{"count":28857,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xNi45NDA0NTMmcz05MzI0NDk2JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDktMjcmcD0y&q=EXECUTED+CONTRACTS+CLASSIFICATION+OF+CONTRACTS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4332386/in-re-foreclosure-of-a-deed-of-trust-executed-by-lucks/","attorney":"\nTroutman Sanders LLP, by D. Kyle Deak, for petitioner-appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Trustee.\n, \nFerguson, Hayes, Hawkins & DeMay, PLLC, by James R. DeMay, for respondent-appellant.\n","caseName":"In Re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Lucks","caseNameFull":"In THE MATTER OF FORECLOSURE OF a DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY GORDON F. LUCKS Dated July 14, 2006 and Recorded in Book 4254, Page 96 in the Buncombe County Public Registry","citation":["369 N.C. 222","794 S.E.2d 501","2016 N.C. LEXIS 1161"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":4332386,"court":"Supreme Court of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C.","court_id":"nc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"162A16","docket_id":4556034,"judge":"Newby, Hudson, Beasley, Ervin","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:14:56.710561Z","date_created":"2016-12-21T17:11:29.636317Z","score":{"bm25":40.560646}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9870598,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:53:58.404281Z","date_created":"2023-09-26T20:03:23.240430Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nNEWBY, Justice.\nThe contractual right of foreclosure by power of sale under a deed of trust is a non-judicial proceeding. In the comprehensive statutory framework governing non-judicial foreclosure by power of sale set forth in Chapter 45 of our General Statutes, the General Assembly *223has prescribed certain minimal judicial procedures, including requiring notice an","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[1155643,1157362,1202551,1210249,1234157,1234564,1236737,1237833,1268823,1318345,1322682,1326840,1327407,1330741,1333964,1375599,1406806,2176933,2502829,3650771,3676950],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=1&pdf=35083","id":4109647,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/12/21/in_re_lucks.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:04:51.312401Z","date_created":"2016-12-21T17:11:29.643759Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"98f2ab8575fd22fd076e798f2f7cbbed42e6cd10","snippet":"                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n                                      No. 162A16\n\n                               Filed 21 December 2016\n\n IN THE MATTER OF FORECLOSURE OF A DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY\n GORDON F. LUCKS dated July 14, 2006 and recorded in Book 4254, Page 96 in\n the Buncombe County Public Registry\n\n\n\n      Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the unpublished decision of a\n\ndivided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 785 S.E.2d 185 (2016),\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4109647,9870598,9870599],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2505909/in-re-the-foreclosure-of-a-deed-of-trust-executed-by-bass/","attorney":"\nK&L Gates, LLP, by A. Lee Hogewood, III and Brian G. Fork, for Petitioner-appellant.\n, \nLegal Aid of North Carolina, Inc., by E. Maccene Brown, Gregory E. Pawlowski, John Christopher Lloyd, and Andre C. Brown, for Respondent-appellee.\n","caseName":"In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Bass","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Tonya R. Bass in the Original Amount of $139,988.00 Dated October 12, 2005, Recorded in Book 4982, Page 86, Durham County Registry, Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., as Substitute Trustee","citation":["720 S.E.2d 18","217 N.C. App. 244","76 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 203","2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2426"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":2505909,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-12-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"COA11-565","docket_id":304840,"judge":"Hunter, Robert, Thigpen, McCullough","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:23:57.099770Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:19:58.486722Z","score":{"bm25":34.577904}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8013,"cites":[1155543,1202551,1213114,1249913,1268198,1273110,1292048,1300538,1326840,1334648,1375485,1403771,1407487,2503655,2509426,3650406,3664357,3665558],"download_url":null,"id":2505909,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:17:51.709564Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:00:44.090232Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"aa47ccc143a62fa0beed3a47203605a5e8eaeda8","snippet":"\n720 S.E.2d 18 (2011)\nIn the Matter of the foreclosure of a Deed of Trust executed by Tonya R. BASS in the original amount of $139,988.00 dated October 12, 2005, recorded in Book 4982, Page 86, Durham County Registry,\nSubstitute Trustee Services, Inc., as Substitute Trustee.\nNo. COA11-565.\nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina.\nDecember 6, 2011.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2505909],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10578988/matter-of-county-of-westchester-v-city-of-rye/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of County of Westchester v. City of Rye","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2025 NY Slip Op 02201"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10578988,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 66977/22","docket_id":70229138,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-21T17:30:55.623161Z","date_created":"2025-05-08T22:37:05.619320Z","score":{"bm25":20.200186}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2555034,2590720,3618282,4532158,5533592,6038965,9393649,9788074,9808889],"download_url":"http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2025/2025_02201.htm","id":11045576,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2025/04/16/matter_of_county_of_westchester_v._city_of_rye_240.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T11:26:19.672159Z","date_created":"2025-05-08T22:37:05.627657Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"62fa5269561bab303157a83266099fb327a1b34c","snippet":"\n\nMatter of County of Westchester v City of Rye (2025 NY Slip Op 02201)\n\n\n\n\n\nMatter of County of Westchester v City of Rye\n\n\n2025 NY Slip Op 02201\n\n\nDecided on April 16, 2025\n\n\nAppellate Division, Second Department\n\n\n\nPublished by New York State Law Report","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2025/2025_02201.htm","id":10846488,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2025/04/16/matter_of_county_of_westchester_v._city_of_rye.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T20:13:58.809625Z","date_created":"2025-04-16T20:14:04.130199Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"77524e4888150ead9100d55d0cb7190fe22c234d","snippet":"\n\nMatter of County of Westchester v City of Rye (2025 NY Slip Op 02201)\n\n\n\n\n\nMatter of County of Westchester v City of Rye\n\n\n2025 NY Slip Op 02201\n\n\nDecided on April 16, 2025\n\n\nAppellate Division, Second Department\n\n\n\nPublished by New York State Law Report","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10846488,11045576],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3172683/vistas-construction-of-illinois-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Vistas Construction of Illinois, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3172683,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-01-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"ASBCA No. 58479, 58480, 58481, 58482, 58483, 58486, 58487, 58488","docket_id":3031431,"judge":"O'Connell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:15:56.618683Z","date_created":"2016-01-27T21:32:01.767544Z","score":{"bm25":19.671156}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[103152,210422,484762,559078,560001,659890,670645,691406,700525,784971],"download_url":"http://www.asbca.mil/Decisions/2016/58479,%2058480,%2058481,%2058482,%2058483,%2058486,%2058487,%2058488%20Vistas%20Construction%20of%20Illinois,%20Inc.%201.12.16.pdf","id":3172683,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/01/12/vistas_construction_of_illinois_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:49:00.651481Z","date_created":"2016-01-27T21:00:14.871077Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c475f3d346546ac5c8ca6179a4c3710cea21f8bc","snippet":"                ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n\nAppeals of --                                 )\n                                              )\nVistas Construction of Illinois, Inc.         )      ASBCA Nos. 58479, 58480, 58481\n                                              )                 58482, 58483, 58486\n                                              )                 58487, 58488\nUnder Contract No. W912P8-08-C-0036           )\n\nAPPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3172683],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10287077/hl-contracting-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"H&L Contracting LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10287077,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"63695","docket_id":69432742,"judge":"McLish","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-12-03T20:00:19.531616Z","date_created":"2024-12-03T20:00:19.452130Z","score":{"bm25":19.590395}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111719,483919,771162,777648,787384,794812,8976674],"download_url":"http://www.asbca.mil/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=gDIQ4bO0Qj0%3d&portalid=143","id":10753665,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/21/hl_contracting_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-03T19:16:39.941050Z","date_created":"2024-12-03T20:00:19.458825Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"87e5a4ad40d27057f7e55c12a9c10d3d3360e659","snippet":"               ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n Appeal of -                                )\n                                            )\n H&L Contracting LLC                        )    ASBCA No. 63695\n                                            )\n Under Contract No. W912WJ-22-C-0012        )\n\n APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                  Michael H. Payne, Esq.\n                                                  Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall\n                                         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10753665],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10277387/left-hand-design-corporation/","attorney":"","caseName":"Left Hand Design Corporation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10277387,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-11-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"62458","docket_id":69390180,"judge":"Young","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-19T20:00:13.992145Z","date_created":"2024-11-19T20:00:13.822485Z","score":{"bm25":19.37718}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.asbca.mil/Portals/143/Decisions/2024/62458 Left Hand Design Corporation 11.7.24 Decision.pdf?ver=vAJUf6lOcN9NvqNoKyaDeg%3d%3d","id":10743977,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/11/07/left_hand_design_corporation.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:51:05.404484Z","date_created":"2024-11-19T20:00:13.840381Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"424241f6e98bc9c53ca4835bc7dc39b848a8447b","snippet":"               ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n Appeal of -                                  )\n                                              )\n Left Hand Design Corporation                 )    ASBCA No. 62458\n                                              )\n Under Contract Nos. N00014-10-C-0306         )\n                     FA8651-08-C-0155         )\n\n APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:                     Mr. Lawrence M. Germann\n                                                    President","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10743977],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9368144/dieckhaus-v-bd-of-governors-of-the-univ-of-nc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Dieckhaus v. Bd. of Governors of The Univ. of N.C.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9368144,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-01-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-797","docket_id":66733993,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:58:20.879498Z","date_created":"2023-01-17T13:03:45.662403Z","score":{"bm25":18.42888}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[98597,110169,578275,1265485,1287196,1287801,1293873,1308241,1316969,1328397,1328837,1335731,1341428,1357634,1389685,2502706,2728202,3167112,3173536,3641867,3662431,4020662,6352829,6722557,6727346,7247235,8900917,8901931,9426772,9428680,9428995,9564618,9582597,9585981,9799905,9799911,9824698,9854170,9877947],"download_url":"http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=41342","id":9363620,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/01/17/dieckhaus_v._bd._of_governors_of_the_univ._of_n.c..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T07:20:26.549183Z","date_created":"2023-01-17T13:03:45.663632Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0f5e503d343f1672488697bf65a14588f6e23976","snippet":"                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n                                        2023-NCCOA-1\n\n                                        No. COA21-797\n\n                                     Filed 17 January 2023\n\n     Orange County, No. 20CVS564\n\n     DEENA DIECKHAUS, GINA MCALLISTER,\n     BRADY WAYNE ALLEN, JACORIA STANLEY,\n     NICHOLAS SPOONEY and VIVIAN HOOD, each\n     individually and on behalf of all others\n     similarly situated, Plaintiffs,\n\n                   v.\n\n   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9363620],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"sovereign immunity, implied-in-fact contract, immunity for institutions of higher learning related to COVID-19"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/894759/pkg-contracting-inc-v-city-of-mesquite/","attorney":"E. John Gorman, Bradford Wald Irelan, for petitioner., James R. Jordan, for respondent.","caseName":"PKG Contracting, Inc. v. City of Mesquite","caseNameFull":"PKG CONTRACTING, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF MESQUITE, Respondent","citation":["197 S.W.3d 388","49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 906","2006 Tex. LEXIS 647","2006 WL 1793304"],"citeCount":27,"cluster_id":894759,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-06-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04-1139","docket_id":687711,"judge":"Willett","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:06:17.593626Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T15:06:47.706452Z","score":{"bm25":18.329596}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1400009,1770441],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=4a3a4acd-b9e7-42bb-ba1b-0be53504b8dc&coa=cossup&DT=OPINION&MediaID=45b627fe-f5e0-447f-a473-2cd7026bb08d","id":894759,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2006/06/30/columbus_independent_school_district_v._five_oaks_achievement_center.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-09-24T21:38:07.589881Z","date_created":"2013-06-06T20:26:07.443115Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"0b551f27b27f4a7c5ea6bb734554159f87790bfe","snippet":"\n197 S.W.3d 388 (2006)\nPKG CONTRACTING, INC., Petitioner,\nv.\nCITY OF MESQUITE, Respondent.\nNo. 04-1139.\nSupreme Court of Texas.\nJune 30, 2006.\nE. John Gorman, Bradford Wald Irelan, for petitioner.\nJames R. Jordan, for respondent.\nPER CURIAM.\nPKG Contracting, Inc. sued the City of Mesquite for breach of a contract to construct a storm drainage sys","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[894759],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9473494/state-of-hawaii-organization-of-police-officers-v-city-and-county-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Hawai'i Organization of Police Officers v. City and County of Honolulu","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9473494,"court":"Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Haw. App.","court_id":"hawapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-02-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CAAP-21-0000603","docket_id":68235697,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:24:55.243091Z","date_created":"2024-02-08T19:05:09.262471Z","score":{"bm25":18.255362}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1271394,4911919,9835475],"download_url":"https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CAAP-21-0000603sdo.pdf","id":9931332,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/02/08/state_of_hawaii_organization_of_police_officers_v._city_and_county_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T09:50:14.461673Z","date_created":"2024-02-08T19:05:09.264870Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6dd7a165d11f7a11175200dd6b6870a70627673c","snippet":"  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER\n\n\n\n\n                                                  Electronically Filed\n                                                  Intermediate Court of Appeals\n                                                  CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX\n                                                  08-FEB-2024\n                                                  07:46 AM\n                                                  Dkt. 66 SO\n\n\n\n                         ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9931332],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10609848/n-state-envtl-inc-v-town-of-mooresville/","attorney":"","caseName":"N. State Envtl., Inc. v. Town of Mooresville","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10609848,"court":"Court of Appeals of North Carolina","court_citation_string":"N.C. Ct. App.","court_id":"ncctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-06-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-765","docket_id":70571016,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-18T12:07:14.531413Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T12:07:14.457533Z","score":{"bm25":18.145369}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1213780,1245226,1254016,1269744,1304394,1345199,1363737,3650681,8909530],"download_url":"https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&pdf=44543","id":11076436,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/18/n._state_envtl._inc._v._town_of_mooresville.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:38:17.506388Z","date_created":"2025-06-18T12:07:14.465331Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"acdd0fefc11daea770719f2e8610ccfbad805fcc","snippet":"              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA\n\n                                     No. COA24-765\n\n                                 Filed 18 June 2025\n\nIredell County, No. 21CVS001134-480\n\nNORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Plaintiff,\n\n             v.\n\nTOWN OF MOORESVILLE, Defendant.\n\n\n      Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 10 July 2023 by Judge William\n\nLong in Iredell County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 April 2025.\n\n\n      Craige Jenkins Liipfert & Walker LL","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11076436],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"breach of contract; utility conflicts; contract term; de novo review"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10601616/david-boland-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"David Boland, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10601616,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"60498","docket_id":70498422,"judge":"Cates-Harman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-11T04:59:47.793247Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T15:01:37.090608Z","score":{"bm25":18.08332}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[99237,294077,482941,498432,552472,747588,757546,770228,778175,778387],"download_url":"https://www.asbca.mil/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=wXLjY-WurK8%3d&portalid=143","id":11068204,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/06/david_boland_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:08:05.293455Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T15:01:37.098964Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c7db51d215e9a8d6a3d90ba5173f285982157e6e","snippet":"               ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n Appeal of -                                     )\n                                                 )\n David Boland, Inc.                              )   ASBCA No. 60498\n                                                 )\n Under Contract No. W912P8-10-C-0079             )\n\n APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                      Denis L. Durkin, Esq.\n                                                     Michael S. Vitale, Esq.\n                  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11068204],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7902658/national-classification-committee-v-united-states/","attorney":"John R. Bagileo, Washington, D.C., with whom William W. Pugh, Bryce Rea, Jr. and Leo C. Franey, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners., Craig Keats, Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D.C., with whom J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert S. Burk, Acting General Counsel, Lawrence H. Richmond, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Evelyn G. Kitay, Atty., I.C.C., Robert B. Nicholson and Robert J. Wiggers, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondents.","caseName":"National Classification Committee v. United States","caseNameFull":"NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE and National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Respondents NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE and National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission","citation":["246 U.S. App. D.C. 295","765 F.2d 164"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7902658,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1985-06-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Nos. 84-1195, 84-1329","docket_id":64996240,"judge":"Davis, Edwards, Wald","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:14:49.203063Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T17:31:44.280321Z","score":{"bm25":17.787287}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7851160,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:58:14.197306Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T17:31:44.296053Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOpinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.\nSeparate Statement filed by Circuit Judge WALD.\nWALD, Circuit Judge:\nPetitioners, the National Classification Committee (“NCC”) and the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. (“NMFTA”), seek review of two Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC” or “Commission”) decisions ordering petitioners to cancel tariffs reclassifying cert","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7851160],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10601594/skanska-usa-civil-southeast-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10601594,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"61220, 61347","docket_id":70498401,"judge":"Arnett","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-06-11T04:58:22.456441Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T15:01:26.663282Z","score":{"bm25":17.730358}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[210547,285565,288092,292909,293813,601595,744699,770228,772058,778175,779361,779646,6644841,6646145,6827190,8592890,8593687,8595209,8596296,9399710,9798497],"download_url":"https://www.asbca.mil/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=QRaUtmSZmLI%3d&portalid=143","id":11068182,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/04/03/skanska_usa_civil_southeast_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T02:38:16.411705Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T15:01:26.670180Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fd9d6d91c788a76f4df8da2c920b24981a921bfc","snippet":"                   ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n    Appeals of -                                   )\n                                                   )\n    Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.              )    ASBCA Nos. 61220, 61347\n                                                   )\n    Under Contract No. N40085-10-C-3006            )\n\n    APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:                       Arnie B. Mason, Esq.\n                                                         Williams Mull","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11068182],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4698178/gale-v-war-contracts-price-adjustment-board/","attorney":"Alfred W. Massnick, Esq ., for the petitioners. Ralph G. Cornell, Esq ., for the respondent.  ","caseName":"Gale v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board","caseNameFull":"Estate of Robert I. Gale, Robert I. Gale, Jr., Guy W. Waters and Edgar H. Vogel v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board","citation":["19 T.C. 1107","1953 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 214"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4698178,"court":"United States Tax Court","court_citation_string":"Tax Ct.","court_id":"tax","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1953-03-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket No. 741-R","docket_id":16705789,"judge":"Withey","lexisCite":"1953 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 214","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:58:50.417743Z","date_created":"2020-01-16T21:11:50.001139Z","score":{"bm25":17.722635}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4476071],"download_url":null,"id":4631824,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T20:04:40.027650Z","date_created":"2020-11-21T03:10:27.539716Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"Estate of Robert I. Gale, Deceased, Robert I. Gale, Jr., Executor, Guy W. Waters and Edgar H. Vogel, Petitioners, v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, RespondentGale v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardDocket No. 741-R","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4631824,4476071],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5978754/lessler-v-suffolk-county-classification/","attorney":"","caseName":"Lessler v. Suffolk County Classification","caseNameFull":"George Lessler v. Suffolk County Classification and Salary Appeals Board","citation":["74 A.D.2d 842","425 N.Y.S.2d 391","1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10604"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":5978754,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1980-03-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62338280,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T07:36:38.721785Z","date_created":"2022-01-12T22:46:29.581821Z","score":{"bm25":17.650778}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":5838682,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-07T17:31:59.836114Z","date_created":"2022-01-12T22:46:29.591079Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nIn a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Suffolk County Classification and Salary Appeals Board, the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, and the County of Suffolk to hear and determine petitioners’ appeal regarding the salary upgrading of Deputy Sheriffs grades I through IV, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 7, 1978, which granted the petition and directed that the appeal be heard. Judgm","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5838682],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2282332/in-re-grievance-of-hood/","attorney":"Michael R. Zimmerman, VSEA Staff Attorney, Montpelier, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, and Michael Seibert, Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Defendant-Appellant.","caseName":"In Re Grievance of Hood","caseNameFull":"In Re Grievance of Robert L. Hood and Thomas O. Mahar, Jr.","citation":["592 A.2d 907","156 Vt. 412","1991 Vt. LEXIS 89","140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2997"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":2282332,"court":"Supreme Court of Vermont","court_citation_string":"Vt.","court_id":"vt","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1991-05-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"88-271","docket_id":2169400,"judge":"Allen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:19:19.445498Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T22:23:58.530899Z","score":{"bm25":17.631628}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2112616,2313011],"download_url":null,"id":2282332,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"vermont/supreme_court_opinions/documents/535afe1590533420.xml","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:41:22.100327Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:58:34.971794Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0aa9952e84f4cf390392846784153512233bc9fa","snippet":"\nThe State appeals from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board restoring two state employees to their former pay grades and awarding them back pay for wages lost as a result of their \"involuntary demotion.\" We reverse.\nOn January 14, 1987, Governor Madeleine Kunin, citing 3 V.S.A. §§ 209 and 2001,1 signed an executive order that provided, in part, as follows:\n [I] do hereby transfer the following posi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[5884,5886,5896,5905,5907],"panel_names":["Frederic W. Allen","Albert W. Barney Jr.","Ernest W. Gibson III","James L. Morse","Louis P. Peck"],"posture":"Appeal from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board restoring two state employees to their former pay grades and awarding them back pay for wages lost as a result of their involuntary demotion. Labor Relations Board, Yessne, Acting Chair, presiding. Reversed.","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2282332],"source":"ZLU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"<bold>1. Public Employees — Collective Bargaining — Generally</bold>\n\nThe construction of collective bargaining agreements is governed by traditional principles of contract law.\n\n<bold>2. Contracts — Construction — Generally</bold>\n\nIn construing an agreement, effect should, if possible, be given to every material provision as part of an integrated whole.\n\n<bold>3. Public Employees — Collective Bargaining — Interpretation of</bold> <bold>Agreement</bold>\n\nWhere plaintiffs' positions were transferred by executive order from one state agency to a state department and were, after appropriate classification review was made, reallocated to lower classes and pay grades, but plaintiffs' were kept on at their current salary levels, the state's actions constituted a \"reallocation\" under terms of collective bargaining agreement and plaintiffs' demotions to lower pay scales were permissible.\n\n<bold>4. Public Employees — Labor Relations Board — Determinations</bold>\n\nLabor Relation Board's order that plaintiffs be restored to their former pay grade with back pay was reversed because the state's actions of transferring plaintiffs from one state agency to a state department, and reallocating the transferred positions to lower classes and pay grades,<page_number>Page 413</page_number>\nwere permissible under collective bargaining agreement as a \"reallocation\" rather than a \"demotion.\"\n\n"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9442318/innovative-technologies-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Innovative Technologies, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9442318,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-07-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"61686, 62185","docket_id":68019550,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:17:35.318054Z","date_created":"2023-11-18T22:01:06.144212Z","score":{"bm25":17.605919}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[211140,442059],"download_url":"http://www.asbca.mil/Decisions/2023/61686%20Innovative%20Technologies,%20Inc.%207.26.23%20Decision.pdf","id":9900143,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/07/26/innovative_technologies_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:19:02.049175Z","date_created":"2023-11-18T22:01:06.145722Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3b2214d64937b72a5e849453197b9b34883afbb0","snippet":"     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. The decision issued on the date below is\n     subject to an ASBCA Protective Order. This version has been approved for public\n                                        release.\n                 ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n\n    Appeals of -                                  )\n                                                  )\n    Innovative Technologies, Inc.                 )    ASBCA Nos. 61686, 62185\n                                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9900143],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3542949/stone-v-general-electric-contracts-corp/","attorney":"Greek L. Rice,  Attorney-General, by  Geo. H. Ethridge, \nAssistant Attorney-General,  J.H. Sumrall,  of Jackson, and  R.W.  Heidelberg,  of Hattiesburg, for A.H. Stone, Chairman State Tax Commission.\n\nSee briefs of State Tax Commission in A.H. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission, v. C.I.T. Corporation,  193 Miss. 344 , 7 So.2d 811 , and A.H. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission, v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corporation,  193 Miss. 338 , 7 So.2d 820 \n  Watkins  Eager,  of Jackson, for General Electric Contracts Corporation.\n\nObjections to constitutionality of Chapter 110, Laws of 1940, asserted in brief for C.I.T. Corporation, appellant, in C.I.T. Corporation v. A.H. Stone, Chairman of State Tax Commission, et al.,  193 Miss. 344 ,  7 So.2d 811 , are referred to and adopted.\n\nIf the tax in question is held to be privilege or excise tax, all doubts must be resolved in favor of the taxpayer and liability may not be imposed unless the same is free from doubt.\n\nThe appellee now adopts brief filed by C.I.T. Corporation upon the foregoing point in C.I.T. Corporation v. A.H. Stone, Chairman of State Tax Commission, et al.,  193 Miss. 344 ,  7 So.2d 811 .\n\nAssuming the tax in question to be a privilege tax, the transactions involved were had outside of the State of Mississippi, and if the statute should be construed and enforced as to impose liability upon the General Electric Contracts Corporation, appellee, therefore, such statute would violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as well as the Fourteenth Section of the Bill of Rights of the State of Mississippi. The taxing power of a state may not extend beyond the boundaries of the state.\n\nSee briefs of appellee, Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corporation, in A.H. Stone, Chairman State Tax Commission, v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corporation,  193 Miss. 338 , 7 So.2d 820 .\n\nArgued orally by  R.W. Heidelberg, J.H. Sumrall  and  Geo. H.  Ethridge,  for appellant, and by  W.H. Watkins,  for appellee.","caseName":"Stone v. General Electric Contracts Corp.","caseNameFull":"Stone, Chairman of State Tax Commission v. General Electric Contracts Corporation.","citation":["7 So. 2d 811","193 Miss. 317","1942 Miss. LEXIS 84"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3542949,"court":"Mississippi Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Miss.","court_id":"miss","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1942-04-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 34987.","docket_id":3415074,"judge":"McGehee, Alexander, Griffith","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T21:19:13.035164Z","date_created":"2016-07-05T22:26:24.784716Z","score":{"bm25":17.45011}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4889,"cites":[99622,101356,102025,103094,103287,103414],"download_url":null,"id":3515229,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"/home/mlissner/columbia/opinions/mississippi/court_opinions/documents/4c9b3a6d5e3998fd.xml","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T07:38:50.702802Z","date_created":"2016-07-05T22:26:24.789631Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3a9c64e6db4432acddd3388d6147369e72885abf","snippet":"This suit is brought to test the constitutionality of Chapter 110, Laws of 1940, and to recover from the appellant *Page 321 \ncertain taxes paid under protest by the appellee pursuant thereto. The case is controlled in all of its essential features by the decision rendered on this day in Cause No. 34958, A.H. Stone, Chairman of State Tax Commission v. General Contract Purchase Corporation, 193 Miss. 301, ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"APPEAL from chancery court of Hinds county, HON. V.J. STRICKER, Chancellor.","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3515229,3515230],"source":"ZU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10010583/lockheed-martin-aeronautics-company/","attorney":"","caseName":"Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10010583,"court":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","court_citation_string":"A.S.B.C.A.","court_id":"asbca","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-04-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"62209","docket_id":68964986,"judge":"Page","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-07-22T19:02:06.486597Z","date_created":"2024-07-22T19:02:06.444931Z","score":{"bm25":16.99322}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[212106,560001,775952,783501,2652135,2652950,4554013,8593350,9441127],"download_url":"http://www.asbca.mil/Portals/143/Decisions/2024/ASBCA No. 62209 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Redacted April 23 2024 Board Decision.pdf?ver=B1Jz1PpXwzXQCfifQe6yjw%3d%3d","id":10477184,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/04/22/lockheed_martin_aeronautics_company.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-02T18:58:17.738123Z","date_created":"2024-07-22T19:02:06.448980Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ee2c9a7f2fa92c3cda18d3f8850edc98afd6a443","snippet":"               ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS\n\n Appeal of -                                  )\n                                              )\n Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company          )    ASBCA No. 62209\n                                              )\n Under Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471          )\n\n APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                    Stephen J. McBrady, Esq.\n                                                   J. Chris Haile, Esq.\n                                   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10477184],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9324496/shenango-presbyterian-seniorcare-v-lawrence-county-board-of-assessment/","attorney":"Michael Yukevich, Jr. and Chadd C. Colin, for plaintiff/petitioner., Thomas W Leslie, for defendant Lawrence County., John F. Salopek, for defendants New Wilmington Borough and Wilmington Area School District.","caseName":"Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare v. Lawrence County Board of Assessment Appeals","caseNameFull":"Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare v. Lawrence County Board of Assessment Appeals","citation":["38 Pa. D. & C.5th 421"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9324496,"court":"Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County","court_citation_string":"","court_id":"pactcompllawren","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 11387 of 2004","docket_id":66604844,"judge":"Piccione","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:47:30.972424Z","date_created":"2022-12-02T17:49:27.179541Z","score":{"bm25":16.940453}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9319805,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:29:31.701673Z","date_created":"2022-12-02T17:49:27.185331Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPICCIONE, J.,\n— Before this court for disposition is the motion to enforce contribution in lieu of real estate taxes agreement of settlement (hereinafter, the “motion”) filed on behalf of the plaintiff/pettitioner, Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation (hereinafter, the “petitioner”). On October 31, 2013, the petitioner filed the motion, wherein it requests this court enjoin the defendan","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9319805],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}