{"count":11876,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xMS44OTk1ODImcz00MzMwMjI0JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMDkmcD0y&q=LIEN+CONFINED+TO+ACTUAL+INTERESTS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9505515/doskocz-v-als-lien-services/","attorney":"","caseName":"Doskocz v. ALS Lien Services","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9505515,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-05-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A166299","docket_id":68548334,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:32:42.401515Z","date_created":"2024-05-21T00:02:36.277329Z","score":{"bm25":48.36764}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1037409,1195277,1277425,1426902,1801932,2243644,2247646,2252642,2259515,2260409,2268122,2285997,2630960,2631650,2742178,2827838,5665599,6106749,6107005,6107165,6107640],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A166299.PDF","id":9972128,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/05/20/doskocz_v._als_lien_services.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:30:58.176793Z","date_created":"2024-05-21T00:02:36.282840Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"43d6b55d909e0be8c879eed614ba0144e628870e","snippet":"Filed 5/20/24\n                CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION *\n\n       IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                        FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                 DIVISION ONE\n\n\n TERESA DOSKOCZ et al.,\n         Plaintiffs and Respondents,          A166299\n\n v.                                           (Contra Costa County\n ALS LIEN SERVICES et al.,                    Super. Ct. No. MSC17–01486)\n         Defendants and Appellants.\n\n\n       Plaintiff Te","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9972128],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2740338/allstate-lien-recovery-corp-v-stansbury/","attorney":"Randolph C. Baker (Jeffrey N. Pritzker, Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein & Blatt, PA, Towson, MD), Steven A. Cohen, Baltimore, MD, on the brief, for Appellant., Jane Santoni (Victoria Chihos, Williams & Santoni, LLP, on the brief), Towson, MD, for Appellee.","caseName":"Allstate Lien & Recovery Corp. v. Stansbury","caseNameFull":"ALLSTATE LIEN & RECOVERY CORPORATION, Et Al. v. Cedric STANSBURY","citation":["219 Md. App. 575","101 A.3d 520","2014 Md. App. LEXIS 123"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":2740338,"court":"Court of Special Appeals of Maryland","court_citation_string":"Md. Ct. Spec. App.","court_id":"mdctspecapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-10-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1025/13","docket_id":1429555,"judge":"Zarnoch, Graeff, Hotten","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:19:17.802725Z","date_created":"2015-11-23T17:22:12.394131Z","score":{"bm25":33.626537}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1443711,1990791,1992563,2334674],"download_url":"http://www.mdcourts.gov/opinions/cosa/2014/1025s13.pdf","id":2740338,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/10/07/allstate_lien__recovery_v._stansbury.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:41:09.339402Z","date_created":"2014-10-07T18:04:59.712298Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"62e7868ec641d5eea2c43c6c7b061e351e9511cf","snippet":"\n\n\n  GRAEFF, J.\n \n\n  This case involves a garageman’s lien, a lien created on a motor vehicle on behalf of someone who conducted work on a vehicle but was not paid for the service by the owner of the vehicle. Cedric Stansbury, appellee, brought suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County against appellants, Allstate Lien & Recovery Corp","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2740338],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/894686/flores-v-millennium-interests-ltd/","attorney":"Harry Herzog, David A. Carp, Herzog Carp & McManus, William C. Wagner, and J. James Luck, Godwin Gruber LLP, Houston, for Appellant., H. Miles Cohn, Sheiness Scott Grossman & Cohn, L.L.P., and Michelle Friery, Houston, for Appellee., J. Ken Nunley, Nunley Davis Jolley & Hill, L.L.P., Boerne, Vincent L. Hazen, Hazen & Terrill, P.C., Bill Davis, Office of Atty. Gen., Austin, Deborah G. Hankinson, Law Offices of Deborah Hankinson PC, Dallas, for Amicus Curiae","caseName":"Flores v. Millennium Interests, Ltd.","caseNameFull":"Arturo FLORES, Et Al., Appellants, v. MILLENNIUM INTERESTS, LTD., Et Al., Appellees","citation":["185 S.W.3d 427","48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1060","2005 Tex. LEXIS 733","2005 WL 2397521"],"citeCount":109,"cluster_id":894686,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-1003","docket_id":1268396,"judge":"Medina, Hecht, O'Neill, Wainwright, Johnson, Willett, Brister, Jefferson, Green","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:06:15.765891Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:25:09.837688Z","score":{"bm25":26.782085}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5823,"cites":[96941,110112,112557,112900,117862,118026,118424,127910,894667,1494134,1507983,1522113,1747173,1749669,1752828,1753039,2127131,2339924,2381704,2419880,3903842],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=87976f5a-012a-4225-901b-dc18bbd7b0ce&coa=cossup&DT=OPINION&MediaID=a9f3fced-726b-45d8-a6a0-0dbdc981c6fd","id":894686,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2005/09/30/arturo_flores_v._millennium_interests_ltd..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:41:37.064610Z","date_created":"2013-06-06T20:14:39.683448Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f33078787baf1a803163b72fdbc5e952b4669a4","snippet":"\n185 S.W.3d 427 (2005)\nArturo FLORES, et al., Appellants,\nv.\nMILLENNIUM INTERESTS, LTD., et al., Appellees.\nNo. 04-1003.\nSupreme Court of Texas.\nArgued February 15, 2005.\nDecided September 30, 2005.\nRehearing Denied March 31, 2006.\n*428 Harry Herzog, David A. Carp, Herzog Carp & McManus, Willi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9512889,9512890,9512891,894686],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10098837/in-re-wack-jills-inc-assignor-to-sm-financial-services-corporation/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Wack Jills, Inc., Assignor: To: SM Financial Services Corporation, Assignee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10098837,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-08-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C.A. No. 2019-0650-PAF","docket_id":69114153,"judge":"Fioravanti V.C.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-08-29T21:05:56.705212Z","date_created":"2024-08-29T21:05:56.637506Z","score":{"bm25":22.922483}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1189498,2393941,3865637,3870075,3966934,7310605,8067309,8499671],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=368790","id":10565437,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/08/29/in_re_wack_jills_inc._assignor_to_sm_financial_services_corporation.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:14:42.297926Z","date_created":"2024-08-29T21:05:56.646432Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b275b7b5eadfa11f3ed8f75b8523cfa6223e8a5c","snippet":"      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\nIn re:                                 )\n                                       )\nWACK JILLS, Inc., f/k/a JACK           )\nWILLS, INC.,                           )\n                                       )\n             Assignor,                 )\n                                       )\nTo:                                    )   C.A. No. 2019-0650-PAF\n                                       )\nSM FINANCIAL SERVICES                  )\nCORPORAT","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10565437],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1708276/lien-v-mcgladrey-pullen/","attorney":"Glen H. Johnson, Johnson Huffman P.C., Rapid City, for plaintiffs and appellees., Allen G. Nelson, Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, Rapid City, Michael J. Bleck, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, MN, Richard L. Miller, Jr., McGla-drey & Pullen, Chicago, IL, for defendant and appellant.","caseName":"Lien v. McGladrey & Pullen","caseNameFull":"Thomas E. LIEN and Judith J. Lien, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. McGLADREY & PULLEN, Defendant and Appellant","citation":["509 N.W.2d 421","1993 S.D. LEXIS 154","1993 WL 518319"],"citeCount":38,"cluster_id":1708276,"court":"South Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"S.D.","court_id":"sd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1993-12-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18220","docket_id":1294967,"judge":"Sabers, Miller, Amundson, Wuest, Henderson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T05:31:33.073399Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T15:38:21.649323Z","score":{"bm25":22.504414}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5697,"cites":[1229988,1234134,1396612,1613673,1647689,1669150,1719679,1745089,1824980,1854679,1865212,1906391,1934869,1961091,2207417,2224611,2228624],"download_url":null,"id":1708276,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T11:18:10.665887Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:11:58.422444Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f62d1ea272921080e8660e4c24fbbb7148980173","snippet":"\n509 N.W.2d 421 (1993)\nThomas E. LIEN and Judith J. Lien, Plaintiffs and Appellees,\nv.\nMcGLADREY & PULLEN, Defendant and Appellant.\nNo. 18220.\nSupreme Court of South Dakota.\nArgued August 31, 1993.\nDecided December 15, 1993.\nRehearing Denied January 20, 1994.\n*422 Glen H. Johnson, Johnson Huff","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1708276,9670857,9670858,9670859],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2807426/in-re-amendments-to-the-rules-regulating-the-florida-bar-biennial/","attorney":"John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Gregory William Coleman, President, Mary Ellen Bateman, DEUP Division Director, and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.","caseName":"In Re AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR (BIENNIAL PETITION)","caseNameFull":"In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Biennial Petition)","citation":["167 So. 3d 412","40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 330","2015 Fla. LEXIS 1282","2015 WL 3617835"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2807426,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC14-2088","docket_id":2663936,"judge":"Labarga, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Canady, Polston, Perry","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:53:20.100697Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T15:43:06.510122Z","score":{"bm25":19.603188}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2015/sc14-2088.pdf","id":2807426,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/06/11/in_re_amendments_to_the_rules_regulating_the_florida_bar_biennial.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:30:06.556170Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T15:03:13.329943Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0270c0ead9eee97d4d7f76ed02ac9d35a6959242","snippet":"\n\n\n  PER CURIAM.\n \n\n  This matter is before the Court on the petition of The Florida Bar proposing amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules).\n  \n   See\n  \n  R. Regulating Fla. Bar 1-12.1. We have jurisdiction.\n  \n   See\n  \n  art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.\n \n\n  The Bar’s petition in this case proposes amendments to the following Bar Rul","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2807426],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7830839/amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-appellate-procedure/","attorney":"Mark King Leban, Judge, Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Miami, FL, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner., Judy Bone, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, FL, Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, Senterfitt and Eidson, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, and Barbara Debelius-Enemark, Pro se, Crawfordville, FL, Interested Parties with comments.","caseName":"Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure","caseNameFull":"AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE","citation":["894 So. 2d 202","30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 84","2005 Fla. LEXIS 154","2005 WL 242690"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7830839,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-02-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. SC04-108","docket_id":64836172,"judge":"Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:55:20.637212Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T20:57:20.827481Z","score":{"bm25":19.12741}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7773266,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:38:01.515407Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T20:57:20.845488Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM.\nThe Florida Bar’s Appellate Court Rules Committee (Committee) has filed its biennial report of regular-cycle proposed rule amendments in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(4). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.\nBACKGROUND\nThe Committee’s regular-cycle report proposes amendments to rules 9.020 (Definitions), 9.030 (Ju","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7773266],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10592139/brakebush-brothers-inc-v-certain-underwriters-at-lloyds-of-london/","attorney":"","caseName":"Brakebush Brothers, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London - Novae 2007 Syndicate Subscribing to Pol'y No. 93prx17f157","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2022 NCBC 23"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10592139,"court":"North Carolina Business Court","court_citation_string":"N.C. Bus. Ct.","court_id":"ncbizct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-05-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-CVS-367","docket_id":70354610,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-05-23T21:13:57.957706Z","date_created":"2025-05-23T21:13:57.859060Z","score":{"bm25":18.558474}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[25894,164676,1258686,1259877,1279464,1292537,1298587,1323590,1324497,1332827,1339541,1385393,1418778,5135176,6698437,6720651,9887709],"download_url":"https://www.nccourts.gov/assets/documents/opinions/2022%20NCBC%2023.pdf?VersionId=vRDXCIaPpSCEt_T26XrtIUynG34Vexcv","id":11058727,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/05/11/brakebush_brothers_inc._v._certain_underwriters_at_lloyds_of_london_-.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T14:15:31.889275Z","date_created":"2025-05-23T21:13:57.886898Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b52186c188c50ab8512ac27c943b0515152f914f","snippet":"Brakebush Brothers., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London -\nNovae 2007 Syndicate Subscribing to Pol’y No. 93PRX17F157, 2022 NCBC 23.\n\nSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA                IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE\n                                           SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION\nDAVIE COUNTY                                      20 CVS 367\n\nBRAKEBUSH BROTHERS, INC.\nAND HOUSE OF RAEFORD\nFARMS,\n\n                   Plaintiffs,\n\nv.\n\nCERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT\nLLOYD’S OF LONDON - NOVAE\n2007 SYNDICAT","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11058727],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/173452/city-of-new-york-v-permanent-mission-of-india-to-the-united-nations/","attorney":"Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York (John Low-Beer, Scott Shorr, Sarah Stewart, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee., Aaron Stiefel, Robert A. Kandel, Marisa Pizzolato, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y., David O. Bickart, Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellants., H. Thomas Byron III, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington D.C. (Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, James H. Thessin, Deputy Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, Susan Benda, Attorney Adviser, United States Department of State, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Lev. L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney, David S. Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Douglas Letter, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, on the briefs), for Amicus Curiae United States of America.","caseName":"City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations","caseNameFull":"The CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO the UNITED NATIONS, Defendant-Appellant, Great America Leasing Corporation, Jane Doe # 1 Through Jane Doe # 20, the Names of the Last 20 Defendants Being Unknown to the Plaintiff, the Persons or Parties Intended to Be, Persons or Corporations, if Any, Having or Claiming an Interest in or Lien Upon the Property Described in the Complaint, Defendants; The City of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the Bayaryn Jargalsaikhan, as Principal Resident Representative to the United Nations of the Mongolian People’s Republic, Defendant-Appellant","citation":["618 F.3d 172","58 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 689","2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17127"],"citeCount":37,"cluster_id":173452,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-08-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket 08-1805-cv, 08-1806-cv","docket_id":1923598,"judge":"Calabresi, Hall, Sessions","lexisCite":"2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17127","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T18:51:56.260355Z","date_created":"2014-12-21T11:06:28.338170Z","score":{"bm25":18.215485}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1726,2575,2589,101225,107045,110529,110547,110564,110736,110773,111221,111672,112068,112163,112703,112925,117841,118239,118379,118450,118452,118485,130156,134749,142892,145715,145822,145868,145902,145925,158151,185521,376891,415508,421681,435925,510021,578338,666572,714800,762268,771206,794150,797919,1356933,1383063,1383882,1427175,1464694,1506455,1675454,2334259,2363940,2469231,6953108,6990562,8878986,9432987,9434620],"download_url":"http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c92e3ea1-d643-42d5-9327-108ced23b5ac/2/doc/08-1805-cv_opn.pdf","id":173452,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/08/17/City_of_New_York_v._The_Permanent_Mission_of_India_to_the_United_Nations.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T11:36:33.334831Z","date_created":"2010-08-17T14:35:40Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8271ee0be58f8a2b9476b6684b3b3ea59e9f2d03","snippet":"\n618 F.3d 172 (2010)\nThe CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee,\nv.\nThe PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO the UNITED NATIONS, Defendant-Appellant,\nGreat America Leasing Corporation, Jane Doe # 1 through Jane Doe # 20, the names of the last 20 defendants being unknown to the plaintiff, the persons or parties intended to be, persons or corporations, if any, having or claiming an interest in or lien upon the property described in the complaint, Defenda","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[506,1334],"panel_names":["Guido Calabresi","Peter W. Hall"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[173452],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/835988/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-spencer/","attorney":"Michael L. Spencer, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for himself., Chris Mullmann, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.","caseName":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Spencer","caseNameFull":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MICHAEL L. SPENCER, Accused","citation":["58 P.3d 228","335 Or. 71","2002 Ore. LEXIS 912"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":835988,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-11-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"OSB 00-49, 00-51; SC S49362","docket_id":486888,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:46:24.150743Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T09:53:17.266425Z","score":{"bm25":16.437866}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[836033,836095,1136109,1200514,1205744,1355786,1424487,1427010,1442167,1449785],"download_url":"http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S49362.htm","id":835988,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2002/11/22/in_re_spencer_2.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:17:22.309907Z","date_created":"2013-03-01T21:12:42.942657Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"93ed7202472b16a492abfe462fdc53e5a93d2762","snippet":"\n58 P.3d 228 (2002)\n335 Or. 71\nIn re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Michael L. SPENCER, Accused.\n(OSB 00-51, 01-49; SC S49362).\nSupreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.\nArgued and Submitted September 9, 2002.\nDecided November 22, 2002.\n*229 Michael L. Spencer, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[835988],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7832554/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-criminal-procedure/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure","caseNameFull":"In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-CONFORM RULES TO 2004 LEGISLATION","citation":["900 So. 2d 528","30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 244","2005 Fla. LEXIS 615","2005 WL 774834"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7832554,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-04-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. SC04-2489","docket_id":64837890,"judge":"Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:55:46.491791Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T21:00:40.930065Z","score":{"bm25":16.007555}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7775086,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:38:28.690130Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T21:00:40.948341Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM.\nThe Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report proposing amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure to conform the rules to 2004 legislation. The Committee proposes amendments to rule 3.111 (Providing Counsel to Indigents); rule 3.220 (Discovery); and rule 3.670 (Rendition of Judgment); and proposes new rule 3.984 (Affidavit of Indigent Status). We hav","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7775086],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1106033/amend-to-rules-of-app-proc-civ-proc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Amend. to Rules of App. Proc., Civ. Proc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["887 So. 2d 1090","2004 WL 2201732"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":1106033,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2004-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC04-1139","docket_id":1515169,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:49:29.424639Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T17:19:16.334856Z","score":{"bm25":15.231654}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106595,106883,111095,118507,1695551,1704928,1722065,1786916,1829537,1886170,1911120],"download_url":null,"id":1106033,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:06:13.716133Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T04:02:37.361787Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"4d028d99ed16e2edebcdaf1ce764f8468c6d2dd5","snippet":"\n887 So.2d 1090 (2004)\nAMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES.\nNo. SC04-1139.\nSupreme Court of Florida.\nSeptember 30, 2004.\nJohn F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1106033],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2724805/first-american-title-insurance-company-v-darrell-calhoun-and-barbara/","attorney":"Kurt V. Laker, Doyle Legal Corporation, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.","caseName":"First American Title Insurance Company v. Darrell Calhoun and Barbara Calhoun, Successors to Marcus Burgher III, for Issuance of Tax Deed","caseNameFull":"FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Intervenor, v. Darrell CALHOUN and Barbara Calhoun, Successors to Marcus Burgher III, for Issuance of Tax Deed, Appellees-Petitioners","citation":["13 N.E.3d 423","2014 WL 2884455","2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 283"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2724805,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13A01-1304-MI-177","docket_id":1160546,"judge":"Pyle, Mathias, Bradford","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:13:28.008329Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T14:43:23.436064Z","score":{"bm25":15.057882}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104786,110981,112038,145663,852057,852227,852456,1984593,2046007,2079450,2092756,2101941,2106523,2135036,2150024,2219178,2224006,2240815,2438161],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/06251401rrp.pdf","id":2724805,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/06/25/first_american_title_insurance_company_v._darrell_calhoun_and_barbara.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:29:55.115981Z","date_created":"2014-09-08T20:41:35.131451Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c872488547f5d87a74126c26adedea5efa39a9a8","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  PYLE, Judge.\n \n\n\n   STATEMENT OF THE CASE\n  \n\n\n  This discretionary interlocutory appeal involves a mortgage foreclosure judgment holder’s motion for summary judgment seeking to set aside the issuance of a tax deed for property located in Crawford County and purchased in a tax sale. The summary judgment motion was based on","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2724805],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2502660/american-society-for-the-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animals-v-feld/","attorney":"Katherine A. Meyer, Tanya Sanerib, Eric Robert Glitzenstein, Howard M. Crystal, Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Kimberly Denise Ockene, Jonathan Russell Loworn, The Humane Society of the United States, Stephen A. Saltzburg, George Washington University Law School, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs., John M. Simpson, Joseph T. Small, Jr., Lisa Zeiler Joiner, Michelle C. Pardo, George A. Gasper, Kara L. Petteway, Lance L. Shea, Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant.","caseName":"American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.","caseNameFull":"AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Defendant","citation":["677 F. Supp. 2d 55","71 ERC (BNA) 1651","2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121394","2009 WL 5159752"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2502660,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civ. Action 03-2006 (EGS)","docket_id":2369789,"judge":"Emmet G. Sullivan","lexisCite":"2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121394","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:22:34.329807Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:41:05.178566Z","score":{"bm25":14.907553}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3133,"cites":[109462,109897,110654,111258,112305,112747,118096,118217,118329,185763,185883,187188,187465,660150,669633,674590,687585,1398726,2462772,2620886],"download_url":null,"id":2502660,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:15:48.438731Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:59:10.263139Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7f114ca2ade00f6d58515d9490af85035cd46af5","snippet":"\n677 F.Supp.2d 55 (2009)\nAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, et al., Plaintiffs,\nv.\nFELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Defendant.\nCiv. Action No. 03-2006 (EGS).\nUnited States District Court, District of Columbia.\nDecember 30, 2009.\n*57 Katherine A. Meyer, Tanya Sanerib, Eric Robert Glitzenstein, Howard M. Crystal, Me","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2502660],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7797237/amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure/","attorney":"Herman J. Russomanno, President, Miami, Florida, Terrence Russell, President-elect, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and John f. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, Florida, on behalf of The Florida Bar; and Lori E. Terens, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Jacksonville, Florida, for Petitioner., Henry P. Trawick, Jr., Sarasota, Florida, Responding.","caseName":"Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure","caseNameFull":"AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE","citation":["773 So. 2d 1098","2000 Fla. LEXIS 2312","2000 WL 1472356"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7797237,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-10-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. SC00-730","docket_id":64802529,"judge":"Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:46:35.586969Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T19:55:20.447935Z","score":{"bm25":14.595398}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7737432,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:31:00.620198Z","date_created":"2022-07-30T19:55:20.477956Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM.\nThe Civil Procedure Rules Committee of The Florida Bar has submitted its quadrennial report of proposed changes to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c), the proposed changes were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation, and the Board approved the chan","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7737432],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4444094/ron-sommers-as-chapter-7-trustee-for-alabama-and-dunlavy-ltd-flat-stone/","attorney":"Manuel (Ned) Munoz, Jr., Texas Association of Builders V.P. of Reg. Affairs & Gen. Counsel, Austin, for Amicus Curiae Texas Association of Builders., Aaron Daniel Day, Texas Land Title Association, Austin, for Amicus Curiae Texas Land Title Association., Joseph L. Lanza, Texas Association of Builders V.P. of Reg. Affairs & Gen. Counsel, Austin, Charles M. Vethan, Vethan Law Firm, P.C-, Houston, James Elio Doyle, Nicole Shirley Bakare, Doyle Res-trepo Harvin & Robbins LLP, Houston, .Kemp W. Gorthey, Attorney at Law, Austin, for Petitioner., Blaine Hummel, Bradford Wald Irelan, Irelan McDaniel PLLC, Houston, for Respondent.","caseName":"Ron Sommers, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Alabama and Dunlavy, Ltd., Flat Stone II, Ltd., and Flat Stone, Ltd., and as Successor in Interest to Jay Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the Jhc Trusts I and Ii v. Sandcastle Homes, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Ron SOMMERS, as Chapter 7 Trustee FOR ALABAMA AND DUNLAVY, LTD., Flat Stone II, Ltd., and Flat Stone, Ltd., and as Successor in Interest to Jay Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the JHC Trusts I and II, Petitioner, v. SANDCASTLE HOMES, INC., Respondent; Ron Sommers, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Alabama and Dunlavy, Ltd., Flat Stone II, Ltd., and Flat Stone, Ltd., and as Successor in Interest to Jay Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the JHC Trusts I and II, Petitioner, v. NewBiss Property, LP, Respondent","citation":["521 S.W.3d 749","60 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1291","2017 WL 2608353","2017 Tex. LEXIS 554"],"citeCount":71,"cluster_id":4444094,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-0847, 15-0848","docket_id":6225515,"judge":"Brown, Green, Johnson, Guzman, Boyd, Lehrmann, Willett, Hecht, Devine","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:46:42.914345Z","date_created":"2017-11-17T06:12:06.187478Z","score":{"bm25":14.518841}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[6531,1402476,1533247,1567059,1577083,1746312,1757753,1947413,2099971,2364464,2431274,2431363,2547903,3127143,3923284,3962074,4888445,4895027,5115012,5143048,9512883,9512892,9512929,9705773,9810939,9810985,9818462,9818784],"download_url":null,"id":9879294,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:56:29.678010Z","date_created":"2023-09-27T18:06:17.267610Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJustice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the Court,\nin which Justice Green, Justice Johnson, Justice Guzman, and Justice Boyd joined.\nBlack’s Law Dictionary tells us that to “expunge” is “[t]o remove from a recordt;] ... to erase or destroy.”1 Today we must decide just how much notice is “erased” or “destroyed” when a statute expunges a noti","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4221347,9879295,9879296,9879294],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2637206/in-re-application-of-oba-to-amend-the-rules-of-professional-conduct/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Application of Oba to Amend the Rules of Professional Conduct","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2007 OK 22"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":2637206,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-04-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SCBD-5266","docket_id":6498,"judge":"Concur: Winchester","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:29:48.739943Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T05:49:26.043499Z","score":{"bm25":13.54774}},"neutralCite":"2007 OK 22","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5464,"cites":[112090,2637124],"download_url":null,"id":2637206,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:27:14.411297Z","date_created":"2013-11-01T21:26:37.303677Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"622ab566e04056cb873765bab6bd802dc528fea3","snippet":"\n2007 OK 22\nIN RE: APPLICATION OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION TO AMEND THE OKLAHOMA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND TO AMEND RULE 1.4 OF THE RULES GOVERNING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.\nNo. SCBD-5266.\nSupreme Court of Oklahoma.\nApril 17, 2007.\n\nORDER\n¶1 Upon application by the Oklahoma Bar Association, the Court approves the amendments to the Oklahoma Rules o","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2637206],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2637124/in-re-oklahoma-bar-assn-to-amend-the-oklahoma-rules-of-professional/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Oklahoma Bar Ass'n to Amend the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct","caseNameFull":"In Re APPLICATION OF the OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION TO AMEND the OKLAHOMA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT and to Amend Rule 1.4 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings","citation":["2007 OK 22","171 P.3d 780","2007 Okla. LEXIS 28"],"citeCount":19,"cluster_id":2637124,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-04-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SCBD-5266","docket_id":2519,"judge":"Winchester, Edmondson, Lavender, Hargrave, Opala, Kauger, Taylor, Colbert","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:29:47.721909Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T05:47:07.868298Z","score":{"bm25":13.339984}},"neutralCite":"2007 OK 22","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5464,"cites":[112090,2637206],"download_url":null,"id":2637124,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:27:15.142290Z","date_created":"2013-11-01T21:26:31.812137Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5c1431b2bcd04c1a993e0a3435ade908bd3216e4","snippet":"\n171 P.3d 780 (2007)\n2007 OK 22\nIn re APPLICATION OF the OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION TO AMEND the OKLAHOMA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT and to Amend Rule 1.4 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings.\nNo. SCBD-5266.\nSupreme Court of Oklahoma.\nApril 17, 2007.\n\nORDER\n¶ 1 Upon application by the Oklahoma Bar Association, the Co","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2637124],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2959130/francis-williams-montenegro-and-lynda-williams-v-wells-fargo-bank-na/","attorney":"","caseName":"Francis Williams Montenegro and Lynda Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee F/K/A Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Amortizing Residential Collateral Trust Mortgage Pass-Through","caseNameFull":"Francis Williams Montenegro and Lynda Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee F/K/A Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Amortizing Residential Collateral Trust Mortgage Pass-Through","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2959130,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Austin","court_id":"txctapp3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-13-00123-CV","docket_id":2816269,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:06:28.142276Z","date_created":"2015-09-17T04:48:15.519876Z","score":{"bm25":12.508739}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1505453,1509393,1534468,1579322,1722735,2184899,2270428,2353906,2358019,2454382,2537593],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=4079&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa03%5cOpinion","id":2959130,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/06/03/francis_williams_montenegro_and_lynda_williams_v._wells_fargo_bank_n.a..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:06:28.143907Z","date_created":"2015-09-17T03:52:08.317866Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"79581835180dc0e3d59b7d48de28b2b26a3e074f","snippet":"      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN\n\n\n                                      NO. 03-13-00123-CV\n\n\n\n               Francis Williams Montenegro and Lynda Williams, Appellants\n\n                                                 v.\n\n   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A.,\n   as Trustee f/k/a Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for the Structured Asset\n Securities Corporation Amortizing Residential Collateral Trust Mortgage Pass-Throu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2959130],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4330224/application-of-black-hills-power/","attorney":"Mark A. Moreno of Moreno, Lee & Bac-hand, PC, Pierre, South Dakota, Andrew P. Moratzka of Stoel Rives, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Chad T. Marriott of Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for appellants GCC Dacotah, Inc., Pete Lien & Sons, Inc., Rushmore Forest Products, Inc., Spearfish Forest Products, Inc., Rapid City Regional Hospital, Inc. & Wharf Resources, Inc., together the Black Hills Industrial Intervenors., Lee A. Magnuson, Nicole 0. Tupman, Lindquist & Vennum LLP, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and Todd Brink, Amy Koe-nig of Black Hills Power Corporation, Rapid City, South Dakota, Attorneys for ap-pellee Black Hills Power., Karen E. Cremer, Special Assistant Attorney General, South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellee South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.","caseName":"Application of Black Hills Power","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Application of BLACK HILLS POWER, INC. for Authority to Increase Its Electric Rates","citation":["2016 SD 92","889 N.W.2d 631","2016 S.D. 92","2016 S.D. LEXIS 161","2016 WL 7245331"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":4330224,"court":"South Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"S.D.","court_id":"sd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"27751","docket_id":4553166,"judge":"Wilbur, Gilbertson, Zinter, Severson, Kern","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:14:24.633434Z","date_created":"2016-12-15T14:13:31.739139Z","score":{"bm25":11.899582}},"neutralCite":"2016 SD 92","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[900134,900344,901195,1763733,1802629],"download_url":"http://ujs.sd.gov/uploads/sc/opinions/27751.pdf","id":4107485,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/12/14/application_of_black_hills_power.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:03:27.057986Z","date_created":"2016-12-15T14:13:31.746563Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fa7b1979e77d842be2aa34957301c4c3d5325ae6","snippet":"\n\n\n  WILBUR, Justice.\n \n\n  [¶ 1.] In March 2014, Black Hills Power, Inc., (BHP) filed an application for authority to increase electric rates with the South Dakota Public Utility Commission. In June 2014, Black Hills Industrial Intervenors (BHII)\n  \n   1\n  \n  filed a motion to intervene, and the Commission granted the motion. The parties th","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4107485],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}