  NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
           ______________________

   OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
          Plaintiff-Appellant,

                      v.

    HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
          Defendant-Appellee.
        ______________________

               2013-1277
         ---------------------

   OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
          Plaintiff-Appellant,

                      v.

       SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.,
           Defendant-Appellee.
         ______________________

               2013-1278
         ---------------------

   OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
          Plaintiff-Appellant,

                      v.
2   OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS V. HEWLETT-PACKARD
COMPANY

         LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC.,
               Defendant-Appellee.
             ______________________

                     2013-1279
               ---------------------

        OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
               Plaintiff-Appellant,

                            v.

                      DELL INC.,
                   Defendant-Appellee.
                 ______________________

                       2013-1280
                 ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Nos. 12-CV-3125, 12-
CV-3126, 12-CV-3127, and 12-CV-4999, Judge William H.
Alsup.
                ______________________

  Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
                       ORDER
    The judgments of non-infringement in favor of the de-
fendant-appellees Hewlett-Packard Co., Sony Electronics,
Inc., Lenovo, Inc., and Dell, Inc. are affirmed. We base
our decision solely on our agreement with the district
court’s construction of the phrase “wherein the power
control means supply power to said memory integrated
circuit.” Under the parties’ stipulation, our agreement
with this aspect of the district court’s claim construction
OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS V. HEWLETT-PACKARD              3
COMPANY

is sufficient to support the non-infringement judgment.
We do not reach any other issues raised on appeal.


                        AFFIRMED


                                FOR THE COURT

December 12, 2013               /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                       Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court

cc: Bryan G. Harrison
    Paul Alexander
