{"count":357232,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz00My40MzI4MiZzPTIwODk0OTgmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0xMC0wMyZwPTI%3D&q=INTENT+ELEMENTS+AND+STANDARDS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10311207/aesthetic-elements-inc-v-meera-enterprises-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Aesthetic Elements, Inc. v. Meera Enterprises, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10311207,"court":"Court of Appeals of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa Ct. App.","court_id":"iowactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-1250","docket_id":69530733,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-09T16:08:22.695638Z","date_created":"2025-01-09T16:08:22.655481Z","score":{"bm25":92.01752}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[8247598],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/22438/embed/CourtAppealsOpinion","id":10777795,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/01/09/aesthetic_elements_inc._v._meera_enterprises_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T02:36:25.865525Z","date_created":"2025-01-09T16:08:22.657308Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4eded410c3a99509cd7ee3f9a43cdefbfa0f57f3","snippet":"                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA\n\n                                  No. 23-1250\n                             Filed January 9, 2025\n\n\nAESTHETIC ELEMENTS, INC.,\n    Plaintiff-Appellee,\n\nvs.\n\nMEERA ENTERPRISE, LLC,\n     Defendant-Appellant.\n________________________________________________________________\n\n\n      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, David M. Cox, Judge.\n\n\n\n      A defendant appeals a jury verdict awarding liquidated damages to the\n\nplaintiff on its ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10777795],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9408612/demill-v-peace-officer-standards/","attorney":"","caseName":"Demill v. Peace Officer Standards","caseNameFull":"","citation":["531 P.3d 781","2023 UT App 56"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9408612,"court":"Court of Appeals of Utah","court_citation_string":"Utah Ct. App.","court_id":"utahctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20210217-CA","docket_id":67519022,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:10:27.140550Z","date_created":"2023-06-22T02:11:24.915419Z","score":{"bm25":86.41083}},"neutralCite":"2023 UT App 56","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[107336,130160,2585194,2598582],"download_url":"https://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/appopin/Demill%20v.%20Peace%20Officer%20Standards20230525_20210217_56.pdf","id":9404088,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/25/demill_v._peace_officer_standards.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:10:27.123002Z","date_created":"2023-06-22T02:11:24.917682Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"972b7b54b8af14183fddeeae195298bd4c92e865","snippet":"                         2023 UT App 56\n\n\n               THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                        RON DEMILL,\n                         Petitioner,\n                              v.\n       PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL,\n                        Respondent.\n\n                            Opinion\n                       No. 20210217-CA\n                       Filed May 25, 2023\n\n               Original Proceeding in this Court\n\n              Jeremy G. Jones and Richard R. Willie,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9404088],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10883903/trace-elements-inc-v-nadja-mackensen/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trace Elements, Inc. v. Nadja MacKensen","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10883903,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":"S","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC2024-1274","docket_id":73568298,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-02T15:08:43.576594Z","date_created":"2026-07-02T15:08:43.417761Z","score":{"bm25":77.02502}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1090776,1140885,1697927,1714787,1768726,1779188,1837609,1857919,1860954,1950924,2543738,4091401,4275559,4317775,4358642,4767373,4800605,4812513,7734390,9480053,9651885,9806904,9806908],"download_url":"https://flcourts-media.flcourts.gov/content/download/2490832/opinion/Opinion_SC2024-1274.pdf","id":11351431,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/07/02/trace_elements_inc._v._nadja_mackensen.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-02T15:13:21.893133Z","date_created":"2026-07-02T15:08:43.462122Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0841d71f697457eee7feeac1812efffc5dec39e8","snippet":"          Supreme Court of Florida\n                             ____________\n\n                          No. SC2024-1274\n                            ____________\n\n                     TRACE ELEMENTS, INC.,\n                           Petitioner,\n\n                                  vs.\n\n                    NADJA MACKENSEN, et al.,\n                          Respondents.\n\n                             July 2, 2026\n\nMUÑIZ, J.\n\n     Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 governs “all proposals for\n\nsettle","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11351431],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10325138/griffin-v-police-officer-standards-and-training-commission/","attorney":"","caseName":"Griffin v. Police Officer Standards and Training Commission","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10325138,"court":"Superior Court of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Super. Ct.","court_id":"delsuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"K24A-04-006 NEP","docket_id":69599377,"judge":"Primos J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-31T20:05:13.073630Z","date_created":"2025-01-31T20:05:13.012570Z","score":{"bm25":75.08509}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109382,1473189,1481092,1522532,1522546,1534218,1544087,1904554,1920380,1980330,1983484,1992057,2176586,2273721,2280389,2318330,2321606,2327996,2445828,2553016,4102895,4396523,4964202,4967327,8376925],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=374850","id":10791726,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/01/31/griffin_v._police_officer_standards_and_training_commission.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:04:22.627889Z","date_created":"2025-01-31T20:05:13.018652Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0e01743dbdb69e4e168db733207ce4c74955238c","snippet":"      IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\nANTHONY GRIFFIN,                     )\n                                     )\n             Appellant,              )\n                                     )\n      v.                             )     C.A. No. K24A-04-006 NEP\n                                     )\nPOLICE OFFICER STANDARDS             )\nAND TRAINING COMMISSION,             )\n                                     )\n             Appellee.               )\n\n                          ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10791726],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10635440/alaska-police-standards-council-v-valent-maxwell/","attorney":"","caseName":"Alaska Police Standards Council v. Valent Maxwell","caseNameFull":"","citation":["465 P.3d 467"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":10635440,"court":"Alaska Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Alaska","court_id":"alaska","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-06-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S17079","docket_id":70830744,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-17T21:29:57.929460Z","date_created":"2025-07-17T21:24:27.489724Z","score":{"bm25":66.50341}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104856,1170104,1223907,1234202,2159792,2331009,2350712,2507994,2794608,4245941,4247928,9782246],"download_url":"https://appellate-records.courts.alaska.gov/CMSPublic/UserControl/OpenOpinionDocument?docNumber=7458&caseNumber=S17079&opinionType=OP","id":11102027,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/06/12/alaska_police_standards_council_v._valent_maxwell.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:19:50.438254Z","date_created":"2025-07-17T21:24:27.498310Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b61d263fa4fbf4f8ad03ca0ed6871bc85af1385d","snippet":"      Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER.\n      Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts,\n      303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email\n      corrections@akcourts.us.\n\n\n\n               THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA\n\nALASKA POLICE STANDARDS                         )\nCOUNCIL,                                        )   Supreme Court No. S","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11102027],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10099962/sen-v-dept-of-ed-professional-standards-practices-comm/","attorney":"","caseName":"S.E.N. v. Dept. of Ed. (Professional Standards & Practices Comm.)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10099962,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-08-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"651 C.D. 2023","docket_id":69120068,"judge":"Wallace","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-08-30T22:10:55.559552Z","date_created":"2024-08-30T22:10:55.502565Z","score":{"bm25":59.99523}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1931779,4127061,4956581],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/651CD23_8-28-24.pdf","id":10566562,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/08/28/s.e.n._v._dept._of_ed._professional_standards__practices_comm..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:15:09.119178Z","date_created":"2024-08-30T22:10:55.509169Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0ea5075267cda8b0f5a9695704965b15aa20271d","snippet":"            IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\n\nS.E.N.,                                :\n                            Petitioner :\n                                       :\n           v.                          : No. 651 C.D. 2023\n                                       : Argued: May 7, 2024\nDepartment of Education                :\n(Professional Standards and            :\nPractices Commission),                 :\n                            Respondent :\n\nBEFORE:        HONORABLE PATRICIA A.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10566562],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5005033/mcalpin-v-criminal-justice-standards-training-commission/","attorney":"William M. Furlow of Grossman, Fur-low, and Bayo, LLC, Tallahassee, for Appellant., Thomas F. Kirwin, General Counsel, and Linton Eason, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Tallahassee, for Appellee.","caseName":"McAlpin v. Criminal Justice Standards & Training Commission","caseNameFull":"John B. McALPIN v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION","citation":["155 So. 3d 416","2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20982","2014 WL 7404018"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5005033,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-12-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 1D14-1355","docket_id":60245645,"judge":"Fensom, James, Nortwick, Osterhaus","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:19:23.072325Z","date_created":"2021-08-21T21:15:44.300343Z","score":{"bm25":57.34914}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4816750,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:57:34.014589Z","date_created":"2021-08-21T21:15:44.329289Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM.\nJohn B. McAlpin, Chief of the Sneads Police Department, appeals the Criminal Justice and Standards Training Commission’s final order suspending his law enforcement certification for eighteen months, to be followed by two years’ probationary reinstatement. We reverse as to two of the charges, but affirm as to the misuse of official position charge.\nAppellant raises a preliminary issue regarding th","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4816750],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10276392/triad-hunter-llc-v-eagle-natrium-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Triad Hunter, L.L.C. v. Eagle Natrium, L.L.C.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["257 N.E.3d 982","2024 Ohio 5188"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":10276392,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-10-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23 MO 0019","docket_id":69386632,"judge":"Hanni","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:00:19.371225Z","date_created":"2024-11-18T22:14:21.376970Z","score":{"bm25":54.45094}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ohio 5188","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690817,2698190,2700877,2707291,3706128,3724406,3726271,3732826,3753176,3761255,3772676,4543796,6319406,6753769,6754469,6754479,6755709,6757328,6758010,6758070,6758639,6759958,6761859,6762006,6762250,6762602,6769618,6774623,6776757,6780047,6782198,6782217,6785385,6792744,9433294,9434419,11149739,11149741,11152670],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/7/2024/2024-Ohio-5188.pdf","id":10742982,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/10/29/triad_hunter_l.l.c._v._eagle_natrium_l.l.c..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T12:14:23.220988Z","date_created":"2024-11-18T22:14:21.388386Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4a8178271dc322de88eaed04acae7da5700eefeb","snippet":"[Cite as Triad Hunter, L.L.C. v. Eagle Natrium, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-5188.]\n\n\n\n             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                             SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                  MONROE COUNTY\n\n                                      TRIAD HUNTER, LLC,\n\n                              Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,\n\n                                                     v.\n\n                               EAGLE NATRIUM, LLC, ET AL.,\n\n                                ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10742982],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"elements of negligence met; expert not required on standard of care; elements of trespass met; intentional conduct required for trespass; oil and gas drilling; salt mining; brine caverns; motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; motion for new trial; stipulation as to ownership; evidence presented as to damages; denial of remittitur; punitive damages request denied; no actual malice; proper jury instructions; no permanent injunction; compensated for future damages; adequate remedy at law"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2479458/helping-others-maintain-environmental-standards-v-bos/","attorney":"Donald Q. Manning, of McGreevy Williams P.C., of Rockford, and Thomas J. Nack, of Nack, Richardson & Kurt, of Galena, for appellants., Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, of Chicago (Michael A. Scodro, Solicitor General and Brett E. Legner, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for appellee Illinois Department of Agriculture., David D. Albee Jr., of Galena, for other appellees., Danielle J. Diamond, of Diamond & LeSueur, P.C., of McHenry, and James N. Saul, of James N. Saul, LLC, of Madison, Wisconsin, for amici curiae.","caseName":"Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards v. Bos","caseNameFull":"HELPING OTHERS MAINTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. A.J. BOS Et Al., Defendants-Appellants; HELPING OTHERS MAINTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A.J. BOS Et Al., Defendants-Appellees","citation":["941 N.E.2d 347","406 Ill. App. 3d 669"],"citeCount":57,"cluster_id":2479458,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-12-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2—09—1283, 2—10—0162 cons.","docket_id":2346445,"judge":"Bowman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:04:09.210751Z","date_created":"2015-05-19T22:56:50.028976Z","score":{"bm25":52.588978}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1987695,1990717,2003432,2006947,2012227,2012960,2021392,2022166,2027287,2032493,2034239,2036303,2052637,2063659,2069100,2069584,2078980,2080738,2083662,2089704,2094687,2094886,2095241,2099844,2099976,2114599,2123947,2133610,2133846,2136844,2136882,2140769,2143038,2144159,2148295,2160055,2162388,2168595,2170408,2192212,2194549,2199977,2204958,2221615,2222480,2230109,2234973,2243725,2254197,2478444,2481670,2482701],"download_url":null,"id":2479458,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:05:25.261053Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:50:01.188660Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4a11e7c9977b3610cd3d651a49582aaba27b0fda","snippet":"\n941 N.E.2d 347 (2010)\nHELPING OTHERS MAINTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, Leroy Behrens, Laurel Behrens, Mary Jo Burke, Juanita Cropper, Jeffrey Graves, Dean B. Hicks, Kathleen M. Hicks, Steve Holesinger, Will Liberton, Lori Runkle, and Richard Runkle, Plaintiffs-Appellees,\nv.\nA.J. BOS, Traditions Investments, LLC, and the Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellants.\nHelping Others Maintain Environmental Standards, Leroy Behrens, Laurel Beh","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2479458],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7050925/johnson-v-department-of-public-safety-standards-training/","attorney":"George W. Kelly argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner., Karla H. Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.","caseName":"Johnson v. Department of Public Safety Standards & Training","caseNameFull":"Lance A. JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STANDARDS AND TRAINING","citation":["253 Or. App. 307","293 P.3d 228","2012 WL 5429461","2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7050925,"court":"Court of Appeals of Oregon","court_citation_string":"Or. Ct. App.","court_id":"orctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-11-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"901306; A147361","docket_id":64039261,"judge":"Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T12:22:56.543279Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T01:35:56.156735Z","score":{"bm25":49.143177}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6954322,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T09:35:40.513684Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T01:35:56.166656Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSCHUMAN, P. J.\nPetitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST) revoking his license as a private investigator. The order was based on a conclusion that petitioner, while working on behalf of a criminal defense attorney, interviewed crime victims without making certain disclosures mandated by Article I, section 42(l)(c), of the Oregon Constitution, as well as s","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6954322],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9353328/bryant-v-wake-forest-univ-baptist-med-ctr/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bryant v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9353328,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-02-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-138","docket_id":66670557,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:54:38.393457Z","date_created":"2022-12-20T14:16:38.741596Z","score":{"bm25":48.00123}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1155560,1203470,1210246,1234157,1258088,1269267,1269824,1340374,1357131,1377867,2507781,3652666,7397558],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=40764","id":9348800,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/02/15/bryant_v._wake_forest_univ._baptist_med._ctr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:35:59.139747Z","date_created":"2022-12-20T14:16:38.752931Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fc62df4bc31080703b970e5be4be1748d62370cf","snippet":"                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n                                     2022-NCCOA-89\n\n                                       No. COA21-138\n\n                                  Filed 15 February 2022\n\n     Forsyth County, No. 18 CVS 5491\n\n     KIMBERLY D. BRYANT, Plaintiff,\n\n                 v.\n\n     WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH CAROLINA\n     BAPTIST HOSPITAL, WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES, &\n     MEHMET TAMER YALCINKAYA, M.D., Defendants.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9348800],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"medical malpractice object left in body during surgery summary judgment was proper on claims for actual and constructive fraud because there was no evidence of deceptive intent or fiduciary relationship between physician and patient res ipsa loquitor did not apply because elements of both standard of care and breach required expert testimony summary judgment on medical malpractice claim was proper because four-year rather than ten-year statute of limitations applied because evidence was uncontroverted that object left in body was intended to be left in body permanently for purpose of medical treatment punitive damages claim failed where all other claims did not withstand summary judgment"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/889200/inquiry-concerning-complaint-of-judicial-standards-commission-v-leroy-not/","attorney":"","caseName":"Inquiry Concerning Complaint Of: Judicial Standards Commission v. Leroy Not Afraid","caseNameFull":"INQUIRY CONCERNING COMPLAINT OF: JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, Complainant, v. LEROY NOT AFRAID, Respondent","citation":["2010 MT 285","245 P.3d 1116","358 Mont. 532","2010 Mont. LEXIS 456"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":889200,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"PR 09-0639","docket_id":630131,"judge":"Cotter, Leaphart, Morris, Nelson, Wheat","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:04:44.685115Z","date_created":"2015-06-09T23:06:30.205497Z","score":{"bm25":47.861675}},"neutralCite":"2010 MT 285","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9512237,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T21:02:17.072547Z","date_created":"2023-08-06T22:12:34.971190Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*533OPINION AND ORDER\n¶1 Following its inquiry into the complaint filed against Leroy Not Afraid (Not Afraid) by appointed prosecuting attorney, Geoffrey R. Keller (Keller), the Judicial Standards Commission (JSC) filed its recommendation with this Court. The JSC recommends that Not Afraid be sanctioned for violating the Montana Cons","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9512238,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T21:02:17.058418Z","date_created":"2023-08-06T22:12:34.978794Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJUSTICE NELSON,\nconcurring in the result but dissenting from the reasoning.\n¶28 I agree with the Court that the complaint against Not Afraid must be dismissed, but I strongly disagree with the Court’s rationale.\nI. Jurisdiction\n|¶29 The most fundamental problem with this case is evident from its (caption: Inquiry Concerni","type":"concurrence-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,105807,108754,109720,110328,876068,876214,876240,876709,877111,877262,877398,877940,879777,881789,882648,882713,882825,883215,884629,884668,884787,886025,886114,886123,886303,886536,887287,887469,887809,888078,888212,888654,889527,1164141,1186533,1254428,1291854,1398568,3542767,3544088],"download_url":"http://searchcourts.mt.gov/getDocument?vid={25975C8F-3073-43B6-BF24-A630015D27DD}","id":889200,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/12/30/matter_of_leroy_not_afraid..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:27:55.110463Z","date_created":"2013-06-05T05:41:32.490386Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7b9c4833b1694c68877c2b6a58d9111bd7dfaf37","snippet":"\n245 P.3d 1116 (2010)\n2010 MT 285\nINQUIRY CONCERNING COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, Complainant,\nv.\nLeroy NOT AFRAID, Respondent.\nNo. PR 09-0639.\nSupreme Court of Montana.\nDecember 30, 2010.\n\n\n*1118 OPINION AND ORDER\n¶ 1 Following its inquiry into the complaint filed against Ler","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9512237,9512238,889200],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1678093/in-re-texas-ezpawn-fair-labor-standards-act-litigation/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Texas EZPawn Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation","caseNameFull":"In Re TEXAS EZPAWN FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT LITIGATION","citation":["633 F. Supp. 2d 395","2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53636","2008 WL 2513682"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":1678093,"court":"District Court, W.D. Texas","court_citation_string":"W.D. Tex.","court_id":"txwd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-06-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1:07-cv-00553-AWA","docket_id":1266647,"judge":"Andrew W. Austin","lexisCite":"2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53636","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T05:20:03.324477Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T15:25:14.178693Z","score":{"bm25":47.702335}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[23173,26080,26477,103704,103706,104034,111221,111620,111719,118241,118362,118450,131157,200756,499082,627399,686466,746443,748374,763094,1388869,1611959,2568433,2593153],"download_url":null,"id":1678093,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T10:58:37.571958Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:05:45.097375Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c89ef9019bc7fd9267ea3f6c095839c4c0653f32","snippet":"\n633 F.Supp.2d 395 (2008)\nIn re TEXAS EZPAWN FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT LITIGATION.\n1:07-cv-00553-AWA\nUnited States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.\nJune 18, 2008.\n\n\n*396 GENERAL ORDER\nANDREW W. AUSTIN, United States Magistrate Judge.\nBefore the Court are Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1678093],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6352997/bryant-v-wake-forest-univ-baptist-med-ctr/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bryant v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6352997,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-02-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-138","docket_id":63000818,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:16:01.868857Z","date_created":"2022-02-15T13:06:11.035784Z","score":{"bm25":47.36009}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=40764","id":6221703,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"bin/2022/02/15/bryant_v._wake_forest_univ._baptist_med._ctr..bin","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:59:58.996033Z","date_created":"2022-02-15T13:06:11.038216Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6fe8df88e7007383e8b5c53a501efce57497da80","snippet":"                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n                                     2022-NCCOA-89\n\n                                       No. COA21-138\n\n                                  Filed 15 February 2022\n\n     Forsyth County, No. 18 CVS 5491\n\n     KIMBERLY D. BRYANT, Plaintiff,\n\n                 v.\n\n     WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH CAROLINA\n     BAPTIST HOSPITAL, WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES, &\n     MEHMET TAMER YALCINKAYA, M.D., Defendants.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6221703],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"medical malpractice object left in body during surgery summary judgment was proper on claims for actual and constructive fraud because there was no evidence of deceptive intent or fiduciary relationship between physician and patient res ipsa loquitor did not apply because elements of both standard of care and breach required expert testimony summary judgment on medical malpractice claim was proper because four-year rather than ten-year statute of limitations applied because evidence was uncontroverted that object left in body was intended to be left in body permanently for purpose of medical treatment punitive damages claim failed where all other claims did not withstand summary judgment"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2230356/in-re-qwests-wholesale-service-quality-standards/","attorney":"Larry D. Espel, John M. Baker, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel, P.L.L.P., Jason D. Topp, Qwest Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant Qwest Corporation., Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and Minnesota Department of Commerce., Steven H. Alpert, Cassandra O. O’Hern, Assistant Attorneys General, St. Paul, MN, for Minnesota Public Utilities Commission., Gregory R. Merz, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Lesley J. Lehr, St. Paul, MN, for MCI, Inc., successor to WorldCom, Inc., Mark J. Ayotte, Thomas Erik Bailey, Briggs and Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for AT & T Communications of the Midwest, Inc., Dan M. Lipschultz, Michael J. Bradley, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, MN, for Encore Communications, L.L.C., Global Crossing Local Services, Inc., McLeodU-SA, Inc., New Edge Networks, Inc., NorthStar Access, L.L.C., Onvoy, Inc., Rythms Links, Inc., Time Warner Telecom of Minnesota L.L.C., and US Link, Inc., Virgina K. Zeller, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Minnesota Department of Commerce., W. Patrick Judge, Briggs and Morgan, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for Covad Communications Co., Karen L. Clauson, Eschelon Teleeon of Minnesota, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, for Es-chelon Telecom of Minnesota, Inc., Todd G. Hartman, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for Time Warner Telecom of Minnesota L.L.C.","caseName":"In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of QWEST’S WHOLESALE SERVICE QUALITY STANDARDS","citation":["702 N.W.2d 246","2005 Minn. LEXIS 488","2005 WL 1981570"],"citeCount":22,"cluster_id":2230356,"court":"Supreme Court of Minnesota","court_citation_string":"Minn.","court_id":"minn","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-08-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A03-1409","docket_id":2128458,"judge":"Page","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:55:03.092992Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T23:18:56.237575Z","score":{"bm25":47.038177}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9885053,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:15:30.730252Z","date_created":"2023-10-06T03:28:34.519307Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nCONCURRENCE & DISSENT\nI agree that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) lacks statutory *263authority to require an incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) to make self-executing payments to its competitors for failure to comply with wholesale service quality standards. But because the MPUC’s wholesale service quality standards f","type":"in-part-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[109628,110773,112766,112777,117918,118260,198617,730881,744536,766457,767871,779263,785238,785552,1240475,1270370,1578080,1699822,1723393,1788680,1856038,2376295,3510757],"download_url":null,"id":2230356,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:23:17.011551Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:43:43.415651Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1c23b34e1530cdcc136f9bb5f72b646deb0748a6","snippet":"\n702 N.W.2d 246 (2005)\nIn the Matter of QWEST'S WHOLESALE SERVICE QUALITY STANDARDS.\nNo. A03-1409.\nSupreme Court of Minnesota.\nAugust 18, 2005.\n*247 Larry D. Espel, John M. Baker, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel, P.L.L.P., Jason D. Topp, Qwest Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant Qwest Corporation.\nMike Hatch, Attorney Gener","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2230356,9885052,9885053],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3144896/helping-others-maintain-environmental-standards-v-aj-bos/","attorney":"","caseName":"Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards v. A.J. Bos","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3144896,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-12-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2-09-1283 & 2-10-0162 Cons. Rel","docket_id":3002488,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:57:26.517190Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T18:42:51.360398Z","score":{"bm25":46.814987}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1987695,2003432,2012227,2027287,2032493,2034239,2052637,2063659,2114599,2133610,2133846,2140769,2143038,2144159,2168595,2170408,2192212,2194549,2199977,2221615,2230109,2512974],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2010/2ndDistrict/December/2091283.pdf","id":3144896,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/12/22/helping_others_maintain_environmental_standards_v._a.j._bos.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:29:27.436340Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T18:05:14.346919Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"874d1b50f486dbe0e17236bcc6c9766b7ed11882","snippet":"                        Nos. 2-09-1283 & 2-10-0162 cons.  Filed: 12-22-10\n______________________________________________________________________________\n\n                                         IN THE\n\n                               APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS\n\n                              SECOND DISTRICT\n______________________________________________________________________________\n\nHELPING OTHERS MAINTAIN                ) Appeal from the Circuit Court\nENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS,               )","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3144896],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1788680/in-re-qwests-wholesale-service-quality-standards/","attorney":"Jason D. Topp and Larry D. Espel, John M. Baker, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Es-pel P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for relator Qwest Corporation., Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Steven H. Alpert, Cassandra Opperman O’Hern, Assistants Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission., Virginia K. Zeller, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent Minnesota Department of Commerce., Dan M. Lipschultz, Michael J. Bradley, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents McLeod USA, Inc., North-Star Access, LLC, Onvoy, Inc., U.S. Link, Inc., Encore Communications L.L.C., In-tegra Telecom of Minnesota, Inc., Global Crossing Local Services, Inc., New Edge Networks, Inc., Otter Tail Telecom, and VAL-AD Joint Venture, L.L.P. d/b/a 702 Communications., Gregory R. Merz, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Lesley J. Lehr, St. Paul, MN, for respondent WorldCom, Inc., Karen L. Clauson, Eschelon Telecom of Minnesota, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Eschelon Telecom of Minnesota, Inc., Steven H. Weigler, AT & T Law Department, Denver, CO; and Thomas E. Bailey, Mark J. Ayotte, Briggs & Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent AT & T Communications of the Midwest, Inc., W. Patrick Judge, Briggs & Morgan, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for respondent DIECA Communications, d/b/a Covad Communications Co., Rebecca McElfresh Liethen, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Time Warner.","caseName":"In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of QWEST’S WHOLESALE SERVICE QUALITY STANDARDS","citation":["678 N.W.2d 58","2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 354","2004 WL 772116"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":1788680,"court":"Court of Appeals of Minnesota","court_citation_string":"Minn. Ct. App.","court_id":"minnctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2004-04-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A03-1409","docket_id":1361590,"judge":"Randall, Harten, Minge","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T06:11:11.945696Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T16:08:53.370474Z","score":{"bm25":46.738697}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9683466,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:16:23.117666Z","date_created":"2023-08-24T13:29:20.186638Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION\nHARTEN, Judge.\nRespondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) issued an order imposing on relator Qwest Corporation, the incumbent local exchange carrier, benchmark service quality standards and an enforcement mechanism for those standards affecting wholesale transactions between Qwest and respondents competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs). Qwest unsuccessfully moved for reconsideration","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[111221,118260,134728,744536,769553,779263,1350648,1678032,1699350,1750155,1808196,1839862,1906168,1997584,2142846,2145939,2218070,2219183,3509587],"download_url":null,"id":1788680,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T12:15:34.685378Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:26:54.007343Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4ade0d6030e4b6912e6e1ad946e6181e9513168d","snippet":"\n678 N.W.2d 58 (2004)\nIn the Matter of QWEST'S WHOLESALE SERVICE QUALITY STANDARDS.\nNo. A03-1409.\nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota.\nApril 13, 2004.\n*60 Jason D. Topp and Larry D. Espel, John M. Baker, Jeanette M. Bazis, Greene Espel P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for relator Qwest Corporation.\nMike Hatch, Attorney General, Steven H. Alper","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1788680,9683466,9683467],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1049509/bee-deselm-v-tennessee-peace-officers-standards-an/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bee Deselm v. Tennessee Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":1049509,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-10-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M2009-01525-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":1203253,"judge":"Judge Holly M. Kirby","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:28:44.275345Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T14:59:34.821918Z","score":{"bm25":45.166477}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8276,"cites":[118217,1055696,1057924,1058043,1058772,1060968,1400410,1463845,1503571,1506501,1532881,1560566,1657265,1666473,1667158,1716729,1784073,1791973,1861109,2438670],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/OPINIONS/TCA/PDF/104/Bee%20Deselm%20v%20TN%20POST%20Commission%20opn.pdf","id":1049509,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/10/08/bee_deselm_v._tennessee_peace_officers_standards_and_training_commission.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:20:43.461789Z","date_created":"2013-10-08T19:51:11.968586Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6e51ceeb108f6862047db298df08a4a62d60e55c","snippet":"                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                             AT NASHVILLE\n                                    May 26, 2010 Session\n\n      BEE DESELM, CARL SEIDER, JAMES GRAY, DONNA BRIAN,\n          MIKE WHALEN, SUSAN JERKINS, GERALD BONE,\n      RICHARD HELD, ALBERT AKERMAN, MARGO AKERMAN,\n         ROBERT CUNNINGHAM, AND MILLIE CUNNINGHAM\n                              v.\n      TENNESSEE PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS AND TRAINING\n             COMMISSION AND TIMOTHY HUTCHISON\n\n    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1049509],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2545716/state-judicial-standards-comn-v-espinosa/","attorney":"","caseName":"STATE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COM'N v. Espinosa","caseNameFull":"","citation":["73 P.3d 197","134 N.M. 59"],"citeCount":17,"cluster_id":2545716,"court":"New Mexico Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.M.","court_id":"nm","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"28,040","docket_id":2409517,"judge":"Maes","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:48:57.486686Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:54:49.065094Z","score":{"bm25":43.920853}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5154,"cites":[85272,105739,112173,1123526,1128290,1143137,1161041,1196727,1213505,1297060,1386909,1386996,1387131,1436353,1441686,2064810,2113686,2544824,2621560,3572498,3573224],"download_url":null,"id":2545716,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:38:44.278385Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:18:32.210861Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"09e05918baba1e6c44c84fc7baaec07987ffe72a","snippet":"\n73 P.3d 197 (2003)\n134 N.M. 59\n2003-NMSC-017\nSTATE of New Mexico, ex rel., NEW MEXICO JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION and Commissioners, Douglas W. Turner, Chair, Lay Member, Teresa G. Chaparro, Vice-Chair, Lay Member, Hon. Frank H. Allen, District Judge Member, Hon. Frank K. Wilson, District Judge Member, Hon. Buddy Hall, Magistrate Judge Member, Kathleen M. Brandt, Esq., Attorney Member, Mark A. Filosa, Esq","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2545716],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2089498/alspaugh-v-commission-on-law-enforcement-standards/","attorney":"Gabrian & Parks, PC. (by Dennis L. Gabrian), for the plaintiffs., Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, and Kristin M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.","caseName":"Alspaugh v. Commission on Law Enforcement Standards","caseNameFull":"Alspaugh v. Commission on Law Enforcement Standards","citation":["634 N.W.2d 161","246 Mich. App. 547"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":2089498,"court":"Michigan Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mich. Ct. App.","court_id":"michctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2001-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket 220156","docket_id":1942953,"judge":"Hood, Doctoroff, Kelly","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:45:26.326441Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T20:41:07.993053Z","score":{"bm25":43.43282}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111827,487442,495503,745421,764901,1244486,1302460,1440277,1470125,1678900,1693674,1830672,1980034,2016314,2037438,2051562,2211869,2450288],"download_url":null,"id":2089498,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:06:29.470907Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:17:33.464391Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fbee658b4e86fb46787a1d4a46ffa2c748821c07","snippet":"\n634 N.W.2d 161 (2001)\n246 Mich. App. 547\nAaron Walter ALSPAUGH and Raymond Kujawa, Plaintiffs-Appellees,\nv.\nCOMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS, f/k/a Michigan Law Enforcement Officers Training Council, Defendants-Appellants.\nDocket No. 220156.\nCourt of Appeals of Michigan.\nSubmitted February 5, 2001, at Detroit.\nDecided June 29, 200","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7545,7564],"panel_names":["Martin M. Doctoroff","Kirsten F. Kelly"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2089498],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}