            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                      OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                              No. 09-653V
                                         Filed: March 21, 2014

****************************
JASON STITT, as Personal        *
Representative of the Estate of *
Pamela Wanga Stitt,             *                          Stipulation; Attorney Fees and Costs
                    Petitioner, *
      v.                        *
                                *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH             *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,             *
                    Respondent. *
****************************

F. John Caldwell, Jr., Esq., Maglio, Christopher & Toale PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Glenn MacLeod, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                        DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

        In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 I issued
a decision on November 15, 2013, that awarded compensation pursuant to
respondent’s proffer. On March 14, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation for attorney fees
and costs. The stipulation indicates that after informal discussions regarding petitioner’s
draft fee application, petitioner has amended his fee request. Respondent does not
object to the amended amount petitioner is requesting. Additionally, pursuant to
General Order #9, the stipulation notes that petitioner incurred no personal litigation
costs.



1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44
U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will
delete such material from public access.
2
 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq.
(2006).

                                                      1
       I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a
reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems
reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the total $142,454.003 in
the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel of
record, F. John Caldwell, Jr., for petitioner’s attorney fees and costs.

        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                         s/ Denise K. Vowell
                                         Denise K. Vowell
                                         Chief Special Master




3
 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including
costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924
F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
4
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
See Vaccine Rule 11(a).


                                                     2
