{"count":9971,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz00Ny4wMzEzMyZzPTQ0ODA5OTImdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0wOC0xOCZwPTI%3D&q=DIVISION+AND+CLASSIFICATION+OF+REAL+PROPERTY+CLASSIFICATION+AND+TYPES+OF+REAL+PROPERTY&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7108373/csx-transportation-inc-v-new-york-state-office-of-real-property-services/","attorney":"Gregory G. Fletcher, Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell, Memphis, TN (James N. Blair, Wolfman, Babbit & King, LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Courtney G. Hyers, Senior Tax Counsel, CSX Corporation, Richmond, VA, of counsel, David J. Bowling, General Tax Counsel, CSX Corporation, Richmond, VA, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee., Daniel J. Chepaitis, Assistant Solicitor General, Office Of the Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, N.Y. (Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Caitlin J. Halligan, Solicitor General of the State of New York, Michael S. Belohlavek, Deputy Solicitor General of the State of New York), for Défendants-Appellants., Stephanie R. Marcus, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC (Robert D, McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, James B. Comey, Jr., United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Mark B. Stern, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, on the brief), for intervenor the United States.","caseName":"CSX Transportation, Inc. v. New York State Office of Real Property Services","caseNameFull":"CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, Frank B. Cernese, John M. Bacheller, in their official capacities as members of the New York State Board of Real Property Services and their successors in office, Thomas G. Griffin, in his official capacity as executive director and secretary to the State Office of Real Property Services and his successors in office, and Ifigenia T. Brown, City of New York, City of Rochester, East Syracuse-Minoa Central School District, North Rockland Central School District, Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Central School District, Onondaga County, Monroe County, Town of Bethlehem, Town of Cheektowaga, Town of Stony Point and Village of Herkimer, in their own behalf and as representatives of a defendant's class, The United States of America, Intervenor","citation":["306 F.3d 87"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":7108373,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket No. 01-7966","docket_id":64096724,"judge":"Berman, Miner, Sack","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T12:39:40.835308Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T04:16:09.665118Z","score":{"bm25":112.80831}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92702,96819,97260,107182,108221,108990,109520,110881,110895,111503,111825,111875,112171,112292,112926,118011,118134,118140,118316,118323,118407,118506,161664,2468159,2633664,5519850,5533599,6982905,9426527,9433265,9434044],"download_url":null,"id":7014427,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T15:18:33.365077Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T04:16:09.680836Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMINER, Circuit Judge.\nDefendant-appellant the New York State Office of Real Property Services (“ORPS”) and defendants-appellants Frank B. Cernese, John M. Bacheller, Thomas G. Griffin, and Ifigenia T. Brown (the “Individual Defendants”) appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, J.) denying their motion, based on Eleventh Amendment immunity, for judgment ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7014427],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/779366/csx-transportation-inc-v-new-york-state-office-of-real-property-services/","attorney":"","caseName":"Csx Transportation, Inc. v. New York State Office Of Real Property Services","caseNameFull":"Csx Transportation, Inc. v. New York State Office of Real Property Services, Frank B. Cernese, John M. Bacheller, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the New York State Board of Real Property Services and Their Successors in Office, Thomas G. Griffin, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director and Secretary to the State Office of Real Property Services and His Successors in Office, and Ifigenia T. Brown, City of New York, City of Rochester, East Syracuse-Minoa Central School District, North Rockland Central School District, Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Central School District, Onondaga County, Monroe County, Town of Bethlehem, Town of Cheektowaga, Town of Stony Point and Village of Herkimer, in Their Own Behalf and as Representatives of a Defendant's Class, the United States of America, Intervenor","citation":["306 F.3d 87","2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20402"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":779366,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"01-7966","docket_id":964088,"judge":"","lexisCite":"2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20402","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T19:55:23.256388Z","date_created":"2016-01-25T16:15:23.197168Z","score":{"bm25":109.3224}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92702,96819,97260,107182,108221,108990,109520,110881,110895,111503,111825,111875,112171,112292,112926,118011,118134,118140,118316,118323,118407,118506,161664,752968,2468159,5519850,5533599,6982905,7014427,9426527,9433265,9434044],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/306/306.F3d.87.01-7966.html","id":779366,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:38:29.621802Z","date_created":"2012-04-18T13:16:37Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a7a6165e33e253b386818195626e83004d3f9c13","snippet":"306 F.3d 87\n    CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, Frank B. Cernese, John M. Bacheller, in their official capacities as members of the New York State Board of Real Property Services and their successors in office, Thomas G. Griffin, in his official capacity as executive director and secretary to the State Office of Real Property Services and his successors in office, and Ifigenia T. B","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[779366],"source":"R","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8444027/whatley-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-classification-center/","attorney":"*1154Brian Mendelsohn, Susan Jill Benton, Gerald Wesley King, Jr., Federal Defender Program, Inc., ATLANTA, GA, for Petitioner - Appellee-Cross Appellant., Richard W. Tangum, Beth Attaway Burton, Sabrina Graham, Attorney General's Office, ATLANTA, GA, for Respondent - Appellant-Cross Appellee.","caseName":"Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center","caseNameFull":"Frederick R. WHATLEY, Cross v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, Cross","citation":["927 F.3d 1150"],"citeCount":104,"cluster_id":8444027,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 13-12034","docket_id":65663459,"judge":"Hull, Jordan, Tjoflat","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:15:25.179929Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:53:59.298440Z","score":{"bm25":70.95124}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8415463,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T02:11:06.405473Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:53:59.314492Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nTJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:\nFrederick R. Whatley (\"Petitioner\") murdered a bait shop owner in Georgia in 1995. He was convicted and sentenced to death.1 After the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed his convictions and death sentence, Whatley v. State , 270 Ga. 296, ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8415463,8415464],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5328708/qwest-corp-v-colorado-division-of-property-taxation/","attorney":"","caseName":"Qwest Corp. v. Colorado Division of Property Taxation","caseNameFull":"QWEST CORPORATION v. COLORADO DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS, State of Colorado","citation":["310 P.3d 113","2011 WL 3332876","2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 1296"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":5328708,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-08-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 10CA1320","docket_id":61669886,"judge":"Dailey, Sternberg, Webb","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:43:30.703090Z","date_created":"2022-01-02T02:30:52.588340Z","score":{"bm25":65.73856}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":5158974,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T00:09:24.507627Z","date_created":"2022-01-02T02:30:52.603789Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*114Opinion by\nJudge WEBB.\nIn this property tax dispute, plaintiff, Qwest Corporation (\"Qwest\"), appeals the *115trial court's judgment granting the motion to dismiss of defendant, Colorado Division of Property Taxation, Department of Local Affairs, State of Colorado (\"DPT\"). According to Qwest, becaus","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5158974],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4794151/431-east-palisade-avenue-real-v-city-of-englewood/","attorney":"","caseName":"431 East Palisade Avenue Real v. City of Englewood","caseNameFull":"","citation":["977 F.3d 277"],"citeCount":30,"cluster_id":4794151,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-10-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-3621","docket_id":18519221,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:29.531875Z","date_created":"2020-10-08T17:00:20.600021Z","score":{"bm25":64.473755}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[118347,321094,417783,527806,690283,776991,791672,1967185,2499787,4154238],"download_url":"https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/193621p.pdf","id":4574498,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/10/08/431_east_palisade_avenue_real_v._city_of_englewood.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:29.592714Z","date_created":"2020-10-08T17:00:20.601886Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a90efd35483424a2047c9d78c58762058738b59a","snippet":"                                        PRECEDENTIAL\n\n     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n          FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT\n               _____________\n\n                 No. 19-3621\n               _____________\n431 EAST PALISADE AVENUE REAL ESTATE, LLC;\n      7 NORTH WOODLAND STREET, LLC;\n          JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10\n\n                          v.\n\n           CITY OF ENGLEWOOD;\n       CITY COUNCIL OF ENGLEWOOD,\n\n                     Appellants\n                  ______________\n\n          On Ap","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4574498],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7862153/omni-property-cos-v-sylvania-twp-bd-of-zoning-appeals/","attorney":"","caseName":"OMNI Property Cos. v. Sylvania Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2022 Ohio 3083"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":7862153,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"L-21-1227","docket_id":64945379,"judge":"Pietrykowski","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:03:54.129850Z","date_created":"2022-09-02T15:08:47.299297Z","score":{"bm25":64.33733}},"neutralCite":"2022 Ohio 3083","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8122,"cites":[3697376,4018218,4453023],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/6/2022/2022-Ohio-3083.pdf","id":7806019,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/02/omni_property_cos._v._sylvania_twp._bd._of_zoning_appeals.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:42:40.403568Z","date_created":"2022-09-02T15:08:47.315681Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3202fb59ffad9cb4ffbd2573467f27510caf5cb1","snippet":"[Cite as OMNI Property Cos. v. Sylvania Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 2022-Ohio-3083.]\n\n\n\n\n                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                                SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                                     LUCAS COUNTY\n\n\nOMNI Property Companies                                  Court of Appeals No. L-21-1227\n\n        Appellant                                        Trial Court No. CI0202001961\n\nv.\n\nSylvania Township Board of\nZoning Appeals                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7806019],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"In an R.C. 2506.04 administrative appeal, the lower court did not err in affirming the denial of a conditional use permit where probative and reliable evidence demonstrated that the requested use was not harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and would negatively impact at least one adjacent property."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4631440/frederick-whatley-v-warden-georgia-diagnostic-and-classification-center/","attorney":"","caseName":"Frederick Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4631440,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-12034","docket_id":15808732,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:40:32.131084Z","date_created":"2019-06-20T17:00:36.921892Z","score":{"bm25":63.454296}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201312034.pdf","id":4408693,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/06/20/frederick_whatley_v._warden_georgia_diagnostic_and_classification_center.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:32:06.143279Z","date_created":"2019-06-20T17:00:36.925247Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9f057ccf216805a7cd4ab67f3717a880b4e12fe0","snippet":"           Case: 13-12034   Date Filed: 06/20/2019   Page: 1 of 91\n\n\n                                                                     [PUBLISH]\n\n\n             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n                      ________________________\n\n                             No. 13-12034\n                       ________________________\n\n                   D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cv-00074-WSD\n\n\nFREDERICK R. WHATLEY,\n\n                                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4408693],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"NEW","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8917461/bordentown-real-estate-associates-llc-v-director-division-of-taxation/","attorney":"Bruce M. Sattin for plaintiffs (Szafennan, Lakind, Blumstein & Bidder, P.C., attorney)., Mdrikde Toye for defendant (Anne Milgram, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).","caseName":"Bordentown Real Estate Associates, LLC v. Director, Division of Taxation","caseNameFull":"BORDENTOWN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, LLC AND RISING SUN 295 PLAZA, LLC v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION","citation":["24 N.J. Tax 561"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":8917461,"court":"New Jersey Tax Court","court_citation_string":"N.J. Tax Ct.","court_id":"njtaxct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-03-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":66183668,"judge":"Small","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T22:24:47.075898Z","date_created":"2022-11-27T01:51:12.798099Z","score":{"bm25":60.088924}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8905808,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:32:45.211891Z","date_created":"2022-11-27T01:51:12.807508Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nSMALL, P.J.T.C.\nThe taxpayers in this case challenge the Director of the Division of Taxation’s (the “Director”) denial of their application for a refund of that portion of the Realty Transfer Fee (“RTF”) known as the mansion tax. The Director denied the refund because the property had been classified by the assessor of Bordentown Township as commercial property which is subject to the mansion tax. The taxpayers argue that t","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8905808],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4529501/matter-of-real-estate-bd-of-ny-inc-v-city-of-new-york/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New York","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 NY Slip Op 5906"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4529501,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"160081/15 101798/15 6109","docket_id":7729118,"judge":"Moulton, J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:10:34.066799Z","date_created":"2018-08-23T16:22:29.693212Z","score":{"bm25":57.318104}},"neutralCite":"2018 NY Slip Op 5906","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110516,111891,112747,2210555,2584358,2590616,2828722,3184090,4079387,4096981,4167361,4308652,5485042,5485880,5489058,5537335,5537840,5539003,5539477,5539716,5804477,5925397,6004250,6006701,6084471,6101808,6998979,8410194,9432511,9432685,9433466,9722685],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_05906.htm","id":4306754,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2018/08/23/matter_of_real_estate_bd._of_n.y._inc._v._city_of_new_york.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:21:10.606954Z","date_created":"2018-08-23T16:22:29.713474Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"33199548b56eae13dd1f2ad95acd2b164b798f07","snippet":"\r\n\r\nMatter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y.,  Inc. v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 05906)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nMatter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y.,  Inc. v City of New York\r\n\r\n\r\n2018 NY Slip Op 05906\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on August 23, 2018\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, First Department\r\n\r\n\r\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4306754],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4531399/matter-of-real-estate-bd-of-ny-inc-v-city-of-new-york/","attorney":"","caseName":"Matter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New York","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 NY Slip Op 5906"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4531399,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"160081/15 101798/15 6109","docket_id":7775047,"judge":"Moulton, J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:11:05.340524Z","date_created":"2018-08-30T15:15:00.501630Z","score":{"bm25":55.909355}},"neutralCite":"2018 NY Slip Op 5906","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110516,111891,112747,2210555,2584358,2590616,2828722,3184090,4079387,4096981,4167361,4306754,5485042,5485880,5489058,5537335,5537840,5539003,5539477,5539716,5804477,5925397,6004250,6006701,6084471,6101808,6998979,8410194,9432511,9432685,9433466,9722685],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_05906.htm","id":4308652,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2018/08/23/matter_of_real_estate_bd._of_n.y._inc._v._city_of_new_york_1.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:22:28.553963Z","date_created":"2018-08-30T15:15:00.525235Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"815e80aa30c44c61eba7e9bc47741075a8b4e736","snippet":"\r\n\r\nMatter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y.,  Inc. v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 05906)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nMatter of Real Estate Bd. of N.Y.,  Inc. v City of New York\r\n\r\n\r\n2018 NY Slip Op 05906\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on August 23, 2018\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, First Department\r\n\r\n\r\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4308652],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4416183/real-alternatives-inc-v-secretary-department-of-health-human-services/","attorney":"Matthew S. Bowman (Argued), David A. Cortman, Alliance Defending Freedom, 440 First Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20001, Counsel for Appellants Real Alternatives, Inc.; Kevin I. Bagatta, Esq.; Thomas A. Lang, Esq.; Clifford W. McKeown, Kevin H. Theriot, Elissa M. Graves, Alliance Defending Freedom, 15100 N. 90th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, Randy Wen-ger, Independence Law Center, 23 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101, Counsel for Appellants Real Alternatives, Inc.; Kevin I. Bagatta, Esq.; Thomas A. Lang, Esq,; Clifford W. McKeown, Benjamin C. Mizer, Peter J. Smith, Mark B. Stern, Alisa B. Klein, Patrick G. Nemeroff, Megan Barbero, Joshua M. Salzman (Argued), United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530, Counsel for Appellees Secretary Department of Health and Human Services; Secretary United States Department of Labor; Secretary United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Treasury, Richard B. Katskee, Natacha Y. Lam, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, 1901 L Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036, Seth M. Marnin, David L. Barkey, Anti-Defamation League, 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158, Counsel for Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Anti-Defamation League; Central Conference of American Rabbis; Hadas-sah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc.; National Council of Jewish Women; People for the American Way Foundation; Union for Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism","caseName":"Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human Services","caseNameFull":"REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC.; Kevin I. Bagatta, Esq.; Thomas A. Lang, Esq.; Clifford W. McKeown, Appellants v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Secretary United States Department of Labor; Secretary United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Treasury","citation":["867 F.3d 338","2017 WL 3324690","2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14361"],"citeCount":44,"cluster_id":4416183,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-1275","docket_id":6133142,"judge":"Jordan, Greenaway, Rendell","lexisCite":"2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14361","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:39:01.190226Z","date_created":"2017-08-04T17:00:55.907690Z","score":{"bm25":55.38497}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9877746,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T08:13:15.932098Z","date_created":"2023-09-27T16:20:00.457219Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION\nRENDELL, Circuit Judge:\nOne of the many provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), requires employer-provided health insurance plans to cover an array of preventative services, including FDA-approved contraceptives, at no cost to participating employees. Employees have the option of seeking out covered medical providers and using their ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[101466,103870,103976,105044,106660,106995,107832,108088,108135,108530,109088,109495,109661,110440,110647,110991,111488,111507,111596,111688,111944,112037,112404,112443,112870,112881,112896,112919,118089,118140,118493,142900,145684,145730,145875,170693,185153,187263,219205,243372,288006,363505,375363,396313,414083,450813,463375,473646,504389,620673,699561,770887,774398,781630,783458,791782,809122,1275953,1324254,2681317,2681318,3203655],"download_url":"http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/161275p.pdf","id":4193436,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/08/04/real_alternatives_inc_v._secretary_department_of_health.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:02:22.516210Z","date_created":"2017-08-04T17:00:55.914634Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a0b71b0a7f05ba0e76b2619e323b99a8ce068368","snippet":"                                PRECEDENTIAL\n\n     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n          FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT\n\n                _____________\n\n                 No. 16-1275\n                _____________\n\n\n REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC.; KEVIN I. BAGATTA,\n   ESQ.; THOMAS A. LANG, ESQ.; CLIFFORD W.\n                 MCKEOWN,\n                       Appellants\n\n                     v.\n\n\n   SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND\n HUMAN SERVICES; SECRETARY UNITED STATES\n  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; SECRETARY UNITED\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9877746,9877747,4193436],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2717911/matter-of-better-world-real-estate-group-v-new-york-city-dept-of-fin/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Schroder & Strom, LLP, Mineola (Michael J. Scarpa of counsel), for appellant., Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Vincent D’Orazio, Steven Tishco and Brooke Zacker of counsel), for respondents.","caseName":"Matter of Better World Real Estate Group v. New York City Dept. of Fin.","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of Better World Real Estate Group, Appellant, v. New York City Department of Finance Et Al., Respondents","citation":["122 A.D.3d 27","992 N.Y.S.2d 247"],"citeCount":125,"cluster_id":2717911,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-08-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2012-01396","docket_id":885552,"judge":"Roman, Miller, Leventhal, Balkin","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:10:46.411713Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T12:54:29.895095Z","score":{"bm25":54.587593}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2008095,3585447,3586050,3587019,3596399,3612050,3615220,5401466,5421700,5525501,5529556,5534976,5796856,5811302,5916807,6182619],"download_url":null,"id":9802842,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:52:38.232194Z","date_created":"2023-08-31T14:57:01.571882Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBalkin, J.P\n(dissenting). I would hold, contrary to the majority, that the petition does not state a cause of action. In holding otherwise, my colleagues in the majority misconstrue section 11-206 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and call into question the well-established procedure for challenging real property tax assessments in New York City. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.\nAs the majority","type":"dissent"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2060546,2195063,2240751,2244861,2584358,2587206,2588891,3604189,3615220,5428047,5484377,5529556,5534290,5535557,5537085,5537115,5537379,5539850,5540341,5540505,5692533,5770029,5796856,5805644,5811302,5851017,5853875,5873661,5873680,5905521,5916825,5960226,6054862,6083949,9716088],"download_url":null,"id":9802841,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:33:22.290638Z","date_created":"2023-08-31T14:57:01.558359Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*29OPINION OF THE COURT\nLeventhal, J.\nIn January 2008, while the petitioner was in the midst of building a new two-family house and garage on its property in Queens, the New York City Department of Finance (hereinafter the DOF) classified the property as a three-family house with one store or office. As a result of this apparently mistaken classification,","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2008095,2060546,2095082,2195063,2240751,2244861,2584358,2587206,2588891,3585447,3586050,3587019,3596399,3604189,3612050,3615220,5320373,5401466,5421700,5428047,5484377,5485874,5525501,5529556,5534290,5534976,5535557,5537085,5537115,5537379,5539850,5540341,5540505,5692533,5719865,5770029,5796856,5805644,5811302,5840621,5851017,5853875,5873661,5873680,5905521,5906409,5916807,5916825,5960226,6054862,6083949,6182619],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_05786.htm","id":2717911,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2014/08/13/matter_of_better_world_real_estate_group_v._new_york_city_dept._of_fin..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:24:55.556391Z","date_created":"2014-08-13T21:03:59.536356Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"518cff146496a88ee13ea763d72e70654089d5c4","snippet":"Matter of Better World Real Estate Group v New York City Dept. of Fin. (2014 NY Slip Op 05786)\r\nMatter of Matter of Better World Real Estate Group v New York City Dept. of Fin.\r\n2014 NY Slip Op 05786\r\nDecided on August 13, 2014\r\nAppellate Division, Second Department\r\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2717911,9802841,9802842],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3157803/central-woodwork-inc-v-cheyenne-johnson-shelby-county-assessor-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Central Woodwork, Inc. v. Cheyenne Johnson, Shelby County Assessor of Property","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3157803,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-11-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2015-00040-COA-R3-CV","docket_id":3015856,"judge":"Judge Brandon O. Gibson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:06:46.004974Z","date_created":"2015-11-25T00:00:18.415105Z","score":{"bm25":51.491623}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8273,"cites":[1058201,1495140,1523578,1576940,1672547,1684381,1737282,1746058,1752930,2187861,2411063,2433466],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/centralwoodworkopn.pdf","id":3157803,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/11/24/central_woodwork_inc._v._cheyenne_johnson_shelby_county_assessor_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:38:30.211487Z","date_created":"2015-11-24T23:07:06.032953Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"07ed2672601616d5377d14917ad043fd1943bd41","snippet":"               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE\n                            AT JACKSON\n                              October 29, 2015 Session\n\n   CENTRAL WOODWORK, INC. v. CHEYENNE JOHNSON, SHELBY\n             COUNTY ASSESSOR OF PROPERTY\n\n             Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County\n                     No. CH-14-0158-2   Jim Kyle, Chancellor\n\n\n             No. W2015-00040-COA-R3-CV – Filed November 24, 2015\n\n\nTaxpayer appealed the Shelby County Assessor of Property‟s","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3157803],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2198559/frazier-v-real-time-resolutions-inc/","attorney":"Susan Jean Dodds, Scott A. Coben, Scott A. Coben and Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Debtors/Appellees., Melissa Anne Vermillion, Cassandra J. Richey, Prober & Raphael, Woodland Hills, CA, for Creditor/Appellant.","caseName":"Frazier v. REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC.","caseNameFull":"In Re Phillip Leslie FRAZIER and Jennifer Jo Frazier, Debtors/Appellees, v. REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., Creditor/Appellant","citation":["469 B.R. 889","2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32046","2012 WL 812387"],"citeCount":19,"cluster_id":2198559,"court":"District Court, E.D. California","court_citation_string":"E.D. Cal.","court_id":"caed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-03-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2:11-cv-00290","docket_id":2066958,"judge":"England","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32046","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-11-21T00:01:45.708856Z","date_created":"2015-10-01T17:22:38.981129Z","score":{"bm25":49.06222}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":998,"cites":[20732,104523,112204,112617,112680,112871,152930,733459,749363,762663,767886,773509,776547,780223,1024951,1530575,1859275,1910812,1930700,1937125,1949532,1949807,1978829,2002293,2025707,2187496,2189836,2190004,2194266,2195374,2195997,2196017,2197104,2197586,2198112,2200769,2200783,2200859,2201034,2201910,2202338,2203847],"download_url":null,"id":2198559,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:09:47.062894Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:35:05.388524Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b646a795004d67b63839ad64fc46c3eeb2bd5abd","snippet":"\n469 B.R. 889 (2012)\nIn re Phillip Leslie FRAZIER and Jennifer Jo Frazier, Debtors/Appellees,\nv.\nREAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., Creditor/Appellant.\nNo. 2:11-cv-00290-MCE.\nUnited States District Court, E.D. California.\nMarch 9, 2012.\n*891 Susan Jean Dodds, Scott A. Coben, Scott A. Coben and Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Debtors/App","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2198559],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4832715/central-nursing-realty-llc-v-illinois-property-tax-appeal-board/","attorney":"","caseName":"Central Nursing Realty, LLC v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 IL App (1st) 180994"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":4832715,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-06-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-18-0994","docket_id":18687527,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:36:51.571493Z","date_created":"2020-11-24T22:37:05.957947Z","score":{"bm25":48.371952}},"neutralCite":"2020 IL App (1st) 180994","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2078232,2085567],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2020/1stDistrict/1180994.pdf","id":4636494,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/06/11/central_nursing_realty_llc_v._illinois_property_tax_appeal_board.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T20:08:06.232669Z","date_created":"2020-11-24T22:37:05.960509Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"89825e3035d41cf7045a858309d614903dcefae2","snippet":"                                     2020 IL App (1st) 180994\n                                           No. 1-18-0994\n                                    Opinion filed June 11, 2020\n                                                                                    Fourth Division\n ______________________________________________________________________________\n\n                                              IN THE\n                               APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS\n                        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4636494],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5145654/tech-one-associates-v-board-of-property-assessment-appeals-review/","attorney":"John A. Straka III, Pittsburgh, for Tech One Associates., John F. Cambest, Dodaro, Matta & Cambest, P.C., Pittsburgh, for West Miff-lin Borough and West Mifflin Borough, West Mifflin Area School District., Michael Henry Wojcik, Allegheny County Law Department, for Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County.","caseName":"Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review","caseNameFull":"TECH ONE ASSOCIATES v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, West Mifflin Borough and West Mifflin Area School District","citation":["53 A.3d 685","617 Pa. 439","2012 Pa. LEXIS 973"],"citeCount":34,"cluster_id":5145654,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-04-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":60459449,"judge":"Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:55:08.429813Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:18:27.728331Z","score":{"bm25":48.330902}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4966181,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-06T08:20:57.109345Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:18:27.751540Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nOPINION\n\nJustice TODD.\nThis appeal concerns the validity of a single unified assessment of both a tract of land, and the buildings of a shopping center, movie theater, and restaurant located on the land, where the land is owned by one business entity — Appellant Tech One *687Associates — and the buildings and surrounding improvements to t","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4966181],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10870600/chickasaw-county-board-of-review-v-property-assessment-appeal-board-and/","attorney":"","caseName":"Chickasaw County Board of Review v. Property Assessment Appeal Board; and Growmark, Inc","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10870600,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":"S","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-06-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-1002","docket_id":73445403,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-05T14:14:37.603800Z","date_created":"2026-06-05T14:14:37.487295Z","score":{"bm25":48.30257}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1229802,1843113,1930579,1960857,1966956,1988453,1998149,2040830,2116931,2121304,2687600,2781878,4249739,4249761,4249762,4350624,9721204,9724506,9743053,9880294,9880455],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/25636/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":11338058,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/06/05/chickasaw_county_board_of_review_v._property_assessment_appeal_board_and.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-06-05T14:15:12.327261Z","date_created":"2026-06-05T14:14:37.491107Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"826eb049884918dab6b72bd9a44c3edc75a0d525","snippet":"                          In the Iowa Supreme Court\n\n                                      No. 25–1002\n\n                 Submitted February 18, 2026—Filed June 5, 2026\n\n                        Chickasaw County Board of Review,\n\n                                       Appellant,\n\n                                           vs.\n\n                        Property Assessment Appeal Board,\n\n                                       Appellee,\n\n                                          and\n\n                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11338058],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10021479/central-nursing-realty-llc-v-illinois-property-tax-appeal-board/","attorney":"","caseName":"Central Nursing Realty, LLC v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 IL App (1st) 180994"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10021479,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-06-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-18-0994","docket_id":18687527,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-07-30T15:21:20.806260Z","date_created":"2024-07-30T15:21:20.740869Z","score":{"bm25":48.25291}},"neutralCite":"2020 IL App (1st) 180994","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2011453,2078232,2085567,2101573,2254791,2479160,3146124,4636494],"download_url":"https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/resources/f3ac8596-6375-4143-8a2e-35c8c94c202d/file","id":10488080,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/06/11/central_nursing_realty_llc_v._illinois_property_tax_appeal_board_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:18:15.662931Z","date_created":"2024-07-30T15:21:20.748860Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9f1e362c3bb9fd44590f035690fcbcfb4311e6bf","snippet":"                                                                               Digitally signed by\n                                                                               Reporter of\n                                                                               Decisions\n                                                                               Reason: I attest to\n                            Illinois Official Reports                          the accuracy and\n                          ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10488080],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4447491/state-of-tennessee-v-tabitha-gentry-aka-abka-re-bay/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Tennessee v. Tabitha Gentry (AKA ABKA RE BAY)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4447491,"court":"Court of Appeals of Tennessee","court_citation_string":"Tenn. Ct. App.","court_id":"tennctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-11-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"W2015-01745-SC-R11-CD","docket_id":6233319,"judge":"Justice Cornelia A. Clark","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:47:38.979583Z","date_created":"2017-11-30T15:15:29.933038Z","score":{"bm25":47.97364}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110138,1044002,1044035,1044041,1057821,1057874,1057938,1058090,1060945,1148902,1476525,1651862,2052839,2093466,2361031,2431718,2431765,2435969,2462832,2469459,2584273,2629763,2640879,3298758],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/gentry.tabitha.opn_.pdf","id":4224744,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/11/29/state_of_tennessee_v._tabitha_gentry_aka_abka_re_bay.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:24:15.597495Z","date_created":"2017-11-30T15:15:29.942162Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"63012677ece069f74e85f9d603ef7b856d09bde5","snippet":"                                                                                            11/29/2017\n                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE\n                              AT JACKSON1\n                                   June 1, 2017 Session\n\n  STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TABITHA GENTRY (AKA ABKA RE BAY)\n\n                   Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals\n                            Shelby County Criminal Court\n                  No. 13-02671      Hon. James M. Lammey, Judge\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4224744],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The primary issue in this appeal is whether Tennessee's theft statute, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-14-103, encompasses theft of real property. The defendant physically entered and occupied for over a week a vacant East Memphis house valued at more than two million dollars and filed documents with the Shelby County Register of Deeds Office purporting to reflect her ownership of the property. A jury convicted the defendant of theft of property valued at over $250,000 and aggravated burglary. The defendant challenges her convictions, arguing that Tennessee's theft statute does not encompass theft of real property. We conclude that our theft statute applies to theft of real property by occupation, seizure, and the filing of a deed to the property and that the evidence is sufficient to support the defendant's convictions. We also reject the defendant's arguments that the trial court improperly limited her cross-examination of a prosecution witness and her closing argument. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals upholding the defendant's convictions and remanding to the trial court for resentencing."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4480992/consolidated-rail-corp-v-ace-property-casualty/","attorney":"Mark W. Mosier, Washington, DC, for appellant., Ronald P. Schiller, Philadelphia, for Continental, appellee., David Smith, Philadelphia, for Italico and L'Ancora, appellees., Marie S. Barbich, Philadelphia, for Stonewall, appellee.","caseName":"Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ace Property & Casualty","caseNameFull":"CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Appellant v. ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. (Formerly Aetna Ins. Co. ), Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance Co. (Formerly Allianz Ins. Co.), Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co., Allstate Insurance Co. (As Successor in Interest to Northbrook Excess & Surplus Ins. Co. A/K/A Northbrook Ins. Co.), American Home Assurance Co. (American International Group), American Motorists Insurance Co. (Kemper), Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada (U.S. Branch), (Formerly GAN General Ins. Co. (Formerly Simcoe & Erie General Ins. Co.) ), Birmingham Fire Insurance Co. of PA. (American International Group), Britamco Underwriters, Inc. C/O Devonshire Group, Century Indemnity Co. (Successor in Interest to Cigna Specialty Ins. Co. (Formerly California Union Insurance Co.) and as Successor to CCI Insurance Co., Successor to Insurance Co. of North America), Continental Insurance Co. (In Its Own Right and as Successor in Interest to Harbor Insurance Co.) (CNA Insurance Cos.), Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (EMC Insurance Cos.), Employers Insurance of Wausau (Formerly Employers Mutual of Wausau), Evanston Insurance Co., Everest Reinsurance Co. (Formerly Prudential Reinsurance Co.), Federal Insurance Co. (Chubb Group of Ins. Cos.), Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., First State Insurance Co. (Hartford Insurance Group), Granite State Insurance Co. (American International Group), Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Hartford Insurance Group), Hudson Insurance Co., INSCO C/O Devonshire Group, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (American International Group), Landmark Insurance Co. (American International Group), Lexington Insurance Co. (American International Group), Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Midstates Reinsurance Corp. (Formerly Mead Reinsurance Corp. ), National Casualty Co., National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA (American International Group), Northwestern National Insurance Co. (Formerly Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co.), Old Republic Insurance Co., Pacific Insurance Co. (CNA Insurance Cos.), Republic Insurance Co., Royal Insurance Co. of America (Formerly Royal Globe Ins. Co.) (Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group ), Sentry Insurance Group (As Assumptive reInsurer of Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. and Great Southwest Surplus Lines Ins. Co.), St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (St. Paul Travelers Companies), St Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. (St. Paul Travelers Companies), Stonewall Insurance Co., TIG Insurance Co. (As Successor to International Ins. Co. (Formerly International Surplus Lines Ins. Co.) ) (Fairfax Financial (USA) Group), TIG Premier Insurance Co. (Formerly Transamerica Ins. Co. ) (Fairfax Financial (USA) Group), Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. (Formerly Atena Casualty and Surety Co.) (St. Paul Travelers Companies), Travelers Indemnity Co.(St. Paul Travelers Companies), Twin City Fire Insurance Co. (Hartford Insurance Group), Unione Italiana Reinsurance Co. of America, Inc., Utica Mutual Insurance Co., Zurich American Insurance Co. (Formerly Zurich Insurance Co.) and Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (Formerly Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association), Appellees","citation":["182 A.3d 1011"],"citeCount":22,"cluster_id":4480992,"court":"Superior Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Super. Ct.","court_id":"pasuperct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1376 EDA 2015","docket_id":6345558,"judge":"Gantman, Lazarus, Platt","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:57:11.212611Z","date_created":"2018-03-26T18:51:01.502769Z","score":{"bm25":47.03133}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[457830,566820,1482065,1523589,1539534,1551164,1889359,1891495,1942376,1975966,1979389,1990684,2058145,2287406,2320443,2367394,2376147,2387667],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/Opinion  AffirmedReversedRemanded  10347792034518328.pdf","id":4258245,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/03/23/consolidated_rail_corp._v._ace_property__casualty.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:47:19.420110Z","date_created":"2018-03-26T18:51:01.510223Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6d0b9a1b9346c7eddafa106221575f34bda9e855","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.:\n \n\n  Appellant, Consolidated Rail Corporation (\"Conrail\"), appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of Stonewall Insurance Company (\"Stonewall\"), Continental Insurance Company (\"Continental\"), and Lloyd Italico & L'Ancora (\"Lloyd\"). For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and re","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4258245],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}