
USCA1 Opinion

	




          November 17, 1995                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                            ____________________        No. 95-1340                                GERALD MASTRACCHIO, SR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              GEORGE VOSE, JR., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND                       [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]                                           ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                          Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Gerald Mastracchio on brief pro se.            __________________            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department            _________________        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  We  have carefully reviewed the record                      __________            and  briefs.  Plaintiff was not prejudiced by the magistrate-            judge's refusal to continue the  hearing and order the return            of  plaintiff's  legal  papers   because  it  is  clear  that            plaintiff  had no liberty interest in his prison job.  Sandin                                                                   ______            v. Conner,  115 S.Ct. 2293  (1995); Bulger  v. United  States               ______                           ______     ______________            Bureau of Prisons, 65 F.3d 48, 50 (5th Cir. 1995).            _________________                      Affirmed.                      ________                                         -3-
