     Case: 18-20095      Document: 00514625675        Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/31/2018




          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 18-20095
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                         August 31, 2018
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

REYNALDO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.




                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 4:17-CR-601-1




Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo



      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-20095    Document: 00514625675     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/31/2018


                                 No. 18-20095

Hernandez-Hernandez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Hernandez has not filed a response.

      We have reviewed the brief and the relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2
