
USCA1 Opinion

	




        September 12, 1996      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1637                                   GEORGE BAKALIS,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                      GUNARS RUTKOVSKIS, ELIZABETH R. O'DONNELL                                AND PETER M. LAURIAT,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ___________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ____________________            George Bakalis on brief pro se.            ______________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  We affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's                      __________            action for the  reasons stated in the district  court's April            3, 1996 memorandum and order.   For the reasons stated by the            district court, we can not review the state court's dismissal            of plaintiff's action.   As for plaintiff's allegations about            the  library's refusal  to  accept his  papers  and the  city            attorney's actions,  they do  not state  any claim for  which            relief may be granted in a federal court.                      Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                      ________                                         -2-
