{"count":95322,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yMS44NDA0MDgmcz01MjgxNzY4JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMDkmcD0y&q=INCLUSION+OF+ALL+ESSENTIAL+FACTS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236960/assertion-of-executive-privilege-over-deliberative-materials-regarding/","attorney":"","caseName":"Assertion of Executive Privilege Over Deliberative Materials Regarding Inclusion of Citizenship Question on 2020 Census Questionnaire","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236960,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601424,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:16.026735Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:40.635834Z","score":{"bm25":34.494797}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[100996,109101,419805,7250922,9419915,9427661,9428127],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1350186/download","id":6103842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/06/11/assertion_of_executive_privilege_over_deliberative_materials_regarding.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:29:49.417854Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:40.638307Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c960dc3be68cddcb19220d85769fd8ce136ed562","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n\n        Assertion of Executive Privilege Over Deliberative\n          Materials Regarding Inclusion of Citizenship\n             Question on 2020 Census Questionnaire\nThe President may assert executive privilege over “priority documents” relating to the\n  Secretary of Commerce’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 de-\n  cennial census questionnaire that the House Committee on Oversight and Reform has\n  demanded as responsive to its subpoenas. The “priority docum","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103842],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The President may assert executive privilege over \"priority documents\" relating to the Secretary of Commerce's decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire that the House Committee on Oversight and Reform has demanded as responsive to its subpoenas. The \"priority documents\" all involve pre-decisional deliberative material, attorney-client communications, or attorney work product. The President may make a protective assertion of executive privilege over the remaining subpoenaed documents to give time for the Departments of Commerce and Justice to determine whether any remaining documents may be subject to privilege."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10931833/national-digital-inclusion-alliance-v-trump/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Digital Inclusion Alliance v. Trump","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10931833,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":"FD","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-07-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2025-3606","docket_id":73181402,"judge":"Judge John D. Bates","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-15T21:02:47.423525Z","date_created":"2026-07-15T21:02:47.013376Z","score":{"bm25":32.1626}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":201,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025cv3606-60","id":11399374,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/07/15/national_digital_inclusion_alliance_v._trump.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-07-15T21:31:43.895310Z","date_created":"2026-07-15T21:02:47.226719Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7d2b7ef2c7e57f5630083ed940f9038584d3622c","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n\nNATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION\nALLIANCE,\n\n        Plaintiff,\n\n        v.                                               Civil Action No. 25-3606 (JDB)\n\nDONALD TRUMP et al.,\n\n        Defendants.\n\n\n                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n       The National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) challenges the President’s dissolution of\n\nthe Digital Equity Act’s Competitive G","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11399374],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5344295/loveland-essential-group-llc-v-grommon-farms-inc/","attorney":"Cline Williams Wright Johnson & Oldfa-ther, LLP., Tracy A. Oldemeyer, Fort Collins, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Erik G. Fischer, P.C., Erik G. Fischer, Fort Collins, Colorado, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.","caseName":"Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.","caseNameFull":"LOVELAND ESSENTIAL GROUP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. GROMMON FARMS, INC., a Colorado corporation Gary Grommon and Connie Grommon","citation":["318 P.3d 6","2012 COA 22","2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 170","2012 WL 311662"],"citeCount":28,"cluster_id":5344295,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-02-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 11CA0722","docket_id":61691965,"judge":"Carparelli, Carparellli, Furman, Jones","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:47:32.867888Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:05:47.649847Z","score":{"bm25":31.445059}},"neutralCite":"2012 COA 22","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":5176970,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T00:22:03.854592Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:05:47.674838Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOpinion by\nJudge J. JONES.\n{1 This appeal concerns the second lawsuit between plaintiff, Loveland Essential Group, LLC (Buyer), and defendants, Grom-mon Farms, Inc., Gary Grommon, and Connie Grommon (collectively, Seller), arising from Buyer's purchase of commercial real property and assets from Seller. Buyer asserts that its claims in this case arose after it filed the first lawsuit but before there was a final ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5176970,5176971],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9424202/westlands-water-dist-v-all-persons-interested/","attorney":"","caseName":"Westlands Water Dist. v. All Persons Interested","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9424202,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-09-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"F083632","docket_id":67672671,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:12:47.333475Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T20:03:55.554206Z","score":{"bm25":28.667751}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[208081,692032,799987,822905,1160900,2259755,5452486,5452490,7248386,8412500,9560400],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/F083632.PDF","id":9830283,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/09/01/westlands_water_dist._v._all_persons_interested.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:00:44.951776Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T20:03:55.560739Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d53ef24c7545faaf2ef710cebe265273e0d61d43","snippet":"Filed 8/7/23; Modified and Certified for Pub. 9/1/23 (order attached)\n\n\n\n\n          IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                                   FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n\n WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT,\n                                                                            F083632 & F084202\n          Plaintiff and Appellant,\n                                                                        (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG03887)\n                   v.\n\n ALL PERSONS INTERESTED","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9830283],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7700216/all-american-healthcare-llc-v-dichiara/","attorney":"","caseName":"All American Healthcare, L.L.C. v. Dichiara","caseNameFull":"ALL AMERICAN HEALTHCARE, L.L.C. and Nelson J. Curtis, III, D.C. v. Benjamin DICHIARA, D.C.","citation":["263 So. 3d 922"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7700216,"court":"Louisiana Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"La. Ct. App.","court_id":"lactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-12-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. 18-CA-432","docket_id":64703388,"judge":"Johnson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:21:02.301441Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T19:57:19.618853Z","score":{"bm25":27.70871}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7635628,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:08:18.809457Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T19:57:19.626119Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJOHNSON, J.\nPlaintiffs/Appellants, All American Healthcare, L.L.C. and Nelson J. Curtis, III, D.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as \"All American\"), appeal the granting of a partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, Benjamin Dichiara, D.C., and dismissal of their claims for breach of the employee non-solicitation agreement with prejudice from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division \"A\". For the f","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7635628],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10439006/septa-v-f-anderson-all-that-philly-jazz-oor/","attorney":"","caseName":"SEPTA v. F. Anderson & All That Philly Jazz (OOR)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10439006,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-05-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"48 C.D. 2024","docket_id":70027180,"judge":"McCullough","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-05-01T14:31:00.375828Z","date_created":"2025-05-01T14:30:32.063965Z","score":{"bm25":27.391588}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8212,"cites":[1890227,2077166,2299090,3173385,4089787,4126628,4356777,4964734,4965279,4965926,4966818,4967079,4967556,4967827,4967863,4969787,4969830,4970664],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/48CD24_5-1-25.pdf","id":10905594,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/05/01/septa_v._f._anderson__all_that_philly_jazz_oor.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:32:29.715892Z","date_created":"2025-05-01T14:30:32.077215Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"66581694cff58541a84cb32707875b865f32e65e","snippet":"                 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\nSoutheastern Pennsylvania                       :\nTransportation Authority,                       :\n                  Petitioner                    :\n           v.                                   :   No. 48 C.D. 2024\n                                                :\nFaye Anderson and All That                      :   Submitted: March 4, 2025\nPhilly Jazz (Office of                          :\nOpen Records),                              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10905594],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7700217/all-american-healthcare-llc-v-dichiara/","attorney":"","caseName":"All American Healthcare, L.L.C. v. Dichiara","caseNameFull":"ALL AMERICAN HEALTHCARE, L.L.C. and Nelson J. Curtis, III, D.C. v. Benjamin DICHIARA, D.C.","citation":["263 So. 3d 922"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7700217,"court":"Louisiana Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"La. Ct. App.","court_id":"lactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-12-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. 18-CA-432","docket_id":64703389,"judge":"Johnson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:21:02.323292Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T19:57:19.629321Z","score":{"bm25":27.250683}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7635629,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T12:58:13.351408Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T19:57:19.636026Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJOHNSON, J.\nPlaintiffs/Appellants, All American Healthcare, L.L.C. and Nelson J. Curtis, III, D.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as \"All American\"), appeal the granting of a partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, Benjamin Dichiara, D.C., and dismissal of their claims for breach of the employee non-solicitation agreement with prejudice from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division \"A\". For the f","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7635629],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6475156/howard-michael-caplan-v-all-american-auto-collision-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Howard Michael Caplan v. All American Auto Collision, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["36 F.4th 1083"],"citeCount":16,"cluster_id":6475156,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-06-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-14099","docket_id":63363068,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:49:55.958083Z","date_created":"2022-06-06T17:01:32.654330Z","score":{"bm25":26.46048}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[76205,76269,77081,78012,78103,377993,416759,436335,499824,600834,653729,658201,800017,1037772,1498974,2648815,4200162,4378101,6215821,8891557,8900097,8916397,9416030,9420123,9429188,9429529,9429949],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201914099.pdf","id":6347267,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/06/06/howard_michael_caplan_v._all_american_auto_collision_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T05:47:35.356784Z","date_created":"2022-06-06T17:01:32.662735Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"442227b5365c120214bcf8cb3e95b723d481bca0","snippet":"USCA11 Case: 19-14099    Date Filed: 06/06/2022   Page: 1 of 21\n\n\n\n\n                                            [PUBLISH]\n                          In the\n         United States Court of Appeals\n               For the Eleventh Circuit\n\n                 ____________________\n\n                        No. 19-14099\n                 ____________________\n\nHOWARD MICHAEL CAPLAN,\n                                            Plaintiff-Appellant,\nversus\nALL AMERICAN AUTO COLLISION, INC.,\na Florida Profit Co","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6347267],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6659251/all-am-oilfield-llc-v-cook-inlet-energy-llc/","attorney":"Michael A. Grisham, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Anchorage, for All American Oilfield. Cabot Christianson, Law Offices of Cabot Christianson, Anchorage, for Carol Inman., Elena Romerdahl, Perkins Coie LLP, Anchorage, and David A. Zdunkewicz, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston, Texas, for Cook Inlet Energy, LLC., Kevin G. Clarkson, Brena, Bell & Clarkson, P.C., Anchorage, and Aaron M. Guerrero and Carolyn Carollo, Snow Spence Green LLP, Houston, Texas, for Charles Gebhardt, Trustee., Laura Fox, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Jahna Lindemuth, Attorney General, Juneau, for Amicus Curiae State of Alaska.","caseName":"All Am. Oilfield, LLC v. Cook Inlet Energy, LLC","caseNameFull":"ALL AMERICAN OILFIELD, LLC, and v. COOK INLET ENERGY, LLC, and In re: Cook Inlet Energy, LLC, Debtor, Charles Gebhardt, Trustee for the Miller Energy Resources Creditors' Liquidation Trust v. Carol Inman, d/b/a Starichkof Enterprises","citation":["446 P.3d 767"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6659251,"court":"Alaska Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Alaska","court_id":"alaska","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-08-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Supreme Court Nos. S-16974/17043 (Consolidated)","docket_id":63637727,"judge":"Bolger, Carney, Maassen, Stowers, Winfree","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:39:09.011160Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T21:50:08.756726Z","score":{"bm25":25.78324}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6536714,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T07:29:53.826529Z","date_created":"2022-07-19T21:50:08.768397Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWINFREE, Justice.\nI. INTRODUCTION\nIn 1910 the United States Congress passed Alaska's first mineral dump lien statute, granting laborers a lien against a \"dump or mass\" of hard-rock minerals for their work creating the dump. After piecemeal revisions, Alaska's 1933 territorial legislature amended the dump lien statute to include oil and gas development, creating a framework for technological advanc","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6536714],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8526739/in-re-all-island-truck-leasing-corp/","attorney":"Anthony F. Giuliano, Pryor & Mandelup, Westbury, NY, Peter W. Ito, Polsinelli Shughart P.C., Denver, CO, for Debtor.","caseName":"In re All Island Truck Leasing Corp.","caseNameFull":"IN RE: ALL ISLAND TRUCK LEASING CORP., Debtor","citation":["546 B.R. 522","76 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 379","2016 Bankr. LEXIS 634","62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 79","2016 WL 821174"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":8526739,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"Bankr. E.D.N.Y.","court_id":"nyeb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 8-09-77670-reg","docket_id":65788420,"judge":"Grossman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:50:25.575439Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:16.670235Z","score":{"bm25":25.143824}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[466461,677033,774289,1524965,1820815,1834426,1848186,1862125,1876490,1879472,1880825,1883045,1897998,1936712,1949200,1961422,1992661,2013183,2018092,2686372,8496106,8497506],"download_url":null,"id":8499222,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:53:49.492422Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:45:16.676783Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMEMORANDUM DECISION\n\nRobert E. Grossman, United States Bankruptcy Judge\nBefore the Court are the final applications pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330 for compensation for the Chapter 7 Trustee, Kenneth Kirschenbaum (the “Trustee”) and counsel for the Trustee, Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C. (“K & K”) as well as other professionals retained by the Trustee in the case of All Island Tr","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8499222],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9395656/american-national-insurance-company-v-bertha-arce-individually-and-as/","attorney":"","caseName":"American National Insurance Company v. Bertha Arce, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9395656,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-0843","docket_id":67297871,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:05:19.249356Z","date_created":"2023-04-30T14:07:53.937835Z","score":{"bm25":25.012714}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[894821,1691196,2277356,2427569,2432680,2446797,2450686,2463262,3916885,3935883,3943798,3949908,3962353,3965447,3980048,4123447,4264089,4362305,4897936,4998484,5001836,5006378,5009950,5125047,7252336,9654929,9662054,9810982,9811031,9836363],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=8641&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5csc%5cOpinion","id":9391132,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/04/28/american_national_insurance_company_v._bertha_arce_individually_and_as_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T16:20:23.423830Z","date_created":"2023-04-30T14:07:53.939568Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7d5e536e06a0b7850c4177abccdab5e043656f16","snippet":"         Supreme Court of Texas\n                          ══════════\n                           No. 21-0843\n                          ══════════\n\n             American National Insurance Company,\n                             Petitioner,\n\n                                  v.\n\n                     Bertha Arce, Individually\n     and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated,\n                            Respondent\n\n   ═══════════════════════════════════════\n               On Petition for Re","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9391132],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2657053/william-j-waters-v-all-phase-const/","attorney":"James C. Arnold, Petersen Parkinson & Arnold PLLC, Idaho Falls, argued for appellant., Steven R. Fuller, Fuller & Fuller PLLC, Preston, argued for respondents.","caseName":"William J. Waters v. All Phase Const.","caseNameFull":"William J. WATERS, Claimant-Appellant, v. ALL PHASE CONSTRUCTION, Employer, and State Insurance Fund, Surety, Defendants-Respondents","citation":["156 Idaho 259","322 P.3d 992","2014 Ida. LEXIS 84"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":2657053,"court":"Idaho Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Idaho","court_id":"idaho","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-03-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"39556-2012","docket_id":152355,"judge":"Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:38:52.634518Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T07:04:00.150914Z","score":{"bm25":24.622454}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9799063,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:51:24.415632Z","date_created":"2023-08-31T05:44:53.883484Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJ. JONES, Justice,\ndissenting.\nI dissent from the Court’s opinion because the Commission’s order is not supported by substantial evidence. “[I]f the findings of the Commission are not supported by substantial, competent evidence, they are not *264binding or conclusive.... In such instances, the findings of ","type":"dissent"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[874037,874105,874177,1135322,1152370,1347916,1431520,2583916,2599158,2622613,3411678,3511801,3544062],"download_url":"http://www.isc.idaho.gov/opinions/39556.pdf","id":2657053,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/03/18/william_j._waters_v._all_phase_const..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:41:12.632785Z","date_created":"2014-03-18T18:51:22.932008Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"36c866e996231ac946d65df874f76a12a32e67c4","snippet":"                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO\n\n                                    Docket No. 39556-2012\n\nWILLIAM J. WATERS,                                )\n                                                  )          Pocatello, May 2013 Term\n       Claimant-Appellant,                        )\n                                                  )          2014 Opinion No. 27\nv.                                                )\n                                                  )      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2657053,9799062,9799063],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5063516/bertha-arce-individually-and-as-representative-of-all-others-similarly/","attorney":"","caseName":"Bertha Arce, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. American National Insurance Company","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5063516,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Amarillo","court_id":"txctapp7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-08-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-19-00362-CV","docket_id":60313580,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:45:45.347400Z","date_created":"2021-08-26T08:25:08.026347Z","score":{"bm25":24.467764}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1588054,2282289,2396058,2547580,5113362],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=38683&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa07%5cOpinion","id":4878897,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/08/24/bertha_arce_individually_and_as_representative_of_all_others_similarly.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:45:45.339017Z","date_created":"2021-08-26T08:25:08.028202Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1e09d3da95ce6f61c800edfcece1ac04ca709d5a","snippet":"                                   In The\n                              Court of Appeals\n                     Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo\n                             ________________________\n\n                                  No. 07-19-00362-CV\n                             ________________________\n\n            BERTHA ARCE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE\n              OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT\n\n                                              V.\n\n                AMER","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4878897],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2800495/tug-valley-pharmacy-llc-v-all-below/","attorney":"Michael M. Fisher, Esq., Elizabeth S. Cimino, Esq., Jackson Kelly PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC, Samuel Randolph Ballengee, and, B & K Pharmacies, Inc., d/b/a Family, Pharmacy., David F. Nelson, Esq., Hendrickson & Long, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Strosnider Drug Store, Inc. d/b/a, Sav-Rite Pharmacy., Cecil C. Varney, Esq., Williamson, West Virginia, for Diane Shafer, M.D., James M. Cagle, Esq., Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.","caseName":"Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC v. All Below","caseNameFull":"TUG VALLEY PHARMACY, LLC; B & K Pharmacies, Inc. D/B/A Family Pharmacy; Strosnider Drug Store, Inc. D/B/A Sav-Rite Pharmacy; And Dr. Diane Shafer Defendants Below, Petitioners v. ALL PLAINTIFFS BELOW IN MINGO COUNTY Civil Action Nos. 10-C-251, 11-C-332, 12-C-38, 10-C-252, 10-C-319, 12-C-39, 12-C-35, and 11-C-370, Plaintiffs Below, Respondents","citation":["235 W. Va. 283","773 S.E.2d 627","2015 W. Va. LEXIS 673"],"citeCount":27,"cluster_id":2800495,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-05-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14-0144","docket_id":2656618,"judge":"Workman, Benjamin, Ketchum, Loughry","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:51:11.582555Z","date_created":"2015-05-13T20:07:45.760516Z","score":{"bm25":24.405123}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9807310,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:34:57.683022Z","date_created":"2023-08-31T19:58:59.088468Z"},"ordering_key":4,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBENJAMIN, Justice,\nconcurring:\n(Filed May 28, .2015)\nBad cases can make bad law. This is a bad case. According to the parties, the plaintiffs are bad people and the defendants are bad people. Plaintiffs say defendants are “pill mills.” Indeed, many have been prosecuted. Defendants say plaintiffs are common addicts who want to avoid self-responsibility, who engage in illegal conduct, and wh","type":"concurrence-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9807307,9807308,9807309,9807310,2800495],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Certified Question","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/817725/all-tools-inc-v-united-states/","attorney":"Peter S. Herrick, P.A. (Peter S. Herrick), for plaintiff., Tony West, Assistant Attorney General; Barbara S. Williams, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Coinmericial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, (Edward F. Kenny); Office of Assistant Chief Counsel for Import Administration, International Trade Litigation United States Customs and Border Protection (Chi. S. Choy), of counsel, for defendant.","caseName":"All Tools, Inc. v. United States","caseNameFull":"All Tools, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant","citation":["2010 CIT 114","34 Ct. Int'l Trade 1318"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":817725,"court":"United States Court of International Trade","court_citation_string":"Ct. Intl. Trade","court_id":"cit","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-10-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court 07-00237","docket_id":881068,"judge":"Eaton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:38:17.405023Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T12:53:01.559192Z","score":{"bm25":24.330381}},"neutralCite":"2010 CIT 114","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[102656,793853,818174,818552,818667,818734,818970,819014,819427,1569841],"download_url":"http://www.cit.uscourts.gov/SlipOpinions/Slip_op10/10-114.pdf","id":817725,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/10/05/all_tools_inc._v._united_states.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T15:35:33.211383Z","date_created":"2013-02-01T01:57:24.218964Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ed1e8c00c32dbc29a6cd0e3e0afdc8d0c291ae7b","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  EATON, Judge;\n \n\n  This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on a claimed lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. By its motion, defendant alleges that plaintiff, All Tools, Inc. (“All Tools”), failed to file timely its summons pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2636(a)(1) (2006), and therefore failed to establish jurisdiction b","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[817725],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10283749/in-the-matter-of-the-verified-petition-for-the-proposed-creation-of-a-pk-12/","attorney":"","caseName":"In the Matter of the Verified Petition for the Proposed Creation of a Pk-12 All-Purpose Regional School District by the Borough of Seabright, Etc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10283749,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A-0716-23","docket_id":69414181,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-26T15:08:07.622128Z","date_created":"2024-11-26T15:08:07.564205Z","score":{"bm25":24.046059}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1560404,1896650,1921930,1931082,1954767,1982733,2090168,2108074,2324375,2324591,2554165,2676802,2763431,8227398],"download_url":"https://www.njcourts.gov/system/files/court-opinions/2024/a0716-23.pdf","id":10750337,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/26/in_the_matter_of_the_verified_petition_for_the_proposed_creation_of_a_pk-12.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:53:17.220719Z","date_created":"2024-11-26T15:08:07.566280Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ccb15faeec28f80341ef24a70784114e85b7f79c","snippet":"             NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE\n            APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION\n\n                                SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY\n                                APPELLATE DIVISION\n                                DOCKET NO. A-0716-23\n\nI/M/O THE VERIFIED PETITION\nFOR THE PROPOSED\nCREATION OF A PK-12 ALL-\nPURPOSE REGIONAL SCHOOL\nDISTRICT BY THE BOROUGH\nOF SEA BRIGHT, BOROUGH OF            APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION\n\nHIGHLANDS, BOROUGH OF                      November 26, 2024","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10750337],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1665340/board-of-directors-v-all-taxpayers/","attorney":"","caseName":"Board of Directors v. All Taxpayers","caseNameFull":"","citation":["938 So. 2d 11","2006 WL 2548480"],"citeCount":118,"cluster_id":1665340,"court":"Supreme Court of Louisiana","court_citation_string":"La.","court_id":"la","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-09-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2005-C-2298","docket_id":1253995,"judge":"Kimball","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-05-23T01:33:27.886745Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T15:19:12.325999Z","score":{"bm25":23.447044}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4585,"cites":[1099219,1113660,1862807],"download_url":null,"id":1665340,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T10:49:27.543205Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:03:58.402968Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"38bb8101c48e99f270dd1fe091f7c8eaea3d5580","snippet":"\n938 So.2d 11 (2006)\nThe BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF the INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF the CITY OF GONZALES, LOUISIANA, INC.\nv.\nALL TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS, CITIZENS OF the CITY OF GONZALES, State of Louisiana and of the Gonzales Economic Development District Number 1 and Non-Residents Owning Property or Subject to Taxation in Said City or District, and All Other Persons Interested in or Affected in Any Way by the Issuance of Not to Exceed $49,875,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1665340],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8730007/all-energy-corp-v-energetix-llc/","attorney":"J. Mark Brewer, Sondra Jones, Jurica Brewer & Pritchard, P.C., Houston, TX, Jonathan M. Gallagher, Sean P. Moore, Brian P. Rickert, Brown Winick Graves Gross Baskerville & Schoenebaum PLC, John David Hartung, Bradley Philip Schroeder, Hartung & Schroeder, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff., Sarah Elizabeth Crane, Joseph A. Happe, Stanley J. Thompson, Davis Brown Koehn Shors & Roberts PC, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant.","caseName":"All Energy Corp. v. Energetix, LLC","caseNameFull":"ALL ENERGY CORPORATION v. ENERGETIX, LLC Energetix Holdings II, LLC and Mitch Miller","citation":["985 F. Supp. 2d 974","2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189576","2012 WL 9516125"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":8730007,"court":"District Court, S.D. Iowa","court_citation_string":"S.D. Iowa","court_id":"iasd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-11-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 4:11-CV-00617-JEG","docket_id":65995931,"judge":"Gritzner","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189576","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:12:43.975870Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T07:24:13.163781Z","score":{"bm25":23.427351}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8713206,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T03:59:36.371864Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T07:24:13.171205Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER\nJAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge.\nNow before the Court are Motions to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim and a Motion to Strike brought by Defendants Energetix Holdings II, LLC (Holdings), and Mitch Miller (Miller). Plaintiff All Energy Corporation f/k/a All Fuels and Energy Company (All Energy) resists. No party has requested a hearing, and the Court finds that n","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8713206],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2068619/regis-insurance-v-all-american-rathskeller-inc/","attorney":"Miles A. Kirshner, Pittsburgh, for appellant., Robert C. Rayman, State College, for All American, Rosengrant and Haughton, appellees.","caseName":"Regis Insurance v. All American Rathskeller, Inc.","caseNameFull":"REGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant v. ALL AMERICAN RATHSKELLER, INC.; Jason, Ryan, Chris, Curtis Rosengrant; Colin Haughton, Grace Jiminez, Admistratrix of the Estate of Salvadore Peter Serrano, and Brooke E. Morgan, Appellees","citation":["976 A.2d 1157","2009 Pa. Super. 99","2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 998","2009 WL 1483504"],"citeCount":46,"cluster_id":2068619,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-05-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"773 MDA 2007","docket_id":1913019,"judge":"Elliott, Donohue, Popovich","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:34:42.038875Z","date_created":"2015-12-18T23:45:42.125815Z","score":{"bm25":21.903116}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[454678,1478486,1483233,1508474,1888958,1891235,1909067,1922132,1922212,1934926,1942376,1969561,1969663,1973725,2067091,2102909,2166551,2247346,2260322,2287406,2338702,2366379,2390885,2390944,2403534,2404638,2415596,2483847],"download_url":null,"id":2068619,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T16:52:21.970260Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:13:59.760395Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cc9fc303f68688af6b73cbf3bb6b97eed167ac64","snippet":"\n976 A.2d 1157 (2009)\nREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant\nv.\nALL AMERICAN RATHSKELLER, INC.; Jason, Ryan, Chris, Curtis Rosengrant; Colin Haughton, Grace Jiminez, Admistratrix of the Estate of Salvadore Peter Serrano, and Brooke E. Morgan, Appellees.\nNo. 773 MDA 2007\nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania.\nArgued February 27, 2008.\nFiled May 28, 2009.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8227,8229,8244],"panel_names":["Christine L. Donohue","Kate Ford Elliott","Zoran Popovich"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2068619],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5281768/all-american-siding-windows-inc-v-bank-of-america-national-assn/","attorney":"Craig P. Henderson, William L. Wolf, PC, Dallas, for appellants., Tricia R. DeLeon, Lauren Brown, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, Dallas, for ap-pellee.","caseName":"All American Siding & Windows, Inc. v. Bank of America, National Ass'n","caseNameFull":"ALL AMERICAN SIDING & WINDOWS, INC., and EagleOne Financial, Inc. v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION","citation":["367 S.W.3d 490","77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 388","2012 WL 1366568","2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3118"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":5281768,"court":"Court of Appeals of Texas","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.","court_id":"texapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-04-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 06-11-00104-CV","docket_id":60614786,"judge":"Carter, Morriss, Moseley","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:31:11.198061Z","date_created":"2021-10-02T13:15:44.573011Z","score":{"bm25":21.840408}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[895175,1353594,1380742,1404975,1449946,1579192,1579264,1580915,1586891,1587129,1638189,1652086,1723118,1752503,1876006,2003292,2335960,2340315,3089614,9513162,9608896,9609220,9646213,9659868,9682489,9765410,9770758,9779471],"download_url":null,"id":5109746,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T23:34:47.807489Z","date_created":"2021-10-02T13:15:44.590127Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION\nOpinion by Justice CARTER.\nAll American Siding & Windows, Inc. (AAS), and its affiliated company Ea-gleOne Financial, Inc. (EagleOne), appeal a summary judgment entered1 in favor of Bank of America, N.A. (Bank). AAS and EagleOne argue that the trial court erred in: (1) overruling the objections to the affidavit of corporate representative Ryan Evans in support of t","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5109746],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}