{"count":4590,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz05LjIzNTQyNCZzPTk0Njk3MTAmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0xMC0wMiZwPTI%3D&q=SWORN+DECLARATIONS+UNDER+OATH+CONFESSIONS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10588039/state-v-nerswick/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Nerswick","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 Ohio 1802"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10588039,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C-240304","docket_id":70327295,"judge":"Crouse","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-05-21T13:10:09.476149Z","date_created":"2025-05-21T13:10:09.396374Z","score":{"bm25":20.6361}},"neutralCite":"2025 Ohio 1802","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[103610,2691117,2691534,2691787,2692480,2707747,3749444,6754002,9311364,9403187,9521157,9801925],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/1/2025/2025-Ohio-1802.pdf","id":11054627,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/05/21/state_v._nerswick.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:30:46.543940Z","date_created":"2025-05-21T13:10:09.413976Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"93426be0ae287ac613611b52ed10d108bc2dbf99","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Nerswick, 2025-Ohio-1802.]\n\n\n\n                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n                FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO\n                    HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                                 :       APPEAL NO.       C-240304\n                                                       TRIAL NO.        C/23/CRB/7383\n         Plaintiff-Appellee,                   :\n\n   vs.                                         :\n                                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11054627],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS – CRIM.R. 3 – OATHS – AFFIDAVITS – JURATS – CONFESSION OF ERROR: The criminal complaints against defendant were invalid under Crim.R. 3(A), and the municipal court therefore lacked jurisdiction to convict defendant, where body-worn-camera footage revealed that the officer who signed the jurats attached to the criminal complaints had not administered an oath to the complaining witness and had not witnessed the complainant apply his signature."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6457828/state-v-eatmon/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Eatmon","caseNameFull":"","citation":["169 Ohio St. 3d 1","201 N.E.3d 818","2022 Ohio 1197"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":6457828,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-04-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2020-1018","docket_id":63230796,"judge":"Stewart, J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:08:06.546615Z","date_created":"2022-04-12T22:19:53.078415Z","score":{"bm25":13.427397}},"neutralCite":"2022 Ohio 1197","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105149,106881,2691785,4028554,4443948,4546067],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2022/2022-Ohio-1197.pdf","id":6329939,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/04/12/state_v._eatmon.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:08:06.516565Z","date_created":"2022-04-12T22:19:53.088895Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e20f61c670728fe0d58d090a261df93d92d7e591","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nv. Eatmon, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1197.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical o","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6329939],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Criminal law—Material-witness warrants—When requesting that a court issue a material-witness warrant, state must establish, by oath or affidavit, probable cause to believe that the witness is material and that the warrant is necessary to procure the witness's attendance at trial—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10295686/manuel-morales-v-the-state-of-texas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Manuel Morales v. the State of Texas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10295686,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Dallas","court_id":"txctapp5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-12-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-23-00312-CR","docket_id":69476622,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:44.981390Z","date_created":"2024-12-18T07:15:38.877984Z","score":{"bm25":11.915238}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[145641,2187264,2959736],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=52050&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa05%5cOpinion","id":10762274,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/12/13/manuel_morales_v._the_state_of_texas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:44.973831Z","date_created":"2024-12-18T07:15:38.880043Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"72111d9cba4268a0a3882d1376ee9308a3cb8eb4","snippet":"AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed December 13, 2024\n\n\n\n\n                                     In The\n                            Court of Appeals\n                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas\n                              No. 05-23-00312-CR\n\n                      MANUEL MORALES, Appellant\n                                  V.\n                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee\n\n              On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 7\n                           Dallas County, Texas\n           ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10762274],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9395382/state-v-morikawa/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Morikawa","caseNameFull":"","citation":["153 Haw. 199","528 P.3d 963"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9395382,"court":"Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Haw. App.","court_id":"hawapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CAAP-20-0000058","docket_id":67287731,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:55:37.508500Z","date_created":"2023-04-28T19:03:19.520036Z","score":{"bm25":10.957523}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3408802,4385969,4464243,4527904,4658980,5134117,6347078,6347079,9423233],"download_url":"https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CAAP-20-0000058sdo.pdf","id":9390858,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/04/28/state_v._morikawa.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T07:46:33.984347Z","date_created":"2023-04-28T19:03:19.521291Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fac18b98e4b0f41d17fe97e949121070c6accea8","snippet":"   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER\n\n\n\n\n                                                    Electronically Filed\n                                                    Intermediate Court of Appeals\n                                                    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX\n                                                    28-APR-2023\n                                                    07:51 AM\n                                                    Dkt. 52 SO\n               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9390858],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4240064/christopher-ray-weatherspoon-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Christopher Ray Weatherspoon v. State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4240064,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-07-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-15-00237-CR","docket_id":4112370,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:20:09.316305Z","date_created":"2016-07-20T08:11:11.948980Z","score":{"bm25":10.594149}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1629648,1872621,1891171],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=52138&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa03%5cOpinion","id":4017325,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/07/15/christopher_ray_weatherspoon_v._state_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:20:09.786596Z","date_created":"2016-07-20T08:11:11.955407Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5e85565e75bd9252a32ae296e30cb21600bb17d3","snippet":"      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN\n\n\n                                       NO. 03-15-00237-CR\n\n\n\n                           Christopher Ray Weatherspoon, Appellant\n\n                                                  v.\n\n                                   The State of Texas, Appellee\n\n\n      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT\n          NO. 71839, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING\n\n\n\n                             MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n       ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4017325],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10601728/com-v-alameda-g/","attorney":"","caseName":"Com. v. Alameda, G.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 Pa. Super. 119"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10601728,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-06-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2930 EDA 2024","docket_id":70498963,"judge":"Panella","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-11T06:03:41.772273Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T16:14:03.675217Z","score":{"bm25":10.534462}},"neutralCite":"2025 Pa. Super. 119","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8243,"cites":[1518503,1523629,1535934,1549029,1930955,1988906,2156754,2158814,2291236,2371386,4200554,4347387,4965925,6308512,10782747],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-S19001-25o - 106400350314531831.pdf","id":11068316,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/10/com._v._alameda_g..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:35:20.103870Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T16:14:03.684508Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4b24944fcaf0889937f29453830500d987a8be5f","snippet":"J-S19001-25                     2025 PA Super 119\n\n\n\n COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA             :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF\n                                          :        PENNSYLVANIA\n                                          :\n              v.                          :\n                                          :\n                                          :\n GERMAN ALAMEDA                           :\n                                          :\n                    Appellant             :   No","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11068316],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5017571/acosta-v-state/","attorney":"Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Andrew Brasher, deputy atty. gen., and Kristi O. Wilkerson, asst. atty. gen., for petitioner., J. Timothy Kyle of Russell, Straub & Kyle, Decatur, for respondent.","caseName":"Acosta v. State","caseNameFull":"Ex parte State of Alabama. (In re Devonte Cortes ACOSTA v. STATE of Alabama)","citation":["208 So. 3d 651","2016 Ala. LEXIS 16"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5017571,"court":"Supreme Court of Alabama","court_citation_string":"Ala.","court_id":"ala","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-02-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1141281","docket_id":60258296,"judge":"Bolin, Bryan, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:22:26.233169Z","date_created":"2021-08-22T18:57:25.802193Z","score":{"bm25":10.401003}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4830734,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T21:04:01.024602Z","date_created":"2021-08-22T18:57:25.813484Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSTUART, Justice.\nDevonte Cortes Acosta was convicted of first-degree burglary and was sentenced to 156 months in prison. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his conviction and sentence. Acosta v. State, 208 So.3d 645 (Ala.Crim.App.2015). The State petitioned for certiorari review of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision. We reverse and remand.\nThe evidence presented at trial indicates that o","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4830734,4830735,4830736,4830737],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4536485/mitchell-wayne-petrea-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mitchell Wayne Petrea v. State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4536485,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Texarkana","court_id":"txctapp6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"06-18-00075-CR","docket_id":7902599,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:04:41.415327Z","date_created":"2018-09-19T20:39:13.685435Z","score":{"bm25":10.383017}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1369425,1371028,1464072,1489720,1739835,1747507,2408479,2427876,2449770,2455801,2468681,2539489],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=77197&Index=%5c%5coca%2dpsql12%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa07%5cOpinion","id":4313738,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/09/19/mitchell_wayne_petrea_v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:04:41.405039Z","date_created":"2018-09-19T20:39:13.691887Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d0cf7233e675659b7f430eb19dbf3a67cbf5cab7","snippet":"                    In The\n              Court of Appeals\nSixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana\n\n\n                  No. 06-18-00075-CR\n\n\n\n        MITCHELL WAYNE PETREA, Appellant\n\n                           V.\n\n           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee\n\n\n\n          On Appeal from the 8th District Court\n               Hopkins County, Texas\n               Trial Court No. 1726265\n\n\n\n\n      Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.\n      Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss\n\f     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4313738],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4326627/laqunn-gary-v-state-of-mississippi/","attorney":"\n  OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, BY: BENJAMIN ALLEN SUBER, GEORGE T. HOLMES, ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT\n , \n  OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BY: ALICIA MARIE AINSWORTH, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE\n ","caseName":"Laqunn Gary v. State of Mississippi","caseNameFull":"Laqunn GARY A/K/A Lagunn Gary A/K/A Laqunn Sharod Gary v. STATE of Mississippi","citation":["237 So. 3d 100"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4326627,"court":"Mississippi Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Miss.","court_id":"miss","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. 2014–KA–01172–SCT","docket_id":4547304,"judge":"Maxwell, Kitchens","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:13:21.452132Z","date_created":"2016-12-01T20:09:46.396839Z","score":{"bm25":10.311732}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9869874,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:11:45.919455Z","date_created":"2023-09-26T19:42:08.383245Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\n   KITCHENS, JUSTICE, SPECIALLY CONCURRING:\n  \n\n   ¶ 19. I concur with the majority's holding that, because the trial court did not require the State to present a\n   \n    prima facie\n   \n   case that Gary's confession was voluntary and that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his\n   \n    Miranda\n   \n\n    6\n   \n   rights, the trial court erred by admitting the video","type":"concurrence-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[106881,107252,1131322,1154603,1727310,1737256,1779499,1823373,1873849,1932693],"download_url":"http://courts.ms.gov/Images/Opinions/CO117118.pdf","id":4103888,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/12/01/laqunn_gary_v._state_of_mississippi.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:00:56.029550Z","date_created":"2016-12-01T20:09:46.404339Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2ddb52e787bed861ffd702db5a7c91379c491caa","snippet":"                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI\n\n                        NO. 2014-KA-01172-SCT\n\nLAQUNN GARY a/k/a LAGUNN GARY a/k/a\nLAQUNN SHAROD GARY\n\nv.\n\nSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI\n\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT:               05/22/2014\nTRIAL JUDGE:                    HON. JEFF WEILL, SR.\nTRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS:          MICHAEL HENRY\n                                ALISON KELLY\n                                YEMI KINGS\n                                BRAD HUTTO\n                                GRETA HARRIS","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4103888,9869872,9869874],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10646376/jonathan-colorado-navarro-v-pamela-bondi/","attorney":"","caseName":"Jonathan Colorado Navarro v. Pamela Bondi","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10646376,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2025-01-28","dateFiled":"2025-07-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1253","docket_id":68379814,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-08-01T21:00:53.153109Z","date_created":"2025-08-01T21:00:53.071814Z","score":{"bm25":10.241896}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2650655,4367102,4699588,5176319,6238244,6319459,6332218,9182936,9419298,9420123,9838781,9886986,10794381],"download_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01253/pdf/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01253-0.pdf","id":11112963,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/07/31/jonathan_colorado_navarro_v._pamela_bondi.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T00:35:21.980142Z","date_created":"2025-08-01T21:00:53.073747Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5cb2a62c3f4703fe6a10dbe9449bdb00bc5bb329","snippet":"USCA4 Appeal: 24-1253     Doc: 58        Filed: 07/31/2025    Pg: 1 of 16\n\n\n\n\n                                            PUBLISHED\n\n                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n                                             No. 24-1253\n\n\n        JONATHAN ALEXANDER COLORADO NAVARRO,\n\n                     Petitioner,\n\n              v.\n\n        PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General,\n\n                     Respondent.\n\n\n\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11112963],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10338104/state-v-adams/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Adams","caseNameFull":"","citation":["563 P.3d 719"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10338104,"court":"Supreme Court of Kansas","court_citation_string":"Kan.","court_id":"kan","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-02-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"126130","docket_id":69665670,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:50:57.513923Z","date_created":"2025-02-24T16:06:31.999327Z","score":{"bm25":10.070078}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[98977,105363,106862,108541,110216,118168,727366,1196636,1251749,1412922,2567758,4251388],"download_url":"https://www.kscourts.gov/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Opinions/126130_1.pdf?ext=.pdf","id":10804692,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/02/14/state_v._adams_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:50:57.632679Z","date_created":"2025-02-24T16:06:32.001000Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3d6564f83abb5b121dbc28e730c051cb2cd5a23c","snippet":"              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS\n\n                                        No. 126,130\n\n                                     STATE OF KANSAS,\n                                        Appellant,\n\n                                              v.\n\n                              CHRISTOPHER SHAWN ADAMS,\n                                       Appellee.\n\n\n                              SYLLABUS BY THE COURT\n\n\n1.\n       The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10804692],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4318829/maas-v-superior-court-of-san-diego-county/","attorney":"Counsel, Russell S. Babcock, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner., No appearance for Respondent., Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Edward C. DuMont, State Solicitor General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Steven T. Oetting, Deputy State Solicitor General, Lise S. Jacobson, Peter Quon, Jr., and Susan E. Miller, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest.","caseName":"Maas v. Superior Court of San Diego County","caseNameFull":"MICHAEL EUGENE MAAS, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest","citation":["1 Cal. 5th 962","383 P.3d 637","209 Cal. Rptr. 3d 571","2016 Cal. LEXIS 9039"],"citeCount":37,"cluster_id":4318829,"court":"California Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Cal.","court_id":"cal","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-11-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S225109","docket_id":4486162,"judge":"Cantil-Sakauye, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:11:15.657994Z","date_created":"2016-11-07T18:02:42.403878Z","score":{"bm25":10.024067}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1113311,1160194,1265670,1345022,1389262,1393905,2515489,2632650,2633606,2639151],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S225109.PDF","id":4096090,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/11/07/maas_v._super._ct..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:55:32.843476Z","date_created":"2016-11-07T18:02:42.410655Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"114bb28345c693507e48f8cc3fee83f485c25889","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion\n \n\n  CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.\n \n\n  —Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6\n  \n   1\n  \n  affords litigants the right to peremptorily challenge a superior court judge based on a good faith belief that the judge is prejudiced. When a motion under section 170.6 is in proper form and timely filed, the judge is n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4096090],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4989983/johnson-v-state/","attorney":"Imhotep Alkebu-Lan, attorney for appellant., Office of the Attorney General by Scott Stuart, attorney for appellee.","caseName":"Johnson v. State","caseNameFull":"Cordarrell JOHNSON a/k/a Codarrell Johnson v. STATE of Mississippi","citation":["110 So. 3d 353","2013 WL 1197882","2013 Miss. App. LEXIS 132"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4989983,"court":"Court of Appeals of Mississippi","court_citation_string":"Miss. Ct. App.","court_id":"missctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-03-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 2011-CA-00939-COA","docket_id":60230281,"judge":"Barnes, Carlton, Fair, Griffis, Irving, Ishee, James, Lee, Maxwell, Roberts","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:15:44.558877Z","date_created":"2021-08-20T23:51:38.423216Z","score":{"bm25":9.876693}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4800083,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:49:12.703346Z","date_created":"2021-08-20T23:51:38.442027Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nFAIR, J.,\nfor the Court:\n¶ 1. Johnson was convicted of two counts of sale of Dilaudid, a schedule II controlled substance, in violation of section 41-29-139(a)(1) of the Mississippi Code Annotated (Supp.2012). He was sentenced to serve two twenty-year terms concurrently, each with five years suspended. Johnson received an enhanced sentence because the sale occurred within 1,500 feet of a school or church. ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4800083],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3207668/united-states-v-maurice-d-moore/","attorney":"David E. Hollar, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant., H. Jay Stevens, Attorney, Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Inc., South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.","caseName":"United States v. Maurice D. Moore","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maurice Dimitrie MOORE, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["824 F.3d 620","100 Fed. R. Serv. 658","2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9717","2016 WL 3031047"],"citeCount":21,"cluster_id":3207668,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-1785","docket_id":3068162,"judge":"Posner, Williams', Pallmeyer","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9717","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:37:24.531063Z","date_created":"2016-05-27T18:01:06.161365Z","score":{"bm25":9.717293}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[371426,521929,529998,711156,757077,760895,770756,792009],"download_url":"http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2016/D05-27/C:15-1785:J:Pallmeyer:aut:T:fnOp:N:1761918:S:0","id":3207562,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/05/27/united_states_v._maurice_d._moore.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T04:13:43.741998Z","date_created":"2016-05-27T18:01:06.168365Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"984ca09ea9029e2d10b4c538ce143e6dc17b15f8","snippet":"\n\n\n  PALLMEYER, District Judge.\n \n\n  Marcus Hayden, a federal probationer, engaged in an armed battle with police on April 9, 2012. One officer was injured in the gun fight, and Hayden himself was shot and killed. The government recovered the firearm Hayden used and has charged Defendant Maurice Moore with selling that weapon to Hayden, a known felon, and falsely reporting that the weapon w","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3207562],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"criminal","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10607062/john-ellis-johnson-v-state-of-arkansas/","attorney":"","caseName":"John Ellis Johnson v. State of Arkansas","caseNameFull":"","citation":["596 S.W.3d 83","2020 Ark. App. 157"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10607062,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-03-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70564240,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:50:20.395153Z","date_created":"2025-06-17T20:26:49.010105Z","score":{"bm25":9.655167}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ark. App. 157","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1402480,1489743,1565028,1669206,1740647,1879986,2333744,2391566,2429708,2461284,2468760,4216836,5110032,5111179,6108097,7826737,9662630,9666433,9677470,9773284],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/462304/1/document.do","id":11073650,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/03/04/john_ellis_johnson_v._state_of_arkansas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:50:20.356589Z","date_created":"2025-06-17T20:26:49.019649Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"301ba64a11006324951e4371baf6f84459f9f11f","snippet":"                                                    Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 157\nReason: I attest to the accuracy\nand integrity of this document\n                                     ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\nDate: 2021-07-01 13:15:24                                 DIVISION IV\n                                                          No. CR-19-253\nFoxit PhantomPDF Version:\n9.7.5\n\n                                                                  Opinion Delivered: March 4, 2020\n\n                   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11073650],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10631228/state-of-missouri-v-israel-barrera/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Missouri v. Israel Barrera","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10631228,"court":"Missouri Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mo. Ct. App.","court_id":"moctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"WD87670","docket_id":70761844,"judge":"Mitchell, P.J., and Hardwick, J., concur.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-11T20:33:59.982801Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T15:09:33.966441Z","score":{"bm25":9.61204}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7737,"cites":[118352,1638459,1638982,1773883,2167177,2172678,2333257,2456999,2541038,2779601,5097457,5098854,5111414,5287910,9422845,9429232,9429558,9429766,9432055,9433091,9435413,9634908,9668201],"download_url":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=220834","id":11097815,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/05/27/state_of_missouri_v._israel_barrera.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:17:23.712842Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T15:09:33.996669Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"424e6af55e05c8c11e354582c0f085f504224e2c","snippet":"           IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS\n                   WESTERN DISTRICT\nSTATE OF MISSOURI,                            )\n                                              )\n                               Appellant,     )\n                                              )    WD87670\nv.                                            )\n                                              )    OPINION FILED:\n                                              )    May 27, 2025\nISRAEL BARRERA,                        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7713,7728],"panel_names":["Lisa White Hardwick","Karen King Mitchell"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11097815],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4296399/christopher-ray-weatherspoon-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Christopher Ray Weatherspoon v. State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4296399,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-15-00237-CR","docket_id":4462973,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:42:16.117617Z","date_created":"2016-09-30T04:12:10.068141Z","score":{"bm25":9.609261}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,1683826,1872621,2438997],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=41629&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa01%5cOrder","id":4073660,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/09/30/christopher_ray_weatherspoon_v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:42:16.144282Z","date_created":"2016-09-30T04:12:10.075512Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5034f9c9e84afa0b8378b3e17973a19255ff45ba","snippet":"                                                                           ACCEPTED\n                                                                       03-15-00237-CR\n                                                                               7174853\n                                                            THIRD COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                       AUSTIN, TEXAS\n                                                                  9/30/2015","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4073660],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9371602/progressive-equity-invests-llc-v-painesville-twp-bd-of-trustees/","attorney":"","caseName":"Progressive Equity Invests., L.L.C. v. Painesville Twp. Bd. of Trustees","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ohio 180"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9371602,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-01-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-L-016","docket_id":66769942,"judge":"Nelson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:59:11.614608Z","date_created":"2023-01-30T19:08:43.584534Z","score":{"bm25":9.467901}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 180","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4162664],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2023/2023-Ohio-180.pdf","id":9367078,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/01/23/progressive_equity_invests._l.l.c._v._painesville_twp._bd._of_trustees.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:40:17.396734Z","date_created":"2023-01-30T19:08:43.588495Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"62342c350090302d1414e335d863bbbe9e14460b","snippet":"[Cite as Progressive Equity Invests., L.L.C. v. Painesville Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2023-Ohio-180.]\n\n\n\n                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                            ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                   LAKE COUNTY\n\nPROGRESSIVE EQUITY                                       CASE NO. 2022-L-016\nINVESTMENTS, LLC,\n\n                  Appellant,                             Administrative Appeal from the\n                                                         Cour","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9367078],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CIVIL - administrative appeal court of common pleas R.C. 2506.01 failure to exhaust administrative remedies zoning resolution trustees administrative officials board of zoning appeals no right to notice, hearing, and opportunity to introduce evidence."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4247895/clifton-carl-lamar-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Clifton Carl Lamar v. State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4247895,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-08-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-14-00729-CR","docket_id":4120429,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:21:07.491310Z","date_created":"2016-08-16T00:13:34.735203Z","score":{"bm25":9.442728}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1489720,1579188,1662517,1872621,1891171,2446808,2463936],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=52341&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa03%5cOpinion","id":4025156,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/08/09/clifton_carl_lamar_v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:21:07.745415Z","date_created":"2016-08-16T00:13:34.743456Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2e4c507f818e9de2cf8b8e5c29fa218d859af580","snippet":"      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN\n\n\n                                      NO. 03-14-00729-CR\n\n\n\n                                 Clifton Carl Lamar, Appellant\n\n                                                 v.\n\n                                  The State of Texas, Appellee\n\n\n      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT\n          NO. 72785, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING\n\n\n\n                            MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n\n              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4025156],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9469710/donald-j-trump-v-secretary-of-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Donald J. Trump v. Secretary of State","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 ME 5"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9469710,"court":"Supreme Judicial Court of Maine","court_citation_string":"Me.","court_id":"me","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-01-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Ken-24-24","docket_id":68200059,"judge":"Valerie Stanfill, Andrew M. Mead, Jospeh M. Jabar, Catherine R. Connors, Andrew M. Horton, Wayne R Douglas, Thomas E. Humphrey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:24:03.081036Z","date_created":"2024-01-28T22:50:27.371813Z","score":{"bm25":9.235424}},"neutralCite":"2024 ME 5","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1468940,1501486,1921867,1925743,2112094,2293877,2354896,2355064,2799297,3175864,4580297,4673896,4945024,4961177,4961371,4964214,4965735,6335002],"download_url":"","id":9927548,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/01/24/donald_j._trump_v._secretary_of_state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T09:30:06.370068Z","date_created":"2024-01-28T22:50:27.484168Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3f1618ff5f375d78f3bd7b806d3323321290c329","snippet":"MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT                                      Reporter of Decisions\nDecision:    2024 ME 5\nDocket:      Ken-24-24\nSubmitted on\n  Memoranda: January 24, 2024\nDecided:     January 24, 2024\n\nPanel:        STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, and DOUGLAS, JJ., and\n              HUMPHREY, A.R.J.\n\n\n                                DONALD J. TRUMP\n\n                                          v.\n\n                            SECRETARY OF STATE et al.\n\n\nPER CURIAM\n\n         [","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[4624,4629,16208,16209,16210,16212,16214],"panel_names":["Jospeh M. Jabar","Andrew M. Mead","Valerie Stanfill","Andrew M. Horton","Catherine R. Connors","Thomas E. Humphrey","Wayne R Douglas"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9927548],"source":"D","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}