{"count":39801,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0zMi4yNDUyNDMmcz02MzEzMjA2JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjkmcD0y&q=PRESERVATION+AND+CARE+OF+TRUST+PROPERTY&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4500958/national-trust-for-historic-preservation-v-semonite/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Semonite","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4500958,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-05-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2017-1574","docket_id":6898174,"judge":"Judge Royce C. Lamberth","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:02:25.038451Z","date_created":"2018-05-24T19:00:55.028831Z","score":{"bm25":48.16142}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1844,"cites":[109827,110953,110991,112255,134751,151425,185915,186599,187224,201450,405954,407571,426278,446898,448992,456326,458547,492611,525204,555431,564758,617923,772245,779424,786525,795906,1652632,2398897,2414250,2421224,2463815,2475527,2493984,2504557,2522932,2539932,2540122,2568541,2596639],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv1574-86","id":4278211,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/05/24/national_trust_for_historic_preservation_v._semonite.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T19:28:41.285083Z","date_created":"2018-05-24T19:00:55.042941Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d2dde84a234cab59d95902fb2880e7a67ce370aa","snippet":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION\nASSOCIATION,\n\nPlaintiff,\n\nv.\nTODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, U.S\nArmy Corps of Engineers and ROBERT M.\nSPEER, Acting Secretary of the Army\n\nDefendants,\n\nVIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER\nCOMPANY,\n\nDefendant-Intervenor.\n\n \n\nNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC\nPRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES\nand ASSOCIATION FOR THE\nPRESERVATION OF THE VIRGINIA\nANTIQUITIES\n\nPlaintiff,\n\nV.\nTODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, U.S\nArmy ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4278211],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10103710/bluegrass-trust-for-historic-preservation-v-lexington-fayette-urban-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bluegrass Trust for Historic Preservation v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government Planning Commission","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10103710,"court":"Kentucky Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ky.","court_id":"ky","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-08-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-SC-0480","docket_id":69126566,"judge":"Conley","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-09-04T02:06:56.527340Z","date_created":"2024-09-04T02:06:56.472563Z","score":{"bm25":43.241673}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,105074,112593,2462976,3447735,3450012,3453324,5021710,5024870,5050177,5053965,7144583,7145746,7378315,7379824,7384212],"download_url":"https://appellatepublic.kycourts.net/api/api/v1/publicaccessdocuments/b3e8f4f5f933d35993c52ccc6ba618eb7efabf132c9b47b954ccf0541158cd28/download","id":10570310,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/08/22/bluegrass_trust_for_historic_preservation_v._lexington_fayette_urban_county.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:45:26.821581Z","date_created":"2024-09-04T02:06:56.479331Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bbcd9965f7a6f408e4d88ec1b49e86ff86decf9a","snippet":"                                               RENDERED: AUGUST 22, 2024\n                                                        TO BE PUBLISHED\n\n\n\n               Supreme Court of Kentucky\n                              2022-SC-0480-DG\n\nBLUEGRASS TRUST FOR HISTORIC                                        APPELLANTS\nPRESERVATION\n\n\nV.                 ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS\n                           NO. 2020-CA-0726\n                        FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT\n                            N","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10570310],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10841485/national-trust-for-historic-preservation-in-the-united-states-v-nps/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. NPS","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10841485,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-04-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26-5101 & 26-5108","docket_id":73179443,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-11T16:00:51.166884Z","date_created":"2026-04-11T16:00:50.931297Z","score":{"bm25":39.14647}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111672,118075,145884,944097,4248498,4278949,4312991,4697473,6317062,6402049,6501080,9432577,9435422,9527076,9806335,9879670,10467292],"download_url":"https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/orders/docs/2026/04/26-5101LDSN2.pdf","id":11308835,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/04/11/national_trust_for_historic_preservation_in_the_united_states_v._nps.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-11T16:01:17.374289Z","date_created":"2026-04-11T16:00:50.972843Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1a572074d66607de617ac7aa20a915a2360be9c1","snippet":"                      United States Court of Appeals\n                                  FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT\n                                           ____________\nNo. 26-5101                                                      September Term, 2025\n                                                                           1:25-cv-04316-RJL\n                                                            Filed On: April 11, 2026\nNational Trust for Historic Preservation in the\nUnited S","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11308835],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4244604/lake-oswego-preservation-society-v-city-of-lake-oswego/","attorney":"Daniel Kearns, Reeve Kearns PC, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the petitioners on review., Christopher P. Koback, Hathaway Koback Connors LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the respondent on review, Marjorie Hanson., No appearance on behalf of respondent on review City of Lake Oswego., Carrie A. Richter, Garvey Schubert Barer, Portland, filed the brief for amici curiae Restore Oregon and Architectural Heritage Center, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation Action, Preservation Works, The City of Portland, The City of Pendleton, and The City of the Dalles. With her on the brief was Jennifer Bragar, Portland; Kathryn Beaumont, Portland Office of City Attorney, Portland for City of Portland; Gene E. Parker, Attorney for the City of The Dalles, The Dalles; and Nancy E. Kerns, Attorney for the City of Pendleton, Pendleton., Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for amici curiae State Historic Preservation Office and Department of Land Conservation and Development. With her on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General., With her on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General.","caseName":"Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego","caseNameFull":"LAKE OSWEGO PRESERVATION SOCIETY, Marylou Colver, and Erin O’Rurke-Meadors, Petitioners on Review, v. CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO, Respondent on Review, and Marjorie HANSON, Trustee for the Mary Cadwell Wilmot Trust. Respondent on Review","citation":["360 Or. 115","379 P.3d 462","2016 Ore. LEXIS 473"],"citeCount":23,"cluster_id":4244604,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-08-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"LUBA 2014-009; CA A157619; SC S063048","docket_id":4117068,"judge":"Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Landau, Baldwin, Brewer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T23:48:38.365889Z","date_created":"2016-08-04T15:11:17.311829Z","score":{"bm25":38.867924}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109924],"download_url":"http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063048.pdf","id":4021865,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/08/04/lake_oswego_preservation_society_v._city_of_lake_oswego.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:05:53.203908Z","date_created":"2016-08-04T15:11:17.317821Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0d8e2e4b7c2c57b67777a2e7ceb14b913749a729","snippet":"\n\n\n  BALMER, C. J.\n \n\n  The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals is affirmed.\n \n\n \n   *117\n   \n  BALMER, C. J.\n \n\n  This case concerns the interpretation of Oregon’s historic property designation consent statute, ORS 197.772. T","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4021865],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10942169/national-trust-for-historic-preservation-in-the-united-states-v-nps/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. NPS","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10942169,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-06-05","dateFiled":"2026-08-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26-5123","docket_id":73204895,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-07T15:01:31.040175Z","date_created":"2026-08-07T15:01:30.930287Z","score":{"bm25":38.56291}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/08/26-5123-2187096.pdf","id":11409752,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/07/national_trust_for_historic_preservation_in_the_united_states_v._nps.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-07T15:03:28.603084Z","date_created":"2026-08-07T15:01:30.943777Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"36b4dababbdc99bffc85432826c7a9e73e30346b","snippet":" United States Court of Appeals\n         FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT\n\n\n\nArgued June 5, 2026                   Decided August 7, 2026\n\n                        No. 26-5123\n\n   NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE\n                   UNITED STATES,\n                      APPELLEE\n\n                             v.\n\n              NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL.,\n                      APPELLANTS\n\n\n\n\n                 Consolidated with 26-5134\n\n\n        Appeals from the United States Dist","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11409752],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10944776/national-trust-for-historic-preservation-in-the-united-states-v-nps/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. NPS","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10944776,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":"2026-06-05","dateFiled":"2026-08-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"26-5123","docket_id":73204895,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-11T15:00:59.734709Z","date_created":"2026-08-11T15:00:59.629712Z","score":{"bm25":38.148254}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/08/26-5123.pdf","id":11412361,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/07/national_trust_for_historic_preservation_in_the_united_states_v._nps_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-11T15:01:15.675440Z","date_created":"2026-08-11T15:00:59.636244Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2bff9ec25d543f6fc0674ed2ce3206115e021d97","snippet":" United States Court of Appeals\n         FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT\n\n\n\nArgued June 5, 2026                   Decided August 7, 2026\n\n                        No. 26-5123\n\n   NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE\n                   UNITED STATES,\n                      APPELLEE\n\n                             v.\n\n              NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL.,\n                      APPELLANTS\n\n\n\n\n                 Consolidated with 26-5134\n\n\n        Appeals from the United States Dist","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11412361],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3161568/olivero-v-new-york-city-department-of-housing-preservation-development/","attorney":"","caseName":"Olivero v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Jason Olivero, Respondent, v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development Et Al., Appellants","citation":["134 A.D.3d 481","21 N.Y.S.3d 73"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3161568,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-12-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15612 101282/13","docket_id":3019925,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:09:46.066733Z","date_created":"2015-12-10T17:55:44.306525Z","score":{"bm25":35.847984}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2057346],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_09167.htm","id":3161568,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/12/10/matter_of_olivero_v._new_york_city_dept._of_hous._preserv.__dev..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:41:09.586661Z","date_created":"2015-12-10T17:06:56.393287Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3d4bc125087aa69963991cd95ac4e36632604b8e","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *482\n   \n  Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered March 28, 2014, which granted the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), dated June 13, 2013, denying petitioner’s application for succession rights","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3161568],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4573133/cowpasture-river-preservation-v-forest-service/","attorney":"ARGUED: Austin D. Gerken, Jr., SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, Asheville, North Carolina, for Petitioners. Avi Kupfer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Brooks Meredith Smith, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Amelia Burnette, J. Patrick Hunter, Asheville, North Carolina, Gregory Buppert, Jonathan Gendzier, SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Petitioners Cowpasture River Preservation Association, Highlanders for Responsible Development, Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, Shenandoah Valley Network, and The Virginia Wilderness Committee. Nathan Matthews, SIERRA CLUB ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROGRAM, Oakland, California, for Petitioners Sierra Club and Wild Virginia, Inc. Eric Grant, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Andrew C. Mergen, J. David Gunter II, Environment & Natural Resources Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stephen A. Vaden, Principal Deputy General Counsel, Washington, D.C., Jay McWhirter, Sarah Kathmann, Office of the General Counsel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Atlanta, Georgia, for Respondents. Andrea W. Wortzel, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Intervenor.","caseName":"Cowpasture River Preservation v. Forest Service","caseNameFull":"COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION; Highlanders for Responsible Development; Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation ; Shenandoah Valley Network; Sierra Club; Virginia Wilderness Committee; Wild Virginia, Inc., Petitioners, v. FOREST SERVICE, an Agency of the U.S. Department of the Agriculture; Kathleen Atkinson, in Her Official Capacity as Regional Forester of the Eastern Region; Ken Arney, in His Official Capacity as Acting Regional Forester of the Southern Region, Respondents, Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC, Intervenor.","citation":["911 F.3d 150"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":4573133,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-12-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1144","docket_id":8405000,"judge":"Gregory, Wynn, Thacker","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:23:18.952450Z","date_created":"2018-12-13T20:00:38.875394Z","score":{"bm25":35.559998}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110953,110991,111221,111678,112255,118096,134751,764071,788826,791786,793627],"download_url":"http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/181144.P.pdf","id":4350386,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/12/13/cowpasture_river_preservation_v._forest_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:51:39.949849Z","date_created":"2018-12-13T20:00:38.885739Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a28c2fb2405ce1469a0178cfa96e6dd89e7fa694","snippet":"\n\n\n  THACKER, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  In this case, we address whether the United States Forest Service (\"Forest Service\") complied with the National Forest Management Act (\"NFMA\"), the National Environmental Policy Act (\"NEPA\"), and the Mineral Leasing Act (\"MLA\") in issuing a Special Use Permit (\"SUP\") and Record of Decision (\"ROD\") authorizing Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (\"Atlantic\"), the projec","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4350386],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9401741/mcgee-v-state-dept-of-health-care-services/","attorney":"","caseName":"McGee v. State Dept. of Health Care Services","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9401741,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C093796","docket_id":67420494,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:06:53.569811Z","date_created":"2023-05-24T19:04:27.140747Z","score":{"bm25":34.124382}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[122259,802687,6982186],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C093796.PDF","id":9397217,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/24/mcgee_v._state_dept._of_health_care_services.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:23:41.215787Z","date_created":"2023-05-24T19:04:27.141776Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6707b0440df2676e50d835101b32399058813462","snippet":"Filed 5/24/23\n                               CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n\n\n\n                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n                                THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                             (Calaveras)\n                                                ----\n\n\n\n\nDANIEL MCGEE, as Trustee, etc.,                                         C093796\n\n                  Plaintiff and Appellant,                    (Super. Ct. No. 12PR7408)\n\n        v.\n\nSTATE ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9397217],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4760996/united-states-forest-service-v-cowpasture-river-preservation-assn/","attorney":"Anthony A. Yang, Washington, DC, for the petitioners in No. 18-1584., Paul D. Clement, Washington, DC, for the petitioner in No. 18-1587., Michael K. Kellogg, Washington, DC, for the respondents., Stephen A. Vaden, General Counsel, Sarah Kathmann, Attorney Advisor, Department of Agriculture, Daniel H. Jorjani, Solicitor, John M. Henson, Attorney Advisor, Department of the Interior, Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Eric Grant, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Andrew C. Mergen, J. David Gunter II, Avi M. Kupfer, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the Federal Petitioners., Paul D. Clement, Erin E. Murphy, William K. Lane III, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for petitioner Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC., Austin D. Gerken, Jr., Amelia Burnette, J. Patrick Hunter, Southern Environmental Law Center, Asheville, NC, Michael K. Kellogg, Gregory G. Rapawy, Bradley E. Oppenheimer, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, Gregory Buppert, Southern Environmental Law Center, Charlottesville, VA, for respondents Cowpasture River Preservation, Association, Highlanders for Responsible, Development, Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, Shenandoah, Valley Network, and Virginia Wilderness Committee., Nathan Matthews, Sierra Club Environmental Law Program, Oakland, CA, for respondents, Sierra Club and, Wild Virginia, Inc.","caseName":"United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Assn.","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Et Al., Petitioners v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION Et Al.; Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, Petitioner v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, Et Al.","citation":["140 S. Ct. 1837","207 L. Ed. 2d 186"],"citeCount":30,"cluster_id":4760996,"court":"Supreme Court of the United States","court_citation_string":"SCOTUS","court_id":"scotus","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-06-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1584; 18-1587","docket_id":17248923,"judge":"Clarence Thomas","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:17:06.909220Z","date_created":"2020-06-15T15:00:39.155789Z","score":{"bm25":34.11916}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3200,"cites":[94950,96405,107219,112373,112632,112826,118376,118410,205720,1201814,1295355,1334106,1341613,2088909,2592096],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1584_igdj.pdf","id":4541343,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/06/15/united_states_forest_service_v._cowpasture_river_preservation_assn..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:03:57.216929Z","date_created":"2020-06-15T15:00:39.172682Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0c41f5dbd5fc8d4dcc01a9ecf5a29f97beffe847","snippet":"\n\n\n  Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court.\n  \n   *\n  \n\n\n\n   *1841\n  \n  We granted certiorari in these consolidated cases to decide whether the United States Forest Service has authority under the Mineral Leasing Act,\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4541343],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6579398/springfield-preservation-trust-inc-v-springfield-library-museums-assn/","attorney":"John J. Egan for Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield., John Egnal, of Pennsylvania (Terry Scott Nagel with him) for the plaintiff.","caseName":"Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. v. Springfield Library & Museums Ass'n","caseNameFull":"Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. v. Springfield Library and Museums Association, Inc., & another","citation":["447 Mass. 408"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":6579398,"court":"Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court","court_citation_string":"Mass.","court_id":"mass","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-08-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":63509406,"judge":"Ireland, Sosman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:17:14.693166Z","date_created":"2022-06-25T12:36:41.743045Z","score":{"bm25":33.977768}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2032970,2160288,2175297,6446706,6446707,6451678,6458089],"download_url":null,"id":6453464,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T19:59:48.451492Z","date_created":"2022-06-25T12:36:41.755276Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nIreland, J.\n(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Spina and Co win, JJ., join). I concur in the court’s conclusion that Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc., is entitled to a hearing on further remedies. I write separately because I disagree with the court’s conclusion that the exemption contained in § 2.46.030(A) of the Revised Ordinances of the city of Springfield (ordinance) is ","type":"in-part-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6453463,6453464],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9539881/oceanview-property-v-baker-a/","attorney":"","caseName":"Oceanview Property v. Baker, A.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Pa. Super. 124"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9539881,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-06-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"292 WDA 2023","docket_id":68849003,"judge":"Lazarus, P.J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-16T22:37:05.809733Z","date_created":"2024-06-12T16:11:16.607977Z","score":{"bm25":33.645805}},"neutralCite":"2024 Pa. Super. 124","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8236,"cites":[1979564,2077109,4261211,4264286,4282268,4382447],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-S34011-23o - 105968004269801787.pdf","id":10006494,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/06/12/oceanview_property_v._baker_a..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T16:06:29.848606Z","date_created":"2024-06-12T16:11:16.618574Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"915bf9a101616627b1a7de3a4f30e350b462f431","snippet":"J-S34011-23\n\n                       2024 PA Super 124\n\n\n OCEANVIEW PROPERTY               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF\n MANAGEMENT & RECOVERY            :        PENNSYLVANIA\n SERVICES, LLC                    :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n              v.                  :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n ADELAIDE C. BAKER, DECEASED,     :   No. 292 WDA 2023\n TOGETHER WITH KNOWN HEIRS        :\n AND UNKNOWN HEIRS","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10006494],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4331598/goodwin-by-and-through-hales-v-four-county-electric-care-trust-inc/","attorney":"Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP, by Patricia P. Shields, Raleigh, and Joshua D. Neighbors, and Law Offices of Wade E. Byrd, P.A., Fayetteville, by Wade E. Byrd, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Young Moore and Henderson, P.A., Raleigh, by Dana H. Hoffman, for Defendant-Appellee.","caseName":"Goodwin, by and Through Hales v. Four County Electric Care Trust, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Delvon R. GOODWIN, BY AND THROUGH His Guardian Ad Litem, Melissa I. HALES, Plaintiff, v. FOUR COUNTY ELECTRIC CARE TRUST, INC., A/K/A Four County Electric Membership Corporation, Defendant.","citation":["795 S.E.2d 590","251 N.C. App. 69","2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 1309","2016 WL 7367967"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4331598,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"COA16-481","docket_id":4555110,"judge":"Dillon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:14:44.985616Z","date_created":"2016-12-20T13:10:29.458793Z","score":{"bm25":33.627094}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1206740,1212875,1215343,1215774,1228760,1237868,1242933,1247499,1256019,1258843,1261722,1263485,1270835,1276204,1281957,1301953,1302022,1305194,1305795,1309167,1328496,1332634,1335833,1349953,1357306,1358554,1386292,1399330,1816116],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=34712","id":4108859,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/12/20/goodwin_v._four_cty._electric_care_tr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:04:18.593415Z","date_created":"2016-12-20T13:10:29.465727Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"45a37cf4628d1bc6e2a8222a252bb5f858ecbdee","snippet":"\n\n\n  DILLON, Judge.\n \n\n\n   *69\n  \n  Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to amend the summons and complaint and granting Four County Electric\n  \n   *70\n  \n  Care Trust, Inc.'s motion to dismiss th","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4108859],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4403471/us-bank-trust-national-association-as-trustee-of-the-american-homeowner/","attorney":"","caseName":"U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the American Homeowner Preservation Trust Series 2013C v. Chester Modesitt and Martha R. Modesitt (mem. dec.)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4403471,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"61A01-1612-MF-2897","docket_id":6080078,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:35:37.574867Z","date_created":"2017-06-26T15:10:27.495056Z","score":{"bm25":33.456326}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[852407,2052829,2103758,2125083,2137243,2241959,2523713],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/06261704tc.pdf","id":4180724,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/06/26/u.s._bank_trust_national_association_as_trustee_of_the_american_homeowner.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:53:35.369791Z","date_created":"2017-06-26T15:10:27.501993Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9ca1f78ab902ae5936181c16d4e7df8946f0b0d8","snippet":"MEMORANDUM DECISION\nPursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),                            FILED\nthis Memorandum Decision shall not be\n                                                             Jun 26 2017, 9:24 am\nregarded as precedent or cited before any\ncourt except for the purpose of establishing                      CLERK\n                                                              Indiana Supreme Court\nthe defense of res judicata, collateral                          Court of Appeals\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4180724],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10304643/matter-of-kosmo-family-trust/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Kosmo Family Trust","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Kosmo Family Trust. Laura E. Knipe Wieland, Donna Savino","citation":["2024 NY Slip Op 24324"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10304643,"court":"Surrogate's Court, Albany County","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Surr. Ct., Albany Cty.","court_id":"nysurctalbany","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-12-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"File No. 2018-235/A","docket_id":69498694,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-12-26T21:10:35.111939Z","date_created":"2024-12-26T21:10:32.584379Z","score":{"bm25":33.39266}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[93380,2060605,2102020,3595554,3616170,3623203,5475698,5488832,5533550,5535176,5538751,5539873,5718539,5737398,5780205,5780387,5797923,5812615,5845453,5851973,5852825,5854795,5869148,5890904,5938576,5995532,6019364,6072243,6072368,6081164,6212977,6499982,9518853,9532065],"download_url":"https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2024/2024_24324.htm","id":10771231,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2024/12/23/matter_of_kosmo_family_trust.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T15:53:52.436203Z","date_created":"2024-12-26T21:10:32.592931Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e71d4332528ec85bc4649f966aaa1ff4f6543c25","snippet":"\n\nMatter of Kosmo Family Trust (2024 NY Slip Op 24324)\n\n\n\n\n[*1]\n\n\nMatter of Kosmo Family Trust\n\n\n2024 NY Slip Op 24324\n\n\nDecided on December 23, 2024\n\n\nSurrogate's Court, Albany County\n\n\nPettit, S.\n\n\nPublished by New York S","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10771231],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4256994/lake-oswego-preservation-society-v-city-of-lake-oswego/","attorney":"","caseName":"Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4256994,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-08-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S063048","docket_id":4422511,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T23:52:06.064625Z","date_created":"2016-09-16T03:06:40.500780Z","score":{"bm25":33.044716}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109924,834895,835011,835187,835419,835480,835507,835574,835771,1113400,1145500,1168803,1186897,1211329,1293474,2613226],"download_url":"http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063048.pdf","id":4034255,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/08/04/lake_oswego_preservation_society_v._city_of_lake_oswego_2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:14:16.091090Z","date_created":"2016-09-16T03:06:40.507364Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ff7c031b53eaf7003064b31c988ce265231f951b","snippet":"No. 51\t                       August 4, 2016\t115\n\n              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE\n                    STATE OF OREGON\n\n        LAKE OSWEGO PRESERVATION SOCIETY,\n                        Marylou Colver,\n                 and Erin O’Rurke-Meadors,\n                     Petitioners on Review,\n                               v.\n                 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO,\n                    Respondent on Review,\n                              and\n                      Marjorie HANSON,\n         truste","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4034255],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4840566/shawareb-v-ssm-health-care-of-oklahoma/","attorney":"","caseName":"SHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMA","caseNameFull":"","citation":["480 P.3d 894","2020 OK 92"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":4840566,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-11-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":18754595,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:17:14.286262Z","date_created":"2020-12-17T21:12:36.828520Z","score":{"bm25":32.978577}},"neutralCite":"2020 OK 92","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112903,1125027,1186256,1187593,1196171,1210800,1224250,1429318,2524431,2602317,2624133,2625103,2625922,2633767,2682786,2682808,2682809,2742221,2762639,3214950,4168854,4214331,4227521,4227522,4351578,4545196,4640327,5158592,5178112],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=487371","id":4644345,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2020/11/24/shawareb_v._ssm_health_care_of_oklahoma_3.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-22T22:37:36.258991Z","date_created":"2020-12-17T21:12:36.831883Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fa3757d200edf344b1d1bd900489091da892b7be","snippet":"\n\t\tOSCN Found Document:SHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMA\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n  \n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tSHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMA2020 OK 92Case Number: 117633Decided: 11/24/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA\nCite as: 2020 OK 92, __ P.3d __\n\n\t\t\t\t\nNOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REV","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4644345],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10317455/oceanview-property-v-baker-a/","attorney":"","caseName":"Oceanview Property v. Baker, A.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["319 A.3d 508","2024 Pa. Super. 126"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":10317455,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-06-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"292 WDA 2023","docket_id":68849003,"judge":"Lazarus, P.J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-15T18:02:29.283952Z","date_created":"2025-01-18T07:00:44.659068Z","score":{"bm25":32.74441}},"neutralCite":"2024 Pa. Super. 126","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8236,"cites":[1979564,2077109,4261211,4264286,4282268,4382447],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-S34011-23o.pdf","id":10012820,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/06/12/oceanview_property_v._baker_a._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T07:15:08.724147Z","date_created":"2024-06-13T16:10:10.999881Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3789e0341d69a442bbe59492896c15a4ef1def1f","snippet":"J-S34011-23\n\n                       2024 PA Super 126\n\n\n OCEANVIEW PROPERTY               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF\n MANAGEMENT & RECOVERY            :        PENNSYLVANIA\n SERVICES, LLC                    :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n              v.                  :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n ADELAIDE C. BAKER, DECEASED,     :   No. 292 WDA 2023\n TOGETHER WITH KNOWN HEIRS        :\n AND UNKNOWN HEIRS","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":8236,"cites":[1979564,2077109,4261211,4264286,4282268,4382447,10012820,10782042],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-S34011-23o.pdf","id":10784043,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/06/12/oceanview_property_v._baker_a._2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:01:51.441652Z","date_created":"2025-01-18T07:00:44.679255Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"46049812eae4d026634b59371332fb912b466329","snippet":"J-S34011-23\n\n                       2024 PA Super 126\n\n\n OCEANVIEW PROPERTY               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF\n MANAGEMENT & RECOVERY            :        PENNSYLVANIA\n SERVICES, LLC                    :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n              v.                  :\n                                  :\n                                  :\n ADELAIDE C. BAKER, DECEASED,     :   No. 292 WDA 2023\n TOGETHER WITH KNOWN HEIRS        :\n AND UNKNOWN HEIRS","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10012820,10784043],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2820842/prescott-v-oklahoma-capitol-preservation-commission/","attorney":". Ryan Kiesel, Brady Henderson, ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, Attorney for Plaintiffs—Appellants., E. Seott Pruitt, Patrick Wyrick, Cara N. Rodriguez, Office of the Oklahoma Attorney General, Oklahoms City, OK, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee. -, Hiram Sasser, Liberty Institute, Plano, TX, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee., Paul D. Clement, George W. Hicks, Jr., Taylor A.R. Mechan, Baneroft PLLC, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Mark E. DeForrest., Mark D. Spencer, McAfee & Taft, Oklahoma City, OK, Attorney for Amicus Curiae Mark E.. DeForrest.","caseName":"PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION","caseNameFull":"Dr. Bruce PRESCOTT, James Huff, Donald Chabot, and Cheryl Franklin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["2015 OK 54","373 P.3d 1032","2015 WL 3982750"],"citeCount":16,"cluster_id":2820842,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-07-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"113,332","docket_id":2677626,"judge":"Reif, Kauger, Watt, Winchester, Edmondson, Taylor, Gurich, Combs, Colbert","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:59:07.518702Z","date_created":"2015-07-28T17:17:37.709058Z","score":{"bm25":32.623375}},"neutralCite":"2015 OK 54","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9809708,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:35:46.256813Z","date_created":"2023-08-31T21:22:20.587900Z"},"ordering_key":5,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nTAYLOR, J.,\nwith whom GURICH, J. joins, concurring in the demal of the pet1t1on for rehearing:\n1 I concur in the Cdurt’s order denying rehearing. I write separately to address issues raised in the Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission's petition for rehearing, filed by the Oklahoma Attorney General, and issues which were not directly confronted in this Court's opinion. The Commission urges that (1) t","type":"concurrence-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[48976,92510,109611,111020,111113,118386,131166,161267,164029,166214,169679,171218,184115,493286,711101,771474,774320,779464,786918,789390,799984,799990,799993,1170594,1175998,1181028,1186189,1192544,1198234,1201149,1228516,1231408,1249461,1460037,2268048,2327648,2518696,2582226,2608682,2615416,2617619,2622765,2630213,2756744,2821547,3812190,3815608,3816888],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=476438","id":2820842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/07/27/prescott_v._oklahoma_capitol_preservation_commission.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:40:01.954873Z","date_created":"2015-07-28T16:22:48.038044Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8f023cda8dfb6bc6c732dbced9711934406ca375","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n\r\n        \r\n        L","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2820842,9809704,9809705,9809706,9809707,9809708,9809709,9809710],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6313206/allison-v-new-york-city-landmarks-preservation-commission/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Albert K. Butzel and Michael S. Gruen, New York City, for petitioners. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Amy Weinblatt of counsel), for New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, respondent. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York City (Maria T. Vullo and Aliza J. Balog of counsel), for Vornado Realty Trust and others, respondents.","caseName":"Allison v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Eric W. Allison v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission","citation":["35 Misc. 3d 500"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":6313206,"court":"New York Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sup. Ct.","court_id":"nysupct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-08-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62944366,"judge":"Billings","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-02-26T22:15:43.691729Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:49:50.015718Z","score":{"bm25":32.245243}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2006941,2057170,2057248,2123647,2165417,2167556,2210555,2212406,2224604,2230125,2584358,5485417,5485880,5532769,5538090,5538334,5538773,5539716,5673357,5675623,5704425,5707464,5737659,5760251,5763062,5781352,5792036,5799642,5800775,5800798,5800994,5818134,5971292,5994729,6002202,6003607,6080455,6081119,6083292,6084958,6093461,6094540,9424818,9432577,9433887,9722685,9786457],"download_url":null,"id":6181612,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:43:40.410554Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:49:50.042118Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nLucy Billings, J.\nThis proceeding requires the court to determine what interests and injuries New York City’s Landmarks Preservation and Historic Districts Law protects, so as to confer standing for persons without a property or contractual interest in the landmark, which would confer standing absent the statutory protection. This determination in turn requires the court to ascertain whe","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6181612],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}