    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 09-657V
                                      Filed: January 5, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               UNPUBLISHED
ROSELLA LYONS,                *
                              *                               Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
          Petitioner,         *
                              *                               Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                            *                               Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Guillain-
                              *                               Barré Syndrome (“GBS”).
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *
                              *
          Respondent.         *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Franklin John Caldwell, Jr., Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.
Michael Milmoe, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

                                            DECISION 1

        On October 2, 2009, Rosella Lyons (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleges
that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”)
vaccine administered to her on October 14, 2008. 3
1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
3
  The petition lists the date of vaccination as October 14, 2007. However, the medical records
reflect that the date of vaccination was October 14, 2008, and the parties have now stipulated that
the latter date is accurate.

                                                  1
       On January 2, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation.

        Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged GBS or any other
injury, and further denies that her current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The
undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in
awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $300,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
       amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
       U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       Stipulation ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation. 4

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                               s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                               Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                               Special Master




4
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                  2
Case 1:09-vv-00657-UNJ Document 70 Filed 01/02/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:09-vv-00657-UNJ Document 70 Filed 01/02/15 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:09-vv-00657-UNJ Document 70 Filed 01/02/15 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:09-vv-00657-UNJ Document 70 Filed 01/02/15 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:09-vv-00657-UNJ Document 70 Filed 01/02/15 Page 5 of 5
