{"count":8333820,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0wLjk5MDM0NTkmcz0xMDg3ODUzOCZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTEwLTIzJnA9Mg%3D%3D&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/11034117/fcc-v-brown/","attorney":"","caseName":"FCC v. Brown","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":11034117,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-10-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A476","docket_id":74964156,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-10-14T21:01:08.927217Z","date_created":"2026-10-14T21:01:08.779642Z","score":{"bm25":0.9992628}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104138,104466,109827,117826,136985,184772,1218853,9413203,9423519,9434668],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a476_k537.pdf","id":11501811,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/10/14/fcc_v._brown.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-10-14T22:48:54.974030Z","date_created":"2026-10-14T21:01:08.787835Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"758c730db105dc43e627c6e99eaacc929fa2bcaf","snippet":"                 Cite as: 610 U. S. ____ (2026)           1\n\n                          Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A476\n                         _________________\n\n\n   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v.\n           SHERROD BROWN, ET AL.\n                ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A477\n                         _________________\n\n\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11501811],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10984030/people-not-politicians-v-onder/","attorney":"","caseName":"People Not Politicians v. Onder","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10984030,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A388","docket_id":74855784,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-25T22:01:18.968090Z","date_created":"2026-09-25T22:01:18.670615Z","score":{"bm25":0.9977573}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110729,145884,4523017,9435151],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a388_q86b.pdf","id":11451693,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/09/25/people_not_politicians_v._onder.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-25T22:04:11.713169Z","date_created":"2026-09-25T22:01:18.765236Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"57e2532403ca95a951bf6d738e284c3834e2938e","snippet":"                 Cite as: 609 U. S. ____ (2026)           1\n\n                          Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A388\n                         _________________\n\n\n    PEOPLE NOT POLITICIANS, ET AL. v. ROBERT\n                ONDER, ET AL.\n                ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                     [September 25, 2026]\n\n  PER CURIAM.\n  In 2022, the Missouri Legislature enacted a redistricting\nmap for ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11451693],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10983722/department-of-homeland-security-v-league-of-women-voters/","attorney":"","caseName":"Department of Homeland Security v. League of Women Voters","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10983722,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A308","docket_id":74851817,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-25T16:02:50.281721Z","date_created":"2026-09-25T16:02:50.143275Z","score":{"bm25":0.9977573}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[89311,108520,145884,4276947,6496703,9406262,9413203,9430945,10831113],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a308_pok0.pdf","id":11451385,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/09/25/department_of_homeland_security_v._league_of_women_voters.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-25T16:51:27.503187Z","date_created":"2026-09-25T16:02:50.150406Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"59c656a2696aed5fadc9a3028cb79801c2139b97","snippet":"                 Cite as: 609 U. S. ____ (2026)            1\n\n                          Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A308\n                         _________________\n\n\n DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v.\n      LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, ET AL.\n                 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                     [September 25, 2026]\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   Since 1986, the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitl","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11451385],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10967483/national-republican-congressional-committee-v-brown/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10967483,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-09-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A274","docket_id":74753007,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-04T20:01:39.166657Z","date_created":"2026-09-04T20:01:39.020413Z","score":{"bm25":0.99609625}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[184772,1218853,9393808,9413203],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a274_l537.pdf","id":11435097,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/09/04/national_republican_congressional_committee_v._brown.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-04T20:01:47.759670Z","date_created":"2026-09-04T20:01:39.031192Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"86d3ae8691c1a5626f3d4b93c034a64e0bbd012c","snippet":"                  Cite as: 609 U. S. ____ (2026)              1\n\n                           Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                          _________________\n\n                           No. 26A274\n                          _________________\n\n\n     NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL\n         COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. SHERROD\n                BROWN, ET AL.\n                 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                       [September 4, 2026]\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   On March 30, 2026, the","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11435097],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10963060/national-park-service-v-national-trust-for-historic-preservation-in-the/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10963060,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-08-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A203","docket_id":74727602,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-31T21:06:06.298041Z","date_created":"2026-08-31T21:02:13.522613Z","score":{"bm25":0.99578017}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109703,4698691,9424818,9425798,9425802,9428574,9432577,9433887,9435380,9435422,10012738,11085138],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a203_2b8e.pdf","id":11430669,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/31/national_park_service_v._national_trust_for_historic_preservation_in_the.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-01T00:19:17.801545Z","date_created":"2026-08-31T21:02:13.565937Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6dcebb94aa39fcfb5be07c1dfc5cb4cc09107dd8","snippet":"                  Cite as: 609 U. S. ____ (2026)             1\n\n                           Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                          _________________\n\n                           No. 26A203\n                          _________________\n\n\n   NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL\n   TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE\n               UNITED STATES\n                 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                        [August 31, 2026]\n\n   PER CURIAM.\n   In October 2025","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11430669],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10956828/trump-v-california/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trump v. California","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10956828,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-08-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26A124","docket_id":74692535,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-24T21:01:50.236428Z","date_created":"2026-08-24T21:01:50.102749Z","score":{"bm25":0.9952274}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108707,109410,112653,117826,145717,145884,2784695,2812588,3214779,4641444,4644647,4682274,4698691,9133696,9413203,9418652,9422525,9429949,9431166,9432577,9433146,9435138,9435151,9502825,9875632,9888811,11085138],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a124_hgci.pdf","id":11424433,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/24/trump_v._california.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-24T21:05:03.653482Z","date_created":"2026-08-24T21:01:50.110008Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"315ee5ca1f12d6a2115e24cb7ae336ddf35f9106","snippet":"                 Cite as: 609 U. S. ____ (2026)            1\n\n                          Per Curiam\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A124\n                         _________________\n\n\n  DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED\n      STATES, ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.\n                 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY\n                         _________________\n\n                          No. 26A139\n                         ______","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11424433],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10883542/trump-v-barbara-revisions-70126/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10883542,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-01","dateFiled":"2026-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-365","docket_id":73129750,"judge":"John G. Roberts","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-01T16:01:13.648638Z","date_created":"2026-07-01T16:01:11.745482Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908957}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2738,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_new_5if6.pdf","id":11351070,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/30/trump_v._barbara_revisions_70126.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-01T17:23:55.545576Z","date_created":"2026-07-01T16:01:11.837604Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e8c2a8c3ca91acb7dca3d82db8352942bf956986","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11351070],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10882240/national-republican-senatorial-committee-v-federal-election-commn/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10882240,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2025-12-09","dateFiled":"2026-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-621","docket_id":72010643,"judge":"Brett Kavanaugh","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T15:03:43.755064Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T15:03:04.418309Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908957}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1713,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-621_h315.pdf","id":11349765,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/30/national_republican_senatorial_committee_v._federal_election_commn.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T15:54:05.944618Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T15:03:04.459449Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c39b087d03ec4955e2ea604ab741e6f580a7c80b","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349765],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10882239/trump-v-barbara/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trump v. Barbara","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10882239,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-01","dateFiled":"2026-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-365","docket_id":73129750,"judge":"John G. Roberts","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T15:03:43.659089Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T15:03:03.444944Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908957}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2738,"cites":[84769,84778,84978,85134,85178,85192,85330,85367,85412,85621,85768,85861,86795,86982,87254,87376,87869,87952,88998,89019,89416,90897,94354,94842,95682,96405,99626,100576,104748,105221,108316,109777,111426,112536,117858,118096,145692,145911,219732,805485,944097,1457586,3619252,4512161,4698691,4887270,4928567,4931132,4931301,5118993,5457516,5459839,5550655,5551958,6145247,6229422,6229782,6311907,6333581,6347223,6349963,6350017,6353492,6404598,6404858,6406292,6406520,6407494,6407655,6414483,6496704,6498328,6997518,7160270,7186530,7186635,7268856,7382778,8124399,8126710,8629387,8629404,8634111,8638748,8639398,9301735,9304533,9382639,9393810,9400446,9405814,9416268,9416310,9416312,9416318,9416337,9416626,9416892,9417049,9417386,9417622,9417865,9418540,9419548,9420153,9420211,9420593,9420766,9421411,9421561,9423382,9424520,9425829,9425848,9427734,9429772,9430161,9430933,9430976,9431458,9431645,9432577,9433568,9433586,9434104,9434106,9434294,9434491,9435003,9435156,9435380,9435860,9441634,9441864,9472946,9474521,9484843,9496648,9500790,9515886,9841835,9842143,9873454,9883076,9888262,9950988,10145945,10452863,10453795,10453796,10816961,11085138],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf","id":11349764,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/30/trump_v._barbara.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T15:54:04.480127Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T15:03:03.593882Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c77dddcaa21f73f2bd48a38ecf6ef71e562752d8","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349764],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10882186/west-virginia-v-b-p-j/","attorney":"","caseName":"West Virginia v. B. P. J.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10882186,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-01-13","dateFiled":"2026-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-43","docket_id":72138839,"judge":"Brett Kavanaugh","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T14:01:19.059144Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T14:01:18.568126Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908957}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1713,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-43_2b35.pdf","id":11349709,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/30/west_virginia_v._b._p._j..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T14:08:02.134555Z","date_created":"2026-06-30T14:01:18.926471Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3551764b570996379b01eb5aa84c2b597508a3ea","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349709],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10881683/chatrie-v-united-states/","attorney":"","caseName":"Chatrie v. United States","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10881683,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-27","dateFiled":"2026-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-112","docket_id":73250786,"judge":"Elana Kagan","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:01:07.476594Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:07.289380Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908171}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1691,"cites":[91256,96405,104490,104504,107473,108005,112389,112795,856347,873669,2093210,3216391,3216435,4274911,4276946,4287285,4409491,4665321,4696349,4697835,6671989,6671995,6672090,7263677,7268856,9417418,9418368,9418495,9418652,9419503,9420022,9420460,9423459,9423552,9423763,9426375,9427224,9427384,9427638,9428299,9429102,9429232,9429563,9429751,9429766,9430502,9430836,9431050,9431296,9431606,9433198,9433723,9434104,9434809,9434962,9434968,9441559,9485385,9502773,9883108,10783239],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-112_0am4.pdf","id":11349205,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/29/chatrie_v._united_states.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:05:11.908028Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:07.323235Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c5bea822489c4b194e3e1518f35baa970890ba27","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349205],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10881682/trump-v-cook/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trump v. Cook","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10881682,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-01-21","dateFiled":"2026-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25A312","docket_id":72170175,"judge":"John G. Roberts","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:01:06.723419Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:06.579915Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908171}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2738,"cites":[85272,86324,90550,92710,94717,94920,94949,94981,95509,95854,96405,96876,100923,101189,105739,118356,145884,450552,944097,2621048,2784695,2790213,3300828,3487511,3572498,4256210,4518656,4518659,4544798,4697834,5456219,5471012,6349963,6541164,6562424,7936740,7967875,9402663,9404568,9405076,9413203,9417824,9418151,9418565,9419237,9419429,9420361,9420472,9420759,9425596,9430887,9431090,9432024,9433041,9433285,9433757,9434091,9434643,9434723,9434809,9435422,9795078,9883053,9888074,9888811,10452863,10453795,10453797,10831113,11076611,11084233,11085138,11243405],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf","id":11349204,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/29/trump_v._cook.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:09:34.107663Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:06.614338Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5face7c8647153aea1ec698091e7b40139809523","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349204],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10881681/trump-v-slaughter/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trump v. Slaughter","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10881681,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2025-12-08","dateFiled":"2026-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-332","docket_id":72005945,"judge":"John G. Roberts","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:01:05.680552Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:05.533352Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908171}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2738,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf","id":11349203,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/29/trump_v._slaughter.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:01:12.006481Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:05.569525Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"86d4cb6fd5d30b7324ae9cfbda0299684a75099e","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349203],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10881680/watson-v-republican-national-committee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Watson v. Republican National Committee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10881680,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-03-23","dateFiled":"2026-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1260","docket_id":72483760,"judge":"Amy Coney Barrett","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:01:04.701761Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:04.485111Z","score":{"bm25":0.9908171}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8543,"cites":[73535,90042,96405,97668,118152,1671252,2261232,3544125,4269448,4523017,4687475,6231709,6531713,8024017,9373887,9419158,9432229,9433146,9434408,9435229,9505319,9887864,10145945,10628381],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1260_g3cn.pdf","id":11349202,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/29/watson_v._republican_national_committee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-29T15:05:24.836465Z","date_created":"2026-06-29T15:01:04.530985Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6c4367909087338f39c59cf48c12d5ac02895d6d","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11349202],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10880244/monsanto-v-durnell/","attorney":"","caseName":"Monsanto v. Durnell","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10880244,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-27","dateFiled":"2026-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1068","docket_id":72483540,"judge":"Brett Kavanaugh","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:01:13.631172Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:13.487067Z","score":{"bm25":0.99050295}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1713,"cites":[76639,96405,1472870,2459025,4274908,4686995,7263691,9062624,9429679,9431431,9432371,9432650,9432987,9433130,9433361,9434787,9435266,9435372,9441634,9749507,9929945,10452863,10508059],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1068_n7ip.pdf","id":11347763,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/25/monsanto_v._durnell.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:09:47.672751Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:13.521837Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7f8e640abc5bda243a3f796de6c85e020110fd42","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11347763],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10880243/mullin-v-al-otro-lado/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mullin v. Al Otro Lado","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10880243,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-03-24","dateFiled":"2026-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-5","docket_id":72610778,"judge":"Samuel Alito","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:01:12.637459Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:12.514537Z","score":{"bm25":0.99050295}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":77,"cites":[84778,96405,105078,108413,111043,111203,118356,145719,145836,800859,1304414,1446000,3065029,3187538,3214778,4238063,4248498,4258391,4264598,4288402,4373129,4381301,4692447,6349227,6351406,6496703,6496704,9404568,9413213,9420958,9421085,9421659,9424111,9424435,9424439,9428574,9428666,9428728,9428832,9430879,9431360,9432497,9432806,9432858,9433887,9434047,9434163,9434783,9435008,9435821,9441719,9441739,9441822,9485612,9502773,9502823,9506050,9526997,9795100,9808243,9812706,9889173,9889186,9931116,9950988,11064935,11080913],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-5_86qd.pdf","id":11347762,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/25/mullin_v._al_otro_lado.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:09:20.906046Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:12.548063Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e34f91dbe7555aae182ab663b4247e79eb7ed5ea","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11347762],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10880242/mullin-v-doe/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mullin v. Doe","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10880242,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-29","dateFiled":"2026-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-1083","docket_id":73265897,"judge":"Samuel Alito","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:01:11.830338Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:11.664729Z","score":{"bm25":0.99050295}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":77,"cites":[84968,91704,96405,100055,103925,105222,111686,112536,145884,186143,506179,2797291,4248498,4264598,4288402,4403081,4518657,4698690,6330203,6333581,6341011,6671984,6671988,9417945,9420077,9420426,9420696,9426032,9426188,9426633,9429949,9431344,9432714,9795100,9823702,9824227,9888811,10453795,11076612],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-1083_f204.pdf","id":11347761,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/25/mullin_v._doe.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:08:02.810610Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:11.698186Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"66ca11e80315957616410402832de2495ccf1012","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11347761],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10880241/wolford-v-lopez/","attorney":"","caseName":"Wolford v. Lopez","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10880241,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-01-20","dateFiled":"2026-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1046","docket_id":72163396,"judge":"Samuel Alito","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:01:10.930801Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:10.489320Z","score":{"bm25":0.99050295}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":77,"cites":[96405,99012,100047,104053,856347,2632070,2809763,3604746,3642960,4297035,4526980,4670961,4697833,4697835,4889635,4913156,6352829,6408268,8632971,9397380,9405814,9419341,9419378,9427728,9428907,9431174,9432503,9432999,9435156,9435860,9824672,9888039,10145945,10780841],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1046_nmio.pdf","id":11347760,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/25/wolford_v._lopez.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-25T15:11:39.946651Z","date_created":"2026-06-25T15:01:10.633457Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d6c03de3e6e50e832406bcfa3e37e7995ec79c86","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11347760],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10879690/landor-v-louisiana-dept-of-corrections-and-public-safety-revisions/","attorney":"","caseName":"Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety Revisions: 6/24/26","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10879690,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2025-11-10","dateFiled":"2026-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-1197","docket_id":71895448,"judge":"Neil Gorsuch","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-24T18:01:29.783592Z","date_created":"2026-06-24T18:01:29.554760Z","score":{"bm25":0.9903459}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1250,"cites":[84774,85098,85272,85535,86345,87755,89649,91064,96405,100185,102844,103442,103600,104029,108653,111377,112033,112404,112657,118006,118151,118263,118423,622534,1227811,2676593,2676871,2790213,4190727,4641442,6335831,7261906,9400444,9405814,9416431,9417943,9418870,9418878,9418925,9420022,9424704,9428284,9428648,9428863,9429483,9429510,9429617,9429823,9431078,9432272,9432480,9432622,9432846,9433130,9433509,9433597,9433678,9434273,9434425,9434479,9434610,9434809,9435471,9500048,9501447,9515867,9802880,9839934,9842143,9889182,9975175,10806539,11084231],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/23-1197_new_1p24.pdf","id":11347209,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/23/landor_v._louisiana_dept_of_corrections_and_public_safety_revisions.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-24T20:55:46.774603Z","date_created":"2026-06-24T18:01:29.642457Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"695c6a15d3f219e2df1d3611568ad8b66f80f668","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11347209],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10878538/blanche-v-lau/","attorney":"","caseName":"Blanche v. Lau","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10878538,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-04-22","dateFiled":"2026-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-429","docket_id":73228193,"judge":"Clarence Thomas","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-23T15:01:13.147073Z","date_created":"2026-06-23T15:01:12.999624Z","score":{"bm25":0.9903459}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3200,"cites":[96405,105078,2679683,4248498,4276947,4528128,4691189,6074151,9424295,9428728,9428959,9434781,9484706,9485612,9526997,10033661,10816061,11084232],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-429_h3ci.pdf","id":11346055,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/23/blanche_v._lau.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-23T15:07:59.606858Z","date_created":"2026-06-23T15:01:13.036628Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"120f30b2f51f5c25c4e00ce66230903a3362773a","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)              OCTOBER TERM, 2025                                       1\n\n                                       Syllabus\n\n         NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n       being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n       The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n       prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n       See United States v. Detroit ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11346055],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}