




Becker v. State



COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

)
DAWN HARRINGTON AS NEXT FRIEND)
OF SAVANNAH McDONALD, A MINOR,)
		   No.  08-02-00464-CV

)
			Appellant,)
			Appeal from

)
v.)
		     143rd District Court

)
ROY F. PEARCE,)
		of Reeves County, Texas

)
			Appellee.)
		(TC# 01-12-17237-CVR)


MEMORANDUM OPINION


	This appeal is before the court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Finding that the Appellant has failed to file a brief or respond
to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
	On March 31, 2003, this Court informed Appellant by letter that her brief was past due and
no motion for extension of time had been filed.  The Court advised Appellant that her appeal would
be dismissed unless she responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be
continued.  See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8.  No reply has been filed.
	This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when
appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for
such failure.  Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63
(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ).  We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a
response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none.  We see no
purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. 
Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c) and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


May 15, 2003						 
 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Panel No. 2
Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.
