{"count":37027,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0xOS44NTY4MDYmcz0xMDgxOTQwOCZ0PW8mZD0yMDI2LTA4LTIzJnA9Mg%3D%3D&q=ADMINISTRATIVE+CONCESSIONS&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10460908/dion-horton-v-administrative-judge-jill-rangos/","attorney":"","caseName":"Dion Horton v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos","caseNameFull":"","citation":["136 F.4th 470"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":10460908,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2025-02-19","dateFiled":"2025-05-02","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"24-1325","docket_id":68915190,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:39:32.323310Z","date_created":"2025-05-02T17:00:37.323944Z","score":{"bm25":36.250244}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[85330,101183,102473,108556,729754,4298275,4393426,4439722,6673849,8958267,9423233,9423680,9425003,9425285,9425988,9426279,9429208,9429639,9430027,9430976,9431137,9431922,9432531,9433499,9433685,9466247,9472445,9804296,9847578,10739644,10783414],"download_url":"https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/241325p.pdf","id":10927496,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/05/02/dion_horton_v._administrative_judge_jill_rangos.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T22:24:17.459147Z","date_created":"2025-05-02T17:00:37.333928Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a5c9432252af8d1553d34696b1414ae1c67cc585","snippet":"                                        PRECEDENTIAL\n\n         UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n              FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT\n                  _______________\n\n                      No. 24-1325\n                    _______________\n\nDION HORTON; DAMON JONES; CRAIG BROWNLEE;\n  RAHDNEE ODEN-PRITCHETT; TATE STANFORD;\nELIJAH BRONAUGH, individually and on behalf of a class\n           of similarly situated persons,\n                                         Appellants\n                         v.\n\nADM","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10927496],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2532201/elias-v-world-wide-concessions-llc/","attorney":"Toni L. Villaverde of Tony L. Villaverde, PLLC., South Miami, for Appellant., Laurence F. Leavy and Jay Siegel of Laurence Leavy and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, and Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.","caseName":"Elias v. WORLD WIDE CONCESSIONS, LLC","caseNameFull":"Raquel ELIAS, Appellant, v. WORLD WIDE CONCESSIONS, LLC D/B/A Pizza Hut and Comp Options, Appellees","citation":["41 So. 3d 304","2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10817","35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1525"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2532201,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-07-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1D09-5076","docket_id":2396205,"judge":"Benton, Hawkes, Lewis","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-17T21:17:35.456281Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:50:19.818294Z","score":{"bm25":34.47433}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1136148,1715764],"download_url":null,"id":2532201,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T20:32:01.777756Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:13:24.314364Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":true,"sha1":"73a72228bfa8349697c07170deddec1de71551a1","snippet":"\n41 So.3d 304 (2010)\nRaquel ELIAS, Appellant,\nv.\nWORLD WIDE CONCESSIONS, LLC d/b/a Pizza Hut and Comp Options, Appellees.\nNo. 1D09-5076.\nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.\nJuly 7, 2010.\nRehearing Denied August 5, 2010.\nToni L. Villaverde of Tony L. Villaverde, PLLC., South Miami, for Appellant.\nLaurence F. Leavy and Jay Siege","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2532201],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4575596/albert-aa-cartenuto-iii-v-justice-administrative-commission/","attorney":"Maria del Carmen Calzon of Law Offices of Maria del Carmen Calzon, P.A., Coral Gables, Florida, for Appellants, Ana Cristina Martinez, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Justice Administrative Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee","caseName":"Albert A.A. Cartenuto, III v. Justice Administrative Commission","caseNameFull":"Albert A. A. CARTENUTO, III, Et Al., Appellants, v. JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION, Appellee.","citation":["260 So. 3d 908"],"citeCount":1,"cluster_id":4575596,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-12-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC18-322","docket_id":8439943,"judge":"Per Curiam","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:23:55.404762Z","date_created":"2018-12-20T17:05:17.996288Z","score":{"bm25":32.214714}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1808509,1920315,4800312],"download_url":"http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2018/sc18-322.pdf","id":4352849,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/12/20/albert_a.a._cartenuto_iii_v._justice_administrative_commission.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:53:25.117619Z","date_created":"2018-12-20T17:05:18.000843Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ac1fa230c4538c1d413a5359be72199020bb1fd5","snippet":"\n\n\n  PER CURIAM.\n \n\n  This case is before the Court on appeal from an order denying a motion for attorney's fees. Because the order concerns certain fees incurred during a capital postconviction proceeding, this Court has jurisdiction of the appeal under article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.\n  \n   See\n  \n\n   McClain v. Atwater\n  \n  ,\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4352849],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4783236/craig-geness-v-administrative-office-of-penns/","attorney":"","caseName":"Craig Geness v. Administrative Office of Penns","caseNameFull":"","citation":["974 F.3d 263"],"citeCount":94,"cluster_id":4783236,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit","court_citation_string":"3rd Cir.","court_id":"ca3","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-09-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"19-2253","docket_id":18416997,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:17.856447Z","date_created":"2020-09-08T17:00:38.375898Z","score":{"bm25":31.625076}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[108281,118018,118087,134743,145697,145730,152321,611569,714017,758670,768217,768786,783618,785662,794736,796680],"download_url":"https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/192253p.pdf","id":4563583,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/09/08/craig_geness_v._administrative_office_of_penns.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-17T21:59:17.886284Z","date_created":"2020-09-08T17:00:38.378050Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a8cabf6fa78a5b785f243e48c44ce52d7378b7f8","snippet":"                                                                     PRECEDENTIAL\n\n                         UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\n                              FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT\n                                   ___________\n\n                                     No. 19-2253\n                                     ___________\n\n                                  CRAIG A. GENESS\n\n                                           v.\n\n           ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS;\n       ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4563583],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7921999/collie-concessions-inc-v-bruce/","attorney":"Shivers & Associates, George L. Parson, for appellants., Raymond J. Doumar, for appellee.","caseName":"Collie Concessions, Inc. v. Bruce","caseNameFull":"COLLIE CONCESSIONS, INC. v. BRUCE","citation":["272 Ga. App. 578","612 S.E.2d 900","2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1133","2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 341"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":7921999,"court":"Court of Appeals of Georgia","court_citation_string":"Ga. Ct. App.","court_id":"gactapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2005-03-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"A04A1735","docket_id":65016642,"judge":"Blackburn, Mikell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T16:19:54.391955Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T20:42:49.767438Z","score":{"bm25":30.615484}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7871429,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T00:04:16.292264Z","date_created":"2022-09-08T20:42:49.780930Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMikell, Judge.\nWe granted Collie Concessions, Inc.’s application for a discretionary appeal to review the order of the superior court reversing the appellate division of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation’s adoption of the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of benefits to Lillie Bruce. Based on the reasons set forth below, we reverse.\nIn the absence of legal error, the factual findin","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7871429,7871430],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9503843/mehdaoui-v-city-of-chicago-department-of-administrative-hearings/","attorney":"","caseName":"Mehdaoui v. City of Chicago Department of Administrative Hearings","caseNameFull":"","citation":["446 Ill. Dec. 680","171 N.E.3d 497","2020 IL App (1st) 182720"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9503843,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-02-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-18-2720","docket_id":68540431,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:11:59.195857Z","date_created":"2024-05-17T16:52:10.711911Z","score":{"bm25":30.424982}},"neutralCite":"2020 IL App (1st) 182720","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2026943,2038355,2244317,2752321,2769088,3217756],"download_url":"https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/resources/5eec7d83-3e56-4997-ba36-eb66e0234ebd/file","id":9970456,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/02/07/mehdaoui_v._city_of_chicago_department_of_administrative_hearings.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:11:59.178860Z","date_created":"2024-05-17T16:52:10.719913Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fa5042f80fa9ab082a7258c82e03b6d27dcba902","snippet":"                                                                         Digitally signed\n                                                                         by Reporter of\n                                                                         Decisions\n                                                                         Reason: I attest to\n                         Illinois Official Reports                       the accuracy and\n                                                        ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9970456],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8443340/tibbs-v-administrative-office-of-the-illinois-courts/","attorney":"John A. Baker, Attorney, Baker, Baker & Krajewski, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Frank Henry Bieszczat, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Civil Appeals Division, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appel-lee.","caseName":"Tibbs v. Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts","caseNameFull":"Autumn TIBBS v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS COURTS","citation":["860 F.3d 502","27 Wage Hour & Leave Rep. (BNA) 645","27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 645","2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10789","101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,825","2017 WL 2627822"],"citeCount":68,"cluster_id":8443340,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 16-1671","docket_id":65662582,"judge":"Hamilton, Kanne, Posner","lexisCite":"2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10789","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T19:14:59.879907Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:17:30.292196Z","score":{"bm25":29.155983}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8414716,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T02:27:11.718764Z","date_created":"2022-11-02T21:17:30.297122Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nHAMILTON, Circuit Judge.\nPlaintiff Autumn Tibbs worked as an administrative assistant in the Illinois court system. She was suspended the day she returned to work after taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. She was then fired after she chose not to attend a disciplinary meeting. Tibbs sued the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts. She contends that this agency employed","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8414716],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4581402/albert-aa-cartenuto-iii-v-justice-administrative-commission/","attorney":"","caseName":"Albert A.A. Cartenuto, III v. Justice Administrative Commission","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4581402,"court":"Supreme Court of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla.","court_id":"fla","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-01-04","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"SC18-322","docket_id":8498549,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:25:29.902690Z","date_created":"2019-01-15T04:06:23.447778Z","score":{"bm25":28.822935}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1808509],"download_url":"https://www.floridasupremecourt.org/content/download/425254/4583258/file/sc18-322.pdf","id":4358655,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/01/04/albert_a.a._cartenuto_iii_v._justice_administrative_commission_1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T16:57:20.160282Z","date_created":"2019-01-15T04:06:23.457772Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"331f373510ac00f0acb0d25c617b1632e4eb4d1c","snippet":"          Supreme Court of Florida\n                                  ____________\n\n                                  No. SC18-322\n                                  ____________\n\n                    ALBERT A. A. CARTENUTO, III, et al.,\n                                Appellants,\n\n                                         vs.\n\n                JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION,\n                              Appellee.\n\n                              December 20, 2018\n                            CORREC","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4358655],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4401560/autumn-tibbs-v-administrative-office-of-the-i/","attorney":"","caseName":"Autumn Tibbs v. Administrative Office of the I","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4401560,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","court_citation_string":"7th Cir.","court_id":"ca7","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2017-06-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"16-1671","docket_id":6076853,"judge":"Hamilton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:35:04.326718Z","date_created":"2017-06-19T21:04:11.225586Z","score":{"bm25":28.61307}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1343,"cites":[205112,765412,766588,768584,789089,1193933,1238120,1388009,1444104],"download_url":"http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2017/D06-19/C:16-1671:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:1981982:S:0","id":4178813,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2017/06/19/autumn_tibbs_v._administrative_office_of_the_i.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T14:52:15.756659Z","date_created":"2017-06-19T21:04:11.237013Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"37b43df4163ab809efc9b8fbd0c8307775be9127","snippet":"                                                                        \n\n                                In the\n\n     United States Court of Appeals\n                  For the Seventh Circuit\n                      ____________________ \nNo. 16‐1671 \nAUTUMN TIBBS, \n                                                   Plaintiff‐Appellant, \n\n                                   v. \n\nADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS COURTS, \n                                        Defendant‐Appellee. \n              ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4178813],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9440768/estate-of-james-e-caan-jacaan-administrative-trust-scott-caan-trustee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of James E. Caan, Jacaan Administrative Trust, Scott Caan, Trustee, Special Administrator","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9440768,"court":"United States Tax Court","court_citation_string":"Tax Ct.","court_id":"tax","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14783-18","docket_id":67893545,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:17:11.280943Z","date_created":"2023-11-14T20:02:31.702653Z","score":{"bm25":27.631937}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[101568,102139,111043,223254,363596,365515,625866,2474611,2651427,4181067,4286670,4472255,4472824,4473023,4473047,4474081,4474959,4481022,4483246,4483467,4485213,4486139,9431140],"download_url":"","id":9898593,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/14/estate_of_james_e._caan_jacaan_administrative_trust_scott_caan_trustee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T06:09:00.534691Z","date_created":"2023-11-14T20:02:31.707901Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b8ff5bdd5ecfea14207a4799c92996e5ad5c7b74","snippet":"                United States Tax Court\n                            CORRECTED\n                            161 T.C. No. 6\n\n      ESTATE OF JAMES E. CAAN, DECEASED, JACAAN\n  ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST, SCOTT CAAN, TRUSTEE, SPECIAL\n                   ADMINISTRATOR,\n                       Petitioner\n\n                                   v.\n\n           COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,\n                       Respondent\n\n                              —————\n\nDocket No. 14783-18.                            File","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9898593],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/5146200/allegheny-county-department-of-administrative-services-v-parsons/","attorney":"Stephen H. Yuhan, New York, NY, for appellants., George M. Janocsko, Pittsburgh, for ap-pellee Allegheny County Department of Administrative Services., Anthony R. Sosso, Jr., Pittsburgh, for appellee A Second Chance, Inc.","caseName":"Allegheny County Department of Administrative Services v. Parsons","caseNameFull":"ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and A Second Chance, Inc. v. James PARSONS and WTAE-TV","citation":["61 A.3d 336","2013 WL 141697","2013 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 18"],"citeCount":23,"cluster_id":5146200,"court":"Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania","court_citation_string":"Pa. Commw. Ct.","court_id":"pacommwct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2013-01-14","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":60460036,"judge":"Covey, Jubelirer, Leadbetter, Leavitt, McCullough, McGinley, Pellegrini, Simpson","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T03:55:15.615762Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:21:16.209113Z","score":{"bm25":27.362345}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4966814,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-22T22:17:02.692206Z","date_created":"2021-09-24T16:21:16.232534Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nOPINION BY\nJudge SIMPSON.\nThis case returns to us following our remand in Department of Administrative Services/ASCI v. Parsons/WTAE-TV, 13 A.3d 1025 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011) (en banc) (ASCI I). Television reporter James Parsons and WTAE-TV (collectively, Requester) appeal from the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas’ (trial court) order that reversed the Office of Open Records (OOR) Final Determ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4966814],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9433675/estate-of-james-e-caan-jacaan-administrative-trust-scott-caan-trustee/","attorney":"","caseName":"Estate of James E. Caan, Jacaan Administrative Trust, Scott Caan, Trustee, Special Administrator","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9433675,"court":"United States Tax Court","court_citation_string":"Tax Ct.","court_id":"tax","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-10-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"14783-18","docket_id":67893545,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:15:10.817160Z","date_created":"2023-10-18T19:04:07.837433Z","score":{"bm25":26.470465}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[101568,102139,111043,223254,363596,365515,625866,2474611,2651427,4181067,4286670,4472255,4472824,4473023,4473047,4474081,4474959,4481022,4483246,4483467,4485213,4486139,9431140],"download_url":"","id":9891494,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/10/18/estate_of_james_e._caan_jacaan_administrative_trust_scott_caan_trustee.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T04:57:40.667257Z","date_created":"2023-10-18T19:04:07.838619Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"88603013dc5c13fa8693c38aa46e49946fe96969","snippet":"                United States Tax Court\n\n                            161 T.C. No. 6\n\n      ESTATE OF JAMES E. CAAN, DECEASED, JACAAN\n  ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST, SCOTT CAAN, TRUSTEE, SPECIAL\n                   ADMINISTRATOR,\n                       Petitioner\n\n                                   v.\n\n           COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,\n                       Respondent\n\n                              —————\n\nDocket No. 14783-18.                            Filed October 18, 2023.\n\n                ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9891494],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4832354/city-of-charleston-v-system-of-administrative-hearing-of-the-city-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"City of Charleston v. System of Administrative Hearing of the City of Charleston","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2019 IL App (4th) 180634"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4832354,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2020-10-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"4-18-0634","docket_id":18687121,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T02:36:45.936857Z","date_created":"2020-11-24T22:32:39.059102Z","score":{"bm25":25.205475}},"neutralCite":"2019 IL App (4th) 180634","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2093466,2094764,2142984,2148929,2166304,2231863,3151172,3412773],"download_url":"http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2019/4thDistrict/4180634.pdf","id":4636133,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2020/10/08/city_of_charleston_v._system_of_administrative_hearing_of_the_city_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T20:07:50.162858Z","date_created":"2020-11-24T22:32:39.062698Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"dcc4040c4cb58e873a68d75a0cc1428c677718d3","snippet":"                                                                             Digitally signed by\n                                                                             Reporter of\n                                                                             Decisions\n                                                                             Reason: I attest to\n                           Illinois Official Reports                         the accuracy and\n                                    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4636133],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1546534/maine-school-administrative-district-no-37-v-pineo/","attorney":"Marc N. Frenette, Esq. (orally), Skelton, Taintor & Abbott, Auburn, ME, for Vance Pineo and Arthur Tatangelo., Jerrol A. Crouter, Esq. (orally), Brianne M. Martin, Esq., Drummond Woodsum, Portland, ME, for Maine School Administrative District No. 37.","caseName":"Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. Pineo","caseNameFull":"MAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO. 37 v. Vance PINEO Et Al.","citation":["2010 ME 11","988 A.2d 987","2010 Me. LEXIS 13"],"citeCount":15,"cluster_id":1546534,"court":"Supreme Judicial Court of Maine","court_citation_string":"Me.","court_id":"me","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2010-02-18","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Docket: Was-09-330","docket_id":1103506,"judge":"Saufley, Alexander, Levy, Mead, Gorman, Jabar","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T04:32:16.241137Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T14:20:55.027846Z","score":{"bm25":25.168634}},"neutralCite":"2010 ME 11","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":4621,"cites":[1497876,1897729,1905655,1961270,2085591,2158879,2197625,2345014,2390463,2402665,4940862,4948996,4954084,9540759,9629871],"download_url":null,"id":1546534,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T09:41:49.189033Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:40:54.999999Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"419ac1bb6dcd453b9f3453616cee5efb49d0e42a","snippet":"\n988 A.2d 987 (2010)\n2010 ME 11\nMAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO. 37\nv.\nVance PINEO et al.\nDocket: Was-09-330.\nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine.\nArgued: January 14, 2010.\nDecided: February 18, 2010.\n*988 Marc N. Frenette, Esq. (orally), Skelton, Taintor & Abbott, Auburn, ME, for V","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1546534],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/8746271/rmd-concessions-llc-v-westfield-corp/","attorney":"Alan B. Robinson, Jordan, Keys, Jessamy & Botts, L.L.P., Greenbelt, MD, for Plaintiff., Roy Grant Decker, Jr., Stauffer, Rommel, Decker & Dulany, L.L.C., McLean, VA, Morris Kletzkin, Mark David Crawford, Fried-lander, Misler, Friedlander, Sloan & Herz, Washington, D.C., for Defendants.","caseName":"RMD Concessions, L.L.C. v. Westfield Corp.","caseNameFull":"RMD CONCESSIONS, L.L.C. v. WESTFIELD CORP., INC.","citation":["194 F.R.D. 241","2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6865","2000 WL 640237"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":8746271,"court":"District Court, E.D. Virginia","court_citation_string":"E.D. Va.","court_id":"vaed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2000-05-15","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. CIV.A. 00-497-A","docket_id":66012240,"judge":"Ellis","lexisCite":"2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6865","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T21:18:02.748050Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T09:35:25.990100Z","score":{"bm25":23.092796}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":8729534,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T18:35:26.255220Z","date_created":"2022-11-26T09:35:25.995313Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nMEMORANDUM OPINION\nELLIS, District Judge.\nThis antitrust, tortious interference with contract and defamation case arising from a lease dispute was transferred here from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. It raises the question whether a Rule 41(a)(2) non-prejudicial dismissal may *242be granted on condition that should p","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[8729534],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2973702/miller-v-administrative-office-of-the-courts/","attorney":"ARGUED: Thomas E. Clay, Clay, Ken-ealy, Wagner & Adams, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Cynthia Blevins Doll, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, Louisville, Kentucky, Robert E. Stopher, Boehl, Sto-pher & Graves, Louisville, Kentucky, Margaret E.M. Keane, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Louisville, Kentucky, for Ap-pellees. ON BRIEF: Thomas E. Clay, Clay, Kenealy, Wagner & Adams, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Cynthia Blevins Doll, Lisa C. DeJaco, Wyatt, Tar-rant & Combs, Louisville, Kentucky, Robert E. Stopher, Robert D. Bobrow, Boehl, Stopher & Graves, Louisville, Kentucky, Margaret E.M. Keane, Melissa Norman Bork, Laurel S. Doheny, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Louisville, Kentucky, for Ap-pellees.","caseName":"Miller v. Administrative Office of the Courts","caseNameFull":"Beverly L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Judge Thomas B. Wine, in His Individual Capacity, Tim Vize, in His Individual and Official Capacities, and Judge James M. Shake, in His Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees","citation":["448 F.3d 887","2006 WL 1389636"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":2973702,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-05-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-5981","docket_id":2830921,"judge":"Suhrheinrich, Gilman, Rogers","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T16:24:01.679849Z","date_created":"2015-09-22T17:50:26.833589Z","score":{"bm25":22.881754}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106497,110917,111611,111620,111719,470110,507147,563837,726614,734245,763587,766647,767608,772826,782143,787454,790266,792931,793570,1684886],"download_url":"http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0176p-06.pdf","id":2973702,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2006/05/23/miller_v._admin_office_ct.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T01:32:14.705780Z","date_created":"2015-09-22T17:06:10.263752Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"23312dea75a680e10c2e689bcbafaac3798c6ae4","snippet":"\n\n\n  OPINION\n \n\n  RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.\n \n\n  After Beverly Miller was fired from her job of over 24 years as the jury-pool manager for Jefferson County, Kentucky, she sued the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) as well as various county officials. She alleged a First Amendment violation on the basis that her termination was in retaliation for bringing t","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2973702],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/794414/miller-v-administrative-office-of-the-courts/","attorney":"","caseName":"Miller v. Administrative Office of the Courts","caseNameFull":"Beverly L. Miller v. Administrative Office of the Courts, Judge Thomas B. Wine, in His Individual Capacity, Tim Vize, in His Individual and Official Capacities, and Judge James M. Shake, in His Official Capacity","citation":["448 F.3d 887","24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1016","2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12600"],"citeCount":88,"cluster_id":794414,"court":"Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","court_citation_string":"6th Cir.","court_id":"ca6","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2006-05-23","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"05-5981","docket_id":736084,"judge":"","lexisCite":"2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12600","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-09T21:22:42.537238Z","date_created":"2015-09-22T21:24:11.673409Z","score":{"bm25":21.50458}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[106497,110917,111611,111620,111719,563837,726614,734245,763587,766647,767608,772826,782143,787454,790266,792931,793570,1684886],"download_url":"http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/448/448.F3d.887.05-5981.html","id":794414,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T14:34:15.410869Z","date_created":"2012-04-19T03:14:31Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"961fb7ec87dd0cf2922cc453b9c3878dfc2f18aa","snippet":"448 F.3d 887\n    Beverly L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Judge Thomas B. Wine, in his individual capacity, Tim Vize, in his individual and official capacities, and Judge James M. Shake, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.\n    No. 05-5981.\n    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.\n    Argued: April 26, 2006.\n    ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[794414],"source":"R","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10819407/national-concessions-group-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Concessions Group Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10819407,"court":"Trademark Trial and Appeal Board","court_citation_string":"T.T.A.B.","court_id":"ttab","court_jurisdiction":"FS","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"87183434","docket_id":73094305,"judge":"Thurmon, Greenbaum, English","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-27T04:22:15.543921Z","date_created":"2026-03-27T04:22:15.436463Z","score":{"bm25":20.329245}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[247612,421006,491079,771691,3203304],"download_url":"https://ttab-reading-room.uspto.gov/cms/rest/legal-proceeding/87183434/decision/EXA_24.pdf","id":11286178,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/03/national_concessions_group_inc..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-27T04:22:27.576793Z","date_created":"2026-03-27T04:22:15.455067Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"f97ed5f3d93fba4e03caf53db18eeb2a82ad6a68","snippet":"                                 This Opinion is a\n                               Precedent of the TTAB\n\n                                                                  Mailed: May 3, 2023\n\n             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE\n                                _____\n\n                         Trademark Trial and Appeal Board\n                                      _____\n\n                      In re National Concessions Group, Inc.\n                                         _____\n\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11286178],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"1 and 45 (lawful use)"},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1952328/in-re-orangebrook-concessions-inc/","attorney":"Patricia A. Redmond, Miami, Fla., for debtor and special counsel to trustee., Alfred W. Beck, Trustee., John H. Genovese, Miami, Fla., for City of Hollywood., Richard N. Friedman, Miami, Fla., for Ben Novack.","caseName":"In Re Orangebrook Concessions, Inc.","caseNameFull":"In Re ORANGEBROOK CONCESSIONS, INC., Debtor","citation":["47 B.R. 858","12 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 813","1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6411"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":1952328,"court":"United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.","court_citation_string":"Bankr. S.D. Florida","court_id":"flsb","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"1985-04-01","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"18-24379","docket_id":1776496,"judge":"Sidney M. Weaver","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T07:36:00.822690Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T19:23:23.578844Z","score":{"bm25":20.17093}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":1952328,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T14:38:54.069826Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T07:54:12.328466Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"19290843511087c68b66a93c0a662caaa48fe4ef","snippet":"\n47 B.R. 858 (1985)\nIn re ORANGEBROOK CONCESSIONS, INC., Debtor.\nBankruptcy No. 84-00559-BKC-SMW.\nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.\nApril 1, 1985.\nPatricia A. Redmond, Miami, Fla., for debtor and special counsel to trustee.\nAlfred W. Beck, Trustee.\nJohn H. Genovese, Miami, Fla., for City of Hollywood.\nRichard N. Friedman, Miami, Fla., for Ben","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1952328],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10819408/national-concessions-group-inc/","attorney":"","caseName":"National Concessions Group Inc.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10819408,"court":"Trademark Trial and Appeal Board","court_citation_string":"T.T.A.B.","court_id":"ttab","court_jurisdiction":"FS","dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-05-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"87168058","docket_id":73094306,"judge":"Thurmon, Greenbaum, English","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-27T04:22:16.966034Z","date_created":"2026-03-27T04:22:16.864755Z","score":{"bm25":19.856806}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[247612,421006,491079,771691,3203304],"download_url":"https://ttab-reading-room.uspto.gov/cms/rest/legal-proceeding/87168058/decision/EXA_25.pdf","id":11286179,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/05/03/national_concessions_group_inc._1.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-03-27T04:22:29.116986Z","date_created":"2026-03-27T04:22:16.882515Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"541d435c7d564e42f2955524732bcb7edf30d630","snippet":"                                 This Opinion is a\n                               Precedent of the TTAB\n\n                                                                  Mailed: May 3, 2023\n\n             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE\n                                _____\n\n                         Trademark Trial and Appeal Board\n                                      _____\n\n                      In re National Concessions Group, Inc.\n                                         _____\n\n  ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11286179],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"1 and 45 (lawful use)"}]}