 Extension of District Court Jurisdiction Under § 1110 of the
                     Federal Aviation Act

Section 1110 of the Federal Aviation A ct authorizes the President to extend that A ct to
  areas outside the United States, but does not authorize an analogous extension o f the
  geographic jurisdiction of a district court for purposes o f enforcing certain o f the A ct’s
  provisions. An executive o rd er extending the Act to the Trust Territory o f the Pacific
  Islands (T T PI) would make its provisions part of the law of the T TPI, and enforceable
  through the T T P I judicial system.

                                                                          August 27, 1981
    MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR TH E ASSISTANT CHIEF
     COUNSEL, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

  This responds to your request for the guidance of this Office on the
question whether the President has authority under § 1110 of the Fed­
eral Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. § 1510) (Act), to
extend by executive order a judicial district of the United States in
support of a geographical extension of the Act by executive order. You
understand that our response to your inquiry was delayed in view of
the difficulties you had in ascertaining the manner under which similar
problems were solved under Executive Order No. 11,326, 3 C.F.R. 617
(1966-1970 Comp.), which extended parts of the Federal Aviation Act
to the Ryukyu Islands. We have been advised now that the issue did
not arise at that time because the provisions of the Federal Aviation
Act under which this problem becomes critical were not extended to
the Ryukyu Islands.
  Section 1110 of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1510, provides:
            Whenever the President determines that such action
         would be in the national interest, he may, to the extent, in
         the manner, and for such periods of time as he may
         consider necessary, extend the application of this Act to
         any areas of land or water outside of the United States
         and the overlying airspace thereof in which the Federal
         Government of the United States, under international
         treaty, agreement or other lawful arrangement has the
         necessary legal authority to take such action.
   Under the authority of this section, Titles III and XII of the Act
already have been extended by Executive Order No. 10,854, 3 C.F.R.
                                             276
389 (1959-1963 Comp.), “to those areas of land or water outside the
United States and the overlying airspace thereof over or in which the
Federal Government of the United States . . . has appropriate jurisdic­
tion and control.” This definition, as pointed out in your memorandum,
includes the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (TTPI). It is now
contemplated to extend most of the titles of the Act to the TTPI in
order to enable aircraft owned by citizens of the Micronesian entities to
be registered in the United States. Your agency feels that such exten­
sion of the Act to the TTPI is feasible only if the Act and the
regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration can be fully en­
forced with respect to persons located in the violations occurring in the
TTPI.
   The Act provides for its enforcement largely through civil and crimi­
nal proceedings in the district courts in which the offense or violations
are committed, or where the person committing a violation of the Act
carries on his business. §§ 903, 904, 1007 (49 U.S.C. §§ 1473, 1474,
 1487). Because the TTPI is not within any federal judicial district, the
question arises how the Act can be effectively enforced in the T T P I.1
This gives rise to the question whether the President’s authority under
§ 1110 of the Act includes the power both to extend the Act to areas
outside the United States and the power to extend the geographic
jurisdiction of a district court to an area outside the United States to
which the Act has been made applicable.
   In our view this question must be answered in the negative. The
jurisdiction of the federal district courts is purely statutory. Section
 1110 does not expressly confer on the President the power to extend
the geographical jurisdiction of the district courts, and such power is
not easily implied from the language of that section. Moreover, it
cannot be said that this power follows by necessary implication because
§1110 would be nugatory in the absence of a judicial forum in which
the extension of the Act could be enforced. The experience of Execu­
tive Order Nos. 10,854 and 11,326 shows that some titles of the Act can
be extended without a concomitant extension of the jurisdiction of a
federal court. In addition, § 903(a) provides for a forum for some
violations of the Act outside the United States. See supra note 1.
   Our conclusion that § 1110 of the Act does not confer on the Presi­
dent the power to enlarge the geographic jurisdiction of a federal
district court, however, does not mean that there is no available means
of enforcing the provisions of the Act in the event it is extended to the
   1Section 903 provides that where an “offense is committed out o f the jurisdiction of any particular
State o r district, the trial shall be in the district where the offender. . . is arrested or is first brought ”
This provision does not appear to be sufficiently effective in the case o f non-resident aliens.

                                                     277
TTPI. According to § 101(2) of Title I of the Trust Territory Code
(1970):
       (2) such laws of the United States, as shall, by their own
       force, be in effect in the Trust Territory, including the
       Executive Orders o f the President and orders of the Sec­
       retary of the Interior
have the effect of law in the TTPI. An executive order extending the
Act to the TT PI therefore would be a part of the law of the TTPI and
judicially enforceable there. However, since the judicial system of the
TT PI is controlled by orders of the Secretary of the Interior, we would
suggest that you consult with the Office of the Solicitor of the Interior
on the best method of conferring enforcement jurisdiction on the TTPI
High Court.
                                            L a r r y L . S im m s
                                    Deputy Assistant Attorney General
                                        Office o f Legal Counsel




                                   278
