 
    

        
		
        

        
        
        
        
        

        
		
        	
		STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARROZ



    

	
    
	


		Skip to Main Content
		Accessibility Statement
	




Help
Contact Us




e-payments
Careers











Home
Courts
Decisions
Programs
News
Legal Research
Court Records
Quick Links





OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARROZ

					

				
  



				



						Previous Case

						Top Of Index

						This Point in Index

						Citationize

						Next Case

						Print Only




STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARROZ2020 OK 11Case Number: SCBD-6876Decided: 02/10/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2020 OK 11, __ P.3d __

FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. 

State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant,
v.
Keegan K. Harroz, Respondent.
ORDER OF IMMEDIATE INTERIM SUSPENSION
¶1 On November 27, 2019, the Complainant Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) filed a verified complaint against the respondent, Keegan K. Harroz, pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A. The OBA, with the concurrence of the Professional Responsibility Commission, requests an emergency interim suspension of Respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 6.2A of the RGDP.
¶2 In support, the Complainant states that Respondent was arrested on September 13, 2019 on a warrant for Intimidating a State's Witness out of Okmulgee County. Respondent bonded out of jail on September 27, 2019, and was then charged in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. M-19-521-P, with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(Prohibited Person in Possession of Ammunition) and 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(Selling or Otherwise Disposing of a Firearm to a Prohibited Person). A detention hearing was held on October 2, 2019, and Respondent was ordered to remain in detention pending trial. On October 16, 2019, an Indictment was filed against Respondent in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. CR-19-325-SLP, charging Respondent with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(8). Respondent is currently being held at the Logan County Detention Center in federal custody.
¶3 Complainant states that the Office of the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association has received three grievances against Respondent since she was incarcerated involving failure to appear for a court proceeding, failure to prepare documents, and failure to return fees so that the clients could obtain alternative counsel. Complainant alleges that the current number of clients that Respondent represents is unknown, but that the amount of money in her trust account indicates there are multiple clients that are not presently being represented. Complainant alleges Respondent's conduct poses an immediate threat of substantial and irreparable public harm and requests an emergency interim suspension. Complaint also seeks an Order for Respondent to cease withdrawals from her client trust account and to permit an audit to determine what fees should be returned to clients, as well as an Order directing Respondent to assist Complainant in returning client files.
¶4 This Court ordered Respondent to show cause why an Order of Immediate Interim Suspension, and the other requested Orders, should not be entered. On January 13, 2020, Respondent answered and denied any professional misconduct, denied she committed any crime, and denied she has done anything improper regarding her trust account. Respondent requested that this Court deny the Complainant's request for interim suspension. The issue was set for hearing on February 6, 2020. On February 4, 2020, Respondent filed a Consent to the Entry of an Order of Immediate Interim Suspension and Waiver of Hearing to Show Cause. Respondent states that it would be in the best interests of justice for an Order of Emergency Interim Suspension to be entered at this time. Respondent specifically waives her right to a hearing but states that the waiver should not be construed as an admission of the trust of the allegations. Respondent reserves the right to contest the allegations and/or to present evidence in mitigation of the alleged professional misconduct at any future hearings to determine the merits of the allegations. Respondent states that client documents and files are being returned and that the process is expected to be completed in the near future. Respondent also states that an audit of the client trust account has been performed, that unearned fees are being returned, and that the process of returning unearned client funds is expected to be completed in the near future. The hearing on February 6, 2020 was then stricken.
¶5 Upon consideration of the Complaint and application for an order of emergency interim suspension, and Respondent's Consent to entry of the emergency interim suspension, the Court finds that an Order of Emergency Interim Suspension should be entered.
¶6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Keegan K. Harroz is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 6.2A of the RGDP.
¶7 Respondent Keegan K. Harroz is further ordered to file a status report no later than March 17, 2020, regarding the status of the return of documents, files, and unearned client funds.
¶8 Respondent Keegan K. Harroz is ordered to give written notices by certified mail, within 20 days from the date of this order, to all of her clients having legal business then pending of her inability to represent them and the necessity for promptly retaining new counsel. If Keegan K. Harroz is a member of, or associated with, a law firm or professional corporation, such notice shall be given to all clients of the firm or professional corporation, which have legal business then pending with respect to which the Respondent had substantial responsibility. Respondent shall also file a formal withdrawal as counsel in all cases pending in any tribunal. Respondent must file, within 20 day from the date of this Order, an affidavit with the Commission and with the Clerk of the Supreme Court stating that she has complied with this Order, together with a list of the clients so notified and a list of all other State and Federal courts and administrative agencies before which the lawyer is admitted to practice. Proof of substantial compliance by Respondent with this Order shall be a condition precedent to any petition for reinstatement.
¶9 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT in conference on February 10, 2020.
/S/CHIEF JUSTICE 
ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document



Cite
Name
Level



None Found.


Citationizer: Table of Authority



Cite
Name
Level



None Found.


















oscn

				EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net
				Oklahoma Judicial Center
				2100 N Lincoln Blvd.
				Oklahoma City, OK 73105


courts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Court of Criminal Appeals
Court of Civil Appeals
District Courts



decisions

New Decisions
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Court of Criminal Appeals
Court of Civil Appeals



programs

The Sovereignty Symposium
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Early Settlement Mediation
Children's Court Improvement Program (CIP)
Judicial Nominating Commission
Certified Courtroom Interpreters
Certified Shorthand Reporters
Accessibility ADA







Contact Us
Careers
Accessibility ADA






