      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



                                      NO. 03-04-00090-CV



                                      In the Matter of G. C.




     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. J-22,824, HONORABLE WILLIAM D. KING, JUDGE PRESIDING



                            MEMORANDUM OPINION


               The district court found beyond a reasonable doubt that G.C. committed criminal

trespass and adjudicated him delinquent. The court placed him on probation in the custody of his

father and grandmother for six months.

               G.C. was charged with two counts of burglary of a building and with criminal

trespass. The trial judge held that the evidence was insufficient to convict G.C. for the burglaries,

but adjudicated him delinquent for the Class B misdemeanor criminal trespass. By his sole issue on

appeal, G.C. contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because he should have

been tried under a more specific statute with a less severe punishment range. Compare Tex. Educ.

Code Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996) (trespass on school grounds, Class C misdemeanor), with Tex. Pen.

Code Ann. § 30.05 (West 2004-05) (trespass, Class B misdemeanor). He argues that because the

lesser offense is a Class C misdemeanor and is not within the definition of delinquent conduct, the

district court lacked jurisdiction. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 51.03(a) (West Supp. 2004-05); see
also Tex. Const. art. V, § 19 (justice court has original jurisdiction over offenses punishable by fine

only).

                This Court has recently concluded in a similar juvenile case that these statutes are not

in pari materia, that the State could charge the juvenile under either statute, and that the district court

had jurisdiction over the allegation of criminal trespass against the juvenile. See In the Matter of

J.M.R., No. 03-03-00749-CV, slip op. at 8, 2004 WL 2357887, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 21,

2004, no pet. h.). This appeal is controlled by that decision.

                We affirm the judgment of the district court.




                                                 __________________________________________

                                                 Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: November 12, 2004




                                                    2
