
USCA1 Opinion

	




        December 6, 1995        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                            ____________________        No. 95-1574                                   A.G. EDWARDS, JR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                PHYLLIS VELIS, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                      [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Selya, Stahl and Lynch,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            A.G. Edwards, Jr. on brief pro se.            _________________            Rhonda T.  Maloney and  Esdaile, Barrett  & Esdaile  on brief  for            __________________      ___________________________        appellees Phyllis Velis, Nicole Velis and Christopher Velis.            Richard  K.  Donahue, Jr.  and  Donahue  &  Donahue  on brief  for            _________________________       ___________________        appellee Harvey I. Katzen, M.D.            William D. Crowe and Crowe & Dunn on  brief for appellee Harold M.            ________________     ____________        Goldstein.            George A. Berman,  Deirdre M. Giblin  and Posternak,  Blankstein &            ________________   _________________      ________________________        Lund on brief for appellees Frederic A. Swartz and Swartz & Swartz.        ____                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  After carefully considering the briefs                      __________            of  the  parties and  reviewing  the  record,  we affirm  the            judgment of  the district  court for essentially  the reasons            stated in its Memorandum & Order, dated April 13, 1995.                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.                      ________   ___                                         -2-
