        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 15-896V
                                      Filed: June 23, 2017
                                          Unpublished

****************************
EFRAIM KAMARA,             *
                           *
               Petitioner, *
          v.               *
                           *                              Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *                              Special Processing Unit (SPU)
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
               Respondent. *
                                                  *
****************************
Nancy R. Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.
Michael P. Milmoe, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On August 19, 2015, Efraim Kamara (“petitioner”), filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-
Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October
28, 2014. On May 18, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation
to petitioner based on the parties’ joint stipulation. (ECF No. 46).

       On June 7, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
No. 51). Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $27,995.00, attorneys’
costs in the amount of $4,521.79, for a total amount of $32,516.79. Id. at 1. In


1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement indicating he
incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

        On June 8, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No.
52). Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.” Id. at 2. Respondent “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special
Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees
and costs.” Id. at 3. Petitioner has filed no reply.

      In the undersigned’s experience, petitioner’s request appears reasonable, and
the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested amount.

      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

       Accordingly, the undersigned awards $32,516.79, 3 representing
reimbursement for all attorneys' fees and costs, in the form of a check payable
jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel, Nancy R. Meyers, Ward Black Law.

        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                          Chief Special Master




3
  This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
4
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                     2
