
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1335                                RUSSELL BROWN, ET AL.,                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                               WALLY ARMSTRONG, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,                                        _____________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                                 ____________________            Russell M. Brown on brief pro se.            ________________            Lee Carl  Bromberg, Julia Huston, and  Bromberg & Sunstein LLP  on            __________________  ____________       _______________________        brief for Wally Armstrong and Gator Golf Enterprises, Inc.            Scott P. Lewis, Robert L.  Brennan, Jr. and Palmer & Dodge LLP, on            ______________  _______________________     __________________        brief  for appellees  American Telecast  Corporation, Wally  Armstrong        Golf, Inc., Kenny Rogers and Pat Summerall.                                 ____________________                                   NOVEMBER 6, 1997                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.  Plaintiff  Russell Brown has  appealed the                 ___________            grant of  summary judgment in  favor of defendants.   Brown's            appellate brief  is inappropriately  styled  as if  it was  a            motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).  We do not consider            such motions  in the first instance.   In any event,  we have            carefully  considered the parties'  briefs and the  record on            appeal.    Nothing  that  Brown  has  raised in  this  appeal            warrants overturning  the district  court's grant  of summary            judgment.                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                 ________                                         -2-
