     Case: 17-51045      Document: 00514823720         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/05/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 17-51045                           FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                February 5, 2019
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                           Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CONCEPCION MURO DE GOMEZ, also known as La Senora, also known as
Connie, also known as Conejita, also known as Concepcion Muro Juarez, true
name Concepcion Muro-Juarez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:11-CR-1239-3


Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Concepcion Muro De Gomez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Muro De Gomez has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-51045   Document: 00514823720    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/05/2019


                               No. 17-51045

as Muro De Gomez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.      Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. Muro De Gomez’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is
DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).




                                     2
