       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

             IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF
                ______________________

                      2014-1288
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No.
10/885,569.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch,
of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him
on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the
brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office
P.C., of Chicago, Illinois.

     JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa-
tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN
K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solici-
tor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
    PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Cir-
cuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


  December 8, 2014             /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court
