{"count":5643,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xNS43NTkxNzUmcz04NzI4NTUxJnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjkmcD0y&q=AGENT+ACTING+FOR+UNIDENTIFIED+PRINCIPALS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7307761/columbus-america-discovery-group-inc-v-unidentified-wrecked-abandoned/","attorney":"Philip N. Davey, Esquire, • Bryan K. Meals, Esquire, Davey & Brogan PC, Norfolk, VA, for Plaintiff., James L. Chapman VI, Esquire, Cyrus W. Grandy, Esquire, Steven M. Stancliff, Esquire, Crenshaw Ware & Martin PLC, Conrad M. Shumadine, Esquire, Brett A. Spain, Esquire, Willcox & Savage PC, Norfolk, VA, for Defendant.","caseName":"Columbus-America Discovery Group, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel","caseNameFull":"COLUMBUS-AMERICA DISCOVERY GROUP, INC. v. The UNIDENTIFIED, WRECKED AND ABANDONED SAILING VESSEL, etc.","citation":["34 F. Supp. 3d 595"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7307761,"court":"District Court, E.D. Virginia","court_citation_string":"E.D. Va.","court_id":"vaed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-07-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2:87cv363","docket_id":64296238,"judge":"Smith","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:33:10.407274Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:09:45.205734Z","score":{"bm25":29.993494}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7225664,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:05:33.604664Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:09:45.213172Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\n\nREBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge.\nThis matter is before the court on the Motion to Substitute Party, filed by Recovery Limited Partnership (“RLP”) on January 3, 2014. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Substitute Party is GRANTED.\nI. Factual and Procedural Background\nIn September of 1857, the S.S. Central America","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7225664],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2427207/islamic-american-relief-agency-v-unidentified-fbi-agents/","attorney":"Shereef Akeel, Melamed, Dailey & Akeel, P.C., Huntington Woods, MI, for Plaintiff., Andrea Marie Gacki, Carlton Greene, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.","caseName":"Islamic American Relief Agency v. Unidentified FBI Agents","caseNameFull":"ISLAMIC AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY, Plaintiff, v. UNIDENTIFIED FBI AGENTS, Et Al., Defendants","citation":["394 F. Supp. 2d 34","2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21570","2005 WL 2386028"],"citeCount":22,"cluster_id":2427207,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-09-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CIV.A. 04-2264(RBW)","docket_id":2299508,"judge":"Walton","lexisCite":"2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21570","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T11:36:01.093429Z","date_created":"2015-08-27T21:50:31.385443Z","score":{"bm25":28.806105}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3362,"cites":[12205,104200,105573,107034,107701,108283,108362,108375,108600,108606,108752,109026,109380,109382,109515,109569,109815,110170,110188,110333,110554,110564,110742,110798,111116,111243,111507,111719,111722,112304,112315,112610,118335,118466,184318,184605,185065,185451,185967,186194,269385,282610,392963,393982,414191,417696,437447,500012,508935,535573,577670,663691,712170,767936,786479,1087667,1451686,1453157,1471305,1520091,1537532,1813542,1880941,1951642,2297187,2313446,2330408,2339932,2345393,2345908,2448120,2492937,2519279,2519408],"download_url":null,"id":2427207,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T19:31:25.362861Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:32:14.944043Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f02b26a9c3f6b56627ad4fcf3509f3d054a241fa","snippet":"\n394 F.Supp.2d 34 (2005)\nISLAMIC AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY, Plaintiff,\nv.\nUNIDENTIFIED FBI AGENTS, et al., Defendants.\nNo. CIV.A. 04-2264(RBW).\nUnited States District Court, District of Columbia.\nSeptember 15, 2005.\n*35 *36 *37 *38","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2427207],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4777418/citizens-for-responsibility-v-fec/","attorney":"","caseName":"Citizens for Responsibility v. FEC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["971 F.3d 340"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4777418,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-08-21","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-5261","docket_id":17467225,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:06.713320Z","date_created":"2020-08-21T17:00:40.288347Z","score":{"bm25":25.90961}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[749,1741,109380,111221,111661,111782,184609,185070,480629,498113,585201,688685,740398,800991,1087669,4269448],"download_url":"https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/0/DCEFA4F3D6438109852585CB005860AC/$file/18-5261-1857631.pdf","id":4557765,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/08/21/citizens_for_responsibility_v._fec.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:06.688008Z","date_created":"2020-08-21T17:00:40.290245Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fbbffb0aa226737d9c6f5b335d53b9f274073c5e","snippet":" United States Court of Appeals\n          FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT\n\n\n\nArgued September 13, 2019            Decided August 21, 2020\n\n                         No. 18-5261\n\n CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON\n                 AND NICHOLAS MEZLAK,\n                       APPELLEES\n\n                              v.\n\n              FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ,\n                        APPELLEE\n\n       CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES,\n                     APPELLANT\n\n","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4557765],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7330923/cockrum-v-donald-j-trump-for-president-inc/","attorney":"*164Anne Harden Tindall, Justin G. Florence, Protect Democracy Project, Inc., Washington, DC, Barbara J. Chisholm, Pro Hac Vice, Danielle E. Leonard, Pro Hac Vice, Stephen P. Berzon, Pro Hac Vice, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Steven A. Hirsch, Pro Hac Vice, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, San Franisco, CA, Ian M. Bassin, United to Protect Democracy, New York, NY, Richard Primus, The University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI, Benjamin Leon Berwick, Protect Democracy Project, Cambridge, MA, for Plaintiffs., Jeffrey Baltruzak, Pro Hac Vice, Jones Day, Pittsburgh, PA, Michael Anthony Carvin, Vivek Suri, Jones Day, L. Peter Farkas, Halloran Farkas & Kittila LLP, Washington, DC, Grant J. Smith, Pro Hac Vice, Strategysmith, PA, Robert C. Buschel, Pro Hac Vice, Buschel Gibbons, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants., ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge *165Before the Court are defendants' motions to dismiss and plaintiffs' motion for jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs are two Democratic National Committee (\"DNC\") donors (Cockrum and Schoenberg) and a former DNC employee (Comer). Defendants are Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (\"the Trump Campaign\"), and Roger Stone, who was employed by the Trump Campaign until November 9, 2015, and allegedly continued thereafter to advise the Trump Campaign informally. Plaintiffs assert that defendants engaged in a conspiracy with unidentified Russian agents and WikiLeaks to publish hacked emails. They bring two tort claims under D.C. law, one alleging a conspiracy to violate plaintiffs' privacy rights by publicly disclosing private facts and the other alleging a conspiracy to subject plaintiffs to intentional infliction of emotional distress. They also bring a federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), alleging a conspiracy to violate plaintiffs' right to give support or advocacy to their chosen political candidate. (Pls.' Am. Compl., ECF No. 17, (\"Compl.\") ¶¶ 25-26.)1, For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants and, alternatively, that Washington D.C. is not the proper venue for plaintiffs' suit. The Court will grant defendants' motions to dismiss, deny plaintiffs' motion, and dismiss plaintiffs' suit without prejudice.2 Given this ruling, the Court does not address defendants' arguments that the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to sustain a claim for tortious civil conspiracies or a conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).3 Although the Court will explain the distinction between personal jurisdiction and the merits in detail below, it bears emphasizing that this Court's ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election., Plaintiffs are two donors to the DNC and one former DNC employee. (Compl. ¶¶ 2-5, 32-34.) Plaintiff Roy Cockrum is a domiciliary of Tennessee who donated to the DNC and multiple candidates for public office in 2016. (Id. ¶¶ 3, 32.) Plaintiff Eric Schoenberg is a domiciliary of New Jersey who also contributed to the DNC in the 2016 election cycle. (Id. ¶¶ 4, 33.) Plaintiff Scott Comer is a domiciliary of Maryland and worked as the DNC Finance Office's Chief of Staff from April 2015 to October 2016, and as the DNC's LGBT Finance Chair from June 2016 to October 2016. (Id. ¶¶ 5, 34.)","caseName":"Cockrum v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Roy COCKRUM Scott Comer and Eric Schoenberg v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and Roger Stone","citation":["319 F. Supp. 3d 158"],"citeCount":25,"cluster_id":7330923,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-07-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 17–1370 (ESH)","docket_id":64319407,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:39:31.641322Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:43:35.277271Z","score":{"bm25":23.297884}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7248841,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:28:12.220295Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:43:35.298187Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nB. Hack of the DNC's Email Systems\nPlaintiffs allege that\n[o]n one or more occasions before the summer of 2016, computer hackers working on behalf of the Russian government hacked into the email systems of the DNC in the District of Columbia and obtained voluminous amounts of data, including emails and other documents sent to and from thousands of individuals. Some of those individuals were staff m","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7248841],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7329219/bigelow-v-tom-garrett-tom-garrett-for-cong/","attorney":"*39Kenneth P. Norwick, Norwick Schad & Goeling, New York, NY, for Plaintiff., Christopher M. Woodfin, Woodfin Law Offices, PLLC, Richmond, VA, Monique Antonia Miles, Old Town Associates, P.C., Alexandria, VA, Elizabeth Burgin Waller, Pro Hac Vice, Joshua F.P. Long, Pro Hac Vice, Woods, Rogers PLC, Zachary S. Agee, Woods Rogers PLC, Roanoke, VA, for Defendants.","caseName":"Bigelow v. Tom Garrett & Tom Garrett for Cong.","caseNameFull":"Todd BIGELOW v. Tom GARRETT and Tom Garrett for Congress","citation":["299 F. Supp. 3d 34"],"citeCount":26,"cluster_id":7329219,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-13","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 17–1975 (PLF)","docket_id":64317703,"judge":"Friedman","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:38:59.761215Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:26:42.566359Z","score":{"bm25":22.829529}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7247135,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:44:14.782818Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:26:42.576005Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nPAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge\nCurrently before the Court are two motions concerning the exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendants Tom Garrett and Tom Garrett for Congress.1 The first is defendants' Motion [Dkt. No. 6] to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue to the Unit","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7247135],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4393779/trust-for-the-benefit-of-goldstein-v-lipetz/","attorney":"","caseName":"Trust for the Benefit of Goldstein v. Lipetz","caseNameFull":"Trust for the Benefit of Shari Lynn Goldstein, Appellant-Respondent, v. Linda Lipetz, Respondent-Appellant","citation":["2017 NY Slip Op 4070","150 A.D.3d 562","53 N.Y.S.3d 296"],"citeCount":12,"cluster_id":4393779,"court":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","court_citation_string":"N.Y. App. Div.","court_id":"nyappdiv","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-05-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1564 157826/12","docket_id":6065070,"judge":"Richter, Gesmer, Tom, Friedman, Kapnick","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:32:13.001383Z","date_created":"2017-05-23T17:14:03.130927Z","score":{"bm25":22.621748}},"neutralCite":"2017 NY Slip Op 4070","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2057204,2079387,2590824,5475866,5787531,6089465,6098700,6175135,6205263],"download_url":null,"id":9875670,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:55:13.654131Z","date_created":"2023-09-26T22:39:45.725454Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n*563Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered July 27, 2015, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its first, second and third causes of action and for dismissal of defendant’s affirmative defenses and counterclaim, and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, to grant plaintiffs motion, and to dec","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[2057204,2079387,2590824,5475866,5516623,5787531,6089465,6098700,6175135,6205263,6214831,9875670],"download_url":"http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_04070.htm","id":4171032,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"html/2017/05/23/goldstein_v._lipetz.html","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:47:01.119522Z","date_created":"2017-05-23T17:14:03.136688Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d73e2d67204eb6d5a9552432d8b964e38cdcd55c","snippet":"\r\n\r\nGoldstein v Lipetz (2017 NY Slip Op 04070)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nGoldstein v Lipetz\r\n\r\n\r\n2017 NY Slip Op 04070\r\n\r\n\r\nDecided on May 23, 2017\r\n\r\n\r\nAppellate Division, First Department\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4171032,9875670,9875672],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9481806/united-for-fbi-integrity-v-us-department-of-justice/","attorney":"","caseName":"United for Fbi Integrity v. U.S. Department of Justice","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9481806,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-03-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2022-2885","docket_id":68316331,"judge":"Judge Rudolph Contreras","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:26:58.011078Z","date_created":"2024-03-06T23:01:16.780241Z","score":{"bm25":22.080133}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":710,"cites":[134730,184504,184712,186016,186064,186834,187254,187269,319872,410926,437450,526427,556586,586798,610872,613160,675085,709483,799697,1513919,2650503,2656711,2659078,2661371,2662668,2662810,2769553,2823399,3004919,3188957,4154865,4195262,4199876,4300888,4700846,4879504,5130056,6350102,7254322,7847957,9400806,9426368,9431619,9431814,9432431,9433625,9439294,9439645,9439744,9441877,9441909],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv2885-23","id":9948419,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/03/06/united_for_fbi_integrity_v._u.s._department_of_justice.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T09:17:54.219688Z","date_created":"2024-03-06T23:01:16.807592Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3b5b34e00980ff5ffaca60821901cfe532fa221a","snippet":"                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\nUNITED FOR FBI INTEGRITY,                       :\n                                                :\n       Plaintiff,                               :       Civil Action No.:      22-2885 (RC)\n                                                :\n       v.                                       :       Re Document No.:       13, 15\n                                                :\nU.S. DEPA","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9948419],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4377317/com-of-pa-acting-by-ag-kathleen-kane-v-golden-gate-national-senior-care/","attorney":"Victoria S. Nugent, Washington, DC, for plaintiff., Thomas H. Lee, II, Philadelphia, and Elizabeth M. Locke, Alexandria, VA, for defendants.","caseName":"Com. of PA Acting by AG Kathleen Kane v. Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC","caseNameFull":"COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania Acting by Attorney General, Kathleen Kane, Plaintiff v. GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL SENIOR CARE LLC; GGNSC Holdings LLC; GGNSC Administrative Services LLC; GGNSC Clinical Services LLC; GGNSC Equity Holdings LLC; GGNSC Harrisburg LP; GGNSC Harrisburg GP, LLC; GGNSC Camp Hill III LP; GGNSC Camp Hill III GP, LLC; GGNSC Clarion LP; GGNSC Clarion GP, LLC; GGNSC Gettysburg LP; GGNSC Gettysburg GP, LLC; GGNSC Altoona Hillview LP; GGNSC Altoona Hillview GP, LLC; GGNSC Lansdale LP; GGNSC Lansdale GP, LLC; GGNSC Monroeville LP; GGNSC Monroeville GP, LLC; GGNSC Mt. Lebanon LP; GGNSC Mt. Lebanon GP, LLC; GGNSC Phoenixville II LP; GGNSC Phoenixville II GP, LLC; GGNSC Philadelphia LP; GGNSC Philadelphia GP, LLC; GGNSC Wilkes-Barre II LP; GGNSC Wilkes-Barre II GP, LLC; GGNSC Tunkhannock LP; GGNSC Tunkhannock GP, LLC; GGNSC Erie Western Reserve LP; GGNSC Erie Western Reserve GP, LLC; GGNSC Pottsville LP; GGNSC Pottsville GP, LLC, Defendants","citation":["158 A.3d 203","2017 WL 1075535","2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 84"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4377317,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-03-22","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Com. of PA Acting by AG Kathleen Kane v. Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC - 336 M.D. 2015","docket_id":4620319,"judge":"Leavitt, Jubelirer, Simpson, Brobson, McCullough, Covey, Wojcik","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:27:47.398948Z","date_created":"2017-03-22T13:11:10.734120Z","score":{"bm25":21.971004}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104727,222510,538493,546329,560407,601792,771517,780232,786512,1271965,1439484,1443853,1476890,1478048,1495758,1517758,1523608,1525838,1533656,1885398,1924976,1962683,1974795,1975823,1985847,1989058,1990887,1990909,1991214,1991405,2052304,2057821,2071392,2077017,2102630,2168833,2268711,2290943,2295183,2295263,2304720,2321005,2322268,2322994,2324615,2325148,2342402,2350713,2375690,2389082,2400687,2401146,2410349,2443414,2497127,3845834,3846956,3848740,3849091,3849203,3850203],"download_url":"http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/336MD15_3-22-17.pdf","id":4154570,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/03/22/com._of_pa_acting_by_ag_kathleen_kane_v._golden_gate_national_senior_care.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:35:36.882375Z","date_created":"2017-03-22T13:11:10.765000Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"59244b92618ec5bab66b99db9cc78fe088c1342c","snippet":"             IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA\n\nCommonwealth of Pennsylvania          :\nActing by Attorney General,           :\nKathleen Kane,                        :\n                       Plaintiff      :\n                                      :\n                   v.                 :\n                                      :\nGolden Gate National Senior Care LLC; :\nGGNSC Holdings LLC; GGNSC             :\nAdministrative Services LLC; GGNSC :\nClinical Services LLC; GGNSC Equity :\nHoldings ","type":"combined-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":9873492,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T22:54:41.145210Z","date_created":"2023-09-26T21:36:15.741025Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION BY\nJUDGE COVEY\nBefore this Court are Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC, et al.’s (Golden Gate) preliminary objections to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s (Commonwealth) Amended Complaint and Petition for Injunctive Relief addressed to this Court’s original jurisdiction.1\n*212Golden Ga","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[8201,8207],"panel_names":["Anne E. Covey","Renee Cohn Jubelirer"],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4154570,9873492,9873494],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/796836/gamal-johnson-in-no-05-5029-v-parole-agent-david-knorr-individually/","attorney":"","caseName":"Gamal Johnson, in No. 05-5029 v. Parole Agent David Knorr, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Parole Agent William Jones Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Commonwealth of Penna. Dept. Of Probation & Parole Police Officer John Doe Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia Police Officer Richard Roe Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia City of Philadelphia. Gamal Johnson v. Parole Agent David M. Knorr, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Parole Agent William Jones, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. Of Probation and Parole Police Officer John Doe, Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia Police Officer Richard Roe, Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia City of Philadelphia. David Knorr, in No. 05-5139","caseNameFull":"Gamal Johnson, in No. 05-5029 v. Parole Agent David Knorr, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Parole Agent William Jones Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Commonwealth of Penna. Dept. Of Probation & Parole Police Officer John Doe Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia Police Officer Richard Roe Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia City of Philadelphia. Gamal Johnson v. Parole Agent David M. Knorr, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Parole Agent William Jones, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. Of Probation and Parole Police Officer John Doe, Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia Police Officer Richard Roe, Individually & as a Police Officer for the City of Philadelphia City of Philadelphia. David Knorr, in No. 05-5139","citation":["477 F.3d 75","2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3242"],"citeCount":85,"cluster_id":796836,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-02-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-5029","docket_id":1399661,"judge":"","lexisCite":"2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3242","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:21:40.156371Z","date_created":"2016-01-20T18:41:23.716509Z","score":{"bm25":20.990927}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[112924,117864,145662,513429,567931,610898,684357,758737,759473,760124,780724,790197,790412,791362,2467584],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/477/477.F3d.75.05-5139.05-5029.html","id":796836,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T14:43:19.316794Z","date_created":"2012-04-19T04:33:46Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f443d080effa74a652535dc35bf6818a07b752b6","snippet":"477 F.3d 75\n    Gamal JOHNSON, Appellant in No. 05-5029v.Parole Agent David KNORR, Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna.; Parole Agent William Jones Individually & as a Parole Officer for the Commonwealth of Penna.; Commonwealth of Penna. Dept. of Probation & Parole; Police Officer John Doe Individually & as a Police Officer for The City of Philadelphia; Police Officer Richard Roe Individually & a","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[796836],"source":"R","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7332113/citizens-for-quality-educ-san-diego-v-barrera/","attorney":"*1011Charles S. LiMandri, LiMandri & Jonna LLP, Rancho Santa Fe, CA, Teresa Lynn Mendoza, Barnhorst Scheiner and Goonan, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs., Jennifer Marie Fontaine, Michael Cody Sullivan, Paul, Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.","caseName":"Citizens for Quality Educ. San Diego v. Barrera","caseNameFull":"CITIZENS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION SAN DIEGO v. Richard BARRERA, in his official capacity as Board President","citation":["333 F. Supp. 3d 1003"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":7332113,"court":"District Court, S.D. California","court_citation_string":"S.D. Cal.","court_id":"casd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case No. 17-cv-1054-BAS-JMA","docket_id":64320598,"judge":"Bashant, Hon","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:39:49.365177Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:57:14.451835Z","score":{"bm25":20.240465}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[117845,118025,118093,175509,176919,177742,222779,388426,390045,436001,515793,556529,613556,672916,780840,788193,797909,801970,815037,1382726,1429691,1466041,2121663,2154366,2340266,2412882,2471357,2518178,2609591,2752606,2758065,2798030,2804418,3292757,4274907,4288402,4297539,4313994,6931243,6982359,7002685,7224927,7234463,7237570,7244149,7248647,7249661,8409878,8410927,8412731,8990588,9006120,9412944,9420679,9422649,9423838,9424479,9424657,9426519,9427834,9428097,9428574,9428666,9428741,9429317,9429581,9429754,9430075,9430165,9431040,9431092,9431440,9431556,9431691,9431844,9431866,9432577,9432656,9432833,9433029,9433491,9433887,9434951,9435003,9435153,9435422,9438532,9441864,9441934,9485130,9495144,9499963,9500030,9500740,9501859,9522904,9558602,9573814,9786812,9797145,9799096,9799664,9807255,9823248,9841520,9841980],"download_url":null,"id":7250031,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-08T21:49:31.490352Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:57:14.472223Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nHon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge\nThis case stems from the San Diego Unified School District's (the \"District\") decision in July 2016 to develop an Anti-Islamophobia Initiative (the \"Initiative\") to address Islamophobia and anti-Muslim bullying and the District's decision in April 2017 to adopt implementing \"Action Steps.\"\nPlaintiffs are two organizations-Citizens for Quality Education San Diego (\"","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7250031],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4514024/cockrum-v-donald-j-trump-for-president-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Cockrum v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4514024,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-07-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2017-1370","docket_id":7357348,"judge":"Judge Ellen S. Huvelle","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:06:22.530995Z","date_created":"2018-07-04T00:02:30.618582Z","score":{"bm25":19.944902}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1582,"cites":[47637,104972,105508,111117,118288,136997,185065,185781,187183,219732,331591,362878,417693,428296,535573,555428,625183,696193,1379815,1517748,2090001,2206566,2282959,2326485,2404303,2414114,2469194,2475841,2475969,2481699,2481795,2487284,2519833,2572571,2592817,2644673,2654532],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv1370-72","id":4291277,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/07/03/cockrum_v._donald_j._trump_for_president_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:10:18.854832Z","date_created":"2018-07-04T00:02:30.635400Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"bfadf96fb31251210cec0d3ff85d456e9dc64477","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n\n ROY COCKRUM; SCOTT COMER; and\n ERIC SCHOENBERG,\n\n                         Plaintiffs,\n                                                      Civil Action No. 17-1370 (ESH)\n                 v.\n\n DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT,\n INC.; and ROGER STONE,\n\n                        Defendants.\n\n\n\n                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n       Before the Court are defendants’ ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4291277],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4800631/center-for-biological-diversity-app-v-dept-of-fish-and-wildlife-resps/","attorney":"","caseName":"Center For Biological Diversity, App v. Dept. Of Fish And Wildlife, Resps","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4800631,"court":"Court of Appeals of Washington","court_citation_string":"Wash. Ct. App.","court_id":"washctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-10-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"53863-6","docket_id":18577198,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:27:24.309786Z","date_created":"2020-10-27T18:17:41.166561Z","score":{"bm25":18.796766}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108502,112747,118329,687585,1118439,1119607,1136526,1160198,1170637,1205292,1215248,1241366,1250944,1253234,1275766,1359260,1392584,1426772,2448921,2513899,2515064,2520292,2546754,2571426,2571763,2581757,2621461,2622018,2622275,2624899,2626833,2628970,2629291,2630867,2631774,2639257,4711055,4711798,4711921,4712413,4712439,4712501,4713165,4713348,4713392,4714675,4714883,4715459,4734418],"download_url":"http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2 53863-6-II Published Opinion.pdf","id":4580978,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/10/27/center_for_biological_diversity_app_v._dept._of_fish_and_wildlife_resps.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:29:05.376147Z","date_created":"2020-10-27T18:17:41.168306Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"3ff7f9a743f69b22fd2e95ac6a98248c399465a8","snippet":"                                                                                            Filed\n                                                                                      Washington State\n                                                                                      Court of Appeals\n                                                                                       Division Two\n\n                                                                                      October 2","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4580978],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7306012/citizens-for-appropriate-rural-roads-inc-v-foxx/","attorney":"Mick G. Harrison, Bloomington, IN, for Plaintiffs., Daniel W. Pinkston, U.S. Department of Justice, Denver, CO, Jared S. Pettinato, John Brett Grosko, United States Department of Justice, Albert M. Ferio, Elisabeth C. Frost, Perkins Coie LLP, William G. Malley, Washington, DC, Shelese M. Woods, United States Attorney’s Office, Timothy J. Junk, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants.","caseName":"Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads, Inc. v. Foxx","caseNameFull":"CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, INC. v. Anthony FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation","citation":["14 F. Supp. 3d 1217","2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43167","2014 WL 1323189"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":7306012,"court":"District Court, S.D. Indiana","court_citation_string":"S.D. Ind.","court_id":"insd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2014-03-31","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 1:11-cv-01031-SEB-DML","docket_id":64294489,"judge":"Barker","lexisCite":"2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43167","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:32:44.338814Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:04:04.346073Z","score":{"bm25":18.384169}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7223915,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:18:32.233441Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T04:04:04.354586Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nORDER ON MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT\n\nSARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.\nThis cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 141], and the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment [Docket Nos. 142, 160 & 162]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunction and summary j","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7223915],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/610569/in-re-agent-orange-product-liability-litigation/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation.","caseNameFull":"In Re \"Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation. Shirley Ivy, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Ivy, Deceased Charles Jardon and Tony K. Jardon, Individually and as Next Friend of Charles Jardon, Jr. Robin Jardon, Warren Jardon and Sharon Jardon Verda Wilson, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Isaiah Wilson, Jr., Deceased Shirley Zalewaski, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Yen Zalewaski, Deceased Gary Thomas Mary Lee Thomas James L. Kent Emma I. Kent Dawn Marie Inman, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Bobby Joe Inman, Deceased Earl Thompson Judy L. Thompson James Donald Deloatch Joyce Deloatch Peggy Sands, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Martin Sands, Deceased Emile Annibolli Ursula Margot Parry, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of James D. Parry, Sr., Deceased James D. Parry, Jr. James Christopher Parry Laura Jenkins, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Eddie Jenkins, Deceased Ronald L. Hartman, Katherina H. Hartman, and as Next Friend to Jeffery Alan Hartman and Angela Marie Hartman, Both Minors Individually and as Representative of Those Similarly Situated, James White, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Clarence White, Deceased Charles Brown v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company, Also Known as Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Company, Also Known as Occidental Electro Chemical Corporation, Also Known as Maxus Energy Corp., Also Known as Occidental Chemical Corporation, Also Known as Diamond Shamrock Co. Dow Chemical Company Monsanto Company Uniroyal, Inc. Hercules, Inc. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc.","citation":["996 F.2d 1425","1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15365"],"citeCount":118,"cluster_id":610569,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","court_citation_string":"2d Cir.","court_id":"ca2","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1993-06-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"818","docket_id":1292383,"judge":"","lexisCite":"1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15365","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T18:58:12.773185Z","date_created":"2015-10-13T23:06:10.362233Z","score":{"bm25":17.330908}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[97826,102976,103379,103421,107036,108263,109382,109614,109621,109755,109923,110520,111491,111504,111538,111856,111915,112073,112106,112135,316385,444552,446565,488026,488027,488028,526750,561290,588110,599300,1411455,1411664,1437287,1574006,1758040,1793120,1890681,2003925,2004017,3605301,5532312,6687737,8878580,8912469,8952342,8963822,8978851,8979853,8983768,9002003,9011786,9020070,9048176,9073030,9109858],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/996/996.F2d.1425.92-7537.92-7575.92-7573.670.818.html","id":610569,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T05:17:27.832297Z","date_created":"2011-08-23T10:26:10Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b38d77cfce7e9e2719c5ed01e5930f70225b259e","snippet":"996 F.2d 1425\n    In re \"AGENT ORANGE\" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION.Shirley IVY, Individually and as Representative of theEstate of Donald Ivy, Deceased;  Charles Jardon and Tony K.Jardon, Individually and as Next Friend of Charles Jardon,Jr.;  Robin Jardon, Warren Jardon and Sharon Jardon;  VerdaWilson, Individually and as Representative of the Estate ofIsaiah Wilson, Jr., Deceased;  Shirley Zalewaski,Individually and as Re","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[610569],"source":"R","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2472742/minnesota-citizens-concerned-for-life-inc-v-swanson/","attorney":"James R. Magnuson, Esq., and Erik G. Kaardal, Esq., Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A.; and James Bopp, Jr., Esq., Joseph E. La Rue, Esq., Kaylan L. Phillips, Esq., and Richard E. Coleson, Esq., Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom, for Plaintiffs., Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, John S. Garry and Kristyn M. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, counsel for Defendants Lori Swanson, Bob Milbert, John Scanlon, Terri Ashmore, Hilda Bettermann, Felicia Boyd, Greg McCullough, Raymond Krause, Eric Lipman, Manuel Cervantes, Beverly Heydinger, Richard Luis, Steve Mihalchick, Barbara Neilson, and Kathleen Sheehy. Daniel P. Rogan and Beth A. Stack, Assistant Hennepin County Attorneys, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, counsel for Defendant Michael Freeman.","caseName":"Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Swanson","caseNameFull":"MINNESOTA CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE, INC.; The Taxpayers League of Minnesota; And Coastal Travel Enterprises, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Lori SWANSON, Minnesota Attorney General, in Her Official Capacity; Bob Milbert, John Scanlon, Terri Ashmore, Hilda Bettermann, Felicia Boyd, and Greg McCullough, Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Members, in Their Official Capacities; Raymond Krause, Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings, in His Official Capacity; Eric Lipman, Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings, in His Official Capacity; Manuel Cervantes, Beverly Heydinger, Richard Luis, Steve Mihalchick, Barbara Neilson, and Kathleen Sheehy, Administrative Law Judges of the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings, in Their Official Capacities; And Michael Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, in His Official Capacity, Defendants","citation":["741 F. Supp. 2d 1115","2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98498","2010 WL 3768041"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":2472742,"court":"District Court, D. Minnesota","court_citation_string":"D. Minnesota","court_id":"mnd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-09-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil 10-2938 (DWF/JSM)","docket_id":277358,"judge":"Donovan W. Frank","lexisCite":"2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98498","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T11:59:26.887196Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T08:07:04.993423Z","score":{"bm25":17.305216}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1105,"cites":[749,1741,23577,96819,108990,109380,110420,111782,112398,117967,130151,131149,148492,150472,371044,386938,482906,724859,765694,793725,1189321,1291331,2538481,2540854],"download_url":null,"id":2472742,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:01:03.353604Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:45:52.187153Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"00677e4ee24e20f574c58f6d0b5a8dc792ffffa6","snippet":"\n741 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2010)\nMINNESOTA CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE, INC.; The Taxpayers League of Minnesota; and Coastal Travel Enterprises, LLC, Plaintiffs,\nv.\nLori SWANSON, Minnesota Attorney General, in her official capacity; Bob Milbert, John Scanlon, Terri Ashmore, Hilda Bettermann, Felicia Boyd, and Greg McCullough, Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Members, in their official capacities; Raymond Krause, Chief Administrativ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2472742],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7330672/citizens-for-responsibility-ethics-in-wash-v-fed-election-commn/","attorney":"*354Adam J. Rappaport, Stuart C. McPhail, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs, Seth E. Nesin, Harry Jacobs Summers, Kevin Deeley, Federal Election Commission, Washington, DC, for Defendant, Thomas Wesley Kirby, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenor","caseName":"Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n","caseNameFull":"CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, and Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, Defendant-Intervenor","citation":["316 F. Supp. 3d 349"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":7330672,"court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","court_citation_string":"D.C. Cir.","court_id":"cadc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-08-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 16-259 (BAH)","docket_id":64319156,"judge":"Contents, Howell, Table","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T13:39:28.026328Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:39:43.042297Z","score":{"bm25":16.935684}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7248589,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T11:28:09.692589Z","date_created":"2022-07-25T05:39:43.102270Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nBERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge *355Table of Contents\nI. BACKGROUND...357\nA. PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT TO THE FEC...357\nB. FEC'S DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT...360\nC. THE INSTANT LITIGATION...364\nII. LEGAL STANDARDS...365\n","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7248589],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8720664/haggar-international-corp-v-united-co-for-food-industry-corp/","attorney":"Edwin D. Schindler, Coram, NY, Robert E. Lyon, Los Angeles, CA, Laurie Ann Poulos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff., Gloria Tsui-Yip, Howard C. Miskin, Wendi Opper Uzar, Yasmin Pooyan, Miskin & Tsui-Yip LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.","caseName":"Haggar International Corp. v. United Co. for Food Industry Corp.","caseNameFull":"HAGGAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, doing business as Montana Food Industries v. UNITED COMPANY FOR FOOD INDUSTRY CORPORATION","citation":["906 F. Supp. 2d 96","2012 WL 5956642","2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169323"],"citeCount":10,"cluster_id":8720664,"court":"District Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"E.D.N.Y","court_id":"nyed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-11-28","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 03 CV 5789(CLP)","docket_id":65986585,"judge":"Pollak","lexisCite":"2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169323","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:08:31.999947Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T06:03:39.504870Z","score":{"bm25":15.97158}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[104131,111293,117913,118411,130141,137731,208107,209671,253233,266755,304082,310373,317760,380308,416559,534304,539953,579955,587762,716624,726060,752412,770598,794951,1189884,1378042,1460665,1480888,1508868,1606135,1690798,1766069,1798845,1817244,1867164,1874842,2322525,2347551,2398337,2429343,2448344,2452755,2456676,2473485,2487035,2520642,2522752,2539909,2562435,2565763,6172127,7004723,8407994,8883987,8969666,8976013,9009904,9093063,9122716,9161756,9170231,9170244,9170245,9278293],"download_url":null,"id":8703857,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T03:56:18.060448Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T06:03:39.517929Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nMEMORANDUM AND ORDER\n\nCHERYL L. POLLAK, United States Magistrate Judge.\nOn November 17, 2003, plaintiff Haggar International Corporation, d/b/a Montana Food Industries (“Haggar”), commenced this action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b), against United Company for Food Industry Corporation (“United”) and Trans Mid-East Shipping & Trading Agency, Inc. (“Trans Mid-East”) (collectively, the “defe","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8703857],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1638473/physicians-for-human-rights-v-us-department-of-defense/","attorney":"Christina S. Coll, Peter M. Brody, Ryan Morland Malone, Ropes & Gray, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff., Scott Risner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants.","caseName":"Physicians for Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Defense","caseNameFull":"PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Et Al., Defendants","citation":["675 F. Supp. 2d 149","2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121331"],"citeCount":55,"cluster_id":1638473,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-12-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action RDB-08-273","docket_id":122704,"judge":"Richard D. Bennett","lexisCite":"2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121331","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T05:05:50.797051Z","date_created":"2015-09-25T22:16:01.975931Z","score":{"bm25":15.961672}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108712,109431,110709,110712,111620,111719,112224,112932,184617,184762,184876,185805,185974,186713,313449,341477,350620,350872,361163,372453,385702,399388,406603,409581,425935,430600,469998,484872,488010,495205,495212,495221,552329,556586,583854,669641,672024,700451,709483,710866,715627,727298,1269289,1456396,1466893,2337724,2410095,2416607,2453753,2453789,2465974,2470990,2476580,2571209],"download_url":null,"id":1638473,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T10:33:05.696029Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:59:38.131012Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a312699c49ec613ce5be8c34a78eb93c2b255d5e","snippet":"\n675 F.Supp.2d 149 (2009)\nPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, Plaintiff,\nv.\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants.\nCivil Action No. RDB-08-273.\nUnited States District Court, District of Columbia.\nDecember 30, 2009.\n*154 Christina S. Coll, Peter M. Brody, Ryan Morland Malone, Ropes & Gray, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.<","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1638473],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9443838/mattsnow-properties-llc-mark-d-mattlage-thurmond-and-robert-j-snowden/","attorney":"","caseName":"MattSnow Properties, LLC, Mark D. Mattlage-Thurmond, and Robert J. Snowden v. First National Bank of McGregor D/B/A TFNB Your Bank for Life","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9443838,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Texarkana","court_id":"txctapp6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"06-23-00039-CV","docket_id":68028528,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:10:34.353450Z","date_created":"2023-11-22T09:09:39.625790Z","score":{"bm25":15.867145}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[11549,19814,34828,516071,537025,797533,1427667,1441578,1631096,1769469,2332122,2334524,2356543,2466070,3156513,3180786,4022460,4050720],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=14499&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa06%5cOpinion","id":9901663,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/20/mattsnow_properties_llc_mark_d._mattlage-thurmond_and_robert_j._snowden.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:10:34.350147Z","date_created":"2023-11-22T09:09:39.626962Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7832aa3f1d50a7940cb198469031a402be51ee5d","snippet":"                          In the\n                    Court of Appeals\n      Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana\n\n\n                         No. 06-23-00039-CV\n\n\n\n                MATTSNOW PROPERTIES, LLC,\nMARK D. MATTLAGE-THURMOND, AND ROBERT J. SNOWDEN, Appellants\n\n                                   V.\n\n                 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF\n      MCGREGOR D/B/A TFNB YOUR BANK FOR LIFE, Appellees\n\n\n\n\n                On Appeal from the 414th District Court\n                      McLenna","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9901663],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8728551/national-assn-for-the-advancement-of-multijurisdiction-practice-v-berch/","attorney":"Grant Joseph Savoy, SKS Law, Joseph Robert Giannini, Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs., John Doe, pro se., Eryn Marie McCarthy, Office of the Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants.","caseName":"National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Berch","caseNameFull":"NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE Allison Girvin Mark Anderson and Mark Kolman v. Hon. Rebecca White BERCH, Chief Justice Hon. W. Scott Bales, Vice Chief Justice Hon. John Pelander and Hon. Robert M. Brutinel, Justices","citation":["973 F. Supp. 2d 1082","2013 WL 5297140","2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134278"],"citeCount":7,"cluster_id":8728551,"court":"District Court, D. Arizona","court_citation_string":"D. Ariz.","court_id":"azd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-09-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. CV-12-1724-PHX-BSB","docket_id":65994475,"judge":"Bade","lexisCite":"2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134278","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:11:59.120499Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T07:12:32.508741Z","score":{"bm25":15.759175}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8711749,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:29:23.421893Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T07:12:32.519013Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nORDER\nBRIDGET S. BADE, United States Magistrate Judge.\nIn this matter, Plaintiffs, the National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (the NAAMJP), Allison Girvin (Girvin), Mark Anderson (Anderson), and Mark Kolman (Kolman), challenge Arizona Supreme Court Rule 34(f), which provides for admission on motion to the Arizona Bar (the AOM Rule). (Doc. 36.) Plaintiffs allege that Ariz","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8711749],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}