                                                                                         FILED

                                                                                       TN C OURI' Of
                                                                                1\rORJITRS' C01IPE.NS_'\TION
                                                                                         C1AD.IS



             TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
            IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                             AT NASHVILLE

Victor Magadan,                                     )   Docket No. 2016-06-2107
           Employee,                               )
v.                                                 )
JS Gardening, LLC,                                  )   State File No. 19824-2016
           Employer,                               )
And                                                )
Auto Owners Insurance Company,                      )   Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
           Carrier.                                )


       EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS


        This case came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on May 11,
20 17, on Mr. Magadan's Request for Expedited Hearing. The present focus of this case
is his entitlement to additional medical benefits for injuries he sustained in a fire at work. 1
JS Gardening does not contest that the fire occurred or that Mr. Magadan suffered bums
from it but disputes the circumstances of his injury and whether the event caused the need
for medical treatment he now seeks relative to his eyes, ears and knee. For the reasons
set forth below, the Court holds Mr. Magadan satisfied his burden, at this stage, to show
he suffered an injury by accident arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of
employment and grants additional medical benefits for treatment of his vision and
hearing problems but denies his request for additional treatment of his knee.

                                         History of Claim

      Mr. Magadan speaks Spanish exclusively. He participated m the Expedited
Hearing with the assistance of a state-certified court interpreter.



1
 Mr. Magadan's entitlement to temporary disability benefits is also checked as an issue on the Dispute
Certification Notice. However, Mr. Magadan offered no proof or argument on the issue at the Expedited
Hearing. Therefore, the Court considers the request waived at this time, but Mr. Magadan may raise it as
an issue at a later date.

                                                   1
        Mr. Magadan worked as a lawn care technician for JS Gardening. On March 4,
20 16, he and others were cutting and clearing brush from a hillside and were instructed to
bum the debris. Mr. Magadan explained that, because it rained often in the days before
the accident, the crew used diesel and gasoline to ignite and fuel the flames, creating a
large fire. He testified it was near the end of the workday and he was carrying a gas can
in his right hand and a blower in his left hand. He was walking approximately twenty
feet away from the fire, when a sudden gust of wind blew flames in his direction and
ignited the gas can, engulfing him in flames. Mr. Magadan tripped, fell and rolled on the
ground to extinguish the flames. He felt burning all over his body, including his eyes and
ears. He testified he felt his eyelashes burning and afterward, his vision became "clouded
and foggy." Mr. Magadan suffered bums principally to his hands and face.

        Mr. Magadan testified a co-worker, whom he did not identify, took him to
Southern Hills Medical Center for emergency care contrary to JS Gardening's instruction
that he see providers at a clinic. His co-worker spoke with providers. Mr. Magadan's
son, David, then eight years old, also accompanied him to hospital, acting as his
interpreter. David testified providers did not ask him what happened. Mr. Magadan
spoke to the providers through his son and informed them he was in pain and his entire
body hurt. Notes from the encounter document a diagnosis of first- and second-degree
bums. (Ex. 2 at 8.) The history states, "'I was working and there was a fire in the trash
can, when I got close, the flames went up all around me,"' and, "Thermal bum, fire in a
garbage can flashed up ... [causing] bums across face and bil[ateral] hands and wrists[.]"
!d. at 13, 1. Mr. Magadan denied he gave a history involving a garbage can. The notes
further state, "First degree bums noted to pt face, singed eyebrows bilaterally . . . 1st
degree bums noted to bil[ateral] ears." !d. at 16. The Southern Hills providers released
him on the same day. Mr. Magadan introduced photographs into evidence of the bums as
they appeared while receiving treatment at Southern Hills and afterward at home over the
next two weeks or so. (Ex. 12.)

      JS Gardening initially denied the claim but afterward sought medical evaluations
of Mr. Magadan's injuries, offering him several panels over the coming weeks. Mr.
Magadan chose Vanderbilt Bum Center as his authorized treating physician for the facial
and hand bums, which treatment he received.

       For his hearing loss, Mr. Magadan selected Dr. David Fortune, who ultimately
assigned a one-percent whole-body impairment rating but also indicated that Mr.
Magadan was not at maximum medical improvement. (Ex. 2 at 26-27.) Dr. Fortune's
notes state, "On March 4th, patient was burning brush and had a tank of gasoline in his
right hand when the tank exploded. . . . Since the explosion, patient complains of right
ear pain and hearing loss/tinnitus in both ears." !d. at 24. The notes further indicate that
Mr. Magadan denied any hearing loss prior to the accident, as well as a family history of
hearing loss. !d.


                                             2
        Mr. Magadan chose Dr. Ira Shivitz for his vision problems. The only records of
this treatment indicate Dr. Shivitz saw him once in May, diagnosing bilateral stationary
peripheral pterygium, pinguecula of the left eye and moderate conjunctivitis. !d. at 22.
Dr. Shivitz's history provides, '"gas can blew up in patients [sic] face in the right eye and
left eye. . .. the condition is associated with was on fire." !d. at 18. Dr. Shivitz
instructed Mr. Magadan to return in three weeks, but there are no office notes in the
record indicating whether this occurred. 2 !d. at 22.

       Ultimately, JS Gardening additionally offered a panel of orthopedists, and Mr.
Magadan chose Dr. Joseph Wieck, whom he saw in August. Dr. Wieck noted, '"He
injured his knee at work when a gasoline container he was carrying exploded." !d. at 30.
He diagnosed acute right-knee pain and right-hand pain, ordered x-rays, and an MRI of
the knee. !d. at 31-32. The insurance adjuster sent Dr. Wieck a letter in October asking,
'"In your medical opinion and to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, did the alleged
March 4, 2016 accident contribute more than 50 percent in causing the degenerative tear
to the medial meniscus with associated para meniscal cyst identified on the MRI,
considering all causes?" Dr. Wieck checked '"no." (Ex. 10.) JS Gardening filed a Notice
of Controversy afterward, arguing that the right-knee injury is not work-related. (Ex. 11.)
However, the notice is silent regarding Mr. Magadan's hearing loss and vision problems.

       Mr. Magadan filed a Request for Expedited Hearing with an accompanying
affidavit indicating he still suffers pain and redness in his eye and is very light-sensitive.
He testified that his knee is still painful as well and it is difficult to walk longer than
thirty minutes to an hour, making it hard to work. Mr. Magadan stated he paid for
bandages and medications relative to the past treatment, but bills for the treatment remain
unpaid. However, he introduced no bills or receipts regarding these sums.

                         Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

       As in all workers' compensation actions, Mr. Magadan, as the employee, has the
burden of proof on the essential elements of his claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing
Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 20 15). However,
since this is an expedited hearing, he only has to come forward with sufficient evidence
from which the Court can determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in
order to meet his burden. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk.
Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

      Applying these general legal principles to the facts of this case, the Court first
considers whether Mr. Magadan sustained an injury as that term is defined under the
Workers' Compensation Law. The Court finds Mr. Magadan sustained bums to his

2
 Mr. Magadan denied signing the Choice of Physician Forms selecting Vanderbilt and Dr. Shivitz but
acknowledged receiving treatment from these authorized providers.

                                                3
hands and face from a brush fire ignited at work on March 4, 2016. He credibly testified
and offered sufficient detail regarding the incident, including that it was late in the
workday, that he carried a gas can and blower at the time, and that the flames spread from
approximately twenty feet away.         He never wavered in his description of the
circumstances of the injury, either in his direct testimony or upon thorough cross-
examination. JS Gardening offered no affidavits or live-witness testimony to contradict
Mr. Magadan's version of events. Instead, it relied upon medical records from the
emergency room stating that he became burnt from a fire in a garbage can. The Court
finds as a factual matter that the language barrier and interpretation offered by an eight-
year-old boy played a sizeable role in providers documenting an incorrect history.
Moreover, notes from the authorized providers corroborate Mr. Magadan's version of the
story. The Court holds Mr. Magadan sustained an injury by accident in the course and
scope ofhis employment.

        Turning now to causation, at an expedited hearing, "a trial court may grant relief if
the court is satisfied that an employee has met the burden of showing that he or she is
likely prevail at a hearing on the merits." Buchanan v. Carlex Glass Co., 2015 TN Wrk.
Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Sept. 29, 2015). This lesser evidentiary standard
"does not relieve an employee of the burden of producing evidence of an injury by
accident that arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment at an
expedited hearing, but allows some relief to be granted if that evidence does not rise to
the level of a 'preponderance of the evidence."' !d. Further, the Appeals Board recently
explained:

       A physician need not use particular words or phrases included in the
       statutory definition of "injury" to establish the requisite medical proof to
       succeed at trial. Thus, a physician may render an opinion that meets the
       legal standard espoused in section 50-6-102(14) without couching the
       opinion in a rigid recitation of the statutory definition. What is necessary,
       however, is sufficient proof from which the trial court can conclude that the
       statutory requirements of an injury as defined in section 50-6-102(14) are
       satisfied.

Panzarella v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS _ , at
slip op. 7 (May 15, 2017)(emphasis in original).

       Here, while the records from Drs. Fortune and Shivitz do not contain direct
statements on causation, the Court finds the Southern Hills records document that Mr.
Magadan sustained an injury to both his eyes and ears and further noted his singed
eyebrows and first-degree bums to his ears. Moreover, the post-accident photographs
show redness in both eyes. Having carefully weighed all the evidence at this expedited
hearing stage of the case, the Court holds Mr. Magadan came forward with sufficient
evidence demonstrating he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that his eye and

                                             4
ear injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment with JS
Gardening.

        However, the Court reaches a different conclusion regarding the knee injury.
Here, JS Gardening offered a panel from which Mr. Magadan selected Dr. Wieck to
evaluate his knee, so that Dr. Wieck became the authorized treating physician; see Tenn.
Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i) (2016). The opinion of the treating physician, selected
by the employee from the employer's designated panel of physicians, is rebuttably
presumed correct on the issue of causation. !d. at§ 50-6-102(14)(E). Dr. Wieck stated in
the letter to the adjuster that the accident did not contribute more than 50 percent in
causing "the degenerative tear to the medial meniscus with associated para meniscal cyst
identified on the MRI." Mr. Magadan offered no contrary medical opinion. Thus, the
Court holds Mr. Magadan did not come forward with sufficient evidence demonstrating
he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that his knee injury arose primarily out of
and in the course and scope of employment with JS Gardening.

        Turning now to the requested relief, the Workers' Compensation Law requires the
employer to furnish, free of charge, medical treatment made reasonably necessary by the
accident. See !d. at§ 50-6-204(a)(l)(A). JS Gardening provided authorized medical care
with the Vanderbilt Bum Center and Drs. Fortune, Shivitz and Wieck. The bums appear
to have healed, and as previously explained, Dr. Wieck concluded that no causal link
exists between the accident and the knee condition. However, Dr. Fortune wrote that Mr.
Magadan is not at maximum medical improvement yet, while Dr. Shivitz recommended a
follow-up three weeks after the initial appointment. Further, Mr. Magadan credibly
testified that his eye pain, redness and sensitivity to light remain. The Court holds Mr.
Magadan is entitled to additional medical benefits with Drs. Fortune and Shivitz. JS
Gardening shall provide this ongoing treatment, free of charge. It shall likewise satisfy
any unpaid balances owed relative to past authorized care.

       Finally, although Mr. Magadan seeks an order that JS Gardening pay for the
Southern Hills treatment and medications, on this record, the Court is presently unable to
do so, as he introduced no medical bills into evidence. This does not prevent Mr.
Magadan from seeking this relief at a later hearing or at the final compensation hearing
with the appropriate evidence.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

   1. JS Gardening or its carrier shall reinitiate medical treatment with Drs. Shivitz and
      Fortune. Mr. Magadan or the providers shall furnish medical bills to JS Gardening
      for prompt payment. JS Gardening or its carrier shall immediately pay any
      outstanding surris owed for past authorized treatment.



                                              5
2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on July 3, 2017, at 8:45 a.m. Central.
   You must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025 to participate in the
   Hearing. Failure to call in may result in a determination of the issues without your
   further participation. The Court recommends that Mr. Magadan arrange for the
   services of an interpreter at the hearing.

3. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
   with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
   of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3)
   (2016). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of
   compliance      with    this     Order    to    the   Bureau     by     email    to
   WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after
   entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period
   of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For
   questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation
   Compliance Unit via email WCComplianc .Program@tn.gov or by calling (615)
   253-1471 or (615) 532-1309.

                               ENTERED this the 16th day of May, 2017.




                                I
                               Court of Workers' Com pen ation Claims




                                        6
                                      APPENDIX

Exhibits:
   1. Affidavit
   2. ~edicalrecords
   3. FROI
   4. Choice of Physician, Vanderbilt Bum Center
   5. Denial notice
   6. Wage statement
   7. Choice ofPhysician form, Dr. Shivitz
   8. Choice of Physician form, Dr. Fortune
   9. Choice of Physician, Dr. Wieck
   10. Causation letter
   11. Notice of Controversy
   12. Photographs of Mr. Magadan's injuries

Technical record:
   1. Petition for Benefit Determination
   2. Dispute Certification Notice
   3. Request for Expedited Hearing
   4. Employer and Insurer's Pre-Hearing Brief


                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I certifY that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to
the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 16th day of~ay,
2017.

Name                        Certified Via       Via     Service sent to:
                            Mail      Fax       Email
Victor ~agadan,                X                        Tayloranall @bellsouth.net;
Self-represented                                        104 Fannin Dr. Lot H,
Em loyee                                                Goodlettsville TN 37072
Michael Haynie,                                   X     mhaynie@manierherod.com
Em lo er' s Counsel



                                         P nny Shr
                                         Court of  rkers' Compensation Claims
                                         WC.CourtCierk@tn.gov


                                            7
