{"count":53642,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yOC4wODY5NDMmcz0xMDQwMTMxMiZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTA5LTI5JnA9Mg%3D%3D&q=FORGERY&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4512895/10-crimes-forgery/","attorney":"","caseName":"10 — Crimes — Forgery","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 COA 89"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4512895,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-06-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2016CA10","docket_id":7322317,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:06:05.980009Z","date_created":"2018-06-29T18:07:43.707279Z","score":{"bm25":174.08917}},"neutralCite":"2018 COA 89","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[25893,103050,107951,111986,112848,117889,118324,118381,161108,180185,184136,276223,481629,582619,617778,712197,746406,747682,750671,751103,779376,791073,1118876,1125695,1131371,1141289,1173403,1179963,1191802,1203504,1206706,1304907,1330164,1352705,1410964,1420765,1427529,1433933,1439456,2122276,2266805,2331281,2356368,2449806,2464579,2581572,2598193,2599838,2614620,2619803,2624845,2625329,2629745,2634447,2636487,2637702,2823789,2823854,3195890,3314023,4024918,4148585,4148587,4148590,4198832,4243652,4285822],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/opinions/6-28-18/2018COA89.pdf","id":4290148,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/06/28/10__crimes__forgery.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:09:29.401873Z","date_created":"2018-06-29T18:07:43.714193Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"94ba77ce685cd3b750f6eed189d22e990cc8bf23","snippet":" The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions\n constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by\n the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be\n cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division.\n Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion\n should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.\n\n\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4290148],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4865452/state-v-foggin/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Foggin","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ohio 830"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4865452,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-03-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CT2020-0038","docket_id":59743863,"judge":"Hoffman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:45:09.272448Z","date_created":"2021-03-18T18:11:59.619631Z","score":{"bm25":36.101448}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ohio 830","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8104,"cites":[3708977,6763551,6775376,6798816,9287285,9801531,11150401],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/5/2021/2021-Ohio-830.pdf","id":4669231,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/03/17/state_v._foggin.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T08:15:06.063008Z","date_created":"2021-03-18T18:11:59.642113Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"53c9b58f8ddc3e99ff1b2d527c4aed656f44796e","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Foggin, 2021-Ohio-830.]\n\n\n COURT OF APPEALS\n MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO\n FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n\n STATE OF OHIO JUDGES:\n Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J.\n Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.\n Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr.,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4669231],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Forgery - Theft - Manifest Weight - Sufficiency of Evidence - Allied Offenses - Merger"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9380761/state-v-spencer/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Spencer","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ohio 596"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9380761,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-02-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2021 CA 00085","docket_id":66922125,"judge":"Delaney","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:01:37.849972Z","date_created":"2023-03-02T15:06:21.826921Z","score":{"bm25":35.37134}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 596","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8076,"cites":[104660,2700058,3182817,3718577,3723071,3761115,3766701,4125920,4294886,4525403,5121473,6753834,6756443,6757068,6757419,6758010,6758672,6759883,6762602,6763551,6763700,6771756,6773578,6775376,6784804,6787498,9415779,9424967,9426191,9432733,11149837,11150401,11152789,11153327],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/5/2023/2023-Ohio-596.pdf","id":9376237,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/02/28/state_v._spencer.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T18:37:48.797765Z","date_created":"2023-03-02T15:06:21.832592Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"08aa00338ea1cf5868f78e9531dfc38292f80e68","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Spencer, 2023-Ohio-596.]\n\n\n COURT OF APPEALS\n LICKING COUNTY, OHIO\n FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n\n STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES:\n :\n : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J.\n Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9376237],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"speedy trial, sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence, forgery, mistrial"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4892410/state-v-kirks/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Kirks","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ohio 2027"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4892410,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-06-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2020 CA 0060","docket_id":59990157,"judge":"Baldwin","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:52:00.048001Z","date_created":"2021-06-16T19:12:26.485677Z","score":{"bm25":35.32361}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ohio 2027","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,2688328,2698866,4648809],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/5/2021/2021-Ohio-2027.pdf","id":4696189,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/06/16/state_v._kirks.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:06:16.811114Z","date_created":"2021-06-16T19:12:26.509868Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c8c59eb8a4e5115f99ba02f72d2be6b5c6dcb5ad","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Kirks, 2021-Ohio-2027.]\n\n\n COURT OF APPEALS\n RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO\n FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO, : JUDGES:\n : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J.\n Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.\n : H","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4696189],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Speedy trial/Manifest weight and sufficiency/Counterfeiting and forgery/Appeal of consecutive sentences"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9437707/state-v-meredith/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Meredith","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ohio 4038"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9437707,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22 CO 0039","docket_id":67985960,"judge":"Hanni","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:16:18.007067Z","date_created":"2023-11-07T18:08:47.298546Z","score":{"bm25":34.434547}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 4038","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111170,625833],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/7/2023/2023-Ohio-4038.pdf","id":9895532,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/07/state_v._meredith.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:17:42.285871Z","date_created":"2023-11-07T18:08:47.333038Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2bcacacabb8ca0c9795b7b94bdb3db5df093a37e","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Meredith, 2023-Ohio-4038.]\n\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n COLUMBIANA COUNTY\n\n STATE OF OHIO,\n\n Plaintiff-Appellee,\n\n v.\n\n JEFFREY DEAN MEREDITH,\n\n Defendant-Appellant.\n\n\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9895532],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"forgery tampering with records improper use of a certificate of title alleged ineffective assistance of counsel no showing of plea agreement trial strategy"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10079820/state-v-simpson/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Simpson","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10079820,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-08-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"23-618","docket_id":69058553,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-08-27T15:11:15.874547Z","date_created":"2024-08-27T15:11:15.823957Z","score":{"bm25":32.989838}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1157169,1237207,2501123,2504563,2728919,4031352,4395914,4417024,8908247],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=43414","id":10546420,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/08/20/state_v._simpson_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:38:00.672824Z","date_created":"2024-08-27T15:11:15.825789Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1bd802f0bab1fe675d039cdaeec10a675a60a2b8","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n No. COA23-618\n\n Filed 20 August 2024\n\nNew Hanover County, No. 19 CRS 58493\n\nSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n v.\n\nSHANITA YVETTE SIMPSON\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 9 December 2022 by Judge Phyllis\n\nM. Gorham in New Hanover County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals\n\n2 April 2024.\n\n\n Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Specia","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10546420],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Forgery of Endorsement Uttering a Forged Endorsement Motion to Dismiss Indictment Eyewitness Identification Reform Act Due Process Rule 2 Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Clerical Error"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8509870/state-v-mackey/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Mackey","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8509870,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-348","docket_id":65738989,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:42:53.946693Z","date_created":"2022-11-08T15:04:31.150420Z","score":{"bm25":32.409668}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1207937,1210865,1297473,1325930,1337906,1420169,1422630],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=41830","id":8482285,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/01/state_v._mackey_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:56:18.124352Z","date_created":"2022-11-08T15:04:31.151323Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"eecb45e75a4bbff187075c992b1296d8fae3dad5","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n 2022-NCCOA-715\n\n No. COA22-348\n\n Filed 1 November 2022\n\n Cabarrus County, No. 20CRS50156-57\n\n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n v.\n\n NIKITA V. MACKEY\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 4 June 2021 by Judge\n\n William Anderson Long, Jr., in Cabarrus County Superior Court. Heard ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8482285],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Forgery Uttering Obtaining Property by False Pretenses Fatal Variance Motion to Quash Unpreserved Issues on Appeal Statutory Right to Recordation under N.C. Gen. Stat § 15A-1241 Recording Private Bench Conferences"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4887854/state-v-mcswain/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. McSwain","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4887854,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-343","docket_id":59951014,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:50:52.050209Z","date_created":"2021-06-01T12:08:14.458652Z","score":{"bm25":32.138252}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=40162","id":4691633,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"bin/2021/05/18/state_v._mcswain_1.bin","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:03:10.336879Z","date_created":"2021-06-01T12:08:14.460914Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b846d8a5473e09f21eb974b7b402f269cc3dff50","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n 2021-NCCOA-216\n\n No. COA20-343\n\n Filed 18 May 2021\n\n Cleveland County, Nos. 18 CRS 2096, 2097\n\n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,\n\n v.\n\n ANGELA MICHELLE MCSWAIN, Defendant.\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 20 December 2019 by Judge\n\n William A. Wood II in Cleveland County Super","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4691633],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Motion to dismiss sufficiency of the evidence forgery of a check uttering a false check falsity element authority to sign illustrative evidence"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10633578/state-of-tennessee-v-tameka-hamilton/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Tameka Hamilton","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10633578,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-07-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2024-01821-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":70807723,"judge":"Judge Camille R. McMullen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-16T18:24:03.265341Z","date_created":"2025-07-16T13:12:22.944283Z","score":{"bm25":31.464716}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8286,"cites":[1043936,1055430,1057566,5282615],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/OpinionsPDFVersion/Hamilton%20Opinion.pdf","id":11100165,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/07/16/state_of_tennessee_v._tameka_hamilton.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T18:01:27.159583Z","date_created":"2025-07-16T13:12:22.956439Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9c1e16b0a2f6a60b004b02838393c4f44f513ed5","snippet":" 07/16/2025\n IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n AT KNOXVILLE\n Assigned on Briefs June 17, 2025\n\n STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAMEKA HAMILTON\n\n Appeal from the Criminal Court for Washington County\n No. 45903, 47638, 47639, 47641, 47642, 47643, 47644B Stacy L. Street, Judge\n _____________________","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11100165],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Defendant, Tameka Hamilton, entered guilty pleas to various offenses including reckless endangerment, evading arrest, theft, identity theft, fraudulent use of a credit card, and forgery. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of eight years and placed the Defendant in a community corrections program. The Defendant subsequently violated her probation based on failure to complete the special conditions of the drug court program. In this appeal, the Defendant contends the trial court erred in ordering her to serve the remainder of her sentence in confinement. Upon review, we affirm."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4883937/state-v-mcswain/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. McSwain","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4883937,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-343","docket_id":59914286,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:49:50.312955Z","date_created":"2021-05-18T12:13:02.571620Z","score":{"bm25":31.307945}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=40162","id":4687716,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"bin/2021/05/18/state_v._mcswain.bin","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:00:41.830541Z","date_created":"2021-05-18T12:13:02.574428Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"45109c4eb00e1324da57284c564f5f2508e3a5b2","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n 2021-NCCOA-216\n\n No. COA20-343\n\n Filed 18 May 2021\n\n Cleveland County, Nos. 18 CRS 2096, 2097\n\n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,\n\n v.\n\n ANGELA MICHELLE MCSWAIN, Defendant.\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 20 December 2019 by Judge\n\n William A. Wood II in Cleveland County Super","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4687716],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Motion to dismiss sufficiency of the evidence forgery of a check uttering a false check falsity element authority to sign illustrative evidence"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4662771/state-v-spencer/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Spencer","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 Ohio 3800"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":4662771,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-09-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19CA6","docket_id":16222719,"judge":"Hess","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:49:24.908397Z","date_created":"2019-09-20T13:09:13.326098Z","score":{"bm25":31.249428}},"neutralCite":"2019 Ohio 3800","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,111170,118487,1637228],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/4/2019/2019-Ohio-3800.pdf","id":4440024,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/09/11/state_v._spencer.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:53:43.369932Z","date_created":"2019-09-20T13:09:13.345171Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"13f20ddabf3a4447c92c2f445527894ff7fdf779","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Spencer, 2019-Ohio-3800.]\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n PICKAWAY COUNTY\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 19CA6\n\n Plaintiff-Appellee, :\n\nv. : DECISION AND\n JUDGMENT ENTRY\nTHOMAS J. SPENCER, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4440024],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"forgery R.C. 2913.31(A)(3) authentication surveillance footage silent witness theory plain error ineffective assistance"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9437597/state-v-hussain/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Hussain","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9437597,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-1024","docket_id":67984790,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:16:15.299939Z","date_created":"2023-11-07T13:06:39.598150Z","score":{"bm25":30.814415}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1204197,1331630,1398708,1424180,4242485,4246324,6722933,9569212],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=42691","id":9895422,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/07/state_v._hussain.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:17:37.862153Z","date_created":"2023-11-07T13:06:39.599843Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e126b0c4e1fe1f70bbdd94b44da85e19b02b2e5f","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n No. COA22-1024\n\n Filed 7 November 2023\n\nBrunswick County, Nos. 18 CRS 865-68, 21 CRS 212\n\nSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n v.\n\nLAKETTA HUSSAIN, Defendant.\n\n\n Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 2 March 2022 by Judge Jason C.\n\nDisbrow in Brunswick Country Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 6\n\nSeptember 2023.\n\n Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9895422],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Forgery uttering forged paper altering court documents residential mortgage fraud obtaining property by false pretense motion to dismiss restitution probation official court records vacate insufficient evidence of essential element remand for resentencing"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8436708/state-v-mackey/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Mackey","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8436708,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-348","docket_id":65651212,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:11:58.975619Z","date_created":"2022-11-01T12:05:04.150958Z","score":{"bm25":30.780123}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1207937,1210865,1297473,1325930,1337906,1420169,1422630],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=41830","id":8407050,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/01/state_v._mackey.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:22:47.086645Z","date_created":"2022-11-01T12:05:04.151841Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"41704373fe2813871b09d56ee481dc3333466fa6","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n 2022-NCCOA-715\n\n No. COA22-348\n\n Filed 1 November 2022\n\n Cabarrus County, No. 20CRS50156-57\n\n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n v.\n\n NIKITA V. MACKEY\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 4 June 2021 by Judge\n\n William Anderson Long, Jr., in Cabarrus County Superior Court. Heard ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8407050],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Forgery Uttering Obtaining Property by False Pretenses Fatal Variance Motion to Quash Unpreserved Issues on Appeal Statutory Right to Recordation under N.C. Gen. Stat § 15A-1241 Recording Private Bench Conferences"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10329162/state-v-frazier/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Frazier","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 Ohio 389"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10329162,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-02-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-CA-12","docket_id":69620291,"judge":"Huffman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-02-07T15:13:38.151380Z","date_created":"2025-02-07T15:13:38.091025Z","score":{"bm25":30.70301}},"neutralCite":"2025 Ohio 389","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2690568,4258479,4262052,4698757,5129257,6339896,6756211,9886433],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/2/2025/2025-Ohio-389.pdf","id":10795750,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/02/07/state_v._frazier.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:05:29.613615Z","date_created":"2025-02-07T15:13:38.105145Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e888195756c86859959cf6c79ba1d8e8ca7fc4c4","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Frazier, 2025-Ohio-389.]\n\n\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n MIAMI COUNTY\n\n STATE OF OHIO :\n :\n Appellee : C.A. No. 2024-CA-12\n :\n v. ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10795750],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The trial court did not commit plain error in failing to merge appellant's convictions for identity fraud, forgery, and grand theft. There are insufficient facts in the record to determine whether the offenses were committed with the same conduct, animus and import. Judgment affirmed."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4838991/state-v-bunkley/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Bunkley","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 Ohio 6675"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4838991,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-12-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2020-L-024","docket_id":18741478,"judge":"Trapp","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:38:27.065648Z","date_created":"2020-12-14T21:11:37.090095Z","score":{"bm25":30.092491}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ohio 6675","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8141,"cites":[110138,2691670,3185631,3723753,3758737,4274882,4375680],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2020/2020-Ohio-6675.pdf","id":4642770,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/12/14/state_v._bunkley.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:19:29.368312Z","date_created":"2020-12-14T21:11:37.105924Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"565f01499a45dbb14049871570f37adcfe74cad8","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Bunkley, 2020-Ohio-6675.]\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n LAKE COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\n STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION\n\n Plaintiff-Appellee, :\n CASE NO. 2020-L-024\n - vs - :\n\n JEROME ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4642770],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CRIMINAL LAW - forgery passing bad checks sufficiency identity spurious dishonored authentication Evid.R. 901(A) self-authentication Evid.R. 902(9) hearsay business records exception Evid.R. 803(6) manifest weight credibility cumulative error."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4421578/people-v-carian/","attorney":"","caseName":"People v. Carian","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2017 COA 106","414 P.3d 34"],"citeCount":20,"cluster_id":4421578,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15CA0470","docket_id":6143453,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:40:39.448657Z","date_created":"2017-08-25T01:06:42.711697Z","score":{"bm25":30.074759}},"neutralCite":"2017 COA 106","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108111,1119600,1160892,1163432,1199791,1222769,1352303,1381937,1423748,2382056,2518028,2519137,2536526,2583958,2589482,2599441,2599894,2604056,2623133,2625601,2628490,2629512,2632921,2633711,2634423,2636120,4024884],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/Sections/Opinions/8-10-17/15CA0470-PD.pdf?ver=2017-08-10-145237-563","id":4198831,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/08/10/people_v._carian.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:06:05.642670Z","date_created":"2017-08-25T01:06:42.719849Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5b53bde3b41c146d67c7e2082c65bc0f89a57499","snippet":"COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA106\n\n\nCourt of Appeals No. 15CA0470\nAdams County District Court No. 14CR1022\nHonorable Thomas R. Ensor, Judge\n\n\nThe People of the State of Colorado,\n\nPlaintiff-Appellee,\n\nv.\n\nSamuel David Carian,\n\nDefendant-Appellant.\n\n\n JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART\n AND VACATED IN PART\n\n Division I\n Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4198831],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Forgery","syllabus":"Forgery—Urinalysis Results—Attempt to Influence a Public Servant—Probation—Res Gestae Evidence—Prosecutorial Misconduct. Carian was on probation for possession of a controlled substance, and mandatory drug tests were a condition of his probation. Carian completed some tests, but missed others and also returned tests with positive results. When Carian's probation officer served him with a revocation complaint for various probation violations, Carian handed her fraudulent urine drug test results from Wiz Quiz, an unapproved urinalysis facility. Carian was convicted of forgery and attempting to influence a public servant. On appeal, Carian contended that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of forgery under CRS § 18-5-102(1)(d) because the urinalysis results at issue were not a \"public record\" or \"an instrument filed or required by law to be filed or legally fileable in or with a public office or public servant.\" While the urinalysis results from Wiz Quiz were \"instrument[s]\" within the reach of the statute, they were not filed, required by law to be filed, or legally fileable, thus the evidence did not support his forgery conviction. Carian also contended that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence under the doctrine of res gestae showing that he had been previously convicted of a drug offense. Regardless of whether the admission of such evidence was error, it did not substantially influence the verdict or affect the fairness of the proceedings regarding his conviction for attempting to influence a public servant. Thus, any error in its admission was harmless. Carian further contended that the prosecutor committed misconduct, during both his opening statement and his rebuttal closing, by asking the jury to hold Carian accountable for wasting public resources and \"squandering\" the opportunity to rehabilitate himself on probation. Although the prosecutor's statements were improper, the admission of such statements does not warrant reversal under either plain or harmless error review."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10019615/state-v-mcswain/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. McSwain","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10019615,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-343","docket_id":59914286,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-07-29T15:55:10.187578Z","date_created":"2024-07-29T15:55:10.139823Z","score":{"bm25":30.034948}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1242519,1295039,1315369,1321248,1323203,1326897,1331630,1390124,1400069,2506505,2728751,3654152,4160866,8907941],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=40162","id":10486216,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/18/state_v._mcswain.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:17:38.061394Z","date_created":"2024-07-29T15:55:10.141653Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"488e72ad62a7d11c02e62cf65d22d509991d382d","snippet":" IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n 2021-NCCOA-216\n\n No. COA20-343\n\n Filed 18 May 2021\n\n Cleveland County, Nos. 18 CRS 2096, 2097\n\n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,\n\n v.\n\n ANGELA MICHELLE MCSWAIN, Defendant.\n\n\n Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 20 December 2019 by Judge\n\n William A. Wood II in Cleveland County Super","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10486216],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Motion to dismiss sufficiency of the evidence forgery of a check uttering a false check falsity element authority to sign illustrative evidence"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4530656/state-v-ervin/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Ervin","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 Ohio 3451"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4530656,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18CA1","docket_id":7757815,"judge":"Harsha","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:10:51.139120Z","date_created":"2018-08-28T15:17:33.178946Z","score":{"bm25":28.58474}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 3451","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8100,"cites":[110797,111206,2690010,2690146,2697206,2735907,4099460],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/4/2018/2018-Ohio-3451.pdf","id":4307909,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/08/22/state_v._ervin.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:22:03.020533Z","date_created":"2018-08-28T15:17:33.191215Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6386302228f58122a55e56d7415d645501f13c3c","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Ervin, 2018-Ohio-3451.]\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n HIGHLAND COUNTY\n\nSTATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 18CA1\n\n Plaintiff-Appellee, :\n\n v. : DECISION AND\n JUDGMENT ENTRY\nSHAWN E. ERVIN, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4307909],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Manifest weight of the evidence Forgery Request for expert at state expense Opportunity to present complete defense Forfeiture of argument"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4860810/state-v-panezich/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Panezich","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 Ohio 572"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4860810,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-02-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20 MA 0052","docket_id":59700963,"judge":"Donofrio","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:43:58.143918Z","date_created":"2021-03-03T19:11:01.236551Z","score":{"bm25":28.504457}},"neutralCite":"2021 Ohio 572","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8079,"cites":[2700817,4294448,4307543,4571561],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/7/2021/2021-Ohio-572.pdf","id":4664589,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/02/24/state_v._panezich.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:48:00.414707Z","date_created":"2021-03-03T19:11:01.253202Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c5d9363ebe81e583d030f52ebc5d94cb7c6fd7a6","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Panezich, 2021-Ohio-572.]\n\n\n\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n MAHONING COUNTY\n\n STATE OF OHIO,\n\n Plaintiff-Appellee,\n\n v.\n\n CLIFTON PANEZICH,\n\n Defendant-Appellant.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4664589],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated theft, telecommunications fraud, three counts of forgery, identity fraud, money laundering, and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity second postconviction petition petition untimely R.C. 2953.23(A)"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10401312/tracy-d-boyd-jr-v-state-of-tennessee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Tracy D. Boyd, Jr. v. State of Tennessee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10401312,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2023-01669-CCA-R3-PC","docket_id":69622526,"judge":"Judge Matthew J. Wilson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-04-29T13:22:19.963943Z","date_created":"2025-04-29T13:22:19.915944Z","score":{"bm25":28.086943}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109648,111170,111539,1057609,1058710,1060512,1060938,1083642,1667196,1769614,2388301,2770820],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/OpinionsPDFVersion/BoydTracyDJr1OPN.pdf","id":10867900,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/04/28/tracy_d._boyd_jr._v._state_of_tennessee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T03:01:21.820405Z","date_created":"2025-04-29T13:22:19.923485Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dcb991dbbda9e9c18e516d0e66cf479a87536045","snippet":" 04/28/2025\n IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n AT JACKSON\n January 14, 2025 Session\n\n TRACY D. BOYD, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE\n\n Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County\n No. C-23-180 Joseph T. Howell, Judge\n ___________________________________\n\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10867900],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Petitioner, Tracy D. Boyd, Jr., appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, which challenged his guilty-pleaded convictions of three counts of impersonating a licensed professional, two counts of theft of property, and one count of forgery. He claims that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel and that his guilty pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered. Upon review of the record, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief."}]}