    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                            No. 13-35V
                                     Filed: November 4, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               UNPUBLISHED
JACOB MCNORTON,               *
                              *                               Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
          Petitioner,         *
                              *                               Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                            *                               Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Tetanus
                              *                               Diphtheria Acellular Pertussis
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *                               (Tdap) Vaccine; Meningococcal
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *                               Vaccine; Hepatitis A and B Vaccine;
                              *                               Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR)
          Respondent.         *                               Vaccine; Polio Inactivated Vaccine;
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               Brachial Neuritis.

Mark T. Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for Petitioner.
Ryan Pyles, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

                                            DECISION1

        On January 15, 2013, Jacob McNorton (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).
Petitioner alleged that he suffered from brachial neuritis as a result of an influenza (“flu”)
vaccine, tetanus diphtheria accellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine, meningococcal vaccine,
hepatitis A and B vaccines, polio inactivated (“IPV”) vaccine, and measles mumps and rubella
(“MMR”) vaccine (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the vaccines”) administered to him on
April 29, 2011.
1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                  1
       On November 3, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation.

       Respondent denies that the vaccines caused Petitioner’s brachial neuritis, either singly or
in combination, are the cause of Petitioner’s brachial neuritis and/or any other injury.
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The
undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in
awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $250,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, Jacob
       McNorton. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
       available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       Stipulation ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                             s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                 2
