{"count":156461,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0yOC45MTgwOTMmcz0zMTg1MjMxJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMTcmcD0y&q=ASSIGNMENT+OF+LEASE&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8404756/in-re-siluria-assignment-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"in Re Siluria (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8404756,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Beaumont","court_id":"txctapp9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-10-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"09-22-00280-CV","docket_id":65595360,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:59:29.450009Z","date_created":"2022-10-21T07:11:30.492399Z","score":{"bm25":42.160496}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":"http://www.search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=15663&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa09%5cOpinion","id":8375099,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/10/20/in_re_siluria_assignment_for_the_benefit_of_creditors_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T12:59:29.454286Z","date_created":"2022-10-21T07:11:30.497647Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bf28bb7554680914756ea9b0b6ca5f412b37ec44","snippet":"                                      In The\n\n                               Court of Appeals\n\n                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont\n\n                              __________________\n\n                              NO. 09-22-00280-CV\n                              __________________\n\n\n IN RE SILURIA (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS),\n                            LLC\n\n__________________________________________________________________\n\n                           Original Pro","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8375099],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1122937/toshiba-master-lease-ltd-v-ottawa-university/","attorney":"Gary V. Fulghum, of Rose, Brouillette & Shapiro, P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant., Robert L. Bezek, Jr., of Bezek, Lowry & Hendrix, P.A., of Ottawa, for appellee.","caseName":"Toshiba Master Lease, Ltd. v. Ottawa University","caseNameFull":"Toshiba Master Lease, Ltd., Appellant, v. Ottawa University, Appellee","citation":["927 P.2d 967","23 Kan. App. 2d 129","1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 146"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":1122937,"court":"Court of Appeals of Kansas","court_citation_string":"Kan. Ct. App.","court_id":"kanctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1996-11-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"74,530","docket_id":416796,"judge":"Elliott, P.J., Knudson, J., and Richard M. Smith, District Judge, Assigned","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T01:55:59.898034Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T09:18:46.707760Z","score":{"bm25":41.90136}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[681078,1113237,1150894,1177311,1188010,1220111,1422078,1466402],"download_url":null,"id":1122937,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T04:51:13.125463Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T04:12:44.713625Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"89d2e5d1ed8d3785db2a60fd72918712f746902e","snippet":"\n23 Kan. App.2d 129 (1996)\n927 P.2d 967\nTOSHIBA MASTER LEASE, LTD., Appellant,\nv.\nOTTAWA UNIVERSITY, Appellee.\nNo. 74,530.\nCourt of Appeals of Kansas.\nOpinion filed November 27, 1996.\nGary V. Fulghum, of Rose, Brouillette & Shapiro, P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant.\n*130 Ro","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[7300,7305],"panel_names":["Jerry G. Elliott","David S. Knudson"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1122937],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4387069/city-of-cincinnati-v-pe-alms-hill-realty-llc/","attorney":"\n  Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP and Christopher D. Cathey, Cincinnati, for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee\n , \n  Hennis, Rothstein and Ellis LLP and Steven M. Rothstein, for Third-Party Defendant-Appellant\n ","caseName":"City of Cincinnati v. PE Alms Hill Realty, LLC","caseNameFull":"CITY OF CINCINNATI, Plaintiff, v. PE ALMS HILL REALTY, LLC, Et Al., Defendants, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Benefit of the Holders of Comm 2014-UBS3 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PE Lima Club West Realty, LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and CP Cincinnati, LLC, Et Al., Third-Party Defendants.","citation":["2017 Ohio 1569","90 N.E.3d 156"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4387069,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-04-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"NO. C–160459","docket_id":5906328,"judge":"Zayas","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:30:21.128767Z","date_created":"2017-04-28T14:13:46.925892Z","score":{"bm25":40.68666}},"neutralCite":"2017 Ohio 1569","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2692390,2704574,3191161,3781673],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/1/2017/2017-Ohio-1569.pdf","id":4164322,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/04/28/cincinnati_v._pe_alms_hills_realty_l.l.c..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:42:13.660874Z","date_created":"2017-04-28T14:13:46.935106Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b86ff8a15818be6148544aa690acb9f6cd1be582","snippet":"\n\n\n  Zayas, Judge.\n \n\n  {¶ 1} Third-party defendant-appellant PE Lima Club West Realty, LLC, (\"PE Lima\") appeals the judgment of the common pleas court appointing a receiver in a commercial foreclosure action initiated by third-party plaintiff-appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the Benefit of the Holders of Comm 2014-UBS3 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certifi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4164322],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"DEBTOR-CREDITOR - RECEIVER: The trial court did not abuse its discretion by appointing a receiver in a third-party commercial foreclosure action. The lender was entitled to a receiver under R.C. 2735.01(A)(3), because the lender presented evidence that the borrower had entered into a contractual assignment of leases and rents."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10360753/siluria-assignment-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-llc-v-lummus-technology/","attorney":"","caseName":"Siluria (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. Lummus Technology LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10360753,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Beaumont","court_id":"txctapp9","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"09-23-00127-CV","docket_id":69765752,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:01.073184Z","date_created":"2025-03-21T10:14:48.869277Z","score":{"bm25":36.84878}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[894479,895236,1376524,1728743,1987708,2276326,2355142,2375241,2441412,2444999,2455735,2461826,2833630,2904372,4164822,4172841,4325949,5096062,5286492,6108757],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaID=98912c76-febe-43f3-8331-b0848939fda5","id":10827341,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/20/siluria_assignment_for_the_benefit_of_creditors_llc_v._lummus_technology.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:23:01.166259Z","date_created":"2025-03-21T10:14:48.905422Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"44a90b2f29e6fa1ca77b1a82642062b1c9705338","snippet":"                                      In The\n\n                               Court of Appeals\n\n                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont\n\n                              ________________\n\n                              NO. 09-23-00127-CV\n                              ________________\n\n    SILURIA (assignment for the benefit of creditors), LLC, Appellant\n\n                                        V.\n\n                 LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Appellee\n_______________________________________","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10827341],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6318814/lease-finance-group-llc-v-qazi/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Joseph I. Sussman, P.C., Cedarhurst, for plaintiff., Kamran A. Qazi, also known as Kamran Qazi, defendant pro se.","caseName":"Lease Finance Group, LLC v. Qazi","caseNameFull":"Lease Finance Group, LLC v. Kamran A. Qazi, Also Known as Kamran Qazi","citation":["56 Misc. 3d 944","59 N.Y.S.3d 281"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6318814,"court":"Civil Court of the City of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. City Civ. Ct.","court_id":"nycivct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":62949975,"judge":"Crane","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:06:56.875032Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:57:45.872754Z","score":{"bm25":36.496933}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2770081,2807345,5685088,6179082],"download_url":null,"id":6187276,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T18:49:25.090100Z","date_created":"2022-02-05T19:57:45.888333Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nMelissa A. Crane, J.\nPlaintiff Lease Finance Group, LLC commenced this action for breach of a personal guaranty. It is undisputed that defendant, Kamran Qazi, signed an equipment finance lease to pay $198 per month over a four-year period beginning April 28, 2014. Mr. Qazi also signed a personal guaranty that guaranteed payment of the lease. The lease was for two Verifone VX 520s credi","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6187276],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2541733/lease-v-fishel/","attorney":"Don A. Bailey, Harrisburg, PA, Sheri D. Coover, Law Office of Sheri D. Coover, Carlisle, PA, for Plaintiff., Devon M. Jacob, Frank J. Lavery, Jr., Lavery, Faherty, Young & Patterson, P.C., David L. Schwalm, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP, Harrisburg, PA, James E. Chiaruttini, Stock and Leader, Sean E. Summers, Barley Snyder LLC, York, PA, Ronald H. Pollock, Jr., Lancaster, PA, Christopher P. Gerber, Eric M. Brown, Siana, Bellwoar & McAndrew, LLP, Chester Springs, PA, for Defendants.","caseName":"Lease v. Fishel","caseNameFull":"David LEASE, Plaintiff, v. Douglas FISHEL, Et Al., Defendants","citation":["712 F. Supp. 2d 359","2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31840","2010 WL 1390650"],"citeCount":42,"cluster_id":2541733,"court":"District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"M.D. Penn.","court_id":"pamd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-04-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"5:07-mj-00003","docket_id":2405326,"judge":"Martin C. Carlson","lexisCite":"2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31840","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:45:38.130714Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:53:28.425066Z","score":{"bm25":35.500862}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[110929,111123,111749,112935,199201,312981,390855,511777,534532,539183,658112,673856,693381,697672,709043,709082,722379,736214,758339,766397,770125,770759,773936,774391,775779,777597,787687,792212,1227508,1420798,1666874,2391662,2395521,2417757],"download_url":null,"id":2541733,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:36:46.380310Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:17:14.543236Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5c214f5720cf5bfa2c2cbc0fe4eb7bd46819b543","snippet":"\n712 F.Supp.2d 359 (2010)\nDavid LEASE, Plaintiff,\nv.\nDouglas FISHEL, et al., Defendants.\nNo. 1:07-CV-0003.\nUnited States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.\nApril 1, 2010.\n*364 Don A. Bailey, Harrisburg, PA, Sheri D. Coover, Law Office of Sheri D. Coover, Carlisle, PA, for Plaintiff.\nDevon M. Jacob, Frank J. Lavery, Jr., Lav","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2541733],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7713658/mblock-investors-llc-v-bovis-lend-lease-inc/","attorney":"Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., and Joy Spillis Lundeen and Johnathan T. Ayers, Miami, for appellant., Kubicki Draper, P.A., and Caryn L. Bellus and Bretton C. Albrecht, Miami, for appellee Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., n/k/a Lendlease (US) Construction, Inc.","caseName":"MBlock Investors, LLC v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.","caseNameFull":"MBLOCK INVESTORS, LLC v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., etc.","citation":["274 So. 3d 504"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7713658,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 3D18-501","docket_id":64718334,"judge":"Emas, Fernandez, Salter","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:24:40.847027Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T23:45:30.834091Z","score":{"bm25":34.90451}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7649169,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:09:16.301737Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T23:45:30.843285Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nEMAS, C.J.\n*506MBlock Investors, LLC (\"MBlock\") appeals the lower court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of defendant below, Bovis Lend Lease, Inc. n/k/a Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. (\"BLL\"), in a construction defect case brought by MBlock to recover damages following its acquisition of property commonly known as the Midblock Mi","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7649169],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4674892/handoush-v-lease-finance-group-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Handoush v. Lease Finance Group, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4674892,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-10-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A150863","docket_id":16410820,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:52:41.211758Z","date_created":"2019-10-31T20:02:44.061130Z","score":{"bm25":34.46843}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[103012,1177079,2567332],"download_url":"http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A150863.PDF","id":4452145,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/10/31/handoush_v._lease_finance_group_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:02:13.666073Z","date_created":"2019-10-31T20:02:44.065064Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"66625fa13d30f0e0fe97ffff939ff62807d4b8b8","snippet":"Filed 10/31/19\n                              CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                                FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                       DIVISION THREE\n\n\n ZEAAD HANDOUSH,\n            Plaintiff and Appellant,\n                                                   A150863\n v.\n LEASE FINANCE GROUP, LLC,                         (Alameda County\n                                                   Super. Ct. No.","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4452145],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7713659/mblock-investors-llc-v-bovis-lend-lease-inc/","attorney":"Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., and Joy Spillis Lundeen and Johnathan T. Ayers, Miami, for appellant., Kubicki Draper, P.A., and Caryn L. Bellus and Bretton C. Albrecht, Miami, for appellee Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., n/k/a Lendlease (US) Construction, Inc.","caseName":"MBlock Investors, LLC v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.","caseNameFull":"MBLOCK INVESTORS, LLC v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., etc.","citation":["274 So. 3d 504"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7713659,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-06-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 3D18-501","docket_id":64718335,"judge":"Emas, Fernandez, Salter","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:24:40.872031Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T23:45:30.844378Z","score":{"bm25":34.44252}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7649170,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:09:16.292659Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T23:45:30.853224Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nEMAS, C.J.\n*506MBlock Investors, LLC (\"MBlock\") appeals the lower court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of defendant below, Bovis Lend Lease, Inc. n/k/a Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. (\"BLL\"), in a construction defect case brought by MBlock to recover damages following its acquisition of property commonly known as the Midblock Mi","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7649170],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2380756/fulton-v-people-lease-corp/","attorney":"Mark Hammons, Tamara L. Gowens, Hammons, Gowens & Associates, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellant., Debra W. McCormick, Kyle L. Buchanan, Rubenstein, McCormick & Pitts, PLLC, Edmond, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee PeopLease Corporation., David P. Hartwell, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and Patricia A. Kirch, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee Mark Findley.","caseName":"Fulton v. People Lease Corp.","caseNameFull":"Brenda FULTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PEOPLE LEASE CORPORATION and Mark Findley, Defendants/Appellees, and Ervin Findley Trucking, Inc., Defendant","citation":["2010 OK CIV APP 84","241 P.3d 255","2010 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 64","2010 WL 3491943"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2380756,"court":"Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma","court_citation_string":"Okla. Civ. App.","court_id":"oklacivapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-03-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"106,675. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1","docket_id":2225423,"judge":"Hetherington, Buettner, Hansen","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T11:12:26.065975Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T22:45:33.191029Z","score":{"bm25":33.69314}},"neutralCite":"2010 OK CIV APP 84","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8175,"cites":[98542,111712,112402,118244,118245,118251,145636,153180,156353,159967,165179,627495,721418,741895,776085,780105,781611,1125394,1129275,1159765,1172386,1172587,1172760,1173030,1187593,1199598,1207940,1219617,1257495,1350310,1365472,1377624,1401377,1403497,1426933,1428230,1455975,1478364,2003436,2293039,2396819,2514334,2588246,2590289,2598853,2607413,2612946,2613537,2616607,2616683,2626585,2626625,2638046,2639115,3797366,3800189,3801247,3817065,3822376],"download_url":null,"id":2380756,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T19:12:28.055645Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:18:06.438264Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ec8ca861a666bbe105b03b73786fa5548d31592d","snippet":"\n241 P.3d 255 (2010)\n2010 OK CIV APP 84\nBrenda FULTON, Plaintiff/Appellant,\nv.\nPEOPLE LEASE CORPORATION and Mark Findley, Defendants/Appellees, and\nErvin Findley Trucking, Inc., Defendant.\nNo. 106,675. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.\nCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.\nMarch ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2380756],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2778816/reynoso-v-bovis-lend-lease-lmb-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Reynoso v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Hector Reynoso, Respondent, v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc., Et Al., Appellants","citation":["125 A.D.3d 740","4 N.Y.S.3d 55"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":2778816,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2015-02-11","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2013-05902","docket_id":2633688,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T14:42:12.690303Z","date_created":"2015-02-11T21:03:59.293480Z","score":{"bm25":32.859436}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2084770,5788468],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_01256.htm","id":2778816,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2015/02/11/reynoso_v._bovis_lend_lease_lmb_inc..html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T23:09:12.586659Z","date_created":"2015-02-11T20:05:46.050717Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"398f5e49f0bf4c199e30c42f686470dc1665348e","snippet":"\n\n\n \n   *741\n   \n  In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Battaglia, J.), dated May 10, 2013, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleg","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2778816],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5630616/troup-v-bovis-lend-lease-lmb-inc/","attorney":"APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Newman, Myers, Kreines, Gross & Harris, New York City, for Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc., and others, defendants., Philip J. Rizzuto, PC., Carle Place, for plaintiff.","caseName":"Troup v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Ray Troup v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.","citation":["45 Misc. 3d 508","990 N.Y.S.2d 770"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":5630616,"court":"New York Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.Y. Sup. Ct.","court_id":"nysupct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-04-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":61983205,"judge":"Partnow","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T06:03:37.512791Z","date_created":"2022-01-09T20:57:27.902395Z","score":{"bm25":32.02434}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112911,1981887,2079387,5532214,5532809,5538287,5539491,5540332,5540506,5675709,5676512,5681607,5683219,5755112,5780190,5790757,5853088,5877984,5912114,5944178,5956204,5982151,6003744,6031382,6056474,6066021,6081034,6082626,6086704,9706044],"download_url":null,"id":5475774,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T02:11:47.329335Z","date_created":"2022-01-09T20:57:27.925207Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nMark I. Partnow, J.\nDefendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint.\nBackground\nOn November 14, 2007, plaintiff Ray Troup was employed as a security guard by nonparty Eddington Security at a certain ongoing construction project at 255 E 74th Street in New York, New York. The project ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[5475774],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4421581/encana-oil-gas-usa-inc-v-miller/","attorney":"Welbom Sullivan Meek & Tooley, P.C., Jens Jensen, Brian S. Tooley, Samuel S. Bacon, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant, Law Offices of George A. Barton, P.C., Stacy A. Burrows, George A. Barton, Robert G. Harken, Overland Park, Kansas, for Defendants-Appellees","caseName":"EnCana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. v. Miller","caseNameFull":"ENCANA OIL & GAS (USA), INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sally MILLER; Barclay Farms, LLC; Joan Elaine Brehon; David Furlong and Joyce Furlong, as Co-Trustees for the Janette Foote Estate; Niles Miller; White River Royalties, LLC; Whitney Brace, as Trustee for the T.E. McClintlock Trust; And Helen Nelson, as Trustee for the Edwin Miller Trust, Defendants-Appellees","citation":["2017 COA 112","405 P.3d 488","2017 WL 3431822","2017 Colo. App. LEXIS 1009"],"citeCount":168,"cluster_id":4421581,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-08-10","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals 16CA1979","docket_id":6143456,"judge":"Fox, Dailey, Bernard","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:40:39.539769Z","date_created":"2017-08-25T01:06:44.408914Z","score":{"bm25":30.852573}},"neutralCite":"2017 COA 112","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[78783,117845,122248,146132,150389,173002,220200,778961,899484,1241701,1439844,2449634,2501802,2513984,2538353,2584681,2590636,2598128,2599346,2622556,2638692,2959735,3215567,4149105,4163072],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/Sections/Opinions/8-10-17/16CA1979-PD.pdf?ver=2017-08-10-150417-240","id":4198834,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/08/10/encana_oil__gas_usa_inc._v._miller.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:06:05.567658Z","date_created":"2017-08-25T01:06:44.414828Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d71bc10573666dccd60620d65a0e64af2fc4bf44","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion by\n \n\n  JUDGE FOX\n \n\n  ¶ 1 A certified class of Colorado oil and gas royalty owners (the Class) and EnCana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. (EnCana), were involved in litigation beginning in 2005 over EnCana’s alleged underpayment of royalties on natural gas it produced. In 2008, EnCana and the Class entered into a settlement agreement that detailed the payment of fun","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4198834],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"A certified class of Colorado oil and gas royalty owners (the Class) and EnCana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. (EnCana) litigated, beginning in 2005, EnCana's alleged underpayment of royalties on natural gas it produced. In 2008, EnCana and the Class entered into a settlement agreement that detailed payment of funds to settle past claims, established the methodology EnCana would use for future royalty payments, and included an arbitration clause. The district court's final judgment approved and incorporated the settlement agreement, dismissed the 2005 case with prejudice, and reserved jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In 2016, oil and gas royalty owners (Owners), purporting to act on behalf of the Class, filed a demand for arbitration alleging EnCana had underpaid royalties owed to Class members in violation of the settlement agreement. EnCana filed a new case in district court asserting that (1) the class ceased to exist when the 2005 case was dismissed with prejudice in 2008, and (2) the 2008 settlement agreement did not authorize arbitration on a class-wide basis. The district court found that the class had not ceased to exist and the claims should be resolved in class-wide arbitration, and entered summary judgment against EnCana. On appeal, EnCana contended that the district court erred in finding that the Class continued after the case was dismissed. The Court of Appeals determined that the Class survived the 2008 dismissal because (1) compliance with the settlement agreement became part of the dismissal order, so the district court retains jurisdiction to give effect to the agreement and (2) the agreement continues for the lives of the leases or royalty agreements covered by the settlement agreement and expressly burdens and benefits successors and assigns of the parties."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8713779/henderson-v-bovis-lend-lease-inc/","attorney":"David J. Comeau, Mark C. Murnane, O’Connor & Nakos, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff., Mark E. Christensen, Jeffrey David Naffziger, Christensen & Ehret, Katherine Amelotte Jones, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.","caseName":"Henderson v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Ken HENDERSON v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.","citation":["848 F. Supp. 2d 847","2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9963","2012 WL 254247"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8713779,"court":"District Court, N.D. Illinois","court_citation_string":"N.D. Ill.","court_id":"ilnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-01-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 10 C 4402","docket_id":65979692,"judge":"Feinerman","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9963","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:06:04.168601Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T05:03:08.152876Z","score":{"bm25":30.499176}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8696971,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:24:07.131488Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T05:03:08.159538Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMemorandum Opinion and Order\n\nGARY FEINERMAN, District Judge.\nPlaintiff Ken Henderson was injured while working as an employee of USA Hoist, a subcontractor on the Trump Tower construction project in Chicago, Illinois. He brought this diversity action against Defendant Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., the construction manager, alleging that Bovis breached its duties under § 414 of the Restatement (Second) o","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8696971],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2675812/american-master-lease-v-idanta-partners/","attorney":"","caseName":"American Master Lease v. Idanta Partners","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2675812,"court":"California Court of Appeal","court_citation_string":"Cal. Ct. App.","court_id":"calctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-05-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"B244689M","docket_id":321772,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T13:44:42.064868Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:29:08.858176Z","score":{"bm25":30.42935}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[117837,623702,1160954,1214774,1229645,1247159,1296743,1427126,1866434,1916809,1926957,2630954,2634810,5452255],"download_url":"http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B244689M.PDF","id":2675812,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2014/05/27/american_master_lease_v._idanta_partners.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T21:53:53.271676Z","date_created":"2014-05-27T19:01:05.296018Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"e6c35188e6a9327454db057e20305905a607b4f0","snippet":"Filed 5/27/14 (unmodified opn. attached)\n                                CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION\n\n              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\n                                 SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT\n\n                                           DIVISION SEVEN\n\n\nAMERICAN MASTER LEASE LLC,                           B244689\n\n         Plaintiff and Respondent,                   (Los Angeles County\n                                                     Super. Ct. No. BC367987)\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2675812],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6777240/brc-lease-co-v-united-states/","attorney":"Timothy F. Brown, Washington, DC, for plaintiff., Cameron Cohick, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, and Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, for defendant.","caseName":"BRC Lease Co. v. United States","caseNameFull":"BRC LEASE COMPANY v. United States","citation":["93 Fed. Cl. 67","2010 U.S. Claims LEXIS 273","2010 WL 2245862"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6777240,"court":"United States Court of Federal Claims","court_citation_string":"Fed. Cl.","court_id":"uscfc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-05-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 09-111C","docket_id":63758477,"judge":"Firestone","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T11:11:23.940510Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T21:01:44.798043Z","score":{"bm25":29.357962}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6660659,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T08:11:54.554875Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T21:01:44.806004Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL\nFIRESTONE, Judge.\nPending before the court in this contract dispute action brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006), is the defendant’s (“government’s”) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 For the reasons set forth below, the government’s","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6660659],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7309140/hassanati-v-international-lease-finance-corp/","attorney":"Mark Evans Millard, Walter John Lack, Engstrom Lipscomb and Lack, Thomas Vincent Girardi, Girardi Keese, Los Ange-les, CA, for Plaintiffs., Daniel A. Solitro, Patricia Arias Musita-no, Susan J. Welde, Lock Lord LLP, Los Angeles, -CA, Gary Westerberg, Matthew J. Kalas, Christopher R. Barth, Locke Lord Bissell and Liddell LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.","caseName":"Hassanati v. International Lease Finance Corp.","caseNameFull":"Mmadi Mlatamou HASSANATI, individually, as heir and as Successor in Interest to Mohamed Abdou Said, deceased Mmadi Mlatamou Hassanati, as Guardian ad Litem for MMR, MMR, MR, MMH, and MMH, minors and heirs to Mohamed Abdou Said v. INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION and Does 1-100","citation":["51 F. Supp. 3d 887","2014 A.M.C. 2755","2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145961","2014 WL 5032354"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":7309140,"court":"District Court, C.D. California","court_citation_string":"C.D. Cal.","court_id":"cacd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-02-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. CV 11-02251 MMM (MANx)","docket_id":64297617,"judge":"Morrow","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145961","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:33:31.955931Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:14:16.067966Z","score":{"bm25":29.329437}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[86158,94930,111719,111722,112038,118223,145660,164676,199076,230832,278288,384353,532842,701724,773773,778072,778598,784948,785167,795912,1146182,1473735,1498448,1559760,1612928,1888127,2255165,2270916,2288194,2376334,5450828,5666071,6939043,6964411,8696333,8696886,8799579,8855318,8883876,8927694,8973901],"download_url":null,"id":7227043,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:08:00.671871Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:14:16.080539Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO APPOINT PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT\nMARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.\nOn January 10, 2010, Mmadi Mlatamou Hassanati, individually, as heir and successor to Mohamed Abdou Said, and as guardian ad litem for Said’s children, filed this action in Los Angeles Superior Court.1 Said perished in th","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7227043],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10350681/national-railroad-passenger-corporation-amtrak-v-sublease-interest/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) v. Sublease Interest Obtained Pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Leasehold Interest Made as of January 25, 2007","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10350681,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-03-05","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-1043","docket_id":69709248,"judge":"Judge Amit P. Mehta","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-03-06T00:01:18.415210Z","date_created":"2025-03-06T00:01:18.324191Z","score":{"bm25":28.956646}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":2209,"cites":[100488,103253,104054,118226,271726,277212,371160,655319,1229410,1390167,1505416,1538154,1542334,1548009,2430946,2673227,2687288,4234050,6882250,7847808],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv1043-181","id":10817269,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/03/05/national_railroad_passenger_corporation_amtrak_v._sublease_interest.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T19:11:15.593751Z","date_created":"2025-03-06T00:01:18.372482Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2f09809be54dbe230e668f8f55fdd98b65aa4301","snippet":"                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n_________________________________________\n                                          )\nNATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER               )\nCORPORATION (AMTRAK),                     )\n                                          )\n      Plaintiff,                          )\n                                          )\n             v.                           )                 Case No. 22-cv-1043 (","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10817269],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6589590/kassis-v-lease-rental-management-corp/","attorney":"Albert L. Farrah, Jr., for the plaintiff., John P. Knight (Robert A. Hurstak with him) for Lease and Rental Management Corporation.","caseName":"Kassis v. Lease & Rental Management Corp.","caseNameFull":"Gus Kassis, administrator v. Lease and Rental Management Corporation & another","citation":["79 Mass. App. Ct. 784"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":6589590,"court":"Massachusetts Appeals Court","court_citation_string":"Mass. App. Ct.","court_id":"massappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-07-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 10-P-130","docket_id":63519598,"judge":"Wolohojian","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T10:20:03.558189Z","date_created":"2022-06-25T12:51:19.985625Z","score":{"bm25":28.950771}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[251603,1650726,2036820,2039187,2047866,2128589,2167711,2234848,2251973,2483673,6441036,6443117,6444059,6446263,6447878,6448985,6450649,6451462,6452830,6453655,6461542,6462047],"download_url":null,"id":6464055,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T07:10:10.365225Z","date_created":"2022-06-25T12:51:19.991615Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nWolohojian, J.\nAt issue in this appeal is whether a long-term lessor of a vehicle owes a duty of care to a person who is injured as a result of a mechanical defect arising after the beginning of the lease. We conclude that, under the law of bailment, no such duty exists. Accordingly, we affirm the trial judge’s allowance of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, as well as the judgment entered in the second trial.\n","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6464055],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/3185231/capano-assocs-llc-v-on-assignment-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Capano & Assocs., L.L.C. v. On Assignment, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2016 Ohio 998"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":3185231,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-03-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CA2015-08-153","docket_id":3044152,"judge":"M. Powell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T18:23:43.984401Z","date_created":"2016-03-14T16:30:17.303135Z","score":{"bm25":28.918093}},"neutralCite":"2016 Ohio 998","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8124,"cites":[2694276],"download_url":"http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/12/2016/2016-Ohio-998.pdf","id":3185196,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/03/14/capano__assocs._l.l.c._v._on_assignment_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T03:57:48.407098Z","date_created":"2016-03-14T16:30:17.309426Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3620df93a6a4aab29ededc1df84bf9ca82ed938e","snippet":"[Cite as Capano & Assocs., L.L.C. v. On Assignment, Inc., 2016-Ohio-998.]\n\n\n\n                                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS\n\n                           TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO\n\n                                            BUTLER COUNTY\n\n\n\n\nCAPANO & ASSOCIATES, LLC,                              :\n                                                                   CASE NO. CA2015-08-153\n        Plaintiff-Appellant,                           :\n                                 ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[3185196],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}