     Case: 11-20214     Document: 00511678270         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/29/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        November 29, 2011
                                     No. 11-20214
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ALBERTO MUNOZ VILLALON, also known as Jose A. Munoz, also
known as Jose Alberto Munoz, also known as Jose Alberton Munoz-Villalon, also
known as Jose Munoz, also known as Jose Abberto Munoz Villalon,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:10-CR-719-1


Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Jose Alberto Munoz Villalon (Munoz)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Munoz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Munoz’s response.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-20214    Document: 00511678270    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/29/2011

                                No. 11-20214

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2
