{"count":119610,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yOC40MTc3MzImcz00NDc2MzA1JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjImcD0y&q=WRITS+FOR+POSSESSION+OF+PERSONAL+PROPERTY&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10641212/personal-services-contractor-association-v-trump/","attorney":"","caseName":"Personal Services Contractor Association v. Trump","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10641212,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-07-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2025-0469","docket_id":70915926,"judge":"Judge Carl J. Nichols","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-25T17:01:33.371047Z","date_created":"2025-07-25T17:01:33.282330Z","score":{"bm25":34.432503}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8611,"cites":[145884,151897,185583,186352,186744,186899,187182,433020,453469,462579,471587,703230,733360,1751876,3131331,4020710,4108776,4174308,4285391,4679976,6221550,6497294,7360825,7847914,7864626,8692101,9380826,9425596,9428673,9429280,9431455,9432577,9432919,9434710,9435380,9435422,9500663,9864181,10290947],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025cv0469-53","id":11107799,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/07/25/personal_services_contractor_association_v._trump.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T00:01:05.134795Z","date_created":"2025-07-25T17:01:33.307854Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"75b43309c14d4d60707347161a74e6b67f537ad1","snippet":"                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\nAMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE\nASSOCIATION, et al.,\n\n             Plaintiffs,\n\n      v.                                           Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-352 (CJN)\n\nDONALD TRUMP, et al.,\n\n             Defendants.\n\n\n\n\nPERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR\nASSOCIATION,\n\n             Plaintiff,\n\n      v.                                           Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-469 (CJN)\n\nDONALD TRUMP, et al","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11107799],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10320554/mimg-clxxii-retreat-on-6th-llc-v-mackenzie-miller-and-parties-in/","attorney":"","caseName":"MIMG CLXXII Retreat on 6th, LLC v. Mackenzie Miller and Parties in Possession","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10320554,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-0670","docket_id":69573623,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-24T15:08:04.725641Z","date_created":"2025-01-24T15:08:04.675048Z","score":{"bm25":33.196636}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[101302,111043,111984,118331,873660,931121,2676593,2804673,2811845,4697834,4879298,6328531,6347225,9387917,9420000,9421223,9432617,9432650,9433361,9433921,9434292,9434702,9434787,9434815,9435271,9800826,9887864,9895574,9916322,10452864],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/21771/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":10787142,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/01/24/mimg_clxxii_retreat_on_6th_llc_v._mackenzie_miller_and_parties_in.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T19:17:22.758637Z","date_created":"2025-01-24T15:08:04.677577Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a333da28f078ceb7f307883b8f3720e4111bdc90","snippet":"                          In the Iowa Supreme Court\n\n                                     No. 23–0670\n\n              Submitted December 17, 2024—Filed January 24, 2025\n\n                        MIMG CLXXII Retreat on 6th, LLC,\n\n                                      Appellant,\n\n                                          vs.\n\n                          Mackenzie Miller and Parties in\n                                  Possession,\n\n                                       Appellees.\n\n\n         Appeal fro","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10787142],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10274737/traxcell-technologies-llc-v-verizon-wireless-personal-communications-lp/","attorney":"","caseName":"Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10274737,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Waco","court_id":"txctapp10","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"10-23-00081-CV","docket_id":67900258,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:00.615438Z","date_created":"2024-11-15T14:12:42.649118Z","score":{"bm25":31.805637}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[87080,148680,796090,1449946,2364421,2396156,4269449,5283161,9646277,9775917],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=12632&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa10%5cOpinion","id":10741327,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/14/traxcell_technologies_llc_v._verizon_wireless_personal_communications_lp.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:00.715985Z","date_created":"2024-11-15T14:12:42.655469Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b7607560628e941fc85afed237200c681e1b9608","snippet":"                                       IN THE\n                               TENTH COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                                        No. 10-23-00081-CV\n\nTRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,\n                                                                         Appellant\n    v.\n\nVERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP,\n                                  Appellee\n\n\n\n                                 From the 170th District Court\n                                   McLennan County, Texas\n       ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10741327],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9386517/allie-construction-inc-v-debra-mosier-as-personal-representative-of-the/","attorney":"","caseName":"Allie Construction, Inc. v. Debra Mosier, as personal representative of the Estate of Willard Mosier","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9386517,"court":"Supreme Court of Alabama","court_citation_string":"Ala.","court_id":"ala","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-03-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-0790","docket_id":67087840,"judge":"JUSTICE MITCHELL","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:03:03.462878Z","date_created":"2023-03-24T15:01:43.482216Z","score":{"bm25":31.7819}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1106453,1601152,1656644,1721814,1794582,7371636,7372235],"download_url":"https://acis.alabama.gov/displaydocs.cfm?no=1127254&event=6KT0IV5SS","id":9381993,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/03/24/allie_construction_inc._v._debra_mosier_as_personal_representative_of_the.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:46:45.697791Z","date_created":"2023-03-24T15:01:43.489787Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2e1a2f7b613ff9b3aea6464bfdc2118d1aa92ed8","snippet":"Rel: March 24, 2023\n\n\n\n\nNotice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern\nReporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts,\n300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other\nerrors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.\n\n\n\n\n         SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA\n                             OCTOBER TERM, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9381993],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4640094/in-re-return-of-seized-property-of-lackawanna-cty/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Return of Seized Property of Lackawanna Cty","caseNameFull":"In RE: Return of Seized Property of LACKAWANNA COUNTY Petition Of: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania","citation":["212 A.3d 1"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":4640094,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"93 MM 2018","docket_id":15928017,"judge":"Dougherty, Donohue","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:42:58.813425Z","date_created":"2019-07-17T13:45:39.301490Z","score":{"bm25":31.668602}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9888946,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:16:41.255117Z","date_created":"2023-10-06T20:06:24.690676Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJUSTICE DOUGHERTY\nThis appeal concerns a motion for return of property filed by several Lackawanna County governmental entities (\"County\") relative to materials seized by the Office of Attorney General (\"OAG\"). The OAG seized the County's property pursuant to search warrants issued by the Supervising Judge of the 41st Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. We consider whether the County's motion for return was properly filed in the Lac","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[1463091,1550641,1907254,1969532,2280228,2369654,2373384,2560269],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/J-101-2018mo - 10406699068865423.pdf","id":4417347,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/07/17/in_re_return_of_seized_property_of_lackawanna_cty.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:37:57.376239Z","date_created":"2019-07-17T13:45:39.304873Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2c4407a232d987644b948750d81fac821f2ed9b9","snippet":"                                 [J-101-2018]\n                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n                               MIDDLE DISTRICT\n\n   SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.\n\n\n IN RE: RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY            :   No. 93 MM 2018\n OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY                        :\n                                             :   Appeal from the Order of the\n                                             :   Lackawanna County Court of\n PETITION OF: CO","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4417347,9888946,9888947],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4394364/m-stuski-v-philadelphia-authority-for-industrial-development-cbre-inc/","attorney":"Marc F. Greenfield, Philadelphia, for appellant. !, Timothy J. Kepner, Philadelphia, for ap-pellees Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, CBRE, Inc., and CB Richard Ellis, Inc.","caseName":"M. Stuski v. Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, CBRE, Inc. and CB Richard Ellis, Inc. v. JPC Group Inc. and City of Philadelphia Department of Public Property","caseNameFull":"Michael STUSKI, Appellant v. PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, CBRE, Inc. and CB Richard Ellis, Inc. v. JPC Group, Inc. and City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Property","citation":["162 A.3d 1196","2017 WL 2291647","2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 277"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4394364,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M. Stuski v. Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, CBRE, Inc. and CB Richard Ellis, Inc. v. JPC Group Inc. and City of Philadelphia Department of Public Property - 1979 C.D. 2016","docket_id":6065858,"judge":"McCullough, Covey, Pellegrini","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:32:22.850710Z","date_created":"2017-05-25T13:15:36.330112Z","score":{"bm25":31.525743}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8201,"cites":[1440679,1946318,2343830,2389589,2424580,4955807,4967740],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/1979CD16_5-25-17.pdf","id":4171617,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/05/25/m._stuski_v._philadelphia_authority_for_industrial_development_cbre_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:47:24.635212Z","date_created":"2017-05-25T13:15:36.339335Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9e465161addf80de6a28b4f77cc5f5304178d3df","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *1198\n   \n  OPINION BY\n \n\n  JUDGE COVEY\n \n\n  Michael Stuski (Stuski) appeals from the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) April 11, 2016 order granting the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (PAID), CBRE, Inc. (CBRE) and CB Richard Ellis, Ine.’s (collectiv","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4171617],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9398646/bigelow-v-reem-property-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bigelow v. Reem Property, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9398646,"court":"Massachusetts Appeals Court","court_citation_string":"Mass. App. Ct.","court_id":"massappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"AC 21-P-1167","docket_id":67372833,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:06:06.798862Z","date_created":"2023-05-12T14:06:08.987159Z","score":{"bm25":31.251966}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[86541,300808,2076438,2079214,2232902,2239916,2526166,2781192,2784683,4322978,4353222,6432282,6450643,6451606,6452448,6453386,6453965,7244442,8241945],"download_url":"https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2023/05/12/m21P1167.pdf","id":9394122,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/12/bigelow_v._reem_property_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:51:24.510583Z","date_created":"2023-05-12T14:06:08.988121Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"536cf030e4fa90a240299d6734ba577529b10185","snippet":"NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal\nrevision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound\nvolumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical\nerror or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of\nDecisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1\nPemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-\n1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us\n\n21-P-1167                                            Appeals Court\n\n             JAMES B. BIGELOW   v","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9394122],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6619749/in-the-matter-of-property-at-meandering-way-dallas/","attorney":"","caseName":"in the Matter of Property at Meandering Way Dallas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6619749,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Dallas","court_id":"txctapp5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-21-00979-CV","docket_id":63556139,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:55:13.270768Z","date_created":"2022-06-29T06:10:56.160887Z","score":{"bm25":31.248022}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[894796,1577109,1631573,1655771,1746539,2335635,3915644,5287855],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=29657&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa05%5cOpinion","id":6496107,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/27/in_the_matter_of_property_at_meandering_way_dallas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:55:13.264823Z","date_created":"2022-06-29T06:10:56.161990Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0b060aa0f8bcc9560beccb99aeb3271c33816eda","snippet":"REVERSE and REMAND and Opinion Filed June 27, 2022\n\n\n\n\n                                    S  In The\n                            Court of Appeals\n                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas\n                                No. 05-21-00979-CV\n\n  IN THE MATTER OF PROPERTY AT MEANDERING WAY DALLAS;\n                    JOHN F. SKELTON, III\n\n                On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court\n                             Collin County, Texas\n                    Trial Court Caus","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6496107],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9382493/colvin-properties-llc-v-paul-colvin-jr-personal-representative-of-the/","attorney":"","caseName":"Colvin Properties, LLC v. Paul Colvin, Jr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Colvin, Sr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ark. App. 128"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9382493,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-03-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":66974912,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:02:03.793190Z","date_created":"2023-03-09T14:02:01.504219Z","score":{"bm25":30.453972}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ark. App. 128","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3275487,5110292,7821807,11074785,11076365],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/521730/1/document.do","id":9377969,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/03/08/colvin_properties_llc_v._paul_colvin_jr._personal_representative_of_the.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T07:27:19.523954Z","date_created":"2023-03-09T14:02:01.506853Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ed454885ee34e7b1f8d14f74ebf18d07cc0f9613","snippet":"                                 Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 128\n                   ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\n                                        DIVISION III\n                                        No. CV-22-33\n\n\n\n COLVIN PROPERTIES, LLC                          Opinion Delivered March   8, 2023\n                       APPELLANT\n                                                 APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON\n                                                 COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT\n V.                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9377969],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9493855/billy-stone-v-k-clark-property-management-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Billy Stone v. K Clark Property Management LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9493855,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-San Antonio","court_id":"txctapp4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-04-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-23-00959-CV","docket_id":68439411,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:13:58.817351Z","date_created":"2024-04-16T14:12:31.930623Z","score":{"bm25":29.980795}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2359173,5113089,5285345],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=25210&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa04%5cOpinion","id":9960468,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/04/10/billy_stone_v._k_clark_property_management_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:13:58.809799Z","date_created":"2024-04-16T14:12:31.937386Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d299d229a66a9e0a57d41b42acf954a94798653b","snippet":"                              Fourth Court of Appeals\n                                     San Antonio, Texas\n                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION\n                                        No. 04-23-00959-CV\n\n               Billy STONE known correctly as Billie O. Stone, d/b/a Stobil Enterprise,\n                                           Appellant\n\n                                                  v.\n\n  K CLARK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, Agent for Trans Ventura, LLC Series B,\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9960468],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4909190/in-re-the-personal-restraint-of-martinez/","attorney":"Eric J. Nielsen, David B. Koch, and Jennifer J. Sweigert (of Nielsen, Broman & Koch PLLC), for petitioner., D. Angus Lee, Prosecuting Attorney, and Douglas R. Mitchell, Deputy, for respondent.","caseName":"In re the Personal Restraint of Martinez","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Raymond Martinez","citation":["171 Wash. 2d 354"],"citeCount":98,"cluster_id":4909190,"court":"Washington Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Wash.","court_id":"wash","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 83219-6","docket_id":60128504,"judge":"Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:56:14.410413Z","date_created":"2021-08-12T00:41:20.280964Z","score":{"bm25":29.57708}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4714589,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:17:49.611443Z","date_created":"2021-08-12T00:41:20.296074Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMadsen, C.J.\n¶1 In his personal restraint petition (PRP), Raymond Martinez challenges his conviction for first degree burglary, contending that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was armed with a deadly weapon within the meaning of the applicable statute. The Court of Appeals dismissed the petition on procedural grounds without reaching the merits. We hold that this petition is properly before the court ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4714589],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9494529/association-of-apartment-owners-of-kuhio-shores-at-poipu-v-pacific-rim/","attorney":"","caseName":"Association of Apartment Owners of Kuhio Shores at Poipu v. Pacific Rim Property Service Corporation","caseNameFull":"","citation":["154 Haw. 108","546 P.3d 1222"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9494529,"court":"Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Haw. App.","court_id":"hawapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-04-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CAAP-19-0000778","docket_id":68446291,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:54:12.804394Z","date_created":"2024-04-17T21:04:42.505984Z","score":{"bm25":29.4794}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[86449,107938,1172558,1198304,1436677,2588750,2600152,2613995,2638030,4379651],"download_url":"https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CAAP-19-0000778sdo.pdf","id":9961142,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/04/17/association_of_apartment_owners_of_kuhio_shores_at_poipu_v._pacific_rim.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:54:12.780407Z","date_created":"2024-04-17T21:04:42.508461Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"206873a7d2c4d44e59e83f33368aaa8d108722ae","snippet":" NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER\n\n\n\n\n                                                  Electronically Filed\n                                                  Intermediate Court of Appeals\n                                                  CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX\n                                                  17-APR-2024\n                                                  09:57 AM\n                                                  Dkt. 229 SO\n\n\n                        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9961142],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10277177/in-re-application-for-correction-of-birth-record-of-adelaide/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of Adelaide","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 5393"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":10277177,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-0934","docket_id":69388361,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-19T14:09:16.196588Z","date_created":"2024-11-19T14:09:16.100295Z","score":{"bm25":29.335808}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 5393","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,945737,1503769,2690857,2691588,2692331,2812209,2935895,3782710,3785567,4345574,4571766,4684475,4703080,4924198,6316245,6329941,6350835,6754418,6754987,6756858,6762913,6763081,7972004,8415682,9346329,9371433,9372381,9911528,9927137,9948044,9948754],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-5393.pdf","id":10743767,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/19/in_re_application_for_correction_of_birth_record_of_adelaide.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T12:36:23.159927Z","date_created":"2024-11-19T14:09:16.125625Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9cea7e44a139c559a75b5a0a4ba4f9edb4014526","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application for Correction of Birth Record of Adelaide, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-5393.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n     advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n     promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n     South Front Street, Colum","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10743767],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Court of appeals' judgment left undisturbed in the absence of a majority to render a judgment."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9376215/arcadians-for-environmental-preservation-v-city-of-arcadia/","attorney":"","caseName":"Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of Arcadia","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9376215,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-02-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B320586","docket_id":66819202,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:00:23.198067Z","date_created":"2023-02-16T18:02:10.017139Z","score":{"bm25":29.29035}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[844192,2783226,3158632,3163665,4034889,4190211,5452479,6107648],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B320586.PDF","id":9371691,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/02/16/arcadians_for_environmental_preservation_v._city_of_arcadia.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:17:06.355295Z","date_created":"2023-02-16T18:02:10.018170Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"98621fe8413e9faeee7a91a91feacca8183bd2f7","snippet":"Filed 2/16/23\n                 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\nIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                  SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                          DIVISION SEVEN\n\n ARCADIANS FOR                        B320586\n ENVIRONMENTAL\n PRESERVATION,                        (Los Angeles County\n                                      Super. Ct. No.\n         Plaintiff and Appellant,     20STCP02902)\n\n         v.\n\n CITY OF ARCADIA et al.,\n\n          Defendants and\n          Respon","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9371691],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10680572/in-re-application-for-correction-of-birth-record-of-adelaide/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of Adelaide","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 5393","177 Ohio St. 3d 281"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10680572,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-0934","docket_id":69388361,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-30T02:16:13.206694Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:09.219630Z","score":{"bm25":29.195885}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 5393","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,1503769,2690857,2692331,2812209,2935895,3770966,3782710,3785567,4345574,4571766,4684475,4703080,4924198,6316245,6329941,6350835,6754418,6754987,6756858,6762913,6763081,7972004,8415682,9346329,9371433,9372381,9515913,9801907,9805377,9887395,9887783,9889182,9911528,9948754,10743767,11147674,11147709,11151491,11152264,11152698,11152864,11153391],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-5393.pdf","id":11147159,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/19/in_re_application_for_correction_of_birth_record_of_adelaide_2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T09:42:52.657037Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:09.270952Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"868a041f424fbd4764f31d5e71384e0cbb175b6b","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 281.]\n\n\n\n\n    IN RE APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF BIRTH RECORD OF ADELAIDE.\n      [Cite as In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of Adelaide,\n                                    2024-Ohio-5393.]\nCourt of appeals’ judgment left undisturbed in the absence of a majority to render\n        a judgment.\n   (No. 2022-0934—Submitted April 4, 2023—Decided November 19, 2024.)\n                APPEAL from the Court of Appe","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-5393.pdf","id":11080325,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/19/in_re_application_for_correction_of_birth_record_of_adelaide_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T21:02:12.383589Z","date_created":"2025-06-19T16:19:47.751863Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"80949ebc4c9925507ce434aab921cc101969aac2","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 281.]\n\n\n\n\n    IN RE APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF BIRTH RECORD OF ADELAIDE.\n      [Cite as In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of Adelaide,\n                                    2024-Ohio-5393.]\nCourt of appeals’ judgment left undisturbed in the absence of a majority to render\n        a judgment.\n   (No. 2022-0934—Submitted April 4, 2023—Decided November 19, 2024.)\n                APPEAL from the Court of Appe","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11147159,11080325],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Court of appeals' judgment left undisturbed in the absence of a majority to render a judgment."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5446589/in-re-travelers-property-casualty-co-of-america/","attorney":"Jeffrey J. Wolf, John Deifell Ormond, Southlake, TX, Ryan Logan Valdez, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Brian Brisco, Fort Worth, TX, Kevin Lamar Sewell, Michael James Watson, Dallas, TX, for relator., Linda Marie Dedman, Scott G. Ball, Dallas, TX, for real party in interest.","caseName":"In re Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America","caseNameFull":"IN RE TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Great American Insurance Company, and Mica Corporation, Relators","citation":["485 S.W.3d 921","2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 2680","2016 WL 1019358"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":5446589,"court":"Court of Appeals of Texas","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.","court_id":"texapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 05-15-01114-CV","docket_id":61796708,"judge":"Evans, Lang, Miers, Whitehill","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T05:15:06.171991Z","date_created":"2022-01-07T06:19:47.945384Z","score":{"bm25":29.178442}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[895139,895260,1501301,1506437,1578047,1663308,1674215,1774439,1868388,2003292,2188742,2419944,2466973,3122280,5110208,9512984,9513113,9769841],"download_url":null,"id":5285126,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T01:00:13.405946Z","date_created":"2022-01-07T06:19:47.957386Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION\nOpinion by\nJustice Lang-Miers\nThis petition for writ of mandamus involves a motion to transfer venue pursuant to the inmate litigation mandatory venue statute. Real party in interest, John Goin, sued relators in Dallas County. Relators contend that Goin was incarcerated in Fannin County, Texas, when at least one of his causes of action accrued and that venue is mandatory there. The","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5285126],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4745459/in-re-magnolia-property-management/","attorney":"","caseName":"in Re Magnolia Property Management","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4745459,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi","court_id":"txctapp13","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-04-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-20-00112-CV","docket_id":17072927,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:32:10.284656Z","date_created":"2020-04-16T02:15:23.422652Z","score":{"bm25":28.841888}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[894594,895396,1383038,1510819,1528385,1576773,1640333,1666157,1668826,1743737,1751404,1751746,1780512,1984599,2364459,2369800,2385347,2428092,2438505,2441906,2445251,2455304,2455568,2469471],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=59433&Index=%5c%5coca%2dpsql12%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa13%5cOpinion","id":4525806,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/04/14/in_re_magnolia_property_management.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:32:10.295189Z","date_created":"2020-04-16T02:15:23.429860Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"11015624dd6b83729582295da7f0a9b4a7ccc5a2","snippet":"                                  NUMBER 13-20-00112-CV\n\n                                     COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                           THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n                             CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG\n\n\n                  IN RE MAGNOLIA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT\n\n\n                           On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.\n\n\n                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n   Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes\n          Memorandum Opinion by Chi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4525806],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9503122/state-of-iowa-v-iowa-district-court-for-emmet-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court For Emmet County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9503122,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-05-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-1703","docket_id":68518117,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:32:07.076284Z","date_created":"2024-05-17T14:05:34.191878Z","score":{"bm25":28.780668}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[794974,1389716,1528661,2311683,8734703,8999969],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/20560/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":9969735,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/05/10/state_of_iowa_v._iowa_district_court_for_emmet_county_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T05:19:17.313246Z","date_created":"2024-05-17T14:05:34.194694Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"24311b341387646e05485916521857fc50271955","snippet":"                      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n\n                                    No. 22–1703\n\n                Submitted March 20, 2024—Filed May 10, 2024\n\n\nSTATE OF IOWA,\n\n      Petitioner,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR EMMET COUNTY,\n\n      Respondent.\n\n\n      Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Emmet County, Jeffrey A. Neary,\n\nJudge.\n\n      State petitions for review of district court order regarding the assessment\n\nof costs for conducting privilege review of electronic information","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9969735],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9501016/state-of-iowa-v-iowa-district-court-for-emmet-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court For Emmet County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9501016,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-05-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-1703","docket_id":68518117,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:31:37.161016Z","date_created":"2024-05-10T14:03:59.675181Z","score":{"bm25":28.487043}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[794974,1389716,1528661,2311683,8734703,8999969],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/20560/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":9967629,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/05/10/state_of_iowa_v._iowa_district_court_for_emmet_county.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:29:26.542075Z","date_created":"2024-05-10T14:03:59.677971Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cdbbad23d3faeb21abc17cfc630e4fb5b738d775","snippet":"                      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n\n                                    No. 22–1703\n\n                Submitted March 20, 2024—Filed May 10, 2024\n\n\nSTATE OF IOWA,\n\n      Petitioner,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR EMMET COUNTY,\n\n      Respondent.\n\n\n      Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Emmet County, Jeffrey A. Neary,\n\nJudge.\n\n      State petitions for review of district court order regarding the assessment\n\nof costs for conducting privilege review of electronic information","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9967629],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4476305/sheila-simeon-v-fat-property/","attorney":"","caseName":"Sheila Simeon v. Fat Property","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4476305,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp14","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14-17-00422-CV","docket_id":6330532,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:57:49.896261Z","date_created":"2018-03-12T07:31:43.509826Z","score":{"bm25":28.417732}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1495587,1574170,1731980,2410296],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=90667&Index=%5c%5coca%2dpsql12%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa14%5cOpinion","id":4253558,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/03/06/sheila_simeon_v._fat_property.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:57:49.888004Z","date_created":"2018-03-12T07:31:43.515094Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4d18966710134007ca1d98530df6ab0ed70d8739","snippet":"Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion Filed March 6, 2018.\n\n\n\n\n                                      In The\n\n                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals\n\n                               NO. 14-17-00422-CV\n\n                          SHEILA SIMEON, Appellant\n                                         V.\n                           FAT PROPERTY, Appellee\n\n             On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4\n                           Harris County, Texas\n                      Trial Court Caus","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4253558],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}