{"count":3359,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xNC4xOTI3Mzk1JnM9NTI5NTAwOSZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTA5LTI2JnA9Mg%3D%3D&q=EFFECT+OF+MODERN+STATUTES+VESTED+AND+CONTINGENT+INTERESTS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1488936/douglas-v-modern-aero-inc/","attorney":"J. Mark Trimble, Diane J. Knoblauch, Rohrbacher, Nicholson & Light, Toledo, OH, for Peter Douglas, Tom Corwin, Dock Treece., Kenneth J. Walsh, Robert S. Stone, McDonald, Hopkins, Burke & Haber, Cleveland, OH, for Modem Aero, Inc., Paul W. Chamberlain, Chamberlain, Neaton & Johnson, Wayzata, MN, for Frank Hancock, Inca, Inc., Donald Chance Mark, Jr., Kerry M. Even-sen, Meagher & Geer, Minneapolis, MN, for Earl Joseph Waugh, Buffalo Aviation.","caseName":"Douglas v. Modern Aero, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Peter DOUGLAS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. MODERN AERO, INC., Et Al., Defendants","citation":["954 F. Supp. 1206","1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4589","1997 WL 85356"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":1488936,"court":"District Court, N.D. Ohio","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ohio","court_id":"ohnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1997-02-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3:96CV7654","docket_id":974501,"judge":"Carr","lexisCite":"1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4589","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T04:11:00.858137Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T13:31:01.782272Z","score":{"bm25":22.87687}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":547,"cites":[104200,104393,110170,111429,281765,305479,529741,563205,669713,722390,1369417,1675736,2376007],"download_url":null,"id":1488936,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T09:01:00.710960Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:27:45.262347Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e8d71cd9b2a545369e88f35aa25324f8d0226d45","snippet":"\n954 F.Supp. 1206 (1997)\nPeter DOUGLAS, et al., Plaintiffs,\nv.\nMODERN AERO, INC., et al., Defendants.\nNo. 3:96CV7654.\nUnited States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.\nFebruary 13, 1997.\n*1207 J. Mark Trimble, Diane J. Knoblauch, Rohrbacher, Nicholson & Light, Toledo, OH, for Peter Douglas, Tom Corwin, Dock Treece.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1488936],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4424228/in-the-matter-of-the-estate-of-eagleton/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EAGLETON","caseNameFull":"","citation":["394 P.3d 284","2017 OK CIV APP 2"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4424228,"court":"Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla. Civ. App.","court_id":"oklacivapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":6148301,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-23T21:44:44.481495Z","date_created":"2017-09-06T17:15:14.201411Z","score":{"bm25":17.04624}},"neutralCite":"2017 OK CIV APP 2","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2627725,2682782,2683623,5159203,5178380],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479756","id":4201481,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/12/09/in_the_matter_of_the_estate_of_eagleton_3.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:07:57.074547Z","date_created":"2017-09-06T17:15:14.207723Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2bf2ec08ec78e19720f4a08b3e256d9d15253afe","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EAGLETON\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479756","id":4117053,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/12/09/in_the_matter_of_the_estate_of_eagleton.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T04:22:54.489604Z","date_created":"2017-01-19T18:13:13.124151Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"127d2cbac116e89422110c3ef29054221eef9f43","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EAGLETON\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479756","id":4117256,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/12/09/in_the_matter_of_the_estate_of_eagleton_1.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T04:23:06.104089Z","date_created":"2017-01-19T21:13:30.712699Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f90c66668ab49e718f452a87fd5789d4dc14bbf3","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EAGLETON\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479756","id":4118903,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2016/12/09/in_the_matter_of_the_estate_of_eagleton_2.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T04:24:43.441616Z","date_created":"2017-01-26T19:11:36.045401Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b7bf62002a335e898dc7d8890d9dbd21052a038d","snippet":" \r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\tOSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EAGLETON\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\r\n        \r\n            \t\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n     \r\n    OSCN navigation\r\n\r\n\r\n    \r\n        \r\n        Home\r\n\r\n        \r\n        Courts\r\n\r\n        \r\n                \r\n\t    Court Dockets\r\n\t\t\t \r\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4117256,4117053,4118903,4201481],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8515934/imo-of-the-doris-j-foster-inter-vivos-declaration-of-trust/","attorney":"","caseName":"IMO of The Doris J. Foster Inter Vivos Declaration of Trust","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8515934,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CA 2018-0589-PWG","docket_id":65774159,"judge":"Griffin, Patricia M.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:45:11.782847Z","date_created":"2022-11-21T22:02:32.098574Z","score":{"bm25":17.00584}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1472473,1488138,1657569,1718194,2259371,3380935,3566768,4829316,4968808,4972803,4975421],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=340650","id":8488394,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/21/imo_of_the_doris_j._foster_inter_vivos_declaration_of_trust.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:00:09.643649Z","date_created":"2022-11-21T22:02:32.106702Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cc7168a62342004dcc4c61eb39f9234deac1a67a","snippet":"                                COURT OF CHANCERY\n                                      OF THE\n                                STATE OF DELAWARE\nPATRICIA W. GRIFFIN                                                     CHANCERY COURTHOUSE\nMASTER IN CHANCERY                                                           34 The Circle\n                                                                     GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947\n\n\n                      Date Submitted:    May 17, 2022\n                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8488394],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9302535/civic-association-of-surrey-park-v-robert-riegel-erin-riegel/","attorney":"","caseName":"Civic Association of Surrey Park v. Robert Riegel & Erin Riegel","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9302535,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C.A. No. 2019-0961-SEM","docket_id":66577177,"judge":"Zurn V.C.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:42:04.654262Z","date_created":"2022-11-30T21:02:45.370773Z","score":{"bm25":16.10337}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1435833,1907043,1927385,1974573,2197909,2327753,2399351,4969444],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=340970","id":9297613,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/30/civic_association_of_surrey_park_v._robert_riegel__erin_riegel.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:02:35.397971Z","date_created":"2022-11-30T21:02:45.374098Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8b13fa5a6e9dce28ee9bc46415c3f07f9f385d2d","snippet":"                              COURT OF CHANCERY\n                                    OF THE\n                              STATE OF DELAWARE\nMORGAN T. ZURN                                                 LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER\nVICE CHANCELLOR                                                    500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400\n                                                                  WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734\n\n\n                                  November 30, 2022\n\nThomas C. M","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9297613],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9454303/jetton-developments-llc-v-estate-of-dorothy-huddleston/","attorney":"","caseName":"Jetton Developments, LLC v. Estate of Dorothy Huddleston","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9454303,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-12-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M2023-00026-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":68107951,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:20:30.716140Z","date_created":"2023-12-21T17:09:56.942681Z","score":{"bm25":15.997059}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1667361,1993469,2342242,2396965],"download_url":"https://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/OpinionsPDFVersion/Majority%20Opinion%20-%20M2023-00026-COA-R3-CV.pdf","id":9912128,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/12/21/jetton_developments_llc_v._estate_of_dorothy_huddleston.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:10:17.639829Z","date_created":"2023-12-21T17:09:56.945331Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"adc3a77a1656c00d3cedac25e31bd8f3bf086d4e","snippet":"                                                                                           12/21/2023\n                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                            AT NASHVILLE\n                                August 22, 2023 Session\n\n        JETTON DEVELOPMENTS, LLC v. ESTATE OF DOROTHY\n                      HUDDLESTON ET AL.\n\n                 Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County\n                   No. 2021CV-97     Louis W. Oliver, Chancellor\n                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9912128],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A limited liability company filed suit in relation to a piece of real property for which the company had executed an agreement to purchase. Although closing did not occur by the time stated in the executed agreement, the trial court ultimately held that the opposing side in this case was estopped from denying that the contract had been extended. Discerning no error, we affirm."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4741086/surgery-center-of-cedar-rapids-v-iowa-department-of-public-health/","attorney":"","caseName":"Surgery Center of Cedar Rapids v. Iowa Department of Public Health","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4741086,"court":"Court of Appeals of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa Ct. App.","court_id":"iowactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-04-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-1835","docket_id":17033746,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:11:50.941114Z","date_created":"2020-04-01T17:04:35.182557Z","score":{"bm25":15.81155}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1706003,1713867,1804083,2197236],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/7317/embed/CourtAppealsOpinion","id":4521433,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/04/01/surgery_center_of_cedar_rapids_v._iowa_department_of_public_health.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:50:06.977788Z","date_created":"2020-04-01T17:04:35.188029Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d8c0cf539ba806cd1898500477c1dad726f126c7","snippet":"                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA\n\n                                   No. 18-1835\n                                Filed April 1, 2020\n\n\nSURGERY CENTER OF CEDAR RAPIDS,\n    Plaintiff-Appellant,\n\nvs.\n\nIOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, STATE HEALTH FACILITIES\nCOUNCIL,\n    Defendant-Appellee,\n\nand\n\nMERCY HOSPITAL CEDAR RAPIDS d/b/a MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, and\nFOX EYE SURGERY, LLC,\n     Intervenors,\n\nand\n\nUNITYPOINT HEALTH CEDAR RAPIDS d/b/a ST. LUKE’S HOSPITAL,\n     Intervenor-Appell","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4521433],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9388782/university-of-texas-at-austin-president-jay-hartzell-v-so/","attorney":"","caseName":"University of Texas at Austin President Jay Hartzell v. S.O.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9388782,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-03-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0811","docket_id":67122988,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:03:37.587192Z","date_created":"2023-04-02T14:07:38.099350Z","score":{"bm25":15.476096}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[8949131],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=8613&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5csc%5cOpinion","id":9384258,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/03/31/university_of_texas_at_austin_president_jay_hartzell_v._s.o..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T20:20:04.955988Z","date_created":"2023-04-02T14:07:38.133543Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fa3d39872cefa0449a7e9de7307ba93e01700b52","snippet":"      Supreme Court of Texas\n                      ══════════\n                       No. 20-0811\n                      ══════════\nUniversity of Texas at Austin President Jay Hartzell, et al.,\n                        Petitioners,\n\n                             v.\n\n                            S.O.,\n                        Respondent\n\n═══════════════════════════════════════\n           On Petition for Review from the\n    Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas\n═══════════════════════════════","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9384258],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9442961/the-matter-of-rochester-police-locust-club-v-city-of-rochester/","attorney":"","caseName":"The Matter of Rochester Police Locust Club v. City of Rochester","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9442961,"court":"New York Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"NY","court_id":"ny","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"81","docket_id":2661943,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:17:44.678474Z","date_created":"2023-11-20T15:05:35.942060Z","score":{"bm25":15.388643}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2058990,2092128,2592494,3614112,3627028,4694951,5484814,5487680,5530857,5531828,5538186,5538994,5541255,5542626,5542630,5824428,5861794,9788223],"download_url":"http://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/Decisions/2023/Nov23/81opn23-Decision.pdf","id":9900786,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/20/the_matter_of_rochester_police_locust_club_v._city_of_rochester.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T09:30:06.019440Z","date_created":"2023-11-20T15:05:35.944725Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"382604af10328723884f37d6f040532a09e92732","snippet":"State of New York                                                      OPINION\nCourt of Appeals                                        This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision\n                                                          before publication in the New York Reports.\n\n\n\n\n No. 81\n In the Matter of Rochester Police\n Locust Club, Inc., et al.,\n         Respondents,\n      v.\n City of Rochester, et al.,\n         Respondents,\n Council of City of Rochester,\n         Appellant.\n\n\n\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9900786],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10601667/revocation-of-prior-monument-designations/","attorney":"","caseName":"Revocation of Prior Monument Designations","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10601667,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":70498758,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:17.014207Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T16:00:16.427056Z","score":{"bm25":15.198445}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[5058,17269,27245,85160,86113,87928,91970,94333,96304,97114,99408,99564,101939,103682,109045,109465,111043,112859,145769,145888,185796,217139,225168,444399,868381,2395835,2770260,4373127,4402817,4420301,4576942,4647936,4673619,6347225,6496181,7252453,7274845,8409752,9300660,9407487,9418277,9419939,9420759,9422621,9425060,9425347,9427174,9427571,9428506,9428654,9429201,9429280,9431313,9432675,9433382,9433921,9434027,9434047,9434723,9435251,9475526,9484549,9494294,9499989,9502823,9527025,9527076,9803992,9888531,9889171,9889205],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1403101/dl","id":11068255,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/05/27/revocation_of_prior_monument_designations.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T02:40:10.944982Z","date_created":"2025-06-10T16:00:16.439407Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"881396332b78747b497f5f9401b7da40ebf90d2e","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n            Revocation of Prior Monument Designations\nThe Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national\n  monument, including by finding that the “landmarks,” “structures,” or “objects” identi-\n  fied in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act’s\n  protections; and such an alteration can have the effect of eliminating entirely the reser-\n  vation of the parcel of land previously associated with a nation","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11068255],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the \"landmarks,\" \"structures,\" or \"objects\" identified in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act's protections; and such an alteration can have the effect of eliminating entirely the reservation of the parcel of land previously associated with a national monument."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4427913/state-of-wyoming-v-zinke/","attorney":"Andrew C. Mergen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC (Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General, William E. Gerard, David A. Carson, Nicholas A. Dimascio, and J. David Gunter II, United States Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Denver, Colorado and Washington, DC; and Richard McNeer, Office of the Solicitor, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, with him on the briefs), appearing for Appellants United States Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior, Kristin Bail, and Ryan Zinke., Michael S. Freeman, Earthjustice, Denver, Colorado (Joel Minor, Earthjustice, Denver, Colorado, and Nathan Matthews, Sierra Club, Oakland, California, with him on the briefs), appearing for Intervenor-Respondent-Appellants Sierra Club, Earthworks, Western Resource Advocates, Conservation Colorado Education Fund, Wilderness Society, and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance., James Kaste, Deputy Attorney General, Wyoming Attorney General’s Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming (Peter K. Michael, Wyoming Attorney General, Michael J. McGra-dy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Erik Petersen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Wyoming Attorney General’s Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Sean D. Reyes, Utah Attorney General, Tyler Green, Solicitor General, Stanford E. Purser, Deputy Solicitor General, Steven F. Alder and Melissa Reynolds, Assistant Attorneys General, Utah Attorney General’s Office, Salt Lake City, Utah; Frederick R. Yar-ger, Solicitor General, Colorado Attorney General’s Office, Denver, Colorado, with him on the brief), appearing for Appellees State of Wyoming, State of Utah, and State of Colorado., Paul M. Seby, Special Assistant Attorney General, Greenberg Traurig, Denver, Colorado; (Wayne K. Stenehjem, Attorney General, and Matthew A. Sagsveen, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, Bismarck, North Dakota, with him on the briefs), appearing for Intervenor-Appellee State of North Dakota., Mark S. Barron (L. Poe Leggette and Alexander K.' Obrecht, with him on the briefs), Baker & Hostetler, Denver, Colorado, appearing for Petitioners-Appellees Independent Petroleum Association of America and Western Energy Alliance., Jeffrey S. Rasmussen (Jeremy J. Patterson and Rebecca Sher, with him on the brief), Fredericks Peebles & Morgan, LLP, Louisville, Colorado, appearing for Appellee Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation., Kevin J. Lynch and Brad Bartlett, Sturm College of Law, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, filed an amicus curiae brief for Interested Public Lands, Natural Resources, Energy, and Administrative Law Professors., Susannah L. Weaver and Sean H. Donahue, Donahue & Goldberg, LLP, Washington, DC, filed an amicus curiae brief for former officials of the U.S. Department of the Interior., Jaimie N. Cavanaugh and Steven J. Lechner, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Lakewood, Colorado, filed an amicus curiae brief for Petroleum Association of Wyoming., M. Reed Hopper and Jonathan Wood, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, California, filed an amicus curiae brief for Wyoming Liberty Group., Timothy C. Fox, Attorney General for the State of Montana, and Tommy H. Butler, Deputy Attorney General for the State of Montana, Helena, Montana; Jahna M. Lindemuth, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska; Derek Schmidt, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, Topeka, Kansas; Ken Paxton, Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, Texas, filed an amicus curiae brief for the States of Montana, Alaska, Kansas, and Texas., Steven P. Lehotsky and Sheldon B. Gilbert, United States Chamber Litigation Center; Jonathan S. Franklin, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, filed an amicus curiae brief for United States Chamber of Commerce.","caseName":"State of Wyoming v. Zinke","caseNameFull":"State of WYOMING; State of Colorado; Independent Petroleum Association of America; Western Energy Alliance, Petitioners-Appellees, and State of North Dakota; State of Utah; UTE Indian Tribe, Intervenors Petitioners-Appellees, v. Ryan ZINKE, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior; United States Bureau of Land Management; United States Department of the Interior; Kristin Bail, Respondents-Appellants, and Sierra Club; Earthworks; Western Resource Advocates; Conservation Colorado Education Fund;. Wilderness Society; Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Intervenors Respondents; United States Chamber of Commerce; Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Former Officials of the U.S. Department of the Interior; Interested Public Lands, Natural Resources, Energy, and Administrative Law Professors; Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Pacific Legal Foundation; Wyoming Liberty Group, State of Montana; State of Alaska; State of Kansas; State of Texas, Amici Curiae. State of Wyoming; State of Colorado; Independent Petroleum Association of America; Western Energy Alliance, Petitioners-Appellees, and State of North Dakota; State of Utah; UTE Indian Tribe, Intervenors Petitioners-Appellees, v. Sierra Club; Earthworks; Western Resource Advocates; Conservation Colorado Education Fund; Wilderness Society; Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Intervenors Respondents-Appellants, and Ryan Zinke, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior; United States Bureau of Land Management; United States Department of the Interior; Kristin Bail, Respondents. United States Chamber of Commerce; Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Former Officials of the U.S. Department of the Interior; Interested Public Lands, Natural Resources, Energy, and Administrative Law Professors; Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Pacific Legal Foundation; Wyoming Liberty Group, State of Montana; State of Alaska; State of Kansas; State of Texas, Amici Curiae","citation":["871 F.3d 1133"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4427913,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit","court_citation_string":"10th Cir.","court_id":"ca10","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-09-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-8068, 16-8069","docket_id":6155968,"judge":"Briscoe, Hartz, Holmes","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:42:25.505119Z","date_created":"2017-09-21T18:01:13.191637Z","score":{"bm25":15.192391}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9878522,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:13:33.215956Z","date_created":"2023-09-27T17:23:36.874956Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBRISCOE, Circuit Judge.\nIn these cases, we are asked to decide whether the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) acted beyond its statutory authority when it promulgated a regulation—43 C.F.R. § 3162.3-3 (2015)1—governing hydraulic fracturing (fracking) on lands owned or held in trust by the United States. The district court invalidated this regulation (hereinafter, the Fracking Regulation) as exceedin","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,104822,106548,107451,107716,109405,109606,109897,109923,111221,117879,118190,127928,158856,162883,164904,171057,171945,172881,173205,567748,743651,777417,1322365,2645422,2672209],"download_url":"http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/16/16-8068.pdf","id":4205166,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/09/21/state_of_wyoming_v._zinke.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:10:24.897769Z","date_created":"2017-09-21T18:01:13.197332Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c5d8f6533dc486db97944ad0cabf01d3cbcd2a42","snippet":"                                                               FILED\n                                                  United States Court of Appeals\n                                                          Tenth Circuit\n\n                                                      September 21, 2017\n                                   PUBLISH            Elisabeth A. Shumaker\n                                                          Clerk of Court\n                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n\n     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4205166,9878522,9878523],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10140676/estate-of-helene-j-evans-v-dept-of-rev/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of Helene J. Evans v. Dept. of Rev.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["24 Or. Tax 126"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10140676,"court":"Oregon Tax Court","court_citation_string":"Or. T.C.","court_id":"ortc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-05-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"TC 5335","docket_id":69254312,"judge":"Manicke","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-10-11T17:12:02.231120Z","date_created":"2024-10-11T17:08:16.256239Z","score":{"bm25":15.135582}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[97307,101583,102004,102723,103219,103330,1512870,3608043,3842621,4286671,4409095,10606323],"download_url":"https://ojd.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p17027coll6/id/9196/download","id":10607277,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/05/28/estate_of_helene_j._evans_v._dept._of_rev..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T18:19:57.127331Z","date_created":"2024-10-11T17:08:16.270932Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d065aa90f603b610a7aac8560e58401a1ada46bc","snippet":"126                            May 28, 2020                              No. 8\n\n                  IN THE OREGON TAX COURT\n                      REGULAR DIVISION\n\n                 ESTATE OF HELENE J. EVANS,\n                           Plaintiff,\n                              v.\n                  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,\n                         Defendant.\n                          (TC 5335)\n     On cross-motions for summary judgment, Plaintiff argued that the United\nStates Constitution’s Due Process","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10607277],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4858058/estate-of-meredith-l-sullivan/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of Meredith L. Sullivan","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4858058,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-02-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0741-PWG","docket_id":59671429,"judge":"Griffin M.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:43:17.745123Z","date_created":"2021-02-22T17:02:55.288267Z","score":{"bm25":14.6014385}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[102817,300288,1188008,1475466,1492850,1894940,1925323,1929987,1933350,1956840,1975889,2076717,2108759,2266934,2308396,2363048,2374706,4283252,4975421],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=317000","id":4661837,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/02/22/estate_of_meredith_l._sullivan.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:46:15.014908Z","date_created":"2021-02-22T17:02:55.294149Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6de2112d2348e7dc1fd5641b61fd731ce69bf1dd","snippet":"   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF                         )    C.A. No.       2018-0741-PWG\nTHE ESTATE OF                            )\nMEREDITH L. SULLIVAN                     )\n\n\n\n\n                           MASTER’S REPORT\n\n                       Date Submitted:   November 19, 2020\n                       Final Report:     February 22, 2021\n\n\n\n\nScott E. Swenson, Brandon R. Harper, and Charles J. Durante, CONNOLLY\nGALLAGHER, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys f","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4661837],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5345114/owens-v-tergeson/","attorney":"Weld - County - District - Court . No. 14CV30160, Honorable Julie C. Hoskins, Judge., Poulson, Odell & Peterson, LLC, Scott M. Campbell, Aaron G. Norris, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Otis, Bedingfield & Peters, LLC, Jennifer Lynn Peters, Christian J. Schulte, Greeley, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellants.","caseName":"Owens v. Tergeson","caseNameFull":"Barbara G. OWENS and G. Charles Gadbois v. Edward H. TERGESON, as Trustee of the Harold Furrow Family Trust and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Esther A. Furrow AED Group, LLC and Pegasus Minerals, LLC","citation":["363 P.3d 826","2015 COA 164","2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 1723","2015 WL 6746535"],"citeCount":16,"cluster_id":5345114,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-11-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals No. 14CA2146","docket_id":61692787,"judge":"Booras, Dailey, Navarro","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:47:46.857443Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:17:01.853105Z","score":{"bm25":14.476165}},"neutralCite":"2015 COA 164","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":5177931,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T00:22:42.659860Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:17:01.872517Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOpinion by\nJUDGE DAILEY\nT1 In this dispute over mineral rights, defendants Edward H. Tergeson, as trustee of the Harold Furrow Family Trust and as personal representative of the Estate of Esther A. Furrow; AED Group, LLC; and Pegasus Minerals, LLC (collectively, the Furrow Defendants), appeal the district court's order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of Plaint","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5177931],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4677112/in-the-matter-of-the-application-of-coe-college-for-interpretation-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"In the Matter of the Application of Coe College for Interpretation of Purported Gift Restrictions v. Coe College","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4677112,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-11-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-0155","docket_id":16445163,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:53:15.555068Z","date_created":"2019-11-08T15:03:52.017443Z","score":{"bm25":14.418089}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1246101,1281726,1749422,1792682,1842323,1910005,1971120,2075673,2087782,2197495,3434479],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/7947/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":4454365,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/11/08/in_the_matter_of_the_application_of_coe_college_for_interpretation_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:03:47.404341Z","date_created":"2019-11-08T15:03:52.021828Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"417d570512bc61bc350a29e5bf3542a6e09b6c01","snippet":"                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA\n                                  No. 19–0155\n\n                         Filed November 8, 2019\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF COE COLLEGE FOR\nINTERPRETATION OF PURPORTED GIFT RESTRICTION,\n\nCOE COLLEGE,\n\n      Appellant.\n\n\n      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Fae Hoover-\n\nGrinde, Judge.\n\n\n\n      A college appeals a district court judgment denying its request for\n\ndeclaratory relief as to the terms of a 1976 charitable gift","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4454365],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4888153/state-of-delaware-dept-of-finance-v-att-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Delaware Dept of Finance v. AT&T Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4888153,"court":"Supreme Court of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del.","court_id":"del","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-06-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"303, 2020","docket_id":59953043,"judge":"Seitz C.J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:50:56.330541Z","date_created":"2021-06-01T21:04:08.618157Z","score":{"bm25":14.398994}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4006,"cites":[99422,104758,111119,111300,292498,326903,329332,360137,365629,370422,373778,384958,385797,468551,486556,565133,654186,686728,690315,773616,1101269,1541285,1793566,1952521,4642796,4969444,7926702,8910901,8916821,9419755,9422881,9422951,9423449,9427273,9431586,9432185,9432768,9873836],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=320670","id":4691932,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/06/01/state_of_delaware_dept_of_finance_v._att_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T08:16:14.296912Z","date_created":"2021-06-01T21:04:08.628543Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d4c340179fd2737f28ce3c0a1ee89b106467cedc","snippet":"        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\n\nSTATE OF DELAWARE,                    §\nDEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,                §    No. 303, 2020\n                                      §\n        Plaintiff Below,              §\n        Appellant,                    §    Court Below: Court of Chancery\n                                      §    of the State of Delaware\n        v.                            §\n                                      §    C.A. No. 2019-0985\nAT&T INC.,             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4691932],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2825365/matter-of-acevedo-v-new-york-state-department-of-motor-vehicles/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Gerstenzang, O’Hern, Sills & Gerstenzang, Albany (Eric H. Sills of counsel), for appellant., Eric T Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel), for respondents.","caseName":"Matter of Acevedo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Kevin B. Acevedo, Appellant, v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Et Al., Respondents","citation":["132 A.D.3d 112","14 N.Y.S.3d 790"],"citeCount":21,"cluster_id":2825365,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-08-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"520060","docket_id":2682197,"judge":"Lahtinen, McCarthy, Peters, Lynch, Garry","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T15:01:18.079806Z","date_created":"2015-08-11T06:32:52.087632Z","score":{"bm25":14.37309}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2077654,2150442,2589032,2590616,2592090,2792357,2805380,3586811,5487441,5489058,5489130,5532181,5536787,5537335,5537840,5538311,5720206,5728453,5783552,5813540,5828569,5842316,5862218,5926798,6024854,6033110,6091432,9710119],"download_url":"http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/Decisions/2015/520060.pdf","id":2825365,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/08/06/matter_of_acevedo_v._new_york_state_department_of_motor_vehicles.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:43:05.941602Z","date_created":"2015-08-11T06:06:10.580100Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"17c4527a3959d80153eae6fc5330accc0a42cca4","snippet":"                          State of New York\n                   Supreme Court, Appellate Division\n                      Third Judicial Department\nDecided and Entered: August 6, 2015                    520060\n________________________________\n\nIn the Matter of KEVIN B.\n   ACEVEDO,\n                    Appellant,\n      v                                     OPINION AND ORDER\n\nNEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF\n   MOTOR VEHICLES et al.,\n                    Respondents.\n________________________________\n\n\nCale","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2825365,9810230,9810231],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3172489/in-re-the-marriage-of-courtney-carr-v-beth-e-carr/","attorney":"Jonathan R. Deenik, Cross Pennamped Wo'olsey & Glazier, P.C., Carmel, IN, Attorney for Appellant., C. Richard Marshall, Columbus, IN, Attorney for Appellee.","caseName":"In Re the Marriage of: Courtney Carr v. Beth E. Carr","caseNameFull":"In Re the Marriage of Courtney CARR, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Beth E. CARR, Appellee-Respondent","citation":["49 N.E.3d 1086","2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 15","2016 WL 320687"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3172489,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-01-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"03A01-1505-DR-436","docket_id":3031230,"judge":"Baker, Bradford, Pyle","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-27T19:00:38.439590Z","date_created":"2016-01-27T16:12:26.223864Z","score":{"bm25":14.352516}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[852210,2006919,2034721,2071614,2081510,2089132,2095035,3428668],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/01271601jgb.pdf","id":3172489,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/01/27/in_re_the_marriage_of_courtney_carr_v._beth_e._carr.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:48:52.024379Z","date_created":"2016-01-27T16:05:58.909390Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dba65a861af57c8e9f48abcaccb07525b772e22c","snippet":"\n\n\n  BAKER, Judge.\n \n\n  [1] Courtney Carr appeals the trial ■court’s dissolutiori order, which, in part, did not count the survivor benefit plan feature of his military pension as a marital asset. Finding that the survivor benefit plan should have been counted as a-marital asset, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with-instructions to recalculate the asset distribution. ■\n <","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3172489],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10293100/pennsylvania-professional-liab-v-governor-of-pennsylvania/","attorney":"","caseName":"Pennsylvania Professional Liab v. Governor of Pennsylvania","caseNameFull":"","citation":["123 F.4th 623"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10293100,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-12-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-2297","docket_id":19867,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:38:27.735483Z","date_created":"2024-12-16T18:00:28.993994Z","score":{"bm25":14.322487}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[57819,201445,772332,5538566,6607974,7249331,7249367,7253904,7263675,8410502,8704141,9418977,9428574,9429830,9430607,9435011,9483447,10474471],"download_url":"https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/182297p.pdf","id":10759688,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/12/16/pennsylvania_professional_liab_v._governor_of_pennsylvania.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T14:08:41.346443Z","date_created":"2024-12-16T18:00:29.008043Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7b5c1b5a554e8cadaa8e665d2871eabfb01c49b6","snippet":"                                   PRECEDENTIAL\n\n     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n          FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT\n               _____________\n\n             Nos. 18-2297 and 18-2323\n                  _____________\n\nPENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY JOINT\n       UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION\n\n                        v.\n\n   GOVERNOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF\n             PENNSYLVANIA,\n      THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE\n    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA\n                    (Intervenor in District Court)","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10759688],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4546786/matter-of-foreclosure-of-tax-liens-v-goldman/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens v. Goldman","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 NY Slip Op 7123"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4546786,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-10-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2017-00694","docket_id":8077167,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:15:22.361875Z","date_created":"2018-10-24T19:46:02.363643Z","score":{"bm25":14.232701}},"neutralCite":"2018 NY Slip Op 7123","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[85104,104200,104786,105062,105392,106501,109721,110981,145663,2196588,2201014,2478870,2583608,2789162,3006217,3176452,3629211,4026084,4124504,5487752,5525492,5535559,5684765,5685406,5689930,5707599,5719789,5765895,5777418,5804437,5815665,5852632,5880199,5904916,5918300,5954125,5983712,5999973,6018336,6094978,6208051,6209484],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_07123.htm","id":4324039,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2018/10/24/matter_of_foreclosure_of_tax_liens_v._goldman.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:33:24.847159Z","date_created":"2018-10-24T19:46:02.378581Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"aec1690c1e6bbbcfd43fa1a64df2bb44b7fb2f5c","snippet":"\r\n\r\nMatter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens v Goldman (2018 NY Slip Op 07123)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nMatter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens v Goldman\r\n\r\n\r\n2018 NY Slip Op 07123\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on October 24, 2018\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, Second Department\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nPublished by New ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4324039],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5295009/league-of-women-voters-of-honolulu-v-state/","attorney":"","caseName":"League of Women Voters of Honolulu v. State.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["150 Haw. 182","499 P.3d 382"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":5295009,"court":"Hawaii Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Haw.","court_id":"haw","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-11-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SCAP-19-0000372","docket_id":60699722,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:48:40.200713Z","date_created":"2021-11-04T19:03:20.832588Z","score":{"bm25":14.1927395}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,93291,101534,111043,871559,871635,1121420,1133732,1160242,1166074,1188338,1191607,1240737,1435293,1520128,2095893,2581001,2595537,2616466,3408264,4099183,4379651,4432892,4456681,4822274,6484980,6485160,6758995,8178877,8221216,8304507,9420596,9422369,9426170,9506235,9712708,9781920,9785726,9786294,9796759,9797652,9835475,9842131,9886850],"download_url":"https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/SCAP-19-0000372.pdf","id":5123571,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/11/04/league_of_women_voters_of_honolulu_v._state..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T13:49:13.639502Z","date_created":"2021-11-04T19:03:20.835004Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"459b0ce799ec71f8e761c3ea53e284116f50869b","snippet":"      *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ***\n\n\n\n\n                                                                 Electronically Filed\n                                                                 Supreme Court\n                                                                 SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX\n                                                                 04-NOV-2021\n                                                                 07:53 AM\n                      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5123571],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}