{"count":24087,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz00MC4yMzE5OCZzPTQ1MjQ4MjAmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wOS0zMCZwPTI%3D&q=MANDAMUS+TO+COMPEL+ELECTION+MANDAMUS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9400765/ex-parte-midsouth-paving-inc-and-christopher-nivert-petition-for-writ-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Ex parte Midsouth Paving, Inc., and Christopher Nivert PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: CIVIL","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9400765,"court":"Supreme Court of Alabama","court_citation_string":"Ala.","court_id":"ala","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-0860","docket_id":67410219,"judge":"JUSTICE STEWART","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:06:38.258634Z","date_created":"2023-05-19T21:03:02.804693Z","score":{"bm25":57.060417}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[454564,1089668,1118493,1142174,1617280,1661787,1685839,1706508,1706658,1777277,1791053,1824123,1903495,1930272,2532289,4848933,4867877,5539891,7586179],"download_url":"https://acis.alabama.gov/displaydocs.cfm?no=1127319&event=6MD0UPJJ9","id":9396241,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/19/ex_parte_midsouth_paving_inc._and_christopher_nivert_petition_for_writ_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:23:24.455488Z","date_created":"2023-05-19T21:03:02.810249Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d4925d776ac19ca0015f429bf4591c18b5c97596","snippet":"Rel: May 19, 2023\n\n\n\n\nNotice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern\nReporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts,\n300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other\nerrors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.\n\n\n\n\n         SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA\n                             OCTOBER TERM, 20","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9396241],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9507932/thom-miller-v-barnettelection-contest-as-to-amendment-a/","attorney":"","caseName":"THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT A","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 S.D. 65"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9507932,"court":"South Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"S.D.","court_id":"sd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-11-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"29546, 29547","docket_id":68771128,"judge":"Steven R. Jensen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-04-29T22:28:49.875302Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T01:56:43.730034Z","score":{"bm25":46.146988}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[198797,494622,899797,900487,900784,900924,901395,901402,901931,1370224,1427390,1587732,1595847,1596126,1824958,1871359,1900531,1906907,1927746,1945933,2011088,2111873,2174941,2455327,3040442,3166718,3257206,3411594,3430947,3511247,3681654,3889212,4350133,5452020,6603712,6684909,6692190,6692539,7226974,7234238,8244994,8255034,8255255,8944235,9503510,9514504,9514924,9515379,9515699,9568320,9584539,9590846,9670676,9670890,9696080,9742049,9796164,9846285,9879051,9974423,9974442,9974446,9974486,9974505,9974559,9974569],"download_url":"https://ujs.sd.gov/uploads/sc/opinions/2954698e671a.pdf","id":9974545,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/11/24/thom__miller_v._barnettelection_contest_as_to_amendment_a.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T13:59:08.578546Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T01:56:43.740341Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c4494ace19a6bd0615957c7b1f7742d5342f6cc9","snippet":"#29546, #29547-a-SRJ\n2021 S.D. 65\n\n                           IN THE SUPREME COURT\n                                   OF THE\n                          STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA\n\n                                      ****\n\n                                     #29546\n\nSHERIFF KEVIN THOM, In His\nOfficial Capacity as Pennington County\nSheriff, and COLONEL RICK MILLER,\nIn His Official Capacity as Superintendent\nof the South Dakota Highway Patrol,           Plaintiffs and Appellees,\n\n      v.\n\nSTEVE BARNE","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9974545],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7328243/united-to-protect-democracy-v-presidential-advisory-commn-on-election/","attorney":"*101Lynn Eisenberg, Danielle Yvette Conley, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs., Carol Federighi, Joseph Evan Borson, Kristina Ann Wolfe, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants.","caseName":"United to Protect Democracy v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election Integrity","caseNameFull":"UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY","citation":["288 F. Supp. 3d 99"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":7328243,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No.: 17–2016 (RC)","docket_id":64316727,"judge":"Contreras","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:38:45.618710Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:19:57.265385Z","score":{"bm25":44.068012}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7246159,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:27:12.097471Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:19:57.277951Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nRUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge\nI. INTRODUCTION\nIn May 2017, the President of the United States signed Executive Order 13,799, which established the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (the \"Commission\"). Approximately one month later, that Commission issued letters to each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia requesting that they provide certain publical","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7246159],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10680594/state-ex-rel-ohio-democratic-party-v-larose/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose","caseNameFull":"","citation":["257 N.E.3d 130","2024 Ohio 4953","178 Ohio St. 3d 229"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10680594,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-10-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-1361","docket_id":69260919,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:00:20.931966Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:41.165454Z","score":{"bm25":43.754887}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 4953","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[145884,2690125,2690648,2691822,2722141,3164605,3775581,3782929,4521193,4564857,4910469,4910910,7806090,9351053,9435151,9801790,9869230,9889277,9889295,10571219,11149706,11150073,11152132,11152243,11152753,11152782],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-4953.pdf","id":11147181,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/10/15/state_ex_rel._ohio_democratic_party_v._larose_2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T05:24:24.321687Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:41.204103Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"ac195b594465b30369acbcfb3e3337f4b571dcc3","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 229.]\n\n\n\n\nTHE STATE EX REL. OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL v. LAROSE, SECY. OF\n                                          STATE.\n   [Cite as State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose, 2024-Ohio-4953.]\nElections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to rescind\n        Directive 2024-21—Relators’ claims are barred by doctrine of laches—\n        Writ denied.\n   (No. 2024-1361—Submitted October 10, 2024—Decided O","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-4953.pdf","id":10609870,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/10/15/state_ex_rel._ohio_democratic_party_v._larose.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T16:07:09.330134Z","date_created":"2024-10-15T15:09:00.100998Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"201a2d03225118e07635db220fba2dc017cb76ce","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-4953.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-4953.pdf","id":11080366,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/10/15/state_ex_rel._ohio_democratic_party_v._larose_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T21:02:14.750205Z","date_created":"2025-06-19T16:20:33.789261Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"79765b83237a6f5ab75fc4b99e64473dd67e30df","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 229.]\n\n\n\n\nTHE STATE EX REL. OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL v. LAROSE, SECY. OF\n                                          STATE.\n   [Cite as State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose, 2024-Ohio-4953.]\nElections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to rescind\n        Directive 2024-21—Relators’ claims are barred by doctrine of laches—\n        Writ denied.\n   (No. 2024-1361—Submitted October 10, 2024—Decided O","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10609870,11147181,11080366],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to rescind Directive 2024-21—Relators' claims are barred by doctrine of laches—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9407191/state-ex-rel-one-person-one-vote-v-larose/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. One Person One Vote v. LaRose","caseNameFull":"","citation":["175 Ohio St. 3d 320","2023 Ohio 1992"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":9407191,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-06-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2023-0630","docket_id":67506911,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:27:56.904517Z","date_created":"2023-06-16T15:06:50.213369Z","score":{"bm25":43.738773}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 1992","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,85412,92076,98918,101684,101890,102013,110532,145777,219097,903979,2678468,2690611,2691755,2691883,2744029,3784127,3784814,4318388,4440857,4567607,7806090,7931616],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2023/2023-Ohio-1992.pdf","id":9402667,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/06/16/state_ex_rel._one_person_one_vote_v._larose.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T20:22:31.548077Z","date_created":"2023-06-16T15:06:50.223141Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bc63b77526f89dafb9107897305d031758670b0f","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. One Person One Vote v. LaRose, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-1992.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 4","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9402667],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to remove proposed constitutional amendment from August 8, 2023 special-election ballot—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4456144/united-to-protect-democracy-v-presidential-advisory-commission-on-election/","attorney":"","caseName":"United to Protect Democracy v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4456144,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-12-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2017-2016","docket_id":6249290,"judge":"Judge Rudolph Contreras","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:50:25.515916Z","date_created":"2017-12-29T17:00:52.534928Z","score":{"bm25":43.021164}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":710,"cites":[108807,109009,110217,110763,112305,112374,112747,118217,136985,145398,145671,145722,145730,145776,145875,145904,175723,184888,185300,185733,185792,186517,186689,187222,214961,299207,452960,597104,616285,669633,700432,722513,2576059],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv2016-33","id":4233397,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/12/29/united_to_protect_democracy_v._presidential_advisory_commission_on_election.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:30:00.269326Z","date_created":"2017-12-29T17:00:52.555107Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d5c6435fe97d427b19ef39e91959fa449b2818c4","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nUNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY, et al. :\n                                    :\n     Plaintiffs,                    :                    Civil Action No.:      17-2016 (RC)\n                                    :\n     v.                             :                    Re Document Nos.:      10, 22, 24\n                                    :\nPRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION :\nON ELECTION IN","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4233397],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8243227/state-ex-rel-ungaro-v-mahoning-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Ungaro v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["169 Ohio St. 3d 508","206 N.E.3d 689","2022 Ohio 3318"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8243227,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2022-1061","docket_id":65368524,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:10:08.015959Z","date_created":"2022-09-22T18:07:44.557822Z","score":{"bm25":43.001644}},"neutralCite":"2022 Ohio 3318","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690313,2694367,2903326,2903327,4211310,4438503,8208321],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2022/2022-Ohio-3318.pdf","id":8208490,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/22/state_ex_rel._ungaro_v._mahoning_cty._bd._of_elections.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:10:08.014544Z","date_created":"2022-09-22T18:07:44.573206Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f393241631382db7b9c53a7d9b9ad11be4d98ff4","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Ungaro v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3318.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Colum","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690313,2694367,2903326,2903327,4211310,4438503],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2022/2022-Ohio-3318.pdf","id":8208321,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/22/state_ex_rel._ungaro_v._mahoning_cty._bd._of_elections_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-13T01:36:58.998508Z","date_created":"2022-09-22T13:07:39.156149Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"89bc69b5f8d704110fdc7ca97262e67f7412dda1","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Ungaro v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3318.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Colum","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8208321,8208490],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify relator's name to the ballot as an independent candidate for state representative—Board of elections abused its discretion—Writ granted."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10680605/state-ex-rel-imposters-ltd-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Imposters, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["245 N.E.3d 764","2024 Ohio 4588","175 Ohio St. 3d 501"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10680605,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-1248","docket_id":69177697,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:21:51.597742Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:58.988389Z","score":{"bm25":42.810543}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 4588","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3170374,4564857,6328872,9801438,9882371,11149706,11151739,11152848],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-4588.pdf","id":11147192,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/19/state_ex_rel._imposters_ltd._v._cuyahoga_cty._bd._of_elections_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T05:25:21.640737Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:16:59.033731Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"1ae806987c7a3b4bd8f35e0b8ae1519d1bdf36d9","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 501.]\n\n\n\n\n   THE STATE EX REL . IMPOSTERS, LTD. v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF\n                                       ELECTIONS.\n     [Cite as State ex rel. Imposters, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections,\n                                    2024-Ohio-4588.]\nElections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify local\n        liquor option for general-election ballot—Board of elections did not abuse\n      ","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-4588.pdf","id":10588539,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/19/state_ex_rel._imposters_ltd._v._cuyahoga_cty._bd._of_elections.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T15:49:49.275008Z","date_created":"2024-09-19T19:10:02.988296Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"ac35a81333abd1ba66fc90741d50696e34a02f03","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Imposters, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-4588.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Stre","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10588539,11147192],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify local liquor option for general-election ballot—Board of elections did not abuse its discretion or act in clear disregard of applicable law in rejecting relator's petition and declining to certify local liquor option for general-election ballot—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4486619/state-ex-rel-schuck-v-columbus-slip-opinion/","attorney":"William Schuck, pro se., Zach Klein, Columbus City Attorney, and Richard N. Coglianese, Joshua T. Cox, and Charles P. Campisano, Assistant City Attorneys, for respondent city of Columbus., Ronald J. O'Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Timothy A. Lecklider, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent Franklin County Board of Elections.","caseName":"State ex rel. Schuck v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"The STATE EX REL. SCHUCK v. the CITY OF COLUMBUS Et Al.","citation":["2018 Ohio 1428","99 N.E.3d 383","152 Ohio St. 3d 590"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4486619,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-04-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0427","docket_id":6362905,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:58:36.695235Z","date_created":"2018-04-13T17:42:48.505923Z","score":{"bm25":42.578003}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 1428","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2018/2018-Ohio-1428.pdf","id":4263872,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/04/13/state_ex_rel._schuck_v._columbus_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:51:20.950438Z","date_created":"2018-04-13T17:42:48.521096Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"59626641ba9a327a710d4f3f903c061dd52d24d7","snippet":"\n\n\n  Per Curiam.\n \n\n\n   *385\n  \n\n   *590\n  \n\n   {¶ 1}\n  \n  In this expedited election case, relator, William Schuck, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, the city of Columbus and the Franklin","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4263872],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections-Mandamus-Writ of mandamus sought to compel removal of proposed city charter amendment from the ballot-Ballot summary conveys sufficient information to inform voters what they are being asked to vote on-Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9406268/state-ex-rel-one-person-one-vote-v-ohio-ballot-bd/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. One Person One Vote v. Ohio Ballot Bd.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["173 Ohio St. 3d 15","227 N.E.3d 1105","2023 Ohio 1928"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9406268,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-06-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2023-0672","docket_id":67492906,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:50.370397Z","date_created":"2023-06-13T20:08:02.357856Z","score":{"bm25":42.36669}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 1928","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690329,2690706,2690943,2691854,9401256],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2023/2023-Ohio-1928.pdf","id":9401744,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/06/12/state_ex_rel._one_person_one_vote_v._ohio_ballot_bd._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:50.379149Z","date_created":"2023-06-13T20:08:02.368706Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7499e70caa4e2d995fd7a06b34ff3655d0f7495f","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. One Person One Vote v. Ohio Ballot Bd., Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-1928.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbu","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690329,2690706,2690943,2691854],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2023/2023-Ohio-1928.pdf","id":9401256,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/06/12/state_ex_rel._one_person_one_vote_v._ohio_ballot_bd..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-13T21:22:37.741439Z","date_created":"2023-06-12T15:09:58.574215Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2d84320337b7ee8aa3365b655861605fe4164b8d","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. One Person One Vote v. Ohio Ballot Bd., Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-1928.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9401256,9401744],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel Ohio Ballot Board to adopt new ballot language for proposed amendment to Ohio Constitution and to compel Ohio secretary of state to adopt new ballot title for the proposed amendment—Writ granted in part and denied in part."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10104619/state-ex-rel-tjaden-v-geauga-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Tjaden v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 3396"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":10104619,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-1041","docket_id":69129294,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-09-04T20:09:59.932753Z","date_created":"2024-09-04T20:09:59.875332Z","score":{"bm25":42.33507}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 3396","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[145801,397107,2690648,2691381,2982412,3690749,4558859,4668962,6774678,6782144,9399118,9878721,11147204],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-3396.pdf","id":10571219,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/04/state_ex_rel._tjaden_v._geauga_cty._bd._of_elections.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-02T21:21:46.567844Z","date_created":"2024-09-04T20:09:59.886958Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4ae7def74e5d8dc6d7971967498a5c1871ae555f","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Tjaden v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-3396.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10571219],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify relator's name to general-election ballot—Board of elections did not abuse its discretion or act in disregard of applicable legal provisions in refusing to certify relator's candidacy and place his name on the ballot—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10680617/state-ex-rel-tjaden-v-geauga-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Tjaden v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 3396","176 Ohio St. 3d 653"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10680617,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-1041","docket_id":69129294,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-30T02:17:09.510260Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:17:09.337493Z","score":{"bm25":42.150017}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 3396","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[145801,397107,2690648,2691381,2982412,3690749,4558859,4668962,9399118,9878721,10571219,11152590],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-3396.pdf","id":11147204,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/04/state_ex_rel._tjaden_v._geauga_cty._bd._of_elections_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T05:25:21.890936Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:17:09.376201Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"bb6456437a69bd07ff8a247b869c9665f4eabd9b","snippet":"[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 653.]\n\n\n\n\nTHE STATE EX REL . TJADEN v. GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.\n[Cite as State ex rel. Tjaden v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2024-Ohio-3396.]\nElections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify\n        relator’s name to general-election ballot—Board of elections did not abuse\n        its discretion or clearly disregard applicable legal provisions in refusing to\n        certify relator’","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11147204],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to certify relator's name to general-election ballot—Board of elections did not abuse its discretion or clearly disregard applicable legal provisions in refusing to certify relator's candidacy and place his name on the ballot—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10618464/ex-parte-james-e-underwood-and-braden-miles-petition-for-writ-of-mandamus/","attorney":"","caseName":"Ex parte James E. Underwood and Braden Miles PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: John Long v. James E. Underwood and Braden Miles) (Walker Circuit Court: CV-19-900131).","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10618464,"court":"Supreme Court of Alabama","court_citation_string":"Ala.","court_id":"ala","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-06-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC-2024-0263","docket_id":70649541,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-27T14:02:03.526052Z","date_created":"2025-06-27T14:02:03.475593Z","score":{"bm25":42.01096}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[70797,110155,1114103,1126469,1599346,1622371,1640607,1707933,1736406,1765962,1782343,1790139,1803760,1819205,1852398,1858828,1874432,1895484,1899505,1925512,3220077,4286670,4802181,4815110,4815976,4822274,4826468,4862437,4868720,4870706,4872667,4874771,7650775,7716159,7772788,8984856,9659691,9783137,9784376,9887864,9931800,9934274,9934933,9937059,9938553,9938628],"download_url":"https://publicportal-api.alappeals.gov/courts/68f021c4-6a44-4735-9a76-5360b2e8af13/cms/case/F58779AE-B3E2-41DE-89D7-20F4AEF5A6D3/docketentrydocuments/655718E8-92B8-45F0-A3B7-169D34EED66C","id":11085052,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/27/ex_parte_james_e._underwood_and_braden_miles_petition_for_writ_of_mandamus.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T05:44:29.293944Z","date_created":"2025-06-27T14:02:03.477462Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"3742f4be07ad4e8f7e8c349adfb2402adddbd23a","snippet":"Rel: June 27, 2025\n\n\n\n\nNotice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern\nReporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts,\n300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other\nerrors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.\n\n\n\n\n         SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA\n                             OCTOBER TERM, 2","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11085052],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10681117/state-ex-rel-thomas-v-wood-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Thomas v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 379","174 Ohio St. 3d 50"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10681117,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-02-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-0072","docket_id":68221395,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-30T02:56:44.362401Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:56:44.170397Z","score":{"bm25":41.974754}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 379","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-379.pdf","id":11147704,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/02/02/state_ex_rel._thomas_v._wood_cty._bd._of_elections_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:27:51.997886Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T02:56:44.213219Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"2d8962343583b48688fe4d87afcec4d3ae2f4aff","snippet":"[Cite as State ex rel. Thomas v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections, 174 Ohio St.3d 50, 2024-Ohio-379.]\n\n\n\n\nTHE STATE EX REL . THOMAS ET AL . v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.\n[Cite as State ex rel. Thomas v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections, 174 Ohio St.3d 50,\n                                     2024-Ohio-379.]\nElections—Prohibition and mandamus—Writs sought to compel board of elections\n        to remove zoning-amendment referendum from primary-election ballot—\n        Relators failed to demonstrate that b","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11147704],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Prohibition and mandamus—Writs sought to compel board of elections to remove zoning-amendment referendum from primary-election ballot—Relators failed to demonstrate that board of elections abused its discretion or disregarded applicable law in certifying referendum for placement on ballot—Writs denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9430516/state-ex-rel-ohioans-for-reproductive-rights-v-ohio-ballot-bd/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Ohioans for Reproductive Rights v. Ohio Ballot Bd.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["174 Ohio St. 3d 285","237 N.E.3d 1","2023 Ohio 3325"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9430516,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2023-1088","docket_id":67859881,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:27:37.794829Z","date_created":"2023-10-05T22:08:52.128779Z","score":{"bm25":41.78021}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 3325","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690329,2690943,2690951,3711059,3783906,4525113,4564464,4672991,6753391,6754459,6754827,6754874,6757368,6760099,6765286,9399118,9401256,9401744,9425160,9801603],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2023/2023-Ohio-3325.pdf","id":9882373,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/09/19/state_ex_rel._ohioans_for_reproductive_rights_v._ohio_ballot_bd..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T03:18:34.769729Z","date_created":"2023-10-05T22:08:52.136071Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"610d0af2c2dbbdb306343df844be0f3692742e2a","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights v. Ohio Ballot Bd., Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-\n3325.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South F","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9882373],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Mandamus—Elections—Initiative—Proposed constitutional amendment—Ballot language—Ohio Constitution, Article XVI, Section 1—Writ sought to compel Ohio Ballot Board to adopt new ballot language for proposed amendment to Ohio Constitution—Writ granted in part and denied in part."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9471817/state-ex-rel-thomas-v-wood-cty-bd-of-elections/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Thomas v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 Ohio 379"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":9471817,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-02-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-0072","docket_id":68221395,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:24:32.885682Z","date_created":"2024-02-02T23:08:40.759189Z","score":{"bm25":41.149475}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 379","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690442,2691865,2960716,3173381,4035014,4255076,4270931,4447816,4525113,4558859,4690896,4879257,5099378,6758190,6772279,6773682,6776476,6778036,6784740,6784883,6786832,6786849,6788507,6788801,6791703,7806090,7838047,11147704,11149758,11152751,11152832,11153257],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2024/2024-Ohio-379.pdf","id":9929655,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/02/02/state_ex_rel._thomas_v._wood_cty._bd._of_elections.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T09:50:17.593894Z","date_created":"2024-02-02T23:08:40.789079Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1f4d2c5767e6f1961970e538885a0b4149704baf","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Thomas v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-379.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbus, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9929655],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Prohibition and mandamus—Writs sought to compel board of elections to remove zoning-amendment referendum from primary-election ballot—Relators failed to demonstrate that board of elections abused its discretion or disregarded applicable law in certifying referendum for placement on ballot—Writs denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4727566/state-ex-rel-white-v-franklin-cty-bd-of-elections-slip-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["160 Ohio St. 3d 1","153 N.E.3d 1","2020 Ohio 524"],"citeCount":14,"cluster_id":4727566,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-02-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2020-0150","docket_id":16849537,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:14:54.182612Z","date_created":"2020-02-14T22:08:02.309053Z","score":{"bm25":41.05595}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ohio 524","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2691600,4259538,4442075,6772879,6784883,9801324,9801425,9802108,11152751],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2020/2020-Ohio-524.pdf","id":4507893,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/02/14/state_ex_rel._white_v._franklin_cty._bd._of_elections_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T03:08:53.579855Z","date_created":"2020-02-14T22:08:02.336350Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d2ff7410f7f6dc0e3fb2d20dd18bbbc5fa58617b","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-524.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Columbu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4507893],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Validation of signatures on nominating petition—Writ of mandamus sought to compel county board of elections to place candidate's name on ballot—Writ denied."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4492423/state-ex-rel-khumprakob-v-mahoning-cty-bd-of-elections-slip-opinion/","attorney":"Terry J. Lodge and Jensen Silvis, for relators., Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sharon K. Hackett, Linette M. Stratford, and Mark D'Apolito, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondents., Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., L. Bradfield Hughes, and Kathleen M. Trafford ; and McTigue & Colombo, L.L.C., Donald J. McTigue, Columbus, and Ben F.C. Wallace, urging denial of the writ for amici curiae Affiliated Construction Trades Ohio Foundation, Ohio Chamber of Commerce, and American Petroleum Institute., Mangano Law Offices Co., L.P.A., Joseph J. Guarino III, and Ryan K. Hymore, Cleveland, urging denial of the writ for amici curiae Western Reserve Building and Construction Trades Council (Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber), Youngstown Warren Black Caucus, Community Mobilization Coalition, and Mahoning Trumbull AFL-CIO.","caseName":"State ex rel. Khumprakob v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"The STATE EX REL. KHUMPRAKOB Et Al. v. MAHONING COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS Et Al.","citation":["2018 Ohio 1602","109 N.E.3d 1184","153 Ohio St. 3d 581"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":4492423,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-04-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0404","docket_id":6374680,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:00:05.035541Z","date_created":"2018-04-24T21:43:09.081416Z","score":{"bm25":41.043804}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 1602","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3785440],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2018/2018-Ohio-1602.pdf","id":4269676,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/04/24/state_ex_rel._khumprakob_v._mahoning_cty._bd._of_elections_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:55:12.662513Z","date_created":"2018-04-24T21:43:09.088503Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d2994f9ed2f0b51152c1f5c9c583ca372b074974","snippet":"\n\n\n  Per Curiam.\n \n\n\n   *1185\n  \n\n   *582\n  \n\n   {¶ 1}\n  \n  In this case, relators, four Youngstown electors,\n  \n   1\n  \n  seek a writ of mandamus to","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4269676],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Mandamus-County board of elections abused its discretion in finding that proposed charter amendment exceeds city's legislative power-Writ compelling board to place proposed amendment on May 2018 ballot granted."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4693720/state-ex-rel-dunn-v-plain-local-school-dist-bd-of-edn-slip-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"State ex rel. Dunn v. Plain Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"","citation":["143 N.E.3d 488","158 Ohio St. 3d 370","2020 Ohio 40"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":4693720,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-01-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2019-1723","docket_id":16674773,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:49:12.845178Z","date_created":"2020-01-09T21:07:57.381682Z","score":{"bm25":40.593685}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ohio 40","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2020/2020-Ohio-40.pdf","id":4471012,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/01/09/state_ex_rel._dunn_v._plain_local_school_dist._bd._of_edn._slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:49:12.840421Z","date_created":"2020-01-09T21:07:57.416232Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f7bab81462189300d657a836cf22754e28239dc","snippet":"[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State\nex rel. Dunn v. Plain Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-40.]\n\n\n\n\n                                           NOTICE\n      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an\n      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to\n      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65\n      South Front Street, Col","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4471012],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Mandamus—Elections—Writ of mandamus sought to compel local school board to forward petition under R.C. 3311.242 to county board of elections—R.C. 3311.242(C) requires school board to forward petition—Writ granted."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4524820/state-ex-rel-guest-v-husted-slip-opinion/","attorney":"Warner Mendenhall Akron, and Logan Trombley, for relator., Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Renata Y. Staff and Halli Brownfield Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted., Fishel, Downey, Albrecht & Riepenhoff, L.L.P., Daniel T. Downey, Melanie J. Williamson, and Angelica M. Jarmusz, Columbus, for respondent Columbiana County Board of Elections.","caseName":"State ex rel. Guest v. Husted (Slip Opinion)","caseNameFull":"The STATE EX REL. GUEST v. HUSTED, Secy., Et Al.","citation":["2018 Ohio 3161","109 N.E.3d 1229","153 Ohio St. 3d 630"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4524820,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0889","docket_id":7624065,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:09:16.261140Z","date_created":"2018-08-08T21:15:22.594375Z","score":{"bm25":40.23198}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 3161","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690345,2691640,2903327,2974360,4211310,4259537,6754407,6784883,6791109,9501399,9801425,9801510,11152751],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2018/2018-Ohio-3161.pdf","id":4302073,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/08/08/state_ex_rel._guest_v._husted_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T02:19:58.220680Z","date_created":"2018-08-08T21:15:22.602166Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"20920588d84c410ce028dcbd24030acb936b73ea","snippet":"\n\n\n  Per Curiam.\n \n\n\n   *631\n  \n\n   {¶ 1}\n  \n  In this expedited election case, relator, Heaven Guest, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and the Columbiana County Board of Elections, to place her name on the November 6, 2018 ballot as an indep","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4302073],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Elections—Mandamus—Writ of mandamus sought to compel secretary of state and county board of elections to place candidate's name on general-election ballot as independent candidate for common-pleas-court judge—Secretary of state did not abuse his discretion in refusing to place candidate's name on the ballot—Writ denied."}]}