{"count":1902,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xMC44NjQ1ODQmcz0yNDgyNDMyJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjImcD0y&q=CREATION+OF+FREEHOLD+ESTATES&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2167428/talcott-fromkin-v-freehold-tp/","attorney":"","caseName":"Talcott Fromkin v. Freehold Tp.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["891 A.2d 690","383 N.J. Super. 298"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":2167428,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-10-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":1989099,"judge":"Alexander D. Lehrer","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:26:42.606743Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T21:02:48.001509Z","score":{"bm25":32.167908}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109646,120581,1436849,1438700,1468402,1470827,1478934,1500330,1505593,1518204,1525499,1526108,1531215,1533785,1545507,1886966,1893246,1926207,1955173,1962760,1988428,2072518,2087473,2110801,2162138,2181265,2209648,2315307,2318714,2334235,2336193,2342377,2349844,2396444,2397991,2399095,2400268,2400696,3560219,3563265],"download_url":null,"id":2167428,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:52:45.520662Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:30:57.124786Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8a5fe193d3d42e1b2c81b1aab804d363cb938e3a","snippet":"\n891 A.2d 690 (2005)\n383 N.J. Super. 298\nTALCOTT FROMKIN FREEHOLD ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff,\nv.\nFREEHOLD TOWNSHIP, Defendant.\nSuperior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County.\nDecided October 26, 2005.\n*694 Wayne J. Peck, for plaintiff Talcott Fromkin Freehold Associates.\nRobert F. Munoz, Freehold, for defenda","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2167428],"source":"L","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1058317/burdette-v-brush-mountain-estates-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["682 S.E.2d 549","278 Va. 286","2009 Va. LEXIS 91"],"citeCount":18,"cluster_id":1058317,"court":"Supreme Court of Virginia","court_citation_string":"Va.","court_id":"va","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-09-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"082079","docket_id":1574243,"judge":"Cynthia D. Kinser","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:31:54.846406Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T17:47:47.489286Z","score":{"bm25":26.332544}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":5934,"cites":[1059296,1060122,1060261,1202399,1233470,1238786,1246253,1246860,1270104,1280654,1301658,1310047,1321480,1329693,1341613,1348712,1355911,1364192,1418083,1998019,2162598,3988208,3990476,5174582,5436255],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/opnscvwp/1082079.pdf","id":1058317,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2009/09/18/burdette_v._brush_mountain_estates.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T01:50:11.378877Z","date_created":"2013-10-09T18:30:09.827431Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2aa8b65711246da4b4f6c5835f3e020216e30a36","snippet":"\n682 S.E.2d 549 (2009)\n278 Va. 286\nKelly BURDETTE\nv.\nBRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLC.\nRecord No. 082079.\nSupreme Court of Virginia.\nSeptember 18, 2009.\n*550 Frank K. Friedman (Kendall O. Clay; Woods Rogers, on briefs), Roanoke, for appellant.\nEdwin C. Stone (Stone & Kellerman, on brief), Christiansbu","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1058317],"source":"LC","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9356118/michelle-elise-parker-jordan-v-ola-kathleen-parker-independent-of-the/","attorney":"","caseName":"Michelle Elise Parker Jordan v. Ola Kathleen Parker, Independent of the Estate of J. Loyd Parker, III, and Allison Renee Parker","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9356118,"court":"Texas Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tex.","court_id":"tex","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-0205","docket_id":66694653,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T00:55:21.970315Z","date_created":"2023-01-02T00:07:40.118366Z","score":{"bm25":14.917494}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[3916092,3936430,3946839,5287348],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=8554&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5csc%5cOpinion","id":9351590,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/12/30/michelle_elise_parker_jordan_v._ola_kathleen_parker_independent_of_the.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T05:37:18.022133Z","date_created":"2023-01-02T00:07:40.119858Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5d3757f0731dbc2a725276ccbfb521b566ad553a","snippet":"          Supreme Court of Texas\n                             ══════════\n                              No. 21-0205\n                             ══════════\n\n                    Michelle Elise Parker Jordan,\n                               Petitioner,\n\n                                    v.\n\n   Ola Kathleen Parker, Independent Executor of the Estate of\n    J. Loyd Parker, III, Deceased, and Allison Renee Parker,\n                             Respondents\n\n      ═══════════════════════════════════════","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9351590],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3210306/martinell-v-board-of-county-commissioners/","attorney":"For Appellants: Jenny K. Harbine, Katherine K. O’Brien, Earthjustice; Bozeman., For Appellees Aisenbreys, Herdens, Hergenriders, Bakich Lechner, and Thuesens: Raymond G. Kuntz, III, Attorney at Law; Red Lodge., For Board of Carbon County Commissioners: Alex R. Nixon, Carbon County Attorney; Red Lodge; Jacqueline R. Papez, Doney Crowley P.C.; Helena., For Amicus Curiae Land Use & Natural Resources Clinic: Michelle Bryan, Ariel Overstreet-Adkins, Land Use and Natural Resources Clinic; Missoula.","caseName":"Martinell v. Board of County Commissioners","caseNameFull":"JACK and BONNIE MARTINELL, Husband and Wife; THOMAS and HAZEL MCDOWALL, Husband and Wife; THOMAS SHAFFREY; And BARRETT and KARI KAISER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARBON COUNTY, the Governing Body of the County of Carbon, Acting by and Through JOHN GREWELL, JOHN PRINKKI, and DOUG TUCKER; DOUG and DENISE AISENBREY, Husband and Wife; WILLIS and THERESE HERDEN, Husband and Wife; DUANE and DENA HERGENRIDER, Husband and Wife; KAREN HERGENRIDER; RUDOLPH HERGENRIDER; SHELLY BAKICH LECHNER, as Personal Representative of the Milovan Bakich Estate; And STEVEN and MONICA THUESEN, Husband and Wife, Defendants and Appellees","citation":["2016 MT 136","383 Mont. 486","373 P.3d 34","2016 Mont. LEXIS 432"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3210306,"court":"Montana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Mont.","court_id":"mont","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-06-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"DA 15-0469","docket_id":3070886,"judge":"Rice, Cotter, McGrath, McKinnon, Shea","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:38:39.693618Z","date_created":"2016-06-07T22:05:16.516294Z","score":{"bm25":14.118801}},"neutralCite":"2016 MT 136","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9823882,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T04:25:54.512449Z","date_created":"2023-09-01T10:17:03.553635Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nJUSTICE RICE\ndelivered the Opinion of the Court.\n¶1 Appellants appeal from an order entered by the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Carbon County, dismissing their complaint. After the Board of Carbon County Commissioners denied the Appellants’ petition to create a zoning district pursuant to § 76-2-101, MCA, et seq., they filed a declaratory acti","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[876104,889494,890212,890352,1038915,2648684],"download_url":"http://searchcourts.mt.gov/getDocument?vid={50C82C55-0000-C217-90E3-B69CB8E0AE9A}","id":3210200,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/06/07/martinell_v._carbon_co._comm..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T04:15:34.720472Z","date_created":"2016-06-07T22:05:16.523502Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b252e5289e594f7b426f82c61ac777b06b158aee","snippet":"                                                                                       June 7 2016\n\n\n                                        DA 15-0469\n                                                                                    Case Number: DA 15-0469\n\n          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA\n                                        2016 MT 136\n\n\n\nJACK and BONNIE MARTINELL, husband and wife;\nTHOMAS and HAZEL MCDOWALL, husband and wife;\nTHOMAS SHAFFREY; and BARRETT and\nKARI K","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3210200,9823882,9823883],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Direct Appeal","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4593304/the-estate-of-leroy-t-keener/","attorney":"","caseName":"the Estate of Leroy T. Keener","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4593304,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi","court_id":"txctapp13","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-02-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-18-00007-CV","docket_id":14566291,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:12:09.801861Z","date_created":"2019-02-23T04:36:01.137487Z","score":{"bm25":14.072386}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[895059,1666026,1742805,1747154,1789372,2102613,2278264,2349560,2376224,2379110,2382192,2385695,2463076,2466077,2540830,2543761],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=40410&Index=%5c%5coca%2dpsql12%2ecourts%2estate%2etx%2eus%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa13%5cOpinion","id":4370557,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/02/21/the_estate_of_leroy_t._keener_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:12:09.799325Z","date_created":"2019-02-23T04:36:01.143320Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9f16f0965e6dea5fbc1b49b0def141eef08329b9","snippet":"                           NUMBER 13-18-00007-CV\n\n                              COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n                       CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG\n\n\n              THE ESTATE OF LEROY T. KEENER, DECEASED\n\n\n                   On appeal from the County Court at Law\n                       of San Patricio County, Texas.\n\n\n                           MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\nBefore Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria\n         Memorand","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4370557],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1387835/kingmill-valley-public-service-district-v-riverview-estates-mobile-home/","attorney":"Glenn 0. Schumacher, Mannington, for appellant., Michael John Aloi, Manchin, Aloi & Car-rick, Fairmont, for appellees.","caseName":"Kingmill Valley Public Service District v. Riverview Estates Mobile Home Park, Inc.","caseNameFull":"KINGMILL VALLEY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT v. RIVERVIEW ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK, INC., Etc., and R.E.S., Inc.","citation":["386 S.E.2d 483","182 W. Va. 116","1989 W. Va. LEXIS 219"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":1387835,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1989-10-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19018","docket_id":932863,"judge":"Miller","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T03:34:32.498738Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T13:14:03.632368Z","score":{"bm25":13.262922}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":6037,"cites":[97040,97781,109924,111839,111887,111912,1128558,1200835,1227831,1252342,1255407,1325153,1328699,1342669,1356048,1356463,1628888,3381143,4004115,4005542],"download_url":null,"id":1387835,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T07:51:34.076307Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T05:54:46.969917Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"450641578038c5630fd090f47fdc915c1c4799bc","snippet":"\n386 S.E.2d 483 (1989)\nKINGMILL VALLEY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT\nv.\nRIVERVIEW ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK, INC., etc., and R.E.S., Inc.\nNo. 19018.\nSupreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.\nOctober 27, 1989.\n*484 Glenn O. Schumacher, Mannington, for appellant.\nMichael John Aloi, Manchin, Aloi & Carrick, Fairmont, for appelle","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1387835],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7213522/in-re-the-protest-of-barker/","attorney":"Robert E. Barker and R. Gay Barker, appellants pro se., Eric W. Barth, of Hinkle Law Firm LLC, of Wichita, for appellee.","caseName":"In re the Protest of Barker","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Protest of Barker, Robert E. and R. Gay for the Year 2011 in Neosho County, Kansas","citation":["50 Kan. App. 2d 375","327 P.3d 1036","2014 WL 2557071","2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 37"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":7213522,"court":"Court of Appeals of Kansas","court_citation_string":"Kan. Ct. App.","court_id":"kanctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-06-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 110,309","docket_id":64201894,"judge":"Bruns, Pierron, Standridge","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:08:40.883943Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T13:06:00.074762Z","score":{"bm25":13.000262}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7125435,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T18:18:31.746483Z","date_created":"2022-07-24T13:06:00.082663Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBruns, P.:\nRobert E. and R. Gay Barker (Barkers) appeal from the decision of the Court of Tax Appeals (COTA) entering summary judgment against them and in favor of Neosho County (County) on the Barkers’ 2011 tax protest appeal. Robert Barker leased an oil and gas interest on land owned by his parents in 1983, and his parents retained a ¾6⅛ royalty interest from the oil and gas that Robert produced. When Robert’s mother died in ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7125435],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2980000/seibold-v-county-of-los-angeles/","attorney":"Counsel, John F. Krattli, County Counsel, and Albert Ramseyer, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant., David M. Shaby II & Associates and David M. Shaby II for Plaintiff and Respondent., J. Ryan Cogdill for Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as Amicus Curiae, upon the request of the Court of Appeal., Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Paul D. Gifford, Assistant Attorney General, Diane S. Shaw and Brian D. Wesley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Board of Equalization as Amicus Curiae, upon the request of the Court of Appeal.","caseName":"Seibold v. County of Los Angeles","caseNameFull":"GUNTER SEIBOLD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant","citation":["240 Cal. App. 4th 674","192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 575","2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 824"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":2980000,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-09-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B253701","docket_id":2837223,"judge":"Kitching, Edmon, Aldrich","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T16:28:09.574701Z","date_created":"2015-09-22T19:34:37.612683Z","score":{"bm25":12.77837}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1146068,1171417,1203172,2514219,2608831,2633765],"download_url":"http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B253701.PDF","id":2980000,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/09/22/seibold_v._county_of_los_angeles.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T01:36:54.045348Z","date_created":"2015-09-22T19:02:43.487226Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"586c77b6e9806b2aad525850445561cbf4c16cf2","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *678\n   \n  Opinion\n \n\n  KITCHING, J.\n \n\n  INTRODUCTION\n \n\n  In this tax refund case we consider what privately held interests affecting publicly owned property constitute taxable possessory interests under Revenue and Taxation Code\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2980000],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10379926/ball-v-new-york-state-dept-of-health/","attorney":"","caseName":"Ball v. New York State Dept. of Health","caseNameFull":"Justin Ball, against The New York State Department of Health","citation":["2025 NY Slip Op 25090"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":10379926,"court":"New York Supreme Court, Schoharie County","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sup. Ct., Schoharie Cty.","court_id":"nysupctscho","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Index No. 2024-469","docket_id":69901746,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-04-16T20:15:04.880066Z","date_created":"2025-04-16T20:14:55.469032Z","score":{"bm25":12.284397}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[85827,86654,89245,90897,100708,102413,102728,102879,103355,103632,108968,109625,112456,145872,799012,4526980,4699488,5181703,5540560,5711139,5991823,6047457,6341898,6352829,6496180,8408757,8945501,9405083,9416316,9416513,9416892,9417760,9417812,9418540,9418724,9418829,9419925,9420117,9420374,9422279,9422471,9422744,9422839,9422845,9422988,9423364,9423455,9423691,9423752,9424099,9424712,9425379,9427200,9427404,9427657,9430773,9430943,9431675,9431802,9431824,9432751,9433522,9435156,9435860,9741900,9841975,9842193,9888039,10145945],"download_url":"https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2025/2025_25090.htm","id":10846514,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2025/04/14/ball_v._new_york_state_dept._of_health.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T08:29:13.303882Z","date_created":"2025-04-16T20:14:55.477060Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"81a3b60e2a14d3037c537b1994424d7813b85e61","snippet":"\n\nBall v New York State Dept. of Health (2025 NY Slip Op 25090)\n\n\n\n\n[*1]\n\n\nBall v New York State Dept. of Health\n\n\n2025 NY Slip Op 25090\n\n\nDecided on April 14, 2025\n\n\nSupreme Court, Schoharie County\n\n\nMarcelle, J.\n\n\nPublish","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10846514],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8917642/nnn-lake-center-llc-v-township-of-evesham/","attorney":"Joseph G. Buro for plaintiff (Zipp & Tannenbaum, LLC, attorneys)., Karen M. Murray for defendant (Caplan, Valenti & Murray, PC, attorneys).","caseName":"NNN Lake Center, LLC v. Township of Evesham","caseNameFull":"NNN LAKE CENTER, LLC BY ONYX EQUITIES, LLC, RECEIVER v. TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM","citation":["28 N.J. Tax 82"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8917642,"court":"New Jersey Tax Court","court_citation_string":"N.J. Tax Ct.","court_id":"njtaxct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-07-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":66183849,"judge":"Dealmeida","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T22:24:52.297225Z","date_created":"2022-11-27T01:51:54.263920Z","score":{"bm25":11.857549}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8906000,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T19:32:47.223514Z","date_created":"2022-11-27T01:51:54.271768Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nDeALMEIDA, P.J.T.C.\nThis is the court’s opinion with respect to the municipality’s motion to dismiss the Complaint for want of jurisdiction because plaintiff, the court-appointed rent receiver for the subject property, is not a “taxpayer ... aggrieved by the assessed valuation of the taxpayer’s property” within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 and lacks standing to challenge the tax year 2014 assessment on the subject ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8906000],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9435561/sandy-m-and-santana-m-co-guardians-and-co-conservators-of-donald-m-v/","attorney":"","caseName":"Sandy M. and Santana M., Co-Guardians and Co-Conservators of Donald M. v. Donald M.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9435561,"court":"West Virginia Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"W. Va.","court_id":"wva","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-10-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"22-0036","docket_id":67918278,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:15:39.364883Z","date_created":"2023-10-26T19:13:11.779721Z","score":{"bm25":11.812113}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1219174,1239448,1241587,1253203,1277923,1288552,1301918,1322018,1322310,1335821,1339082,1340337,1395177,1397053,3877106,4003755,4006122,4006704,4007345,6811862,8176754,8177765,8178372,8181204,9583480],"download_url":"http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/fall2023/22-0036-wooton-p.pdf","id":9893385,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/10/26/sandy_m._and_santana_m._co-guardians_and_co-conservators_of_donald_m._v..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T23:02:19.814639Z","date_created":"2023-10-26T19:13:11.808690Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"885cd8403ccf281448f61001846486595441faa3","snippet":"             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA\n                                                                                FILED\n                                  September 2023 Term\n                                                                         October 26, 2023\n                                _____________________                        released at 3:00 p.m.\n                                                                         EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK\n          ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9893385],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Tort, Contract, and Real Property","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10796170/the-lake-of-the-woods-of-marshall-county-conservancy-district-v/","attorney":"","caseName":"The Lake of the Woods of Marshall County Conservancy District v. Remonstrators Against Establishment of the Conservancy District","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10796170,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":"SA","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2026-02-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"25A-MI-01889","docket_id":72299316,"judge":"Scheele, Vaidik, Bailey","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-19T17:07:35.058301Z","date_created":"2026-02-19T17:07:34.863835Z","score":{"bm25":11.645417}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7253,"cites":[2237309,2730253,3128741,7076497],"download_url":"https://public.courts.in.gov/Decisions/api/Document/Opinion?Id=9ysG0-5YK8OkXt2rQSCyYE5reobSytZ0itJbfBzQ5tupL6K6egB4IXkgrVx2LvzO0","id":11262841,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2026/02/19/the_lake_of_the_woods_of_marshall_county_conservancy_district_v..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-19T17:08:14.954001Z","date_created":"2026-02-19T17:07:34.950304Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d157877eaff260d6981c45d2271edb0ca461253a","snippet":"                                            IN THE\n\n            Court of Appeals of Indiana\n         In re the Establishment of the Lake of the Woods of Marshall\n                          County Conservancy District,                                 FILED\n                                        Appellants-Petitioners                     Feb 19 2026, 9:00 am\n\n                                                                                       CLERK\n                                               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7253,7282],"panel_names":["L Mark Bailey","Nancy H. Vaidik"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11262841],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2329371/city-of-tulsa-v-state/","attorney":"Gerald M. Bender, Steven G. Cousparis, Ellen R. Hinchee, Jessica E. Rainey, Attorneys for City of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellee., Seott D. Boughton, Naney A. Zerr, Assistants Attorney General, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellant.","caseName":"City of Tulsa v. State","caseNameFull":"CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Defendants/Appellant, and the State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Defendant","citation":["2012 OK 47","278 P.3d 602","2012 WL 1677431"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2329371,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-05-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"109,559","docket_id":2199483,"judge":"Kauger","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:41:38.606195Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T22:35:26.602423Z","score":{"bm25":11.423094}},"neutralCite":"2012 OK 47","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109647,109929,110827,111839,1422914,2509046,2617997,2632055,3801950,3811860,3812516,3815129,3815207,3824591,3830162,3833196,4001964],"download_url":null,"id":2329371,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:56:03.909813Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:07:40.946171Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3e2605b89e12f04da55b4854f4d969e98a0bf71e","snippet":"\n278 P.3d 602 (2012)\n2012 OK 47\nCITY OF TULSA, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee,\nv.\nThe STATE of Oklahoma, Defendants/Appellant, and\nThe State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Defendant.\nNo. 109,559.\nSupreme Court of Oklahoma.\nMay 15, 2012.\nAs Corrected May 29, 2012.\n*6","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2329371],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2793614/williams-place-llc-v-state-of-washington-departmen/","attorney":"","caseName":"Williams Place, LLC v. State of Washington, Department of Transportation","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2793614,"court":"Court of Appeals of Washington","court_citation_string":"Wash. Ct. App.","court_id":"washctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-04-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"31681-5","docket_id":2649309,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:47:48.176481Z","date_created":"2015-04-14T17:20:17.738810Z","score":{"bm25":11.253624}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1120007,1122279,1129382,1130430,1141791,1146321,1153001,1166493,1175847,1177536,1187939,1198302,1201475,1210285,1215012,1275766,1348475,1408172,1411824,1423864,1428316,2500473,2516072,2537216,2581584,2581734,2582613,2609143,2610417,2618107,2624899,2640743,3999392,4000715,4002077,4711138,4713104,4720901,4725032,4727799,4731380,4733240,4735282,4736049],"download_url":"http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/316815.pub.pdf","id":2793614,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/04/14/williams_place_llc_v._state_of_washington_department_of_transportation.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:20:03.329515Z","date_created":"2015-04-14T17:14:37.200544Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"067017cc7b787525d2c80878e146da8dbecdfbfd","snippet":"                                                                           FILED \n\n                                                                        APRIL 14,2015 \n\n                                                                 In the Office of the Clerk of Court \n\n                                                               W A State Court of Appeals, Division III \n\n\n\n\n\n            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON \n\n                               DIVISION THREE \n\n\nWI","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2793614],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2766193/new-jersey-department-of-environmental-protection-/","attorney":"","caseName":"New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Alloway Township and County of Salem and William R. Cobb","caseNameFull":"","citation":["438 N.J. Super. 501","105 A.3d 1145"],"citeCount":162,"cluster_id":2766193,"court":"New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division","court_citation_string":"N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.","court_id":"njsuperctappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-01-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A-3835-12","docket_id":2620443,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:34:09.176578Z","date_created":"2015-01-02T15:10:58.886048Z","score":{"bm25":11.236211}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110101,1443675,1479947,1480699,1517535,1924433,1972135,1994422,2293391,2295826,2298418,2320336,2381317,2555137,2644672],"download_url":"http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a3835-12.pdf","id":2766193,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/01/02/new_jersey_department_of_environmental_protection_v._alloway_township_and.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:00:00.996113Z","date_created":"2015-01-02T15:05:17.673429Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6edbf66aa6111fbb8686d760b0f3963b33585937","snippet":"                 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE\n                APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION\n\n                                   SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY\n                                   APPELLATE DIVISION\n                                   DOCKET NO. A-3835-12T3\n\n\nNEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF\nENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,\n                                      APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION\n      Plaintiff-Respondent,               January 2, 2015\n\nv.                                      APPELLAT","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2766193],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2214669/in-re-petition-for-establishment-of-millpond-conservancy-district/","attorney":"Joshua A. Burkhardt, Beers Mailers Backs & Salin, LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellant.","caseName":"In Re Petition for Establishment of Millpond Conservancy District","caseNameFull":"In Re PETITION FOR the ESTABLISHMENT OF the MILLPOND CONSERVANCY DISTRICT","citation":["891 N.E.2d 54","2008 WL 2684136"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2214669,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-07-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"76A03-0711-CV-536","docket_id":2031728,"judge":"Riley, Baker, Robb","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T09:49:26.860195Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T21:22:58.875984Z","score":{"bm25":11.2319565}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":7272,"cites":[2054432],"download_url":null,"id":2214669,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:16:30.677336Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:37:50.719440Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d51ba8000b001a62e74afd155616e26d63cab3e2","snippet":"\n891 N.E.2d 54 (2008)\nIn re PETITION FOR the ESTABLISHMENT OF the MILLPOND CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.\nNo. 76A03-0711-CV-536.\nCourt of Appeals of Indiana.\nJuly 10, 2008.\nJoshua A. Burkhardt, Beers Mallers Backs & Salin, LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellant.\n\nOPINION\nRILEY, Judge.\n\nSTATEMENT OF THE CASE\nAppellants-Remo","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2214669],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4776382/fraternal-order-of-police-newark-lodge-no-12-v-city-of-newark/","attorney":"","caseName":"Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark (083197)(Essex County & Statewide)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4776382,"court":"Supreme Court of New Jersey","court_citation_string":"N.J.","court_id":"nj","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-08-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A-15-19","docket_id":17457468,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:21:03.950508Z","date_created":"2020-08-19T14:07:42.280816Z","score":{"bm25":11.111652}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1506430,1530113,1544333,1903229,1954360,1961853,1962760,2096130,2163378,2184173,2269366,2339450,2348136,2393483,2400219],"download_url":"http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/attorneys/assets/opinions/supreme/a_15_19.pdf","id":4556729,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/08/19/fraternal_order_of_police_newark_lodge_no._12_v._city_of_newark.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:14:27.987710Z","date_created":"2020-08-19T14:07:42.285238Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"24911b5b69a5ed302a99ef1b227f75234e8845c4","snippet":"                                        SYLLABUS\n\nThis syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the\nClerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the\nCourt. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized.\n\n         Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark\n                                 (A-15-19) (083197)\n\nArgued April 27, 2020 -- Decided August 19, 2020\n\nLa","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4556729],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3974125/robinson-v-stark-cty-bd-of-commrs-2007-ca-00154-9-29-2008/","attorney":"Laura Macgregor Comek, Matthew R. Planey, for Relators-Appellants.\n\nEric J. Williams, for Respondent-Appellee Osnaburg.\n\nKevin R. L'hommedieu, Jason P. Reese, for Resps.-Appellees City, Sliman  Clerk.\n\nDeborah A. Dawson, for Respondent-Appellee Commissioners.","caseName":"Robinson v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2007 Ca 00154 (9-29-2008)","caseNameFull":"Herbert G. Robinson, Relators-Appellants v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners","citation":["2008 Ohio 5010"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3974125,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2008-09-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 2007 CA 00154.","docket_id":3846267,"judge":"WISE, J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T22:15:53.130957Z","date_created":"2016-07-06T06:55:09.401960Z","score":{"bm25":11.050903}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8149,"cites":[3761890,6697189,6756703,6758031,6760916,6765417,6776518,6776749,6780051,6789907,11150185],"download_url":null,"id":3725423,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"/home/mlissner/columbia/opinions/ohio/appellate_court_opinions/documents/7077f4cce3cc56e1.xml","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T00:30:34.795625Z","date_created":"2016-07-06T06:55:09.426472Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1b6c1eb627df4f5c8cb067e0b711b2974104f9a6","snippet":"                                 OPINION *Page 2 \n{¶ 1} Appellants Herbert and Donna Robinson appeal the decision of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, which granted a motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in favor of Appellees City of Canton, Samuel Sliman (agent for the city), the Canton City Council Clerk, the Stark County Board of Commissioners and Osnaburg Township. The relevant facts lead","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8076,8104,8149],"panel_names":["Patricia A. Delaney","William Hoffman","John W. Wise"],"posture":"Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 07 CV 01406.\n\nAffirmed.","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3725423,3725425,3725424],"source":"Z","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10688426/state-of-iowa-v-kevin-dwayne-woods-jr/","attorney":"","caseName":"State of Iowa v. Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10688426,"court":"Supreme Court of Iowa","court_citation_string":"Iowa","court_id":"iowa","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-06-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-0261","docket_id":70649640,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-03T14:08:11.741472Z","date_created":"2025-10-03T14:07:35.389038Z","score":{"bm25":10.93555}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[174721,183647,462359,699597,715823,746501,800581,857072,1209041,1324090,1622983,1690796,1700607,1844081,2117128,2248565,2792884,4249620,4327329,4360209,4362640,4412377,4710255,4813385,5177351,5284081,6315918,6352829,6407367,8467088,9401583,9420240,9422190,9424323,9425474,9425730,9427002,9430976,9434491,9435156,9435256,9435860,9441934,9483574,9485643,9842054,9842126,9888524,9960857,10145945,10498123,10535361,10560858,10598527,10732306,10774480,10794127,10803850,10807153,11051434,11060340,11071998],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/22518/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":11155013,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/27/state_of_iowa_v._kevin_dwayne_woods_jr._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-08T09:53:10.972032Z","date_created":"2025-10-03T14:07:35.394467Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"6c6ec822aa43664331d42feed8d4aaebfbd93c67","snippet":"                         In the Iowa Supreme Court\n\n                                     No. 24–0261\n\n                Submitted February 18, 2025—Filed June 27, 2025\n                          Amended September 4, 2025\n\n                                     State of Iowa,\n\n                                       Appellee,\n\n                                            vs.\n\n                            Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr.,\n\n                                       Appellant.\n\n\n         Appeal from th","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"https://www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/22518/embed/SupremeCourtOpinion","id":11085069,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/06/27/state_of_iowa_v._kevin_dwayne_woods_jr..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-05-14T21:07:12.063175Z","date_created":"2025-06-27T14:06:56.847414Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"903fbeb16cc09d1e8d21d23cc5ab9e8e40dd349e","snippet":"                         In the Iowa Supreme Court\n\n                                     No. 24–0261\n\n                Submitted February 18, 2025—Filed June 27, 2025\n\n                                     State of Iowa,\n\n                                       Appellee,\n\n                                            vs.\n\n                            Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr.,\n\n                                       Appellant.\n\n\n         Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Gregory D. Br","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11155013,11085069],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2482432/dirico-v-town-of-kingston/","attorney":"David H. Abbott (Andrew D. Berman with him) for the plaintiffs., Jason R. Talerman for town of Kingston & another., Howard G. Guggenheim, for Thorndike Development Corporation & others, was present but did not argue.","caseName":"DiRico v. Town of Kingston","caseNameFull":"Jennifer DiRico & Others vs. Town of Kingston & Others","citation":["458 Mass. 83","934 N.E.2d 208"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":2482432,"court":"Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court","court_citation_string":"Mass.","court_id":"mass","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-09-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SJC-10628","docket_id":2349681,"judge":"Ireland","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:06:50.458779Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:33:56.497797Z","score":{"bm25":10.864584}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4737,"cites":[2236955],"download_url":null,"id":2482432,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:06:32.941161Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:51:21.361579Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7e497384778c2b89e09b4bcc537c1884448b1038","snippet":"\n458 Mass. 83 (2010)\nJENNIFER DiRICO & others[1]\nv.\nTOWN OF KINGSTON & others.[2]\nNo. SJC-10628.\nSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.\nMay 4, 2010.\nSeptember 21, 2010.\nPresent: MARSHALL, C.J., IRELAND, SPINA, COWIN, CORDY, BOTSFORD, & GANTS, JJ.\nDavid H. Abbott (Andrew D. Berman with ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2482432],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}