    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 13-728V
                                       Filed: March 4, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               UNPUBLISHED
JANINE KADILE,                *
                              *                               Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
          Petitioner,         *
                              *                               Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                            *                               Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine;
                              *                               Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”).
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *
                              *
          Respondent.         *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
Claudia Gangi, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

                                            DECISION 1

        On September 25, 2013, Janine Kadile (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).
Petitioner alleged that, as a result of the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on
October 14, 2010, she suffered from a neurological demyelinating injury. Petitioner later
amended her claim to reflect Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as her alleged injury. See
Amended Petition, filed October 11, 2013.

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                  1
         On March 3, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should
be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s
alleged GBS, any other injury, or her current disabilities. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the
joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation
reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth
therein.

       The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $190,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
       amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
       U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       Stipulation ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation. 3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                              s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                              Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                              Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                  2
Case 1:13-vv-00728-UNJ Document 33 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00728-UNJ Document 33 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00728-UNJ Document 33 Filed 03/03/15 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00728-UNJ Document 33 Filed 03/03/15 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00728-UNJ Document 33 Filed 03/03/15 Page 5 of 5
