                             NUMBER 13-12-00077-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

SERGIO DANIEL GONZALES,                                                      Appellant,

                                            v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 197th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
                  Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Sergio Daniel Gonzales, attempted to perfect an appeal from a

conviction for aggravated assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the
merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       On January 13, 2012, appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court's

June 18, 2003, “Order of Deferred Adjudication; Placement on Community Supervision”

for aggravated assault on a public servant. According to the order, appellant entered a

plea of guilty and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for ten

years. On January 26, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared

that the appeal was not timely perfected and that the appeal would be dismissed if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive.

Appellant has not filed a response to the Court=s directive.

       Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2).

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

       Appellant=s notice of appeal, filed more than eight years after the order was

entered, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.          See

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;


                                             2
however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988

S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

      The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. All pending motions

are likewise DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.



                                                       PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
19th day of April, 2012.




                                            3
