
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1589                                   MARIA FELINSKA,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                          NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS AND TRUCKING                                INDUSTRY PENSION FUND,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                      [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Matthew Cobb for appellant.            ____________            Anne  McCully Murphy with whom Charles P.  O'Connor, Morgan, Lewis            ____________________           ____________________  _____________        &  Bockius,  LLP,  Christopher  N.  Souris  and  Feinberg,  Charnas  &        ________________   _______________________       _____________________        Birmingham, P.C. are on brief for appellee.         ________________                                 ____________________                                   November 6, 1996                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.   Maria  Felinska appeals from  the district                 __________            court's summary judgment dismissing her claim that her former            employer  had  discriminated  against her  by  constructively            discharging  her because of her  age in violation  of the Age            Discrimination in  Employment Act, 29  U.S.C.   621  et. seq.                                                                 ________            The district  court ruled that  Felinska had not  presented a            prima facie  case because, even accepting  her allegations of            fact  as  true,  they  did  not  demonstrate  a  constructive            discharge.  Greenberg  v. Union  Camp Corp., 48  F.3d 22,  26                        _________     _________________            (1st Cir. 1995).  After reviewing the parties' briefs and the            record,  we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the            district court.                 Affirmed.                 ________                                         -2-                                         -2-
