                                        NO. 12-18-00202-CR

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

 LYNN DAVID GROSS,                                            §   APPEAL FROM THE 369TH
 APPELLANT

 V.                                                           §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

 THE STATE OF TEXAS,
 APPELLEE                                                     §   ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM
         Appellant, Lynn David Gross, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed
by Appellant and Appellant’s counsel.                     No decision has been delivered in this
appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
Opinion delivered December 21, 2018.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.




                                             (DO NOT PUBLISH)
                                   COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                        DECEMBER 21, 2018


                                         NO. 12-18-00202-CR


                                       LYNN DAVID GROSS,
                                            Appellant
                                               V.
                                      THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                            Appellee


                                Appeal from the 369th District Court
                           of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 29678)

                    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.
                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
