      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                       NO. 03-03-00623-CR



                                  Teddy Underwood, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee




             FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY
            NO. 71302, HONORABLE LINDA A. RODRIGUEZ, JUDGE PRESIDING



                             MEMORANDUM OPINION


               At a bench trial, appellant Teddy Underwood was convicted of assault with family

violence and sentenced to 180 days in jail and a $500 fine. His court-appointed attorney filed a brief

concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684

(Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v.

State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to

appellant, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.

No pro se brief has been filed.
              We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

              The judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                             __________________________________________

                                             Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: June 24, 2004

Do Not Publish




                                                2
