
USCA1 Opinion

	




        October 10, 1996        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 96-1579                              IN RE CAPE COD MAIL, INC.,                                       Debtor,                                  ROBERT G. HAYDUK,                                      Appellant,                                          v.                              PATRICK M. BUTLER, ET AL.,                                      Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Robert G. Hayduk on brief for appellant.            ________________            John F. Cullen and Cullen & Cullen on brief for appellee.            ______________     _______________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per  Curiam.   Plaintiff-appellant  Cape  Cod Mail,                      ___________            Inc.,  appeals from  the  dismissal of  its summary  judgment            appeals, the discharge of special counsel, and the imposition            of sanctions on special counsel.  We affirm for substantially            the reasons  stated in the  district court's April  24, 1996,            Memorandum  and  Order.   Appellee's  Motion  to Adopt  Lower            Court's Decision for Appellees' Brief is denied as moot.                      Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.                      ________
