                  T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-116



                     UNITED STATES TAX COURT



                   LUIS BIVIECA, Petitioner v.
          COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent



     Docket No. 26281-06S.              Filed September 8, 2008.



     Luis Bivieca, pro se.

     Shawna A. Early, for respondent.



     THORNTON, Judge:   This case was heard pursuant to the

provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect

when the petition was filed.1   Pursuant to section 7463(b), the

decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and




     1
       Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in effect for the year in issue,
and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and
Procedure.
                               - 2 -

this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other

case.

     Respondent determined a $5,827 deficiency in petitioner’s

2005 Federal income tax.   The issues for decision are:

(1) Whether petitioner is entitled to dependency exemption

deductions for two of his girlfriend’s children; (2) whether

petitioner is entitled to the child tax credit; (3) whether

petitioner is entitled to head of household filing status; (4)

whether petitioner is entitled to the child care credit; and (5)

whether petitioner is entitled to the earned income credit.

                            Background

     The parties have stipulated some facts, which we incorporate

herein.   When he petitioned this Court, petitioner resided in New

York.

     In 2005 petitioner was unmarried.   He worked as a building

superintendent in New York City.   As part of his compensation, he

was provided with an apartment in the building.

     Petitioner’s girlfriend, Maria Valdez (Ms. Valdez), had four

children, including J.P. and D.F.,2 who were ages 3 and 9,

respectively, in 2005.   The children were not petitioner’s

biological, adopted, or foster children.



     2
       The Court uses initials when referring to a minor child.
See Rule 27(a)(3).
                               - 3 -

     Petitioner filed his 2005 Federal income tax return as a

head of household reporting $18,410 of adjusted gross income; he

claimed J.P. and D.F. (erroneously described as foster children)

as dependents and also claimed the child tax credit, the child

care credit, and the earned income credit.

     In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed both of

petitioner’s claimed dependency exemptions, the child tax credit,

the child care credit, and the earned income credit.   Respondent

determined petitioner’s filing status to be single rather than

head of household.

                            Discussion

     The burden of proof is on petitioner to show that he is

entitled to the claimed dependency exemptions and other tax

benefits at issue in this case.   See Rule 142(a).3

1. Dependency Exemption

     A taxpayer is entitled to claim a dependency exemption only

if the claimed dependent is a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying

relative” as defined under section 152(c) and (d).    Sec. 152(a).

     A qualifying child is defined as the taxpayer’s child,

brother, sister, stepbrother, or stepsister, or a descendant of

any of them.   Sec. 152(c)(1) and (2).   The term “child” includes


     3
       Petitioner has not claimed or shown that he meets the
requirements under sec. 7491(a) to shift the burden of proof to
respondent as to any factual issue relating to his liability for
tax.
                                 - 4 -

a legally adopted individual and a foster child placed in the

care of the taxpayer by an authorized placement agency or court

order.   Sec. 152(f)(1).    Neither J.P. nor D.F. is a qualifying

child because neither is related to petitioner and neither is an

adopted or foster child.

     An individual who is not a qualifying child may still, under

certain conditions, qualify as a dependent if he or she is a

qualifying relative.   Sec. 152(a).      Under section 152(d)(1), a

qualifying relative is an individual:       (A) Who bears a qualifying

relationship to the taxpayer; (B) whose gross income for the year

is less than the section 151(d) exemption amount ($2,000 for

2005); (C) who receives over one-half of his support from the

taxpayer for the taxable year; and (D) who is not a qualifying

child of the taxpayer or of any other taxpayer for the taxable

year.

     Section 152(d)(2) lists eight types of qualifying

relationships, seven of which involve various familial

relationships that do not cover petitioner’s claimed dependents.

Sec. 152(d)(2)(A)-(G).     The eighth type of qualifying

relationship applies to an individual, other than the taxpayer’s

spouse, who has the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer

and is a member of the taxpayer’s household for the taxable year.

Sec. 152(d)(2)(H).   In order for an individual to be considered a

member of a taxpayer’s household, the taxpayer must maintain the
                                - 5 -

household, and both the taxpayer and the individual must occupy

the household for the entire taxable year.   Sec. 1.152-1(b),

Income Tax Regs.    A taxpayer maintains a household when he or she

furnishes more than one-half of the expenses for the household.

See sec. 2(b); Rev. Rul. 64-41, 1964-1 C.B. (Part 1) 84.

     Petitioner alleges that in 2004 Ms. Valdez and her children

were evicted from their Bronx apartment and came to live with him

in his Manhattan apartment, where he claims they lived throughout

2005.   The limited documentary evidence that petitioner presented

does not corroborate this claim.   For instance, although

petitioner offered into evidence D.F.’s proof of school

registration, it is for the year 2006 rather than 2005 and shows

D.F. as residing at a Bronx address.    This and other deficiencies

in the record and inconsistencies in petitioner’s testimony leave

us unpersuaded that petitioner and the claimed dependents had the

same principal place of abode for all of 2005.

     Moreover, petitioner maintained no receipts or records of

any payments made on J.P.’s or D.F.’s behalf.    Petitioner has not

established the amount of support, if any, he paid on behalf of

J.P. and D.F. or that his contributions constituted over one-half

of their support.   Respondent’s determination on this issue is

sustained.
                                   - 6 -

2. Child Tax Credit

        Section 24 generally allows a tax credit for each qualifying

child of a taxpayer (as defined under section 152(c)) who is

under 17 years of age.     Sec. 24(a), (c)(1).    As discussed above,

neither J.P. nor D.F. is a qualifying child of petitioner.

Petitioner is not entitled to the child tax credit.

3.   Head of Household Filing Status

      Section 1(b) grants a special tax rate for any individual

who qualifies as a head of household.      With exceptions not

relevant here, the statute generally defines head of household as

an unmarried individual who maintains as his or her home a

household which constitutes for more than one-half of the taxable

year the principal place of abode of either a qualifying child

(as defined in section 152(c)) or a dependent of the taxpayer

with respect to whom the taxpayer is allowed a deduction under

section 151.    Sec. 2(b)(1)(A).

      As previously discussed, neither J.P. nor D.F. is a

qualifying child of petitioner, and petitioner is not entitled to

a dependency exemption deduction for J.P. or D.F.      Accordingly,

petitioner is not entitled to head of household filing status for

2005.

4.   Child Care Credit

      Section 21(a) and (b)(2) generally provides for a child care

credit with respect to employment-related expenses that are
                                 - 7 -

incurred to enable the taxpayer to be gainfully employed,

including expenses to care for a “qualifying individual.”    With

exceptions not relevant here, a qualifying individual is

generally defined as an individual who is either a qualifying

child of the taxpayer (within the meaning of section 152(a)(1))

who has not turned 13 or a dependent of the taxpayer who is

physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself or herself

and shares the same place of abode with the taxpayer for more

than one-half of the taxable year.       Sec. 21(b)(1).

     As previously discussed, J.P. and D.F. are not qualifying

children of petitioner within the meaning of section 152(a)(1).

Moreover, petitioner does not allege and the record does not

indicate that either child is physically or mentally incapable of

caring for himself or herself.    Further, petitioner failed to

establish that he actually incurred or paid employment-related

expenses for the care of the children that enabled him to be

employed.4

5.   Earned Income Credit

      Section 32(a) permits an “eligible individual” to claim an

earned income credit against his income tax liability.     To be an


      4
       On Form 2441, Child and Dependent Care Expenses, attached
to his Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2005
petitioner’s claimed employment-related expenses consisted of
$6,000 allegedly paid to Ms. Valdez to care for J.P and D.F.
Inconsistently, Ms. Valdez testified that she had no income for
2005.
                                 - 8 -

eligible individual, an individual must either have a qualifying

child or meet certain other requirements.    Sec. 32(c)(1)(A).    For

2005 an unmarried individual who has no qualifying child is

ineligible for an earned income credit if his or her adjusted

gross income exceeds $11,750.    Rev. Proc. 2004-71, sec. 3.06,

2004-2 C.B. 970, 973.

      Because J.P. and D.F. bore no familial relationship to

petitioner, they were not qualifying children.    See sec.

32(c)(3)(A).   Moreover, because petitioner reported adjusted

gross income of $18,410 for 2005, he is not otherwise eligible

for an earned income credit.

     To reflect the foregoing,


                                          Decision will be entered

                                     for respondent.
