{"count":5,"next":null,"previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10356329/real-time-medical-systems-inc-v-pointclickcare-technologies-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Real Time Medical Systems, Inc. v. PointClickCare Technologies, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10356329,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2025-01-28","dateFiled":"2025-03-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1773","docket_id":69060357,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-03-13T21:00:50.558027Z","date_created":"2025-03-13T21:00:49.948286Z","score":{"bm25":83.94187}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10822917],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4897618/state-v-hulbert/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Hulbert","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ohio 2298"],"citeCount":23,"cluster_id":4897618,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-07-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-19-07","docket_id":60037743,"judge":"Willamowski","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:53:18.156698Z","date_created":"2021-07-06T14:14:24.695455Z","score":{"bm25":14.7375145}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ohio 2298","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2696366,3725772,4645137,6771756,6775376,11149837,11150401],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/3/2021/2021-Ohio-2298.pdf","id":4701397,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/07/06/state_v._hulbert.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T01:40:53.072355Z","date_created":"2021-07-06T14:14:24.708778Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6eceede4a4249e43889db2b35ac24a414cc50920","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Hulbert, 2021-Ohio-2298.]\n\n\n\n\n                       IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                           THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                               VAN WERT COUNTY\n\n\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,\n                                                          CASE NO. 15-19-07\n       PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,\n\n       v.\n\nTINA M. HULBERT,                                          OPINION\n\n       DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.\n\n\n\n                Appeal from Van Wert County Common Pleas Court\n   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4701397],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence when the jury could infer from the facts that the residents of the nursing home did not consent to the defendant taking their money for her personal use. The convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10895529/john-doe-1-v-office-of-the-director-of-national-intelligence/","attorney":"","caseName":"John Doe 1 v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10895529,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2025-12-10","dateFiled":"2026-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-1527","docket_id":70237144,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-03T21:00:45.176812Z","date_created":"2026-07-03T21:00:44.994823Z","score":{"bm25":9.181258}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[102726,112877,187432,488537,504686,655305,664068,723772,778203,790439,1464441,2969013,4207289,7245894,8983890,9425009,9425012,9425596,9426519,9429000,9429945,9431171,9431176,9431344,9431672,9435422,9475184,9483692,9506101,9875857],"download_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca4-25-01527/pdf/USCOURTS-ca4-25-01527-0.pdf","id":11363057,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/07/02/john_doe_1_v._office_of_the_director_of_national_intelligence.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-03T21:02:12.100723Z","date_created":"2026-07-03T21:00:45.000328Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"77c1668e77fa93c30ee8d242ed024c930384191c","snippet":"USCA4 Appeal: 25-1527     Doc: 41        Filed: 07/02/2026   Pg: 1 of 48\n\n\n\n\n                                            PUBLISHED\n\n                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n                                             No. 25-1527\n\n\n        JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN\n        DOE 6; JANE DOE 1; JANE DOE 2; JANE DOE 3; JANE DOE 4; JANE DOE 5,\n\n                           Plaintiffs - ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11363057],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10942434/pseg-renewable-transmission-llc-v-arentz-family-lp/","attorney":"","caseName":"PSEG Renewable Transmission LLC v. Arentz Family, LP","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10942434,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-05-05","dateFiled":"2026-08-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-1730","docket_id":70689952,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-07T21:00:33.886016Z","date_created":"2026-08-07T21:00:33.778996Z","score":{"bm25":8.458056}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[384571,500070,574911,782420,788077,854312,1024526,1194678,1461850,1487837,1932745,1958715,1979339,1990721,2070225,2080766,2085442,2270855,2334674,2341915,2357008,2383872,2813710,3485021,3489402,4347806,4416826,4697835,5142130,6670491,6935620,7375301,7925162,8408684,8415298,8415302,9298401,9371784,9418969,9428911,9429949,9432839,9435422,9635692,9751777,9760152,9761910,9804091,9818782,9884227,9954096,10487567],"download_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca4-25-01730/pdf/USCOURTS-ca4-25-01730-0.pdf","id":11410018,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/06/pseg_renewable_transmission_llc_v._arentz_family_lp.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-07T21:01:41.179175Z","date_created":"2026-08-07T21:00:33.784232Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"81b4f3836e56153661fd0e44e39e10ce2463643a","snippet":"USCA4 Appeal: 25-1730    Doc: 64        Filed: 08/06/2026   Pg: 1 of 47\n\n\n\n\n                                           PUBLISHED\n\n                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n                                FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n                                            No. 25-1730\n\n\n        PSEG RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION LLC,\n\n                          Plaintiff - Appellee,\n\n                   v.\n\n        ARENTZ FAMILY, LP; BARNEY'S FARM, LLC; HZ PROPERTIES, LLC; M &\n        R, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11410018],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7860232/in-re-swervepay-acquisition-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Swervepay Acquisition, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7860232,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-08-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Consolidated C.A. No. 2021-0447-KSJM","docket_id":64927459,"judge":"McCormick, C.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:03:15.083850Z","date_created":"2022-08-26T21:03:07.644935Z","score":{"bm25":8.208008}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104200,1436487,1443950,1518403,1543330,1921994,1933730,1953582,1984316,2010799,2076469,2108911,2180498,2181236,2185552,2192279,2209546,2267865,2294957,2319183,2328604,2346742,2357555,2360388,2374387,4958418,4966482],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=337170","id":7804098,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/08/26/in_re_swervepay_acquisition_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:45:59.459208Z","date_created":"2022-08-26T21:03:07.649555Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1958bd15736ad61f7a3d806f1e4156676e617219","snippet":"        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\nIN RE SWERVEPAY ACQUISITION,            )     Consolidated C.A. No.\nLLC                                     )     2021-0447-KSJM\n\n                           MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n                           Date Submitted: April 14, 2022\n                           Date Decided: August 26, 2022\n\nPeter J. Walsh, Jr., Nicholas D. Mozal, POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP,\nWilmington, Delaware; Orion Armon, COOLEY LLP, Denver, Colorado; Luke Cadigan","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7804098],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}