Filed 5/5/14 In re Jasmine L. CA2/2
                  NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                     SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                  DIVISION TWO


In re JASMINE L., a Person Coming Under                              B250500
the Juvenile Court Law.                                              (Los Angeles County
                                                                     Super. Ct. No. CK97505)


LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
FAMILY SERVICES,

         Plaintiff and Respondent,

         v.

PAUL L. et al.,

         Defendants and Appellants.



         APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Anthony Trendacosta, Juvenile Court Referee. Affirmed.
         Suzanne Davidson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant Paul L.
         Karen J. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant Carmen L.
         John F. Krattli, County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel,
Aileen Wong, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
       Carmen L. (Mother) and Paul L. (Father) appeal from a juvenile court dependency
disposition. Mother pleaded no contest to battering her daughter in August 2012, and the
court sustained allegations that Father battered the child in January 2013. Both parents
inflicted visible injuries on the child, but claim there is no basis for removing her from
parental custody. The disposition order is amply supported by the evidence. We affirm.
                                          FACTS
       Mother and Father are the parents of Jasmine L., born in 1998. In January 2013,
police went to the family home, where yelling and screaming were heard. Father told
officers that Mother asked him to physically discipline Jasmine because she was not
listening to Mother. He spanked Jasmine on her “butt” and arm several times with an
open hand. Jasmine’s older sibling L.L. mentioned that Mother and Father hit her when
she was younger. Jasmine said that whenever her parents “are upset with her, they resort
to physical discipline,” striking her “all over her body.” In response, “Mother admitted
that Jasmine’s statement was true.”
       The incident was reported to the Department of Children and Family Services
(DCFS). When reached by telephone, Father declined to “cooperate with the
investigation because they have already been through this with DCFS.” Later, Father
stated that Jasmine was “disrespectful” so he spanked her with an open hand, denying
that he would ever hurt her. Mother telephoned the social worker and said that “Jasmine
just received a good spanking from her father” for being disrespectful.
       Jasmine informed the social worker that Mother became angry when Jasmine
failed to turn off her computer. At Mother’s request, Father came from his nearby home
to discipline Jasmine. He pushed her to the ground, injuring her arm, which was red and
swollen. There were scratches on Jasmine’s wrist and on both legs. While Jasmine was
pinned to the floor, Father hit her on the behind. This is not the first time that Father has
hit her.
       In light of Jasmine’s physical injuries, and the parents’ history of child abuse
accusations, Jasmine was detained. L. and Mother showed no emotion as Jasmine left.
Jasmine is in therapy due to anger issues, and the family blames her for involving DCFS.

                                              2
Jasmine said that “she wants to go home, but she just wants her father to leave her alone
and stay away from her.”
       When informed that DCFS received two referrals regarding Jasmine, Father
“stated that the allegations are false and he knows how to appropriately discipline his
child.” Father stopped speaking to the investigators when told that Jasmine had
complained that her hair was pulled, her arm was twisted, and she was driven to Malibu
to avoid anyone hearing her screams. The police discovered that Father was listed as a
suspect in a crime report for child abuse involving Jasmine, from 2012.
       Mother denied physically disciplining Jasmine. Mother fears that Jasmine
communicates with strangers on the computer late at night. Jasmine cursed at Mother,
who asked Father to come over and talk to Jasmine. When Father grabbed Jasmine to
force her to her feet, the child scooted onto the floor and Father spanked her. When
asked why Jasmine had marks and bruises from an August 2012 altercation with Mother,
Mother replied that the police lie and “make up stuff”; however, the police have photos of
Jasmine’s injuries. Mother denied past encounters with DCFS, and had to be reminded
that a social worker came to her home in August, September and October of 2012.
Mother did not recall those incidents. Mother felt that Jasmine became defiant in 2011,
when she received a computer. Mother has been too busy since 2011 to put parental
controls on Jasmine’s computer.
       Jasmine advised the social worker that she has had physical altercations with her
sister, brother, and Mother. In August, she and Mother had a fight and her sister L.
“jumped in and helped her mother.” A police report indicates that Mother ended up
straddling Jasmine and banging her head against the tile floor of the bathroom several
times; Mother then poured alcohol into the wounds on Jasmine’s face, causing the child
to scream with pain. Mother stuffed a towel in Jasmine’s mouth to silence her.
Jasmine’s brother disapproved of a website Jasmine was visiting in November 2012, took
her computer and smashed it, provoking a physical altercation. Jasmine is regularly
disciplined, when Mother calls Father to come over and punish her. Jasmine does not



                                             3
like Father “because he puts his women before his children.” When Jasmine’s siblings
were younger, the police came to the house after Father hit the children.
       The family has a history of child abuse referrals dating to 2002, which were
deemed unfounded. Beginning in September 2012, DCFS began investigating whether
Father physically abused Jasmine, noting that he “does smack the child around,” and her
anger toward him was growing. In October 2012, Jasmine reported being punched by her
older brother.
       DCFS filed a petition alleging that Father physically abused Jasmine on
January 20, 2013, and on prior occasions in 2012, causing bruises, scratches and
swelling; Mother physically abused Jasmine on August 26, 2012, and on other occasions
in 2012, striking the child’s head against the bathroom floor, inflicting bruising and
scratches, and muffling the child’s cries by putting a towel in her mouth; and Mother and
Father caused serious physical harm and failed to protect the child.
       The juvenile court found a prima facie case for detaining Jasmine. Mother and
Father denied the allegations. DCFS was ordered to assess the child and her family,
including her physical and psychological status. The parents were given monitored
visitation. In February 2013, Jasmine was placed with a paternal aunt.
       DCFS interviewed the family for the jurisdiction/disposition report. Mother stated
that she and Jasmine have a good relationship, but Jasmine changed when she reached
puberty. Jasmine began communicating with strangers on the computer, culminating in
the events of the night of January 20, 2013, when Jasmine became angry and verbally
abusive after Mother directed her to turn off the computer. L. called Father, who entered
Jasmine’s bedroom. Mother saw Jasmine on the floor and Father was spanking her while
Jasmine fought him. The police came and handcuffed Father. Mother denied that
Jasmine sustained any injuries in the altercation.
       Jasmine expressed fear of Father during her interview with DCFS. She said, “He
will get in my face and force me to talk to him. I just know that something will or is
about to happen with him when he’s angry. I think that we will end up in physical
fights.” Jasmine admitted that she was disrespectful to Mother when told to sign off the

                                             4
Internet. L. telephoned Father, who arrived and threw Jasmine to the floor onto her
stomach. When she tried to wiggle away, he began “to wrestle with me and we roll[ed]
around on the floor and my mom is just standing there watching. The neighbors must
have heard me and they probably called the police,” who came and handcuffed Father.
       The following day, Mother drove with Jasmine to pick up Father, though Jasmine
was still upset about their fight and did not want to talk. In the back seat, Jasmine
scrunched down onto the floor, and Father “started to push all his weight on me to make
it uncomfortable. He told me that we were going to drive somewhere where this time
nobody could hear me scream.” When Jasmine tried to jump out of the car to get away
from Father, he tied her shoes together. Then Mother and Father had an argument about
Mother’s failure to discipline Jasmine, and eventually they dropped Father off.
       Jasmine met with a social worker at school, after which Father came to Jasmine’s
school and made embarrassing scenes. Jasmine was in tears and informed her tutor that
she could not participate because Father was “out of control.” Father had L. chase her,
and Jasmine thought she was going to be punched. Father then began chasing Jasmine.
She ran away and jumped into Mother’s car. The argument continued in the car, so
Jasmine tried to leave the car and L. tried to hit her. As Jasmine ran toward her school,
Father pulled her into his car and told her “he didn’t know if he likes me as a person
anymore.” Later that day, DCFS social workers showed up with police officers.
       L. described Jasmine as being “out of control.” L. opined that Father is “not the
type of person to whoop any kids because he’s a teacher and knows how to communicate
with kids.” Jasmine was defiant and cursing when Father arrived, so “he spanked her on
her butt with his hand. She was [ ] screaming like if she was dying,” and fought back. L.
denied that she and her brother were hit, “maybe we got a spanking on our butt or a time
out but that’s it.” L. denied witnessing any other physical altercations between Father
and Jasmine. She believed that Jasmine was seeking attention the wrong way by
communicating with strangers in online chat rooms. L. noted that Jasmine punched
Mother in the face and kicked holes in the walls of the house, but acknowledged that



                                              5
Jasmine’s friend committed suicide in September 2012, and Jasmine felt guilty because
she did not realize that her friend was being bullied.
       Mother stated that she “was trying to subdue” Jasmine in August 2012 to prevent
her from leaving the house at night, and “if I did scratch her it was on accident.” She did
not strike Jasmine’s head against the floor. Mother does not know how Jasmine got the
marks and bruises shown in police photographs taken that day, “but we were rolling
around because she was trying to leave. I know that I shouldn’t have held her down.”
Jasmine stated that she and Mother had a fight over a cell phone, resulting in scratches to
Jasmine’s face that “could have been from being dragged on the floor by my mom.”
Jasmine hid in the garage: when the family found her there, Father yelled and “smacked
me in my head a couple of times.”
       Mother, who works at a insurance agency, is bonded with Jasmine despite the
recent problems. Mother opined that “we need a break,” but she wants to work on her
parenting skills and have Jasmine come home. Jasmine enjoys living with her aunt and is
content with the DCFS recommendation that she not return home. She is mature,
articulate for her age, and is enrolled in a magnet program.
       DCFS suggested that Mother and Father fail to control their anger when dealing
with Jasmine’s behavior, hitting her in the head, pulling her hair, and banging her head on
the floor. Their actions caused physical injuries and pain, negatively impacted her
emotional well-being, and led to a risk of severe injury because Jasmine attempted to
jump from a moving car while trying to escape from her parents. DCFS recommended
that Jasmine be removed from parental custody due to a substantial danger to her physical
health and safety and to her emotional well-being.
       Father expressed dismay at the allegations against him. He came to Mother’s
home after L. telephoned to say that Jasmine was cursing at Mother. He likes to talk to
his children and “would rather them fear that I am going to do something rather than
doing something to them.” Jasmine displayed a bad attitude and a fighting stance toward
Father, so “I turned her over on her stomach and she swung at me. . . . I gave her four



                                              6
taps on her butt but she was trying to bite me and hit me in the face,” then the police
arrived. Father described the allegations as “ludicrous and beneath me” and “barbaric.”
       The following day, Jasmine became belligerent in the car, tried to kick gearshift
lever and jump out of the vehicle when “we were simply going to talk.” They were
driving because he did not want the neighbors to call the police. Father described himself
as good with children in his work as a substitute teacher. He did not witness the incident
in which Mother allegedly struck Jasmine, hit her head on the bathroom floor and tried to
muffle her with a towel, but he does not believe that Mother would harm Jasmine. The
DCFS report noted that Father would have seen the injuries to Jasmine’s face, as shown
in police photographs, after Mother’s fight with Jasmine.
       The family participated in a Team Decision Meeting with DCFS. During the
meeting, Jasmine described incidents of domestic violence between her parents and
expressed fear that Mother will not protect her from Father if she is returned to parental
custody. Mother allows Father to control situations, and Jasmine feels threatened by
physical retaliation if she returns home. The child’s caregiver reported that Mother and
Father were having unmonitored telephone conversations with Jasmine, in violation of
court order. Jasmine’s therapist believes that the child copes with “bizarre family
interactions” and fears that Father will remove Jasmine from a program geared toward
helping the child with college readiness. Given the parents’ repeated violations of court
orders, and Jasmine’s fear of Father, DCFS did not recommend voluntary services, or that
the child be returned home. After Mother and Father attended a single session of therapy,
Father terminated counseling, saying they did not need it.
       The petition was adjudicated on May 8, 2013. Mother pleaded no contest to
abusing Jasmine by hitting the child’s face and striking her head against the bathroom
floor, inflicting bruises and scratches on the child’s face, chest and arms, and placing a
towel in the child’s mouth to prevent her from making any sound. On other occasions,
Mother struck the child. The physical abuse was excessive and caused unreasonable pain
and suffering, endangering the child’s health and safety.



                                              7
       Father submitted stipulated testimony showing that on January 20, 2013, Jasmine
and Mother had an altercation and Father was called to the home. He began to talk to
Jasmine and attempted to pull her off the couch. When she fought back, he held her with
both hands to restrain her while she was kicking, hitting and flailing. He spanked her
with an open hand and let her off the floor when she calmed down. Her scratches and
bruises resulted from her kicking and flailing on the floor. A few days later, Jasmine
became upset and out of control, and tried to exit a moving vehicle. She also kicked the
car out of gear. Father restrained Jasmine until she calmed down.
       Jasmine’s attorney stated that Mother was “looking into” services, though she had
not started them; nevertheless, Jasmine felt that Mother “is taking responsibility” and
wished to return to Mother, with monitored visitation for Father. Father continued to
deny that he harmed Jasmine but acknowledged that the situation “could have possibly
been handled differently.” Father was willing to submit to the court’s jurisdiction, based
on Mother’s no-contest plea, which created dependency jurisdiction. DCFS noted that
Mother violated court orders preventing unmonitored visits, so her visits should remain
monitored.
       The court cited Jasmine’s statements in DCFS reports expressing fear of Father.
Rejecting the veracity of Father’s stipulated testimony, the court sustained an allegation
that Father has an anger management problem and “on two occasions engaged in combat
with the child.” He physically abused Jasmine on January 20, 2013, by pulling her to the
ground, injuring her arms and legs. The combat caused the child excessive pain and
suffering, endangers her health and safety, and places her at risk of harm.
       The court ordered reunification services. While Jasmine played a part in the
family’s problems, the court said that “to put her back in the same position that she was,
at this point, without [ ] services actually beginning in place and people getting insight, is
asking that we just begin this cycle all over again. . . . As we can see from the facts, these
are not one-time incidents. . . . [B]ut when Jasmine acts out, the parents react in
inappropriate ways. And I have no guarantee, especially in light of the other factors, in
terms of following court’s orders, that she isn’t going to continue to act out. And the

                                              8
parents, without some insight into how they can better manage their responses to
Jasmine, we’re going to be right back here with another incident and another fight.”
       The court declared Jasmine a dependent of the court and found that “continuance
in the home of the parents is contrary to the child’s welfare and that a substantial danger
exists to [her] physical health, safety, protection, physical and emotional well-being.
There are no reasonable means in which the child may be protected without removal.” It
placed Jasmine in the custody of DCFS and ordered Father to complete an anger
management program, a parenting class appropriate for teenagers and individual
counseling to address case issues. Mother was ordered to complete a parenting class and
individual counseling. Father, Mother and Jasmine were ordered to participate in
conjoint family counseling. The parents were authorized to have monitored visits. Once
the family began counseling, the court would consider liberalizing visitation.
                                      DISCUSSION
1. Appeal and Review
       Father and Mother appeal from the disposition, which is an appealable order.
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 395; In re Sheila B. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 187, 196.) We review
the order to see if any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, supports it.
(In re Heather A. (1996) 52 Cal.App.4th 183, 193.) “‘“In making this determination, we
draw all reasonable inferences from the evidence to support the findings and orders of the
dependency court; we review the record in the light most favorable to the court’s
determinations; and we note that issues of fact and credibility are the province of the trial
court.”’” (In re I.J. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 766, 773.)
2. Sufficiency of the Evidence
       Mother and Father contend that insufficient evidence underlies the juvenile court’s
determination that a substantial danger is posed to Jasmine’s physical health, safety,
protection or emotional well-being if the child is returned home, and that there is no
reasonable means to protect her without removing her from Mother’s custody. (Welf. &
Inst. Code, § 361, subd. (c)(1).) They acknowledge that the juvenile court “‘has broad
discretion to determine what would best serve and protect the child’s interest and to

                                              9
fashion a dispositional order in accordance with this discretion.’” (In re Corrine W.
(2009) 45 Cal.4th 522, 532; In re Jose M. (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 1098, 1103-1104.) In
making its determination, the court considers “a broad spectrum of evidence shedding
light on the circumstances of the minor and his or her family.” (In re Rodger H. (1991)
228 Cal.App.3d 1174, 1183.)
       The record is replete with evidence that Mother and Father engaged in
inappropriate and excessive disciplinary measures. In August 2012, Mother engaged in
an altercation that ended with Mother straddling Jasmine on the floor and banging the
child’s head against the tiles. To top it off, Mother poured alcohol into the wounds she
inflicted and muffled the child’s screams of pain with a towel. Mother pleaded no contest
to the dependency count arising from this incident of abuse. Standing alone, the August
2012 incident is sufficient reason to remove Jasmine from Mother’s custody to protect
the child from physical abuse.
       Compounding the matter, Mother told the DCFS social worker that she does not
physically discipline Jasmine. When the social worker asked why Jasmine had marks
and bruises, Mother accused the police of lying, although the police took photos of
Jasmine that reveal her injuries. Mother also denied any prior contacts with DCFS,
although the family has a history of child abuse referrals dating to 2002, and social
workers came to Mother’s home in August, September and October 2012. Mother
purportedly did not recall any of her prior dealings with DCFS. Mother’s statements
demonstrate a lack of candor about the family’s history of domestic violence, and a lack
of insight as to what constitutes excessive punishment amounting to child abuse.
       Aggravating matters further, during the January 2013 incident, Father pinned
Jasmine to the ground and struck her, resulting in a red and swollen arm and scratches on
Jasmine’s wrist and both legs. The juvenile court sustained allegations against Father
arising from this incident, referring to it as “combat with the child.” Mother minimized
Jasmine’s injuries by telling the social worker that it was “just . . . a good spanking.”
Jasmine expressed fear of Father during multiple interviews with DCFS, yet Mother
relies largely on Father to administer discipline in her home: she stood by watching as

                                              10
Father threw Jasmine to the floor and wrestled with the child when she tried to escape.
Mother is an enabler of Father’s violence.
       Finally, Mother and Father drove Jasmine to a remote area in January 2013, telling
her that they were going to a place where “nobody could hear me scream,” because the
neighbors had notified the police of her screams a few days earlier. Jasmine tried to jump
from the moving car to escape from Father, who pushed all of his weight on her as she
crouched on the floor.
       Parental failure to “acknowledge[ ] the inappropriate nature of [ ] parenting
techniques and disciplinary methods” justifies a disposition removing the child from
parental custody and a finding that no reasonable means to protect the child are available.
(In re Cole C. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 900, 918.) When child expresses fear of her
father, who tends to overreact to minor problems with anger or hostility, removal is
proper to protect the child from the father’s abusive tendencies. (In re Heather A., supra,
52 Cal.App.4th at p. 196.) Further, removal is appropriate when the evidence shows that
the custodial mother is unwilling or unable to protect the child from abuse by the child’s
father. (In re R.V. (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 837, 849.) In that situation, the juvenile court
can reasonably find that “the mother needed to make significant progress before she
could provide [the child] with a safe home.” (Ibid.)
       Here, Mother has failed to acknowledge the inappropriate nature of the parenting
techniques and discipline she has administered, along with Father, who overreacts to
minor behavioral problems with anger. Mother violated the juvenile court’s orders by
having unmonitored contact with Jasmine, demonstrating little respect for the
dependency process. Mother’s older daughter L. participated in Mother’s attack on
Jasmine in 2012 and called on Father to punish Jasmine in 2013, indicating that L. would
not help provide Jasmine with a safe home.
       As of the time of disposition, Mother had not participated in any services to
achieve insight into appropriate disciplinary methods, or learn how to defuse oppositional
teenage behavior and develop communication skills that do not involve banging a child’s
head against a tile floor. She ignored DCFS’s recommendation to participate in

                                             11
counseling. Neither Mother nor Father think they have a problem, a denial that flies in
the face of the unchallenged, sustained jurisdictional findings. This is not a close case.
There is “evidence of a strong potential for recurrence of the abuse. A primary purpose
of the juvenile law is protection of the child.” (In re Jose M., supra, 206 Cal.App.3d at
p. 1104.) Ample evidence supports the juvenile court’s disposition order removing
Jasmine from parental custody due to a substantial danger to her safety and well-being if
she remains in Mother’s home.

                                      DISPOSITION
       The judgment is affirmed.
       NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.


                                           BOREN, P.J.
We concur:


       CHAVEZ, J.


       FERNS, J.*




_______________________________________________________________

*     Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice
pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

                                             12
