{"count":84313,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yNi42NTkxODQmcz0yMjc4MDU5JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMDImcD0y&q=FAILURE+OF+CONSIDERATION+RENT&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8339270/rent-a-wreck-inc-v-rent-a-wreck-of-am-inc-in-re-rent-a-wreck-of-am/","attorney":"*115Scott T. Earle, Esq., Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Roger C. Simmons, Esq. (argued), Jacob I. Weddle, Esq., Charles E. Remus II, Esq., Gordon & Simmons, LLC, Frederick, MD, attorneys for Appellants David Schwartz and Rent A Wreck, Inc., Mark Minuti, Esq., Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; Faye B. Feinstein, Esq. (argued) and Christopher Combest, Esq., Quarles & Brady LLP, Chicago, IL, attorneys for Appellees, Rent-A-Wreck of America, Inc., Bundy American, LLC, and Quarles & Brady LLP.","caseName":"Rent A Wreck, Inc. v. Rent-A-Wreck of Am., Inc. (In re Rent-A-Wreck of Am., Inc.)","caseNameFull":"IN RE: RENT-A-WRECK OF AMERICA, INC., Debtors. Rent A Wreck, Inc. and David S. Schwartz v. Rent-A-Wreck of America, Inc., Bundy American, LLC, and Quarles & Brady LLP","citation":["596 B.R. 112"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8339270,"court":"District Court, D. Delaware","court_citation_string":"D. Del.","court_id":"ded","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-02-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 17-11592-LSS (Jointly Administered); Civ. No. 18-801-RGA","docket_id":65517695,"judge":"Andrews","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:31:11.496073Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T13:14:53.695270Z","score":{"bm25":41.254494}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8307601,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:08:03.925369Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T13:14:53.706314Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\nPresently before the Court is the appeal (D.I. 1) of Appellants Rent a Wreck, Inc. and David S. Schwartz (together, \"Schwartz\") from a Bankruptcy Court Order dated May 17, 2018 (B.D.I. 241)1 (\"Order\"), which denied Schwartz's motion for sanctions (B.D.I. 237) (\"Sanctions Motion\") against Rent-A-Wreck of America, Inc. (\"RAWA\") and Bundy American, LLC (\"Bundy,\" and, t","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8307601],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10613152/kwoka-v-enterprise-rent-a-car-company-of-boston-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Kwoka v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["141 F.4th 10"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":10613152,"court":"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit","court_citation_string":"1st Cir.","court_id":"ca1","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2024-09-04","dateFiled":"2025-06-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1126","docket_id":69129097,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:40:19.843149Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T21:00:21.771131Z","score":{"bm25":36.48048}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104133,118486,151195,152317,178095,195350,198264,198879,478063,514584,783037,783883,2669636,2671861,3171725,4312204,4342973,4650812,6103489,6659397,7010825,7251424,8705540,8770127,8777154,8953687,9396192,9422389,9422995,9431864,9432168,9500900],"download_url":"https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/opnfiles/24-1126P-01A.pdf","id":11079740,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/18/kwoka_v._enterprise_rent-a-car_company_of_boston_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T04:25:15.157932Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T21:00:21.774245Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7731b6166021cfbc1e9dce46fc73a401e3bf9e69","snippet":"          United States Court of Appeals\n                       For the First Circuit\n\n\nNo. 24-1126\n\n   KYLE KWOKA, as representative of the opt-in plaintiffs for\n    addressing the issues now on appeal; CAROLINA LOPEZ, as\n   representative of the opt-in plaintiffs for addressing the\n                      issues now on appeal,\n\n                      Plaintiffs, Appellants,\n\n   MAMADOU ALPHA BAH, individually and on behalf of all other\n                similarly situated individuals,\n\n            ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11079740],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6247508/in-re-rent-space-mgmt-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"in Re: Rent Space Mgmt LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6247508,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Dallas","court_id":"txctapp5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-01-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-21-01073-CV","docket_id":62645933,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:50:36.634146Z","date_created":"2022-02-02T07:13:39.133457Z","score":{"bm25":35.5211}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=26268&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa05%5cOpinion","id":6114685,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/01/27/in_re_rent_space_mgmt_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:50:36.692375Z","date_created":"2022-02-02T07:13:39.135967Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"664c651fd6e0d8f2b324b090430f642a197fad29","snippet":"Conditionally Granted and Opinion Filed January 27, 2022\n\n\n\n\n                                    S  In The\n                             Court of Appeals\n                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas\n                                No. 05-21-01073-CV\n\n                  IN RE RENT SPACE MGMT LLC, Relator\n\n           Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1\n                            Dallas County, Texas\n                    Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-04670-A\n\n             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6114685],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8247144/enterprise-rent-a-car-of-la-v-super-ct/","attorney":"","caseName":"Enterprise Rent-A-Car of L.A. v. Super. Ct.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8247144,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-10-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B321016","docket_id":65406445,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T17:52:26.179718Z","date_created":"2022-10-06T20:02:13.064106Z","score":{"bm25":34.36185}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2588374,2631185],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B321016.PDF","id":8212407,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/10/06/enterprise_rent-a-car_of_l.a._v._super._ct..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T01:42:47.545555Z","date_created":"2022-10-06T20:02:13.065979Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7b393b49531840f0b7934fd6fdf0bf89fa0a65fc","snippet":"Filed 10/6/22\n                CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\nIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                   SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                         DIVISION FOUR\n\n\n ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR OF                B321016\n LOS ANGELES,\n                                         (Los Angeles County\n     Petitioner,                         Super. Ct. No. BC654195)\n       v.\n\n THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE\n COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,\n\n       Respondent;\n\n DONARA GRIGORYAN,\n\n     Real Pa","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8212407],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6240634/adhav-v-midway-rent-a-car-inc/","attorney":"Kearney Littlefield, Thomas A. Kearney, Los Angeles, Prescott W. Littlefield, Los Angeles; Catherine Burke Schmidt, Marina Del Rey; Ringler Law Corporation, Jerome L. Ringler, Santa Monica; Esner, Chang & Boyer, Stuart B. Esner, Los Angeles and Shea S. Murphy, Pasadena, for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Molino & Berardino, Steven R. Berardino and Michelle Cooper, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Midway Rent A Car, Inc., Michelman & Robinson, Mona Z. Hanna and Jennifer A. Mauri, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents National Specialty Insurance Company, KnightBrook Insurance Company and Knight Management Services, LLC.","caseName":"Adhav v. Midway Rent A Car, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Ashish ADHAV, and v. MIDWAY RENT A CAR, INC., and","citation":["249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 859","37 Cal. App. 5th 954"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":6240634,"court":"California Court of Appeal, 5th District","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App. 5th","court_id":"calctapp5d","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B285586","docket_id":62615967,"judge":"Weingart","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T08:46:00.850104Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:34:54.002173Z","score":{"bm25":33.907543}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1036211,1127437,1138528,1147506,1165252,1249762,1301891,2106490,2137422,2245336,2247313,2252839,2256272,2256725,2256764,2256803,2274540,2278031,2279528,2284243,2295556,2304671,2305638,2538150,2608541,2780534,4266376,5452558,5666258,6107418,8408146],"download_url":null,"id":6107594,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:18:16.016119Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:34:54.036415Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWEINGART, J.*\n*960I. INTRODUCTION\nPlaintiffs Ashish Adhav and Cullen Dickson rented cars from defendant Midway Rent A Car, Inc. (Midway) and opted to purchase insurance coverage in connection with those rentals. Because Midway is not an insurance company, Midway purchased master ins","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6107594],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8529707/valez-v-rent-in-re-valez/","attorney":"*355J. Zac Christman, Fisher Christman, Stroudsburg, PA, John Fisher, Pittston, PA, for Plaintiff., Frank R. Cori, Law Offices of Frank R. Cori, PC, Orwigsburg, PA, for Defendant.","caseName":"Valez v. Rent (In re Valez)","caseNameFull":"IN RE: David VALEZ, Debtor(s) David Valez, Plaintiff(s) v. EZ Rent a Car Incorporated, Defendant(s)","citation":["601 B.R. 351"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":8529707,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Bankr. M.D. Penn.","court_id":"pamb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case Number: 4:18-bk-03855-RNO; Adversary Number: 4:18-ap-00138-RNO","docket_id":65791389,"judge":"Opel","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:52:07.943850Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:51:41.657784Z","score":{"bm25":33.434753}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8502194,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:07:26.477776Z","date_created":"2022-11-22T22:51:41.666741Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nRobert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge\nDebtor filed an Adversary Complaint alleging Defendant violated the automatic stay. Subsequently, Debtor filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, I will grant Debtor's Motion in part and deny it in part.\nI. JURISDICTION\nThis Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8502194],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6240612/hernandez-v-enter-rent-a-car-co-of-san-francisco/","attorney":"Counsel for Appellant: Law Offices of Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Stucky, Markowitz & Carcione, Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Aaron B. Markowitz and Joshua S. Markowitz for Appellant, Counsel for Respondents: Crowell & Moring, Douglas W. Sullivan and Rebecca M. Suarez ; Yukevich Cavanaugh, James. J. Yukevich and Delmar S. Thomas for Respondents","caseName":"Hernandez v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of San Francisco","caseNameFull":"Janine HERNANDEZ, and v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF SAN FRANCISCO, and","citation":["249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467","37 Cal. App. 5th 187"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":6240612,"court":"California Court of Appeal, 5th District","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App. 5th","court_id":"calctapp5d","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A152703","docket_id":62615944,"judge":"Streeter, Tucher","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T08:46:00.768622Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:34:46.884700Z","score":{"bm25":32.721363}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[442924,1201422,1221982,2108992,2131795,2202869,2255340,2257959,2275409,2514219,5666605,8414110,8936532],"download_url":null,"id":6107569,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:30:59.975694Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:34:46.913216Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nTUCHER, J.\n*190In 2004, Janine Hernandez was a passenger in a 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass that was involved in a head-on collision with another car. Hernandez, who was 11 years old at the time, was seriously injured. In 2012, she filed this action against Enterprise Rent-A-Car and its affiliates (Enterprise) to recover damages resulting from the ca","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[110017,685588,698742,1168887,1173836,1221982,1229291,1523436,1847997,1855788,1870056,1959615,2108992,2118948,2131795,2132926,2134230,2136657,2154705,2244388,2257959,2264942,2275409,2280286,2396316,2514219,3013331,5664178,8414110,8936532],"download_url":null,"id":6107570,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:18:18.335226Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:34:46.939216Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nStreeter, Acting P.J., Dissenting.\nAt 11 years old, plaintiff Janine Hernandez suffered grievous injuries when the car in which she was riding, a 1992 Oldsmobile driven by her sister, was involved in a head-on collision. She survived, but as a paraplegic. She tried to sue various defendants based on a defective design theory, including General Motors Corporation (GM), the manufacturer of the 1992 Oldsmobile, but her lawsuit against","type":"dissent"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6107569,6107570],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4615087/rent-a-center-inc-v-anita-ellis/","attorney":"Richard Wallace, Esq., LITTLER MENDELSON, PC, Charleston, West Virginia, Edward F. Berbarie, Esq., Pro Hac Vice, Robert F. Friedman, Esq., Pro Hac Vice, LITTLER MENDELSON, PC, Dallas, Texas, Counsel for the Petitioners, Jerome J. McFadden, Esq., Law Offices of Jerome McFadden, PLLC, Princeton, West Virginia, James D. McQueen, Esq., McQueen Davis, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, Counsel for the Respondent","caseName":"Rent-A-Center Inc. v. Anita Ellis","caseNameFull":"RENT-A-CENTER, INC. and Rent-A-Center, East, Inc., Defendants Below, Petitioners v. Anita ELLIS, Plaintiff Below, Respondent","citation":["827 S.E.2d 605","241 W. Va. 660"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4615087,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-04-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"17-0644","docket_id":15026782,"judge":"Walker, Workman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:36:03.801892Z","date_created":"2019-04-30T19:46:28.070757Z","score":{"bm25":32.153206}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[117937,118394,145890,149007,623142,779113,1243318,1266270,1287657,1325055,2279694,2507315,2509069],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/spring2019/17-0644.pdf","id":4392340,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/04/30/rent-a-center_inc._v._anita_ellis_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:20:47.271667Z","date_created":"2019-04-30T19:46:28.074574Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2ed890ff69b400cacf0e89ec05faa856faf758d5","snippet":"          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA\n\n                                  January 2019 Term                             FILED\n                                  _______________\n                                                                             April 30, 2019\n                                                                                released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                    No. 17-0644                             EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9888431,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:00:10.262403Z","date_created":"2023-10-06T19:22:26.924113Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWALKER, CHIEF JUSTICE:\nAfter Respondent Anita Ellis was terminated from employment, she filed workers' compensation discrimination claims against Petitioners Rent-A-Center, Inc. and Rent-A-Center East, Inc. Relying on the arbitration agreement that Respondent signed at the time she was hired, Petitioners moved to compel arbitration. Respondent challenged the arbitration agreement's delegation clause, which required that any challeng","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4392340,9888431,9888432],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil-Other","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4757543/owens-v-city-of-oakland-housing-residential-rent-etc-board/","attorney":"","caseName":"Owens v. City of Oakland Housing, Residential Rent etc. Board","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4757543,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-05-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A157663","docket_id":17208203,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:16:12.170491Z","date_created":"2020-05-29T22:03:08.424850Z","score":{"bm25":31.93729}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2612871],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A157663.PDF","id":4537890,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/05/29/owens_v._city_of_oakland_housing_residential_rent_etc._board.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:01:34.978028Z","date_created":"2020-05-29T22:03:08.430597Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"21697dff74dcc10701984354fbb9547f7bd20d75","snippet":"Filed 5/29/20\n                        CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n       IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                           FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                 DIVISION THREE\n\n\n JONATHAN OWENS,\n           Plaintiff and Appellant,\n                                         A157663\n v.\n CITY OF OAKLAND                         (Alameda County\n HOUSING, RESIDENTIAL                    Super. Ct. No.\n RENT and RELOCATION                     RG18914638)\n B","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4537890],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9507322/rent-to-own-llc-v-cr-fed-leasing-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Rent to Own, LLC v. CR-FED Leasing, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9507322,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi","court_id":"txctapp13","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-05-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-23-00563-CV","docket_id":68581823,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:15:00.509445Z","date_created":"2024-05-25T17:12:14.543965Z","score":{"bm25":30.50017}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1382358,1383422,1615396,1745343,1879004,2807283,2828414,5109271,5282674,5287748,5288036,6107915],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=65007&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa13%5cOpinion","id":9973935,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/05/23/rent_to_own_llc_v._cr-fed_leasing_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:15:00.505908Z","date_created":"2024-05-25T17:12:14.546359Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"47e7f679657fe8a447245d6bc39f70fe5013c572","snippet":"                         NUMBER 13-23-00563-CV\n\n                           COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n                    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG\n\n\nRENT TO OWN, LLC,                                                       Appellant,\n\n                                             v.\n\nCR-FED LEASING, LLC,                                                      Appellee.\n\n\n             ON APPEAL FROM THE 131ST DISRTICT COURT\n                    OF BEXAR COUNTY, TE","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9973935],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4987815/franklin-v-enterprise-rent-a-car/","attorney":"Percival Franklin, Baker, LA, Plaintiff, In Proper Person., Azelie Ziegler Shelby, Sarah K. Lunn, Nicholas M. Graphia, Shelby Law Firm, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Percival Franklin., William J. Hamlin, Avery Lea Griffin, Hamlin & Griffin, LLC, Abita Springs, LA, for Defendant, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC., Donna Powe Green, Green Law Firm, P.A., Hattiesburg, MS, for Defendant/Ap-pellee, Enterprise Rent-A-Car.","caseName":"Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car","caseNameFull":"Percival FRANKLIN v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR","citation":["104 So. 3d 720","12 La.App. 3 Cir. 555","2012 WL 6028919","2012 La. App. LEXIS 1581"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":4987815,"court":"Louisiana Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"La. Ct. App.","court_id":"lactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-12-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 12-555","docket_id":60227713,"judge":"Genovese, Painter, Peters","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:15:10.145922Z","date_created":"2021-08-20T21:35:45.235501Z","score":{"bm25":30.245636}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4797745,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:48:00.410805Z","date_created":"2021-08-20T21:35:45.254879Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPAINTER, Judge.\n11 Percival Franklin, in proper person, brought suit against Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC. After she failed to timely respond to requests for admissions of fact propounded by EAN Holdings, LLC (EAN), the successor in interest to Enterprise Leasing Company of New Orleans and Enterprise Rent-A-Car, those requests were deemed admitted, and EAN filed a motion for summary jud","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4797745],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4637465/hernandez-v-enterprise-rent-a-car-co-of-sf/","attorney":"","caseName":"Hernandez v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of S.F.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4637465,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A152703","docket_id":15890042,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:42:16.539909Z","date_created":"2019-07-08T23:01:58.437221Z","score":{"bm25":30.126331}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110017,442924,461414,685588,698742,1168887,1173836,1201422,1221982,1229291,1523436,2202869,2396316,2514219],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A152703.PDF","id":4414718,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/07/08/hernandez_v._enterprise_rent-a-car_co._of_s.f..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:36:05.600436Z","date_created":"2019-07-08T23:01:58.445995Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a782ca631389cf48e2901b7edd62e94e5741313b","snippet":"Filed 7/8/19\n\n                            CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n               IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                              FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                      DIVISION FOUR\n\n\n JANINE HERNANDEZ,\n          Plaintiff and Appellant,\n                                                     A152703\n v.\n ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR                               (San Mateo County\n COMPANY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al.,                    Super. Ct. N","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4414718],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4508513/avis-rent-a-car-system-llc-v-darron-burrill/","attorney":"*585Walter F. McKee, Esq., and Henry E.M. Beck, Esq. (orally), McKee Law, P.A., Augusta, for appellant Darron Burrill, Cheryl J. Cutliffe, Esq. (orally), Basham & Scott, LLC, Brunswick, for appellee Avis Rent A Car System, LLC","caseName":"Avis Rent A Car System, LLC v. Darron Burrill","caseNameFull":"AVIS RENT a CAR SYSTEM, LLC v. Darron BURRILL","citation":["2018 ME 81","187 A.3d 583"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":4508513,"court":"Supreme Judicial Court of Maine","court_citation_string":"Me.","court_id":"me","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-06-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket: Som–17–352","docket_id":7207495,"judge":"Alexander, Mead, Gorman, Jabar, Hjelm, Humphrey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:04:56.019648Z","date_created":"2018-06-19T15:16:44.844950Z","score":{"bm25":30.040682}},"neutralCite":"2018 ME 81","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1191492,1549615,2076945,2323322,2428186,3179549,4023525,4148849,4231115,4260596,4951752,5179732,6356444,6667574,8045374,9751949,9886621],"download_url":"http://www.courts.maine.gov/opinions_orders/supreme/lawcourt/2018/18me081.pdf","id":4285766,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/06/19/avis_rent_a_car_system_llc_v._darron_burrill.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:06:31.269155Z","date_created":"2018-06-19T15:16:44.852560Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"00cd2a95dc49829513a498aef14564ef75d5d136","snippet":"SUPREME\tJUDICIAL\tCOURT\t                                          Reporter\tof\tDecisions\t\nDecision:\t 2018\tME\t81\t\nDocket:\t   Som-17-352\t\nArgued:\t   March\t7,\t2018\t\nDecided:\t  June\t19,\t2018\t\n\t\nPanel:\t    ALEXANDER,\tMEAD,\tGORMAN,\tJABAR,\tHJELM,\tand\tHUMPHREY,\tJJ.\t\nMajority:\t MEAD,\tGORMAN,\tJABAR,\tHJELM,\tand\tHUMPHREY,\tJJ.\t\nDissent:\t  ALEXANDER.\tJ.\t\n\t\n\t\n                                AVIS\tRENT\tA\tCAR\tSYSTEM,\tLLC\t\n                                              \t\n                                             v","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9886621,9886622,4285766],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6240655/1041-20th-st-llc-v-santa-monica-rent-control-bd/","attorney":"Donald F. Woods, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant., Santa Monica Rent Control Board, J. Stephen Lewis, Los Angeles; Best Best & Krieger, John C. Cotti and Gregg W. Kettles, Manhattan Beach, for Defendant and Appellant., No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.","caseName":"1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd.","caseNameFull":"1041 20TH STREET, LLC, and v. SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD, and ASN Santa Monica, LLC, and v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, and","citation":["250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376","38 Cal. App. 5th 27"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":6240655,"court":"California Court of Appeal, 5th District","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App. 5th","court_id":"calctapp5d","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B290242; B290956; B291240","docket_id":62615988,"judge":"Kim","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T08:46:01.426117Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:35:00.584009Z","score":{"bm25":29.994791}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1177289,1177879,1193965,1203279,1217994,1384436,1444411,2114679,2133482,2166835,2168447,2250985,2255503,2258145,2266318,2271047,2271624,2278831,2291344,2295474,2296457,2300463,2304418,2591383,2608192,2610751,2621382,2655166,2802488,4171859,5451717,5452540,6105970,6106728,9748944],"download_url":null,"id":6107617,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:18:15.874670Z","date_created":"2022-01-21T16:35:00.613532Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nKIM, J.\n*379*32I. INTRODUCTION\nPlaintiffs, 1041 20th Street, LLC and ASN Santa Monica, LLC, filed petitions for writs of administrative mandamus ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5 ), and 1041 20th Street, LLC also filed a complaint","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6107617],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4899738/philippe-calderon-v-sixt-rent-a-car-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Philippe Calderon v. Sixt Rent a Car, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["5 F.4th 1204"],"citeCount":17,"cluster_id":4899738,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-07-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-10989","docket_id":60057757,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:51:02.964924Z","date_created":"2021-07-14T19:03:39.799642Z","score":{"bm25":29.437649}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[78076,103972,118248,290688,333881,345116,369336,395332,614159,616808,698355,770357,797552,1649349,1727671,1829761,1855835,1939941,3587325,4571257,4674597,4799064,8409973,8637914,8877045,8907826,9422026,9422028,9423492,9429079,9430157,9430187,9431597,9431737,9433157,9442120,9888387,9938135],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202010989.pdf","id":4703517,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/07/14/philippe_calderon_v._sixt_rent_a_car_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T07:10:51.978401Z","date_created":"2021-07-14T19:03:39.802016Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3ec32d918dc05b426228c96f1b63e04877d54a2e","snippet":"         USCA11 Case: 20-10989      Date Filed: 07/14/2021    Page: 1 of 37\n\n\n\n                                                                       [PUBLISH]\n\n\n\n               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n                          ________________________\n\n                                No. 20-10989\n                          ________________________\n\n                      D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-62408-AHS\n\n\n\nPHILIPPE CALDERON,\non beha","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4703517],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4642461/adhav-v-midway-rent-a-car-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Adhav v. Midway Rent A Car, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4642461,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B285586","docket_id":15962154,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:43:47.561718Z","date_created":"2019-07-24T19:02:20.428594Z","score":{"bm25":29.05179}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[783275,1127437,1147506,1165252,1249762,1301891,2608541],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B285586.PDF","id":4419714,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/07/24/adhav_v._midway_rent_a_car_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:39:42.349187Z","date_created":"2019-07-24T19:02:20.432283Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0a38a06a6581dc83183a89a2bf28a6e9f931842a","snippet":"Filed 7/24/19\n                  CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                 SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                           DIVISION ONE\n\n\nASHISH ADHAV et al.,                    B285586\n\n       Plaintiffs and Appellants,       (Los Angeles County\n                                         Super. Ct. No. BC485275)\n       v.\n\nMIDWAY RENT A CAR, INC., et al.,\n\n       Defendants and Respondents.\n\n\n     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Co","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4419714],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3182382/williamson-green-v-equipment-4-rent-inc/","attorney":"Thomas F. Maffei (Margaret C. Kelly also present) for the defendant., Joan A. Lukey for the plaintiff.","caseName":"Williamson-Green v. Equipment 4 Rent, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Michelle Williamson-Green, Administratrix, vs. Equipment 4 Rent, Inc.","citation":["89 Mass. App. Ct. 153","46 N.E.3d 571"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":3182382,"court":"Massachusetts Appeals Court","court_citation_string":"Mass. App. Ct.","court_id":"massappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"AC 15-P-114","docket_id":3041249,"judge":"Kafker, Vuono, Hanlon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-27T18:58:26.615216Z","date_created":"2016-03-03T16:37:37.961964Z","score":{"bm25":28.65152}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1194549,2000413,2089951,2122745,2218622,2243940],"download_url":"http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/sjc/reporter-of-decisions/new-opinions/15p0114.pdf","id":3182364,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/03/03/williamson-green_v._equipment_4_rent_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:55:47.626043Z","date_created":"2016-03-03T16:37:37.968330Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"918baca600f032f2d72449685a5c22713342b89a","snippet":"\n\n\n  Kafker, C.J.\n \n\n  James Williamson was perched more than one hundred feet high on a boom lift, inspecting the roof of a university building in Boston, when the machine tipped over and\n   \n   *154\n   \n  crashed into a neighboring building, killing him. The boom lift had been manufactured by Grove U.S., LLC (Grove)","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3182364],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7404663/burns-v-hoboken-rent-leveling-stabilization-board/","attorney":"Sean A. Smith argued the cause for appellant (Brack Eichler, LLC, attorneys; Charles X. Gormally, of counsel; Mr. Smith, on the brief)., Cathy C. Cardillo argued the cause for respondents Megan Bums and Joseph Nieves (Ms. Cardillo, of counsel and on the brief)., Respondent Hoboken Rent Leveling & Stabilization Board has not filed a brief.","caseName":"Burns v. Hoboken Rent Leveling & Stabilization Board","caseNameFull":"MEGAN BURNS AND JOSEPH NIEVES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. HOBOKEN RENT LEVELING & STABILIZATION BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND BLOOMFIELD 206 CORPORATION","citation":["429 N.J. Super. 435","59 A.3d 1096","2013 N.J. Super. LEXIS 19"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":7404663,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-02-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":64395165,"judge":"Lihotz, Messano, Ostrer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:59:02.860805Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T21:28:59.198446Z","score":{"bm25":28.358892}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7323843,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:44:54.935246Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T21:28:59.207053Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nThe opinion of the court was delivered by\nLIHOTZ, J.A.D.\nDefendant Bloomfield 206 Corporation (Bloomfield) appeals from the denial of its motion to vacate a stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiffs Megan Burns and Joseph Nieves in this prerogative writ action (PWA). Plaintiffs are tenants in a building owned by Bloomfield. Plaintiffs initially filed the PWA to challenge an upward modification of plainti","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7323843],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10956667/jane-parkin-v-avis-rent-a-car-system-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Jane Parkin v. Avis Rent a Car System LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10956667,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-08-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-1385","docket_id":69719036,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-24T17:00:44.383371Z","date_created":"2026-08-24T17:00:44.209362Z","score":{"bm25":27.10932}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[223418,780491,873028,1356047,4156598,4535060,6343025,8414209,8694687,9377343,9432789,10611650],"download_url":"https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/251385p.pdf","id":11424272,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/08/24/jane_parkin_v._avis_rent_a_car_system_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-08-24T17:02:08.351457Z","date_created":"2026-08-24T17:00:44.213858Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2c3f120669918dcf30e1f7f0e3542114bd3e6c5a","snippet":"   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE\n               THIRD CIRCUIT\n                         No. 25-1385\n\n                JANE PARKIN; DAVID HUGHES,\n                   individually and on behalf\n                 of all others similarly situated\n\n                               v.\n\n              AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC;\n             BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC.;\n                AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.\n\n Budget Rent A Car System, Inc.; Avis Budget Group, Inc.,\n                       Appell","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11424272],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2278059/flores-v-enterprise-rent-a-car-co/","attorney":"Counsel, Steven B. Stevens for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Rutter Hobbs & Davidoff Incorporated, Risa J. Morris and Wesley D. Hurst for Defendant and Respondent Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company., Selman Breitman, Paul E. Stephan and Jennifer J. Capabianco for Defendant and Respondent Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles.","caseName":"Flores v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.","caseNameFull":"JESUS FLORES Et Al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY Et Al., Defendants and Respondents","citation":["188 Cal. App. 4th 1055","116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71","2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1681"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":2278059,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-09-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B215105","docket_id":2164832,"judge":"Willhite","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:18:07.674224Z","date_created":"2015-04-06T21:48:58.538381Z","score":{"bm25":26.659184}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6637,"cites":[1155727,1207891,2165025,2246794,2303858,2496352,2588374,3303125],"download_url":null,"id":2278059,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:40:02.721664Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:57:48.989169Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a8ea9339a72d7de7afbde620dae08692b07788ae","snippet":"\n188 Cal.App.4th 1055 (2010)\n116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71\nJESUS FLORES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,\nv.\nENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.\nNo. B215105.\nCourt of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.\nSeptember 28, 2010.\n*1059 Steven B. Stevens for Plaintiffs and A","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2278059],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}