       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

     IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY
                LICENSING, L.P.
              ______________________

                      2013-1138
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 90/008,095.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Vir-
ginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were
JONATHAN G. GRAVES, OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, AND LORI R.
MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.

   THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia
argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN
K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES,
Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


November 7, 2013               /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court
