     Case: 19-40083      Document: 00515146978         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/07/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 19-40083                            FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                  October 7, 2019
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEMETRICE HODGES,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:17-CR-144-1


Before OWEN, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Demetrice Hodges has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Hodges has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant parts of the record reflected therein.             We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40083      Document: 00515146978   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/07/2019


                                 No. 19-40083

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
