     Case: 09-20553     Document: 00511085942          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2010



              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2010
                                     No. 09-20553
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELISEO GUZMAN-GALVAN, also known as Eliseo Guzman, also known as
Eliseo Guzman Galvan, also known as Luis Zuniga-Galvan,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:09-CR-24-1


Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eliseo Guzman-
Galvan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guzman-Galvan has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 09-20553   Document: 00511085942 Page: 2      Date Filed: 04/20/2010
                               No. 09-20553

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                     2
