
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-1142                                  PRASEUTH PANTHONG,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                   MARY E. MAHONEY,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.                                          _____________                                 ____________________            Praseuth Panthong on brief pro se.            _________________            Terence   P.   O'Malley,   Associate    Counsel,   University   of            _______________________        Massachusetts, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                     May 22, 1997                                 ____________________                 Per  Curiam.    The  order  that this  court  issued  on                 ___________            December 4, 1995  in appeal no. 95-2043 established  that the            notice  of default  that  appellant   previously secured  was            properly vacated and thus is null and void.  That default did            not  provide   appellant  with  any  basis   for  filing  the            bankruptcy petition  that gives  rise to the  present appeal.            Accordingly, the judgment of  the district court is affirmed.                                                                ________            See Local Rule 27.1.   Appellant's request for payment  of an            ___            administrative expense is moot.                                      ____                                         -2-
