IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Plaintiff Below,
Appellee.

DERRICK L. JOHNSON, §
§ No. 628, 2014
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court
§ of the State of Delaware in and
v. § for New Castle County
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 83004982DI
§
§
§

Submitted: February 3, 2015
Decided: April 21, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
O R D E R

This 21St day of April 2015, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening
brief and the appellee’s motion to afﬁrrn, it appears to the Court that:

(l) The appellant, Derrick L. Johnson (“Johnson”), ﬁled this appeal ﬁ'om
3 Superior Court order denying his “motion for relief” from a prior order that
denied his letter requests for a modiﬁcation of sentence. The appellee, State of
Delaware (“State”), has moved to affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the
ground that it is manifest on the face of the opening brief that the appeal is without

merit.I We agree and afﬁrm.

(2) The record reﬂects that, Johnson was indicted in July 1983 for Murder
in the First Degree and other offenses arising from the April 30, 1983 stabbing
death of a fellow inmate, Kevin Harris, when Johnson was nineteen years old. In
June 1984, Johnson pled guilty to Murder in the Second Degree and was sentenced
to life in prison with parole.

(3) Between February and May 2014, Johnson filed a series of letters
requesting that the Superior Court modify or reduce his sentence. By order dated
June 24, 2014, the Superior Court denied the request on the basis that Johnson had
not demonstrated “extraordinary circumstances” sufficient to overcome the time
bar of Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b) (“Rule 35(b)”).2

(4) Johnson did not appeal the Superior Court’s June 24, 2014 order.
Instead, in identical motions ﬁled on July 14 and July 24, 2014, Johnson moved for
“relief” from the June 24, 2014 order under Superior Court Civil Rule 60(b)
(hereinafter “Rule 60(b) motions”), arguing that his “youthfulness and other
mitigating circumstances” warranted the Superior Court’s review of his sentence
“in the interest of justice.” By order dated October 21, 2014, the Superior Court
deemed Johnson’s Rule 60(b) motions as a motion for modiﬁcation of sentence

under Rule 35(b) and denied relief. This appeal followed.

2 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(b) (providing that the court will consider a motion for reduction of

sentence made more than ninety days after sentencing only in extraordinary circumstances or
under 11 Del. C‘. § 4217).

[Q

(5) On appeal, Johnson argues that the Superior Court abused its
discretion when it denied his Rule 60(b) motions without “conducting a plenary
review of the record” under a trilogy of United States Supreme Court decisions that
together bar capital punishment and life sentences without parole for juvenile
offenders} Johnson, however, was not under the age of eighteen when he stabbed
Kevin Harris, and he was not sentenced to life in prison without parole. Under
these circumstances, we ﬁnd no abuse of discretion in the Superior Court’s
summary denial of Johnson’s Rule 60(b) motions as time barred without exception
and repetitive under Rule 35(b).4

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to afﬁrm is

GRANTED. Thejudgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

 

3 See Roper v. Simmons 543 US. 551, 575 (2005) (holding that death penalty cannot be imposed
upon juvenile offenders); Graham v. Florida, 560 US 48, 74-75 (2010) (holding that life in
prison without parole cannot be imposed upon juvenile offenders who did not commit
homicides); Miller v. Alabama, _ U.S. _, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2460 (2012) (holding that
mandatory sentencing schemes imposing life in prison without parole on juvenile homicide
offenders violates the Eighth Amendment).

4 See DeJesus v. State, 2014 WL 2609528 (Del. June 10, 2014) (afﬁrming denial of Rule 35(b)
motion as untimely and repetitive); Railfora' v. State, 2014 WL 44031 (Del. Jan. 2, 2014)
(afﬁrming denial of Rule 35(b) motion when the appellant did not demonstrate that the prison
was not providing adequate medical care, and the prison had not made the required certiﬁcation
under 11 Del. C. § 4217). See also Jackson v. State, 2007 WL 2231072 (Del. Aug. 2, 2007)
(afﬁrming summary denial of Rule 35(b) motion on the basis that relief under civil Rule 60(b)
was not applicable in a criminal proceeding).

