{"count":39749,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yOS4yMjkwNTUmcz00ODAyNjk4JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjkmcD0y&q=CONSTRUCTION+AND+APPLICATION+OF+FOREIGN+STATUTE+Contract+Law&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4662593/in-re-application-to-obtain-discovery-for-use-in-foreign-proceedings/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings","caseNameFull":"","citation":["939 F.3d 710"],"citeCount":18,"cluster_id":4662593,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-5315","docket_id":16220711,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:56:20.102807Z","date_created":"2019-09-19T21:00:22.447289Z","score":{"bm25":46.985073}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[17012,100352,105171,105259,105342,111513,112025,112227,112792,118261,131159,136993,145821,183411,223235,232245,248820,453384,754567,760802,777903,1087670,1991818,2605094,3504874,3986444],"download_url":"http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/19a0246p-06.pdf","id":4439846,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/09/19/in_re_application_to_obtain_discovery_for_use_in_foreign_proceedings.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:56:19.907642Z","date_created":"2019-09-19T21:00:22.452364Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"76c536fcae972198bca0bf991caaf3b43a14e1eb","snippet":" RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION\n Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)\n File Name: 19a0246p.06\n\n UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n\n IN RE: APPLICATION TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN ┐\n FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS. │\n ___________________________________________ │\n ABDUL LATIF JAMEEL TRANSPORTA","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4439846],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4544386/in-re-application-of-jones/","attorney":"Bieser, Greer & Landis, L.L.P., and David C. Greer, Dayton, for applicant., Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Brian G. Dershaw, and Justin D. Flamm, Cincinnati, for the Cincinnati Bar Association., Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Brian S. Sullivan, Mark A. Vander Laan, Cincinnati, and Heidi W. Dorn, Columbus, in support of applicant for amicus curiae Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C., and Matthew C. Blickensderfer, Cincinnati, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C., Thompson Hine, L.L.P., Thomas L. Feher, Frank R. DeSantis, and Karen E. Rubin, Cleveland, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Thompson Hine, L.L.P., Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., and Randolph C. Wiseman, Columbus, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Squire Patton Boggs, L.L.P., and Pierre H. Bergeron, Cincinnati, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Squire Patton Boggs, L.L.P., Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Robert W. Trafford, and Charles C. Warner, Columbus, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Keating, Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., and James R. Matthews, Cincinnati, in support of none of the parties for amicus curiae Keating, Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L.","caseName":"In RE Application of JONES.","caseNameFull":"In Re Application of Jones (Slip Opinion)","citation":["2018 Ohio 4182","123 N.E.3d 877","156 Ohio St. 3d 1"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4544386,"court":"Ohio Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ohio","court_id":"ohio","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-10-17","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2018-0496","docket_id":8039858,"judge":"O'Donnell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:14:37.877161Z","date_created":"2018-10-17T13:26:59.011738Z","score":{"bm25":44.844032}},"neutralCite":"2018 Ohio 4182","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92392,94631,98542,105285,105497,109269,110750,118144,3781066,3784864],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2018/2018-Ohio-4182.pdf","id":4321639,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/10/17/in_re_application_of_jones_slip_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:31:41.849755Z","date_created":"2018-10-17T13:26:59.029949Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a37eec3190ebb4edfad76d66f692b5c5d110acb7","snippet":"\n\n\n O'Donnell, J.\n \n\n\n *878\n \n\n {¶ 1}\n \n Alice Auclair Jones is licensed to practice law in Kentucky and applied for admission without examination to the practice of law in Ohio. The Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness found that after Jones filed her application, she e","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4321639],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Attorneys—Character and fitness—Prof.Cond.R. 5.5—A lawyer admitted to practice law in another jurisdiction who provides legal services exclusively in that jurisdiction from Ohio pending resolution of an application for admission to Ohio bar without examination and who otherwise complies with Prof.Cond.R. 5.5(c) is providing legal services on temporary basis and therefore has not engaged in unauthorized practice of law—Application for admission without examination approved."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2827288/ledroit-law-v-kim/","attorney":"Douglas A. Turner, P.C., David J. Marcus, Golden, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Snell & Wilmer LLP., James D. Kilroy, Jessica E. Yates, Neal McConomy, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellants.","caseName":"Ledroit Law v. Kim","caseNameFull":"LEDROIT LAW, a Canadian Law Firm, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene KIM, an Individual, and Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., an Arizona Limited Liability Partnership, Defendants-Appellants","citation":["2015 COA 114","360 P.3d 247","2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 1214","2015 WL 4760328"],"citeCount":8,"cluster_id":2827288,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-08-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals 14CA1161","docket_id":2684199,"judge":"Loeb, Sternberg, Ney","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T15:02:21.059393Z","date_created":"2015-08-14T06:08:15.288133Z","score":{"bm25":39.754597}},"neutralCite":"2015 COA 114","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[28981,118279,468735,531896,787759,2607069],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinion.cfm?opinionid=9893&courtid=1","id":2827288,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/08/13/ledroit_law_v._kim.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:44:28.542662Z","date_created":"2015-08-14T05:12:31.215694Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3c47eca8d984792bbabb89593a615967b72f5d91","snippet":"\n\n\n Opinion by\n \n\n CHIEF JUDGE LOEB\n \n\n ¶ 1 Defendants, Eugene Kim and Snell & Wilmer LLP., appeal the district court's order recognizing a money judgment entered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against them and in favor of plaintiff, Ledroit Law. We reverse the order recognizing the Ontario judgment.\n \n\n I. Background\n \n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2827288],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7323066/figueroa-v-ministry-for-foreign-affairs-of-sweden/","attorney":"Zein E. Obagi, Obagi Law Group, P.C., Beverly Hills, CA, Stanley Arnold Chinitz, Law Office of Stanley Chinitz, New York, NY, for Plaintiff., Howard Sokol, Katherine Healy Marques, Frederick Donald Braid, Edward C. Frischling, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Figueroa v. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Sweden","caseNameFull":"Carlos FIGUEROA v. The MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF SWEDEN","citation":["222 F. Supp. 3d 304","2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163460","2016 WL 6952300"],"citeCount":19,"cluster_id":7323066,"court":"District Court, S.D. New York","court_citation_string":"S.D.N.Y.","court_id":"nysd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-11-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-cv-00682 (JGK)","docket_id":64311549,"judge":"Koeltl","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163460","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:37:27.430558Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:58:15.803865Z","score":{"bm25":37.588474}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[705,112748,112834,181622,186976,470965,581543,605536,767339,785306,1384234,1953382,2416723,2562174,2572664,2781757,3158927,6941213,7227007,8408220],"download_url":null,"id":7240977,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T22:11:38.444640Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:58:15.810732Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\nJOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:\nThe plaintiff, Carlos Figueroa, has brought claims for personal injury, retalia*307tion, and discrimination (due to his national origin, race, and disability) arising from his employment as an “Office Clerk/Chauffeur” with The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden (the “Ministry”), and th","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7240977],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10125949/mills-law-group-llp-v-republic-of-iraq/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mills Law Group LLP v. Republic of Iraq","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10125949,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-09-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-3323","docket_id":69204363,"judge":"Judge Royce C. Lamberth","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.494720Z","date_created":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.409965Z","score":{"bm25":37.047924}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1844,"cites":[90766,112748,186090,187411,483527,675080,1494338,2444903,2477122,2579974,2661578,2763881,4148760],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv3323-17","id":10592550,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/09/27/mills_law_group_llp_v._republic_of_iraq.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T19:08:16.306195Z","date_created":"2024-09-27T20:01:18.439778Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"383a80e0b17a3b2c01f8cbd4495b576bd4b77e00","snippet":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nMILLS LAW GROUP LLP,\nPlaintiff,\n\nv. Case No. 1:22-CV-3323-RCL\n\nREPUBLIC OF IRAQ\n\nand\n\nMINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE\nREPUBLIC OF IRAQ,\n\nDefendants.\n\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\n\nMills Law Group (“MLG”) has represented the Republic of Iraq in its longstanding\nlitigation against Wye Oak Technologies, Inc. before this Court. See Wye Oak Tech., Inc. v.\nRepublic of Iraq, No. 1:10-cv-1182-RCL, 2019 WL 4044046 (D.D.C. Aug. 27, 2019) (“Wye Oak\nP’). In this a","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10592550],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4766371/in-re-application-and-petition-of-hanwei-guo/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4766371,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-07-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-781","docket_id":17330503,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:18:29.213483Z","date_created":"2020-07-08T15:00:13.280892Z","score":{"bm25":35.713875}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[17012,67733,174079,624666,628636,2496619,2648866,4023494,4439846,4520778,6980496,7252407,8410812,8413524,9434655,9500779],"download_url":"http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/44ebcfed-c0c2-4a1e-a337-9f04abaed585/3/doc/19-781_opn.pdf","id":4546718,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/07/08/in_re_application_and_petition_of_hanwei_guo.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T04:13:44.478648Z","date_created":"2020-07-08T15:00:13.288027Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8e766bd46d908d75b2e52010de591206e255ee0c","snippet":"19-781\nIn re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo\n\n\n UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT\n\n August Term 2019\n\n (Argued: February 28, 2020 Decided: July 8, 2020)\n\n No. 19-781\n\n ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n In Re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo for an Order to take","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4546718],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4766633/in-re-application-and-petition-of-hanwei-guo/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4766633,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-07-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-781","docket_id":17334114,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:18:32.856968Z","date_created":"2020-07-09T14:00:16.224433Z","score":{"bm25":35.244396}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[17012,67733,174079,624666,628636,2496619,2648866,4023494,4439846,4520778,6980496,7252407,8410812,8413524,9434655,9500779],"download_url":"http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c8c02dbd-2ae3-47ee-8761-0563e6c589c0/1/doc/19-781_amd_opn.pdf","id":4546980,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/07/09/in_re_application_and_petition_of_hanwei_guo.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T04:19:33.197540Z","date_created":"2020-07-09T14:00:16.228577Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d46b3344905d0a511da1f0b89ac9fcf835746447","snippet":"19-781\nIn re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo\n\n\n UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT\n\n August Term 2019\n\n (Argued: February 28, 2020 Decided: July 8, 2020\n Amended: July 9, 2020)\n\n No. 19-781\n\n ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––\n In Re: Application and Pe","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4546980],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4848301/application-of-the-hyde-amendment-to-federal-student-aid-programs/","attorney":"","caseName":"Application of the Hyde Amendment to Federal Student-Aid Programs","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4848301,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2021-01-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":29115135,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:09.541237Z","date_created":"2021-01-18T08:00:54.873741Z","score":{"bm25":33.66892}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[86353,102037,109907,110334,354019,361308,364045,365558,394850,593338,8921233,8986460,9425157,9428058,9435285,9435348],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1355946/download","id":4652080,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2021/01/16/application_of_the_hyde_amendment_to_federal_student-aid_programs.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T00:11:27.505648Z","date_created":"2021-01-18T08:00:54.876592Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f3f3e73a154ffa6fd859d18ba6e611db82ee78e","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n Application of the Hyde Amendment\n to Federal Student-Aid Programs\n\nThe Hyde Amendment in the Department of Education’s annual appropriations legislation\n for fiscal years 2020 and 2021 applies to the funding in that legislation for Federal Pell\n Grants, Federal Supplemental Opportunity Grants, Scholarships for Veteran’s Depend-\n ents, and Federal Work-Study Programs. But additional sources of federal funding for\n these programs provided in","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4652080],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Hyde Amendment in the Department of Education's annual appropriations legislation for fiscal years 2020 and 2021 applies to the funding in that legislation for Federal Pell Grants, Federal Supplemental Opportunity Grants, Scholarships for Veteran's Dependents, and Federal Work-Study Programs. But additional sources of federal funding for these programs provided in other statutes are not subject to the Hyde Amendment. Federal student-aid funding subject to the Hyde Amendment remains so after it is paid to higher-education institutions for disbursement. These institutions must therefore comply with the Hyde Amendment in expending such funds."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10352167/scps-llc-v-kind-law/","attorney":"","caseName":"Scps, LLC v. Kind Law","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10352167,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2024-2768","docket_id":69715667,"judge":"Judge Paul L. Friedman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-03-07T18:07:32.888246Z","date_created":"2025-03-07T18:01:25.060352Z","score":{"bm25":33.60925}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1124,"cites":[24802,102730,102976,109703,118288,185065,186982,265408,275646,458984,470954,500012,508409,535573,775453,801440,801891,2115106,2349433,2418875,2562998,2641854,2649683,2660214,2660481,2661923,2662817,2678518,2744408,2746653,2810153,2810791,3183082,3190688,4150292,4157104,4159334,4191475,4203864,4299430,4542780,6349964,6929929,7210719,7245614,7248134,7248770,7249427,7250054,7863321,8457721,8681591,9426170,9428777,9432577,9434456,9435153,9435380,9435422,9439802,9441481,9747673,9798771,9836286,9842773,9910368,9959868,10145839],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2024cv2768-51","id":10818755,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/07/scps_llc_v._kind_law.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T00:21:41.062764Z","date_created":"2025-03-07T18:01:25.087296Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4599d3157f674da94f7267bbbcb7fa6d8bc6edda","snippet":" UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n____________________________________\n )\n )\nSCPS, LLC and SSPS, LLC, )\n )\n Plaintiffs, )\n )\n v. ) Civil Action No. 24-2768 (PLF)\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10818755],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7334801/innovation-law-lab-v-nielsen/","attorney":"*1113Jennifer C. Newell, Christine Patricia Sun, Cody H. Wofsy, Julie Michelle Veroff, Katrina Leigh Eiland, Sean Connor Riordan, ACLU Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, Blaine Meredith Bookey, Eunice Chaeyoung Lee, Karen Barbara Musalo, Kathryn Jane Jastram, The Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, UC Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA, Anand Balakrishnan, Pro Hac Vice, Daniel Antonio Galindo, Judy Rabinovitz, Pro Hac Vice, Lee Gelernt, Pro Hac Vice, Michael King Thomas Tan, Pro Hac Vice, Omar C. Jadwat, Pro Hac Vice, Steven M. Watt, ACLU Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project, New York, NY, Gracie Harper Willis, Pro Hac Vice, Southern Poverty Law Center, Decatur, GA, Mary Catherine Bauer, Southern Poverty Law Center, Charlottesville, VA, Melissa Crow, Pro Hac Vice, Southern Poverty Law Center, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.","caseName":"Innovation Law Lab v. Nielsen","caseNameFull":"INNOVATION LAW LAB v. Kirstjen NIELSEN","citation":["366 F. Supp. 3d 1110"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":7334801,"court":"District Court, N.D. California","court_citation_string":"N.D. Cal.","court_id":"cand","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-04-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 19-cv-00807-RS","docket_id":64323287,"judge":"Seeborg","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:40:28.726841Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T06:15:41.232475Z","score":{"bm25":31.91982}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1744,108736,110527,111789,118167,118264,118483,145791,145928,805485,1087737,1363049,1450536,2959748,3158356,4232139,4248498,4288402,4348693,6074014,6074221,6074712,8411857,8983988,9016208],"download_url":null,"id":7252721,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:54:29.035729Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T06:15:41.242662Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nRICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge\nI. INTRODUCTION\n*1114In January of this year, the Department of Homeland Security (\"DHS\") began implementing a new policy regarding non-Mexican asylum seekers arriving in the United States from Mexico.1 Denominated the \"Migrant Protection Protocols\" (","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7252721],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2827995/in-re-rapid-settlements-ltds-application-for-approval-of-transfer/","attorney":"George E. Telquist and Nicholas A. Ashjian (of Telquist Ziohro McMillen Clare PLLC) (E. John Gorman of The Feldman Law Firm LLP, of counsel), for appellants., MedoraA. Marisseau, Jacque E. St. Romain, and J. Derek Little (of Karr Tuttle Campbell), for respondents.","caseName":"In re Rapid Settlements, LTD's Application for Approval of Transfer","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Application by Rapid Settlements, Ltd., for Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights","citation":["189 Wash. App. 584","359 P.3d 823"],"citeCount":29,"cluster_id":2827995,"court":"Court of Appeals of Washington","court_citation_string":"Wash. Ct. App.","court_id":"washctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-08-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"31435-9-III","docket_id":2684924,"judge":"Siddoway, Brown, Korsmo","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-20T15:40:39.488776Z","date_created":"2015-08-18T16:59:25.258505Z","score":{"bm25":31.397133}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92654,97437,98369,104200,104385,104786,106843,118161,1148716,1162614,1171223,1190491,1266610,1301838,1307517,1359186,1441547,2136587,2387796,2570295,2603499,2632379,2632823,3992912],"download_url":"http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/314359.pub.pdf","id":2827995,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/08/18/in_re_rapid_settlements_ltds_application_for_approval_of_transfer.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:45:00.955960Z","date_created":"2015-08-18T16:25:53.564180Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a47eda21fd8b5b713ee0c9993f62ddf4db5ba941","snippet":"\n\n\n [As amended by order of the Court of Appeals October 29, 2015.]\n \n\n ¶1\n \n\n Siddoway, C.J.\n \n\n Symetra Life Insurance Company and Symetra Assigned Benefit Services Company (collectively Symetra) obtained an antisuit temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining RSL-3B-IL Ltd. (3B) from collaterally attacking Symetra’s final Washington order against 3B i","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2827995],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4329231/in-the-matter-of-the-application-for-licensure-of-nadeen-griepentrog/","attorney":"Geoffrey P. Jarpe, Jesse D. Mondry, Kristian C.S. Weir, Maslon LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for relator)., Cody M. Zustiak, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent Department of Health)., Anthony B. Sanders, Meagan A. Forbes, Lee U. McGrath, Institute for Justice, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for amicus curiae Institute for Justice).","caseName":"In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Application for Licensure of Nadeen Griepentrog.","citation":["888 N.W.2d 478","2016 Minn. App. LEXIS 87"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4329231,"court":"Court of Appeals of Minnesota","court_citation_string":"Minn. Ct. App.","court_id":"minnctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-12-12","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A16-90","docket_id":4551490,"judge":"Jesson, Stauber, Reyes","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:14:07.467662Z","date_created":"2016-12-12T18:07:09.000629Z","score":{"bm25":31.216133}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[92392,102402,102662,103921,108085,112081,112301,117834,118276,375630,536084,707660,1249390,1291427,1292247,1606344,1630216,1647925,1664461,1713194,1728402,1748714,1830182,1958126,1960468,1982634,2165520,2172753,2228322,2280827,2801433,3509317,3745239],"download_url":"http://mn.gov/law-library-stat/archive/ctappub/2016/opa160090-121216.pdf","id":4106492,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/12/12/in_the_matter_of_the_application_for_licensure_of_nadeen_griepentrog..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:02:43.286061Z","date_created":"2016-12-12T18:07:09.007728Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"91be302d256c6b9e806fe7ac724f92d64aa508de","snippet":"\n\n\n OPINION\n \n\n JESSON, Judge\n \n\n Relator challenges an order denying her application for a license as a body-art technician, arguing that the supervision requirement in the body-art licensing statute, Minnesota Statutes section 146B.03, which requires supervision by a licensed Minnesota body-art technician, is unconstitutional. Because the statutory requirement does n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4106492],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2807435/jax-utilities-management-inc-v-hancock-bank-a-foreign-corp/","attorney":"Diane G. Cassaro, Jacksonville; David S. Wainer, III of Ford, Miller & Wainer, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant., Matthew J. Conigliaro of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tampa, and Jason A. Perkins of Carlton ■ Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Orlando, for Hancock Bank, a Foreign Corporation; Lawrence J. Hamilton, II and Barbara Cocciola of Holland & Knight, LLP, Jacksonville, for Plummer Creek, LLC, a Florida Corporation.","caseName":"Jax Utilities Management, Inc. v. Hancock Bank, A Foreign Corp.","caseNameFull":"JAX UTILITIES MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellant, v. HANCOCK BANK, a Foreign Corporation, and Plummer Creek, LLC, a Florida Corporation, Appellees","citation":["164 So. 3d 1266"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2807435,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-06-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14-0664","docket_id":2663945,"judge":"Lewis, Marstiller, Osterhaus","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:53:20.350537Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T15:21:31.587991Z","score":{"bm25":30.848557}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1095600,1102682,1585136,1662356,1848437,1865205,4802630,4804193,4860216,4867837],"download_url":"https://edca.1dca.org/DCADocs/2014/0664/140664_DC05_06112015_095817_i.pdf","id":2807435,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2015/06/10/jax_utilities_management_inc._v._hancock_bank_a_foreign_corp..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:30:08.102015Z","date_created":"2015-06-11T15:04:42.164695Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"27ddb0964fc4e90368ff7cd1b915af78d4f8ab95","snippet":"\n\n\n ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION\n \n\n LEWIS, C.J.\n \n\n We deny Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing or Clarification, but we withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute this opinion in its place.\n \n\n Appellant, Jax Utilities Management, Inc. (“Jax”), challenges the trial court’s entry of a final summary judgment in favor of A","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2807435],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9481949/sunstone-realty-v-bodell-construction/","attorney":"","caseName":"Sunstone Realty v. Bodell Construction","caseNameFull":"","citation":["545 P.3d 260","2024 UT 9"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":9481949,"court":"Utah Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Utah","court_id":"utah","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-03-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 20230285","docket_id":68318064,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:19:59.343834Z","date_created":"2024-03-07T16:20:17.972455Z","score":{"bm25":30.591326}},"neutralCite":"2024 UT 9","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[730876,1156041,1404361,2523054,2602308,4306821,4395477,4452681,4967174,9388455,9431967,9433554,9526615,9677402,9773990],"download_url":"http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/supopin/Sunstone Realty v. Bodell Construction20240307.pdf","id":9948562,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/03/07/sunstone_realty_v._bodell_construction.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T10:35:58.562717Z","date_created":"2024-03-07T16:20:17.999281Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e06b411fb53c927101dd28f8fbe68c270cd80961","snippet":" This opinion is subject to revision before final\n publication in the Pacific Reporter\n 2024 UT 9\n\n\n IN THE\n\n SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH\n\n SUNSTONE REALTY PARTNERS X LLC,\n Appellant,\n v.\n BODELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,\n Appellee.\n\n No. 20230285\n ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9948562],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10356705/national-rifle-association-v-commissioner-florida-dept-of-law/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Rifle Association v. Commissioner, Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10356705,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"11th Cir.","court_id":"ca11","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2024-10-22","dateFiled":"2025-03-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"21-12314","docket_id":60053295,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-03-14T20:01:07.282799Z","date_created":"2025-03-14T20:01:07.154159Z","score":{"bm25":30.435205}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202112314.enb.op.pdf","id":10823293,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/14/national_rifle_association_v._commissioner_florida_dept._of_law.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-03T20:17:30.918632Z","date_created":"2025-03-14T20:01:07.156638Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8aae4ce8178fc96771091629a70c8ee2cc5f3ef3","snippet":"USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169\n\n\n\n\n [PUBLISH]\n In the\n United States Court of Appeals\n For the Eleventh Circuit\n\n ____________________\n\n No. 21-12314\n ____________________\n\n NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10823293],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"ENB","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2272087/stevenson-v-aquila-foreign-qualifications-corp/","attorney":"Ronald D. Marney, David A. Schatz and Derek T. Teeter, Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Herbert W. McIntosh, Steven L. Hob-son and Gary L. Leftridge, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.","caseName":"Stevenson v. Aquila Foreign Qualifications Corp.","caseNameFull":"Dawn STEVENSON, Respondent, v. AQUILA FOREIGN QUALIFICATIONS CORP., Appellant","citation":["326 S.W.3d 920","2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1758","2010 WL 5151244"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":2272087,"court":"Missouri Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Mo. Ct. App.","court_id":"moctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-12-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"WD 72214","docket_id":2159122,"judge":"Ahuja, Howard, Martin","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T10:16:14.374740Z","date_created":"2015-07-30T21:51:06.722167Z","score":{"bm25":30.063848}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1355827,1382479,1491458,1504404,1659319,1684319,1722654,1750224,1767590,1778490,2333378,2356172,2436545,2452045],"download_url":null,"id":2272087,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T18:38:26.781871Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:56:51.291527Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"91335243ebe3dcb32c604edfa04b2ac09386bbcd","snippet":"\n326 S.W.3d 920 (2010)\nDawn STEVENSON, Respondent,\nv.\nAQUILA FOREIGN QUALIFICATIONS CORP., Appellant.\nNo. WD 72214.\nMissouri Court of Appeals, Western District.\nDecember 21, 2010.\n*922 Ronald D. Marney, David A. Schatz and Derek T. Teeter, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.\nHerbert W. McIntosh, Steven L. Hobson and Gary L. Lef","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7684,7718,7723],"panel_names":["Alok Ahuja","Victor C. Howard","Cynthia L. Martin"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2272087],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/858621/cms-contract-management-services-v-united-states/","attorney":"Colm P. Nelson, Foster Pepper PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for CMS Contract Management Services and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton., Neil H. O’Donnell, with whom were Dennis J. Callahan and Jeffrey M. Chiow, Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, San Francisco, California, for Assisted Housing Services Corp., North Tampa Housing Development Corp., and California Affordable Housing Initiatives, Inc., Richard J. Vaeura, with whom were Tina D. Reynolds and K. Alyse Latour, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C., for Southwest Housing Compliance Corporation., Robert K. Tompkins, with whom was Elizabeth M. Gill, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C., for Navigate Affordable Housing Partners.1, Michael R. Golden, with whom were Michael A. Hordell, Heather Kilgore Weiner, and Samuel Jack, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Washington, D.C., for National Housing Compliance., Gabe E. Kennon, with whom was Andrew Mohr, Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington D.C., for Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency., Douglas K. Mickle, with whom were Joseph A Pixley, Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Kirk Manhardt, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C.; Dorie Finner-man, Assistant General Counsel for Assisted Housing and Civil Rights, Kathie Soroka, Special Assistant to the General Counsel, and Kasey M. Podzius, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C., for Defendant., Kevin P. Mullen, with whom was Charles L. Capito III, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae National Council of State Housing Authorities.","caseName":"Cms Contract Management Services v. United States","caseNameFull":"CMS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; The Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton; National Housing Compliance; Assisted Housing Services Corp.; North Tampa Housing Development Corp.; California Affordable Housing Initiatives, Inc.; Navigate Affordable Housing Partners; Southwest Housing Compliance Corp.; And Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Plaintiffs, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant","citation":["110 Fed. Cl. 537","2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 307","2013 WL 1727186"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":858621,"court":"United States Court of Federal Claims","court_citation_string":"Fed. Cl.","court_id":"uscfc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-04-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"12-852C, 12-853C, 12-862C, 12-864C, & 12-869C","docket_id":300268,"judge":"Wheeler","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:57:04.703004Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:17:31.663208Z","score":{"bm25":29.947126}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[776,109009,205533,208807,209668,580039,658825,721426,769216,771944,785931,789965,1228440],"download_url":"http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/WHEELER.CMS_.1041913.pdf","id":858621,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2013/04/19/cms_contract_management_services_v._united_states.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:47:17.155373Z","date_created":"2013-04-22T17:58:19.887516Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bba804d890a3877625519a33809931cb1deac480","snippet":"\n\n\n Pre-award Bid Protests; Project-based HUD Section 8 Housing Assistance Program; Procurement Contracts Contrasted With Cooperative Agreements; 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6308; Applicability of Competition in Contracting Act and Federal Acquisition Regulation; Analysis of HUD Housing Assistance Statutes and Regulations.\n \n\n\n OPINION AND ORDER\n \n\n\n WHEELER, Judge.\n