pages that a're nof poor qhality?‘
at'th.e time_ _of` imaging.

  
    

_ l "1 »""`d'i ‘G/€G .
“ ~ " ' ~ 411 1011»4131’151§§14\
111/11)1:1®4\1 401/4 WK®UUCBTFQW %€C£M§M' j j

441/144 1344 3 @<1411144€1@ 411§§4;5 13 4
4;341413161 fri A§ 1;1\1 51/11@’00» '

  
  

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

` ~QQ11/141\11111 44114114114110114114 F111141441<1140 11011~1111
1 <'§14144 141 413@451111111 41111§44111 1415 1411ch
WUJMU\)Q§/ H/M'M 4:\\111_(@€/41’€`1§1 4404`l 411 §

/.
‘:j _

  
 

530 1.1<’1'13) _- _. _-\- ;\§S‘E"
411 14€111:144111114‘ ,
10114131'1 §`5441 1061/4131“1§33¥'» '"
1:§§411/<1\41 ?> 141414’1;114, 1111/1341/_1€ 194114\/11€10
411§1/11\11*4:10’ 1411\1.10 1<1*€4/1/1144\110€0 1414/114 ©1<10@4>

”*" m 10<1;5\/\/1£3$/ 5&/ 431,1/'1/1'?( \/ 201/gwalle §
434 434 1413 41"®< 1441 3111/4~11“411111131112>>
1 ~' 1014 1444-§§ 44114441§

1/11\111 1444144':114 4133144">1 4441141€143\14
114/c §\/41@13;17:\14,1[ ©1”£1141011@41141 514/411

.. ' ;~;14_-\_ 4§4\<114§4?_14"11, 1411 .
1:114141€§4 14~1’11 333411111 1:1\1§”14144 11144\14 x

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

   
   

4115®1\5151 1/1“1\5@ UJTU 11501 <.1`51/141412`/ `
` 416 C 14 \211421` 1§32 452{51€1255 12515%

5£51>145 1344 -,,1/5‘/111414454 f
1064145<4<15% 1114 45/15¢45\11242 51"14"""@`“`

~ 1144 QQN)BWMvaI/?C
1421:4®\711;3§€§2 4§,(51§115\(:>5 455 5 "~ --:_,
WM§T 1211441>[ 5 344 311/114 ova 551/45 1424145”
1251 54 4 12545 1/155141;1~11;"4
54:15424 5511215 401114545151@ 41411212111512115 51~14146»115
1111/55 35/5115 1542€ 154/§ §121@1¢:41~5154{ 1151d 121 cnw/1a-

_LUHAN\IT( §21151"§115\2 4§5151‘11<?5\ Q514))H§11_1_
,1:\ 124 (1\\/1£“\"1®(11\1 ®1_£ L1/4'\./\1 SJ€§( '

;1;5_15 gnma 312-1146 1415va 115155

54’6145114/53, 11435 341/1144j 5€4144‘/ '

v11@v@150v1\5 151 451 12111241\161*6 514151114 164 v</v1136z
151\5 151564|'1 1514 ' 415@‘4§§€54 435612€11°>5-'¢1.4'
1514 1:1\1 5§§15431(115(541§1 15 1§%45)1/54421“111;°54 515§

~ -`

- 15142111 154 CA\AWVJ\AW§LC 3141\5 14114244;447
L)JIM 1545 515/114 ;15\5 1455 411\125 151a 1€121471_5
~ -¢. 11€115\41511\ 151 1121\55 45114 255 115455
1541;5 1245/1511 1055@0\54 1514 1151@1121:51\1 64 6511:.~
1061\512411511/1/11</14 145 151151552112145 411,5§5 414§
<'_1545/114'14 111541€51/11j 154':1"€_____. 11151131151\5 1/1141445/11 <15\241`
. 5 . U <.@1/11121`5 16141154}45115/15

4 " 1 ’ "’ "*.-if.:‘514134111411)0415 ~
, 55 §§ 41 11\4141515 1455-5 115111 ;1:35121411‘;> WMM

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

.. 5',. Z'

19&1111:1134 1114 1\13114151101~@€33111\1& 3141 1/1/1&341115
. ‘ _ ‘~ 13113 UDMMWG/?L mw"
513 111£,141311'1 1413 3/ 1111141317"1@~4 1111114~
11111"1 431 1/114311111;1_§ **

_ 3651 ' " ~ 1111 511131:111711
1364 11 131 111:1<11§1416144/1311:111 30135`> 51:1111:1114
143§1‘111€3€@ 111/310@€ 14111111;1111411`,31]`
1111\1& 1411 1114161111\111/1661\11`, 1/1144' 411)11

111me 114/c 311/1115 115 15411§@§13 11\11114
_ 14114/14§,111‘1 114/111 55 . 1
- - 1 1@1\31:510111 @QQW<’B ' '

 

 

 

 

    

"*1:131~1111411;01\1 313\111 311111 3015 16\/ 114/1:,
411/14111011111\11 01 1430 541 33111111111 161
1111/151 1/11:131 11114116 131§<111131&1@ 151:~?':» 1313/59
564 MW31,3M491 3663 1311 1111/1144
1401/1301 131‘11<111111;113 14193:11/111)‘€,145
111146\14< 1114161<751411'111 _;; 1 16055£1\‘11131

_ 15111€14 111114:510111110111 1@ 14 '
~ 1141 1411/1@1<.@1/114/111439111110141//11)€

3 1 6141\1€5~1111 w ~11::111_ v 4'

31?<1414,1‘5 <.15111141* 14141:<);16@\11/ ' 115
651@ 1114 10114@1@1~ 1111 04 111/11414143¢1

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

  
 
  

 

 

1113 111 11»11®<@3‘904 110114131111/114146/11;351/1€1\11139
'1“-»41 ,\.1§'/”1- 344 1116 1311 131 1111 11411111414141414)

' 111 173 (1'167(1§ C"Z` 1991 111 (1`1"10 1111411/11/<'14’1:§?”1111 3 11960/

zwwm 6161 361 30 31(111 113 -40'145/61331
.3413461/114 313144660 3103341 ' W,/i
<  1166/663410/ 411 1364 341/33\)6 3436316341

1336/16 >‘ 6611\/141“1 1114)061461:133 1144 61456

\114-”_1 31130 33141:34 630330 4466631061
14)44613446 331/35 10636@11 1314 '

666/11 p146345 611 wwwr§mv 1131105 1466

 

5 -- L? / 661 SLMBd 431!5 4(`0_ 6 CT]@(/ 1444 1011‘111{/4;

161341/,145 1411 1444613446 611314/6 316 14146 1 4 3
. 1303/110 :/4/ 6”63<35/11 5 631/1411 5314

  

" 661/341 \431110”14144'141/13 1111 1363\1 113134~

14311610(331411 1333/666 44 x 14\'1134 1411

..-

 

 

64 131 4\1144430 433 435(”614144111151611 30041.`

 

 

 

.. .- 111/1614 33010104'>111@ :L

 

566 1113»§611 433/51144'30 3460141\/6§131160
5313 10631`633

014 5114¢111\ 643 60 163/411
5 ' 631/1141 636/1660 33141;106616311
' 441466344`6 60314/ 036/ 1534

 

 

 

,_.6;0631:1131\ 336 061413314% mw

136 146'13310` 1164 3141 301 614/1430 10>/ 1

11301`_€0/1/{/61\11` 1465 6\11110) LOCK’|DM 6 S"’SOH

33351111111` 561/365 1566 1111/13 1411

61111463 36 3141 631/340‘610 / 141/431 31610\134
314134 313 111~3110333<14 1464 461135

3111114143116 1 331/1 56141434 611 1440/134
1110 1111 2631/1 5 ~ 1310 14 ».;,.31\)3`4/1~

   

34 44134:,4443, 43 444449444 43<44`3
444';4”4:4%4474 444\44€ QOVWU:UUTFQW 444444/€544`
…4‘44444/4/4444 /*`44.4§4415£34 ’3'3'31(4@
44 5€44 344/444 4 444\4444\44443343 3333 ?>Dw/
344 034/444 5441\4/*44\44®4\4& 444344_4;4_\4__4§_4<_\;_<43’_@_
464_£44\4/441\44444 4443(43€13/1441444 1413 344 SIUGQ~
30 1444 WWOGKES§ 4/’4/4”’7474 4`7/4/€ WCf/\ASGQ
43"€€4\4 4344444/444446°/ 4/4444@€1§4"€49 1/44\440 46§4\4

341\';33€ 44 4/4/4/4/4614:134434/444 4)… 3444:4\4 44/€ 4:3
U\>_\OJ:UW 444 344/444€40 <<44443430 44 436/4744

~ '- 445 343/445 344 ~ '
34444/444444 044@3\43: <113344 3413€13 4 - .
3466/344 9 454 4443€4/… 544 4:4'/444 34 334
34433 434442 344/34 44 344441/4444444300 343
3444444€'3 44ka44‘/ 44 33~34')4(44 lEN:

35 4` 41€4) (4\44]/4/4 »‘*:CGIWW`;(: 414 44444

344_3444»4<443 44 33 3003/434 44 243 304 444

343 .- ' /444) 3333 444 334 334/144
3044,/ 4.4;4:4\4@ MX,(@M,@M 33443/44 344\434~
l 374/4404)4/14 4<’;444443 344 434 443va 04\4
444/434;4/44 <44434/43 344 44 4443< 36 446/4244 **'
44 444{4< 444 334/444441/44414§74 44/4%423404: UZDO/\/
kaDT 333 333 44 3 543/333 434 334
l 443;4:3_ \4<;_4@34§3 534 444441343\4 434 3434%44,>4
~ l x- 4 f .15"`.4 44 , " .

MTG<_FMT 344€34 44,444434 33344`€344€4:44440444

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

   

14455674 6614 1461/4 614 34141:§1§)1:6113015 4

14111\1611 6111\151;51'164 614 » . ‘
146166‘5 1414144016 01\16. 164 1/1/6/11'11/1\141>1614 __4
1145 544/116 14141666 111412642 111 110416114
61/1/141/€/4/\/1/6/<.(1141 1<'_@611412 1014 14 1461/1113 5

1166/65 661/114126114611446411 1111-14 1421 66111\~16
1414€41~46\1“1151 19651/1/11:5560/ 1/11\110 561

11§1146 666141411 1410 5146116<:111 /1;6664146j

1141411141414 6141€6114 __'.j' * '~ ~
' ` 6666 UT 6&46(§11 (_/WGH)@ ';__i

8661644§1<10611414141114146463 51:5 ~
141 11166101;1\141 611/1551/11\1 61511416/3416 561:1¢1
. 424 436 1566 1/11(4;14111 1 4412 651/1414
1111§’§1§11415‘1 5441~14141»1 1146/40
46441 611661 616 1' ~
1/<’/6 1416\/63€5 3765

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

II.LLOCK 1416 601 1 690@6\61463;351/1/63)46061413117

.- _431'1, 1144411-1§~?>'<121161<14411~6:>1>6
MW 1444 1114/1 7114 1111(141/ / 136 l ~'
' 4 45461§ 141411146‘1461 141611644 614/1444

414 L11161/’ 3161115 66111§151/1146‘11161)1 621:331,1,613
1111 141446459 566<141§1156 144664) ,4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l`l/€C@@l ` 7 JA(]

lQ/€ L@CW gil7 @5'5( rn<l<\a>)_‘l-S`§:z'¢, :,oc)<'_lan<s:>~“l

' _‘ No. 40,789-B-H-2

  

 

 

EX PARTE § IN THE 124TH DISTRI '

§ z

§ INAND Fev »

§ .
BRYAN wILLIAMS § GREGG CoUNTY, TEXAS

sTATE’S. REsPoNsE To PETITIONER’S
APPLICATION FoR
wRIT oF HABEAS CoRPUs

 

TO THE»HONORABLE ]UDGE OF SAID COURT:

THE sTA'rE oF TEXAs, opposes P¢tirion@r’g writ OfHab@as corpus

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE
The applicant,"`Bryan Williarns, is confined ianDC_J-I{D because of`his _

conviction and sentence in Gregg County cause number 40,789¥13. Williams was
charged with the felony offense of possession of a controlled.substance (Count I)
and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon (Count II). (App_endix A:

` Indictment). Afcer being admonished that he could face consecutive sentences if he.
went to trial on both counts separately, he elected.severance of the two counts and
jur-y trials on both.` 3 RR 5 -7. The jury found him guilty _of possession of a controlled
substance and sentenced him to 75 years. (Application, ~Appendix G: Judgment~¥

Count I)'. After a jury was seated and testimony had begun on Count H, he pleaded

guilty and was sentenced by the judge to 5 years, tQ_ run consecutively to the 75-year l

40

sentence (Application Appendix H: Judgment-Count Il). was sentenced by the

judge to five years in prison to run consecutively to the 75-year' sentence. ./'d. He is

confined at the Allred Unit as TDCJ inmate number 1784621.

II. APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS

Williams claims that the municipal court judge and trial court judge lacked ` l
jurisdiction, both personal and subject~matter jurisdiction over him due to a void

search warrant affidavit

(‘ * '
llI. NECESSITY FOR AN EVH)ENTIARY HEA`RING AND EXFANSION OF
THE RECORD.

The record needs no expansion Williarns need not be retumed 'to Gregg

County for a hearing.`

z IV. ARGUMENT ANDAUTHORITIES.
_ ( v

l) This is a subsequent Writ application, not subject to any exception.
This is a`subsequent request for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. While there are

exceptions for subsequent writs applications applicant has failed to alleged that his

request falls within one.of those exceptions He alleges that his claims of subject-

2_ AH

_ 1

T~veei(ool . jj

»
matter jurisdiction can never be waived, and that he only recently obtained a copy of
the “defective void Exh. A l from my family member.” The record and facts were
complete when Applicant filed his first application for writ of habeas coipus. ~
7 Application Exhibit A l is the affidavit for search warrant signed by Kilgore Police 4
Department officer Brady L. i\/liddlebrool<s and used to obtain aj search warrant for
the blue 1994 Cadillac in which Williams.had been seen sitting The search Warrant
affidavit was not'offered into evidence at Williarns’ trial. No issue was made of the

search warrant affidavit’s validity at the hearing .on motion to suppress See

l Appendix A, Reporter’s Record from-hearing

' If there had been a problem With the search Warrant affidavit, the issue could

      

have been raised in awaontaeuaai;ess,enn

ien*_`_P'ur_suant to TEX. CODE CRiM. PROC. Art. lliO_'/', §4,. applicant’s writ

 

should be dismissed

2_) _ Williams states he has a- petition or appeal pending in the Eastern
District of B'eaumont, under Cause Number 06:15CV0005.

C'ause-number l0'6:15(_3'\/0005 in the Beaurnont Federa_l Court is related to .
Cause'nurnber 40,789-B, the conviction under scrutiny here. As a matter of fact, the
magistrate’s report states that Williams used the same memorandum of law for his
federal habeas that he used in his first state habeas application See Appendix B,

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Iudge. The magistrate’s 4

" ' , 42 `

' _ -Tr'l/€t.€;‘©`@l

report was signed on luly 9, 20115, and explains that Williams has 14 days to respond
to it, so as of the date of this response, it is technically still pending although a ruling
has been made to deny relief requested as well as to deny a certificate of
appealability v

3) The claim of lack of jurisdiction lacks merit.

If his claim is considered on the merits, it should be denied for the following
reasons Williams claims that Exhibit Al is the affidavit used to secure a search

warrant for a car in which Williams consistently denied any interest The affidavit

was not,~therefore, made a part of the record of this case because the search was

never an issue.

Mr. Williarns complains that the affidavit is void for non-compliance with

ss@rsssalata) (»2 (4) ( ) (»:/7). see

 

assessments "
Application Memorandurn at 2.

The two statutes Williams alleges were not followed do not refer to search
warrant affidavits They refer to charging instruments for misdemeanor offenses
called complaints Wiliiams’ Exhibits A (1) and A (2) are, collectively, the affidavit ’

sworn to by Officer Middlebrool<s in order to get the warrant to search the abandoned

   
 

|, 4_‘..\.;..-.',~_ ms -.‘-'.
a~» art .
.; .='§v.¢_-` _,., 1

car which Williams claimed was not his. l' UHRBQIGPVMI§IWWQABLWM@

‘~ asamredbysaawieas@la

4 l 1 usa

T.lae(aot `_ jt§

Williams’ls sole ground for relief is frivolous and meritless and should be

denied.

~ V. CONCLUSION

- The State prays this Court recommend that the application be denied.

Respeetfully submitted,

CARL L.- DORROUGH
Criminal District Attorney
Gregg County, Texas

By.: %Q//I &£dj~n/ w

Wrdson Brown
istant District Attorney

State Bar No. 03205 900

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

l certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing “State’s Response to
Applicant’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus” was given to the District Clerk
of Gregg County, Texas, on _ July 20, 2015, to be mailed to Applicant, Bryan
Williams, 1784621, Allred Unit, 2101 FM 369 N, Iowa Park, TX 763 67.

 

Assistant District Attorney '
State Bar No. 03205900

5 » 15

 

No. 40,789-13-1¢1_.2[l »

EX‘PARTE § IN-THE 124THDISTRICT CoURT '
§ .
§ rN AND FoR
BRYAN erLlAMs § GREGG CoUNTY, rangest
. ' ‘ ‘ GREGG coumy, T;_.-_XAS
k . int 2 8 2015 _`
FINAL oRDER AND ~ %U'“”’A`m
~ Fn\n)lncs oF FACT AND CoNcLUsloNs on LAw - ' fWa./)
oN APPLICATroN FoR wRIT or .HABEAS CoRPUs g 3

Having considered the Applicant’s Application for Post¢Conviction Writ of`
Habeas corpus the State’s Answer, along with reviewing the record in the case, and
the materials submitted; the Court recommends that the application be DISMISSED
as a subsequent writ, or, if considered on its merits, DENTED., 4

The Court specifically finds as follows:

l) 'l`he police saw Williams exiting a car and later found the car to be
locked. ~ -

2) williams denied that the car was his.
3) The police, after determining that no one else at the location claimed to
own the car, had the car towed, obtained a search warrant and searched

_ the car, finding controlled substance, and several -of` Williams’ personal
items connecting Williams to the car and its contents

'4) Williams was than indicted and his arrest was pursuant to a warrant '

following a grand jury indictment

 

T\l/€r€<a©

5) Williams’ attorney filed a motion to suppress, claiming that his
warrantless arrest was without probable cause, but not making any

claim about the search of the car.

6) Williams’ motion to suppress any statements made after a warrantless
arrest was denied because it was not a warrantless arrest.

@ -Williams could have raised any issue regarding the search warrant
affidavit ‘could have been raised at themotlon»to suppress corr*'direct

 

' The Court makes the following conclusions of law:

1) This is a subsequent writ, not subject to any exceptionl
2)- Williams has a federal habeas pending on this conviction.

3) Williams waived his right to complain about the search warrant affidavit by
denying any interest in the car. ~

4) The complaint that the search warrant affidavit lacked language required of
misdemeanor complaints lacks merit and rs frivolous

The clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a transcript to include the
applicant’s Application for Post-Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus, the State’s

Answer with appendices a copy oftb e indictment the judgment for Countl, and a

 

W.`HO’ : 1 j ' air

copy of these findings and send it to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin,' Texas.

The clerk is further directed to forward a copy of these findings to the applicant

~ iuL 2 2015
erNED en 7

 

O`/t%
1 / ,

 

- c--,-‘y_ ..,

 

 

 

few i"f`l©’n\l& l;:f:iiez> 7;<. <De\lti/tl5 ©)Q

WW CiWV‘/l§ ®N ij \/oiio/ fiath©iai°e79
‘Q_Sii/ii‘® C WU l`al<l€ssr/ wagon criminals

» i:i»> \/l/ly §e/ii<o/i ~ iari@r:wi wish o/.//oaw/i/A/t~?a
° ®i\) I~A(J@o`il \i\ia§ ii 610 :n\t owe camera salt
iii/iia re crowler wW/t §§_Qtil<’iej\ii siler
175 only r\»,\io seol:toi\)§ note <; w iio oiqsiiai/ii

 

 

' J€laieC/r/,/iaiei€®r w;iai:\______';iQ/isi\irf iaia$\w civ stool/ao
.WW i`:§ 15 Q§ l_§©$ :/.45 ots.~a$oi<i

i\a ne/ oi/<f iean

 

 

