                                                                         REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION
                                           ORIGINAL                                     25 APR 2017
                                                                                          OSM
                                                                              U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

1Jn tbe Wntteb                 ~tate~ ~ourt                   of jfeberal ~latm~
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No.16-1719V
                                      Filed: March 29, 2017
                                       Not to be Published
                                                                                          MAR 29 2017
*************************************                                                           OSM
                                                                                           U.S. COURT OF
JU WON LEE,                                       *                                       FEDERAi. CLAIMS
                                                  *
                Petitioner,                       •
                                                  *       PPV/23 ("Pneumovax") vaccine;
v.                                                •       not on Vaccine Injury Table;
                                                  •       case dismissed
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               •
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               •
                                                  •
                Respondent.                       •
                                                  •
*************************************
Ju Won Lee, Los Angeles, CA, prose.
Sarah C. Duncan, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

                                              DECISION 1

        On December 30, 2016, petitioner Mr. Lee filed a petition alleging that a PPV/23
("Pneumovax") vaccination in his left deltoid on September 26, 2016 caused him right shoulder
pain. Petition at pages 3, 7, and 9 (because petitioner did not number the pages in his petition
and attached medical records, the undersigned numbered them by hand, starting with page I
which is Mr. Lee's handwritten letter.)

        On February 24, 2017, Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a Scheduling and
Reassignment Order, giving Mr. Lee until March 10, 2017 to call or e-mail Terriesa Felder to set
up an initial status conference and reassigning the case to the undersigned Special Master Laura

1
   Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Govemment Act of2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)
(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that
all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets
or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar
information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a
decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the
document's enclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within
the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access.
D. Millman. Petitioner Mr. Lee failed to contact Terriesa Felder by March 10, 2017 or at any
time thereafter.

        On March 13, 2017, the undersigned issued an Order to Show Cause why this case
should not be dismissed, giving a response date of March 27, 2017. Petitioner did not respond to
this order.

       Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34 (2012),
which established the Vaccine Program, the undersigned does not have authority to decide
whether or not PPV/23 ("Pneumovax") caused him a vaccine injury because PPV /23 is not on
the Vaccine Injury Table. Since the vaccine that petitioner Mr. Lee received is not on the
Vaccine Injury Table, the undersigned must dismiss his case.

       The undersigned ORDERS this case DISMISSED.

                                         DISCUSSION

        Congress created the Vaccine Program in a statute passed in 1986, effective October 1,
1988, to permit the parents of children who had received certain vaccines listed on the Vaccine
Injury Table and reacted to them to receive compensation. Congress created the Vaccine Injury
Table as part of the statute, listing the vaccines recommended for children in the Vaccine Act. In
addition, adults who received the same vaccines recommended for children could also sue under
the Vaccine Act to receive compensation for vaccine reactions. However, if they received a
vaccine not listed on the Vaccine Injury Table, their suits would be dismissed.

        A full description of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ("VICP") is
available at: https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation (last visited: March 9, 2017). In the
website's section on vaccines covered under the VICP is the statement: "Note: Pneumococcal
polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV, PPV) is not a VICP-covered vaccine."
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/coveredvaccines/index.html (last visited: March 9,
2017). The pneumococcal vaccine recommended for children is a conjugate vaccine, which is
different than the polysaccharide vaccine that petitioner Mr. Lee received. One of the names for
the conjugate vaccine is Prevnar, also known as PPV/13. If petitioner Mr. Lee had received
Prevnar (PPV/13) vaccine, which is given to both adults and children, the undersigned would
have authority under the Vaccine Program to decide whether or not he is entitled to
compensation. But, because petitioner Mr. Lee received Pneumovax (PPV/23), a polysaccharide
vaccine, the undersigned does not have authority to decide whether petitioner Mr. Lee is entitled
to compensation under the Vaccine Program.

        Petitioner never responded to the undersigned's Order to Show Cause or to the Chief
Special Master's Order to telephone the undersigned's judicial assistant to set up a telephonic
status conference. Besides dismissing this case because the undersigned does not have authority
to determine if PPV /23 caused Mr. Lee a shoulder injury, the undersigned dismisses this case
under Vaccine Rule 2l(b)(l) for petitioner's failure to obey two orders.

                                                2
        This case is DISMISSED.

                                            CONCLUSION

     This petition is DISMISSED. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to
RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2



IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: March 29, 2017
                                                                       Laura D. Millman
                                                                        Special Master




2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule l l(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                     3
