                                  ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                                GREG        ABBOTT




                                                  February 12,2004



The Honorable Fred Hill                                      Opinion No. GA-O 148
Chair, Committee on Local Government
  Ways and Means                                             Re:     Whether recent amendments    to section
Texas House of Representatives                               11.13(Z) of the Tax Code may be applied to
P.O. Box 2910                                                restrict homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax
Austin, Texas 78768-29 10                                    year (RQ-0104-GA)

Dear Representative       Hill:

        You ask whether amendments to section 11.13(Z) of the Tax Code enacted by the Seventy-
eighth Legislature in House Bill 1223, see Act of May 28,2003,78th Leg., R.S., ch. 240,§ 1,2003
Tex. Gen. Laws 1 100, 1 100, may be applied to restrict homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.’

         Section 11.13 of the Tax Code provides homeowners with various tax exemptions on the
value of their residence homesteads. See TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 3 11.13(a)-(d), (n)-(q) (Vernon Supp.
2004); see also TEX. CONST. art. VIII, 9 l-b (authorizing residence homestead exemptions); TEX.
TAX CODE ANN. 8 11.13(j)(l) (V emon Supp. 2004) (defining “residence homestead”); Tex. Att’y
Gen. Op. No. JC-0415 (2001) at 4-5 (“principal residence” means primary residence that owner
occupies on a regular basis). Before the House Bill 1223 amendments took effect, section 11.13(Z)
provided that a homestead exemption was not lost when an owner temporarily stopped occupying
the home as his or her principal residence if the owner did not establish a different principal
residence and intended to return.* Section 11.13(Z), as amended by House Bill 1223, now imposes
specific time limits for a temporary absence. An owner who temporarily stops occupying his or her
principal residence is entitled to a homestead exemption only if the owner does not establish a
different principal residence and the absence is:




           ‘Letter from Honorable Fred Hill, Chair, Committee on Local Government Ways and Means, Texas House of
Representatives, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General (Sept. 11,2003) (on file with Opinion Committee)
[hereinafter Request Letter].

           2Prior to amendment, section 11.13(Z) read in its entirety, “A qualified residential structure does not lose its
character as a residence homestead when the owner who qualifies for the exemption temporarily stops occupying it as
a principal residence if that owner does not establish a different principal residence and intends to return and occupy the
structure as his principal residence.” Act of May 26, 1979,66th Leg., R.S., ch. 84 1, 0 1, 1979 Tex. Gen. Laws 22 17,
2236(enacting Tax Code section 11.13(r)).
The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 2                     (GA-0148)




                (1) for a period of less than two years and the owner intends to return and
         occupy the structure as the owner’s principal residence; or

                  (2) caused by the owner’s:

                         (A) military service outside of the United States as a member
                 of the armed forces of the United States or of this state; or

                         (B) residency in a facility that provides         services related to
                 health, infirmity, or aging.

TEX.TAXCODEANN.§         ll.l3(Z)(V emon Supp. 2004). In short, to qualify as temporarily absent, an
owner may not be absent for two years or more unless he or she is on active military duty outside the
United States or is confined in an institution such as a nursing home or hospital.

        House Bill 1223, having received the required two-thirds vote, became effective immediately
upon signature on June 18,2003. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1; Act of May 28,2003,§ 2,
2003 Tex. Gen. Laws at 1100. The question has arisen, however, whether its restriction on
temporary absences applies to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year. See Request Letter,
supra note 1, at 1.

        As we understand the situation giving rise to your request, at least one tax appraisal district
has taken the view that this restriction does apply to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.3
The bill’s author describes this as a “retrospective application of the changes [H.B. 1223 ] made to
the Property Tax Code,” Madden Letter, supra note 3, and you ask whether applying the changes for
the 2003 tax year is legitimate, see Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.

         Generally speaking, the status of property for the purpose of qualifying for tax exemptions
is set on January 1 of the year in question. Section 11.42(a) of the Tax Code provides that, with
limited exceptions not relevant to your question, “eligibility for and amount of an exemption
authorized by this chapter for any tax year are determined by a claimant’s qualifications on January
1.” TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 9 11.42(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004).

         Applying the two-year restriction on temporary absence imposed by House Bill 1223 for the
2003 tax year would, as Representative Madden suggests, be retrospective.      See Madden Letter,
supra note 3. As of January 1,2003, no such restriction formed part of the statute. In order to be
eligible for a homestead exemption under the law as it existed on January 1 of the 2003 tax year, it
was necessary only for the homeowner to have established no other permanent residence and to
intend to return to the homestead. See Act of May 26, 1979, 5 1, 1979 Tex. Gen. Laws at 2236
(enacting Tax Code section 11.13(Z)).


         ‘See Letter from Honorable Jerry A. Madden, Texas House of Representatives, to Honorable Fred Hill, Chair,
Committee on Local Government Ways and Means, Texas House of Representatives (Sept. 11,2003) (attachment to
Request Letter) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Madden Letter].
The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 3               (GA-0148)




        As a rule, retrospective application of statutes requires that such statutes expressly provide
that they shall be retrospective.   Section 3 11.022 of the Government Code states, “A statute is
presumed to be prospective in its operation unless expressly made retrospective.” TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. 0 3 11.022 (Vernon 1998). Nothing in the language of House Bill 1223 makes it retrospectively
applicable to the 2003 tax year. See Act of May 28, 2003, $ 1, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws at 1100.
Accordingly, exemptions for that year are governed, pursuant to section 11.42(a) of the Tax Code,
by “a claimant’s qualifications on January 1” of that year. TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 0 11.42(a) (Vernon
Supp. 2004). Such qualification, as of the relevant date, was not affected by House Bill 1223’s two-
year limitation on temporary absence from the homestead.
The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 4             (GA-0148)




                                      SUMMARY

                       Amendments to section 11.13(Z) of the Tax Code adopted
               pursuant to House Bill 1223, Seventy-eighth Legislature, Regular
               Session do not apply to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.


                                             Yoursyery   truly,




                                       /     GRE
                                             Attom


BARRY R. MCBEE
First Assistant Attorney General

DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
