{"count":748,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xMS4xNzA5MSZzPTY0ODc0NDQmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wOC0yNCZwPTI%3D&q=INTEREST+AS+STOCKHOLDER+AND+DIRECTOR+DISQUALIFICATION+AND+CONFLICTS+OF+INTEREST&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4481096/dale-roush-individually-and-as-trustee-of-the-dale-roush-assets-trust-v/","attorney":"","caseName":"Dale Roush, Individually and as Trustee of the Dale Roush Assets Trust v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joel Hart","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4481096,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas","court_citation_string":"Tex. Crim. App.","court_id":"texcrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-17-00458-CV","docket_id":6346561,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:57:12.916970Z","date_created":"2018-03-27T08:52:05.633405Z","score":{"bm25":16.35992}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[87609,89494,107034,109527,110138,112118,121145,265890,267574,271975,755378,894594,894654,894964,1376277,1381036,1396176,1397187,1397463,1404803,1438692,1440043,1472744,1477038,1488937,1495219,1495519,1496587,1497931,1501020,1504736,1505453,1513498,1523722,1523903,1524543,1526644,1567782,1577196,1577457,1579264,1622851,1624021,1624496,1636223,1636967,1639360,1639649,1655202,1657364,1664839,1677008,1679950,1682130,1691054,1712701,1713950,1714152,1722767,1723012,1724273,1738608,1739209,1739861,1745526,1745923,1746024,1746312,1747517,1751404,1766485,1770887,1773556,1774412,1774536,1775336,1777170,1777750,1779038,1780219,1780708,1782118,1782385,1783896,1785654,1788907,1796983,1867762,1891067,1987708,2174415,2185056,2192358,2291872,2317586,2332969,2352818,2363131,2363599,2367001,2368948,2372172,2382048,2382266,2382822,2383485,2386480,2390090,2402827,2403532,2404367,2406257,2406406,2407809,2408489,2410529,2411317,2412656,2416927,2418272,2418621,2418665,2425364,2427850,2428092,2428164,2430644,2431411,2431923,2432702,2436853,2437273,2437392,2442362,2444123,2444241,2446804,2448085,2450017,2451749,2452183,2454761,2456494,2457024,2457387,2461400,2462545,2463011,2464718,2467021,2467115,2467484,3901061,3907692,3928147,3940166,3950386,3963721,3970413,3977456,3983466],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=73674&Index=%5c%5coca%2dpsql12%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccca%5cOpinion","id":4258349,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/03/23/dale_roush_individually_and_as_trustee_of_the_dale_roush_assets_trust_v..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:47:25.029119Z","date_created":"2018-03-27T08:52:05.639707Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7046773cd02ca9511766c6154ec93f66bd8bfc12","snippet":"07-17-00458CV                                                                                ACCEPTED\nSEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS\nAMARILLO, TEXAS\n3/23/2018 4:00 PM\nVivian Long, Clerk\n\n\n\n\n                                   APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV\n\n                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS          FILED IN\n                                                             7th COURT OF APPEALS\n                              FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS\n             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4258349],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4651945/joann-mondsini-vs-local-finance-board-new-jersey-department-of-community/","attorney":"","caseName":"JOANN MONDSINI VS. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS) (CONSOLIDATED)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4651945,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-03-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A-4482-16T4/A-4504-16T4","docket_id":16084322,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:46:18.793730Z","date_created":"2019-08-20T19:19:47.929678Z","score":{"bm25":14.384371}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1478285,1483976,1497132,1513893,1516529,1884547,1890698,1910280,1931082,1967885,2089418,2108074,2314415,2328334,2344848,2352698,2353182,2385198,2554165],"download_url":"http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/attorneys/assets/opinions/appellate/published/a4482-16a4504-16.pdf","id":4429198,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/03/05/joann_mondsini_vs._local_finance_board_new_jersey_department_of_community.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:46:11.368394Z","date_created":"2019-08-20T19:19:47.933325Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"36836a7bd8777a383500e512a4da88ff4827146d","snippet":"               NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE\n              APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION\n\n                                  SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY\n                                  APPELLATE DIVISION\n                                  DOCKET NOS. A-4482-16T4\n                                              A-4504-16T4\n\nJOANN MONDSINI,\n\n     Petitioner-Appellant,               APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n                                                 March 5, 2019\nv.\n                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4429198],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2259664/la-jolla-cove-motel-hotel-apartments-inc-v-superior-court/","attorney":"Counsel, Sparber Rudolph Annen, Richard J. Annen and Todd R. Gabriel for Petitioner., No appearance for Respondent., Mazzarefla, Dunwoody & Caldarelli, Steven A. Micheli, Michael D. Fabiano; Soden & Steinberger, Stephen R. Soden and Jason W. Coberly for Real Parties in Interest.","caseName":"La Jolla Cove Motel & Hotel Apartments, Inc. v. Superior Court","caseNameFull":"LA JOLLA COVE MOTEL AND HOTEL APARTMENTS, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; HELEN H. JACKMAN, as Trustee, Etc., Et Al., Real Parties in Interest","citation":["17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467","121 Cal. App. 4th 773","2004 Daily Journal DAR 10137","2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7518","2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1332"],"citeCount":18,"cluster_id":2259664,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2004-08-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"D043922","docket_id":2112824,"judge":"Nares","lexisCite":"2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7518","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:10:12.429948Z","date_created":"2015-10-30T00:01:21.033974Z","score":{"bm25":13.826828}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6520,"cites":[110374,1426199,2268245,2278344],"download_url":null,"id":2259664,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:34:28.608412Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:54:52.710951Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0afc0ff7cf04b2bdcff13ddf54e2bbb5d9e97b17","snippet":"\n17 Cal.Rptr.3d 467 (2004)\n121 Cal.App.4th 773\nLA JOLLA COVE MOTEL AND HOTEL APARTMENTS, INC., Petitioner,\nv.\nThe SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Respondent;\nHelen H. Jackman, as Trustee, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest.\nNo. D043922.\nCourt of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One.\nAugust 16, 2004.\nReview Denied November 10,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2259664],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1645341/zayas-bazan-v-marcelin/","attorney":"Carroll Law Firm and Linda L. Carroll, Miami, for petitioner., Sandra Marcelin and Danger Alvarez, in proper persons.","caseName":"Zayas-Bazan v. Marcelin","caseNameFull":"Enrique J. ZAYAS-BAZAN, a Shareholder of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, v. Sandra MARCELIN, Individually and as an Officer and Director of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida Corporation; Danger Alvarez, Individually and as an Officer and Director of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida Corporation, and a Managing Member of Day Trading Tutor, LLC, a Florida Corporation, Respondents","citation":["40 So. 3d 870","2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10579","2010 WL 2836599"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":1645341,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-07-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3D10-726","docket_id":1667085,"judge":"Cope, Rothenberg, Schwartz","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T05:08:49.713313Z","date_created":"2015-10-14T15:09:59.587612Z","score":{"bm25":13.621592}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1102254,1112240,1137820,1813987,1825085],"download_url":null,"id":1645341,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T10:36:39.369221Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:00:40.244657Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"576f0288293418501fb31ae71a9a8b94dc502fdf","snippet":"\n40 So.3d 870 (2010)\nEnrique J. ZAYAS-BAZAN, a Shareholder of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida corporation, Petitioner,\nv.\nSandra MARCELIN, individually and as an Officer and Director of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida corporation; Danger Alvarez, individually and as an Officer and Director of Forex Consulting Corp., a Florida corporation, and a Managing Member of Day Trading Tutor, LLC, a Florida corporation, Respondents.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[6756,6864,7047],"panel_names":["Alan R. Schwartz","Gerald B. Cope Jr.","Leslie B. Rothenberg"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1645341],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10667755/bryan-dorsey-v-robert-t-jones/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bryan Dorsey v. Robert T. Jones","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10667755,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-09-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-0134-CDW","docket_id":71292280,"judge":"Wright M.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-08T16:04:32.094853Z","date_created":"2025-09-08T16:04:32.008236Z","score":{"bm25":13.456247}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1472473,1920182,1969692,1975040,1980330,2056904,2209063,2264044,2334949,2752609,6559062,6559094],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=384690","id":11134342,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/09/08/bryan_dorsey_v._robert_t._jones.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:18:02.614213Z","date_created":"2025-09-08T16:04:32.020671Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"952a689786090a00047afe1b78e11e82ec1028ff","snippet":"                                 COURT OF CHANCERY\n                                          OF THE\n                                 STATE OF DELAWARE\nCHRISTIAN DOUGLAS WRIGHT                                       LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER\n   MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY                                      500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400\n                                                                   WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734\n\n\n\n                                    September 8, 2025\n\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11134342],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5147720/cordes-v-associates-of-internal-medicine/","attorney":"Michael A. Murphy, Pittsburgh, for appellants., Paula A. Koczan and Shari Pakravan, Pittsburgh, for appellees.","caseName":"Cordes v. Associates of Internal Medicine","caseNameFull":"Susanne CORDES, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward D. Cordes, Sr. v. ASSOCIATES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE Tri-State Medical Group, P.C. Tri State Medical Group, P.C. d/b/a/ Associates of Internal Medicine Ann Marie Ray, M.D. and Martha Louise Newman, P.A.","citation":["87 A.3d 829","2014 Pa. Super. 52","2014 WL 971332","2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 127"],"citeCount":21,"cluster_id":5147720,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-03-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":60461575,"judge":"Allen, Bender, Bowes, Donohue, Gantman, Olson, Ott, Stevens, Wecht","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:55:38.163186Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:28:34.821281Z","score":{"bm25":13.332849}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4968636,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T22:18:09.131818Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:28:34.846819Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL BY\nWECHT, J.:\nIn this medical malpractice case, Susanne Cordes (“Appellant”), individually and as administratrix of the estate of Edward D. Cordes, Sr., appeals the October 20, 2011 judgment entered in favor of the above-captioned defendant-Appellees. Appellant claims that the trial court abused its discretion during the jury selection process by denying the challenges for caus","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4968637,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T22:18:09.664302Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:28:34.873042Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nDISSENTING OPINION BY\nOLSON, J.:\nI respectfully dissent from the views set forth in the Opinions in Support of Reversal (“O.S.R.”).1 The law in Pennsylvania holds that indirect or mediated relationships between prospective jurors and case participants are insufficient to raise a presumption of prejudice. Therefore, in my *848","type":"dissent"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4968636,4968637],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2253259/responsible-citizens-v-superior-court-of-fresno-cty/","attorney":"Counsel, Harriman & Gabrielli, John C. Gabrielli and Richard L. Harriman for Petitioners., No appearance for Respondent., Phillip S. Cronin, County Counsel, Philip M. Jay, Deputy County Counsel, and J. Steven Lempel for Real Parties in Interest.","caseName":"Responsible Citizens v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO CTY.","caseNameFull":"RESPONSIBLE CITIZENS Et Al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; DAVID ASKINS Et Al., Real Parties in Interest","citation":["16 Cal. App. 4th 1717","20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 756","93 Daily Journal DAR 8633","93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5122","1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 701"],"citeCount":61,"cluster_id":2253259,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1993-07-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"F018604","docket_id":2105739,"judge":"Thaxter","lexisCite":"93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5122","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:07:41.099450Z","date_created":"2015-10-30T00:01:18.968420Z","score":{"bm25":12.701159}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6610,"cites":[1126391,1248078,1271021,1418388,2140541,2142542,2149279,2150608,2164069,2167392,2168240,2169360,2174839,2616436],"download_url":null,"id":2253259,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:31:56.043219Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:52:04.511706Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"01c29bffe403bdfd2c088059e817f6d91734a145","snippet":"\n16 Cal.App.4th 1717 (1993)\n20 Cal. Rptr.2d 756\nRESPONSIBLE CITIZENS et al., Petitioners,\nv.\nTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; DAVID ASKINS et al., Real Parties in Interest.\nDocket No. F018604.\nCourt of Appeals of California, Fifth District.\nJuly 1, 1993.\n*1720 COUNSEL\nHarriman & G","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2253259],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4240930/zia-shadows-llc-v-city-of-las-cruces/","attorney":"Cindy Rhodes Victor, Kus Ryan & Associates, PLLC, Auburn Hills, Michigan, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., David P. Lutz (William L. Lutz with him on the briefs), Martin,- Lutz, Roggow & Eubanks, P.C., Las Cruces, New Mexico, for Defendant-Appellee.","caseName":"Zia Shadows, L.L.C. v. City of Las Cruces","caseNameFull":"ZIA SHADOWS, L.L.C., a New Mexico Limited Liability Company; Alex Garth; William Garth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LAS CRUCES, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["829 F.3d 1232","2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13391","2016 WL 3960827"],"citeCount":77,"cluster_id":4240930,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit","court_citation_string":"10th Cir.","court_id":"ca10","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-07-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-2009","docket_id":4113251,"judge":"Briscoe, McKay, McHugh","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13391","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T23:47:32.409203Z","date_created":"2016-07-22T17:01:07.161226Z","score":{"bm25":12.663072}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9835054,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:02:06.858804Z","date_created":"2023-09-02T02:02:55.484634Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMcHUGH, Circuit Judge.\nI. INTRODUCTION\nThis appeal arises from a zoning dispute between Zia Shadows L.L.C. and the City of Las Cruces (the City). Zia Shadows L.L.C. and its principals, Alex and William Garth (collectively, Zia Shadows), filed suit in federal district court, alleging the City’s delays in approval of a zoning request— and the conditions ultimately attached to the approval — violated Zia ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[96947,102705,104777,110645,111303,154141,156353,159967,160213,160224,162723,163446,164197,165030,169904,172464,173022,350830,571508,612996,617037,674668,689202,705155,760423,788221,1483361,1855348],"download_url":"http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/15/15-2009.pdf","id":4018191,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/07/22/zia_shadows_llc_v._city_of_las_cruces.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:03:15.879426Z","date_created":"2016-07-22T17:01:07.167638Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a2f49da101b9fae0c8956517169d41fc5cfcef1c","snippet":"                                                                               FILED\n                                                                   United States Court of Appeals\n                                     PUBLISH                               Tenth Circuit\n\n                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         July 22, 2016\n\n                                                                         Elisabeth A. Shumaker\n                            FOR THE TENTH","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4018191,9835054,9835055],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4488317/triumph-mortgage-corp-v-glasgow-citgo-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Triumph Mortgage Corp. v. Glasgow Citgo, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4488317,"court":"Superior Court of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Super. Ct.","court_id":"delsuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-04-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"N16L-11-058 VLM","docket_id":6367768,"judge":"Medinilla J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:59:03.450512Z","date_created":"2018-04-19T16:06:48.201504Z","score":{"bm25":12.625348}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1538011,1941113,1970305,1995909,2185552,2209063,2286857],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=271700","id":4265570,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/04/19/triumph_mortgage_corp._v._glasgow_citgo_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T21:26:26.144948Z","date_created":"2018-04-19T16:06:48.219574Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dd2e58866b11043af75e2c0ac7223e5ae594ec8c","snippet":"IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\nTRIlH\\/IPH MORTGAGE CORP.,\na Delaware corporation,\n\nPlaintiff, C.A. NO. N16L-l 1-058 VLM\n\nV.\n\nGLASGOW CITGO, INC.,\n\na Delaware corporation, Successor by\nname change to GLASGOW GETTY,\nINC.\n\nDefendant.\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nSubmitted: January 23, 2018\nDecided: April 19, 2018\nUpon Consideration ofPlaintW’s Motion to Dl`squall`]j/ Defendant’s Counsel &\n\nExtena’ Case Schedule, DENIED.\n\nUpon Consz'a’eration of Plaintijj” ’s Motionfor Summary Jua’gment - Def","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4265570],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4885170/liquor-bike-llc-v-iowa-district-court-for-polk-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"Liquor Bike, LLC v. Iowa District Court for Polk County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4885170,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0268","docket_id":59925202,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:50:10.467794Z","date_created":"2021-05-21T14:03:51.087279Z","score":{"bm25":12.531667}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[392180,564847,717505,795760,1245969,1284947,1787691,1874546,2202229,2241997,2359330,2580022],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/11772/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":4688949,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/21/liquor_bike_llc_v._iowa_district_court_for_polk_county.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:01:26.430326Z","date_created":"2021-05-21T14:03:51.089177Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6034205fec21aa4cabd588a3235ae30bb45a9a74","snippet":"                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n                                No. 20–0268\n\n               Submitted April 14, 2021—Filed May 21, 2021\n\n\nLIQUOR BIKE, LLC,\n\n       Plaintiff,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY,\n\n       Defendant.\n\n\n\n       Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt,\n\nJudge.\n\n\n\n       A limited liability company filed a petition for a writ of certiorari\n\nchallenging a district court order to disqualify counsel. WRIT SUSTAINED\n\nAND ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4688949],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5290157/liquor-bike-llc-v-iowa-district-court-for-polk-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"Liquor Bike, LLC v. Iowa District Court for Polk County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5290157,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0268","docket_id":60649406,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:33:43.655930Z","date_created":"2021-10-15T14:05:25.820755Z","score":{"bm25":12.522331}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[392180,564847,717505,795760,1245969,1284947,1787691,1874546,2202229,2241997,2359330,2580022],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/11772/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":5118703,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/21/liquor_bike_llc_v._iowa_district_court_for_polk_county_2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T23:41:00.731119Z","date_created":"2021-10-15T14:05:25.822740Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7d0beb5129ddf368b4784201db170b003870e0aa","snippet":"                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n                                No. 20–0268\n\n               Submitted April 14, 2021—Filed May 21, 2021\n\n                          Amended July 20, 2021\n\nLIQUOR BIKE, LLC,\n\n       Plaintiff,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY,\n\n       Defendant.\n\n\n\n       Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt,\n\nJudge.\n\n\n\n       A limited liability company filed a petition for a writ of certiorari\n\nchallenging a district court o","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5118703],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4887307/liquor-bike-llc-v-iowa-district-court-for-polk-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"Liquor Bike, LLC v. Iowa District Court for Polk County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4887307,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0268","docket_id":59945022,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:50:43.970539Z","date_created":"2021-05-28T14:05:57.429404Z","score":{"bm25":12.509538}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[392180,564847,717505,795760,1245969,1284947,1787691,1874546,2202229,2241997,2359330,2580022],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/11772/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":4691086,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/21/liquor_bike_llc_v._iowa_district_court_for_polk_county_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:02:46.362354Z","date_created":"2021-05-28T14:05:57.432322Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"176f0a11d983a456af090d339a22290823740846","snippet":"                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n                                No. 20–0268\n\n               Submitted April 14, 2021—Filed May 21, 2021\n\n\nLIQUOR BIKE, LLC,\n\n       Plaintiff,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY,\n\n       Defendant.\n\n\n\n       Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt,\n\nJudge.\n\n\n\n       A limited liability company filed a petition for a writ of certiorari\n\nchallenging a district court order to disqualify counsel. WRIT SUSTAINED\n\nAND ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4691086],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1119296/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-kinsey/","attorney":"Jack L. Kennedy, of Kennedy & King, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused., Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief were Ronald L. Wade and Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty, Portland.","caseName":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kinsey","caseNameFull":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WILLIAM H. KINSEY, Accused","citation":["660 P.2d 660","294 Or. 544","1983 Ore. LEXIS 1074"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":1119296,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1983-03-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"OSB 80-49, SC 28742","docket_id":482143,"judge":"Lent, Linde, Peterson, Campbell, Roberts, Carson, Jones","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:54:53.639039Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T09:51:19.327786Z","score":{"bm25":12.2862625}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105526,256356,265819,299216,334517,1160348,1160400,1165277,1187212,1187217,1241854,1245350,1343654,1369874,1422723,1463638,1578027,1635885,2288106,2314121,2399559],"download_url":null,"id":1119296,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:48:31.461248Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T04:09:29.016223Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9a166536b0590a53f998c1269fc5efc4abfb980e","snippet":"\n660 P.2d 660 (1983)\n294 Or. 544\nIn re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF William H. KINSEY, Accused.\nNo. OSB 80-49; SC 28742.\nSupreme Court of Oregon.\nArgued and Submitted December 30, 1982.\nDecided March 8, 1983.\nJack L. Kennedy, of Kennedy & King, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused.\nGarry P. McMur","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[1667,5473,5474,5493,5494,5501,5503],"panel_names":["Robert Edward Jones","J. R. Campbell","Wallace P. Carson Jr.","University of California-Berkeley Lent","Hans A. Linde","Edwin J. Peterson","Betty Roberts"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1119296],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5294220/in-re-facebook-inc-derivative-litigation/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Facebook, Inc. Derivative Litigation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5294220,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-11-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0307-JRS","docket_id":60694025,"judge":"Slights V.C.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:34:46.622667Z","date_created":"2021-11-02T22:02:39.375493Z","score":{"bm25":12.257676}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=326110","id":5122782,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/11/02/in_re_facebook_inc._derivative_litigation.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T23:43:55.317142Z","date_created":"2021-11-02T22:02:39.385399Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0019dd4ffd78161c9ff76bfc1bbc115119e68424","snippet":"     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\n\n    IN RE FACEBOOK, INC.                     )   Consolidated\n    DERIVATIVE LITIGATION                    )   C.A. No. 2018-0307-JRS\n\n\n      ORDER REFUSING APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF\n                  INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL\n\n\n       WHEREAS, two competing teams of stockholder plaintiffs and their counsel\n\nsought to be appointed to leadership roles in this consolidated derivative action\n\nbrought on behalf of nominal defendant, Facebook","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5122782],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1847500/russakoff-v-state-dept-of-ins/","attorney":"","caseName":"Russakoff v. State, Dept. of Ins.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["724 So. 2d 582","1998 WL 729754"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":1847500,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1998-10-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"98-642","docket_id":1410000,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T06:47:16.758590Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T16:31:10.218041Z","score":{"bm25":12.157271}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1101777,1138452,1826622],"download_url":null,"id":1847500,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T12:59:48.772106Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:36:35.593834Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"c6efe10bfd4984e1d241bd2b9449f4d9602b5da4","snippet":"\n724 So.2d 582 (1998)\nSheldon RUSSAKOFF, Petitioner,\nv.\nSTATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, as receiver for Sunrise Healthcare Plan, Inc., Respondent.\nNo. 98-642.\nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.\nOctober 21, 1998.\nRehearing Denied January 29, 1999.\nRaoul G. Cantero, III and Jeffrey W. Blacher, of Adorno & Zeder, P.A., M","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1847500],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2209063/in-re-appeal-of-infotechnology-inc/","attorney":"Steven J. Rothschild (argued), Anthony W. Clark, Robert A. Glen and Karen L. Valihura of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Wilmington,, Theisen, Lank, Mulford & Goldberg, P.A., Wilmington, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., Latham & Watkins, Shearman & Sterling and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, amicus curiae on behalf of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom., Grover C. Brown, amicus curiae appointed by the Court, of Morris, James, Hitch-ens & Williams, Wilmington.","caseName":"In Re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc.","caseNameFull":"In Re Appeal of INFOTECHNOLOGY, INC., Shareholder Litigation Disqualification of Counsel","citation":["582 A.2d 215","59 U.S.L.W. 2326","1990 Del. LEXIS 329"],"citeCount":69,"cluster_id":2209063,"court":"Supreme Court of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del.","court_id":"del","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1990-10-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":2079198,"judge":"Horsey, Moore, Walsh","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:46:49.138684Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T01:47:41.321403Z","score":{"bm25":11.837055}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111475,362891,1525277,1955906,1983808,1999840,2079067,2086877,2334118,2346021,2357883],"download_url":null,"id":2209063,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:14:20.811174Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:36:35.906369Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1018831aac77770e879871ead8d7a83c6cafd56a","snippet":"\n582 A.2d 215 (1990)\nIn re Appeal of INFOTECHNOLOGY, INC., Shareholder Litigation Disqualification of Counsel.\nSupreme Court of Delaware.\nSubmitted: October 3, 1990.\nDecided: October 31, 1990.\nSteven J. Rothschild (argued), Anthony W. Clark, Robert A. Glen and Karen L. Valihura of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Wilmington,\nTheisen, Lank, Mulford & Goldb","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[3998,4001,4015],"panel_names":["Henry R. Horsey","Andrew G.T. Moore II","Joseph T. Walsh"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2209063],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8357741/clair-v-clair/","attorney":"","caseName":"Clair v. Clair","caseNameFull":"Claire M. Clair as of the Estate of James E. Clair, Jr. v. Joseph P. Clair, Individually and in his capacity as an officer, director, member, manager, limited and/or general partner and/or shareholder of certain entities","citation":["28 Mass. L. Rptr. 470"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8357741,"court":"Massachusetts Superior Court","court_citation_string":"Mass. Super. Ct.","court_id":"masssuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-05-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 101446BLS1","docket_id":65537744,"judge":"Lauriat, Peter","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:38:01.810086Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T20:23:19.018263Z","score":{"bm25":11.825082}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[429496,1988325,2009033,2039718,2082752,2146452,6444950,6451349,6463017,6463389],"download_url":null,"id":8326526,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:10:52.203852Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T20:23:19.024318Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nLauriat, Peter M., J.\nThe plaintiffs, Claire M. Clair and Jane M. Clair (collectively the “plaintiffs”), as the executrixes of their husbands’ (James Clair and Mark Clair, respectively) estates, brought this action to challenge the disposition of corporate assets remaining after the 2007 sale of substantially all of the assets of a family-owned automobile dealership business. The plaintiffs have now moved to disqualify Murphy &a;","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8326526],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4656971/ms-mary-giddings-wenske-v-blue-bell-creameries-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Ms. Mary Giddings Wenske v. Blue Bell Creameries, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4656971,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-08-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CA 2017-0699-JRS","docket_id":16125441,"judge":"Slights V.C.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:47:52.918597Z","date_created":"2019-08-28T21:02:52.999310Z","score":{"bm25":11.258666}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1537773,1890645,1954895,2208565,2360315,2368877],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=294550","id":4434224,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/08/28/ms._mary_giddings_wenske_v._blue_bell_creameries_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:49:51.265352Z","date_created":"2019-08-28T21:02:53.011549Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"49730178aead2d204bd2bcb5dc4cf7cfe817f127","snippet":"  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\n\nMS. MARY GIDDINGS WENSKE,              )\nINDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF         )\nTHE THOMAS HUNTER GIDDINGS, JR.        )\nTRUST U/W/O THOMAS H. GIDDINGS         )\nDATED 5/23/2000,                       )\n                                       )\n               Plaintiffs,             )\n                                       )\n         v.                            )   C.A. No. 2017-0699-JRS\n                                       )\nBLUE BELL C","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4434224],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10362464/in-re-kimco-developers-inc-kd-houston-1086a-inc-kimco-realty-services/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Kimco Developers, Inc. KD Houston 1086A, Inc., Kimco Realty Services, Inc., and Kimco Realty Corporation v. the State of Texas","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10362464,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [15th Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp15","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-25-00025-CV","docket_id":69777179,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:07.617214Z","date_created":"2025-03-24T08:20:21.632964Z","score":{"bm25":11.231106}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1515115,2271336,2432832,3109318,4353892,5287086],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=225ebb47-38bd-4f2a-a4df-7d06f260f41a","id":10829052,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/17/in_re_kimco_developers_inc._kd_houston_1086a_inc._kimco_realty_services_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:07.610598Z","date_created":"2025-03-24T08:20:21.635114Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b0b4b901a336a3718ee51906788bc59655d05fc8","snippet":"                                                                   ACCEPTED\n                                                               15-25-00025-CV\n                                                 FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                               AUSTIN, TEXAS\n                                                             3/17/2025 1:54 PM\n                          NO. ___________               CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE\n                                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10829052],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6487444/mondsini-v-local-fin-bd/","attorney":"Richard A. Gantner, Matawan, argued the cause for appellant (Cleary Giacobbe Alfieri Jacobs, LLC, attorneys; Richard A. Gantner, on the briefs)., Stephen E. Trimboli, Morristown, argued the cause for intervenor-appellant (Trimboli & Prusinowski, LLC, attorneys; Stephen E. Trimboli, of counsel and on the briefs; Lauren W. Kavanagh, Morristown, on the briefs)., Dominic L. Giova, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney; Melissa Dutton Schaffer, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Melanie R. Walter, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).","caseName":"Mondsini v. Local Fin. Bd.","caseNameFull":"Joann MONDSINI v. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD, Respondent-Respondent. Rockaway Valley Regional Sewerage Authority, Intervenor-Appellant.","citation":["204 A.3d 907","458 N.J. Super. 290"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":6487444,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-03-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DOCKET NOS. A-4482-16T4; A-4504-16T4","docket_id":63417161,"judge":"Brown, Messano, Rose","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:52:19.085040Z","date_created":"2022-06-24T23:16:25.464073Z","score":{"bm25":11.17091}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6359639,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T03:25:33.317300Z","date_created":"2022-06-24T23:16:25.475741Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMESSANO, P.J.A.D.\n*294*909JoAnn Mondsini became the Executive Director of the Rockaway Valley Regional Sewerage Authority (the Authority) in September 2012. Within weeks, Mondsini faced a natural disaster of epic proportions, Super Storm Sandy, which str","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6359639],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}