     Case: 16-40073      Document: 00514046394         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/23/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-40073
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                          June 23, 2017
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                       Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERMAN ORLANDO LOPEZ-AYALA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:15-CR-647-1


Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent German Orlando
Lopez-Ayala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a
supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Ayala
has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez-Ayala’s response. We


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40073    Document: 00514046394    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/23/2017


                                No. 16-40073

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
