946 F.2d 1568
292 U.S.App.D.C. 88
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Diane M. WITT, Surviving Spouse of Barry F. Witt, Deceased, Appellant,v.ELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al.
No. 90-7160.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 89-00191;  Lamberth, J.
Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.


1
This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel.   After full review of the parties' presentations, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant a further opinion.   See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c).   Substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its September 21, 1990 Memorandum Opinion, it is


2
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.


3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.   See D.C.Cir. Rule 15(b)(2).

