       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

     IN RE: EIDOS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
                     Appellant
              ______________________

                      2014-1658
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,898.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    ROBERT C. NISSEN, McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented
by SONG JUNG, CARL PAUL BRETSCHER.

    JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN
K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, SYDNEY O. JOHNSON,
JR.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 April 14, 2015                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
       Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court
