            In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                              OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                    Filed: July 27, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
D. B.,                              *
                                    *               UNPUBLISHED
            Petitioner,             *
                                    *               No. 18-445V
v.                                  *
                                    *               Special Master Dorsey
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                 *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                 *               Decision Based on Stipulation;
                                    *               Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
            Respondent.             *               Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
                                    *               (“SIRVA”).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ron C. Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                          DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION1

       On March 26, 2018, D. B. (“petitioner”), filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleged that as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination
administered on August 18, 2016, she suffered from shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1.

         On July 1, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation
to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 51). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine administered on
August 18, 2016 caused petitioner’s SIRVA, or any other injury. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the

1
 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will
be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b),
petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure
of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access.
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision
to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.
                                                1
parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the
stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the
terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

       These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at ¶ 8.

      The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioners’ compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of
Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                     s/Nora B. Dorsey
                                                     Nora B. Dorsey
                                                     Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                2
