{"count":260790,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0zNC4wNjM4NTQmcz00NzUzODIyJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDktMDMmcD0y&q=PLACE+OF+DELIVERY&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4632589/jacqueline-smith-v-laurenz-place-llc/","attorney":"Attorney for Appellant: Richard E. Bryant, The Law Office of Richard E. Bryant, P.C., Goshen, Indiana","caseName":"Jacqueline Smith v. Laurenz Place LLC","caseNameFull":"Jacqueline SMITH, Appellant, v. LAURENZ PLACE LLC, Appellee.","citation":["127 N.E.3d 1250"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4632589,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals Case 19A-SC-36","docket_id":15829209,"judge":"Bailey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:40:50.313916Z","date_created":"2019-06-25T15:03:31.751642Z","score":{"bm25":41.584824}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2085064,2252929,2523455],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/06251901lmb.pdf","id":4409842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/06/25/jacqueline_smith_v._laurenz_place_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:32:51.957573Z","date_created":"2019-06-25T15:03:31.758659Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d5f9e33ae0b0b2e7d5d4d20a693cc077a4101352","snippet":"\n\n\n  Bailey, Judge.\n \n\n  Case Summary\n \n\n  [1] In Cause No. 71D02-1803-SC-2509 (\"Cause 2509\"), Jacqueline Smith (\"Smith\") was sued by her former landlord, Laurenz Place LLC (\"Laurenz Place\"), for an alleged breach of a lease. The parties reached a settlement and Smith vacated the premises without an admission of breach. Subsequently, Laurenz Place returned Smith's security deposit","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4409842],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9488919/nlrb-v-bannum-place-of-saginaw-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"NLRB v. Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["97 F.4th 351"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":9488919,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-03-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-1632","docket_id":67642996,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:58:55.085472Z","date_created":"2024-03-28T18:00:39.379942Z","score":{"bm25":40.57619}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[50615,205103,593343,773735,4147737,6986458],"download_url":"http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/24a0068p-06.pdf","id":9955532,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/03/28/nlrb_v._bannum_place_of_saginaw_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:58:55.200649Z","date_created":"2024-03-28T18:00:39.383153Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"98a2d4256157bb8df5a3762f2e3f625bdf38f7a5","snippet":"                               RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION\n                               Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)\n                                      File Name: 24a0068p.06\n\n                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n                                 FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n\n                                                            ┐\n NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,\n                                                            │\n                     Petitioner/Cross-Resp","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9955532],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9374193/matter-of-paka-same-day-delivery-inc-commissioner-of-labor/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Paka (Same Day Delivery Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 NY Slip Op 00704"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9374193,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-02-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"533634","docket_id":66799614,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:59:50.262295Z","date_created":"2023-02-09T16:07:56.096696Z","score":{"bm25":39.774464}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4505298,4698246,5119966],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_00704.htm","id":9369669,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2023/02/09/matter_of_paka_same_day_delivery_inc.--commissioner_of_labor.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T15:10:47.637240Z","date_created":"2023-02-09T16:07:56.098246Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9ee8012a7d0101c426088adf6abfc83e3b588d33","snippet":"\n\nMatter of Paka (Same Day Delivery Inc.--Commissioner of Labor) (2023 NY Slip Op 00704)\n\n\n\n\n\nMatter of Paka (Same Day Delivery Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)\n\n\n2023 NY Slip Op 00704\n\n\nDecided on February 9, 2023\n\n\nAppellate Division, Third Department\n\n\n\nPub","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9369669],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6240854/city-of-richardson-v-oncor-elec-delivery-co/","attorney":"Hannah Wilchar, Thomas Lane Brocato, Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., Austin, for Amicus Curiae Steering Committee of Cities Served by Oncor., Scott N. Houston, Texas Municipal League, Austin, for Amicus Curiae Texas Municipal League., Amy Davis, Office of the Attorney, Austin, Brantley D. Starr, Deputy First Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General, Austin, James E. Davis, Kellie E. Billings-Ray, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, Jeffrey C. Mateer, First Assistant Attorney General, Austin, Priscilla M. Hubenak, Office of the Attorney General of Texas Environmental Protection & Admin Law, Austin, W. Kenneth Paxton Jr., Attorney General of Texas Office of the Attorney General, Austin, for Amicus Curiae The Public Utility Commission of Texas., Wallace B. Jefferson, Susan S. Vance, Alexander Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP, Austin, Clarence A. West, Austin, Peter G. Smith, Victoria W. Thomas, Nichols Jackson Dillard Hager & Smith, LLP, Dallas, Roger D. Townsend, Alexander Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP, Houston, for Petitioner., Robert K. Wise, Andrew James Szygenda, Lillard Wise Szygenda PLLC, Dallas, Howard V. Fisher, Oncor Electric Delivery Company, Dallas, John C. Stewart, Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLP, Fort Worth, for Respondent.","caseName":"City of Richardson v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co.","caseNameFull":"CITY OF RICHARDSON, Texas v. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC","citation":["539 S.W.3d 252"],"citeCount":94,"cluster_id":6240854,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-02-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-1008","docket_id":62616191,"judge":"Green","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-26T17:45:18.367496Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:40:44.185956Z","score":{"bm25":38.75674}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111044,670628,894488,894830,895260,895305,1496482,1527473,1709877,2003292,2342827,3195128,3214719,3964971,3968288,4071559,4114778,5286492,9513160,9608662,9645248,9647127,9718380,9763882,9823062,9871882],"download_url":null,"id":6107833,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-26T17:45:18.324257Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:40:44.207951Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJustice Green delivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis case involves a dispute between a city and a utility over who must pay relocation costs to accommodate changes to public rights-of-way. The City of Richardson negotiated a franchise agreement with Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, requiring Oncor to bear the costs of relocating its equipment and facilities to accommodate changes to public rights-of-way. Richardson later app","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6107833],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10368211/oncor-electric-delivery-company-llc-v-public-utility-commission-of-texas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. Public Utility Commission of Texas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10368211,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [15th Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp15","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-24-00042-CV","docket_id":69604286,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:17.356227Z","date_created":"2025-03-31T08:19:25.223013Z","score":{"bm25":38.684624}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=4a8af936-35c7-48d7-99e4-b6b24fa7437a","id":10834799,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/25/oncor_electric_delivery_company_llc_v._public_utility_commission_of_texas_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:17.352143Z","date_created":"2025-03-31T08:19:25.224907Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7a85edc1b6705335fd29d304c6a61595411bba05","snippet":"                                                                                                 ACCEPTED\n                                                                                            15-24-00042-CV\n                                                                         FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                            AUSTIN, TEXAS\n                                                                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10834799],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10325513/oncor-electric-delivery-company-llc-v-public-utility-commission-of-texas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. Public Utility Commission of Texas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10325513,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [15th Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp15","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-24-00042-CV","docket_id":69604286,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:21:44.332268Z","date_created":"2025-02-03T09:18:14.042644Z","score":{"bm25":37.70776}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=916b265d-35f4-488b-bb9a-731ca61a0942","id":10792101,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/01/29/oncor_electric_delivery_company_llc_v._public_utility_commission_of_texas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:21:44.328901Z","date_created":"2025-02-03T09:18:14.044881Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"95f726c4f468d671391b718f0a58c576b4013cd9","snippet":"                                                                                                ACCEPTED\n                                                                                           15-24-00042-CV\n                                                                        FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                           AUSTIN, TEXAS\n                                                                                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10792101],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10348812/the-city-of-killeen-v-oncor-electric-delivery-company-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"The City of Killeen v. Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10348812,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-02-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-23-00063-CV","docket_id":69700908,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:22:31.329082Z","date_created":"2025-03-04T07:17:22.134104Z","score":{"bm25":37.631706}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104708,107451,894512,894868,894949,895342,1377025,1399904,1400009,1484883,1517967,1561516,1572956,1624478,1762374,1768496,2166021,2353903,2379829,2382704,2437166,2457055,2460859,2751330,2831518,2915376,3102925,3119276,4114778,5087854,5109222,5109266,5282849,5285607,6108225],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=7121c303-1725-4f6b-b9e2-b92d18383dc8","id":10815400,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/02/28/the_city_of_killeen_v._oncor_electric_delivery_company_llc_2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:22:31.339550Z","date_created":"2025-03-04T07:17:22.136311Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6311eded8caf52b0f5df5c5ef7b5b71a5b4b82f5","snippet":"        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN\n\n\n                                       NO. 03-23-00063-CV\n\n\n                                  The City of Killeen, Appellant\n\n                                                  v.\n\n                       Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, Appellee\n\n\n                FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY\n    NO. 23-DCV-336513, THE HONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING\n\n\n                                           OPINION\n\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10815400],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6488091/colon-v-strategic-delivery-solutions-llc/","attorney":"Ravi Sattiraju argued the cause for appellants (The Sattiraju Law Firm, PC, attorneys; Ravi Sattiraju, of counsel and on the brief; Carole Lynn Nowicki, on the brief)., Patrick W. McGovern argued the cause for respondents (Genova Burns, LLC, attorneys; Patrick W. McGovern, of counsel and on the brief; Shawn M. Lopez, on the brief).","caseName":"Colon v. Strategic Delivery Solutions, LLC","caseNameFull":"Gloria COLON, Diana Mejia and Freddy Diaz, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. STRATEGIC DELIVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, and Myriam Barreto, Defendants-Respondents.","citation":["210 A.3d 932","459 N.J. Super. 349"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":6488091,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DOCKET NO. A-2378-17T4","docket_id":63417824,"judge":"Firko, Hoffman, Suter","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:52:29.197761Z","date_created":"2022-06-24T23:29:41.877041Z","score":{"bm25":37.45875}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6360295,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T03:25:53.686069Z","date_created":"2022-06-24T23:29:41.886865Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSUTER, J.A.D.\n*354Plaintiffs Gloria Colon, Diana Mejia and Freddy Diaz appeal the January 2, 2018 summary judgment order that dismissed their class action complaint and jury demand. The order required mandatory binding arbitration on an individual basis of their wage and hour claims against defendants Strategic Delivery Solutions, LLC (SDS) an","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6360295],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4394559/matter-of-crystal-medical-delivery-servs-commissioner-of-labor/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Crystal (Medical Delivery Servs.--Commissioner of Labor)","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Claim of Robert A. Crystal, Respondent. Medical Delivery Services, Appellant; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent","citation":["2017 NY Slip Op 4185","150 A.D.3d 1595","55 N.Y.S.3d 518"],"citeCount":16,"cluster_id":4394559,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"523521","docket_id":6066073,"judge":"Peters, McCarthy, Egan, Devine, Mulvey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:32:25.950272Z","date_created":"2017-05-25T16:13:20.796022Z","score":{"bm25":36.892338}},"neutralCite":"2017 NY Slip Op 4185","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2483205,3152333,3156030,3208773,4112046,4116942,5537126],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_04185.htm","id":4171812,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2017/05/25/matter_of_crystal_medical_delivery_servs.--commissioner_of_labor.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:47:34.635506Z","date_created":"2017-05-25T16:13:20.801555Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bb8f76430e7e3baa616844959793cc6c1c7801d8","snippet":"\n\n\n  Peters, P.J.\n \n\n  Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 28, 2015, which ruled, among other things, that Medical Delivery Services was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.\n \n\n  Medical Delivery Services (hereinafter MDS) is a provider of","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4171812],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10611924/joann-place-v-melba-ricard/","attorney":"","caseName":"Joann Place v. Melba Ricard","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10611924,"court":"Louisiana Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"La. Ct. App.","court_id":"lactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-12-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-CA-0456","docket_id":70574434,"judge":"Judge Edwin A. Lombard; Judge Daniel L. Dysart; Judge Dale N. Atkins","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-18T16:32:08.329162Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T16:31:38.729414Z","score":{"bm25":36.21045}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1132259,1591372,1602383,1640965,1726597,1763167,1793867,1837372,1921829,1944960,2487471,2491392,3379242,3467956,4803718,4812174,4821733,4821955,4822961,4824929,4869926,4870767,4876322,7485343,7571129,7613483,7722075,7759560],"download_url":"https://www.la4th.org/opinion/2022/4894421.pdf","id":11078512,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/12/27/joann_place_v._melba_ricard.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:10:24.871736Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T16:31:38.731333Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5884d34aedb93a817197c985368581990d127480","snippet":"JOANN PLACE                             *        NO. 2022-CA-0456\n\nVERSUS                                  *\n                                                 COURT OF APPEAL\nMELBA RICARD                            *\n                                                 FOURTH CIRCUIT\n                                        *\n                                                 STATE OF LOUISIANA\n                                   *******\n\n\n\n                              APPEAL FROM\n                SECOND","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11078512],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6652811/peters-v-hackbarth-delivery-service-inc/","attorney":"COUNSEL FOR 'PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, DONALD ST. PETERS, W. Paul Wilkins, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/AP-PELLEE, HACKBARTH DELIVERY SERVICES Thomas J. Solari ', COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/AP-PELLEE', CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY Wade A. Johnson","caseName":"Peters v. Hackbarth Delivery Service Inc.","caseNameFull":"Donald ST. PETERS v. HACKBARTH DELIVERY SERVICE INC. and Walgreen Company","citation":["204 So. 3d 1157","16 La.App. 5 Cir. 88","2016 La. App. LEXIS 2289"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":6652811,"court":"Louisiana Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"La. Ct. App.","court_id":"lactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. 16-CA-88","docket_id":63630763,"judge":"Gravois, Liljeberg, Murphy, Robert","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:37:33.510823Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T20:12:59.840843Z","score":{"bm25":36.16036}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6529943,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T20:22:08.503550Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T20:12:59.847610Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nGRAVOIS, J.\n|Plaintiff, Donald St. .Peters, appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of *1158defendants, Hackbarth Delivery Service, Inc. and Continental Casualty Company, dismissing his suit for damages against Hackbarth and Continental Casualty. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and remand the matter for further ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6529943],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3176500/mueggenborg-v-place/","attorney":"Noah Fontanez, Fontanez Law Firm, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees., Lowell A. Barto, Assistant District Attorney, Payne County, Stillwater, Oklahoma, for Defendants/Third-Party Defendants/Appellants.","caseName":"MUEGGENBORG v. PLACE","caseNameFull":"Darrell MUEGGENBORG and Jennifer Mueggenborg, Plaintiffs/Third-Party Defendants/Appellees, v. Jason L. PLACE, Sr. and Mary H. Place, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees, and Bonita Stadler, Payne County Treasurer, and the Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, Oklahoma, Defendants/Third-Party Defendants/Appellants","citation":["2016 OK CIV APP 8","365 P.3d 521","2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 111","2015 WL 10037150"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":3176500,"court":"Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla. Civ. App.","court_id":"oklacivapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"114,068","docket_id":3035340,"judge":"Fischer, Goodman, Vcj, Wiseman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:18:20.578746Z","date_created":"2016-02-10T20:30:54.885360Z","score":{"bm25":35.94262}},"neutralCite":"2016 OK CIV APP 8","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[262864,2465353,2600577],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=477427","id":3176482,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/12/29/mueggenborg_v._place.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:51:36.522438Z","date_created":"2016-02-10T20:30:54.896342Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8c3bf1940af2dca476a924891a35926ec7a3084b","snippet":"\n\n\n  JANE P., WISEMAN, Judge.\n \n\n  T1 Bonita Stadler, as the Payne County Treasurer, and the Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, Oklahoma (collectively, Defendants) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Jason\n   \n   *522\n   \n  L. Place, Sr., and Mary H. Place. This appeal is assigned to the ac","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3176482],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3202932/massachusetts-delivery-associa-v-healey/","attorney":"Douglas S. Martland, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, was on brief, for appellant., David C. Casey, with whom Christopher B. Kaczmarek, Stephen T. Melnick, and Littler Mendelson, P.C. were on brief, for appellee.","caseName":"Massachusetts Delivery Associa v. Healey","caseNameFull":"MASSACHUSETTS DELIVERY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Maura T. HEALEY, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellant","citation":["821 F.3d 187","2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8671","2016 WL 2732054"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":3202932,"court":"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit","court_citation_string":"1st Cir.","court_id":"ca1","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-05-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-1908P","docket_id":3063295,"judge":"Howard, Selya, Lynch","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8671","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:34:35.019652Z","date_created":"2016-05-11T21:00:28.689351Z","score":{"bm25":35.81195}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[621257,802752,1033720,2738522,2961175,3170660,3179321,3191234,7232471,9424435,9432562,9800278],"download_url":"http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/15-1908P-01A.pdf","id":3202826,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/05/11/massachusetts_delivery_associa_v._healey.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T04:10:19.200665Z","date_created":"2016-05-11T21:00:28.694207Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2fc64ee6d07603295b96ac69f0f58f004372c429","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *189\n   \n  LYNCH, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  The question in this case is whether the express preemption provision of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (“FAAAA”), 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1), preempts the application of “Prong 2” of the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute, Mass. Gen. Laws c","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3202826],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4493376/state-of-cal-dtsc-v-westside-delivery-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Cal. Dtsc v. Westside Delivery LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["888 F.3d 1085"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4493376,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-04-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-56558","docket_id":6377983,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:00:20.076292Z","date_created":"2018-04-27T17:00:26.128873Z","score":{"bm25":35.29661}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[101961,103979,104053,108783,111221,112241,112714,112716,118347,118387,118450,145748,145857,145879,151320,265102,435023,450726,564766,583582,617732,662394,695595,723749,726685,758770,771054,775487,782048,791883,1198871,1363164,2429141,2577513],"download_url":"http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/04/27/16-56558.pdf","id":4270629,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/04/27/state_of_cal._dtsc_v._westside_delivery_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:55:54.559253Z","date_created":"2018-04-27T17:00:26.134222Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"348311bf5b5fa1c40bbde142d1218371c0af7ea6","snippet":"                FOR PUBLICATION\n\n  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n       FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT\n\n\nCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC           No. 16-56558\nSUBSTANCES CONTROL,\n               Plaintiff-Appellant,         D.C. No.\n                                         2:15-cv-07786-\n                 v.                        SVW-JPR\n\nWESTSIDE DELIVERY, LLC; and\nDOES 1 through 10, inclusive,              OPINION\n             Defendants-Appellees.\n\n\n      Appeal from the United States District Court\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4270629],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9415147/in-re-express-delivery-enterprise-llc-v-the-state-of-texas/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Express Delivery Enterprise LLC v. the State of Texas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9415147,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Tyler","court_id":"txctapp12","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-07-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"12-23-00088-CV","docket_id":67628854,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:07:42.753345Z","date_created":"2023-07-22T10:15:03.059382Z","score":{"bm25":34.843464}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1354655,1467001,1508976,1571590,1782595,1789951,1959911,2283458,2283967,2406058,2419923,2425162,2428092,2541054,3072781,4076657,5282502,5284362],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=13261&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa12%5cOpinion","id":9410623,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/07/21/in_re_express_delivery_enterprise_llc_v._the_state_of_texas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:07:42.750152Z","date_created":"2023-07-22T10:15:03.061607Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1be3b86319b116518fed9f79c91f33cbfaed6bfb","snippet":"                                        NO. 12-23-00088-CV\n                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n                  TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT\n                                           TYLER, TEXAS\n\n\nIN RE:                                                   §\n\nEXPRESS DELIVERY ENTERPRISE\nLLC,                                                     §        ORIGINAL PROCEEDING\n\nRELATOR\n                                                         §\n\n                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9410623],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3184895/mueggenborg-v-place/","attorney":"","caseName":"MUEGGENBORG v. PLACE","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2016 OK CIV APP 8"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":3184895,"court":"Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla. Civ. App.","court_id":"oklacivapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":3043811,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-23T21:39:06.977041Z","date_created":"2016-03-11T16:27:49.987428Z","score":{"bm25":34.416023}},"neutralCite":"2016 OK CIV APP 8","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[262864,2465353,2600577],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=477427","id":3184860,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/12/29/mueggenborg_v._place_2.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:57:38.347023Z","date_created":"2016-03-11T16:27:49.995730Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"488acae5a33ac6459bc35adaf16b149b7165fd0e","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:MUEGGENBORG v. PLACE\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n\r\n        \r\n   ","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=477427","id":3178888,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/12/29/mueggenborg_v._place_1.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-09T12:59:44.518585Z","date_created":"2016-02-19T16:29:51.240813Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d93edf754c0e755f0f657bcb640f445e11dcd3be","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:MUEGGENBORG v. PLACE\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n\r\n        \r\n   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3178888,3184860],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7331109/roberson-v-rest-delivery-developers-llc/","attorney":"*1313Eric Jacob Lindstrom, Egan, Lev & Siwica, PA, Orlando, FL, Shannon E. Liss-Riordan, Thomas Fowler, Pro Hac Vice, Lichten & Liss-Riordan, PC, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff., Steven Greg Wenzel, Wenzel Fenton Cabassa, PA, Tampa, FL, for Defendants.","caseName":"Roberson v. Rest. Delivery Developers, LLC","caseNameFull":"David ROBERSON, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals v. RESTAURANT DELIVERY DEVELOPERS, LLC d/b/a Doorstep Delivery, Andrew Brown, Thomas Colangelo, William Moore, and Daniel Sinor","citation":["320 F. Supp. 3d 1309"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":7331109,"court":"District Court, M.D. Florida","court_citation_string":"M.D. Fla.","court_id":"flmd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No.: 8:17–cv–769–T–33MAP","docket_id":64319593,"judge":"Covington","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:39:34.536887Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:46:33.438847Z","score":{"bm25":34.377396}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7249027,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:47:52.096825Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:46:33.445623Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nVIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\nThis matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Defendants Restaurant Delivery Developers, Andrew Brown, Thomas Colangelo, William Moore, and Daniel Sinor's Motion to Decertify Collective Action (Doc. # 80), filed on May 1, 2018. Plaintiff David Roberson filed his response in opposition on May 22, 2018. (Doc. # 85). For the reasons that follow, the Motion is gran","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7249027],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10291413/oncor-electric-delivery-company-llc-v-robert-louis-hawkins/","attorney":"","caseName":"Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. Robert Louis Hawkins","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10291413,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Dallas","court_id":"txctapp5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-12-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-23-00790-CV","docket_id":69454949,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:36.825551Z","date_created":"2024-12-11T07:15:12.051997Z","score":{"bm25":34.262226}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=51688&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa05%5cOpinion","id":10758001,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/12/03/oncor_electric_delivery_company_llc_v._robert_louis_hawkins.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:36.821036Z","date_created":"2024-12-11T07:15:12.053764Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0ba857e54c52776c0f9b77d25d88c818774efaad","snippet":"REVERSE AND RENDER; Opinion Filed December 3, 2024\n\n\n\n\n                                       In The\n                            Court of Appeals\n                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas\n                               No. 05-23-00790-CV\n\n       ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, Appellant\n                            V.\n               ROBERT LOUIS HAWKINS, Appellee\n\n                On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court\n                             Dallas County, Texas\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10758001],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4895127/in-re-oncor-electric-delivery-company-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"in Re Oncor Electric Delivery Company Llc","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4895127,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-0662","docket_id":60017591,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:52:41.605469Z","date_created":"2021-06-28T07:16:14.297727Z","score":{"bm25":34.25485}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105866],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=8221&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5csc%5cOpinion","id":4698906,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/06/25/in_re_oncor_electric_delivery_company_llc_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:07:54.821009Z","date_created":"2021-06-28T07:16:14.300510Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1bb5add592a423de59f43e5882d36b76a84daa7a","snippet":"                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS\n\n                                              ════════════\n                                                    NO. 19-0662\n                                              ════════════\n\n                 IN RE ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, RELATOR\n\n         ══════════════════════════════════════════════\n                     ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS\n         ══════════════════════════════════════════════\n\n\n        CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, j","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4698906],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4753822/harbourside-place-llc-v-town-of-jupiter-florida/","attorney":"","caseName":"Harbourside Place, LLc v. Town of Jupiter, Florida","caseNameFull":"","citation":["958 F.3d 1308"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":4753822,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-05-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-12457","docket_id":17162933,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:57:55.456969Z","date_created":"2020-05-14T14:00:29.019744Z","score":{"bm25":34.063854}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[76731,77679,108770,112078,118476,183875,340548,382337,453296,603592,658370,807050,809422,2806523,2809763,4285393,5675473,6931004,7245122,7262672,8709752,8980926,9415852,9420278,9426022,9428383,9428495,9430542,9431796,9432680,9432761,9433029,9433999,9434690,9502839,9576663,9820007,9872264,9878687],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201812457.pdf","id":4534169,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/05/14/harbourside_place_llc_v._town_of_jupiter_florida.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-04T21:25:19.091678Z","date_created":"2020-05-14T14:00:29.029122Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"93883f4883cd2e868867a0225c71394217fa13b5","snippet":"              Case: 18-12457    Date Filed: 05/14/2020    Page: 1 of 27\n\n\n\n                                                                            [PUBLISH]\n\n\n\n               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n                          ________________________\n\n                                 No. 18-12457\n                           ________________________\n\n                      D.C. Docket No. 9:16-cv-80170-KAM\n\n\n\nHARBOURSIDE PLACE, LLC,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4534169],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""}]}