{"count":29965,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xMy4xNzg1NzMmcz00ODYzMDU0JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDktMjkmcD0y&q=PREAMBLE&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6620642/in-re-amendment-of-the-preamble-of-the-code-of-judicial-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Amendment of the Preamble of the Code of Judicial Conduct","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6620642,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"574 Judicial Administration 2022","docket_id":63562895,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:28:27.476357Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:50.193596Z","score":{"bm25":137.25618}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/Order Entered - 105194440190219284.pdf","id":6497000,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/30/in_re_amendment_of_the_preamble_of_the_code_of_judicial_conduct.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T07:17:51.062898Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:50.194409Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"da0d13ce7f92a3f2ecd88c756220e2c71ddb9ead","snippet":"                      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\n\n\n\nIN RE:                                             : NO. 574\n                                                   :\nAMENDMENT OF THE PREAMBLE OF                       : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET\nTHE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT                       :\n                                                   :\n\n\n\n\n                                                  ORDER\n\nPER CURIAM\n\n       AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2022, pursuant to Art","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6497000],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6620643/in-re-amendment-of-the-preamble-of-the-code-of-judicial-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Amendment of the Preamble of the Code of Judicial Conduct","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6620643,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"574 Judicial Administration 2022","docket_id":63562896,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:28:27.503601Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:50.403848Z","score":{"bm25":130.29268}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/Attachment - 105194440190219296.pdf","id":6497001,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/30/in_re_amendment_of_the_preamble_of_the_code_of_judicial_conduct_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T20:11:53.430500Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:50.404708Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cddad9085474cd29da1ef5911ba667de8e4837ea","snippet":"                  PENNSYLVANIA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT\n\n                                      Preamble\n***\n[8] The [Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges]\nPennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is designated as the approved body to\nrender advisory opinions and general guidance regarding ethical concerns involving\njudges, other judicial officers and judicial candidates subject to the Code of Judicial\nConduct. [Although such opinions are not, per se, binding u","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6497001],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6620640/in-re-amendment-of-the-preamble-to-rules-governing-standards-of-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Amendment of the Preamble to Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6620640,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"573 Judicial Administration 2022","docket_id":63562893,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:28:27.424311Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:49.767485Z","score":{"bm25":117.19324}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/attach - 105194435190219572.pdf","id":6496998,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/30/in_re_amendment_of_the_preamble_to_rules_governing_standards_of_conduct.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T20:11:55.223722Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:49.770070Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b74ff0e57cb2d47523e62677e0909c4dad0d003a","snippet":"                 RULES GOVERNING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT\n                     OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGES\n\nPreamble\n***\n(8) The [Ethics Committee of the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges\nand the Ethics and Professionalism Committee of the Special Court Judges\nAssociation of Pennsylvania are] Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is\ndesignated as the approved [bodies] body to render advisory opinions and general\nguidance regarding ethical concerns involving magisterial district ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6496998],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6620641/in-re-amendment-of-the-preamble-to-rules-governing-standards-of-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Amendment of the Preamble to Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6620641,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"573 Judicial Administration 2022","docket_id":63562894,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:28:27.450105Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:49.994023Z","score":{"bm25":117.04299}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/Order Entered - 105194435190219697.pdf","id":6496999,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/30/in_re_amendment_of_the_preamble_to_rules_governing_standards_of_conduct_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T07:17:54.794272Z","date_created":"2022-06-30T20:09:49.994816Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"04225395ed49f010b8461131810bea29ffb6b510","snippet":"                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\n\n\n\nIN RE:                        : NO. 573\n                              :\nAMENDMENT OF THE PREAMBLE TO : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET\nTHE RULES GOVERNING STANDARDS :\nOF CONDUCT OF MAGISTERIAL     :\nDISTRICT JUDGES               :\n                              :\n\n\n\n\n                                                ORDER\n\nPER CURIAM\n\n       AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2022, pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the\nConstitution of P","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6496999],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6217662/preamble-properties-lp-v-thomas-k-woodard-antiques-corp/","attorney":"","caseName":"Preamble Properties, L.P. v. Thomas K. Woodard Antiques Corp.","caseNameFull":"Preamble Properties, L.P. v. Thomas K. Woodard Antiques Corp., Appellants-Respondents","citation":["293 A.D.2d 330","739 N.Y.S.2d 824","2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3620"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":6217662,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-04-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62578752,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T08:39:54.880850Z","date_created":"2022-01-13T19:10:00.136072Z","score":{"bm25":89.79826}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2038313],"download_url":null,"id":6084302,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:23:51.519844Z","date_created":"2022-01-13T19:10:00.150865Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOrder and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 11, 2001 and February 22, 2001, respectively, which, inter alia, granted partial summary judgment to plaintiff commercial landlord Preamble Properties as against defendant tenant Thomas K. Woodard Antiques Corp. and individual guarantor defendants Thomas K. Woodard and Blanche Greenstein for rent due plaintiff under the subject lease and guarantees through January 2, ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6084302],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/485828/preamble-v-williamsport-area-community-college/","attorney":"","caseName":"Preamble v. Williamsport Area Community College","caseNameFull":"","citation":["815 F.2d 695"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":485828,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1987-03-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"86-5698","docket_id":2345522,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T21:49:47.082930Z","date_created":"2014-12-22T03:24:14.916943Z","score":{"bm25":69.10679}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/815/815.F2d.695.86-5698.html","id":485828,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T05:20:36.019717Z","date_created":"2011-08-23T09:49:07Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0555b618873fa27fc3950ffddf40a945c0043406","snippet":"815 F.2d 695\n    Preamblev.Williamsport Area Community College\n    86-5698\n    United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.\n    3/13/87\n    \n      M.D.Pa.,\n      Kosik, J.\n    \n    AFFIRMED\n    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[485828],"source":"R","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2763973/burdue-v-federal-aviation-administration/","attorney":"ON BRIEF: Richard G. Martin, Fraser Clemens Martin & Miller LLC, Perrys-burg, Ohio, for Petitioner. Bradley J. Preamble, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.","caseName":"Burdue v. Federal Aviation Administration","caseNameFull":"Bradley J. BURDUE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Respondent","citation":["774 F.3d 1076","2014 FED App. 0304P","2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24391","2014 WL 7270532"],"citeCount":18,"cluster_id":2763973,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-4029","docket_id":2618223,"judge":"Keith, Batchelder, Stranch","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24391","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:32:56.647992Z","date_created":"2014-12-31T18:08:37.535041Z","score":{"bm25":34.60489}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105205,108283,108375,109606,112097,112536,185857,330055,373043,527090,567206,596475,627463,673514,677442,720539,725521,752165,754047,2343211],"download_url":"http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/14a0304p-06.pdf","id":2763973,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/12/23/bradley_burdue_v._faa.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:58:27.184738Z","date_created":"2014-12-23T17:00:59.064129Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"15adb60fcb9e26586bf86a12dd3389550da0c139","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  Bradley J. Burdue petitions for review of a Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) order revoking his certification as an Airworthiness Representative-Maintenance (“DAR-T”). 49 U.S.C. § 44702(d)(2) authorizes the FAA to rescind this designation “at any time for any reason.” We decline to review the merits of","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2763973],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8689730/aircraft-owners-pilots-assn-v-federal-aviation-administration/","attorney":"Kathleen Ann Barbara Yodice, Yodice Associates, Washington, DC, for Petitioner., Bradley James Preamble, Sheila Ann Skojec, Federal Aviation Administration, Litigation Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.","caseName":"Aircraft Owners & Pilots Ass'n v. Federal Aviation Administration","caseNameFull":"AIRCRAFT OWNERS AND PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and Robert A. Sturgell, Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration","citation":["296 F. App'x 92"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8689730,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-10-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-1407","docket_id":65955188,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:56:38.619930Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T00:34:52.012485Z","score":{"bm25":34.145943}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8672803,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:15:52.893821Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T00:34:52.018922Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nJUDGMENT\n\nPER CURIAM.\nThis appeal was considered on the record from the Federal Aviation Administration and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is\n*93ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied for the reasons stated in the memorandum accompanying this judgment.\nPursuant to D","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8672803],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2680223/joseph-sheble-iii-v-michael-huerta/","attorney":"Joseph Michael Lamonaca argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner., Bradley J. Preamble, Trial Attorney, Federal Aviation Administration, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Richard H. Saltsman, Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation and General Law.","caseName":"Joseph Sheble, III v. Michael Huerta","caseNameFull":"Joseph F. SHEBLE, III, Petitioner v. Michael P. HUERTA, Et Al., Respondents","citation":["410 U.S. App. D.C. 312","755 F.3d 954","2014 WL 2853719","2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11830"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2680223,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-06-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-1136","docket_id":402985,"judge":"Garland, Srinivasan, Williams","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11830","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:46:21.578953Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T09:11:38.020214Z","score":{"bm25":31.387276}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105892,185857,780709],"download_url":"http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/0/0851FAE2E9BD3B3A85257D01004D7732/$file/13-1136-1499098.pdf","id":2680223,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/06/24/joseph_sheble_iii_v._michael_huerta.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:57:02.417074Z","date_created":"2014-06-24T15:01:01.044936Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"482db169cff399d6dba49203f248c091df0ddc5a","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SRINIVASAN.\n \n\n  SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  Joseph F. Sheble, III, served as a Designated Pilot Examiner on behalf of the Federal Aviation Administration. That role called for him to conduct flight examinations and issue FAA certificates to pilots. The FAA revoked Sheble’s appointment based on deficiencies in his p","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2680223],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7327324/curtis-v-united-states/","attorney":"Andre Townsend Tennille, III, William Kent Owens, Andrew M. Scherffius, III, Ranse M. Partin, Cale Howard Conley, Conley Griggs Partin, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Douglas Brian Warner; Warner, Hooper & Ramsey, Peachtree City, GA, Thomas Henry Nickerson, Office of Thomas H. Nickerson, Greenville, GA, John McKay Sheftall, Robert C. Martin, Jr., Hall Booth Smith & Slover, Columbus, GA, for Plaintiffs. ■, Bradley J. Preamble,- U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div., Torts Branch, Aviation & Admiralty Litigation, Eric S. Johnson, Orla Margaret Brady, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Austin Millar Hall, Lori M. Beranek, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant.","caseName":"Curtis v. United States","caseNameFull":"Karen J. CURTIS, Individually as the Surviving Spouse of Dr. Jeffrey Van Curtis, and Robert Rupenthal, Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate of Dr. Jeffrey Van Curtis v. United States","citation":["274 F. Supp. 3d 1366"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7327324,"court":"District Court, N.D. Georgia","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ga.","court_id":"gand","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CIVIL ACTION FILE NUMBER 3:15-cv-176-TCB","docket_id":64315808,"judge":"Batten","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:38:31.863848Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:15:14.417207Z","score":{"bm25":21.61122}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7245240,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:40:48.010526Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:15:14.424942Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER\nTimothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge\nOn February 22, 2014, Jeffrey Van Curtis was killed in an airplane crash at the LaGrange-Callaway Airport in LaGrange, Georgia. Curtis’s widow, Plaintiff Karen J. Curtis, and the administrator of his estate, Plaintiff Robert Rupenthal, brought this lawsuit against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7245240],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2676741/pucciariello-v-united-states/","attorney":"Michael Moulis, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for plaintiff., Russell J. Upton, United States Department of Justice, with whom were Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Bryant G. Snee, Acting Director, and Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director, Washington, DC, for defendant. Bradley J. Preamble, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, of counsel., Contract; Fifth Amendment Taking; Preemption of Tucker Act Jurisdiction by 49 U.S.C. § 46110 (2006); Jurisdictional Effect of Failure to Concede Lawfulness of Government “Taking”; Failure to State a Claim for Money Damages; No Jurisdiction to Award Equitable Relief under •28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) (2012).","caseName":"Pucciariello v. United States","caseNameFull":"Carmine J. PUCCIARIELLO, Plaintiff, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant","citation":["116 Fed. Cl. 390","2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 450","2014 WL 2446721"],"citeCount":30,"cluster_id":2676741,"court":"United States Court of Federal Claims","court_citation_string":"Fed. Cl.","court_id":"uscfc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-06-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1:13-cv-00590","docket_id":339491,"judge":"Lynn J. Bush","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:44:58.409068Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:38:17.071871Z","score":{"bm25":21.281408}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[77175,102656,104407,105732,108608,109009,109386,110763,110997,111168,111227,118062,145730,145875,152552,178712,207953,208214,209960,209995,210631,210729,211127,211317,211780,211930,301261,467564,505946,509090,522244,525110,525268,530635,561400,562739,565276,567206,580018,596475,613464,673514,677442,680999,683243,692080,714792,733360,738323,751762,754047,756522,759595,761306,765620,766089,772678,773002,773604,775623,777073,777849,778280,780709,781352,784343,787385,787386,788114,790039,790478,791768,793118,793721,796926,1236389,1437865,2343211],"download_url":"https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0590-22-0","id":2676741,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/06/02/pucciariello_v._united_states.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:54:29.449737Z","date_created":"2014-06-02T20:00:55.691981Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4edb626912cbbe06bf2b2a3c826921ca2749d228","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  BUSH, Senior Judge.\n \n\n  Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). That motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2676741],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9381735/texas-department-of-insurance-division-of-workers-compensation-accident/","attorney":"","caseName":"Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation// Accident Fund Insurance Company of America and Texas Cotton Ginners' Trust v. Accident Fund Insurance Company of America and Texas Cotton Ginners' Trust// Cross-Appellee, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9381735,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-02-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-21-00074-CV","docket_id":66961217,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:04:21.351146Z","date_created":"2023-03-07T11:08:06.405603Z","score":{"bm25":15.349978}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=43125&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa03%5cOpinion","id":9377211,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/02/28/texas_department_of_insurance_division_of_workers_compensation_accident_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:04:21.353477Z","date_created":"2023-03-07T11:08:06.406652Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f95c9c8ab304c8468f68df8a24742178e140d7ad","snippet":"       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN\n\n\n                      JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 28, 2023\n\n\n\n                                     NO. 03-21-00074-CV\n\n\n Appellant, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation// Cross-\n     Appellants, Accident Fund Insurance Company of America and Texas Cotton\n                                    Ginners’ Trust\n\n                                                v.\n\n  Appellees, Accident Fund Insurance Company of America","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9377211],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10601322/in-re-amendments-to-the-arkansas-rules-of-professional-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Amendments to the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 Ark. 115"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":10601322,"court":"Supreme Court of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark.","court_id":"ark","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-06-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70496698,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-11T01:02:57.475485Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T00:02:40.973572Z","score":{"bm25":14.878968}},"neutralCite":"2025 Ark. 115","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/523724/1/document.do","id":11067910,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/05/in_re_amendments_to_the_arkansas_rules_of_professional_conduct.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:35:09.329220Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T00:02:40.983789Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"7bec73fd8cdf475bc14a9abdb51a072e32ebcde3","snippet":"                                     Cite as 2025 Ark. 115\n                 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\n\n                                                   Opinion Delivered: June 5, 2025\n\nIN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE\nARKANSAS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL\nCONDUCT\n\n\n\n\n                                         PER CURIAM\n\n        In response to the growing use of artificial intelligence, the Supreme Court of\n\n Arkansas Committee on Automation created a subcommittee to study the use of artificial\n\n intelligence i","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11067910],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8616662/pamela-rose-siojo-v-overseas-manpower-solutions/","attorney":"","caseName":"PAMELA ROSE SIOJO v. OVERSEAS MANPOWER SOLUTIONS","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8616662,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-2190","docket_id":65879522,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:28:19.841703Z","date_created":"2022-11-23T16:02:51.880143Z","score":{"bm25":14.32675}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://edca.4dca.org/DCADocs/2021/2190/212190_DC13_11232022_094801_i.pdf","id":8595685,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/23/pamela_rose_siojo_v._overseas_manpower_solutions.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T03:22:35.499792Z","date_created":"2022-11-23T16:02:51.881392Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c40165b4da8c03b57cd93f152e4f59e441f8d894","snippet":"        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA\n                              FOURTH DISTRICT\n\n                          PAMELA ROSE SIOJO,\n                              Appellant,\n\n                                      v.\n\n                  OVERSEAS MANPOWER SOLUTIONS,\n                             Appellee.\n\n                              No. 4D21-2190\n\n                            [November 23, 2022]\n\n   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,\nBroward County;","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8595685],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10120528/marilyn-and-scott-turnbow-v-hiegel-building-solutions-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Marilyn and Scott Turnbow v. Hiegel Building Solutions, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ark. App. 438"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10120528,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":69171459,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-09-18T14:02:05.699971Z","date_created":"2024-09-18T14:02:05.639481Z","score":{"bm25":13.878042}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ark. App. 438","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1491482,1491508,1742878,1744998,1873219,2787096,2901227,4240544,5288399,7827844,9297758,9662911,9773135,9824307,9957387],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/522955/1/document.do","id":10587129,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/18/marilyn_and_scott_turnbow_v._hiegel_building_solutions_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-02T21:28:59.487546Z","date_created":"2024-09-18T14:02:05.647065Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a3f1da6893fab1f379f17118aacb8d8ba7048517","snippet":"                                Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 438\n                   ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\n                                      DIVISION III\n                                      No. CV-23-310\n\n\n\n\n                                               Opinion Delivered September 18, 2024\n\nMARILYN AND SCOTT TURNBOW\n                     APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER\n                                COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT\nV.                              [NO. 23CV-22-1177]\n\nHIEGEL BUILDING ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10587129],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10054987/john-doe-v-sec-public-reissued-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"John Doe v. SEC (PUBLIC REISSUED OPINION)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10054987,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2023-11-13","dateFiled":"2024-08-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-1044","docket_id":66835686,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-08-23T15:00:59.210680Z","date_created":"2024-08-23T15:00:59.165259Z","score":{"bm25":13.613983}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[184884,186700,3169963,6326896],"download_url":"https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/0/50FE4843D079673785258B7B0051CC11/$file/23-1044-2070395.pdf","id":10521587,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/08/16/john_doe_v._sec_public_reissued_opinion_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-03T01:42:44.618043Z","date_created":"2024-08-23T15:00:59.167033Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5685806584983cd244ab21b37421e529fdab9aec","snippet":" United States Court of Appeals\n          FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT\n\n\n\nArgued November 13, 2023                Decided June 21, 2024\n                                     Reissued August 16, 2024\n\n\n                         No. 23-1044\n\n                         JOHN DOE,\n                         PETITIONER\n\n                               v.\n\n          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,\n                       RESPONDENT\n\n\n              On Petition for Review of an Order\n         of the ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10521587],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10608264/abraham-grant-v-state-of-arkansas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Abraham Grant v. State of Arkansas","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 Ark. 282"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":10608264,"court":"Supreme Court of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark.","court_id":"ark","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-09-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70568180,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-18T03:57:35.208434Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T03:57:35.144018Z","score":{"bm25":13.508186}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ark. 282","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1878000,2342896,2676192],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/485582/1/document.do","id":11074852,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/09/24/abraham_grant_v._state_of_arkansas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:09:25.753507Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T03:57:35.158753Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fd1d3c37a3cd15dec637b3cac94cf5a2938727a6","snippet":"                                  Cite as 2020 Ark. 282\n                  SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\n                                     No. CV-19-983\n\n\n\n\nABRAHAM GRANT                                 Opinion Delivered September 24, 2020\n                              APPELLANT\n\nV.                                       PRO SE MOTIONS TO DISCREDIT\n                                         APPELLEE’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF, FOR\nSTATE OF ARKANSAS                        CONSTITUTION OF STATE OF\n            ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11074852],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3216544/floyd-v-state/","attorney":"Gerald K. Crow, for appellant., Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., Little Rock, by: Kristen C. Green, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.","caseName":"Floyd v. State","caseNameFull":"Phillip FLOYD, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee","citation":["2016 Ark. 264","495 S.W.3d 82","2016 Ark. LEXIS 227"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":3216544,"court":"Supreme Court of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark.","court_id":"ark","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CR-15-813","docket_id":3081810,"judge":"Courtney Hudson Goodson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:42:35.196871Z","date_created":"2016-06-23T16:06:19.089156Z","score":{"bm25":13.3808975}},"neutralCite":"2016 Ark. 264","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9824308,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T04:26:20.100826Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T10:38:35.188898Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":" Howard W. Brill, Chief Justice, concurring. |fiI concur with the majority, but write to express an additional reason for the result. The first generally recognized ethical standards for lawyers were the Canons of Professional Ethics. Adopted by the American Bar Association in 1908 and later approved by the Arkansas Supreme Court, the forty-se","type":"concurrence-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[108377,108582,109572,1491482,1491508,1499929,1603697,1639311,1685604,1713787,1742878,1744998,2166195,2437830,2639638,2674458],"download_url":"http://opinions.aoc.arkansas.gov/weblink8/0/doc/355473/Electronic.aspx","id":3216438,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/06/23/floyd_v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T04:20:03.423113Z","date_created":"2016-06-23T16:06:19.095694Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"954633d5e69023892d96115ea08cdab173f685f5","snippet":"                                   Cite as 2016 Ark. 264\n\n\n                SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\n                                      No.   CR-15-813\nPHILLIP FLOYD\n                                                Opinion Delivered: June   23, 2016\n                               APPELLANT\n\nV.                                              APPEAL FROM THE CARROLL\n                                                COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT\nSTATE OF ARKANSAS                               [CR2015-136]\n    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3216438,9824307,9824308,9824309,9824310],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4864535/2157-acp-llc-v-famous-indus-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"2157 ACP LLC v. Famous Indus., Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 NY Slip Op 01478"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4864535,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-03-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 155888/17 Appeal No. 13325 Case No. 2020-01713","docket_id":59736196,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:44:55.786523Z","date_created":"2021-03-16T17:10:16.046839Z","score":{"bm25":13.214218}},"neutralCite":"2021 NY Slip Op 01478","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4666833,5674846],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01478.htm","id":4668314,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2021/03/11/2157_acp_llc_v._famous_indus._inc._1.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:49:48.914121Z","date_created":"2021-03-16T17:10:16.051006Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0451b6a7d28b88f39eb4b8cc0112654a4bc810d3","snippet":"\r\n\r\n2157 ACP LLC v Famous Indus., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 01478)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n2157 ACP LLC v Famous Indus., Inc.\r\n\r\n\r\n2021 NY Slip Op 01478\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on March 11, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, First Department\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nPublished by New York State Law Reportin","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4668314],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4863054/2157-acp-llc-v-famous-indus-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"2157 ACP LLC v. Famous Indus., Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 NY Slip Op 01478"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4863054,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-03-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 155888/17 Appeal No. 13325 Case No. 2020-01713","docket_id":59723383,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:44:34.539721Z","date_created":"2021-03-11T17:09:06.195682Z","score":{"bm25":13.178573}},"neutralCite":"2021 NY Slip Op 01478","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4668314,5674846],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01478.htm","id":4666833,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2021/03/11/2157_acp_llc_v._famous_indus._inc..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:49:16.595439Z","date_created":"2021-03-11T17:09:06.199052Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"82d2f827bb1fc7206815b686ad21188336c99cfa","snippet":"\r\n\r\n2157 ACP LLC v Famous Indus., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 01478)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n2157 ACP LLC v Famous Indus., Inc.\r\n\r\n\r\n2021 NY Slip Op 01478\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on March 11, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, First Department\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nPublished by New York State Law Reportin","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4666833],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}