{"count":63137,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0zMC40NjgyNjQmcz03MzM0ODAxJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMTAmcD0y&q=JUDICIAL+NOTICE+OF+FOREIGN+LAW&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9473327/estate-of-heath/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of Heath","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2024 ND 23"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":9473327,"court":"North Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.D.","court_id":"nd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-02-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20230250","docket_id":68234691,"judge":"Jensen, Jon J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:24:53.317041Z","date_created":"2024-02-08T16:08:33.420357Z","score":{"bm25":39.88142}},"neutralCite":"2024 ND 23","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[879552,895706,896101,896201,896715,897404,1303764,1865692,2015067,2075057,2228983,2288068,4191915,4661345,9811762],"download_url":"http://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/2024ND23","id":9931165,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/02/08/estate_of_heath.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T09:16:23.640129Z","date_created":"2024-02-08T16:08:33.438606Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"308df3984f652c32423840a8f37c3ce5d4b55f3e","snippet":"                                                                             FILED\n                                                                     IN THE OFFICE OF THE\n                                                                  CLERK OF SUPREME COURT\n                                                                       FEBRUARY 8, 2024\n                                                                   STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA\n\n\n\n\n                  IN THE SUPREME COURT\n                  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9931165],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"PROBATE - WILLS - TRUSTS","syllabus":"A prerequisite to obtaining an order establishing the authority of a domiciliary foreign personal representative is proof of the authority to act as the personal representative in the foreign jurisdiction, meaning an active appointment in the foreign jurisdiction. Chapter 30.1-24, N.D.C.C., gives a district court the authority to consider petitions to initiate foreign probate proceedings. The issuance of an order without satisfaction of all of the statutory prerequisites does not divest subject matter jurisdiction. It is instead an error in the application of the law, which may furnish grounds for appeal, but it does not invalidate the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). To grant a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), the district court must make a finding that the motion was brought within a reasonable time otherwise, the motion must be denied. A trustee with an interest in a disputed mineral interest that it contends is intended to benefit the trust has sufficient interest in the probate proceedings disposing of those interests, to possess standing. The district court may only take judicial notice of a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it is either generally known within the court's territorial jurisdiction or it is a fact that can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10283211/mills-law-group-llp-v-republic-of-iraq/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mills Law Group LLP v. Republic of Iraq","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10283211,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-3323","docket_id":69204363,"judge":"Judge Royce C. Lamberth","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-25T21:02:12.309978Z","date_created":"2024-11-25T21:02:12.200880Z","score":{"bm25":39.142803}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1844,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv3323-24","id":10749799,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/25/mills_law_group_llp_v._republic_of_iraq.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T02:30:03.175300Z","date_created":"2024-11-25T21:02:12.224625Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0655db181a4581b2211f8d6e7131a35230578818","snippet":"                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n  MILLS LAW GROUP LLP,\n\n         Plaintiff,\n\n  v.                                                       Case No. 1:22-CV-3323-RCL\n\n REPUBLIC OF IRAQ\n and\n MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE\n REPUBLIC OF IRAQ,\n\n         Defendants.\n\n\n                          AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n        Mills Law Group (\"MLG\") has represented the Republic of Iraq in its longstanding\n\nlitigation aga","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10749799],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9478981/sundholm-v-hollywood-foreign-press-assn/","attorney":"","caseName":"Sundholm v. Hollywood Foreign Press Assn.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9478981,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-02-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B324842","docket_id":68288431,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:26:15.959339Z","date_created":"2024-02-27T22:05:34.189067Z","score":{"bm25":38.158356}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1037173,1195306,2140015,2254888,2258664,2304164,2569097,2637244,2811266,5452514,5665740,6107064,6107698],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B324842.PDF","id":9945594,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/02/27/sundholm_v._hollywood_foreign_press_assn..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:30:06.769077Z","date_created":"2024-02-27T22:05:34.199708Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f456ae1c5908c36c873ddb8157f22516495e85f","snippet":"Filed 2/27/24\n                CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\nIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                 SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                         DIVISION SEVEN\n\n\n MAGNUS SUNDHOLM,                   B324842\n\n         Plaintiff and Appellant,   (Los Angeles County\n                                    Super. Ct. No.\n         v.                         21STCV44898)\n\n HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN\n PRESS ASSOCIATION et al.,\n\n        Defendants and\n        Respondents.\n\n\n      APPEA","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9945594],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2827288/ledroit-law-v-kim/","attorney":"Douglas A. Turner, P.C., David J. Marcus, Golden, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Snell & Wilmer LLP., James D. Kilroy, Jessica E. Yates, Neal McConomy, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellants.","caseName":"Ledroit Law v. Kim","caseNameFull":"LEDROIT LAW, a Canadian Law Firm, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene KIM, an Individual, and Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., an Arizona Limited Liability Partnership, Defendants-Appellants","citation":["2015 COA 114","360 P.3d 247","2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 1214","2015 WL 4760328"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2827288,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-08-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals 14CA1161","docket_id":2684199,"judge":"Loeb, Sternberg, Ney","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T15:02:21.059393Z","date_created":"2015-08-14T06:08:15.288133Z","score":{"bm25":37.95638}},"neutralCite":"2015 COA 114","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[28981,118279,468735,531896,787759,2607069],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinion.cfm?opinionid=9893&courtid=1","id":2827288,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/08/13/ledroit_law_v._kim.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:44:28.542662Z","date_created":"2015-08-14T05:12:31.215694Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3c47eca8d984792bbabb89593a615967b72f5d91","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion by\n \n\n  CHIEF JUDGE LOEB\n \n\n  ¶ 1 Defendants, Eugene Kim and Snell & Wilmer LLP., appeal the district court's order recognizing a money judgment entered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against them and in favor of plaintiff, Ledroit Law. We reverse the order recognizing the Ontario judgment.\n \n\n  I. Background\n \n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2827288],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4740815/fulmen-company-v-office-of-foreign-assets-control/","attorney":"","caseName":"Fulmen Company v. Office of Foreign Assets Control","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4740815,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-03-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2018-2949","docket_id":17029523,"judge":"Judge Richard J. Leon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:11:46.950529Z","date_created":"2020-03-31T20:00:57.420117Z","score":{"bm25":37.223248}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1911,"cites":[104813,106496,108752,110991,112382,184871,185719,185941,185967,186232,186854,435214,437220,499419,797941,1379570,2330303,2410822,2448120,2472167,2520562],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv2949-26","id":4521162,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/03/31/fulmen_company_v._office_of_foreign_assets_control.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:49:54.597958Z","date_created":"2020-03-31T20:00:57.437417Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9561a85676bfc2c4ff4df2498932e5951d0a73cc","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nFULMEN COMP ANY, et al.,                            )\n                                                    )\n                Plaintiffs,                         )\n                                                    )\n                       v.                           )      Civil Case No. 18-2949 (RJL)\n                                                    )\nOFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4521162],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10125949/mills-law-group-llp-v-republic-of-iraq/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mills Law Group LLP v. Republic of Iraq","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10125949,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-3323","docket_id":69204363,"judge":"Judge Royce C. Lamberth","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.494720Z","date_created":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.409965Z","score":{"bm25":34.92301}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1844,"cites":[90766,112748,186090,187411,483527,675080,1494338,2444903,2477122,2579974,2661578,2763881,4148760],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv3323-17","id":10592550,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/27/mills_law_group_llp_v._republic_of_iraq.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T19:08:16.306195Z","date_created":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.439778Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"383a80e0b17a3b2c01f8cbd4495b576bd4b77e00","snippet":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nMILLS LAW GROUP LLP,\nPlaintiff,\n\nv. Case No. 1:22-CV-3323-RCL\n\nREPUBLIC OF IRAQ\n\nand\n\nMINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE\nREPUBLIC OF IRAQ,\n\nDefendants.\n\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\n\nMills Law Group (“MLG”) has represented the Republic of Iraq in its longstanding\nlitigation against Wye Oak Technologies, Inc. before this Court. See Wye Oak Tech., Inc. v.\nRepublic of Iraq, No. 1:10-cv-1182-RCL, 2019 WL 4044046 (D.D.C. Aug. 27, 2019) (“Wye Oak\nP’). In this a","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10592550],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9443016/empres-at-riverton-llc-dba-wind-river-rehabilitation-and-wellness-a/","attorney":"","caseName":"Empres At Riverton, Llc D/B/A Wind River Rehabilitation and Wellness, a Foreign Llc Empres Wyoming Healthcare, Llc, a Foreign Llc Empres Healthcare Group, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Empres Financial Services, Llc, a Foreign Llc and Empres Healthcare Management, Llc, a Foreign Llc v. Teri Osborne, Appointed Wrongful Death Representative and Special Administrator for the Estate of Loy Forshee","caseNameFull":"","citation":["538 P.3d 670","2023 WY 112"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9443016,"court":"Wyoming Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Wyo.","court_id":"wyo","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S-23-0082","docket_id":68021007,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:49:51.029669Z","date_created":"2023-11-20T16:12:53.519682Z","score":{"bm25":33.059223}},"neutralCite":"2023 WY 112","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[507445,854400,1119109,1131707,1253228,2157630,2566053,2783749,5149117,5283665,6343025,9370422,9550053,9572866,10465366,10465416],"download_url":"https://documents.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions/Empres%20S-23-0082.pdf","id":9900841,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/20/empres_at_riverton_llc_dba_wind_river_rehabilitation_and_wellness_a.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T09:15:16.482683Z","date_created":"2023-11-20T16:12:53.535244Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a139fc4c95f4faf22f9f2051022b7ccb8930d10c","snippet":"               IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING\n\n                                  2023 WY 112\n\n                                                   OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023\n\n                                                         November 20, 2023\n\nEMPRES AT RIVERTON, LLC d/b/a WIND\nRIVER REHABILITATION AND\nWELLNESS, a foreign LLC; EMPRES\nWYOMING HEALTHCARE, LLC, a foreign\nLLC; EMPRES HEALTHCARE GROUP,\nINC., a foreign corporation; EMPRES\nFINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, a foreign\nLLC; and EMPRES HE","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9900841],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5343389/employment-law-group-pc-v-san-diego-employment-law-group/","attorney":"","caseName":"Employment Law Group, P.C. v. San Diego Employment Law Group","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5343389,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-01-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2020-1852","docket_id":61688537,"judge":"Judge John D. Bates","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:47:19.975528Z","date_created":"2022-01-04T23:01:22.040110Z","score":{"bm25":32.774826}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":201,"cites":[104200,111117,185065,186336,186524,219732,313090,421081,428296,480536,499041,780367,1943078,2370795,2412989,2518255,2654532,2660817,2961319,3177019,4036068,4651903,4671322,7252916,9421664,9422389,9429523,9736672],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2020cv1852-31","id":5176051,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/01/04/employment_law_group_p.c._v._san_diego_employment_law_group.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T15:26:00.241781Z","date_created":"2022-01-04T23:01:22.096764Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2ddfacc61f8cbb8e3b7515f767ba52a8a1470908","snippet":"                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                               FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n  THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP,\n  P.C.,\n            Plaintiff,\n             v.                                                  Civil Action No. 20-1852 (JDB)\n\n  DENNIS BRADY d/b/a SAN DIEGO\n  EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP,\n            Defendant.\n\n\n                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n        Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant Dennis Brady d/b/a","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5176051],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10001042/new-york-center-for-foreign-policy-affairs-v-united-states-department-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs v. United States Department of State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10001042,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-07-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2020-3847","docket_id":68940739,"judge":"Judge Paul L. Friedman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-07-13T03:52:17.721472Z","date_created":"2024-07-12T21:01:39.301674Z","score":{"bm25":32.51352}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1124,"cites":[109703,186696,618639,687621,2349433,2418875,2649683,2660167,2661606,2661923,2801043,2807856,3183438,3196850,3203301,4150292,4157104,4191475,4296969,4698691,7248770,7804776,7864626,8312523,9426170,9426423,9428673,9432577,9435380,9439278,9440648,9479787,9490082,9501160,9502825,9810411,9823248,9864181],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2020cv3847-23","id":10467643,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/07/12/new_york_center_for_foreign_policy_affairs_v._united_states_department_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-02T17:50:07.173144Z","date_created":"2024-07-12T21:01:39.330712Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"eac79c1af0e261e53ce33461d4fadf4f4cbad59b","snippet":"                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n____________________________________\n                                          )\nNEW YORK CENTER FOR FOREIGN               )\nPOLICY AFFAIRS, et al.,                   )\n                                          )\n                Plaintiffs,               )\n                                          )\n        v.                                )           Civil Action No. 20-3847 (PL","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10467643],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10352167/scps-llc-v-kind-law/","attorney":"","caseName":"Scps, LLC v. Kind Law","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10352167,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2024-2768","docket_id":69715667,"judge":"Judge Paul L. Friedman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-03-07T18:07:32.888246Z","date_created":"2025-03-07T18:01:25.060352Z","score":{"bm25":32.17555}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1124,"cites":[24802,102730,102976,109703,118288,185065,186982,265408,275646,458984,470954,500012,508409,535573,775453,801440,801891,2115106,2349433,2418875,2562998,2641854,2649683,2660214,2660481,2661923,2662817,2678518,2744408,2746653,2810153,2810791,3183082,3190688,4150292,4157104,4159334,4191475,4203864,4299430,4542780,6349964,6929929,7210719,7245614,7248134,7248770,7249427,7250054,7863321,8457721,8681591,9426170,9428777,9432577,9434456,9435153,9435380,9435422,9439802,9441481,9747673,9798771,9836286,9842773,9910368,9959868,10145839],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2024cv2768-51","id":10818755,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/07/scps_llc_v._kind_law.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T00:21:41.062764Z","date_created":"2025-03-07T18:01:25.087296Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4599d3157f674da94f7267bbbcb7fa6d8bc6edda","snippet":"                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n____________________________________\n                                    )\n                                    )\nSCPS, LLC and SSPS, LLC,            )\n                                    )\n            Plaintiffs,             )\n                                    )\n      v.                            )                 Civil Action No. 24-2768 (PLF)\n                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10818755],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6811683/judicial-watch-inc-v-us-department-of-justice/","attorney":"","caseName":"Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6811683,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-07-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2021-1216","docket_id":63793184,"judge":"Judge Royce C. Lamberth","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T11:20:27.450341Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T22:00:46.359295Z","score":{"bm25":31.901503}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1844,"cites":[2448,111719,184071,184712,184811,185818,186834,186972,187345,187372,206187,220173,341477,393156,410926,415608,556586,619318,799697,1356581,1688134,2311737],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2021cv1216-21","id":6698196,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/07/20/judicial_watch_inc._v._u.s._department_of_justice.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T21:16:47.641290Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T22:00:46.393936Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5ab46df8265e249bb433f16e682894c0ff1dcde8","snippet":"                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                                FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n    JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.\n\n          Plaintiff,\n\n    v.                                                              Case No. 1:21-cv-01216-RCL\n\n    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,\n\n          Defendant.\n\n\n\n                                           MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n         This case arises out of a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request that plaintiff\n\nJudicial Watch, Inc. (“","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6698196],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7862976/judicial-watch-inc-v-us-department-of-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7862976,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2020-1729","docket_id":64952411,"judge":"Judge Timothy J. Kelly","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:04:08.695209Z","date_created":"2022-09-07T12:00:36.591864Z","score":{"bm25":31.783539}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8589,"cites":[184071,184876,186834,442963,552329,780370,796441,799697,2328419,2473657,7245402],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2020cv1729-34","id":7806842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/07/judicial_watch_inc._v._u.s._department_of_state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:46:44.569003Z","date_created":"2022-09-07T12:00:36.720352Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"eb689c47ce877c55f7db7ac19b693398854ab589","snippet":"                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\nJUDICIAL WATCH, INC.,\n\n               Plaintiff,\n\n       v.                                             Civil Action No. 20-1729 (TJK)\nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF\nSTATE,\n\n               Defendant.\n\n\n                            MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\n\n       Judicial Watch, Inc. sued the Department of State under the Freedom of Information Act\n\nto obtain records of requests ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7806842],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4788801/bazzi-v-united-states-department-of-the-treasury-office-of-foreign-assets/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bazzi v. United States Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4788801,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-09-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2019-0484","docket_id":18468953,"judge":"Judge Randolph D. Moss","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:24:19.549280Z","date_created":"2020-09-24T01:01:12.723790Z","score":{"bm25":31.702085}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2334,"cites":[108283,108752,111379,151425,181837,187224,393673,445221,529367,583324,607967,658294,717539,748358,1888857,2476552,2477655,2573446,4410724],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2019cv0484-31","id":4569148,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/09/23/bazzi_v._united_states_department_of_the_treasury_office_of_foreign_assets.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:22:06.477701Z","date_created":"2020-09-24T01:01:12.739258Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dbed9832860dd687bd18de50f1a502193f743679","snippet":"                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM BAZZI,\n\n                Plaintiff,\n                                                     No. 19-cv-484 (RDM)\n        v.\n\n ANDREA M. GACKI, et al.,\n\n                Defendants.\n\n\n                             MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\n\n       Plaintiff Mohammad Ibrahim Bazzi seeks to supplement the administrative record of the\n\nproceeding that led the Office o","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4569148],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6655871/quinn-v-eighth-judicial-dist-court-of-nev/","attorney":"McDonald Carano LLP and Pat Lundvall, Las Vegas, for Petitioners John B. Quinn, Michael T. Zeller, Michael L. Fazio, and Ian S. Shelton., Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP and Daniel F. Polsenberg, Joel D. Henriod, and Abraham G. Smith, Las Vegas; Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Mark E. Ferrario and Tami D. Cowden, Las Vegas; Sidley Austin, LLP, and James M. Cole, Washington, D.C.; Sidley Austin, LLP, and Scott D. Stein, Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner Elaine P. Wynn., Brownstein Hyatt Farber & Schreck LLP and Mitchell J. Langberg, Las Vegas; Pisanelli Bice PLLC and Todd L. Bice, James J. Pisanelli, and Debra L. Spinelli, Las Vegas; Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP and Robert L. Shapiro, Los Angeles, California, for Real Parties in Interest.","caseName":"Quinn v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.","caseNameFull":"John B. QUINN, an individual Michael T. Zeller, an individual Michael L. Fazio, an individual and Ian S. Shelton, an individual and Elaine P. Wynn, an individual v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK and the Honorable Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge, and Kimmarie Sinatra, an individual Wynn Resorts, Limited, a Nevada corporation, Real Parties in Interest.","citation":["410 P.3d 984"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":6655871,"court":"Nevada Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Nev.","court_id":"nev","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-02-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 74519","docket_id":63634193,"judge":"Hardesty","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:38:17.355816Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T21:20:35.632218Z","score":{"bm25":31.20943}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6533103,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T07:28:32.712751Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T21:20:35.639332Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBy the Court, HARDESTY, J.:\nIn this writ petition, we consider whether a Nevada district court has authority to compel an out-of-state2 attorney to appear in Nevada for a deposition as a nonparty witness in a civil action pending in Nevada state court where the attorney has appeared pro hac vice in the action. We conclude that it does not. Because the district court lacked authority to compel the out-of","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6533103],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10007720/tw-v-new-york-state-board-of-law-examiners/","attorney":"","caseName":"T.W. v. New York State Board of Law Examiners","caseNameFull":"","citation":["110 F.4th 71"],"citeCount":30,"cluster_id":10007720,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2023-06-05","dateFiled":"2024-07-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-1661","docket_id":67090055,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:37:31.708929Z","date_created":"2024-07-19T15:00:28.649498Z","score":{"bm25":31.180225}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2430,76932,104057,105221,109574,202306,541948,620711,719727,754643,768066,779423,790597,795129,797960,2377681,2384255,2480796,2520699,3030794,4406333,4518660,4544794,4681640,6966232,8407880,8594097,9414338,9418117,9425645,9428818,9430175,9430229,9431380,9433265,9433494,9433509,9433780,9433864,9433878,9433947,9434044,9434245,9434445,9434602,9434995,9485550,9841762],"download_url":"http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/0c3ee3dd-f37a-408f-84e8-48ab999375f6/2/doc/22-1661_opn.pdf","id":10474321,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/07/19/t.w._v._new_york_state_board_of_law_examiners.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-02T17:57:02.323754Z","date_created":"2024-07-19T15:00:28.651679Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5cc972339b6a8157517ea5ad9992084bcfd15f3e","snippet":"22-1661\nT.W. v. New York State Board of Law Examiners\n\n\n\n\n                                   In the\n           United States Court of Appeals\n                      For the Second Circuit\n\n\n                            August Term, 2022\n                              No. 22-1661\n\n                                    T.W.,\n                             Plaintiff-Appellant,\n\n                                       v.\n\n NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, DIANE BOSSE, JOHN J.\n MCALARY, BRYAN WILLIAMS,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10474321],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5106956/askan-holdings-ltd-v-united-states-department-of-the-treasury-office-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Askan Holdings Ltd. v. United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5106956,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-09-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2020-1458","docket_id":60419432,"judge":"Judge Richard J. Leon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:45:31.199412Z","date_created":"2021-09-23T22:01:37.304842Z","score":{"bm25":31.135235}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1911,"cites":[1038004,2476250,2682239,2818121,4170954,4456901,4540021,4541691,4546527,4647361,4651903,4688998,4701445,6988794,8683999,9425685,9429396,9432577,9433887,9439415,9439671,9439788,9500887,9824532,9842672,9864132],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2020cv1458-59","id":4925463,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/09/23/askan_holdings_ltd._v._united_states_department_of_the_treasury_office_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T12:41:16.108615Z","date_created":"2021-09-23T22:01:37.328970Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0bc0d9aef500c94d15377303806141b29d62c6db","snippet":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\nFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nASKAN HOLDINGS, LTD.,\nPlaintiff\n\nV. Civil Case No. 20-1458 (RJL)\n\nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF\n\nTHE TREASURY, OFFICE OF\nFOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, et al.\n\nNew Neue Nee Nee Ne Nee” ne” ee ee” ee”\n\nDefendants.\n\nVd\n\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nSeptember Zag 2021 [Dkt. # 36]\n\n \n\nPlaintiff Askan Holdings, Ltd. (“Askan”) is challenging a decision by the United\nStates Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control and several officials\n(colle","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4925463],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4833882/judicial-watch-inc-v-us-department-of-justice/","attorney":"","caseName":"Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4833882,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-11-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2018-2107","docket_id":18692831,"judge":"Judge Tanya S. Chutkan","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:37:10.018875Z","date_created":"2020-11-25T22:00:53.944885Z","score":{"bm25":30.902197}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":620,"cites":[111410,111719,111722,112224,112667,112863,184071,185974,186596,187372,214960,219828,350620,370469,381797,487108,495205,496580,562035,2380132],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv2107-31","id":4637661,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/11/25/judicial_watch_inc._v._u.s._department_of_justice.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T20:08:53.492518Z","date_created":"2020-11-25T22:00:53.974355Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"32bdf950baebe2ce823ba5ca0bda7423e6a923e9","snippet":"                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n                                            )\nJUDICIAL WATCH, INC                         )\n                                            )\n              Plaintiff,                    )\n                                            )\n      v.                                    )       Civil Action No. 18-cv-2107 (TSC)\n                                            )\n                         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4637661],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7324682/judicial-watch-inc-v-us-department-of-state/","attorney":"Michael Bekesha, Paul J. Orfanedes, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington,' DC, for Plaintiff., Robert J. Prince, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.","caseName":"Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State","caseNameFull":"JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE","citation":["241 F. Supp. 3d 174","2017 WL 1078544","2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39687"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":7324682,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-03-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 14-1511 (ABJ)","docket_id":64313165,"judge":"Jackson","lexisCite":"2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39687","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:37:51.814139Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:03:26.289043Z","score":{"bm25":30.70896}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7242594,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:25:47.422605Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:03:26.297989Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nAMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge\nPlaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. sent a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) re*177quest to defendant United States Department of State (“State Department”) seeking records relating to - notes or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the United States Consula","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7242594],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/11011693/kideckel-v-foreign-nation-of-canada/","attorney":"","caseName":"Kideckel v. Foreign Nation of Canada","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":11011693,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":"FD","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-10-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2024-2907","docket_id":72155331,"judge":"Judge Carl J. Nichols","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-10-05T17:02:31.151662Z","date_created":"2026-10-05T17:02:30.662801Z","score":{"bm25":30.602781}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8611,"cites":[62373,145884,347649,472980,702289,786561,2778132,7246151,9418165,10851703],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2024cv2907-193","id":11479375,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/10/05/kideckel_v._foreign_nation_of_canada.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-10-05T17:07:37.834953Z","date_created":"2026-10-05T17:02:31.025928Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"722abf9972c58d1aa36695b53b7e8ed503816c9a","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\nBRENT KIDECKEL,\n\n              Plaintiff,\n\n      v.                                              Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-02907 (CJN)\n\nFOREIGN NATION OF CANADA et al.,\n\n              Defendants.\n\n\n                                             ORDER\n\n       Plaintiff Brent Kideckel moves to stay this Court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to\n\nDefendants as sanctions for Kideckel’s ve","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11479375],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7334801/innovation-law-lab-v-nielsen/","attorney":"*1113Jennifer C. Newell, Christine Patricia Sun, Cody H. Wofsy, Julie Michelle Veroff, Katrina Leigh Eiland, Sean Connor Riordan, ACLU Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, Blaine Meredith Bookey, Eunice Chaeyoung Lee, Karen Barbara Musalo, Kathryn Jane Jastram, The Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, UC Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA, Anand Balakrishnan, Pro Hac Vice, Daniel Antonio Galindo, Judy Rabinovitz, Pro Hac Vice, Lee Gelernt, Pro Hac Vice, Michael King Thomas Tan, Pro Hac Vice, Omar C. Jadwat, Pro Hac Vice, Steven M. Watt, ACLU Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, New York, NY, Gracie Harper Willis, Pro Hac Vice, Southern Poverty Law Center, Decatur, GA, Mary Catherine Bauer, Southern Poverty Law Center, Charlottesville, VA, Melissa Crow, Pro Hac Vice, Southern Poverty Law Center, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.","caseName":"Innovation Law Lab v. Nielsen","caseNameFull":"INNOVATION LAW LAB v. Kirstjen NIELSEN","citation":["366 F. Supp. 3d 1110"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":7334801,"court":"District Court, N.D. California","court_citation_string":"N.D. Cal.","court_id":"cand","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-04-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 19-cv-00807-RS","docket_id":64323287,"judge":"Seeborg","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:40:28.726841Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T06:15:41.232475Z","score":{"bm25":30.468264}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1744,108736,110527,111789,118167,118264,118483,145791,145928,805485,1087737,1363049,1450536,2959748,3158356,4232139,4248498,4288402,4348693,6074014,6074221,6074712,8411857,8983988,9016208],"download_url":null,"id":7252721,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:54:29.035729Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T06:15:41.242662Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nRICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge\nI. INTRODUCTION\n*1114In January of this year, the Department of Homeland Security (\"DHS\") began implementing a new policy regarding non-Mexican asylum seekers arriving in the United States from Mexico.1 Denominated the \"Migrant Protection Protocols\" (","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7252721],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}