 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,
                                                 DIVISION ONE
                     Respondent,
                                                                               f-3
                                                 No. 70519-9-1                         ,!•' <~~'
                                                                               on      ~-i ' '
        v.
                                                                                Z3Z.   m,_
                                                                                ysf     ____   -—

                                                                                —<
                                                                                        •-n _
MARTENIS MINNIFIELD,                             UNPUBLISHED OPINION
                                                                                 CP


                     Appellant.
                                                 FILED:     MAY 1 8 2015

       Per Curiam — Martenis Minnifield appeals the sentence imposed

following his conviction for second degree assault. He contends the court erred

in imposing an exceptional sentence on that count absent notice of the State's

intent to seek an exceptional sentence on that count. But the State points out,

and Minnifeld does not dispute, that Minnifield's trial counsel proposed

instructions requiring the jury to consider an aggravating circumstance if it found

Minnifield guilty of second degree assault on either of the charged counts.

Accordingly, any error was invited and cannot be raised on appeal. State v.

Wininqs, 126 Wn. App. 75, 89, 107 P.3d 141 (2005); State v. Smith, 122 Wn.

App. 294, 299, 93 P.3d 206 (2004).

      We affirm.


                        FOR THE COURT:                1V^^|
