{"count":17383,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xNy4xMzY1Njgmcz01MzQ1NTMwJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMTYmcD0y&q=DISPENSATION+WITH+FORMAL+SERVICE&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7320787/hearts-with-haiti-inc-v-kendrick/","attorney":"David A. Goldman, Peter J. DeTroy, III, Russell Pierce, Devin W. Deane, Kelly M. Hoffman, Robert P. Cummins, Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, Portland, ME, Robert F. Oberkoetter, Law Office of Robert F. Oberkoetter, Russells Mills, MA, for Plaintiffs. ', Brent A. Singer, David C. King, F. David Walker, IV, Matthew M. Cobb, Rud-man & Winchell, Bangor, ME, for Defendant.","caseName":"Hearts With Haiti, Inc. v. Kendrick","caseNameFull":"HEARTS WITH HAITI, INC. v. Paul KENDRICK","citation":["192 F. Supp. 3d 181","2016 WL 3443909","2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79620"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":7320787,"court":"District Court, D. Maine","court_citation_string":"D. Me.","court_id":"med","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-06-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2:13-cv-00039-JAW","docket_id":64309270,"judge":"Woodcock","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79620","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:36:51.310540Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:51:09.367740Z","score":{"bm25":32.838203}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1001,85861,89019,89834,96099,98324,107609,118069,199467,200935,200967,202104,202596,203155,279454,366288,398646,470963,569239,583575,617485,684340,812569,1742757,2094286,2391593,2469336,2735671,8419651,9431703,9434608,9478021],"download_url":null,"id":7238697,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:24:22.009894Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:51:09.381660Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION\n' JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\nOn July 23, 2015, after thirteen days of emotional and contentious testimony, a *184federal jury issued a stunning victory in this defamation case in favor of the Plaintiffs and ag","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7238697],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10329338/yang-v-ics-protective-service/","attorney":"","caseName":"Yang v. Ics Protective Service","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10329338,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-02-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-3836","docket_id":67736241,"judge":"Judge Trevor N. McFadden","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-02-07T21:01:17.396335Z","date_created":"2025-02-07T21:01:17.284769Z","score":{"bm25":27.955622}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8602,"cites":[106497,108432,110159,112858,118505,184981,241201,488510,737389,8444074,8683999],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv3836-100","id":10795926,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/02/07/yang_v._ics_protective_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:05:31.604334Z","date_created":"2025-02-07T21:01:17.314688Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"23d41dcc5a6b439afff8c99ff50d260b84c7d687","snippet":"                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                                     FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n    JIN YANG,\n\n                               Plaintiff,\n\n                               v.                                  Case No. 1:22-cv-03836 (TNM)\n\n    ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al.,\n\n                               Defendants.\n\n\n                                            MEMORANDUM ORDER\n\n           Plaintiff Jin Yang moves for leave to file a third amen","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10795926],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236850/licensing-marijuana-cultivation-in-compliance-with-the-single-convention-on/","attorney":"","caseName":"Licensing Marijuana Cultivation in Compliance with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236850,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-06-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601153,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:12.406498Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:29.555306Z","score":{"bm25":25.684637}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2974,70712,109454,110675,111771,112574,118284,177782,390473,439229,475760,858043,1355148,2655597,4170683,4184765,9431586,9431651,9434078,9435251,9463996,9806335,9842965],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1272131/download","id":6103732,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/06/06/licensing_marijuana_cultivation_in_compliance_with_the_single_convention_on.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T15:43:33.660602Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:29.557755Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6b898b1047ffcb471bf8569dd01107edaa293bfe","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n          Licensing Marijuana Cultivation in Compliance\n           with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs\nUnder the Controlled Substances Act, the Drug Enforcement Administration may register\n  an applicant to cultivate marijuana only if the registration scheme is consist ent with\n  the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. To comply with the Single Convention,\n  DEA’s licensing framework must provide for a system in which DEA or its legal agent\n  has physical possession and","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103732],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Under the Controlled Substances Act, the Drug Enforcement Administration may register an applicant to cultivate marijuana only if the registration scheme is consistent with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. To comply with the Single Convention, DEA's licensing framework must provide for a system in which DEA or its legal agent has physical possession and ownership over the cultivated marijuana and assumes control of the distribution of marijuana no later than four months after harvesting."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4845396/montgomery-v-internal-revenue-service/","attorney":"","caseName":"Montgomery v. Internal Revenue Service","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4845396,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-01-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2017-0918","docket_id":29082567,"judge":"Judge James E. Boasberg","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:40:03.785432Z","date_created":"2021-01-05T19:00:30.225814Z","score":{"bm25":24.202316}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":313,"cites":[110217,111719,184876,186104,186834,187057,187372,214960,406603,442963,469998,537606,552329,556586,709483,780370,1513919,2392891,2467410,2540742],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv0918-110","id":4649175,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/01/05/montgomery_v._internal_revenue_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T19:29:25.626490Z","date_created":"2021-01-05T19:00:30.242652Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6bb6e996251c82ef0b3bfd664146bbfd32430c08","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n\n THOMAS A. MONTGOMERY & BETH\n W. MONTGOMERY,\n\n         Plaintiffs,\n                v.                                          Civil Action No. 17-918 (JEB)\n INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,\n\n         Defendant.\n\n\n                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n       This Opinion marks the Court’s latest foray into the dense thicket that is this Freedom of\n\nInformation Act litigat","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4649175],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1450499/american-assn-of-people-with-disabilities-v-herrera/","attorney":"Wendy R. Weiser, Myrna Perez, Brennan Center for Justice, Daniel F. Kolb, Anna Thea Bridge, David J. Lisson, Rosanna Garza Lipscomb, Sharon Katz, Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, NY, Neal A. Potischman, Davis Polk & Ward-well, Menlo Park, CA, John W. Boyd, David H. Urias, Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A., Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiffs., Scott Fuqua, Assistant Attorney General, Litigation Division, Santa Fe, NM, for Defendant.","caseName":"American Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. Herrera","caseNameFull":"AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, Federation of Women's Clubs Overseas, Inc., New Mexico Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, and Southwest Organizing Project, Plaintiff, v. Mary HERRERA, in Her Capacity as Secretary of State, Defendant","citation":["580 F. Supp. 2d 1195","2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82597","2008 WL 4368941"],"citeCount":14,"cluster_id":1450499,"court":"District Court, D. New Mexico","court_citation_string":"D.N.M.","court_id":"nmd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-09-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CIV 08-0702 JB/WDS","docket_id":1009908,"judge":"James O. Browning","lexisCite":"2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82597","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T03:56:54.363885Z","date_created":"2015-06-01T16:56:37.518010Z","score":{"bm25":21.834576}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":430,"cites":[103438,103490,105117,105285,105746,106000,106514,106850,107045,107701,108153,108348,108858,108993,109517,109767,110188,110470,110768,110874,110904,111094,111226,111781,112087,112675,112743,112766,117869,118055,118056,118102,118268,118299,118385,118504,145684,145813,145824,156580,158785,163765,166611,167317,167840,168044,331103,479257,503094,560380,590025,788429,1300261,1381348,1462377,2427412,2503496,2514024,2565590,2568119,2613548,2614688,2636906],"download_url":null,"id":1450499,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T08:33:50.047273Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:13:30.654807Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"42f7c895a29b5fa9aa796e14933d7ccc17bb5b45","snippet":"\n(2008)\nAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEPLE WITH DISABILITIES, Federation of Women's Clubs Overseas, Inc., New Mexico Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, and Southwest Organizing Project, Plaintiff,\nv.\nMary HERRERA, in her capacity as Secretary of State, Defendant.\nNo. CIV 08-0702 JB/WDS.\nUnited States District Court, D. New Mexico.\nSeptember 17, 2008.\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1450499],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8350942/sergeant-christopher-thompson-v-charleston-police-civil-service-commission/","attorney":"","caseName":"Sergeant Christopher Thompson v. Charleston Police Civil Service Commission and Charleston Police Department","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8350942,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-10-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-0723","docket_id":65530863,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T18:35:49.722509Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T20:13:32.646364Z","score":{"bm25":20.783335}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1284514,1313887,1356735],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/memo-decisions/fall2022/21-0723 md.pdf","id":8319727,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/10/17/sergeant_christopher_thompson_v._charleston_police_civil_service_commission.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:08:32.481620Z","date_created":"2022-10-17T20:13:32.655414Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b1a6e656a1c98bfc82c2669ee6224fa4a7913705","snippet":"                                                                                  FILED\n                                                                              October 17, 2022\n                                                                               EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n\n                            STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA                             SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS\n                                                                                   OF WEST VIRGINIA\n       ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8319727],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Administrative Agency-Other","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8467825/carr-v-hope-community-service-inc/","attorney":"Inetha Michelle Carr, Appellant Pro Se.","caseName":"Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Service, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Inetha M. CARR, Plaintiff—Appellant v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC, Defendant—Appellee","citation":["430 F. App'x 228"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8467825,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","court_citation_string":"4th Cir.","court_id":"ca4","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-05-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 11-1353","docket_id":65691891,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:25:52.142877Z","date_created":"2022-11-04T17:34:20.246554Z","score":{"bm25":19.974302}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8439694,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:35:30.684541Z","date_created":"2022-11-04T17:34:20.251414Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPER CURIAM:\nInetha Michelle Carr appeals the district court’s order granting her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and summarily dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Serv., No. 3:11-cv-00159-JRS (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We deny Carr’s motion","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8439694],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7902165/potvin-v-lincoln-service-equipment-co/","attorney":"Mark D. Robins, pro hac vice, with whom was Frank A. May, for the appellant (defendant Guaranty Fund Management Services)., Joshua A. Hawks-Ladds, with whom, on the brief, was Christine Collyer, for the appellee (plaintiff).","caseName":"Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.","caseNameFull":"JAMES POTVIN v. LINCOLN SERVICE AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY","citation":["298 Conn. 620","6 A.3d 60","2010 Conn. LEXIS 374"],"citeCount":42,"cluster_id":7902165,"court":"Supreme Court of Connecticut","court_citation_string":"Conn.","court_id":"conn","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-10-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC 18357","docket_id":64995740,"judge":"Katz, Zarella","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:14:41.722583Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T17:24:27.461061Z","score":{"bm25":19.469118}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1472864,1530424,1720377,1971475,1990526,1997431,2075023,2097926,2180348,2195145,2281660,2405208,2587744,7841456,7842314,7842858,7844272,7844446,7845164,7846059,7846155,7847417,7848275,7848909,7849481,7849497,7859995,8041735,9709307,9760245],"download_url":null,"id":7850610,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:59:22.131130Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T17:24:27.483960Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nOpinion\n\nZARELLA, J.\nThe defendant Guaranty Fund Management Services1 appeals2 from the decision of the compensation review board (board), which upheld the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the third district (commissioner) imposing sanctions against the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (association)","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7850610,7850611],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/806410/wildearth-guardians-v-public-service-company/","attorney":"Maclain Joyce, Student Attorney (Professor Kevin Lynch, Supervisor, and Professor Michael Ray Harris with him on the briefs, and Casey Giltner, Student Attorney, with him on the opening brief), Environmental Law Clinic, University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Denver, CO, for Appellant., William M. Bumpers, Baker Botts L.L.P., Washington, District of Columbia (A. Kent Mayo and Michael Heister, Baker Botts, L.L.P., Washington, District of Columbia, and Colin C. Deihl, Ann E. Prouty, and Linda L. Rockwood, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Denver, CO, with him on the brief), for Appellee.","caseName":"WildEarth Guardians v. Public Service Company","caseNameFull":"WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico Non-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, Doing Business as XCEL Energy, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["690 F.3d 1174","42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20171","2012 WL 3243458","75 ERC (BNA) 1651","2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16770"],"citeCount":79,"cluster_id":806410,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit","court_citation_string":"10th Cir.","court_id":"ca10","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-08-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"11-1400","docket_id":1074187,"judge":"O'Brien, Tymkovich, Matheson","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16770","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:29:05.190207Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T14:08:58.396484Z","score":{"bm25":19.42408}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104822,107803,108906,110228,112747,118093,118315,118329,118402,145658,145753,145767,161281,162215,164773,166174,167827,169389,169594,170438,171888,172192,182614,221426,613270,668243,751908,755790,1322365,1494237,1855418,2178292,2475758,2498649,2620886],"download_url":"http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1400.pdf","id":806410,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2012/08/10/wildearth_guardians_v._public_service_company.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T15:14:54.511021Z","date_created":"2012-08-10T16:02:21Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2351b672b0a604ff43dd6178c80b4bb4713d137e","snippet":"\n\n\n  TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  The question in this case is whether allegations that Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) violated the Clean Air Act have become moot. WildEarth Guardians claims that PSCo’s construction of a new coal-fired power plant in Pueblo, Colorado violated the Act because PSCo failed to obtain a valid construction permit. WildEarth seeks civil penalties to","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[806410],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7325266/congaree-riverkeeper-inc-v-carolina-water-service-inc/","attorney":"J, Blanding Holman, IV, Southern Environmental Law Center, Charleston, SC, Catherine Moore Wannamaker, Pro Hac Vice, Southern Environmental Law Center, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff., Chad Nicholas Johnston, John Marion S. Hoefer, Randy Lowell, Willoughby and Hoefer, Columbia, SC, for Defendant.","caseName":"Congaree Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.","caseNameFull":"CONGAREE RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. CAROLINA WATER SERVICE, INC.","citation":["248 F. Supp. 3d 733","2017 WL 1176766","2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47360"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":7325266,"court":"District Court, D. South Carolina","court_citation_string":"D.S.C.","court_id":"scd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-03-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action Number: 3:15-cv-00194-MBS","docket_id":64313749,"judge":"Seymour","lexisCite":"2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47360","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:38:00.198387Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:05:53.703946Z","score":{"bm25":19.149145}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7243178,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:26:04.523550Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:05:53.712428Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER AND OPINION\nThe Honorable Margaret B. Seymour, Senior United States District Court Judge\nOn January 14, 2015, Plaintiff Congaree Riverkeeper, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) sued Defendant Carolina Water Service, Inc. (“Defendant”) for violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. (2012). In Claim I, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated its National Pollutant Discharge Eliminati","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7243178],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2658560/bark-v-united-states-forest-service/","attorney":"Matt G. Kenna, Public Interest Environmental Law, Durango, CO, for Plaintiffs., Jason Alan Hill, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant., Kevin R. Garden, The Garden Law Firm P.C., Alexandria, VA, for Intervenor-De-fendants.","caseName":"Bark v. United States Forest Service","caseNameFull":"BARK, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant, and National Forest Recreation Association Et Al., Intervenor-Defendants","citation":["37 F. Supp. 3d 41","44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20073","2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41883","2014 WL 1289446"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":2658560,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-03-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2012-1505","docket_id":164440,"judge":"Judge Rudolph Contreras","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41883","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:39:21.030617Z","date_created":"2015-02-20T20:53:23.422916Z","score":{"bm25":19.068699}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":710,"cites":[1741,90753,104034,105289,105290,109565,110993,111202,111221,111383,112204,112490,112852,112875,117943,118082,118362,118450,136985,145693,185354,185538,185747,186693,186714,186736,187453,602784,724013,777077,903979],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2012cv1505-44","id":2658560,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/03/28/bark_v._united_states_forest_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:42:14.867170Z","date_created":"2014-03-28T22:16:47.115816Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"03cdb7005cf3e19a76815d7730e19a5b779702e3","snippet":"\n\n\n\n   MEMORANDUM OPINION\n  \n\n\n  Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion FOR Summary Judgment; Granting Federal Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting Intervenor-Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment\n \n\n  RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge\n \n\n  I. INTRODUCTION\n \n\n  “National Forests are made for and owned by","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2658560],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7314405/roberts-v-united-parcel-service-inc/","attorney":"Alex Umansky, Jessenia Maldonado, Phillips & Associates, PLLG, Casimir Joseph Wolnowski, New York, NY, for Plaintiff., Kerrie R. Heslin, Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., Short Hills, NJ, Melissa Anne Herbert, Rachel Mara. Manne, Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., Chatham, NJ, for Defendant.","caseName":"Roberts v. United Parcel Service, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Tameeka ROBERTS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.","citation":["115 F. Supp. 3d 344","2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97989","127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1457","2015 WL 4509994"],"citeCount":11,"cluster_id":7314405,"court":"District Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"E.D.N.Y","court_id":"nyed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-07-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 13-CV-6161","docket_id":64302884,"judge":"Weinstein","lexisCite":"2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97989","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:35:07.537589Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:30:26.132750Z","score":{"bm25":18.942148}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[68124,108237,109834,112252,112466,118026,118027,118181,118244,130160,213259,470412,752430,771074,789252,857791,859136,945737,1302107,1989271,2285525,2476764,2620700,2646028,2653200,2675024,2812209,2814123,5772680,5902444,5939731,6975957,6982937,7226542,7226936,7229774,8471384,8698640,8699770,8700006,8711593,8713850],"download_url":null,"id":7232310,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:17:28.755622Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:30:26.150625Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM & JUDGMENT\nJACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:\nI. Introduction. ..348\nII. Procedural History. .'.....349\nIII. Facts\nA. 2007 .'. XÍ CO\nB. 2008 . LO 00\nC. 2009 . LO CO\n","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7232310],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7861726/fells-v-service-employees-international-union-seiu-and-district-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Fells v. Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and District of Columbia","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7861726,"court":"District of Columbia Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"D.C.","court_id":"dc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-09-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-CV-1246 & 20-CV-387","docket_id":64941898,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:03:46.367902Z","date_created":"2022-09-01T14:02:36.130111Z","score":{"bm25":18.937077}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106761,109091,545464,607123,718800,1472584,1510200,1538995,2071623,2309577],"download_url":"https://www.dccourts.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Fells%20v%20Serv.%20Emp.%20and%20DC%2019-CV-1246.pdf","id":7805592,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/09/01/fells_v._service_employees_international_union_seiu_and_district_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T13:42:32.344263Z","date_created":"2022-09-01T14:02:36.131485Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2c5acd56115d6a58a64c6cf4994f1fca5c0350c4","snippet":"Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the\nAtlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the\nCourt of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound\nvolumes go to press.\n\n              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                         Nos. 19-CV-1246 & 20-CV-0387\n\n                        KENDALL K.W. FELLS, APPELLANT,\n\n                                         V.\n\n     SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7805592],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5146767/youngs-sales-service-v-underground-storage-tank-indemnification-board/","attorney":"Carl D. Buchholz, III, Esq., Angela Marie Heim, Esq., Kimberly Ann Lapworth, Esq., John Christie McMeekin II, Esq., Rawle & Henderson, L.L.P., Philadelphia, for Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board and Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund., David J. Lanza, Esq., for Young’s Sales and Service.","caseName":"Young's Sales & Service v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board","caseNameFull":"YOUNG'S SALES AND SERVICE v. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INDEMNIFICATION BOARD and Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund","citation":["70 A.3d 795","620 Pa. 670","2013 WL 2980609","2013 Pa. LEXIS 1255"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":5146767,"court":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa.","court_id":"pa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-06-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":60460610,"judge":"Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:55:24.819995Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:24:05.519597Z","score":{"bm25":17.993336}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4967467,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T22:17:26.533479Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:24:05.533131Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nOPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT\n\nJustice TODD.\nFollowing the release of regulated substances from four underground storage tanks located on its property, Appellee Young’s Sales and Service submitted a claim with Appellant Underground Storage Indemnification Fund (the “Fund”) seeking reimbursement of the remediation costs it incurred. We granted review to consider whether the Commonweal","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4967467,4967468,4967469],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10808676/san-carlos-apache-tribe-v-united-states-forest-service/","attorney":"","caseName":"San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States Forest Service","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10808676,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-03-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-5189","docket_id":71139018,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-14T00:01:03.784083Z","date_created":"2026-03-14T00:01:03.677041Z","score":{"bm25":17.97675}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[78617,108088,112404,118096,2672209,6353575,6931590,6989161,9016231,9363164,9364446,9424861,9429994,9430776,9431242,9432577,9433201,9435108,9435153,9435422,9492702,9500707,9553950,9817684,9950712,9972556,9976036,10582748,10594259,11085139],"download_url":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/03/13/25-5189.pdf","id":11275419,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/03/13/san_carlos_apache_tribe_v._united_states_forest_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-14T00:02:33.515941Z","date_created":"2026-03-14T00:01:03.681472Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"71d9d9d9b77541c07995dd290a044bedfa58a65e","snippet":"                              FOR PUBLICATION                     FILED\n                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                 MAR 13 2026\n                                                               MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK\n                                                                U.S. COURT OF APPEALS\n                          FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT\n\nARIZONA MINING REFORM                      No. 25-5185\nCOALITION; INTER TRIBAL                    D.C. No.\nASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11275419],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7309143/public-service-mutual-insurance-v-liberty-surplus-insurance/","attorney":"Brian J. O’Connor, Diepenbrock and Cotter, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff., Patrick P. Fredette, Timothy R. Sullivan, McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte and Carruth, LLP, Fresno, CA, for Defendants.","caseName":"Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Liberty Surplus Insurance","caseNameFull":"PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION and Does 1 through 10, inclusive","citation":["51 F. Supp. 3d 937","2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139773","2014 WL 4926263"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":7309143,"court":"District Court, E.D. California","court_citation_string":"E.D. Cal.","court_id":"caed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 2:14-cv-00226-MCE-KJN","docket_id":64297620,"judge":"England","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139773","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:33:32.053442Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:14:16.410434Z","score":{"bm25":17.963648}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105573,106497,109009,112934,145730,145875,497054,599277,715714,780573,1158751,1267839,1289112,1363144,1669222,2117816,2126461,2145439,2173550,2201192,2245429,2245801,2246776,2254646,2263960,2271731,2275489,2276258,2276827,2293309,2304835,2512930,3300150,5663535,5666264,8916325],"download_url":null,"id":7227046,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:19:45.508978Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:14:16.417545Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM AND ORDER\nMORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Chief Judge.\nThrough the present action, Plaintiff Public Service Mutual Insurance Company (“PSMIC” or “Plaintiff’) seeks equitable indemnification from another insurance carrier, Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation (“LSIC”) for amounts paid by PSMIC for the defense and indemnification of its insureds, Fair Oaks Fountains, LLC (“FOF”) and FPI Management Com","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7227046],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8716999/chavarria-v-new-york-airport-service-llc/","attorney":"William Cafaro, Law Offices of William Cafaro, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs., Joel Steven Schneck, Goldberg Rimberg & Friedlander, Christopher A. D’Angelo, Vandenberg & Feliu LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Chavarria v. New York Airport Service, LLC","caseNameFull":"Lazaro CHAVARRIA v. NEW YORK AIRPORT SERVICE, LLC","citation":["875 F. Supp. 2d 164","2012 WL 2394797","2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87876"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":8716999,"court":"District Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"E.D.N.Y","court_id":"nyed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 10-CV-1930 (MDG)","docket_id":65982918,"judge":"","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87876","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:07:03.066888Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T05:31:51.049505Z","score":{"bm25":17.887245}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111627,304888,318518,413307,1312511,1447275,1589150,1793072,2288624,2411342,2512293,6936521,6985405,8409368,8727934,8740016,9037229,9042523],"download_url":null,"id":8700192,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:25:19.449026Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T05:31:51.057606Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nORDER\n\nGO, United States Magistrate Judge:\nPlaintiffs, current and former transportation “ticket agents” for defendants, bring this collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and class action under sections 190 and 650 et seq. of the New York State Labor Law (“NYS Labor Law”) alleging that defendants failed to pay them overtime. Afte","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8700192],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4533761/preeminent-protective-services-inc-v-service-employees-international/","attorney":"","caseName":"Preeminent Protective Services Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 32bj","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4533761,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2018-0502","docket_id":7831774,"judge":"Judge Rosemary M. Collyer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:11:41.471064Z","date_created":"2018-09-10T19:00:46.414294Z","score":{"bm25":17.755201}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":687,"cites":[105511,106084,106085,107199,110459,186723,754554,4967900],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv0502-15","id":4311014,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/09/10/preeminent_protective_services_inc._v._service_employees_international.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:24:11.319427Z","date_created":"2018-09-10T19:00:46.427874Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"de8cdc27a32f77c96274e7643e66d854b7a04d6b","snippet":"                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                       FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n__________________________________\n                                   )\nPREEMINENT PROTECTIVE              )\nSERVICES, INC.,                    )\n                                   )\n            Plaintiff,             )\n                                   )\n      v.                           )    Civil Action No. 18-502 (RMC)\n                                   )\nSERVICE EMPLOYEES               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4311014],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10839352/san-carlos-apache-tribe-v-united-states-forest-service/","attorney":"","caseName":"San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States Forest Service","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10839352,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","court_citation_string":"9th Cir.","court_id":"ca9","court_jurisdiction":"F","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-04-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25-5189","docket_id":71139018,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-08T17:00:46.687149Z","date_created":"2026-04-08T17:00:46.597575Z","score":{"bm25":17.266397}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[78617,90454,99564,106511,108088,112404,118096,276163,396264,714881,1041860,2672209,2798272,6340168,6353575,6931590,6989161,9016231,9363164,9364446,9424861,9429994,9430776,9431242,9432577,9433201,9435108,9435153,9435422,9435498,9492702,9499606,9500707,9553950,9817684,9950712,9972556,9976036,10582748,10594259,10748876,11085139],"download_url":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/04/08/25-5189.pdf","id":11306696,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/04/08/san_carlos_apache_tribe_v._united_states_forest_service.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-04-08T17:02:50.605795Z","date_created":"2026-04-08T17:00:46.604930Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4aad33a5a14a682a0e61852e327dc151192b357d","snippet":"                   FOR PUBLICATION\n\n      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n          FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT\n\nARIZONA MINING REFORM                 No. 25-5185\nCOALITION; INTER TRIBAL\n                                        D.C. No.\nASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA,\n                                     2:21-cv-00122-\nINC.; EARTHWORKS; CENTER\n                                          DWL\nFOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY;\nACCESS FUND; GRAND\nCANYON CHAPTER OF THE                 AMENDED\nSIERRA CLUB,                     ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11306696],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5345530/public-service-co-v-department-of-revenue/","attorney":"Silverstein & Pomerantz, LLP, Neil I. Pomerantz, Robert R. Gunning, Mark E. Medina, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee., John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Robert H. Dodd, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellants.","caseName":"Public Service Co. v. Department of Revenue","caseNameFull":"PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY of Colorado v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE of the State of Colorado and M. Michael Cooke, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue","citation":["397 P.3d 1111","2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 1518","2011 WL 4089971"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5345530,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-09-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 10CA1026","docket_id":61693211,"judge":"Loeb, Nieto, Roy","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T04:47:53.409026Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:26:24.737405Z","score":{"bm25":17.136568}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":5178417,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T00:22:57.312001Z","date_created":"2022-01-06T01:26:24.754619Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOpinion by\nJudge ROY.\nDefendants, the Colorado Department of Revenue and M. Michael Cooke, in her official capacity as executive director of the department (collectively the Department), appeal from the judgment of the trial court reversing the Department’s final determination that plaintiff, Public Service Company of Colorado (taxpayer), was not entitled to a refund of sales and use taxes it paid on","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5178417],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}