Case: 14-1379        Document: 25           Page: 1       Filed: 08/28/2014




             NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                      ______________________

                     ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.,
                        Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                      v.

       ROBERTA S. BREN AND OBLON SPIVAK,
               Defendants-Appellees,

                                    AND

   MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, U.S.
  PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA
                  M. KING,
             Defendants-Appellees.

                      ______________________

                            2014-1379
                      ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-01417-CMH-
 IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

     ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                     ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.,
                        Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                      v.
Case: 14-1379        Document: 25   Page: 2     Filed: 08/28/2014



 2                                  POTTER   v. BREN




        ROBERTA S. BREN AND OBLON SPIVAK,
                Defendants-Appellees,

                              AND

      MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, U.S.
     PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA
                     M. KING,
                Defendants-Appellees.
               ______________________

                           2014-1505
                     ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-01417-CMH-
 IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.
                  ______________________
                          PER CURIAM.
                           ORDER
     On July 24, 2014, this court dismissed-in-part and af-
 firmed-in-part the above-captioned appeals. Mr. Potter
 has now filed a “Motion for an Order to Show Cause,” a
 “Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction in the United States
 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,” and a “Motion
 for Relief from Judgment.”
     To the extent that Mr. Potter is seeking reconsidera-
 tion of this court’s July 24, 2014 order, he has not shown
 entitlement to relief.
      Accordingly,
Case: 14-1379        Document: 25   Page: 3   Filed: 08/28/2014



  POTTER   v. BREN                                            3



       IT IS ORDERED THAT:
       All pending motions are denied.
                                      FOR THE COURT

                                      /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Clerk of Court


 s30
