
USCA1 Opinion

	




          May 24, 1996                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 95-2137                               FREDERICK M. HEON, JR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                             GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                       [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Frederick M. Heon, Jr. on brief pro se.            ______________________            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department            _________________        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per  Curiam.     Frederick   Heon,   Jr.,  who   is                      ___________            incarcerated at the Adult Correctional  Institutions in Rhode            Island, appeals  from the  district court's dismissal  of his            civil  rights suit  under 42  U.S.C.    1983 against  various            state  prison officials.    We affirm  substantially for  the            reasons given in the magistrate judge's report dated July 12,            1995,  which the district court adopted as its decision.  See                                                                      ___            also  Dominique v. Weld,  73 F.3d 1156  (1st Cir. 1996).   We            ____  _________    ____            have considered Heon's claims of error, but find none of them            persuasive.                      Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.                      ____________________________                                         -2-
