{"count":3511,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yMS4zMDc4NjEmcz0zMTA3OTE5JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMTAtMDEmcD0y&q=DEROGATION+OF+MARRIAGE&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9371949/marriage-of-belthius/","attorney":"","caseName":"Marriage of Belthius","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9371949,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-01-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B315673","docket_id":66774030,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:59:16.509469Z","date_created":"2023-01-31T19:02:17.690496Z","score":{"bm25":42.88112}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2567514],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B315673.PDF","id":9367425,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/01/31/marriage_of_belthius.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:40:22.044087Z","date_created":"2023-01-31T19:02:17.701253Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e00ac6d3ce2ba1fbce4b64c274c68e6fe6be6110","snippet":"Filed 1/4/23; certified for publication 1/31/23 (order attached)\n\n\n\n\nIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                       SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                      DIVISION TWO\n\n\nIn re Marriage of DARRELL P.                             B315673\nand ANGELA M. BELTHIUS.\n                                                         (Los Angeles County\n                                                         Super. Ct. No. VD023301)\n\nDARRELL P. BELTHIUS,\n\n      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9367425],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10622013/in-re-marriage-of-nimrick/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Marriage of Nimrick","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10622013,"court":"Court of Appeals of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa Ct. App.","court_id":"iowactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-07-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1227","docket_id":70691218,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-02T16:09:12.680733Z","date_created":"2025-07-02T16:09:12.634876Z","score":{"bm25":38.557045}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1228513,1656526,1832878,1998705,2025844,2046794,2100805,2146046,2234530,2265279,5285490,8980926,9426279,9426537,9880308],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/23393/embed/CourtAppealsOpinion","id":11088601,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/07/02/in_re_marriage_of_nimrick.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:12:36.760544Z","date_created":"2025-07-02T16:09:12.637242Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f7840730fe0dddc828864f3dc1efc4bc1144446f","snippet":"                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA\n\n                                 No. 24-1227\n                              Filed July 2, 2025\n\n\nIN RE THE MARRIAGE OF STEPHANIE NIMRICK\nAND VICTOR NIMRICK\n\nUpon the Petition of\nSTEPHANIE NIMRICK, n/k/a STEPHANIE TROUTWINE,\n      Petitioner-Appellee,\n\nAnd Concerning\nVICTOR NIMRICK,\n     Respondent-Appellant.\n________________________________________________________________\n\n      Appeal   from   the   Iowa   District   Court   for   Black   Hawk  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11088601],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4587246/in-re-marriage-of-schmidgall/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Marriage of Schmidgall","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2018 IL App (3d) 170189"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4587246,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-02-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3-17-0189","docket_id":14533704,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:27:03.783092Z","date_created":"2019-02-04T21:07:22.346730Z","score":{"bm25":32.7198}},"neutralCite":"2018 IL App (3d) 170189","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2050857,2647711,3135651],"download_url":"http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2018/3rdDistrict/3170189.pdf","id":4364499,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/02/04/in_re_marriage_of_schmidgall.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:01:28.461479Z","date_created":"2019-02-04T21:07:22.358190Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5a05704f5b671c2620f82d473580bc61f4828a42","snippet":"                                                                              Digitally signed by\n                                                                              Reporter of Decisions\n                                                                              Reason: I attest to the\n                            Illinois Official Reports                         accuracy and\n                                                                              integrity of this\n             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4364499],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3005666/in-re-marriage-of-walker/","attorney":"Counsel, The Law Offices of Saylin & Swisher, Brian G. Saylin and Lindsay L. Swisher for Appellant., Paul W. Samarán and Guerin L. Butterworth for Respondent.","caseName":"In re Marriage of Walker","caseNameFull":"In Re the Marriage of CHERYL A. and ROY M. WALKER. CHERYL A. WALKER, Respondent, v. ROY M. WALKER, Appellant","citation":["240 Cal. App. 4th 986","193 Cal. Rptr. 3d 134"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":3005666,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-09-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"G050448","docket_id":2862923,"judge":"Ikola, O'Leary, Thompson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T16:45:52.638724Z","date_created":"2015-09-29T23:39:49.983239Z","score":{"bm25":32.71549}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112522,112617,112680,1158283,1183916,1854034],"download_url":"http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/G050448.PDF","id":3005666,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/09/29/in_re_marriage_of_walker.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T01:55:51.911113Z","date_created":"2015-09-29T23:02:46.470431Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"80c28fe494805e1cd21d50f2a6bbd7d82134fbb8","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion\n \n\n  IKOLA, J.\n \n\n  A marriage dissolution proceeding commences, one spouse is discharged from her debts by a bankruptcy court, a community property home subject to a secured home equity loan is sold, and the proceeds (beyond the amount needed to pay the secured lender) are available for distribution to the parties. Should the proceeds be distributed equally or","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3005666],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2825531/marriage-of-bilyeu-v-bilyeu/","attorney":"Suzanne Woodrow-Snell, Woodrow-Snell Law Office, Purcell, Oklahoma, and Betsy Ann Brown, Norman, Oklahoma, for Petitioner/Appellee., Ann K. Hadrava, Hadrava Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Respondent/Appellant.","caseName":"Marriage of Bilyeu v. Bilyeu","caseNameFull":"In Re the MARRIAGE OF Joseph BILYEU, Petitioner/Appellee, v. Shyla BILYEU, Respondent/Appellant","citation":["352 P.3d 56","2015 OK CIV APP 58","2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 47","2015 WL 3814377"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":2825531,"court":"Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla. Civ. App.","court_id":"oklacivapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-05-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"112,300","docket_id":2682364,"judge":"Thornbrugh, Rapp, Barnes","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T15:01:24.834712Z","date_created":"2015-08-11T06:59:55.148826Z","score":{"bm25":32.442673}},"neutralCite":"2015 OK CIV APP 58","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2357335,2509463,2512323,2517792,2637250,2832401,5156785,5158404],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=476019","id":2825531,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/05/14/bilyeu_v._bilyeu.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:43:12.103280Z","date_created":"2015-08-11T06:13:31.791989Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"044e36c7a080f13313cc5df15be3b2650e43315c","snippet":"\n\n\n  P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH, Judge.\n \n\n  T1 Shyla Bilyeu (Mother) appeals a divoree decree awarding primary physical custody to Joseph Bilyeu (Father) with joint custody. On review, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in decreeing joint custody. We affirm.\n \n\n  BACKGROUND\n \n\n  2 The parties were married in 2006. Father filed for di","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2825531],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2671272/in-re-marriage-of-tiballi/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Marriage of Tiballi","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2014 IL 116319"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":2671272,"court":"Illinois Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ill.","court_id":"ill","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-04-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"116319","docket_id":290746,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:43:13.920017Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:13:11.289777Z","score":{"bm25":29.398798}},"neutralCite":"2014 IL 116319","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2041056,2058826,2201038,2251163],"download_url":"http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/SupremeCourt/2014/116319.pdf","id":2671272,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/04/24/in_re_marriage_of_tiballi.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:50:42.975986Z","date_created":"2014-04-24T22:20:40.730204Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c6460c0753640a7529efbdb6a67816201de27eb0","snippet":"                                  Illinois Official Reports\n\n                                          Supreme Court\n\n\n\n                              In re Marriage of Tiballi, 2014 IL 116319\n\n\n\nCaption in Supreme           In re MARRIAGE OF ROBERT N. TIBALLI, Appellant, and\nCourt:                       SHEILA J. ILAGAN TIBALLI, Appellee.\n\n\n\nDocket No.                   116319\n\n\n\nFiled                        March 20, 2014\n\n\n\nHeld                         Fees of a professional evaluator in a cus","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2671272],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2114615/marriage-of-boone-v-boone/","attorney":"Edward J. Calderaro, Sachs & Hess, P.C., Schererville, IN, Attorney for Appellant.","caseName":"Marriage of Boone v. Boone","caseNameFull":"In Re the Marriage of Raymond BOONE, Appellant, v. Tammy BOONE, Appellee","citation":["924 N.E.2d 649","2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 521","2010 WL 1233479"],"citeCount":16,"cluster_id":2114615,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-03-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"45A03-0906-CV-243","docket_id":180504,"judge":"Friedlander, Bradford, Najam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:57:19.360916Z","date_created":"2015-09-14T13:32:41.153108Z","score":{"bm25":28.448685}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9719945,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:05:10.873361Z","date_created":"2023-08-26T08:10:10.997696Z"},"ordering_key":2,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nNAJAM, Judge,\ndissenting.\nI respectfully dissent. Indiana law does not prohibit trial courts from entering retroactive initial child support orders. As the majority acknowledges, a parent has a common law duty to support his child. That duty begins when a child is born, not when a petition for dissolution of marriage is filed.\nIndiana Code Section 31-16-2-2 codifies the common law duty of ","type":"dissent"},{"author_id":7263,"cites":[2030983,2140203,2244157,2254498,3422604,3423703],"download_url":null,"id":2114615,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:22:59.584746Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:21:19.350427Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1e59926633467c47fcca83ef86f49a725958bdec","snippet":"\n924 N.E.2d 649 (2010)\nIn re the Marriage of Raymond BOONE, Appellant,\nv.\nTammy BOONE, Appellee.\nNo. 45A03-0906-CV-243.\nCourt of Appeals of Indiana.\nMarch 31, 2010.\n*650 Edward J. Calderaro, Sachs & Hess, P.C., Schererville, IN, Attorney for Appellant.\n\nOPINION\nFRIEDLANDER, Judge.\nRaymond Boone (F","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2114615,9719944,9719945],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2546102/in-re-the-marriage-of-skarda/","attorney":"Russell D. Daves, Attorney at Law, Lubbock, TX, for Appellants., John C. Sims, Sims Hubberst & Wilson, Lubbock, TX, for Appellee.","caseName":"In Re the Marriage of Skarda","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Vicki SKARDA and Gregory Wayne Skarda","citation":["345 S.W.3d 665","2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4794","2011 WL 2502946"],"citeCount":22,"cluster_id":2546102,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Amarillo","court_id":"txctapp7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-09-00191-CV","docket_id":2409899,"judge":"Campbell and Hancock and Pirtle","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:20:35.316655Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:39:55.712454Z","score":{"bm25":27.528906}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1376570,1383975,1393754,1404238,1505703,1517372,1525528,1580809,1617186,1665910,1778124,1873052,1880218,1986202,2378933,2416268,2429499,2432488,2441146,3612417],"download_url":null,"id":2546102,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T08:20:35.310889Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:18:37.825685Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"431a7cc60b26b72fb4c907bbec602f6fcfd2cc44","snippet":"\n345 S.W.3d 665 (2011)\nIn the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Vicki SKARDA and Gregory Wayne Skarda.\nNo. 07-09-00191-CV.\nCourt of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo, Panel A.\nJune 23, 2011.\n*667 Russell D. Daves, Attorney at Law, Lubbock, TX, for Appellants.\nJohn C. Sims, Sims Hubberst & Wilson, Lubbock, TX, for Appellee.\nBefore CAMPB","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8311,8333,8370],"panel_names":["James T. Campbell","Mackey K. Hancock","Patrick A. Pirtle"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2546102],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3143191/in-re-marriage-of-sharp/","attorney":"Lawrence S. Starkopf and Rachel C. Heyman, both of Starkopf & Silver-man, of Highland Park, for appellant., Barry A. Rose, of Round Lake Park, for appellee.","caseName":"In re: Marriage of Sharp","caseNameFull":"In Re MARRIAGE OF LAURIE SHARP, Petitioner-Appellee, and STEVEN SHARP, Respondent-Appellant","citation":["369 Ill. App. 3d 271","860 N.E.2d 539","307 Ill. Dec. 885","2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 1181"],"citeCount":54,"cluster_id":3143191,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-12-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2-05-1233 Rel","docket_id":3000783,"judge":"Malley","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:56:14.260601Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T19:07:59.934688Z","score":{"bm25":25.534107}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1861160,1897102,2015615,2031598,2032010,2038998,2065888,2103782,2147040,2227151],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2006/2ndDistrict/December/2051233.pdf","id":3143191,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2006/12/14/in_re_marriage_of_sharp.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:28:20.329849Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T17:58:20.815204Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f3ce2f431404d464db4e79e59d9f8883a1a94e3a","snippet":"\n\n\n  JUSTICE O’MALLEY\n \n\n  delivered the opinion of the court:\n \n\n  Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(b)(5) (155 Ill. 2d R. 304(b)(5)), respondent, Steven Sharp, appeals from the trial court’s order finding him in indirect civil contempt for refusing to comply with a court order directing him to pay temporary child support and ma","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3143191],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2463850/in-re-marriage-of-gallegos-baca-gallegos/","attorney":"No Appearance for Appellee., Litvak Litvak Mehrtins & Epstein, P.C., Wendy J. Smock, Paula J. Smith, for Appellant., No Appearance for Intervenors-Appellees.","caseName":"In Re Marriage of Gallegos & Baca-Gallegos","caseNameFull":"In Re the MARRIAGE OF Charles Anthony GALLEGOS, Appellee, and Jennifer BACA-GALLEGOS, Appellant, and Gloria Gallegos and Leroy Gallegos, Intervenors-Appellees","citation":["251 P.3d 1086","2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 1352","2010 WL 3584283"],"citeCount":17,"cluster_id":2463850,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-09-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"09CA2015","docket_id":2277777,"judge":"Davidson, Plank, Ney","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T11:55:06.818235Z","date_created":"2016-01-11T20:01:48.617267Z","score":{"bm25":24.795341}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6662,"cites":[1210573,2523917,2586533,2599742,2602302,2614040,2617780,2623786,2626512,2633347,2633550,2633673,2635892,2638052,2638257,2638291,2640214,2640504],"download_url":null,"id":2463850,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T19:54:48.243302Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:42:39.306669Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"08718a8e0fb1c10c1fff10293938f731c05e32c4","snippet":"\n251 P.3d 1086 (2010)\nIn re the MARRIAGE OF Charles Anthony GALLEGOS, Appellee, and\nJennifer BACA-GALLEGOS, Appellant, and\nGloria Gallegos and Leroy Gallegos, Intervenors-Appellees.\nNo. 09CA2015.\nColorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.\nSeptember 16, 2010.\n*1087 No Appearance for Appellee.\nLitvak Litvak Mehrtins & Epstein, P","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2463850],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2031133/in-re-marriage-of-rosenbaum-golden/","attorney":"Dean A. Dickie and Rosa M. Tumialan, both of Dykema Gossett PLLC, of Chicago, for appellant., Scott C. Colky and Alison G. Turoff, both of Colky & Kirsh, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee.","caseName":"In Re Marriage of Rosenbaum-Golden","caseNameFull":"In Re MARRIAGE OF JODY ROSENBAUM-GOLDEN, Petitioner-Appellee, and BRUCE P. GOLDEN, Respondent-Appellant","citation":["884 N.E.2d 1272","381 Ill. App. 3d 65","319 Ill. Dec. 27","2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 185"],"citeCount":27,"cluster_id":2031133,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-03-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-07-2940","docket_id":1852245,"judge":"Murphy","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:13:36.711210Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:58:39.520278Z","score":{"bm25":24.356129}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1980414,2018183,2034315,2038282,2039240,2044476,2061676,2065888,2071234,2072588,2096133,2123941,2125432,2128049,2135803,2140807,2190741,2205043,2211159,2227570,2230231,2241259,2252799,3415543],"download_url":null,"id":2031133,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T16:10:28.598430Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:06:32.044908Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8e52e10f64644e397bb442617e6f3ee1a8ed10fb","snippet":"\n884 N.E.2d 1272 (2008)\nIn re MARRIAGE OF Jody ROSENBAUM-GOLDEN, Petitioner-Appellee, and\nv.\nBruce P. GOLDEN, Respondent-Appellant.\nNo. 1-07-2940.\nAppellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.\nMarch 6, 2008.\nRehearing Denied April 1, 2008.\n*1277 Dean A. Dickie, Rosa M. Tumialan, Dykema Gossett PLLC","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2031133],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1283082/in-re-the-marriage-of-melius-v-melius/","attorney":"Edward L. Winer, Jana Auné Deach, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant., Alan C. Eidsness, Melissa J. Nilsson, Henson & Efron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.","caseName":"In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius","caseNameFull":"In Re the Marriage of Matthew Shane MELIUS, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Julie Ann MELIUS, Respondent (A08-0826); In Re the Marriage of Matthew Shane Melius, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Julie Ann Melius, N/K/A Julie Ann Gomer, Respondent (A08-1010)","citation":["765 N.W.2d 411","2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 83"],"citeCount":28,"cluster_id":1283082,"court":"Court of Appeals of Minnesota","court_citation_string":"Minn. Ct. App.","court_id":"minnctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-05-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A08-0826, A08-1010","docket_id":1566605,"judge":"Kalitowski, Lansing, Schellhas","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T02:53:51.589501Z","date_created":"2015-12-08T16:17:07.097017Z","score":{"bm25":23.809353}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7629,"cites":[1254240,1350113,1593491,1648573,1661597,1744594,1753553,1754541,1800398,1807878,1818706,1834011,1835360,1857658,1928680,1937239,1966404,2080417,2105500,2114475,2206612,2209237,2234686],"download_url":null,"id":1283082,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T06:40:40.574284Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T05:20:44.081107Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ba75edb389d347485de67f272029eba31e628778","snippet":"\n765 N.W.2d 411 (2009)\nIn re the Marriage of Matthew Shane MELIUS, petitioner, Appellant,\nv.\nJulie Ann MELIUS, Respondent (A08-0826);\nIn re the Marriage of Matthew Shane Melius, petitioner, Appellant,\nv.\nJulie Ann Melius, n/k/a Julie Ann Gomer, Respondent (A08-1010).\nNos. A08-0826, A08-1010.\nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota.\nMay 19, 2009.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1283082],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3147116/in-re-marriage-of-rosenbaum-golden/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Marriage of Rosenbaum-Golden","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3147116,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-03-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-07-2940 Rel","docket_id":3004708,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:58:51.039729Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T19:27:58.110813Z","score":{"bm25":23.231316}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1592787,1980414,2038282,2044476,2065888,2128049,2135803,2190741,2211159,2230231,3415543],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2008/1stDistrict/March/1072940.pdf","id":3147116,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2008/03/06/in_re_marriage_of_rosenbaum-golden.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:30:55.657453Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T18:26:28.927144Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4814559037555468590ba443ee9a1ba4757f4ab9","snippet":"                                                                             FOURTH DIVISION\n                                                                                 March 6, 2008\n\n\n\n\nNo. 1-07-2940\n\n\n\nIn re MARRIAGE OF                                    )       Appeal from the Circuit\n                                                     )       Court of Cook County,\nJODY ROSENBAUM-GOLDEN,                               )       Domestic Relations Division\n                                  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3147116],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3140398/in-re-marriage-of-murphy/","attorney":"Michael R. Murphy, of Springfield, appellant pro se., Catherine Madonia, of Springfield, appellee pro se.","caseName":"In re Marriage of Murphy","caseNameFull":"In Re MARRIAGE OF CATHERINE MURPHY, N/K/A Catherine M. Madonia, Petitioner-Appellee, and MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Respondent-Appellant","citation":["327 Ill. App. 3d 845","261 Ill. Dec. 684","763 N.E.2d 933","2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 91"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":3140398,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-02-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"4-01-0292 Rel","docket_id":2997990,"judge":"Steigmann, Cook","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:54:27.622838Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T18:41:09.966991Z","score":{"bm25":22.44224}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9819494,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:39:13.245244Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T06:26:29.342899Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":" JUSTICE STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court: Section 508(a)(3.1) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Act) (750 ILCS 5/508(a)(3.1) (West 2000)) provides that a trial court may award attorney fees for “[t]he prosecution of any claim on appeal (if the prosecuting party has substantially prevailed).” ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[110929,112798,118430,765424,770014,1869440,1896842,1981853,1990769,2013292,2022146,2029131,2038013,2044563,2077361,2084804,2095993,2154079,2166549,2182989,2185354,2223010,2229848,2240771,2246224],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2002/4thDistrict/February/Wp/4010292.doc","id":3140398,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"wpd/2002/02/06/in_re_marriage_of_murphy.wpd","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:26:11.421257Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T17:51:32.837156Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0900403980b267834f47e8daf95216ceccae0630","snippet":"\n\n\n\n\nNO. 4-01-0292\n\n\n\nIN THE APPELLATE COURT\n\n\n\nOF ILLINOIS\n\n\n\nFOURTH DISTRICT\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn re:  the Marriage of CATHERINE MURPHY, n/k/a CATHERINE M. MADONIA,\n\nPetitioner-Appellee,\n\nand\n\nMICHAEL R. MURPHY,","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3140398,9819494,9819495],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2598699/in-re-marriage-of-wilson/","attorney":"Mark Kramer argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Kramer & Associates., George W. Kelly argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.","caseName":"In Re Marriage of Wilson","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Marriage of Eric Michael WILSON, Respondent, and Monique Alwien Quade WILSON, Appellant. Monique Alwien WILSON, Petitioner, v. Eric Michael WILSON, Respondent","citation":["55 P.3d 1106","184 Or. App. 212","2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1563"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2598699,"court":"Court of Appeals of Oregon","court_citation_string":"Or. Ct. App.","court_id":"orctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2002-10-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"9908-67658 and 0004-63675; A113524","docket_id":284302,"judge":"Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer and Schuman, Judges","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:17:13.021012Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:10:11.294822Z","score":{"bm25":22.354406}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108608,109684,836016,836463,1087668,1356666,1374750,2515924,2606341,2629802,2638362],"download_url":null,"id":2598699,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:04:26.331231Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T11:17:00.872913Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"451be3076954e12b728b97f5419efa215fbad6e2","snippet":"\n55 P.3d 1106 (2002)\n184 Or.App. 212\nIn the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Eric Michael WILSON, Respondent, and\nMonique Alwien Quade Wilson, Appellant.\nMonique Alwien Wilson, Petitioner,\nv.\nEric Michael Wilson, Respondent.\n9908-67658 and 0004-63675; A113524.\nCourt of Appeals of Oregon.\nArgued and Submitted July 9, 2002.\nDecided October","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2598699],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/884451/marriage-of-harsell/","attorney":"","caseName":"Marriage of Harsell","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":884451,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1997-02-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"96-518","docket_id":639095,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:03:21.514493Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T11:07:13.918274Z","score":{"bm25":21.792086}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[880392,881877],"download_url":"http://searchcourts.mt.gov/getDocument?vid={5BD4EFCB-3848-492D-8232-C8B933E8937A}","id":884451,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/1997/02/06/marriage_of_harsell.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:15:02.522616Z","date_created":"2013-06-05T03:07:27.801316Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"53d2ed204959811faa091855e0916d52d593991f","snippet":"                            No. 96-518\n          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA\n\n\n\n\nIN RE THE MARRIAGE OF\nDEBRA ANN HARSELL,\n          Petitioner and Respondent,\n    and\nDENNIS MIRL HARSELL,\n          Respondent and Appellant.\n\n\n\nAPPEAL FROM:   District Court of the Fourth Judicial District,\n               In and for the County of Missoula,\n               The Honorable Douglas G. Harkin, Judge presiding\n\n\nCOUNSEL OF RECORD:\n          For Appellant:\n               Dennis Mirl Harsel","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[884451],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3137894/in-re-marriage-of-bartlett/","attorney":"Michael D. Canulli, of Oak Brook, for appellant., Joseph E. Birkett, State’s Attorney, of Wheaton (Martin P. Moltz, of State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor’s Office, of counsel), and Robert E. Davison, of DePaepe & Davison, of Springfield, for the People.","caseName":"In re Marriage of Bartlett","caseNameFull":"In Re MARRIAGE OF ROGER E. BARTLETT, Petitioner, and DOROTHY J. BARTLETT, Respondent (Michael D. Canulli, Contemnor-Appellant v. the People of the State of Illinois, Appellee)","citation":["305 Ill. App. 3d 28","238 Ill. Dec. 357","711 N.E.2d 460","1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 338"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3137894,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1999-05-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2—98—0277, 2—98—0278 cons.","docket_id":2995486,"judge":"Colwell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:52:39.486618Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T17:50:38.958790Z","score":{"bm25":21.721079}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2174234],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/1999/2ndDistrict/May/WP/2980277.doc","id":3137894,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"wpd/1999/05/21/in_re_marriage_of_bartlett.wpd","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:24:26.305652Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T17:47:07.821250Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f2cbc33ae6defb388406e478034e093e15ecae7c","snippet":"\n\n\n  JUSTICE COLWELL\n \n\n  delivered the opinion of the court:\n \n\n  Contemnor, Michael D. Canulli, a licensed attorney representing respondent Dorothy J. Bartlett, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Du Page County summarily finding him in direct criminal contempt of court and imposing a $500 fine. We reverse.\n \n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3137894],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3107906/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-vicki-skarda-and-gregory-wayne-skarda/","attorney":"","caseName":"in the Matter of the Marriage of Vicki Skarda and Gregory Wayne Skarda","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3107906,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Amarillo","court_id":"txctapp7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-09-00191-CV","docket_id":2965381,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:02.764658Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:18:59.056730Z","score":{"bm25":21.332644}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1376570,1383975,1393754,1404238,1505703,1517372,1525528,1580809,1617186,1665910,1778124,1873052,1880218,1986202,2378933,2416268,2429499,2432488,2441146,3612417],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=3881&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa07%5cOpinion","id":3107906,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2011/06/23/in_the_matter_of_the_marriage_of_vicki_skarda_and_gregory_wayne_skarda.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:02.832888Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:16:50.812231Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f4079d8e48ec8b16415847d314887ebcde9d6ef9","snippet":"                                 NO. 07-09-00191-CV\n\n                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n                                    AT AMARILLO\n\n                                       PANEL A\n\n                                    JUNE 23, 2011\n\n\n                 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF VICKI SKARDA\n                          AND GREGORY WAYNE SKARDA\n\n\n           FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;\n\n      ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3107906],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3107911/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-vicki-skarda-and-gregory-wayne-skarda/","attorney":"","caseName":"in the Matter of the Marriage of Vicki Skarda and Gregory Wayne Skarda","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3107911,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Amarillo","court_id":"txctapp7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-09-00191-CV","docket_id":2965386,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:02.964527Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:16:52.318911Z","score":{"bm25":21.324083}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1376570,1383975,1393754,1404238,1505703,1517372,1525528,1580809,1617186,1778124,1873052,1986202,2378933,2416268,2429499,2432488,2441146,3612417],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=3811&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa07%5cOpinion","id":3107911,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"docx/2011/06/23/in_the_matter_of_the_marriage_of_vicki_skarda_and_gregory_wayne_skarda.docx","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:02.988397Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:16:52.318855Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6a1f8098c5a85557e3d5a98d3aa6e146b8f59a5f","snippet":"                              NO. 07-09-00191-CV\n                                       \n                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n                                       \n                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n                                       \n                                  AT AMARILLO\n                                       \n                                    PANEL A\n                                       \n----------------------------------------------------","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3107911],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3107919/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-vicki-skarda-and-gregory-wayne-skarda/","attorney":"","caseName":"in the Matter of the Marriage of Vicki Skarda and Gregory Wayne Skarda","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3107919,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Amarillo","court_id":"txctapp7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-06-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"07-09-00191-CV","docket_id":2965394,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:03.974063Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T07:04:11.495826Z","score":{"bm25":21.307861}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1376570,1383975,1393754,1404238,1505703,1517372,1525528,1580809,1617186,1665910,1778124,1873052,1880218,1986202,2378933,2416268,2429499,2432488,2441146,3612417],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=19677&Index=%5c%5cOCA%2dPSQL01%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa07%5cOpinion","id":3107919,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2011/06/23/in_the_matter_of_the_marriage_of_vicki_skarda_and_gregory_wayne_skarda.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T10:54:03.940335Z","date_created":"2015-10-16T06:16:53.850908Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c07544dbdaa7103047a97021032f47c5d89a0def","snippet":"\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nNO. 07-09-00191-CV\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nIN THE COURT OF APPEALS\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nFOR THE\r\nSEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\r\n\r\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3107919],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}