             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,672



                EX PARTE CHRISTIAN RAMIRO MIRELES, Applicant



             ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
            CAUSE NO. F-0950552-W IN THE 363RD DISTRICT COURT
                          FROM DALLAS COUNTY



        Per curiam.

                                           OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to imprisonment for life.

        Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file

a notice of appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal

of the judgment of conviction in cause number F-0950552-W from the 363rd District Court of Dallas
                                                                                                      2

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the

issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence

had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should

Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.



Delivered: November 2, 2011
Do Not Publish
