                       _____________                                 ____________________            Vicente  Santori Coll,  Vicente  Santori  Margarida and  Victor J.            _____________________   ___________________________      _________        Casal  Vazquez on brief  for appellants, Event  Producers, Inc., Jorge        ______________        Torres Caratini, Miguel Angel Rey and Jose Morales Ortiz.            Manuel  A. Quilichini on  brief for  defendants/appellees, Tyser &            _____________________        Co. North America, Inc., Certain Insurers at Lloyd's of London.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.    Appellants appeal from a decision of                      __________            the district  court  dismissing on  summary  judgment  motion            their  suit alleging  that  appellees had  wrongfully delayed            payment of  certain  insurance  proceeds.    After  carefully            reviewing  the record  in  this case,  we  conclude that  the            district  court   correctly  granted  summary   judgment  for            appellees.    Accordingly,  we   affirm  the  decision  below            essentially for  the reasons  stated in the  district court's            opinions and orders dated November 24, 1993, and December 28,            1993.                                         -2-
