


SMITH V. STATE






NO. 07-08-0507-CR



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL C



MARCH 12, 2009

______________________________



LISA JANELL SMITH, 



Appellant



v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, 



Appellee

_________________________________



FROM THE 31
ST
 DISTRICT COURT OF WHEELER COUNTY;



NO.  4413; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

_______________________________



Dismissal

_______________________________



Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Lisa Smith (appellant) filed an appeal from the trial court’s refusal to reduce her bond, pending an adjudication hearing, from $500,000.00.  On February 20, 2009, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and attached an affidavit wherein he stated that appellant had been released from custody on a personal recognizance bond and that appellant no longer desired to pursue her appeal.  Because the case has become moot, we dismiss the matter.

A case is moot when (1) a party seeks a judgment to resolve a controversy, but no controversy exists, or (2) judgment is sought on a matter which cannot have any practical legal effect on an existing controversy.  
Texas Health Care Info. Council v. Seton Health Plan, Inc.
, 94 S.W.3d 841, 846-47 (Tex. App.–Austin 2002, no pet.).  Because appellant received the relief requested, a controversy no longer exists.  Nor would our proceeding with the appeal and rendering an opinion and judgment have any practical legal effect on an existing controversy.  So, we conclude that the appeal has become moot and dismiss it.  
In re R.M., 
234 S.W.3d 103, 104 (Tex. App.–El Paso 2007, no pet.).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot.



Brian Quinn

          Chief Justice





Do not publish.

 

 

