{"count":3434,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yMy42NTg3JnM9OTUwODcxMyZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTA5LTI3JnA9Mg%3D%3D&q=IMPEACHMENT+OF+ATTESTING+WITNESSES+EXECUTION+AND+ATTESTATION+OF+WILLS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10838267/julie-muth-goodman-v-jason-nemes-in-his-official-capacity-as-chair-of-the/","attorney":"","caseName":"Julie Muth Goodman v. Jason Nemes, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the House of Representatives Impeachment Committee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10838267,"court":"Kentucky Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ky.","court_id":"ky","court_jurisdiction":"S","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-04-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2026-SC-0124","docket_id":73151035,"judge":"Lambert","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-06T18:06:19.800388Z","date_created":"2026-04-06T18:06:19.644382Z","score":{"bm25":37.08991}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4526,"cites":[84759,84935,95854,109380,1377672,1686587,1908820,2127431,2426705,2446605,2465018,3442641,3443817,3446593,3449678,3951397,5014568,5062054,5063007,5112905,5115398,5283039,5283672,6420866,7129095,7130267,7132639,7133133,7140751,7146240,7148852,7379834,8221228,8221236,8221298,8588156,8588182,9420759,9422369,9423382,9424080,9425486,9432714,9434585,9460437,9655213,9668951,9771687],"download_url":"https://appellatepublic.kycourts.net/api/api/v1/publicaccessdocuments/6ce15e3bf08986dc00523cf2685082b2db948b2e19fcc2b98a4bcfd34dc7d029/download","id":11305607,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/04/06/julie_muth_goodman_v._jason_nemes_in_his_official_capacity_as_chair_of_the.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-06T18:06:53.545474Z","date_created":"2026-04-06T18:06:19.705839Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"027e6ac7fd43109cc4f71f85c6d07ca70a524c34","snippet":"                                  SPECIAL RENDITION: APRIL 6, 2026\n                                                TO BE PUBLISHED\n\n\n           Supreme Court of Kentucky\n                         2026-SC-0122-I\n\nJULIE MUTH GOODMAN                                        MOVANT\n\n\n\n               ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS\nV.                      NO. 2026-CA-0321\n             FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT NO. 26-CI-00272\n\n\n\nJASON NEMES, IN HIS OFFICIAL                          RESPONDENTS\nCAPACITY AS ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11305607],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10681685/nelson-steve-marteney-v-agnes-nuzum-murphy-administratrix-of-the-estate/","attorney":"","caseName":"Nelson Steve Marteney v. Agnes Nuzum Murphy, Administratrix of the Estate of Ervin Severn McVicker","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10681685,"court":"Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia","court_citation_string":"","court_id":"wvactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-ica-59","docket_id":71498300,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-30T14:21:50.620159Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T14:21:50.546366Z","score":{"bm25":31.559227}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1040643,1327873,1386511],"download_url":"https://www.courtswv.gov/sites/default/pubfilesmnt/2025-09/25-ICA-59%20_MD.pdf","id":11148272,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/09/30/nelson_steve_marteney_v._agnes_nuzum_murphy_administratrix_of_the_estate.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:28:21.577319Z","date_created":"2025-09-30T14:21:50.549916Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"487ae6f18075b92a5e41cc8a3ed16eb892e6b764","snippet":"       IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA\n                                                                               FILED\nNELSON STEVE MARTENEY,                                                   September 30, 2025\nPlaintiff Below, Petitioner                                             ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK\n                                                                         INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11148272],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Probate","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4636029/board-of-professional-responsibility-of-the-supreme-court-of-tennessee-v/","attorney":"\n  Linn Guerrero, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Loring E. Justice.\n , \n  Gerald Morgan and William C. Moody, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Board of Professional Responsibility.\n , \n  Cornelia A. Clark, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Sharon G. Lee, Holly Kirby, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined.\n ","caseName":"Board of Professional Responsibility of The Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Loring Edwin Justice","caseNameFull":"BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF the SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE v. Loring Edwin JUSTICE","citation":["577 S.W.3d 908"],"citeCount":14,"cluster_id":4636029,"court":"Tennessee Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tenn.","court_id":"tenn","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2017-01334-SC-R3-BP","docket_id":15869185,"judge":"Justice Cornelia A. Clark","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:41:49.083897Z","date_created":"2019-07-02T16:46:20.584830Z","score":{"bm25":29.437565}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5715,"cites":[1057558,1057635,1060628,1061043,1252416,1473467,1652899,1872312,1872802,1999325,2336535,2613118],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/boardofprofessionarespv.justice.opn_.pdf","id":4413282,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/07/02/board_of_professional_responsibility_of_the_supreme_court_of_tennessee_v..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:35:06.020242Z","date_created":"2019-07-02T16:46:20.597555Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"079c8321304e66ef85dca09c80b87c9b50aae581","snippet":"\n\n\n  Cornelia A. Clark, J.\n \n\n  This lawyer-disciplinary proceeding stems from a Knoxville attorney's conduct in a federal personal injury lawsuit where the attorney represented the plaintiff. The federal district court imposed a discovery sanction against the corporate defendant and ordered it to pay the attorney's fees and costs the plaintiff had incurred in locating and deposing a witness the ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4413282],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"This lawyer-disciplinary proceeding stems from a Knoxville attorney's conduct in a federal personal injury lawsuit where the attorney represented the plaintiff. The federal district court imposed a discovery sanction against the corporate defendant and ordered it to pay the attorney's fees and costs the plaintiff had incurred in locating and deposing a witness the corporate defendant failed to disclose. When the plaintiff's lawyer submitted an itemization of fees and costs to the federal district court, the lawyer falsely claimed as his own work the work that a paralegal had performed. The lawyer also submitted a written declaration along with the itemization falsely claiming that he had kept contemporaneous records of his time in the case and attesting to the truth and accuracy of the itemization. The lawyer also requested in the itemization \"grossly exaggerated and unreasonable\" attorney's fees of more than $103,000 for work beyond the scope of the federal district court's order. Later, the lawyer testified falsely in a hearing before the federal district court by reaffirming the truth and accuracy of the itemization and the written declaration. A Hearing Panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility (\"Hearing Panel\") determined that the lawyer had violated four provisions of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct (\"RPC\")—RPC 1.5(a) (Fees) RPC 3.3(a) (Candor Toward the Tribunal) RPC 3.4(b) (Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel) and RPC 8.4(a) and (c) (Misconduct). The Hearing Panel found six aggravating and two mitigating factors and sanctioned the lawyer with a one-year active suspension and twelve additional hours of ethics continuing legal education. The Board of Professional Responsibility (\"Board\") and the lawyer appealed to the Chancery Court for Knox County. Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9, § 1.3. The trial court affirmed the Hearing Panel's findings of fact and conclusions of law but modified the sanction to disbarment. The trial court concluded that Standard 5.11 of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (\"ABA Standards\"), which identifies disbarment as the presumptive sanction, applies and that the aggravating and mitigating factors do not warrant a lesser sanction than disbarment. The lawyer appealed, and after carefully reviewing the record and applicable authorities, we affirm the trial court's judgment in all respects, including its modification of the sanction to disbarment."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10406995/joseph-m-benson-v-pamela-benson-and-edward-benson-as-of-the-estate-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Joseph M. Benson v. Pamela Benson and Edward Benson, as / of the Estate of August Frank Benson, Jr., and Bank of Romney","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10406995,"court":"Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia","court_citation_string":"","court_id":"wvactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-ica-247","docket_id":69982603,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-04-29T21:32:12.707522Z","date_created":"2025-04-29T21:32:12.670310Z","score":{"bm25":28.692581}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1207828,1216291,1283866,1320025,1322271,1327873,1339082,1340275,1375110,1386511,4004194,4162028,8178752,8179987],"download_url":"https://www.courtswv.gov/sites/default/pubfilesmnt/2025-04/24-ICA-247_MD.pdf","id":10873583,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/04/29/joseph_m._benson_v._pamela_benson_and_edward_benson_as__of_the_estate_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:20:21.994412Z","date_created":"2025-04-29T21:32:12.672047Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3ea4f714d78b84017e0fbe2d9329081484a1dae0","snippet":"       IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA\n\nJOSEPH M. BENSON,\nPlaintiff Below, Petitioner\n\nv.) No. 24-ICA-247            (Cir. Ct. Hampshire Cnty. Case No. CC-14-2023-P-12)\n\nPAMELA BENSON AND EDWARD BENSON, AS                                         FILED\nEXECUTRIX/EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF                                      April 29, 2025\nAUGUST FRANK BENSON, JR.,                                           ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK\n                                   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10873583],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Probate","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10621899/steve-matthews-v-the-state-of-florida/","attorney":"","caseName":"Steve Matthews v. the State of Florida","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10621899,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3D2023-0018","docket_id":70690847,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-02T15:05:38.412759Z","date_created":"2025-07-02T15:05:38.319679Z","score":{"bm25":27.210173}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1148588,1663299,1680863,1690639,1700903,1788785,1883013,4219144,4805388,4835799,7567625,7614200,9421572,9423688],"download_url":"https://3dca.flcourts.gov/pre_opinion_content_download/2454228","id":11088487,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/07/02/steve_matthews_v._the_state_of_florida.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:12:25.848474Z","date_created":"2025-07-02T15:05:38.322196Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"557f653a72bd320430fe2805b76091cf7839b77c","snippet":"      Third District Court of Appeal\n                               State of Florida\n\n                          Opinion filed July 2, 2025.\n       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.\n\n                            ________________\n\n                            No. 3D23-0018\n                     Lower Tribunal No. F97-29034A\n                          ________________\n\n\n                            Steve Matthews,\n                                  Appellant,\n\n            ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11088487],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10608059/kwasi-mckinney-v-state-of-arkansas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Kwasi McKinney v. State of Arkansas","caseNameFull":"","citation":["594 S.W.3d 879","2020 Ark. 113"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10608059,"court":"Supreme Court of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark.","court_id":"ark","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-03-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70567731,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:49:05.135661Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T02:55:45.814202Z","score":{"bm25":27.156755}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ark. 113","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2366065,2546038,4097354,4173548,4203433,4240539,5113523,5115308,6107734,6108353,6108525,6111309,9422583,9652381,10848710],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/465518/1/document.do","id":11074647,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/03/12/kwasi_mckinney_v._state_of_arkansas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:49:05.079721Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T02:55:45.823873Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"771bf56c1bdd15f904bb75f3312efd807ba9167d","snippet":"                                                     Cite as 2020 Ark. 113\nDigitally signed by Susan\nWilliams                            SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\nReason: I attest to the accuracy                        No. CR-18-546\nand integrity of this document\nDate: 2023.07.12 13:39:49 -05'00'\n\n                                                                Opinion Delivered: March 12, 2020\n                 KWASI MCKINNEY\n                                             PETITIONER\n               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11074647],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10630179/state-of-missouri-v-rachel-nixon/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Missouri v. Rachel Nixon","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10630179,"court":"Missouri Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mo. Ct. App.","court_id":"moctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"ED110548","docket_id":70760660,"judge":"James M. Dowd, J., and Cristian M. Stevens, J., concur.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-11T20:08:53.214406Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T15:02:05.294401Z","score":{"bm25":26.731354}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7710,"cites":[108471,778770,1789590,2174468,2427881,2454625,4108886,4427297,5115145,5288263,9420536,9422583],"download_url":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=195993","id":11096766,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/30/state_of_missouri_v._rachel_nixon.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T18:01:05.230532Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T15:02:05.315298Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"94daae6f675d8d29a309dd6ee856e6b92ec8c684","snippet":"               In the Missouri Court of Appeals\n                       Eastern District\n                                           DIVISION THREE\n\nSTATE OF MISSOURI,                                     )         No. ED110548\n                                                       )\n         Appellant,                                    )         Appeal from the Circuit Court\n                                                       )         of the City of St. Louis\nv.                               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11096766],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9455686/estate-of-h-burns/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of H. Burns","caseNameFull":"","citation":["540 P.3d 1029","414 Mont. 365","2023 MT 253"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":9455686,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-12-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DA 22-0456","docket_id":65762776,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:18:58.697392Z","date_created":"2023-12-28T00:05:27.251259Z","score":{"bm25":26.31394}},"neutralCite":"2023 MT 253","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[884034,885844,889395,1130652,1165821,3133172,4163237,6639941,8026935,9507279,9509672,9510216],"download_url":"https://juddocumentservice.mt.gov/getDocByCTrackId?DocId=456836","id":9913511,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/12/27/estate_of_h._burns.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:18:58.612034Z","date_created":"2023-12-28T00:05:27.253976Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"940e51caec11db508917fdbcb7b79f9ef2929f19","snippet":"                                                                                      12/27/2023\n\n\n                                      DA 22-0456\n                                                                                  Case Number: DA 22-0456\n\n\n              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA\n\n                                      2023 MT 253\n\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:\n\nHORATIO W. BURNS,\n\n         Deceased.\n\n\n\nAPPEAL FROM:         District Court of the Sixth Judicial","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9913511],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Direct Appeal","syllabus":"Opinion - Published - Justice Baker - AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4737586/in-re-estate-of-glenn-allen-atkins/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Estate of Glenn Allen Atkins","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4737586,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-03-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2018-02018-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":16992062,"judge":"Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:10:55.291961Z","date_created":"2020-03-19T17:13:01.092648Z","score":{"bm25":25.674994}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8272,"cites":[1053647,1054484,1055283,1082293,1439941,1520705,1590110,1624410,1640488,1668557,1752204,1773252,1796696,2275851,2364918],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/in_re_atkins_e2018-02018.pdf","id":4517933,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/03/19/in_re_estate_of_glenn_allen_atkins.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:47:39.563549Z","date_created":"2020-03-19T17:13:01.100117Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4b76191fb0e5a32766fb7004fe7670a1ec302efe","snippet":"                                                                                          03/19/2020\n               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                          AT KNOXVILLE\n                               December 4, 2019 Session\n\n                  IN RE ESTATE OF GLENN ALLEN ATKINS\n\n                 Appeal from the Chancery Court for Union County\n                   No. 1740    Elizabeth C. Asbury, Chancellor\n\n\n                             No. E2018-02018-COA-R3-CV\n\n\nIn this es","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4517933],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"In this estate proceeding, the original petitioner, an adult child of the decedent, filed a petition for letters of administration, averring that the decedent had died intestate. The trial court initially granted the petition, designating the petitioner as the personal representative of the decedent's estate. The decedent's surviving spouse subsequently filed a petition requesting the trial court's acceptance into probate of a holographic will, purportedly executed by the decedent, which the surviving spouse presented to the court. The original petitioner and another adult child of the decedent then filed motions contesting the validity of the holographic will. Following a bench trial, the trial court found the holographic will to be valid, accepted the will into probate, and named the surviving spouse as the personal representative of the decedent's estate. The adult children contesting the holographic will have appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10608793/christopher-w-terrell-v-state-of-arkansas/","attorney":"","caseName":"Christopher W. Terrell v. State of Arkansas","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ark. App. 179"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":10608793,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-04-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70569362,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-18T06:26:45.315578Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T06:26:45.252017Z","score":{"bm25":24.895226}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ark. App. 179","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[536109,723991,765807,1264901,1588418,2640029,2787521,4204695,4208970,4287285,5282618,6107739,6110793,6110861,7822109,9429592,11073045,11074363],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/495797/1/document.do","id":11075381,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/04/21/christopher_w._terrell_v._state_of_arkansas.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T03:57:28.596809Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T06:26:45.264006Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"918b077706730cc225263260438578c311c42bc1","snippet":"                                       Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 179\nElizabeth Perry              ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\nI attest to the accuracy and\nintegrity of this document            DIVISION IV\n2023.06.26 15:36:29 -05'00'           No. CR-20-491\n2023.001.20174\n        CHRISTOPHER W. TERRELL                         Opinion Delivered: April 21, 2021\n\n\n                                      APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE POINSETT\n                                                COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11075381],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10357082/gusan-v-commissioner-of-correction/","attorney":"","caseName":"Gusan v. Commissioner of Correction","caseNameFull":"","citation":["231 Conn. App. 429"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":10357082,"court":"Connecticut Appellate Court","court_citation_string":"Conn. App. Ct.","court_id":"connappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"AC46490","docket_id":69744548,"judge":"Bright; Suarez; Sheldon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-04T16:47:54.937875Z","date_created":"2025-03-17T12:05:13.323461Z","score":{"bm25":24.878904}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[107729,108215,109540,111170,111539,111724,542940,1968153,1991348,2276187,4168548,4380833,7848508,9429592],"download_url":"http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP231/AP231.146.pdf","id":10823670,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/18/gusan_v._commissioner_of_correction.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-04T16:47:54.956396Z","date_created":"2025-03-17T12:05:13.325078Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"aebb5263f4736513747cf3ccb32c90efa0b58196","snippet":"************************************************\n   The “officially released” date that appears near the\nbeginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be\npublished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it\nis released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the\nbeginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin-\nion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi-\ncially released” date appearing in the opinion.\n   All opinions are subject to modification and technical\ncor","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"Amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Tolland and tried to the court, M. Murphy, J.; judgment denying the petition, from which the petitioner, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Affirmed. Matthew C. Eagan, assigned counsel, for the appel- lant (petitioner). Rocco A. Chiarenza, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Matthew C. Gedansky, state's attorney, and Elizabeth Moseley, senior assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent). The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument.","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10823670],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The petitioner, who previously had been convicted, on a plea of guilty, of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, appealed, on the granting of certification, from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claimed, inter alia, that the court erred in rejecting his claim that his right to the effective assistance of trial counsel was violated. Held: This court concluded that it was unnecessary for it to consider whether the habeas court was correct in its assessment of the performance of the petitioner's trial counsel because, even if his counsel were deficient in failing to file motions for discovery and to suppress, the petitioner failed to demonstrate, in accordance with Strickland v. Washington (466 U.S. 668) and Hill v. Lockhart (474 U.S. 52), that he was prejudiced as a result of those omissions, as he did not demonstrate a reasonable probability that a motion to suppress would have been granted. Argued September 18, 2024—officially released March 18, 2025"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9452702/state-of-tennessee-v-john-shaffighi/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. John Shaffighi","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9452702,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-12-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2022-00525-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":68093342,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:20:08.734517Z","date_created":"2023-12-15T19:09:49.430553Z","score":{"bm25":24.78085}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[94565,106598,110138,118381,136995,1043843,1043846,1043888,1043936,1055520,1057558,1057566,1057758,1057832,1058439,1058506,1060515,1060685,1060973,1080076,1448625,1512404,1514684,1528630,1625710,1651862,1728877,2435421,2458636,2720424,2750181,2789547,5092096,5108553],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/OpinionsPDFVersion/Majority%20Opinion%20-%20State%20of%20Tennessee%20v.%20John%20Shaffighi%20-%20E2022-00525.pdf","id":9910527,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/12/15/state_of_tennessee_v._john_shaffighi.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:21:56.807772Z","date_created":"2023-12-15T19:09:49.432899Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f83e13a21ab8c50d69d819aa0f9c921557a7e12c","snippet":"                                                                                            12/15/2023\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                         AT KNOXVILLE\n                                  April 25, 2023 Session\n\n                 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN SHAFFIGHI\n\n                   Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County\n                          No. 56097 G. Scott Green, Judge\n                      ___________________________________\n\n         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9910527],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A Knox County jury found the Defendant, John Shaffighi, guilty of aggravated rape and aggravated sexual battery from events occurring in 1992. He was sentenced to an effective term of twenty-five years. On appeal, the Defendant challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions. He also asserts the trial court erred by (1) denying a motion to dismiss in light of missing evidence (2) allowing the victim's forensic interview to be played at trial (3) denying his motion for a mistrial after testimony from the victim (4) limiting the testimony of his expert witness (5) instructing the jury on its deliberation during its deadlock and (6) imposing the maximum sentence after misapplying enhancement factors and failing to apply mitigating factors. The State concedes that the Defendant was not sentenced properly under the pre-2005 sentencing statutes. Upon our review, we affirm the Defendant's convictions but respectfully remand the case for resentencing in accordance with Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004)."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9438136/stephen-m-hood-v-linda-hood-individually-and-as-the-of-the-estate-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Stephen M. Hood v. Linda Hood, Individually and as the of the Estate of Dorothy Hood and as the of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Hood","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9438136,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-0214","docket_id":67960524,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:16:24.919041Z","date_created":"2023-11-08T21:14:48.624838Z","score":{"bm25":24.618507}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111719,1207828,1230622,1264787,1283866,1320025,1321290,1327873,1339060,1339082,1340275,1342120,2110076,4003974,4004194,4005333,4919874,6592541,6593866,8175425,8176185,8179987,8180017,9565192],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/memo-decisions/fall2023/22-0214 md amd.pdf","id":9895961,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/08/stephen_m._hood_v._linda_hood_individually_and_as_the_of_the_estate_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:03:26.614060Z","date_created":"2023-11-08T21:14:48.626092Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"929ad346d9e42d33529cd266084e7ab21d7fb5ef","snippet":"                                                                                  FILED\n                            STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA                       November 8, 2023\n                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                            released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                                                          EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS\nStephen M. Hood,       ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9895961],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil-Other","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4418897/in-re-estate-of-charles-edward-fant-iii/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Estate of Charles Edward Fant, III","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4418897,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2016-02498-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":6138511,"judge":"Judge Kenny Armstrong","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:39:57.831912Z","date_created":"2017-08-16T13:11:26.382247Z","score":{"bm25":24.562778}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8264,"cites":[1057714,1058249,1486954,1576940,2118521,2187861,2287769,3833425],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/estateofcharlesfantopn.pdf","id":4196150,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/08/15/in_re_estate_of_charles_edward_fant_iii.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:04:17.802084Z","date_created":"2017-08-16T13:11:26.391483Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ec0cfab2dd0740f7ba454883db3ea8317ed3b9ee","snippet":"                                                                                         08/15/2017\n               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                            AT JACKSON\n                                 June 29, 2017 Session\n\n              IN RE ESTATE OF CHARLES EDWARD FANT III\n\n                  Appeal from the Probate Court for Shelby County\n                    No. PR005326      Karen D. Webster, Judge\n                     ___________________________________\n\n            ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4196150],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"This is a will contest. The affidavit attached to the purported will was signed, in the presence of the testator, by two witnesses. At the hearing on the will contest, both witnesses and the notary public testified as to the validity of signatures on the purported will. The trial court held that the will and accompanying affidavit were not in strict compliance with the statute and denied admission of the will to probate. On appeal, the proponent of the purported will argues that the will satisfied the recent statutory requirements of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 32-1-104(b) such that the signatures of both witnesses were integrated into the will. Concluding that the witnesses' signatures were integrated into the will pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 32-1-104(b), and that the other statutory requirements were met, we reverse the trial court's ruling."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9437159/stephen-m-hood-v-linda-hood-individually-and-as-the-of-the-estate-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Stephen M. Hood v. Linda Hood, Individually and as the of the Estate of Dorothy Hood and as the of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Hood","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9437159,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-0214","docket_id":67960524,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:16:07.969517Z","date_created":"2023-11-03T19:12:21.609041Z","score":{"bm25":24.540276}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111719,1207828,1216291,1230622,1264787,1283866,1320025,1321290,1327873,1339060,1339082,1340275,1342120,2110076,4003974,4004194,4005333,4919874,6592541,6593866,8175425,8176185,8179987,8180017],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/memo-decisions/fall2023/22-0214 md.pdf","id":9894984,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/03/stephen_m._hood_v._linda_hood_individually_and_as_the_of_the_estate_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:17:32.275561Z","date_created":"2023-11-03T19:12:21.612711Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"07f81eb4f82872095a61fbe174a621f1b209b627","snippet":"                            STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA\n                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                FILED\nStephen M. Hood,\nPlaintiff Below,                                                        November 3, 2023\nPetitioner.                                                                  released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                                                         EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9894984],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil-Other","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9447377/in-re-estate-of-carte-v-bringardner/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Estate of Carte v. Bringardner","caseNameFull":"","citation":["229 N.E.3d 763","2023 Ohio 4286"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":9447377,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22AP-787","docket_id":68040555,"judge":"Dorrian","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:56.380833Z","date_created":"2023-11-28T21:10:41.711534Z","score":{"bm25":24.294798}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 4286","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8081,"cites":[3776772,3779140,4539980,4544181,9403284],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/10/2023/2023-Ohio-4286.pdf","id":9905202,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/21/in_re_estate_of_carte_v._bringardner.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:56.426405Z","date_created":"2023-11-28T21:10:41.722545Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7d3d9022653ac88cc4a4a78d195f2f07eee4d0be","snippet":"[Cite as In re Estate of Carte v. Bringardner, 2023-Ohio-4286.]\n\n                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n\n                                   TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n\nIn the Matter of the Estate of                          :\nJames Carte, Deceased,\n                                                        :\nDan Miller,                                                           No. 22AP-787\n                                                        :           (Prob. No. 606694WC)","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9905202],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion under Civ.R. 56(F) for an extension of time to complete discovery, where appellant had ample time to conduct discovery, lacked diligence in pursuing discovery, and the discovery cut-off date elapsed more than one month prior to appellant filing the Civ.R. 56(F) motion. Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to movants on grounds that appellant lacked standing to pursue his will contest."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9437535/stephen-m-hood-v-linda-hood-individually-and-as-the-of-the-estate-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Stephen M. Hood v. Linda Hood, Individually and as the of the Estate of Dorothy Hood and as the of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Hood","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9437535,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-0214","docket_id":67960524,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:16:13.069026Z","date_created":"2023-11-06T20:13:03.112265Z","score":{"bm25":24.112717}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111719,1207828,1230622,1264787,1283866,1320025,1321290,1327873,1339060,1339082,1340275,1342120,2110076,4003974,4004194,4005333,4919874,6592541,6593866,8175425,8176185,8179987,8180017,9565192],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/memo-decisions/fall2023/22-0214 md.pdf","id":9895360,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/03/stephen_m._hood_v._linda_hood_individually_and_as_the_of_the_estate_of_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:03:11.769722Z","date_created":"2023-11-06T20:13:03.113904Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"707fbbd75c8e00f8868c7217dfd7dac4b866f1e1","snippet":"                            STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA\n                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                FILED\nStephen M. Hood,\nPlaintiff Below,                                                        November 3, 2023\nPetitioner.                                                                  released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                                                         EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9895360],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil-Other","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4655546/cameron-dominque-roberts-v-state-of-florida/","attorney":"","caseName":"Cameron Dominque Roberts v. State of Florida","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4655546,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-08-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1834","docket_id":16104186,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:47:28.557569Z","date_created":"2019-08-23T18:02:37.355693Z","score":{"bm25":23.77254}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1093497,1097475,1680667,1792218,1817368,1825341,1838747,2534158],"download_url":"https://edca.1dca.org/DCADocs\\2018/1834/181834_1284_08232019_01430446_i.pdf","id":4432799,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/08/23/cameron_dominque_roberts_v._state_of_florida.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:48:45.576500Z","date_created":"2019-08-23T18:02:37.359261Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4199438e926853be7811528cfef8fa2d5c0770ae","snippet":"         FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL\n                STATE OF FLORIDA\n                 _____________________________\n\n                         No. 1D18-1834\n                 _____________________________\n\nCAMERON DOMINQUE ROBERTS,\n\n    Appellant,\n\n    v.\n\nSTATE OF FLORIDA,\n\n    Appellee.\n                 _____________________________\n\n\nOn appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.\nWilliam E. Davis, Judge.\n\n                         August 23, 2019\n\n\nPER CURIAM.\n\n     Cameron Dominque Ro","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4432799],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5293326/dye-v-county-commission-of-marion-county/","attorney":"","caseName":"Dye v. County Commission of Marion County","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5293326,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-10-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0602","docket_id":60681752,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:34:33.937706Z","date_created":"2021-10-28T19:04:58.442196Z","score":{"bm25":23.681028}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1207802,1303517,1309213,1394025,4006313],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/fall2021/20-0602-wooton-p.pdf","id":5121888,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/10/28/dye_v._county_commission_of_marion_county.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T23:43:15.212966Z","date_created":"2021-10-28T19:04:58.443879Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"244edd4daac35f603223f3b85ccbef3f50ad05c1","snippet":"            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA\n\n                             September 2021 Term                        FILED\n                                                                    October 28, 2021\n                           _____________________                         released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                                                     EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n                                                                     SUPREME COURT OF","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5121888],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Probate","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9508713/jamie-mills-v-commissioner-alabama-department-of-corrections/","attorney":"","caseName":"Jamie Mills v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections","caseNameFull":"","citation":["102 F.4th 1235"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":9508713,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-05-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-11661","docket_id":68750719,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:36:36.784723Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T17:01:12.980981Z","score":{"bm25":23.6587}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[77205,105912,451983,492109,1036896,2497666,2714535,2816608,3192591,4151830,9415845,9422583,9426555,9426567,9431362,9432638,9433839,9434356,9434551,9441739,9499997,9500020,9839602],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202411661.Ord.pdf","id":9975326,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/05/28/jamie_mills_v._commissioner_alabama_department_of_corrections_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T13:59:33.308406Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T17:01:12.982944Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"760fa0761340e45e883536244c9f37726c1cdcfe","snippet":"USCA11 Case: 24-11661    Document: 19-1      Date Filed: 05/28/2024   Page: 1 of 18\n\n\n\n\n                                                              [PUBLISH]\n\n                                    In the\n                 United States Court of Appeals\n                         For the Eleventh Circuit\n\n                           ____________________\n\n                                 No. 24-11661\n                           ____________________\n\n        JAMIE MILLS,\n                                ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9975326],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"ORD","syllabus":""}]}