     Case: 15-50633      Document: 00513420617         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/11/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 15-50633
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        March 11, 2016
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                       Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHNNY COX, JR.,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:14-CR-156-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Johnny Cox, Jr., has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Cox has not filed a response. Although Cox remains subject to a term of
supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon
the revocation of his probation. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-50633     Document: 00513420617     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/11/2016


                                  No. 15-50633

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED
in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States
v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).




                                        2
