{"count":26834,"next":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?cursor=cz0zMC4zMDM5NzQmcz03Njk3MTY2JnQ9byZkPTIwMjYtMDgtMjkmcD0y&q=ACTIONS+FOUNDED+ON+PRIVITY+OF+CONTRACT+PRIVITY+OF+CONTRACT&type=o","previous":null,"results":[{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4316372/layton-construction-co-v-shaw-contract-flooring-services-inc/","attorney":"The Holt Group LLC, L. Tyrone Holt, Kevin P. Walsh, Kevin D. Poyner, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant, Hall & Evans, LLC, Darin J. Lang, Brian Molzahn, Elizabeth K. Olson, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellee","caseName":"Layton Construction Co. v. Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc.","caseNameFull":"LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES, INC., D/B/A Spectra Contract Flooring, a Georgia Corporation, Defendant-Appellee","citation":["2016 COA 155","409 P.3d 602","2016 Colo. App. LEXIS 1494"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":4316372,"court":"Colorado Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Colo. Ct. App.","court_id":"coloctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2016-10-20","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals 15CA1435","docket_id":4483488,"judge":"Jones, Graham, Miller","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:10:37.374848Z","date_created":"2016-10-28T16:05:47.479829Z","score":{"bm25":77.99086}},"neutralCite":"2016 COA 155","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[109964,511669,754246,1121373,1199108,1213690,1376513,2366096,2517171,2543008,2571518,2581659,2584994,2621911,2622800,2635967,2637921,3311183,3314386,4024924],"download_url":"http://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/Sections/Opinions/10-20-16/15CA1435-PD.pdf?ver=2016-10-28-082316-173","id":4093633,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2016/10/20/layton_construction_co._v._shaw_contract_flooring_services_inc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T13:53:46.560260Z","date_created":"2016-10-28T16:05:47.486928Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"fefb9268b29084fa9f8f9bd362d3849bac9f75bf","snippet":"\n\n\n  Opinion by\n \n\n  JUDGE J. JONES\n \n\n  ¶ 1 Plaintiff, Layton Construction Co., Inc. (Layton), appeals the district court’s summary judgment for defendant, Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc. (Shaw), based on the doctrine of claim preclusion. Because we conclude that all of Layton’s contentions challenging the district court’s application of that doctrine are wi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4093633],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"Summary Judgment—Claim Preclusion","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2412837/in-re-onstar-contract-litigation/","attorney":"","caseName":"In Re OnStar Contract Litigation","caseNameFull":"In Re: ONSTAR CONTRACT LITIGATION","citation":["600 F. Supp. 2d 861","2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12583","2009 WL 415990"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":2412837,"court":"District Court, E.D. Michigan","court_citation_string":"E.D. Mich.","court_id":"mied","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2009-02-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Case 2:07-MDL-01867","docket_id":2285102,"judge":"Sean F. Cox","lexisCite":"2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12583","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T11:28:21.693561Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:08:42.827406Z","score":{"bm25":60.790733}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":746,"cites":[103542,106788,145730,473001,507140,528209,664683,705085,1199775,1314450,1349664,1476754,1493782,1866016,1881346,1942294,2149721,2205146,2280950,2290504,2294333,2296633,2350076,2403347,2415900,2419332,2510615,2521456,2564394],"download_url":null,"id":2412837,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T19:22:25.765379Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T09:25:27.674037Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"5f67914bf25b7c02da0cc84d42ebcfc2c4e6471c","snippet":"\n600 F.Supp.2d 861 (2009)\nIn Re: ONSTAR CONTRACT LITIGATION.\nCase No. 2:07-MDL-01867.\nUnited States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.\nFebruary 19, 2009.\n\n\n*862 OPINION & ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS\n\nSEAN F. COX, District Judge.\nBuyers and lesse","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2412837],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6779017/brooks-range-contract-services-inc-v-united-states/","attorney":"Johnathan M. Bailey, San Antonio, TX, for plaintiff., Devin A Wolak, with whom were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director, and Ryan M. Majerus, of counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant. Leigh Ann Bunetta, Regional Counsel for the General Services Administration, Denver, CO, of counsel., Michael A Gordon, Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenors. Fran Baskin, Washington, DC, of counsel.","caseName":"Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. v. United States","caseNameFull":"BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. v. The UNITED STATES of America, and Urban Services Group, Inc., and Meridian Management Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors","citation":["101 Fed. Cl. 699","2011 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2437","2011 WL 6962751"],"citeCount":40,"cluster_id":6779017,"court":"United States Court of Federal Claims","court_citation_string":"Fed. Cl.","court_id":"uscfc","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2011-12-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 11-700 C","docket_id":63760292,"judge":"Hewitt","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T11:11:49.899415Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T21:03:20.567315Z","score":{"bm25":54.925026}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":6662637,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T21:06:04.230074Z","date_created":"2022-07-20T21:03:20.581531Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\n\nOPINION\n\nHEWITT, Chief Judge.\nThis is a post-award bid protest brought by plaintiff Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. (Brooks Range or plaintiff). Plaintiff challenges the award of a contract for building management services at two federal buildings in Colorado to defendant-interve-nors Urban Services Group, Inc. and Meridian Management Corporation (Urban and Meridian or intervenors). See","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6662637],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/1445846/in-re-nigeria-charter-flights-contract-litigation/","attorney":"Ike Obinna Echeruo, Echeruo Attorneys at Law, LLP, New York, NY, John Edozie, Madu, Edozie & Madu PC, New York, NY, Brendan E. Zahner, John Patrick Doherty, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, LLP, New York, NY, for Dr. Obiora Anyoku, Dr. Azuka Anyoku, Faith Adepoju, Uche Ukwuoma, Newman Nkwor, Plaintiffs., Ike Obinna Echeruo, Echeruo Attorneys at Law, LLP, New York, NY, John Edozie, Madu, Edozie & Madu PC, New York, NY, John Patrick Doherty, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, LLP, New York, NY, for McLord Obioha, Plaintiff., Brendan E. Zahner, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, LLP, New York, NY, Daniel Robert Lapinski, Lee Squitieri, Maria J. Ciccia, Squitieri & Fearon LLP, New York, NY, John Patrick Doherty, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, LLP, New York, NY, for Anthonia James, Plaintiff., Frank J. Costello, Malcolm L. Benge, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, Washington, DC, Patrick J. Bonner, Free-hill, Hogan & Mahar, New York, NY, for World Airways, Inc., Defendant., Peter Obafemi, Defendant, Pro se, Babalakin & Co., Lafiaji, Lagos., David M. Goldhaber, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, Colleen Anne DeNoto, Sedgwick Detert Moran & Arnold LLP, New York, NY, for Capital Indem. Ins. Co., Defendant.","caseName":"In Re Nigeria Charter Flights Contract Litigation","caseNameFull":"In Re NIGERIA CHARTER FLIGHTS CONTRACT LITIGATION. in Re World Airways Litigation","citation":["520 F. Supp. 2d 447","2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79351","2007 WL 3124527"],"citeCount":38,"cluster_id":1445846,"court":"District Court, E.D. New York","court_citation_string":"E.D.N.Y","court_id":"nyed","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2007-10-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"04 MD 1613(RJD)(MDG), 04 CV 0304(RJD)(MDG)","docket_id":1003923,"judge":"Dearie","lexisCite":"2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79351","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T03:55:27.909468Z","date_created":"2015-02-23T18:41:02.846444Z","score":{"bm25":50.875175}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":841,"cites":[75957,103542,110993,112574,112742,118253,137726,184987,198693,263483,279214,294458,324033,324811,353913,366534,464796,486609,490017,498441,504358,505489,524053,531213,554979,564318,670488,676990,687594,692326,724998,728084,747595,749801,752940,755548,757291,762113,762402,769746,783948,785320,787944,788225,1429051,1488499,1934962,2039299,2095525,2290181,2306803,2333543,2346342,2375559,2380574,2410394,2469063,2472231,2472246,2482988,2533224,2583491,3608934],"download_url":null,"id":1445846,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-24T08:30:39.900181Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T06:11:54.921143Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"ed5537040d883f08ce41c18f38202df508c76115","snippet":"\n520 F.Supp.2d 447 (2007)\nIn re NIGERIA CHARTER FLIGHTS CONTRACT LITIGATION.\nIn re World Airways Litigation.\nNos. 04 MD 1613(RJD)(MDG), 04 CV 0304(RJD)(MDG).\nUnited States District Court, E.D. New York.\nOctober 25, 2007.\n*448 *449 Ike Obinna Echeruo, Echeruo Attorneys at Law, LLP, New York, NY, Joh","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[1445846],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4696892/transp-labor-contractleasing-inc-v-commr/","attorney":"Michael I. Saltzman ,  Kathleen Pakenham , and  Todd C. Simmens , for petitioner. Jack Forsberg ,  Gary R. Shuler, Jr. , and Eric Johnson, for respondent.  ","caseName":"Transp. Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. v. Comm'r","caseNameFull":"TRANSPORT LABOR CONTRACT/LEASING, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE","citation":["123 T.C. 154","2004 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 34","123 T.C. No. 9"],"citeCount":5,"cluster_id":4696892,"court":"United States Tax Court","court_citation_string":"Tax Ct.","court_id":"tax","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2004-08-09","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 1188-01 ","docket_id":16704478,"judge":"\"Chiechi, Carolyn P.\"","lexisCite":"2004 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 34","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:58:29.499910Z","date_created":"2020-01-16T21:11:00.752735Z","score":{"bm25":46.257717}},"neutralCite":"123 T.C. No. 9","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":4474559,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T18:17:46.513404Z","date_created":"2020-01-16T21:11:00.786559Z"},"ordering_key":1,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":" Chiechi, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal income tax (tax): TYEAug. 31 Deficiency 1993 . $330,320 1994 . 28,346 1995 . 1,694,076 ","type":"lead-opinion"},{"author_id":null,"cites":[102139,112710,118435,295781,515236,525030,700458,741970,768100,779616,783342,1704780,4474559],"download_url":null,"id":4612796,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T19:51:09.029168Z","date_created":"2020-11-20T19:51:59.503805Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"TRANSPORT LABOR CONTRACT/LEASING, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentTransp. Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. v. Comm'rNo. 1188-01 United States Tax Court","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4612796,4474559],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/2504375/contract-materials-processing-inc-v-kataleuna-gmbh-catalysts/","attorney":"Joseph S. Lyons, Neil Jay Brafman, Law Office of Joseph S. Lyons, Towson, MD, Paul S. Richter, Richter, Miller and Finn, Richard Harold Gins, Gins and Greenfeld PC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff., Barbara Susan Wahl, Evan Scott Sto-love, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin and Kahn PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendants., Barbara Susan Wahl, Evan Scott Sto-love, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin and Kahn PLLC, Benjamin Sorrells Boyd, Piper Rudniek LLP, Brian E. Ferguson, McDermott, Will and Emery, Washington, DC, Alice A. Brown, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Houston, TX, John J. Woloszyn, pro se, Baltimore, MD, for Movants., Barbara Susan Wahl, Evan Scott Sto-love, Randall A. Brater, Arent, Fox, Kint-ner, Plotkin and Kahn PLLC, Washington, DC, for Counter Claimants., Joseph S. Lyons, Law Office of Joseph S. Lyons, Towson, MD, Paul S. Richter, Richter, Miller and Finn, Washington, DC, for Counter Defendants.","caseName":"Contract Materials Processing, Inc. v. KataLeuna GmbH Catalysts","caseNameFull":"CONTRACT MATERIALS PROCESSING, INC., Plaintiff v. KATALEUNA GMBH CATALYSTS, Defendant","citation":["303 F. Supp. 2d 612","2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24660","2003 WL 23281533"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":2504375,"court":"District Court, D. Maryland","court_citation_string":"D. Maryland","court_id":"mdd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2003-08-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"CIV. AMD 98-147","docket_id":2371533,"judge":"Davis","lexisCite":"2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24660","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T12:23:34.799631Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T23:41:44.241450Z","score":{"bm25":42.468746}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":808,"cites":[112394,609756,1441850,1466742,1538802,1962495,1984816,2067562,2206406,2322713,2388601,2401707,2401797,2459916],"download_url":null,"id":2504375,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-27T20:50:04.935426Z","date_created":"2013-10-30T10:00:02.357209Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"204a7d4422b9e287d88fd7020dd8245583882c27","snippet":"\n303 F.Supp.2d 612 (2003)\nCONTRACT MATERIALS PROCESSING, INC., Plaintiff\nv.\nKATALEUNA GMBH CATALYSTS, Defendant\nNo. CIV. AMD 98-147.\nUnited States District Court, D. Maryland.\nAugust 25, 2003.\n*613 Joseph S. Lyons, Neil Jay Brafman, Law Office of Joseph S. Lyons, Towson, MD, Paul S. Richter, Richter, Miller and Finn, Richard Harol","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[2504375],"source":"LU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4588774/bryan-alexander-karl-cameron-william-love-charlie-lovins-kevin-mcmurray/","attorney":"\n  Bryan ALEXANDER, Karl Cameron, William Love, Charlie Lovins, Kevin McMurray and Matt Oelker, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants/Cross Appellees-Plaintiffs,\n  \n  v.\n  \n  LINKMEYER DEVELOPMENT II, LLC, Steven Linkmeyer, and Brian Bischoff, Appellees/Cross Appellants-Defendants,\n ","caseName":"Bryan Alexander, Karl Cameron, William Love, Charlie Lovins, Kevin McMurray and Matt Oelker, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Linkmeyer Development II, LLC","caseNameFull":"Bryan ALEXANDER, Karl Cameron, William Love, Charlie Lovins, Kevin McMurray and Matt Oelker, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants/Cross Appellees-Plaintiffs, v. LINKMEYER DEVELOPMENT II, LLC, Steven Linkmeyer, and Brian Bischoff, Appellees/Cross Appellants-Defendants","citation":["119 N.E.3d 603"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":4588774,"court":"Indiana Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ind. Ct. App.","court_id":"indctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2019-02-08","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Court of Appeals Case 18A-PL-311","docket_id":14542374,"judge":"Baker","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T01:27:30.010256Z","date_created":"2019-02-08T16:08:20.450150Z","score":{"bm25":36.558327}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[97977,358118,1983752,2004742,2014255,2149146,2155678,2181936,2206304,2220568,2482313],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/02081902mgr.pdf","id":4366027,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2019/02/08/bryan_alexander_karl_cameron_william_love_charlie_lovins_kevin_mcmurray.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T17:02:34.373401Z","date_created":"2019-02-08T16:08:20.456828Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"9fce13ba9df7c778ed1f9d6447f745a2527ecb04","snippet":"\n\n\n  [1] This case comes before this court as an interlocutory appeal from the parties' respective cross-motions for summary judgment. Specifically, a class of laborers (\"the Class\") formerly employed by Linkmeyer Development II, LLC, and its members Steve Linkmeyer and Brian Bischoff (collectively, \"the Defendants\"), appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment and the granting, in part, of the Defendants' motion","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4366027],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9513299/andrews-v-carbon-on-26th-llc/","attorney":"","caseName":"Andrews v. Carbon On 26th, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["244 N.E.3d 365","2024 IL App (1st) 231369"],"citeCount":6,"cluster_id":9513299,"court":"Appellate Court of Illinois","court_citation_string":"Ill. App. Ct.","court_id":"illappct","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":"2024-05-02","dateFiled":"2024-06-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"1-23-1369","docket_id":68496847,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:21:41.144651Z","date_created":"2024-06-07T15:05:20.653869Z","score":{"bm25":36.556244}},"neutralCite":"2024 IL App (1st) 231369","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[2036899,2085545,2095657,2135796,2167576,2174291,2229905,2240800,2484315,2651045,4184562],"download_url":"https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/resources/524c71be-c7e2-45c5-965c-279dd15fde9f/file","id":9979912,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/06/07/andrews_v._carbon_on_26th_llc.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:21:41.172698Z","date_created":"2024-06-07T15:05:20.672174Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"b11a84e2fbd5d806fbec330c55c4b337011e0584","snippet":"                                    2024 IL App (1st) 231369\n\n                                                                            FIFTH DIVISION\n                                                                                 June 7, 2024\n\n                                        IN THE\n                             APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS\n                               FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT\n\nNo. 1-23-1369\n\nMELISSA ANDREWS,                                            )\n               ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9979912],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10628714/charlie-wilson-as-administrator-of-the-estate-of-willie-wilson-and-on/","attorney":"","caseName":"Charlie Wilson, as Administrator of the Estate of Willie Wilson and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Willie Wilson v. Lexington Manor Senior Care, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10628714,"court":"Court of Appeals of Mississippi","court_citation_string":"Miss. Ct. App.","court_id":"missctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-08-30","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"2021-CA-00072-COA","docket_id":70759057,"judge":"Westbrooks, Latrice A., J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-07-11T20:06:58.394464Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T14:41:12.809733Z","score":{"bm25":36.11733}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":16236,"cites":[271739,1090629,1091470,1106431,1589299,1630266,1630394,1650228,1728977,1779185,1792074,1807079,1808992,1836737,1907167,4821714,4923285,9429079,9656776,9779988,9804111],"download_url":"https://courts.ms.gov/images/Opinions/CO162609.pdf","id":11095301,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/08/30/charlie_wilson_as_administrator_of_the_estate_of_willie_wilson_and_on.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-01T17:16:12.336745Z","date_created":"2025-07-11T14:41:12.821568Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"d166e7ef1b36e1136f8c3788c6dde162b0da5cef","snippet":"           IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI\n\n                                NO. 2021-CA-00072-COA\n\nCHARLIE WILSON, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF                                        APPELLANT\nTHE ESTATE OF WILLIE WILSON AND ON\nBEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH\nBENEFICIARIES OF WILLIE WILSON\n\nv.\n\nLEXINGTON MANOR SENIOR CARE, LLC                                             APPELLEE\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT:                          12/10/2020\nTRIAL JUDGE:                               HON. BARRY W","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[11095301],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9446074/in-re-estate-of-goode/","attorney":"","caseName":"In re Estate of Goode","caseNameFull":"","citation":["2023 Ohio 4253"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9446074,"court":"Ohio Court of Appeals","court_citation_string":"Ohio Ct. App.","court_id":"ohioctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-11-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"9-23-12","docket_id":68035040,"judge":"Willamowski","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-23T01:18:29.027008Z","date_created":"2023-11-27T16:09:18.005205Z","score":{"bm25":34.68563}},"neutralCite":"2023 Ohio 4253","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[387386,3779164,6760169,6765423,9392523,9801702],"download_url":"https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/3/2023/2023-Ohio-4253.pdf","id":9903899,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/11/27/in_re_estate_of_goode.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-05T09:03:17.509212Z","date_created":"2023-11-27T16:09:18.025806Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"a5e86b1171a695a4365f29691344f3e42f34ad6a","snippet":"[Cite as In re Estate of Goode, 2023-Ohio-4253.]\n\n\n\n\n                      IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO\n                          THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT\n                              MARION COUNTY\n\n\n\n\nIN RE:                                                    CASE NO. 9-23-12\n\nTHE ESTATE OF:\nJUDITH GOODE, (JOANNE M. BROOKS,\nADMINISTRATOR)\n\n[STATE OF OHIO, OHIO DEPARTMENT                           OPINION\nOF MEDICAID - APPELLANT]\n\n\n\n                 Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Cour","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9903899],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":"Third-Party Beneficiary Incidental Beneficiary Enforcement of Contract. Non-party to a contract may only enforce a contract if they are an intended third-party beneficiary. If merely an incidental beneficiary, there is no right to enforce the contract."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9490282/tracey-scott-and-lorrenzo-hampton-individually-and-on-behalf-of-all-others/","attorney":"","caseName":"Tracey Scott and Lorrenzo Hampton, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Revclaims, LLC","caseNameFull":"","citation":["688 S.W.3d 425","2024 Ark. App. 231"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":9490282,"court":"Court of Appeals of Arkansas","court_citation_string":"Ark. Ct. App.","court_id":"arkctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-04-03","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"","docket_id":68403081,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:49:35.947535Z","date_created":"2024-04-03T14:01:57.935402Z","score":{"bm25":34.54908}},"neutralCite":"2024 Ark. App. 231","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1543224,1762302,2679569,2680633,2745111,7827228,9393446,9671208,9824016,11073619,11076283],"download_url":"https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/courtofappeals/en/522667/1/document.do","id":9956895,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/04/03/tracey_scott_and_lorrenzo_hampton_individually_and_on_behalf_of_all_others.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-29T11:58:57.048920Z","date_created":"2024-04-03T14:01:57.962416Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"2a4fb0b7801a88e8d90d76b3a78ab0998f2ae178","snippet":"                               Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 231\n                   ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS\n                                      DIVISION III\n                                      No. CV-22-211\n\n\n\n TRACEY SCOTT AND LORRENZO      Opinion Delivered April 3, 2024\n\n HAMPTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON\n                                APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD\n BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY\n                                COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,\n SITUATED\n                                WESTERN DI","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9956895],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10307853/watson-v-district-of-columbia/","attorney":"","caseName":"Watson v. District of Columbia","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":10307853,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-01-06","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2023-1670","docket_id":68961620,"judge":"Judge Beryl A. Howell","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-01-06T22:01:03.826701Z","date_created":"2025-01-06T22:01:03.675047Z","score":{"bm25":34.523933}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":1536,"cites":[93697,110155,112107,117845,118082,145448,145677,186007,186029,186587,590210,717539,820904,2802328,3170343,4651903,4662766,9226121,9396146,9432491,9434467,9434575,9434815,9439366,9439433,9439647,9439726,9439784,9810411,9956245,9968488,10512595],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2023cv1670-75","id":10774441,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/01/06/watson_v._district_of_columbia.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-06T16:25:54.465942Z","date_created":"2025-01-06T22:01:03.704266Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"629c999ca9923412fbfd6af80d79a76b84664ed2","snippet":"                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n DOMINIQUE WATSON, on behalf of herself\n and as putative personal representative of the\n Estate of Giovanni Love,\n                               Plaintiff,\n                                                             Civil Action No. 23-1670 (BAH)\n                                 v.\n                                                             Judge Beryl A. Howell\n DISTRICT OF COLUM","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10774441],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9986963/kimberly-pickens-as-administrator-for-and-on-behalf-of-the-estate-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Kimberly Pickens as Administrator for and on Behalf of the Estate of Rajolei Dejahl Pickens And Kimberly Pickens, Individually and as Next Friend of William Pickens, Diego Ajani Pickens, Elijah Sol Pickens, Judah Nirvan Pickens, and Arun Gil Pickens, Minors v. Robert J. Hewitt","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":9986963,"court":"Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District","court_citation_string":"Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi","court_id":"txctapp13","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2024-06-27","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"13-22-00279-CV","docket_id":68902037,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:15:56.133386Z","date_created":"2024-06-29T17:11:18.531361Z","score":{"bm25":32.757656}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[4016997],"download_url":"https://search.txcourts.gov/RetrieveDocument.aspx?DocId=66276&Index=%5c%5c10%2e20%2e4%2e7%5cTamesIndexes%5ccoa13%5cOpinion","id":10453572,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2024/06/27/kimberly_pickens_as_administrator_for_and_on_behalf_of_the_estate_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2026-02-24T13:15:56.169625Z","date_created":"2024-06-29T17:11:18.533275Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c3dfb086f17106933091ebb892413705a43e6a69","snippet":"                    NUMBER 13-22-00279-CV\n\n                     COURT OF APPEALS\n\n             THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n\n               CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG\n\n\nKIMBERLY PICKENS, AS ADMINISTRATOR\nFOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE\nESTATE OF RAJOLEI DEJAHL PICKENS,\nINDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND\nOF WILLIAM PICKENS, DIEGO AJANI PICKENS,\nJUDAH NIRVAN PICKENS, AND\nARUN GIL PICKENS,                                      Appellant,\n\n                                  v.\n\nROBERT J. HEWITT,                ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10453572],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/6470149/goodrich-v-bank-of-america-na/","attorney":"","caseName":"Goodrich v. Bank of America, N.A.","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":6470149,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2022-05-19","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2021-1344","docket_id":63322804,"judge":"Judge Dabney L. Friedrich","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T09:47:44.508827Z","date_created":"2022-05-19T17:01:25.866429Z","score":{"bm25":31.140244}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":8575,"cites":[540301,585774,1460916,1611745,2305288,2660174,2662851,2723620,4158379,4258391,4402817,4660378,7248137,9426352,9435031,9435068,9435339,9439824,9490424,9752295,9843120],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2021cv1344-15","id":6342260,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2022/05/19/goodrich_v._bank_of_america_n.a..pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-27T22:23:59.890775Z","date_created":"2022-05-19T17:01:26.010963Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"4b6e98e5899750bb5607c6d6849ccf8558facec2","snippet":"                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n\n\n ROBERT D. GOODRICH, individually and\n in his capacity as trustee of the Robert D.\n Goodrich Revocable Trust,\n\n                Plaintiff,\n                                                           No. 21-cv-01344 (DLF)\n        v.\n\n BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al.,\n\n                 Defendants.\n\n\n                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION\n\n       Robert D. Goodrich, individ","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[6342260],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/9384230/4201-2nd-ave-w-v-first-state-bank-trust/","attorney":"","caseName":"4201 2nd Ave W v. First State Bank & Trust","caseNameFull":"","citation":["987 N.W.2d 658","2023 ND 43"],"citeCount":3,"cluster_id":9384230,"court":"North Dakota Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"N.D.","court_id":"nd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2023-03-16","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"20220309","docket_id":67019783,"judge":"Jensen, Jon J.","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T17:58:24.735379Z","date_created":"2023-03-16T13:05:26.207078Z","score":{"bm25":30.881544}},"neutralCite":"2023 ND 43","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[897452,897629,897927,898634,1668946,2003323,2173871,4222057,4560777,4579317,5129600,8482964,9349540],"download_url":"http://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/2023ND43","id":9379706,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2023/03/16/4201_2nd_ave_w_v._first_state_bank__trust.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-28T12:07:04.919017Z","date_created":"2023-03-16T13:05:26.223947Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"320901b4e6a6ceb83ef0e52e28a633a6d437d9e8","snippet":"                                                                                  FILED\n                                                                          IN THE OFFICE OF THE\n                                                                       CLERK OF SUPREME COURT\n                                                                              MARCH 16, 2023\n                                                                        STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA\n\n\n\n\n                     IN THE SUPR","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[9379706],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"CONTRACTS","syllabus":"Secured creditors may recover on a debt by proceeding against all collateral in a single action or by proceeding against personal property after foreclosing a real property mortgage securing the same debt. An existing lien on collateral, when acknowledged by a subsequent party taking an interest in that collateral, will remain foreclosable by the secured party maintaining the lien. Privity exists when one is so identified in interest with another that the person represents the same legal right. The plain language of a contract is used to determine the parties' intent."},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/852040/sharon-gill-on-her-own-behalf-and-on-behalf-of-the-estate-of-gale-gill-v/","attorney":"Linda George, W. Russell Sipes, Todd Barnes, Michael L. Schultz, Kathleen A. Farinas and Ashleigh M. Resetarits, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant., Ross E. Rudolph, James B. Godbold, Joseph H. Langerak IV, Evansville, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.","caseName":"Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.","caseNameFull":"Sharon GILL, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill, Appellant (Plaintiff Below), v. EVANSVILLE SHEET METAL WORKS, INC., Appellee (Defendant Below)","citation":["970 N.E.2d 633","2012 WL 2384095","2012 Ind. LEXIS 473"],"citeCount":2,"cluster_id":852040,"court":"Indiana Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Ind.","court_id":"ind","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2012-06-25","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"49S05-1111-CV-672","docket_id":1370881,"judge":"Sullivan, Dickson, Rucker, David, Massa","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-21T00:53:45.296390Z","date_created":"2014-10-30T16:13:12.001347Z","score":{"bm25":30.68311}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[165742,424092,440008,498411,596408,670569,852065,852165,852363,852400,852872,1154308,1182116,1186239,1233716,1237610,1267358,1291083,1311491,1339639,1408752,1414668,1487750,1526263,1801927,1834681,1941550,1954959,2054165,2068177,2068995,2082226,2102506,2118931,2130539,2133922,2145224,2150024,2154677,2157773,2159493,2178960,2200911,2209768,2211549,2226328,2232422,2237976,2251818,2318879,2318958,2319174,2329340,2452251,2478536,2583639,2603610,3421136],"download_url":"http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/0625201201fsj.pdf","id":852040,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2012/06/25/sharon_gill_on_her_own_behalf_and_on_behalf_of_the_estate_of_gale_gill_v._2.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-23T17:17:11.410716Z","date_created":"2013-03-02T01:14:48.714576Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"cb4a42f5bcde6737fc239045fd982af39144e2c9","snippet":"\n\n\n  On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A05-0912-CV-699\n \n\n  SULLIVAN, Justice.\n \n\n  The plaintiff claims that her husband’s death was caused by the defendant’s negligence in installing or removing asbestos-containing materials. The trial court ruled for the defendant because the claim had not been brought within the time Indiana law requi","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[852040],"source":"CU","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7697165/driessen-v-univ-of-miami-sch-of-law-children-youth-law-clinic/","attorney":"Klein Glasser Park & Lowe, P.L., and Robert M. Klein and Andrew M. Feldman, Miami, for appellee.","caseName":"Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law Children & Youth Law Clinic","caseNameFull":"Rochelle DRIESSEN v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW CHILDREN AND YOUTH LAW CLINIC","citation":["260 So. 3d 1080"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7697165,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 3D18-999","docket_id":64699923,"judge":"Lagoa, Rothenberg, Suarez","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:20:15.137357Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T18:55:13.530524Z","score":{"bm25":30.43901}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7632545,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:07:56.830994Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T18:55:13.535711Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nROTHENBERG, C.J.\nRochelle Driessen, the mother of Brittany Oliver (\"Brittany\"), a developmentally disabled person, appeals the trial court's final order dismissing with prejudice her second amended complaint for legal malpractice against the University of Miami School of Law Children and Youth Law Clinic (\"the Clinic\") for failure to state a cause of action. Because Ms. Driessen is ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7632545],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/10384277/teton-county-board-of-county-commissioners-v-state-of-wyoming-board-of/","attorney":"","caseName":"Teton County Board of County Commissioners v. State of Wyoming, Board of Land Commissioners","caseNameFull":"","citation":["567 P.3d 675","2025 WY 48"],"citeCount":4,"cluster_id":10384277,"court":"Wyoming Supreme Court","court_citation_string":"Wyo.","court_id":"wyo","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2025-04-24","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"S-24-0175","docket_id":69936443,"judge":"","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-11-26T18:00:11.112063Z","date_created":"2025-04-24T15:25:47.251396Z","score":{"bm25":30.384089}},"neutralCite":"2025 WY 48","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[1250688,1344920,2454645,4165231,5156885,5157166,5177382,5178501,6534707,7803146,9367356,9537173,9550321,9560482,9572718,9787047,10465277,10465315,10465320,10465406,10598760,10732908],"download_url":"https://documents.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions/County%20Commissioners%20S-24-0175.pdf","id":10850865,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2025/04/24/teton_county_board_of_county_commissioners_v._state_of_wyoming_board_of.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-12-07T09:21:12.592896Z","date_created":"2025-04-24T15:25:47.262752Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"c5649258c9df288a693897bb526d60371774cfcf","snippet":"                 IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING\n\n                                             2025 WY 48\n\n                                                                    APRIL TERM, A.D. 2025\n\n                                                                             April 24, 2025\n\n\n  TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY\n  COMMISSIONERS,\n\n  Appellant\n  (Defendant),\n\n  v.                                                                 S-24-0175\n\n  STATE OF WYOMING, BOARD OF\n  LAND COMMISSI","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[10850865],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/4475379/lewis-v-government-of-the-district-of-columbia/","attorney":"","caseName":"Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia","caseNameFull":"","citation":[],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":4475379,"court":"District Court, District of Columbia","court_citation_string":"D.D.C.","court_id":"dcd","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-03-07","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"Civil Action No. 2015-0352","docket_id":6327058,"judge":"Judge Reggie B. Walton","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T00:55:39.877389Z","date_created":"2018-03-07T22:00:41.536424Z","score":{"bm25":30.344557}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":3362,"cites":[103379,106497,107200,109186,112275,112585,117841,182792,184981,186295,187196,277831,329267,382650,389933,411859,453327,546209,609171,686417,717539,721288,1423977,1460768,1680651,2145752,2337479,2476144,2517312],"download_url":"https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2015cv0352-55","id":4252632,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":"pdf/2018/03/07/lewis_v._government_of_the_district_of_columbia.pdf","meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-25T15:43:36.053835Z","date_created":"2018-03-07T22:00:41.546524Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"7422f99e21634ab5ef0efc30f828b4e3261b1c4c","snippet":"                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                       FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n____________________________________\n                                     )\nKAYLA DIONNE LEWIS and               )\nFELTON HILL,                        )\n                                    )\n                  Plaintiffs,       )\n                                    )\n      v.                            )        Civil Action No. 15-352 (RBW)\n                                    )\nGOVERNMENT OF TH","type":"combined-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[4252632],"source":"C","status":"Published","suitNature":"Civil","syllabus":""},{"absolute_url":"/opinion/7697166/driessen-v-univ-of-miami-sch-of-law-children-youth-law-clinic/","attorney":"Klein Glasser Park & Lowe, P.L., and Robert M. Klein and Andrew M. Feldman, Miami, for appellee.","caseName":"Driessen v. Univ. of Miami Sch. of Law Children & Youth Law Clinic","caseNameFull":"Rochelle DRIESSEN v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW CHILDREN AND YOUTH LAW CLINIC","citation":["260 So. 3d 1080"],"citeCount":0,"cluster_id":7697166,"court":"District Court of Appeal of Florida","court_citation_string":"Fla. Dist. Ct. App.","court_id":"fladistctapp","court_jurisdiction":null,"dateArgued":null,"dateFiled":"2018-09-26","dateReargued":null,"dateReargumentDenied":null,"docketNumber":"No. 3D18-999","docket_id":64699924,"judge":"Lagoa, Rothenberg, Suarez","lexisCite":"","meta":{"timestamp":"2024-06-22T15:20:15.163167Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T18:55:13.598791Z","score":{"bm25":30.303974}},"neutralCite":"","non_participating_judge_ids":[],"opinions":[{"author_id":null,"cites":[],"download_url":null,"id":7632546,"joined_by_ids":[],"local_path":null,"meta":{"timestamp":"2025-10-26T23:07:56.843348Z","date_created":"2022-07-29T18:55:13.603907Z"},"ordering_key":null,"per_curiam":false,"sha1":"","snippet":"\nROTHENBERG, C.J.\nRochelle Driessen, the mother of Brittany Oliver (\"Brittany\"), a developmentally disabled person, appeals the trial court's final order dismissing with prejudice her second amended complaint for legal malpractice against the University of Miami School of Law Children and Youth Law Clinic (\"the Clinic\") for failure to state a cause of action. Because Ms. Driessen is ","type":"lead-opinion"}],"panel_ids":[],"panel_names":[],"posture":"","procedural_history":"","scdb_id":"","sibling_ids":[7632546],"source":"U","status":"Published","suitNature":"","syllabus":""}]}