
USCA1 Opinion

	




                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 97-2269                                    FRIEDRICH LU,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                 HARSHBARGER, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,                                           ___________                          Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Friedrich Lu on brief pro se.            ____________            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  and  Juliana deHaan  Rice,            __________________                           ____________________        Assistant  Attorney   General,  on   appellees'  motion  for   summary        disposition and memorandum of law.                                 ____________________                                   February 2, 1998                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.  Upon review of the record and consideration                 __________            of  the  arguments  raised  in  appellant's  briefs  and  the            appellees' motion  for  summary disposition,  we perceive  no            substantial reason to overturn the order of dismissal.                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.                 ________   ___                                         -2-
