(;: j(ii: ;'

H/i.\';i.'.‘i i=

ZWBNUViS §H 8:@2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASH|NGTON

STATE OF WASHENGTON,

)
) No. 77295-3-|
Respondertt, )
) DlViSiON ONE
v. )
)
MOHAMED D. DUKULY, ) UNPUBLiSi-!ED OPiN|ON
)
)

FiLEi:); NU"<! ?`Q‘?ii"i&

PER CuRlAM. Mohamed Dukuiy appeais his conviction for first degree

Appe|iant.

robbery, arguing that a statute (RCW 13.04.030) requiring his prosecution in
adult court vioiates procedurat and substantive due process The same
arguments Were recentiy rejected in, and are controlled by, the Washington State
Supreme Court’s decision in State v. V\Iati<ins, w Wn.2d _ , 423 P.3d 830, 832
(2018).

Afiirmed.

For the Couri:

 

 

