
NO. 07-01-0363-CR



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL B



OCTOBER 11, 2001



______________________________





ROYCE L. WELLINGTON, APPELLANT



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE





_________________________________



FROM THE 140
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;



NO. 2001-435768; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE



_______________________________



Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.

Pending before the Court is a “Motion for Appeal of Conviction,” filed by appellant Royce L. Wellington, 
and a Clerk’s Record as to Cause Number 2001-435,768 in the 140
th
 District Court of Lubbock County.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

   	By his Motion for Appeal appellant sought the trial court’s approval to appeal from his conviction pursuant to a plea-bargained guilty plea for Aggravated Perjury.  The judgment was signed on June 1, 2001; sentence was imposed on June 1, 2001; no Motion for New Trial was filed except to the extent appellant’s Motion for Appeal could be construed as an untimely Motion for New Trial; appellant’s Motion for Appeal was filed on August 28, 2001. 

  	In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a notice of appeal.  
Tex. R. App. P.
 25.2(a).  The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, unless a timely motion for new trial is filed. 
TRAP
  26.2(a).  A motion for new trial may be filed by a criminal defendant no later than 30 days after the date sentence is imposed in open court.  
TRAP 
 21.4(a).  The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended for 15 days under certain circumstances. 
TRAP
 26.3.  If the time for filing a notice of appeal is to be extended, both a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time which complies with TRAP 10.5(b) must be filed within the 15 day period.  TRAP 26.3;  
Olivo v. State
, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523-25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).  

An untimely-filed notice of appeal will not invoke the jurisdiction of the court of appeals.  
See
 
State v. Riewe
, 13 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000).  Thus, if an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  
Slaton v. State
, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); 
Olivo v. State
, 918 S.W.2d at 523-25.



To the extent appellant’s Motion for Appeal is a Motion for New Trial it was not timely to extend the time for filing notice of appeal; to the extent appellant’s Motion for Appeal is a notice of appeal, it was not timely filed.
  A motion to extend time to file notice of appeal was not filed.  Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over this proceeding.  
Slaton
, 981 S.W.2d at 210; 
Olivo
, 918 S.W.2d at 523.  

The matter is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  
TRAP
 39.8, 40.2, 43.2. 



Phil Johnson

   Justice





Do not publish.
âåùÖùåßÑperform these tasks, then same must be requested before January 6, 2006.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

