                                    Cite as 2015 Ark. 89

                SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

       IN RE SPECIAL TASK FORCE                   Opinion Delivered   February 26, 2015
       ON      PRACTICE    AND
       PROCEDURE IN CIVIL
       CASES–AMENDMENT TO ARK.
       R. CIV. P. 3
                                      PER CURIAM

       A proposal originated with our Special Task Force on Practice and Procedure in Civil

Cases to provide presuit notice for medical-malpractice cases. See In re Special Task Force on

Practice & Procedure in Civil Cases, 2014 Ark. 5 (per curiam). The proposal was referred to the

Committee on Civil Practice. The Committee revised the Task Force’s proposal to address

statute-of-limitations concerns, and Ark. R. Civ. P. 3, as amended, was republished for

comment. See In re Special Task Force on Practice & Procedure in Civil Cases–Proposed Amendment

to Ark. R. Civ. P. 3, 2014 Ark. 343 (per curiam).

       Today, we adopt the amendment to Rule 3, as set out below, and republish the rule.

This amendment is effective upon the General Assembly’s enactment of a companion

limitations-tolling provision.1

       We thank the members of the Task Force, the members of the Civil Practice

Committee, and all who commented for their contributions.




       1
      The contents of the notice in subdivision (d)(1) are based on Ark. Code Ann. § 16-
114-212, in which notice is optional. If subdivision (d) becomes effective, the statute is
deemed superseded pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-11-301.
Rule 3. Commencement of Action; “Clerk” Defined; Separate Actions and Filing
Fees; Notice of Medical Injury.

(a) Commencement. A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the clerk of the
court, who shall note thereon the date and precise time of filing.

(b) Clerk. The term “clerk of the court” as used in these rules means the circuit clerk and,
with respect to probate matters, any county clerk who serves as ex officio clerk of the probate
division of the circuit court pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 14-14-502(b)(2)(B). In counties
where the county clerk serves as the ex officio clerk of any division of the circuit court, the
filing requirement shall be satisfied when the complaint is filed with either the circuit clerk
or the county clerk.

(c) Separate Actions; Filing Fees.
       (1) The clerk shall assign a new case number and charge a new filing fee for the filing
of any case that is refiled after having been dismissed.

         (2) No other claim or counterclaim for relief, including without limitation, divorce,
annulment, separate maintenance, or paternity, shall be asserted in an action filed under the
Domestic Abuse Act, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-15-101 et seq., but a separate action seeking other
relief shall be filed, and the clerk shall assign a new case number and charge a filing fee unless
the filing fee is waived pursuant to Rule 72 of these rules.

       (3) A petition for adoption cannot be asserted in a guardianship proceeding, but a
separate action shall be filed, and the clerk shall assign a new case number and charge a filing
fee unless the filing fee is waived pursuant to Rule 72 of these rules.

(d) Notice of Claim in Actions for Medical Injury.
        (1) Upon enactment of a statute tolling the applicable statute of limitations as provided
in paragraph (4) of this subdivision (d), no action for medical injury shall be commenced until
at least sixty (60) days after service of a written notice of the claim upon each medical-care
provider to be named as a defendant. The notice shall include:

               (A) the patient’s full name, date of birth, present address, address at the time of
the diagnosis, care, treatment, or procedure at issue, and the last four digits of his or her social
security number;

               (B) the full name and address of the person authorizing the notice and his or her
relationship to the patient, if the notice is not sent by the patient;

             (C) the date or dates of the diagnosis, care, treatment, or procedure at issue, a
summary of the alleged wrongful conduct, and a description of the alleged injury;
               (D) the names and addresses of the known medical-care providers who provided
any care or treatment relating to the alleged injury; and

              (E) an authorization permitting the medical-care provider receiving the notice
to obtain the patient’s medical records from the medical-care providers listed pursuant to
subparagraph (D) of this paragraph (1).

       (2) The notice shall be served on a medical-care provider by certified mail, return
receipt requested, or by a commercial delivery company qualified under Rule 4(d)(8)(C). For
purposes of paragraph (1) of this subdivision (d), service of the notice shall be deemed
complete on mailing or on submitting it to a commercial delivery company, and the date of
mailing or submission shall be the date of service.

       (3) If the notice substantially complies with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this
subdivision (d), an ensuing complaint based on the alleged injury shall not be dismissed on the
ground that the notice was insufficient or otherwise defective.

        (4) This subdivision (d) shall apply to actions filed after the effective date of a statute
enacted by the General Assembly providing that when the notice specified in paragraph (1)
of this subdivision is served within sixty (60) days before expiration of the applicable statute
of limitations, the time for commencement of the action is extended by ninety (90) days after
service of the notice, with the date of service determined in accordance with paragraph (2)
of this subdivision.

Addition to Reporter’s Notes (2015 Amendment): New subdivision (d) resolves the
separation-of-powers issue at the core of Weidrick v. Arnold, 310 Ark. 138, 835 S.W.2d 843
(1992). There, the supreme court invalidated a statute which, contrary to Rule 3, conditioned
commencement of an action for medical injury upon providing written notice of the claim
to the defendant. Subdivision (d) adds this requirement to the rule, effective upon the General
Assembly’s enactment of a companion limitations-tolling provision.

        The contents of the notice in paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) are based on Ark. Code
Ann. § 16-114-212, added by Section 22 of Act 649 of 2003. Under section 16-114-212,
notice is optional and is presumably given only when the plaintiff needed to take advantage
of the tolling provision. The statute is deemed superseded pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-
11-301 when subdivision (d) becomes effective.

       Subdivision (d)(1)(C) is intended to require some notice of not only the injury but also
what the defendant is alleged to have done wrong. In subdivision (d)(1)(D), the language
“who provided any care or treatment” is intended to make clear that the list of providers is
not limited to those who contributed to the injury and includes those who subsequently
treated or cared for the patient.
For housekeeping purposes, former subdivisions (d) and (e) of the rule have been added as
separate paragraphs to subdivision (c).

      BAKER and HART, JJ., dissent.
