{"count":7752,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz00MS4xMTk0OTUmcz04NDQwMTE1JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDUtMjQmcD0y&q=William+D+Siegel","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2148103/dg-ex-rel-tang-v-william-w-siegel-associates/","attorney":"Curtis Charles Warner, Warner Law Firm, LLC, Chicago, IL, Alexander Holmes Burke, Burke Law Offices, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff., David M. Schultz, Clifford E. Yuknis, James Constantine Vlahakis, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, John Paul Ryan, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.","caseName":"D.G. Ex Rel. Tang v. William W. Siegel & Associates","caseNameFull":"D.G., by and Through Loidy TANG, as Next Friend, Individually and on Behalf of a Class, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM W. SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LCC, Defendant","citation":["791 F. Supp. 2d 622","2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63298","2011 WL 2356390"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":2148103,"court":"District Court, N.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ill.","court_id":"ilnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"11 C 599","docket_id":2016478,"judge":"Charles P. Kocoras","lexisCite":"2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63298","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:16:59.598676Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T05:40:35.508248Z","score":{"bm25":87.40969}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1805,"cites":[109301,145730,205472,761745,1453208],"download_url":null,"id":2148103,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:42:38.879652Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:27:46.687755Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b77a303c72a1e89cc95afa96ffaac2bb759c6a12","snippet":"\n791 F.Supp.2d 622 (2011)\nD.G., by and through Loidy TANG, as Next Friend, individually and on behalf of a class, Plaintiff,\nv.\nWILLIAM W. SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LCC, Defendant.\nNo. 11 C 599.\nUnited States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.\nJune 14, 2011.\n*623 Curtis Charles Warner, Warner Law Fir","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2148103],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8343964/siegel-v-hsbc-holdings-plc/","attorney":"*725William T. Gibbs, Corboy & Demetrio, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs., Mark G. Hanchet, Pro Hac Vice, Robert William Hamburg, Pro Hac Vice, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY, Justin Adam McCarty, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.","caseName":"Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLC","caseNameFull":"Jeffrey SIEGEL v. HSBC HOLDINGS, PLC","citation":["283 F. Supp. 3d 722"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":8343964,"court":"District Court, E.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"E.D. Ill.","court_id":"illinoised","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 15–cv–10139","docket_id":65522885,"judge":"Blakey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:32:56.557412Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T16:13:37.260123Z","score":{"bm25":75.316475}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8312400,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:09:23.033970Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T16:13:37.270602Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJohn Robert Blakey, United States District Judge\nOn November 9, 2005, terrorists affiliated with al-Qaeda in Iraq (\"AQI\")1 perpetuated coordinated bombings of three hotels in Amman, Jordan. Certain victims of that cowardly attack and their representatives2 now allege that Defendants HSBC Holdings, plc (\"HSBC-Holdings\"), HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (\"HSBC-U.S.\"), HSBC Bank Mi","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8312400],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8701211/siegel-v-delta-air-lines-inc/","attorney":"Kevin Russell, Goldstein & Russell, PC, Bethesda, MD, Jeffrey S. Abraham, Abraham Fruchter & Twersky, LLP, New York, NY, Gregory K. Arenson, Robert N. Kaplan, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, New York, NY, Martin D. Chitwood, Craig Gordon Harley, Chitwood Harley Harnes, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Cale H. Conley, Conley Griggs Partin, LLP, Atlanta, GA, David Howard Flint, Michelle Roback Kraynak, Schreeder Wheeler & Flint, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Jared W. Heald, Bovis Kyle & Burch, Atlanta, GA, Robert Austin Klinek, Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick, PLLC, Washington, DC, Dan Kotchen, Daniel'L. Low, Kotchen & Low, LLP, Washington, DC, R. Bryant McCulley, R. Bryant McCulley, McCulley McCluer, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Linda P. Nuss-baum, Nussbaum Law Group, PC, New York, NY, Robert S. Wood, Gordon C. Rhea, P.C., MT Pleasant, SC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees Martin Siegel, Stephen Powell, Henryk J. Jachimowicz, Laura Greenberg Gale, Carla Dahl, Dan Kotchen, Daniel L. Low, Kotchen & Low, LLP, Washington, DC, R. Bryant McCulley, R. Bryant McCulley, McCulley McCluer, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, David Terry, Dan Kotchen, Daniel L. Low, Kotchen & Low, LLP, Washington, DC, R. Bryant McCulley, McCulley McCluer, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, for Avery Insurance Group, Inc., Randall Allen, Samuel Reed Rutherford, Alston & Bird, LLP, Atlanta, GA James P. Denvir, Scott Gant, Michael Scott Mitchell, Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, Thomas W. Rhodes, William Parker Sanders, Smith Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant Delta Air Lines, Inc., Aden L. Atkins, David Smith, Vinson & Elkins, LLP, Washington, DC, Roger W. Fones, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Washington, DC, Thomas W. Rhodes, William Parker Sanders, Smith Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant Artran Airways, Inc., Alison M. Zieve, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae Public Citizen, National Consumer Law Center, Scott Eliot Perwin, Kenny Nachwalter, PA, Miami, FL, for Amicus Curiae American Antitrust Institute","caseName":"Siegel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Martin SIEGEL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Stephen Powell, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Henryk J. Jachimowicz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Laura Greenberg Gale, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Carla Dahl, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Airtran Airways, Inc.","citation":["714 F. App'x 986"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8701211,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 16-16401; 17-11733","docket_id":65966684,"judge":"Dubina, Goldberg, Wilson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:01:10.903365Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T07:10:48.355137Z","score":{"bm25":67.236275}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8684370,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-25T04:43:44.763349Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T07:10:48.359430Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":" PER CURIAM: Ater careful review and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm based on the well-reasoned decision of the district court, dated March 28, 2017. AFFIRMED. ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8684370],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8771286/siegel-v-shell-oil-co/","attorney":"Ben Barnow, Erich Paul Schork, Sharon Harris, Barnow & Associates, P.C., Han J. Chorowsky, Chorowsky Law Offices, James R. Rowe, The Law Firm of Rowe & Associates, Larry D. Drury, William J. Harte, William J. Harte, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs., Heather Joy Macklin, Ray G. Rezner, Jessica Maria Perez Simmons, Mark Scott Bernstein, Shermin Kruse, Barack, Ferrazzano, Kirschbaum, & Nagelberg, LLP., Catherine Nancy Tetzlaff, Bradley B. Falkof, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Richard Cartier Godfrey, Barack S. Echols, Leslie M. Smith, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Nathan P. Eimer, Adam B. Deutsch, Andrew George Klevorn, Chad J. Doellinger, Eimer, Stahl, Klevorn & Solberg, LLP, James E. Michel, Marc E. Darnell, William M. McErlean, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP., Michael A. Pope, Christopher Mac Neil Murphy, Mary Elisabeth Gardner, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, Chicago, IL, Joseph G. Eaton, Sean Patrick Burke, T. Joseph Wendt, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Christopher Vauclain Roberts, David L. Yohai, James W. Quinn, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.","caseNameFull":"Michael SIEGEL and Rebecca Siegel, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., an Indiana corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio corporation, and Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation","citation":["256 F.R.D. 580","2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72314","2008 WL 4378399"],"citeCount":19,"cluster_id":8771286,"court":"District Court, N.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ill.","court_id":"ilnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-09-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 06 C 0035","docket_id":66037401,"judge":"Amy, Eve","lexisCite":"2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72314","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:28:40.187970Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T11:42:03.546099Z","score":{"bm25":55.654453}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8754830,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:44:29.855009Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T11:42:03.551612Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\n\nAMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge.\nIn their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs Michael and Rebecca Siegel allege that Defendants Shell Oil Company, BP Corporation North America, Inc., Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Marathon Oil Company, and Exxon Mobil Corporation are liable under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/1, et seq., <","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8754830],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1394515/siegel-v-shell-oil-co/","attorney":"Ben Barnow, Blake Anthony Strautins, Erich Paul Sehork, Sharon Harris, Barnow and Assoc., PC, Han Chorowsky, Chorow-sky Law Offices, James R. Rowe, The Law Firm of Rowe & Associates, Larry D. Dru-ry, Larry D. Drury, Ltd., William J. Harte, William J. Harte, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs., Heather Joy MacKlin, Ray G. Rezner, Jessica Maria Perez Simmons, Mark Scott Bernstein, Shermin Kruse, Barack, Fer-razzano, Kirschbaum, Perlman & Nagel-berg, Catherine Nancy Tetzlaff, Bradley B. Falkof, James E. Michel, Marc E. Darnell, William M. McErlean, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Michael A. Pope, Christopher Mac Neil Murphy, Mary Elisabeth Gardner, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Richard Cartier Godfrey, Barack S. Echols, Leslie M. Smith, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Nathan P. Eimer, Adam B. Deutsch, Andrew George Klevorn, Chad J. Doellinger, Eimer Stahl Klevorn Solberg LLP, Chicago, IL, Sean Patrick Burke, T. Joseph Wendt, Joseph G. Eaton, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Christopher Vauclain Roberts, David L. Yohai, James W. Quinn, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.","caseNameFull":"Michael SIEGEL, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio Corporation, and Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants","citation":["656 F. Supp. 2d 825","2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80958","2009 WL 2905552"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":1394515,"court":"District Court, N.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ill.","court_id":"ilnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-09-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case 06 C 0035","docket_id":158268,"judge":"Eve","lexisCite":"2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80958","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T03:38:06.907477Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T07:06:37.638615Z","score":{"bm25":55.510117}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111719,111722,145738,771246,774619,789621,789844,793783,796351,796870,797793,797797,1253823,1260912,1302372,1323927,1349630,1389534,1401014,1457539,1991443,2001572,2012325,2023417,2031966,2039722,2065734,2071588,2083470,2094521,2142043,2147862,2167245,2204015,2204613,2223400,2236508],"download_url":null,"id":1394515,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T07:56:00.898566Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T05:56:50.479801Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"824287814a7899986ee899b574b907d26bbb392d","snippet":"\n656 F.Supp.2d 825 (2009)\nMichael SIEGEL, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff,\nv.\nSHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., an Indiana corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio corporation, and Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, Defendants.\nCase No. 06 C 0035.\nUnited St","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1394515],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2315093/todaro-v-siegel-fenchel-peddy-pc/","attorney":"Steven Ian Locke, Esq., Jeffrey I. Schulman, Esq., Carabba Locke LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs., Philip D. Nykamp, Esq., Patrick Brian Fife, Esq., Twomey, Latham, Shea, & Kelly, LLP, Riverhead, NY, Kevin M. Fox, Esq., Russo Fox & Karl, Hauppauge, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Todaro v. Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.","caseNameFull":"Jacquelyn TODARO and Maria H. Moscarelli, Plaintiffs, v. SIEGEL FENCHEL & PEDDY, P.C., William D. Siegel, Saul R. Fenchel, Tracie P. Peddy, and Andrew G. Cangemi, Defendants","citation":["697 F. Supp. 2d 395","2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36989","2010 WL 1068768"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2315093,"court":"District Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"E.D.N.Y","court_id":"nyed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-03-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-CV-2939 JS/WDW","docket_id":2182578,"judge":"Seybert","lexisCite":"2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36989","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:33:42.348713Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T22:29:12.150325Z","score":{"bm25":53.825806}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2915,"cites":[791025,1214273,2373444,2400264,6978167,8410125,8471448],"download_url":null,"id":2315093,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:52:28.747310Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:04:20.130074Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"66ce6ef96c251a673ebff5f772d4cc593a5e4355","snippet":"\n697 F.Supp.2d 395 (2010)\nJacquelyn TODARO and Maria H. Moscarelli, Plaintiffs,\nv.\nSIEGEL FENCHEL & PEDDY, P.C., William D. Siegel, Saul R. Fenchel, Tracie P. Peddy, and Andrew G. Cangemi, Defendants.\nNo. 04-CV-2939 JS/WDW.\nUnited States District Court, E.D. New York.\nMarch 24, 2010.\n*398 Steven Ian Locke, Esq., Jeffrey I. Sch","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2315093],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3085607/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3085607,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-02-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":2943082,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:34:23.586403Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T03:14:19.778881Z","score":{"bm25":53.13069}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=1846&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa04%5cOrder","id":3085607,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/02/18/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:34:23.591743Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T02:42:46.654643Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"828f19ef63b764e842724fc0ba597f06f278a76b","snippet":"                                                                 VHS San Antonio Partners,\n                                                                  LLC d/b/a Baptist Health\n                                                                   System and d/b/a North\n\n\n\n                          Fourth Court of Appeals\n                                 San Antonio, Texas\n                                     February 18, 2015\n\n                                    No. 04-14-00153-CV\n\n           ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3085607],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2761650/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2761650,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":2615887,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:21.203469Z","date_created":"2014-12-17T10:07:07.019298Z","score":{"bm25":52.882797}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=9572&Index=***coa04%5cOpinion","id":2761650,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/17/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:21.189160Z","date_created":"2014-12-17T09:10:31.491890Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9cdfb87c9676dec7c8846f4548d49fa7805133fa","snippet":"                          Fourth Court of Appeals\n                                 San Antonio, Texas\n\n                                      JUDGMENT\n                                    No. 04-14-00153-CV\n\n                 Harold GASKILL III, M.D. and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A.,\n                                      Appellants\n\n                                              v.\n\nVHS SAN ANTONIO PARTNERS, LLC d/b/a Baptist Health System and d/b/a North Central\n  Baptist Hospital, Baptist Heath Syste","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2761650],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2765755/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2765755,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":2620005,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:56.256203Z","date_created":"2014-12-31T19:19:28.953290Z","score":{"bm25":52.724995}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=3258&Index=***coa04%5cOrder","id":2765755,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/31/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:56.340591Z","date_created":"2014-12-31T10:14:34.682101Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8f1f6fc1779f6503d776908a1f1bc6664bbf9b11","snippet":"                                                                 VHS San Antonio Partners,\n                                                                  LLC d/b/a Baptist Health\n                                                                   System and d/b/a North\n                                                                       Central Baptist\n\n\n                          Fourth Court of Appeals\n                                 San Antonio, Texas\n                                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2765755],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2487505/siegel-v-shell-oil-co/","attorney":"Han J. Chorowsky, Chorowsky Law Offices, Larry Daniel Drury, Larry D. Dru-ry, Ltd., William J. Harte, William J. Harte, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs., Heather Joy Macklin, Ray G. Rezner, Shermin Kruse, Barack, Ferrazzano, Kirschbaum, Perlman & Nagelberg, Catherine Nancy Tetzlaff, Bradley B. Falkof, Catherine Nancy Tetzlaff, Marc E. Darnell, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Richard Cartier Godfrey, Barack S. Echols, Leslie M. Smith, Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Chicago), Nathan P. Eimer, Andrew George Klevorn, Chad J. Doellinger, Eimer Stahl Klevorn & Solberg, LLP, John Matthew Richardson, Michael A. Pope, Melissa M. Eckhause, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP (Chicago), Chicago, IL, for Defendants.","caseName":"Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.","caseNameFull":"Michael SIEGEL and Rebecca Siegel, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio Corporation, and Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants","citation":["480 F. Supp. 2d 1034","2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21144","2007 WL 917477"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":2487505,"court":"District Court, N.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ill.","court_id":"ilnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-03-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"06 C 0035","docket_id":2355140,"judge":"St. Eve","lexisCite":"2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21144","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:11:44.583477Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:35:51.568957Z","score":{"bm25":52.686665}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[22788,105573,540063,547251,548406,557249,575872,629176,664927,666893,739980,747771,755433,757343,762148,762779,766156,770154,777125,780678,781870,783936,784071,784278,784768,786650,787151,790012,790730,791053,792484,793378,794801,796697,796870,1975256,2012647,2024132,2045247,2045973,2050591,2060395,2071588,2080549,2081714,2087932,2130415,2132694,2147212,2147862,2148405,2195077,2233247,2237940,2243306,2249052,2312384,2323668,2522626],"download_url":null,"id":2487505,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:08:45.773207Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:53:11.789584Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b9c5ccead1c13c98f339b457a1fabc285d35de4f","snippet":"\n480 F.Supp.2d 1034 (2007)\nMichael SIEGEL and Rebecca Siegel, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,\nv.\nSHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, BP Corporation North America, Inc., an Indiana corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio corporation, and Exxon Mobil Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, Defendants.\nNo. 06 C 0035.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2487505],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2761651/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2761651,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":2615888,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:21.244078Z","date_created":"2014-12-17T09:43:10.444205Z","score":{"bm25":51.75635}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1383613],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=9555&Index=***coa04%5cOpinion","id":2761651,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/17/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:24:21.238014Z","date_created":"2014-12-17T09:10:32.022826Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3d2a35e8e1b625f341cb480793a18dc4b4bf3840","snippet":"                              Fourth Court of Appeals\n                                     San Antonio, Texas\n                                             OPINION\n                                        No. 04-14-00153-CV\n\n                      Harold GASKILL III, M.D. and Harold Gaskill, M.D. PA,\n                                          Appellants\n\n                                                  v.\n\nVHS SAN ANTONIO PARTNERS, LLC d/b/a Baptist Health System and d/b/a North Central\n   Baptist ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2761651],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10358197/ferdinand-v-siegel/","attorney":"","caseName":"Ferdinand v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 NY Slip Op 01608"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10358197,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 617724/17","docket_id":69757519,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-21T18:18:40.676598Z","date_created":"2025-03-19T19:11:09.955234Z","score":{"bm25":48.846817}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2038313],"download_url":"http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2025/2025_01608.htm","id":10824785,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2025/03/19/ferdinand_v._siegel.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-21T18:18:40.640958Z","date_created":"2025-03-19T19:11:09.962764Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0282964ef39ea43aec541245eec09ca8102b0326","snippet":"\n\nFerdinand v Siegel (2025 NY Slip Op 01608)\n\n\n\n\n\nFerdinand v Siegel\n\n\n2025 NY Slip Op 01608\n\n\nDecided on March 19, 2025\n\n\nAppellate Division, Second Department\n\n\n\nPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10824785],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4261223/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4261223,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":4427352,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:23:12.260038Z","date_created":"2016-09-28T21:56:00.237793Z","score":{"bm25":48.59417}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=6678&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa08%5cOrder","id":4038484,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/29/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:23:12.317451Z","date_created":"2016-09-28T21:56:00.246603Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5aa51dbdc5b3d88e46a4c88e0cbbbcc457558f80","snippet":"                                                                                             ACCEPTED\n                                                                                        04-14-00153-CV\n                                                                             FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS\n                                                                                  12/26/2014 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4038484],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7745941/mccabe-v-siegel/","attorney":"Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Jane Kreusler-Walsh, P.A., and Lake Lytal and Linda Sweeting of Lytal & Reiter, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants., Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., and Richard D. Schuler, of Schuler Wilkerson, Halvorson & Williams, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appel-lees-Victor Siegel, M.D., and Victor Siegel, M.D., P.A.","caseName":"McCabe v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"Alexandra McCABE and Dennis McCabe, her husband v. Victor SIEGEL, M.D., Victor Siegel, M.D., P.A., and Randy Fox, M.D.","citation":["642 So. 2d 570","1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4971","1994 WL 203043"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7745941,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1994-05-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 93-3054","docket_id":64750814,"judge":"Anstead, Hersey, Polen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:33:28.088424Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T03:13:41.603924Z","score":{"bm25":47.68739}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7682648,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:11:12.706910Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T03:13:41.608476Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM.\nREVERSED. We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in reinstituting a settlement agreement between the parties that the court had previously invalidated.\nThis appeal arises out of a claim alleging medical malpractice against the appellees. Appellants entered into a settlement agreement with appellees Victor Siegel, M.D. and Victor Siegel, M.D., P.A. (Dr. Siegel), on July 8, 1993. Th","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7682649,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:18:44.873847Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T03:13:41.609902Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nOPINION ON REHEARING\n\nThe appellees have correctly called our attention to factual mistakes contained in our previous opinion. While the mistakes do not change the result, and we otherwise deny rehearing, we issue this opinion to correct the mistakes.\nWe agree with appellants that the trial court erred in reinstituting a settlement agreement between the parties that the court had previously invalidated.","type":"rehearing"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7682648,7682649],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4261219/harold-gaskill-iii-md-and-harold-gaskill-md-pa-v-vhs-san-antonio/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harold Gaskill, III, MD and Harold Gaskill, M.D. P.A. v. VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC D/B/A Baptist Health System and D/B/A North Central Baptist Hospital, Baptist System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve, David Siegel, William Waechter, Jaydeep Shah","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4261219,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-14-00153-CV","docket_id":4427348,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:23:12.129946Z","date_created":"2016-09-28T21:55:58.845294Z","score":{"bm25":47.68475}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=9569&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa08%5cOrder","id":4038480,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/29/harold_gaskill_iii_md_and_harold_gaskill_m.d._p.a._v._vhs_san_antonio.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:23:12.112081Z","date_created":"2016-09-28T21:55:58.850950Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e007d31bd65a8cec8047de339cc595dcf57dce62","snippet":"                                                                                        ACCEPTED\n                                                                                   04-14-00153-CV\n                                                                        FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                             SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS\n                                                                             12/26/2014 9:30:36 AM\n              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4038480],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1535520/spenler-v-siegel-in-re-spenler/","attorney":"David M. Reeder, Lewis, D’Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Los Angeles, CA, for Charles William Spenler., Stuart I. Koenig, Laurie K. Jones, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, for Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee.","caseName":"Spenler v. Siegel (In Re Spenler)","caseNameFull":"In Re Charles William SPENLER, M.D., Debtor. Charles William SPENLER, M.D., Appellant, v. Alfred H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee","citation":["212 B.R. 625","97 D.A.R. 12","97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7910","97 Daily Journal DAR 12429","1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1488"],"citeCount":23,"cluster_id":1535520,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir. BAP","court_id":"bap9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1997-08-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"BAP Nos. CC-96-1093-JSH, CC-96-1174, CC-96-1422, Bankruptcy No. LA 95-26467 LF","docket_id":1086354,"judge":"Jones, Snyder, Hagan","lexisCite":"97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7910","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T04:28:10.317779Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T14:13:54.490810Z","score":{"bm25":46.433582}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110698,112725,568532,682791,1529786,1549539,1860242,1881959,1939140,1981528,1988862,1999016],"download_url":null,"id":1535520,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T09:34:39.282269Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:37:10.177224Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ce3e3a2442722d4adb522c1175923b7fde276602","snippet":"\n212 B.R. 625 (1997)\nIn re Charles William SPENLER, M.D., Debtor.\nCharles William SPENLER, M.D., Appellant,\nv.\nAlfred H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.\nBAP Nos. CC-96-1093-JSH, CC-96-1174, CC-96-1422, Bankruptcy No. LA 95-26467 LF.\nUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.\nArgued and Submitted July 23, 1997.\nDecided August 29, 1997","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1535520],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1358582/r-a-siegel-co-v-bowen/","attorney":"Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Robert L. Shannon, Jr., Rebecca T. Christian, for appellants., Gray, Hedrick & Edenfield, William E. Gray II, Bruce M. Eden-field, Evan R. Mermelstein, for appellees.","caseName":"R. A. Siegel Co. v. Bowen","caseNameFull":"R. A. SIEGEL COMPANY Et Al. v. BOWEN Et Al.","citation":["539 S.E.2d 873","246 Ga. App. 177","2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4070","2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1182"],"citeCount":30,"cluster_id":1358582,"court":"Court of Appeals of Georgia","court_citation_string":"Ga. Ct. App.","court_id":"gactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-09-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A00A1061","docket_id":787680,"judge":"Blackburn, Eldridge, Barnes","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T03:24:15.329898Z","date_created":"2015-10-30T16:12:49.488544Z","score":{"bm25":45.213146}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7143,"cites":[597207,659902,1284828,1293158,1303597,1312902,1329069,1335361,1365289,1371913],"download_url":null,"id":1358582,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T07:31:49.878171Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T05:45:44.215047Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"77d9ea5b0775e7529909bfa5c15d7b26f61c62d0","snippet":"\n539 S.E.2d 873 (2000)\n246 Ga. App. 177\nR.A. SIEGEL COMPANY et al.\nv.\nBOWEN et al.\nNo. A00A1061.\nCourt of Appeals of Georgia.\nSeptember 28, 2000.\n*875 Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Robert L. Shannon, Jr., Rebecca T. Christian, Atlanta, for appellants.\nGray, Hedrick & Edenfield, William E. Gray","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1358582],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4622316/cd-by-and-through-md-v-natick-public-school-district/","attorney":"Benjamin J. Wish, with whom Todd & Weld, LLP, Laurie R. Martucci, and Martucci Law Associates were on brief, for appellants., Selene Almazan-Altobelli and Ellen Saideman on brief for Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc., amicus curiae., Ira A. Burnim, Lewis Bossing, Elizabeth B. McCallum, Paul E. Poirot, William T. DeVinney, and Baker Hostetler, LLP on brief for the Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Association of University Centers on Disabilities, Disability Law Center, National Center for Learning Disabilities, National Center for Youth Law, National Disability Rights Network, and National Down Syndrome Congress, amici curiae., Felicia S. Vasudevan, with whom Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP was on brief, for Natick Public School District., Anna Rachel Dray-Siegel, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, was on brief, for Bureau of Special Education Appeals., Michael J. Long and Long & DiPietro, LLP on brief for the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, amicus curiae., Francisco M. Negrón, Jr., Cristine M.D. Goldman, Colleen Shea, Colby Brunt, and Stoneman, Chandler & Miller, LLP on brief for National School Boards Association and Massachusetts Association of School Committees, amici curiae.","caseName":"C.D. by and Through M.D. v. Natick Public School District","caseNameFull":"C.D., BY AND THROUGH Her Parents and Next Friends, M.D. and P.D.; M.D.; P.D., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. NATICK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT; Bureau of Special Education Appeals, Defendants, Appellees.","citation":["924 F.3d 621"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":4622316,"court":"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit","court_citation_string":"1st Cir.","court_id":"ca1","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-05-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1794P","docket_id":15662350,"judge":"Torruella, Lynch, Kayatta","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:37:57.497306Z","date_created":"2019-05-22T21:00:12.618079Z","score":{"bm25":42.99779}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2183,164926,203107,204144,415202,504001,523168,546213,597411,609180,611562,613437,788676,792576,804461,808848,2477754,2830308,4151829,4305365,4313228,4320688,4380559,6929530,8410661,8412898,8949140,9333232,9428892,9434893,9835307,9843112],"download_url":"http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/18-1794P-01A.pdf","id":4399569,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/05/22/c.d._v._natick_public_school_district.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:25:41.551361Z","date_created":"2019-05-22T21:00:12.621737Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5997a415b0134f69e8cdd1d001e0be51c21ddcb9","snippet":"\n\n\n  LYNCH, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n\n   *624\n  \n  The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that students with certain disabilities be provided a \"[f]ree appropriate public education\" (FAPE) in the \"[l]east restrictive environment\" (LRE) appropriate for each student.\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4399569],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5302012/state-v-siegel/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"","citation":["180 N.E.3d 574","2021 Ohio 4208"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":5302012,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-11-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20CA17","docket_id":61586435,"judge":"Smith","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:54:53.787256Z","date_created":"2021-12-01T18:13:45.608988Z","score":{"bm25":42.48059}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ohio 4208","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[98094,2690636,2690732,2693554,2706373,3168562,3686909,3707671,3712290,3717691,3723035,3732721,3739618,3744956,3776936,3776986,3778518,4164863,4192046,4408167,4508895,4555760,4642638,6755976,6762008,9422279,9422845,9422971,9423895,9425753,9429232,9429766,9430871,9432055,9804549,9883118,11151282],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/4/2021/2021-Ohio-4208.pdf","id":5130574,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/11/24/state_v._siegel.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T14:08:03.934671Z","date_created":"2021-12-01T18:13:45.621312Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cd9baa5b952eaaca1928699fcdb06f90406c9993","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Siegel, 2021-Ohio-4208.]\n\n\n\n\n                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                              FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                 WASHINGTON COUNTY\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                 :\n                               :\n     Plaintiff-Appellee,       :    Case No. 20CA17\n                               :\n     v.                        :\n                               :    DECISION AND\nSTEVEN A. SIEGEL,              :    JUDGMENT ENTRY\n   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5130574],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"PROBABLE CAUSE FOR ISSUANCE OF SEARCH WARRANT-When relying upon the tip of a known informant that is part of the criminal milieu in support of the issuance of a search warrant, an affiant must attest to the informant's veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge, or must independently corroborate the information provided independent police corroboration of a suspect's address and vehicle does not constitute evidence of drug trafficking the unverified tip of a known, criminal informant coupled only with independent police verification of the suspect's address and vehicle and criminal history consisting of only one drug-related conviction from eight years prior and one pending drug-related charge without any information regarding the basis for the pending charge, did not constitute sufficient probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant for the suspect's residence."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8440115/strom-v-siegel-fenchel-peddy-pc-profit-sharing-plan/","attorney":"Leslie Corwin (Neil A. Capobianco & Simon Miller, on the brief), Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant., Stephen B. Latham (Philip D. Nykamp, on the brief), Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo LLP, Riverhead, N.Y., for defendants-appellees.","caseName":"Strom v. Siegel Fenchel & Peddy P.C. Profit Sharing Plan","caseNameFull":"Karen STROM v. SIEGEL FENCHEL & PEDDY P.C. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C. Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C. Cash Balance Pension Plan, Saul R. Fenchel, P.A. Plan, Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C., in its capacity as Plan Administrator, William D. Siegel, in his capacities as Trustee and fiduciary, Saul R. Fenchel, in his capacities as Trustee and fiduciary, Tracie P. Peddy, in her capacities as Trustee and fiduciary and 2 Plan Administrator and Saul R. Fenchel, P.A., in its capacity as Plan Administrator","citation":["497 F.3d 234","41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1484","2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19321","2007 WL 2317405"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":8440115,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-08-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket No. 06-3107-cv","docket_id":65658476,"judge":"Calabresi, McLaughlin, Sotomayor","lexisCite":"2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19321","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:13:00.220710Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T18:28:14.350527Z","score":{"bm25":41.119495}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112197,563199,739956,782709,788728,790054,790799,6983864],"download_url":null,"id":8410951,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:24:29.754018Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T18:28:14.356442Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:\nPlaintiff-appellant Karen Strom sued her former law firm, defendant-appellee Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C. (“SFP”), under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., claiming entitlement to benefits under pension plans administered by the firm. Strom now appeals from the September 30, 2005 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eas","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8410951],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}