{"count":19429,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0zMy45MTUxNSZzPTIxMjIwOTMmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wOC0yOSZwPTI%3D&q=FORMATION+AND+CREATION&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10325313/cnb-bank-v-new-creation-fellowship-of-buffalo/","attorney":"","caseName":"CNB Bank v. New Creation Fellowship of Buffalo","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 NY Slip Op 00563"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10325313,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"846 CA 24-00401","docket_id":69600224,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-21T18:18:08.423197Z","date_created":"2025-01-31T21:13:56.187924Z","score":{"bm25":93.59187}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2716790,4082927,5485175,5536770,5680950,5748292,5825128,5905442,5943359,5973457,6032470,8212370,9912727],"download_url":"http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2025/2025_00563.htm","id":10791901,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2025/01/31/cnb_bank_v._new_creation_fellowship_of_buffalo.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T03:38:03.730388Z","date_created":"2025-01-31T21:13:56.197241Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0d41d0e17d5ce7c5e4f8319d6ed60cf3de2b4b36","snippet":"\n\nCNB Bank v New Creation Fellowship of Buffalo (2025 NY Slip Op 00563)\n\n\n\n\n\nCNB Bank v New Creation Fellowship of Buffalo\n\n\n2025 NY Slip Op 00563\n\n\nDecided on January 31, 2025\n\n\nAppellate Division, Fourth Department\n\n\n\nPublished by New York State Law Repo","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10791901],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10665570/whether-the-creation-of-natcast-violates-the-government-corporation-control/","attorney":"","caseName":"Whether the Creation of Natcast Violates the Government Corporation Control Act","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10665570,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-09-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":71263785,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T23:00:20.470107Z","date_created":"2025-09-03T23:00:20.303771Z","score":{"bm25":81.58202}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[748802,2644672,4260146,4879298,9420060,9433083,9434817,9492190,9500502,9806335],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1412911/dl","id":11132157,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/09/02/whether_the_creation_of_natcast_violates_the_government_corporation_control.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T03:07:22.742055Z","date_created":"2025-09-03T23:00:20.320066Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6f03a4824ba888332054f67cd24c44d3c6b41045","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n              Whether the Creation of Natcast Violates\n              the Government Corporation Control Act\nThe Government Corporation Control Act applies to an agency that brings a corporation\n  into existence, even if the agency does not retain ownership of or control over the\n  corporation.\nAn agency cannot avoid the strictures of the Government Corporation Control Act by\n  enlisting private individuals as proxies to incorporate an entity that would otherwise\n  violate the Gov","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11132157],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Government Corporation Control Act applies to an agency that brings a corporation into existence, even if the agency does not retain ownership of or control over the corporation."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10278800/in-re-appeal-for-formation-of-independent-sd/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Appeal for Formation of Independent SD","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10278800,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-10-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"58 MAP 2020","docket_id":69396595,"judge":"Donohue, Christine","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-21T00:43:31.663343Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T00:43:31.406902Z","score":{"bm25":80.66745}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1941460,2549643,4118580,6374257],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/J-4A-2021mo - 104917296148521363.pdf","id":10745388,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/10/07/in_re_appeal_for_formation_of_independent_sd_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:51:35.323493Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T00:43:31.415013Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"81e76b31d66a8ad1fc81660db85ceff2b0fbd52e","snippet":"                             [J-4A-2021 and J-4B-2021]\n                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n                                 MIDDLE DISTRICT\n\n   BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.\n\n\n IN RE: APPEAL FOR FORMATION OF                   :   No. 58 MAP 2020\n INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT                      :\n CONSISTING OF THE BOROUGH OF                     :   Appeal from the Order of the\n HIGHSPIRE, DAUPHIN COUNTY,                       :   Commonweal","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10745388],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10278799/in-re-appeal-for-formation-of-independent-sd/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Appeal for Formation of Independent SD","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10278799,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-10-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"59 MAP 2020","docket_id":69396594,"judge":"Donohue, Christine","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-21T00:43:30.792280Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T00:43:30.742743Z","score":{"bm25":80.46357}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1941460,2549643,4118580,6374257],"download_url":"https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/J-4B-2021mo - 104917297148523206.pdf","id":10745387,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/10/07/in_re_appeal_for_formation_of_independent_sd.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:51:35.337465Z","date_created":"2024-11-21T00:43:30.751670Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"de1b347a0e05649f2843d1e8f2fe885f909c4ed8","snippet":"                             [J-4A-2021 and J-4B-2021]\n                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n                                 MIDDLE DISTRICT\n\n   BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.\n\n\n IN RE: APPEAL FOR FORMATION OF                   :   No. 58 MAP 2020\n INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT                      :\n CONSISTING OF THE BOROUGH OF                     :   Appeal from the Order of the\n HIGHSPIRE, DAUPHIN COUNTY,                       :   Commonweal","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10745387],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8248589/tracy-rural-county-fire-etc-v-local-agency-formation-etc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Tracy Rural County Fire etc. v. Local Agency Formation etc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8248589,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-10-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C095083","docket_id":65421515,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T17:52:57.444191Z","date_created":"2022-10-13T18:02:09.545722Z","score":{"bm25":74.934235}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1155482],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C095083.PDF","id":8213852,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/10/13/tracy_rural_county_fire_etc._v._local_agency_formation_etc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T01:48:15.234075Z","date_created":"2022-10-13T18:02:09.556576Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f354ff102ea90b35f08466a8ccab74f816180247","snippet":"Filed 10/13/22\n                              CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n\n\n\n              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n                              THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                           (San Joaquin)\n                                               ----\n\n\n\n\n TRACY RURAL COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION                               C095083\n DISTRICT,\n                                                           (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV-\n                 Plaintif","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8213852],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4395404/in-re-creation-of-park-dist-within-chester-twp/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Creation of Park Dist. Within Chester Twp.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2017 Ohio 4031"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4395404,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2016-G-0082","docket_id":6067138,"judge":"Gallagher","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:32:42.911971Z","date_created":"2017-05-30T19:30:01.898276Z","score":{"bm25":68.59233}},"neutralCite":"2017 Ohio 4031","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690286,3162529,3194004,3729181,3752542,3785278,4016833,4172587],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2017/2017-Ohio-4031.pdf","id":4172657,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/05/30/in_re_creation_of_park_dist._within_chester_twp._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:48:05.399392Z","date_created":"2017-05-30T19:30:01.911929Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"86a2ab8d34024bb2b752d980f484ad8401d77150","snippet":"[Cite as In re Creation of Park Dist. Within Chester Twp., 2017-Ohio-4031.]\n\n                                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                                ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                      GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF THE\nCREATION OF A PARK                                         OPINION\nDISTRICT WITHIN\nCHESTER TOWNSHIP                                           CASE NO. 2016-G-0082\n\n\n\n\nAppeal from the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4172657],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"PROBATE - R.C. Chapter 1545 park district jurisdiction R.C. 2101.06 master commissioner continuing jurisdiction plenary power. Probate courts maintain continuing jurisdiction to consider the removal of a park district's commissioners under R.C. 1545.06, but exceed that jurisdiction by imposing the fees of the master commissioner against an unrelated, independent political agency and by considering the validity of a contractual agreement entered under R.C. 1545.14."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2549643/in-re-formation-of-independent-school-district/","attorney":"William H.R. Casey, Doylestown, and James G. Sweeney, Goshen, NY, for appellant., David F. Conn, New Britain, for appel-lee Palisades School District., Alan B. McFall, Bangor, for appellee Easton School District., Mary P. Fullerton, Harrisburg, for ami-cus curiae Department of Education.","caseName":"In Re Formation of Independent School District","caseNameFull":"In Re: Petition for Formation of INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. Appeal Of: Riegelsville Tax and Education Coalition","citation":["17 A.3d 977","2011 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 167","2011 WL 1379619"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":2549643,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-04-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2210 C.D. 2009","docket_id":2413770,"judge":"Jubelirer, Leavitt, Friedman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:52:06.764438Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:56:05.147424Z","score":{"bm25":67.92957}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9784757,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:47:04.935248Z","date_created":"2023-08-30T20:53:19.814931Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nDISSENTING OPINION BY\nSenior Judge FRIEDMAN.\nI respectfully dissent. The majority vacates the order of the Court of Common *992Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) and remands this case to the trial court with instructions to remand the case to the Secretary of Education (Secretary) for a formal administrative hearing on the educational merits of the p","type":"dissent"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9784756,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:47:04.928839Z","date_created":"2023-08-30T20:53:19.808816Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION BY\nJudge LEAVITT.1\nThe Riegelsville Tax and Education Coalition is a nonprofit corporation formed to *979promote the advancement of quality education in the Borough of Riegelsville. At present, Riegelsville, which is located in the northeast corner of Bucks County, is split between the Easton School District in No","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[108100,1467308,1563315,1897424,1941460,1941913,1947701,1979326,1980793,1994950,2157198,2181426,2197791,2312147,2336631,2443362,3848059,3851622],"download_url":null,"id":2549643,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:40:10.399162Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:19:26.075073Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6552ed1379218e1bf699fdcf359dea70762cd7f4","snippet":"\n17 A.3d 977 (2011)\nIn re: Petition for Formation of INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.\nAppeal of: Riegelsville Tax and Education Coalition.\nNo. 2210 C.D. 2009.\nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.\nArgued September 14, 2010.\nDecided April 13, 2011.\n*978 William H.R. Casey, Doylestown, and James G. Sweeney, Goshen, NY, for ap","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8206,8207,8210],"panel_names":["Rochelle S. Friedman","Renee Cohn Jubelirer","Mary Hannah Leavitt"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2549643,9784756,9784757],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4395334/in-re-creation-of-a-park-dist-within-chester-twp/","attorney":"\n  Frank H. Scialdone and Todd M. Raskin, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., 100 Franklin's Row, 34305 Solon Road, Solon, Ohio 44139; Bridey Matheney, Assistant Prosecutor, 231 Main Street, Suite 3A, Chardon, Ohio 44024, (For Appellant-Chester Township Board of Trustees).\n , \n  James M. Gillette, City of Chardon Police Prosecutor, PNC Bank Building, 117 South Street, Suite 208, Chardon, Ohio 44024, (For Appellee-Chester Township Park District Board of Commissioners).\n ","caseName":"In Re Creation of a Park Dist. Within Chester Twp.","caseNameFull":"In the MATTER OF the CREATION OF a PARK DISTRICT WITHIN CHESTER TOWNSHIP","citation":["2017 Ohio 4031","91 N.E.3d 26"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4395334,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. 2016–G–0082","docket_id":6067047,"judge":"Gallagher","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:32:39.639989Z","date_created":"2017-05-30T16:16:08.204207Z","score":{"bm25":67.906296}},"neutralCite":"2017 Ohio 4031","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690286,3162529,3194004,3729181,3752542,3785278,4016833,4172657],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2017/2017-Ohio-4031.pdf","id":4172587,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/05/30/in_re_creation_of_park_dist._within_chester_twp..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:48:03.032682Z","date_created":"2017-05-30T16:16:08.223961Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"273b5a9763193afcdce2d4651deec5ef1a341663","snippet":"\n\n\n  SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., Eighth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.\n \n\n  {¶ 1} The core of this appeal is the extent of the probate court's jurisdiction over a judicially created park district under R.C. Chapter 1545. The probate court invoked its own continuing jurisdiction in a case initiated by the Chester Township Board of Trustees (\"Trustees\") in 1984 to create the Chester Townsh","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4172587],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"PROBATE - R.C. Chapter 1545 park district jurisdiction R.C. 2101.06 master commissioner continuing jurisdiction plenary power. Probate courts maintain continuing jurisdiction to consider the removal of a park district's commissioners under R.C. 1545.06, but exceed that jurisdiction by imposing the fees of the master commissioner against an unrelated, independent political agency and by considering the validity of a contractual agreement entered under R.C. 1545.14."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2032526/in-re-creation-of-conservancy-dist/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Creation of Conservancy Dist.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["875 N.E.2d 222"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2032526,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-10-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"50A04-0612-CV-694","docket_id":1853919,"judge":"Baker","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:14:32.648176Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:59:24.828812Z","score":{"bm25":62.289436}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7254,"cites":[852536,853421,2118462,2149780],"download_url":null,"id":2032526,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T16:12:07.109432Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:06:52.386618Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d741552b2144e459d1b4332b152b6af0f709bddf","snippet":"\n875 N.E.2d 222 (2007)\nIn re the Petition for the CREATION OF SOUTH-WEST LAKE MAXINKUCKEE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.\nJohn Crist, Appellant-Intervenor,\nv.\nSouth-West Lake Maxinkuckee Conservancy District, Appellee.\nNo. 50A04-0612-CV-694.\nCourt of Appeals of Indiana.\nOctober 22, 2007.\n*224 Stanley F. Wruble III, Leone Halpin, LLP, So","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2032526],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1941460/in-re-petition-for-formation-of-independent-school-district/","attorney":"William H.R. Casey, Doylestown, for appellant., David F. Conn, New Britain, for appel-lee, Palisades School District., Alan B. McFall, Bangor, for appellee, Easton Area School District., M. Patricia Fullerton, Asst. Chief Counsel, for appellee, PA Department of Education.","caseName":"In Re Petition for Formation of Independent School District","caseNameFull":"In Re: PETITION FOR FORMATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appeal Of: Riegelsville Tax & Education Coalition","citation":["962 A.2d 24","2008 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 622","2008 WL 5263369"],"citeCount":15,"cluster_id":1941460,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2008-11-13","dateFiled":"2008-12-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"545 C.D. 2008","docket_id":1769494,"judge":"Leadbetter, Friedman, Simpson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:32:57.165763Z","date_created":"2015-11-24T15:14:47.105861Z","score":{"bm25":60.797596}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1956576,1983136,2156567,2209664,2332963],"download_url":null,"id":1941460,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pennsylvania/commonwealth_court_opinions/documents/5f622a7c17403741.xml","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T14:27:27.401161Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:52:42.722269Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"81714514698fbb42768ffd1ffa9aae6344b0dce6","snippet":"\nThe Riegelsville Tax Education Coalition (Coalition)1 appeals from the February 27, 2008, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court), which denied the Coalition's Petition for Formation of Independent School District (Petition) because the Secretary of Education (Secretary) determined that the Petition lacked merit from an educational standpoint. We vacate and remand.\nThe Coalition filed its Petition pursu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8206,8209,8219],"panel_names":["Rochelle S. Friedman","Bonnie Brigance Leadbetter","Robert Simpson"],"posture":"Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County, No. 0702132-31-6, Waite, J. Page 25","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1941460],"source":"ZLU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2651510/protect-agricultural-land-v-stanislaus-county-local-agency-formation/","attorney":"Counsel, Law Office of Rose M. Zoia and Rose M. Zoia for Plaintiff and Appellant., John P. Doering, County Counsel, William Dean Wright and Thomas Boze, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent., Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Edward Grutzmacher; and Michael L. Lyions for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.","caseName":"Protect Agricultural Land v. Stanislaus County Local Agency Formation Commission","caseNameFull":"PROTECT AGRICULTURAL LAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STANISLAUS COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent; CITY OF CERES, Real Party in Interest and Respondent","citation":["223 Cal. App. 4th 550","167 Cal. Rptr. 3d 343","2014 WL 308137","2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 80"],"citeCount":15,"cluster_id":2651510,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-01-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"F066544","docket_id":98030,"judge":"Franson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:36:24.852247Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T06:34:11.544794Z","score":{"bm25":60.057045}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1158499,1160899,1802006],"download_url":"http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/F066544.PDF","id":2651510,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/01/28/protect_agricultural_land_v._stanislaus_etc._com..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:37:06.574369Z","date_created":"2014-01-29T00:18:41.162496Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"afb9e5223fed64e918d5e21271d1dc0f02c49398","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion\n \n\n  FRANSON, J.\n \n\n  INTRODUCTION\n \n\n  Plaintiff Protect Agricultural Land (PAL) filed a petition for writ of mandate to challenge the decision by the Stanislaus County Local Agency Formation Commission (Stanislaus LAFCO) to approve the application submitted by real party in interest City of Ceres (City) for the West Landing Specific Pl","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2651510],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2258842/placer-county-local-agency-formation-commission-v-nevada-county-local/","attorney":"Counsel, Law Offices of William M. Wright, William M. Wright; and Scott H. Finley for Plaintiff and Appellant., Law Office of Neil A. Eskind and Neil A. Eskind for Intervener and Appellant., Law Offices of P. Scott Browne and P. Scott Browne for Defendant and Respondent., Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Joseph M. Quinn, K. Scott Dickey and Ruthann G. Ziegler for Intervener and Respondent.","caseName":"Placer County Local Agency Formation Commission v. Nevada County Local Agency Formation Commission","caseNameFull":"PLACER COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NEVADA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent; NORTHSTAR COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, Intervener and Appellant; TRUCKEE SANITARY DISTRICT, Intervener and Respondent","citation":["37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 729","135 Cal. App. 4th 793","2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 410","2006 Daily Journal DAR 626","2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 35"],"citeCount":17,"cluster_id":2258842,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-01-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C047697","docket_id":193057,"judge":"Sims","lexisCite":"2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 410","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:09:58.509935Z","date_created":"2014-11-26T21:30:38.865808Z","score":{"bm25":59.48306}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2252130,2260925,2521296,2588255],"download_url":null,"id":2258842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:34:04.293771Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:54:41.758075Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b83a0931a3dfa0bc6db7ad89ae57b835152f71b0","snippet":"\n37 Cal.Rptr.3d 729 (2006)\n135 Cal.App.4th 793\nPLACER COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Appellant,\nv.\nNEVADA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent;\nNorthstar Community Services District, Intervenor and Appellant;\nTruckee Sanitary District, Intervenor and Respondent.\nNo. C047697.\nCourt of Appeal, Third District.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2258842],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2521226/general-creation-llc-v-leapfrog-enterprises-inc/","attorney":"Wade W. Massie, Penn, Stuart & Esk-ridge, Abingdon, Virginia, Douglas D. Sal-yers and Dabney J. Carr, IV, Troutman Sanders LLP, Richmond, Virginia, and Atlanta, Georgia, Darrell L. Olson, Brenton R. Babcock, and Christy L. Green, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, California, for Plaintiffs., Howard C. McElroy, Bundy McElroy Hodges, Abingdon, Virginia, and James G. Gilliland, Jr., K.T. Cherian, and Robert A. McFarlane, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant.","caseName":"General Creation LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.","caseNameFull":"GENERAL CREATION LLC, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant","citation":["232 F. Supp. 2d 661","66 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1753","2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22183","2002 WL 31548117"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":2521226,"court":"District Court, W.D. Virginia","court_citation_string":"W.D. Va.","court_id":"vawd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-11-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1:02CV00001","docket_id":2385025,"judge":"Jones","lexisCite":"2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22183","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:29:36.859500Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:46:36.825406Z","score":{"bm25":55.2134}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1657,"cites":[118019,460134,575005,655580,694395,696248,712241,722611,723912,729658,731053,733356,746412,746968,751211,758118,759521,763646,766552,766966,767090,767187,768428,774010,2413304],"download_url":null,"id":2521226,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:26:53.101033Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:09:10.867858Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a19604bf5ef8c824b90f1ff0f6ccbd7500d1ef25","snippet":"\n232 F.Supp.2d 661 (2002)\nGENERAL CREATION LLC, et al., Plaintiffs,\nv.\nLEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant.\nNo. 1:02CV00001.\nUnited States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division.\nNovember 18, 2002.\n*662 *663 *664 Wade W. Massie, Penn, Stuart &","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2521226],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1074114/project-creation-inc-v-kenneth-neal/","attorney":"","caseName":"Project Creation, Inc. v. Kenneth Neal","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":1074114,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-04-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M1999-01272-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":1009903,"judge":"Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:37:52.903494Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T13:45:04.925347Z","score":{"bm25":50.117943}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8267,"cites":[112457,112539,758577,1074410,1079167,1079274,1523032,2452167],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/OPINIONS/TCA/PDF/013/ProjectCreation.pdf","id":1074114,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2000/04/12/project_creation_inc._v._kenneth_neal.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T02:27:52.524903Z","date_created":"2013-10-09T20:04:06.889008Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cda1d03f292376cdbd898bf47f8aca8ded180c1d","snippet":"                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                             AT NASHVILLE\n                                    April 12, 2000 Session\n\n       PROJECT CREATION, INC., ET AL. v. KENNETH NEAL, ET AL.\n\n                       Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County\n                          No. 10352    John O. Wootton, Jr., Judge\n\n\n\n                    No. M1999-01272-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 21, 2001\n\n\nThe trial court dismissed Plaintiffs’ libel action and then granted ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1074114],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2245282/san-bernardino-valley-water-conservation-district-v-san-bernardino-county/","attorney":"Counsel, Lagerlof, Senecal, Gosney & Kruse, H. Jess Senecal and James D. Ciampa for Plaintiff and Appellant., Best Best & Krieger, Kendall H. MacVey and Daniel S. Roberts for Defendant and Respondent., Downy Brand, David R.E. Aladjem, Maya R. Ferry; Varner & Brandt and Brendan Brandt for Intervener and Respondent.","caseName":"San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District v. San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission","caseNameFull":"SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent; SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, Intervener and Respondent","citation":["173 Cal. App. 4th 190","92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662","2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 589"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2245282,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-03-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B208974","docket_id":2095506,"judge":"Coffee","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:02:02.834791Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T21:52:35.535897Z","score":{"bm25":47.588486}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6361,"cites":[1250387,2144444,2255464,2262367,2608665],"download_url":null,"id":2245282,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:28:48.507800Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:50:12.879263Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"446fe5c07b6c36e0ba4cba6bc117c36c23fe3c75","snippet":"\n173 Cal.App.4th 190 (2009)\n___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___\nSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant,\nv.\nSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent;\nSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, Intervener and Respondent.\nNo. B208974.\nCourt of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2245282],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10608677/in-re-creation-of-the-office-of-ethics-counsel-and-amendments-to-rules-16/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Creation of the Office of Ethics Counsel and Amendments to Rules 1.6 and 8.3 of the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ark. 169"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10608677,"court":"Supreme Court of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark.","court_id":"ark","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70569057,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-18T05:51:54.380460Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T05:51:54.313327Z","score":{"bm25":45.67363}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ark. 169","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/513713/1/document.do","id":11075265,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/09/30/in_re_creation_of_the_office_of_ethics_counsel_and_amendments_to_rules_1.6.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:09:37.680694Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T05:51:54.327805Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b57efea16652b6aee722b99d75af0a6811eb9951","snippet":"Reason: I attest\nto the accuracy\nand integrity of\nthis document\nDate:\n2022.06.09                         Cite as 2021 Ark. 169\n12:52:56 -05'00'\nAdobe Acrobat      SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\nversion:\n2022.001.20117\n                                               Opinion Delivered: September 30, 2021\n\n\n IN RE CREATION OF THE OFFICE\n OF ETHICS COUNSEL AND\n AMENDMENTS TO RULES 1.6 AND\n 8.3 OF THE ARKANSAS RULES OF\n PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT\n\n\n\n\n                                       PER CURIAM\n\n         Pu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11075265],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4731503/in-re-for-formation-of-ind-sch-dist-consisting-of-the-borough-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: for Formation of Ind. Sch. Dist. Consisting of the Borough of Highspire, Dauphin County, PA ~ Appeal of : Highspire Ed. Coal.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4731503,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-03-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"242 C.D. 2019","docket_id":16912728,"judge":"Leavitt, President Judge","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:09:22.963875Z","date_created":"2020-03-02T14:09:22.085450Z","score":{"bm25":45.02529}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8210,"cites":[1941460,2549643],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/242CD19_3-2-20.pdf","id":4511850,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/03/02/in_re_for_formation_of_ind._sch._dist._consisting_of_the_borough_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:43:36.310307Z","date_created":"2020-03-02T14:09:22.096833Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c0a5907f6eeab1c98c8c51a1d373cb1e82382883","snippet":"          IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\nIn Re: Petition for Formation of          :\nIndependent School District Consisting    :\nof the Borough of Highspire, Dauphin      :\nCounty, Pennsylvania                      :   No. 242 C.D. 2019\n                                          :   Argued: December 12, 2019\nAppeal of: Highspire Education            :\nCoalition                                 :\n\n\nBEFORE:      HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge\n             HONORABLE P. KEV","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4511850],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2276192/cequel-iii-communications-i-llc-v-local-agency-formation-commission-of/","attorney":"Counsel, Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, Richard R. Patch, Gregg M. Picks, Sabrina L. Feve; Diamond 0 Baker and Craig A. Diamond for Plaintiff and Appellant., Law Offices of P. Scott Browne, P. Scott Browne and Marsha A. Burch for Defendant and Respondent., Law Office of Porter Simon, Steven C. Gross; Miller, Owen & Trost, Nancy C. Miller and Madeline E. Miller for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.","caseName":"Cequel III Communications I, LLC v. Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada County","caseNameFull":"CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF NEVADA COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; TRUCKED DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Et Al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents","citation":["57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 32","149 Cal. App. 4th 310","2007 Daily Journal DAR 4469","2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3540","2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 492"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":2276192,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-04-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C052238","docket_id":1850130,"judge":"Cantil-Sakauye","lexisCite":"2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3540","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:17:36.939034Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:57:41.719734Z","score":{"bm25":42.38589}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2135580,2257706,2266258,2285465],"download_url":null,"id":2276192,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:39:24.723161Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:57:28.392413Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6aa44263a912e1e8f44bf2bbc068ceba136ed435","snippet":"\n57 Cal.Rptr.3d 32 (2007)\n149 Cal.App.4th 310\nCEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant,\nv.\nLOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF NEVADA COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent;\nTruckee Donner Public Utility District et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.\nNo. C052238.\nCourt of Appeal of California, Third District.\nApril 3, 2007.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2276192],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1155482/board-of-supervisors-v-local-agency-formation-commission/","attorney":"Counsel, Brenton A. Bleier, Peter Mixon, Remy & Thomas, Tina A. Thomas, James G. Moose and Whitman Manley for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Dwight L. Herr, County Counsel (Santa Cruz), Deborah Steen and Jane M. Scott, Assistant County Counsel, and Victor J. Westman, County Counsel (Contra Costa), as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Hyde & Miller, Hyde, Miller & Owen, Hyde, Miller & Savage, Nancy C. Miller, Kirk E. Trost, Matina R. Kolokotronis, Christiane E. Layton and Paul Chrisman for Defendant and Appellant., Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer and Patrick J. Borchers for Real Party in Interest and Appellant., Rourke & Woodruff, Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, Daniel K. Spradlin, Lois E. Jeffrey, Robert W. Lucas, Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard and Anthony B. Manzanetti as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant and Real Party in Interest and Appellant.","caseName":"Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation Commission","caseNameFull":"BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant and Appellant; CITRUS HEIGHTS INCORPORATION PROJECT, Real Party in Interest and Appellant","citation":["838 P.2d 1198","3 Cal. 4th 903","13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 245","92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9150","92 Daily Journal DAR 15115","1992 Cal. LEXIS 5466"],"citeCount":77,"cluster_id":1155482,"court":"California Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Cal.","court_id":"cal","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1992-11-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S023805","docket_id":553393,"judge":"Mosk","lexisCite":"92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9150","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T02:07:28.159606Z","date_created":"2015-09-25T18:01:34.050329Z","score":{"bm25":38.02919}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3831,"cites":[96718,100208,106127,106739,106989,107197,107971,108470,108485,109614,109642,110598,110742,110968,111195,111507,112294,112296,112739,112743,112763,1529182,1884299],"download_url":null,"id":1155482,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T05:12:38.222532Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T04:26:08.762629Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9a42d005e3d0de8cdbc84c68b60f98336b6539b0","snippet":"\n3 Cal.4th 903 (1992)\n838 P.2d 1198\n13 Cal. Rptr.2d 245\nBOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,\nv.\nLOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant and Appellant; CITRUS HEIGHTS INCORPORATION PROJECT, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.\nDocket No. S023805.\nSupreme Court of California.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1155482],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2122093/city-of-livermore-v-local-agency-formation-commission/","attorney":"Counsel, Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, and Lorenzo E. Chambliss, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant., Thomas R. Curry, City Attorney, Mark I. Weinberger, Alletta d’A. Belin and Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger for Plaintiff and Respondent.","caseName":"City of Livermore v. Local Agency Formation Commission","caseNameFull":"CITY OF LIVERMORE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Defendant and Appellant","citation":["184 Cal. App. 3d 531","230 Cal. Rptr. 867","1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1924"],"citeCount":27,"cluster_id":2122093,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1986-07-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A029998","docket_id":1972890,"judge":"Smith","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:01:47.802681Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T20:55:50.477187Z","score":{"bm25":33.91515}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6588,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":2122093,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:27:09.411595Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:23:02.193383Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f31944cb089e6b47dc0df0875930ffaaf56acf49","snippet":"\n184 Cal.App.3d 531 (1986)\n230 Cal. Rptr. 867\nCITY OF LIVERMORE, Plaintiff and Respondent,\nv.\nLOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Defendant and Appellant.\nDocket No. A029998.\nCourt of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.\nJuly 22, 1986.\n*534 COUNSEL\nRichard J. Moore, C","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2122093],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}