{"count":419668,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz01MS40MTA2MiZzPTQzNDUxNDEmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0xMC0wNiZwPTI%3D&q=TRUSTEE+Insurance+Law&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8441706/law-v-siegel-in-re-law/","attorney":"Stephen Law, Chino, CA, pro se., Steven Todd Gubner, I, Esquire, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellee.","caseName":"Law v. Siegel (In re Law)","caseNameFull":"In re Stephen LAW, Debtor. Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee","citation":["748 F.3d 1304","2014 WL 1613297","2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7610"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8441706,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-04-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 09-60046","docket_id":65660448,"judge":"Paez, Pregerson, Thomas","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7610","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:13:51.587872Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T19:59:39.315842Z","score":{"bm25":69.35782}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[218242,2655499],"download_url":null,"id":8412861,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:25:11.816839Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T19:59:39.320196Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER\nPursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Law v. Siegel, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014), we vacate our disposition at 435 Fed.Appx. 697 (9th Cir.2011), reverse the Bankruptcy-Appellate Panel’s and bankruptcy court’s decisions, and remand to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with instructions to remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8412861],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8528088/in-re-allegro-law-llc/","attorney":"Daniel Gary Hamm, Hamm & Wilkins, P.C., Carly B. Wilkins, Carly B. Wilkins, P.C., Montgomery, AL, Lucy E. Tufts, Cunningham Bounds, LLC, Mobile, AL, for Debtor., Carly B. Wilkins, Carly B. Wilkins, P.C., Montgomery, AL, Lucy E. Tufts, Cunningham Bounds, LLC, Mobile, AL, for Trustee.","caseName":"In re Allegro Law LLC","caseNameFull":"IN RE ALLEGRO LAW LLC, Debtor","citation":["568 B.R. 832"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8528088,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama","court_citation_string":"Bankr. M.D. Ala.","court_id":"almb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-03-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 10-30631-WRS","docket_id":65789769,"judge":"Sawyer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:51:09.303721Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:47:56.726107Z","score":{"bm25":65.51522}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8500573,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:54:08.514931Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:47:56.730700Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM DECISION\nWilliam R. Sawyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge\nThis Chapter 7 bankruptcy case came before the Court for an evidentiary hearing on the Trustee’s Motion to Transfer on March 27, 2017. (Doc. 5613). Trustee Carly Wilkins .seeks to transfer the bankruptcy case of Timothy McCallan, which is currently pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, under C","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8500573],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8522851/walton-v-dellutri-law-group-in-re-the-dellutri-law-group/","attorney":"Carmen Dellutri, The Dellutri Law Group, P.A., Ft. Myers, FL, for The Dellu-tri Law Group, P.A., Carlos L. de Zayas, Lydecker Diaz, L.L.C., Miami FL, for The Dellutri Law Group, P.A., J. Steven Wilkes, U.S. Department of Justice, Tampa, FL, for the United States Trustee for Region 21.","caseName":"Walton v. Dellutri Law Group (In re the Dellutri Law Group)","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of The DELLUTRI LAW GROUP, Donald F. Walton, United States Trustee for Region 21, Movant v. The Dellutri Law Group","citation":["482 B.R. 642"],"citeCount":47,"cluster_id":8522851,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida","court_citation_string":"Bankr. M.D. Fla.","court_id":"flmb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-10-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 9-12-mp-00002-BSS","docket_id":65784523,"judge":"Schermer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:48:44.638906Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:37:47.803962Z","score":{"bm25":58.059757}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8495329,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:03:46.114204Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:37:47.810864Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER\nBARRY S. SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge.\nOn July 11, 2012, this Court conducted its hearing in this miscellaneous proceeding to consider the United States Trustee’s Omnibus Motion For Examination Of Services Rendered And Fees Paid To The Dellutri Law Group And Motion To Compel The Filing Of Supplemental Disclosure Of Attorney Compensation, Fees And Expenses In Pre-Confirmed Chapter ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8495329],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479632/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"Lili Lin, City of Industry, CA, for Appellants., Steven T. Gubner, Esq., Ezra, Brutzkus, Gubner, LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, U.S. Trustee, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Kenneth Gross, Perliss & Gross, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen Law, City of Industry, CA, for Appellees.","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Stephen LAW, Debtor, Stephen Law Lili Lin v. Alfred H. Siegel, Appellees In the Matter of Stephen Law, Debtor, Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Stephen Law","citation":["308 F. App'x 161"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479632,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Nos. 07-55200, 07-55203","docket_id":65705471,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:37.668328Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:39:54.541135Z","score":{"bm25":57.37794}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[337657,764209,1924430,8408787],"download_url":null,"id":8451625,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:38:48.013804Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:39:54.551030Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving a compromise agreement that allows the trustee to recover a fraudulent trust deed for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. Alfred H. Siegel, the bankruptcy trustee, cross appeals from the","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451625],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479630/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"Lili Lin, City of Industry, CA, for Appellants., Steven T. Gubner, Esq., Ezra, Brutzkus, Gubner, LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, U.S. Trustee, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Kenneth Gross, Perliss & Gross, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen Law, City of Industry, CA, for Appellees.","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Stephen LAW, Debtor, Stephen Law Lili Lin v. Alfred H. Siegel, Appellees In the Matter of Stephen Law, Debtor, Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Stephen Law","citation":["308 F. App'x 161"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479630,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Nos. 07-55200, 07-55203","docket_id":65705469,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:37.618254Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:39:50.125598Z","score":{"bm25":56.6914}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[337657,764209,1924430,8408787],"download_url":null,"id":8451623,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:38:48.000875Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:39:50.131677Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving a compromise agreement that allows the trustee to recover a fraudulent trust deed for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. Alfred H. Siegel, the bankruptcy trustee, cross appeals from the","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451623],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1904567/in-re-law/","attorney":"Ainat Kiewe, Steven T. Gubner, Talin Keshishian, Woodland Hills, CA, Ezra Brutzkus & Gubner LLP, Robin B. Sokol, Encino, CA, for debtor., Alfred H. Siegel, Siegel, Gottlieb, Man-gel & Levine, Sherman Oaks, CA, trustee.","caseName":"In Re Law","caseNameFull":"In Re Stephen LAW, Debtor","citation":["401 B.R. 447","2009 Bankr. LEXIS 309","2009 WL 483821"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":1904567,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California","court_citation_string":"Bankr. C.D. Cal.","court_id":"cacb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-02-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"LA-04-10052-TD","docket_id":1506708,"judge":"Thomas A. Donovan","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:17:52.038991Z","date_created":"2014-12-03T19:26:00.842528Z","score":{"bm25":56.24273}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[786011,1924430],"download_url":null,"id":1904567,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T13:48:39.240935Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:46:36.912651Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0f0fb68840a2e51e9d4803b43f4fb51251ee8f07","snippet":"\n401 B.R. 447 (2009)\nIn re Stephen LAW, Debtor.\nNo. LA-04-10052-TD.\nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California.\nFebruary 20, 2009.\n*448 Ainat Kiewe, Steven T. Gubner, Talin Keshishian, Woodland Hills, CA, Ezra Brutzkus & Gubner LLP, Robin B. Sokol, Encino, CA, for debtor.\nAlfred H. Siegel, Siegel, Gottlieb, Mangel & Le","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1904567],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8480347/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"Stephen Law, City of Industry, CA, pro se., Steven T. Gubner, Esq., Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellee.","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In re: Stephen LAW, Debtor, Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee","citation":["309 F. App'x 95"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8480347,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-55194","docket_id":65706186,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:51.885248Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T02:00:53.328248Z","score":{"bm25":56.188114}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[777161],"download_url":null,"id":8452340,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:38:53.290402Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T02:00:53.333958Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order striking his answer and granting the trustee’s motion for default judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. See Arrow Elecs., Inc., v. Howard Justus (In Re Kaypro), 218 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.2","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8452340],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8480348/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"Stephen Law, City of Industry, CA, pro se., Steven T. Gubner, Esq., Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellee.","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In re: Stephen LAW, Debtor, Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee","citation":["309 F. App'x 95"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8480348,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-55194","docket_id":65706187,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:51.947116Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T02:00:53.328247Z","score":{"bm25":55.838356}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[777161],"download_url":null,"id":8452341,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:38:53.304119Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T02:00:53.335153Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order striking his answer and granting the trustee’s motion for default judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. See Arrow Elecs., Inc., v. Howard Justus (In Re Kaypro), 218 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.2","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8452341],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8338242/desormes-v-charlotte-school-of-law/","attorney":"Scott M. Charmoy, Charmoy & Char-moy, LLC, Fairfield, CT, for Appellee., US Trustee, U.S. Trustee Office, New Haven, CT, for US Trustee.","caseName":"Desormes v. Charlotte School of Law","caseNameFull":"In re Kenneth DESORMES, Debtor. Kenneth Desormes v. Charlotte School of Law","citation":["497 B.R. 390"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":8338242,"court":"District Court, D. Connecticut","court_citation_string":"D. Conn.","court_id":"ctd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-08-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil No. 3:12CV1281 (AWT)","docket_id":65516650,"judge":"Thompson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:30:38.151896Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T12:56:54.115952Z","score":{"bm25":55.821644}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[107144,196420,746861,769369,771212,796969,1522913,1913398,1923167,1925417,1942389,1949594,1962020,2022666,5901422],"download_url":null,"id":8306573,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:07:31.739870Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T12:56:54.122205Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\n*391\nRULING ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL\n\nALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.\nThe appellant, Kenneth Desormes (“De-sormes”), appeals two orders of the Bankruptcy Court: (i) an order overruling an objection to a proposed sale of property (Adv. Proc. No. 10-50079, Doc. No. 70) and (ii) an order construing the notice of intent to sell as a motion under ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8306573],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8338838/law-offices-of-kotlarsky-v-rosen/","attorney":"Mark Kotlarsky, Law Offices of Mark Kotlarsky, for Appellant., Paul Sweeney, Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC, Columbia, MD, for Appellee., Richard Harold Gins, Law Office of Richard H. Gins LLC, Bethesda, MD, for Silver Spring Family Medical Center, LLC.","caseName":"Law Offices of Kotlarsky v. Rosen","caseNameFull":"IN RE: SILVER SPRING FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER, LLC. Law Offices of Mark Kotlarsky, Esq. Pension Plan v. Gary A. Rosen, Trustee","citation":["550 B.R. 286","2016 WL 827387","2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26823","62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 91"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":8338838,"court":"District Court, D. Maryland","court_citation_string":"D. Maryland","court_id":"mdd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. TDC-15-1834","docket_id":65517260,"judge":"Chuang","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26823","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:30:56.279944Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T13:06:36.534737Z","score":{"bm25":55.78333}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8307169,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:04:18.499560Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T13:06:36.541312Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nTHEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge\nAppellant Law Offices of Mark Kotlar-sky, Esq. Pension Plan (“Kotlarsky”) appeals an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. The order awarded attorney’s fees to counsel for Appellee Trustee Gary A. Rosen (“Trustee”). The Appeal is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. No hearing is necessary to resolve th","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8307169],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479608/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Stephen LAW, Debtor, Lili Lin Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee","citation":["308 F. App'x 152"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479608,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-56239","docket_id":65705447,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:37.435439Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:38:50.812762Z","score":{"bm25":54.244843}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[337657],"download_url":null,"id":8451601,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:39:52.790513Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:38:50.819867Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders approving a compromise agreement and authorizing distribution of real estate sale proceeds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. See Arrow Elecs., Inc","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451601],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479609/law-v-siegel/","attorney":"","caseName":"Law v. Siegel","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Stephen LAW, Debtor, Lili Lin Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee","citation":["308 F. App'x 152"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479609,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-56239","docket_id":65705448,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:37.461212Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:38:57.947432Z","score":{"bm25":53.605927}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[337657],"download_url":null,"id":8451602,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:39:52.784278Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:38:57.956621Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM **\nStephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders approving a compromise agreement and authorizing distribution of real estate sale proceeds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. See Arrow Elecs., Inc","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451602],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8694716/grenadier-v-bww-law-group/","attorney":"Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW Law Group, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza; Mary Catherine Zinsner, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, McGuire-woods, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.","caseName":"Grenadier v. BWW Law Group","caseNameFull":"Janice Wolk GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC Howard N. Bierman Equity Trustees, LLC Mark R. Galbraith Wells Fargo Bank of America, f/k/a Lasalle Bank as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank","citation":["612 F. App'x 190"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":8694716,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-08-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 15-1169","docket_id":65960177,"judge":"Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkinson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:58:42.639230Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T03:15:01.967221Z","score":{"bm25":53.43267}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8677810,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:17:33.985418Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T03:15:01.973080Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nAffirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.\nUnpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.\nPER CURIAM;\nJanice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. B","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8677810],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8526689/wilkins-v-americorp-inc-in-re-allegro-law-llc/","attorney":"Steve Olen, Attorney for Plaintiff, Lucy E. Tufts, Attorney for Plaintiff, Thomas R. McAlpine, Attorney for Defendants, Carly B. Wilkins, Plaintiff/Trustee","caseName":"Wilkins v. AmeriCorp Inc. (In re Allegro Law LLC)","caseNameFull":"IN RE ALLEGRO LAW LLC, Debtor Carly B. Wilkins, Trustee v. AmeriCorp Inc., Seton Inc., and Timothy McCallan","citation":["545 B.R. 675","2016 Bankr. LEXIS 494"],"citeCount":14,"cluster_id":8526689,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama","court_citation_string":"Bankr. M.D. Ala.","court_id":"almb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-02-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 10-30631-WRS; Adv. Pro. No. 11-3007-WRS","docket_id":65788370,"judge":"Sawyer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:50:24.793250Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:10.990422Z","score":{"bm25":52.929897}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8499172,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:53:41.372988Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:11.010991Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMEMORANDUM DECISION\n\nWilliam R. Sawyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge\nThis Adversary Proceeding was called for trial on November 4, 2013. Plaintiff Daniel G. Hamm1 was present in person and by counsel Steve Olen and Lucy Tufts. Neither the Defendants nor their counsel, Thomas McAlpine, appeared. For the reasons set forth below, the Court enters judgment by default i","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8499172],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8526727/united-states-trustee-v-pynn-in-re-pynn/","attorney":"Melanie Scott Green, Office of the United States Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff., Nam H. Le, Jaurigue Law Group, Glendale, CA, for Defendant.","caseName":"United States Trustee v. Pynn (In re Pynn)","caseNameFull":"IN RE: Darren D. PYNN, Debtor. United States Trustee v. Darren D. Pynn","citation":["546 B.R. 425"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":8526727,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California","court_citation_string":"Bankr. C.D. Cal.","court_id":"cacb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No.: 2:14-bk-28537-TD; Adv No.: 2:15-ap-01125-TD","docket_id":65788408,"judge":"Donovan","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:50:25.249995Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:15.384863Z","score":{"bm25":52.87854}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[147873,488021,1456509,1531645,1552471,1814731,1824442,1834281,7028114,8622900],"download_url":null,"id":8499210,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:05:56.535414Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:15.390807Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM DECISION\nThomas B. Donovan, United States Bankruptcy Judge\nINTRODUCTION\nThe United States Trustee (Plaintiff) filed a timely adversary seeking denial of Darren Pynn’s (Debtor) discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(4)(A) and 727(a)(2)(A). The adversary was tried on January 28, 2016, by written declaration and cross-examination of witnesses. At the conclusion of trial, the","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8499210],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8697668/grenadier-v-bww-law-group-llc/","attorney":"Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.","caseName":"Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC","caseNameFull":"Janice Wolk GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC Howard N. Bierman Equity Trustees, LLC Mark R. Galbraith Wells Fargo Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees Janice Wolk Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC Howard N. Bierman Equity Trustees, LLC Mark R. Galbraith Wells Fargo Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A.","citation":["668 F. App'x 502"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8697668,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-09-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 16-1048, No. 16-1088","docket_id":65963132,"judge":"Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkinson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:59:41.501267Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T05:02:31.184011Z","score":{"bm25":52.635147}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8680790,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:18:35.188786Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T05:02:31.187972Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nUnpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.\nPER CURIAM:\nJanice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders denying her motions for a writ of error and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB, 2015 WL 11111067 (E.D.","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8680790],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8698144/grenadier-v-bww-law-group-llc/","attorney":"Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant ■ Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW Law Group, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, McGuire-woods, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.","caseName":"Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC","caseNameFull":"Janice Wolk GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC Howard N. Bierman Equity Trustees, LLC Mark R. Galbraith Wells Fargo Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities","citation":["670 F. App'x 807"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8698144,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-11-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 16-1504","docket_id":65963609,"judge":"Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkinson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:59:55.342613Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T05:15:40.086560Z","score":{"bm25":52.464825}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8681266,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:18:48.102097Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T05:15:40.091193Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nAffirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.\nUnpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.\nPER CURIAM:\nJanice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s order declining to take action on her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8681266],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4614805/neff-v-orange-twp-trustee-knapp/","attorney":"","caseName":"Neff v. Orange Twp. Trustee Knapp","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 Ohio 1612"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4614805,"court":"Ohio Court of Claims","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. Cl.","court_id":"ohioctcl","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-03-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-01124PQ","docket_id":15023030,"judge":"McGrath","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:35:59.214952Z","date_created":"2019-04-30T15:42:16.080635Z","score":{"bm25":51.851982}},"neutralCite":"2019 Ohio 1612","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/13/2019/2019-Ohio-1612.pdf","id":4392058,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/03/13/neff_v._orange_twp._trustee_knapp.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:20:33.942615Z","date_created":"2019-04-30T15:42:16.089965Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"62265e3e2bdc9a675f3199e360a533d891ce5a7d","snippet":"[Cite as Neff v. Orange Twp. Trustee Knapp, 2019-Ohio-1612.]\n\n\n\n\nSTACEY A. NEFF                                       Case No. 2018-01124PQ\n\n       Requester                                     Judge Patrick M. McGrath\n\n       v.                                            ENTRY ADOPTING\n                                                     SPECIAL MASTER REPORT\nORANGE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE LISA                         AND RECOMMENDATION\nKNAPP\n\n       Respondent\n\n        {¶1} Requester Stacey A. Neff, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4392058],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Core Terms: public record court of claims R.C. 2743.75 R.C. 149.43 ambiguous overly broad email. Overview: Requester sought email between respondent and employees of a named company on specific dates and times. The special master found that the request as clarified prior to litigation reasonably identified the records sought. The special master further found that requester did not provide clear and convincing evidence to overcome respondent's attestation that if such emails had existed, they would have been deleted in accordance with the office records retention schedule and were no longer in her possession. Requester filed objections. Outcome: The court found no error of law or other defect on the face of the special master's decision and adopted the report and recommendation as its own."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8695297/grenadier-v-bww-law-group-llc/","attorney":"Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW Law Group, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, Troutman Sanders LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, McGuire-woods, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.","caseName":"Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC","caseNameFull":"Janice Wolk GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC Howard N. Bierman Equity Trustees, LLC Mark R. Galbraith Wells Fargo Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A.","citation":["622 F. App'x 276"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8695297,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-11-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 15-1751","docket_id":65960759,"judge":"Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkinson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:58:53.638054Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T03:37:01.106020Z","score":{"bm25":51.551}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8678393,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:17:48.829914Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T03:37:01.110428Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nAffirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.\nUnpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.\nPER CURIAM: '\nJanice Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders denying her various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, N","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8678393],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4345141/kalnoki-v-first-american-trustee-servicing-solutions-llc/","attorney":"Counsel, Andrew G. Kalnoki for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Law Offices of Glenn H. Wechsler, Glenn H. Wechsler and Natalie Sperry Mandelin for Defendants and Respondents First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC, and First American Title Insurance Company., Dawe & Christopherson and Dean A. Christopherson for Defendants and Respondents Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and U.S. Bank National Association.","caseName":"Kalnoki v. First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC","caseNameFull":"ANDREW G. KALNOKI Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC, Et Al., Defendants and Respondents; ANDREW G. KALNOKI Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Et Al., Defendants and Respondents","citation":["8 Cal. App. 5th 23","214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 292"],"citeCount":42,"cluster_id":4345141,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-02-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C073207; C075062, C079144","docket_id":4578878,"judge":"Hull, Blease, Duarte","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:18:25.373594Z","date_created":"2017-02-01T20:02:34.892340Z","score":{"bm25":51.41062}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[74086,1158283,1158751,1159339,1170435,1170824,1218023,1229645,1289112,1434656,1745730,1801932,1869464,2189395,2200050,2588284],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C073207.PDF","id":4122401,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/02/01/kalnoki_v._first_american.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:13:35.072641Z","date_created":"2017-02-01T20:02:34.899088Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8a165962dd285fda71e26ca22de9ed7b4e043140","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *29\n   \n  Opinion\n \n\n  HULL, J.\n \n\n  —Plaintiffs Andrew and Kathi Kalnoki (the Kalnokis) appeal from a judgment dismissing their second amended complaint for wrongful foreclosure-related causes of action after the trial court sustained defendants’ d","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4122401],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}