{"count":256140,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yNS44ODE3MjUmcz0xOTIyMzY1JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDktMjYmcD0y&q=COMPLETION+AND+EFFECTIVENESS+OF+APPOINTMENT&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4537805/in-re-the-trust-fbo-samuel-frances-dupont-under-trust-agreement-dated/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN RE: THE TRUST FBO SAMUEL FRANCES duPONT UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 4, 1936 (POWER OF APPOINTMENT TRUST)","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4537805,"court":"Court of Chancery of Delaware","court_citation_string":"Del. Ch.","court_id":"delch","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"C.A. No. 12904-MG","docket_id":7928862,"judge":"Griffin M.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:12:50.650990Z","date_created":"2018-09-25T16:08:10.105027Z","score":{"bm25":44.786423}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105728,118001,1437388,1445404,1526754,1545523,1559994,1874847,1897295,1909212,1925932,1929987,1956917,1977097,2051755,2156092,2198154,2273949,2293887,2299215,2323193,2338288,2346108,2383138,2570630,3484528],"download_url":"http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=278840","id":4315058,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/09/25/in_re_the_trust_fbo_samuel_frances_dupont_under_trust_agreement_dated.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:27:01.662783Z","date_created":"2018-09-25T16:08:10.113597Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5b217f5807bd3e2807fe3f49a020b3eff70a7648","snippet":"    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE\n\nIN RE: THE TRUST FBO SAMUEL                    )     C.A. No. 12904-MG\nFRANCES duPONT UNDER TRUST                     )\nAGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 4, 1936                 )\n(POWER OF APPOINTMENT TRUST)                   )\n                                               )\n\n\n\n\n                            MASTER’S REPORT\n\n                       Date Submitted: July 31, 2018\n                       Draft Report:\n                       Final Report: Se","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4315058],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4658493/in-re-appointment-of-special-prosecutor/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Appointment of Special Prosecutor","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 IL 122949"],"citeCount":57,"cluster_id":4658493,"court":"Illinois Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ill.","court_id":"ill","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-09-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"122949","docket_id":16151341,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:48:17.502165Z","date_created":"2019-09-04T15:04:12.088603Z","score":{"bm25":40.38926}},"neutralCite":"2019 IL 122949","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[78522,107489,108898,110060,110217,110227,112320,184533,186371,206187,350700,358838,503854,506094,567236,1057154,1987695,2012829,2029533,2033226,2037735,2059078,2069050,2108870,2119520,2141828,2144023,2173160,2198743,2199362,2208718,2224522,2233470,2239826,3135764,3192668,4163216,4240452],"download_url":"http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/SupremeCourt/2019/122949.pdf","id":4435746,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/09/04/in_re_appointment_of_special_prosecutor.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:50:52.376286Z","date_created":"2019-09-04T15:04:12.095718Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"1309d277f2dd5421f9bf9fac9625a71038a3b543","snippet":"                                                                               Digitally signed by\n                                                                               Reporter of\n                                                                               Decisions\n                                                                               Reason: I attest to\n                           Illinois Official Reports                           the accuracy and\n                          ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4435746],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6357019/in-re-the-appointment-of-a-kinship-guardian/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Justino Garcia for T.H., Jeffrey Blinkoff for Graham Windham Services to Families and Children., Angella Hull, Attorney for the Children., Daniel Moskowitz for C.C., Lance Dandridge for L.N.G.","caseName":"In re the Appointment of a Kinship Guardian","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Appointment of a Kinship Guardian (Subsidized Kinship Guardian Program) for N.L.G. and Another, Infants","citation":["56 Misc. 3d 663","57 N.Y.S.3d 634"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6357019,"court":"New York City Family Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y.C. Fam. Ct.","court_id":"nycfamct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":63007275,"judge":"Hunt","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:17:06.805458Z","date_created":"2022-02-16T02:14:40.877562Z","score":{"bm25":37.4899}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2531090],"download_url":null,"id":6225735,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T19:01:19.431729Z","date_created":"2022-02-16T02:14:40.897585Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nJohn M. Hunt, J.\nThe plight of this broken family is painful, its fate apparently final. The facts of this case are uniquely disturbing in this court’s experience, a sad by-product of a dysfunctional legal process and a mechanical foster care system. Ideally, Family Court and foster care exist to protect children and reunite them with their parents. Here, neither goal was accomplished. I","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6225735],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7306590/crane-v-gore-design-completion-ltd/","attorney":"Michael V. Galo, Jr., Galo Law Firm, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff., Cora C. McGowan, Donna K. McElroy, Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, San Antonio, TX, for Defendants.","caseName":"Crane v. Gore Design Completion, Ltd.","caseNameFull":"Stacy CRANE v. GORE DESIGN COMPLETION, LTD. and Melissa Trevino","citation":["21 F. Supp. 3d 769","2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72780","2014 WL 2153915"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":7306590,"court":"District Court, W.D. Texas","court_citation_string":"W.D. Tex.","court_id":"txwd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-03-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil No. 5:12-CV-925-OLG","docket_id":64295067,"judge":"Garcia","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72780","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:32:53.122331Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:05:53.769311Z","score":{"bm25":37.240234}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7224493,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:03:24.459651Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:05:53.777146Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*771ORDER\nORLANDO L. GARCIA, District Judge.\nPlaintiff Stacy Crane sued her former employer, Defendant Gore Design Completion, Ltd., and her former supervisor, Defendant Melissa Trevino, for demoting and then firing her in alleged violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. Defendants have moved for s","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7224493],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4468877/in-re-appointment-of-a-special-prosecutor/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Appointment of a Special Prosecutor","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2017 IL App (1st) 161376"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4468877,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-02-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-16-13761-16-18921-16-2071 cons.","docket_id":6308215,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:53:52.368450Z","date_created":"2018-02-16T23:07:58.483790Z","score":{"bm25":37.04887}},"neutralCite":"2017 IL App (1st) 161376","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[105703,110060,110227,371973,381789,491446,1876228,2002832,2042009,2077215,2087724,2119520,2211552,2239826,2254047,3135672,4103684],"download_url":"http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2017/1stDistrict/1161376.pdf","id":4246130,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/02/16/in_re_appointment_of_a_special_prosecutor.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:38:54.655059Z","date_created":"2018-02-16T23:07:58.491517Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"248b0a2ac6107d9ebc6af963fd304975059a6425","snippet":"                                                                              Digitally signed by\n                                                                              Reporter of Decisions\n                                                                              Reason: I attest to the\n                            Illinois Official Reports                         accuracy and\n                                                                              integrity of this\n             ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4246130],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4342294/date-of-appointment-for-purposes-of-calculating-the-term-of-an-interim/","attorney":"","caseName":"Date of Appointment for Purposes of Calculating the Term of an Interim United States Attorney","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4342294,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-03-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":4575077,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:23:49.970519Z","date_created":"2017-01-27T22:40:51.197386Z","score":{"bm25":36.849796}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,87067],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/03/31/op-olc-v024-p0045_0.pdf","id":4119555,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2000/03/16/date_of_appointment_for_purposes_of_calculating_the_term_of_an_interim.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:11:55.766258Z","date_created":"2017-01-27T22:40:51.204915Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a229224bf49d6d4033634fc4b0f3d794b184e37b","snippet":" Date of Appointment for Purposes of Calculating the Term of\n              an Interim United States Attorney\nThe appointm ent date o f an interim U nited States A ttorney appointed by the A ttorney G eneral is\n   established by the A ttorney G eneral’s intent, and here the form of order used by the Attorney\n   General expressly states her intent — that the appointm ent is m ade upon satisfaction o f the condi­\n   tions that the office is vacant and that the designee has taken the oath o f office","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4119555],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4756305/in-re-appointment-of-members-to-the-judicial-ethics-advisory-panel/","attorney":"","caseName":"IN RE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2020 OK 40"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4756305,"court":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla.","court_id":"okla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-05-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":17192854,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:15:48.391220Z","date_created":"2020-05-26T20:12:00.049574Z","score":{"bm25":36.00575}},"neutralCite":"2020 OK 40","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=486600","id":4536652,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2020/05/11/in_re_appointment_of_members_to_the_judicial_ethics_advisory_panel.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-22T22:35:11.597592Z","date_created":"2020-05-26T20:12:00.056885Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d0b4a7b3d492b99cef1c1f0389e632283235b476","snippet":"\n\t\tOSCN Found Document:IN RE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n  \n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tIN RE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL2020 OK 40Decided: 05/11/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA\nCite as: 2020 OK 40, __ P.3d __\n\n\t\t\t\t\nFOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. \n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4536652],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4655547/in-re-petition-to-stay-the-effectiveness-of-formal-ethics-opinion/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4655547,"court":"Tennessee Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Tenn.","court_id":"tenn","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-08-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"M2018-01932-SC-BAR-BP","docket_id":16104311,"judge":"Chief Justice Jeffrey S. Bivins","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:47:28.612206Z","date_created":"2019-08-23T18:09:24.036361Z","score":{"bm25":35.947742}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106598,111514,117923,121166,145883,179722,775109,793047,1060515,2457200,2521208],"download_url":"http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/sites/default/files/inrepetitiontostaytheeffectivenessofformalethics.opn_.pdf","id":4432800,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/08/23/in_re_petition_to_stay_the_effectiveness_of_formal_ethics_opinion.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:48:47.104785Z","date_created":"2019-08-23T18:09:24.047931Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"0d8a426fb8abf6ee1bf49b13270fcc64e4cc5cc2","snippet":"                                                                                          08/23/2019\n                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE\n                            AT NASHVILLE\n                                 May 30, 2019 Session\n\n     IN RE: PETITION TO STAY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FORMAL\n                    ETHICS OPINION 2017-F-163\n\n\n\n                            No. M2018-01932-SC-BAR-BP\n\n\nThe Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference (“TNDAGC”) filed with this Court\na pet","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4432800],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference (\"TNDAGC\") filed with this Court a petition to vacate Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163 (\"Opinion\") issued by the Board of Professional Responsibility (\"Board\") regarding ethical considerations for prosecutors under Rule 3.8(d) of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct. The TNDAGC also requested that the Court stay the effectiveness of the Opinion pending review. This Court determined that a full and deliberate review of the issues was necessary and granted a stay of the effectiveness of the Opinion. Based on our review, we decline to interpret a prosecutor's ethical duty under Rule 3.8(d) as being more expansive than one's legal obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), and its progeny, or that \"timely\" disclosure of the material should be interpreted as \"as soon as reasonably practicable.\" Accordingly, we vacate Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163 of the Board of Professional Responsibility. We also take this opportunity to interpret Rule 3.8(d) as coextensive in scope with a prosecutor's legal obligations under Brady and its progeny, as explained in this opinion."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6317491/in-re-the-appointment-of-a-guardian-for-zhuo/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Grimaldi & Yeung LLP, Brooklyn (Naomi Levin of counsel), for petitioner.","caseName":"In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Zhuo","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Appointment of a Guardian for Zhuo","citation":["53 Misc. 3d 1121","42 N.Y.S.3d 530"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":6317491,"court":"New York Surrogate's Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sur. Ct.","court_id":"nysurct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-09-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62948652,"judge":"Torres","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:06:35.663306Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:55:37.519181Z","score":{"bm25":35.000587}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[100233,106545,108281,109382,110506,112478,112786,130160,134743,1236300,5522538,5525907,5527122,5529539,5537333,5773701,5989715,6179989,6184840,6192425,6207013,6210339,6222538,9433860],"download_url":null,"id":6185939,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:49:04.240061Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:55:37.536535Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nMargarita López Torres, S.\nBefore the court is a petition seeking to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person of the respondent pursuant to article 17-A of the Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act. The petitioner alleges that the respondent is incapable of autonomous decision-making by reason of a diagnosis of intellectual disability and therefore requires the appointment of a guar","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6185939],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6460093/authority-of-the-president-to-prospectively-appoint-a-supreme-court-justice/","attorney":"","caseName":"Authority of the President to Prospectively Appoint a Supreme Court Justice","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6460093,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-04-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":63240594,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:11.880335Z","date_created":"2022-04-15T18:00:09.363972Z","score":{"bm25":34.98316}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,87067,101906,1360802,2336464,4113200,6759040,8292240,9431772],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1494816/download","id":6332204,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/04/06/authority_of_the_president_to_prospectively_appoint_a_supreme_court_justice.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T06:30:05.222767Z","date_created":"2022-04-15T18:00:09.371308Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a8b9cdaf1a2ee3c962361f1d69ed292833fce0e2","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n             Authority of the President to Prospectively\n                 Appoint a Supreme Court Justice\nIf the Senate votes to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as an Associate Justice of the\n    Supreme Court, the President may complete her appointment to the Supreme Court by\n    signing her commission before Justice Breyer’s resignation takes effect.\n\n                                                                           April 6, 2022\n\n     MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE CO","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6332204],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"If the Senate votes to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, the President may complete her appointment to the Supreme Court by signing her commission before Justice Breyer's resignation takes effect."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6316405/in-re-the-appointment-of-a-guardian-for-dd/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, New York City (Nancy Delaney of counsel), for petitioners., Advocates for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Legal Clinic, Brooklyn (Natalie Chin of counsel), guardian ad litem.","caseName":"In re the Appointment of a Guardian for D.D.","caseNameFull":"In the Matter of the Appointment of a Guardian for D.D.","citation":["50 Misc. 3d 666","19 N.Y.S.3d 867"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":6316405,"court":"New York Surrogate's Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sur. Ct.","court_id":"nysurct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-10-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62947566,"judge":"Torres","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:06:19.894151Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:53:57.564318Z","score":{"bm25":32.543114}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[100233,103701,107082,107480,109768,2679204,2812209,6163017,6179989,6182296],"download_url":null,"id":6184840,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:48:43.640605Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:53:57.582185Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nMargarita López Torres, S.\nThis is a proceeding brought by Ms. D. and M.D. (collectively, the petitioners) to be appointed the coguardians of the person of D.D. pursuant to article 17-a of the Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act. Ms. D. is D.D.’s mother and M.D. is one of D.D.’s brothers. Petitioners also seek the appointment of W.D. and A.D., D.D.’s brothers, as standby guardian and alterna","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6184840],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2019653/in-re-appointment-of-special-prosecutor/","attorney":"Robert L. Michels (argued), Dan K. Webb, Raymond W. Mitchell, and Katherine M. Gross, all of Winston & Strawn, LLP of Chicago, for appellant., Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, of Chicago (Richard S. Huszagh and Ellen Mandeltort, Assistant Attorneys General, of counsel), for appellee., David B. Mueller (argued), John E. Cassidy III, and Nell German, all of Cassidy & Mueller, of Peoria, for appellees Dean Stone, Michael Kraycinovich, and Tracy Jones.","caseName":"In Re Appointment of Special Prosecutor","caseNameFull":"In Re APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROSECUTOR (The People Ex Rel. John T. Pepmeyer, as State’s Attorney of Knox County, Petitioner-Appellant)","citation":["902 N.E.2d 730","388 Ill. App. 3d 220","327 Ill. Dec. 609","2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 33"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2019653,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3-07-0553","docket_id":1783494,"judge":"Burke","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:08:20.591729Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:26:44.834201Z","score":{"bm25":32.17922}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2026744,2027684,2043234,2047154,2047989,2052760,2054098,2076994,2079189,2081896,2095295,2101950,2106400,2116334,2124096,2128329,2132168,2170357,2184085,2245170],"download_url":null,"id":2019653,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T15:57:46.281261Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:04:07.033856Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"59bc3c48086e5e50208ca0f8f32077c25542ae5e","snippet":"\n902 N.E.2d 730 (2009)\nIn re APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROSECUTOR.\n(The People ex rel. John T. Pepmeyer, as State's Attorney of Knox County, Petitioner-Appellant).\nNo. 3-07-0553.\nAppellate Court of Illinois, Third District.\nJanuary 29, 2009.\n*733 Robert L. Michels, Dan K. Webb, Raymond W. Mitchell, Katherine M. Gross, Winston & Straw","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2019653],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236956/appointment-and-removal-of-federal-reserve-bank-members-of-the-federal-open/","attorney":"","caseName":"Appointment and Removal of Federal Reserve Bank Members of the Federal Open Market Committee","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236956,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-10-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601420,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:15.406180Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:39.248919Z","score":{"bm25":31.537033}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[90042,92120,93491,95239,105739,109380,112042,320298,393347,405221,790096,803749,1559081,2518125,4286673,8639466,9416730,9418565,9427682,9430708,9431444,9432915,9433083,9433462,9477092,9806335,9873454],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1349721/download","id":6103838,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/10/23/appointment_and_removal_of_federal_reserve_bank_members_of_the_federal_open.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:16:38.959802Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:41:39.251795Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8c26cba694e482344660de31b079f5359918e382","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n      Appointment and Removal of Federal Reserve Bank\n       Members of the Federal Open Market Committee\nThe statutory procedures for appointing and removing Federal Reserve Bank members\n  of the Federal Open Market Committee are consistent with the Constitution, and\n  would have continued to be so under proposed H.R. 6741, the Federal Reserve Re-\n  form Act of 2018.\n\n                                                                October 23, 2019\n\n                     MEMORANDU","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103838],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"The statutory procedures for appointing and removing Federal Reserve Bank members of the Federal Open Market Committee are consistent with the Constitution, and would have continued to be so under proposed H.R. 6741, the Federal Reserve Reform Act of 2018."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3141169/in-re-appointment-of-special-prosecutor/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Appointment of Special Prosecutor","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":3141169,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-01-29","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"3-07-0553 Rel","docket_id":2998761,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T17:55:03.860589Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T18:22:28.488208Z","score":{"bm25":31.133257}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2026744,2027684,2047989,2095295,2132168,2170357,2245170],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2009/3rdDistrict/January/3070553.pdf","id":3141169,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2009/01/29/in_re_appointment_of_special_prosecutor.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:26:46.648347Z","date_created":"2015-10-22T17:53:25.829083Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9553d4966a3e832a13e66de1760bb77c6cb4c8f8","snippet":"                                  No. 3--07--0553\n_________________________________________________________________________________\nFiled January 29, 2009\n                                      IN THE\n\n                              APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS\n\n                                 THIRD DISTRICT\n_________________________________________________________________________________\n\nIn re APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL             ) Appeal from the Circuit Court\nPROSECUTOR                          ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3141169],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7322018/retail-service-systems-inc-v-mattress-by-appointment-llc/","attorney":"James Edward Arnold, Gerrod Louis Bede, James E. Arnold & Associates Co., LPA, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff., Jessica A. Reese, Joseph Jude Golian, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Columbus, OH, Douglas M. Grimsley, Michael P. Flynn, Steven W. Zoffer, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.","caseName":"Retail Service Systems, Inc. v. Mattress By Appointment, LLC","caseNameFull":"RETAIL SERVICE SYSTEMS, INC. v. MATTRESS BY APPOINTMENT, LLC","citation":["210 F. Supp. 3d 916","2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133855","2016 WL 5476147"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7322018,"court":"District Court, S.D. Ohio","court_citation_string":"S.D. Ohio","court_id":"ohsd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-09-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 2:15-cv-2769","docket_id":64310501,"judge":"Sargus","lexisCite":"2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133855","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:37:10.502943Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:55:03.292088Z","score":{"bm25":29.448309}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7239928,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:31:14.248172Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:55:03.298340Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION AND ORDER\nEdmund A. Sargus, Jr., Chief United States District Judge\nThis matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.) For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Mo*921tion is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART.\nI.\nPlaintiff, Retail Service Sys","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7239928],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4335842/appointment-of-umpire-for-hayes-family-trust-v-state-farm-fire-casualty/","attorney":"Jason Waddell, Jason Waddell, PLLC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Appellants., Benjamin G. Kemble (David V. Jones with him on the brief), Jones, Andrews & Ortiz, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Ap-pellee.","caseName":"Appointment of Umpire for Hayes Family Trust v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.","caseNameFull":"In Re: Appointment of Umpire for HAYES FAMILY TRUST, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Clayton A. Hayes, Co-Trustee, Petitioners-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent-Appellee","citation":["845 F.3d 997","2017 WL 33533","2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 81"],"citeCount":113,"cluster_id":4335842,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit","court_citation_string":"10th Cir.","court_id":"ca10","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-01-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"15-6164","docket_id":4561907,"judge":"Tymkovich, Hartz, Moritz","lexisCite":"2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 81","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:15:59.517870Z","date_created":"2017-01-04T17:01:28.162539Z","score":{"bm25":27.34975}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104095,107024,117906,153845,159160,166166,170612,182665,222717,541819,579526,596587,681699,711201,1362480,1582152,1889758,2566887,4875084],"download_url":"http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/15/15-6164.pdf","id":4113103,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/01/04/in_re_hayes_family_trust.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:07:27.449074Z","date_created":"2017-01-04T17:01:28.168980Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"8f4244eb64b5d6495d9af1ff27f436624c3bbd1a","snippet":"\n\n\n  TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.\n \n\n  This appeal arises from a property damage claim filed by the Hayes Family Trust with its insurer, State Farm Fire & Casualty. When the parties could not agree on the amount of loss, Hayes invoked an appraisal process provided by the policy to calculate the loss incurred. The policy establishes a procedure whereby each party selects an impartial apprai","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4113103],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2106400/appointment-of-special-states-attorney/","attorney":"James G. Groat, of Sandwich, for appellant., Steven M. Puiszis and Stephen R. Swofford, both of Hinshaw & Culbertson, of Chicago, for appellees.","caseName":"Appointment of Special State's Attorney","caseNameFull":"In Re APPOINTMENT OF a SPECIAL STATE’S ATTORNEY (Gayle M. Franzen, Petitioner, v. Joseph E. Birkett, as State’s Attorney of the County of Du Page, Respondent (The County Board of the County of Du Page, Respondent-Appellee; William J. Maio, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee; William E. Jegen, Respondent-Appellant))","citation":["713 N.E.2d 168","305 Ill. App. 3d 749","238 Ill. Dec. 922","1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 407"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":2106400,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1999-06-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2-98-0917","docket_id":1936467,"judge":"Rapp","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T08:53:28.410087Z","date_created":"2016-01-29T16:23:26.463557Z","score":{"bm25":26.97509}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2008917,2031402,2036447,2045484,2076867,2123903,2134584,2195252,2198075,2209838,2238401,2245526,3414505,3417169,3417347],"download_url":null,"id":2106400,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T17:18:40.462391Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T08:20:05.158044Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"91da66ecb958cf70f71853f9c67f15bc9b4da3a3","snippet":"\n713 N.E.2d 168 (1999)\n305 Ill. App.3d 749\n238 Ill.Dec. 922\nIn re APPOINTMENT OF a SPECIAL STATE'S ATTORNEY (Gayle M. Franzen, Petitioner,\nv.\nJoseph E. Birkett, as State's Attorney of the County of Du Page, Respondent (The County Board of the County of Du Page, Respondent-Appellee; William J. Maio, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee; William E. Jegen, Respondent-Appellant)).\nNo. 2-98-0917","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2106400],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4342209/appointment-of-member-of-holocaust-memorial-council/","attorney":"","caseName":"Appointment of Member of Holocaust Memorial Council","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4342209,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-02-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":null,"docket_id":4574992,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:23:57.280470Z","date_created":"2017-01-27T22:40:17.570015Z","score":{"bm25":26.872244}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[84759,93088,99904,8581265],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2003/02/31/op-olc-v027-p0051_0.pdf","id":4119470,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2003/02/06/appointment_of_member_of_holocaust_memorial_council.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:11:51.953587Z","date_created":"2017-01-27T22:40:17.575260Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2069cac94b4dc05707ae781c03395221d0ff9862","snippet":"      Appointment of Member of Holocaust Memorial Council\nThe process of appointing an individual as a member of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council\n  was not completed.\nEven if the process of appointing a member of the Council had been completed, the President’s\n  appointment of another individual to that same position effected a removal of that appointee.\n\n                                                                                  February 6, 2003\n\n            MEMORANDUM OPINION","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4119470],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6236858/application-of-the-anti-nepotism-statute-to-a-presidential-appointment-in/","attorney":"","caseName":"Application of the Anti-Nepotism Statute to a Presidential Appointment in the White House Office","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6236858,"court":"Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel","court_citation_string":"OLC","court_id":"olc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-01-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62601161,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-09-03T16:24:13.539583Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:32.377240Z","score":{"bm25":26.333078}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[117902,186444,517395,625329,686416,9418565,9424850,9426429,9431772,9477013,9483690,9864303],"download_url":"https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1085561/download","id":6103740,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/01/20/application_of_the_anti-nepotism_statute_to_a_presidential_appointment_in_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:16:35.590626Z","date_created":"2022-01-14T20:11:32.379463Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"20ef813eb6397a97aab7e6dbb7ea4b8b1c8277da","snippet":"(Slip Opinion)\n\n         Application of the Anti-Nepotism Statute to a\n      Presidential Appointment in the White House Office\nSection 105(a) of title 3, U.S. Code, which authorizes the President to appoint employees\n   in the White House Office “without regard to any other provision of law regulating the\n   employment or compensation of persons in the Government service,” exempts posi-\n   tions in the White House Office from the prohibition on nepotism in 5 U.S.C. § 3110.\n\n                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6103740],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Section 105(a) of title 3, U.S. Code, which authorizes the President to appoint employees in the White House Office \"without regard to any other provision of law regulating the employment or compen-sation of persons in the Government service,\" exempts positions in the White House Office from the prohibition on nepotism in 5 U.S.C. § 3110."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1922365/in-re-appointment-of-district-attorney/","attorney":"Joseph A. O’Brien, Scranton, for appellants., Brian J. Cali, Dunmore, for appellee, Lackawanna County Republican Party., Bradley K. Moss, Philadelphia, for ap-pellee, Andrew Jarbola.","caseName":"In Re Appointment of District Attorney","caseNameFull":"In Re Appointment of DISTRICT ATTORNEY. Appeal of Board of Elections of Lackawanna County and County Commissioners of Lackawanna County","citation":["756 A.2d 711"],"citeCount":14,"cluster_id":1922365,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-07-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":1656165,"judge":"Doyle, Colins, McGinley, Smith, Pellegrini, Flaherty, Leadbetter","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:25:37.525116Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T18:26:56.057856Z","score":{"bm25":25.881725}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9696171,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T07:19:59.856416Z","date_created":"2023-08-25T18:39:38.751704Z"},"ordering_key":3,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*717PELLEGRINI, Judge,\ndissenting.\nI respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority that home rule charter communities are not free to change the method of filling a vacant elected office contained in a particular municipal or county code that governed the particular municipality or county before it adopted home rule. To so hold is at variance with A","type":"dissent"},{"author_id":8204,"cites":[1520327,1954440,1976804,2054235,2266010,2307799,2333470],"download_url":null,"id":1922365,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T14:06:47.059996Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:49:44.368814Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d32f4ef2a27d484db325c2ce9a9c4fd03abcba2c","snippet":"\n756 A.2d 711 (2000)\nIn re Appointment of DISTRICT ATTORNEY.\nAppeal of Board of Elections of Lackawanna County and County Commissioners of Lackawanna County.\nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.\nArgued March 8, 2000.\nDecided July 17, 2000.\nAs Amended July 20, 2000.\n*712 Joseph A. O'Brien, Scranton, for appellants.\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1922365,9696169,9696170,9696171],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}