                                   In The
                              Court of Appeals
                     Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
                             ________________________

                                 No. 07-18-00269-CV
                             ________________________


       THREE NUNS, INC. D/B/A HEAVEN NIGHT CLUB AND CLUB SABOR,
                     AND TROY A. MESA, APPELLANTS

                                           V.

JONATHAN DAVILA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JAYLIN DAVILA,
 JONATHAN DAVILA, JR., AND JOLIJAH DAVILA AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF
       THE ESTATE OF AMANDA GONZALES DAVILA, APPELLEES


                           On Appeal from the 99th District Court
                                  Lubbock County, Texas
           Trial Court No. 2015-515,057; Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding


                                      July 31, 2018

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
                    Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.


      Appellants, Three Nuns, Inc. d/b/a Heaven Night Club and Club Sabor, and Troy

A. Mesa, attempt to appeal from the Final Judgment of the trial court. Now pending before

this court are Appellants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and

Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal. We deny Appellants’ motion for extension, grant
Appellees’ motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       The trial court signed the Final Judgment on March 26, 2018. On April 25, 2018,

Appellants timely filed a motion to set aside the judgment and motion for new trial. See

TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a), (g). Accordingly, Appellants’ notice of appeal was due ninety

days after the judgment was signed, i.e., by June 25, 2018.1 See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1(a)(1), (a)(2) (A notice of appeal is due within ninety days after a judgment is signed

if a motion for new trial or motion to modify the judgment is timely filed.). This deadline

could have been extended to July 10, 2018, had Appellants filed a notice of appeal and

a motion for extension of time within the fifteen-day extension period. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.3, 10.5(b); see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (implying

a motion for extension when an appellant tenders a notice of appeal within fifteen days

after the notice deadline). Appellants filed their notice of appeal on July 18, 2018. On

July 23, 2018, Appellants filed a motion for extension of time, explaining that counsel

inadvertently missed the notice deadline. Appellees responded and moved to dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking this court’s jurisdiction. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 616. Notwithstanding that the Texas

Supreme Court has directed us to construe the Rules of Appellate Procedure reasonably

and liberally so that the right of appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely

necessary to effect the purpose of those rules; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 616-17, we are

prohibited from enlarging the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case. See TEX. R.




       1 The ninetieth day after March 26, 2018, fell on Sunday, June 24. The notice of appeal deadline
was, therefore, extended to Monday, June 25. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a).

                                                  2
APP. P. 2 (providing that we may not suspend a rule’s operation or order a different

procedure to alter the time for perfecting an appeal).


       Because Appellants filed their notice of appeal after the fifteen-day extension

period, we must deny their motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. And, as their

notice of appeal was filed untimely, we have no discretion to permit the late notice to

confer jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss

and dismiss Appellants’ purported appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a).2


                                                                Per Curiam




       2 Pursuant to appellate rule 2, we dispense with the ten-day notice requirement of appellate rule
42.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 42.3.

                                                   3
