{"count":717178,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yOS42ODI1MTYmcz04MzUxNDYmdD1vJmQ9MjAyNi0xMC0wMiZwPTI%3D&q=DISCRETION+AS+TO+AMOUNT&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5310866/discretion-to-continue-the-home-confinement-placements-of-federal-prisoners/","attorney":"","caseName":"Discretion to Continue the Home-Confinement Placements of Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5310866,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-12-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":61635910,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:11.746454Z","date_created":"2021-12-21T21:02:08.253406Z","score":{"bm25":47.541855}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111043,2648128,2811845,4657003,9425409,9426318,9431344,9432497,9434047,9440569,9888811],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1457926/download","id":5139416,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/12/21/discretion_to_continue_the_home-confinement_placements_of_federal_prisoners.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T15:12:49.552618Z","date_created":"2021-12-21T21:02:08.256248Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9593aee77086aea9fef2238dcbba6119f4618f34","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\nDiscretion to Continue the Home-Confinement Placements of\n     Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency\nThis Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the\n  Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home\n  confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Eco-\n  nomic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18\n  U.S.C. § 624(c)(2). Having been asked to r","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5139416],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"This Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 624(c)(2). Having been asked to reconsider, we now conclude that section 12003(b)(2) and the Bureau's preexisting authorities are better read to give the Bureau discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236953/discretion-to-continue-the-home-confinement-placements-of-federal-prisoners/","attorney":"","caseName":"Discretion to Continue the Home-Confinement Placements of Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236953,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-12-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601417,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:15.012404Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:35.741285Z","score":{"bm25":46.11145}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[111043,2648128,2811845,4657003,9425409,9426318,9431344,9432497,9434047,9440569,9888811],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1457926/download","id":6103835,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/12/21/discretion_to_continue_the_home-confinement_placements_of_federal_prisoners_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T15:43:26.957867Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:35.746512Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f482dab326998f3ab729e85eec43d1ea34eb18eb","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\nDiscretion to Continue the Home-Confinement Placements of\n     Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency\nThis Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the\n  Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home\n  confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Eco-\n  nomic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18\n  U.S.C. § 624(c)(2). Having been asked to r","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103835],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"This Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 624(c)(2). Having been asked to reconsider, we now conclude that section 12003(b)(2) and the Bureau's preexisting authorities are better read to give the Bureau discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4887107/in-re-parental-rights-as-to-tmr/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO T.M.R.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 NV 23"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4887107,"court":"Nevada Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Nev.","court_id":"nev","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"81032","docket_id":59942733,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-09T14:23:05.595612Z","date_created":"2021-05-27T20:13:42.659911Z","score":{"bm25":40.260437}},"neutralCite":"2021 NV 23","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1175707,1241295,1291289,2543266,2622696,6534252,8042143,8045662,8045821,8045894,8045917,9607660],"download_url":"https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=58773&csIID=58773&deLinkID=817645&onBaseDocumentNumber=21-15209","id":4690886,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/27/in_re_parental_rights_as_to_t.m.r._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T09:41:29.800684Z","date_created":"2021-05-27T20:13:42.663095Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"aec557c557ed097ba3b5419649dfd3121d65f321","snippet":"                                                 137 Nev., Advance Opinion 23\n                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA\n\n\n                IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL                         No. 81032\n                RIGHTS AS TO T.M.R., A MINOR\n                UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE.\n\n                MARCUS STEVEN H.,\n                Appellant,                                                 FLED\n                vs.\n                                                      ","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=58773&csIID=58773&deLinkID=817645&onBaseDocumentNumber=21-15209","id":5133269,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/27/in_re_parental_rights_as_to_t.m.r..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T21:26:42.537811Z","date_created":"2021-12-09T17:09:51.879362Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"697eccee03a9fb1f077f402773a86d2ea7bf2107","snippet":"                                                 137 Nev., Advance Opinion 23\n                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA\n\n\n                IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL                         No. 81032\n                RIGHTS AS TO T.M.R., A MINOR\n                UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE.\n\n                MARCUS STEVEN H.,\n                Appellant,                                                 FLED\n                vs.\n                                                      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5133269,4690886],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4887108/in-re-parental-rights-as-to-lls/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO L.L.S.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 NV 22"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4887108,"court":"Nevada Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Nev.","court_id":"nev","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"79124","docket_id":59942734,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-09T14:23:16.668543Z","date_created":"2021-05-27T20:13:42.888969Z","score":{"bm25":39.153004}},"neutralCite":"2021 NV 22","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[320476,469882,497993,530633,747640,769192,1131964,1183189,1241295,1395288,2368883,2543266,6535658,8045735,8045947,9424930,9426279,9428010,9428708,9430161,9434305,9471656,9519378,9579099,9782317],"download_url":"https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=55904&csIID=55904&deLinkID=817643&onBaseDocumentNumber=21-15207","id":4690887,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/27/in_re_parental_rights_as_to_l.l.s._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-09T14:23:49.572569Z","date_created":"2021-05-27T20:13:42.893016Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"268316fa65bb74e1f554023af81632e969e6211c","snippet":"                                  137 Nev., Advance Opinion 22\n       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL                          No. 79124\nRIGHTS AS TO L.L.S., A MINOR.\n\nTAHJA L.,\nAppellant,\n                                                          Nan\nVS.\n                                                           MAY 2 7 2021\nSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT\n                                                          EU F $ T A. DROWN\nOF FAMILY SERVICES; AND L.","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=55904&csIID=55904&deLinkID=817643&onBaseDocumentNumber=21-15207","id":5133270,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/05/27/in_re_parental_rights_as_to_l.l.s..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-10T21:26:42.594426Z","date_created":"2021-12-09T17:09:55.638728Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"67004e03d26796572562da14640310a5e5c9ec1e","snippet":"                                  137 Nev., Advance Opinion 22\n       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA\n\n\nIN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL                          No. 79124\nRIGHTS AS TO L.L.S., A MINOR.\n\nTAHJA L.,\nAppellant,\n                                                          Nan\nVS.\n                                                           MAY 2 7 2021\nSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT\n                                                          EU F $ T A. DROWN\nOF FAMILY SERVICES; AND L.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5133270,4690887],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2776374/united-states-v-funds-up-to-and-including-the-amount-of-56634-in-us/","attorney":"Kristen M. Warden, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.","caseName":"United States v. Funds Up to and Including the Amount of $56,634 in U.S. Currency","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. FUNDS UP TO AND INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF $56,634 IN U.S. CURRENCY ON DEPOSIT IN BANESCO INTERNATIONAL, PANAMA, ACCOUNT # 201000274785, TITLED IN THE NAME OF INVERSIONES CEDENO C.A., and/or Property Traceable Thereto, Et Al., Defendants","citation":["79 F. Supp. 3d 112","90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1874","2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12918"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2776374,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-02-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2012-0259","docket_id":2631085,"judge":"Judge Amy Berman Jackson","lexisCite":"2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12918","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:41:09.418794Z","date_created":"2015-02-04T16:58:55.983336Z","score":{"bm25":38.564438}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[384962,2392395,2412738],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2012cv0259-47","id":2776374,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/02/04/united_states_v._funds_up_to_and_including_the_amount_of_56634_in_u.s..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:07:27.972446Z","date_created":"2015-02-04T16:01:00.646110Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c6b8bad8856d7b9cfe3594a40336271a6dbdddbf","snippet":"\n\n\n\n   MEMORANDUM OPINION\n  \n\n\n\n   AMY\n  \n  BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge\n \n\n  Pending before this Court is plaintiff United States of America’s motion for partial default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) against defendants\n  \n   in rem\n  \n  (1) Funds Up to and Including the Amount of $113,676 in U.S. ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2776374],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4894414/wvmf-funding-as-successor-to-onewest-bank-fsb-v-luisa-palmero/","attorney":"","caseName":"WVMF Funding, as Successor to Onewest Bank, FSB v. Luisa Palmero","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4894414,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-06-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC19-1920","docket_id":60009912,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:52:30.054181Z","date_created":"2021-06-24T15:03:08.978369Z","score":{"bm25":36.730793}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1088980,1776871,1860017,1865825,3390213,3397639,4829129],"download_url":"https://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pre_opinion_content_download/751128","id":4698193,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/06/24/wvmf_funding_as_successor_to_onewest_bank_fsb_v._luisa_palmero.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T20:07:28.031129Z","date_created":"2021-06-24T15:03:08.980155Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7aeeff36a1116a2ca9a1df13c88ec06e5a07d8c0","snippet":"          Supreme Court of Florida\n                            ____________\n\n                           No. SC19-1920\n                            ____________\n\n  WVMF FUNDING, AS SUCCESSOR TO ONEWEST BANK, FSB,\n                      Petitioner,\n\n                                 vs.\n\n                      LUISA PALMERO, et al.,\n                           Respondents.\n\n                           June 24, 2021\n\nLAWSON, J.\n\n     The decision on review presents the legal questions of whether,\n\nin a f","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4698193],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9426969/in-re-term-of-parental-rights-as-to-cr-and-ar/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.R. and A.R.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["536 P.3d 298"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9426969,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arizona","court_citation_string":"Ariz. Ct. App.","court_id":"arizctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1 CA-JV 23-0041","docket_id":67807758,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:49:44.978142Z","date_created":"2023-09-19T16:04:36.803903Z","score":{"bm25":35.97267}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1292043,1352727,3168832],"download_url":"http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2023/1%20CA-JV%2023-0041%20OP%20In%20Re%20Term%20Of%20Parental%20Rights%20As%20To%20C.R.%20and%20A.R..pdf","id":9840594,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/09/19/in_re_term_of_parental_rights_as_to_c.r._and_a.r..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-13T19:49:45.032522Z","date_created":"2023-09-19T16:04:36.807175Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"eca08edde8291cf55ec1a30e1d5175b92607a682","snippet":"                               IN THE\n            ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS\n                           DIVISION ONE\n\n\n  IN RE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO C.R. and A.R.\n\n                         No. 1 CA-JV 23-0041\n                           FILED 9-19-2023\n\n\n         Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County\n                           No. JS519906\n         The Honorable Sigmund G. Popko, Judge Pro Tempore\n\n                             AFFIRMED\n\n\n                             COUNS","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9840594],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9507932/thom-miller-v-barnettelection-contest-as-to-amendment-a/","attorney":"","caseName":"THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT A","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2021 S.D. 65"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":9507932,"court":"South Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"S.D.","court_id":"sd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-11-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"29546, 29547","docket_id":68771128,"judge":"Steven R. Jensen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-04-29T22:28:49.875302Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T01:56:43.730034Z","score":{"bm25":35.88598}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[198797,494622,899797,900487,900784,900924,901395,901402,901931,1370224,1427390,1587732,1595847,1596126,1824958,1871359,1900531,1906907,1927746,1945933,2011088,2111873,2174941,2455327,3040442,3166718,3257206,3411594,3430947,3511247,3681654,3889212,4350133,5452020,6603712,6684909,6692190,6692539,7226974,7234238,8244994,8255034,8255255,8944235,9503510,9514504,9514924,9515379,9515699,9568320,9584539,9590846,9670676,9670890,9696080,9742049,9796164,9846285,9879051,9974423,9974442,9974446,9974486,9974505,9974559,9974569],"download_url":"https://ujs.sd.gov/uploads/sc/opinions/2954698e671a.pdf","id":9974545,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/11/24/thom__miller_v._barnettelection_contest_as_to_amendment_a.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T13:59:08.578546Z","date_created":"2024-05-29T01:56:43.740341Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c4494ace19a6bd0615957c7b1f7742d5342f6cc9","snippet":"#29546, #29547-a-SRJ\n2021 S.D. 65\n\n                           IN THE SUPREME COURT\n                                   OF THE\n                          STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA\n\n                                      ****\n\n                                     #29546\n\nSHERIFF KEVIN THOM, In His\nOfficial Capacity as Pennington County\nSheriff, and COLONEL RICK MILLER,\nIn His Official Capacity as Superintendent\nof the South Dakota Highway Patrol,           Plaintiffs and Appellees,\n\n      v.\n\nSTEVE BARNE","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9974545],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10302970/khyber-holdings-llc-v-us-bank-national-association-as-trustee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Khyber Holdings, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Merill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed CerU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10302970,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.]","court_id":"txctapp1","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-12-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"01-23-00357-CV","docket_id":69491241,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:50.514123Z","date_created":"2024-12-23T09:15:59.234010Z","score":{"bm25":34.565983}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112014,613266,1686255,1753367,1947742,1983605,2333049,2336450,2579119,3115425,3212205,4016374,4391061,5110134,5110875,5113676],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=76146bf3-9576-4667-97db-4f68fb0a7089","id":10769558,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/12/19/khyber_holdings_llc_v._u.s._bank_national_association_as_trustee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:20:50.516283Z","date_created":"2024-12-23T09:15:59.235652Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"57ab58a2535429cd8d766126c5f4b91588a4b2de","snippet":"Opinion issued December 19, 2024\n\n\n\n\n                                   In The\n\n                          Court of Appeals\n                                   For The\n\n                       First District of Texas\n                         ————————————\n                          NO. 01-23-00357-CV\n                        ———————————\n                 KHYBER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant\n                                     V.\n U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN\n  INTEREST TO BANK O","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10769558],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8693768/united-states-v-funds-in-amount-of-495744/","attorney":"Matthew S. Ebert, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Robert M. Leen, Attorney, Everett, WA, Heather L. Winslow, Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Claimant-Appellant.","caseName":"United States v. Funds in Amount of $495,744","caseNameFull":"United States v. FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $495,744, in Rem, Abdel Rahmen Alsharfa, Claimant-Appellant","citation":["596 F. App'x 494"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8693768,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-01-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 12-2080","docket_id":65959227,"judge":"Posner, Rovner, Williams","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T20:58:11.547909Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T02:38:52.577189Z","score":{"bm25":33.785614}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8676862,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:17:12.449983Z","date_created":"2022-11-25T02:38:52.581714Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER\nLaw enforcement officials seized $495,744 from a rented car Abdel Alsharfa was driving. Maintaining that the cash was derived from proceeds of illegal activity, the government instituted civil forfeiture proceedings, and Alsharfa filed a claim to the money. After the government served interrogatories and other discovery requests upon him, he asserted the Fifth Amendment and filed a motion to stay the proceedings. We affirm the d","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8676862],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10628975/loanmax-llc-v-castle-columbus-i-llc-as-successor-in-interest-to/","attorney":"","caseName":"LoanMax, LLC v. Castle Columbus I, LLC, as Successor-In-Interest to Wendelta Property Holdings, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10628975,"court":"Court of Appeals of Mississippi","court_citation_string":"Miss. Ct. App.","court_id":"missctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-02-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2023-CA-00790-COA","docket_id":70759324,"judge":"McDonald, Deborah, J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-11T20:07:06.342529Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T14:42:14.221406Z","score":{"bm25":33.460373}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":16237,"cites":[1110297,1681874,1782908,1830345,2545005,3515146,4821717,9887918],"download_url":"https://courts.ms.gov/images/Opinions/CO181271.pdf","id":11095562,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/02/18/loanmax_llc_v._castle_columbus_i_llc_as_successor-in-interest_to.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:16:22.972457Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T14:42:14.235702Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f20cf102b79a5932a140a3840c0db552cbf0811d","snippet":"          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI\n\n                                 NO. 2023-CA-00790-COA\n\nLOANMAX, LLC                                                        APPELLANT/\n                                                                CROSS-APPELLEE\n\nv.\n\nCASTLE COLUMBUS I, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR-                                APPELLEE/\nIN-INTEREST TO WENDELTA PROPERTY                              CROSS-APPELLANT\nHOLDINGS, LLC\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT:                           07","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11095562],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5065305/jose-calderon-individually-and-as-next-friend-to-eg-and-ag-and/","attorney":"","caseName":"Jose Calderon, individually and as next friend to E.G. and A.G., and Veronica Gonzales, individually and as next friend to E.G. and A.G. v. Saber Khan","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5065305,"court":"Court of Appeals of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa Ct. App.","court_id":"iowactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-09-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20-0489","docket_id":60330708,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:34:49.125550Z","date_created":"2021-09-01T15:08:38.971325Z","score":{"bm25":33.25246}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110929,1294584,1647066,1803920,1889767,1920832,1953696,1989929,2015959,3434677],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/12440/embed/CourtAppealsOpinion","id":4880686,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/09/01/jose_calderon_individually_and_as_next_friend_to_e.g._and_a.g._and.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T21:19:33.110298Z","date_created":"2021-09-01T15:08:38.973925Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2483b6bf2bf58c5394162af2d8194c102b081832","snippet":"                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA\n\n                                 No. 20-0489\n                           Filed September 1, 2021\n\n\nJOSE CALDERON, individually and as next friend to E.G. and A.G., and\nVERONICA GONZALES, individually and as next friend to E.G. and A.G.,\n     Plaintiffs-Appellants,\n\nvs.\n\nSABER KHAN,\n     Defendant-Appellee.\n________________________________________________________________\n\n\n      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt, J","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4880686],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236868/special-government-employee-serving-as-paid-consultant-to-saudi-company/","attorney":"","caseName":"Special Government Employee Serving as Paid Consultant to Saudi Company","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236868,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-01-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601171,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:14.919549Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:36.163848Z","score":{"bm25":32.940517}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92882,109380,9416730],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/2016-01-13-kacare-emols/download","id":6103750,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/01/13/special_government_employee_serving_as_paid_consultant_to_saudi_company.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:16:36.819758Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:36.166180Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"22817d280f4f0e0b544883169ed7a32d9a5f8327","snippet":"              Special Government Employee Serving as\n                 Paid Consultant to Saudi Company\nA special government employee, retained to provide advice on behalf of the Department\n   of Commerce to Middle Eastern countries that are reforming and harmonizing their\n   laws, may accept a paid consulting position with a Saudi energy company without vio-\n   lating the Emoluments Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8, because he does not hold\n   an “Office of Profit or Trust under” the Unite","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103750],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A special government employee, retained to provide advice on behalf of the Department of Commerce to Middle Eastern countries that are reforming and harmonizing their laws, may accept a paid consulting position with a Saudi energy company without violating the Emoluments Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8, because he does not hold an \"Office of Profit or Trust under\" the United States."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2814007/texas-honeycomb-partners-llc-kathleen-mccarthy-david-mccarthy-david/","attorney":"","caseName":"Texas Honeycomb Partners, LLC, Kathleen McCarthy, David McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Shannon McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Ryan McCarthy, and David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Kevin McCarthy v. Alan Johnson","caseNameFull":"Texas Honeycomb Partners, LLC, Kathleen McCarthy, David McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Shannon McCarthy, David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Ryan McCarthy, and David McCarthy as Successor-In-Interest to Kevin McCarthy v. Alan Johnson","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2814007,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi","court_id":"txctapp13","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-14-00699-CV","docket_id":2670610,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:28:25.841143Z","date_created":"2015-07-02T09:59:19.925086Z","score":{"bm25":31.910934}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[894996,1404869,1439512,1485041,1619726,1634204,1657596,1678834,2278697,2409421,3920089],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=718&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa13%5cOrder","id":2814007,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/07/02/texas_honeycomb_partners_llc_kathleen_mccarthy_david_mccarthy_david.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:28:25.837015Z","date_created":"2015-07-02T09:39:25.154162Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"641e2e63901f769bfb98f89affdab832e0ff07af","snippet":"                   NUMBER 13-14-00699-CV\n\n                    COURT OF APPEALS\n\n             THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n               CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG\n____________________________________________________________\n\nTEXAS HONEYCOMB PARTNERS, LLC,\nKATHLEEN MCCARTHY, DAVID MCCARTHY,\nDAVID MCCARTHY AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST\nTO SHANNON MCCARTHY, DAVID MCCARTHY\nAS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO RYAN\nMCCARTHY, AND DAVID MCCARTHY AS\nSUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEVIN MCCARTHY,              Appellants,\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2814007],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4529196/nicholas-p-marrocco-v-funds-in-the-amount-of-one-hun/","attorney":"","caseName":"Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One Hun","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4529196,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-3238","docket_id":7724807,"judge":"Manion","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:10:27.063984Z","date_created":"2018-08-23T07:00:27.130635Z","score":{"bm25":31.092934}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2027,"cites":[39243,76787,106373,112239,112904,118234,217819,220377,376711,496618,672087,691303,725510,746460,751568,763288,764693,767285,775987,776605,781682,790498,792601,1249203,1425090,1434460,1446463,1447430,1456522],"download_url":"http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-22/C:16-3238:J:Manion:aut:T:fnOp:N:2206323:S:0","id":4306449,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/08/22/nicholas_p._marrocco_v._funds_in_the_amount_of_one_hun_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:20:54.059230Z","date_created":"2018-08-23T07:00:27.140469Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dbb9e987491f8b91bf7d7c1a5f8b88d8b4861515","snippet":"                              In the\n\n    United States Court of Appeals\n                For the Seventh Circuit\n                    ____________________\nNo. 16-3238\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,\n                                v.\n\nFUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF\nONE HUNDRED THOUSAND\nAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY\nDOLLARS ($100,120.00),\n                                                          Defendant.\n\nAPPEAL OF:\n\nNICHOLAS P. MARROCCO AND\nVINCE","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4306449],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2688832/in-re-bond-in-the-amount-of-75000/","attorney":"Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney By Thomas J. Rankin, Tucson, Attorneys for Appellee., T.S. Hartzell, Tucson, Attorney for Appellant.","caseName":"In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000","caseNameFull":"In Re BOND IN the AMOUNT OF $75,000","citation":["225 Ariz. 401","238 P.3d 1275","591 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16","2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 147"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2688832,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arizona","court_citation_string":"Ariz. Ct. App.","court_id":"arizctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-09-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2 CA-CV 2010-0005","docket_id":457921,"judge":"Vásquez, Eckerstrom, Kelly","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:52:20.042682Z","date_created":"2015-08-28T20:17:18.240057Z","score":{"bm25":30.246685}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1166525,1194461,1197856,1219402,1228765,1242987,1296677,1409123,1487175,2515919,2594469,2597706,2629776,2635342,2637786],"download_url":"https://www.appeals2.az.gov/Decisions/CV20100005Opinion.pdf","id":2688832,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2010/09/10/in_re_bond_in_the_amount_of_75000.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T22:03:17.085256Z","date_created":"2014-08-01T14:52:58.658625Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0af0fe52bc5551be31cfb155a1a4f805ca50edd8","snippet":"\n\n\n\n   OPINION\n  \n\n\n  VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.\n \n\n  ¶ 1 Gloria Urias and American Liberty Bail Bonds (collectively, “American Liberty”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment forfeiting a $75,000 appearance bond after the defendant, Jesus Gonzalez-Lugo, failed to appear for court proceedings, including his criminal trial. American Liberty contends the court l","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2688832],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8508948/demetria-washington-v-yellowfin-loan-servicing-corp-as-the-successor-in/","attorney":"","caseName":"Demetria Washington v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as the Successor in Interest to Option One Mortgage Corporation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8508948,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Fort Worth","court_id":"txctapp2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-11-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"02-21-00215-CV","docket_id":65735264,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:00:07.365006Z","date_created":"2022-11-07T12:07:19.092042Z","score":{"bm25":30.122564}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1777327,2287450,2541910,3981760,5282946],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=40333&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa02%5cOpinion","id":8481317,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/11/03/demetria_washington_v._yellowfin_loan_servicing_corp._as_the_successor_in_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:00:07.448487Z","date_created":"2022-11-07T12:07:19.093011Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f154f38e4d7d779ce135ae8e17e9023fda35925c","snippet":"                         In the\n                    Court of Appeals\n            Second Appellate District of Texas\n                     at Fort Worth\n                  ___________________________\n                       No. 02-21-00215-CV\n                  ___________________________\n\n              DEMETRIA WASHINGTON, Appellant\n\n                                   V.\n\nYELLOWFIN LOAN SERVICING CORP., AS THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST\n     TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee\n\n\n\n\n             O","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8481317],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4529098/nicholas-p-marrocco-v-funds-in-the-amount-of-one-hun/","attorney":"Craig A. Oswald, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Brian Elliott King, Attorney, Stephen M. Komie, Attorney, Komie & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Appellants Nicholas P. Marrocco And Vincent J. Fallon","caseName":"Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One Hun","caseNameFull":"UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS ($100,120.00), Defendant. Appeal Of: Nicholas P. Marrocco and Vincent J. Fallon.","citation":["901 F.3d 758"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":4529098,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-3238","docket_id":7718946,"judge":"Flaum, Manion, Hamilton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:10:25.376281Z","date_created":"2018-08-22T20:00:21.028810Z","score":{"bm25":29.872562}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2027,"cites":[39243,76787,106373,112239,112904,118234,217819,220377,376711,496618,672087,691303,725510,746460,751568,763288,764693,767285,775987,776605,781682,790498,792601,1249203,1425090,1434460,1446463,1447430,1456522],"download_url":"http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-22/C:16-3238:J:Manion:aut:T:fnOp:N:2206323:S:0","id":4306351,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/08/22/nicholas_p._marrocco_v._funds_in_the_amount_of_one_hun.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:20:48.849257Z","date_created":"2018-08-22T20:00:21.043532Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f9fbf226e9031ba8b6bc6e981ccae2c80879351","snippet":"\n\n\n  Manion, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  In December 2002, law enforcement seized $100,120 in United States currency from a passenger on an Amtrak train. The federal government initiated a civil forfeiture proceeding against the currency. The passenger and the owner of the funds, neither of whom were ever charged with committing any crime related to the funds, joined the suit as claimants. After fourtee","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4306351],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/835208/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-campbell/","attorney":"G. Jefferson Campbell, Jr., in propria persona, argued the cause. Douglas J. Richmond, Kellington, Krack, Richmond, Blackhurst & Glatte, LLP, Medford, filed the briefs for the accused., Stacy J. Hankin, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Tigard, filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.","caseName":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Campbell","caseNameFull":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of G. JEFFERSON CAMPBELL, JR., Accused","citation":["202 P.3d 871","345 Or. 670","2009 Ore. LEXIS 6"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":835208,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-02-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"OSB 06-14, 06-127; SC S055577","docket_id":202035,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:45:53.089926Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T07:30:04.715190Z","score":{"bm25":29.856342}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[835211,835242,835281,835416,835482,835583,835777,836475,1115641,1119296,1160400,1176246,1199889,1205744,1245136,1372951,1535263,1965335,2604082],"download_url":"http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S055577.htm","id":835208,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2009/02/05/in_re_campbell_3.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:15:03.731670Z","date_created":"2013-03-01T21:10:28.362256Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"257a9a908eed96ad3b345004219d2095c8e65e97","snippet":"\n202 P.3d 871 (2009)\n345 Or. 670\nIn re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF G. Jefferson CAMPBELL, Jr., Accused.\nOSB 06-14, 06-127; SC S055577.\nSupreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.\nArgued and Submitted December 10, 2008.\nDecided February 5, 2009.\n*873 G. Jefferson Campbell, Jr., in propria persona, argued t","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[835208],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/835146/in-re-complaint-as-to-the-conduct-of-paulson/","attorney":"Lauren J. Paulson, Aloha, argued the cause and filed the briefs in propria persona., Stacy J. Hankin, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.","caseName":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson","caseNameFull":"In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LAUREN J. PAULSON, Accused","citation":["216 P.3d 859","346 Or. 676","2009 Ore. LEXIS 210"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":835146,"court":"Oregon Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Or.","court_id":"or","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-09-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"OSB 05-187, 06-05, 07-19, 07-20, 07-21, 07-22; SC S055610","docket_id":647934,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:45:52.633581Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T11:11:16.318804Z","score":{"bm25":29.682516}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[835195,835281,835416,835583,835886,835919,835944,835957,835989,836006,836024,836026,836182,836212,836266,836502,836580,836592,1113135,1120146,1167529,1199716,1199889,1213667,1214652,1258034,1268560,1280783,1441941,1442152,2514069,2611488,2618340,3684043],"download_url":"http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S055610.htm","id":835146,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2009/09/03/in_re_paulson_3.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T16:14:58.494847Z","date_created":"2013-03-01T21:10:18.125057Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"43e00291c3be68b98ee8c5b65c77021c2c5e2b42","snippet":"\n216 P.3d 859 (2009)\n346 Or. 676\nIn re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Lauren J. PAULSON, Accused.\n(OSB 05-187, 06-05, 07-19, 07-20, 07-21, 07-22; SC S055610).\nSupreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.\nArgued and Submitted December 9, 2008.\nDecided September 3, 2009.\n*862 Lauren J. Paulson, Aloha, argued th","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[835146],"source":"LCU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}