          TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


                                         NO. 03-02-00531-CR



                                   Henry Belford Blount, Appellant

                                                     v.

                                     The State of Texas, Appellee




          FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                NO. 51,580, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING



                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION


                After pleading guilty, appellant Henry Belford Blount was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 22.021 (West Supp. 2003). The district court assessed punishment at

imprisonment for thirty years.

                Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d

553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of
counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

                 We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and

without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to

withdraw is granted.

                 The judgment of conviction is affirmed.




                                                 David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: January 24, 2003

Do Not Publish
