{"count":277,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz05Ljc5MjQ3MSZzPTIxNzgxNSZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTEwLTA5JnA9Mg%3D%3D&q=ENGRAVING+OR+POSSESSING+PLATES+FOR+COUNTERFEITING+BANK+BILLS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4413878/state-v-jones/","attorney":"","caseName":"State v. Jones","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2017 Ohio 7019"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4413878,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-07-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CA2016-10-194","docket_id":6128801,"judge":"Piper","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:38:23.877814Z","date_created":"2017-07-31T17:12:04.495630Z","score":{"bm25":20.740086}},"neutralCite":"2017 Ohio 7019","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8123,"cites":[3755930,4154029,6783077,11152281],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/12/2017/2017-Ohio-7019.pdf","id":4191131,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/07/31/state_v._jones.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T02:03:21.735742Z","date_created":"2017-07-31T17:12:04.504692Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7237b201f37ad17b7981716e473ea10a6a6518db","snippet":"[Cite as State v. Jones, 2017-Ohio-7019.]\n\n\n\n                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                            TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO\n\n                                            BUTLER COUNTY\n\n\n\n\nSTATE OF OHIO,                                    :\n\n        Plaintiff-Appellee,                       :      CASE NO. CA2016-10-194\n\n                                                  :             OPINION\n    - vs -                                                   ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4191131],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Appellant's convictions were not rendered against the manifest weight of the evidence where the jury heard evidence that appellant was complicit in defrauding a store by using a counterfeit bill to pay for a purchase, and that he possessed marijuana when police found marijuana in his home and in a car in which he was a passenger."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4644585/united-states-v-rueda/","attorney":"J. Hillary Billings, Assistant Federal Defender was on brief for appellant., Renee M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorney, Appellate Chief, with whom Halsey B. Frank, United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.","caseName":"United States v. Rueda","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Meylisi RUEDA, Defendant, Appellant.","citation":["933 F.3d 6"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":4644585,"court":"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit","court_citation_string":"1st Cir.","court_id":"ca1","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-07-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1962P","docket_id":15996639,"judge":"Howard, Thompson, Barron","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:44:21.854451Z","date_created":"2019-07-31T21:00:10.391827Z","score":{"bm25":16.884052}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[220354,626677,815783,2776709,3152009,4097312,4207262],"download_url":"http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/18-1962P-01A.pdf","id":4421838,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/07/31/united_states_v._rueda.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:41:09.752798Z","date_created":"2019-07-31T21:00:10.401337Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"90a304ad86a11e368fd44d02566bb25f1cbd308b","snippet":"\n\n\n  BARRON, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n\n   *7\n  \n  Meylisi Rueda (\"Rueda\") pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit access-device fraud, in violation of\n  \n   18 U.S.C. § 1029\n  \n  (a)(2), (a)","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4421838],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4485168/state-of-washington-v-stacy-ann-bradshaw/","attorney":"","caseName":"State Of Washington v. Stacy Ann Bradshaw","caseNameFull":"","citation":["414 P.3d 1148"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4485168,"court":"Court of Appeals of Washington","court_citation_string":"Wash. Ct. App.","court_id":"washctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-04-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"75853-5","docket_id":6358238,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:58:14.820679Z","date_created":"2018-04-09T19:53:10.522662Z","score":{"bm25":16.489439}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[118098,1199769,1391499,1423352,1423725,2616646,3990962],"download_url":"http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/758535.pdf","id":4262421,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/04/09/state_of_washington_v._stacy_ann_bradshaw.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:50:15.366995Z","date_created":"2018-04-09T19:53:10.529520Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1fd520e07e7719d1c13f6b452c72e597c7cc25c7","snippet":"                                                                   MED\n                                                           COURT OF APPEALS OW I\n                                                            STATE OF WASHINGTON\n                                                           2018 APR -9 AM 8:38\n\n\n\n\n           IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\n\n    STATE OF WASHINGTON,                     )\n                                             )       No. 75853-5-1\n        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4262421],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/76656/kelley-v-secretary-for-the-department-of-corrections/","attorney":"James Charles Lohman, Austin, TX, for Petitioner-Appellee., Carol M. Dittmar, Tampa, FL, for Respondent-Appellant.","caseName":"Kelley v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections","caseNameFull":"William H. KELLEY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant","citation":["377 F.3d 1317","2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15249","2004 WL 1637062"],"citeCount":243,"cluster_id":76656,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2004-07-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03-10513","docket_id":398086,"judge":"Tjoflat, Anderson, Wilson","lexisCite":"2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15249","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T18:05:02.872794Z","date_created":"2015-10-14T22:18:30.938167Z","score":{"bm25":14.905699}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[71689,72483,72650,73627,76007,76034,76600,94565,106544,106598,108417,110382,110662,110807,111170,111514,111552,111717,111727,111799,112728,117893,117934,118135,118211,118296,118307,160217,599028,672140,677146,678913,688709,741088,746269,755248,755534,769485],"download_url":"http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200310513.pdf","id":76656,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2004/07/23/Kelley_v._Secretary_for_the_Department_of_Corr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:06:00.423366Z","date_created":"2010-04-27T02:20:13Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5e09779492bd4cbb5158eafdee77649e08df2807","snippet":"\n\n\n  TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:\n \n\n  The petitioner, William H. Kelley, is a Florida prisoner on death row, having been convicted of first degree murder. The district court granted a writ of habeas corpus setting aside his conviction and sentence.\n  \n   1\n  \n  We reverse.\n \n\n  This case — from the time of the murder to the ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[76656],"source":"CRU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1301033/people-v-harrison/","attorney":"Michael A. Cox, Attorney General, B. Eric Restuccia, Solicitor General, Catherine M. Castagne, Prosecuting Attorney, and William E. Molner, Assistant Attorney General, for the people., Daniel J. Rust for the defendant.","caseName":"People v. Harrison","caseNameFull":"People v. Harrison","citation":["768 N.W.2d 98","283 Mich. App. 374"],"citeCount":104,"cluster_id":1301033,"court":"Michigan Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mich. Ct. App.","court_id":"michctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-04-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket 279264","docket_id":1572979,"judge":"Zahra, O'Connell, Kelly","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T02:59:43.759213Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T17:47:10.248480Z","score":{"bm25":13.286755}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4804,"cites":[839919,843020,845991,848647,848721,1581962,1830440,2126538,2219814],"download_url":null,"id":1301033,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T06:52:59.494851Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T05:24:08.638381Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d407b48d5c278ee453965e1d7b954f34fab38a86","snippet":"\n768 N.W.2d 98 (2009)\n283 Mich. App. 374\nPEOPLE\nv.\nHARRISON.\nDocket No. 279264.\nCourt of Appeals of Michigan.\nSubmitted April 7, 2009, at Detroit.\nDecided April 14, 2009, at 9:20 a.m.\n*99 Michael A. Cox, Attorney General, B. Eric Restuccia, Solicitor General, Catherine M. Castagne, Prosecut","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1301033],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479308/united-states-v-morris/","attorney":"C. Mignonne Griffing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Core L. Morris, Plain Dealing, LA, pro se.","caseName":"United States v. Morris","caseNameFull":"United States v. Core L. MORRIS also known as, Pretty Boy","citation":["307 F. App'x 872"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479308,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","court_citation_string":"5th Cir.","court_id":"ca5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-30916","docket_id":65705135,"judge":"Engelhardt, Smith, Southwick","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:31.782017Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:27:52.952592Z","score":{"bm25":12.10271}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[755412,9492811],"download_url":null,"id":8451299,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:39:49.096042Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:27:52.973015Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM: **\nCore Morris appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea. For the reasons set forth below, we VACATE and REMAND for resentencing.\nMorris pled guilty to one count of a bill of information and two counts of an indictment. The charge under the bill of information to which Morris accepted guilt was for conspiracy to defraud insurance companies through use ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451299],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8479307/united-states-v-morris/","attorney":"C. Mignonne Griffing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Core L. Morris, Plain Dealing, LA, pro se.","caseName":"United States v. Morris","caseNameFull":"United States v. Core L. MORRIS also known as, Pretty Boy","citation":["307 F. App'x 872"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8479307,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","court_citation_string":"5th Cir.","court_id":"ca5","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 07-30916","docket_id":65705134,"judge":"Engelhardt, Smith, Southwick","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:30:31.747776Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:27:52.723679Z","score":{"bm25":12.038715}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[755412,9492811],"download_url":null,"id":8451298,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:39:49.099111Z","date_created":"2022-11-05T01:27:52.743925Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM: **\nCore Morris appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea. For the reasons set forth below, we VACATE and REMAND for resentencing.\nMorris pled guilty to one count of a bill of information and two counts of an indictment. The charge under the bill of information to which Morris accepted guilt was for conspiracy to defraud insurance companies through use ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8451298],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4239244/rainey-v-the-state/","attorney":"Zell & Zell, Rodney S. Zell, for appellant., Shannon G. Wallace, District Attorney, Cliff Head, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.","caseName":"Rainey v. the State","caseNameFull":"Henry Rainey v. State","citation":["338 Ga. App. 413","790 S.E.2d 106","2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 440"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4239244,"court":"Court of Appeals of Georgia","court_citation_string":"Ga. Ct. App.","court_id":"gactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-07-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A16A0675","docket_id":4111544,"judge":"Rickman, Barnes, Miller, Ellington, McFadden, Mercier, McMillian, Boggs, Branch","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T23:47:01.341890Z","date_created":"2016-07-18T07:05:54.093767Z","score":{"bm25":11.573805}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9834897,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:02:04.606191Z","date_created":"2023-09-02T01:57:11.295105Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nRickman, Judge.\nHenry Rainey appeals his conviction for criminal attempt to commit armed robbery. Rainey contends, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We agree and reverse.\nOn appeal, “[w]e view the evidence ... in the light most favorable to the verdict and no longer presume the defendant is innocent. We do *414","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,111170,5572087,5601202],"download_url":"https://efast.gaappeals.us/download?filingId=6b7de74c-0d17-4d3c-8de7-a195eae4943d","id":4016505,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/07/18/henry_rainey_v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:02:10.754470Z","date_created":"2016-07-18T07:05:54.099692Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"abee78f0e42e7dc82ed6492b3fe348ce97a935ad","snippet":"                                   WHOLE COURT\n\n                    NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be\n                    physically received in our clerk’s office within ten\n                    days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.\n                                http://www.gaappeals.us/rules\n\n\n                                                                       July 13, 2016\n\n\n\n\nIn the Court of Appeals of Georgia\n A16A0675. RAINEY v. THE STATE.\n\n      RICKMAN, Jud","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4016505,9834897,9834898],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4237368/people-v-mutter/","attorney":"Counsel, Donna L. Harris, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Scott C. Taylor and Daniel Hilton, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.","caseName":"People v. Mutter","caseNameFull":"The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES CARL MUTTER, Defendant and Appellant","citation":["1 Cal. App. 5th 429","204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 643","2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 563"],"citeCount":9,"cluster_id":4237368,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-07-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"E064355","docket_id":4109643,"judge":"Miller, Hollenhorst, Achng, Slough","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T23:46:31.403475Z","date_created":"2016-07-11T19:02:35.349648Z","score":{"bm25":11.502793}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2582113,2588536],"download_url":"http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E064355.PDF","id":4014629,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/07/11/people_v._mutter.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:00:54.447155Z","date_created":"2016-07-11T19:02:35.355273Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"56817ca1d43e15b641ccb95b04f32832c6e3ccb9","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion\n \n\n  MILLER, J.—\n \n\n  The trial court denied the Proposition 47 petition for resen-tencing of defendant and appellant James Carl Mutter. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.)\n  \n   1\n  \n  Defendant contends the trial court erred because the crime for which he sought resentencing—possession or receipt of counterfeit currency (","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4014629],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2807267/frank-anthony-evans-jr-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"Frank Anthony Evans Jr. v. State","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2807267,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Tyler","court_id":"txctapp12","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"12-14-00053-CR","docket_id":2663769,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:27:20.362261Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T11:42:02.020625Z","score":{"bm25":11.218734}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1377598,1487693,1517312,1520336,1521398,1572272,1590541,1615721,1713584,1877704,2271405,2341345],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=7822&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa12%5cOpinion","id":2807267,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/06/11/frank_anthony_evans_jr._v._state.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:27:20.361466Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T11:18:39.841179Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c2ae16417c338e83eb7a4db238c29c4f7f53868f","snippet":"                                 NO. 12-14-00053-CR\n\n                         IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n              TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT\n\n                                    TYLER, TEXAS\n\nFRANK ANTHONY EVANS, JR.,                       §      APPEAL FROM THE 7TH\nAPPELLANT\n\nV.                                              §      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT\n\nTHE STATE OF TEXAS,\nAPPELLEE                                        §      SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS\n\n                                 MEM","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2807267],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4753378/people-v-seo/","attorney":"","caseName":"People v. Seo","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4753378,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-05-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"G057597","docket_id":17151455,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:15:04.317399Z","date_created":"2020-05-12T21:02:17.912095Z","score":{"bm25":10.731511}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1277360,2551479,6106723],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/G057597.PDF","id":4533725,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/05/12/people_v._seo.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:58:41.165996Z","date_created":"2020-05-12T21:02:17.915498Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"969739d2f6c03e078200f9b802e54443ed8026ac","snippet":"Filed 5/12/20\n\n\n\n\n                             CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                              FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                        DIVISION THREE\n\n\nTHE PEOPLE,\n\n    Plaintiff and Respondent,                        G057597\n\n        v.                                           (Super. Ct. No. 15NF2368)\n\nSUNG JUE SEO,                                        OPINION\n\n    Defendant and Appellant.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4533725],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/626957/united-states-v-carney/","attorney":"ON BRIEF: Frank W. Heft, Jr., Patrick J. Bouldin, Office of the Federal Defender, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, Kentucky.","caseName":"United States v. Carney","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse CARNEY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant","citation":["675 F.3d 1007","2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7114","2012 WL 1172179"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":626957,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-04-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"10-5638","docket_id":1891101,"judge":"Daughtrey, Cole, Rogers","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7114","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T23:01:42.573220Z","date_created":"2015-03-11T17:37:38.120406Z","score":{"bm25":10.668779}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[58,78484,109925,111262,201438,683179,785340,793369,796045,1189037,1456764],"download_url":"http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/12a0097p-06.pdf","id":626957,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2012/04/10/United_States_v._Jesse_Carney_Jr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T06:15:14.233546Z","date_created":"2012-04-10T14:04:05Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0f68dbf7562822aa74b26125c9c5a080f0168244","snippet":"\n675 F.3d 1007 (2012)\nUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,\nv.\nJesse CARNEY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 10-5638.\nUnited States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.\nApril 10, 2012.\nON BRIEF: Frank W. Heft, Jr., Patrick J. Bouldin, Office of the Federal Defender, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[672,800,2762],"panel_names":["Ransey Guy Cole Jr.","Martha Craig Daughtrey","John M. Rogers"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[626957],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/596501/united-states-v-rodney-holloman/","attorney":"Mark S. Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant., Michael M. Baylson, U.S. Atty., Walter S. Batty, Jr., Scott D. Godshall, Asst. U.S. Attys., for appellee.","caseName":"United States v. Rodney Holloman","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America v. Rodney HOLLOMAN, Appellant","citation":["981 F.2d 690","1992 WL 359128"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":596501,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1992-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"92-1429","docket_id":523401,"judge":"Viter, Greenberg, Seitz, Sloviter, Becker, Stapleton, Mansmann, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Nygaard, Alito, Roth, Lewis","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T22:47:58.322742Z","date_created":"2015-10-14T00:55:45.215124Z","score":{"bm25":10.43854}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9483676,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T06:20:08.719283Z","date_created":"2023-08-05T09:28:39.822723Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nSLO VITER, Chief Judge.\nI.\n\nIntroduction\n\nRodney Holloman was convicted following a jury trial of fourteen counts of possession of counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a), one count of use of an unassigned social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B), and two counts of possession of “an implement design","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/981/981.F2d.690.92-1429.html","id":596501,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T04:28:04.382317Z","date_created":"2011-08-23T10:21:59Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e7f31272e0b8565f53cb8692ec72474fc4b4cfaa","snippet":"981 F.2d 690\n    UNITED STATES of Americav.Rodney HOLLOMAN, Appellant.\n    No. 92-1429.\n    United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.\n    Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) Dec. 3, 1992.Decided Dec. 8, 1992.Sur Petition for Rehearing Dec. 30, 1992.\n    \n      Mark S. Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant.\n    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[596501,9483676,9483677],"source":"RU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6815352/state-v-willis/","attorney":"Russell Y. Leffler, Huron County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daivia S. Kasper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee., Chad D. Huber, for appellant.","caseName":"State v. Willis","caseNameFull":"The STATE of Ohio v. WILLIS","citation":["192 Ohio App. 3d 579","949 N.E.2d 1042"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6815352,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-02-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. H-10-003","docket_id":63796955,"judge":"Handwork, Pietrykowski, Singer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T11:21:26.927900Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T22:12:16.874402Z","score":{"bm25":10.364093}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6702213,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T08:24:12.131936Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T22:12:16.879592Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSinger, Judge.\n{¶ 1} Appellant appeals his conviction for forgery and possession of criminal tools entered on a jury verdict in the Huron County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.\n{¶ 2} On April 19, 2008, a man in a silver-colored SUV came to the drive-through window at the McDonald’s restaurant in Norwalk, Ohio, ordering food that cost less than ten dollars. The man handed the wi","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6702213],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/555130/united-states-v-ira-marvin-dickey/","attorney":"Knut S. Johnson, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant., Carol C. Lam and Nancy L. Worthington, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.","caseName":"United States v. Ira Marvin Dickey","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ira Marvin DICKEY, Defendant-Appellant","citation":["924 F.2d 836","91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 618","91 Daily Journal DAR 988","1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 877","1991 WL 4575"],"citeCount":123,"cluster_id":555130,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1991-01-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"89-50340","docket_id":828530,"judge":"Reinhardt, Leavy, King","lexisCite":"91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 618","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T22:26:39.978089Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T21:28:22.748713Z","score":{"bm25":10.328668}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[519969,536080,537813,540780,542066,543189,544309,544728,545276,547567,8976758,9094922,9096964],"download_url":null,"id":9481280,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T06:19:26.334477Z","date_created":"2023-08-05T08:13:26.287279Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nLEAVY, Circuit Judge:\nOn January 4, 1989, Ira Marvin Dickey was indicted on three counts of violating federal currency laws: possession of an engraved plate for the printing of counterfeit $20 bills (18 U.S.C. § 477), printing of counterfeit $20 bills (18 U.S.C. § 471), and possession of three counterfeit $100 bills (18 U.S.C. § 472). On February 27, 1989, Dickey pleaded guilty to the second count of the indictment; the two ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[462712,519969,527667,536080,537001,537813,540780,542066,543189,544309,544728,545276,547567],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/924/924.F2d.836.89-50340.html","id":555130,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T02:24:50.234083Z","date_created":"2011-08-23T10:09:20Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"328f9f5afb2c4b3ce01e6435e9c9144cf1c81613","snippet":"924 F.2d 836\n    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ira Marvin DICKEY, Defendant-Appellant.\n    No. 89-50340.\n    United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.\n    Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1990.Decided Jan. 23, 1991.\n    \n      Knut S. Johnson, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appe","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[555130,9481280,9481281],"source":"RU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/780424/united-states-of-america-v-wayne-brown/","attorney":"John P. Messina, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellant., Andrew H. Kahl, argued, Des Moines, IA (Robert C. Dopf, on the brief), for appellee.","caseName":"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. WAYNE BROWN, —","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wayne BROWN, Defendant—Appellant","citation":["315 F.3d 929","60 Fed. R. Serv. 181","2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 246","2003 WL 61103"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":780424,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","court_citation_string":"8th Cir.","court_id":"ca8","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-01-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"02-2007","docket_id":740312,"judge":"Bowman, Arnold, Loken","lexisCite":"2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 246","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:14:27.129912Z","date_created":"2015-10-14T00:08:32.185948Z","score":{"bm25":10.291449}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[362845,748626,773993],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/315/315.F3d.929.02-2007.html","id":780424,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:41:53.201938Z","date_created":"2012-04-18T15:06:32Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"75c50bf199986482d37ed572d07b937bbc6d72f0","snippet":"\n\n\n  LOKEN, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  A jury convicted Wayne Brown of possessing counterfeit currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Brown appeals, arguing the district court\n  \n   1\n  \n  abused its discretion in overruling his hearsay objection to testimony by a Secret Service agent based upon the agency’s database for tracking counterfeit cur","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[780424],"source":"RU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6319049/people-v-dent/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Queens Law Associates (Christopher Whitehair of counsel) for defendant., Richard A. Brown, District Attorney (Timothy Bates of counsel), for plaintiff.","caseName":"People v. Dent","caseNameFull":"The People of the State of New York v. Tyran Dent","citation":["57 Misc. 3d 300","61 N.Y.S.3d 446"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":6319049,"court":"New York Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sup. Ct.","court_id":"nysupct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62950210,"judge":"Módica","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:07:01.692351Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:58:10.552929Z","score":{"bm25":10.2437525}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[107564,107831,111143,118036,1977360,2033638,2820185,3210342,4089523,5529156,5530806,5537117,5538743,5540379,5540832,5779696,8708364,9422845,9430865,9432041,9434728,9531197,9724919],"download_url":null,"id":6187516,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:49:34.506375Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:58:10.576428Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*302OPINION OF THE COURT\nDeborah Stevens Módica, J.\nA hearing was held on May 11, 2017 to determine the admissibility of statement evidence and physical property. The following constitutes the decision and order of the court.\nFindings of Fact\nPolice Officer Thomas Lane, a 12-year veteran of the New York City Polic","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6187516],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3030656/united-states-v-wayne-brown/","attorney":"","caseName":"United States v. Wayne Brown","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3030656,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","court_citation_string":"8th Cir.","court_id":"ca8","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-01-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"02-2007","docket_id":2888082,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T16:59:27.854949Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T22:50:06.809734Z","score":{"bm25":10.067472}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[362845,427712,535304,589737,591185,748626,773993],"download_url":"http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/03/01/022007P.pdf","id":3030656,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2003/01/09/united_states_v._wayne_brown.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T02:14:14.107908Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T22:44:41.828927Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"97534aa5dfb161cda78dcd28c84fae1372cbf331","snippet":"                     United States Court of Appeals\n                              FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT\n                                    ___________\n\n                                    No. 02-2007\n                                    ___________\n\nUnited States of America,                *\n                                         *\n      Plaintiff - Appellee,              *\n                                         * Appeal from the United States\n      v.                                 * Dist","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3030656],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7317240/united-states-v-johnson/","attorney":"Ann Marie Blaylock, Ronald L. Walutes, Jr., United States Attorney’s Office, Alexandria, VA, for United States of America., Kevin Richard Brehm, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, VA, for Ronnesha Michele Upchurch.","caseName":"United States v. Johnson","caseNameFull":"United States v. Andrew Justin JOHNSON","citation":["149 F. Supp. 3d 678","2016 WL 775772","2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23712"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7317240,"court":"District Court, E.D. Virginia","court_citation_string":"E.D. Va.","court_id":"vaed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-02-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1:15-CR-271 (LMB)","docket_id":64305723,"judge":"Brinkema","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23712","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:35:55.134939Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:39:44.120252Z","score":{"bm25":9.837392}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7235148,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:22:38.241389Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:39:44.124804Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nLeonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge\nThis case came on for trial by the Court on February 17, 2016. The sole issue in this bench trial was whether the government has sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, Andrew Justin Johnson (“Johnson” or “defendant”), knowingly and intentionally conspired with Preston Holmes, III (“Holmes”), Matthew Jones ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7235148],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/217815/united-states-v-wright/","attorney":"Robert Epstein, Brett G. Sweitzer [ARGUED], Mark T. Wilson, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant., Maria M. Carrillo, Robert A. Zauzmer [ARGUED], Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.","caseName":"United States v. Wright","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, v. Justine WRIGHT, Appellant","citation":["642 F.3d 148","2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10928","2011 WL 2139109"],"citeCount":51,"cluster_id":217815,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"10-2970","docket_id":1874757,"judge":"Fisher, Jordan, Cowen","lexisCite":"2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10928","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-20T19:12:10.066724Z","date_created":"2015-12-11T18:15:36.255355Z","score":{"bm25":9.792471}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2076,145843,753723,1212740,1229558,1250163,1253123,1262661,1462215],"download_url":"http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102970p.pdf","id":217815,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2011/06/01/United_States_v._Justine_Wright.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:59:05.635975Z","date_created":"2011-06-01T16:28:54Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b3295023a2674eac9456bd63d6d955a2686b5577","snippet":"\n642 F.3d 148 (2011)\nUNITED STATES of America,\nv.\nJustine WRIGHT, Appellant.\nNo. 10-2970.\nUnited States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.\nArgued April 14, 2011.\nFiled: June 1, 2011.\n*149 Robert Epstein, Brett G. Sweitzer [ARGUED], Mark T. Wilson, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[741,1063,1679],"panel_names":["Robert E. Cowen","Dennis Michael Fisher","Kent A. Jordan"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[217815],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}