{"count":39361,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yMi44MDQ4NzYmcz00MzAyMzM1JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMDkmcD0y&q=OATHS+AND+ACKNOWLEDGMENTS+APPLICATION+REQUIREMENTS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9432250/in-re-application-of-johns/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application of Johns","caseNameFull":"","citation":["173 Ohio St. 3d 160","227 N.E.3d 1238","2023 Ohio 3679"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9432250,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-10-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2023-0337","docket_id":67874785,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:50.635069Z","date_created":"2023-10-12T13:07:20.839682Z","score":{"bm25":38.147377}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 3679","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2023/2023-Ohio-3679.pdf","id":9890069,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/10/12/in_re_application_of_johns.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:50.602655Z","date_created":"2023-10-12T13:07:20.845264Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1a8fa341682a9472e3429c33f166bb0b77452b1c","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application of Johns, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-3679.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n     advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n     promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n     South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9890069],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Attorneys—Character and fitness—Application for admission to the practice of law—Applicant failed to establish present character, fitness, and moral qualifications by clear and convincing evidence—Application disapproved and applicant permitted to reapply for admission at a later date."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4402089/in-re-application-of-callam/","attorney":"Mary L. Cibella, for applicant., Susan M. Fitch, for the Akron Bar Association., Yorys, Sater, Seymour <& Pease, L.L.P., and Damien C. Kitte, for the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness., The Gertsburg Law Firm Co., L.P.A., and Alexander E. Gertsburg, for amicus curiae, the Gertsburg Law Firm Co., L.P.A., in support of applicant.","caseName":"In Re Application of Callam","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Callam (Slip Opinion)","citation":["2017 Ohio 4361","150 Ohio St. 3d 311"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4402089,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2016-1240","docket_id":6077938,"judge":"Kennedy, French, O'Neill, Fischer, Dewine, O'Donnell, O'Connor","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:35:14.217914Z","date_created":"2017-06-21T13:13:48.043859Z","score":{"bm25":34.16366}},"neutralCite":"2017 Ohio 4361","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9876804,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:55:31.457024Z","date_created":"2023-09-27T15:34:21.835186Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPer Curiam.\n{¶ 1} Michael Alexander Callam, of Macedonia, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0092109, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio on November 17, 2014, after passing the Ohio bar examination administered in July of that year.\n{¶ 2} On April 17, 2015, the Office of Bar Admissions received a letter from the Geauga County Prosecuting Attorney relating that beginning in September 2013, Callam had ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2017/2017-Ohio-4361.pdf","id":4179342,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/06/21/in_re_application_of_callam_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:52:36.130931Z","date_created":"2017-06-21T13:13:48.055464Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7ed1c96ad4937fd806243eb5b9c086dd247234c6","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application of Callam, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-4361.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n     advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n     promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n     South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typograph","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4179342,9876804,9876805],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Attorneys-Character and fitness-Lack of candor during admissions process-License revoked and reapplication in two years permitted."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6457813/class-d-application-of-big-foot/","attorney":"","caseName":"Class D Application of Big Foot","caseNameFull":"","citation":["408 Mont. 187","507 P.3d 169","2022 MT 67"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":6457813,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-04-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DA 21-0249","docket_id":63230781,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:30:03.417884Z","date_created":"2022-04-12T22:16:00.419672Z","score":{"bm25":34.120537}},"neutralCite":"2022 MT 67","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[889540,890183,2797202,4519518,4519519,4681501,4908752,6536822,9433582,9507527,9511055,9511568,9512069,9512390,9512544],"download_url":"https://juddocumentservice.mt.gov/getDocByCTrackId?DocId=386631","id":6329924,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/04/05/class_d_application_of_big_foot.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T19:31:59.842481Z","date_created":"2022-04-12T22:16:00.421497Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4d7aec90858b0d5655bef583bed58995ec5c47a7","snippet":"                                                                                           04/05/2022\n\n                                       DA 21-0249\n                                                                                       Case Number: DA 21-0249\n          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA\n                                       2022 MT 67\n\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF the Class D Application\nof Big Foot Dumpsters & Containers, LLC\nApplication for Class D Garbage Service\nbetween","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6329924],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Direct Appeal","syllabus":"Opinion - Published - Justice Jim Rice, Affirmed."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9404953/application-of-moneri-for-admission-to-the-bar/","attorney":"","caseName":"Application of Moneri for Admission to the Bar","caseNameFull":"","citation":["483 Md. 567"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9404953,"court":"Court of Appeals of Maryland","court_citation_string":"Md.","court_id":"md","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"29m/22","docket_id":67456738,"judge":"Order","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:07:44.159745Z","date_created":"2023-06-08T14:06:50.330032Z","score":{"bm25":33.909393}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4409688,7920801],"download_url":"http://www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2023/29a22m.pdf","id":9400429,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/31/application_of_moneri_for_admission_to_the_bar_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:24:36.256698Z","date_created":"2023-06-08T14:06:50.334635Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"009b5b020730fd610782aed9a26362d6ab637de3","snippet":"Show cause hearing held May 5, 2023.\n\n\n                                                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT\n\n                                                                              OF MARYLAND*\n\n\n                                                                                  Misc. No. 29\n\n\n                                                                            September Term, 2022\n\n\n\n                                                                    IN THE M","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9400429],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9403208/application-of-moneri-for-admission-to-the-bar/","attorney":"","caseName":"Application of Moneri for Admission to the Bar","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9403208,"court":"Court of Appeals of Maryland","court_citation_string":"Md.","court_id":"md","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"29m/22","docket_id":67456738,"judge":"Order","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:07:16.886598Z","date_created":"2023-05-31T20:07:55.991517Z","score":{"bm25":33.770306}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4409688,7920801],"download_url":"http://www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2023/29a22m.pdf","id":9398684,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/31/application_of_moneri_for_admission_to_the_bar.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:53:05.432553Z","date_created":"2023-05-31T20:07:55.997101Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"66a3d439015eb1a4d3c2ddcd00f22f50c01c8535","snippet":"Show cause hearing held May 5, 2023.\n\n\n                                                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT\n\n                                                                              OF MARYLAND*\n\n\n                                                                                 Misc. No. 29\n\n\n                                                                            September Term, 2022\n\n\n\n                                                                    IN THE MA","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9398684],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3179493/in-re-application-of-scannell/","attorney":"John Richard Scannell, pro se., William J. Danso, for the Trumbull County Bar Association.","caseName":"In Re Application of Scannell","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Scannell (Slip Opinion)","citation":["2016 Ohio 583","145 Ohio St. 3d 258","48 N.E.3d 547"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3179493,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-02-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2015-0541","docket_id":3038343,"judge":"Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill, O'Connor","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:20:06.678692Z","date_created":"2016-02-23T14:27:06.103990Z","score":{"bm25":32.4178}},"neutralCite":"2016 Ohio 583","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2016/2016-Ohio-583.pdf","id":3179475,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/02/23/in_re_application_of_scannell_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:53:45.073683Z","date_created":"2016-02-23T14:27:06.110325Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"ec570978eed51fc1d072d3b289c1ac63965f360c","snippet":"\n\n\n  Per Curiam.\n \n\n  {¶ 1} John Richard Scannell of Cortland, Ohio, is a 2013 graduate of the University of Cincinnati College of Law. He has applied to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio and to take the July 2013 bar exam. Two members of the Trumbull County Bar Association admissions committee interviewed Sc","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3179475],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10281330/in-re-criminal-complaint-application-for-arrest-warrant/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant","caseNameFull":"","citation":["350 Conn. 633"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":10281330,"court":"Supreme Court of Connecticut","court_citation_string":"Conn.","court_id":"conn","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-10-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC20995","docket_id":69235632,"judge":"McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Alexander; Dannehy","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-02T02:18:53.355922Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T17:04:27.900140Z","score":{"bm25":31.908833}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR350/CR350.59.pdf","id":10747918,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/26/in_re_criminal_complaint__application_for_arrest_warrant.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T18:33:12.410877Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T17:04:27.901780Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ed85b0a351022ce941a53ca08b8b0458d13280e2","snippet":"************************************************\n   The “officially released” date that appears near the\nbeginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be\npublished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it\nis released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the\nbeginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin-\nion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi-\ncially released” date appearing in the opinion.\n   All opinions are subject to modification and technical\ncor","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR349/CR349.59.pdf","id":10598336,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/07/01/in_re_criminal_complaint__application_for_arrest_warrant.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T15:55:14.576968Z","date_created":"2024-10-08T18:05:01.665475Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f7aff42824ff9c1a27e8eaa8ea85cfea89ce8ac4","snippet":"************************************************\n   The “officially released” date that appears near the\nbeginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be\npublished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it\nis released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the\nbeginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin-\nion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi-\ncially released” date appearing in the opinion.\n   All opinions are subject to modification and technical\ncor","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":11298905,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/10/03/in_re_criminal_complaint__application_for_arrest_warrant.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-02T02:24:05.202611Z","date_created":"2026-04-02T02:17:53.434403Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4f89009e973e09831b1175870bfef5e11e16c6bb","snippet":"November 26, 2024               CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                       Page 79\n\n\n\n\n         350 Conn. 633              NOVEMBER, 2024                                   633\n                 In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant\n\n\n          IN RE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION\n                     FOR ARREST WARRANT\n                          (SC 20995)\n              McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.*\n\n                      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"Writ of error from the order of the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield, T. Welch, J., denying applications by the plaintiffs in error for certain arrest warrants, brought to the Appellate Court, where the writ was transferred to this court; thereafter, this court denied This case originally was argued before a panel of this court consisting of Chief Justice Robinson and Justices McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy. Thereafter, Chief Justice Robinson retired from this court and did not participate in the consideration of the case. The listing of justices reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument. October 3, 2024, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes. 634 NOVEMBER, 2024 350 Conn. 633 In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant the defendant in error's motion to dismiss. Writ of error dismissed. Cameron L. Atkinson, for the plaintiffs in error (Albert Bottone et al.). Evan O'Roark, assistant solicitor general, with whom were Timothy F. Costello, supervisory assistant state's attorney, and, on the brief, William Tong, attorney gen- eral, and Patrick J. Griffin, chief state's attorney, for the defendant in error (state).","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11298905,10747918,10747917,10598336,10598335],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The plaintiffs in error, three registered electors residing in the city of Bridge- port, filed a writ of error challenging the decision of a trial judge, who denied their applications, filed pursuant to statute (§ 9-368), for arrest warrants for two individuals who had allegedly violated certain election laws in connec- tion with the 2023 Democratic primary election for the office of the mayor of Bridgeport. The plaintiffs in error claimed, inter alia, that the trial judge had misinterpreted § 9-368, whereas the defendant in error, the state of Connecticut, claimed that the writ of error should be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiffs in error were neither statutorily nor classically aggrieved by the denial of the arrest warrant applications. Held: The plaintiffs in error were not required to establish that they were statutorily aggrieved in order to bring a writ of error challenging the denial of their arrest warrant applications. This court dismissed the writ of error because the plaintiffs in error were not classically aggrieved by the trial judge's denial of the arrest warrant applications, insofar as they lacked a specific, personal and legal interest in the arrest and prosecution of those who allegedly violate election laws. (One justice concurring separately) Argued May 1—officially released October 3, 2024"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3134033/in-re-application-of-libretti/","attorney":"Deborah Zaccaro Hoffman, for applicant., Paul G. Crist, for the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association., James F. Lentz, for amici curiae Citizens’ Institute for Law and Public Policy and CURE-Ohio, in support of applicant., Robert J. Wall, for amicus curiae Ohio Justice & Policy Center, in support of applicant., Robert L. Tobik, John T. Martin, Erica Cunliffe, Jeffrey M. Gamso, Linda Hricko, Paul Kuzmins, Christopher Scott Maher, and Cullen Sweeney, as amici curiae, in support of applicant., Pamela Daiker-Middaugh, Avery Friedman, C. Timothy Murphy, Amy Hollaway, Carole Heyward, Doron Kalir, Kenneth Kowalski, Stephen Lazarus, Kevin O’Neill, John Plecnik, Peter Sayegh, Daniel Dropko, Joseph Buckley, Christopher Maher, and Dennis Terez, as amici curiae, in support of applicant.","caseName":"In Re Application of Libretti","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Libretti (Slip Opinion)","citation":["2015 Ohio 4338","145 Ohio St. 3d 67","47 N.E.3d 102"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3134033,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-10-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2014-1555","docket_id":2991625,"judge":"O'Connor, Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, O'Neill","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:50:12.190708Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T14:49:39.961069Z","score":{"bm25":31.705278}},"neutralCite":"2015 Ohio 4338","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9818980,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:39:01.782329Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T06:17:19.853370Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPer Curiam.\n{¶ 1} Joseph Victor Libretti Jr. of Cleveland, Ohio, has applied to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. A two-person panel of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association admissions committee interviewed Libretti on June 6, 2013, made a provisional finding that he possessed the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[117979,680780,2690383,2690482],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2015/2015-Ohio-4338.pdf","id":3134033,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/10/22/in_re_application_of_libretti_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:21:42.308766Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T14:06:44.218668Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"b371ea6f8b3a86ae8433c3aabadd887b133b8471","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application of Libretti, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4338.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n     advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n     promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n     South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typogra","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3134033,9818980,9818981],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4761889/in-re-application-of-phares-slip-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application of Phares (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["163 N.E.3d 483","161 Ohio St. 3d 316","2020 Ohio 3346"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4761889,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-06-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2020-0232","docket_id":17259655,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:17:26.542511Z","date_created":"2020-06-18T13:09:45.961145Z","score":{"bm25":31.595053}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ohio 3346","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2020/2020-Ohio-3346.pdf","id":4542236,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/06/18/in_re_application_of_phares_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:17:26.488371Z","date_created":"2020-06-18T13:09:45.968493Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6321ab327f4d19f9cfdc20b6ed90a5c1552b552e","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application of Phares, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3346.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in\n     an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested\n     to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio,\n     65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typograph","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4542236],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Attorneys—Character and fitness—Applications to take bar exam and to register as candidate for admission to practice of law—Failure to disclosure termination of employment for testing positive for marijuana—Pending applications disapproved but application to take July 2022 or a later bar exam permitted."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4675771/in-re-application-of-holzhauser-graber-slip-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application of Holzhauser-Graber (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 Ohio 4500"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4675771,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-11-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-1425","docket_id":16427090,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:52:55.400571Z","date_created":"2019-11-05T14:07:44.629864Z","score":{"bm25":29.603886}},"neutralCite":"2019 Ohio 4500","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2019/2019-Ohio-4500.pdf","id":4453024,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/11/05/in_re_application_of_holzhauser-graber_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:02:51.337404Z","date_created":"2019-11-05T14:07:44.636808Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1e086d6a937d98d96ed35228697d5217801be439","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In\nre Application of Holzhauser-Graber, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4500.]\n\n\n\n\n                                         NOTICE\n     This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n     advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n     promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n     South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of an","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4453024],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Attorneys—Application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law—Failure to provide complete and accurate information about applicant's past—Failure to prove character, fitness, and moral qualifications to practice law—Pending application disapproved—Prior bar-examination results ordered to be unsealed and released"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3180041/in-re-application-of-john-clader/","attorney":"Sarah A. Wilson, Assistant District Attorney, Milford, for Commonwealth, appellant., Steven R. Guccini, Hawley, for appellee.","caseName":"In Re: Application of John Clader","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of John P. CLADER, Trading as LT Investigations, for a Private Detective License. Appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania","citation":["135 A.3d 1062","2016 Pa. Super. 49","2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 124","2016 WL 769438"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3180041,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-02-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2094 EDA 2014","docket_id":3038891,"judge":"Gantman, Bender, Bowes, Panella, Shogan, Lazarus, Ott, Stabile, Jenkins","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-24T21:09:02.234867Z","date_created":"2016-02-24T18:29:05.166937Z","score":{"bm25":29.277586}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9821762,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:39:54.458910Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T08:25:54.285436Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.:\nAppellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the order entered in the Pike County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the petition of Appellee, John P. Clader, trading as LT Investigations, for a private detective license, with certain restrictions, pursuant to the Private Detective Act of 1953, 22 P.S. § 11 et seq. We reverse.\nThe relevant facts and procedural hist","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2090178,2159684,2265472,2294657,2308390,2445085,6307671],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-E03008-15o - 1025583936202130.pdf","id":3180023,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/02/24/in_re_application_of_john_clader.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:54:08.119959Z","date_created":"2016-02-24T18:29:05.173668Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"381160a4bc1857fa2f89019a6733337d0862e76a","snippet":"J-E03008-15\n\n                              2016 PA Super 49\n\nIN RE: APPLICATION OF JOHN P.              :     IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF\nCLADER, TRADING AS LT                      :          PENNSYLVANIA\nINVESTIGATIONS, FOR A PRIVATE              :\nDETECTIVE LICENSE                          :\n                                           :\n                                           :\nAPPEAL OF: COMMONWEALTH OF                 :\nPENNSYLVANIA                               :          No. 2094 EDA 2014\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3180023,9821762,9821763],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2682640/in-re-application-of-collins/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application of Collins","caseNameFull":"","citation":["288 Neb. 519"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":2682640,"court":"Nebraska Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Neb.","court_id":"neb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-07-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S-13-1020","docket_id":368941,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-08-26T02:01:48.490390Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:53:47.148446Z","score":{"bm25":28.49438}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[874162,1595696,1948211,9706441],"download_url":"http://supremecourt.ne.gov/sites/supremecourt.ne.gov/files/sc/opinions/s13-1020.pdf","id":2682640,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/07/11/in_re_application_of_collins.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:58:45.216756Z","date_created":"2014-07-11T14:02:13.321232Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c00bf30dc86fe500b9a6bda70a7af0492aa2052b","snippet":"                         Nebraska Advance Sheets\n\t                       IN RE APPLICATION OF COLLINS\t519\n\t                              Cite as 288 Neb. 519\n\nNPPD’s subordination agreements did not affect NPPD’s right\nto demand the water from other users.\n   The majority opinion rejects the junior appropriators’ argu-\nment that permitting NPPD to demand the water from them\nconstituted a recovery of both money and water for loss of the\nsame appropriation right. It reasons that if a “junior appro","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2682640],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1039109/in-re-application-of-floyd-edmond-webb-iii/","attorney":"Floyd Edmond Webb, III, for Applicant., Patricia K. Rocha, Esq., Providence, for Committee on Character & Fitness.","caseName":"In Re Application of Floyd Edmond WEBB, III","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Floyd Edmond Webb, III.","citation":["58 A.3d 150","2013 R.I. LEXIS 7","2013 WL 135857"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":1039109,"court":"Supreme Court of Rhode Island","court_citation_string":"R.I.","court_id":"ri","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-01-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2013-3-M.P.","docket_id":915281,"judge":"Suttell, Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, Indeglia","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-24T20:21:28.125732Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T13:06:50.629264Z","score":{"bm25":26.772757}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2001610,2092153,2167625],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ri.gov/Courts/SupremeCourt/Opinions/13-3.pdf","id":1039109,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2013/01/11/in_re_application_of_floyd_edmond_webb_iii..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T00:52:30.514172Z","date_created":"2013-08-28T22:27:51.133738Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1822c6972bcbb9704af42b7c9958f9a07caffbd9","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  PER CURIAM.\n \n\n  The applicant, Floyd Edmond Webb, III, petitioned this Court for a hearing concerning the recommendation of the Supreme Court’s Committee on Character and Fitness (committee) that he be denied admission to the Rhode Island bar. Specifically, the applicant asserts that the committee abused its discretion by neither admitting him to the","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1039109],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4678881/in-re-application-no-op-0003-transcanada/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application No. OP-0003 -- (TransCanada)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["303 Neb. 872"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4678881,"court":"Nebraska Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Neb.","court_id":"neb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-08-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S-17-1331","docket_id":16471820,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:53:43.496693Z","date_created":"2019-11-15T15:07:21.555754Z","score":{"bm25":25.793505}},"neutralCite":"303 Neb. 872","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[102490,1231285,1296805,1347284,1584424,1592561,1619051,1634638,1697455,1709339,1747734,1816952,1821367,1837801,1890684,1928649,2045174,2057448,2067080,2081826,2106714,2162021,2223137,2225251,2227782,2228511,2232555,2655132,2670611,2924336,4190470,4205439,4218999,4223345,4223356,4223357,4261962,4270163,4280366,4293896,4296236,4318559,4361966,4389062,4390695,4393625,4393720,4398782,4404475,4439077,6651869,6658045,6659624,8038636,8039325,8040006,8040290,8041009,8249599,9430874,9458476,9575467,9581308,9661193,9686447,9696599],"download_url":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00006778PUB","id":4456134,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/08/23/in_re_application_no._op-0003_--_transcanada_17.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T02:55:33.768113Z","date_created":"2019-11-15T15:07:21.562167Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dcaabe30774eee04933fb3193cd3f05994f4c24d","snippet":"Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library\nwww.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/\n11/15/2019 09:07 AM CST\n\n\n\n\n                                                        - 872 -\n                                  Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets\n                                          303 Nebraska R eports\n                                         IN RE APPLICATION NO. OP-0003\n                                                Cite as 303 Neb. 872\n\n\n\n\n                               In re A pplication No. ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4456134],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2805388/matter-of-application-of-cesar-adrian-vargas-for-admission-to-the-bar-of/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Juan Cartagena, New York City (Jose Perez of counsel), for applicant., Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General, Washington, D.C. (Joyce R. Branda, Mark B. Stern, Daniel Penny and Lindsey Powell of counsel), for United States of America, amicus curiae., Eric P. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (.Barbara D. Underwood, Kristen Clarke, Denise A. Hartman and Andrew B. Ayers of counsel), for State of New York, amicus curiae.","caseName":"Matter of Application of Cesar Adrian Vargas for Admission to the Bar of the State of New York.","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Cesar Adrian Vargas, an Applicant for Admission to the Bar of the State of New York","citation":["131 A.D.3d 4","10 N.Y.S.3d 579"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":2805388,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2013-10725ON APPLICATION","docket_id":2661716,"judge":"Dillon, Eng, Mastro, Rivera, Skelos","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:52:41.271104Z","date_created":"2015-06-03T20:03:58.498608Z","score":{"bm25":25.218668}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[98542,105497,108373,108527,109259,109269,109463,110718,111265,112632,112641,112647,112768,118148,118318,122252,803270,2052530,2067670,2682041,3578215,3594175,5530527,5539853,5802932,5949535,6028204,6212999,7229499,9419136,9420179,9428401,9428818,9428879,9441634,9501447],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_04657.htm","id":2805388,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/06/03/matter_of_application_of_cesar_adrian_vargas_for_admission_to_the_bar_of.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:28:41.030848Z","date_created":"2015-06-03T19:13:43.564305Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"22e56d55bbbfe1843fd777a9be410fb83335dbbd","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION OF THE COURT\n \n\n  Per Curiam.\n \n\n  We are called upon to determine whether an undocumented immigrant, who is authorized to be present in the United\n   \n   *6\n   \n  States under the auspices of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy of the federal government, and who meets the statuto","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2805388],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1940613/in-the-matter-of-application-of-strzempek/","attorney":"Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire of Greenbelt, for applicant.","caseName":"In the Matter of Application of Strzempek","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Application of Gregory John STRZEMPEK for Admission to the Bar of Maryland","citation":["962 A.2d 988","407 Md. 102","2008 Md. LEXIS 633"],"citeCount":15,"cluster_id":1940613,"court":"Court of Appeals of Maryland","court_citation_string":"Md.","court_id":"md","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Misc. Docket No. 2 Sept. Term 2008","docket_id":1768459,"judge":"Bell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:32:41.831460Z","date_created":"2014-12-22T16:02:37.107750Z","score":{"bm25":24.46326}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9699147,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:20:48.828023Z","date_created":"2023-08-25T20:11:36.908641Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*104BATTAGLIA, J.\nIn this case we are asked to decide whether to grant the petition for admission to the Maryland Bar of Gregory John Strzempek, who filed his application on December 19, 2005, and who, thereafter, failed to timely supplement it with the Board of Law Examiners, with the information that he had been arrested ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[1475319,1502363,1525148,1547415,1897387,1953031,1971389,1988614,1989942,2054431,2057864,2060441,2063436,2064639,2171566,2184623,2209613,2258976,2292554,2295395,2299587,2307579,2314778,2338251],"download_url":null,"id":1940613,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T14:26:37.407373Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:52:35.563248Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2a38de8ea22ef35d245a219f9739d59b3f5d0bbd","snippet":"\n962 A.2d 988 (2008)\n407 Md. 102\nIn the Matter of the Application of Gregory John STRZEMPEK for Admission to the Bar of Maryland.\nMisc. Docket No. 2 Sept. Term 2008.\nCourt of Appeals of Maryland.\nDecember 30, 2008.\nMelvin G. Bergman, Esquire of Greenbelt, for applicant.\n*989 Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[4658,4661,4663,4664,4685,4700],"panel_names":["Sally D. Adkins","Mary Ellen Barbera","Lynne A. Battaglia","Robert M. Bell","Glenn T. Harrell Jr.","Joseph F. Murphy Jr."],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1940613,9699147,9699148],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8436109/federal-vacancies-reform-acts-application-to-a-vacancy-for-which-prior/","attorney":"","caseName":"Federal Vacancies Reform Act's Application to a Vacancy for Which Prior Presidents Submitted Multiple Nominations","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8436109,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-10-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":65643328,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:13.081336Z","date_created":"2022-10-28T16:00:07.428257Z","score":{"bm25":24.050156}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[9430708],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/file/1547721/download","id":8406470,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/10/21/federal_vacancies_reform_acts_application_to_a_vacancy_for_which_prior.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:22:33.621939Z","date_created":"2022-10-28T16:00:07.434359Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"df7f721fd6a365939bbbc4b02c7b2ee9568bd894","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\nFederal Vacancies Reform Act’s Application to a Vacancy for\n  Which Prior Presidents Submitted Multiple Nominations\nUpon the inauguration of a new President, the Federal Vacancies Reform Act restarts the\n  entire timing sequence for acting service in a position that was vacant on inauguration\n  day, authorizing an acting official to serve for up to 300 days after inauguration day,\n  during the pendency of the new President’s first and second nominations for the vacant\n  position,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8406470],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Upon the inauguration of a new President, the Federal Vacancies Reform Act restarts the entire timing sequence for acting service in a position that was vacant on inauguration day, authorizing an acting official to serve for up to 300 days after inauguration day, during the pendency of the new President's first and second nominations for the vacant position, and for 210 days following the rejection, withdrawal, or return of a first or second nomination submitted by the new President."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1975358/in-re-application-of-silva/","attorney":"Michael A. Nelsen, of Hillman, Forman, Nelsen, Childers & McCormack, for applicant., William T. Wright for Nebraska State Bar Commission.","caseName":"In Re Application of Silva","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Alberto Silva for Admission to the Nebraska State Bar on Examination","citation":["665 N.W.2d 592","266 Neb. 419","2003 Neb. LEXIS 121"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":1975358,"court":"Nebraska Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Neb.","court_id":"neb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-07-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S-34-020003","docket_id":1803596,"judge":"Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:44:31.354429Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:36:06.676970Z","score":{"bm25":23.384636}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5018,"cites":[1348997,1805366,1934587,1991367,2171566],"download_url":null,"id":1975358,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T15:06:40.955994Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:57:41.572030Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7a8d0b1105073785c6b33ab5df0e38dd91b2e1f8","snippet":"\n665 N.W.2d 592 (2003)\n266 Neb. 419\nIn re APPLICATION OF Alberto SILVA for Admission to the Nebraska State Bar on Examination.\nNo. S-34-020003.\nSupreme Court of Nebraska.\nJuly 18, 2003.\n*593 Michael A. Nelsen, of Hillman, Forman, Nelsen, Childers & McCormack, for applicant.\nWilliam T. Wright, Kearney, fo","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1975358],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1043660/in-re-appeal-of-application-for-search-warrant/","attorney":"Thomas J. Donovan, Jr., Chittenden County State’s Attorney, Andrew R. Strauss, Deputy State’s Attorney, Burlington, and William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, Evan R Meenan and David E. Tartter, Assistant Attorneys General (On the Brief), Montpelier, for Petitioner., Matthew Valerio, Defender General, Rebecca Turner, Appellate Defender and Marshall Pahl, Montpelier, for Amicus Curiae Office of the Defender General., Dan Barrett, Montpelier, for Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Vermont, Catherine Crump and Jason D. Williamson, New York, New York, and Jay Rorty, Santa Cruz, California, for Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, and Hanni M. Fakhoury, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation.","caseName":"In Re Appeal of Application for Search Warrant","caseNameFull":"In Re Appeal of Application for Search Warrant","citation":["193 Vt. 51","2012 VT 102","71 A.3d 1158","2012 WL 6217042","2012 Vt. LEXIS 100"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":1043660,"court":"Supreme Court of Vermont","court_citation_string":"Vt.","court_id":"vt","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-12-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2010-479","docket_id":363238,"judge":"Reiber, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Burgess","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:26:36.081590Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:50:34.280284Z","score":{"bm25":23.36413}},"neutralCite":"2012 VT 102","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[101164,104504,110100,118103,131146,172097,172511,187308,204312,339106,401072,406519,678871,794809,880930,1057203,1346529,1437500,1891711,1956689,2284463,2328846,2368465,2370086,2381898,2410945,2435265,2517270,2517918,5155582,6453582,6939945,8172128,8734703,9418758,9419320,9423459,9423895,9427183,9427537,9427638,9428014,9429766,9430836,9431619,9432041,9432823,9433801,9434968,9438359,9461933,9492053,9498747,9599469,9630526,9647865,9673454,9694304,9696692,9700074,9706067,9748806,9797203,9817762],"download_url":null,"id":9522045,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T06:32:34.549844Z","date_created":"2023-08-07T02:17:17.126682Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nDooley, J.\n¶ 1. In this complaint for extraordinary relief, we are asked to determine whether a judicial officer has discretion to attach ex ante or prospective conditions to a search warrant. The State petitions this Court to strike ten such conditions pertaining to the search of a personal computer, seized by police as part of an identity theft investigation. The State contends that the conditions exceed the judicial officer’s a","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[101164,101970,103791,104504,107483,107831,108377,109522,109860,110061,110100,110118,110317,111013,111262,111301,111823,111834,112224,112448,112873,118103,118289,131146,145670,148430,172097,172511,175207,183984,187308,198323,204312,216733,328845,339106,401072,406519,483554,502266,678871,682438,721474,763086,793638,794809,796501,880930,1057203,1270161,1346529,1357240,1358518,1437500,1439872,1448376,1527471,1723461,1891711,1907869,1925418,1950490,1956689,1989352,2284463,2311683,2328846,2358380,2370086,2381898,2410945,2435265,2517270,2517918,2635602],"download_url":"http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/supct/current/op2010-479.html","id":1043660,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2012/12/14/in_re_application_of_search_warrant.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:04:35.916394Z","date_created":"2013-10-08T00:24:49.708274Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"30ed8baa25b2ebc74b54c1fcd80352adf16c6256","snippet":"2012 VT 102\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn re Application for Search\r\nWarrant (2010-479)\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n2012 VT 102\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[Filed 14-Dec-2012]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nNOTICE:  This opinion is\r\nsubject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision\r\nbefore publication in the Vermont Reports.  Readers are requested to","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9522045,9522046,1043660],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4302335/in-re-application-of-green-for-admission-to-okla-bar-assoc/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN RE APPLICATION OF GREEN FOR ADMISSION TO OKLA. BAR ASSOC.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2016 OK 98"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4302335,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-09-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":4468943,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-23T21:42:42.924926Z","date_created":"2016-10-04T22:11:12.817446Z","score":{"bm25":22.804876}},"neutralCite":"2016 OK 98","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2339839,2602356,4035831,5156440,5158516,5177617],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479346","id":4079596,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/09/20/in_re_application_of_green_for_admission_to_okla._bar_assoc._1.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:44:02.972746Z","date_created":"2016-10-04T22:11:12.824000Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"320dba0833f4f3b4d6664ae3a3d2f78d3e7d581b","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN RE APPLICATION OF GREEN FOR ADMISSION TO OKLA. BAR ASSOC.\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479346","id":4035831,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/09/20/in_re_application_of_green_for_admission_to_okla._bar_assoc..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T03:02:04.607907Z","date_created":"2016-09-22T04:35:58.344456Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4882439e76f109522910e8620e1a7bd6da5b53e0","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN RE APPLICATION OF GREEN FOR ADMISSION TO OKLA. BAR ASSOC.\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4079596,4035831],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}