{"count":3774,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xMy43MjUyNTcmcz02OTEzMjEmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wOC0yMSZwPTI%3D&q=LIBERAL+CONSTRUCTION+OF+RATIFICATION&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2804019/funke-v-aggregate-construction-inc/","attorney":"Richard P. Olson (argued) and Andrew T. Forward (appeared), Minot, N.D., for plaintiffs and appellees., Ronald G. Schmidt, Rapid City, S.D., for defendant and appellant and crossclaim defendant.","caseName":"Funke v. Aggregate Construction, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Robin D. FUNKE and Kathleen M. Funke, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. AGGREGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant and Appellant v. Robert Cogdill, Crossclaim Defendant","citation":["2015 ND 123","863 N.W.2d 855","2015 N.D. LEXIS 147","2015 WL 3406802"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":2804019,"court":"North Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.D.","court_id":"nd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20140052","docket_id":2660241,"judge":"Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Crothers, McEvers, Kapsner","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:52:18.440555Z","date_created":"2015-05-28T00:04:55.394664Z","score":{"bm25":23.550947}},"neutralCite":"2015 ND 123","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[672864,896162,896755,897836,898197,898500,898725,898787,898946,899339,899427,1390871,1426993,1747354,2029669,2131741,2340988,2463734,2518732,2649735,2671834,2779206],"download_url":"http://www.ndcourts.gov/wp/20140052.wpd","id":2804019,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"wpd/2015/05/27/funke_v._aggregate_construction_inc..wpd","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:27:37.089517Z","date_created":"2015-05-27T23:10:10.309393Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e72e46934ed18e73b58339bf94a436a221cf8307","snippet":"\n\n\n  VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.\n \n\n  [¶ 1] Aggregate Construction, Inc., appealed from a summary judgment- declaring leases of shop and office property to Aggregate were terminated on December 81, 2011, and dismissing Aggregate’s counterclaims against Robin and Kathleen Funke. We conclude the district court did not err in construing the leases to effectuate a termination on December 31, 20","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2804019],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10606983/c-r-construction-co-inc-v-david-smith/","attorney":"","caseName":"C & R Construction Co., Inc. v. David Smith","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 Ark. App. 105"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":10606983,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-02-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70563777,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-17T19:55:23.341962Z","date_created":"2025-06-17T19:55:23.273552Z","score":{"bm25":23.03378}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ark. App. 105","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1382987,1383145,1399098,1399458,1399951,1588942,1716777,2194255,2383496,2453157,3170745,3196504,5111125,7808918,7818836,7826372,9645040,9649327,9718348],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/461249/1/document.do","id":11073571,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/02/12/c__r_construction_co._inc._v._david_smith.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:37:02.265791Z","date_created":"2025-06-17T19:55:23.283788Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b7964d18e36586fab479bd3c2148eaa7a79c597f","snippet":"                                                    Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 105\nReason: I attest to the accuracy\n                                      ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\nand integrity of this document\nDate: 2021-06-30 11:40:44\nFoxit PhantomPDF Version:                                 DIVISION IV\n9.7.5\n                                                          No. CV-18-198\n\n\n                                                                    Opinion Delivered February 12, 2020\n             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11073571],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2790598/robl-construction-inc-v-andrew-homoly/","attorney":"Kelsey J. O’Donnell, White Goss Bowers March, Schulte & Weisenfels, Kansas City, MO, argued (Daniel 0. Herrington, on the brief), for appellant., David W. White, Foland, Wickens, Eis-felder, Roper & Hofer, P.C., Kansas City, MO, argued (Lynn Weddle Judkins, on the brief), for appellee.","caseName":"Robl Construction, Inc. v. Andrew Homoly","caseNameFull":"ROBL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Kansas Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Andrew G. HOMOLY, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["781 F.3d 1029","2015 WL 1446771"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2790598,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","court_citation_string":"8th Cir.","court_id":"ca8","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-04-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-3607","docket_id":2646063,"judge":"Riley, Smith, Kelly","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:45:58.662694Z","date_created":"2015-04-01T17:00:06.737183Z","score":{"bm25":22.345848}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[93168,111719,213687,1116916,1145237,1164545,1175755,1176035,1179952,1180149,1186294,1198175,1205840,1216485,1274530,1347206,1351943,1383305,1420349,1424088,1465399,1472867,2350883,2459335,2511786,2517115,2585438,2612263,2616295,2628021,2639808],"download_url":"http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/15/04/133607P.pdf","id":2790598,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/04/01/robl_construction_inc._v._andrew_homoly.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:17:54.613749Z","date_created":"2015-04-01T16:01:00.835696Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"507bd1c1afc15c34991908662402a4e6372235f9","snippet":"                 United States Court of Appeals\n                             For the Eighth Circuit\n                         ___________________________\n\n                                 No. 13-3607\n                         ___________________________\n\n                  Robl Construction, Inc., a Kansas Corporation\n\n                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant\n\n                                            v.\n\n                                 Andrew G. Homoly\n\n              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9806644,9806645,2790598],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/889783/dick-anderson-construction-inc-v-monroe-property-co/","attorney":"For Appellant: John H. Guin; Law Office of John H. Guin, PLLC, Spokane, Washington., For Appellee: Jeffrey T. Dickson; Christian, Samson & James, PLLC, Missoula; Scott M. Stearns, Randy J. Cox, Thomas J. Leonard; Boone Karlberg, P.C. Missoula.","caseName":"Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. v. Monroe Property Co.","caseNameFull":"DICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Montana Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MONROE PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendant and Appellee","citation":["2011 MT 138","255 P.3d 1257","361 Mont. 30","2011 Mont. LEXIS 190"],"citeCount":22,"cluster_id":889783,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DA 10-0440","docket_id":633894,"judge":"Mike McGrath","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:04:54.965775Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T11:04:59.345512Z","score":{"bm25":20.477999}},"neutralCite":"2011 MT 138","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4987,"cites":[776331,883155,885066,885464,888050,888682,888705,889884],"download_url":"http://searchcourts.mt.gov/getDocument?vid={E2885DDE-19A2-4F33-97EE-37F0762A31B6}","id":889783,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2011/06/14/d._anderson_v._monroe_property.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:29:47.702989Z","date_created":"2013-06-05T06:12:53.614826Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"015a12132f1dbcd557b15bfceb09c717d04a68c7","snippet":"\n255 P.3d 1257 (2011)\n2011 MT 138\n361 Mont. 30\nDICK ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Montana corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant,\nv.\nMONROE PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant and Appellee.\nNo. DA 10-0440.\nSupreme Court of Montana.\nSubmitted on Briefs April 6, 2011.\nDecided June 14","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[889783],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8328205/gates-at-williams-brice-condominium-assn-v-ddc-construction-inc/","attorney":"Howard A. Van Dine, III, Allen Mattison Bogan, Erik Tison Norton, and Tara C. Sullivan, all of Nelson Mullins Riley <& Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellants., Justin O’Toole Lucey and Stephanie D, Drawdy, of Justin O’Toole Lucey, P.A., of Mount Pleasant, for Respondents.","caseName":"Gates at Williams-Brice Condominium Ass'n v. DDC Construction Inc.","caseNameFull":"THE GATES AT WILLIAMS-BRICE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and Katharine Swinson, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DDC CONSTRUCTION, INC. Kapasi Glass Mart, Inc. DMC Consolidated, Inc. DMC Builders, Co., Inc., individually and d/b/a The Dinerstein Companies, DC Developers—Columbia Condos, Inc. Columbia Condos, LP DMC Developers I, Ltd. 31-W Insulation Company, Inc. Associated Concrete Contractors, Inc. Bailey Electric Company, LLC C&B Utilities, LP Carolina Floor Systems, Inc. Century Fire Protection, LLC Cherokee Inc. Coronado Stucco, LP Cross Plains Custom Tile, Inc. Lowry Construction & Framing Inc. LTB Construction, Inc. Martin Morales Jr. Painting & Drywall, LLC Metal Construction Materials, Inc. Southwest Ironworks, Inc. The Clerkley/Watkins Group, LP Tindall Corporation Triad Pest Control, Inc. Wyman Acoustics LLC Alenco Holding Corporation, Alenco Window GA, LLC, New AlencoWindow, Ltd. AWC Holding Company Crosby Window, Inc., f/k/a/ Action WinDoor Technology, Inc. Geo-Systems Design & Testing, Inc. HGE Consulting, Inc. Maintenance Builders Supply, Ltd. SCA Engineers, Inc. Sinclair & Associates, Inc. Faultless Hardware, individually and d/b/a Pamex Inc. T & M Concrete, Inc. Loveless Commercial Contracting, Inc. Economy Waterproofing, Inc. BMC West Corporation Highway One Construction, Inc. J.I. Windows LLC Dietrich Industries, Inc., a/k/a Dietrich Metal Framing, Inc. n/k/a Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC Best Masonry and its successor in interest, OldCastle APG Headwaters, Inc. d/b/a Best Masonry and John Doe 1-10, Of Whom DDC Construction, Inc. and Columbia Condos, LP, are the","citation":["418 S.C. 282","792 S.E.2d 240","2016 S.C. App. LEXIS 110"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8328205,"court":"Court of Appeals of South Carolina","court_citation_string":"S.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"scctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-08-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Appellate Case No. 2015-000180; Opinion No. 5438","docket_id":65506590,"judge":"Geathers, Lockemy, Williams","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:26:21.583907Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T11:03:26.096926Z","score":{"bm25":19.471498}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8295953,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:03:49.519273Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T11:03:26.104012Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWILLIAMS, J.\nThis matter comes before this court after the circuit court denied the Dinerstein Defendants’ and OCIP Defendants’1 (collectively “Developer”) motion for a nonjury trial and to strike the class action allegations of Katharine Swinson, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the Gates at Williams-Brice Condominium Association (collectively “Homeowners”). On app","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8295953],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2542328/ames-construction-inc-v-intermountain-industrial-inc/","attorney":"John F. Haffey, Robert J. Phillips, Phillips Law Firm, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff., Christian T. Nygren, Philip B. Condra, Milodragovich Dale Steinbrenner & Nygren, Missoula, MT, for Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff Intermountain Industrial, Inc., C.J. Johnson, Kalkstein & Johnson, Missoula, MT, for Defendant Maxum Indemnity Company., Bradley J. Luck, Isaac M. Kantor, Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, Missoula, MT, for Third Party Defendant.","caseName":"Ames Construction, Inc. v. Intermountain Industrial, Inc.","caseNameFull":"AMES CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERMOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL, INC. and Maxum Indemnity Company, Defendants; Intermountain Industrial, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Western States Insurance Agency, Inc., Third Party Defendant","citation":["712 F. Supp. 2d 1160","2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41588","2010 WL 1741480"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":2542328,"court":"District Court, D. Montana","court_citation_string":"D. Mont.","court_id":"mtd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CV-08-164-M-DWM","docket_id":2405935,"judge":"Donald W. Molloy","lexisCite":"2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41588","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:46:09.226753Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:53:42.762806Z","score":{"bm25":19.38179}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2278,"cites":[884625,885470,886115,888906,889058,2310443,2526268],"download_url":null,"id":2542328,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:37:08.160297Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:17:37.599069Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"aab09ec828590155f3369fa6dbe3a95cdef1ffc9","snippet":"\n712 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2010)\nAMES CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff,\nv.\nINTERMOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL, INC. and Maxum Indemnity Company, Defendants.\nIntermountain Industrial, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff,\nv.\nWestern States Insurance Agency, Inc., Third Party Defendant.\nNo. CV-08-164-M-DWM.\nUnited States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division.\nApril 28, 2010.\n<","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2542328],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4291062/the-port-of-houston-authority-of-harris-county-texas-v-zachry/","attorney":"","caseName":"the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4291062,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp14","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14-10-00708-CV","docket_id":4457636,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:38:50.344311Z","date_created":"2016-09-29T23:48:54.851508Z","score":{"bm25":18.845173}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[99644,118467,145754,398711,586854,754248,786062,894487,894512,894515,894594,894617,894667,894678,894690,894726,894775,894823,894940,894951,895009,895096,895161,895197,895198,895256,895258,895269,895307,895308,895309,895311,895349,895363,895380,895405,1138852,1266564,1288968,1370476,1376467,1376552,1376570,1377553,1383123,1383232,1399904,1400009,1426779,1440049,1443838,1447185,1449946,1463491,1467050,1467145,1472904,1492572,1496294,1502612,1504609,1505643,1506362,1507983,1508020,1509959,1512874,1514858,1515227,1521192,1564400,1568684,1572837,1576263,1589619,1591186,1594643,1618876,1620661,1620793,1621057,1623996,1628285,1629825,1633520,1635395,1635839,1636890,1637703,1638777,1654904,1663301,1664581,1667778,1677111,1682136,1683205,1686277,1687157,1707595,1718950,1726063,1731074,1742776,1748175,1749669,1760462,1763360,1766885,1768079,1780418,1780915,1782452,1788747,1859502,1860926,1868645,1871140,1873103,1876270,1880125,1959288,1987708,1989032,1990126,1993206,2047857,2099504,2102131,2103439,2105618,2185004,2189963,2270366,2270992,2279991,2287450,2291928,2332835,2336260,2342387,2342691,2358050,2358586,2365131,2373111,2379200,2382125,2382247,2385238,2385579,2385703,2388221,2389600,2393582,2401418,2402970,2406058,2408903,2411524,2419077,2424152,2427543,2429794,2430766,2431368,2432195,2434188,2436793,2441963,2442417,2449929,2450513,2455763,2457857,2461826,2539741,2541052,2545413,2600610,2620886,2621688,3683929,3904467,3911267,3938835,3965665,3971077,3978640],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=83713&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa01%5cOpinion","id":4068323,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/06/12/the_port_of_houston_authority_of_harris_county_texas_v._zachry.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T11:38:50.361188Z","date_created":"2016-09-29T23:48:54.859278Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8941db1559173f5f2e638ec795cc62b634f7b576","snippet":"                                                                                     ACCEPTED\n                                                                                 14-10-00708-CV\n                                                                 FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                              HOUSTON, TEXAS\n                                                                            6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM\n                           ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4068323],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2622944/birdwood-subdivision-homeowners-assn-v-bulotti-construction-inc/","attorney":"John A. Seiller, IV, Ketchum, for appellant., Robertson & Slette, PLLC, Twin Falls, for respondent. Gary D. Slette argued.","caseName":"Birdwood Subdivision Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bulotti Construction, Inc.","caseNameFull":"BIRDWOOD SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., an Idaho Nonprofit Corporation, and Amy C. Browning, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Amy G. Browning Revocable Trust Dated July 8, 2005, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellants, v. BULOTTI CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Idaho Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Respondent","citation":["175 P.3d 179","145 Idaho 17","2007 Ida. LEXIS 228"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":2622944,"court":"Idaho Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Idaho","court_id":"idaho","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-12-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"33391","docket_id":97210,"judge":"Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:25:25.316026Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T06:33:55.604623Z","score":{"bm25":17.939297}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4150,"cites":[1401226,2510351,2518351,2538217,2543464,2549930,2602412,2626283],"download_url":null,"id":2622944,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:20:23.036938Z","date_created":"2013-11-01T20:41:12.686549Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e40a224878ceef648e3628ac98c17a195c2526cc","snippet":"\n175 P.3d 179 (2007)\nBIRDWOOD SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., an Idaho nonprofit corporation, and Amy C. Browning, individually, and as co-trustee of the Amy G. Browning Revocable Trust dated July 8, 2005, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellants,\nv.\nBULOTTI CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Respondent.\nNo. 33391.\nSupreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 2","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2622944],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1465156/gill-construction-inc-v-18th-vine-authority/","attorney":"Roy Bash, William E. Quirk, and Susan C. Hascall, Kansas City, MO, for appellant-respondent, Gill Construction Co., Lana K. Torezon and Heather A. Brown, Assistant City Attorneys, Kansas City, MO, for respondent-appellant, 18th & Vine Authority., Galen Beaufort, City Attorney, Kansas City, MO, for respondent, City of Kansas City, Missouri.","caseName":"Gill Construction, Inc. v. 18th & Vine Authority","caseNameFull":"GILL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. 18TH & VINE AUTHORITY, Respondent-Appellant, City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent","citation":["157 S.W.3d 699","2004 WL 2933484"],"citeCount":25,"cluster_id":1465156,"court":"Missouri Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mo. Ct. App.","court_id":"moctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-02-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"WD 62073, WD 62076","docket_id":1619769,"judge":"Breckenridge, Smart, Howard","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T04:02:13.712497Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T18:09:39.836370Z","score":{"bm25":17.133554}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[627509,1352534,1463777,1464963,1518735,1519888,1523211,1579062,1579362,1591141,1655364,1687430,1712852,1724111,1747876,1754944,1759746,1772744,1781980,1785288,2188127,2369756,2426623,2438339,2441675,2454463,3525001],"download_url":null,"id":1465156,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T08:44:44.607236Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:21:42.768305Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"569404cdc21cfaa61a0e5afe1ed847e2e1f09b0c","snippet":"\n157 S.W.3d 699 (2005)\nGILL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant-Respondent,\nv.\n18TH & VINE AUTHORITY, Respondent-Appellant,\nCity of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.\nNos. WD 62073, WD 62076.\nMissouri Court of Appeals, Western District.\nDecember 21, 2004.\nAs Modified February 1, 2005.\nMotion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied February 1, 200","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7691,7718,7747],"panel_names":["Patricia Breckenridge","Victor C. Howard","James Smart"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1465156],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9399915/matter-of-22-50-jackson-ave-assoc-lp-v-county-of-suffolk/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of 22-50 Jackson Ave. Assoc., L.P. v. County of Suffolk","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 NY Slip Op 02658"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9399915,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 419/19","docket_id":67402332,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-21T18:10:05.746368Z","date_created":"2023-05-17T20:08:27.359135Z","score":{"bm25":16.242306}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2050656,2123647,2135902,2185208,2224604,2795901,3182107,3588625,4569025,4666577,4681852,5484804,5516239,5519867,5523801,5537335,5538082,5540347,5776205,5815639,5829263,5908551,6007028,6055855,6226470,11155086],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_02658.htm","id":9395391,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2023/05/17/matter_of_22-50_jackson_ave._assoc._l.p._v._county_of_suffolk.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T22:03:45.980967Z","date_created":"2023-05-17T20:08:27.362458Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"325de52f3fc54f02d734442f80b89a1d27546048","snippet":"\n\nMatter of 22-50 Jackson Ave. Assoc., L.P. v County of Suffolk (2023 NY Slip Op 02658)\n\n\n\n\n\nMatter of 22-50 Jackson Ave. Assoc., L.P. v County of Suffolk\n\n\n2023 NY Slip Op 02658\n\n\nDecided on May 17, 2023\n\n\nAppellate Division, Second Department\n\n\n\nPublishe","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9395391],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10609703/geraldine-epps-as-personal-representative-of-the-estate-of-melissa-dennis/","attorney":"","caseName":"Geraldine Epps, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melissa Dennis and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Journee Dennis v. Ouachita County Medical Center","caseNameFull":"","citation":["636 S.W.3d 787","2021 Ark. App. 389"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":10609703,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-10-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70570661,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:54:57.615982Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T10:49:33.845310Z","score":{"bm25":15.386664}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ark. App. 389","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1399458,1588272,1631578,1634319,1794268,2104407,2334426,2540106,2645819,6111263,7825428,9718348,9769021,11074733],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/514575/1/document.do","id":11076291,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/10/20/geraldine_epps_as_personal_representative_of_the_estate_of_melissa_dennis.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T18:44:33.294238Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T10:49:33.867959Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c8fe44f6aaaf343089b73b664deb0cacda01ca4f","snippet":"                                            Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 389\nElizabeth Perry\nI attest to the accuracy and\n                               ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\nintegrity of this document                          DIVISION II\n                                                   No. CV-20-626\n2023.07.12 13:15:19 -05'00'\n2023.003.20215\n             GERALDINE EPPS, AS PERSONAL    Opinion Delivered October 20, 2021\n             REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE\n             OF MELISSA DENNIS AND","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11076291],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4768022/league-of-women-voters-of-michigan-v-secretary-of-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Secretary of State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4768022,"court":"Michigan Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mich. Ct. App.","court_id":"michctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-07-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"353654","docket_id":17350956,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:18:55.589771Z","date_created":"2020-07-15T15:07:16.802573Z","score":{"bm25":15.0654335}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[91704,106739,106850,107917,107971,145774,145813,842365,848846,849020,849204,2006185,2051537,3493714,3496235],"download_url":"http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20200714_C353654_62_353654C.OPN.PDF","id":4548369,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/07/14/league_of_women_voters_of_michigan_v._secretary_of_state_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:08:53.479209Z","date_created":"2020-07-15T15:07:16.808754Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"647b7b26f80323896997ac7ec694b10eb32e7a17","snippet":"            If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to\n                 revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.\n\n\n\n\n                             STATE OF MICHIGAN\n\n                             COURT OF APPEALS\n\n\nLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN,                                  FOR PUBLICATION\nDEBORAH BUNKLEY, ELIZABETH CUSHMAN,                                  July 14, 2020\nand SUSAN SMITH,\n\n               Plaintiffs,\n\nv                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4548369],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1922727/quad-cities-construction-inc-v-advanta-business-services-corp-in-re/","attorney":"David E. Eash and Irving “Buddy” Paul, Huppin, Ewing, Anderson & Paul, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for Plaintiff., Ford Elsaesser, Elsaesser, Jarzabek, Anderson, Marks & Elliott, Sandpoint, Idaho and Michael L. Temin, Wolf, Block, Schorr, & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Defendant.","caseName":"Quad-Cities Construction, Inc. v. Advanta Business Services, Corp. (In Re Quad-Cities Construction, Inc.)","caseNameFull":"In Re QUAD-CITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC. Debtor. Quad-Cities Construction, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Advanta Business Services, Corp., F/K/A Advanta Leasing Corp., Defendant","citation":["254 B.R. 459","2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1294","2000 WL 1597566"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":1922727,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho","court_citation_string":"Bankr. D. Idaho","court_id":"idb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-09-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-01544","docket_id":1670329,"judge":"Terry Myers","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:25:44.229710Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T18:33:29.399380Z","score":{"bm25":14.976544}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105573,109009,111722,388149,442036,447577,569171,734189,751397,755238,756998,760870,768420,768534,1167580,1199886,1200305,1203334,1228002,1256481,1265636,1308494,1402460,1428007,1449936,1843738,1904724,1955377,2465836,2575475,2594612,2605838,3411358],"download_url":null,"id":1922727,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T14:07:06.231786Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:49:47.334704Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5e1822cfc7ad85167d67166bac1720323be5bd9b","snippet":"\n254 B.R. 459 (2000)\nIn re QUAD-CITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC. Debtor.\nQuad-Cities Construction, Inc., Plaintiff,\nv.\nAdvanta Business Services, Corp., f/k/a Advanta Leasing Corp., Defendant.\nNo. 99-20666.\nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho.\nSeptember 1, 2000.\n*460 *461 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1922727],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1897736/winkler-construction-co-inc-v-jerome/","attorney":"T. Bruce Hanley, Towson, for petitioner., George Psoras, Jr. (Gregory J. Psoras on brief), Towson, for respondents.","caseName":"WINKLER CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. Jerome","caseNameFull":"WINKLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Scott JEROME, Et Al.","citation":["734 A.2d 212","355 Md. 231","1999 Md. LEXIS 466"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":1897736,"court":"Court of Appeals of Maryland","court_citation_string":"Md.","court_id":"md","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1999-08-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"157, Sept. Term, 1998","docket_id":1749211,"judge":"Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Karwacki","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:14:40.382758Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:10:43.924183Z","score":{"bm25":14.973318}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9693213,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T21:56:51.998708Z","date_created":"2023-08-25T16:30:31.534513Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWILNER, Judge.\nMaryland Code, § 9-102 of the Real Property Article provides, in relevant part, that every building that is either newly erected or repaired to the extent of 15% of its value is subject to a lien—a mechanic’s lien—for the payment of all debts contracted for work done and materials supplied for or about the building. That includes debts owing to subcontractors who h","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[1898477,1921535,1951280,1987453,1996000,2100753,2287623,2304756,2331962,2391275,3484400],"download_url":null,"id":1897736,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T13:41:01.411488Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:45:24.258020Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ebf2d7ad40eb18c508773c0981d8d79abd08628e","snippet":"\n734 A.2d 212 (1999)\n355 Md. 231\nWINKLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.\nv.\nScott JEROME, et al.\nNo. 157, Sept. Term, 1998.\nCourt of Appeals of Maryland.\nAugust 2, 1999.\n*214 T. Bruce Hanley, Towson, for petitioner.\nGeorge Psoras, Jr. (Gregory J. Psoras on brief), Towson, for respondents.\nArgued be","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[4664,4669,4678,4689,4708,4709,4717],"panel_names":["Robert M. Bell","Dale R. Cathell","John C. Eldridge","Robert L. Karwacki","Irma S. Raker","Lawrence F. Rodowsky","Alan M. Wilner"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1897736,9693213,9693214],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5992395/haberman-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-city-of-long-beach/","attorney":"","caseName":"Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Sinclair Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach","citation":["94 A.D.3d 997","942 N.Y.S.2d 571"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":5992395,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-04-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62352221,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T07:40:09.670605Z","date_created":"2022-01-13T00:28:26.574361Z","score":{"bm25":14.839361}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2057170,2123647,5485173,5687303,5687798,5714706,5737136,5757031,5777194,5784514,5792477,5820030,5984725,9860424],"download_url":null,"id":5853299,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T03:52:34.093007Z","date_created":"2022-01-13T00:28:26.591553Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nIn a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach dated December 29, 2003, which revoked a building permit previously issued to the petitioners/plaintiffs on August 12, 2003, and action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the petitioners/plaintiffs are entitled to the building permit, the petitioners/plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, N","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5853299],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6619107/broome-v-the-regents-of-the-u-of-cal/","attorney":"","caseName":"Broome v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6619107,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A160591","docket_id":63550859,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:28:03.824376Z","date_created":"2022-06-27T19:01:28.524148Z","score":{"bm25":14.809301}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[6107221],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A160591.PDF","id":6495465,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/27/broome_v._the_regents_of_the_u._of_cal..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T20:11:22.251113Z","date_created":"2022-06-27T19:01:28.525456Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"06f523e6490ed552898e013b4223cd9ceaaf4853","snippet":"Filed 6/27/22\n                      CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n       IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                         FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                DIVISION FIVE\n\n\n\n\n ANNE BROOME et al.,\n                                            A160591\n         Plaintiffs and Appellants,\n v.                                         (Alameda County\n                                            Super. Ct. No. RG14744056)\n THE REGENTS OF THE\n UNIVERSITY OF CAL","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6495465],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9429639/thai-meditation-association-of-alabama-inc-v-city-of-mobile-alabama/","attorney":"","caseName":"Thai Meditation Association of Alabama, Inc. v. City of Mobile, Alabama","caseNameFull":"","citation":["83 F.4th 922"],"citeCount":20,"cluster_id":9429639,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2023-05-04","dateFiled":"2023-10-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-11674","docket_id":66918546,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:55:06.899574Z","date_created":"2023-10-02T21:00:45.616530Z","score":{"bm25":14.50123}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[76550,76936,112404,422168,427394,794686,807200,1753612,1776200,1944032,2648815,2767352,2768598,4508421,4586609,6495362,6930196,8211095,8916458,9432833,9433509,9496381,9616081],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202211674.pdf","id":9881496,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/10/02/thai_meditation_association_of_alabama_inc._v._city_of_mobile_alabama.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T04:47:27.930313Z","date_created":"2023-10-02T21:00:45.642407Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a96e51e99f757b48ff8b0923ca59f79358abf609","snippet":"USCA11 Case: 22-11674   Document: 79-1    Date Filed: 10/02/2023   Page: 1 of 19\n\n\n\n\n                                                           [PUBLISH]\n                                 In the\n                 United States Court of Appeals\n                        For the Eleventh Circuit\n\n                         ____________________\n\n                               No. 22-11674\n                         ____________________\n\n        THAI MEDITATION ASSOCIATION\n        OF ALABAMA, INC.,\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9881496],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3204976/associated-builders-and-contractors-v-city-of-lansing/","attorney":"Masud Labor Law Group (by Kraig M. Schutter) for plaintiff., Plunkett Cooney (by Michael S. Bogren) for defendant., Amici Curiae:, Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, PC (by C. Thomas Ludden and Samantha K. Heraud), for the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center., Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC (by Clifford W. Taylor, Paul D. Hudson, and James D. Boufides), for the Michigan Municipal League., Bauckham, Sparks, Lohrstorfer, Thall & Seeber, PC (by Robert E. Thall), for the Michigan Townships Association., McKnight, McClow, Canzano, Smith & Radtke, PC (by John R. Canzano), for the Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council., Sachs Waldman, PC (by Andrew Nickelhoff), for the Michigan State AFL-CIO.","caseName":"Associated Builders and Contractors v. City of Lansing","caseNameFull":"Associated Builders and Contractors v. City of Lansing","citation":["499 Mich. 177","880 N.W.2d 765","2016 WL 2888719","2016 Mich. LEXIS 869"],"citeCount":104,"cluster_id":3204976,"court":"Michigan Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mich.","court_id":"mich","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-05-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket 149622","docket_id":3065418,"judge":"Zahra, Markman, McCormack, Viviano, Bernstein, Larsen, Young","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:35:53.693152Z","date_created":"2016-05-19T04:04:39.333216Z","score":{"bm25":14.034074}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9823385,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:40:20.164322Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T09:55:27.084319Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nYOUNG, C.J.\nPlaintiff appeals by leave the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Associated Builders & Contractors v City of Lansing.1 Plaintiff claims that the city of Lansing’s Ordinance 206.18(a) is unconstitutional under this Court’s 1923 decision Attorney General ex rel Lennane v Detroit2 and is an unlawful usurpation of state power. The","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[842966,846038,848847,1349478,1704280,1711365,1733170,2123657,2123843,3500052],"download_url":"http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/OPINIONS/FINAL/SCT/149622_61_01.pdf","id":3204870,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/05/17/associated_builders_and_contractors_v._city_of_lansing.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T04:11:51.115553Z","date_created":"2016-05-19T04:04:39.339801Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c6e6e72d9bb2a111e8108437cb20d96c396574af","snippet":"                                                                                       Michigan Supreme Court\n                                                                                             Lansing, Michigan\n                                                                Chief Justice:         Justices:\n\n\n\nSyllabus                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.   Stephen J. Markman\n                                                                         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3204870,9823385,9823386],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9997796/east-central-water-district-v-city-of-grand-forks/","attorney":"","caseName":"East Central Water District v. City of Grand Forks","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 ND 135"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9997796,"court":"North Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.D.","court_id":"nd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-07-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 20230389","docket_id":68918232,"judge":"McEvers, Lisa K. Fair","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-07-05T15:06:16.714236Z","date_created":"2024-07-05T15:06:16.658032Z","score":{"bm25":13.8449335}},"neutralCite":"2024 ND 135","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1348785,1825054,2121393,2804021,3680088,3680548,3680846,3680903,3681048,3681541,3682481,4185712,4560872,4688455,6734424,6738656,8203450,8599820,9513538,9910420,10597739],"download_url":"https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinions/165633","id":10464397,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/07/05/east_central_water_district_v._city_of_grand_forks.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T01:13:09.391114Z","date_created":"2024-07-05T15:06:16.666954Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a93406f8ee6fa56f5fc5d6573c085e7d3e30763e","snippet":"                       IN THE SUPREME COURT\n                       STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA\n\n                                      2024 ND 135\n\nEast Central Water District,                                                     Plaintiff\n      v.\nCity of Grand Forks, North Dakota,                                             Defendant\n      and\nWilliam J. Brudvik and Ohnstad Twichell, P.C.,                    Third-Party Defendants\n\n\n\n                                     No. 20230389\n\nCertified Questio","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10464397],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Certified Question - Civil - Civil","syllabus":"The language \"invalid and unenforceable\" in N.D.C.C. § 6-09.4-22(2) means an agreement made without the public lending authority as a party is void ab initio."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/691321/linan-faye-construction-co-inc-v-housing-authority-of-the-city-of/","attorney":"Cary L. Flitter (argued), Lundy, Flitter & Beldeeos, Narberth, PA, for appellant Linan-Faye Const. Co., Inc., Mark D. Caswell (argued), Freeman, Zel-ler & Bryant, Cherry Hill, NJ, for appellee Housing Authority of the City of Camden.","caseName":"Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Camden","caseNameFull":"LINAN-FAYE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF CAMDEN","citation":["49 F.3d 915","1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5078","1995 WL 55661"],"citeCount":103,"cluster_id":691321,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1995-03-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"94-5193","docket_id":835062,"judge":"Becker, Cowen, Garth, Sloviter, Stapleton, Mansmann, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Scirica, Nygaard, Alito, Roth, Lewis, McKee, Sarokin","lexisCite":"1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5078","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T23:28:27.994854Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T23:46:43.030741Z","score":{"bm25":13.725257}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9487897,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T06:21:29.921116Z","date_created":"2023-08-05T12:29:28.050274Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*917OPINION OF THE COURT\nCOWEN, Circuit Judge.\nLinan-Faye Construction Company Co., Inc. (“Linan-Faye”), a public housing contractor, appeals from orders of the district court that granted summary judgment for the Housing Authority of the City of Camden (“HACC”) on Linan-Faye’s claims under public contract law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because the distric","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[100556,103012,105930,107219,108609,110484,111719,111722,112135,252804,262606,262680,283150,603514,653670,660196,672868,679504,1088035,1359107,1403189,1465559,1493269,1495107,1502196,1502920,1519116,1928775,1947393,1948816,1993206,1996117,2050155,2058590,2075466,2093114,2174159,2311744,2350899],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/49/49.F3d.915.94-5193.html","id":691321,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T09:21:33.826248Z","date_created":"2012-04-17T05:12:02Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8de34c0fc2b266a35d1be071fdf9ef26e0250026","snippet":"49 F.3d 915\n    LINAN-FAYE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellantv.HOUSING AUTHORITY OF The CITY OF CAMDEN.\n    No. 94-5193.\n    United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.\n    Argued Sept. 23, 1994.Decided Feb. 13, 1995.Sur Petition for Rehearing March 13, 1995.\n    \n      Cary L. Flitter (argued), Lundy, Flitter & Beldecos, N","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[691321,9487897,9487898,9487899],"source":"RU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}