{"count":23936,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xNy4wNDc0OTMmcz00NTkxODMzJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjQmcD0y&q=FELONY+CLASSIFICATION&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9491063/larry-j-bradley-v-state-of-tennessee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Larry J. Bradley v. State of Tennessee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9491063,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-04-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M2023-00119-CCA-R3-PC","docket_id":68409165,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:29:12.704135Z","date_created":"2024-04-04T19:09:56.031510Z","score":{"bm25":37.1918}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1054593,1058839,1060512,1061007,1061016,1083472,1769614,1791734,2429469,2770820,4274909,9429592,9524418],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/OpinionsPDFVersion/UNSIGNED-M2023-0119-CCA-BRADLEY.pdf","id":9957676,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/04/04/larry_j._bradley_v._state_of_tennessee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T09:18:30.565372Z","date_created":"2024-04-04T19:09:56.040592Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"966edd5a5b55e8ca1df9c956ab7d66de6587fc16","snippet":"                                                                                         04/04/2024\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                         AT NASHVILLE\n                        Assigned on Briefs December 12, 2023\n\n               LARRY J. BRADLEY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE\n\n               Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County\n                No. 2015-CR-9      William R. Goodman, III, Judge\n                     ___________________________________\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9957676],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Petitioner, Larry J. Bradley, appeals from the Montgomery County Circuit Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief related to his convictions for evading arrest, attempted carjacking, aggravated burglary, and assault. Petitioner argues that the post-conviction court erred in denying relief based upon his claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because (1) trial counsel argued that Petitioner was guilty of attempted carjacking without consulting with Petitioner and (2) trial counsel failed to properly determine the felony classification for Petitioner's Indiana convictions for purposes of sentencing. He also argues the \"Circuit Court erred in denying [Petitioner's] petition to set aside the sentence on the attempted carjacking conviction due to the ineffective assistance of counsel.\" After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8444027/whatley-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-classification-center/","attorney":"*1154Brian Mendelsohn, Susan Jill Benton, Gerald Wesley King, Jr., Federal Defender Program, Inc., ATLANTA, GA, for Petitioner - Appellee-Cross Appellant., Richard W. Tangum, Beth Attaway Burton, Sabrina Graham, Attorney General's Office, ATLANTA, GA, for Respondent - Appellant-Cross Appellee.","caseName":"Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center","caseNameFull":"Frederick R. WHATLEY, Cross v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, Cross","citation":["927 F.3d 1150"],"citeCount":104,"cluster_id":8444027,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 13-12034","docket_id":65663459,"judge":"Hull, Jordan, Tjoflat","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:15:25.179929Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:53:59.298440Z","score":{"bm25":34.125755}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8415463,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T02:11:06.405473Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:53:59.314492Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nTJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:\nFrederick R. Whatley (\"Petitioner\") murdered a bait shop owner in Georgia in 1995. He was convicted and sentenced to death.1 After the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed his convictions and death sentence, Whatley v. State , 270 Ga. 296, ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8415463,8415464],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3160879/johnson-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-classification-prison/","attorney":"Brian Kammer, Marcia A. Widder, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Beth Attaway Burton, Attorney General’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent Appellee.","caseName":"Johnson v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison","caseNameFull":"Marcus Ray JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["805 F.3d 1317","2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22997","2015 WL 7303405"],"citeCount":19,"cluster_id":3160879,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-11-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-15173","docket_id":3019111,"judge":"Carnes, Hull, Pryor","lexisCite":"2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22997","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:09:14.078881Z","date_created":"2015-12-08T21:35:31.473392Z","score":{"bm25":33.870373}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[76146,76374,76576,77687,78135,78338,112808,118359,173874,1212815,1226301],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201515173.pdf","id":3160879,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/11/19/marcus_johnson_v._warden.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:40:36.718753Z","date_created":"2015-12-08T21:01:17.410916Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"54852b4dd35dba12aff744bb2101c5d19f2100c9","snippet":"\n\n\n  PER CURIAM:\n \n\n  Marcus Ray Johnson, a Georgia inmate under a death sentence, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court on the eve of his execution.\n \n\n  I. FACTS OF THE CRIMES\n \n\n  The Georgia Supreme Court summarized the facts of Johnson’s 1994 crimes as follows:\n \n\n  The","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3160879],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"ORD","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3187268/ledford-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-classification-prison/","attorney":"Mary Elizabeth Wells, Law Office of M.E. Wells, Atlanta, GA, John D. Cline, Law Office of John D. Cline, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Beth Attaway Burton, Sabrina Graham, Attorney General’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee..","caseName":"Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison","caseNameFull":"J.W. LEDFORD, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["818 F.3d 600","2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5062","2016 WL 1084274"],"citeCount":283,"cluster_id":3187268,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14-15650","docket_id":3046194,"judge":"Carnes, Hull, Jordan","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5062","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:24:53.514681Z","date_created":"2016-03-21T16:03:43.470859Z","score":{"bm25":32.972862}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[48733,75072,75487,77314,78222,78528,78551,107252,111170,111373,121158,130159,137735,145700,145870,147406,173701,178434,182992,206045,213842,557868,616869,620311,688709,731385,789370,1140944,1156862,1293195,1312642,1344392,1367916,2641235,2654277,2679204,2811850,4799652],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201415650.pdf","id":3187215,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/03/21/j._w._ledford_jr._v._warden_gdcp.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:59:17.048226Z","date_created":"2016-03-21T16:03:43.477443Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6c0bb70bba3b545aaaeebd6df794a1dba1ec0069","snippet":"\n\n\n  HULL, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  Petitioner J.W. Ledford, Jr., a Georgia death-row inmate, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, raising multiple challenges to his- capital conviction and death sentence. The district court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Led-ford’s claim that he is intellectually disabled and- not subject to execution.\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3187215],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4631440/frederick-whatley-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-classification-center/","attorney":"","caseName":"Frederick Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4631440,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-12034","docket_id":15808732,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:40:32.131084Z","date_created":"2019-06-20T17:00:36.921892Z","score":{"bm25":30.466394}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201312034.pdf","id":4408693,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/06/20/frederick_whatley_v._warden_georgia_diagnostic_and_classification_center.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:32:06.143279Z","date_created":"2019-06-20T17:00:36.925247Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9f057ccf216805a7cd4ab67f3717a880b4e12fe0","snippet":"           Case: 13-12034   Date Filed: 06/20/2019   Page: 1 of 91\n\n\n                                                                     [PUBLISH]\n\n\n             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n                      ________________________\n\n                             No. 13-12034\n                       ________________________\n\n                   D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cv-00074-WSD\n\n\nFREDERICK R. WHATLEY,\n\n                                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4408693],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2750581/daniel-anthony-lucas-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-classification/","attorney":"David C. Blickenstaff, Schiff Hardin, LLP, Chicago, IL, Elisabeth Carey-Davis, The Law Office of Lisa Carey-Davis, Bozeman, MT, for Petitioner-Appellant., Dana Elizabeth Weinberger, Beth Atta-way Burton, Sabrina Graham, Georgia Department of Law, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee.","caseName":"Daniel Anthony Lucas v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison","caseNameFull":"Daniel Anthony LUCAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["771 F.3d 785","2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21467","2014 WL 5840138"],"citeCount":13,"cluster_id":2750581,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-11-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1311909","docket_id":2595665,"judge":"Hull, Marcus, Pryor","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21467","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:24:15.765053Z","date_created":"2014-11-12T20:05:07.444723Z","score":{"bm25":27.505163}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1757,76549,77201,78021,78095,78159,102436,104321,106598,107359,109024,111170,111514,111717,112085,112388,112845,117923,118307,121158,122241,122736,127898,134748,145122,145720,149614,182992,213842,799612,801975,1247358,1290170,2670965],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201311909.pdf","id":2750581,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/11/12/daniel_anthony_lucas_v._warden_georgia_diagnostic_and_classification.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:48:37.066461Z","date_created":"2014-11-12T20:01:07.452019Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"eef2ef1fa6147f5b49147dae71c480e588c5b81a","snippet":"\n\n\n  MARCUS, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  Daniel Anthony Lucas was sentenced to death for his role in the murders of three members of the Moss family during a botched burglary and robbery. He appeals the district court’s denial of his federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Five claims are certified to us. On none is he entitled to relief.\n \n\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2750581],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4523977/state-v-dornoff/","attorney":"\n  Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.\n , \n  Lawrence A. Gold, for appellant.\n ","caseName":"State v. Dornoff","caseNameFull":"STATE of Ohio, Appellee v. Steven H. DORNOFF, Jr., Appellant","citation":["2018 Ohio 3084","105 N.E.3d 1278"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4523977,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"WD-16-072","docket_id":7598765,"judge":"Singer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:09:02.397944Z","date_created":"2018-08-06T13:06:25.076418Z","score":{"bm25":24.522377}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 3084","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8134,"cites":[2526547],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/6/2018/2018-Ohio-3084.pdf","id":4301230,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/08/03/state_v._dornoff.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:17:15.870013Z","date_created":"2018-08-06T13:06:25.084909Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2692564dd06eb877e659f3d348a0093e8ebc4dcc","snippet":"\n\n\n  SINGER, J.\n \n\n  {¶ 1} Appellant, Steven H. Dornoff, Jr., appeals the September 14, 2016 judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, where he was sentenced to 15 years of incarceration, following acceptance of his negotiated guilty plea agreement. For the reasons which follow, we vacate and remand.\n \n\n  {¶ 2} Appellant sets forth the following assignments of error:\n </","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4301230],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Criminal. Rape. Felonious assault. Kidnapping. Sexual offender classification. Guilty Plea. Crim.R. 11. R.C. Chapter 2950."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10667917/state-v-ison/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Ison","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 Ohio 3193"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10667917,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-09-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2024-T-0094","docket_id":71295245,"judge":"S. Lynch","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-08T21:10:06.296424Z","date_created":"2025-09-08T21:10:06.187219Z","score":{"bm25":23.655518}},"neutralCite":"2025 Ohio 3193","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106037,2704659,2707463,2770083,3005605,3720588,3721559,3746068,4283269,4409651,4652203,5116681,5122148,6338807,6759591,6763551,6771704,7085951,7805952,8209169,8210618,8483657,9324827,9325518,9364982,9370473,9800875,9801312,9802016,9882866,9890908,9910969,9949522,9952749,9971905,10498126,10769955,10819799,11053248],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2025/2025-Ohio-3193.pdf","id":11134504,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/09/08/state_v._ison.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:18:13.408145Z","date_created":"2025-09-08T21:10:06.214008Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1633a94e2cfae08be8e2cbc36002e0feb2ffeace","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Ison, 2025-Ohio-3193.]\n\n\n                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                     ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                           TRUMBULL COUNTY\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                                 CASE NO. 2024-T-0094\n\n                 Plaintiff-Appellee,\n                                               Criminal Appeal from the\n        - vs -                                 Court of Common Pleas\n\nCRAIG S. ISON,\n                                               Tr","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11134504],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CRIMINAL - competence to stand trial; competency hearing; \"raising\" competence; maintaining defense; indicia of incompetence; mental health diagnosis; sufficiency of the evidence; trespass in a habitation; stealth; force; merger; allied offenses; aggravated robbery; felonious assault; separate and identifiable harm; consecutive sentences; proportionality analysis; criminal history; omnibus sentences; violent offender classification"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4748674/state-v-ruffer/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Ruffer","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 Ohio 2656"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4748674,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-04-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"F-19-007","docket_id":17102183,"judge":"Osowik","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:13:49.977346Z","date_created":"2020-04-27T15:09:56.935872Z","score":{"bm25":22.386124}},"neutralCite":"2020 Ohio 2656","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8121,"cites":[111170],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/6/2020/2020-Ohio-2656.pdf","id":4529021,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/04/24/state_v._ruffer.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:55:23.098403Z","date_created":"2020-04-27T15:09:56.952360Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"23b44a9dfd4870ed42cd03b2d38ac3f665418412","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Ruffer, 2020-Ohio-2656.]\n\n\n\n\n                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                                 SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                      FULTON COUNTY\n\n\nState of Ohio                                    Court of Appeals No. F-19-007\n\n        Appellee                                 Trial Court No. 18CR000015\n\nv.\n\nIan C. Ruffer                                    DECISION AND JUDGMENT\n\n        Appellant                              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4529021],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Trial court did not err in not merging appellant's felony drug convictions for sentencing purposes as the underlying offenses each involved a drug from a different drug schedule classification, and as such, they are not allied offenses of similar import."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4632399/state-v-martin/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Martin","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 Ohio 2504"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4632399,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-L-060","docket_id":15825467,"judge":"Cannon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:40:47.801775Z","date_created":"2019-06-24T19:47:49.833894Z","score":{"bm25":20.522484}},"neutralCite":"2019 Ohio 2504","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8065,"cites":[2697765,2700849,2741967,3153949,3184530,3185433,3190444,3768113,4102075,4170777,4225747,4309126],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/11/2019/2019-Ohio-2504.pdf","id":4409652,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/06/24/state_v._martin.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:32:47.567907Z","date_created":"2019-06-24T19:47:49.850294Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bec46e79bd69b5bd6ce5809bdbde9b75b4ae0ea6","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Martin, 2019-Ohio-2504.]\n\n\n                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                                 ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                             LAKE COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\n STATE OF OHIO,                                       :      OPINION\n\n                  Plaintiff-Appellee,                 :\n                                                             CASE NO. 2018-L-060\n         - vs -                                       :\n\n Z","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4409652],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CRIMINAL LAW - CONSTITUTIONAL - R.C. 2950.01 sex offender classification equal protection due process cruel and unusual punishment R.C. 2907.03(A)(9) athletic coach minor victim Tier III sex offender. SENTENCING - proportionality consistency similar crimes overriding purposes of felony sentencing R.C. 2929.11 seriousness and recidivism factors R.C. 2929.12 element of the offense."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7862086/state-v-perry/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Perry","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2022 Ohio 3056"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":7862086,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C-200178","docket_id":64944993,"judge":"Myers","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:03:52.019193Z","date_created":"2022-09-02T13:08:15.190418Z","score":{"bm25":19.686289}},"neutralCite":"2022 Ohio 3056","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4700876,6323716,7803823],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/1/2022/2022-Ohio-3056.pdf","id":7805952,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/02/state_v._perry.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:46:34.149176Z","date_created":"2022-09-02T13:08:15.195732Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8f61f8d934f6c4f99780ac5afdfce407b64c060d","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Perry, 2022-Ohio-3056.]\n\n                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n                FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO\n                           HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                                   :       APPEAL NO. C-200178\n                                                         TRIAL NO. B-1904068\n       Plaintiff-Appellee,                       :\n\n vs.                                             :\n                                                ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7805952],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SEPARATION OF POWERS – SENTENCING – R.C. 2903.41 – VIOLENT- OFFENDER CLASSIFICATION: The trial court erred by classifying defendant as a violent offender and telling him he would be required to register with Ohio's Violent Offender Database upon his release from prison because felonious assault, the offense for which defendant was convicted, is not a predicate offense listed in R.C. 2903.41. Defendant cannot demonstrate that the indefinite sentencing scheme embodied in the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional on its face because the law does not violate the separation-of-powers doctrine. See State v. Guyton, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-190657, 2022-Ohio-2962."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8245355/state-v-jackson/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Jackson","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2022 Ohio 3449"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":8245355,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C-200332","docket_id":65388930,"judge":"Winkler","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T17:51:38.503767Z","date_created":"2022-09-30T13:08:05.380219Z","score":{"bm25":19.39596}},"neutralCite":"2022 Ohio 3449","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3775357,4216794,4531677,4669559,4678498,4700876,4707903,6762746,6772787,6793329,7803823,7805952,8209832,9424054],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/1/2022/2022-Ohio-3449.pdf","id":8210618,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/30/state_v._jackson.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T03:13:13.251333Z","date_created":"2022-09-30T13:08:05.385226Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e0f78fd31f343b4ea44860ff866c43736b799f67","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Jackson, 2022-Ohio-3449.]\n\n\n\n\n                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n                      FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO\n                           HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO\n\n\n\n\n STATE OF OHIO,                               :   APPEAL NO. C-200332\n                                                  TRIAL NO. B-1906355\n         Plaintiff-Appellee,                  :\n\n   VS.                                        :     O P I N I O N.\n\n WILLIAM JACKSON,                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8210618],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"GUILTY PLEA — CRIM.R. 11 — SENTENCING — VIOLENT OFFENDER CLASSIFICATION — REAGAN TOKES LAW: Defendant failed to demonstrate that his guilty plea was not made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently where the trial court fully complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2). The trial court erred by classifying defendant as a violent offender and ordering defendant to enroll in the violent-offender registry pursuant to R.C. 2903.41 where defendant was not convicted under any of the qualifying code sections. The trial court did not err by imposing an indefinite sentence for a second-degree-felony offense where the Reagan Tokes Law is not unconstitutional on its face, see State v. Guyton, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-190657, 2022-Ohio-2962, but the trial court erred in failing to provide at sentencing the notices required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c)."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4439794/state-of-tennessee-v-tommy-lee-houser-jr/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Tommy Lee Houser, Jr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4439794,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-11-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2017-00987-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":6184228,"judge":"Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:45:25.319043Z","date_created":"2017-11-01T20:18:21.365163Z","score":{"bm25":19.273148}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8293,"cites":[110138,1057558,1057682,1058090,1058651,1060523,1060573,1060708,1060945,1081009,1520677,1531833,1636806,1653946,1666311,1716765,1717810,2362733,2408703,2456081],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/tommy_lee_houser_opinion.pdf","id":4217047,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/11/01/state_of_tennessee_v._tommy_lee_houser_jr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:18:38.459593Z","date_created":"2017-11-01T20:18:21.376867Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"539ee2feb153dbb7d9e47dcc5cd4b675227e7f64","snippet":"                                                                                           11/01/2017\n        .IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                         AT KNOXVILLE\n                        Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2017\n\n           STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TOMMY LEE HOUSER, JR.\n\n                  Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County\n                    No. 105733         Steven W. Sword, Judge\n                     ___________________________________\n\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4217047],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A Knox County jury convicted the Defendant, Tommy Lee Houser, Jr., of felony theft. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court classified the Defendant as a career offender and imposed a mandatory twelve year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant asserts that the evidence supporting his conviction is insufficient and that the trial court erred in applying the Class D felony offense classification rather than the \"new\" Class E felony offense classification. After review, we affirm the trial court's judgment."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9444110/state-v-pacheco/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Pacheco","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ohio 4208"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9444110,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"112268","docket_id":68030037,"judge":"Groves","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:18:00.322345Z","date_created":"2023-11-22T18:08:25.874997Z","score":{"bm25":19.208923}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 4208","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2929097,9882747,9896206],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/8/2023/2023-Ohio-4208.pdf","id":9901935,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/22/state_v._pacheco.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:05:58.397803Z","date_created":"2023-11-22T18:08:25.886178Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b47e968b1c1a9f8112da7f4fbc0dfa66227f487b","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Pacheco, 2023-Ohio-4208.]\n\n\n                               COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n\n                             EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                                      :\n\n                 Plaintiff-Appellee,                :\n                                                             No. 112268\n                 v.                                 :\n\nJASON PACHECO,                                      :\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9901935],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Conceded error nunc pro tunc R.C. 2903.08(C)(2) and (3) points license suspension consecutive sentences prior conviction postrelease control enhanced classification Reagan Tokes. The trial court's imposition of a ten-year driver's license suspension following a conviction for vehicular assault was contrary to law. Under R.C. 2903.08(C)(2) and (3), absent a prior conviction, a defendant is not subject to an enhanced classification as it relates to license suspension. The trial court made the necessary findings for consecutive sentences. Reagan Tokes is not unconstitutional. The trial court erred when it stated in its entries that the defendant was convicted of felonious assault by means of a deadly weapon or dangerous ordnance, in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(2), rather than felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) accordingly, the trial court must correct that error on remand."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/76215/robert-karl-hicks-v-frederick-j-head-warden-gerogia-diagnostic-and/","attorney":"Robert L. MeGlasson, II (Court-Appointed), Decatur, GA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Susan V. Boleyn, State Law Dept., Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee.","caseName":"Robert Karl Hicks v. Frederick J. Head, Warden, Gerogia Diagnostic and Classification Prison","caseNameFull":"Robert Karl HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frederick J. HEAD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["333 F.3d 1280","2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11811","2003 WL 21373174"],"citeCount":17,"cluster_id":76215,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-06-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"01-11621","docket_id":2039175,"judge":"Edmondson, Birch, Dubina","lexisCite":"2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11811","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-12-05T19:22:58.876066Z","date_created":"2015-12-16T18:01:01.219402Z","score":{"bm25":19.177681}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104321,107359,111356,111750,112566,112845,145122,669740,693414,715648,757309,1340635,1340730],"download_url":"http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200111621.pdf","id":76215,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2003/06/16/Robert_Karl_Hicks_v._Frederick_J._Head_Warden_Gerogia_Diagnostic_and.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T12:55:28.929642Z","date_created":"2010-04-26T23:53:43Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e91b1c50e12553ba4ad2a398635eeb6f0d3aa918","snippet":"\n\n\n  DUBINA, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  Petitioner Robert Karl Hicks (“Hicks”), a death row inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying him federal habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We granted Hicks’s motion for a Certificate of Appealability (“COA”)\n  \n   1\n  \n  on a question of first impression for our circuit: whether violation","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[76215],"source":"CRU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4470946/state-of-tennessee-v-laylon-ward-jr/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Laylon Ward, Jr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4470946,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-02-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2017-00736-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":6315745,"judge":"Judge John Everett Williams","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:54:25.929120Z","date_created":"2018-02-26T15:25:54.593296Z","score":{"bm25":18.744606}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8294,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/ward_laylon_jr._opn.pdf","id":4248199,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/02/23/state_of_tennessee_v._laylon_ward_jr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:40:22.331519Z","date_created":"2018-02-26T15:25:54.602510Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"42e0afe1cc90a6c08c329c16fd95ac79b692afb9","snippet":"                                                                                          02/23/2018\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                          AT JACKSON\n                        Assigned on Briefs December 5, 2017\n\n               STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAYLON WARD, JR.\n\n                   Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dyer County\n                    No. 16-CR-68       R. Lee Moore, Jr., Judge\n                     ___________________________________\n\n     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4248199],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Defendant, Laylon Ward, Jr., was convicted by a Dyer County jury of reckless aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range II, multiple offender to eight years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the Defendant challenges his classification as a Range II offender, arguing that the trial court erred in considering two previous convictions as felonies. After a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6459244/state-of-tennessee-v-wayne-david-jones/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Wayne David Jones","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6459244,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-04-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M2020-00871-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":63234461,"judge":"Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:44:57.464455Z","date_created":"2022-04-13T20:12:13.221901Z","score":{"bm25":18.05359}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8291,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/jones_wayne_david-_filed_opn.pdf","id":6331355,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/04/12/state_of_tennessee_v._wayne_david_jones.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T06:29:48.200578Z","date_created":"2022-04-13T20:12:13.233624Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c59552aaa67f63b30ef8fd03190ffb7aea554293","snippet":"                                                                                        04/12/2022\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                         AT NASHVILLE\n                       Submitted on Briefs December 15, 2021\n\n             STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WAYNE DAVID JONES\n\n                Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County\n                    No. 2016-A-250 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge\n\n\n\n                            No. M2020-00871-CCA-R3-CD\n\n\n\n\nThe De","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6331355],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Defendant, Wayne David Jones, was convicted by a jury of two counts of reckless homicide, one count of aggravated child abuse, and one count of child neglect, for which he received an effective twenty-five-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficent to support his convictions because the jury improperly weighed conflicting expert medical testimony regarding the thirteen-month-old victim's head trauma and cause of death. Following our review, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant's convictions. However, we determine error with the classification of the Defendant's child neglect conviction as a Class A misdmeanor and the imposition of a misdemeanor sentence. Accordingly, we vacate the conviction and sentence for child neglect and remand for entry of a modified Class E felony child neglect conviction and for the trial court to impose a corresponding felony sentence. In all other respects, we affirm."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/757863/robert-lewis-collier-v-tony-turpin-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and/","attorney":"Amy Gershenfeld Donnella, St. Davids, PA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Thurbert Baker, Atty. Gen., Susan V. Boleyn, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee.","caseName":"Robert Lewis Collier v. Tony Turpin, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center","caseNameFull":"Robert Lewis COLLIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tony TURPIN, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["155 F.3d 1277"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":757863,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1999-03-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"95-8682","docket_id":709509,"judge":"Tjoflat, Dubina, Barkett","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:03:11.057678Z","date_created":"2014-12-22T16:40:36.824026Z","score":{"bm25":17.65904}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[72964,107715,109439,109535,109717,109935,110662,111169,111170,111957,491574,505930,566779,602457,663718,684428,1227479,1263560,1307678],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/155/155.F3d.1277.95-8682.html","id":757863,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T12:46:56.734092Z","date_created":"2012-04-18T04:15:38Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1758aea572fc667126c37b5cc48c2d230640063d","snippet":"\n\n\n  TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  Robert Lewis Collier appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In 1978, Collier was convicted in the Superior Court of Catoosa County, Georgia, of felony murder, aggravated assault, and three armed robberies. Collier was sentenced to death for the murder conviction. The murder occurred as Collier fled from the scene of three armed ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[757863],"source":"RU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4847331/state-of-tennessee-v-andre-bowen/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Andre Bowen","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4847331,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-01-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2019-01210-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":29102155,"judge":"Judge J. Ross Dyer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:40:33.549850Z","date_created":"2021-01-13T16:12:35.414058Z","score":{"bm25":17.287338}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,1057558,1057615,1057682,1057821,1058090,1060681,1060703,1060989,1077323,1078019,1514430,1516927,1518420,1520677,1531833,1571919,1621939,1674551,1747577,1780609,1785010,2362733,2406007,2408703,2431765,2432629,2435953,2456081],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/bowen_andre_opn.pdf","id":4651110,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/01/12/state_of_tennessee_v._andre_bowen.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-28T21:24:01.536003Z","date_created":"2021-01-13T16:12:35.419627Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7c897a8d719a98349bc88c0d30b6fa6fd97ea1ac","snippet":"                                                                                           01/12/2021\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                          AT JACKSON\n                                 August 5, 2020 Session\n\n                  STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDRE BOWEN\n\n                  Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County\n                      No. 18-01853       Lee V. Coffee, Judge\n                      ___________________________________\n\n         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4651110],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A Shelby County grand jury indicted the defendant, Andre Bowen, and his co-defendant, Anthony Olivo, for two counts of first-degree, felony murder (Counts 1 and 2) and attempted especially aggravated robbery (Count 3). The grand jury also indicted the defendant for two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Counts 4 and 5). After a joint trial, the jury acquitted the defendant on Count 1 but found him guilty of the lesser-included offense of facilitation of first-degree, felony murder in Count 2, attempted especially aggravated robbery in Count 3, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in Counts 4 and 5, for which the trial court imposed an effective sentence of seventy-two years. On appeal, the defendant challenges thesufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and argues the trial court erred in sentencing. After our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court, but remand the case for a new sentencing hearing as to Counts 4 and 5 to reflect the appropriate felony classification for each offense and for entry of new sentences for each conviction."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4591833/state-of-tennessee-v-rodger-e-broadway/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Rodger E. Broadway","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4591833,"court":"Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Crim. App.","court_id":"tenncrimapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-02-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E2018-01033-CCA-R3-CD","docket_id":14559065,"judge":"Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:28:15.706915Z","date_created":"2019-02-19T22:36:16.353114Z","score":{"bm25":17.047493}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8287,"cites":[1060587],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/roger_a._broadway_cca_majority_opinion.pdf","id":4369086,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/02/19/state_of_tennessee_v._rodger_e._broadway.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:04:30.161040Z","date_created":"2019-02-19T22:36:16.363589Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9a6634af20f00510e45100ae140daf24bb8ce00a","snippet":"                                                                                             02/19/2019\n        IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                         AT KNOXVILLE\n                          Assigned on Briefs January 24, 2019\n\n             STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RODGER E. BROADWAY\n\n                   Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County\n                        No. 73375 Steven W. Sword, Judge\n\n\n                              No. E2018-01033-CCA-R3-CD\n\n\nThe","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4369086],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Defendant, Rodger E. Broadway, pleaded guilty to first degree felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, and aggravated rape and received an effective sentence of life without the possibility of parole. Fifteen years after his sentencing, he filed a motion pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1 alleging that his sentences were illegal because (1) the State failed to file the notice of its intent to seek life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and (2) the judgment forms for his remaining convictions reflect a standard offender classification with a 100% service requirement as a violent offender. The trial court summarily dismissed the motion on the basis that it failed to state a colorable claim. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred by summarily denying relief. We affirm the judgment of the trial court."}]}